I lifted this from an earlier post I made in another thread...
"..although I'm one that does believe in a specific "drawn by the Spirit/believing on/calling on Jesus" event of one being saved, IMO, it's very clear that is only by grace...and that we don't then earn our way somehow through works. As I understand it, the works are a result of the grace, and the relationship with a loving Father which we want to please...and as He continues to draw us into His will and empower us. I believe He does bring us into obedience, disciplines us as Sons, etc., but not as a way of earning [or keeping] our salvation."
I also lifted this from one of Martin's recent posts...(hope that's OK Martin, sent you a PM about it)...if not OK, please edit out. "There was never this alls well that ends well abomination that many people nowadays mistake for Biblically [Cross and Blood-Centered] Christian Universalism."
This all got me to thinking about a topic that has been a work in progress for me my whole life...coming from an extremely legalist POV, gradually learning about grace, sometimes abusing grace, still seeking that balance/increased understanding.
A few random thoughts and POV's to which I've been exposed/experienced;
"If you don't live right, you'll backslide and go to hell...get down here to the altar and get saved again"
"If you feel convicted of your sins, then that's Satan, because God has already forgiven us everything and we're not to worry about it" -- (paraphrasing a current, well-known UR writer)
He also says "don't try to live better, just turn your eyes to God and let Him take care of it...like lifting your eyes to the sun so your pupils dilate...don't smash your eyeballs with your fingers trying to make it happen"
"We are saved by grace, kept by grace, and works are a manifestation of that"
"Works don't have to do with salvation, but are about Sonship, being one of the Chosen that rules and reigns over the nations with Christ [in the millenium/thousand year reign]".
Personally, I believe what I posted at the beginning. But it remains a struggle, in that sometimes I really do struggle, feeling convicted, trying to please, and sometimes just outright feeling condemned. (Oh me of little faith.) And then there comes a season of rest, trusting in the Lord, which is a relief...then I wonder, is that because I did what I needed to do to get close again, or because I "gave up" and leaned on Him...so on it goes...but all the while, it's the process of learning "it's in Him I live, breathe, have my being"...
Anyone else exposed to any of this, or live any of this?
THE HOLY SPIRIT CONFRONTED ME WITH WHAT MY MOTIVE WAS TO POST THIS THREAD. THIS COULD BE A DIVISIVE TOPIC. CAN WE PLEASE USE THIS TO TRY TO HELP EACH OTHER AS BROTHERS AND SISTERS? God's blessing, James.
My POV,
The whole works idea has been completley blown out of porportion. The idea of works in direct assotiation with a "saved" individual comes from James... It's quite interesting that such a huge topic in our current paridiegm is summed up quite quickly in the few paragraphs of James.
The whole odea of works as preached by Paul and Peter, John all other writers even including James are all revolving around the Law of Moses.
In Exodus 19 Israel goes into an agreement with God to work for their inheritance. That is the work references throughout the bible. Works, and dead works are always refering to Isrealites trying to become included into the promises of God by working through the law.
What Jesus accomplished is that we have been included into the promises by His works, there for let us give up our works, our attemps at gaining access into the promises of God through our works and realize what we have because of Jesus.
Those are the works we are in now, as Paul says in Hebrews 4 saying that God rested from all His works and likewise those who believe likewise enter into that rest therefore let us work diligently to enter into that rest.
How? By having our minds renewed to the truth of His works and inclusion into the the restoration of Jesus.
When I read the verses quouted below I get the impressing that works are very important.
I snipped a little in the verses but they repeat the list of (examples of) works 3 times.
IMO to clear to just read over it and say 'only grace saves'.
The sheep and goats are judged over none spiritual things.
That grace eventually overrules everything I can accept.
But that there is no judgement on works I can not accept. Or I just need a proper explanation....
Matthew 25:33-46
33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.
......
37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. 41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
......
46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
Quote from: jabcat on February 21, 2009, 04:04:56 AM
QuoteHe also says "don't try to live better, just turn your eyes to God and let Him take care of it...like lifting your eyes to the sun so your pupils dilate...don't smash your eyeballs with your fingers trying to make it happen"
It's just the opposite. If you look at the sun your pupils would constrict. When you walk into a dark room your pupils dilate to let in more light.
Quote"We are saved by grace, kept by grace, and works are a manifestation of that"
"Works don't have to do with salvation, but are about Sonship, being one of the Chosen that rules and reigns over the nations with Christ [in the millenium/thousand year reign]".
Personally, I believe what I posted at the beginning. But it remains a struggle, in that sometimes I really do struggle, feeling convicted, trying to please, and sometimes just outright feeling condemned. (Oh me of little faith.) And then there comes a season of rest, trusting in the Lord, which is a relief...then I wonder, is that because I did what I needed to do to get close again, or because I "gave up" and leaned on Him...so on it goes...but all the while, it's the process of learning "it's in Him I live, breathe, have my being"...
Anyone else exposed to any of this, or live any of this?
I agree wholeheartedly. When we do wrong (and we will) God does not want us going through life always moaning and groaning to Him about how rotten we are. The important thing is to go to God, tell Him we are sorry but . . . but thank Him for giving His only begotten Son to die not just for that specific sin but for all our sins. This refocuses out attention away from us and out problems to Him who is perfect and loving.
Let's not forget about the Adversary who is the accuser of the brethren. He would love for us to go through our life always focusing our attention on our failures rather than on God's successes.
And our consciences . . . if they condemn us then run to God, tell Him what we've done and again, thank Him for all He has done for us. And get on with life focusing on Him!
Tony
I would agree we are drawn by grace and not on our own will.
But these "works" are very important, no not to us remaining saved, but they are important to our heavenly Father!
What is the purpose of putting us through such times as we endure in this realm? Doesn't God have a purpose? Isn't it his desire to be fully expressed? To fully express the Father we must fully understand his opinion. To get that we must be willing to suffer greatly. We don't have too! It's not a "condition", it may be a request, but it will only be attempted by those who love the Father more then they love their own moment in this realm.
As for the "works", what are they? Faith, faith is a verb, it's an action. Faith is "calling" (present tense) those things which seem not as though they were. The work of faith is knowing in your heart that you are complete in him and then walking like it and acting like it.
Faith gives us confidence. But Faith must be exercised or it's weak and not as useful. Why? Because we need faith or we're doomed? No, because without faith we cannot please God, but the greater our faith the greater his pleasure. So it's no longer about us! It's no longer working out our salvation for us, because we need to or else! It's about the Father! It's about expressing something that is worth expressing.
1 Peter 1:7
That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:
What does he mean, "unto the appearance of Jesus Christ"? If Christ is in you, and he is, then how does he appear? Isn't it through the exercise of our faith. Calling those things which "appear" not as though they are real. If the kingdom is within in you, GREAT! You're good to go. But for some reason our heavenly Father wants to be fully expressed in this realm, and his full expression must come through people. If Christ is to ever fully appear in this earthly realm again, someones faith is going to have to endure the test of fire.
Romans 10:10
For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Faith is confessing(an action) those things we know in our heart, not just verbal language, but body language as well. It's our current understanding that will be changed(saved). Romans 12:2
And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
That you may prove, or show, or express fully, what is the good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God. Why? Not for you! Remember, you are all taken care of, it's not about you, it's about him! That's why Paul, John, Peter, James and the others worked so hard to express HIM. They loved him and desired to do his will and not just live a happy life for themselves.....though they could have if they could have quenched the burning desire of their love for God and not themselves.
Let this be our goal in this realm:Psalm 40:8 (King James Version)
I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart.
I posted this on another forum and also used this as a Bible study in a Baptist Church. I don't think any one got it though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you really stop and think about it, our works have gotten us into trouble with God and man since the beginning of time. Works have caused man to be proud, self righteous, boastful. Our so called works have been used to try to please and impress God and man.
Adam and Eve:
God told them not to eat of the tree of good and evil, which he knew they would. They did and their nakedness, {or sin} was uncovered. They tried to cover their nakedness by their own works. They made themselves clothes out of fig leaves. Now you know what a big puff of wind would do to that? (Gen. 3:7)
God had to make them clothes out of skin, probably sheep. First sacrifice, blood had to be shed, nakedness, {or sins} was covered. Adam and Eve's work, was useless. The sheep or lamb represented Christ and the coats of skin represents the covering of sin (Gen. 3:21). This was a foreshadow of the coming of Christ to die for the world. Adam and Eve tried to cover their sins by their own works, in making clothes out of fig leaves.
Then we have Cain:
Cain and Abel both offered sacrifices to God. Cain offered the works of his hands, the sweat of his brow. Able offered a sheep, a foreshadow of Christ. (Gen. 4:3-5) Now, Cain probably thought he worked harder than Abel, after all a garden takes a lot of work. He thought God would be more pleased with his offering since he worked with his own hands preparing it. Do you see pride developing? God wasn't pleased with Cain's offering. Why? Cain tried to please God by his own works, which resulted in being jealous and envious of Abel. Which led to murder. It was Cain's attitude and intentions of the heart about his own works that got him into trouble, not the works themselves. Even though God wasn't pleased with Cain's offering he told him if he did well he would be accepted. {Heb: Have the excellency}
Then we have Job:
Job was rich and respected in the streets by all the men. Enough to make one prideful. In Job's eyes he was righteous because of his works. Job said "I have been eyes to the blind, I have fed the poor, I have been father to the fatherless. (Job 29:12-17) Do you see the I's here? Job couldn't understand why God was giving him all these trials because he had done everything perfect. Works!!! Do you see a pattern, a puffing up, a boastful prideful pattern when it comes to our works? Job didn't mention God when he was pointing out the works he had done. He forgot to mention that it was God who gave him everything in order for him to do all the things he bragged about doing. Do you see pride and boastfulness here? (Job 42:5-6) Job said "I have heard of you but now mine eye seeth thee". "Wherefore, I abhor myself". Something we all must come to do. It wasn't the works that Job did that was bad or wrong, it was Job's attitude, intention, thoughts, and heart concerning those works, he only looked to himself, not God. When Job came to see he wasn't all that great and how little he was compared to God, he came to abhor himself. God said "where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth"? God told Job if he could deck himself with majesty and excellency and array himself with glory and beauty, bring the proud down low, tread down the wicked, then God would confess that Job's own right hand could save him (Job 40:10-14). Save him from the wretchedness he was in. If Job was so good, great, and mighty, he could restore himself to where he was before.
Then we go to Nebuchadnezzar:
Nebuchadnezzar had a dream and Daniel interpreted it for the king and told him his kingdom would be taken away and what would happen. What did Nebchadnezzar do? He walked into the palace and said "Is not this great Babylon, that I have built for the house of the kingdom by the might of my power". (Dan. 4:30-31) From that moment the kingdom was taken away from him. Nebuchadnezzar bragged about his works. God showed Nebuchadnezzar he wasn't as great as he thought he was. What did Nebuchadnezzar come to see? (Dan. 4:37) "Now I Nebuchadnezzar praise and extol and honour the King of heaven, all whose works are truth, and his ways judgment: and those that walk in pride he is able to abase. Nebuchadnezzar's works made him proud and boastful. This is where our works, ...or attitude about our works, gets us into trouble.
Then we come to the Pharisees:
Jesus called them hypocrites, vipers, snakes, I call them a bunch of do do's. Lots of works, do this do that. They followed Jesus around trying to find things to accuse him of. They were proud, boastful, used their works to honor themselves and look good to man. This is what our attitude about our works does for us, it causes us to look inward to ourselves instead of upward to God for all things. (Matt. 23:5-7) Jesus said "all their works they do for to be seen of men". They put works above love, mercy, compassion, forgiveness (Matt. 23:23). Jesus said "they loved to stand in the market place and say long prayers and wear clothes that drew attention to themselves. They tried to look righteous to others.
Another example is the Pharisee and the Publican who went into the temple to pray (Luke18:10-13) The Pharisee prayed "God I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. I fast twice a week I give tithes of all that I possess". Isn't this a pride, boastful attitude? The publican prayed, "God be merciful to me a sinner". Even though the Pharisee did the works that was required of him, he made them void by his attitude and self righteousness. His works made him boastful, proud, and self righteous. God wasn't even pleased with his prayer.
Do you see a continual pattern here?
Then we come to Paul:
Paul wasn't self righteous. He was different from the rest. Paul said "what do we have that wasn't given to us". Not by works of righteousness that we have done (Tit. 3:5). Paul said "if righteousness came by the works of the law, {any law,} then Christ is dead in vain" (Gal. 2:21). Paul came to see that our works wasn't important as far as our salvation was concerned. (Eph. 2:8-10) "For by grace are ye saved through faith and that {faith} not of yourselves: it is the gift of God. Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath BEFORE ORDAINED {Heb: prepared} that we should walk in them". So, any good works we do they were already prepared, that we would do them. All these works that were bragged about, made men boastful, proud, self righteous, was not really their works, but God's. It was their attitude, intentions, heart, that Job and Nebuchadnezzar came to see that was wrong. They should have thanked and praised God for giving them the opportunity and means to do these things that they took credit for.
Here are the works that are most important. (Gal. 5:22-26) "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance". If you notice there are no keeping of Holydays mentioned, no tithing, fasting, praying. All of these are outward appearances, they are not spiritual. God seeks for us to worship him in Spirit and truth (John 4:23-24). Not by any works that we can brag about. All of these are spiritual works. But even these works are not our works but Christ working in us. How can I say this? (Gal. 2:20) (Rom. 6:6-11) We are dead in Christ. Dead people don't work. It is no longer us working, but Christ working in us. We cannot brag, boast, or be self righteous about anything we do. If we do we are not giving God the glory, we are exalting our selves.
Even the good works we do can make us proud, boastful, and self righteous, this is what happened to Job. He didn't give God all the glory, honor, and praise for the works he did, he gave it to himself. It was his attitude, thoughts, and intentions of the heart about his works that God showed him was wrong.
Christ told his disciples they had to deny themselves. What does that mean? I think it means to give God all the praise and glory for all things that we do no matter what it is, instead of claiming glory for ourselves. We have to come to the place that Job and Nebuchadnezzar did. Job said "I abhor myself". Nebuchadnezzar said "I blessed the most high, and I praised and honoured him".
We should always remember, (Phil. 2:13) "For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure". Not our pleasure, not our works. (Phil.. 3:9) "not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith". {Christ's faith} Any of the do's are law, which is our own righteousness. Our works cannot save us, they cannot make us righteous. When we claim our own works as our own all we get is self righteousness and a prideful, boastful, puffed up attitude.
We have absolutely nothing to boast, be proud, or self righteous, about.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
One other thing that is good to remember is... and some might not agree with me here.
The books of the Bible are out of order in most of the translations. Paul's works should be positioned last in the Bible, not James, Peter, or John. This is what makes it confusing. The writings of James, Peter, and John, were all written to the Jew's who were under the Law. This is why you see works preached in these epistles. Only the Jew's were under the New Covenant, not Gentiles. Even Paul when he first started went to the Jew's first but later to the Gentiles. You can see a difference in Pauls first writings from later, starting in Ephesians onward.
CHB
but paul did said he was boastful.
CHB, you wrote.......
If you really stop and think about it, our works have gotten us into trouble with God and man since the beginning of time. Works have caused man to be proud, self righteous, boastful. Our so called works have been used to try to please and impress God and man.
Got me to thinkin. Did God really create us expecting us not to do wrong? Think about it. Put 20 people in a room with a button on the wall and tell them not to push it. Maybe some of them wouldn't actually push it but all of them would wonder about it. You just can't do that to people.
Now here's God putting a button right in front of people and saying "Don't push that. Isn't this a nice day? Nice ear rings, Eve." I mean there's probably not that much to do in the garden so they must have had quite a bit of time to wonder about things and I bet that tree was a big wondering event.
What do people do wrong anyway? Eat from apple trees? In other words what do people do that is so foreign to their natures? Try telling a fish not to swim. People eat fruit from trees, they lie, steal, kill, make love, laugh and so on. These desires are within them. Why the big surprise if we do what is within us?
cp
CP
Mercy could not be 'known' for what it is,neither 'GRACE'
nor perfection of the Sons of God...without undergoing
the expierence of evil. Evil is necessary to develope and show
forth the sterling qualities of mercy[undeserved kindness,]
nor could long-suffering/endurance or compassion be manifest.
EVIL provides that which causes suffering and hardship.
Mercy and forgiveness...just consider..if God had made
all His children sinless to begin with...how would
compassion for the suffering and mercy be shown.
It is an aspect of His Holy Spirit Nature that we as His children
must also have developed in us.We would be incomplete
in all of the qualities of love....He demands ALL of the fruit.
Otherwise we may be righteous..but hard-hearted..not having
compassion on the suffering[not knowing wht to suffer is.
Is love really LOVE, without mercy and compassion?
THE FULLNESS OF LOVE OF OUR FATHER AND CHRIST
MUST BE DEVELOPED IN US.
It was no design flaw of His, this expierence with evil
we all undergo here.He has it all under control
CHB loved that post about works
Sheila
Quote from: sheila on February 21, 2009, 11:25:31 PM
CP
Mercy could not be 'known' for what it is,neither 'GRACE'
nor perfection of the Sons of God...without undergoing
the expierence of evil. Evil is necessary to develope and show
forth the sterling qualities of mercy[undeserved kindness,]
nor could long-suffering/endurance or compassion be manifest.
EVIL provides that which causes suffering and hardship.
Mercy and forgiveness...just consider..if God had made
all His children sinless to begin with...how would
compassion for the suffering and mercy be shown.
It is an aspect of His Holy Spirit Nature that we as His children
must also have developed in us.We would be incomplete
in all of the qualities of love....He demands ALL of the fruit.
Otherwise we may be righteous..but hard-hearted..not having
compassion on the suffering[not knowing wht to suffer is.
Is love really LOVE, without mercy and compassion?
THE FULLNESS OF LOVE OF OUR FATHER AND CHRIST
MUST BE DEVELOPED IN US.
It was no design flaw of His, this expierence with evil
we all undergo here.He has it all under control
CHB loved that post about works
Sheila
I hear ya but of course the argument is, so God needs some little girl to get raped and then butchered to teach us about mercy. It really doesn't compute and I am not arguing here at all, just calling it like I see it.
I would rather not know mercy and compassion if it costs so much but this is not my show, it is Gods so all must be right, right?
I also think God can make some pretty deep and understanding creatures without the tortures, rapes, cancers and what not. God doesn't need anything or anyone to create 'out of this world' things within and without.
My thoughts are God does what He wants, when He wants and what He creates, black and white, should be thrilled just to be part of it.
cp
I hear you,CP. That little girl died at the hands of evil..
just like Christ did.[Rose] I hate it,too. I think He is also
developing a real HATRED OF EVIL IN US.
It is traumatizing..this world..the evil and
suffering in it.
Sheila
Quote from: sheila on February 22, 2009, 12:14:29 AM
I hear you,CP. That little girl died at the hands of evil..
just like Christ did.[Rose] I hate it,too. I think He is also
developing a real HATRED OF EVIL IN US.
It is traumatizing..this world..the evil and
suffering in it.
Sheila
And again, not arguing, but even with the evil that abounds, the buck stops with God. I say this with the utmost respect, of course, for God but there is no denying that God thought this whole, and I mean whole, thing up. Evil is included in this whole, don't you agree? However you look at it, this is Gods show. Many players but one director and producer in the ultimate sense.
'Heaven' has got to be one crazy realm if this earth is any indication of the degree Gods thoughts can go!
cp
Personally, I believe what I posted at the beginning. But it remains a struggle, in that sometimes I really do struggle, feeling convicted, trying to please, and sometimes just outright feeling condemned. (Oh me of little faith.) And then there comes a season of rest, trusting in the Lord, which is a relief...then I wonder, is that because I did what I needed to do to get close again, or because I "gave up" and leaned on Him...so on it goes...but all the while, it's the process of learning "it's in Him I live, breathe, have my being"...
Anyone else exposed to any of this, or live any of this?
Hey Jabcat...you where describing me there, Im living it as well.
I sponser 2 young kids through World Vision, a boy and a Girl the boy is from Ecuador, the Girl from Myanmar (Burma)
Ephesians 2
10 For His achievement are we, being created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God makes ready beforehand, that we should be walking in them.
Am going to come back with a Link from U Tube for you, on a very good teaching about how the Holy Spirit does not convict us of Sin....
back soon...
Hello Jabcat...
Here is the Link... http://gracewalkministries.blogspot.com/2008/03/101-lies-taught-in-church-every-sunday_12.html
Enjoy
I think we should do what we can and not live in the shadow of guilt from others who have decided what someone should do.
Each person reading this thread has no idea that there are people that you have helped; You may not even be aware of it. You may even look at yourself and think your not doing enough, that you do not measure up. In reality you always measure up to Gods love, we as humans simply have not reached the glory of God yet.
When you think of works, what exactly comes to mind for what you should measure up too?
To me the key is doing what you can because you really want to, maybe doing some things when you may not feel like it because its the right thing to do.
If you missed an opportunity, look for one tomorrow, or the next day, or the day after that. The story of Lots wife looking back is not about Gods judgment per sey, it is the killing spirit of regret concerning things we cannot do anything about.
Look forward, do the best you can with what you have.
Quote from: SpiritDriven on February 22, 2009, 12:45:36 AM
Hello Jabcat...
Here is the Link... http://gracewalkministries.blogspot.com/2008/03/101-lies-taught-in-church-every-sunday_12.html
Enjoy
Enjoying the posts...good points Paul and others. Thanks SpiritDriven...I'll check it out. :thumbsup:
Quote from: claypot
Got me to thinkin. Did God really create us expecting us not to do wrong? Think about it. Put 20 people in a room with a button on the wall and tell them not to push it. Maybe some of them wouldn't actually push it but all of them would wonder about it. You just can't do that to people.
Of course God expects us to do exactly what we do. I think what we do is for our own good no matter what it is, that's the way it was planned. God has all the answers and He knows the end of all things which will be
good when all is said and done. I think we are going through a process. You know, like God isn't finished with me yet, at least I hope not.
CHB
Quote from: claypot on February 21, 2009, 10:40:41 PM
CHB, you wrote.......
If you really stop and think about it, our works have gotten us into trouble with God and man since the beginning of time. Works have caused man to be proud, self righteous, boastful. Our so called works have been used to try to please and impress God and man.
Got me to thinkin. Did God really create us expecting us not to do wrong? Think about it. Put 20 people in a room with a button on the wall and tell them not to push it. Maybe some of them wouldn't actually push it but all of them would wonder about it. You just can't do that to people.
Now here's God putting a button right in front of people and saying "Don't push that. Isn't this a nice day? Nice ear rings, Eve." I mean there's probably not that much to do in the garden so they must have had quite a bit of time to wonder about things and I bet that tree was a big wondering event.
What do people do wrong anyway? Eat from apple trees? In other words what do people do that is so foreign to their natures? Try telling a fish not to swim. People eat fruit from trees, they lie, steal, kill, make love, laugh and so on. These desires are within them. Why the big surprise if we do what is within us?
cp
Hi cp,
I think you hit the nail on the head here (perhaps without realizing it?)... anyway: Yes, God did put us in the garden with a big button and told us not to push it... knowing full well that we would push the button and in fact he intended that we would.
Why would He do such a thing? So we would know what it is like. So we would fully understand evil and unrighteousness - this is a requirement to become righteous.
Cheers,
Legoman "Just another claypot like you" :winkgrin:
legoman, did he hit the "Easy" button? :laughing7:
Hey Legoman,
QuoteWhy would He do such a thing? So we would know what it is like. So we would fully understand evil and unrighteousness - this is a requirement to become righteous.
I realize that many people believe this, but I can't see any biblical reasoning to support this. Where do you get this from the bible?
Quote from: Dallas on February 25, 2009, 06:54:04 PM
Hey Legoman,
QuoteWhy would He do such a thing? So we would know what it is like. So we would fully understand evil and unrighteousness - this is a requirement to become righteous.
I realize that many people believe this, but I can't see any biblical reasoning to support this. Where do you get this from the bible?
God is making us into his image - he is making us into his own Sons & Daughters. Jesus was the prototype.
2 Cor 6:17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.
18 And will be a Father unto you, and
ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
1 John 3:1 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that
we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.
2Beloved,
now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
3And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.
So we are to become sons & daughters of God. But in order to become sons of God, we must be refined, scourged, and purified. God loves us as sons, and every son will be scourged by him:
Hebrews 12:6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.
Now, why is all this evil in the world? Let's look at Ecc 1:13 in a few different versions:
Ecc 1:13 [KJV] ... this sore travail hath God given to the sons of man to be exercised therewith.
Ecc 1:13 [YLT] ... It [is] a sad travail God hath given to the sons of man to be humbled by it.
Ecc 1:13 [COV] ... It is an experience of evil Elohim [God] has given to the sons of humanity to humble them by it
The concordant old testament version [COV] gives us the best meaning here: God has given us an experience of evil so we will be humbled. In fact men become snared in evil:
Ecc 9:23 For man also knoweth not his time: as the fishes that are taken in an evil net, and as the birds that are caught in the snare; so are the sons of men
snared in an evil time, when it falleth suddenly upon them.
Part of this is the many trials & judgements we will have to face. Yes, we too will have to go through our own form of judgements. Everyone is judged at one time or another, and it begins with us, the house of God:
1 Peter 4:12Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you:
...
1 Pe 4:16 Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.
17 For the time is come that
judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?
But the judging is very important - it is the very vehicle that will make us righteous:
Isaiah 26:9 With my soul have I desired thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee early: for when thy judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world will learn
righteousness.So through judgement we will be made righteous, and eventually we will be presented faultless (perfect - righteous) to God:
Jude 1:24 Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy,
25 To the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen.
So as you can see, God has a grand plan, and it all started with us pushing the button (eating from the tree of good and evil - the first sin), so that God could form us into his image. Along the way there will be a lot of evil, trials, scourging, chastising, and judgement that we must endure. But it is all for the glorious purpose of being made righteous.
The verses I presented are just a small subset - in fact the whole bible is describing this plan. However not everyone sees it, mainly because God has sent a strong delsusion (2 Thes 2:11) and has bound us over to disobedience (Romans 11:32) so he may eventually have mercy on us all.
There are pages and pages that have been written on this if you want to read more...
Legoman
Hi lego man
seems very much the explaination L Ray Smith.....
I kinda few those scripts in Eccl as Under the SUN,that of the natural existance which for mine relate somewhat to the OLD C..the Old man...
As for EVIL, maybe a relative term for ignorance...
For God HAS set the WORLD in the HEART of MEN. MAYBE both the GLORY of the OLD and the GREATER GLORY of the NEW. Christ HID in the hearts of MEN? The Pearl of GREAT price?
Ecc 3:11 He hath made every [thing] beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.
anyways Just a Thought
Blessings
T
Quote from: Taffy on February 25, 2009, 09:13:13 PM
Hi lego man
seems very much the explaination L Ray Smith.....
I kinda few those scripts in Eccl as Under the SUN,that of the natural existance which for mine relate somewhat to the OLD C..the Old man...
As for EVIL, maybe a relative term for ignorance...
For God HAS set the WORLD in the HEART of MEN. MAYBE both the GLORY of the OLD and the GREATER GLORY of the NEW. Christ HID in the hearts of MEN? The Pearl of GREAT price?
Ecc 3:11 He hath made every [thing] beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.
anyways Just a Thought
Blessings
T
Yes as you can tell I read alot of Ray Smith's stuff. It makes sense to me...
Ecc 3:11 is another good one, I almost quoted it as well... everything is beautiful in his time - I read that as relating to Ecc 3:1 "To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven" - basically there is a reason for
everything that happens, and
no man can figure it all out. Although I hope He explains it all to us some day...
Legoman
Quote from: legoman on February 25, 2009, 09:21:38 PM
Quote from: Taffy on February 25, 2009, 09:13:13 PM
Hi lego man
seems very much the explaination L Ray Smith.....
I kinda few those scripts in Eccl as Under the SUN,that of the natural existance which for mine relate somewhat to the OLD C..the Old man...
As for EVIL, maybe a relative term for ignorance...
For God HAS set the WORLD in the HEART of MEN. MAYBE both the GLORY of the OLD and the GREATER GLORY of the NEW. Christ HID in the hearts of MEN? The Pearl of GREAT price?
Ecc 3:11 He hath made every [thing] beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.
anyways Just a Thought
Blessings
T
Yes as you can tell I read alot of Ray Smith's stuff. It makes sense to me...
Ecc 3:11 is another good one, I almost quoted it as well... everything is beautiful in his time - I read that as relating to Ecc 3:1 "To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven" - basically there is a reason for everything that happens, and no man can figure it all out. Although I hope He explains it all to us some day...
Legoman
Hi Dallas :icon_flower:
excuse the typo.... VIEW those scrips.... :mblush:
Theres seasons bro yup AMEN :icon_flower:
..Moving from ONE season to another..from ONE age to ANother
Doesnt Ray equally state that scriptures one big parable...for Me ,scripture in essence speaks very much of the OLD and the NEW(Cs)..which Both testify of HIM
Gen 1:14 And God said, Let there be
lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for
signs, and for
seasons, and for
days, and
years: Seems for me at least bro, that the pharisees FAILED TO SEE the **** SIGN **** of the TIMES, The coming of a a NEW DAY , NEW SEASON , AND NEW YEAR(50TH Jubilee, The acceptable YEAR of our LORD?}
Mat 16:3 And in the morning, [It will be] foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowring. O [ye] hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky;
but can ye not [discern] the signs of the times? Dan 2:21 And
he changeth the times and the seasons: he
removeth kings, and
setteth up kings: he
giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding: SEEMS AGAIN Times and seasons are NOT known to**man** But he cometh
Act 1:7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the
times or the seasons, which the
Father hath put in his own power. Act 1:8
But ye shall receive power, after that the
Holy Ghost is come upon you: and
ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
Moving from that which is Under the SON, Old man, to that which is ABOVE , the New man Maybe?
Ecc 3:11 is another good one, I almost quoted it as well... everything is
beautiful in his time - I read that as relating to Ecc 3:1 "To
every thing there is a season, and a time to
every purpose under the heaven" - basically there is a reason for
everything that happens, and
no man can figure it all out. Although I hope He explains it all to us some day...
Blessings Bro..Thanks for sharing :icon_flower:
To understand this subject we must establish if works are ever required to be saved in the scriptures:
Rom 2:5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God;
Rom 2:6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds:
Rom 2:7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:
To receive aionios Life is to be saved. Here in those verses we clearly see that the aionios life is given as a direct result of works. But the scriptures seems contradicting at first because we read this:
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
So what is the explaination? - the explaination is that the works mentioned in Romans 2:6 and those in Ephesians 2:9 derive from two difference sources. Those in Romans 2:6 are actually the works of the Christ while those in Ephesians 2:9 are referring to those of man.
They way to think of it is this. Consider that ALL Good works are copyrighted by the Christ. All evil works are those are our own. If I wrote a book and another man went before a large assembly and lectured the crowd from my book and received applause because of what was contained in the message then I should be the one receiving the glory not the one giving the lecture. I'm the rightful owner. Likewise, Christ owns all GOOD works. They are His. Even if we should perform Good works - we should never take credit for that which is the Good that we do but rather give such praise to our Lord Jesus for it is Him performing a work through us. This is where salvation is. Salvation is the manifestation of His works through us. We must become CHRIST-like! Many references to this conformance are expressed in the scriptures including becoming members of His Body and having the mind of Christ.
Many that disagree with this will quote the verses from the beginning of Romans 4 but often leave out or fail to comprehend the first verse.
Rom 4:1 What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
That is a key piece of this verse. This reference of "to the flesh" shows that were specifically speaking about the works of Abraham and not according to the works of Faith (which are of Christ).
It should be no wonder then that we are exhorted to provoke others unto Good works:
Heb 10:24 And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works:
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 03, 2009, 08:40:58 PM
To understand this subject we must establish if works are ever required to be saved in the scriptures:
Rom 2:5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God;
Rom 2:6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds:
Rom 2:7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:
To receive aionios Life is to be saved. Here in those verses we clearly see that the aionios life is given as a direct result of works.
Paul, in Romans 2:7 they may
seek glory and honour and immortality, eternal life by their works but it is not saying they will get it for the apostle Paul in this area is telling us none are righteous. They only get it through Christ's obedience.
Quote from: Tony N on March 03, 2009, 09:07:25 PM
Paul, in Romans 2:7 they may seek glory and honour and immortality, eternal life by their works but it is not saying they will get it for the apostle Paul in this area is telling us none are righteous. They only get it through Christ's obedience.
Tony, to me the verses do say that the aionios life is rendered for works. My statements don't contracdict the fact that we are not righteous. Jesus IS righteous and when we have Christ in us - He puts down sin in our own flesh. See it is His obedience that is being performed through us.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 03, 2009, 08:40:58 PM
Consider that ALL Good works are copyrighted by the Christ.
:cloud9: Yes, exactly, that's why it says the Holy Ghost does the works.....Blessings....
Tony, going back to your assertion that aionios means "duration". Let's look at this verse:
Rom 16:25 Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,
The bolded part is all translated from the word "aionios". So if we were to substitute the word "duration" there it would have not boundary to give a reference point for the reader. It doesn't work and just leaves us in confusion. But if we say it means age-enduring then it means that the mystery was kept secret from before this age began.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 03, 2009, 09:22:51 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 03, 2009, 09:07:25 PM
Paul, in Romans 2:7 they may seek glory and honour and immortality, eternal life by their works but it is not saying they will get it for the apostle Paul in this area is telling us none are righteous. They only get it through Christ's obedience.
Tony, to me the verses do say that the aionios life is rendered for works. My statements don't contracdict the fact that we are not righteous. Jesus IS righteous and when we have Christ in us - He puts down sin in our own flesh. See it is His obedience that is being performed through us.
Paul
From Romans 1:14 to 3:23 the apostle Paul is proving the utter inability for mankind to be righteous by law and apart from law. It is not till Paul gets to Romans 3:24 that he begins to prove that all righteousness is through Jesus Christ. The apostle Paul Paul is not saying "works + Christ = righteousness."
Quote from: Tony N on March 03, 2009, 09:57:22 PM
From Romans 1:14 to 3:23 the apostle Paul is proving the utter inability for mankind to be righteous by law and apart from law. It is not till Paul gets to Romans 3:24 that he begins to prove that all righteousness is through Jesus Christ. The apostle Paul Paul is not saying "works + Christ = righteousness."
Tony, I believe we both agree that all righeousness is done through Jesus Christ. I think we both agree that man is unable of his works to perform righteousness. It appears to me that you don't believe that the performance of righteousness is needed to be saved and this is where we disagree. I believe that an incapable man can perform what is righteous by having the spirit of the capable man (Christ).
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 03, 2009, 10:09:58 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 03, 2009, 09:57:22 PM
From Romans 1:14 to 3:23 the apostle Paul is proving the utter inability for mankind to be righteous by law and apart from law. It is not till Paul gets to Romans 3:24 that he begins to prove that all righteousness is through Jesus Christ. The apostle Paul Paul is not saying "works + Christ = righteousness."
Tony, I believe we both agree that all righeousness is done through Jesus Christ. I think we both agree that man is unable of his works to perform righteousness. It appears to me that you don't believe that the performance of righteousness is needed to be saved and this is where we disagree. I believe that an incapable man can perform what is righteous by having the spirit of the capable man (Christ).
Paul
Hi Paul, thanks for your thoughts. I agree with you. The problem is this: Paul is not showing how mankind is doing his works by having the spirit of Christ in them in Romans 1:14 to 3:23 especially Romans 2:7. In 2:7 they may
seek eonian life by doing good works but that doesn't mean they get it. All their righteousness is as filthy rags.
Quote from: Tony N on March 03, 2009, 10:30:08 PM
Hi Paul, thanks for your thoughts. I agree with you. The problem is this: Paul is not showing how mankind is doing his works by having the spirit of Christ in them in Romans 1:14 to 3:23 especially Romans 2:7. In 2:7 they may seek eonian life by doing good works but that doesn't mean they get it. All their righteousness is as filthy rags.
Tony,
Let me give you the Young's Literal Translation which I believe makes it easier to understand:
Rom 2:6 who shall render to each according to his works;
Rom 2:7 to those, indeed, who in continuance of a good work, do seek glory, and honour, and incorruptibility--life age-during;
See the "life age-during" (I prefer age-enduring) is rendered to those working. The works are those righteous works of the Christ in them. They are working because they seek glory, honour and incorruptibility and will receive aionios life because of it.
I believe that verses 2:6-7 do indeed show that those doing the works of Christ will receive life aionios.
Paul
Paul, sorry, can't help ya bud.
Tony
Quote from: Tony N on March 03, 2009, 11:00:27 PM
Paul, sorry, can't help ya bud.
Tony
That is quite alright Tony, God obviously hasn't given me to understand what it is your trying to teach me.
Paul
Hi guys. Just taking a shot here. Does this help at all? If not :dontknow:, hey I tried :)
This from the Geneva Study Bible Commentary;
"Glory which follows good works, which he does not lay out before us as though there were any that could attain to salvation by his own strength, but, he lays this condition of salvation before us, which no man can perform, to bring men to Christ, who alone justifies the believers, as he himself concludes; see Ro 2:21-22."
God's blessing, James.
Quote from: jabcat on March 04, 2009, 01:54:18 AM
Hi guys. Just taking a shot here. Does this help at all? If not :dontknow:, hey I tried :)
This from the Geneva Study Bible Commentary;
"Glory which follows good works, which he does not lay out before us as though there were any that could attain to salvation by his own strength, but, he lays this condition of salvation before us, which no man can perform, to bring men to Christ, who alone justifies the believers, as he himself concludes; see Ro 2:21-22."
God's blessing, James.
Hi James, Paul said the law was given to escort them to Christ. It wasn't given by God as if God thought they could keep the whole law and become righteous by it. So i can see what you are saying by your quote above.
yeah, in my mind, i was thinking about the law as analogous, but decided not to go there :thumbsup:
A.P. Adams does an excellent job explaining faith & works---both types of work...good works and justifying works (work done in harmony with God, according to His purpose for each "present time" as the plan He set in place in the beginning moves forward through time.)
Part 1:
http://www.tentmaker.org/books/SpiritOfTheWord/009FaithAndWorks.htm
Part 2:
http://www.tentmaker.org/books/SpiritOfTheWord/013FaithAndWorks.htm
This is a Roman Catholic source but a very good one on the subject.
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1510.htm
Includes discussion also of God's Will and Free will as well.
Paul
A believer cannot and should not mix works with grace to become more righteous or have a better standing with God. To do so is to enter into Galatianism.
I'm not saying a believer should not do good works out of love. But they are not required for salvation nor for being more righteous according to what Paul wrote to the Galatians.
i continually look for ways to do ideal acts of kindness. :popout:
the more i do the more i stink, the harder i work, the weaker i feel. :flamebreath:
the more i learn, the more i dont know. :fool:
the moment i think i got something figured out, im wrong. :doh:
i have no place to turn cept to HIM. :gthumbsup:
crazy stuff man. :Gtantrum:
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 01:17:33 PM
A believer cannot and should not mix works with grace to become more righteous or have a better standing with God. To do so is to enter into Galatianism.
I'm not saying a believer should not do good works out of love. But they are not required for salvation nor for being more righteous according to what Paul wrote to the Galatians.
Tony, Grace does NOT exclude works. To be under Grace is to have been given the Christ. Christ is NOT idle. If you don't have works your none of His.
Again, the distinction must be made between our works and His (the Christ) works. Works are a REQUIREMENT to being saved. I'm not talking about OUR works but talking about His works.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 04:02:37 PM
Tony, Grace does NOT exclude works. To be under Grace is to have been given the Christ. Christ is NOT idle. If you don't have works your none of His.
Again, the distinction must be made between our works and His (the Christ) works. Works are a REQUIREMENT to being saved. I'm not talking about OUR works but talking about His works.
Paul
Good works are NOT a requirement to being saved----to think that is to fall from grace! You're mixing Law and Grace.....very dangerous doctrine that can lead to "self" righteousmess or hopelessness.
As God grows/transforms us more into the image of Christ, we will naturally manifest good works as God wants to bless us by blessing others. But to say that doing good works is a requirement for salvation is a very, very harmful teaching!
I think you should read the links I posted earlier.
Quote from: LaurieJo on March 04, 2009, 04:54:40 PM
Good works are NOT a requirement to being saved----to think that is to fall from grace! You're mixing Law and Grace.....very dangerous doctrine that can lead to "self" righteousmess or hopelessness.
As God grows/transforms us more into the image of Christ, we will naturally manifest good works as God wants to bless us by blessing others. But to say that doing good works is a requirement for salvation is a very, very harmful teaching!
I think you should read the links I posted earlier.
Hi LauriJo, I'm very confident that Works are required. Again, not my own works but the works of Christ. If anyone is telling me that doing the works of Christ is falling from Grace, I would say they are mistaken. I find no shame in what I'm teaching here. It is all scriptural. Consider this:
Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
The scriptures are even teaching that those that do His commandments are those that have right to the tree of life (salvation).
The scriptures here are showing a requirement of performing His commandments to obtaining access to the tree of life. Please address this verse in your rebuttal. Again, I say that Grace doesn't exclude works - it only excludes our works.
Paul
come on yall.
good works DONT save, but we are saved UNTO good works.
bottom line, who knowing Christ would not LOOK for ways to work/bless...ETC.
simple :happy3:
dont let the word ""works"" cause problems.
chuckt.
Quote from: chuckt on March 04, 2009, 05:25:52 PM
come on yall.
good works DONT save, but we are saved UNTO good works.
bottom line, who knowing Christ would not LOOK for ways to work/bless...ETC.
simple :happy3:
dont let the word ""works"" cause problems.
chuckt.
But GOOD works do save. The "unto" good works is what we are to provoke others to. The word "works" is only a problem when people commit the error of assuming that we can just believe and continue in our own works as if we shall receiving the blessings of God for simply acknowledging a favorable feeling towards what God is and His ways. By Grace you become a branch of the vine but if that branch doesn't produce fruit - it is pruned from the vine. Again, I submit the following verse:
Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
It is those that DO His commandments that receive of the Tree of Life.
Paul
QuoteBut GOOD works do save.
save
FROM what??
Why are the disciples told in MT 24:13, MK13:13 that in order to be saved that they must endure to the end? Were not the disciples already saved? What does saved mean, anyhow? Maybe we should start following the rules of grammar and, every time we see the words saved or salvation, ask the question:
"Saved from what?" and "Saved to what?".QuoteRev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
It is those that DO His commandments that receive of the Tree of Life.
22:14 Happy are those who are rinsing their robes, that it will be their license to the tree of life, and they may be entering the portals into the city.
whatever......
anyone INCHRIST will be doing ""works"". one dosent do works to GET SAVED.
i will not go round and round with this. we can prooftext at each other all day long. :sigh:
The words ""saved"" and ""salvation"" have all but lost all meaning in the 21st century western world.
Good day and blessing to you.
chuckt
Quote from: chuckt on March 04, 2009, 05:50:57 PM
QuoteBut GOOD works do save.
save FROM what??
Why are the disciples told in MT 24:13, MK13:13 that in order to be saved that they must endure to the end? Were not the disciples already saved? What does saved mean, anyhow? Maybe we should start following the rules of grammar and, every time we see the words saved or salvation, ask the question: "Saved from what?" and "Saved to what?".
QuoteRev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
It is those that DO His commandments that receive of the Tree of Life.
22:14 Happy are those who are rinsing their robes, that it will be their license to the tree of life, and they may be entering the portals into the city.
whatever......
anyone INCHRIST will be doing ""works"". one dosent do works to GET SAVED.
i will not go round and round with this. we can prooftext at each other all day long. :sigh:
The words ""saved"" and ""salvation"" have all but lost all meaning in the 21st century western world.
Good day and blessing to you.
chuckt
You asked "saved from what". The answer is saved from your sins which leads to death. Thus if you believe that your saved and acknowledge Christ as your Lord and Savior but still are practicing sin as if to believe that your already saved then guess what? - your not saved. It is
impossible to still practice sin and be saved.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 05:08:37 PM
Hi LauriJo, I'm very confident that Works are required. Again, not my own works but the works of Christ. If anyone is telling me that doing the works of Christ is falling from Grace, I would say they are mistaken. I find no shame in what I'm teaching here. It is all scriptural. Consider this:
Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
The scriptures are even teaching that those that do His commandments are those that have right to the tree of life (salvation).
The scriptures here are showing a requirement of performing His commandments to obtaining access to the tree of life. Please address this verse in your rebuttal. Again, I say that Grace doesn't exclude works - it only excludes our works.
Paul
Paul....Christ is the tree of life.
I might be misunderstanding you....but, it seems to me that you are confusing grace and faith, and don't understand the difference between "good works" and "works that justify".
Please read this article to better understand what I mean:
http://www.tentmaker.org/books/SpiritOfTheWord/013FaithAndWorks.htm
QuoteYou asked "saved from what". The answer is saved from your sins which leads to death. Thus if you believe that your saved and acknowledge Christ as your Lord and Savior but still are practicing sin as if to believe that your already saved then guess what? - your not saved. It is impossible to still practice sin and be saved.
Paul
WOW ...so works save us from our sin :thumbdown:
ok. when you can show me how much sin is too much we can go on :dontknow:
i mean forget grace.
and some will say oh so since grace abounds we can go on sinning?
this is pure carnal thinking.
please post me a chart of sins and how much is too much.
wait how about this, to address your subject, here is the work:
2Pe 1:5 And beside this,
giving all diligence,
add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
2Pe 1:6 And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness;
2Pe 1:7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness LOVE. :bgdance:
2Pe 1:8 For
if these things be in you, and abound,
they make [you that ye shall] neither [be] barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. 2Pe 1:9 But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins. 2Pe 1:10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:
i think i'll do these things and leave ""getting into heaven"" up to GOD.
salvation is a process and ALL christians sin some more than others at different times, so please post us a ""sin chart"" :laughing7:
i mean there is plenty of sin in our life we dont even recognize!!later
chuckt
Quote from: chuckt on March 04, 2009, 06:12:41 PM
QuoteYou asked "saved from what". The answer is saved from your sins which leads to death. Thus if you believe that your saved and acknowledge Christ as your Lord and Savior but still are practicing sin as if to believe that your already saved then guess what? - your not saved. It is impossible to still practice sin and be saved.
Paul
WOW ...so works save us from our sin :thumbdown:
ok. when you can show me how much sin is too much we can go on :dontknow:
i mean forget grace.
and some will say oh so since grace abounds we can go on sinning?
this is pure carnal thinking.
please post me a chart of sins and how much is too much.
wait how about this, to address your subject, here is the work:
2Pe 1:5 And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
2Pe 1:6 And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness;
2Pe 1:7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness LOVE. :bgdance:
2Pe 1:8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make [you that ye shall] neither [be] barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
2Pe 1:9 But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins.
2Pe 1:10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:
i think i'll do these things and leave ""getting into heaven"" up to GOD.
salvation is a process and ALL christians sin some more than others at different times, so please post us a ""sin chart"" :laughing7:
i mean there is plenty of sin in our life we dont even recognize!!
later
chuckt
Here is how many sins are to much: 1
See Jesus was without sin. If you continue in your sins and yet acknowledge Christ (which many do) then you don't have Christ and infact commit blasphemy for you defame the name of Jesus Christ.
I haven't seen you address my verse that I posted. Did you think it was translated wrong? Here it is again:
Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Should I follow what your saying or what God's Word is saying? The challenge to everyone here is that you will not find evidence from God's Word to show that one is not saved as a direct result of Christ WORKING through them.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 05:08:37 PM
Hi LauriJo, I'm very confident that Works are required. Again, not my own works but the works of Christ. If anyone is telling me that doing the works of Christ is falling from Grace, I would say they are mistaken. I find no shame in what I'm teaching here. It is all scriptural. Consider this:
Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
The scriptures are even teaching that those that do His commandments are those that have right to the tree of life (salvation).
The scriptures here are showing a requirement of performing His commandments to obtaining access to the tree of life. Please address this verse in your rebuttal. Again, I say that Grace doesn't exclude works - it only excludes our works.
Paul
Galatianism, pure and simple.
Also, trettep, you are bringing an evangel that was not an evangel Paul brought. He said if anyone bring a different evangel other than what we bring let him be anathema. Paul never taught saved by works which we do. He never taught that works are required but in fact taught that works were not required.
I would suggest you stop mixing Circumcision writings such as Revelation passages with Paul's evangel. Don't so makes it a different evangel.
Quote
Here is how many sins are to much: 1
So much for grace and the Cross.
2Cr 5:19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
1Jo 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for [the sins of] the whole world
Rom 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son,
much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.
QuoteSee Jesus was without sin. If you continue in your sins and yet acknowledge Christ (which many do) then you don't have Christ and infact commit blasphemy for you defame the name of Jesus Christ.
again you contradict you say 1 sin now you say sins. again i ask, how much sin? oh you can spot the biggie sins, thats easy, what about the sins you commit and are not aware of?
QuoteI haven't seen you address my verse that I posted. Did you think it was translated wrong? Here it is again:
yes i did and i told you, one prooftext means nothing, the SUM of Gods word is truth, and you are belitteling the CROSS and Christ and HIS power to save!
QuoteRev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
the greek here says blessed are they rinsing their robes!
http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/Greek_Index.htm
be that as it may, the commandments are
love God and Love thy neighbor!
QuoteShould I follow what your saying or what God's Word is saying? The challenge to everyone here is that you will not find evidence from God's Word to show that one is not saved as a direct result of Christ WORKING through them.
Quoteone is not saved as a direct result of Christ WORKING through them
HUH?...sorry but one IS being saved by the work of Christ IN THEM.
IS WAS and WILL BE!
let Christ do the work IN HIS TIME.
Chapter 13
1 If I should be speaking in the languages of men and of the messengers, yet should have no love, I have become resounding copper or a clanging cymbal.
2 And if I should have prophecy and should be perceiving all secrets and all knowledge, and if I should have all faith, so as to transport mountains, yet have no love, I am nothing.
3 And if ever I should be morselling out all my possessions, and if I should be giving up my body, that I should be boasting, yet may have no love, in nothing do I benefit.
have a good day.
chuckt
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 06:38:02 PM
Galatianism, pure and simple.
Also, trettep, you are bringing an evangel that was not an evangel Paul brought. He said if anyone bring a different evangel other than what we bring let him be anathema. Paul never taught saved by works which we do. He never taught that works are required but in fact taught that works were not required.
I would suggest you stop mixing Circumcision writings such as Revelation passages with Paul's evangel. Don't so makes it a different evangel.
TonyN - I'm quite comfortable with the message of Paul and His Gospel is what I'm preaching here. Paul did teach we are saved by the works of Christ. Paul only taught that OUR works are not required. So again if you can prove other wise from God's Word that someone can be saved without performing the Works of Christ then I will turn from such a message. Surely, if you believe Paul is preaching that Christ Works don't save us that you can present that from His own words.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 06:44:38 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 06:38:02 PM
Galatianism, pure and simple.
Also, trettep, you are bringing an evangel that was not an evangel Paul brought. He said if anyone bring a different evangel other than what we bring let him be anathema. Paul never taught saved by works which we do. He never taught that works are required but in fact taught that works were not required.
I would suggest you stop mixing Circumcision writings such as Revelation passages with Paul's evangel. Don't so makes it a different evangel.
TonyN - I'm quite comfortable with the message of Paul and His Gospel is what I'm preaching here. Paul did teach we are saved by the works of Christ. Paul only taught that OUR works are not required. So again if you can prove other wise from God's Word that someone can be saved without performing the Works of Christ then I will turn from such a message. Surely, if you believe Paul is preaching that Christ Works don't save us that you can present that from His own words.
Paul
Gal 6:1 Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.
Gal 6:2 Bear ye one another's burdens,
and so fulfil the law of Christ.
can you list the commandments you are talking about doing?
thanks
chuckt
:cloud9: Trettep, are you speaking along the lines of, "Faith without works (His) is dead?"
Blessings....
Quote from: Cardinal on March 04, 2009, 06:54:11 PM
:cloud9: Trettep, are you speaking along the lines of, "Faith without works (His) is dead?"
Blessings....
Yes, exactly Cardinal, thanks for that clarification.
Paul
Quote from: chuckt on March 04, 2009, 06:49:34 PM
can you list the commandments you are talking about doing?
thanks
chuckt
Here you go Chuckt. I thought I already posted this as a reply but didn't see it. So I apology if this is a repeat.
Rom 13:9 for, `Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false testimony, Thou shalt not covet;' and if there is any other command, in this word it is summed up, in this: `
Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself;'
Rom 13:10 the
love to the neighbour doth work no ill; the
love, therefore, is the fulness of law.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 07:12:24 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 04, 2009, 06:49:34 PM
can you list the commandments you are talking about doing?
thanks
chuckt
Here you go Chuckt. I thought I already posted this as a reply but didn't see it. So I apology if this is a repeat.
Rom 13:9 for, `Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false testimony, Thou shalt not covet;' and if there is any other command, in this word it is summed up, in this: `Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself;'
Rom 13:10 the love to the neighbour doth work no ill; the love, therefore, is the fulness of law.
Paul
thanks. i didnt see that and i agree 100% LOVE fullfills the law.
God bless
chuckt
Quote from: chuckt on March 04, 2009, 07:23:05 PMthanks. i didnt see that and i agree 100% LOVE fullfills the law.
God bless
chuckt
Well at least we agree on that, Chuckt.
Paul
Quote from: Cardinal on March 04, 2009, 06:54:11 PM
:cloud9: Trettep, are you speaking along the lines of, "Faith without works (His) is dead?"
Blessings....
This from Card cleared it up for me. I like that. Jesus said He works and His Father works and we know what they were working on don't we?
cp
Quote from: claypot on March 04, 2009, 07:53:24 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 04, 2009, 06:54:11 PM
:cloud9: Trettep, are you speaking along the lines of, "Faith without works (His) is dead?"
Blessings....
This from Card cleared it up for me. I like that. Jesus said He works and His Father works and we know what they were working on don't we?
cp
Yes, this is the distinction that many don't make. They simply read Paul as saying that we are saved by Grace through Faith and not of works and then many conclude that ALL works are unrighteous. But we are saved BY the righteousness of Jesus. I break up many that claim to be Christians in this regard into two groups. Those that believe that we are saved BECAUSE of Jesus and those that believe we are saved BY Jesus. The distinction is that many believe that it is not a REQUIREMENT to perform the works of Christ in order to be saved. But what I believe can't be disputed is that Dead Faith cannot access Grace.
Paul
It amazes me that anyone could believe that Christ's words do not apply to us. Jesus was looking past his death, resurrection, and ascension to the Father into the age in which Paul preached.
- John 14:12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
What does this verse say about anyone who does not come to the point that he does the works that Christ did? It says that that person does not believe on Christ.
Religion has so messed up the idea of works.
We are told we have to do things and then we are told how we should be, what we should think and then even churches will tell you what you should be doing in order to be a witness to prove your faith, etc. Then of course since our deeds are not what saves us then people start getting tripped up over the appearance that scripture contradicts the idea.
Ja 2:22 You are observing that faith worked together with his works, and by works was faith perfected.
Ja 2:24 You see that outby works a man is being justified, and not by faith only.
Phl 2:13 for it is God Who is operating in you to will as well as to work for the sake of His delight.
To me it is that each of us will manifest works inherantly by the faith God gives us, the two are inseparable. What is able to be separated is the judgment and finger pointing from people over the issue.
Can anyone rightly know every single detail that God works to justify us? Nope. But he IS working to do that and thats what its about.
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 06:44:38 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 06:38:02 PM
Galatianism, pure and simple.
Also, trettep, you are bringing an evangel that was not an evangel Paul brought. He said if anyone bring a different evangel other than what we bring let him be anathema. Paul never taught saved by works which we do. He never taught that works are required but in fact taught that works were not required.
I would suggest you stop mixing Circumcision writings such as Revelation passages with Paul's evangel. Don't so makes it a different evangel.
TonyN - I'm quite comfortable with the message of Paul and His Gospel is what I'm preaching here. Paul did teach we are saved by the works of Christ. Paul only taught that OUR works are not required. So again if you can prove other wise from God's Word that someone can be saved without performing the Works of Christ then I will turn from such a message. Surely, if you believe Paul is preaching that Christ Works don't save us that you can present that from His own words.
Paul
Paul wrote that "we are saved by grace through faith and this is not out of you. It is God's approach present,
not of works lest any man should boast."
trettep, are you saying that if one mixes works with grace that those works are the works of Christ? And so are you saying Paul was wrong for writing Galatians?
trettep, the apostle Paul said in Galatians that we are justified by the faith of Christ alone and not by works of law.
Is it possible to love Christ "by faith alone" while not keeping His commandments?
- John 14:21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
<br>
- John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments
<br>
- John 14:24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.
Are these verses still true? Or were Christ's disciples supposed to quickly forget these words after Pentecost so as not to fall from grace in the age of grace?
What was Christ trying to tell His disciples?
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 08:36:00 PM
Is it possible to love Christ "by faith alone" while not keeping His commandments?
- John 14:21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
<br>- John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments
<br>- John 14:24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.
Are these verses still true? Or were Christ's disciples supposed to quickly forget these words after Pentecost so as not to fall from grace in the age of grace?
What was Christ trying to tell His disciples?
Different strokes for different folks.
The laws governing Canada are not to be enforced upon American citizens living in America.
