I'm having trouble believing this even came up for a topic of discussion
(Click to enlarge)
[attachment deleted by admin]
That sort of thing is just an opening wedge for the pedophiles, to begin to normalize the detestable.
What constitutes underage in this context?
This is the agenda of NAMBLA. (The North American Man Boy Love Association) They maintain it's is good and healthy for older ment o take younger ones and "teach" them about "love" :sigh:
Quote from: ded2daworld on February 17, 2013, 02:05:52 AM
This is the agenda of NAMBLA. (The North American Man Boy Love Association) They maintain it's is good and healthy for older ment o take younger ones and "teach" them about "love" :sigh:
From what I gather, that was also the philosophy of Athenians around 4 and 3 hundred BC. Doesn't seem as if much progress has been made.
I've heard or seen reports of Hillary C. being seen at NAMBLA meetings. I found out that the web sites of certain Libertarian bigwigs make some very interesting connections - only one of the reasons I am an ex-Libertarian. The basic leave-us-be/anything-goes philosophy was employed to justify the unjustifiable.
Laz. former libertarian is another thing we have in common. :Chinscratch:
Amazing! How deep were you into it? For myself, I read all of Ayn Rand's books, subscribed to her newsletter, attended the founding meetings of the Missouri Lib Party, and voted Lib. In time I got turned around, even bridging the gap by reading the Christian-Libertarian (is that an oxymoron?) newsletter Galatians Seven. Now I see Rand as a sociopath.
I only read Rand's books and voted libertarian once. There's just no room in her society for the sick, the disabled, the unemployable, the hurting the "wretched refuse to our teeming shore"
So should the end then read: Send these, those with homess, without storms in their lives to me, I keep my lamp down around my fee" ?