The laws governing America are not to be enforced upon Canadians living in Canada.
In other words, we can't make Canadians pay taxes to support us even if we have laws which state Americans must pay taxes.
Likewise, the Circumcision is different from the Uncircumcision. We of the Uncircumcision are never told by our apostle, Paul, that we must do those things which Christ told His disciples to do. Dig?
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 08:32:05 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 06:44:38 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 06:38:02 PM
Galatianism, pure and simple.
Also, trettep, you are bringing an evangel that was not an evangel Paul brought. He said if anyone bring a different evangel other than what we bring let him be anathema. Paul never taught saved by works which we do. He never taught that works are required but in fact taught that works were not required.
I would suggest you stop mixing Circumcision writings such as Revelation passages with Paul's evangel. Don't so makes it a different evangel.
TonyN - I'm quite comfortable with the message of Paul and His Gospel is what I'm preaching here. Paul did teach we are saved by the works of Christ. Paul only taught that OUR works are not required. So again if you can prove other wise from God's Word that someone can be saved without performing the Works of Christ then I will turn from such a message. Surely, if you believe Paul is preaching that Christ Works don't save us that you can present that from His own words.
Paul
Paul wrote that "we are saved by grace through faith and this is not out of you. It is God's approach present, not of works lest any man should boast."
trettep, are you saying that if one mixes works with grace that those works are the works of Christ? And so are you saying Paul was wrong for writing Galatians?
trettep, the apostle Paul said in Galatians that we are justified by the faith of Christ alone and not by works of law.
Maybe this is what T was talking ofTT to many Ts around :laughing7:
Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them
His works Through Us , one boasts come the law Bro, and the deeds thereof :mblush:
Rom 3:27 Where [is]
boasting then? It is excluded.
By what law? of works? Nay: but by the
law of faith.
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 08:32:05 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 06:44:38 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 06:38:02 PM
Galatianism, pure and simple.
Also, trettep, you are bringing an evangel that was not an evangel Paul brought. He said if anyone bring a different evangel other than what we bring let him be anathema. Paul never taught saved by works which we do. He never taught that works are required but in fact taught that works were not required.
I would suggest you stop mixing Circumcision writings such as Revelation passages with Paul's evangel. Don't so makes it a different evangel.
TonyN - I'm quite comfortable with the message of Paul and His Gospel is what I'm preaching here. Paul did teach we are saved by the works of Christ. Paul only taught that OUR works are not required. So again if you can prove other wise from God's Word that someone can be saved without performing the Works of Christ then I will turn from such a message. Surely, if you believe Paul is preaching that Christ Works don't save us that you can present that from His own words.
Paul
Paul wrote that "we are saved by grace through faith and this is not out of you. It is God's approach present, not of works lest any man should boast."
trettep, are you saying that if one mixes works with grace that those works are the works of Christ? And so are you saying Paul was wrong for writing Galatians?
trettep, the apostle Paul said in Galatians that we are justified by the faith of Christ alone and not by works of law.
Not at all Tony. I'm making the disctinction between the works of man and those of Christ. Paul made that distinction also. But if you disgree Tony, then I will ask you what I ask others:
Can dead Faith (Faith without works - according to James) Access Grace?
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 08:32:05 PM
Paul wrote that "we are saved by grace through faith and this is not out of you. It is God's approach present, not of works lest any man should boast."
trettep, are you saying that if one mixes works with grace that those works are the works of Christ? And so are you saying Paul was wrong for writing Galatians?
trettep, the apostle Paul said in Galatians that we are justified by the faith of Christ alone and not by works of law.
- Ephesains 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
The first "works" are works originating in man - such that he could boast in them.
The second "works" are works done due to being God's workmanship which is purely by grace.
You can not lump things like "love your neighbor" and "be ye perfect as the Father is perfect" under "Works of the law" as if it is in the same category as physical circumcision and physical Sabbath keeping which are only outward forms of true circumcision (of the heart) and entering His rest.
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 08:41:33 PMLikewise, the Circumcision is different from the Uncircumcision.
So which is it Tony? Is it an
age of grace through faith alone, or is it a
race of grace through faith alone?
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 08:41:33 PMLikewise, the Circumcision is different from the Uncircumcision. We of the Uncircumcision are never told by our apostle, Paul, that we must do those things which Christ told His disciples to do. Dig?
No I don't dig Tony.
- Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
<br>
- Romans 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
Paul just got done proving that
man is justified by faith apart from works of the law. Then Paul applies his proof to both Jew and Gentile alike. So how is it you say that the Circumcision justification includes works while the Uncircumcision justification does not?
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 09:22:50 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 08:41:33 PMLikewise, the Circumcision is different from the Uncircumcision. We of the Uncircumcision are never told by our apostle, Paul, that we must do those things which Christ told His disciples to do. Dig?
No I don't dig Tony.
- Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
<br>- Romans 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
Paul just got done proving that man is justified by faith apart from works of the law. Then Paul applies his proof to both Jew and Gentile alike. So how is it you say that the Circumcision justification includes works while the Uncircumcision justification does not?
Read James. A man is not justified if he does not do the law.
Jam 2:24 You see that by works a man is being justified, and not by faith only."
Jam 2:8-14 Howbeit,
if you are discharging the royal law, according to the scripture, "You shall be loving your associate as yourself,you are doing ideally." (9) Yet if you are showing partiality, you are working sin, being exposed by the law as transgressors." (10) For anyone who should be keeping the whole law, yet should be tripping in one thing, has become liable for all." (11) For He Who is saying, You should not be committing adultery, said, You should not be murdering, also. Now if you are not committing adultery, yet are murdering, you have become a transgressor of law." (12) Thus be speaking and thus be doing, as those about to be judged by a law of freedom. " (13) For the judging is merciless to him who does not exercise mercy. Vaunting is mercy against judging. (14) What is the benefit, my brethren,
if anyone should be saying he has faith, yet may have no works? That faith can not save him."
James is diametrically different from Pau's evangel.
Paul would never teach to the nations what James taught to the twelve tribes of Israel (James 1:1).
I feel like this conversation is an argument over which came first, the chicken or the egg. :dontknow:
What if the examples given in Scripture were not intended for us to conform to, but instead, just recognize and acknowledge their root as they manifest in us also.
A righeous person will do thus and thus . . ..the church then jumps on the "thus and thus" and try to impose on the sheep of how you should fit that mold . . .when instead . .all that Scripture was saying was . . .when Chirst is in you . . . these are some of the changes he'll make in you . . .
But if you don't see these things in people, it doesn't mean that they aren't saved . . .it just may mean they're very young in their salvation and the spiritual metamorphis has not yet taken a visual affect. Kind of like planting a seed . . .just because you don't see it sprouting up yet, doesn't mean that the seed has died and life is present.
Quote from: Nathan on March 04, 2009, 09:29:31 PM
I feel like this conversation is an argument over which came first, the chicken or the egg. :dontknow:
What if the examples given in Scripture were not intended for us to conform to, but instead, just recognize and acknowledge their root as they manifest in us also.
A righeous person will do thus and thus . . ..the church then jumps on the "thus and thus" and try to impose on the sheep of how you should fit that mold . . .when instead . .all that Scripture was saying was . . .when Chirst is in you . . . these are some of the changes he'll make in you . . .
But if you don't see these things in people, it doesn't mean that they aren't saved . . .it just may mean they're very young in their salvation and the spiritual metamorphis has not yet taken a visual affect. Kind of like planting a seed . . .just because you don't see it sprouting up yet, doesn't mean that the seed has died and life is present.
:icon_flower:
iwas kinda talking this stuff earlier elsewhere :thumbsup:
Quote from: Nathan on March 04, 2009, 09:29:31 PM
I feel like this conversation is an argument over which came first, the chicken or the egg. :dontknow:
What if the examples given in Scripture were not intended for us to conform to, but instead, just recognize and acknowledge their root as they manifest in us also.
A righeous person will do thus and thus . . ..the church then jumps on the "thus and thus" and try to impose on the sheep of how you should fit that mold . . .when instead . .all that Scripture was saying was . . .when Chirst is in you . . . these are some of the changes he'll make in you . . .
But if you don't see these things in people, it doesn't mean that they aren't saved . . .it just may mean they're very young in their salvation and the spiritual metamorphis has not yet taken a visual affect. Kind of like planting a seed . . .just because you don't see it sprouting up yet, doesn't mean that the seed has died and life is present.
We have to live by every word of God.
Luk 4:4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.
Paul says that Faith is the access to Grace. There is no way that we can access Grace with dead Faith. It is impossible. Some here are objecting to that. The goal here is to show that we are saved BY Jesus not because of Him. If Jesus is in us then we will do the works that He did. Those that overcome get to partake of the Tree of Life:
Rev 2:7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that
overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
If we can't overcome our own flesh (and we can't) then someone must do it for us. That someone is Christ Jesus. What those verses in Rev Chapters 2 and 3 show is that the Lord is checking works to see who has the Christ and then providing the reward of Life for those works.
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 09:27:06 PMJames is diametrically different from Pau's evangel.
You didn't explain why Paul applied his diametrically different gospel to the circumcision.
QuotePaul would never teach to the nations what James taught to the twelve tribes of Israel (James 1:1).
- Galatians 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, 20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Quote from: Nathan on March 04, 2009, 09:29:31 PMI feel like this conversation is an argument over which came first, the chicken or the egg. :dontknow: What if the examples given in Scripture were not intended for us to conform to, but instead, just recognize and acknowledge their root as they manifest in us also.
If they are not meant to be conformed to, then why did Jesus command people to conform to them?
- Luke 3:7 Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 10:16:52 PMIf they are not meant to be conformed to, then why did Jesus command people to conform to them?
- Luke 3:7 Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
There seems to be this belief that once your in the vine that you can't be cast off. That would be taking the universalist position way to far.
Paul
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 10:02:32 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 09:27:06 PMJames is diametrically different from Pau's evangel.
You didn't explain why Paul applied his diametrically different gospel to the circumcision.
That's because Paul didn't apply his diametrically different gospel to the circumcision.
QuotePaul would never teach to the nations what James taught to the twelve tribes of Israel (James 1:1).
Quote- Galatians 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, 20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Cute.
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 10:40:29 PMThat's because Paul didn't apply his diametrically different gospel to the circumcision.
Because he didn't have one.
Paul taught that man (both Jew and Gentile) are justified by faith apart from the works of the law.
Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Romans 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 10:45:03 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 10:40:29 PMThat's because Paul didn't apply his diametrically different gospel to the circumcision.
Because he didn't have one.
Paul taught that man (both Jew and Gentile) are justified by faith apart from the works of the law.
Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Romans 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
That's what I'm saying. Paul taught that and James taught that a man is not justified by faith only.
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 10:38:31 PM
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 10:16:52 PMIf they are not meant to be conformed to, then why did Jesus command people to conform to them?
- Luke 3:7 Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
There seems to be this belief that once your in the vine that you can't be cast off. That would be taking the universalist position way to far.
Paul
Question . . .what did you do to become a sinner?
Answer . . .nothing . .you were born into it through the first Adam
Question . . .what must you do to become saved?
Answer . . .nothing . . .you were born into it through the second Adam
You can claim works and outward fruit until you're blue in the face, but that's not a message of freedom you preach . . .Christ freed us from the laws . .including yours . . .you're trying to say grace isn't strong enough, the cross wasn't powerful enough for me to live righteously . . .i must also "do" whatever your standards of being a Christian are . . .and I'm not in agreement with that . . .I believe grace is just that powerful . .my works do not give me my status in the kingdom . . .what does is, my awareness of what has been declared over me . . .all that's required is to exercise the authority that is already provided.
You want to judge salvation by one's actions . . .yet we're instructed to "work out your own salvation" and I choose to do just that . . .
I also disagree that you can lose the gift that you never earned in the first place. God's gifts are unrepentant . . .he doesn't take them back . . .salvation is not a reward . .it's a gift and it doesn't get returned just because my flesh acts up after the gift has been received. There is more freedom here than the natural reasoning mind can comprehend . . . grace is just that great.
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 10:47:27 PMBecause he didn't have one.
Paul taught that man (both Jew and Gentile) are justified by faith apart from the works of the law.
Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Romans 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
That's what I'm saying. Paul taught that and James taught that a man is not justified by faith only.
So was James teaching a false gospel? If not then why were Paul and James teaching the Circumcison two different true gospels? And Earlier you said "Likewise, the Circumcision is different from the Uncircumcision." but now you agreed that both are justified by faith apart from the works of the law. So how is it different?
Quote from: Nathan on March 04, 2009, 11:10:23 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 10:38:31 PM
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 10:16:52 PMIf they are not meant to be conformed to, then why did Jesus command people to conform to them?
- Luke 3:7 Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
There seems to be this belief that once your in the vine that you can't be cast off. That would be taking the universalist position way to far.
Paul
Question . . .what did you do to become a sinner?
Answer . . .nothing . .you were born into it through the first Adam
Question . . .what must you do to become saved?
Answer . . .nothing . . .you were born into it through the second Adam
You can claim works and outward fruit until you're blue in the face, but that's not a message of freedom you preach . . .Christ freed us from the laws . .including yours . . .you're trying to say grace isn't strong enough, the cross wasn't powerful enough for me to live righteously . . .i must also "do" whatever your standards of being a Christian are . . .and I'm not in agreement with that . . .I believe grace is just that powerful . .my works do not give me my status in the kingdom . . .what does is, my awareness of what has been declared over me . . .all that's required is to exercise the authority that is already provided.
You want to judge salvation by one's actions . . .yet we're instructed to "work out your own salvation" and I choose to do just that . . .
I also disagree that you can lose the gift that you never earned in the first place. God's gifts are unrepentant . . .he doesn't take them back . . .salvation is not a reward . .it's a gift and it doesn't get returned just because my flesh acts up after the gift has been received. There is more freedom here than the natural reasoning mind can comprehend . . . grace is just that great.
:icon_flower:
Quote from: Nathan on March 04, 2009, 11:10:23 PMQuestion . . .what must you do to become saved?
Answer . . .nothing . . .you were born into it through the second Adam
Nathan, Why was that not the answer Jesus gave when people asked them the same question "What must I do to inherit aionion life?" Did Jesus say anything close to "nothing" ? Jesus did teach we are saved by grace, but He did not say "nothing".
Quote from: Taffy on March 04, 2009, 11:27:09 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 04, 2009, 11:10:23 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 10:38:31 PM
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 10:16:52 PMIf they are not meant to be conformed to, then why did Jesus command people to conform to them?
- Luke 3:7 Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
There seems to be this belief that once your in the vine that you can't be cast off. That would be taking the universalist position way to far.
Paul
Question . . .what did you do to become a sinner?
Answer . . .nothing . .you were born into it through the first Adam
Question . . .what must you do to become saved?
Answer . . .nothing . . .you were born into it through the second Adam
You can claim works and outward fruit until you're blue in the face, but that's not a message of freedom you preach . . .Christ freed us from the laws . .including yours . . .you're trying to say grace isn't strong enough, the cross wasn't powerful enough for me to live righteously . . .i must also "do" whatever your standards of being a Christian are . . .and I'm not in agreement with that . . .I believe grace is just that powerful . .my works do not give me my status in the kingdom . . .what does is, my awareness of what has been declared over me . . .all that's required is to exercise the authority that is already provided.
You want to judge salvation by one's actions . . .yet we're instructed to "work out your own salvation" and I choose to do just that . . .
I also disagree that you can lose the gift that you never earned in the first place. God's gifts are unrepentant . . .he doesn't take them back . . .salvation is not a reward . .it's a gift and it doesn't get returned just because my flesh acts up after the gift has been received. There is more freedom here than the natural reasoning mind can comprehend . . . grace is just that great.
:icon_flower:
So what must you do to stay in salvation? Obviously, the Bible talks of those enduring to the end for a purpose.
Paul
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 11:18:11 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 10:47:27 PMBecause he didn't have one.
Paul taught that man (both Jew and Gentile) are justified by faith apart from the works of the law.
Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Romans 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
That's what I'm saying. Paul taught that and James taught that a man is not justified by faith only.
So was James teaching a false gospel? If not then why were Paul and James teaching the Circumcison two different true gospels? And Earlier you said "Likewise, the Circumcision is different from the Uncircumcision." but now you agreed that both are justified by faith apart from the works of the law. So how is it different?
I agreed that Paul taught that Jews and Greeks are justified by faith apart from works to those Jews and Greeks who come under his administration.
No, James was teaching the twelve tribes of Israel. That is who James is addressed to in James 1:1. We of the nations are not the twelve tribes of Israel.
Paul would not teach the twelve tribes what he taught us of the nations and James would not teach to us what he taught to the twelve tribes.
I see salvation is for all, but the process is one of two ways:
1. with reward (narrow path), clothed with HIS righteousness
2. wide road (through wrath/destructive fire), in shame, naked.
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 11:40:02 PMI agreed that Paul taught that Jews and Greeks are justified by faith apart from works to those Jews and Greeks who come under his administration.
No, James was teaching the twelve tribes of Israel. That is who James is addressed to in James 1:1. We of the nations are not the twelve tribes of Israel.
Paul would not teach the twelve tribes what he taught us of the nations and James would not teach to us what he taught to the twelve tribes.
So what determined who was under Paul's adminiatration. Aren't "the Circumcision" of the twelve tribes of Israel?
:cloud9: That's what I see too, Zeek......and the great thing about that is, we were told if we saw someone who was lacking a cloak (Christ the outer anointing), we were to give them ours (works of Christ, ie. lay hands on). Blessings....
James 1:21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
Romans 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. 3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
These Two scriptures were used on another board to show that James and Paul did not agree with one another. Here was my reply, hope it may be helpful to others that see a contradiction between James and Paul.
Do these scriptures conflict with one another? Or are they speaking of two aspects of faith.
First it should be pointed out that Paul in Romans 4 is speaking of faith in the birth of Isaac (this is seen in verses 18-22) and James is speaking of the sacrifice of Isaac.
Two different aspects of faith.
Abraham did nothing but believe in Isaacs birth, but once Isaac/Christ is birthed in us He produces works of faith. It is these works of faith James is speaking of and this can be seen in verse 22 "Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?" /complete
If Abraham never offered up Isaac (which is works) then his faith would never have come to completion.
We can see these same works of faith also mentioned by both Jesus and Paul.
John 8:39
39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
1 Corinthians 3:11-15
11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble; 13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is.( Are they works of faith or works of the law)
14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. 15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Ephesians 2:8-10
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works,(these would be works of the law) least any man should boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them. (works of faith)
2 Thessalonians 1:11
11 Wherefore also we pray always for you, that our God would count you worthy of this calling, and fulfil all the good pleasure of his goodness, and the work of faith with power:
Hebrews 11:7
7 By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark (works) to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith.
Now think on this; if Noah had not built the boat (which was a work of faith, the same works of faith James is speaking on) then he and his house would have drowned with the rest of mankind.
Adds another layer to "faith without works is dead" don't it.
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 11:18:11 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 04, 2009, 10:47:27 PMBecause he didn't have one.
Paul taught that man (both Jew and Gentile) are justified by faith apart from the works of the law.
Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Romans 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
That's what I'm saying. Paul taught that and James taught that a man is not justified by faith only.
So was James teaching a false gospel? If not then why were Paul and James teaching the Circumcison two different true gospels? And Earlier you said "Likewise, the Circumcision is different from the Uncircumcision." but now you agreed that both are justified by faith apart from the works of the law. So how is it different?
I agreed that Paul taught that Jews and Greeks are justified by faith apart from works to those Jews and Greeks who come under his administration.
No, James was teaching the twelve tribes of Israel. That is who James is addressed to in James 1:1. We of the nations are not the twelve tribes of Israel.
Paul would not teach the twelve tribes what he taught us of the nations and James would not teach to us what he taught to the twelve tribes.
Tony, please start another thread on that subject and we can debate that also.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 12:12:29 AM
James 1:21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
Romans 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. 3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
These Two scriptures were used on another board to show that James and Paul did not agree with one another. Here was my reply, hope it may be helpful to others that see a contradiction between James and Paul.
Do these scriptures conflict with one another? Or are they speaking of two aspects of faith.
First it should be pointed out that Paul in Romans 4 is speaking of faith in the birth of Isaac (this is seen in verses 18-22) and James is speaking of the sacrifice of Isaac.
Two different aspects of faith.
Abraham did nothing but believe in Isaacs birth, but once Isaac/Christ is birthed in us He produces works of faith. It is these works of faith James is speaking of and this can be seen in verse 22 "Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?" /complete
If Abraham never offered up Isaac (which is works) then his faith would never have come to completion.
We can see these same works of faith also mentioned by both Jesus and Paul.
John 8:39
39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
1 Corinthians 3:11-15
11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble; 13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is.( Are they works of faith or works of the law)
14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. 15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Ephesians 2:8-10
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works,(these would be works of the law) least any man should boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them. (works of faith)
2 Thessalonians 1:11
11 Wherefore also we pray always for you, that our God would count you worthy of this calling, and fulfil all the good pleasure of his goodness, and the work of faith with power:
Hebrews 11:7
7 By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark (works) to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith.
Now think on this; if Noah had not built the boat (which was a work of faith, the same works of faith James is speaking on) then he and his house would have drowned with the rest of mankind.
Adds another layer to "faith without works is dead" don't it.
Basically that all comes down to verse 1 of that chapter of Romans:
Rom 4:1 What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as
pertaining to the flesh, hath found?
I so often hear those other verses quoted by not that first one. And it sets up the context of the works that the other verses are talking about. Those are the works of the flesh. Not to be confused with the works of Righteousness by Christ that he performed via Faith. We all have done works of the flesh and many as we can see many have performed works of the Christ. Those works are contrary to each other.
Paul
QuoteWe all have done works of the flesh and many as we can see many have performed works of the Christ. Those works are contrary to each other.
Hi Paul
I agree, if you thought I said anything contrary you did not understand my post.
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 11:29:44 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 04, 2009, 11:27:09 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 04, 2009, 11:10:23 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 10:38:31 PM
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 10:16:52 PMIf they are not meant to be conformed to, then why did Jesus command people to conform to them?
- Luke 3:7 Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
There seems to be this belief that once your in the vine that you can't be cast off. That would be taking the universalist position way to far.
Paul
Question . . .what did you do to become a sinner?
Answer . . .nothing . .you were born into it through the first Adam
Question . . .what must you do to become saved?
Answer . . .nothing . . .you were born into it through the second Adam
You can claim works and outward fruit until you're blue in the face, but that's not a message of freedom you preach . . .Christ freed us from the laws . .including yours . . .you're trying to say grace isn't strong enough, the cross wasn't powerful enough for me to live righteously . . .i must also "do" whatever your standards of being a Christian are . . .and I'm not in agreement with that . . .I believe grace is just that powerful . .my works do not give me my status in the kingdom . . .what does is, my awareness of what has been declared over me . . .all that's required is to exercise the authority that is already provided.
You want to judge salvation by one's actions . . .yet we're instructed to "work out your own salvation" and I choose to do just that . . .
I also disagree that you can lose the gift that you never earned in the first place. God's gifts are unrepentant . . .he doesn't take them back . . .salvation is not a reward . .it's a gift and it doesn't get returned just because my flesh acts up after the gift has been received. There is more freedom here than the natural reasoning mind can comprehend . . . grace is just that great.
:icon_flower:
So what must you do to stay in salvation? Obviously, the Bible talks of those enduring to the end for a purpose.
Paul
Recieving the END of your Faith, the salvation of your souls ,
For me its how we perceive Who or What the END is , ?
Receiving the END( Christ) of your Faith, the salvation of your souls and he ,who endures to the END( Christ) will be saved.
mean while Im his
workmanship and continue in the faith ( HIS) in what ever this life brings and where ever HE leads me
WHAT WORKS are done are His through me , GOOD works are a Labour of love , as His spirit flows in me, it flows to others ,
To HIM the Glory , ALWAYS :icon_flower:
:icon_flower:
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 12:47:51 AM
Hi Paul
I agree, if you thought I said anything contrary you did not understand my post.
Good thoughts Pneuma.
Another thing to notice about James' and Paul's statements about fath and works. Both made logical arguments or proofs from scripture. Neither of their proofs hinged on what race, religion, or administration one belongs to. Therefore, if their proofs were sound, they could not arrive at opposing conclusions for different races, religions, or administrations.
Quote from: bobf on March 05, 2009, 01:06:14 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 12:47:51 AM
Hi Paul
I agree, if you thought I said anything contrary you did not understand my post.
Good thoughts Pneuma.
Another thing to notice about James' and Paul's statements about fath and works. Both made logical arguments or proofs from scripture. Neither of their proofs hinged on what race, religion, or administration one belongs to. Therefore, if their proofs were sound, they could not arrive at opposing conclusions for different races, religions, or administrations.
Amen Bob as we are all of the household of God, therfore race has absulutly no part in the picture.
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 01:11:40 AMAmen Bob as we are all of the household of God, therfore race has absulutly no part in the picture.
Yeah. I don't know if you're following my discussion with Tony. Am I missing something? Is there a difference between "the circumcision" (Romans 3:30) and "the twelve tribes of Israel" (James 1:1) ???
this is the works...to beleive in His son....
you must beleive..to put faith in what the Son has told you
that your sins are forgiven..that He comes from the Father
and is giving life to the dead.
as far as..if you love me you will keep my commands...
if you beleive in Him you will treasure up His words
in your heart...
Now, as it pertains to His return and Him giving rewards
to those who in faith await Him.......
I beleive it goes like this.....well done..you have been faithful
in a FEW things...enter into the joy of your Master.
NOTICE IT IS A FEW THINGS
The Holy spirit given was for the manifestaton of differing
gifts to the body of Christ....some teachers, some acts of
mercy...some apostle's some prophets, some tongues.
YOU DON"T SET YOUR OWN STANDARD OF JUDGEMENT
AS TO WHAT YOUR BROTHER SHOULD BE IN CHRIST
It is Christ that gives the gifts...what? tell sister so and so
that does acts of mercy she is not saved coz she doesn't
speak in tongues, hasn't been given a ministry/flock to shepherd
the gift of healing..or all the other. You don't condemn a
servant to His Master..EVER.....
Go to Walmart...watch the people.....now tell me...who are
closer to God? Do you know? NO!!......the sinner was more
righteous in the eyes of God...because He begged for mercy
not the guy who said ..thnk you Lord, that I'm not like that
guy over there...I don't do this or that. cowpoop!!
the parable of the prodigal son also teaches us the very
same thing...over and over He teaches us these things..
but alas...some do not obey Him...they do not keep His
command to JUDGE NOT LEST YE BE JUDGED...they persist
in judging other beleivers as saved or not...they mark a line
and say, surely this guy is condemned! will they enter?
what about this eye for an eye stuff? He told us about it.
that mentality is nothing but like punishment for like offense
and what did He have to say about those who commit
adultery? He said if you kept looking at a woman lustfully
you were just as guilty as if you had committed the act.
will they too,enter the kingdom of heaven?
He wants us to heed His counsel for our own good...
not because He will kill us if we don't heed it...because we
failed in some area to keep all that He commanded..perfectly.
He also gave us these commands so we would recognize and
know what our Father's mind was on these things. You do
beleive He and the Father are One don't you?
We need to be keeping these words ourselves and not looking
around at our brothers to see if they are ,in order to condemn
them. John 21;22 Jesus set Peter straight on this matter
when he told Peter by what death He would glorify God..
and told him to 'follow me' When Peter asked about the
disciple whom Jesus loved..'what about him?' Jesus answered,
'If I want him to remain alive until I return,what is that to
you?' YOU must follow me."It's not our business
So, what if you never committ adultery and yet, judge others
have you fallen from Grace.?.will you enter?.
what if you pray to yourself...thank you Lord for making me
righteous...I'm not like these other christians out there..
I don't practice sin like they do.will YOU enter?
Weighteir matters of the Law like justice and mercy
remember your a sinner just like everyone else,you have no
righteousness of your own...all have and will fall short
and continue to fall short. You're in the same boat.
Mercy...those who judge without mercy will have there
judgement without mercy
Wise and Foolish builders
Everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into
practice is like a wise man who builds his house upon a rock.
will those who do not practice such things enter in?
The woman caught in the act of adultery...surely she is
condemned? Those of you free of sin..you be the first to judge
her.Have at it,,,the Lord gives you permission to throw that
first stone..........
Quote from: bobf on March 05, 2009, 01:17:11 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 01:11:40 AMAmen Bob as we are all of the household of God, therfore race has absulutly no part in the picture.
Yeah. I don't know if you're following my discussion with Tony. Am I missing something? Is there a difference between "the circumcision" (Romans 3:30) and "the twelve tribes of Israel" (James 1:1) ???
No difference between circumcision and non circumcision, Paul even states as much.
Tony follow Knoch teaching on this Bob, although I like some of what Knoch teaches this is one of the areas I differ from his and Tonys beleif.
I certainly don't claim to have all that figured out, but there sure seems to be significant differences between Peter's "doctine" to the early Jewish-Christian Nazarenes, and Paul's "doctrine" to the Gentiles being grafted in...I certainly find it of interest, but again, don't have the full picture of it...another piece of it, it seems the Gentiles were never given The Law :dontknow:.
Quote from: jabcat on March 05, 2009, 02:20:18 AM
I certainly don't claim to have all that figured out, but there sure seems to be significant differences between Peter's "doctine" to the early Jewish-Christian Nazarenes, and Paul's "doctrine" to the Gentiles being grafted in...I certainly find it of interest, but again, don't have the full picture of it...another piece of it, it seems the Gentiles were never given The Law :dontknow:.
Hi Jab, if you see a contradiction I beleive it to be the error of your own eyes, the scriptures don't contradict each other, but maybe your refuring to when Paul stood up against Peter because Peter fell into the error of the Jews.
No the outward law was not given to the Gentiles, but it was given just the same for they recieved it inwardly.
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 12:47:51 AM
QuoteWe all have done works of the flesh and many as we can see many have performed works of the Christ. Those works are contrary to each other.
Hi Paul
I agree, if you thought I said anything contrary you did not understand my post.
Sorry pneuma, I didn't mean to imply that you did. I often just spot things in statements and blurt out a quick thought. Don't take it as disagreement or anything.
Paul
Quote from: Taffy on March 05, 2009, 12:56:55 AMRecieving the END of your Faith, the salvation of your souls ,
For me its how we perceive Who or What the END is , ?
Receiving the END( Christ) of your Faith, the salvation of your souls and he ,who endures to the END( Christ) will be saved.
mean while Im his workmanship and continue in the faith ( HIS) in what ever this life brings and where ever HE leads me
WHAT WORKS are done are His through me , GOOD works are a Labour of love , as His spirit flows in me, it flows to others ,
To HIM the Glory , ALWAYS :icon_flower:
:icon_flower:
Yes Taffy, wonderful!
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 02:31:24 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 12:47:51 AM
QuoteWe all have done works of the flesh and many as we can see many have performed works of the Christ. Those works are contrary to each other.
Hi Paul
I agree, if you thought I said anything contrary you did not understand my post.
Sorry pneuma, I didn't mean to imply that you did. I often just spot things in statements and blurt out a quick thought. Don't take it as disagreement or anything.
Paul
No problem bro, just wanted to make it clear I was actually in agreement with what you and Bob have been saying in this thread.
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 02:29:07 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 05, 2009, 02:20:18 AM
I certainly don't claim to have all that figured out, but there sure seems to be significant differences between Peter's "doctine" to the early Jewish-Christian Nazarenes, and Paul's "doctrine" to the Gentiles being grafted in...I certainly find it of interest, but again, don't have the full picture of it...another piece of it, it seems the Gentiles were never given The Law :dontknow:.
Hi Jab, if you see a contradiction I beleive it to be the error of your own eyes, the scriptures don't contradict each other, but maybe your refuring to when Paul stood up against Peter because Peter fell into the error of the Jews.
No the outward law was not given to the Gentiles, but it was given just the same for they recieved it inwardly.
Is this necessary?
I will accept that you have an opinion or understanding, but perhaps present it in that manner. I never said the scriptures contradict each other. Contradict is your word. I believe scripture reconciles when taken in context and rightly divided.
Quote from: jabcat on March 05, 2009, 02:52:35 AM
I will accept that you have an opinion or understanding, but perhaps present it in that manner. I never said the scriptures contradict each other. Contradict is your word. I believe scripture reconciles when taken in context and rightly divided.
Just a missunderstanding then bro, so to clearify you beleive Peter at one time preached a different gospel the Paul? would this be before he sheets of clean and unclean he saw or after?
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 01:43:22 AM
Quote from: bobf on March 05, 2009, 01:17:11 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 01:11:40 AMAmen Bob as we are all of the household of God, therfore race has absulutly no part in the picture.
Yeah. I don't know if you're following my discussion with Tony. Am I missing something? Is there a difference between "the circumcision" (Romans 3:30) and "the twelve tribes of Israel" (James 1:1) ???
No difference between circumcision and non circumcision, Paul even states as much.
Tony follow Knoch teaching on this Bob, although I like some of what Knoch teaches this is one of the areas I differ from his and Tonys beleif.
In CHRIST circumcision or uncircumcision is availing anything:
Gal 5:6 "For
in Christ Jesus neither circumcision is availing anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith, operating through love."
the above verse is saying quite a lot different than what you imply.
Gal 6:15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is anything, but a new creation."
In Christ there is no Circumcision or Uncircumcision:
Col 3:11 wherein there is no Greek and Jew, Circumcision and Uncircumcision, barbarian, Scythian, slave, freeman, but all and in all is Christ."
Yet Paul shows the Circumcision still exists in the real world:
Eph 2:11 Wherefore, remember that once you, the nations in flesh - who are termed 'Uncircumcision' by those termed 'Circumcision,' in flesh, made by hands -"
Col 4:11 and Jesus, termed Justus,
who are of the Circumcision. These are the only fellow workers for the kingdom of God who became a solace to me."
Tit 1:10 For many are insubordinate, vain praters and imposters, especially those of the Circumcision,
Gal 2:7-9 But, on the contrary, preceiving that
I have been entrusted with the evangel of the Uncircumcision, (8) according as
Peter of the Circumcision (for He Who operates in Peter for the apostleship of the
Circumcision operates in me also for the nations), (9) and, knowing the grace which is being given to me, James and Cephas and John, who are supposed to be pillars, give to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that we, indeed, are to be for the nations, yet they for the
Circumcision-"
pneuma, you have been weighed in the balance and have been found wanting.
Actually Tony these were the scriptures Bob asked me about
Romans 3:29-30
29 Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also: 30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
James 1:1-5
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
2 My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; 3 Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience. 4 But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing. 5 If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.
Now you might believe that those of the circumcision (the 12 tribes) spoken of in James are different than the people Paul was referring to but I don't. James is talking about those in Christ and so is Paul and there is no difference between those in circumcision and those who are not.
Don't forget Paul also went to the circumcision first before he went to the gentile.
And if James or Peter or anyone else preached a different Gospel then Paul said they were accursed.
Galatians 1:8-9
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
So you can believe they preached a different Gospel but then you are believing Paul to be in error here.
There is only ONE Gospel Tony not TWO.
And you last statement to me shows were you are spiritually.
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 03:10:42 AM
In CHRIST circumcision or uncircumcision is availing anything:
Gal 5:6 "For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision is availing anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith, operating through love."
Yet Paul shows the Circumcision still exists in the real world:
Eph 2:11 Wherefore, remember that once you, the nations in flesh - who are termed 'Uncircumcision' by those termed 'Circumcision,' in flesh, made by hands -"
Col 4:11 and Jesus, termed Justus, who are of the Circumcision. These are the only fellow workers for the kingdom of God who became a solace to me."
Gal 2:7-9 But, on the contrary, preceiving that I have been entrusted with the evangel of the Uncircumcision, (8) according as Peter of the Circumcision (for He Who operates in Peter for the apostleship of the Circumcision operates in me also for the nations), (9) and, knowing the grace which is being given to me, James and Cephas and John, who are supposed to be pillars, give to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that we, indeed, are to be for the nations, yet they for the Circumcision-"
Thanks Tony, that's what I was getting at. The salvation was the same for both groups;
through Jesus. But as you say, "in real life", there was a group as I mentioned in my previous post, the Jewish-Christian Nazarenes, who had been brought up through temple worship, circumcision, the Law. Although now saved through grace by the death and resurrection of Jesus the Messiah, in reality having spiritually passed into the New Covenant, still, they had walked in the ways of the Old Covenant, and actually continued to hold to many of the customs of the OC and the Law...yes, the Law..and I'm bettin' they weren't able to undo the circumcision of their flesh :mshock:. The history of the Nazarenes shows that although they were known as the people of the Way, they still held to many of their Jewish customs...including continuing to worship in the temple! As you say, and as I was suggesting,
primarily, Peter's ministry was to them, including his addressing some different realities that existed for them that did not exist for the gentiles, to whom Paul
primarily ministered. No difference in What saved them, Who the source of their salvation was...so not a different gospel, yet a different people with different backgrounds, and truly different histories with God Himself, as it were.
The Nazarenes eventually scattered, the temple was destroyed, and one would think Christendom would have become a more united body..well, enter the RCC, then the Eastern Orthodox split, then the Reformation, then the Baptists, Methodists, AG, etc....Jesus
is the gospel, but still, thousands of different viewpoints.
So as I understand it, same salvation, different peoples with different issues...and different
primary ministers of the gospel to each. And today, works are a response to love and guidance, not as a means to salvation..."neither circumcision or uncircumcision"... :thumbsup:
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 07:50:02 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 04, 2009, 07:23:05 PMthanks. i didnt see that and i agree 100% LOVE fullfills the law.
God bless
chuckt
Well at least we agree on that, Chuckt.
Paul
Good morning paul.
thats why i posted 1 cor 13 and the peter verses about adding to faith till we get to LOVE.
many ""christians"" look real good on the outside, nice and churchy, they have great self control, they dont steal, smoke, drink, fornicate,murder, they give money to the man, they donate time for bake sales and church events, always doing doing doing, yet are DEAD on the inside, full of hate, and torment and fear.
sorry if i was harsh with you yesterday.
God bless
chuckt
Quote from: chuckt on March 05, 2009, 02:00:54 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 07:50:02 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 04, 2009, 07:23:05 PMthanks. i didnt see that and i agree 100% LOVE fullfills the law.
God bless
chuckt
Well at least we agree on that, Chuckt.
Paul
Good morning paul.
thats why i posted 1 cor 13 and the peter verses about adding to faith till we get to LOVE.
many ""christians"" look real good on the outside, nice and churchy, they have great self control, they dont steal, smoke, drink, fornicate,murder, they give money to the man, they donate time for bake sales and church events, always doing doing doing, yet are DEAD on the inside, full of hate, and torment and fear.
sorry if i was harsh with you yesterday.
God bless
chuckt
:icon_flower:
you dude ...we dont see from one month til the next, then ya come over causing trouble , what is it, that little beautiful grand daughter keeping you up at nite bro? ...getting kinda tetchy, wait till the other comes, then look out bud. :laughing7:
:Sparkletooth: :Sparkletooth: :Sparkletooth: :Sparkletooth: :Sparkletooth:
(http://s277.photobucket.com/albums/kk76/chuckart/th_n1393815327_30281118_7844638.jpg)
(http://s277.photobucket.com/albums/kk76/chuckart/th_n1393815327_30273475_7745.jpg)
im here always reading and waiting in the shadows to pounce :laughing7:
Quote from: chuckt on March 05, 2009, 02:57:17 PM
(http://s277.photobucket.com/albums/kk76/chuckart/th_n1393815327_30281118_7844638.jpg)
(http://s277.photobucket.com/albums/kk76/chuckart/th_n1393815327_30273475_7745.jpg)
im here always reading and waiting in the shadows to pounce :laughing7:
Gosh bud , How shes grown, she has( sorry bro cant remember the little sweeties name) your eating habits I see...a chip off the old block as they say, she beating those drums too :HeartThrob:
Quote from: Taffy on March 05, 2009, 03:05:38 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 05, 2009, 02:57:17 PM
(http://s277.photobucket.com/albums/kk76/chuckart/th_n1393815327_30281118_7844638.jpg)
(http://s277.photobucket.com/albums/kk76/chuckart/th_n1393815327_30273475_7745.jpg)
im here always reading and waiting in the shadows to pounce :laughing7:
Gosh bud , How shes grown, she has( sorry bro cant remember the little sweeties name) your eating habits I see...a chip off the old block as they say, she beating those drums too :HeartThrob:
Good day Taffy Bro! and blessing to you.
her name is Hannah Elise.
yup she eats like her pawpaw.....
well they live about 4 hrs south and i need to start going down more and visiting, i tend to take things for granted, i dont wanna let time slip bye.
i got her a bugs bunny doll like the one her mom had as a child and YES i will hopefully get her beating the drums soon.
she likes the little piano.
she's a
blast......oh:
noun: a highly pleasurable or exciting experience
hope all is well bro, as best that can be expected.
love
chuckt aka euty :bgdance:
Seems there are 3 types of works....all mentiond in this thread, but 2 getting most of the focus.
There are works of the Hebrew's Old Covenant Law---by it the righteousness of God and the weakness of our flesh is revealed to us...it is a revelation needed so that we can receive the gospel.
Then there are "good works". These are things we do naturally as our love for others grow. Many in the church system are falsely led to think that performing "good works" scores them reward points with God....they don't realize how that mindset hinders their faith from growing. They have "zeal without knowledge"...thinking that "good works" makes one more right with God is performance-based religion...to think that doing "good Works" or keeping the Jew's Law is a requirement is to "fall from grace".
As God transforms us into the image of His Son, we will manifest those works.
Then there are the works that James spoke of...."justifying works". As the plan God set in place at the beginning of time moves forward through the ages, He has had people doing these works during the times in which they lived. In chapter 11 of Hebrews there is a list of people who we can see their faith by their works: Noah, Abraham, Rahab, etc.
They all had a knowledge of what God was going to bring to pass during their time....and they worked in harmony with God.
Same thing with Paul, James, and the disciples who lived during their time....they worked "together with God" during that transition period.
They knew the destruction soon to take place in Jerusalem and the the suffering many would suffer for following Christ.....but they had acquired a strong faith because of their knowledge of God and His plan that spans from the beginning to future time past the time that they lived. They knew they were called to "labour together with God", just as those in Hebrews 11, to do what God had purposed during their time. Those are justifying works....we can see their faith by their works.
Now we need to think about what God is doing during our time....I am seeing inklings....anyone else?
Quote from: jabcat on March 05, 2009, 07:13:51 AM
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 03:10:42 AM
In CHRIST circumcision or uncircumcision is availing anything:
Gal 5:6 "For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision is availing anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith, operating through love."
Yet Paul shows the Circumcision still exists in the real world:
Eph 2:11 Wherefore, remember that once you, the nations in flesh - who are termed 'Uncircumcision' by those termed 'Circumcision,' in flesh, made by hands -"
Col 4:11 and Jesus, termed Justus, who are of the Circumcision. These are the only fellow workers for the kingdom of God who became a solace to me."
Gal 2:7-9 But, on the contrary, preceiving that I have been entrusted with the evangel of the Uncircumcision, (8) according as Peter of the Circumcision (for He Who operates in Peter for the apostleship of the Circumcision operates in me also for the nations), (9) and, knowing the grace which is being given to me, James and Cephas and John, who are supposed to be pillars, give to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that we, indeed, are to be for the nations, yet they for the Circumcision-"
Thanks Tony, that's what I was getting at. The salvation was the same for both groups; through Jesus. But as you say, "in real life", there was a group as I mentioned in my previous post, the Jewish-Christian Nazarenes, who had been brought up through temple worship, circumcision, the Law. Although now saved through grace by the death and resurrection of Jesus the Messiah, in reality having spiritually passed into the New Covenant, still, they had walked in the ways of the Old Covenant, and actually continued to hold to many of the customs of the OC and the Law...yes, the Law..and I'm bettin' they weren't able to undo the circumcision of their flesh :mshock:. The history of the Nazarenes shows that although they were known as the people of the Way, they still held to many of their Jewish customs...including continuing to worship in the temple! As you say, and as I was suggesting, primarily, Peter's ministry was to them, including his addressing some different realities that existed for them that did not exist for the gentiles, to whom Paul primarily ministered. No difference in What saved them, Who the source of their salvation was...so not a different gospel, yet a different people with different backgrounds, and truly different histories with God Himself, as it were.
The Nazarenes eventually scattered, the temple was destroyed, and one would think Christendom would have become a more united body..well, enter the RCC, then the Eastern Orthodox split, then the Reformation, then the Baptists, Methodists, AG, etc....Jesus is the gospel, but still, thousands of different viewpoints.
So as I understand it, same salvation, different peoples with different issues...and different primary ministers of the gospel to each. And today, works are a response to love and guidance, not as a means to salvation..."neither circumcision or uncircumcision"... :thumbsup:
Jabcat, good post.
What some people here fail to realize is that the Jewish Christians were the ones giving Paul a hard time.
As late as Acts 21 tens of thousands of those Jewish Christians were zealous for the law:
"Now those who hear glorified God. Besides, they said to him, "You are beholding, brother, how
many tens of thousands there are among the Jews who have believed, and all are inherently zealous for the law?" (Act 21:20).
If Peter, James or John came to the Galatians with an evangel different from what Paul brought to them they were to be anathema. They had the evangel of the Circumcision. Paul had the evangel of the Uncircumcision. They and those of those Christian Jews were no longer allowed to bring their evangel of law and grace to the Galatians.
They did not have the same evangel. Cut Paul's writings out of the Bible and you only have the future allotment of all believers on the earth. And they are all under the 12. They must endure to the end or they can't be saved (by saved I mean saved for the kingdom to be set up on the earth).
Under Paul's evangel, IN CHRIST there is no Jew nor Greek, Circumcision or Uncircumcision, male nor female, slave or free.
In the Lord there is Jew and Greek, male and female, slave and free male and female.
Under Paul's evangel there is a celestial allotment for the believers far above the earth.
Under Peter's evangel, there still are Jews and Greeks, Circumcision and Uncircumcision to contend with; the Gentiles are under the thumb of the Jewish believers.
Under Peter's evangel the allotment is all on the earth.
Oh heck, a picture is worth a thousand words: http://www.weltmanager.de/worldmanager/TheTwoEvangels.html (http://www.weltmanager.de/worldmanager/TheTwoEvangels.html)
QuoteSo as I understand it, same salvation, different peoples with different issues...and different primary ministers of the gospel to each. And today, works are a response to love and guidance, not as a means to salvation..."neither circumcision or uncircumcision"...
Hi Jab I don't really have a problem with what you said here, but it is not a different doctrine which you said in an earlier post which is were the confussion on my end came in, as if to say the doctrine to the Jews is different then the doctrine given to the gentile.
If it was a different doctrine to the Jews back then it is still a different doctrine to the Jews today which is what Tony beleives.
If Peter was teaching a different doctrine to the Jews then Paul was teaching to the Gentiles Paul would not have withstood Peter to his face for dissimulation, to which Peter repented of doing. Peter and the boys were all of the 12 tribes right? so did they recieve a different Gospel or doctrines from God then Paul who is also of the 12 tribes?
By the way I am of the 12 tribes of Israel and I recieve Pauls teachings of grace, faith and works so if it is a differnet doctrine that is given to the 12 tribes how is it that I recieve that which Paul taught.
For me the proof is in the pudding, therefore this different doctrine spoken of by Knoch and Tony is in error or I would not have recieved the ministration of grace.
Quote from: LaurieJo on March 05, 2009, 03:24:30 PM
Seems there are 3 types of works....all mentiond in this thread, but 2 getting most of the focus.
There are works of the Hebrew's Old Covenant Law---by it the righteousness of God and the weakness of our flesh is revealed to us...it is a revelation needed so that we can receive the gospel.
Then there are "good works". These are things we do naturally as our love for others grow. Many in the church system are falsely led to think that performing "good works" scores them reward points with God....they don't realize how that mindset hinders their faith from growing. They have "zeal without knowledge"...thinking that "good works" makes one more right with God is performance-based religion...to think that doing "good Works" or keeping the Jew's Law is a requirement is to "fall from grace".
As God transforms us into the image of His Son, we will manifest those works.
Then there are the works that James spoke of...."justifying works". As the plan God set in place at the beginning of time moves forward through the ages, He has had people doing these works during the times in which they lived. In chapter 11 of Hebrews there is a list of people who we can see their faith by their works: Noah, Abraham, Rahab, etc.
They all had a knowledge of what God was going to bring to pass during their time....and they worked in harmony with God.
Same thing with Paul, James, and the disciples who lived during their time....they worked "together with God" during that transition period.
They knew the destruction soon to take place in Jerusalem and the the suffering many would suffer for following Christ.....but they had acquired a strong faith because of their knowledge of God and His plan that spans from the beginning to future time past the time that they lived. They knew they were called to "labour together with God", just as those in Hebrews 11, to do what God had purposed during their time. Those are justifying works....we can see their faith by their works.
Now we need to think about what God is doing during our time....I am seeing inklings....anyone else?
Its a Matter of Judgment :icon_flower:
Hbr 6:10 For God [is] not unrighteous to
forget your work and
labour of love, which ye
have shewed toward his name, in that ye have ministered to the saints, and do minister The Work of faith both in us and co-operately, is a Labour of Love , the labour which is shown(
act of ministering) to HIS NAME, without such works ,then FAITH is DEAD, Therefore Justification is the Act of DOING
1Th 1:3 Remembering without ceasing your
work of faith, and
labour of love, and
patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, in the sight of God and our Father;
Those in James who paid more Honour to the Rich(those who took them to the
Judgment seats and Blasphemed the name by which they were CALLED- mm)than one who was In need Of BREAD and White Garment,SEEMS TO ME THEIR FAITH were Without works,as did they didnt administer Christ to the NEEDY , either in physical deed or spiritual?
Jam 2:1 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of glory,
with respect of persons. James says I will show Faith BY my works( maybe an act of adMininstering Christ) , I see alittle more going on in James than just the
physical application
even those who adverse to Christ believe their to be one God, just wonder again if this relates to those of the Circumcision, those messengers of lies and death? :icon_king:
Jam 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
Jam 2:20 But wilt thou know,
O vain man, that faith without
works is dead? Their failure you enact
True Judgment oppossed to that of the respect of others( as is the case in James)
Jam 2:13 For he shall have
judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and
mercy rejoiceth against judgment The mercy and compassion given to them by Our Lord , then in so failing to do so unto others
Zec 7:9 Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying,
Execute true judgment, and shew mercy and compassions every man to his brother:
:icon_flower:
I'm not so sure I'm ready to jump on this "same doctrine" band wagon just yet either. In reading through Acts, you'll see there was a great concern about what Paul was preaching because to the Jews it was a very different doctrine than they believed in. It got so sensitive that Paul had to drop what he was doing, go to Jerusalem and explain to them exactly what he was preaching. And the argument there was, the Jews felt the Gentiles should physically be circumcised and Paul preached that they didn't need to, but the physical circumcision was a practice that only physical Jews followed. But the circumcision that takes place in us is one of a spiritual nature not of a physical.
So in that sense, the gospel was very much different . .the Jews are all about following laws physically, but the message to the Gentiles was that Christ did to you spiritually what the Jews chose to do physcially . . .when Paul finished giving his defense on his message to them, they discussed it amongst themselves and their verdict was . . .
Acts 15 (Message Translation)
19-21"So here is my decision: We're not going to unnecessarily burden non-Jewish people who turn to the Master. We'll write them a letter and tell them, 'Be careful to not get involved in activities connected with idols, to guard the morality of sex and marriage, to not serve food offensive to Jewish Christians—blood, for instance.' This is basic wisdom from Moses, preached and honored for centuries now in city after city as we have met and kept the Sabbath."
Very good Nathan.
The believing Jews under Peter, tens of thousands to be exact, were zealous to do the law of Moses. They were the main persecutors of Paul, I believe.
Both groups are saved due to what Christ did in His death, burial and resurrection.
Quote from: chuckt on March 05, 2009, 02:00:54 PMGood morning paul.
thats why i posted 1 cor 13 and the peter verses about adding to faith till we get to LOVE.
many ""christians"" look real good on the outside, nice and churchy, they have great self control, they dont steal, smoke, drink, fornicate,murder, they give money to the man, they donate time for bake sales and church events, always doing doing doing, yet are DEAD on the inside, full of hate, and torment and fear.
sorry if i was harsh with you yesterday.
God bless
chuckt
I agree with that Chuckt. I noticed you put Christians in quotes. The real test of our faith is in adversity. How much do we love others when they hate and persecute us. That is the real test of our Faith in Christ. Jesus continued to love those that hated Him. If we have Christ - we shall also.
Paul
Quote from: LaurieJo on March 05, 2009, 03:24:30 PM
Seems there are 3 types of works....all mentiond in this thread, but 2 getting most of the focus.
There are works of the Hebrew's Old Covenant Law---by it the righteousness of God and the weakness of our flesh is revealed to us...it is a revelation needed so that we can receive the gospel.
Then there are "good works". These are things we do naturally as our love for others grow. Many in the church system are falsely led to think that performing "good works" scores them reward points with God....they don't realize how that mindset hinders their faith from growing. They have "zeal without knowledge"...thinking that "good works" makes one more right with God is performance-based religion...to think that doing "good Works" or keeping the Jew's Law is a requirement is to "fall from grace".
As God transforms us into the image of His Son, we will manifest those works.
Then there are the works that James spoke of...."justifying works". As the plan God set in place at the beginning of time moves forward through the ages, He has had people doing these works during the times in which they lived. In chapter 11 of Hebrews there is a list of people who we can see their faith by their works: Noah, Abraham, Rahab, etc.
They all had a knowledge of what God was going to bring to pass during their time....and they worked in harmony with God.
Same thing with Paul, James, and the disciples who lived during their time....they worked "together with God" during that transition period.
They knew the destruction soon to take place in Jerusalem and the the suffering many would suffer for following Christ.....but they had acquired a strong faith because of their knowledge of God and His plan that spans from the beginning to future time past the time that they lived. They knew they were called to "labour together with God", just as those in Hebrews 11, to do what God had purposed during their time. Those are justifying works....we can see their faith by their works.
Now we need to think about what God is doing during our time....I am seeing inklings....anyone else?
I only see two works in the scriptures. Those of the flesh (evil) and those of the Christ (good). Following the letter is actually evil. The motivation for following the letter is still the flesh and driven by fear. The works of Christ are after forgiveness of past debt and are motivated by love.
Paul
:cloud9: That was an interesting site page, Tony. Never heard of that theory before. Blessings....
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 05:05:48 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 05, 2009, 02:00:54 PMGood morning paul.
thats why i posted 1 cor 13 and the peter verses about adding to faith till we get to LOVE.
many ""christians"" look real good on the outside, nice and churchy, they have great self control, they dont steal, smoke, drink, fornicate,murder, they give money to the man, they donate time for bake sales and church events, always doing doing doing, yet are DEAD on the inside, full of hate, and torment and fear.
sorry if i was harsh with you yesterday.
God bless
chuckt
I agree with that Chuckt. I noticed you put Christians in quotes. The real test of our faith is in adversity. How much do we love others when they hate and persecute us. That is the real test of our Faith in Christ. Jesus continued to love those that hated Him. If we have Christ - we shall also.
Paul
you speak truth here, many believers have a form of godliness never really having their faith tested. and they are mean as snakes to those not in their club.
i like this verse:
1cor11:19 For it must be that there are sects also among you, that those also who are qualified may be becoming apparent among you.
KJV:
1Cr 11:19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.
when we are railed against and reproached, and cursed, we bless and are approved.
grace and peace.
chuckt
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 04:30:15 PM
I'm not so sure I'm ready to jump on this "same doctrine" band wagon just yet either. In reading through Acts, you'll see there was a great concern about what Paul was preaching because to the Jews it was a very different doctrine than they believed in. It got so sensitive that Paul had to drop what he was doing, go to Jerusalem and explain to them exactly what he was preaching. And the argument there was, the Jews felt the Gentiles should physically be circumcised and Paul preached that they didn't need to, but the physical circumcision was a practice that only physical Jews followed. But the circumcision that takes place in us is one of a spiritual nature not of a physical.
So in that sense, the gospel was very much different . .the Jews are all about following laws physically, but the message to the Gentiles was that Christ did to you spiritually what the Jews chose to do physcially . . .when Paul finished giving his defense on his message to them, they discussed it amongst themselves and their verdict was . . .
Acts 15 (Message Translation)
19-21"So here is my decision: We're not going to unnecessarily burden non-Jewish people who turn to the Master. We'll write them a letter and tell them, 'Be careful to not get involved in activities connected with idols, to guard the morality of sex and marriage, to not serve food offensive to Jewish Christians—blood, for instance.' This is basic wisdom from Moses, preached and honored for centuries now in city after city as we have met and kept the Sabbath."
There is only ONE Gospel. There is a variety of audiences to receive that Gospel. Peter was rebuked by Paul for showing evidence of distinction as if the Gospel was divided. Let us not jump to the same error as Peter.
Paul
Quote from: chuckt on March 05, 2009, 05:15:11 PM
you speak truth here, many believers have a form of godliness never really having their faith tested. and they are mean as snakes to those not in their club.
i like this verse:
1cor11:19 For it must be that there are sects also among you, that those also who are qualified may be becoming apparent among you.
KJV:
1Cr 11:19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.
when we are railed against and reproached, and cursed, we bless and are approved.
grace and peace.
chuckt
Excellent selection of verses on that topic, praise God!
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 05:19:45 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 04:30:15 PM
I'm not so sure I'm ready to jump on this "same doctrine" band wagon just yet either. In reading through Acts, you'll see there was a great concern about what Paul was preaching because to the Jews it was a very different doctrine than they believed in. It got so sensitive that Paul had to drop what he was doing, go to Jerusalem and explain to them exactly what he was preaching. And the argument there was, the Jews felt the Gentiles should physically be circumcised and Paul preached that they didn't need to, but the physical circumcision was a practice that only physical Jews followed. But the circumcision that takes place in us is one of a spiritual nature not of a physical.
So in that sense, the gospel was very much different . .the Jews are all about following laws physically, but the message to the Gentiles was that Christ did to you spiritually what the Jews chose to do physcially . . .when Paul finished giving his defense on his message to them, they discussed it amongst themselves and their verdict was . . .
Acts 15 (Message Translation)
19-21"So here is my decision: We're not going to unnecessarily burden non-Jewish people who turn to the Master. We'll write them a letter and tell them, 'Be careful to not get involved in activities connected with idols, to guard the morality of sex and marriage, to not serve food offensive to Jewish Christians—blood, for instance.' This is basic wisdom from Moses, preached and honored for centuries now in city after city as we have met and kept the Sabbath."
There is only ONE Gospel. There is a variety of audiences to receive that Gospel. Peter was rebuked by Paul for showing evidence of distinction as if the Gospel was divided. Let us not jump to the same error as Peter.
Paul
It wasn't what Peter was preaching that was different . .it's what he was "doing" that was in error. He preached that Jews and Gentiles were both accepted and on the same playing field . . . this was a huge paradigm shift because Jews always viewed themselves as "above" everyone else . . .Jesus even came to the Jews "first" and "then" the Gentiles . . .but what Peter preached and what he "did" were two different things . . and "that" is what Paul was rebuking him for. He was all friendly with the Gentiles until predominant Jews showed up . .then he shunned the Gentiles and hung out with these hot shot Jews . . .
But I still stand on the fact that there is only ONE gate . .which is Christ . .even though the gospels may vary, depending on the people that are being spoken to.
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 11:29:44 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 04, 2009, 11:27:09 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 04, 2009, 11:10:23 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 04, 2009, 10:38:31 PM
Quote from: bobf on March 04, 2009, 10:16:52 PMIf they are not meant to be conformed to, then why did Jesus command people to conform to them?
- Luke 3:7 Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
There seems to be this belief that once your in the vine that you can't be cast off. That would be taking the universalist position way to far.
Paul
Question . . .what did you do to become a sinner?
Answer . . .nothing . .you were born into it through the first Adam
Question . . .what must you do to become saved?
Answer . . .nothing . . .you were born into it through the second Adam
You can claim works and outward fruit until you're blue in the face, but that's not a message of freedom you preach . . .Christ freed us from the laws . .including yours . . .you're trying to say grace isn't strong enough, the cross wasn't powerful enough for me to live righteously . . .i must also "do" whatever your standards of being a Christian are . . .and I'm not in agreement with that . . .I believe grace is just that powerful . .my works do not give me my status in the kingdom . . .what does is, my awareness of what has been declared over me . . .all that's required is to exercise the authority that is already provided.
You want to judge salvation by one's actions . . .yet we're instructed to "work out your own salvation" and I choose to do just that . . .
I also disagree that you can lose the gift that you never earned in the first place. God's gifts are unrepentant . . .he doesn't take them back . . .salvation is not a reward . .it's a gift and it doesn't get returned just because my flesh acts up after the gift has been received. There is more freedom here than the natural reasoning mind can comprehend . . . grace is just that great.
:icon_flower:
So what must you do to stay in salvation? Obviously, the Bible talks of those enduring to the end for a purpose.
Paul
The thread seems to be jumping quite a bit since yesterday but I wanted to respond to this . . .I used to preach the same thing . . . "You're saved by grace, but you maintain that salvation by works . . .." That was my statement . . . makes me cringe to think about it now.
To think that I 'must' maintain salvation by my own efforts is to say the cross was not enough . . .that it was not as "finished" as Christ said it was . . .and that it was incomplete.
The argument is not that I "must" manifest the outside works . . .the argument is the works manifest themselved "because" of my salvation on the inside . . .it's not about the activity on the outside . .the focus is the transformation that takes place on the inside.
The Gospel shouldn't be about what one must "do". It's about what has already been done. At least that's where I'm at with all of it.
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 05:43:50 PM
It wasn't what Peter was preaching that was different . .it's what he was "doing" that was in error. He preached that Jews and Gentiles were both accepted and on the same playing field . . . this was a huge paradigm shift because Jews always viewed themselves as "above" everyone else . . .Jesus even came to the Jews "first" and "then" the Gentiles . . .but what Peter preached and what he "did" were two different things . . and "that" is what Paul was rebuking him for. He was all friendly with the Gentiles until predominant Jews showed up . .then he shunned the Gentiles and hung out with these hot shot Jews . . .
But I still stand on the fact that there is only ONE gate . .which is Christ . .even though the gospels may vary, depending on the people that are being spoken to.
Well I believe what we do is a preaching also. It is still a communication but your correct it was what Peter was doing and not what he was saying. I apologize if I was giving the wrong understanding. My point is that there is only One Gospel and the message is only presented differently to the two different audiences (Jews and Gentiles).
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 05:55:02 PM
The thread seems to be jumping quite a bit since yesterday but I wanted to respond to this . . .I used to preach the same thing . . . "You're saved by grace, but you maintain that salvation by works . . .." That was my statement . . . makes me cringe to think about it now.
To think that I 'must' maintain salvation by my own efforts is to say the cross was not enough . . .that it was not as "finished" as Christ said it was . . .and that it was incomplete.
The argument is not that I "must" manifest the outside works . . .the argument is the works manifest themselved "because" of my salvation on the inside . . .it's not about the activity on the outside . .the focus is the transformation that takes place on the inside.
The Gospel shouldn't be about what one must "do". It's about what has already been done. At least that's where I'm at with all of it.
The moment someone has asked for forgiveness and received Christ they have received forgiveness of their debts (sins). So at that point they are without imputed sin. But if they continue in sin they are worse off then if they hadn't been forgiven of their sins. Consider the parable of the Unforgiving Servant. The servant received forgiveness of his debt when he requested it but yet he went out and continued in the sin of unforgiving others of their debt to him and then suffered worse as a result of it. Therefore it is very important to endure till the end. So Salvation is very much about what must still be done. Now consider if the servant had received forgiveness for his debts then for him to go out and do GOOD works could not be because of debt but is because of agreement to the message of the King.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 06:10:41 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 05:55:02 PM
The thread seems to be jumping quite a bit since yesterday but I wanted to respond to this . . .I used to preach the same thing . . . "You're saved by grace, but you maintain that salvation by works . . .." That was my statement . . . makes me cringe to think about it now.
To think that I 'must' maintain salvation by my own efforts is to say the cross was not enough . . .that it was not as "finished" as Christ said it was . . .and that it was incomplete.
The argument is not that I "must" manifest the outside works . . .the argument is the works manifest themselved "because" of my salvation on the inside . . .it's not about the activity on the outside . .the focus is the transformation that takes place on the inside.
The Gospel shouldn't be about what one must "do". It's about what has already been done. At least that's where I'm at with all of it.
The moment someone has asked for forgiveness and received Christ they have received forgiveness of their debts (sins). So at that point they are without imputed sin. But if they continue in sin they are worse off then if they hadn't been forgiven of their sins. Consider the parable of the Unforgiving Servant. The servant received forgiveness of his debt when he requested it but yet he went out and continued in the sin of unforgiving others of their debt to him and then suffered worse as a result of it. Therefore it is very important to endure till the end. So Salvation is very much about what must still be done. Now consider if the servant had received forgiveness for his debts then for him to go out and do GOOD works could not be because of debt but is because of agreement to the message of the King.
Paul
trettep, that is what happens when you mix what is for the Circumcision with the Uncircumcision.
We of the nations, if we sin, grace superexceeds (Rom.5:20).
You are still involved in Galatianism.
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 06:10:41 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 05:55:02 PM
The thread seems to be jumping quite a bit since yesterday but I wanted to respond to this . . .I used to preach the same thing . . . "You're saved by grace, but you maintain that salvation by works . . .." That was my statement . . . makes me cringe to think about it now.
To think that I 'must' maintain salvation by my own efforts is to say the cross was not enough . . .that it was not as "finished" as Christ said it was . . .and that it was incomplete.
The argument is not that I "must" manifest the outside works . . .the argument is the works manifest themselved "because" of my salvation on the inside . . .it's not about the activity on the outside . .the focus is the transformation that takes place on the inside.
The Gospel shouldn't be about what one must "do". It's about what has already been done. At least that's where I'm at with all of it.
The moment someone has asked for forgiveness and received Christ they have received forgiveness of their debts (sins). So at that point they are without imputed sin. But if they continue in sin they are worse off then if they hadn't been forgiven of their sins. Consider the parable of the Unforgiving Servant. The servant received forgiveness of his debt when he requested it but yet he went out and continued in the sin of unforgiving others of their debt to him and then suffered worse as a result of it. Therefore it is very important to endure till the end. So Salvation is very much about what must still be done. Now consider if the servant had received forgiveness for his debts then for him to go out and do GOOD works could not be because of debt but is because of agreement to the message of the King.
Paul
If that's where you choose to be . ..so be it. But it seems to be overriding the power of grace . . .and understanding the relationship of a bondservant . . . Jesus died for my sin before I was even born. I had nothing to do with it . .I wasn't there . . .not in the flesh anyway . . .in spirit, as Paul states, we were all there. I'm not going to focus on "how" I must walk . . .I'm choosing to pursue Christ and the areas where I am weak . . . I leave them to him. Granted, our bad choices do have consequences . . .you become an alcoholic, you become abusive to your body and perhaps those you love around you . . .but being an alcoholic does nothing toward making me righteous or unrighteous.
I don't maintain my salvation, I put faith in the one who has the power to do that. My pursuit is Christ, My desire is to reproduce Christ in others . . .there is no joy in trying to live in discipline just so my salvation remains intact. Freedom is just that . . .it's being "free" to be who I am and let Christ to the transforming in my nature as I mature in him. He's the one working in me both to will and to do his good pleasure. The cup does nothing to keep the contents in it . . . it does what it was created to do . . .if it has a crack in it, the cup-maker will fix that . .not the cup.
QuoteThe moment someone has asked for forgiveness and received Christ they have received forgiveness of their debts (sins). So at that point they are without imputed sin. But if they continue in sin they are worse off then if they hadn't been forgiven of their sins. Consider the parable of the Unforgiving Servant. The servant received forgiveness of his debt when he requested it but yet he went out and continued in the sin of unforgiving others of their debt to him and then suffered worse as a result of it. Therefore it is very important to endure till the end. So Salvation is very much about what must still be done. Now consider if the servant had received forgiveness for his debts then for him to go out and do GOOD works could not be because of debt but is because of agreement to the message of the King.
Paul
this is where you loose me paul.
i dont think anything i say here will be of service.
blessings to you.
chuckt
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 06:10:41 PM
The moment someone has asked for forgiveness and received Christ they have received forgiveness of their debts (sins). So at that point they are without imputed sin. But if they continue in sin they are worse off then if they hadn't been forgiven of their sins. Consider the parable of the Unforgiving Servant. The servant received forgiveness of his debt when he requested it but yet he went out and continued in the sin of unforgiving others of their debt to him and then suffered worse as a result of it. Therefore it is very important to endure till the end. So Salvation is very much about what must still be done. Now consider if the servant had received forgiveness for his debts then for him to go out and do GOOD works could not be because of debt but is because of agreement to the message of the King.
Jesus said "forgive them father for they know not what they do" It is spoken, it is finished
Are we supposed to wait till someone asks before we forgive?
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 06:10:41 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 05:55:02 PM
The thread seems to be jumping quite a bit since yesterday but I wanted to respond to this . . .I used to preach the same thing . . . "You're saved by grace, but you maintain that salvation by works . . .." That was my statement . . . makes me cringe to think about it now.
To think that I 'must' maintain salvation by my own efforts is to say the cross was not enough . . .that it was not as "finished" as Christ said it was . . .and that it was incomplete.
The argument is not that I "must" manifest the outside works . . .the argument is the works manifest themselved "because" of my salvation on the inside . . .it's not about the activity on the outside . .the focus is the transformation that takes place on the inside.
The Gospel shouldn't be about what one must "do". It's about what has already been done. At least that's where I'm at with all of it.
The moment someone has asked for forgiveness and received Christ they have received forgiveness of their debts (sins). So at that point they are without imputed sin. But if they continue in sin they are worse off then if they hadn't been forgiven of their sins. Consider the parable of the Unforgiving Servant. The servant received forgiveness of his debt when he requested it but yet he went out and continued in the sin of unforgiving others of their debt to him and then suffered worse as a result of it. Therefore it is very important to endure till the end. So Salvation is very much about what must still be done. Now consider if the servant had received forgiveness for his debts then for him to go out and do GOOD works could not be because of debt but is because of agreement to the message of the King.
Paul
Paul :icon_flower:
FOR ME- Its very much, a ""Reaping what we sow""
The Lord was Moved with (Mercy) and compassion upon the servant ,another who failed to do likewise to others who deserved the same ,
BUT
Mat 18:34 And his
lord was wroth, and
delivered him to the tormentors, till he
should pay all that was due unto him. Mat 18:35 So likewise shall
my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.
Are Good works ,mercy and compassion to each man his Brother , well indeed it is. :HeartThrob:
you could say , he failed to FEAR God
.seems other failed in compassion and mercy, also failing to FEAR,
Jud 1:12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds [they are] without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
Rom 3:13 Their throat [is] an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps [is] under their lips:
Rom 3:14 Whose mouth [is] full of cursing and bitterness:
Rom 3:15 Their feet [are] swift to shed blood:
Rom 3:16 Destruction and misery [are] in their ways:
Rom 3:17 And the way of peace have they not known:
Rom 3:18 There is no
fear of God before their eyes( understanding). :icon_flower:
WOOO HOO!!! :thumbsup: :goodpost: :Urock: :rocker
Taffy, what do you do with "God is dealing graciously with all our offenses
Col 2:13 Who rouses Him from among the dead, you also being dead to the offenses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He vivifies us together jointly with Him, dealing graciously with all our offenses,
2Co 5:19 how that God was in Christ, conciliating the world to Himself, not reckoning their offenses to them, and placing in us the word of the conciliation."
Looks like a change has occurred AFTER Christ died and it is different for us of the nations.
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 06:55:20 PMtrettep, that is what happens when you mix what is for the Circumcision with the Uncircumcision.
We of the nations, if we sin, grace superexceeds (Rom.5:20).
You are still involved in Galatianism.
YLT:
Rom 5:20 And law came in, that the offence might abound, and where the sin did abound, the grace did overabound,
Tony, performing His righteous works is not to be confused with the works of the circumcision.
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 06:57:22 PM
If that's where you choose to be . ..so be it. But it seems to be overriding the power of grace . . .and understanding the relationship of a bondservant . . . Jesus died for my sin before I was even born. I had nothing to do with it . .I wasn't there . . .not in the flesh anyway . . .in spirit, as Paul states, we were all there. I'm not going to focus on "how" I must walk . . .I'm choosing to pursue Christ and the areas where I am weak . . . I leave them to him. Granted, our bad choices do have consequences . . .you become an alcoholic, you become abusive to your body and perhaps those you love around you . . .but being an alcoholic does nothing toward making me righteous or unrighteous.
I don't maintain my salvation, I put faith in the one who has the power to do that. My pursuit is Christ, My desire is to reproduce Christ in others . . .there is no joy in trying to live in discipline just so my salvation remains intact. Freedom is just that . . .it's being "free" to be who I am and let Christ to the transforming in my nature as I mature in him. He's the one working in me both to will and to do his good pleasure. The cup does nothing to keep the contents in it . . . it does what it was created to do . . .if it has a crack in it, the cup-maker will fix that . .not the cup.
Nathan, you can't produce Christ in others if your works are after the flesh. If you preach Christ and say that the performance of His Works are not necessary for salvation then you bring forth blasphemy. Freedom, Nathan, is to no longer be in debt. But if you continue in your sins - your debt remains.
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Do you not see that obedience is UNTO righteousness?
Nathan, seriously consider what I'm saying to you. I'm not preaching our works here. I'm preaching His works, which accompany those that are in His name.
Paul
The debt is paid.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 05, 2009, 07:30:00 PM
Jesus said "forgive them father for they know not what they do" It is spoken, it is finished
Are we supposed to wait till someone asks before we forgive?
Paul, the prayer of forgiveness was to those that knew not that they were persecuting the Son of God. God has mercy upon whom He will. Forgive those that ask for it. Forgive those that know not what they are doing. Remember with forgiveness comes release of the offense or (debt). God doesn't release the offense of those that haven't desired it. But be sure that God will bring about their desire. Consider these verses:
YLT
Mat 18:21 Then Peter having come near to him, said, `Sir, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him--till seven times?'
Mat 18:22 Jesus saith to him, `I do not say to thee till seven times, but till seventy times seven.
Now if we forgive once and for all then Jesus would not have answered seventy times seven.
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 08:12:27 PM
Taffy, what do you do with "God is dealing graciously with all our offenses
Col 2:13 Who rouses Him from among the dead, you also being dead to the offenses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He vivifies us together jointly with Him, dealing graciously with all our offenses,
2Co 5:19 how that God was in Christ, conciliating the world to Himself, not reckoning their offenses to them, and placing in us the word of the conciliation."
Looks like a change has occurred AFTER Christ died and it is different for us of the nations.
The debt is Indeed paid , but it doesnt negate reaping and sowing . :icon_flower:
To whom mercy and compasion was given, when least deserved , we give unto others.( good works)
He works in the hearts of men and its there we are recompensed..Lest we turn liberty to licence...Tis His work In and through US, is AS i see it. :icon_flower: call it Growing pain :icon_flower:
:icon_flower:
Quote from: Taffy on March 05, 2009, 07:43:39 PM
Paul :icon_flower:
FOR ME- Its very much, a ""Reaping what we sow""
The Lord was Moved with (Mercy) and compassion upon the servant ,another who failed to do likewise to others who deserved the same ,
BUT
Mat 18:34 And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.
Mat 18:35 So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.
Are Good works ,mercy and compassion to each man his Brother , well indeed it is. :HeartThrob:
you could say , he failed to FEAR God
.seems other failed in compassion and mercy, also failing to FEAR,
Jud 1:12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds [they are] without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
Rom 3:13 Their throat [is] an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps [is] under their lips:
Rom 3:14 Whose mouth [is] full of cursing and bitterness:
Rom 3:15 Their feet [are] swift to shed blood:
Rom 3:16 Destruction and misery [are] in their ways:
Rom 3:17 And the way of peace have they not known:
Rom 3:18 There is no fear of God before their eyes( understanding).
:icon_flower:
Hi Taffy, thank you for actually looking up the parable and commenting on that. Yes, you post great comments because fear is a factor. Fear is the beginning of wisdom. It is when we realize that we are not under God's Grace that fear should cause us to be concerned. The servant in the parable had debt (we can all it sin) and realized the King was going to take account of his debt. His fear caused him to ask for forgiveness and he received that mercy at least until he betrayed the King's mercy.
Paul
Here's the thing . . . we're all in different rooms in our relationship with the same God. I'm not in the same room as you . . . and you're not in the same room as I . . .there's no condemnationt here, it's just an observation. The resistance comes when we try to push others in different rooms into ours . . .and that's what I feel you are trying to do here. Your emphasis is on the manifestations . .whether they are works unto salvation or righteousness . . . for me it makes no difference because the works that do produce through me may or may not meet your personal standards . . . in this case, I'm guessing it's the latter . . .and as you are proving to be true, those who focus on the works, become judges over others in their works as well.
Paul states he didn't care what anyone says about him . . .what matters to him is what God says of him . . . I'm going to rest in that. My only concern is, brothers in Christ become wife-beaters . . .they browbeat the bride into some state of submission in order for their own personal agenda to be met. If you believe works maintain your salvation, fine . . .please don't make that a requirement of others . .that's all I'm saying.
Quote from: Taffy on March 05, 2009, 08:46:18 PMThe debt is Indeed paid , but it doesnt negate reaping and sowing . :icon_flower:
To whom mercy and compasion was given, when least deserved , we give unto others.( good works)
He works in the hearts of men and its there we are recompensed..Lest we turn liberty to licence...Tis His work In and through US, is AS i see it. :icon_flower: call it Growing pain :icon_flower:
:icon_flower:
Outstanding, very good post! Yes, Taffy, this is why I classify those that claim to be Christians often into two groups:
1) Those that believe we are saved BECAUSE of Jesus
2) Those that believe we are saved BY Jesus.
Both are correct in message but when our focus is only on #1 then we have errored. The focus should be on #2.
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 08:48:24 PM
Here's the thing . . . we're all in different rooms in our relationship with the same God. I'm not in the same room as you . . . and you're not in the same room as I . . .there's no condemnationt here, it's just an observation. The resistance comes when we try to push others in different rooms into ours . . .and that's what I feel you are trying to do here. Your emphasis is on the manifestations . .whether they are works unto salvation or righteousness . . . for me it makes no difference because the works that do produce through me may or may not meet your personal standards . . . in this case, I'm guessing it's the latter . . .and as you are proving to be true, those who focus on the works, become judges over others in their works as well.
Paul states he didn't care what anyone says about him . . .what matters to him is what God says of him . . . I'm going to rest in that. My only concern is, brothers in Christ become wife-beaters . . .they browbeat the bride into some state of submission in order for their own personal agenda to be met. If you believe works maintain your salvation, fine . . .please don't make that a requirement of others . .that's all I'm saying.
Your fruit is what is inspected by the Judge. I'm sure there are those branches in the vine that will say - "Hey were just happy to be in the vine" not knowing that they are about to be pruned for bearing no fruit.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 08:46:54 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 05, 2009, 07:43:39 PM
Paul :icon_flower:
FOR ME- Its very much, a ""Reaping what we sow""
The Lord was Moved with (Mercy) and compassion upon the servant ,another who failed to do likewise to others who deserved the same ,
BUT
Mat 18:34 And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.
Mat 18:35 So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.
Are Good works ,mercy and compassion to each man his Brother , well indeed it is. :HeartThrob:
you could say , he failed to FEAR God
.seems other failed in compassion and mercy, also failing to FEAR,
Jud 1:12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds [they are] without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
Rom 3:13 Their throat [is] an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps [is] under their lips:
Rom 3:14 Whose mouth [is] full of cursing and bitterness:
Rom 3:15 Their feet [are] swift to shed blood:
Rom 3:16 Destruction and misery [are] in their ways:
Rom 3:17 And the way of peace have they not known:
Rom 3:18 There is no fear of God before their eyes( understanding).
:icon_flower:
Hi Taffy, thank you for actually looking up the parable and commenting on that. Yes, you post great comments because fear is a factor. Fear is the beginning of wisdom. It is when we realize that we are not under God's Grace that fear should cause us to be concerned. The servant in the parable had debt (we can all it sin) and realized the King was going to take account of his debt. His fear caused him to ask for forgiveness and he received that mercy at least until he betrayed the King's mercy.
Paul
What does forgiveness mean? Does it mean you have to continue to be a sitting duck for the one who is wronging or abusing you? Does it mean you cannot feel any anger about what was done to you? Does it mean you can't ask for redress of grievances? Does it mean you can't ask the other to repent?
THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING . . .
Quote from: Molly on March 05, 2009, 08:59:36 PM
What does forgiveness mean? Does it mean you have to continue to be a sitting duck for the one who is wronging or abusing you? Does it mean you cannot feel any anger about what was done to you? Does it mean you can't ask for redress of grievances? Does it mean you can't ask the other to repent?
If the ungoldy wages wrath against you - you are to accept it and not repay. If you in Christ, then you shouldn't feel anger, you should feel joy.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 09:10:35 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 05, 2009, 08:59:36 PM
What does forgiveness mean? Does it mean you have to continue to be a sitting duck for the one who is wronging or abusing you? Does it mean you cannot feel any anger about what was done to you? Does it mean you can't ask for redress of grievances? Does it mean you can't ask the other to repent?
If the ungoldy wages wrath against you - you are to accept it and not repay. If you in Christ, then you shouldn't feel anger, you should feel joy.
Paul
Feel joy? Is that what it says? Doesn't it say 'count it all joy'? Isn't that different from feeling?
"count" it all joy [Jam 1]
G2233
ἡγέομαι
hēgeomaihayg-eh'-om-ahee
Middle voice of a (presumed) strengthened form of G71; to lead, that is,
command (with official authority); figuratively to deem, that is,
consider: - account, (be) chief, count, esteem, governor, judge, have the rule over, suppose,
think.
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 06:55:20 PMtrettep, that is what happens when you mix what is for the Circumcision with the Uncircumcision.
We of the nations, if we sin, grace superexceeds (Rom.5:20).
You are still involved in Galatianism.
That's what happens when you believe Christ. We of the nations, if we sin, we will reap (Gal 6:7). Grace superabounds by judging and chastening sin, not by turning a blind eye to it.
Quote from: Molly on March 05, 2009, 09:26:35 PM
]Feel joy? Is that what it says? Doesn't it say 'count it all joy'? Isn't that different from feeling?
"count" it all joy [Jam 1]
G2233
ἡγέομαι
hēgeomai
hayg-eh'-om-ahee
Middle voice of a (presumed) strengthened form of G71; to lead, that is, command (with official authority); figuratively to deem, that is, consider: - account, (be) chief, count, esteem, governor, judge, have the rule over, suppose, think.
2Co 12:10 Therefore I
take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.
Paul
sigh . . out of context bud.
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 08:35:00 PM
Now if we forgive once and for all then Jesus would not have answered seventy times seven.
I see your point; I don't think the number of times we forgive is at issue persey.
You say we must ask for forgiveness. But scripture really does not pose that responsibnility directly to us. We are to repent, which is not the same thing.
My point with Jesus is that he showed to us an example that He did not wait till those who crucified him saw the error of their ways and asked for forgivness.
Likewise "Do we wait till we are asked, before we forgive someone?
I would answer no to that question and apply that to Gods even greater ability to forgive.
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 11:07:42 PM
sigh . . out of context bud.
Please be more specific. Give us some help here. Blanket statements that something is out of context are viewed as more trollish then helpful.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 05, 2009, 11:08:01 PM
I see your point; I don't think the number of times we forgive is at issue persey.
You say we must ask for forgiveness. But scripture really does not pose that responsibnility directly to us. We are to repent, which is not the same thing.
My point with Jesus is that he showed to us an example that He did not wait till those who crucified him saw the error of their ways and asked for forgivness.
Likewise "Do we wait till we are asked, before we forgive someone?
I would answer no to that question and apply that to Gods even greater ability to forgive.
I don't believe that God waits until someone asks for it either. My comment in that regard was mostly in relation to the parable that I was commenting about where the servant did ask for it. And you have stated the fact that Jesus did ask for the forgiveness of those that knew not what they had done. Can you provide an example of when God ever forgived those that were not desirable of forgiveness?
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 05, 2009, 08:59:36 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 08:46:54 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 05, 2009, 07:43:39 PM
Paul :icon_flower:
FOR ME- Its very much, a ""Reaping what we sow""
The Lord was Moved with (Mercy) and compassion upon the servant ,another who failed to do likewise to others who deserved the same ,
BUT
Mat 18:34 And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.
Mat 18:35 So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.
Are Good works ,mercy and compassion to each man his Brother , well indeed it is. :HeartThrob:
you could say , he failed to FEAR God
.seems other failed in compassion and mercy, also failing to FEAR,
Jud 1:12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds [they are] without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
Rom 3:13 Their throat [is] an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps [is] under their lips:
Rom 3:14 Whose mouth [is] full of cursing and bitterness:
Rom 3:15 Their feet [are] swift to shed blood:
Rom 3:16 Destruction and misery [are] in their ways:
Rom 3:17 And the way of peace have they not known:
Rom 3:18 There is no fear of God before their eyes( understanding).
:icon_flower:
Hi Taffy, thank you for actually looking up the parable and commenting on that. Yes, you post great comments because fear is a factor. Fear is the beginning of wisdom. It is when we realize that we are not under God's Grace that fear should cause us to be concerned. The servant in the parable had debt (we can all it sin) and realized the King was going to take account of his debt. His fear caused him to ask for forgiveness and he received that mercy at least until he betrayed the King's mercy.
Paul
What does forgiveness mean? Does it mean you have to continue to be a sitting duck for the one who is wronging or abusing you? Does it mean you cannot feel any anger about what was done to you? Does it mean you can't ask for redress of grievances? Does it mean you can't ask the other to repent?
Forgiveness means to exercise mercy and compassion.. but even so seems HE recompences in the Bosom ,
Isa 65:6 Behold, [it is] written before me:
I will not keep silence, but will
recompense, even recompense into their bosom Rom 12:17
Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide
things honest in the sight of all men. 2Th 1:6 Seeing [it is] a
righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that
trouble you; Hbr 10:30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance [belongeth] unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people
For its a FEAR ful thing to fall into the Hands of the LIVING GOD
Makes Sense some to me Molly :icon_flower:
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 11:23:59 PM
And you have stated the fact that Jesus did ask for the forgiveness of those that knew not what they had done. Can you provide an example of when God ever forgived those that were not desirable of forgiveness?
Ps 130:3 If You should keep account of depravities, O Yah, O Yahweh, who should stand?
Ps 130:4 For with You is pardon That You may be devoutly feared.
Ac 5:31 This Inaugurator and Saviour, God exalts to His right hand, to give repentance to Israel and the pardon of sins.
Ac 5:32 We' are witnesses to these declarations, as well as the holy spirit which God gives to those yielding to Him."
Ac 26:18 to open their eyes, to turn them about from darkness into light and from the authority of Satan on to God, for them to get a pardon of sins and an allotment among those who have been hallowed by faith that is into in Me.'
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 08:13:14 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 06:55:20 PMtrettep, that is what happens when you mix what is for the Circumcision with the Uncircumcision.
We of the nations, if we sin, grace superexceeds (Rom.5:20).
You are still involved in Galatianism.
YLT:
Rom 5:20 And law came in, that the offence might abound, and where the sin did abound, the grace did overabound,
Tony, performing His righteous works is not to be confused with the works of the circumcision.
Paul
The issue is not performing righteous works, the issue is you say if works are not performed then one is not saved. That is Galationism.
Hi Nathan just a few comments on some of your posts.
QuoteI'm not so sure I'm ready to jump on this "same doctrine" band wagon just yet either. In reading through Acts, you'll see there was a great concern about what Paul was preaching because to the Jews it was a very different doctrine than they believed in. It got so sensitive that Paul had to drop what he was doing, go to Jerusalem and explain to them exactly what he was preaching. And the argument there was, the Jews felt the Gentiles should physically be circumcised and Paul preached that they didn't need to, but the physical circumcision was a practice that only physical Jews followed. But the circumcision that takes place in us is one of a spiritual nature not of a physical.
Yes and that is why Paul said there is no difference between the circumcision and non circumcision. Paul preached the SAME gospel to those of the circumcision as he did to the Gentiles and it was because he did that, that the Jews got up into his face. So if a different gospel or doctrine was to be preached to the 12 tribes what in the world was Paul doing preaching to them the SAME gospel he preached to the Gentiles?
QuoteIt wasn't what Peter was preaching that was different . .it's what he was "doing" that was in error. He preached that Jews and Gentiles were both accepted and on the same playing field . . . this was a huge paradigm shift because Jews always viewed themselves as "above" everyone else . . .Jesus even came to the Jews "first" and "then" the Gentiles . . .but what Peter preached and what he "did" were two different things . . and "that" is what Paul was rebuking him for.
Nathan what MESSAGE did that send to the Jews. It is not just, what we say that ministers the Gospel it is what we DO also that counts. So by example Peter was indeed preaching a different Gospel then Paul and that is why Paul withstood him and why Peter repented of doing it.
QuoteThe thread seems to be jumping quite a bit since yesterday but I wanted to respond to this . . .I used to preach the same thing . . . "You're saved by grace, but you maintain that salvation by works . . .." That was my statement . . . makes me cringe to think about it now.
For myself I would not say salvation depends on works as works are the characteristics of our salvation. ( I am speaking of the works of faith) I see the works more as going on to the perfection of our salvation as is spoken to the overcomers.
QuoteThe Gospel shouldn't be about what one must "do". It's about what has already been done. At least that's where I'm at with all of it.
It should be about BOTH bro for our salvation is assured in Christ but perfection only comes by works which is the evidence of our salvation. Tis why James says faith without works is dead.
This part is addressed to all.
If as Tony states that it is a different gospel or doctrine delivered to the 12 tribes then to the gentiles, then NOTHING Peter, John and the boys write relates to the Gentiles, only Paul's writings would concern them. And Paul's writings would NOT apply to the 12 tribes.
Therefore, Peter, John and the boys writings would NOT PERTAIN to any reading here UNLESS they are of the 12 tribes and NOTHING in Paul's writings would PERTAIN to any here that are of the 12 tribes.
This would create the same DIVISION Paul refuted when people were making the argument about who they were of, some said they were of Peter (and according to Tony's understanding that would have to be of the 12 tribes) others said they were of Apollo and other of Paul ( which again according to Tony can then only be the Gentiles) and Paul refuted this by saying Is Christ DIVIDED.
It is the SAME Gospel, SAME doctrine,SAME baptisem, SAME everything else, for if it is NOT THE SAME then the middle wall of partition has NOT been broken down.
So than if Peter and the boys Gospel is ONLY for the 12 tribes then these scriptures have NOTHING to do with YOU unless YOU are of the 12 tribes.
1 Peter 1:3-7
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, 5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
6 Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations: 7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:
Yet how many of YOU that are NOT of the 12 tribes has had their faith tried in the fire.
Here another one that would not apply to YOU unless YOU were of the 12 tribes if the Gospel is divided in this way.
1 Peter 2:5
5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
YOU CANNOT be one of these LIVELY STONE if this ONLY PERTAINS to the 12 tribes.
For myself I want the WHOLE enchilada spoken throughout the WHOLE of scripture, I don't believe in the this is for me and this is for you division of the Gospel, the Gospel does not set UP divisions it breaks them DOWN.
God bless
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 05, 2009, 11:08:01 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 08:35:00 PM
Now if we forgive once and for all then Jesus would not have answered seventy times seven.
I see your point; I don't think the number of times we forgive is at issue persey.
You say we must ask for forgiveness. But scripture really does not pose that responsibnility directly to us. We are to repent, which is not the same thing.
My point with Jesus is that he showed to us an example that He did not wait till those who crucified him saw the error of their ways and asked for forgivness.
Likewise "Do we wait till we are asked, before we forgive someone?
I would answer no to that question and apply that to Gods even greater ability to forgive.
Hi Paul, im getting lost with all these smallers :icon_king:
FOR MINE-Forgiveness has always Been, But its work was done at the Cross,
We do likewise , the work of It when it comes about, to ever it comes too..70x7 MEANS always , as mentioned in the last post , FOR mine again, vengeance is His .
too add tot he post of Mollys
Rom 12:19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Tis how I see bro :icon_flower:
QuoteThere is only ONE Gospel. There is a variety of audiences to receive that Gospel. Peter was rebuked by Paul for showing evidence of distinction as if the Gospel was divided. Let us not jump to the same error as Peter.
Amen Paul for the Gospel is not just in what we say it is also in what we do.
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 11:36:19 PM
Hi Nathan just a few comments on some of your posts.
QuoteI'm not so sure I'm ready to jump on this "same doctrine" band wagon just yet either. In reading through Acts, you'll see there was a great concern about what Paul was preaching because to the Jews it was a very different doctrine than they believed in. It got so sensitive that Paul had to drop what he was doing, go to Jerusalem and explain to them exactly what he was preaching. And the argument there was, the Jews felt the Gentiles should physically be circumcised and Paul preached that they didn't need to, but the physical circumcision was a practice that only physical Jews followed. But the circumcision that takes place in us is one of a spiritual nature not of a physical.
Yes and that is why Paul said there is no difference between the circumcision and non circumcision. Paul preached the SAME gospel to those of the circumcision as he did to the Gentiles and it was because he did that, that the Jews got up into his face. So if a different gospel or doctrine was to be preached to the 12 tribes what in the world was Paul doing preaching to them the SAME gospel he preached to the Gentiles?
QuoteIt wasn't what Peter was preaching that was different . .it's what he was "doing" that was in error. He preached that Jews and Gentiles were both accepted and on the same playing field . . . this was a huge paradigm shift because Jews always viewed themselves as "above" everyone else . . .Jesus even came to the Jews "first" and "then" the Gentiles . . .but what Peter preached and what he "did" were two different things . . and "that" is what Paul was rebuking him for.
Nathan what MESSAGE did that send to the Jews. It is not just, what we say that ministers the Gospel it is what we DO also that counts. So by example Peter was indeed preaching a different Gospel then Paul and that is why Paul withstood him and why Peter repented of doing it.
QuoteThe thread seems to be jumping quite a bit since yesterday but I wanted to respond to this . . .I used to preach the same thing . . . "You're saved by grace, but you maintain that salvation by works . . .." That was my statement . . . makes me cringe to think about it now.
For myself I would not say salvation depends on works as works are the characteristics of our salvation. ( I am speaking of the works of faith) I see the works more as going on to the perfection of our salvation as is spoken to the overcomers.
QuoteThe Gospel shouldn't be about what one must "do". It's about what has already been done. At least that's where I'm at with all of it.
It should be about BOTH bro for our salvation is assured in Christ but perfection only comes by works which is the evidence of our salvation. Tis why James says faith without works is dead.
This part is addressed to all.
If as Tony states that it is a different gospel or doctrine delivered to the 12 tribes then to the gentiles, then NOTHING Peter, John and the boys write relates to the Gentiles, only Paul's writings would concern them. And Paul's writings would NOT apply to the 12 tribes.
Therefore, Peter, John and the boys writings would NOT PERTAIN to any reading here UNLESS they are of the 12 tribes and NOTHING in Paul's writings would PERTAIN to any here that are of the 12 tribes.
This would create the same DIVISION Paul refuted when people were making the argument about who they were of, some said they were of Peter (and according to Tony's understanding that would have to be of the 12 tribes) others said they were of Apollo and other of Paul ( which again according to Tony can then only be the Gentiles) and Paul refuted this by saying Is Christ DIVIDED.
It is the SAME Gospel, SAME doctrine,SAME baptisem, SAME everything else, for if it is NOT THE SAME then the middle wall of partition has NOT been broken down.
So than if Peter and the boys Gospel is ONLY for the 12 tribes then these scriptures have NOTHING to do with YOU unless YOU are of the 12 tribes.
1 Peter 1:3-7
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, 5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
6 Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations: 7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:
Yet how many of YOU that are NOT of the 12 tribes has had their faith tried in the fire.
Here another one that would not apply to YOU unless YOU were of the 12 tribes if the Gospel is divided in this way.
1 Peter 2:5
5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
YOU CANNOT be one of these LIVELY STONE if this ONLY PERTAINS to the 12 tribes.
For myself I want the WHOLE enchilada spoken throughout the WHOLE of scripture, I don't believe in the this is for me and this is for you division of the Gospel, the Gospel does not set UP divisions it breaks them DOWN.
God bless
I haven't followed the rest of the thread, but these are good observations, pneuma.
I have a sneaking suspicion that we tend to make the same kind of mistakes as to what is for "believers" and "non-believers", but that's a whole other can o' worms.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 05, 2009, 11:34:10 PM
Ps 130:3 If You should keep account of depravities, O Yah, O Yahweh, who should stand?
Ps 130:4 For with You is pardon That You may be devoutly feared.
Ac 5:31 This Inaugurator and Saviour, God exalts to His right hand, to give repentance to Israel and the pardon of sins.
Ac 5:32 We' are witnesses to these declarations, as well as the holy spirit which God gives to those yielding to Him."
Ac 26:18 to open their eyes, to turn them about from darkness into light and from the authority of Satan on to God, for them to get a pardon of sins and an allotment among those who have been hallowed by faith that is into in Me.'
Hi Paul,
God uses Chastisements to bring about that desire for forgiveness. But none of those verses say that God ever gives forgiveness unto those that don't desire it. I believe that God's Wrath will cause the desire for forgiveness and a longing for the Goodness that is God.
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 11:35:00 PM
The issue is not performing righteous works, the issue is you say if works are not performed then one is not saved. That is Galationism.
That is what God is showing us in His Word Tony. Faith with works is the access to Grace. Grace is what saves us. Again, there is no such thing as dead Faith (Faith without Good works) that can provide access to Grace. Tony that is the message you want me to believe it seems. You want me to believe that one can just believe and say "Lord, Lord" and be saved. The fruit of the branches is inspected and what bears no fruit is pruned from the vine. To believe what your saying would mean that a branch that will not bear fruit is acceptable to God. The belief that one can be saved without doing Good Works is the doctrine of the Nicolaitans.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 11:46:30 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 05, 2009, 11:34:10 PM
Ps 130:3 If You should keep account of depravities, O Yah, O Yahweh, who should stand?
Ps 130:4 For with You is pardon That You may be devoutly feared.
Ac 5:31 This Inaugurator and Saviour, God exalts to His right hand, to give repentance to Israel and the pardon of sins.
Ac 5:32 We' are witnesses to these declarations, as well as the holy spirit which God gives to those yielding to Him."
Ac 26:18 to open their eyes, to turn them about from darkness into light and from the authority of Satan on to God, for them to get a pardon of sins and an allotment among those who have been hallowed by faith that is into in Me.'
Hi Paul,
God uses Chastisements to bring about that desire for forgiveness. But none of those verses say that God ever gives forgiveness unto those that don't desire it. I believe that God's Wrath will cause the desire for forgiveness and a longing for the Goodness that is God.
Paul
Hi Paul Jesus while on the cross said forgive them for they know not what they do.
Those who crucified Him never asked for His forgiveness yet He still forgave them.
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 11:46:30 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 05, 2009, 11:34:10 PM
Ps 130:3 If You should keep account of depravities, O Yah, O Yahweh, who should stand?
Ps 130:4 For with You is pardon That You may be devoutly feared.
Ac 5:31 This Inaugurator and Saviour, God exalts to His right hand, to give repentance to Israel and the pardon of sins.
Ac 5:32 We' are witnesses to these declarations, as well as the holy spirit which God gives to those yielding to Him."
Ac 26:18 to open their eyes, to turn them about from darkness into light and from the authority of Satan on to God, for them to get a pardon of sins and an allotment among those who have been hallowed by faith that is into in Me.'
Hi Paul,
God uses Chastisements to bring about that desire for forgiveness. But none of those verses say that God ever gives forgiveness unto those that don't desire it. I believe that God's Wrath will cause the desire for forgiveness and a longing for the Goodness that is God.
Paul
What scripture are you referring to that says God will not forgive unless we ask?
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 11:53:25 PM
Hi Paul Jesus while on the cross said forgive them for they know not what they do.
Those who crucified Him never asked for His forgiveness yet He still forgave them.
Yes pneuma, your correct, I should have clarified that more. God does forgive those that knew not what they do which I stated in an earlier post. My request should rather be to show evidence from God's Word where He forgives those that willfully sin (knowing what they do is sin).
Thank you pneuma.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 11:52:07 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 11:35:00 PM
The issue is not performing righteous works, the issue is you say if works are not performed then one is not saved. That is Galationism.
That is what God is showing us in His Word Tony. Faith with works is the access to Grace. Grace is what saves us. Again, there is no such thing as dead Faith (Faith without Good works) that can provide access to Grace. Tony that is the message you want me to believe it seems. You want me to believe that one can just believe and say "Lord, Lord" and be saved. The fruit of the branches is inspected and what bears no fruit is pruned from the vine. To believe what your saying would mean that a branch that will not bear fruit is acceptable to God. The belief that one can be saved without doing Good Works is the doctrine of the Nicolaitans.
Paul
The doctrine of Nicolaitans had to do with elders (such as pastor and teacher types) lording it over the laity.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 05, 2009, 11:57:36 PM
What scripture are you referring to that says God will not forgive unless we ask?
My original comment in that regard was in response to the parable of the unforgiving servant. God will forgive those that desire forgiveness whether or not they ask so long as they are desirable of forgiveness or have not willfully sinned (knew not what they did). Those that willfully sin are those that don't receive forgiveness if they should continue in such sin after they already received forgiveness for that sin.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 11:58:30 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 05, 2009, 11:53:25 PM
Hi Paul Jesus while on the cross said forgive them for they know not what they do.
Those who crucified Him never asked for His forgiveness yet He still forgave them.
Yes pneuma, your correct, I should have clarified that more. God does forgive those that knew not what they do which I stated in an earlier post. My request should rather be to show evidence from God's Word where He forgives those that willfully sin (knowing what they do is sin).
Thank you pneuma.
Paul
Hi Paul I agree there is a difference willful sinning is the sin unto death and death is the only remedy for it. ( just so you know what I mean I see the DEATH as the LAW, which is a ministration of death and our schoolmaster that leads to Christ.)
Quote from: Doc on March 06, 2009, 12:01:08 AMThe doctrine of Nicolaitans had to do with elders (such as pastor and teacher types) lording it over the laity.
The doctrine of the Nicolaitans is the doctrine of believing that you can be saved by confessing your sins but continue in those same sins. It is license to sin under the guise of approval and salvation.
Paul
QuoteI haven't followed the rest of the thread, but these are good observations, pneuma.
I have a sneaking suspicion that we tend to make the same kind of mistakes as to what is for "believers" and "non-believers", but that's a whole other can o' worms.
Thanks Doc. and yes your sneaking suspicion is correct.
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 12:03:21 AM
Hi Paul I agree there is a difference willful sinning is the sin unto death and death is the only remedy for it. ( just so you know what I mean I see the DEATH as the LAW, which is a ministration of death and our schoolmaster that leads to Christ.)
Pneuma, I believe that Law is still relevant - not the Law in the letter but the Law of God still abounds in Spirit. I believe we establish that Law by Faith in Christ Jesus. Not the letter of the law. I also believe the letter of the law was a demonstration of the flesh. Many will claim that the Law is done away with. But only the letter is done away with. For if the Law were done away with then righteousness (which is obedience) is also done away with. So death is the practice of the letter (or as I would say also the flesh) and Life is the practice of the Faith. And I agree what the law was our schoolmaster as God's Word shows us.
I may start another thread if there isn't one already on the topic of the Law because it is so important to the issue of works.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 12:11:17 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 12:03:21 AM
Hi Paul I agree there is a difference willful sinning is the sin unto death and death is the only remedy for it. ( just so you know what I mean I see the DEATH as the LAW, which is a ministration of death and our schoolmaster that leads to Christ.)
Pneuma, I believe that Law is still relevant - not the Law in the letter but the Law of God still abounds in Spirit. I believe we establish that Law by Faith in Christ Jesus. Not the letter of the law. I also believe the letter of the law was a demonstration of the flesh. Many will claim that the Law is done away with. But only the letter is done away with. For if the Law were done away with then righteousness (which is obedience) is also done away with. So death is the practice of the letter (or as I would say also the flesh) and Life is the practice of the Faith. And I agree what the law was our schoolmaster as God's Word shows us.
I may start another thread if there isn't one already on the topic of the Law because it is so important to the issue of works.
Paul
Hi Paul I agree with you about the law bro, but as to starting a new thread on the law you might want to check with the Mods first as it is one of the topic that is taboo here or at least was.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 12:01:46 AM
Those that willfully sin are those that don't receive forgiveness if they should continue in such sin after they already received forgiveness for that sin.
ok, gotcha there, what scripture do you use to say this so I can do some studying?
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 11:14:28 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 05, 2009, 11:07:42 PM
sigh . . out of context bud.
Please be more specific. Give us some help here. Blanket statements that something is out of context are viewed as more trollish then helpful.
Paul
I'm short in response because I really don't want to debate or argue . . . I've shared what I see, you don't see it . . .fine . ..so I move on . .or try to . .
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 12:23:36 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 12:11:17 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 12:03:21 AM
Hi Paul I agree there is a difference willful sinning is the sin unto death and death is the only remedy for it. ( just so you know what I mean I see the DEATH as the LAW, which is a ministration of death and our schoolmaster that leads to Christ.)
Pneuma, I believe that Law is still relevant - not the Law in the letter but the Law of God still abounds in Spirit. I believe we establish that Law by Faith in Christ Jesus. Not the letter of the law. I also believe the letter of the law was a demonstration of the flesh. Many will claim that the Law is done away with. But only the letter is done away with. For if the Law were done away with then righteousness (which is obedience) is also done away with. So death is the practice of the letter (or as I would say also the flesh) and Life is the practice of the Faith. And I agree what the law was our schoolmaster as God's Word shows us.
I may start another thread if there isn't one already on the topic of the Law because it is so important to the issue of works.
Paul
Hi Paul I agree with you about the law bro, but as to starting a new thread on the law you might want to check with the Mods first as it is one of the topic that is taboo here or at least was.
Scott
that must have been some time back , I have no memory of the Law being a Taboo subject :dontknow:
Go ahead start One...im sure Ill get told soon enough if it was , and the worst is..i can close it...
go ahead bro :icon_flower:
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 11:35:00 PMThe issue is not performing righteous works, the issue is you say if works are not performed then one is not saved. That is Galationism.
Tony, would this be Galatianism if Paul had preached it to the uncircumcision?
- Matthew 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Galatians is about this kind of thing:
- Luke 11:39 And the Lord said unto him, Now do ye Pharisees make clean the outside of the cup and the platter; but your inward part is full of ravening and wickedness.
<br>
- Romans 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
<br>
- Galatians 3:3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?
Are "being circumcised" and "love thy neighbor" both works of the law in the book of Galatians? I interchanged them to see how well that would work.
- Galatians 5:14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; go get circumised.
<br>
- Galatians 5:2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye love your neighbor as yourself, Christ shall profit you nothing.
<br>
- Galatians 5:3 For I testify again to every man that loves his neighbor, that he is a debtor to do the whole law
<br>
- Galatians 5:6 For in Jesus Christ neither love availeth any thing, nor hate; but faith which worketh by being circumcised.
QuoteGalatians 5:14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; go get circumised.
Galatians 5:2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye love your neighbor as yourself, Christ shall profit you nothing.
Galatians 5:3 For I testify again to every man that loves his neighbor, that he is a debtor to do the whole law
Galatians 5:6 For in Jesus Christ neither love availeth any thing, nor hate; but faith which worketh by being circumcised.
BOB..STOP IT MAN...,I didnt read the part where ya said ya changed it.... :laughing7: Drrrrr
Just for a Mo, IT WAS TIME for some more Tabs,... :icon_king:
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 12:58:14 AMBOB..STOP IT MAN...,I didnt read the part where ya said ya changed it.... :laughing7: Drrrrr
Just for a Mo, IT WAS TIME for some more Tabs,... :icon_king:
LOL... those were kind of fun. I esp. liked the last one.
:cloud9: As a side note; Nicolaitans is derived from two Greek words: "nikao", meaning to conquer or rule, and "laos", meaning people as in "laity". When joined, the two words mean people conquerors or rulers.
He further adds to the meaning of this in his response to the church of Pergamos, in which He mentions the prophet Balaam, who got the children of Israel to bring a curse on themselves by having sex with temple prostitutes in their war camp. Balaam was a prophet for hire; think gainsaying spirit, a spirit that speaks for personal gain. Blessings....
Quote from: bobf on March 06, 2009, 01:03:37 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 12:58:14 AMBOB..STOP IT MAN...,I didnt read the part where ya said ya changed it.... :laughing7: Drrrrr
Just for a Mo, IT WAS TIME for some more Tabs,... :icon_king:
LOL... those were kind of fun. I esp. liked the last one.
:icon_flower:
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 12:23:36 AMHi Paul I agree with you about the law bro, but as to starting a new thread on the law you might want to check with the Mods first as it is one of the topic that is taboo here or at least was.
Oh, I didn't know that. Why would a subject of God's Word be taboo? Any mods want to explain?
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 12:31:16 AM
ok, gotcha there, what scripture do you use to say this so I can do some studying?
Really, it is the parables. Consider the parable that I commented on earlier. The parable of the unforgiving servant which you can find in Matthew 18.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 01:14:23 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 12:23:36 AMHi Paul I agree with you about the law bro, but as to starting a new thread on the law you might want to check with the Mods first as it is one of the topic that is taboo here or at least was.
Oh, I didn't know that. Why would a subject of God's Word be taboo? Any mods want to explain?
Paul
what Twice :icon_king:
Look a little up the thread Paul .....No worries :icon_flower:
Wow, this thread's all over the place :happy3:. There sure are a lot of different POV's, and I don't claim to have it all figured out. I do think though that often, part of the reason for all the varying POV's, is mixing context(s)...i.e., to whom exactly primarily, at the time, was Jesus speaking, and about what? To "the nations" under grace, or the Jews still adhering to the Law..Jesus hadn't even literally died and resurrected yet. Who was the Revelation primarily directed? And again, who were Paul and Peter primarily addressing? IMO, if we just put all that in a sack, shake it up, and then start pulling out random scriptures here and there to make our points, we end up with real messes...hey, maybe even some new denominations :laughing7:. I don't pretend the absolute final word here, but maybe something for us to think and pray on :thumbsup:.
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 12:31:33 AM
I'm short in response because I really don't want to debate or argue . . . I've shared what I see, you don't see it . . .fine . ..so I move on . .or try to . .
Nathan, I hope you reconsider but I understand.
Paul
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 01:09:51 AM
:cloud9: As a side note; Nicolaitans is derived from two Greek words: "nikao", meaning to conquer or rule, and "laos", meaning people as in "laity". When joined, the two words mean people conquerors or rulers.
He further adds to the meaning of this in his response to the church of Pergamos, in which He mentions the prophet Balaam, who got the children of Israel to bring a curse on themselves by having sex with temple prostitutes in their war camp. Balaam was a prophet for hire; think gainsaying spirit, a spirit that speaks for personal gain. Blessings....
I actually read an early "Christian" writing that discussed the meaning of the doctrine. I can't say that I agree with the entire document but I remember studying that in relation to the comparison to Balaam and it couldn't find a reason or motive as why something like that would be "made up" in an early period. So it is the best source I have today next to the scriptures.
Paul
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 01:09:51 AM
:cloud9: As a side note; Nicolaitans is derived from two Greek words: "nikao", meaning to conquer or rule, and "laos", meaning people as in "laity". When joined, the two words mean people conquerors or rulers.
He further adds to the meaning of this in his response to the church of Pergamos, in which He mentions the prophet Balaam, who got the children of Israel to bring a curse on themselves by having sex with temple prostitutes in their war camp. Balaam was a prophet for hire; think gainsaying spirit, a spirit that speaks for personal gain. Blessings....
Thanks for confirming (indirectly) what I said, Card...
That's what I was talking about, Paul.
No ONE..absolutely no-one has a right to Lord it over
anyones faith in Christ. in regard to these required 'works"
what? when? how? let's see...as a jehovah's wittness you
needed to attend 5 meetings a week and go out in feild
service a minimum of 12 hours a month to have an OK standing
one little old lady went into congestive heart failure twice in
a month and still got in her 12 hours so what's your excuse?
I was actually subjected to these parameters of 'works'
required...but even if I did do this my salvation was still not
assured.
It's a matter of conscience people...something between the
beleiver and God and the Holy spirit.. Other's would be hard put
to judge anyone's works,I would think, especially since Jesus
said to pray in private and not blow your horn when you do
give gifts of mercy.
1Cor 13;4 LOVE KEEPS NO RECORD OF WRONGS
God IS LOVE LOVE NEVER FAILS
If you haven't realized that by the blotting out of all
tresspasses on the cross for the whole world
YOU'LL NEVER KNOW IT
LOVE ENDURES ALL THINGS
if someone should remain in a state of sin[don't we all]
until the death of their flesh...LOVE WOULD CALL THEM
OUT OF THEIR GRAVES.SOS 8;6
Some people need to quit worrying so much about what their
brothers are doing..or are failing to do,
and show some concern for their own actions.
IF YOUR CONSCIENCE CONVICTS YOU FOR NOT DOING
SOMETHING."some work".YOU NEED TO HEED IT
If the Holy Spirit directs you to do a work,heed it
But, you don't have a right to have your conscience
Lord it over anyone else .
Some have one hour of work..others a whole day
some's work is in the cool of the day..without much effort
or suffering or sweat...some's work make their tongues stick
to the roof of their mouths
John 6;28,29 Then they asked him" What must we do to do
the works God requires?' Jesus answered, 'the work of God
is this;TO BELEIVE IN THE ONE HE HAS SENT"
WE LIVE AND BREATHE AND EXIST IN A CONTINUAL STATE
OF GRACE
one man when healed was told to 'go home and tell all your
family what God has done for you" that was the work assigned
to that man...BY JESUS HIMSELF
Quote from: Doc on March 06, 2009, 01:33:31 AM
Thanks for confirming (indirectly) what I said, Card...
That's what I was talking about, Paul.
Doc, I'm saying that a doctrine is not just given to elders.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 10:43:20 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 05, 2009, 09:26:35 PM
]Feel joy? Is that what it says? Doesn't it say 'count it all joy'? Isn't that different from feeling?
"count" it all joy [Jam 1]
G2233
ἡγέομαι
hēgeomai
hayg-eh'-om-ahee
Middle voice of a (presumed) strengthened form of G71; to lead, that is, command (with official authority); figuratively to deem, that is, consider: - account, (be) chief, count, esteem, governor, judge, have the rule over, suppose, think.
2Co 12:10 Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.
Paul
Again, that doesn't necessarily mean you are feeling "pleasure" at getting robbed, punched in the face, reviled, or woefully abused. Let's not get masochistic here. It is more a comment about what this is all adding up to in the sense of understanding rather than a feeling.
"take pleasure in"
G2106
εὐδοκέω
eudokeō
yoo-dok-eh'-o
From G2095 and G1380; to think well of, that is, approve (an act); specifically to approbate (a person or thing): - think good, (be well) please (-d), be the good (have, take) pleasure, be willing.
The other piece of this is that Paul is suffering for a cause--that also is different from somebody walking up to you in the street and punching you in the face for no reason other than they are mean or they feel like it.
Quote from: sheila on March 06, 2009, 02:37:43 AM
No ONE..absolutely no-one has a right to Lord it over
anyones faith in Christ. in regard to these required 'works"
what? when? how? let's see...as a jehovah's wittness you
needed to attend 5 meetings a week and go out in feild
service a minimum of 12 hours a month to have an OK standing
one little old lady went into congestive heart failure twice in
a month and still got in her 12 hours so what's your excuse?
I was actually subjected to these parameters of 'works'
required...but even if I did do this my salvation was still not
assured.
It's a matter of conscience people...something between the
beleiver and God and the Holy spirit.. Other's would be hard put
to judge anyone's works,I would think, especially since Jesus
said to pray in private and not blow your horn when you do
give gifts of mercy.
1Cor 13;4 LOVE KEEPS NO RECORD OF WRONGS
God IS LOVE LOVE NEVER FAILS
If you haven't realized that by the blotting out of all
tresspasses on the cross for the whole world
YOU'LL NEVER KNOW IT
LOVE ENDURES ALL THINGS
if someone should remain in a state of sin[don't we all]
until the death of their flesh...LOVE WOULD CALL THEM
OUT OF THEIR GRAVES.SOS 8;6
Some people need to quit worrying so much about what their
brothers are doing..or are failing to do,
and show some concern for their own actions.
IF YOUR CONSCIENCE CONVICTS YOU FOR NOT DOING
SOMETHING."some work".YOU NEED TO HEED IT
If the Holy Spirit directs you to do a work,heed it
But, you don't have a right to have your conscience
Lord it over anyone else .
Some have one hour of work..others a whole day
some's work is in the cool of the day..without much effort
or suffering or sweat...some's work make their tongues stick
to the roof of their mouths
John 6;28,29 Then they asked him" What must we do to do
the works God requires?' Jesus answered, 'the work of God
is this;TO BELEIVE IN THE ONE HE HAS SENT"
WE LIVE AND BREATHE AND EXIST IN A CONTINUAL STATE
OF GRACE
one man when healed was told to 'go home and tell all your
family what God has done for you" that was the work assigned
to that man...BY JESUS HIMSELF
Doing the works of Christ are required for salvation. Are you saying that isn't so?
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 02:38:50 AM
Again, that doesn't necessarily mean you are feeling "pleasure" at getting robbed, punched in the face, reviled, or woefully abused. Let's not get masochistic here. It is more a comment about what this is all adding up to in the sense of understanding rather than a feeling.
"take pleasure in"
G2106
εὐδοκέω
eudokeō
yoo-dok-eh'-o
From G2095 and G1380; to think well of, that is, approve (an act); specifically to approbate (a person or thing): - think good, (be well) please (-d), be the good (have, take) pleasure, be willing.
The other piece of this is that Paul is suffering for a cause--that also is different from somebody walking up to you in the street and punching you in the face for no reason other than they are mean or they feel like it.
Molly, then we are to "think well of" those persecutions. How is that? I interpret that as "pleasure".
Paul
:cloud9: There are works of the Spirit and there are works of the flesh, and there are even works in the natural (such as feeding the poor). As many as are led by the SPIRIT of God, they are the sons of God. Jesus's Spiritual ministry (works of the Spirit) did not start until the Spirit baptized Him, and neither does ours.
Works of the flesh are like laciviousness, lust, coveting, ect.
Natural works are like feeding and clothing the poor, but even these have a Spirit origin, else Satan can even wear you out doing "good works" that the Father has not ordained that YOU personally do. The steps of the righteous are ordered by the Lord, and He orders them through His Spirit.
Works of the Spirit, then are not only Him using you in the gifts of the Spirit, healing, deliverance, ect., but are WHATEVER He tells you do. God has an order and His order is; WHATEVER GOD WANTS.
Hearing Him then, becomes of paramount importance, because to hear to God, is not how we think of it. To hear, means to hear AND OBEY (works). This is why it says be not just a hearer of the Word, but a doer also. Blessings....
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 02:38:19 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 06, 2009, 01:33:31 AM
Thanks for confirming (indirectly) what I said, Card...
That's what I was talking about, Paul.
Doc, I'm saying that a doctrine is not just given to elders.
Paul
Wha? I don't understand your point here.
Quoteelse Satan can even wear you out doing "good works" that the Father has not ordained that YOU personally do.
Gosh :mshock: as I fall of my chair... ..twas Talking to T about that a few Hrs back,,were you at the Inn too sis :icon_king:
:icon_flower:
:cloud9: Only in Spirit, LOL..... :winkgrin:
What I'm saying is you don't have the right to judge
anyone as it pertains to any works . It's not your buisiness
What is your buisiness is to see that YOU follow Him.
John 21;23 Jesus was instructing Peter in reference to
the 'work' in his position...when Peter was concerned about
what would be the assignment[or work] of another...Jesus
replied 'IF I want him to remain alive until I return,
WHAT IS THAT TO YOU?
YOU MUST FOLLOW ME"
Now if someone does 'fail' to do a work of the Holy spirits
direction...like the parable teaches in regard to the talents
I'm sure they would suffer loss, but loose their salvation ?
for I am convinced that nothing can seperate us
Have you NOT HEARD ABOUT THE SALVATION OF ALL?
Sheila
Quote from: trettep on March 05, 2009, 11:52:07 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 05, 2009, 11:35:00 PM
The issue is not performing righteous works, the issue is you say if works are not performed then one is not saved. That is Galationism.
That is what God is showing us in His Word Tony. Faith with works is the access to Grace. Grace is what saves us. Again, there is no such thing as dead Faith (Faith without Good works) that can provide access to Grace. Tony that is the message you want me to believe it seems. You want me to believe that one can just believe and say "Lord, Lord" and be saved. The fruit of the branches is inspected and what bears no fruit is pruned from the vine. To believe what your saying would mean that a branch that will not bear fruit is acceptable to God. The belief that one can be saved without doing Good Works is the doctrine of the Nicolaitans.
Paul
If you just read Paul who is our apostle of the nations then you will not continue making such theological mistakes. We are to follow Paul, not Peter, James or John.
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 03:17:26 AM
:cloud9: There are works of the Spirit and there are works of the flesh, and there are even works in the natural (such as feeding the poor). As many as are led by the SPIRIT of God, they are the sons of God. Jesus's Spiritual ministry (works of the Spirit) did not start until the Spirit baptized Him, and neither does ours.
Works of the flesh are like laciviousness, lust, coveting, ect.
Natural works are like feeding and clothing the poor, but even these have a Spirit origin, else Satan can even wear you out doing "good works" that the Father has not ordained that YOU personally do. The steps of the righteous are ordered by the Lord, and He orders them through His Spirit.
Works of the Spirit, then are not only Him using you in the gifts of the Spirit, healing, deliverance, ect., but are WHATEVER He tells you do. God has an order and His order is; WHATEVER GOD WANTS.
Hearing Him then, becomes of paramount importance, because to hear to God, is not how we think of it. To hear, means to hear AND OBEY (works). This is why it says be not just a hearer of the Word, but a doer also. Blessings....
The works of the Spirit have been here far before we knew of Jesus. There are only two types of works I see in scripture which would be those of the flesh (which includes the letter) and those of Faith (Christ's works).
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 06, 2009, 03:22:32 AM
Wha? I don't understand your point here.
Doc, you don't think the doctrine of the Nicolaitans was only applicable to the elders do you?
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 04:11:03 AM
The works of the Spirit have been here far before we knew of Jesus. There are only two types of works I see in scripture which would be those of the flesh (which includes the letter) and those of Faith (Christ's works). Paul
:cloud9: I didn't mean to imply that they weren't here before we knew Jesus, as obviously God's Spirit moved in myriads of ways before that. I know what you're saying, and if you analyze it, the natural works I mentioned were also contained in the letter. Blessings....
Quote from: sheila on March 06, 2009, 03:52:40 AM
What I'm saying is you don't have the right to judge
anyone as it pertains to any works . It's not your buisiness
What is your buisiness is to see that YOU follow Him.
John 21;23 Jesus was instructing Peter in reference to
the 'work' in his position...when Peter was concerned about
what would be the assignment[or work] of another...Jesus
replied 'IF I want him to remain alive until I return,
WHAT IS THAT TO YOU?
YOU MUST FOLLOW ME"
Now if someone does 'fail' to do a work of the Holy spirits
direction...like the parable teaches in regard to the talents
I'm sure they would suffer loss, but loose their salvation ?
for I am convinced that nothing can seperate us
Have you NOT HEARD ABOUT THE SALVATION OF ALL?
Sheila
Sheila, I don't have to judge anyone to know that God's Word tells us that the works of Christ we must do.
Paul
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 04:17:23 AM
:cloud9: I didn't mean to imply that they weren't here before we knew Jesus, as obviously God's Spirit moved in myriads of ways before that. I know what you're saying, and if you analyze it, the natural works I mentioned were also contained in the letter. Blessings....
Yes, correct Cardinal, those natural things would be those works of the flesh.
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 06, 2009, 04:02:31 AM
If you just read Paul who is our apostle of the nations then you will not continue making such theological mistakes. We are to follow Paul, not Peter, James or John.
Tony, I attempt to follow the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The same Gospel that Paul preached. The same Gospel that Peter preached. You typing to blind eyes if your trying to pass off your division of God's Word to me.
Paul
For those that don't believe works are required to be saved. Why did Paul say this:
Rom 1:5 By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:
If Paul received Grace for obedience to the Faith then why do other claim we don't need to have works (obedience) to be saved?
Why was Paul trying to make the Gentiles obedient?
Rom 15:18 For I will not dare to speak of any of those things which Christ hath not wrought by me, to make the Gentiles obedient, by word and deed,
Paul
Paul, I personally don't see those verses saying that without the obedience there would be no faith and grace, and that we wouldn't be saved...as I understand, when we're truly saved, the works of obedience are a result of that....as He leads, guides, corrects us as sons...His grace saves and keeps us..."for by grace are you saved, and that not of yourselves"..."
Gal.3:2-3 "This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?" IMO, this verse addresses it. Blessings, James.
P.S. I'm not a big arguer...sometimes I think we need to listen and pray more, and insist on our POV less...that's how I see it, and God will show us...
Quote from: jabcat on March 06, 2009, 05:06:16 AM
Paul, I personally don't see those verses saying that without the obedience there would be no faith and grace, and that we wouldn't be saved...as I understand, when we're truly saved, the works of obedience are a result of that....as He leads, guides, corrects us as sons...His grace saves and keeps us..."for by grace are you saved, and that not of yourselves"..."
Gal.3:2-3 "This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"
Jabcat, you don't see where it says that Grace was received for obedience? That means that obedience had to come before the receipt of Grace.
Paul
Hi Paul. No, not in this particular verse, I don't see it saying that. I think we could make that next step if that's how we believed, but just looking at that verse, I don't see that's what it is saying. I could be wrong, I will look at it more closely, do a little more study on that particular passage of scripture. Thanks, James.
Quote from: jabcat on March 06, 2009, 05:11:33 AM
Hi Paul. No, not in this particular verse, I don't see it saying that. I think we could make that next step if that's how we believed, but just looking at that verse, I don't see that's what it is saying. I could be wrong, I will look at it more closely, do a little more study on that particular passage of scripture. Thanks, James.
Please do Jabcat. I appreciate your consideration.
Paul
He died for us when we were yet in our sins..an enemy
.what kind of obediance is that?
Quote from: sheila on March 06, 2009, 05:21:53 AM
He died for us when we were yet in our sins..an enemy
.what kind of obediance is that?
Sheila, can dead Faith (Faith without works) access Grace?
Paul
Really,rather CAN LOVE AND GRACE FAIL IN IT'S WORK
Quote from: sheila on March 06, 2009, 05:33:04 AM
Really,rather CAN LOVE AND GRACE FAIL IN IT'S WORK
Sheila, can you answer directly to my question? Can dead Faith (Faith without works) access Grace?
Paul
Sorry for jumping in, Sheila can answer too :mblush:. Again, there's always room for my not completely understanding, but I don't believe our faith with which we believe is "our works". I understand it as a gift, God giving me the very ability to believe...not somehow me conjuring up a good work of faith so I can get saved...I see it as God's gift to me, both the faith and grace, then He grows me daily from there, which then include works and obedience...still, all His salvation and grace through me, empowering me even to do those works...in Him I live and breathe, etc. If it was my "live works", then I could boast...and Paul says we can't, that it's not our doing. And again, this in Galatians, "Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"
I'm not saying I 110% agree with this, but #1 I think it's funny, and #2, I at least s/w see his point. Martin Zender talks about us "doing God's work"...he says, no what really happens is, we're in God's car. He allows us to play with the power windows and/or door locks while He drives.
I beleive it can..... doubting Thomas..put no faith in the
risen Lord ' no work of beleif there' no exercizing of faith
there in that account...but He was not denied access to Jesus-
grace extended it's hand first...same story with Peter walking
on the water.
There is a lot of dead faith on the earth...it is a work of
GRACE and Holy Spirit to quicken it.
What do you think dead faith is but unbeleif...
Do you not know that all have been concluded in unbeleif..?
The works follow GRACE...they do not always precede...
except in the case of Jesus Christ WHOSE OBEDIENCE
WORKED THE GRACE OF GOD TO ALL WHO DID NOT
DO THE WORKS OF OBEDIENCE.
Abraham and Sarah's bodies were as good as dead.....they had
not brought forth the promised seed[grace] of God,yet.
they had faile to obey
they proceeded to do this 'work' of their faith...and brought
forth Ishmael.
Some times the 'works' of faith lie dormant...and as dead
the faith weakens..we all sleep......it must be quickened by
the spirit....such as 'the Bridegroom cometh!" and
'arise o'sleeper"
Having the faith of Christ ...
We seem to be in a period of testing to ascertain our fitness, giving the offender freedom to act, or make a decision; a time to be considerate, or thoughtful by the Grace of God. And the right, power, or privilege of making a choice requires judgment, as we live by the consequences of our decisions; right or wrong. May we merit to always make the proper selection – for whom much is given, much is required!
He will rectify the misguided in due time:
"Love Never Fails."
peacemaker
:cloud9: Perhaps what is needed here Paul, is a clarification of what salvation means to you? That might sound simple, but there are varying viewpoints, on how/what it is that is accomplished and when. Blessings....
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 04:12:20 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 06, 2009, 03:22:32 AM
Wha? I don't understand your point here.
Doc, you don't think the doctrine of the Nicolaitans was only applicable to the elders do you?
Paul
I'm giving the definition of what the doctrine of the Nicolaitans was. You seem to be saying it's something completely different. The doctrine of the Nicolaitans had nothing to do with works, at least not in the context you're talking about.
Quote
Jabcat, you don't see where it says that Grace was received for obedience? That means that obedience had to come before the receipt of Grace.
Paul
Not to jump in for Jab here, but it's exactly the reverse, Paul. We receive grace so that we CAN obey...
And that's how I was seeing it and didn't express it very well...you have a way Doc, of saying what I'm saying or thinking, but better..stop that :laughing7:. Anyway, yeah, what I see there is "not so we're saved, but more so since we're saved"...
Quote from: jabcat on March 06, 2009, 08:12:50 AM
And that's how I was seeing it and didn't express it very well...you have a way Doc, of saying what I'm saying or thinking, but better..stop that :laughing7:. Anyway, yeah, what I see there is "not so we're saved, but more so since we're saved"...
Hey no worries man, that happens to me too. I just happened to see the flaw in perception there and jumped in.
I'm sure you'll be able to return the favor at some point. :thumbsup:
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 02:42:42 AM
Quote from: sheila on March 06, 2009, 02:37:43 AM
No ONE..absolutely no-one has a right to Lord it over
anyones faith in Christ. in regard to these required 'works"
what? when? how? let's see...as a jehovah's wittness you
needed to attend 5 meetings a week and go out in feild
service a minimum of 12 hours a month to have an OK standing
one little old lady went into congestive heart failure twice in
a month and still got in her 12 hours so what's your excuse?
I was actually subjected to these parameters of 'works'
required...but even if I did do this my salvation was still not
assured.
It's a matter of conscience people...something between the
beleiver and God and the Holy spirit.. Other's would be hard put
to judge anyone's works,I would think, especially since Jesus
said to pray in private and not blow your horn when you do
give gifts of mercy.
1Cor 13;4 LOVE KEEPS NO RECORD OF WRONGS
God IS LOVE LOVE NEVER FAILS
If you haven't realized that by the blotting out of all
tresspasses on the cross for the whole world
YOU'LL NEVER KNOW IT
LOVE ENDURES ALL THINGS
if someone should remain in a state of sin[don't we all]
until the death of their flesh...LOVE WOULD CALL THEM
OUT OF THEIR GRAVES.SOS 8;6
Some people need to quit worrying so much about what their
brothers are doing..or are failing to do,
and show some concern for their own actions.
IF YOUR CONSCIENCE CONVICTS YOU FOR NOT DOING
SOMETHING."some work".YOU NEED TO HEED IT
If the Holy Spirit directs you to do a work,heed it
But, you don't have a right to have your conscience
Lord it over anyone else .
Some have one hour of work..others a whole day
some's work is in the cool of the day..without much effort
or suffering or sweat...some's work make their tongues stick
to the roof of their mouths
John 6;28,29 Then they asked him" What must we do to do
the works God requires?' Jesus answered, 'the work of God
is this;TO BELEIVE IN THE ONE HE HAS SENT"
WE LIVE AND BREATHE AND EXIST IN A CONTINUAL STATE
OF GRACE
one man when healed was told to 'go home and tell all your
family what God has done for you" that was the work assigned
to that man...BY JESUS HIMSELF
Doing the works of Christ are required for salvation. Are you saying that isn't so?
Paul
Great stuff you've been putting out there Sheila. I'm rather baffled by the question here . ."doing the works" . . .the only thing required of us is to believe in the one who finished the works. That seed faith grows into works of our own . . .but to base my salvation on my works . . . that's then saying that the cross again was not enough. I'll answer this straight for ya . . . I'm saying it ain't as you're indicating . . it just isn't so.
So what do you do when you see others "not" manifesting your expectation of works at their salvation? Do you confront them and try to steer them back?
S
Quote from: sheila on March 06, 2009, 06:11:43 AM
I beleive it can..... doubting Thomas..put no faith in the
risen Lord ' no work of beleif there' no exercizing of faith
there in that account...but He was not denied access to Jesus-
grace extended it's hand first...same story with Peter walking
on the water.
There is a lot of dead faith on the earth...it is a work of
GRACE and Holy Spirit to quicken it.
What do you think dead faith is but unbeleif...
Do you not know that all have been concluded in unbeleif..?
The works follow GRACE...they do not always precede...
except in the case of Jesus Christ WHOSE OBEDIENCE
WORKED THE GRACE OF GOD TO ALL WHO DID NOT
DO THE WORKS OF OBEDIENCE.
Sheila, I don't have more to say to you if you believe that Dead Faith can access Grace.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:08:25 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 06, 2009, 05:06:16 AM
Paul, I personally don't see those verses saying that without the obedience there would be no faith and grace, and that we wouldn't be saved...as I understand, when we're truly saved, the works of obedience are a result of that....as He leads, guides, corrects us as sons...His grace saves and keeps us..."for by grace are you saved, and that not of yourselves"..."
Gal.3:2-3 "This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"
Jabcat, you don't see where it says that Grace was received for obedience? That means that obedience had to come before the receipt of Grace.
Paul
The obedience of faith is just that. It is putting faith into what God has said is true concerning His Son. The faith is in the genetive So it could be "faith's obedience." It doesn't have anything to do with works but only faith.
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 07:30:51 AM
:cloud9: Perhaps what is needed here Paul, is a clarification of what salvation means to you? That might sound simple, but there are varying viewpoints, on how/what it is that is accomplished and when. Blessings....
Cardinal, first off, I believe salvation is to be saved from our sins which lead to death. I believe that once we have Faith then we receive the Spirit and once we have the Spirit that Christ will overcome our flesh to prevent us from further incurring sin. If we should stumble and unwillfully sin then I believe God shall forgive us. If we should endure this way until the end then we shall be saved (to not have imputed sin). But should we continue in sin then I believe we will reap God's Wrath. I believe we can't serve to masters. Some here believe that Good Works are not required. Paul says this:
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 06, 2009, 08:07:49 AM
I'm giving the definition of what the doctrine of the Nicolaitans was. You seem to be saying it's something completely different. The doctrine of the Nicolaitans had nothing to do with works, at least not in the context you're talking about.
Not to jump in for Jab here, but it's exactly the reverse, Paul. We receive grace so that we CAN obey...
Doc, let's do this. Let's start another thread on the Nicolaitans and we can present our sources. As to getting it in reverse then that would include the Apostles Paul - surely you don't believe that. It was Paul that tells us that Faith is the access to Grace.
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have
access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 03:49:49 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 07:30:51 AM
:cloud9: Perhaps what is needed here Paul, is a clarification of what salvation means to you? That might sound simple, but there are varying viewpoints, on how/what it is that is accomplished and when. Blessings....
Cardinal, first off, I believe salvation is to be saved from our sins which lead to death. I believe that once we have Faith then we receive the Spirit and once we have the Spirit that Christ will overcome our flesh to prevent us from further incurring sin. If we should stumble and unwillfully sin then I believe God shall forgive us. If we should endure this way until the end then we shall be saved (to not have imputed sin). But should we continue in sin then I believe we will reap God's Wrath. I believe we can't serve to masters. Some here believe that Good Works are not required. Paul says this:
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Paul
Unwillfully sin? Really? That may sound good on paper bro, but when I sin . . .I'm not doing it unwillfully . . .it's a choice . ..I will it. If I didn't will it . . then I wouldn't be doing it in the first place.
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 03:55:39 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 03:49:49 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 07:30:51 AM
:cloud9: Perhaps what is needed here Paul, is a clarification of what salvation means to you? That might sound simple, but there are varying viewpoints, on how/what it is that is accomplished and when. Blessings....
Cardinal, first off, I believe salvation is to be saved from our sins which lead to death. I believe that once we have Faith then we receive the Spirit and once we have the Spirit that Christ will overcome our flesh to prevent us from further incurring sin. If we should stumble and unwillfully sin then I believe God shall forgive us. If we should endure this way until the end then we shall be saved (to not have imputed sin). But should we continue in sin then I believe we will reap God's Wrath. I believe we can't serve to masters. Some here believe that Good Works are not required. Paul says this:
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Paul
Unwillfully sin? Really? That may sound good on paper bro, but when I sin . . .I'm not doing it unwillfully . . .it's a choice . ..I will it. If I didn't will it . . then I wouldn't be doing it in the first place.
maybe it was a typo?
as for me, my flesh loves to sin.
im reminded of pauls words:
Rom 7:13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful
Rom 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: Rom 7:25
I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin. QUESTION:
Does God use sin to crush us? bring to the end of ourselves. Does God know what each one of us need to get us feed up?
FREE FROM SIN:
is the one who lust's all day any different from the one who commits adultry?
is the one full of hate any less free from sin than the murderer?
be well yall.
chuckt
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 03:55:01 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 06, 2009, 08:07:49 AM
I'm giving the definition of what the doctrine of the Nicolaitans was. You seem to be saying it's something completely different. The doctrine of the Nicolaitans had nothing to do with works, at least not in the context you're talking about.
Not to jump in for Jab here, but it's exactly the reverse, Paul. We receive grace so that we CAN obey...
Doc, let's do this. Let's start another thread on the Nicolaitans and we can present our sources. As to getting it in reverse then that would include the Apostles Paul - surely you don't believe that. It was Paul that tells us that Faith is the access to Grace.
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Paul
We have access to grace by our faith--that's an important point.
Jesus is always saying to people--
your faith has healed you.
Absolutely guys . . .faith is the active ingredient to salvation . . .not the outward manifestation of works. I really like that verse you used there with Romans 7 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: He's saying he's dimensional . . .I never saw that before . . .but he's taking the laws of God . .not Moses or Old Covenant, but the laws of God and applying them to himself inwardly, instead of applying to working and manifesting them outwardly.
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 03:55:39 PMUnwillfully sin? Really? That may sound good on paper bro, but when I sin . . .I'm not doing it unwillfully . . .it's a choice . ..I will it. If I didn't will it . . then I wouldn't be doing it in the first place.
Nathan, Jesus said to forgive them for they know not what they do. If they were willfully sinning then that would mean they knew what they did.
Paul
So faith accesses grace, grace leads to obedience, and obedience leads to works--is that how it goes?
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 04:40:00 PM
Absolutely guys . . .faith is the active ingredient to salvation . . .not the outward manifestation of works. I really like that verse you used there with Romans 7 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: He's saying he's dimensional . . .I never saw that before . . .but he's taking the laws of God . .not Moses or Old Covenant, but the laws of God and applying them to himself inwardly, instead of applying to working and manifesting them outwardly.
Nathan, do you believe that Jesus followed the Law?
Paul
So you're basing willful sin on one verse . . .that originally wasn't in the conversation in the first place? My testimony is not what my rendition of Scripture is ... it is what I personally experience. And when I personally experience sin . . .it's a choice . . . if you want to be literal with it, Jesus didn't say forgive them of their sins because they don't know what their doing . . .he just asked God to forgive them for killing him . .because they didn't realize who he was.
Again, this is why I really don't want to get caught up in debates with others who are clearly in a different place. I've laid my weapons of warfare down . . .and since I have, the active sparring back and forth isn't something I enjoy doing anymore. I'm sure this is here for only a season . . .but as it's here in me now, I want to be obedient to it . . .surely you can appreciate that part of it.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:01:09 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 04:40:00 PM
Absolutely guys . . .faith is the active ingredient to salvation . . .not the outward manifestation of works. I really like that verse you used there with Romans 7 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: He's saying he's dimensional . . .I never saw that before . . .but he's taking the laws of God . .not Moses or Old Covenant, but the laws of God and applying them to himself inwardly, instead of applying to working and manifesting them outwardly.
Nathan, do you believe that Jesus followed the Law?
Paul
Sigh . . . I'll bite . . .
No.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:01:09 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 04:40:00 PM
Absolutely guys . . .faith is the active ingredient to salvation . . .not the outward manifestation of works. I really like that verse you used there with Romans 7 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: He's saying he's dimensional . . .I never saw that before . . .but he's taking the laws of God . .not Moses or Old Covenant, but the laws of God and applying them to himself inwardly, instead of applying to working and manifesting them outwardly.
Nathan, do you believe that Jesus followed the Law?
Paul
He doesn't seem to follow it the way the Pharisees follow it--for instance, all his Sabbath shenanigans.
But, then, he's the Lord of the Sabbath, --he can do anything he wants lol.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:00:49 PM
So faith accesses grace, grace leads to obedience, and obedience leads to works--is that how it goes?
Grace is what saves us via Faith. James implies that Faith without works can not save.
Jas 2:14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
Molly what your proposing is that Faith without works does save. Let me make it clear to you. That if Faith without works can save then it SURELY HAS PROFIT. James is obviously disputing that.
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 05:04:43 PM
So you're basing willful sin on one verse . . .
What do you mean by that statement, Nathan?
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 05:05:28 PM
Nathan, do you believe that Jesus followed the Law?
Paul
Sigh . . . I'll bite . . .
No.
[/quote]
Ok, Nathan, then tell me how Jesus was without sin and also how was He righteous if He didn't follow the Law.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:10:41 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:00:49 PM
So faith accesses grace, grace leads to obedience, and obedience leads to works--is that how it goes?
Grace is what saves us via Faith. James implies that Faith without works can not save.
Jas 2:14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
Molly what your proposing is that Faith without works does save. Let me make it clear to you. That if Faith without works can save then it SURELY HAS PROFIT. James is obviously disputing that.
Paul
I'm not proposing anything. I'm just trying to figure out how it works. I've been following your posts.
You point out that Paul receives grace from faith leading to obedience. And later, obedience leads to works.
So the starting point is faith--which is counterintuitive, but I think that is correct. That is why James says that faith without works is dead, because faith inevitably leads to works.
What bothers me with your line of questioning Paul is that your emphasis is on the natural manifestation rather than the spiritual transformation . . . and being a transparent person (purposefully) my frustrations with that tend to spill over into my tone as I post. No condemnation mind you . . . but it just appears you're set on proving something that just seems to be of little relevance when pursuing Christ. . .again, this is just my personal opinion . . .I'm not trying to speak on behalf of everyone else.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:06:16 PMHe doesn't seem to follow it the way the Pharisees follow it--for instance, all his Sabbath shenanigans.
But, then, he's the Lord of the Sabbath, --he can do anything he wants lol.
I agree with the first part of your answer that He didn't follow it the way the Pharisees follow it.
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 05:17:04 PM
What bothers me with your line of questioning Paul is that your emphasis is on the natural manifestation rather than the spiritual transformation . . . and being a transparent person (purposefully) my frustrations with that tend to spill over into my tone as I post. No condemnation mind you . . . but it just appears you're set on proving something that just seems to be of little relevance when pursuing Christ. . .again, this is just my personal opinion . . .I'm not trying to speak on behalf of everyone else.
Nathan, many don't like my position. The majority doesn't like my position but that is what I expect. I don't actually consider it MY position. I believe it is the position of Jesus Christ that we are to His works. I believe to preach that we can be saved without the requirement of His works is blasphemous.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:15:46 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 05:05:28 PM
Nathan, do you believe that Jesus followed the Law?
Paul
Sigh . . . I'll bite . . .
No.
Ok, Nathan, then tell me how Jesus was without sin and also how was He righteous if He didn't follow the Law.
Paul
[/quote]
Jesus was without sin because he was not bound by the law. It is the law that gives sin it's strength. Following the law does NOT give you righteousness. You are righteous because God declared it over you. Abraham was declared as righteous because God declared it. God declared it because Abraham "believed" . . .there's your works . . .it's simply believing in the one who fulfilled what you're seemingly trying to tell me I must now follow. If Jesus already fulfilled the law, and my faith is in Christ, then there is no need for me to also follow that which is already fulfilled.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:16:53 PMI'm not proposing anything. I'm just trying to figure out how it works. I've been following your posts.
You point out that Paul receives grace from faith leading to obedience. And later, obedience leads to works.
So the starting point is faith--which is counterintuitive, but I think that is correct. That is why James says that faith without works is dead, because faith inevitably leads to works.
Can we both agree then that Faith without works has no profit whatsoever as James shows? If that be the case then can we see that Faith with works (His works - not our own or those of the law), provide access to Grace?
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:21:56 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 05:17:04 PM
What bothers me with your line of questioning Paul is that your emphasis is on the natural manifestation rather than the spiritual transformation . . . and being a transparent person (purposefully) my frustrations with that tend to spill over into my tone as I post. No condemnation mind you . . . but it just appears you're set on proving something that just seems to be of little relevance when pursuing Christ. . .again, this is just my personal opinion . . .I'm not trying to speak on behalf of everyone else.
Nathan, many don't like my position. The majority doesn't like my position but that is what I expect. I don't actually consider it MY position. I believe it is the position of Jesus Christ that we are to His works. I believe to preach that we can be saved without the requirement of His works is blasphemous.
Paul
That explains it . . .I preach that we're called to walk in the spirit . . .not in the flesh . . .I preach that our "minds" are always at emnity against God. I preach that the flesh profiteth nothing . . .all of which I believe are also Scriptural.
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 05:23:23 PM
Ok, Nathan, then tell me how Jesus was without sin and also how was He righteous if He didn't follow the Law.
Paul
Jesus was without sin because he was not bound by the law. It is the law that gives sin it's strength. Following the law does NOT give you righteousness. You are righteous because God declared it over you. Abraham was declared as righteous because God declared it. God declared it because Abraham "believed" . . .there's your works . . .it's simply believing in the one who fulfilled what you're seemingly trying to tell me I must now follow. If Jesus already fulfilled the law, and my faith is in Christ, then there is no need for me to also follow that which is already fulfilled.
[/quote]
Some of what you said there I actually agree with. But consider that Paul says by Faith we establish the Law. Why would that be? What Law is He talking about? And why would the Law be ordained unto Life?
Paul
One of the issues of works is that it is humanized into a perception of what we think everyone should do.
Churches are full of this nonsense, you should do this, that and the other thing and if someone doesn't see you doing what they think is right, then they have some right to correct you and steer you to doing what is right.
Faith without works is dead. It is a statement of fact. It is not about me looking at my neighbor and thinking, "boy, they say they love Christ but I never see them doing anything"
No, has nothing to do with that. It is assurance that God gives faith and it will not return void, because it "works" to reconcile.
So even the most dispicable person to us may have their doctrine or theology all twisted and messed up, but that mustard seed is still written on their heart and as much as Christians do not like it God works that faith for his purpose as well.
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 05:25:30 PM
That explains it . . .I preach that we're called to walk in the spirit . . .not in the flesh . . .I preach that our "minds" are always at emnity against God. I preach that the flesh profiteth nothing . . .all of which I believe are also Scriptural.
Nathan, the message I am preaching is the works of the Spirit not the flesh. Remember, I said these are His works not our that we are to perform. Those that have Christ have a different mind. They have the mind of Christ in them:
Php 2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:24:46 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:16:53 PMI'm not proposing anything. I'm just trying to figure out how it works. I've been following your posts.
You point out that Paul receives grace from faith leading to obedience. And later, obedience leads to works.
So the starting point is faith--which is counterintuitive, but I think that is correct. That is why James says that faith without works is dead, because faith inevitably leads to works.
Can we both agree then that Faith without works has no profit whatsoever as James shows? If that be the case then can we see that Faith with works (His works - not our own or those of the law), provide access to Grace?
Paul
Yes, James is telling us that if we have faith it will lead to certain things--the end point of which is works.
But, in following your posts, there seems to be a progression, that is, one comes before the other--are you not meaning to say that?
That's why I put it in that order: faith-->grace--->obedience--->works.
In other words, you are not going to have works without the others preceding it first?
I'm not sure how you then conclude that works access grace, though. It seems grace comes directly from faith.
Maybe you mean that works
prove access to grace?
I'm not trying to be difficult, just trying to understand.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 05:31:09 PM
One of the issues of works is that it is humanized into a perception of what we think everyone should do.
Churches are full of this nonsense, you should do this, that and the other thing and if someone doesn't see you doing what they think is right, then they have some right to correct you and steer you to doing what is right.
Faith without works is dead. It is a statement of fact. It is not about me looking at my neighbor and thinking, "boy, they say they love Christ but I never see them doing anything"
No, has nothing to do with that. It is assurance that God gives faith and it will not return void, because it "works" to reconcile.
So even the most dispicable person to us may have their doctrine or theology all twisted and messed up, but that mustard seed is still written on their heart and as much as Christians do not like it God works that faith for his purpose as well.
Jesus said this:
Mat 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
Mat 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Jesus tells us to know them by their fruits. Don't you think He is going to do the same?
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:34:37 PMYes, James is telling us that if we have faith it will lead to certain things--the end point of which is works.
But, in following your posts, there seems to be a progression, that is, one comes before the other--are you not meaning to say that?
That's why I put it in that order: faith-->grace--->obedience--->works.
In other words, you are not going to have works without the others proceding it first?
I'm not sure how you then conclude that works access grace, though. It seems grace comes directly from faith.
Maybe you mean that works prove access to grace?
I'm not trying to be difficult, just trying to understand.
Here would be the order Molly:
Faith with (works = obedience) which accesses Grace.
Consider also that once your in Grace and continue in obedience that your growing in Grace.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:28:36 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 05:23:23 PM
Ok, Nathan, then tell me how Jesus was without sin and also how was He righteous if He didn't follow the Law.
Paul
Jesus was without sin because he was not bound by the law. It is the law that gives sin it's strength. Following the law does NOT give you righteousness. You are righteous because God declared it over you. Abraham was declared as righteous because God declared it. God declared it because Abraham "believed" . . .there's your works . . .it's simply believing in the one who fulfilled what you're seemingly trying to tell me I must now follow. If Jesus already fulfilled the law, and my faith is in Christ, then there is no need for me to also follow that which is already fulfilled.
Some of what you said there I actually agree with. But consider that Paul says by Faith we establish the Law. Why would that be? What Law is He talking about? And why would the Law be ordained unto Life?
Paul
[/quote]
Dont we through HIM in us and US in HIm establish the Royal Law OF which HE IS. = Law of Faith , Law of liberty, Law of Righteousness, Law of Life, Law of the Spirit , Law of God ,if my memory serves.
Its His works through us made manifest , but its a progression , fruit takes time to develop , its not grown instantly.. :icon_flower:
QuoteJesus tells us to know them by their fruits. Don't you think He is going to do the same?
HUH?friend,
Jhn 15:4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.
Jhn 15:5 I am the vine, ye [are] the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
Rom 8:11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by
his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
2Cr 3:16 Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away.
2Cr 3:17 Now
the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord [is], there [is] liberty.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:31:33 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 05:25:30 PM
That explains it . . .I preach that we're called to walk in the spirit . . .not in the flesh . . .I preach that our "minds" are always at emnity against God. I preach that the flesh profiteth nothing . . .all of which I believe are also Scriptural.
Nathan, the message I am preaching is the works of the Spirit not the flesh. Remember, I said these are His works not our that we are to perform. Those that have Christ have a different mind. They have the mind of Christ in them:
Php 2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
Paul
Yes, a different mind, not the carnal mind, but the mind of Christ.
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 05:38:58 PM
Dont we through HIM in us and US in HIm establish the Royal Law OF which HE IS. = Law of Faith , Law of liberty, Law of Righteousness, Law of Life, Law of the Spirit , Law of God ,if my memory serves.
Its His works through us made manifest , but its a progression , fruit takes time to develop , its not grown instantly.. :icon_flower:
Well there is fruit immediately. Maybe not as much as we like. But every moment in Christ is a moment that the flesh doesn't prevail over us. That is fruit.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 03:49:49 PM
If we should endure this way until the end then we shall be saved (to not have imputed sin). But should we continue in sin then I believe we will reap God's Wrath. I believe we can't serve to masters. Some here believe that Good Works are not required. Paul says this:
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Paul
The apostle Paul wrote:
Rom 5:9 "Much rather, then, being now justified in His blood, we shall be saved from indignation, through Him."
Also, you didn't finish what came after Romans 6:16:
Rom 6:16-18 Are you not aware that to whom you are presenting yourselves as slaves for obedience, his slaves you are, whom you are obeying, whether of Sin for death, or of Obedience for righteousness? (17) Now thanks be to God that you were slaves of Sin, yet you obey from the heart the type of teaching to which you were given over." (18) Now, being freed from Sin, you are enslaved to Righteousness."
We are not enslaved to Sin but to Righteousness. The obedience for righteousness is the obedience of faith or in other word "faith's obedience" which is believe God concerning His Son's death, burial and resurrection.
Quote from: chuckt on March 06, 2009, 05:39:22 PMHUH?
friend,
Jhn 15:4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.
Jhn 15:5 I am the vine, ye [are] the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
Paul
Rom 8:11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
2Cr 3:16 Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away.
2Cr 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord [is], there [is] liberty.
Chuckt:
Joh 15:2 Every branch in me that beareth
not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 06, 2009, 05:45:45 PM
The apostle Paul wrote:
Rom 5:9 "Much rather, then, being now justified in His blood, we shall be saved from indignation, through Him."
Also, you didn't finish what came after Romans 6:16:
Rom 6:16-18 Are you not aware that to whom you are presenting yourselves as slaves for obedience, his slaves you are, whom you are obeying, whether of Sin for death, or of Obedience for righteousness? (17) Now thanks be to God that you were slaves of Sin, yet you obey from the heart the type of teaching to which you were given over." (18) Now, being freed from Sin, you are enslaved to Righteousness."
We are not enslaved to Sin but to Righteousness. The obedience for righteousness is the obedience of faith or in other word "faith's obedience" which is believe God concerning His Son's death, burial and resurrection.
What part of what I said is in contradiction to those verses. Please be specific.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:35:08 PM
Jesus tells us to know them by their fruits. Don't you think He is going to do the same?
Since Jesus talks about matters of the heart which is not readily seen by you, how does that factor in to the equation?
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:40:36 PMYes, a different mind, not the carnal mind, but the mind of Christ.
Yes, Molly. So if we have the mind of Christ and Christ had no sin - can we really say that if we continue to practice sin that we are of Christ? - the answer is no. We would be the servant of sin if we practiced sin.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:37:59 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:34:37 PMYes, James is telling us that if we have faith it will lead to certain things--the end point of which is works.
But, in following your posts, there seems to be a progression, that is, one comes before the other--are you not meaning to say that?
That's why I put it in that order: faith-->grace--->obedience--->works.
In other words, you are not going to have works without the others proceding it first?
I'm not sure how you then conclude that works access grace, though. It seems grace comes directly from faith.
Maybe you mean that works prove access to grace?
I'm not trying to be difficult, just trying to understand.
Here would be the order Molly:
Faith with (works = obedience) which accesses Grace.
Consider also that once your in Grace and continue in obedience that your growing in Grace.
Paul
Oh.
So it's faith+works (obedience) ---> grace?
That makes grace the endpoint.
Do you think we can be obedient without grace, then? You mean because the obedience comes from having Christ within us?
Jesus is sometimes surprised (it seems to me) by the people who are healed--that is, he is surprised they have the faith to access grace.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
Since Jesus talks about matters of the heart which is not readily seen by you, how does that factor in to the equation?
It is what comes out of the heart that defiles a man. That is what Jesus is inspecting.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:47:47 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 06, 2009, 05:45:45 PM
The apostle Paul wrote:
Rom 5:9 "Much rather, then, being now justified in His blood, we shall be saved from indignation, through Him."
Also, you didn't finish what came after Romans 6:16:
Rom 6:16-18 Are you not aware that to whom you are presenting yourselves as slaves for obedience, his slaves you are, whom you are obeying, whether of Sin for death, or of Obedience for righteousness? (17) Now thanks be to God that you were slaves of Sin, yet you obey from the heart the type of teaching to which you were given over." (18) Now, being freed from Sin, you are enslaved to Righteousness."
We are not enslaved to Sin but to Righteousness. The obedience for righteousness is the obedience of faith or in other word "faith's obedience" which is believe God concerning His Son's death, burial and resurrection.
What part of what I said is in contradiction to those verses. Please be specific.
Paul
You said "If we should endure this way until the end then we shall be saved (to not have imputed sin). But should we continue in sin then I believe we will reap God's Wrath."
The apostle Paul says just the opposite.
and? what does he take away?
salvation? allotments?
How can the blind[unbeleiver] see without an act of grace,first?
How can the deaf[unbeleiver] hear and obey without an act
of grace....wasn't it the 'miracles' and 'grace' that was given
to them that made beleivers out of them? Even God bearing
wittness through acts of grace given..that caused them to put
faith in Jesus?
John 5;24-30....a time is coming when the dead will hear
the voice of the son of God, and those who hear will live.
And He has given Him authority to judge because he is the
son of man
........those who have done good[beleive and put faith in the
Word] will rise to live.....inner man...new creation
....and those who have done evil will rise to be condemned
......[sin works of flesh]old man,Adam
v45 But do not think that I will accuse you before the Father
Your accuser is Moses,on whom your hopes are set.
If you beleived Moses you would beleive me,for he wrote
about me.But since you do not beleive what he wrote
how are you going to beleive what I say?
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:50:08 PMOh.
So it's faith+works (obedience) ---> grace?
That makes grace the endpoint.
Do you think we can be obedient without grace, then? You mean because the obedience comes from having Christ within us?
Jesus is sometimes surprised (it seems to me) by the people who are healed--that is, he is surprised they have the faith to access grace.
I think the moment we have Faith plus works we have Grace. And yes the obedience comes from having Christ within you. You have been paying attention.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:51:50 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
Since Jesus talks about matters of the heart which is not readily seen by you, how does that factor in to the equation?
It is what comes out of the heart that defiles a man. That is what Jesus is inspecting.
Paul
How are you to recognize that? What is the fruit?
Give an example.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:49:50 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 05:40:36 PMYes, a different mind, not the carnal mind, but the mind of Christ.
Yes, Molly. So if we have the mind of Christ and Christ had no sin - can we really say that if we continue to practice sin that we are of Christ? - the answer is no. We would be the servant of sin if we practiced sin.
Paul
Yes, I agree. But, my experience of it is that I am often in the mind of Christ, but not always.
For me it's a sweet spot which I find through daily exercise--renewing.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:51:50 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
Since Jesus talks about matters of the heart which is not readily seen by you, how does that factor in to the equation?
It is what comes out of the heart that defiles a man. That is what Jesus is inspecting.
Paul
We can't see the heart, but we can see the fruit. That's why he tells us to look for the fruit. By the fruit, you will know the man.
A fig tree does not produce thistles.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 06:02:31 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:51:50 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
Since Jesus talks about matters of the heart which is not readily seen by you, how does that factor in to the equation?
It is what comes out of the heart that defiles a man. That is what Jesus is inspecting.
Paul
We can't see the heart, but we can see the fruit. That's why he tells us to look for the fruit. By the fruit, you will know the man.
A fig tree does not produce thistles.
Examples. I can read scripture and read "you shall know them by their fruit" and people can repeat it and repeat it.
Examples please of this thing that you cannot see in the heart but you will know the man by.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 06:12:29 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 06:02:31 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:51:50 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
Since Jesus talks about matters of the heart which is not readily seen by you, how does that factor in to the equation?
It is what comes out of the heart that defiles a man. That is what Jesus is inspecting.
Paul
We can't see the heart, but we can see the fruit. That's why he tells us to look for the fruit. By the fruit, you will know the man.
A fig tree does not produce thistles.
Examples. I can read scripture and read "you shall know them by their fruit" and people can repeat it and repeat it.
Examples please of this thing that you cannot see in the heart but you will know the man by.
Ephesians 5:9
(For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth)
22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
23Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.--Gal 5
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 06:19:56 PM
Ephesians 5:9
(For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth)
22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
23Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
--Gal 5
Thank you. I have friends that exhibit these traits but according to many would not be considered christians. The latter part of verse 23 is the key that gets ignored.
:cloud9: I think I see where you're coming from with this, Paul. Relate this to Noah finding GRACE in God's eyes, if you would, please. Blessings....
What is the purpose of the observation? So you can go tell them their fruitless? Or so that you yourself use wisdom and love as you approach them . . .and knowing they may be fruitless, you don't receive something from them that would cause you're own relationship to stumble . . .
This idea that we're to make it our business and calling to point out the fruitlessness in others, has red flags all over it.
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 06:30:14 PM
What is the purpose of the observation? So you can go tell them their fruitless? Or so that you yourself use wisdom and love as you approach them . . .and knowing they may be fruitless, you don't receive something from them that would cause you're own relationship to stumble . . .
This idea that we're to make it our business and calling to point out the fruitlessness in others, has red flags all over it.
well, I think he is pointing it out to us for our own protection, so we know what we are dealing with.
My fatal flaw is that I will often ignore the fruit--giving people the benefit of the doubt, or forgiving.
But, you do so at your own peril, I have found out.
It's not to judge the other, but to know what manner of person you are dealing with.
I said to a workman the other day, 'You lied to me.'
He went nuts. He said, I don't lie. I said, You lied by omission and on purpose.
wow--at that point, he was willing to do anything to make amends.
But, if I had ignored it, I would have suffered needlessly.
And, I bet he will think twice the next time he lies to a customer because he thinks it is the expedient thing to do.
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 06:30:14 PM
This idea that we're to make it our business and calling to point out the fruitlessness in others, has red flags all over it.
Yep, people use the verses about works and fruit all the time to decide who is godly and who is not when it is not for that purpose.
People can do wrong things and really mess up, this pattern of "knowing them by their fruits" has nothing to do with our right to decide anything.
It is so we can encourage even the smallest good trait in anyone knowing that "GOD" "WORKS" and everyone has fruit whether anyone likes to try to find it or not.
Molly your right, we shouldn't just put up with a lie, but fruit is there in the workman.
1Cr 4:5 Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then shall every man have praise of God.
isnt there also a scripture about NOT judging according to appearance?
chuckt
Oh wow . . .good stuff guys . . . I love what all three of you have just shared . .. I'm not used to having people pick up on the same things so quickly as what you've done . . . tis quite refreshing.
It's all the same..weeds and wheat...dead branches and
and fruitful boughs....these things are found in every human
because ..that is what the salvation of sinners is all about.
the angels must gather out the weeds..the gardner must
prune unfruitful dead branches in us. The Holy spirit must be
given and do the works through our dead[sinful] flesh.Quicken.
when you walk in faith is it what you see..or is it the unseen
When we beleive [have faith] in God's salvation of all
is it because we see everyone raised,resurrected and perfected
now?
I can see the fruit of Babylon...even the denial of the grace
and salvation of all mankind....I can not gather 'fruit' from
that..less I gather condemnation and judgement and
everlasting destruction for the masses of mankind.
were not to judge by appearance...there are those with works
'casting out demons in his name etc' that he does not know,
there are those that have a reputation that they are alive
but are dead.
the problem is they work lawlessness when they judge and
condemn their brothers...the Royal LAW is to LOVE GOD and
Love your brother as yourself.
IS IT LAWFUL TO KILL OR HEAL
NOTHING CAN SEPERATE MANKIND FROM THAT LOVE
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 03:55:39 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 03:49:49 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 07:30:51 AM
:cloud9: Perhaps what is needed here Paul, is a clarification of what salvation means to you? That might sound simple, but there are varying viewpoints, on how/what it is that is accomplished and when. Blessings....
Cardinal, first off, I believe salvation is to be saved from our sins which lead to death. I believe that once we have Faith then we receive the Spirit and once we have the Spirit that Christ will overcome our flesh to prevent us from further incurring sin. If we should stumble and unwillfully sin then I believe God shall forgive us. If we should endure this way until the end then we shall be saved (to not have imputed sin). But should we continue in sin then I believe we will reap God's Wrath. I believe we can't serve to masters. Some here believe that Good Works are not required. Paul says this:
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Paul
Unwillfully sin? Really? That may sound good on paper bro, but when I sin . . .I'm not doing it unwillfully . . .it's a choice . ..I will it. If I didn't will it . . then I wouldn't be doing it in the first place.
Romans 7:15
15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
Hi Nathan, was Paul willfully sinning here or did he sin against/unwilfully his will?
All sin falls under two types, sins that are not unto death and sins that are unto death.
Willfully sinning is a sin unto death. The sins we do unwillfully are not unto death.
So yes unwillfull sin is in the scriptures.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 05:21:56 PM
I believe to preach that we can be saved without the requirement of His works is blasphemous.
"I, see" said, the blind man!
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 07:48:44 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 03:55:39 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 03:49:49 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 07:30:51 AM
:cloud9: Perhaps what is needed here Paul, is a clarification of what salvation means to you? That might sound simple, but there are varying viewpoints, on how/what it is that is accomplished and when. Blessings....
Cardinal, first off, I believe salvation is to be saved from our sins which lead to death. I believe that once we have Faith then we receive the Spirit and once we have the Spirit that Christ will overcome our flesh to prevent us from further incurring sin. If we should stumble and unwillfully sin then I believe God shall forgive us. If we should endure this way until the end then we shall be saved (to not have imputed sin). But should we continue in sin then I believe we will reap God's Wrath. I believe we can't serve to masters. Some here believe that Good Works are not required. Paul says this:
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Paul
Unwillfully sin? Really? That may sound good on paper bro, but when I sin . . .I'm not doing it unwillfully . . .it's a choice . ..I will it. If I didn't will it . . then I wouldn't be doing it in the first place.
Romans 7:15
15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
Hi Nathan, was Paul willfully sinning here or did he sin against/unwilfully his will?
All sin falls under two types, sins that are not unto death and sins that are unto death.
Willfully sinning is a sin unto death. The sins we do unwillfully are not unto death.
So yes unwillfull sin is in the scriptures.
To say that Paul sinned against his will is to say that sin renders you unconscious and takes over you like it's some ominous evil that we have no power over. When Paul sinned, he chose to. And it bothered him because he knew better, but still CHOSE to do it. And his observation was his frustration of the battle between flesh and spirit that is in him . . .and that battle never ceases until we leave this realm of flesh completely .. .be it by way of natural death, or by way of supernatural transformation into our glorified state at the end of the ages . . .but "until" then, flesh is always going to war with the spirit. We're always going to "choose" to make bad decisions, choose to give in to the flesh . . .not to mention the times where we flare up unintentionally . . .it's all still causing us to miss the mark.
That's why I think understanding John the Baptist's proclamation about Jesus taking away the sin of the world is so profound. It's because in the world, sin still manifests . .but to those who are in Christ . .the sin has no affect . .the power of it has no affect because GRACE ABOUNDS. And the sooner we get our attention off of the falling down, and turn to the Christ who resurrects . .the sooner we'll get into the freedom of life and reproduction rather than doom and gloom of reproof.
I pursue patterns in Scripture . . .if I see the pattern, I can then understand the principle. The pattern that I see with this in Scripture is clearly with the children of Israel in the land of Goshen . . .the plagues came and they were in the middle of it all, but God protected them from all of it. Noah . . .the rains came, the flood manifested, and Noah, being in the middle of it . . .was protected by the ark of Christ. So . . .my spirit is in the center of my flesh, my flesh is subject to the natural . . I get colds, the flu, back aches . . .my bones break and my flesh bleeds . . .but regardless of what my natural body goes through . .regardless of what my outer man experiences . . .my inner man is hid in Christ.
Quote from: PaulMolly your right, we shouldn't just put up with a lie, but fruit is there in the workman.
well, let's say I pruned a few branches for him. :laughing7:
Question to all
Do you believe all works are the same?
Do you believe there are works of the law and works of faith?
I ask because what seems to be taking place in this thread, is people keep pointing back to works of the law when those of us who believe in works have stated repeatedly that we are talking about spiritual works, works of faith, works of Jesus etc. It as though some can't seem to differentiate between the two.
Jesus said greater WORKS shall ye do because I go to the Father.
Pretty plain imo that WORKS are to be done by us through Christ, yet many here seem to be saying we don't have to do WORKs.
So a simple way to end this debate is to ask all here this question
Do you believe we are to do the greater WORKS Jesus mentioned?
If you answer YES to this question, I don't see how you then can make an argument against what Paul, Bob and I have been saying. For if you make an argument against what we are saying then you are not differentiating between the two laws.
Both are manifesting in the natural realm . . .both are called "works" and for me, they could be the exact same activity . . the difference is, the motives of the one doing them. I could be a preacher because my interpretation of certain Scriptures say I should become one . . .or I could be a preacher because I have a shepherds heart . . .either way, the ministry is there and active, but the motives are different . . .if the motive is right, the ministry benefits.
I don't believe tithing is a New Testament requirement . .but say that to the church in general and you'll be martyred for sure . . .but yet I still give . . .my giving is out of the spirit's generosity, not out of the law of the letter. same activity . . .different motivation.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 06:12:29 PMExamples. I can read scripture and read "you shall know them by their fruit" and people can repeat it and repeat it.
Examples please of this thing that you cannot see in the heart but you will know the man by.
Paul, easy one and I will let you take your pick since there are so many. Find any thing that Jesus did in the scriptures. And there you go.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 06:23:14 PMThank you. I have friends that exhibit these traits but according to many would not be considered christians. The latter part of verse 23 is the key that gets ignored.
Paul, did those friends atrribute those good things to Christ or did they attribute them not to Christ. Because if they attributed them to Christ then they indeed were Good things but if they didn't then they robbed Christ of His Glory and thus they were not Good things. Christ is the Copyright holder of all GOOD deeds that men can perform.
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 06, 2009, 06:30:14 PM
What is the purpose of the observation? So you can go tell them their fruitless? Or so that you yourself use wisdom and love as you approach them . . .and knowing they may be fruitless, you don't receive something from them that would cause you're own relationship to stumble . . .
This idea that we're to make it our business and calling to point out the fruitlessness in others, has red flags all over it.
Nathan, who are we to avoid here in this verse and how do we determine it:
Rom 16:17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
Paul
QuoteTo say that Paul sinned against his will is to say that sin renders you unconscious and takes over you like it's some ominous evil that we have no power over. When Paul sinned, he chose to. And it bothered him because he knew better, but still CHOSE to do it
.
Nathan that's not according to scripture, here reread them
14For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin. 15For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
16If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. 17Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
No more I that do it but sin that dwelleth in me.
18For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. 19For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
Now here the crucial part Paul says for TO WILL IS PRESENT with me, obviously Paul did not choose to sin for he goes on to say For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
20Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Can you not see that Paul refuses to blame himself here for his sin? But lays the blame squarely where it belongs on the law of sin within him.
21I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
Paul say that when he would do good, Paul wanted to do good Nathan but the law of sin held him captive.
22For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: 23But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
Do you see this law in his members warred against the law of his mind and by that law of sin took him captive against his will and caused him to sin.
24O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? 25I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
Paul sums it up this way So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
Nathan I am not picking at you brother just trying to point out something you might not have seen before.
QuoteThat's why I think understanding John the Baptist's proclamation about Jesus taking away the sin of the world is so profound. It's because in the world, sin still manifests . .but to those who are in Christ . .the sin has no affect . .the power of it has no affect because GRACE ABOUNDS. And the sooner we get our attention off of the falling down, and turn to the Christ who resurrects . .the sooner we'll get into the freedom of life and reproduction rather than doom and gloom of reproof.
Nathan what you see as doom and gloom of reproof I see as liberty in Christ, knowing my sins because of the law of sin in me are NOT imputed unto me, the only sins that are imputed unto us are the sins of wilful disobedience, thus sin was in the world BEFORE the law but was not imputed unto us UNTIL after the DISOBEDIENCE of Adam. That liberty brother, knowing I am only responsible for the sins I wilfully commit.
QuoteI pursue patterns in Scripture . . .if I see the pattern, I can then understand the principle. The pattern that I see with this in Scripture is clearly with the children of Israel in the land of Goshen . . .the plagues came and they were in the middle of it all, but God protected them from all of it. Noah . . .the rains came, the flood manifested, and Noah, being in the middle of it . . .was protected by the ark of Christ. So . . .my spirit is in the center of my flesh, my flesh is subject to the natural . . I get colds, the flu, back aches . . .my bones break and my flesh bleeds . . .but regardless of what my natural body goes through . .regardless of what my outer man experiences . . .my inner man is hid in Christ.
I agree.
QuoteBoth are manifesting in the natural realm . . .both are called "works" and for me, they could be the exact same activity . . the difference is, the motives of the one doing them.
I have no problem with that understanding Nathan for some do hold the truth in unrightiousness.
So you not appossed to works, just the motive behind why one does the works.
If that is what you are speaking of I agree, for it is the same law but it is how we apprehend the law is what counts.
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 08:25:15 PM
Question to all
Do you believe all works are the same?
Do you believe there are works of the law and works of faith?
I ask because what seems to be taking place in this thread, is people keep pointing back to works of the law when those of us who believe in works have stated repeatedly that we are talking about spiritual works, works of faith, works of Jesus etc. It as though some can't seem to differentiate between the two.
Jesus said greater WORKS shall ye do because I go to the Father.
Pretty plain imo that WORKS are to be done by us through Christ, yet many here seem to be saying we don't have to do WORKs.
So a simple way to end this debate is to ask all here this question
Do you believe we are to do the greater WORKS Jesus mentioned?
If you answer YES to this question, I don't see how you then can make an argument against what Paul, Bob and I have been saying. For if you make an argument against what we are saying then you are not differentiating between the two laws.
Scott :icon_flower:
Those who are His are Annoited unto works, His works through US made manifest, for the fullfilment of His purpose, it seems babes are very much stuck in the Earth purposing themselves with the Literal..ie fundaments...I see a Cycle and progression :icon_flower:
.
Here is Paul's comment at the end of Romans 7:
Rom 7:25 I thank God--through Jesus Christ our Lord; so then, I myself indeed with the mind do serve the law of God, and with the flesh, the law of sin.
I wonder how many realize they are to serve the Law of God through Jesus Christ?
Paul
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:04:56 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 08:25:15 PM
Question to all
Do you believe all works are the same?
Do you believe there are works of the law and works of faith?
I ask because what seems to be taking place in this thread, is people keep pointing back to works of the law when those of us who believe in works have stated repeatedly that we are talking about spiritual works, works of faith, works of Jesus etc. It as though some can't seem to differentiate between the two.
Jesus said greater WORKS shall ye do because I go to the Father.
Pretty plain imo that WORKS are to be done by us through Christ, yet many here seem to be saying we don't have to do WORKs.
So a simple way to end this debate is to ask all here this question
Do you believe we are to do the greater WORKS Jesus mentioned?
If you answer YES to this question, I don't see how you then can make an argument against what Paul, Bob and I have been saying. For if you make an argument against what we are saying then you are not differentiating between the two laws.
Scott :icon_flower:
Those who are His are Annoited unto works, His works through US made manifest, for the fullfilment of His purpose, it seems babes are very much stuck in the Earth purposing themselves with the Literal..ie fundaments...I see a Cycle and progression :icon_flower:
.
Not sure of what you mean bro, but I beleive that which is done in the spirit will be manifest in the earth.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 08:48:19 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 06:23:14 PMThank you. I have friends that exhibit these traits but according to many would not be considered christians. The latter part of verse 23 is the key that gets ignored.
Paul, did those friends atrribute those good things to Christ or did they attribute them not to Christ. Because if they attributed them to Christ then they indeed were Good things but if they didn't then they robbed Christ of His Glory and thus they were not Good things. Christ is the Copyright holder of all GOOD deeds that men can perform.
Paul
Christ is the copyright holder of all good deeds done by men.
I love it!
Some preferred the equation representation to understanding this. So let's go that approach and see who disagrees. Here is the equation that I understand:
Faith + works (not ours but His) -> (recursive = Growing in Grace) -> salvation!
What this equation above means that when we have Faith and Good works we access Grace. And when we are in Grace and continue to have Faith + works we will Grow in Grace. And if we endure and continue in this process till the end, then we shall receive salvation.
Paul
:cloud9: Paul, I'm not offended by what you're sharing because I think you've seen something. I only wish you would share in more detail. Blessings....
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:11:23 PM
Some preferred the equation representation to understanding this. So let's go that approach and see who disagrees. Here is the equation that I understand:
Faith + works (not ours but His) -> (recursive = Growing in Grace) -> salvation!
What this equation above means that when we have Faith and Good works we access Grace. And when we are in Grace and continue to have Faith + works we will Grow in Grace. And if we endure and continue in this process till the end, then we shall receive salvation.
Paul
This is why the one that has much has more given to him.
You could call it the cycle of salvation--a whirlwind--the staircase to heaven.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:09:37 PMChrist is the copyright holder of all good deeds done by men.
I love it!
Yes, Molly and I think if everyone thinks that way they will start to understand many things more that they read in scripture. We as man are always wicked creatures. This is why when Christ is alive in us - we are no more because we will no longer seek to perform the pleasure of our flesh that we did in the past but instead the lusts of our flesh will be overcome by the New man in us which is Christ. This is HOW we are saved (it is Christ putting down our lusts in our own flesh by His very nature in us). This can ONLY be accomplish by Faith. This is all logical and rational when we understand that Jesus Christ is the copyright owner of all good works. That is why this question of works is so critical to undertand.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 09:09:01 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:04:56 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 08:25:15 PM
Question to all
Do you believe all works are the same?
Do you believe there are works of the law and works of faith?
I ask because what seems to be taking place in this thread, is people keep pointing back to works of the law when those of us who believe in works have stated repeatedly that we are talking about spiritual works, works of faith, works of Jesus etc. It as though some can't seem to differentiate between the two.
Jesus said greater WORKS shall ye do because I go to the Father.
Pretty plain imo that WORKS are to be done by us through Christ, yet many here seem to be saying we don't have to do WORKs.
So a simple way to end this debate is to ask all here this question
Do you believe we are to do the greater WORKS Jesus mentioned?
If you answer YES to this question, I don't see how you then can make an argument against what Paul, Bob and I have been saying. For if you make an argument against what we are saying then you are not differentiating between the two laws.
Scott :icon_flower:
Those who are His are Annoited unto works, His works through US made manifest, for the fullfilment of His purpose, it seems babes are very much stuck in the Earth purposing themselves with the Literal..ie fundaments...I see a Cycle and progression :icon_flower:
.
Not sure of what you mean bro, but I beleive that which is done in the spirit will be manifest in the earth.
yes bro thats what I reffering to ,through Us into the Earth, I just related Babes to thier starting place, young in the faith moving towards Sonship,.. :thumbsup:
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:16:34 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:09:37 PMChrist is the copyright holder of all good deeds done by men.
I love it!
Yes, Molly and I think if everyone thinks that way they will start to understand many things more that they read in scripture. We as man are always wicked creatures. This is why when Christ is alive in us - we are no more because we will no longer seek to perform the pleasure of our flesh that we did in the past but instead the lusts of our flesh will be overcome by the New man in us which is Christ. This is HOW we are saved (it is Christ putting down our lusts in our own flesh by His very nature in us). This can ONLY be accomplish by Faith. This is all logical and rational when we understand that Jesus Christ is the copyright owner of all good works. That is why this question of works is so critical to undertand.
Paul
Amen :thumbsup:
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 09:12:24 PM
:cloud9: Paul, I'm not offended by what you're sharing because I think you've seen something. I only wish you would share in more detail. Blessings....
Cardinal, essentially we are of Christ (Christians) if we are becoming the Christ.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:20:23 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 09:12:24 PM
:cloud9: Paul, I'm not offended by what you're sharing because I think you've seen something. I only wish you would share in more detail. Blessings....
Cardinal, essentially we are of Christ (Christians) if we are becoming the Christ.
Paul
wow..I just said that on another thread.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:14:29 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:11:23 PM
Some preferred the equation representation to understanding this. So let's go that approach and see who disagrees. Here is the equation that I understand:
Faith + works (not ours but His) -> (recursive = Growing in Grace) -> salvation!
What this equation above means that when we have Faith and Good works we access Grace. And when we are in Grace and continue to have Faith + works we will Grow in Grace. And if we endure and continue in this process till the end, then we shall receive salvation.
Paul
This is why the one that has much has more given to him.
You could call it the cycle of salvation--a whirlwind--the staircase to heaven.
Molly, is what I'm saying starting to make sense. I'm trying to find the best ways to present this. I went the equation route because you had a good idea in putting it in that form.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:24:48 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:14:29 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:11:23 PM
Some preferred the equation representation to understanding this. So let's go that approach and see who disagrees. Here is the equation that I understand:
Faith + works (not ours but His) -> (recursive = Growing in Grace) -> salvation!
What this equation above means that when we have Faith and Good works we access Grace. And when we are in Grace and continue to have Faith + works we will Grow in Grace. And if we endure and continue in this process till the end, then we shall receive salvation.
Paul
This is why the one that has much has more given to him.
You could call it the cycle of salvation--a whirlwind--the staircase to heaven.
Molly, is what I'm saying starting to make sense. I'm trying to find the best ways to present this. I went the equation route because you had a good idea in putting it in that form.
Paul
Yes, it's making sense to me. But, then, I like equations.
It's not something that I have thought about before, and it's a little surprising. But, I agree with you.
In a sense, I think you could say salvation is a dynamic process.
Quote from: pneuma on March 06, 2009, 09:18:28 PMAmen :thumbsup:
Praise Jesus, pneuma! I'm really getting my eyes watered up in the hopes that finally some are understanding this.
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:23:59 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:20:23 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 09:12:24 PM
:cloud9: Paul, I'm not offended by what you're sharing because I think you've seen something. I only wish you would share in more detail. Blessings....
Cardinal, essentially we are of Christ (Christians) if we are becoming the Christ.
Paul
wow..I just said that on another thread.
molly
i think a few people are saying the same thing..just wording it differently.. :icon_flower:
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:28:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:23:59 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:20:23 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 09:12:24 PM
:cloud9: Paul, I'm not offended by what you're sharing because I think you've seen something. I only wish you would share in more detail. Blessings....
Cardinal, essentially we are of Christ (Christians) if we are becoming the Christ.
Paul
wow..I just said that on another thread.
molly
i think a few people are saying the same thing..just wording it differently.. :icon_flower:
well, for sure.
But, why isn't this taught in churches?
I said it to a minister a few months ago and she looked at me like I was the devil's spawn.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:26:15 PMYes, it's making sense to me. But, then, I like equations.
It's not something that I have thought about before, and it's a little surprising. But, I agree with you.
In a sense, I think you could say salvation is a dynamic process.
Great Molly, I may be bearing fruit! Of course all glory goes to the vine (Jesus Christ). You are right also - it is a dynamic process. Please read the parable of the pounds (talents) which you can find at Luke 19:12. When you read that you will realize that we must INCREASE.
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:30:46 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:28:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:23:59 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:20:23 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 09:12:24 PM
:cloud9: Paul, I'm not offended by what you're sharing because I think you've seen something. I only wish you would share in more detail. Blessings....
Cardinal, essentially we are of Christ (Christians) if we are becoming the Christ.
Paul
wow..I just said that on another thread.
molly
i think a few people are saying the same thing..just wording it differently.. :icon_flower:
well, for sure.
But, why isn't this taught in churches?
I said it to a minister a few months ago and she looked at me like I was the devil's spawn.
cos theres still very earthly sis....Tis a progression isnt it?
That which carnal cant really grasp and move forward...relatively speaking I see them as Babes... :icon_flower:
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:31:45 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:26:15 PMYes, it's making sense to me. But, then, I like equations.
It's not something that I have thought about before, and it's a little surprising. But, I agree with you.
In a sense, I think you could say salvation is a dynamic process.
Great Molly, I may be bearing fruit! Of course all glory goes to the vine (Jesus Christ). You are right also - it is a dynamic process. Please read the parable of the pounds (talents) which you can find at Luke 19:12. When you read that you will realize that we must INCREASE.
Paul
This, also, is how we become saviors ourselves.
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:35:45 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:30:46 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:28:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:23:59 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:20:23 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 09:12:24 PM
:cloud9: Paul, I'm not offended by what you're sharing because I think you've seen something. I only wish you would share in more detail. Blessings....
Cardinal, essentially we are of Christ (Christians) if we are becoming the Christ.
Paul
wow..I just said that on another thread.
molly
i think a few people are saying the same thing..just wording it differently.. :icon_flower:
well, for sure.
But, why isn't this taught in churches?
I said it to a minister a few months ago and she looked at me like I was the devil's spawn.
cos theres still very earthly sis....Tis a progression isnt it?
That which carnal cant really grasp and move forward...relatively speaking I see them as Babes... :icon_flower:
But, it's all there in the Bible. All you have to do is read the Bible--to know it intellectually, at least.
Don't they read the Bible?
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:37:00 PMThis, also, is how we become saviors ourselves.
Yes that is technically true but our flesh still exists and may take occasion to become prideful if we say that to much so let's continue to give Christ that glory in us.
We haven't talked specifically much about the Holy Spirit and the role of that Spirit in this. I hope to start another thread soon about that. I want to talk about how a Word is the wind that transforms us.
Paul
Come on Molly..read Nats context post ..Tis the Spirit which RISES those words to Life ,many still see death and darkness, doom and Gloom...HE REVEALS these things ,and its always to His Glory, it ALWAYS goes back to HIM :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance:
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 08:48:19 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 06, 2009, 06:23:14 PMThank you. I have friends that exhibit these traits but according to many would not be considered christians. The latter part of verse 23 is the key that gets ignored.
Paul, did those friends atrribute those good things to Christ or did they attribute them not to Christ. Because if they attributed them to Christ then they indeed were Good things but if they didn't then they robbed Christ of His Glory and thus they were not Good things. Christ is the Copyright holder of all GOOD deeds that men can perform.
Paul
So Paul . .according to you and this theory here . . .Mother Theresa that impacted the world with her outreach . . you're saying if she doesn't acknowledge God, or Christ as her savior . .all of those wonderful things she did were actually bad things???
Secondly . . . the recipe of righteousness . . .it doesn't start with faith for me at all guys . . .it starts with grace. Remember . . .man wasn't even around when the decision was made to create him . . .Grace ignites faith . . faith births response to that grace. I still don't think that the response of others should be what we are looking at in others. Not everyone's nature is the same, so even though two people may recieve the same exact salvation, their personalities will dictate what kind of response they will have to that salvation.
The purpose of knowing the fruit of another is not to judge whether or not there salvation is real . . .but that their message is pure . . .that whole thing is about discerning false prophets . ..not brothers and sisters in the Lord.
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:43:46 PM
Come on Molly..read Nats context post ..Tis the Spirit which RISES those words to Life ,many still see death and darkness, doom and Gloom...HE REVEALS these things ,and its always to His Glory, it ALWAYS goes back to HIM :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance:
Are you saying that we cannot understand that, even on an intellectual level, without the Holy Spirit?
I'm not disputing that, I'm just trying to figure out what is going on.
Jesus said to the Pharisees--you slam the door to the kingdom in their faces--as though the Pharisees were doing it on purpose.
Quote from: NathanSo Paul . .according to you and this theory here . . .Mother Theresa that impacted the world with her outreach . . you're saying if she doesn't acknowledge God, or Christ as her savior . .all of those wonderful things she did were actually bad things???
Mother Theresa is an interesting case. Personally, I find her a little creepy, even before she revealed that she hadn't felt the presence of Jesus in 40 years or whatever it was.
I am just grateful that I was not at her mercy in one of her hostels--where people lay on the floor dying.
I wouldn't wish that on my dog.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:51:33 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:43:46 PM
Come on Molly..read Nats context post ..Tis the Spirit which RISES those words to Life ,many still see death and darkness, doom and Gloom...HE REVEALS these things ,and its always to His Glory, it ALWAYS goes back to HIM :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance:
Are you saying that we cannot understand that, even on an intellectual level, without the Holy Spirit?
well not being an intellectual myself Molly ...Folk are where they are...gee,im nobodys Judge, but somethings Blinding their intellect and preventing them moving forward ...
let me know next time ya go and talk to the Brightest and ask Him\her.... :icon_flower:
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 10:04:06 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:51:33 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:43:46 PM
Come on Molly..read Nats context post ..Tis the Spirit which RISES those words to Life ,many still see death and darkness, doom and Gloom...HE REVEALS these things ,and its always to His Glory, it ALWAYS goes back to HIM :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance:
Are you saying that we cannot understand that, even on an intellectual level, without the Holy Spirit?
well not being an intellectual myself Molly ...Folk are where they are...gee,im nobodys Judge, but somethings Blinding their intellect and preventing them moving forward ...
let me know next time ya go and talk to the Brightest and ask Him\her.... :icon_flower:
well--I'm just trying to get over my recent trauma from three weeks in church.
I couldn't believe what they were teaching--they were literally shutting down the Spirit--turning off the lights.
And, the look in the minister's eyes whenever I would bring something up--horror and, worse than that, ...fear...
What was she afraid of? That everything she knew might be wrong? Or that I would lead her students down the wrong path? Or what? Oh, well, I probably will never know.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 10:10:04 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 10:04:06 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:51:33 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:43:46 PM
Come on Molly..read Nats context post ..Tis the Spirit which RISES those words to Life ,many still see death and darkness, doom and Gloom...HE REVEALS these things ,and its always to His Glory, it ALWAYS goes back to HIM :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance:
Are you saying that we cannot understand that, even on an intellectual level, without the Holy Spirit?
well not being an intellectual myself Molly ...Folk are where they are...gee,im nobodys Judge, but somethings Blinding their intellect and preventing them moving forward ...
let me know next time ya go and talk to the Brightest and ask Him\her.... :icon_flower:
well--I'm just trying to get over my recent trauma from three weeks in church.
I couldn't believe what they were teaching--they were literally shutting down the Spirit--turning off the lights.
And, the look in the minister's eyes whenever I would bring something up--horror and, worse than that, ...fear...
What was she afraid of? That everything she knew might be wrong? Or that I would lead her students down the wrong path? Or what? Oh, well, I probably will never know.
ya sowing seeds Sis....may take many seasons before their watered....some just may wither until another tine...go easy there, it can take its toll such places...I havent been for yrs...
:HeartThrob:
The place that needs it the most is the one that fears the worst. The one thing churches are adamant about is unity . . .and that kind of thing brings division. It really needs to start at the top . . pray for the pastors and teachers that not ony will they be able to see it . . .but that they'll be able to make way for the changes that come with it.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:55:45 PM
Mother Theresa is an interesting case. Personally, I find her a little creepy, even before she revealed that she hadn't felt the presence of Jesus in 40 years or whatever it was.
Thats actually what religion does, it kept her from feeling spiritual because it teaches people to look in all the wrong places.
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 10:15:52 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 10:10:04 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 10:04:06 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 09:51:33 PM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 09:43:46 PM
Come on Molly..read Nats context post ..Tis the Spirit which RISES those words to Life ,many still see death and darkness, doom and Gloom...HE REVEALS these things ,and its always to His Glory, it ALWAYS goes back to HIM :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance:
Are you saying that we cannot understand that, even on an intellectual level, without the Holy Spirit?
well not being an intellectual myself Molly ...Folk are where they are...gee,im nobodys Judge, but somethings Blinding their intellect and preventing them moving forward ...
let me know next time ya go and talk to the Brightest and ask Him\her.... :icon_flower:
well--I'm just trying to get over my recent trauma from three weeks in church.
I couldn't believe what they were teaching--they were literally shutting down the Spirit--turning off the lights.
And, the look in the minister's eyes whenever I would bring something up--horror and, worse than that, ...fear...
What was she afraid of? That everything she knew might be wrong? Or that I would lead her students down the wrong path? Or what? Oh, well, I probably will never know.
ya sowing seeds Sis....may take many seasons before their watered....some just may wither until another tine...go easy there, it can take its toll such places...I havent been for yrs...
:HeartThrob:
Yes, but I was backing up everything I said with scripture, which came to me out of the blue--and kind of surprised me since I don't make a point to memorize scripture. So God himself must have wanted her to know those things.
But, I can't go back. I can't be in a place where they are turning off the spigots.
Even Jesus couldn't work in a place which turned off the spigots.
A prophet is not without honor except in his own home town lol.
Quote from: Molly on March 06, 2009, 10:22:22 PM
But, I can't go back. I can't be in a place where they are turning off the spigots.
I found the same thing, if I go back I will become a withered branch.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 09:20:23 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 06, 2009, 09:12:24 PM
:cloud9: Paul, I'm not offended by what you're sharing because I think you've seen something. I only wish you would share in more detail. Blessings....
Cardinal, essentially we are of Christ (Christians) if we are becoming the Christ.
Paul
:cloud9: AMEN, AMEN, AMEN........ :thumbsup:
"Yet to him who is not working,
yet is believing on Him Who is justifying
the irreverent,
his faith is reckoned for righteousness."
Rom 4:5
Quote from: Tony N on March 06, 2009, 11:45:43 PM
"Yet to him who is not working,
yet is believing on Him Who is justifying
the irreverent,
his faith is reckoned for righteousness."
Rom 4:5
Amen TT :icon_flower:
By the deeds of the LAW no man is justified. :thumbsup:
Quote from: Tony N on March 06, 2009, 05:53:33 PMYou said "If we should endure this way until the end then we shall be saved (to not have imputed sin). But should we continue in sin then I believe we will reap God's Wrath."
The apostle Paul says just the opposite.
Coud you quote what you are referring to Tony? Thanks.
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 11:50:19 PMBy the deeds of the LAW no man is justified. :thumbsup:
Is loving your neighbor a "deed of the law" ?
Quote from: bobf on March 07, 2009, 12:28:30 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 06, 2009, 11:50:19 PMBy the deeds of the LAW no man is justified. :thumbsup:
Is loving your neighbor a "deed of the law" ?
isnt a Fulfillment of the law ,?
isnt true that the Israelites were told to Hate their enemies...seems a GREATer magnification to me, for instance-The Honour in the Old C compared to the HONOUR your Mother and Father with a promise -differs quite from that spoke of In the New...the previous was a Burden
The old for me Has noting to do with the NEW...one was a Physical application the other has a greater Spiritual significance ...the law is Magnified...therefore its greater......
Keep the LAW in its sense as Much as wish..keep the Sabbath as a Literal DAY...aint going to make you Righteous...
but im not denying its Moral Value.
:icon_flower:
Quote from: Tony N on March 06, 2009, 11:45:43 PM
"Yet to him who is not working,
yet is believing on Him Who is justifying
the irreverent,
his faith is reckoned for righteousness."
Rom 4:5
Those are the works of the flesh. Read verse 1:
Rom 4:1 What, then, shall we say Abraham our father, to have found,
according to flesh?
I think most here are in agreement that the works of the flesh are not a requirement for salvation. Paul shows elsewhere that the works of Christ are a requirement for salvation.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 12:50:47 AM
Those are the works of the flesh. Read verse 1:
Rom 4:1 What, then, shall we say Abraham our father, to have found, according to flesh?
I think most here are in agreement that the works of the flesh are not a requirement for salvation. Paul shows elsewhere that the works of Christ are a requirement for salvation.
Paul
Can you say what are works of the flesh and what are works of Christ--and how do we tell the difference?
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 12:59:48 AMCan you say what are works of the flesh and what are works of Christ--and how do we tell the difference?
Pretty much any work that caters to the lusts of the flesh is is a work of the flesh which equals the opposite of do unto neighbor as you want done unto you.
Paul
So clarifying...Paul, aren't you summarily saying "bad or sinful works" won't get us salvation, but "good, righteous works" will? Is what you're saying that simple? That if we sin, no salvation. If we "live for God", that gives us salvation? If not, please distinguish...
I try to believe and practice that my works are as filthy rags, that it's all His grace and works...His death, resurrection, gift to me, and "His grace is sufficient"...thanks, james.
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 01:05:34 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 12:59:48 AMCan you say what are works of the flesh and what are works of Christ--and how do we tell the difference?
Pretty much any work that caters to the lusts of the flesh is is a work of the flesh which equals the opposite of do unto neighbor as you want done unto you.
Paul
well, for instance, bad guys that get their money in a bad way, including killing people, will always give some of it to charity. I'm not sure what they're thinking--I doubt it's guilt otherwise they'd give it all away, but are those works of the flesh or works of Christ?
Do unto others........
THEN RUN!!!!!!
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 07, 2009, 01:15:10 AM
Do unto others........
THEN RUN!!!!!!
Before they get a chance to do unto you :Sparkletooth:
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 01:12:40 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 01:05:34 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 12:59:48 AMCan you say what are works of the flesh and what are works of Christ--and how do we tell the difference?
Pretty much any work that caters to the lusts of the flesh is is a work of the flesh which equals the opposite of do unto neighbor as you want done unto you.
Paul
well, for instance, bad guys that get their money in a bad way, including killing people, will always give some of it to charity. I'm not sure what they're thinking--I doubt it's guilt otherwise they'd give it all away, but are those works of the flesh or works of Christ?
:cloud9: God looks at the motive of the heart; that's what the fire is for that tries our works. They might get completely by with all of it in this realm, but they won't the next. Not in a vengeful, cast them into hell way, but God has a way of purifying what is His. Blessings....
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 01:07:06 AM
So clarifying...Paul, aren't you summarily saying "bad or sinful works" won't get us salvation, but "good, righteous works" will? If not, please distinguish...I try to believe and practice that my works are as filthy rags, that it's all His grace and works...His death, resurrection, gift to me, and "His grace is sufficient"...thanks, james.
Not at all jabcat because at the moment we receive forgiveness we no longer have debt - so we are not doing Good works because we have debt - those past sins were forgiven = no more debt. The works we do in Christ are Love. They are because we want to remain in righteousness. When the Israelites committed a sin - they would do the work of sacrificing because they had a debt to pay. But they would go and continue to sin because all they had to do was again go and submit a sacrifice. Their conscience could never be pure because they could continue in sin. But with Christ we receive Forgiveness of our sins and we continue in righteousness. See in the letter of the law - there is still a license to sin because you can just go and submit your sacrifice - but not so when we are in Christ.
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 01:12:40 AMwell, for instance, bad guys that get their money in a bad way, including killing people, will always give some of it to charity. I'm not sure what they're thinking--I doubt it's guilt otherwise they'd give it all away, but are those works of the flesh or works of Christ?
Works of Christ is where Christ receives the Glory.
Paul
OK, I see what you're saying, and I agree, we need to be obedient (I would add, with His empowerment through us)...following onward, do you believe if we don't "remain in righteousness", we lose our salvation, are no longer saved? My understanding is, our works can't "keep us saved"...begun in Spirit, then not staying saved by flesh. Thanks, James.
Quote from: Taffy on March 07, 2009, 12:49:57 AMisnt a Fulfillment of the law ,?
isnt true that the Israelites were told to Hate their enemies...seems a GREATer magnification to me, for instance-The Honour in the Old C compared to the HONOUR your Mother and Father with a promise -differs quite from that spoke of In the New...the previous was a Burden
The old for me Has noting to do with the NEW...one was a Physical application the other has a greater Spiritual significance ...the law is Magnified...therefore its greater......
Keep the LAW in its sense as Much as wish..keep the Sabbath as a Literal DAY...aint going to make you Righteous...
but im not denying its Moral Value.
What I'm asking is, when Paul said "by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified" did Paul have in mind things like forgiving, showing mercy, loving your neighbor, loving your enemy, etc.
Here is someone who was justified by love.
Luke 7:47 Wherefore I say unto thee, Her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little.
I think "deeds of the law" refers to outward physical things like keeping the physcial Sabbath, being circumcized etc. which can be performed without regard to being inwardly circumcised. Thus "not of works" and similar statements by Paul is not referring to Christ's commandments.
So, Paul, if we are like the Corinthians, would we be unsaved since the Corinthians all had problems? They surely did not do the works which brought glory to Christ yet Paul still called them saints and God and Christ still accepted them.
Quote from: Tony N on March 07, 2009, 01:53:23 AM
They surely did not do the works which brought glory to Christ yet Paul still called them saints and God and Christ still accepted them.
Amen. Hard to understand, coming from my extremely legalistic background, but that's what it says, isn't it? Ah, soak it in.
:cloud9: I can see what Paul is saying, and assuming he's not meaning it in a legalistic sort of way, and I don't think he is, he is right. We are to be a spiritual work in progress, and what 99% of the churches I know of teach, basically, is you "get saved" and sit on a church pew until you die. There is little if any growth, but a whole lot of trying to TEACH people how to be "better Christians" instead of teaching them how to put on Christ and walk in the Spirit.
I was given a dream/vision of someone once, and I will never forget it as long as I live. This person had refused time and again, to stop doing what from the appearance realm, looked like a good work. And it WAS a good work, if not for the fact the Lord had said more than once, enough already, so that made it a whole new ballgame. Because that meant a proceeding word of life by which we live, had come forth for this person.
So anyway, in this dream/vision, real as day, I was there with all these people at a huge banquet hall, and the person in question. Suddenly the one who had been the instigator of the good works this person was doing that the Lord said to stop, appeared at the French doors outside, bidding this person leave with them to do more of the good works. The person went outside with them, ignoring once again what the Lord said to do. I went out after this person, intending to try to bring her to her senses and repentance.
Just then, I looked at the disobedient person, and I was shocked to see the Lord in her, shriveled up and misshapen, limbs contorted from lack of use (as in not reaching out to be used to heal, not walking in the Spirit, ect.).
And then He spoke, "I HAVE BEEN PUT TO SHAME THROUGH DEAD WORKS."
I felt sick to my stomach and jolted awake. So dead works, regardless of how they look to others or to ourselves, are works that don't have the life (direction) of the Spirit in them. Blessings....
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 01:40:22 AM
OK, I see what you're saying, and I agree, we need to be obedient (I would add, with His empowerment through us)...following onward, do you believe if we don't "remain in righteousness", we lose our salvation, are no longer saved? My understanding is, our works can't "keep us saved"...begun in Spirit, then not staying saved by flesh. Thanks, James.
Well I believe the works DO keep you saved, hence the need to endure unto the end. I believe the scriptures show that if after you have received Good Works that you are to increase in them. If you do not then what you had is taken away. Consider the parable of the pounds (talents).
Paul
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:06:02 AM
:cloud9: I can see what Paul is saying, and assuming he's not meaning it in a legalistic sort of way, and I don't think he is, he is right. We are to be a spiritual work in progress, and what 99% of the churches I know of teach, basically, is you "get saved" and sit on a church pew until you die. There is little if any growth, but a whole lot of trying to TEACH people how to be "better Christians" instead of teaching them how to put on Christ and walk in the Spirit.
I was given a dream/vision of someone once, and I will never forget it as long as I live. This person had refused time and again, to stop doing what from the appearance realm, looked like a good work. And it WAS a good work, if not for the fact the Lord had said more than once, enough already, so that made it a whole new ballgame. Because that meant a proceeding word of life by which we live, had come forth for this person.
So anyway, in this dream/vision, real as day, I was there with all these people at a huge banquet hall, and the person in question. Suddenly the one who had been the instigator of the good works this person was doing that the Lord said to stop, appeared at the French doors outside, bidding this person leave with them to do more of the good works. The person went outside with them, ignoring once again what the Lord said to do. I went out after this person, intending to try to bring her to her senses and repentance.
Just then, I looked at the disobedient person, and I was shocked to see the Lord in her, shriveled up and misshapen, limbs contorted from lack of use (as in not reaching out to be used to heal, not walking in the Spirit, ect.).
And then He spoke, "I HAVE BEEN PUT TO SHAME THROUGH DEAD WORKS."
I felt sick to my stomach and jolted awake. So dead works, regardless of how they look to others or to ourselves, are works that don't have the life (direction) of the Spirit in them. Blessings....
Hi ya sis, amen and dead works are like tares they look the same but there is no life in them.
That same principle can be applied to the difference between the letter of the law and the spiritual law
They look the same but one has no life while the other is nothing but life.
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:06:02 AM
:cloud9: I can see what Paul is saying, and assuming he's not meaning it in a legalistic sort of way, and I don't think he is, he is right. We are to be a spiritual work in progress, and what 99% of the churches I know of teach, basically, is you "get saved" and sit on a church pew until you die. There is little if any growth, but a whole lot of trying to TEACH people how to be "better Christians" instead of teaching them how to put on Christ and walk in the Spirit.
Cardinal, if that is all the further they get after genuinely believing God that Christ died for their sins then they are still saved.
The Galatians are the severest test case of a Christian. Yes, they fell out of grace but Paul still said they were saved and God and Christ still accepted them as beloved.
:cloud9: Hi pneuma, and Amen..... :thumbsup:
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 02:08:06 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 01:40:22 AM
OK, I see what you're saying, and I agree, we need to be obedient (I would add, with His empowerment through us)...following onward, do you believe if we don't "remain in righteousness", we lose our salvation, are no longer saved? My understanding is, our works can't "keep us saved"...begun in Spirit, then not staying saved by flesh. Thanks, James.
Well I believe the works DO keep you saved, hence the need to endure unto the end. I believe the scriptures show that if after you have received Good Works that you are to increase in them. If you do not then what you had is taken away. Consider the parable of the pounds (talents).
Paul
Hi paul we view this just a little differently, a babe in Christ starts out just as any baby does, they don't do any work but wait around, and cry to be fed, that does not mean they are not saved because they do no work (there not capable of work). Work belongs to those who have grown up enough to eat meat, yes it may still be mixed with milk but they know have strenght to do the works of their Father to the degree of the strenght the fathers meat has given them. And this will continue until they have obtianed the fullness of Christ. So works for me are not what keeps us saved they are what is necessary to obtain the fullness of Christ or to obtain the end of our salvation.
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 02:08:06 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 01:40:22 AM
OK, I see what you're saying, and I agree, we need to be obedient (I would add, with His empowerment through us)...following onward, do you believe if we don't "remain in righteousness", we lose our salvation, are no longer saved? My understanding is, our works can't "keep us saved"...begun in Spirit, then not staying saved by flesh. Thanks, James.
Well I believe the works DO keep you saved, hence the need to endure unto the end. I believe the scriptures show that if after you have received Good Works that you are to increase in them. If you do not then what you had is taken away. Consider the parable of the pounds (talents).
Paul
I guess then where we would differ on that is back to the context of the evangels of the circumcision and uncircumcision...IMO, that's the only way all the verses wrt to grace and works reconcile...otherwise, we come up with schizms and arguments, many saying scriptures contradict...which they don't when rightly divided ("cut"). "Saved by grace, not of ourselves"...I sure can't boast.
Paul can answer for himself Card, but IMO, what I see is the difference between "working to stay a child of God and not of the devil (what use is grace)", and "doing the obedient works of a son as God grows us (grace still intact)". Again, works as a result of grace, not as a means to get grace. God's blessing, James.
Quote from: Tony N on March 07, 2009, 02:20:52 AM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:06:02 AM
:cloud9: I can see what Paul is saying, and assuming he's not meaning it in a legalistic sort of way, and I don't think he is, he is right. We are to be a spiritual work in progress, and what 99% of the churches I know of teach, basically, is you "get saved" and sit on a church pew until you die. There is little if any growth, but a whole lot of trying to TEACH people how to be "better Christians" instead of teaching them how to put on Christ and walk in the Spirit.
Cardinal, if that is all the further they get after genuinely believing God that Christ died for their sins then they are still saved.
The Galatians is the severest test case of a Christian. Yes, they fell out of grace but Paul still said they were saved and God and Christ still accepted them as beloved.
:cloud9: Tony, I'm not one that believes that they're not. But there is a three fold salvation process and what is saved of them first, is their spirit. What the works beyond that initial salvation process deals with is the salvation process of the whole of their soul; it is the justification in the inner court of the Tabernacle pattern. Works tried by fire (whether in this life or the next). Blessings....
Quote from: Tony N on March 07, 2009, 01:53:23 AM
So, Paul, if we are like the Corinthians, would we be unsaved since the Corinthians all had problems? They surely did not do the works which brought glory to Christ yet Paul still called them saints and God and Christ still accepted them.
Tony, there is not sin where there is no knowledge of sin.
Paul
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:06:02 AM
:cloud9: I can see what Paul is saying, and assuming he's not meaning it in a legalistic sort of way, and I don't think he is, he is right. We are to be a spiritual work in progress, and what 99% of the churches I know of teach, basically, is you "get saved" and sit on a church pew until you die. There is little if any growth, but a whole lot of trying to TEACH people how to be "better Christians" instead of teaching them how to put on Christ and walk in the Spirit.
I was given a dream/vision of someone once, and I will never forget it as long as I live. This person had refused time and again, to stop doing what from the appearance realm, looked like a good work. And it WAS a good work, if not for the fact the Lord had said more than once, enough already, so that made it a whole new ballgame. Because that meant a proceeding word of life by which we live, had come forth for this person.
So anyway, in this dream/vision, real as day, I was there with all these people at a huge banquet hall, and the person in question. Suddenly the one who had been the instigator of the good works this person was doing that the Lord said to stop, appeared at the French doors outside, bidding this person leave with them to do more of the good works. The person went outside with them, ignoring once again what the Lord said to do. I went out after this person, intending to try to bring her to her senses and repentance.
Just then, I looked at the disobedient person, and I was shocked to see the Lord in her, shriveled up and misshapen, limbs contorted from lack of use (as in not reaching out to be used to heal, not walking in the Spirit, ect.).
And then He spoke, "I HAVE BEEN PUT TO SHAME THROUGH DEAD WORKS."
I felt sick to my stomach and jolted awake. So dead works, regardless of how they look to others or to ourselves, are works that don't have the life (direction) of the Spirit in them. Blessings....
It is really easy to comprehend if we consider that we are branches in the vine. If the branch doesn't bear fruit it is cast off from the vine.
Paul
[/quote]
If we don't consider the evangels of the circumcision and uncircumcision, rightly cutting the Word, how is this scripture reconciled with working to keep salvation? "Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"
:cloud9: As a side note..... Noah found grace in God's eyes, yet he still had to work to build an ark. We too are working to build an ark, as we are obedient to apply whatever is quickened to us, ie. we are putting on Christ, the new ark that will raise us up above the waters of judgment (death contained in the law/letter). Blessings....
Quote from: bobf on March 07, 2009, 01:51:55 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 07, 2009, 12:49:57 AMisnt a Fulfillment of the law ,?
isnt true that the Israelites were told to Hate their enemies...seems a GREATer magnification to me, for instance-The Honour in the Old C compared to the HONOUR your Mother and Father with a promise -differs quite from that spoke of In the New...the previous was a Burden
The old for me Has noting to do with the NEW...one was a Physical application the other has a greater Spiritual significance ...the law is Magnified...therefore its greater......
Keep the LAW in its sense as Much as wish..keep the Sabbath as a Literal DAY...aint going to make you Righteous...
but im not denying its Moral Value.
What I'm asking is, when Paul said "by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified" did Paul have in mind things like forgiving, showing mercy, loving your neighbor, loving your enemy, etc.
Here is someone who was justified by love.
Luke 7:47 Wherefore I say unto thee, Her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little.
I think "deeds of the law" refers to outward physical things like keeping the physcial Sabbath, being circumcized etc. which can be performed without regard to being inwardly circumcised. Thus "not of works" and similar statements by Paul is not referring to Christ's commandments.
Yes Bob Im sure He did, But if we take Custom and put ourselves in thier times, Thier tradition Blinded them of the reality . Pauls empahasis for mine is To Break those Bounderies before the Build , ya cant go in different Directions at the same Time,
and again to latter Yes...Literal dos and dont just makes one ConForm ,im not saying theres not a Pressing, But the Transformation is as You say from Within...if ya will ,working from the Inside OUT oppossed to Math 23 , cleansing the outside of the Dish for the APPERANCE of righteousness,...Its a Matter of the Heart\Mind. :icon_flower:
:icon_flower:
Quote from: pneuma on March 07, 2009, 02:25:26 AM
Hi paul we view this just a little differently, a babe in Christ starts out just as any baby does, they don't do any work but wait around, and cry to be fed, that does not mean they are not saved because they do no work (there not capable of work). Work belongs to those who have grown up enough to eat meat, yes it may still be mixed with milk but they know have strenght to do the works of their Father to the degree of the strenght the fathers meat has given them. And this will continue until they have obtianed the fullness of Christ. So works for me are not what keeps us saved they are what is necessary to obtain the fullness of Christ or to obtain the end of our salvation.
But don't you believe that the work is started immediately? If your mind is even pursuing or seeking God's Truth when it could be rather pursuing the lusts of your flesh then isn't that work? Isn't that Christ putting down sin in your flesh? Someone is at work in you if that is occurring. I understand what your saying but again Faith without works would be dead. We wouldn't be in Grace as a babe in Christ if the work hadn't begun.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:33:18 AM
If we don't consider the evangels of the circumcision and uncircumcision, rightly cutting the Word, how is this scripture reconciled with working to keep salvation? "Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"
Jab you are mixing up the letter of the law which has no life in it with the spiritual law
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:34:02 AM
:cloud9: As a side note..... Noah found grace in God's eyes, yet he still had to work to build an ark. We too are working to build an ark, as we are obedient to apply whatever is quickened to us, ie. we are putting on Christ, the new ark that will raise us up above the waters of judgment (death contained in the law/letter). Blessings....
Again amen :thumbsup:
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:26:13 AM
I guess then where we would differ on that is back to the context of the evangels of the circumcision and uncircumcision...IMO, that's the only way all the verses wrt to grace and works reconcile...otherwise, we come up with schizms and arguments, many saying scriptures contradict...which they don't when rightly divided ("cut"). "Saved by grace, not of ourselves"...I sure can't boast.
Paul can answer for himself Card, but IMO, what I see is the difference between "working to stay a child of God and not of the devil (what use is grace)", and "doing the obedient works of a son as God grows us (grace still intact)". Again, works as a result of grace, not as a means to get grace. God's blessing, James.
I stand corrected here Jabcat, I don't want to imply that the Christian is performing the Good Work because they want to stay in salvation because that isn't really true and probably my flesh getting the better of me in that post. But rather that the works are performed because of Love - the wanting of helping others and to abide in God's love. I make that correction because the sound of "stay in salvation" could be misinterpreted as being motivated by fear which is not what I wanted to communicate.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:33:18 AM
If we don't consider the evangels of the circumcision and uncircumcision, rightly cutting the Word, how is this scripture reconciled with working to keep salvation? "Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"
:cloud9: Geez, I can't keep up with you guys! Anyway Jab.....Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling is I assume the scripture you're referring to here? That Greek word there also means deliverance, and deliverance is a spiritual work that begins after one receives the baptism of the HG. It is the beginning of Matt. 13 where the tares are thrown into the fire, and the end of your flesh ruled "world".
So the two scriptures in that light, do not contradict one another at all, but agree with one another. Blessings.....
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:33:18 AM
If we don't consider the evangels of the circumcision and uncircumcision, rightly cutting the Word, how is this scripture reconciled with working to keep salvation? "Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"
The works of the flesh are not the same as the works of the Christ which come by the Spirit. This is a rebuke that proves the case that we must do His works. Any work that is not His is ours. And our works ARE the work of the flesh.
Paul
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:34:02 AM
:cloud9: As a side note..... Noah found grace in God's eyes, yet he still had to work to build an ark. We too are working to build an ark, as we are obedient to apply whatever is quickened to us, ie. we are putting on Christ, the new ark that will raise us up above the waters of judgment (death contained in the law/letter). Blessings....
He who has Christ IS the ark. They are the Ark of the New covenant. Men that possess the Spirit of God ARE the Ark of the New covenant. The Law is inside of them - it is written in their hearts.
Paul
:cloud9: Exactly......putting on Christ who IS the ark, makes us the ark, too, as the Head and the body are one. :thumbsup:
Thanks Paul, so you're NOT saying we work to stay saved.
OK, so at the risk of sounding too simplistic here...isn't everyone basically saying we're saved by grace, then God empowers us to do His will? It seems like we're majoring in semantics, and minoring in Jesus' death, resurrection, and life in and through us. :dontknow:
And if we can then get beyond that, isn't there much more fruitful discussion as in the last 2 posts re: the Ark? I.e., how this plays out, what it looks like, how we "put on Christ"? My :2c:.
Hi Paul yes I agree that it should start right away, but alas that's not always the case for Paul sates
For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. 13For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. 14But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
1Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, 2Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. 3And this will we do, if God permit
Paul is does not say they are not saved who only drink the milk, but he encourages those who still drink milk to go on to perfection. And that is what we are to do also for babes in Christ.
This is brought out more forcefully when we read what Paul said here
1And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. 2I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. 3For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? 4For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
Paul still called these babes his brethren even though he knew that they were still not able to eat meat. Babes are saved but have need of teaching that they might grow some teeth and be then able to eat the meat. There is a growing process in Christ no one starts as an adult.
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:26:13 AM
Paul can answer for himself Card, but IMO, what I see is the difference between "working to stay a child of God and not of the devil (what use is grace)", and "doing the obedient works of a son as God grows us (grace still intact)".
:cloud9: Sorry Jab, just trying to help.... :mblush:
sorry, hit the wrong button again...modify instead of quote... :doh:
You don't have to apologize to me you silly dear one....I can talk with you honestly without it being a "rub"...we don't need to argue or prove we know more than each other...because I already know you know more than me :laughing7:
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 02:08:06 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 01:40:22 AM
OK, I see what you're saying, and I agree, we need to be obedient (I would add, with His empowerment through us)...following onward, do you believe if we don't "remain in righteousness", we lose our salvation, are no longer saved? My understanding is, our works can't "keep us saved"...begun in Spirit, then not staying saved by flesh. Thanks, James.
Well I believe the works DO keep you saved, hence the need to endure unto the end. I believe the scriptures show that if after you have received Good Works that you are to increase in them. If you do not then what you had is taken away. Consider the parable of the pounds (talents).
Paul
Hi Paul, how do you see this verse??
1Co 3:15 If any man's
work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself
shall be saved; yet so as by fire. how can he be saved, if his works were burned up (1Co 3:12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble
1Co 3:13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall
try every man's work of what sort it is.
1Co 3:14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
1Co 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Quote from: pneuma on March 07, 2009, 02:54:37 AM
Hi Paul yes I agree that it should start right away, but alas that's not always the case for Paul sates
For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. 13For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. 14But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
1Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, 2Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. 3And this will we do, if God permit
Paul is does not say they are not saved who only drink the milk, but he encourages those who still drink milk to go on to perfection. And that is what we are to do also for babes in Christ.
This is brought out more forcefully when we read what Paul said here
1And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. 2I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. 3For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? 4For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
Paul still called these babes his brethren even though he knew that they were still not able to eat meat. Babes are saved but have need of teaching that they might grow some teeth and be then able to eat the meat. There is a growing process in Christ no one starts as an adult.
and thenTake Hebrew Scott.By Now you should be as Teachers,..BUT again..
What you just wrote I wrote earlier, then binned it...but Just added hebrews to it..its a Cycle and a Progression
Quote from: Zeek on March 07, 2009, 02:58:27 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 02:08:06 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 01:40:22 AM
OK, I see what you're saying, and I agree, we need to be obedient (I would add, with His empowerment through us)...following onward, do you believe if we don't "remain in righteousness", we lose our salvation, are no longer saved? My understanding is, our works can't "keep us saved"...begun in Spirit, then not staying saved by flesh. Thanks, James.
Well I believe the works DO keep you saved, hence the need to endure unto the end. I believe the scriptures show that if after you have received Good Works that you are to increase in them. If you do not then what you had is taken away. Consider the parable of the pounds (talents).
Paul
Hi Paul, how do you see this verse??
1Co 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
how can he be saved, if his works were burned up (1Co 3:12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble
1Co 3:13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is.
1Co 3:14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
1Co 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Zeek two different types of works are being spoken of in those scriptures, the works that are burnt up are work of the flesh the works that are not burnt up are works of the spirit.
That why is say the fire will try every man's work of what sort it is.
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:57:50 AM
sorry, hit the wrong button again...modify instead of quote... :doh:
You don't have to apologize to me you silly dear one....I can talk with you honestly without it being a "rub"...we don't need to argue or prove we know more than each other...because I already know you know more than me :laughing7:
James
I do it all the Time bud............ :sigh:
Quote from: pneuma on March 07, 2009, 03:01:14 AM
Quote from: Zeek on March 07, 2009, 02:58:27 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 02:08:06 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 01:40:22 AM
OK, I see what you're saying, and I agree, we need to be obedient (I would add, with His empowerment through us)...following onward, do you believe if we don't "remain in righteousness", we lose our salvation, are no longer saved? My understanding is, our works can't "keep us saved"...begun in Spirit, then not staying saved by flesh. Thanks, James.
Well I believe the works DO keep you saved, hence the need to endure unto the end. I believe the scriptures show that if after you have received Good Works that you are to increase in them. If you do not then what you had is taken away. Consider the parable of the pounds (talents).
Paul
Hi Paul, how do you see this verse??
1Co 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
how can he be saved, if his works were burned up (1Co 3:12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble
1Co 3:13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is.
1Co 3:14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
1Co 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Zeek two different types of works are being spoken of in those scriptures, the works that are burnt up are work of the flesh the works that are not burnt up are works of the spirit.
right, i agree. I thot Paul was saying one couldnt' be saved without works of the Spirit. But in those verses, one can be saved, through destruction of the "works of the flesh", there is nothing in those verses about being saved by works of the Spirit.
One pathway (narrow) produces works of Christ and reward,
no shame.
and
other pathway (broad) results in savlation but no reward, left desolate, naked,
shamed. Jer 23:40 And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten.
Quote from: Taffy on March 07, 2009, 03:04:41 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:57:50 AM
sorry, hit the wrong button again...modify instead of quote... :doh:
You don't have to apologize to me you silly dear one....I can talk with you honestly without it being a "rub"...we don't need to argue or prove we know more than each other...because I already know you know more than me :laughing7:
James
I do it all the Time bud............ :sigh:
sheesh...you must be quicker at catching it than me...maybe more practice :laughing7:
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:34:02 AM
:cloud9: As a side note..... Noah found grace in God's eyes, yet he still had to work to build an ark. We too are working to build an ark, as we are obedient to apply whatever is quickened to us, ie. we are putting on Christ, the new ark that will raise us up above the waters of judgment (death contained in the law/letter). Blessings....
So, Noah didn't rush out to feed the poor--he did what God directed him to do.
Is that what works is? For each of us, it might be something different?
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 03:11:28 AM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:34:02 AM
:cloud9: As a side note..... Noah found grace in God's eyes, yet he still had to work to build an ark. We too are working to build an ark, as we are obedient to apply whatever is quickened to us, ie. we are putting on Christ, the new ark that will raise us up above the waters of judgment (death contained in the law/letter). Blessings....
So, Noah didn't rush out to feed the poor--he did what God directed him to do.
Is that what works is? For each of us, it might be something different?
Hi Molly do whatever God tells you to do, if He tells you to do nothing that still doing His work, it is all in what He says for you to do.
:cloud9: Amen pneuma.... :thumbsup:
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:57:50 AM
sorry, hit the wrong button again...modify instead of quote... :doh:
You don't have to apologize to me you silly dear one....I can talk with you honestly without it being a "rub"...we don't need to argue or prove we know more than each other...because I already know you know more than me :laughing7:
:cloud9: Oh ok, I thought you were politely telling me to "butt out" , LOL....and somehow I doubt that (last comment). Blessings....
I wasn't say that at all, trying to let you and Paul see how I was seeing it...these discussion boards would be great, if it wasn't for the need to communicate :happy3:
Quote from: pneuma on March 07, 2009, 02:35:47 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:33:18 AM
If we don't consider the evangels of the circumcision and uncircumcision, rightly cutting the Word, how is this scripture reconciled with working to keep salvation? "Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"
Jab you are mixing up the letter of the law which has no life in it with the spiritual law
I will consider your opinion. Thanks.
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:50:58 AM
Thanks Paul, so you're NOT saying we work to stay saved.
OK, so at the risk of sounding too simplistic here...isn't everyone basically saying we're saved by grace, then God empowers us to do His will? It seems like we're majoring in semantics, and minoring in Jesus' death, resurrection, and life in and through us. :dontknow:
Well, we do but it isn't the motivation. The motivation is to perform His will. Yes we are saved by Grace. And it is the Grace that is attracting us towards Faith and Good Works but it isn't until we have that Faith and Good Works that we can access that Grace.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:51:54 AM
And if we can then get beyond that, isn't there much more fruitful discussion as in the last 2 posts re: the Ark? I.e., how this plays out, what it looks like, how we "put on Christ"? My :2c:.
I hope to discuss those other topics soon as well. I want to show you who the two witnesses are and how to determine it yourself and expound on the Ark of the Covenant also. Much more to say here as I think this subject is very important. If we don't understand this one - then the other ones will be difficult to understand.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 07, 2009, 02:54:37 AM
Hi Paul yes I agree that it should start right away, but alas that's not always the case for Paul sates
For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. 13For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. 14But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
1Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, 2Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. 3And this will we do, if God permit
Paul is does not say they are not saved who only drink the milk, but he encourages those who still drink milk to go on to perfection. And that is what we are to do also for babes in Christ.
This is brought out more forcefully when we read what Paul said here
1And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. 2I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. 3For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? 4For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
Paul still called these babes his brethren even though he knew that they were still not able to eat meat. Babes are saved but have need of teaching that they might grow some teeth and be then able to eat the meat. There is a growing process in Christ no one starts as an adult.
Consider this pneuma, would you agree that those were Paul's brethren if they are babes in Christ? And if they are babes in Christ then Christ is working. Christ is never idle. Sure they are not yet perfected but Christ is transforming them. All our mortal lives we are being transformed.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 07, 2009, 03:13:26 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 03:11:28 AM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:34:02 AM
:cloud9: As a side note..... Noah found grace in God's eyes, yet he still had to work to build an ark. We too are working to build an ark, as we are obedient to apply whatever is quickened to us, ie. we are putting on Christ, the new ark that will raise us up above the waters of judgment (death contained in the law/letter). Blessings....
So, Noah didn't rush out to feed the poor--he did what God directed him to do.
Is that what works is? For each of us, it might be something different?
Hi Molly do whatever God tells you to do, if He tells you to do nothing that still doing His work, it is all in what He says for you to do.
Ok that's good--I agree with that. But, not to beg a point, how do you know you are doing what God wants you to do?
Quote from: Zeek on March 07, 2009, 02:58:27 AMHi Paul, how do you see this verse??
1Co 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
how can he be saved, if his works were burned up (1Co 3:12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble
1Co 3:13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is.
1Co 3:14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
1Co 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Christ is building the Temple. Take verse 13 and compare to this one:
1Co 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.
The fire is the trial of the works. Again, this is why it is so important to increase. Recall the parable of the pounds (talents).
Paul
Quote from: Zeek on March 07, 2009, 03:05:29 AM
right, i agree. I thot Paul was saying one couldnt' be saved without works of the Spirit. But in those verses, one can be saved, through destruction of the "works of the flesh", there is nothing in those verses about being saved by works of the Spirit.
One pathway (narrow) produces works of Christ and reward, no shame.
and
other pathway (broad) results in savlation but no reward, left desolate, naked, shamed.
Jer 23:40 And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten.
Zeek, I believe that God will ultimately save everyone. Now to what happens to those that continued in their fleshy ways - willfully sinning? I believe they will experience the Wrath of God. But ultimately they too shall be saved. But the parable of the unforgiving servant shows that the servant was tormented UNTIL his debt was paid.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 04:31:06 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 07, 2009, 02:54:37 AM
Hi Paul yes I agree that it should start right away, but alas that's not always the case for Paul sates
For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. 13For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. 14But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
1Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, 2Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. 3And this will we do, if God permit
Paul is does not say they are not saved who only drink the milk, but he encourages those who still drink milk to go on to perfection. And that is what we are to do also for babes in Christ.
This is brought out more forcefully when we read what Paul said here
1And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. 2I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. 3For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? 4For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
Paul still called these babes his brethren even though he knew that they were still not able to eat meat. Babes are saved but have need of teaching that they might grow some teeth and be then able to eat the meat. There is a growing process in Christ no one starts as an adult.
Consider this pneuma, would you agree that those were Paul's brethren if they are babes in Christ? And if they are babes in Christ then Christ is working. Christ is never idle. Sure they are not yet perfected but Christ is transforming them. All our mortal lives we are being transformed.
Paul
Getting to sound like an echo on this thread :laughing7:
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 04:24:22 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:50:58 AM
Thanks Paul, so you're NOT saying we work to stay saved.
OK, so at the risk of sounding too simplistic here...isn't everyone basically saying we're saved by grace, then God empowers us to do His will? It seems like we're majoring in semantics, and minoring in Jesus' death, resurrection, and life in and through us. :dontknow:
Well, we do but it isn't the motivation. The motivation is to perform His will. Yes we are saved by Grace. And it is the Grace that is attracting us towards Faith and Good Works but it isn't until we have that Faith and Good Works that we can access that Grace.
Paul
Hi Paul. OK, then it's that last line that I don't see that way, if I'm understanding you. Directly, how do you believe we "
access grace with those good works"? Maybe you're not saying it, but it sounds to me like you're saying we have to act first,
and know how to act in our own works, to initially get that grace, i.e., get saved....Simply, when you believed, did you do it, or did God give you that faith to believe? In other words, was it your work or His? Again, I don't know if semantics are getting us, or if there's a deeper meaning, and that's what I'm trying to clarify. Thanks, James.
ah, and I just more clearly see you are saying we work to stay saved...no matter the motivation, bottom line, that it's our effort that keeps us saved?
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 04:49:37 AM
Quote from: Zeek on March 07, 2009, 03:05:29 AM
right, i agree. I thot Paul was saying one couldnt' be saved without works of the Spirit. But in those verses, one can be saved, through destruction of the "works of the flesh", there is nothing in those verses about being saved by works of the Spirit.
One pathway (narrow) produces works of Christ and reward, no shame.
and
other pathway (broad) results in savlation but no reward, left desolate, naked, shamed.
Jer 23:40 And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten.
Zeek, I believe that God will ultimately save everyone. Now to what happens to those that continued in their fleshy ways - willfully sinning? I believe they will experience the Wrath of God. But ultimately they too shall be saved. But the parable of the unforgiving servant shows that the servant was tormented UNTIL his debt was paid.
Paul
thank you. I believe this too.
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 05:02:24 AM
Hi Paul. OK, then it's that last line that I don't see that way, if I'm understanding you. Directly, how do you believe we "access grace with those good works"? Maybe you're not saying it, but it sounds to me like you're saying we have to act first, and know how to act in our own works, to initially get that grace, i.e., get saved....Simply, when you believed, did you do it, or did God give you that faith to believe? In other words, was it your work or His? Again, I don't know if semantics are getting us, or if there's a deeper meaning, and that's what I'm trying to clarify. Thanks, James.
The reference to accessing the Grace via Faith is mentioned here:
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have
access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
As I said before, all GOOD works are copyright owned by Christ Jesus. We may be performing them but they are His. The MOMENT we have Faith demonstrated with His Works through us is when I believe we have accessed Grace. We continue to perform Good works because Jesus is at work putting down sin in our flesh at that point by His very nature. His works are Love.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 05:11:12 AM
ah, and I just more clearly see you are saying we work to stay saved...no matter the motivation, bottom line, that it's our effort that keeps us saved?
We're doing the effort but it isn't our effort. That effort belongs to Christ. He gets the glory for the Good Works done. He is the copyright holder to all Good Works that man does. Remember our works are like filthy rags.
Paul
Quote from: Zeek on March 07, 2009, 05:14:16 AMthank you. I believe this too.
Thanks Zeek, ask questions and if I can answer them I will or tell you that I don't know or try to help in some way. I have learned a lot of others here since I joined especially about how to deliver this message and that is a tremendous help in producing fruit.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 05:21:38 AM
Quote from: Zeek on March 07, 2009, 05:14:16 AMthank you. I believe this too.
Thanks Zeek, ask questions and if I can answer them I will or tell you that I don't know or try to help in some way. I have learned a lot of others here since I joined especially about how to deliver this message and that is a tremendous help in producing fruit.
Paul
Can you or someone answer this question?
How do you know you are doing what God wants you to do?
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 05:16:32 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 05:02:24 AM
Hi Paul. OK, then it's that last line that I don't see that way, if I'm understanding you. Directly, how do you believe we "access grace with those good works"? Maybe you're not saying it, but it sounds to me like you're saying we have to act first, and know how to act in our own works, to initially get that grace, i.e., get saved....Simply, when you believed, did you do it, or did God give you that faith to believe? In other words, was it your work or His? Again, I don't know if semantics are getting us, or if there's a deeper meaning, and that's what I'm trying to clarify. Thanks, James.
The reference to accessing the Grace via Faith is mentioned here:
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
As I said before, all GOOD works are copyright owned by Christ Jesus. We may be performing them but they are His. The MOMENT we have Faith demonstrated with His Works through us is when I believe we have accessed Grace. We continue to perform Good works because Jesus is at work putting down sin in our flesh at that point by His very nature. His works are Love.
Paul
OK, hang onto
that one :laughing7:. This one I understand and agree with...IMO, it's the "BY WHOM" part of this verse that's key :thumbsup: (no modification to your post..I'm having a bad button night :sigh:)
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 05:24:48 AMCan you or someone answer this question?
How do you know you are doing what God wants you to do?
1Jn 2:5 But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him.
1Jn 2:6 He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.
Do as the Lord instructed us:
Mat 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
Mat 22:38 This is the first and great commandment.
Mat 22:39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Mat 22:40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Mat 19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
Rom 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
Paul
Part of this is me working through this, based on my background, etc. I started the thread :mblush:. So, I'm still having misgivings about us working to stay saved. In brief, I understand it more that He saves us and then He keeps us...He empowers us to be His sons...that once chosen, He won't let us become "unsaved"...we certainly may have judgment and things to pay various amounts of stripes for, but as a son...I believe (rightly or wrongly) that we are still chosen, not become bastards by us, at some point along the way, becoming unable to perform righteous works enough to maintain our own salvation. In essence, that He won't let that happen, His grace supercedes our frailty. Perhaps "no man can pluck them out of My hand" includes me (as "no man")....what do you think?
1Co 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;
1Co 10:2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
1Co 10:3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;
1Co 10:4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.
1Co 10:5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.
1Co 10:6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.
1Co 10:7 Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.
1Co 10:8 Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand.
1Co 10:9 Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents.
1Co 10:10 Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer.
1Co 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for examples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.
1Co 10:12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
1Co 10:13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.
1Co 10:14 Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry.
1Co 10:21 Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils.
1Ti 4:16 Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.
1Ti 6:11 But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness.
1Ti 6:12 Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses.
1Ti 6:18 That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate;
1Ti 6:19 Laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life. [/b]
Quote1Jn 2:5 But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him.
"keepeth"G5083
τηρέω
tēreōtay-reh'-o
From τηρός teros (
a watch; perhaps akin to G2334);
to guard (from loss or injury, properly
by keeping the eye upon; and thus differing from G5442, which is properly to prevent escaping; and from G2892, which implies a fortress or full military lines of apparatus), that is, to note (a prophecy; figuratively to fulfil a command); by implication to detain (in custody; figuratively to maintain); by extension to withhold (for personal ends; figuratively to keep unmarried): -
hold fast, keep (-er), (ob-, pre-, re)
serve, watch.
[his]
"word"G3056
λόγος
logoslog'-os
From G3004;
something said (including the thought); by implication a topic (subject of discourse), also reasoning (the mental faculty) or motive; by extension a computation; specifically (with the article in John) the Divine Expression (that is, Christ): - account, cause, communication, X concerning, doctrine, fame, X have to do, intent, matter, mouth, preaching, question, reason, + reckon, remove, say (-ing), shew, X speaker, speech, talk, thing, + none of these things move me, tidings, treatise, utterance,
word, work.
47When evening came, the boat was in the middle of the lake, and he was alone on land. 48He saw the disciples straining at the oars, because the wind was against them. About the fourth watch of the night he went out to them, walking on the lake. He was about to pass by them, 49but when they saw him walking on the lake, they thought he was a ghost. They cried out, 50because they all saw him and were terrified.
Immediately he spoke to them and said, "Take courage! It is I. Don't be afraid." 51Then he climbed into the boat with them, and the wind died down. They were completely amazed, 52for they had not understood about the loaves; their hearts were hardened.
---Mark 6
Quote from: Zeek on March 07, 2009, 05:54:15 AM
that Rock was Christ.
Amen. I believe all scripture must reconcile, and do, when taken in total context. Here's some more to add to the context;
"...we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but
through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and
not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified..."
According as
he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world,
that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Ephesians 1:4 KJV
Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset [us], and let us run with patience the race that is set before us, Looking unto
Jesus the author and finisher of [our] faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God. Hebrews 12:1-2 KJV
Jeremiah 29:11
11 For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "
plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.
Quote"...we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified..."
well, because we cannot do works of the law without him, otherwise we would be like the Pharisees, full of dead men's bones, trying to rely on ourselves and failing.
That is not to say that with him we are not doing works of the law, right?
We are, we should be--
John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.Deuteronomy 5:10
And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments.
Yes, I believe so Molly. I had typed the following up, then saw your post.
So, in summary for me, at this moment...yes there are works, but they are only done by Him through me...yes I need to yield, present myself a living sacrifice...but it's in Him I live, move, have my being. The whole of scripture gives the bigger picture. Maybe I'll keep understanding more about this, but as for me, this is my hope;
"my hope is built on nothing less, than Jesus' love and righteousness
I dare not trust the sweetest frame, but wholly lean on Jesus' name
On Christ the solid rock I stand, all other ground is sinking sand,
all other ground is sinking sand"
Here's the bottom line for me...whether one thinks they can keep themself saved with their own works, or whether one totally leans on Jesus and the works occur from the inside out, God is working all according to His will, and He wills that all be saved. Glory to His name.
Quote from: JabSo, in summary for me, at this moment...yes there are works, but they are only done by Him through me...
Yes, otherwise we are like the disciples with the hardened hearts rowing against the wind and screaming in terror when Jesus approaches them--they didn't recognize him.
But, when he climbed in the boat with them, the wind died down and the lake became calm...
very nice point...i didn't see that when you first posted it....i've rowed plenty, trusting that by my works i could gain His acceptance, and keep out of hell...if anyone thinks that works, IMO, they just haven't done it long enough yet...
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 07:06:45 AM
very nice point...i didn't see that when you first posted it....i've rowed plenty, trusting that by my works i could gain His acceptance, and keep out of hell...if anyone thinks that works, IMO, they just haven't done it long enough yet...
I've literally rowed against the wind. You don't go anywhere. lol (and it's hard work).
Yes (rowed), no (didn't get anywhere), and yes (made me tired...VERY tired)! :happy3:
There's a lot I could go into about my upbringing, my life, and I don't take this topic lightly. And, I'm not willing to just accept someone else's view of it as the truth. For me personally, it's caused too many tears, too much heartache, too many failures and disappointments, thinking I could do it either my way, or in my own strength. I don't think we can take one or two scriptures and make a case for such a huge issue as this...it's a Genesis to Revelation, full context, rightly divided issue.
There are whole denominational and ideologically entrenched stances that span down through the centuries...the Arminian/Calvinist (Baptist/Presbyterian) groups, who maintain salvation is a gift, and the continuance of our salvation is the same/nothing in our strength, every good work is God-ordained, established and transpired through us, not BY us.....pitted against much of the rest of Christendom, that says "you better live right or you'll go to hell". To let a little of my years and years of frustration out here, if anyone thinks you've got the ability in yourself to live right, then let's see it...I've tried it, and as you say, Molly, the Pharisee and Sadducee spirit manifested itself time and again. I believe we are to "walk humbly before our God", and "look to Him, the Author AND Finisher of our faith".
56And whithersoever he entered, into villages, or cities, or country, they laid the sick in the streets, and besought him that they might touch if it were but the border of his garment: and as many as touched him were made whole.
--Mark 6
[as many as] "touched" [him]
G680
ἅπτομαι
haptomai
hap'-tom-ahee
Reflexive of G681; properly to attach oneself to, that is, to touch (in many implied relations): - touch.
G681
ἅπτω
haptō
hap'-to
A primary verb; properly to fasten to, that is, (specifically) to set on fire: - kindle, light.
[were made] "whole"
G4982
σώζω
sōzō
sode'-zo
From a primary word σῶς sōs̄ (contraction for the obsolete σάος saos, "safe"); to save, that is, deliver or protect (literally or figuratively): - heal, preserve, save (self), do well, be (make) whole.
Quote from: trettep on March 06, 2009, 03:55:01 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 06, 2009, 08:07:49 AM
I'm giving the definition of what the doctrine of the Nicolaitans was. You seem to be saying it's something completely different. The doctrine of the Nicolaitans had nothing to do with works, at least not in the context you're talking about.
Not to jump in for Jab here, but it's exactly the reverse, Paul. We receive grace so that we CAN obey...
Doc, let's do this. Let's start another thread on the Nicolaitans and we can present our sources. As to getting it in reverse then that would include the Apostles Paul - surely you don't believe that. It was Paul that tells us that Faith is the access to Grace.
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Paul
Ok, but we weren't talking about faith and grace. We were talking about what comes first, obedience or grace.
We receive grace through faith (which does not originate with us), then we "have what it takes" to obey.
And as to starting a thread on Nicolaitans; no thank you. I don't want to get into a petty squabble over "this source says this" vs. "that source says that". It's pointless.
And frankly, I don't really care who you cite as a source anyway; your definition of nicolaitanism doesn't make any sense, spiritually speaking.
Quote from: Doc on March 07, 2009, 08:26:36 AM
We were talking about what comes first, obedience or grace.
We receive grace through faith (which does not originate with us), then we "have what it takes" to obey.
Amen...Jesus (All dwells in Him) + nothing else :thumbsup:. Anything that's good, anything that's righteous, proceeds from/through/because of Him...the Rock of Our Salvation, the Cornerstone that the builders rejected, the Author
and Finisher!
Thanks, Jab...
And now that I've read a bit more of this thread, I do understand more of where Paul (trettep) is coming from. The wording used is confusing at times, hence the seven pages of clarifying posts since I checked the thread last night. :laughing7:
Anyway, Paul... I think I understand where you're coming from now (And I do actually agree with a lot of what you were saying while you were clarifying your position), but there is just a little something about the way you're saying certain things that is a little unsettling to me. Could just be a question of semantics, though.
That's what I was pestering Paul about, too :icon_joker:. I.e., do you think you keep yourself saved by your works, or that Jesus keeps us saved by His works through us..what I call "Him empowering us to do His will"? I'm still not sure I exactly know where Paul stands on that...I will tell you one thing though...I personally can't keep myself saved...I submit myself, present myself to Him (which again, He helps me do), and He helps me learn a little more daily how to do His will...but I can't do it without Him...
People I see that think they have some sort of power within themselves to "please God", IMO, often tend to be the ones that are the most judgmental, divisive, and don't make for the family members most likely to break bread with....I've been (and still sometimes are) one...they say it takes one to know one :sigh:
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 09:20:20 AM
That's what I was pestering Paul about, too :icon_joker:. I.e., do you think you keep yourself saved by your works, or that Jesus keep us saved by His works through us..what I call "Him empowering us to do His will"? I'm still not sure I exactly know where Paul stands on that...I will tell you one thing though...I personally can't keep myself saved...I submit myself, present myself to Him (which again, He helps me do), and He helps me learn a little more daily how to do His will...but I can't do it without Him...
Amen, Jab.
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 02:33:18 AM
If we don't consider the evangels of the circumcision and uncircumcision, rightly cutting the Word, how is this scripture reconciled with working to keep salvation? "Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"
AMEN!
AMEN!
AMEN!
AMEN!
AMEN!
AMEN!
AMEN!
AMEN!
AMEN!
AMEN!
AMEN!
QuoteConsider this pneuma, would you agree that those were Paul's brethren if they are babes in Christ?
Hi Paul,
1And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ
Yes they were Paul's brethren according to his own words.
QuoteAnd if they are babes in Christ then Christ is working. Christ is never idle. Sure they are not yet perfected but Christ is transforming them. All our mortal lives we are being transformed.
I agree that He is indeed working in them, but the Father does not send a babe out to WORK in the field for a babe is not yet fully equipped to withstand. Jesus Himself did not fully enter into His calling until He was about 30 years of age, yet He grew in GRACE with God and man. The Father always waits to send forth His chosen vessel until they are mature enough to withstand all that will come there way.
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 04:37:15 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 07, 2009, 03:13:26 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 03:11:28 AM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 07, 2009, 02:34:02 AM
:cloud9: As a side note..... Noah found grace in God's eyes, yet he still had to work to build an ark. We too are working to build an ark, as we are obedient to apply whatever is quickened to us, ie. we are putting on Christ, the new ark that will raise us up above the waters of judgment (death contained in the law/letter). Blessings....
So, Noah didn't rush out to feed the poor--he did what God directed him to do.
Is that what works is? For each of us, it might be something different?
Hi Molly do whatever God tells you to do, if He tells you to do nothing that still doing His work, it is all in what He says for you to do.
Ok that's good--I agree with that. But, not to beg a point, how do you know you are doing what God wants you to do?
By the fruit that you bring forth.
QuoteSo, in summary for me, at this moment...yes there are works, but they are only done by Him through me..
Hi Jab, for me yes He does the works through me and in cooperation from me, in other words we must cooperate with Him or the work will not be preformed.
Jesus is the HEAD of the body of Christ and the HEAD cannot say to the FEET I have no need of you. The WHOLE body of Christ MUST WORK together as ONE body.
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 06:58:56 AM
Quote"...we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified..."
well, because we cannot do works of the law without him, otherwise we would be like the Pharisees, full of dead men's bones, trying to rely on ourselves and failing.
That is not to say that with him we are not doing works of the law, right?
We are, we should be--
John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.
Deuteronomy 5:10
And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments.
Christ works are the Law. But we need to make a distinction. Christ works are not the exercise of the letter of the law which were done away with.
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 07, 2009, 09:16:06 AM
Thanks, Jab...
And now that I've read a bit more of this thread, I do understand more of where Paul (trettep) is coming from. The wording used is confusing at times, hence the seven pages of clarifying posts since I checked the thread last night. :laughing7:
Anyway, Paul... I think I understand where you're coming from now (And I do actually agree with a lot of what you were saying while you were clarifying your position), but there is just a little something about the way you're saying certain things that is a little unsettling to me. Could just be a question of semantics, though.
My sentiments EXACTLY . . . something isn't fully settled with this whole idea of works leading to grace thing . . . nor will it for me . . .Grace abounds . . .for me it was Grace that called, brought and cleansed me THEN the manifestations of that experience began to come forth . . .
For me, the wording may be the problem as much as the motive behind it . .but I'm not sure yet. I do believe works are very much a part of the church as they mature in Christ . . I've said this all along . . . but to the mature . . .I believe it is not a badge to wave over those we think are still in their spiritual youth and ignorance, but instead it's yet another way of seeing light and coming into rest as our air we breathe rather than works. And . .as stated before . . .the end result that we "used" to come to when we were in ministry and works . .we still get in rest . .but it's no longer through the labor of us, we're not working . . .we're simply "functioning" in the ministries that we're equipped to do . . .just like conduit . . .it isn't working .. . it's simply functioning within the purpose for which it was made . . .it's not what it "does" that defines it . .it's what it "is".
I just do not see that manifesting Christ's works in us is what maintains our salvation in him . . .it was a gift . . and it's not a high-maintenance gift . . .it's a free gift that brings freedom . . .strapping myself to someone's idea of salvation maintenance is not my idea of freedom.
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 03:46:20 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 07, 2009, 06:58:56 AM
Quote"...we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified..."
well, because we cannot do works of the law without him, otherwise we would be like the Pharisees, full of dead men's bones, trying to rely on ourselves and failing.
That is not to say that with him we are not doing works of the law, right?
We are, we should be--
John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.
Deuteronomy 5:10
And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments.
Christ works are the Law. But we need to make a distinction. Christ works are not the exercise of the letter of the law which were done away with.
Paul
There are only two laws Paul . . .love and love.
Matthew 22
34-36When the Pharisees heard how he had bested the Sadducees, they gathered their forces for an assault. One of their religion scholars spoke for them, posing a question they hoped would show him up: "Teacher, which command in God's Law is the most important?"
37-40Jesus said, "'Love the Lord your God with all your passion and prayer and intelligence.' This is the most important, the first on any list. But there is a second to set alongside it: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.' These two commands are pegs; everything in God's Law and the Prophets hangs from them."
Quote from: Doc on March 07, 2009, 09:16:06 AM
Thanks, Jab...
And now that I've read a bit more of this thread, I do understand more of where Paul (trettep) is coming from. The wording used is confusing at times, hence the seven pages of clarifying posts since I checked the thread last night. :laughing7:
Anyway, Paul... I think I understand where you're coming from now (And I do actually agree with a lot of what you were saying while you were clarifying your position), but there is just a little something about the way you're saying certain things that is a little unsettling to me. Could just be a question of semantics, though.
Doc, I often believe that I'm a horrible speaker on these things. But I have learned a lot about what is working by getting feedback from many here.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 09:20:20 AM
That's what I was pestering Paul about, too :icon_joker:. I.e., do you think you keep yourself saved by your works, or that Jesus keeps us saved by His works through us..what I call "Him empowering us to do His will"? I'm still not sure I exactly know where Paul stands on that...I will tell you one thing though...I personally can't keep myself saved...I submit myself, present myself to Him (which again, He helps me do), and He helps me learn a little more daily how to do His will...but I can't do it without Him...
People I see that think they have some sort of power within themselves to "please God", IMO, often tend to be the ones that are the most judgmental, divisive, and don't make for the family members most likely to break bread with....I've been (and still sometimes are) one...they say it takes one to know one :sigh:
Jabcat, I will have some other discussions about the Law and the Spirit that I hope will shed some light to you help you to understand more. So please be sure to look for those threads. I have started one on the Law and hope to post more there shortly.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 07, 2009, 02:33:46 PM
QuoteConsider this pneuma, would you agree that those were Paul's brethren if they are babes in Christ?
Hi Paul,
1And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ
Yes they were Paul's brethren according to his own words.
QuoteAnd if they are babes in Christ then Christ is working. Christ is never idle. Sure they are not yet perfected but Christ is transforming them. All our mortal lives we are being transformed.
I agree that He is indeed working in them, but the Father does not send a babe out to WORK in the field for a babe is not yet fully equipped to withstand. Jesus Himself did not fully enter into His calling until He was about 30 years of age, yet He grew in GRACE with God and man. The Father always waits to send forth His chosen vessel until they are mature enough to withstand all that will come there way.
I agree pneuma.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 07, 2009, 03:58:40 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 07, 2009, 09:20:20 AM
That's what I was pestering Paul about, too :icon_joker:. I.e., do you think you keep yourself saved by your works, or that Jesus keeps us saved by His works through us..what I call "Him empowering us to do His will"? I'm still not sure I exactly know where Paul stands on that...I will tell you one thing though...I personally can't keep myself saved...I submit myself, present myself to Him (which again, He helps me do), and He helps me learn a little more daily how to do His will...but I can't do it without Him...
People I see that think they have some sort of power within themselves to "please God", IMO, often tend to be the ones that are the most judgmental, divisive, and don't make for the family members most likely to break bread with....I've been (and still sometimes are) one...they say it takes one to know one :sigh:
Jabcat, I will have some other discussions about the Law and the Spirit that I hope will shed some light to you help you to understand more. So please be sure to look for those threads. I have started one on the Law and hope to post more there shortly.
Paul
I think we all need to understand more, including that our righteousness is as filthy rags...and unfortunately, when I attempt to push my personal understandings on others, there comes a point to where those rags begin to smell.
May I strive to "Be devoted to one another in brotherly love; give preference to one another in honor".
Quote from: jabcat on March 08, 2009, 07:15:26 PM
I think we all need to understand more, including that our righteousness is as filthy rags...and unfortunately, when I attempt to push my personal understandings on others, there comes a point to where those rags begin to smell.
May I strive to "Be devoted to one another in brotherly love; give preference to one another in honor".
My concern is that people read the fact that it is not by our works that we are saved and then continue on being themselves with a twist that they now acknowledge Jesus as the savior. If that is happening then they are committing blasphemy (holding cheap then nature of Christ). We can no longer be ourselves. He will love those that persecute Him, ourselves will not do that. It should be no wonder that we are to PROVOKE others towards Good works.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 08, 2009, 07:56:38 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 08, 2009, 07:15:26 PM
I think we all need to understand more, including that our righteousness is as filthy rags...and unfortunately, when I attempt to push my personal understandings on others, there comes a point to where those rags begin to smell.
May I strive to "Be devoted to one another in brotherly love; give preference to one another in honor".
My concern is that people read the fact that it is not by our works that we are saved and then continue on being themselves with a twist that they now acknowledge Jesus as the savior. If that is happening then they are committing blasphemy (holding cheap then nature of Christ). We can no longer be ourselves. He will love those that persecute Him, ourselves will not do that. It should be no wonder that we are to PROVOKE others towards Good works.
Paul
I understand that, but on the other hand, I think we need to be very careful in how we present that...not bringing a yoke of bondage to those that have been freed by the blood of Jesus. I hear your heart here, but IMO, if we're not very careful, we can encourage people to get their focus on works and off of Jesus. That's why for me personally, I believe in stressing obedience, submitting to Him and His will, but that it's only through His grace and the power of the Holy Spirit that we get our next breath, much less presume to please Him. Don't be discouraged, encourage...I think we can go too far either way, making things sound like condoning either disobedience or focus on our own abilities...it's my POV that falling in either direction is unfruitful. Believe me, I've had concerns the other way...I don't see scripture advocating sinning more, not paying attention to it, grace will take care of it...IMO, that's mis-using grace, "should I sin more that grace would more abound"...but again, as I understand it, all my strength and ability is from and throught our Master... :thumbsup:
Anyway, thanks for disucssing this with me, I think that's a good thing.
God's blessing, James.
Quote from: trettep on March 08, 2009, 07:56:38 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 08, 2009, 07:15:26 PM
I think we all need to understand more, including that our righteousness is as filthy rags...and unfortunately, when I attempt to push my personal understandings on others, there comes a point to where those rags begin to smell.
May I strive to "Be devoted to one another in brotherly love; give preference to one another in honor".
My concern is that people read the fact that it is not by our works that we are saved and then continue on being themselves with a twist that they now acknowledge Jesus as the savior. If that is happening then they are committing blasphemy (holding cheap then nature of Christ). We can no longer be ourselves. He will love those that persecute Him, ourselves will not do that. It should be no wonder that we are to PROVOKE others towards Good works.
Paul
I have a friend who has been learning about Jesus for a few years now. She is slowly changing, but she falls back a lot into confusion and doubt, even today. She's very double-minded. I keep telling her she has to read the scriptures every day. For some reason, she won't do that, yet. She tries for a week or so and then stops. I am convinced that this is very important, and maybe the one thing that everyone could do to press into Christ and that is guaranteed to produce fruit.
7 Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. 8 Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads. 9 Write them on the doorframes of your houses and on your gates.--Deut 6
Amen Molly...being filled with Him.
Quote from: jabcat on March 08, 2009, 08:05:46 PMI understand that, but on the other hand, I think we need to be very careful in how we present that...not bringing a yoke of bondage to those that have been freed by the blood of Jesus. I hear your heart here, but IMO, if we're not very careful, we can encourage people to get their focus on works and off of Jesus. That's why for me personally, I believe in stressing obedience, submitting to Him and His will, but that it's only through His grace and the power of the Holy Spirit that we get our next breath, much less presume to please Him. Don't be discouraged, encourage...I think we can go too far either way, making things sound like condoning either disobedience or focus on our own abilities...it's my POV that falling in either direction is unfruitful. Believe me, I've had concerns the other way...I don't see scripture advocating sinning more, not paying attention to it, grace will take care of it...IMO, that's mis-using grace, "should I sin more that grace would more abound"...but again, as I understand it, all my strength and ability is from and throught our Master... :thumbsup:
Anyway, thanks for disucssing this with me, I think that's a good thing.
God's blessing, James.
I think we need to put everyone's thoughts on works. Those works of the Christ. I think we need to Provoke them to do Good works:
Heb 10:24 and may we consider one another to provoke to love and to good works,
His works are those of Love. We just need for everyone to ensure they are distinguish between which works they are to perform and which ones they are not to perform. Those of Christ we are to perform. Those of our flesh, we are not to perform.
Paul
Grace
"Understanding without the presence of His Spirit is like trying to eat without swallowing."
Christ is the finished work of the Father, and we are (in)cluded as being complete in Him. Therefore, to experience His Grace, is to know that "It is finished." There is nothing anyone can do to add to this life, nor can they take away from the truth.
Knock, knock!
Is He not the ONE who now works and lives within, your neighbor next door?
What is this work of Christ?
peacemaker
Quote from: trettep on March 08, 2009, 11:28:22 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 08, 2009, 08:05:46 PMI understand that, but on the other hand, I think we need to be very careful in how we present that...not bringing a yoke of bondage to those that have been freed by the blood of Jesus. I hear your heart here, but IMO, if we're not very careful, we can encourage people to get their focus on works and off of Jesus. That's why for me personally, I believe in stressing obedience, submitting to Him and His will, but that it's only through His grace and the power of the Holy Spirit that we get our next breath, much less presume to please Him. Don't be discouraged, encourage...I think we can go too far either way, making things sound like condoning either disobedience or focus on our own abilities...it's my POV that falling in either direction is unfruitful. Believe me, I've had concerns the other way...I don't see scripture advocating sinning more, not paying attention to it, grace will take care of it...IMO, that's mis-using grace, "should I sin more that grace would more abound"...but again, as I understand it, all my strength and ability is from and throught our Master... :thumbsup:
Anyway, thanks for disucssing this with me, I think that's a good thing.
God's blessing, James.
I think we need to put everyone's thoughts on works. Those works of the Christ. I think we need to Provoke them to do Good works:
Heb 10:24 and may we consider one another to provoke to love and to good works,
His works are those of Love. We just need for everyone to ensure they are distinguish between which works they are to perform and which ones they are not to perform. Those of Christ we are to perform. Those of our flesh, we are not to perform.
Paul
Hi Paul!
Oh! My precious brother, I want to thank you for all that you have shared on this topic....I have been RICHLY blessed!
This that you wrote says it so beautifully and POWERFULLY and clearly.....
"I think we need to put everyone's thoughts on works. Those works of the Christ. I think we need to Provoke them to do Good works:
Heb 10:24 and may we consider one another to provoke to love and to good works,
His works are those of Love. We just need for everyone to ensure they are distinguish between which works they are to perform and which ones they are not to perform. Those of Christ we are to perform. Those of our flesh, we are not to perform." (trettep/Paul).
Thank you for spurring me on to know Him....for encouraging me to ask Him to perform His good works within me....thank you.
Be blessed my brother,
DaughterofDavid
Quote from: trettep on March 08, 2009, 11:28:22 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 08, 2009, 08:05:46 PMI understand that, but on the other hand, I think we need to be very careful in how we present that...not bringing a yoke of bondage to those that have been freed by the blood of Jesus. I hear your heart here, but IMO, if we're not very careful, we can encourage people to get their focus on works and off of Jesus. That's why for me personally, I believe in stressing obedience, submitting to Him and His will, but that it's only through His grace and the power of the Holy Spirit that we get our next breath, much less presume to please Him. Don't be discouraged, encourage...I think we can go too far either way, making things sound like condoning either disobedience or focus on our own abilities...it's my POV that falling in either direction is unfruitful. Believe me, I've had concerns the other way...I don't see scripture advocating sinning more, not paying attention to it, grace will take care of it...IMO, that's mis-using grace, "should I sin more that grace would more abound"...but again, as I understand it, all my strength and ability is from and throught our Master... :thumbsup:
Anyway, thanks for disucssing this with me, I think that's a good thing.
God's blessing, James.
I think we need to put everyone's thoughts on works. Those works of the Christ. I think we need to Provoke them to do Good works:
Heb 10:24 and may we consider one another to provoke to love and to good works,
His works are those of Love. We just need for everyone to ensure they are distinguish between which works they are to perform and which ones they are not to perform. Those of Christ we are to perform. Those of our flesh, we are not to perform.
Paul
Paul, are you able, within yourself, your own strength, to do the works of Christ, those works of love? You said earlier,
if I understood you, that we must do a work to get saved, then work to stay saved. I agree we do works, but I believe we are absolutely unable to do anything without
His empowerment. So IMO, there's sort of a paradox. We work, we do His will as we submit to Him and walk each day to please Him...but in essence, it's not really us that's doing it...it's Him through us...IMO, we can take absolutely no credit for our obedience, love, or faith..it all proceeds from Him.
I do not deny we do works, but I do claim that when it's all said and done, we can take no credit, because our righteousness is as filthy rags, and it's in Him we live, move, have our being.
Can you take any credit for, and did/do you work for 1) having the faith to get saved, and 2) being able to do the right things to stay saved, because when I cut to the bottom of what I've understood you to say in the past few days, that's what I hear? Maybe that's not what you mean, but I keep getting this overall sense that that's what you think. Please let me know if I'm wrong about that. Wouldn't be the first time. :laughing7: James.
Hi, Jab--
I think we can do what we can do--if that makes sense. We can ask, seek, knock. We can search relentlessly for him. We can pay attention. We can work hard. We can run the good race. We can be active and proactive instead of passive. We can seize what is being offered. Or we can go to church once a week and nod off.
Matthew 5:6
Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.
Hi Dear Molly. Again, not saying at all that we don't work...heck, I probably struggle more than many to "be a good Christian"...I'm still learning this grace thing, I shouldn't sound like I have it all down, I don't. (Remember I'm a Pentecostal preacher's kid, then joined lots with the Southern Baptists! I just think even when I raise my hand to knock, I'm using His strength, not mine.
Please tell me what you think about this verse; So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy. Romans 9:16.
God's blessing, James.
Yes, he is so Wonderful! He is just waiting for us to ask. I often forget myself to ask. And, sometimes, I feel the response is--it's about time! What were you waiting for? His mercy is abundant. He's so generous...
11If a son shall ask bread of any of you that is a father, will he give him a stone? or if he ask a fish, will he for a fish give him a serpent?
12Or if he shall ask an egg, will he offer him a scorpion?
13If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children: how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him?
--Luke 11
6And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,
7Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, ..
--Ex 34
Thank you Lord.
Where would I be without your mercy
I'm afraid there'd be no hope for me
Where would I be without your love that came and gave itself away
Only requiring I believe
Where would I be Lord
where would I be
Where would i be Lord
Without your mercy, where would I be
1 Corinthians 15:10 But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me.
1Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,
2Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.
3Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,
4To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
5Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
6Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations:
7That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:
8Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory:
9Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.
--1 Peter 1
[you] "who are kept" [by the power of God through faith unto salvation]
G5432
φρουρέω
phroureō
froo-reh'-o
From a compound of G4253 and G3708; to be a watcher in advance, that is, to mount guard as a sentinel (post spies at gates); figuratively to hem in, protect: - keep (with a garrison). Compare G5083.
[unto salvation ready] "to be revealed" [in the last time.]
G601
ἀποκαλύπτω
apokaluptō
ap-ok-al-oop'-to
From G575 and G2572; to take off the cover, that is, disclose: - reveal.
Hi Jabcat,
It is all His grace.
Even when we ask....it is His grace that empowers us to ask.....there is nothing that we can take credit for.... NOTHING....for it is ALL HIS WORK and we are His workmanship.
As I have read this thread it is clear to me that (trettep and pneuma) are speaking of 2 DIFFERENT kinds of works.
1.) The Works of The CHRIST
2.) The Works of the flesh
For me, I desire to do only those works that He desires to do THROUGH me. As I am joined to Him and BECOME one in Him....my mind is one with His mind....my heart is one with His heart.....my will is one with His will..... the outcome is that I will think His thoughts and have His motivation, will, heart, to accomplish what He desires to DO through my life in any given situation, circumstance, or with any individual that He brings into my life. (The BECOMING of course takes time....but He is always advancing and overcoming within us day by day as we submit to His Kingship and Lordship)....and once again it is only by His grace that we are able to submit. :bigGrin:
As someone earlier said to Molly....the Good Work might even be doing nothing .....for He is the owner of ALL and His will for some might be to BE STILL....and even in that act of obedience there is much being accomplished within.
It really all comes down to obedience....and for one to have a heart to obey is all by HIS GRACE.
We can't take credit for ANYTHING....
What I hear you say....is something so beautiful.....and that is that you understand that there is nothing within you (your flesh) that can DO anything .....and that is also what I hear trettep saying too...it is only CHRIST IN YOU that can do.....and as you yield to Him this is what will bring forth the fruit of good 'works'....the yielding is a participation....and this is something I see that Father wants us all to be asking of Him is..."Father, please give us the grace TO YIELD to your workmanship that you are doing within us."
So be it.
Be blessed,
DaughterofDavid
Quote from: daughterofdavid....the yielding is a participation....and this is something I see that Father wants us all to be asking of Him is..."Father, please give us the grace TO YIELD to your workmanship that you are doing within us."
Yes, that's a great way of putting it, especially for those of us for whom that might not be so easy, depending, as we learned to do, on our own considerable resources for so long. Yielding can be hard work, until we finally find that sweet spot where we are walking in his will and door after door opens up effortlessly.
Acts 16:26
And suddenly there was a great earthquake, so that the foundations of the prison were shaken: and immediately all the doors were opened, and every one's bands were loosed.
Daughter and Mol :thumbsup:...similar to my favorite terms, submitting and obeying...because then, in our weakness, He is strong, and then He works through us, not me trying to "force His hand"...
I was thinking some more about what trettep may be saying as well. trettep, if you're saying what Daughter of David's post states, then we're probably talking about the same things, perhaps just speaking a little different language. A reason I've continued to clarify though, including my last post, is a couple of comments you made earlier, one being "we have to work to access grace", and "that we work to stay saved". To me, those may appear subtle, yet IMO, profound differences than this; For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God Ephesians 2:8
God's blessing, James.
Quote from: DaughterofDavid on March 09, 2009, 01:25:51 AM
Hi Paul!
Oh! My precious brother, I want to thank you for all that you have shared on this topic....I have been RICHLY blessed!
This that you wrote says it so beautifully and POWERFULLY and clearly.....
"I think we need to put everyone's thoughts on works. Those works of the Christ. I think we need to Provoke them to do Good works:
Heb 10:24 and may we consider one another to provoke to love and to good works,
His works are those of Love. We just need for everyone to ensure they are distinguish between which works they are to perform and which ones they are not to perform. Those of Christ we are to perform. Those of our flesh, we are not to perform." (trettep/Paul).
Thank you for spurring me on to know Him....for encouraging me to ask Him to perform His good works within me....thank you.
Be blessed my brother,
DaughterofDavid
DaughterofDavid, I'm very blessed if your blessed by our Lord Jesus Christ. If so that this message is True then your then the enrichment you gained from it puts fruit on my branch to which I owe Jesus Christ OUR Savior all this wonderful Glory.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 02:12:20 AM
Paul, are you able, within yourself, your own strength, to do the works of Christ, those works of love? You said earlier, if I understood you, that we must do a work to get saved, then work to stay saved. I agree we do works, but I believe we are absolutely unable to do anything without His empowerment. So IMO, there's sort of a paradox. We work, we do His will as we submit to Him and walk each day to please Him...but in essence, it's not really us that's doing it...it's Him through us...IMO, we can take absolutely no credit for our obedience, love, or faith..it all proceeds from Him.
I think your getting it Jebcat. Jebcat, my works are filthy rags (ALWAYS). I can't do what is Good because there is a copyright on works that are Good and the copyright holder is Jesus Christ. So if I do what is Good then it is Him and not me that performs it. So while I might still falter and my flesh gets an advantage as long as I continue in putting on Christ, I can be sure that Christ will continue to produce Good Works. Please read the parable of the talents (pounds) to see that we are expected to increase. We are not expected to be perfect the moment we begin putting Christ on. But be sure that we are expected to be heading in the direction of perfection.
Quote
I do not deny we do works, but I do claim that when it's all said and done, we can take no credit, because our righteousness is as filthy rags, and it's in Him we live, move, have our being.
Can you take any credit for, and did/do you work for 1) having the faith to get saved, and 2) being able to do the right things to stay saved, because when I cut to the bottom of what I've understood you to say in the past few days, that's what I hear? Maybe that's not what you mean, but I keep getting this overall sense that that's what you think. Please let me know if I'm wrong about that. Wouldn't be the first time. :laughing7: James.
Were doing the actual Good works Jebcat but they are owned by Christ. They are not our works. Our works are of the flesh and as you have said they are as filthy rags. I don't take any credit for any Good Works I do Jebcat (at least I'm trying more not to). But as you can see if our Lord has come to destroy the works of Satan which is sin then if we continue in sin then Christ is not in us. For where Christ is - is the putting down of sin.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 05:49:00 AM
Daughter and Mol :thumbsup:...similar to my favorite terms, submitting and obeying...because then, in our weakness, He is strong, and then He works through us, not me trying to "force His hand"...
I was thinking some more about what trettep may be saying as well. trettep, if you're saying what Daughter of David's post states, then we're probably talking about the same things, perhaps just speaking a little different language. A reason I've continued to clarify though, including my last post, is a couple of comments you made earlier, one being "we have to work to access grace", and "that we work to stay saved". To me, those may appear subtle, yet IMO, profound differences than this; For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God Ephesians 2:8
God's blessing, James.
Yes Jebcat, I understand those things might be confusing but even though I might have knowledge in this regard (by the Grace of God), your edifying me, by telling me what you understand and don't understand to help me be more able to administer this message towards others. Be please to know Jebcat, that the works that I say that we must do are those of Christ not our own works. We must perform His works to remain in Grace. Faith + Works is access to Grace. The moment that is exercised your in Grace, and then you must continue to GROW in Grace and that is done by continuing in saving Faith (Faith plus His works).
Paul
Hi Paul. What do you think I'm getting? Getting a clearer picture of how you see it, or getting how I need to understand it?
Yes, I absolutely agree with this quote too; "But as you can see if our Lord has come to destroy the works of Satan which is sin then if we continue in sin then Christ is not in us. For where Christ is - is the putting down of sin." Christ doing the work, through a submitted vessel that for some reason beyond me, He has chosen with which to do it.
God's blessing, James.
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 06:11:59 AM
Hi Paul. What do you think I'm getting? Getting a clearer picture of how you see it, or getting how I need to understand it?
Yes, I absolutely agree with this quote too; "But as you can see if our Lord has come to destroy the works of Satan which is sin then if we continue in sin then Christ is not in us. For where Christ is - is the putting down of sin." Christ doing the work, through a submitted vessel that for some reason beyond me, He has chosen with which to do it.
God's blessing, James.
Jebcat, when I say your getting it - I believe it means your understanding what Christ has communicated. I may have delivered some of that message but those in Christ are not divided. We are all eventually going to be of one mind - that of Christ Jesus. The Lord's hasn't perfected me yet. If I'm sounding to arrogant in what I'm saying or making it sound like this message is my own personal message then please let me know and what you think I can do to not come across like that.
Paul
Quote from: DaughterofDavid on March 09, 2009, 03:21:20 AM
For me, I desire to do only those works that He desires to do THROUGH me. As I am joined to Him and BECOME one in Him....my mind is one with His mind....my heart is one with His heart.....my will is one with His will..... the outcome is that I will think His thoughts and have His motivation, will, heart, to accomplish what He desires to DO through my life in any given situation, circumstance, or with any individual that He brings into my life. (The BECOMING of course takes time....but He is always advancing and overcoming within us day by day as we submit to His Kingship and Lordship)....and once again it is only by His grace that we are able to submit. :bigGrin:
:cloud9: Amen :thumbsup:
Brother Paul, I'm going to be honest with you (maybe I'm your iron to sharpen your iron :laughing7:). We may both benefit from this in how we present our beliefs, and perhaps also clarify in our own minds just what those are :bigGrin:.
So first of all, that's what I wondered, if you were saying I was finally learning. I may be a little slow, but come on :laughing7:. Now mind you, hopefully I am learning and will continue to learn of Him, but if you'll notice, I don't think I've changed anything I've said since the beginning of this conversation. What I've been doing is "pushing" you to clarify if you think you/we work for our salvation or not. So, honestly brother, here's the thing with that; it did sound that it could have been a little arrogant to me, or at least a bit presumptuous...I can't judge you though...I can be overly sensitive and take things too personally (things for God to help me work on ME about), so you decide between you and God...you know your heart. :thumbsup:
So, the following quote, as I see things right now, sound at least somewhat contradictory statements...quote "works we must do are those of Christ not our own works. We must perform His works to remain in Grace." Again, maybe you're speaking a sophisticated evangelical dialect and I'm speaking southern Missouri Bapticostal...
So if you're of a mind, perhaps explain what you mean that you perform, but Christ has them copyrighted...how that works in your life...and if it dovetails at all with my saying any works I do is by His strength in me...the need to submit/obey, seeking to do His will, yes, but needing His help every step of the way...I ain't sayin' I'm good at it, I'm just sayin' that's what I believe. :thumbsup:
A man's heart plans his course, but Yahweh directs his steps. Pr. 16:9
Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
God's blessing, James.
James/jabcat
Do you think one can fall from grace? if so how??
Well, a quick answer, without thinking about it for 30 minutes and checking scripture, I understand a "fall from grace", according to Ap. Paul, to be going back to depending on works, especially works of the Law to attain grace and righteousness that Jesus provided us on the cross. I believe in the perseverance of the saints, that who God chooses, He is and will be the Author and Finisher of their faith.
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 06:51:26 AM
Well, a quick answer, without thinking about it for 30 minutes and checking scripture, I understand a "fall from grace", according to Ap. Paul, to be going back to depending on works, especially works of the Law to attain grace and righteousness that Jesus provided us on the cross. I believe in the perseverance of the saints, that who God chooses, He is and will be the Author and Finisher of their faith.
So if one falls from grace, is that God working in man to lose faith??
in other words, who is the one that falls from grace? Christ working in man, or man alone??
I've answered a question, and I'll answer more. But let's play this fairly. Do you believe you can please God alone?
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 07:13:03 AM
I've answered a question, and I'll answer more. But let's play this fairly. Do you believe you can please God alone?
no
For me, this whole idea of works is related to if one has "been enlightened: (Heb 6, 2 peter 2:20).
Once enlightened, given knowledge, eyes opened to the LOVE of the FATHER through Christ Jesus. I believe we have a will, a will that now has "awareness/knowledge" of choice:
a choice to surrender our will/spirit to the father and through the Holy Spirit produce HIS works;
or
a choice/will to turn away from LOVE, and turn back to "denying HIM" through law sacrifice.
So I see the will/choice as our doings; and the fruit produced from it as the result of HIM working in me,
or the fruit being from the choice to turn away.
For me, without making this a free will argument; an enlightened person, now has will/choice to surrender to the Father and HIM work through us
or
Puff up and turn away.
I don't have disagreements with most of that, without getting into a "free will" discussion, which we won't do.
Although I admittedly can't fully explain this, have never claimed I could, and certainly can't fully understand God's ways (why He does what He does); God is not responsible for my sin, I am; however, I don't believe I can (especially alone) make all the right choices to justify His grace/unmerited favor. Simply, I agree God requires us to make choices, as part of His growing us. But since each breath I take is through His strength, then each "good" deed I may do is through His strength. I can take no credit for it.
So, since you asked, I believe I'm responsible for my sins and receive said judgment, and that God is responsible for goodness (even if He empowers me to do some) and should get all praise. Not good at it, but it's how I understand it.
I also believe He expects submission and obedience, but I have to have His strength to do it. Do I believe we are required to seek to do His will? Yes, but I believe that's only possible in the Spirit, as it works through and empowers me; because if I could have pleased Him on my own, He wouldn't have needed to send me His precious Son.
I've been wrong about many things, but I'd be surprised, taken strictly as simply worded, if that would be an issue among believers :dontknow:. If it is, then it's probably time for me to back out of this and let better scholars than I wrestle with it. I've so related to Peter, when he spoke those profound words; "I go a'fishing."
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 07:39:18 AM
God is not responsible for my sin, I am; however, I don't believe I can (especially alone) make all the right choices to justify His grace/unmerited favor.
So is it possible that works by grace via faith our due to man's "will" to first have chosen this path (after enlightened) but once chosen; God through Christ works through you to produce good fruit.
and it is man's "will", to decide to reject the "faith" and turn back to law; and hence produce "self righteous works"
So, in this sense, to me; man who has tasted the good things of the Lord, is responsible for whether he "stays in grace", or whether he "turns away from it."
But only if he first has had his eyes opened to the Truth, which i believe is all God's doings.
i'ts late, and i'm just thinking out loud.
interesting stuff.
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 07:42:10 AM
I also believe He expects submission and obedience, but I have to have His strength to do it.
I don't know about that; Is it possible that with "enlightened" eyes, we can choose with our "will" to submit or obey
or
we can choose to turn away with our "will".
??
off to bed.
good night
nighty night...another day. God's blessing.
Anyway, you're probably asking questions Origen and Billy Graham would argue over, and you're talking to me about it? :laughing7:
With my limited understanding, God is good, I'm not. I try to please Him, but I sure need His help.
I'm going to own something here...I started this thread, and have probably been more involved in it than any other. So I want to share a couple of things.
I spent my formative years in/and affected by a church community environment of, if you get saved, OK, but guess what? Now you have to; stop smoking (or go to hell), not take one sip of beer or wine (or go to hell), men not wear your hair over your ears (or go to hell), women don't wear pants (or go to hell), don't say darn, much less, you know, the other 'd' word (or go to hell), don't listen to rock n roll (or go to hell), don't watch TV (or go to hell), absolutely don't go to a movie (or go to hell), don't dance (or go to hell), pray often enough or (lose your salvation and, you guess it, go to hell), stay as close to God "as you're supposed to" (or go to hell), don't think like that (or go to hell), read your Bible enough, love God enough, or "stay on fire for God enough" (or you'll be spewed out of His mouth and...go to hell), get baptized by immersion and with the correct words said over you (or go to hell), get saved at an altar on your knees, crying..there has to be crying or you're not saved (or go to hell)...
You probably get the picture. Sparing some details, God led me into a loving, supportive, forgiving, grace-teaching Baptist fellowship and dear old pastor, and married to a precious wife (of which I am unworthy) of the same persuasion. He did a lot of healing of my wounded heart and spirit while sitting in that Baptist pew. I began to learn and believe that maybe, just maybe, God really did love me. Maybe, just maybe, I didn't have to fear that any move, any thought, any mis-step wouldn't cause Him to hate me and rain down His wrath upon me. That maybe, even when I failed Him and my dear wife miserably, that He wouldn't cut me off forever and send me to Hell..that He wouldn't punish me by taking the life of my child...that maybe, I could really believe that He could forgive me and still accept me. That He wouldn't destroy me in His anger and burn me forever. Based on...guess what? Not my good works. Not all those things I'd been taught I had to do exactly right, exactly all the time.
But..because..He..loved me..because..He..did..something..on..the..cross..I..was..and..am..unable..to..do..myself. Because He is good and righteous...because He's big enough, and powerful enough, and sufficient enough, and worthy enough..to lift me up; to set me in His presence, to begin to heal me again, to reassure me that even when I failed Him, He still loves me. And that He'll pick me up, brush me off, take my hand, and say "come on son, this way...I've got you...I'm holding onto you...I won't let you, any man, any devil, take you out of My hand. I didn't save you so that would happen. I have plans for you, and they are good. I'm strong enough, and I know how to finish in you what I've started". Thank you, Jesus.
So if I seem to struggle with this topic, I do. If I seem to be very on guard of even thinking I'm being told I have to somehow work hard enough, be good enough, measure up enough, to please Him and be accepted by Him and not cut off from and tortured by Him...then please forgive me, as I try to be obedient to His will...while knowing I must lean on and depend on Him for every breath...because I've lived being unable to "measure up" and having to learn (still learning) to lean on, count on, depend on Him.
This is my walk with Him, and He knows how to finish my salvation. Your walk may be different, but He also knows exactly what to do with yours. He knows your name.
I just felt I wanted to share this tonight.
God's blessing, James.
James -
So glad to have read some of your personal story. I think most people who come here can relate to this. I've been to all manner of churches throughout my life and spent a good portion of my life terrified of God and convinced that he hated me because I was such a miserable sinner. It sure was a heavy yoke of bondage I stayed in for so many years.
My faith struggles have changed to other things. For example, I began to question in my mind in summer '07, "What if God is not real?". I was very reluctant to share this with anyone at the time it happened because there had never been a time in my life when I questioned his realness - it was always his nature I'd questioned. The reason I'd never questioned God's existence was because somehow when I was a toddler (perhaps age 3) I had an experience alone with God of being awestruck by the realization that GOD IS. I'll never forget it. You'd think that I would have also concluded that GOD IS GOOD. But due to childhood experiences, I did not know if God was good, or rather, whether he would be good to me. I must say, I found it shocking to have that question pop into my mind in summer '07 in a serious nagging way. It upset me deeply. But I was quickly delivered from it. When it happened, I just thought - wow - Satan never gives up on trying to torment our minds - whomever Satan is. Faith is something we must fight for - it is akin to treading water it seems. My main conclusion to the "what if God is not real" question was that if God is not real, then nothing is real and everything is meaningless which was the same way I felt when I believed eternal torment could be God's divine plan of the ages. Life and love are much too glorious for either to be the case.
Goodnight and God bless you -
Anne
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 06:42:48 AM
Brother Paul, I'm going to be honest with you (maybe I'm your iron to sharpen your iron :laughing7:). We may both benefit from this in how we present our beliefs, and perhaps also clarify in our own minds just what those are :bigGrin:.
So first of all, that's what I wondered, if you were saying I was finally learning. I may be a little slow, but come on :laughing7:. Now mind you, hopefully I am learning and will continue to learn of Him, but if you'll notice, I don't think I've changed anything I've said since the beginning of this conversation. What I've been doing is "pushing" you to clarify if you think you/we work for our salvation or not. So, honestly brother, here's the thing with that; it did sound that it could have been a little arrogant to me, or at least a bit presumptuous...I can't judge you though...I can be overly sensitive and take things too personally (things for God to help me work on ME about), so you decide between you and God...you know your heart. :thumbsup:
So, the following quote, as I see things right now, sound at least somewhat contradictory statements...quote "works we must do are those of Christ not our own works. We must perform His works to remain in Grace." Again, maybe you're speaking a sophisticated evangelical dialect and I'm speaking southern Missouri Bapticostal...
So if you're of a mind, perhaps explain what you mean that you perform, but Christ has them copyrighted...how that works in your life...and if it dovetails at all with my saying any works I do is by His strength in me...the need to submit/obey, seeking to do His will, yes, but needing His help every step of the way...I ain't sayin' I'm good at it, I'm just sayin' that's what I believe. :thumbsup:
A man's heart plans his course, but Yahweh directs his steps. Pr. 16:9
Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
God's blessing, James.
Hi James,
Let's consider Romans 11:6 since you quoted above. The "works" in that verse are a reference to OUR works, and not His works. Now OUR works are works that originate in the nature of man (the flesh). When we have Christ, we will be performing His works. He still owns them yet we are performing them. Don't think that because we are performing the works of Christ that it somehow means they are OUR works. They are still His works. We perform those works. Often times, I find others that believe they have Christ but do not do as Christ does. I have even questioned a work that someone did as to say was that the work of Christ or your own only to be told that Christ was working ON them and they don't rely on works they perform. This is why I often classify those that claim to be Christians as two different types. Those that believe they are saved BECAUSE of Jesus and those that believe they are saved BY Jesus. The latter is my belief. The scriptures make it clear that Jesus is going to check for fruit of the branch. That fruit is the works that we have performed but are a reference to His works since it is a reference to a branch that is in the vine (Christ). When we perform LOVE - we perform the works of Christ.
Paul
Hello Jabcat,
Thank you for sharing your heart with us. I treasure it.
After reading all that you wrote....all I could see was such a PURE HEART.....a heart that wants to please His Lord with all his might....a heart that is ever seeking to know Him more....a heart that only wants to do His will.....a heart that wants to understand the Word.....just one big HEART that the Lord loves so deeply. :HeartThrob:
You are precious my brother....and I am honored to know Him in you.
Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall SEE GOD.
DaughterofDavid
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 07:39:18 AM...
So, since you asked, I believe I'm responsible for my sins and receive said judgment, and that God is responsible for goodness (even if He empowers me to do some) and should get all praise. Not good at it, but it's how I understand it.
I believe a bit differently here. I know God holds us accountable for our sins but I don't believe that is the same thing as responsible. At least I see a distinction in God's Word.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 08:53:25 AM
I spent my formative years in/and affected by a church community environment of, if you get saved, OK, but guess what? Now you have to; stop smoking (or go to hell), not take one sip of beer or wine (or go to hell), men not wear your hair over your ears (or go to hell), women don't wear pants (or go to hell), don't say darn, much less, you know, the other 'd' word (or go to hell), don't listen to rock n roll (or go to hell), don't watch TV (or go to hell), absolutely don't go to a movie (or go to hell), don't dance (or go to hell), pray often enough or (lose your salvation and, you guess it, go to hell), stay as close to God "as you're supposed to" (or go to hell), don't think like that (or go to hell), read your Bible enough, love God enough, or "stay on fire for God enough" (or you'll be spewed out of His mouth and...go to hell), get baptized by immersion and with the correct words said over you (or go to hell), get saved at an altar on your knees, crying..there has to be crying or you're not saved (or go to hell)...
:cloud9: What?! You mean they're not ALL like that? :winkgrin: Seriously though, that was my brief experience in all but one of the churches I attended. Glad you made it out alive, James :HeartThrob: Blessings....
Jabcat, I've truly enjoyed ALL of your posts. I've found there is much in common with what you say and what I think. In reading some of your background. . .even that is similar, all though mine was not of a Baptist background . .but pentecostal . . .which really doesn't matter because I'm learning that the label on the front may be different, but the enforcement within is just as brutal . . . same song, different verse.
And like you, I also have a twinge of unsettlement every time I see the works are raised to the same level as the grace . . .even the faith. It is because of Grace that I am enabled to receive "anything" . .so for me . . .it all starts with Grace . . .and it's my "faith" that activates the grace in me. I believe, therefore I "am".
Why the need for the measuring at all? Why the emphasis on works at all? Whether it's the works of Christ or the works of flesh, to me . . .for me to conciously focus on either one of them is not where the relationship is at. Relationship is in the person, not in the attributes of the person. Jesus went out of his way to bring healing to the body through "his" grace, mercy and love. 'My' yoke is easy . .my burden is light . . .
As he lives in us, he matures us, he gives us direction, he gives us strength to move in the direction of his choosing . . . When I begin to focus on trying to do what he did, walk like he walked, think like he thought . . .all of that, when I begin trying to follow that through my concious choice, I have gone from pursuing Christ . . .to idolizing the fruit . . . the truth is . . .as you pursue Christ . . . those things take on a life of their own "in" me without me trying to purposefully do them. He changes my desires, he changes my appetite for what is good and what is bad. But it's not because I chose that diet, but because he put a desire in me to do that.
Actually, I speak metaphorically, but this is also something that has happened to me literally . . . for the past month or so, I have been craving salad . . .all the time . . . even as I write this, I have a bag next to me with a mix of calliflower, celery, carrots, broccoli and cherry tomatos . . .this is not how I used to eat . .but my appetite has changed. I don't eat the same things I used to eat when I was in my youth . .as we mature, spiritually as well . . .as we mature, he changes our appetites.
I just don't feel comfortable telling people they must combine works in with their faith in order to gain, or maintain their salvation. It's not about me . .it's not about my success or failure . . .I'm supposed to decrease so that he can increase . . .it's as Paul said . . .I pursue Christ and him alone . .everything else is secondary after that.
:cloud9: Nathan; sounds like a "Daniel fast" to me......."pulse" (Old English word for veggies and grains) and water. He's put me on those several times, and I wish He would again. Blessings....
Quote from: Nathan on March 09, 2009, 07:26:50 PM
And like you, I also have a twinge of unsettlement every time I see the works are raised to the same level as the grace . . .even the faith. It is because of Grace that I am enabled to receive "anything" . .so for me . . .it all starts with Grace . . .and it's my "faith" that activates the grace in me. I believe, therefore I "am".
Hi Nathan. It is not like I wait until someone says something wrong until I want to say something but what you wrote above kind of made me think of something.
I bolded the part I wish to say something about. I don't understand the flipping back and forth. First of all you say it is because of Grace that you are enabled to receive anything. That is so true! But then you seem to backtrack and state that "it is my faith that activates the grace in me." But, Nathan, grace grows in accord with the weakkness of our faith. As a matter of fact, grace increases when we sin. Not that we should sin so that grace would increase! God forbid! (see Romans 5:20). So it would seem that the more we lack faith the greater grace becomes to pick up the lack.
QuoteNathan wrote: I just don't feel comfortable telling people they must combine works in with their faith in order to gain, or maintain their salvation. It's not about me . .it's not about my success or failure . . .I'm supposed to decrease so that he can increase . . .it's as Paul said . . .I pursue Christ and him alone . .everything else is secondary after that.
Amen to that!
Quote from: Tony N on March 09, 2009, 07:48:47 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 09, 2009, 07:26:50 PM
And like you, I also have a twinge of unsettlement every time I see the works are raised to the same level as the grace . . .even the faith. It is because of Grace that I am enabled to receive "anything" . .so for me . . .it all starts with Grace . . .and it's my "faith" that activates the grace in me. I believe, therefore I "am".
Hi Nathan. It is not like I wait until someone says something wrong until I want to say something but what you wrote above kind of made me think of something.
I bolded the part I wish to say something about. I don't understand the flipping back and forth. First of all you say it is because of Grace that you are enabled to receive anything. That is so true! But then you seem to backtrack and state that "it is my faith that activates the grace in me." But, Nathan, grace is one of the constants on God's chosen ones. It does not grow nor diminish according to the strength and weakness of our faith. As a matter of fact, grace increases when we sin. Not that we should sin so that grace would increase! God forbid! (see Romans 5:20). So it would seem that the more we lack faith the greater grace becomes to pick up the lack.
QuoteNathan wrote: I just don't feel comfortable telling people they must combine works in with their faith in order to gain, or maintain their salvation. It's not about me . .it's not about my success or failure . . .I'm supposed to decrease so that he can increase . . .it's as Paul said . . .I pursue Christ and him alone . .everything else is secondary after that.
Amen to that!
Well, now you have "me" thinking about that as well . . . the reason I say it like I said it is because even though Grace exists in and around me whether I acknowledge it or not, when I "believe" in that grace . . .it creates a reaction in me . . .it activates it in me in the sense that I'm now able to let go of the labors I once embraced. If I didn't believe in that grace, I would continue living according to my own measuring rather than let it go and exercise that Grace in me. It's not flipping back and forth . . .Grace began it all. Faith or no faith . .grace abounds. the faith just makes the Grace manifest more vividly in my life.
:cloud9: This is something I've been thinking about. When I did not know God, and was walking in sin, grace should have abounded all the more. Not saying it didn't, grace is unmerited favor, and I sure didn't merit any, but for sure, I wasn't aware of His grace, as I was too busy walking out all the generational curses in my life.
Now then I didn't know, but now that I know, I have seen over the years when disobedient, that it did seem that His unmerited favor withdrew itself a bit as I walked out what my flesh had reaped. Whereas when I've been obedient in whatever He had me walking in at the time, for sure He turned some things that could have been very destructive, and gave me favor with men, against what would have been expected. Not sure what I'm trying to point out here, just my musings on it all, out loud. Blessings....
Thank you all for your gracious hearts and wonderful words of truth.
Paul, as I stated in my little "testimony", "This is my walk with Him, and He knows how to finish my salvation. Your walk may be different, but He also knows exactly what to do with yours."
God's blessing, James.
Quote from: Tony N on March 09, 2009, 07:48:47 PMHi Nathan. It is not like I wait until someone says something wrong until I want to say something but what you wrote above kind of made me think of something.
I bolded the part I wish to say something about. I don't understand the flipping back and forth. First of all you say it is because of Grace that you are enabled to receive anything. That is so true! But then you seem to backtrack and state that "it is my faith that activates the grace in me." But, Nathan, grace grows in accord with the weakkness of our faith. As a matter of fact, grace increases when we sin. Not that we should sin so that grace would increase! God forbid! (see Romans 5:20). So it would seem that the more we lack faith the greater grace becomes to pick up the lack.
QuoteNathan wrote: I just don't feel comfortable telling people they must combine works in with their faith in order to gain, or maintain their salvation. It's not about me . .it's not about my success or failure . . .I'm supposed to decrease so that he can increase . . .it's as Paul said . . .I pursue Christ and him alone . .everything else is secondary after that.
Amen to that!
Tony, Grace doesn't increase the more we sin. I believe you interpreting Romans 5:20 incorrectly. Romans 5:20 is saying where sin abounded (which is in all of us via our Old Man) that Grace is NOW abounding (after we have access Grace) more.
Paul
The bottom line for me is that he is the author and perfecter (finisher) of our faith, which is the starting point of all of this. He is the beginning and the end. All things came from him and all things will return to him. If he starts it, and he finishes it, what's left for me to do? Nothing. It's all God working in and through us, until there is nothing left of the flesh, and it's all God there. How else do we think God is going to be all in all? "I live, yet it is no longer I, but Christ". Do we have choices to make? Certainly, but he works all according to his will, and works all things together for our good. Our job is not to do anything, but to be the vessel for God to live his life out through us. He will do his works in and through us
We can't even pretend to understand it all, because his thoughts are not our thoughts, nor his ways our ways. That is, until his thoughts become "our" thoughts, and his ways become "our" ways. :cloud9:
Rom 5:20 Yet law came in by the way, that the offense should be increasing. Yet where sin increases, grace superexceeds,
Quote from: Doc on March 09, 2009, 11:30:27 PM
The bottom line for me is that he is the author and perfecter (finisher) of our faith, which is the starting point of all of this. He is the beginning and the end. All things came from him and all things will return to him. If he starts it, and he finishes it, what's left for me to do? Nothing. It's all God working in and through us, until there is nothing left of the flesh, and it's all God there. How else do we think God is going to be all in all? "I live, yet it is no longer I, but Christ". Do we have choices to make? Certainly, but he works all according to his will, and works all things together for our good. Our job is not to do anything, but to be the vessel for God to live his life out through us. He will do his works in and through us
We can't even pretend to understand it all, because his thoughts are not our thoughts, nor his ways our ways. That is, until his thoughts become "our" thoughts, and his ways become "our" ways. :cloud9:
Doc Holliday, here you go writing out my own thoughts again :laughing7:... :thumbsup:. We must be brothers separated at birth..maybe twins even..maybe that's why momma used to call me Roc(khead). Just kidding, she was a good momma.
Tony, if God's grace didn't superceed, I'd be a dead duck.
Not necessarily a cause and effect in romans 5:20
does grace wait for sin or does grace already super exceed sin in the first place.
Or does it matter? Can sin ever exceed grace? If it can't then, it can't, no matter how ya word it.
Amen Paul H...Grace works.
Quote from: trettep on March 09, 2009, 08:44:39 PM
Tony, Grace doesn't increase the more we sin. I believe you interpreting Romans 5:20 incorrectly. Romans 5:20 is saying where sin abounded (which is in all of us via our Old Man) that Grace is NOW abounding (after we have access Grace) more.
Grace 'covers' sin. If there is more sin then more grace is needed to cover the sin.
In a sinless world no grace is needed.
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 11:47:18 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 09, 2009, 11:30:27 PM
The bottom line for me is that he is the author and perfecter (finisher) of our faith, which is the starting point of all of this. He is the beginning and the end. All things came from him and all things will return to him. If he starts it, and he finishes it, what's left for me to do? Nothing. It's all God working in and through us, until there is nothing left of the flesh, and it's all God there. How else do we think God is going to be all in all? "I live, yet it is no longer I, but Christ". Do we have choices to make? Certainly, but he works all according to his will, and works all things together for our good. Our job is not to do anything, but to be the vessel for God to live his life out through us. He will do his works in and through us
We can't even pretend to understand it all, because his thoughts are not our thoughts, nor his ways our ways. That is, until his thoughts become "our" thoughts, and his ways become "our" ways. :cloud9:
Doc Holliday, here you go writing out my own thoughts again :laughing7:... :thumbsup:. We must be brothers separated at birth..maybe twins even..maybe that's why momma used to call me Roc(khead). Just kidding, she was a good momma.
Tony, if God's grace didn't superceed, I'd be a dead duck.
Well, as far as I'm concerned James, we
are brothers separated at birth. :winkgrin: That goes for the rest of you here at tentmaker, too. :thumbsup:
QuoteOur job is not to do anything, but to be the vessel for God to live his life out through us. He will do his works in and through us
I think that would be ideal. The priests carry the ark. But for me, for now, he is with me, but he is other.
He's my friend. We walk together. Sometimes he tells me what to do, sometimes he doesn't. But, he always protects me, and works the outcome for good.
I couldn't live without him.
Quote from: Tony N on March 09, 2009, 11:35:27 PM
Rom 5:20 Yet law came in by the way, that the offense should be increasing. Yet where sin increases, grace superexceeds,
That would be present tense instead of the aorist tense which the Greek uses.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 11:47:18 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 09, 2009, 11:30:27 PM
The bottom line for me is that he is the author and perfecter (finisher) of our faith, which is the starting point of all of this. He is the beginning and the end. All things came from him and all things will return to him. If he starts it, and he finishes it, what's left for me to do? Nothing. It's all God working in and through us, until there is nothing left of the flesh, and it's all God there. How else do we think God is going to be all in all? "I live, yet it is no longer I, but Christ". Do we have choices to make? Certainly, but he works all according to his will, and works all things together for our good. Our job is not to do anything, but to be the vessel for God to live his life out through us. He will do his works in and through us
We can't even pretend to understand it all, because his thoughts are not our thoughts, nor his ways our ways. That is, until his thoughts become "our" thoughts, and his ways become "our" ways. :cloud9:
Doc Holliday, here you go writing out my own thoughts again :laughing7:... :thumbsup:. We must be brothers separated at birth..maybe twins even..maybe that's why momma used to call me Roc(khead). Just kidding, she was a good momma.
Tony, if God's grace didn't superceed, I'd be a dead duck.
Yo, Jab,
Rom 6:1 What, then, shall we declare? That we may be persisting in sin that grace should be increasing?
I'm sure the Roman believers knew that when sin increases that grace superexceeds it. So they were wondering if they could just go out and sin all they want so that grace should be increasing. Paul said No to that. Nevertheless, the idea is there that if we do sin that grace does increase.
And "God is dealing graciously with all our offenses." Yes, we offend. But God doesn't hold over our heads the threat of damnation should we offend or sin. Rather He always works with us as a loving father in love and grace.
Quote from: trettep on March 10, 2009, 12:43:54 AM
Quote from: Tony N on March 09, 2009, 11:35:27 PM
Rom 5:20 Yet law came in by the way, that the offense should be increasing. Yet where sin increases, grace superexceeds,
That would be present tense instead of the aorist tense which the Greek uses.
Paul
My Greek text says it is verb_aorist_active_subjunctive for "increases" and for "superexceeds" verb_aorist_active_indicative. Aorist shows ongoingness. Some grammars state the aorist is a present tense.
Here is an excellent online Greek tool. It is free. You may have to subscribe. Plug in Romans 5:20 at the top right and it agrees with what my Greek text says concerning the two aformentioned words.
http://www.greekbiblestudy.org/gnt/main.do (http://www.greekbiblestudy.org/gnt/main.do)
G5248 huperperisseuo hoop-er-per-is-syoo'-o
from G5228 and G4052;
to super-abound:--abound much more, exceeding.
su⋅per⋅a⋅bound /ˌsupərəˈbaʊnd/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [soo-per-uh-bound] Show IPA
–verb (used without object) 1. to abound beyond something else.
2. to be very abundant or too abundant (usually fol. by in or with).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Tony N on March 10, 2009, 02:45:21 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 09, 2009, 11:47:18 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 09, 2009, 11:30:27 PM
The bottom line for me is that he is the author and perfecter (finisher) of our faith, which is the starting point of all of this. He is the beginning and the end. All things came from him and all things will return to him. If he starts it, and he finishes it, what's left for me to do? Nothing. It's all God working in and through us, until there is nothing left of the flesh, and it's all God there. How else do we think God is going to be all in all? "I live, yet it is no longer I, but Christ". Do we have choices to make? Certainly, but he works all according to his will, and works all things together for our good. Our job is not to do anything, but to be the vessel for God to live his life out through us. He will do his works in and through us
We can't even pretend to understand it all, because his thoughts are not our thoughts, nor his ways our ways. That is, until his thoughts become "our" thoughts, and his ways become "our" ways. :cloud9:
Doc Holliday, here you go writing out my own thoughts again :laughing7:... :thumbsup:. We must be brothers separated at birth..maybe twins even..maybe that's why momma used to call me Roc(khead). Just kidding, she was a good momma.
Tony, if God's grace didn't superceed, I'd be a dead duck.
Yo, Jab,
Rom 6:1 What, then, shall we declare? That we may be persisting in sin that grace should be increasing?
I'm sure the Roman believers knew that when sin increases that grace superexceeds it. So they were wondering if they could just go out and sin all they want so that grace should be increasing. Paul said No to that. Nevertheless, the idea is there that if we do sin that grace does increase.
And "God is dealing graciously with all our offenses." Yes, we offend. But God doesn't hold over our heads the threat of damnation should we offend or sin. Rather He always works with us as a loving father in love and grace.
For me, the person who thinks it's okay to live as you wish and grace will cover it . .. is the same who still doesn't understand that to live in that thinking is not pursuing Christ. When I pursue Christ . . .when I just let him live in me . . . when I let him be in my DAILY thoughtlife, as well as my nightlife . . .when I read of him, worship to him, just ramble around with him . . .then the deeds in me that are subpar are covered by grace as I walk in him. There's no need to try to step as he steps . . .if my eyes are on him, my feet will follow and I may even step in a cow pie occasionally . . .but both the Father and myself are oblivious to that because regardless of what I step in thorugh out my day, my relationship with him will continually wash me, cleanse me, and I don't even need to be always aware of it.
Pursue love and the rest falls into place.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 10, 2009, 04:20:11 PM
Pursue love and the rest falls into place.
AMEN.
i often think 1 cor 13 sums up christianity to a tee. :boogie:
peace
euty
Quote from: chuckt on March 10, 2009, 04:43:50 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 10, 2009, 04:20:11 PM
Pursue love and the rest falls into place.
AMEN.
i often think 1 cor 13 sums up christianity to a tee. :boogie:
peace
euty
I'm with ya bro . . . it's a beautiful chapter.
Grace is for sinners, not the perfect.
Quote from: Tony N on March 10, 2009, 05:56:17 PM
Grace is for sinners, not the perfect.
thank god im not like those sinners over there :heat:
Quote from: Tony N on March 09, 2009, 11:35:27 PM
Rom 5:20 Yet law came in by the way, that the offense should be increasing. Yet where sin increases, grace superexceeds,
The way I read that Tony, is that I should be sinning as much as possible to ensure that I get the most Grace possible. Don't you see error in that?
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 10, 2009, 06:13:02 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 09, 2009, 11:35:27 PM
Rom 5:20 Yet law came in by the way, that the offense should be increasing. Yet where sin increases, grace superexceeds,
The way I read that Tony, is that I should be sinning as much as possible to ensure that I get the most Grace possible. Don't you see error in that?
Paul
NO NO NO thats carnal thinking, stinkin thinkin.....GO FORBID!!
why do people say these things when grace is spoken of?? :ticked:
paul even addressed this type thinking!!
hey friend you should read :
"""HOW TO BE FREE FROM SIN WHILE SMOKING A CIGARETTE"""
by martin zender.
be well
chuckt
Quote from: chuckt on March 10, 2009, 06:16:21 PM
NO NO NO thats carnal thinking, stinkin thinkin.....GO FORBID!!
why do people say these things when grace is spoken of?? :ticked:
paul even addressed this type thinking!!
hey friend you should read :
"""HOW TO BE FREE FROM SIN WHILE SMOKING A CIGARETTE"""
by martin zender.
be well
chuckt
Can you see how I came to that conclusion based on Tony's verse though?
Paul
QuoteCan you see how I came to that conclusion based on Tony's verse though?
Paul
only because i heard it before from unlearned/legalists. :sigh:
sorry bro not trying to be harsh. and not really speaking of you , but i scratch my head HERE on this forum.
grace teaches us to say no to unrighteouness.
LOVE constrains us.
Tony spoke the truth.
i person who commits adultery is as much a slave to sin as one who lusts.
be well
chuckt.
he that is forgiven much..loves much....
as I look about the earth..and the long history of man on it.
I can't help but to see....all that error and sin....
tranposed in the heavenlies..to LOVE..
...and then...I can say..this WILL ALL BE AL[L]RIGHT[OUS]
for when He is ALL IN ALL...ALL WILL BE RIGHTEOUS
Quote from: chuckt on March 10, 2009, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 10, 2009, 05:56:17 PM
Grace is for sinners, not the perfect.
thank god im not like those sinners over there :heat:
Chuck, when my dad was still alive he asked me to pray at the dinner table I said: "I thank you God that I am not a sinner like my dad and brother."
They got a good kick out of that.
Quotehe that is forgiven much..loves much....
Chapter 3
1 Remind them to be subject to sovereignties, to authorities; to be yielding, and to be ready for every good work,
2 to be calumniating
no one, to be pacific, lenient, displaying all meekness
toward all humanity.3 For we
also were once foolish, stubborn, deceived, slaves of various desires and gratifications, leading a life in malice and envy, detestable, hating one another.
4 Yet when the kindness and fondness for humanity of our Saviour, God, made its advent...........
AMEN!
Quote from: Tony N on March 10, 2009, 07:05:49 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 10, 2009, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 10, 2009, 05:56:17 PM
Grace is for sinners, not the perfect.
thank god im not like those sinners over there :heat:
Chuck, when my dad was still alive he asked me to pray at the dinner table I said: "I thank you God that I am not a sinner like my dad and brother."
They got a good kick out of that.
Then you got a good kick out of that from Dad. :laughing7:
Quote from: chuckt on March 10, 2009, 06:35:44 PMonly because i heard it before from unlearned/legalists. :sigh:
sorry bro not trying to be harsh. and not really speaking of you , but i scratch my head HERE on this forum.
grace teaches us to say no to unrighteouness.
LOVE constrains us.
Tony spoke the truth.
i person who commits adultery is as much a slave to sin as one who lusts.
be well
chuckt.
I'm not a legalist. But the verse that Tony provides is present tense and it DOES convey the meaning that the more I should sin that the more Grace will abound unto me.
See the problem I see is his interpretation of the verse. That present tense is the problem. Again, here is Tony's version:
Rom 5:20 Yet law came in by the way, that the offense should be increasing. Yet where sin increases, grace superexceeds,
Here is the version from Young's Literal Translation:
Rom 5:20 And law came in, that the offence might abound, and where the sin did abound, the grace did overabound,
Now if the meaning is present tense then Young's Literal Translation would use the word "does" instead of did. Here is the Greek parsing based on WH:
Rom 5:20 νομοςG3551 N-NSM δεG1161 CONJ παρεισηλθενG3922 V-2AAI-3S ιναG2443 CONJ πλεονασηG4121 V-AAS-3S τοG3588 T-NSN παραπτωμαG3900 N-NSN ουG3757 ADV δεG1161 CONJ
επλεονασενG4121 V-AAI-3S ηG3588 T-NSF αμαρτιαG266 N-NSF
υπερεπερισσευσενG5248 V-AAI-3S ηG3588 T-NSF χαριςG5485 N-NSF
I have bolded the verb that is translated as "abounded" in the KJV here in the Greek text along with its parsing information. Notice the V-AAI. This is telling us that it is a Verb, Aorist Tense, Active Voice and Indicative Mood. The key here is the Aorist Tense. This tense means something happened (past tense).
Now, Tony claims that the aorist, active, indicative should be interpreted as PRESENT tense. As you can see the two different views have profound consequences towards the meaning of the verse.
The translation of Young's Literal Translation indicates to me that where sin abounded (past tense) - meaning where sin at one time abounded at that location is where afterwards, Grace has more abounded.
When I read Tony's verse it says to me that there sin is abounding (present tense) is where (Grace is also more abounding). Now even if you believe we are not to continue in sin, that verse as Tony presents it shows that one would still have MORE Grace even if they did continue in sin.
I believe that translation of Tony's is in error. I desire Tony to show me of those Greek Grammars that he claims interprets aorist, active, indicative as PRESENT Tense. So Tony if you read this post, please provide a specific link that references such. I will provide here one that shows aorist is past tense (notice chart in the middle of the page):
http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/egreek/egreek08.htm
Paul
ok paul,
i see what you are saying but following along we see:
20 Yet law came in by the way, that the offense should be increasing. Yet where sin increases, grace superexceeds,
21 that, even as Sin reigns in death, thus Grace also should be reigning through righteousness, for life eonian, through Jesus
Jesus IS WAS and WILL BE...... follow along:
Chapter 6
1 What, then, shall we declare? That we may be persisting in sin that grace should be increasing?
2 May it not be coming to that! We, who died to sin, how shall we still be living in it?
3 Or are you ignorant that whoever are baptized into Christ Jesus, are baptized into His death?
4 We, then, were entombed together with Him through baptism into death, that, even as Christ was roused from among the dead through the glory of the Father, thus we also should be walking in newness of life.
so it is INDEED present tense as the object of the topic is us dieing to sin INCHRIST. and US NOT persisting ""in sin"" even though that GRACE is STILL increasing. and WILL increase till the end.
ok, i understand your point, do you understand mine?
and thanks for the link.
peace bro
chuckt
Quote from: trettep on March 10, 2009, 07:44:07 PM
See the problem I see is his interpretation of the verse. That present tense is the problem. Again, here is Tony's version:
Rom 5:20 Yet law came in by the way, that the offense should be increasing. Yet where sin increases, grace superexceeds,
Here is the version from Young's Literal Translation:
Rom 5:20 And law came in, that the offence might abound, and where the sin did abound, the grace did overabound,
Now if the meaning is present tense then Young's Literal Translation would use the word "does" instead of did. Here is the Greek parsing based on WH:
Paul
trettep, it is not in error but shows the aorist:
"In "A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of
Historical Research" Prof. Robertson has this to say regarding the
translation of the Aorist into English: "The Greek Aorist ind., as
can be readily seen, is not the exact equivalent of any tense in
any other language. It has {nuances} all its own, many of them
difficult, or well nigh impossible to reproduce in English. We
merely do the best we can in English to translate in one way or
another the total result of a word, context and tense. Certainly
one cannot say that the English translations have been successful
with the Greek Aorist...(Page 847). The English past will
translate the Greek aorist in many cases where we prefer `have'...
(Page 848). The Greek aorist and the English past do not exactly
correspond....The Greek aorist covers much more ground than the
English past...The aorist in Greek is so rich in meaning that the
English labors and groans to express it. As a matter of fact the
Greek aorist is translatable into almost every English tense
except the imperfect..." Again, "The aorist is, strictly speaking,
timeless."
"As this is the latest and most authoritative work on the
grammar of the New Testament, it is evident that Dr. Weymouth's
suggestion has not been deemed a satisfactory solution and that
the translation of the aorist into English is in a most
unsatisfactory state notwithstanding all the efforts of modern
scholarship.
"In view of this self-confessed failure, any attempt at the
solution of so grave a defect in our method of translation should
be welcomed and examined on its own merits.
"Dr. Weymouth, in his pamphlet "On the Rendering into English
of the Greek Aorist and Perfect" criticizes the Revised Version
for its treatment of the aorist. Falling in with the prevailing
tendency, they had changed
p188 Weymouth Prefers the Perfect
as a Rendering of the Aorist
many renderings which are in the "perfect" (using HAVE) to the
past tense. In fact they, generally speaking, regarded the aorist
as referring to the past. Dr. Weymouth noted how often it makes
poor English, and felt, in an indefinite way, that the aorist must
not be confined to the past. He would have it rendered by the
"perfect," as it often is in the Authorized Version, at the same
time translating the perfect in this way as well. But if the
aorist is I-HAVE-LOVED and the Perfect also is I-HAVE-LOVED, what
is the difference between them? After all, the chief function of a
translation is to preserve the distinctions of the original. If a
painter should copy a picture of sheep and goats and draw them all
alike, he may produce a pretty picture, but an abominable copy.
There are sharp boundaries between all the forms of the Greek verb
as we shall see, and they should be distinguished as far as
possible.
"Weymouth pleads for the perfect, as a rendering of the Greek
aorist because it has a bearing on the present, which the past has
not. He protests that "it is too commonly believed and taught that
the Greek Aorist Indicative...is equivalent to the Simple Past
Tense in English (I {wrote}, I {loved}, I {brought}...) "He
affirms that "the English Past, used according to the {true
English idiom}, will largely fail to coincide with the Aorist..."
He makes the startling discovery that we give the English Present
the force of a Future, giving the following examples: "We {start}
tomorrow," "The king {comes} here tonight." He might have added
the fact that this same "present" is used of the past also, as in
"The king {comes} here since he was crowned."
"He was on the verge of discovering that the English "Present"
is not a present at all but a true past-future indefinite. He even
gives examples where the Present must be used, as, "The Chronicle
{states}--," "Clarendon {records}--," "Gibbon {informs} us--." The
one instance he gives for the past in narrative is found in Acts
25:14: "Festus {declared}." But the Greek word here used has none
of the characteristics of the true aorist at all-
p189 Weymouth Prefers the Perfect
as a Rendering of the Aorist
except the sign of the past. {Etheto} is a simple past, and should
be rendered "Festus {submitted} Paul's case to the king."
"To prove that the aorist is not a simple past he gives the
following instances in which both the A. V. and the Revisers
render it by the perfect: We add the C. V. rendering to show that
it can usually be still better rendered by the so-called English
"present."
Matt.5:21,27 Ye {have heard} that it was said
C. V. You {hear} that it was declared
Mark 10:20 All these things I {have observed}
C. V. I {maintain} all these things from
Rev.14:8 Babylon is fallen, is fallen
C. V. It falls! It falls! Babylon
"The perfect limits the {action} to the past just as much as
the past tense does. In these and all other instances of the
aorist the action is not confined to the past.
"Weymouth then makes the welcome admission that "{aorist}
means {indefinite}, and we must bow to the authority of the Greek
grammarians who held that name to be a suitable one...." This is
precisely the point for which we contend.
"He then gives examples where he thinks the aorist should be
rendered by the pluperfect and the translators have so given it.
Matt.1:24 As the angel {had bidden} him
C. V. As the messenger {bids} him
Matt.11:1 When {he had made} an {end}
C. V. When Jesus {finishes}
Matt.27:31 When they {had mocked} Him
C. V. And when they {deride} Him
Matt.26:19 As Jesus {had appointed} them
C. V. As Jesus {instructs} them
Mark 1:32 When the sun {had set}
C. V. When the sun {sets}
"The following is a step in the right direction: "{The Aorist
is often used where our idiom demands the Present}...but this
Gnomic Aorist (as in James 1:11, "for the sun {rises}." etc.) and
the Epistolary Aorist (2 Cor.
p190 The Concordant Method of Solving the Problem
8:18, we {send} with him the brother") need not here be enlarged
upon." Weymouth touches the true sense of the aorist here, but,
alas, he did not enlarge upon it! He recognizes its use in the
statement of general truths or proverbs (the Gnomic Aorist). The
very fact that it can be used of things which are true at all
times and that English uses the "present" for this purpose is
sufficient to identify them.
"Those who suppose that the English of our versions is beyond
reproach will be shocked when he states that "the persistent
rendering of the Greek Aorist by the English simple Past in the R.
V. of the N. T. has one very undesirable effect--that {the
translation is not English}." (Unsearchable Riches, vol.13)
Quote from: chuckt on March 10, 2009, 07:53:46 PM
ok paul,
i see what you are saying but following along we see:
20 Yet law came in by the way, that the offense should be increasing. Yet where sin increases, grace superexceeds,
21 that, even as Sin reigns in death, thus Grace also should be reigning through righteousness, for life eonian, through Jesus
Jesus IS WAS and WILL BE...... follow along:
Chapter 6
1 What, then, shall we declare? That we may be persisting in sin that grace should be increasing?
2 May it not be coming to that! We, who died to sin, how shall we still be living in it?
3 Or are you ignorant that whoever are baptized into Christ Jesus, are baptized into His death?
4 We, then, were entombed together with Him through baptism into death, that, even as Christ was roused from among the dead through the glory of the Father, thus we also should be walking in newness of life.
so it is INDEED present tense as the object of the topic is us dieing to sin INCHRIST. and US NOT persisting ""in sin"" even though that GRACE is STILL increasing. and WILL increase till the end.
ok, i understand your point, do you understand mine?
and thanks for the link.
peace bro
chuckt
Chuck, I see the next verse has the same problem of quoting in the present tense verses the past. Consider this from YLT:
Rom 5:21 that even as the sin
did reign in the death, so also the grace may reign, through righteousness, to life age-during, through Jesus Christ our Lord.
What version are you quoting from by the way?
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 10, 2009, 08:16:15 PM
trettep, it is not in error but shows the aorist:
"In "A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of
Historical Research" Prof. Robertson has this to say regarding the
translation of the Aorist into English: "The Greek Aorist ind., as
can be readily seen, is not the exact equivalent of any tense in
any other language. It has {nuances} all its own, many of them
difficult, or well nigh impossible to reproduce in English. We
merely do the best we can in English to translate in one way or
another the total result of a word, context and tense. Certainly
one cannot say that the English translations have been successful
with the Greek Aorist...(Page 847). The English past will
translate the Greek aorist in many cases where we prefer `have'...
(Page 848). The Greek aorist and the English past do not exactly
correspond....The Greek aorist covers much more ground than the
English past...The aorist in Greek is so rich in meaning that the
English labors and groans to express it. As a matter of fact the
Greek aorist is translatable into almost every English tense
except the imperfect..." Again, "The aorist is, strictly speaking,
timeless."
"As this is the latest and most authoritative work on the
grammar of the New Testament, it is evident that Dr. Weymouth's
suggestion has not been deemed a satisfactory solution and that
the translation of the aorist into English is in a most
unsatisfactory state notwithstanding all the efforts of modern
scholarship.
"In view of this self-confessed failure, any attempt at the
solution of so grave a defect in our method of translation should
be welcomed and examined on its own merits.
"Dr. Weymouth, in his pamphlet "On the Rendering into English
of the Greek Aorist and Perfect" criticizes the Revised Version
for its treatment of the aorist. Falling in with the prevailing
tendency, they had changed
p188 Weymouth Prefers the Perfect
as a Rendering of the Aorist
many renderings which are in the "perfect" (using HAVE) to the
past tense. In fact they, generally speaking, regarded the aorist
as referring to the past. Dr. Weymouth noted how often it makes
poor English, and felt, in an indefinite way, that the aorist must
not be confined to the past. He would have it rendered by the
"perfect," as it often is in the Authorized Version, at the same
time translating the perfect in this way as well. But if the
aorist is I-HAVE-LOVED and the Perfect also is I-HAVE-LOVED, what
is the difference between them? After all, the chief function of a
translation is to preserve the distinctions of the original. If a
painter should copy a picture of sheep and goats and draw them all
alike, he may produce a pretty picture, but an abominable copy.
There are sharp boundaries between all the forms of the Greek verb
as we shall see, and they should be distinguished as far as
possible.
"Weymouth pleads for the perfect, as a rendering of the Greek
aorist because it has a bearing on the present, which the past has
not. He protests that "it is too commonly believed and taught that
the Greek Aorist Indicative...is equivalent to the Simple Past
Tense in English (I {wrote}, I {loved}, I {brought}...) "He
affirms that "the English Past, used according to the {true
English idiom}, will largely fail to coincide with the Aorist..."
He makes the startling discovery that we give the English Present
the force of a Future, giving the following examples: "We {start}
tomorrow," "The king {comes} here tonight." He might have added
the fact that this same "present" is used of the past also, as in
"The king {comes} here since he was crowned."
"He was on the verge of discovering that the English "Present"
is not a present at all but a true past-future indefinite. He even
gives examples where the Present must be used, as, "The Chronicle
{states}--," "Clarendon {records}--," "Gibbon {informs} us--." The
one instance he gives for the past in narrative is found in Acts
25:14: "Festus {declared}." But the Greek word here used has none
of the characteristics of the true aorist at all-
p189 Weymouth Prefers the Perfect
as a Rendering of the Aorist
except the sign of the past. {Etheto} is a simple past, and should
be rendered "Festus {submitted} Paul's case to the king."
"To prove that the aorist is not a simple past he gives the
following instances in which both the A. V. and the Revisers
render it by the perfect: We add the C. V. rendering to show that
it can usually be still better rendered by the so-called English
"present."
Matt.5:21,27 Ye {have heard} that it was said
C. V. You {hear} that it was declared
Mark 10:20 All these things I {have observed}
C. V. I {maintain} all these things from
Rev.14:8 Babylon is fallen, is fallen
C. V. It falls! It falls! Babylon
"The perfect limits the {action} to the past just as much as
the past tense does. In these and all other instances of the
aorist the action is not confined to the past.
"Weymouth then makes the welcome admission that "{aorist}
means {indefinite}, and we must bow to the authority of the Greek
grammarians who held that name to be a suitable one...." This is
precisely the point for which we contend.
"He then gives examples where he thinks the aorist should be
rendered by the pluperfect and the translators have so given it.
Matt.1:24 As the angel {had bidden} him
C. V. As the messenger {bids} him
Matt.11:1 When {he had made} an {end}
C. V. When Jesus {finishes}
Matt.27:31 When they {had mocked} Him
C. V. And when they {deride} Him
Matt.26:19 As Jesus {had appointed} them
C. V. As Jesus {instructs} them
Mark 1:32 When the sun {had set}
C. V. When the sun {sets}
"The following is a step in the right direction: "{The Aorist
is often used where our idiom demands the Present}...but this
Gnomic Aorist (as in James 1:11, "for the sun {rises}." etc.) and
the Epistolary Aorist (2 Cor.
p190 The Concordant Method of Solving the Problem
8:18, we {send} with him the brother") need not here be enlarged
upon." Weymouth touches the true sense of the aorist here, but,
alas, he did not enlarge upon it! He recognizes its use in the
statement of general truths or proverbs (the Gnomic Aorist). The
very fact that it can be used of things which are true at all
times and that English uses the "present" for this purpose is
sufficient to identify them.
"Those who suppose that the English of our versions is beyond
reproach will be shocked when he states that "the persistent
rendering of the Greek Aorist by the English simple Past in the R.
V. of the N. T. has one very undesirable effect--that {the
translation is not English}." (Unsearchable Riches, vol.13)
Thanks for the detail Tony. I see those comments if pertaining to the validity of the subject verses as being in error and the translation error. Obviously, Dr. Young disagreed with the rendering of your verse as well. I highly regard Dr. Young. So this matter of translation has profound consequences on what we believe. I'm assuming your version is the Concordant Literal Version? I happen to agree with many things about the Concordant Method as I have read before but if this is it's outcome then either the method or the underlying initial analysis is in error in my opinion.
But I appreciate you giving me this information Tony as it was insightful and may explain why others I have discussed this subject with have had such different opinions on it.
Paul
trettep wrote....
"Thanks for the detail Tony. I see those comments if pertaining to the validity of the subject verses as being in error and the translation error. Obviously, Dr. Young disagreed with the rendering of your verse as well. I highly regard Dr. Young. So this matter of translation has profound consequences on what we believe. I'm assuming your version is the Concordant Literal Version? I happen to agree with many things about the Concordant Method as I have read before but if this is it's outcome then either the method or the underlying initial analysis is in error in my opinion.
But I appreciate you giving me this information Tony as it was insightful and may explain why others I have discussed this subject with have had such different opinions on it.
Paul"
*************************
Hi Paul,
As I have been reading your ongoing comments/conversation with Tony and others regarding the interpretation of WHY grace abounds....I find it interesting that both of you have given 'proof' from scholarly translators of the Word....and yet both come to 2 different conclusions.
Hmmm.
This is a perfect example of the letter of the Word versus the Spirit of the Word....for the Letter has now been thoroughly parsed ....but what does the Spirit of Truth have to say?
I guess this is where each person has to be led by the Spirit of Truth for himself/herself....
My prayer is that all believers would be in agreement that we would not want to continue in sin or practice sin when we know THE PRICE that our beloved Lord had to pay in order to free us of/from sin.
With head bowed low....I am so grateful.
Shalom,
DaughterofDavid
Quote from: Nathan on March 10, 2009, 04:18:57 PM
For me, the person who thinks it's okay to live as you wish and grace will cover it . .. is the same who still doesn't understand that to live in that thinking is not pursuing Christ. When I pursue Christ . . .when I just let him live in me . . . when I let him be in my DAILY thoughtlife, as well as my nightlife . . .when I read of him, worship to him, just ramble around with him . . .then the deeds in me that are subpar are covered by grace as I walk in him. There's no need to try to step as he steps . . .if my eyes are on him, my feet will follow and I may even step in a cow pie occasionally . . .but both the Father and myself are oblivious to that because regardless of what I step in thorugh out my day, my relationship with him will continually wash me, cleanse me, and I don't even need to be always aware of it.
I do agree with this; however, grace
will cover it (even though it's not "okay" to live this way). Another problem other than the one you've stated here is that we still reap what we sow to the flesh in the flesh, so we can't mock God. This will slow his progress of transformation in our lives, and how much "hell" (death) do we really want to reap from approaching things this way? God
will burn this stuff out of us, no matter what or how long it takes...
Quote from: DaughterofDavid on March 10, 2009, 10:11:36 PM
Hi Paul,
As I have been reading your ongoing comments/conversation with Tony and others regarding the interpretation of WHY grace abounds....I find it interesting that both of you have given 'proof' from scholarly translators of the Word....and yet both come to 2 different conclusions.
Hmmm.
This is a perfect example of the letter of the Word versus the Spirit of the Word....for the Letter has now been thoroughly parsed ....but what does the Spirit of Truth have to say?
I guess this is where each person has to be led by the Spirit of Truth for himself/herself....
My prayer is that all believers would be in agreement that we would not want to continue in sin or practice sin when we know THE PRICE that our beloved Lord had to pay in order to free us of/from sin.
With head bowed low....I am so grateful.
Shalom,
DaughterofDavid
Well we can still analyze this in light of scripture that we can see the inconsistency of translating it as the present tense. Consider here the very first place we find the aorist, active, indicative in the New Testament:
Mat 1:2 Abraham
begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;
The word "begat" that I have bolded is aorist, active, indicative and has the same Greek parsing as the word abounded in in the dicussed verse of Romans. Now does it make any sense to translate that as Present tense?
Here is the verse though from the Concordant Literal Version in the Present tense:
Mat 1:2 Abraham
begets Isaac; now Isaac begets Jacob; now Jacob begets Judah and his brothers.
Does anyone really believe that Abraham was still begetting Isaac while Isaac was begetting Jacob?
Paul
Grace covers our eternal destiny whether or not we believe it is fair that someone who lives in a manner that we disapprove of enjoys that same reward.
Grace does not prevent us from taking the path of destruction.
I like many of the comments, bros and sis's :thumbsup: IMO, this passage is an excellent summary of the law, the promise to Abraham that was to THE SEED (singular) Jesus, and what He does for us through His death, blood, resurrection, and grace..if anyone wants to focus on works, that's between them and God...but I will resist a yoke of bondage...I will seek for my yoke to be the yoke of Jesus, Who took my sin and suffering and nailed it to the cross...and Who will lead me into His righteousness...which will as its own fruit, be seeking to please Him..."on Christ the Solid Rock"...
1 O foolish Galatians, who did bewitch you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was openly set forth crucified?
2 This only would I learn from you. Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now perfected in the flesh?
4 Did ye suffer so many things in vain? if it be indeed in vain.
5 He therefore that supplieth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned unto him for righteousness.
7 Know therefore that they that are of faith, the same are sons of Abraham.
8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all the nations be blessed.
9 So then they that are of faith are blessed with the faithful Abraham.
10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under a curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one who continueth not in all things that are written in the book of the law, to do them.
11 Now that no man is justified by the law before God, is evident: for, The righteous shall live by faith;
12 and the law is not of faith; but, He that doeth them shall live in them.
13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us; for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
14 that upon the Gentiles might come the blessing of Abraham in Christ Jesus; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.
And I LOVE the CLT version of the next verses that further explain it further...BEAUTIFUL!
16 Now to Abraham the promises were declared, and to his Seed. He is not saying "And to seeds," as of many, but as of One: And to "your Seed," which is Christ.
17 Now this am I saying: a covenant, having been ratified before by God, the law, having come four hundred and thirty years afterward, does not invalidate,
18 so as to nullify the promise. For if the enjoyment of the allotment is of law, it is no longer of promise. Yet God has graciously granted it to Abraham through the promise.
19 What, then, is the law? On behalf of transgressions was it added, until the Seed should come to Whom He has promised, being prescribed through messengers in the hand of a mediator.
20 Now there is no Mediator of one. Yet God is One.
21 Is the law, then, against the promises of God? May it not be coming to that! For if a law were given that is able to vivify, really, righteousness were out of law.
22 But the scripture locks up all together under sin, that the promise out of Jesus Christ's faith may be given to those who are believing.
23 Now before the coming of faith we were garrisoned under law, being locked up together for the faith about to be revealed.
24 So that the law has become our escort to Christ, that we may be justified by faith.
25 Now, at the coming of faith, we are no longer under an escort,
26 for you are all sons of God, through faith in Christ Jesus.
God's blessing, James.
Right on, James!
And Paul, you can dissect the word to death and argue over tenses and verbs and everything else, but that will not bring life to the hearer, but the point of that passage; that Grace is always stronger than sin will bring life...
Hi Paul,
You state...
"Mat 1:2 Abraham begets Isaac; now Isaac begets Jacob; now Jacob begets Judah and his brothers.
Does anyone really believe that Abraham was still begetting Isaac while Isaac was begetting Jacob?
Paul"***************
You make a good point....and I also want to add what Dr. Young writes regarding the Hebrews view of past and present....
"The Hebrews were in the habit of using the past tense to express the certainty of an action taking place, even though the action might not really be performed for some time. And
That the Hebrews, in referring to events which might be either past or future were accustomed to act on the principle of transferring themselves mentally to the period and place of the events themselves, and were not content with coldly viewing them as those of a bygone or still coming time; hence the very frequent use of the present tense." (pg. IV).
Bottomline though...one does not need to be grammatically correct to be LED by the Holy Spirit....and if one thinks that it is ok to keep sinning and practice sinning then as John says....
"1Jn 2:1 1-2 I write these things to you (may I call you "my children" - for that's how I think of you), to help you to avoid sin. But if a man should sin, remember that our advocate before the Father is Jesus Christ the righteous, the one who made personal atonement for our sins (and for those of the rest of the world as well).
1Jn 2:3 3-6 It is only when we obey God's laws that we can be quite sure that we really know him. The man who claims to know God but does not obey his laws is not only a liar but lives in self-delusion. In practice, the more a man learns to obey God's laws the more truly and fully does he express his love for him. Obedience is the test of whether we really live "in God" or not. The life of a man who professes to be living in God must bear the stamp of Christ."
Shalom,
DaughterofDavid
It seems to me, obeying God is evidence of His presence and all that entails in the believer, more so than a means to obtain it. Tongue and groove :thumbsup:. So again, IMO, if I seek Jesus with all my heart, and I abide in Him and Him in me, He will both lead and empower me to do His will...authoring, and finishing. Focus on losing myself in Jesus, being filled with the Spirit...the fruits of the Spirit are.....
I fear God's discipline too much and hopefully love Him enough, to not blatantly, intentionally continually spit in His face. But IMO, that's because He's in me, not my means to get or keep Him in me.... I know I fail and hurt Him, but I confess, He forgives, and re-establishes my steps. Glory to His name.
I've asked Him to help me understand this, and as I've received of Him, this is how His grace and obedience work together...as I've understood it to this point.
God's blessing, James.
Quote from: jabcat on March 11, 2009, 12:31:00 AM
It seems to me, obeying God is evidence of His presence and all that entails in the believer, more so than a means to obtain it. Tongue and groove :thumbsup:. So again, IMO, if I seek Jesus with all my heart, and I abide in Him and Him in me, He will both lead and empower me to do His will...authoring, and finishing. Focus on losing myself in Jesus, being filled with the Spirit...the fruits of the Spirit are.....
:thumbsup: :happyclap:
Be blessed my brother!
DaughterofDavid
I really do appreciate it, and Bless you too, dear sister...Rejoice in this next post with me! Translation from the Christian Bible (extremely literal, from the Koine Greek) of I John 3:6 "Whoever is continually staying in union with Him, isn't continually doing things that are wrong; whoever is continually doing things that are wrong, hasn't seen Him or come to know Him. 9 Whoever has been born a child of God, isn't continually doing things that are wrong, because His seed is continually staying in him; and this person can't continually do things that are wrong, because he has been born a child of God.
Halleluja!
Quote from: DaughterofDavid on March 11, 2009, 12:50:03 AM
Quote from: jabcat on March 11, 2009, 12:31:00 AM
It seems to me, obeying God is evidence of His presence and all that entails in the believer, more so than a means to obtain it. Tongue and groove :thumbsup:. So again, IMO, if I seek Jesus with all my heart, and I abide in Him and Him in me, He will both lead and empower me to do His will...authoring, and finishing. Focus on losing myself in Jesus, being filled with the Spirit...the fruits of the Spirit are.....
:thumbsup: :happyclap:
Be blessed my brother!
DaughterofDavid
:cloud9: Ditto and Amen.... :thumbsup:
Quote from: jabcat on March 11, 2009, 12:54:22 AM
I really do appreciate it, and Bless you too, dear sister...Rejoice in this next post with me! Translation from the Christian Bible (extremely literal, from the Koine Greek) of I John 3:6 "Whoever is continually staying in union with Him, isn't continually doing things that are wrong; whoever is continually doing things that are wrong, hasn't seen Him or come to know Him. 9 Whoever has been born a child of God, isn't continually doing things that are wrong, because His seed is continually staying in him; and this person can't continually do things that are wrong, because he has been born a child of God.
Halleluja!
I LOVE IT!!!!
And YES I will REJOICE with you....whewww....what a GLORIOUS LORD we have my brother!
To Yahshua be praised, be MAGNIFIED, be GLORIFIED....To Him alone belongs all the wealth, wisdom, glory and HONOR!!!
:happyclap: :ginlove: :high5: :dsunny:
Be blessed,
DaughterofDavid
Rejoice in the Lord always, and again I say rejoice
Rejoice in the Lord always, and again I say rejoice
Rejoice! Rejoice! And again I say rejoice!
Rejoice! Rejoice! And again I say rejoice!
Rejoice in the Lord always, and again I say rejoice
Thou art worthy, Thou art worthy
Thou art worthy, O Lord
To receive glory, glory and honour
Glory and honour and power
For Thou hast created, hast all things created
Thou hast created all things
And for Thy pleasure they are created
Thou art worthy, O Lord
© 1975 Fred Bock Music/Kingsway?s Thankyou Music
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 10, 2009, 10:52:59 PM
Grace covers our eternal destiny whether or not we believe it is fair that someone who lives in a manner that we disapprove of enjoys that same reward.
Grace does not prevent us from taking the path of destruction.
I question if this is true? Where do we find in scripture that those taking the wide path/destruction are covered by grace or access it?
Grace chastens and instructs; and it is accessed through faith; I don't see how grace is for unbelievers. Unbelievers are not chastised, only sons. Those outside of accessing grace are bastards.
I believe LOVE covers us/all of us, as love covers a multitude of sins.
Can anyone show me where unbelievers access grace too??
sincerly searching and pondering this one.
Pro 10:12 Hatred stirreth up strifes: but love covereth all sins.
Tit 2:11 For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men,
"appeared"
G2014
ἐπιφαίνω
epiphainō
ep-ee-fah'ee-no
From G1909 and G5316; to shine upon, that is, become (literally) visible or (figuratively) known: - appear, give light.
Joh 1:5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
Joh 1:9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
Joh 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
Joh 1:11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
Rom 1:5 By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name;
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Rom 5:17 For if by one man's offense death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
Seems to me, grace is only covering those who receive it?
any thots?
Tit 2:12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world;
Tit 2:13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ;
Tit 2:14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.
Tit 2:15 These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority. Let no man despise thee.
Hi Zeek. To me, this moves into that "when is a person saved" area. I personally (though I know many disagree) believe until God gives the faith to believe to each individual (an individual experience) we are not as yet reconciled to Him, i.e., not yet saved. So I don't see saving grace operating yet in an unbeliever's life (God still loves them, plans good for them at the consummation, so a "grace" of that sort...not sure what else to call it); but that they are still awaiting their day of bowing and confessing, their personal gift of belief unto salvation. And God will bring them to that place, just not yet. It appears to me many (most?) will be saved through destruction. My :2c:.
Well,God didn't prevent Adam and Eve from taking a path of
destruction when they were in the garden.He came immediately
and spoke of that seed of the woman..that would crush that
serpents head. He continually cared for them and was merciful
to them even while they trod that coarse of destruction..He
made provision for them[skins]both in their present state and
for their future deliverance.
If you want to see the end of something,look at the beginning.
Now we have been convinced by the Holy spirit that the
Salvation of ALL is the end of the matter...how anyone could think otherwise or question it , I don't know
ALL OF ADAM [man] HAVE WALKED THE DESTRUCTIVE PATH
ALL OF ADAM HAVE AND WILL WALK THE INSTRUCTIVE PATH
destructive/instructive sometimes we learn the hard way
the Holy spirit told me many,many years ago..that I could
listen and learn,or not listen and learn the hard way..
BUT LEARN I WOULD,ONE WAY OR ANOTHER
some children will not listen, no matter what you say to them
and there comes a point when you must let them go in their
own destructive way[loving them the whole time]...
and sometimes..when they hit rock bottom..they come
to a realization..and turn from their destructive coarse..
and when they turn from destruction..they turn to the ONE
they know loves them..for support and help and forgiveness
and strength to overcome their former ways...and for instruction and FORGIVENESS........and
GRACE AND LOVE TRIUMPHS
Quote from: jabcat on March 11, 2009, 02:53:58 AM
Hi Zeek. To me, this moves into that "when is a person saved" area. I personally (though I know many disagree) believe until God gives the faith to believe to each individual (an individual experience) we are not as yet reconciled to Him, i.e., not yet saved. So I don't see saving grace operating yet in an unbeliever's life (God still loves them, plans good for them at the consummation, so a "grace" of that sort...not sure what else to call it); but that they are still awaiting their day of bowing and confessing, their personal gift of belief unto salvation. And God will bring them to that place, just not yet. It appears to me many (most?) will be saved through destruction. My :2c:.
Interesting that you see saved through destruction as a gift of grace. More for me to think upon. I personally see grace as a gift for the firstfruits that can only be accessed by faith. I see grace as the gift of having one's eyes opened for the purpose of serving.
got to go for now. blessings.
z
Quote from: Zeek on March 11, 2009, 02:29:27 AM
I question if this is true?
We are saved by grace, are unbelievers left out of that?
Jabcat :thumbsup:
Ro 5:15 But not as the offence, so also [is] the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, [which is] by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.
:cloud9: Sheila....Amen.....He told me the purpose of the HG was to take us to the Father (by way of the cross). He said some would go kicking and screaming, but ALL would go one way or another. Blessings....
Cardinal :thumbsup:
Quote from: Zeek on March 11, 2009, 02:29:27 AM
I question if this is true? Where do we find in scripture that those taking the wide path/destruction are covered by grace or access it?
Grace chastens and instructs; and it is accessed through faith; I don't see how grace is for unbelievers. Unbelievers are not chastised, only sons. Those outside of accessing grace are bastards.
I believe LOVE covers us/all of us, as love covers a multitude of sins.
Can anyone show me where unbelievers access grace too??
sincerly searching and pondering this one.
Pro 10:12 Hatred stirreth up strifes: but love covereth all sins.
Zeek, we cannot be practicing sin and have Christ. Unbelievers are not accessing Grace.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 03:03:18 AM
Quote from: Zeek on March 11, 2009, 02:29:27 AM
I question if this is true?
We are saved by grace, are unbelievers left out of that?
Yes, until they have been given it. Until God gives them the Faith and works to access Grace - it is out of their reach.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 03:03:18 AM
Quote from: Zeek on March 11, 2009, 02:29:27 AM
I question if this is true?
We are saved by grace, are unbelievers left out of that?
I believe if u look at what grace (the verb does) then yes, unbelievers are left out. They do not receive the gift and its action.
But, LOVE covers all.
All are reconciled through the death, burial and resurrection of the Christ (head and body, those who have received grace, sons; those who lay down their life for the dead).
Ro 5:15 But not as the offence, so also [is] the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the GIFT BY GRACE, [which is] by one man, Jesus Christ, HATH ABOUNDED UNTO MANY.
I'll believe scripture, thanks.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 04:36:02 AM
Ro 5:15 But not as the offence, so also [is] the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the GIFT BY GRACE, [which is] by one man, Jesus Christ, HATH ABOUNDED UNTO MANY.
I'll believe scripture, thanks.
Jas 4:6 But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but
giveth grace unto the humble.
and two verses later:
Rom 5:17 For if by one man's offense death reigned by one; much more
they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
Rom 11:5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the
election of grace.
Again, I don't doubt that grace abounded to many,
Jesus came full of grace and truth:
Joh 1:4 In him was life; and the life was the
light of men.
Joh 1:5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the
darkness comprehended it not.
Joh 1:9 That was the true Light, which
lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
Joh 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the
world knew him not.
Rom 1:5 By whom we have
received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name;
I think people are missing the point that the scriptures are making.
It's being said that grace is not for the unbeliever? Really?
Can an unbeliever be drawn to believe without grace? No. It is Grace that will prevent the unbeliever from being in a state of unbelief for eternity. So Grace is for the unbeliever whether you like it or not.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 05:02:49 AM
I think people are missing the point that the scriptures are making.
It's being said that grace is not for the unbeliever? Really?
Can an unbeliever be drawn to believe without grace? No. It is Grace that will prevent the unbeliever from being in a state of unbelief for eternity. So Grace is for the unbeliever whether you like it or not.
I disagree (at this time, but am open to change)
I believe it is LOVE that never fails, that covers a multitude of sins. I personally think that grace is interchanged with love by most, and I dont' see them as the same.
LOVE wins. Grace is the gift believers receive through faith that then through the Spirit leads a life of LOVE, laying down your life for another.
Those who receive grace through faith, lay down their life for the "dead".
The "dead", do not receive grace by faith; but thankfully; the Christ (those full of grace and truth) were baptized for them.
The "dead" being received is the harvest, the end of the age.
Those who don't receive grace, die in their sins, naked, ashamed; and through this are saved but through destruction.
Can you show me where in scripture all are saved by grace, even if they don't receive it??
"abounded", does that mean receive??
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 05:02:49 AM
I think people are missing the point that the scriptures are making.
It's being said that grace is not for the unbeliever? Really?
Can an unbeliever be drawn to believe without grace? No. It is Grace that will prevent the unbeliever from being in a state of unbelief for eternity. So Grace is for the unbeliever whether you like it or not.
How is Grace for an unbeliever if only the believers can access it? Faith is access to Grace. Faith would exclude the unbeliever and if the unbeliever is excluded then they don't have Grace. BUT if you disagree then tell me what it means to fall from Grace? For if all the unbelievers have Grace then how does the unbeliever fall from Grace?
Paul
:cloud9: I keep going back to Noah with this. Noah found grace in God's eyes. What was the difference between him and the ones that perished? Was it not that he believed and acted upon it? Blessings.....
Ti 2:11 For the saving grace of God made its advent to all humanity,
I'm done.
Quote from: Cardinal on March 11, 2009, 05:27:34 AM
:cloud9: I keep going back to Noah with this. Noah found grace in God's eyes. What was the difference between him and the ones that perished? Was it not that he believed and acted upon it? Blessings.....
Yes, and the same with Abraham.
Genesis 15:6
And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 05:30:50 AM
Ti 2:11 For the saving grace of God made its advent to all humanity,
I'm done.
that's just saying this:
Isaiah 9:2
The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined.
Quote from: Molly on March 11, 2009, 05:40:19 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 05:30:50 AM
Ti 2:11 For the saving grace of God made its advent to all humanity,
I'm done.
that's just saying this:
Isaiah 9:2
The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined.
yes, and HE is the Light of the World, that lighteth every man that cometh into the world,
but the world knew him not.
Quote from: Zeek on March 11, 2009, 05:43:53 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 11, 2009, 05:40:19 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 05:30:50 AM
Ti 2:11 For the saving grace of God made its advent to all humanity,
I'm done.
that's just saying this:
Isaiah 9:2
The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined.
yes, and HE is the Light of the World, that lighteth every man that cometh into the world,
but the world knew him not.
19And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
20For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
21But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. --John 3
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 05:30:50 AM
Ti 2:11 For the saving grace of God made its advent to all humanity,
I'm done.
Tit 2:11 For that grace of God, that bringeth saluation vnto all men, hath appeared,
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 11, 2009, 02:53:58 AM
Hi Zeek. To me, this moves into that "when is a person saved" area. I personally (though I know many disagree) believe until God gives the faith to believe to each individual (an individual experience) we are not as yet reconciled to Him, i.e., not yet saved. So I don't see saving grace operating yet in an unbeliever's life (God still loves them, plans good for them at the consummation, so a "grace" of that sort...not sure what else to call it); but that they are still awaiting their day of bowing and confessing, their personal gift of belief unto salvation. And God will bring them to that place, just not yet. It appears to me many (most?) will be saved through destruction. My :2c:.
I would only differ from you 'slightly' on this one. We
are reconciled to God before we are given the faith to believe it.
2Co 5:19 as, that God was in Christ
reconciling the world to Himself, not charging their deviations to them, and having put the Word of reconciliation in us. (LITV)
Part of the salvation process is being given the faith to see this.
Most
will be saved through destruction though; destruction of the flesh.
Quote from: trettep on March 11, 2009, 05:24:29 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 05:02:49 AM
I think people are missing the point that the scriptures are making.
It's being said that grace is not for the unbeliever? Really?
Can an unbeliever be drawn to believe without grace? No. It is Grace that will prevent the unbeliever from being in a state of unbelief for eternity. So Grace is for the unbeliever whether you like it or not.
How is Grace for an unbeliever if only the believers can access it? Faith is access to Grace. Faith would exclude the unbeliever and if the unbeliever is excluded then they don't have Grace. BUT if you disagree then tell me what it means to fall from Grace? For if all the unbelievers have Grace then how does the unbeliever fall from Grace?
Paul
Depends on whose faith you're talking about. I think we might also be mixing types of grace here.
What falling from grace is, is trying to do the works of God in the flesh. That's how Adam and Eve fell from grace. They tried to be like God by eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. We think we can make "Adam" (flesh) Godly. We can't. Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God.
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 09:03:04 AMDepends on whose faith you're talking about. I think we might also be mixing types of grace here.
What falling from grace is, is trying to do the works of God in the flesh. That's how Adam and Eve fell from grace. They tried to be like God by eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. We think we can make "Adam" (flesh) Godly. We can't. Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God.
What scriptures can you provide to backup the statement that falling from Grace is when we do the works of God?
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 09:03:04 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 11, 2009, 05:24:29 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 05:02:49 AM
I think people are missing the point that the scriptures are making.
It's being said that grace is not for the unbeliever? Really?
Can an unbeliever be drawn to believe without grace? No. It is Grace that will prevent the unbeliever from being in a state of unbelief for eternity. So Grace is for the unbeliever whether you like it or not.
How is Grace for an unbeliever if only the believers can access it? Faith is access to Grace. Faith would exclude the unbeliever and if the unbeliever is excluded then they don't have Grace. BUT if you disagree then tell me what it means to fall from Grace? For if all the unbelievers have Grace then how does the unbeliever fall from Grace?
Paul
Depends on whose faith you're talking about. I think we might also be mixing types of grace here.
What falling from grace is, is trying to do the works of God in the flesh. That's how Adam and Eve fell from grace. They tried to be like God by eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. We think we can make "Adam" (flesh) Godly. We can't. Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God.
there is more than one type of grace??
can you explain?
thanks
z
Quote from: Cardinal on March 11, 2009, 05:27:34 AM
:cloud9: I keep going back to Noah with this. Noah found grace in God's eyes. What was the difference between him and the ones that perished? Was it not that he believed and acted upon it? Blessings.....
The same word for "found" as in "Noah found grace" is the same word translated "receive." Noah received grace from God. Most likely the grace he received was the grace that made him righteous in relation to those around him.
We don't merit grace. We don't do anything to receive grace from God. Well, actually that's not completely true. We have to be sinners. That's the prerequisite.
Quote from: Tony N on March 11, 2009, 02:54:09 PMThe same word for "found" as in "Noah found grace" is the same word translated "receive." Noah received grace from God. Most likely the grace he received was the grace that made him righteous in relation to those around him.
We don't merit grace. We don't do anything to receive grace from God. Well, actually that's not completely true. We have to be sinners. That's the prerequisite.
My take on this Tony is that Christ has to do something through us (which means we will exhibit His works) to access that Grace. Jesus had Grace and was never a sinner.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 11, 2009, 02:15:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 09:03:04 AMDepends on whose faith you're talking about. I think we might also be mixing types of grace here.
What falling from grace is, is trying to do the works of God in the flesh. That's how Adam and Eve fell from grace. They tried to be like God by eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. We think we can make "Adam" (flesh) Godly. We can't. Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God.
What scriptures can you provide to backup the statement that falling from Grace is when we do the works of God?
Paul
The book of Galatians perhaps? The whole message there was . . ."What happened to you? Why am I hearing that you're professing salvation comes through grace AND WORKS (paraphrasing, but I'll look it up and post it in a sec.)
After his initial salutations to the church of Galatia . . .Paul jumped right in and expressed his great concern with them accepting ANOTHER GOSPEL other than the one he originally established. Then for the rest of chapter 1 . .and through chapter 2, Paul builds his case concerning the authenticity of the message that he himself brought to them. Then we finally get to the point of his letter . . .the original message he established with them is this . . .
Galatians 2:16
16 Knowing that
a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
21I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
This is why so many here are not comfortable with this idea that salvation comes through grace PLUS works . . . it's a message that muddies up what was once clear . . .salvation comes through grace BY FAITH ALONE.
1O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3
Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
Salvation comes through faith . . .and it's maintained by the same Spirit that enables us to see, and receive it. Salvation is not maintained by works. Christ works, or otherwise. For me, the works of Christ in me are the fruit, they are the manifestation that the process of redemption is alive in me. They are not a requirment in order for my salvation to be maintained.
Galatians 5
1Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. 2Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
5For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.
Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
Quote from: trettep on March 11, 2009, 03:28:16 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 11, 2009, 02:54:09 PMThe same word for "found" as in "Noah found grace" is the same word translated "receive." Noah received grace from God. Most likely the grace he received was the grace that made him righteous in relation to those around him.
We don't merit grace. We don't do anything to receive grace from God. Well, actually that's not completely true. We have to be sinners. That's the prerequisite.
My take on this Tony is that Christ has to do something through us (which means we will exhibit His works) to access that Grace. Jesus had Grace and was never a sinner.
Paul
True, Jesus was never a sinner but He did nothing to merit God's gace coming on Him:
Luk 2:40 Now
the little Boy grows up and was staunch in spirit, being filled with wisdom, and
the grace of God was on Him."
But we, being sinners, do nothing to merit God's grace.
Likewise Saul, who became Paul is a test case for grace because grace overwhelmed him while on the road to kill christians. He did nothing to merit God's grace:
1Ti 1:13-16 I, who formerly was a calumniator and a persecutor and an outrager: but I was shown mercy, seeing that I do it being ignorant, in unbelief." (14)
Yet the grace of our Lord overwhelms, with faith and love in Christ Jesus." (15) Faithful is the saying, and worthy of all welcome, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, foremost of whom am I." (16) But therefore was I shown mercy, that in me, the foremost, Jesus Christ should be displaying all His patience, for a pattern of those who are about to be believing on Him for life eonian."
I think that we can fool ourselves into thinking that we don't need to do anything since we are saved by the blood of Christ. I call them the "do-nothings for Christ."
In reality, if we say that we're saved, and there is no REAL change in our lifestyles, then we've missed something.
If we have no new works that are being manifested daily in our lives, then our faith is DEAD.
It's veeerrrrryyy comfortable to just say, "well, bless God, I'm saved, I don't need to do anything!!"
The real question is, how can you NOT do anything if you're saved????
Personally, I strive to do works for Him everyday, because I love Him!! And I want to please Him!! That does NOT in any way mean that I feel like I'm trying to justify myself by what I do!!!! I know well that He loved me from the time I was created, so I don't have to worry about trying to earn salvation. Yet I still want to do the works!!
Blessings,
Brian
Quote from: Nathan on March 11, 2009, 03:44:48 PM
The book of Galatians perhaps? The whole message there was . . ."What happened to you? Why am I hearing that you're professing salvation comes through grace AND WORKS (paraphrasing, but I'll look it up and post it in a sec.)
After his initial salutations to the church of Galatia . . .Paul jumped right in and expressed his great concern with them accepting ANOTHER GOSPEL other than the one he originally established. Then for the rest of chapter 1 . .and through chapter 2, Paul builds his case concerning the authenticity of the message that he himself brought to them. Then we finally get to the point of his letter . . .the original message he established with them is this . . .
Galatians 2:16
16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
21I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
This is why so many here are not comfortable with this idea that salvation comes through grace PLUS works . . . it's a message that muddies up what was once clear . . .salvation comes through grace BY FAITH ALONE.
1O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
Salvation comes through faith . . .and it's maintained by the same Spirit that enables us to see, and receive it. Salvation is not maintained by works. Christ works, or otherwise. For me, the works of Christ in me are the fruit, they are the manifestation that the process of redemption is alive in me. They are not a requirment in order for my salvation to be maintained.
Galatians 5
1Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. 2Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
5For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
Wasn't the Galatians fault that they had returned to performing the works of the flesh? What has that to do with the performing the works of the Christ? How is that a refutation of the fact that must perform His work?
Paul
Quote from: whyiloveitaly on March 11, 2009, 04:08:30 PM
I think that we can fool ourselves into thinking that we don't need to do anything since we are saved by the blood of Christ. I call them the "do-nothings for Christ."
In reality, if we say that we're saved, and there is no REAL change in our lifestyles, then we've missed something.
If we have no new works that are being manifested daily in our lives, then our faith is DEAD.
It's veeerrrrryyy comfortable to just say, "well, bless God, I'm saved, I don't need to do anything!!"
The real question is, how can you NOT do anything if you're saved????
Personally, I strive to do works for Him everyday, because I love Him!! And I want to please Him!! That does NOT in any way mean that I feel like I'm trying to justify myself by what I do!!!! I know well that He loved me from the time I was created, so I don't have to worry about trying to earn salvation. Yet I still want to do the works!!
Blessings,
Brian
You sound like your trying to provoke others unto Good Works:
Heb 10:24 And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works:
:thumbsup:
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 11, 2009, 04:37:00 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 11, 2009, 03:44:48 PM
The book of Galatians perhaps? The whole message there was . . ."What happened to you? Why am I hearing that you're professing salvation comes through grace AND WORKS (paraphrasing, but I'll look it up and post it in a sec.)
After his initial salutations to the church of Galatia . . .Paul jumped right in and expressed his great concern with them accepting ANOTHER GOSPEL other than the one he originally established. Then for the rest of chapter 1 . .and through chapter 2, Paul builds his case concerning the authenticity of the message that he himself brought to them. Then we finally get to the point of his letter . . .the original message he established with them is this . . .
Galatians 2:16
16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
21I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
This is why so many here are not comfortable with this idea that salvation comes through grace PLUS works . . . it's a message that muddies up what was once clear . . .salvation comes through grace BY FAITH ALONE.
1O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
Salvation comes through faith . . .and it's maintained by the same Spirit that enables us to see, and receive it. Salvation is not maintained by works. Christ works, or otherwise. For me, the works of Christ in me are the fruit, they are the manifestation that the process of redemption is alive in me. They are not a requirment in order for my salvation to be maintained.
Galatians 5
1Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. 2Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
5For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
Wasn't the Galatians fault that they had returned to performing the works of the flesh? What has that to do with the performing the works of the Christ? How is that a refutation of the fact that must perform His work?
Paul
I'm saying that your claim of combining works with faith lies very close to their claim that they sustain their salvation through their works . . .which you also claimed . . .you're ebracing the works just as they are . .but you've just redefined them which appears to justify the emphasis on works.
Let me put it this way . . .(how I see and present it)
#1 . .salvation comes by faith alone . . .period
#2 . . ."If" there is no fruit manifesting in the one claiming to have the salvation . . .(and here is where we differ) that is between the individual and God. "If" you have accepted Christ in your life . .then he is in you . . .working . .. changing the desires of your heart to the desires of God's will in your life. If your desires are not changed . . .if there is no transformation on the outside, then there's no activity on the inside. But my problem with what's been shared on this is that there seems to be an emphasis on the outward activity.
So, if my fruit don't measure up to your standards . .then what? You approach me and inform me that I must be more like Christ? You quote me Scriptures that imply my fruit must be Christ like? What is the purpose of the approach? If Christ is in me, is that not enough to enable me to have the transformation alone? Is that not the Holy Spirit's role? To lead me into a more pure life . . . to reform my outward actions?
And if Christ is not in me . . .then what good does forcing my outward actions to give the appearance there's been an inward transformation? That's what religion does already.
Either way . . .whether the fruit is seen, or whether it isn't . . .why would we choose to confront each other on what is seen and what isn't?
For me, the purpose of the instructions in Scripture on the observation of another's fruit, is not so I can then go and attempt to instruct them of what their fruit "should" be, but it's to make me aware of what fruit they are feeding me. If they are trying to instruct me without any fruit of life in their own walk, then that would indicate I should be very cautious in receiving anything from them.
Maybe it would be good to SPECIFY "good works."
For example, good works might be speaking in tongues, healing, performing miracles.
For some, good works is going to church, reading the Bible, praying, etc.
For other people, good works might be visiting the sick and dying, comforting the lonely, sharing a word of encouragement here and there.
Still others might consider good works all of the things they DON'T do, such as swear, lie, kill, get irate..
What works are being talked about here?
Also, if it is Christ that does the works in us, then it's true that we cannot judge people by their works, because that's the Lord's job.
The slippery slope I see with "saved by grace, not works" folks is that they tend not to do ANY works because they're afraid they might start feeling "justified by their works" if they do them!
Just a couple of thoughts,
(the other) Brian
Quote from: Nathan on March 11, 2009, 03:44:48 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 11, 2009, 02:15:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 09:03:04 AMDepends on whose faith you're talking about. I think we might also be mixing types of grace here.
What falling from grace is, is trying to do the works of God in the flesh. That's how Adam and Eve fell from grace. They tried to be like God by eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. We think we can make "Adam" (flesh) Godly. We can't. Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God.
What scriptures can you provide to backup the statement that falling from Grace is when we do the works of God?
Paul
The book of Galatians perhaps? The whole message there was . . ."What happened to you? Why am I hearing that you're professing salvation comes through grace AND WORKS (paraphrasing, but I'll look it up and post it in a sec.)
After his initial salutations to the church of Galatia . . .Paul jumped right in and expressed his great concern with them accepting ANOTHER GOSPEL other than the one he originally established. Then for the rest of chapter 1 . .and through chapter 2, Paul builds his case concerning the authenticity of the message that he himself brought to them. Then we finally get to the point of his letter . . .the original message he established with them is this . . .
Galatians 2:16
16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
21I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
This is why so many here are not comfortable with this idea that salvation comes through grace PLUS works . . . it's a message that muddies up what was once clear . . .salvation comes through grace BY FAITH ALONE.
1O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
Salvation comes through faith . . .and it's maintained by the same Spirit that enables us to see, and receive it. Salvation is not maintained by works. Christ works, or otherwise. For me, the works of Christ in me are the fruit, they are the manifestation that the process of redemption is alive in me. They are not a requirment in order for my salvation to be maintained.
Galatians 5
1Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. 2Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
5For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
Thanks for doing that legwork for me Nathan. As good an example as any from scripture of what I'm talking about.
See, part of the problem Paul, is that sometimes we try to search the scriptures for specific verses to "prove" a theological position, when really what you have to look at is the "big picture" witness of the whole of scripture, as well as what God reveals to you personally. I'm a bit concerned you're getting caught up a bit too much in this works thing, and giving it more than it is due. In other words, I share the concern that others have already voiced.
There is a "kind" of grace that flows out of the works of God being done by Him through us, but His grace toward us personally that begins the whole process does not depend on our performance, nor does the continuation of the same. The more we exert the flesh over the spirit, the less of that outflow from us of grace that we'll
see, but God's grace toward us does not change. That's what I'm talking about WRT the "different kinds" of grace.
Quote from: whyiloveitaly on March 11, 2009, 04:08:30 PM
I think that we can fool ourselves into thinking that we don't need to do anything since we are saved by the blood of Christ. I call them the "do-nothings for Christ."
In reality, if we say that we're saved, and there is no REAL change in our lifestyles, then we've missed something.
If we have no new works that are being manifested daily in our lives, then our faith is DEAD.
It's veeerrrrryyy comfortable to just say, "well, bless God, I'm saved, I don't need to do anything!!"
The real question is, how can you NOT do anything if you're saved????
Personally, I strive to do works for Him everyday, because I love Him!! And I want to please Him!! That does NOT in any way mean that I feel like I'm trying to justify myself by what I do!!!! I know well that He loved me from the time I was created, so I don't have to worry about trying to earn salvation. Yet I still want to do the works!!
Blessings,
Brian
This is not what I'm talking about. What I'm saying is that we need to stop trying to do the works of the Spirit in the flesh. We need to let God flow in us and direct us, otherwise what we do is of the flesh. Jesus said that he could do nothing of himself, and he only spoke and did what he saw the Father speaking and doing. It is His life being lived out of us that does the works of the Spirit. We ourselves do nothing.
It's also very easy to fool ourselves into thinking that we are not trying to justify ourselves by what we do.
Let me ask you another question here. Who is the judge of whether we are "not doing anything?" as you describe above?
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 08:40:35 PM
This is not what I'm talking about. What I'm saying is that we need to stop trying to do the works of the Spirit in the flesh. We need to let God flow in us and direct us, otherwise what we do is of the flesh. Jesus said that he could do nothing of himself, and he only spoke and did what he saw the Father speaking and doing. It is His life being lived out of us that does the works of the Spirit. We ourselves do nothing.
:cloud9: You hit on a very good point here Doc......the gifts of the Spirit can be "prostituted", ie. used to build up kingdoms for men instead of being used to build up the kingdom of God IN MEN. Blessings....
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 08:40:35 PM
This is not what I'm talking about. What I'm saying is that we need to stop trying to do the works of the Spirit in the flesh. We need to let God flow in us and direct us, otherwise what we do is of the flesh. Jesus said that he could do nothing of himself, and he only spoke and did what he saw the Father speaking and doing. It is His life being lived out of us that does the works of the Spirit. We ourselves do nothing.
but once we have been enlighted, to continue to "let God flow in us and direct us", do we not need to renew our mind, stay facing HIM, in order for Him to work through us. Run the race. Be diligent, etc.
I used to be a believer in "no free will", but I lean toward; once we've had our eyes opened; the scales removed, there is a choice, we are no longer blind, but we can turn away from the light. If we keep facing the Light, it shines through us.
any thots?
:cloud9: Your comment about facing the light made me think of something. When I first came to the Lord, He had me to think of how a sundial works. I did. Then He told me to see myself as the stylus (upright) in the center, and He as the Sun. I did. Then He asked me a question. He said, "Where is the darkness?"
I said, "Behind me, Lord." And He said, "And that is where it will stay as long as you keep your eyes on Me." Blessings.....
Quote from: Nathan on March 11, 2009, 05:34:48 PMLet me put it this way . . .(how I see and present it)
...#1 . .salvation comes by faith alone . . .period
...
But that is contrary to the scriptures. It salvation comes by Grace THROUGH Faith. So not Faith alone. Faith is the ACCESS to Grace:
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
James implies there is NO profit in Faith that has no works. So how can a No-Works-Faith produce Grace? Isn't Grace a Profit? - I say it surely is.
Jas 2:14 What doth it
profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
Paul
Quote from: Cardinal on March 11, 2009, 08:56:53 PM
:cloud9: Your comment about facing the light made me think of something. When I first came to the Lord, He had me to think of how a sundial works. I did. Then He told me to see myself as the stylus (upright) in the center, and He as the Sun. I did. Then He asked me a question. He said, "Where is the darkness?"
I said, "Behind me, Lord." And He said, "And that is where it will stay as long as you keep your eyes on Me." Blessings.....
:HeartThrob: :HeartThrob: :HeartThrob:
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 08:26:17 PM
Thanks for doing that legwork for me Nathan. As good an example as any from scripture of what I'm talking about.
See, part of the problem Paul, is that sometimes we try to search the scriptures for specific verses to "prove" a theological position, when really what you have to look at is the "big picture" witness of the whole of scripture, as well as what God reveals to you personally. I'm a bit concerned you're getting caught up a bit too much in this works thing, and giving it more than it is due. In other words, I share the concern that others have already voiced.
There is a "kind" of grace that flows out of the works of God being done by Him through us, but His grace toward us personally that begins the whole process does not depend on our performance, nor does the continuation of the same. The more we exert the flesh over the spirit, the less of that outflow from us of grace that we'll see, but God's grace toward us does not change. That's what I'm talking about WRT the "different kinds" of grace.
Doc, I believe we are to live by every word of God.
Mat 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
If one scripture conflicts a doctrine then that man's entire doctrine is a house of cards that has come crashing down.
Paul
Quote from: Cardinal on March 11, 2009, 08:56:53 PM
:cloud9: Your comment about facing the light made me think of something. When I first came to the Lord, He had me to think of how a sundial works. I did. Then He told me to see myself as the stylus (upright) in the center, and He as the Sun. I did. Then He asked me a question. He said, "Where is the darkness?"
I said, "Behind me, Lord." And He said, "And that is where it will stay as long as you keep your eyes on Me." Blessings.....
I wonder if Eve/Adam were standing between the two trees, with the tree of life behind them.
Doc,
The Spirit judges us (in a good way, mind you!). And it's the Spirit that gives us the fuel to do anything at all.
For example, if I'm walking down the street and I see someone in trouble, I FEEL a need to go to that person. To me, that feeling is God's Spirit in me. (He's in all of us, mind you; it's the FLESH that says to look the other way!)
That's when we're called upon to DO something to help, not just pray and say, "well, I'm saved by grace, not works.." and walk away.
(the other) Brian
Quote from: Cardinal on March 11, 2009, 08:56:53 PM
:cloud9: Your comment about facing the light made me think of something. When I first came to the Lord, He had me to think of how a sundial works. I did. Then He told me to see myself as the stylus (upright) in the center, and He as the Sun. I did. Then He asked me a question. He said, "Where is the darkness?"
I said, "Behind me, Lord." And He said, "And that is where it will stay as long as you keep your eyes on Me." Blessings.....
That's the one! :thumbsup:
Doc . . . I'm not going to go any further in this but I do want to give credit where credit is due . . .your posts have always struck many harmonic chords in me . .and these last posts of yours are no exception to that. You share my same vision perfectly.
Blessings.
Quote from: Zeek on March 11, 2009, 09:03:25 PM
Quote from: Cardinal on March 11, 2009, 08:56:53 PM
:cloud9: Your comment about facing the light made me think of something. When I first came to the Lord, He had me to think of how a sundial works. I did. Then He told me to see myself as the stylus (upright) in the center, and He as the Sun. I did. Then He asked me a question. He said, "Where is the darkness?"
I said, "Behind me, Lord." And He said, "And that is where it will stay as long as you keep your eyes on Me." Blessings.....
I wonder if Eve/Adam were standing between the two trees, with the tree of life behind them.
:cloud9: I would think they would have had to turn their backs on the light to look at the darkness and receive from it.........
Quote from: Nathan on March 11, 2009, 09:20:49 PM
Doc . . . I'm not going to go any further in this but I do want to give credit where credit is due . . .your posts have always struck many harmonic chords in me . .and these last posts of yours are no exception to that. You share my same vision perfectly.
Blessings.
Can I be a ditto-head?
Quote from: Cardinal on March 11, 2009, 08:56:53 PM
:cloud9: Your comment about facing the light made me think of something. When I first came to the Lord, He had me to think of how a sundial works. I did. Then He told me to see myself as the stylus (upright) in the center, and He as the Sun. I did. Then He asked me a question. He said, "Where is the darkness?"
I said, "Behind me, Lord." And He said, "And that is where it will stay as long as you keep your eyes on Me." Blessings.....
Glorious....truly glorious.... :dsunny: :ginlove:
Blessings,
DoD
Hi Nathan,
I really like this that you wrote....
"For me, the purpose of the instructions in Scripture on the observation of another's fruit, is not so I can then go and attempt to instruct them of what their fruit "should" be, but it's to make me aware of what fruit they are feeding me. If they are trying to instruct me without any fruit of life in their own walk, then that would indicate I should be very cautious in receiving anything from them. "
Yes, I see what you are saying and I believe that is wisdom.
What do you think of this that Jude speaks of....
"Jud 1:20 But, ye, beloved! building yourselves up in your most holy faith, in Holy Spirit, praying,
Jud 1:21 Yourselves, in God's love, keep,—awaiting the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ, unto age-abiding life.
Jud 1:22 And, on some, indeed, have mercy,—such as are in doubt, be saving, out of the fire, snatching them;
Jud 1:23 But, on others, have mercy with fear, hating even, the garment, spotted by the flesh.
Jud 1:24 Now, unto him who is able—to guard you from stumbling, and to set you in the presence of his glory, without blemish, with exultation,—
Jud 1:25 Unto God alone our Saviour, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, greatness, dominion, and authority, before all the by-gone age, and now, and unto all the coming ages. Amen!"
I see these scriptures as being what our role IN CHRIST is to be for all those that are 'spotted by the flesh'.....
It seems that you are stating what Jude 1:23 is stating....that we are to recoginize other's fruit or lack thereof so that we will not be polluted with what comes out of their own mouths/hearts....for out of the overflow of the heart doth the mouth speak.
Ultimately....it is as Jude says....UNTO GOD ALONE....UNTO HIM WHO IS ABLE ....to guard you from stumbling....wheww....HalleluYah!
Be blessed!
DoD
Absolutely and Amen . . .yet another perfect example of seeing how God reveals his truth to us because that is the Word that is in us, and then "affirms" it with his Word written before us.
If is see spots in the flesh of others . . . and am truly concerned, then the most effective way to remove them is on my knees before the Father . . .not in your face with Scriptures to point out your problems.
As to the question of what is Good Works???
I believe that I AM the Good Work of my Father!
This to me is the ultimate GOOD WORK!
So the GOOD WORK(S)....are all THOSE that are IN CHRIST....whewww!!!
Now can somebody give the Lord a handclap>>>> :happyclap: :Gclap:
Be blessed Tentmaker Family!
DaughterofDavid
:bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :angelharp: :happyclap: :happyclap: :high5: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping:
:cloud9: AMEN..... :myahoo: :ty: :boogie: :happyclap:
John 4:34
Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work.
Hebrews 12:2
Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.
Quote from: trettep on March 11, 2009, 09:02:00 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 08:26:17 PM
Thanks for doing that legwork for me Nathan. As good an example as any from scripture of what I'm talking about.
See, part of the problem Paul, is that sometimes we try to search the scriptures for specific verses to "prove" a theological position, when really what you have to look at is the "big picture" witness of the whole of scripture, as well as what God reveals to you personally. I'm a bit concerned you're getting caught up a bit too much in this works thing, and giving it more than it is due. In other words, I share the concern that others have already voiced.
There is a "kind" of grace that flows out of the works of God being done by Him through us, but His grace toward us personally that begins the whole process does not depend on our performance, nor does the continuation of the same. The more we exert the flesh over the spirit, the less of that outflow from us of grace that we'll see, but God's grace toward us does not change. That's what I'm talking about WRT the "different kinds" of grace.
Doc, I believe we are to live by every word of God.
Mat 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
If one scripture conflicts a doctrine then that man's entire doctrine is a house of cards that has come crashing down.
Paul
I also believe we are to live by
every word of God, not just the ones that are selected in isolation to support a "doctrine". That was the point I was trying to make. Although the scripture records the truth, not all truth is found only "in" scripture, and
that fact does not take anything away from the scripture. It takes the Spirit to show us what is between the lines, though. There are no scriptures that truly conflict true "doctrine", they only conflict in our understanding. Once the Spirit guides us into understanding, there are no conflicts. The Word is the only place all truth is found. Jesus said, "
I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. Not doctrines, not written words on a page.
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 10:50:59 PM
It takes the Spirit to show us what is between the lines, though. There are no scriptures that truly conflict true "doctrine", they only conflict in our understanding. Once the Spirit guides us into understanding, there are no conflicts. The Word is the only place all truth is found. Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. Not doctrines, not written words on a page.
:cloud9: Amen Doc..... :thumbsup:
Quote from: whyiloveitaly on March 11, 2009, 09:16:23 PM
Doc,
The Spirit judges us (in a good way, mind you!). And it's the Spirit that gives us the fuel to do anything at all.
For example, if I'm walking down the street and I see someone in trouble, I FEEL a need to go to that person. To me, that feeling is God's Spirit in me. (He's in all of us, mind you; it's the FLESH that says to look the other way!)
That's when we're called upon to DO something to help, not just pray and say, "well, I'm saved by grace, not works.." and walk away.
(the other) Brian
I do understand what you're talking about; however, the example you presented above could still come from the flesh (from the "good" side of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil).
I agree that "we" are to DO as well, but unless that doing is the Spirit of God flowing through/ out of me, it is the flesh and profits nothing. It's just getting caught up in that flesh life, in doing. My whole point is that we need to do and say ONLY what we see the Father doing and saying. Our job is to be the vessel. His job is to fill that vessel and work through us. We do have a cooperative role in this, but it is not our doing, it's His doing.
Quote from: sheila on March 11, 2009, 09:59:02 PM
:bgdance: :bgdance: :bgdance: :angelharp: :happyclap: :happyclap: :high5: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping:
Quote from: Cardinal on March 11, 2009, 10:00:59 PM
:cloud9: AMEN..... :myahoo: :ty: :boogie: :happyclap:
I just LOVE BOTH OF YOU!!! I love your dancing too.... :bigGrin: :bgdance:
:HeartThrob:
DoD
Quote from: Zeek on March 11, 2009, 08:51:18 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 08:40:35 PM
This is not what I'm talking about. What I'm saying is that we need to stop trying to do the works of the Spirit in the flesh. We need to let God flow in us and direct us, otherwise what we do is of the flesh. Jesus said that he could do nothing of himself, and he only spoke and did what he saw the Father speaking and doing. It is His life being lived out of us that does the works of the Spirit. We ourselves do nothing.
but once we have been enlighted, to continue to "let God flow in us and direct us", do we not need to renew our mind, stay facing HIM, in order for Him to work through us. Run the race. Be diligent, etc.
I used to be a believer in "no free will", but I lean toward; once we've had our eyes opened; the scales removed, there is a choice, we are no longer blind, but we can turn away from the light. If we keep facing the Light, it shines through us.
any thots?
Sure, we need to have our minds renewed, and there is a "cooperative" role in that. But He is the initiator, because it is
His life that does this in us. We of ourselves can do nothing. Without turning this into a no free-will vs. free will debate, Let me just say that my personal stance is that we have what one might call a limited free will. In other words, we have choice, but that will
never stop God achieving His purposes. Just look at Jonah. He tried to say no and, well, you know how that turned out. :laughing7: We can turn away from the light, but not forever.
I will share my hearts :HeartThrob: desire with you,DOD.
I had prayed to the Father to bring a lot of LOVE into my life
this year.People that I could freely love and that could also
love me. He has answered my prayer through the people here
at TM :boyheart: :girlheart:...May we all be granted to
love one another INTENSELY FROM THE HEART!
For LOVE IS A PERFECT BOND OF UNION
To be able to share the treasures of the Kingdom in our hearts
with one another..and to be understood...and to understand
is one of the greatest rewards He could have given us.
Many of us have lost the close intimate contacts of family
and freind due to our being so centered on HIM..and others
not being able to comprehend what we speak of spiritually,
or even others twisting what we say,due to having trouble
understanding..seem alienated from us
Mark 10;29 'I tell you the truth,Jesus replied,'no one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or feilds for me and the gospel, will fail to receive a hundred
times as much in this present age[homes,brothers sisters mothers children and feilds-along with persecutions] and in the age to come,eternal life"
Your expession of love to me,means more than I could ever express.Thank you,
your sister,Sheila
Quote from: sheila on March 11, 2009, 11:57:27 PM
I will share my hearts :HeartThrob: desire with you,DOD.
I had prayed to the Father to bring a lot of LOVE into my life
this year.People that I could freely love and that could also
love me. He has answered my prayer through the people here
at TM :boyheart: :girlheart:...May we all be granted to
love one another INTENSELY FROM THE HEART!
For LOVE IS A PERFECT BOND OF UNION
To be able to share the treasures of the Kingdom in our hearts
with one another..and to be understood...and to understand
is one of the greatest rewards He could have given us.
Many of us have lost the close intimate contacts of family
and freind due to our being so centered on HIM..and others
not being able to comprehend what we speak of spiritually,
or even others twisting what we say,due to having trouble
understanding..seem alienated from us
Mark 10;29 'I tell you the truth,Jesus replied,'no one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or feilds for me and the gospel, will fail to receive a hundred
times as much in this present age[homes,brothers sisters mothers children and feilds-along with persecutions] and in the age to come,eternal life"
Your expession of love to me,means more than I could ever express.Thank you,
your sister,Sheila
OH! My sister I want you to know that you have RICHLY BLESSED me by all that you wrote above.
I am someone who UNDERSTANDS what you have written....the deep price that one pays when following the Lamb whithersoever He goeth....and it has all been worth it.
Almost exactly a year ago The Lamb said to me..."I want you to leave all that you have known to come into all that you have not known"....
Over the last several years He has seperated my family from many friends (dearly loved ones) and also natural family...and I know that He doesn't do that with everyone but it has been the way that He has chosen for us....in a very literal way.
I know that verse that you speak of....for it was in SOWING my natural family (mother/father)
that I was given the RICHES of those in the Fatherhood realm to be my teachers. This was when I learned of Sonship...of the restitution of all things...and so much more....and continue to.
In obedience I followed Him...not understanding....but obeying....and it was after I got out of the boat that He revealed to me that b/c of my SURRENDERING my natural parents He now was free to move in a mighty way while they are here on earth....and accomplish much within their lives....and that we would one day ALL celebrate together what the Lord HAS DONE....what a RE-UNION this will be! He is so precious to me b/c when I surrendered them I was just coming to understand about the restoration of all things (and not by any man either but by Holy Spirit)....but yet I still had the false error of the Hell teaching so I didn't understand how that would work...and as soon as I let go....He REVEALED the truth that ALL WILL BE SAVED and that everlasting torment is a LIE.
To me this is the Higher law of what it means to Honor Father and Mother....to lay your own life down and reputation... to deny self...b/c of the desire of self to be not misunderstood by other family members....and TRUST FATHER to do the greater work of bringing salvation instead of staying on the scene and only getting in the way to their own hurt.
This is why Yahshua could say "I have come to bring a sword..." and still uphold the commandment to honor father and mother....b/c He was speaking of THE GREATER LAW of Love....that exceeds the letter.
You are so right my precious sister....that LOVE IS THE BOND OF PERFECTION. That is AGAPE.
I count it my great honor and privelge to know you....and I honor WHO HE IS IN YOU.
Forever yours, :HeartThrob:
DoD
:cloud9: A big AMEN to both of you ladie's posts...... :HeartThrob:
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 10:50:59 PMI also believe we are to live by every word of God, not just the ones that are selected in isolation to support a "doctrine". That was the point I was trying to make. Although the scripture records the truth, not all truth is found only "in" scripture, and that fact does not take anything away from the scripture. It takes the Spirit to show us what is between the lines, though. There are no scriptures that truly conflict true "doctrine", they only conflict in our understanding. Once the Spirit guides us into understanding, there are no conflicts. The Word is the only place all truth is found. Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. Not doctrines, not written words on a page.
Doc, I don't believe any single verse can contradict the rest of God's Word. So having said (and I believe you would agree), do you not agree also that Faith without works cannot ACCESS the Grace NEEDED to save us?
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 11, 2009, 05:02:49 AM
I think people are missing the point that the scriptures are making.
It's being said that grace is not for the unbeliever? Really?
Can an unbeliever be drawn to believe without grace? No. It is Grace that will prevent the unbeliever from being in a state of unbelief for eternity. So Grace is for the unbeliever whether you like it or not.
I've been thinking about your comment Paul, and found this verse which helps support your statements above
Zec 12:9 And it shall come to pass
in that day, that I will seek to
destroy all the
nations that come against Jerusalem.
Zec 12:10 And I will pour upon the house of David,
and upon
the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the
spirit of grace and of supplications: and
they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.
I believe these scriptures refer to the return of Christ in judgment, and non believers who were hardened or turned away, will THEN have the spirit of grace poured upon them, and as i think it was you or maybe jabcat that earlier posted "every knee will bow" verses, it does appear this is through grace too.
blessings.
z
How does this happen that Grace can be turned into a license to sin?:
Jud 1:4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 12, 2009, 02:39:39 PM
How does this happen that Grace can be turned into a license to sin?:
Jud 1:4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
Paul
16 They are avowing an acquaintance with God, yet
by their acts are denying it, being abominable and stubborn, and disqualified for every good act.
Quote from: chuckt on March 12, 2009, 03:45:39 PM
16 They are avowing an acquaintance with God, yet by their acts are denying it, being abominable and stubborn, and disqualified for every good act.
I like the way you put that "acquaintance with God". Chuckt, do you believe that Faith with Good Works is a REQUIREMENT to salvation. If so, then I would like to hear from those that don't believe such explain that verse.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 12, 2009, 04:55:11 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 12, 2009, 03:45:39 PM
16 They are avowing an acquaintance with God, yet by their acts are denying it, being abominable and stubborn, and disqualified for every good act.
I like the way you put that "acquaintance with God". Chuckt, do you believe that Faith with Good Works is a REQUIREMENT to salvation. If so, then I would like to hear from those that don't believe such explain that verse.
Paul
greetings paul.
faith seems to make me wanna do good works, i am compelled to seek to bless others and take on the servant attitude.
this has grown in me over the yrs it didnt come all at once, praise God he works in me and HE gets all glory.
i even see mercy as a ""work""
prune me LORD. :boydance:
inlove
chuckt
Hi Paul
these you are speaking of..are the twice dead ones..they were really never resurrected or 'born again' in the first place.
they do not come to life until the 1000 yr reign is over...they make up Gog's crowd which fight against the camp of the city
God loves...they are godless men or have a spirit other than the Holy Ghost in them. Think Jim Jones,David Keresh, the recent Mormon sexual,multiple wives and young girls given to the old men in marriage. Think Jimmy Swaggert and all sorts of spiritual giants caught up in immorality that have been revealed.
Jude speaks of sin of sodom and gommorrah/homosexuality pollute their bodies,eyes full of adultery Greedy- think big money
ministries..Balaam's way loving the wages of wickedness..
prophecying curses to Israelites delivered..then through trickery leading them into sexual immorality and idolatry with
the world. These ministrys mouth empty boastful words and appeal to lustful desire of sinful human nature.
yes they are 'twice dead" or twice the candidate for hell..the
proselytes that have been made through these ministries.
yes they will have their time in the LOF judgement...but they,too, will be restored as we know.
The ministry I have been given of the Holy spirit is not like
that, and truly these people do not know of what spirit they
are of...they are misled of these false Christs and false prophets
that are none other than spirits and doctrines of demons
that have twisted the Goodnews of the gospel.
Let the dead bury the dead..and God has appointed the beast to turn on the prostitute and expose her nakedness...however,
it is not the mind of the beast to be in me..but the mind of Christ...and I know God very well knows how to judge and straighten out everything.
But what He has given me is not a ministry of condemnation
nor a judgement unto His wrath..but He has given me the peaceful assurance that all will be gathered into the Holy city
All that has been scattered into the 4 corners of earth and heaven will come into one...
It is NOT for me,Tretp to call down fire of judgement from
Heaven in this matter...it is of the Father to handle this.
and I do KNOW that mercy will come with His judgement/correction and all will be restored.
Yes..this was prophesied about...and it is quickly coming...
Babylon can do nothing but fall
I guess you can see the reaping and sowing aspect of this
and the building with wood and perishable things..and the
building of your house on sand..and the collapse of it..
and the suffering of loss that has occurred and is occurring
but some are saved through fire...and His undeserved kindness and grace will be shown unto them...though He has
long endured vessels of wrath fitted for destruction...He
will show forth the riches of His glory and mercy to vessels of mercy,prepared before hand...and the Kingdom of Heaven has been prepared beforehand for mankinds inheritance...
and all have born the image of the corruptible and all shall bear the image of the incorruptible
Sheila,
Loved what you shared..... :thumbsup:
As I was reading what you wrote....the anointing is so strong on that post that I could see the sun-beams of New Jerusalem and feel the atmosphere....whew.....
Yahshua be praised! :dsunny:
Love you sis! :HeartThrob:
Be blessed mightily today....
DoD
Amen! DOD
the mind of the beast may expose the shame of
nakedness..but we are to clothe the naked in Grace
with a garment of mercy.
Romans 4;18 Against all hope, Abraham in hope beleived
and so became the father of many nations,just as it had been
said of him, "So shall your offspring be'...
WITHOUT WEAKENING IN HIS FAITH..HE FACED THE FACT
THAT HIS BODY WAS AS GOOD AS DEAD-.....
v 20 YET, HE DID NOT WAVER THROUGH UNBELEIF
REGARDING THE PROMISE OF GOD, BUT WAS STRENGTHENED
IN HIS FAITH AND GAVE GLORY TO GOD, BEING FULLY
PERSUADED THAT GOD HAD POWER TO DO WHAT HE PROMISED
THIS IS WHY IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS
and I think of Christ's offspring..even the salvation of all
mankind...and our hope and faith in God in His power to do this
though it is of faith..though the body look as good as dead
at present
v 23 the Words..'IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM were written
not for him alone, BUT ALSO FOR US,TO WHOM GOD WILL
CREDIT RIGHTEOUSNESS- FOR US WHO BELEIVE IN HIM
WHO RAISED JESUS OUR LORD FROM THE DEAD
HE was delivered over to death for our sins
AND WAS RAISED TO LIFE FOR OUR JUSTIFICATION
Romans 5;6
You see, at JUST THE RIGHT TIME...when we were still
powerless, CHRIST DIED FOR THE UNGODLY...
v 8 But God demonstrates His own love for us in this,
while we were still sinners Christ died for us.
Since we have now been justified by his blood,
how much more will we be saved from God's wrath through
him!
Once again loved what you shared Sheila... :thumbsup:
I have come to learn that the Lord will beckon us to come in and shut the door so that when we are 'undressed' it is done very privately and intimately....
All too often though many will not heed the call to come in and shut themselves in with the Lord...and in so doing this is when their nakedness is not only revealed to themselves but to so many others too...
Yes, we are then called to be the 'chamberlains' to help come along and 'cover' with Grace and Mercy all those that are found exposed....
I have found that as I have been obedient in coming away with my beloved and shutting myself in with Him that it has also been a witness to others to heed the call too when the Lord beckons them....
Blessings to you sis,
DoD
DOD,
I agree 100% with your post. Words of spirit and truth
and spoken with the wisdom that is from above.
Blessings right back to you!
your sis,Sheila
Quote from: trettep on March 12, 2009, 04:07:47 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 10:50:59 PMI also believe we are to live by every word of God, not just the ones that are selected in isolation to support a "doctrine". That was the point I was trying to make. Although the scripture records the truth, not all truth is found only "in" scripture, and that fact does not take anything away from the scripture. It takes the Spirit to show us what is between the lines, though. There are no scriptures that truly conflict true "doctrine", they only conflict in our understanding. Once the Spirit guides us into understanding, there are no conflicts. The Word is the only place all truth is found. Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. Not doctrines, not written words on a page.
Doc, I don't believe any single verse can contradict the rest of God's Word. So having said (and I believe you would agree), do you not agree also that Faith without works cannot ACCESS the Grace NEEDED to save us?
Paul
No; I would not agree with that, because I firmly believe that is a misinterpretation of what those scriptures are saying.
Grace comes
through faith, not after it. The works of the Spirit follow both grace and faith, both of which are gifts to us.
If there are a few scriptures that seem to contradict the
rest of the witness of scripture, then there must be something wrong with the understanding of the scriptures that appear to contradict. As you said, there are no contradictions.
Quote from: Doc on March 12, 2009, 10:36:09 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 12, 2009, 04:07:47 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 10:50:59 PMI also believe we are to live by every word of God, not just the ones that are selected in isolation to support a "doctrine". That was the point I was trying to make. Although the scripture records the truth, not all truth is found only "in" scripture, and that fact does not take anything away from the scripture. It takes the Spirit to show us what is between the lines, though. There are no scriptures that truly conflict true "doctrine", they only conflict in our understanding. Once the Spirit guides us into understanding, there are no conflicts. The Word is the only place all truth is found. Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. Not doctrines, not written words on a page.
Doc, I don't believe any single verse can contradict the rest of God's Word. So having said (and I believe you would agree), do you not agree also that Faith without works cannot ACCESS the Grace NEEDED to save us?
Paul
No; I would not agree with that, because I firmly believe that is a misinterpretation of what those scriptures are saying.
Grace comes through faith, not after it. The works of the Spirit follow both grace and faith, both of which are gifts to us.
If there are a few scriptures that seem to contradict the rest of the witness of scripture, then there must be something wrong with the understanding of the scriptures that appear to contradict. As you said, there are no contradictions.
We move from grace to grace and it is our faith that moves us, but grace has been there from the start.
Quote from: pneuma on March 12, 2009, 10:44:54 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 12, 2009, 10:36:09 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 12, 2009, 04:07:47 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 10:50:59 PMI also believe we are to live by every word of God, not just the ones that are selected in isolation to support a "doctrine". That was the point I was trying to make. Although the scripture records the truth, not all truth is found only "in" scripture, and that fact does not take anything away from the scripture. It takes the Spirit to show us what is between the lines, though. There are no scriptures that truly conflict true "doctrine", they only conflict in our understanding. Once the Spirit guides us into understanding, there are no conflicts. The Word is the only place all truth is found. Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. Not doctrines, not written words on a page.
Doc, I don't believe any single verse can contradict the rest of God's Word. So having said (and I believe you would agree), do you not agree also that Faith without works cannot ACCESS the Grace NEEDED to save us?
Paul
No; I would not agree with that, because I firmly believe that is a misinterpretation of what those scriptures are saying.
Grace comes through faith, not after it. The works of the Spirit follow both grace and faith, both of which are gifts to us.
If there are a few scriptures that seem to contradict the rest of the witness of scripture, then there must be something wrong with the understanding of the scriptures that appear to contradict. As you said, there are no contradictions.
We move from grace to grace and it is our faith that moves us, but grace has been there from the start.
Ah, so grace is both an "origin and destination point" with faith as the vehicle moving us between the two...interesting.
Quote from: Doc on March 12, 2009, 10:52:52 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 12, 2009, 10:44:54 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 12, 2009, 10:36:09 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 12, 2009, 04:07:47 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 10:50:59 PMI also believe we are to live by every word of God, not just the ones that are selected in isolation to support a "doctrine". That was the point I was trying to make. Although the scripture records the truth, not all truth is found only "in" scripture, and that fact does not take anything away from the scripture. It takes the Spirit to show us what is between the lines, though. There are no scriptures that truly conflict true "doctrine", they only conflict in our understanding. Once the Spirit guides us into understanding, there are no conflicts. The Word is the only place all truth is found. Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. Not doctrines, not written words on a page.
Doc, I don't believe any single verse can contradict the rest of God's Word. So having said (and I believe you would agree), do you not agree also that Faith without works cannot ACCESS the Grace NEEDED to save us?
Paul
No; I would not agree with that, because I firmly believe that is a misinterpretation of what those scriptures are saying.
Grace comes through faith, not after it. The works of the Spirit follow both grace and faith, both of which are gifts to us.
If there are a few scriptures that seem to contradict the rest of the witness of scripture, then there must be something wrong with the understanding of the scriptures that appear to contradict. As you said, there are no contradictions.
We move from grace to grace and it is our faith that moves us, but grace has been there from the start.
Ah, so grace is both an "origin and destination point" with faith as the vehicle moving us between the two...interesting.
Hi Doc, if you place that understanding between what Paul and others have been sharing it does away with what seems to conflict in the scriptures.
Quote from: pneuma on March 12, 2009, 10:56:40 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 12, 2009, 10:52:52 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 12, 2009, 10:44:54 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 12, 2009, 10:36:09 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 12, 2009, 04:07:47 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 11, 2009, 10:50:59 PMI also believe we are to live by every word of God, not just the ones that are selected in isolation to support a "doctrine". That was the point I was trying to make. Although the scripture records the truth, not all truth is found only "in" scripture, and that fact does not take anything away from the scripture. It takes the Spirit to show us what is between the lines, though. There are no scriptures that truly conflict true "doctrine", they only conflict in our understanding. Once the Spirit guides us into understanding, there are no conflicts. The Word is the only place all truth is found. Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. Not doctrines, not written words on a page.
Doc, I don't believe any single verse can contradict the rest of God's Word. So having said (and I believe you would agree), do you not agree also that Faith without works cannot ACCESS the Grace NEEDED to save us?
Paul
No; I would not agree with that, because I firmly believe that is a misinterpretation of what those scriptures are saying.
Grace comes through faith, not after it. The works of the Spirit follow both grace and faith, both of which are gifts to us.
If there are a few scriptures that seem to contradict the rest of the witness of scripture, then there must be something wrong with the understanding of the scriptures that appear to contradict. As you said, there are no contradictions.
We move from grace to grace and it is our faith that moves us, but grace has been there from the start.
Ah, so grace is both an "origin and destination point" with faith as the vehicle moving us between the two...interesting.
Hi Doc, if you place that understanding between what Paul and others have been sharing it does away with what seems to conflict in the scriptures.
Good eye, pneuma. That's what I've sort of been trying to get at all along. Thanks for putting it so succinctly.
Quote from: Doc on March 12, 2009, 10:36:09 PM
No; I would not agree with that, because I firmly believe that is a misinterpretation of what those scriptures are saying.
Grace comes through faith, not after it. The works of the Spirit follow both grace and faith, both of which are gifts to us.
If there are a few scriptures that seem to contradict the rest of the witness of scripture, then there must be something wrong with the understanding of the scriptures that appear to contradict. As you said, there are no contradictions.
Please be more specific Doc. How is Faith as access to Grace a misinterpretation. Tell me very detail what that verse should be translated as.
Those scriptures don't contradict what I believe at all Doc.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 12, 2009, 11:56:33 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 12, 2009, 10:36:09 PM
No; I would not agree with that, because I firmly believe that is a misinterpretation of what those scriptures are saying.
Grace comes through faith, not after it. The works of the Spirit follow both grace and faith, both of which are gifts to us.
If there are a few scriptures that seem to contradict the rest of the witness of scripture, then there must be something wrong with the understanding of the scriptures that appear to contradict. As you said, there are no contradictions.
Please be more specific Doc. How is Faith as access to Grace a misinterpretation. Tell me very detail what that verse should be translated as.
Those scriptures don't contradict what I believe at all Doc.
Paul
Read pneuma's posts above. He explained it better than I can.
I say this, because I can see from your post that you're not understanding what I'm saying. I'm not saying that those scriptures contradict what you believe.
"Faith as access to Grace", as you put it, is only part of the story, and that's what is confusing your thinking. As pneuma pointed out, Faith is sandwiched between "grace origins/ destinations" (my terminology), but it begins and ends with grace. It's simply a matter of you putting too much emphasis on only one part of the whole.
To use your terminology to put it another way; Grace gives us "access" to faith, which gives us "access" to more grace.
Quote from: Doc on March 13, 2009, 01:47:19 AMRead pneuma's posts above. He explained it better than I can.
I say this, because I can see from your post that you're not understanding what I'm saying. I'm not saying that those scriptures contradict what you believe.
"Faith as access to Grace", as you put it, is only part of the story, and that's what is confusing your thinking. As pneuma pointed out, Faith is sandwiched between "grace origins/ destinations" (my terminology), but it begins and ends with grace. It's simply a matter of you putting too much emphasis on only one part of the whole.
To use your terminology to put it another way; Grace gives us "access" to faith, which gives us "access" to more grace.
Well, I want to clarify that I don't believe we have personally obtained Grace until it is accessed. Grace is FAVOR and only what is favored is going to be saved. (of course all will eventually obtain favor).
Paul
Rom 9:30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
Rom 9:31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
Rom 9:32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;
Consider these verses. Romans 9:31 shows that there is a LAW OF RIGHTEOUSNESS. The problem with the Israelites is that they pursued it by works of the law and not by Faith. But the same law of righteousness is still a requirement for salvation! It is how it is PURSUED that matters!
So let's look at the pursuit. The problem with how the Israelites pursued the law was because they had debt (sin) and all they would sacrifice an animal to be relieved of that debt (sin). But in their minds they were not pure because they knew that all they had to do was return and sacrifice another animal to have their debt erased. So when they did their works to sacrifice they did so because they had to pay a debt. So all their works were for payment of debt. Because until the sacrifice was made their was debt. Not so in Faith. In Faith the moment we believe we are no longer in debt for our sins have been paid for at the cross. But must still perform works. But here is the key part - the motivation will not be because of debt. We cannot return to sin for if we willfully sin after we have been enlightened then we may incurr the Wrath of God.
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 13, 2009, 01:47:19 AM
[To use your terminology to put it another way; Grace gives us "access" to faith, which gives us "access" to more grace.
Amen Doc..."grace..faith...and
THAT not of yourselves"...that's why we can't boast, only humbly love Him and give thanks. And out of that comes obedience, a desire to please...BECAUSE HE FIRST LOVED US!
Of myself, I was unable to do anything to access grace...love, mercy, and grace accessed, then apprehended
me.
Mercy Came Running
Once there was a holy place
Evidence of God's embrace
And I can almost see mercy's face
Pressed against the veil
Looking down with longing eyes
Mercy must have realized
That once His blood was sacrificed
Freedom would prevail
And as the sky grew dark
And the earth began to shake
With justice no longer in the way
Chorus:
Mercy came running
Like a prisoner set free
Past all my failures to the point of my need
When the sin that I carried
Was all I could see
And when I could not reach mercy
Mercy came running to me
Once there was a broken heart
Way to human from the start
And all the years left it torn apart
Hopeless and afraid
Walls I never meant to build
Left this prisoner unfulfilled
Freedom called but even still
It seemed so far away
I was bound by the chains
From the wages of my sin
Just when I felt like giving in
Mercy came running
Like a prisoner set free
Past all my failures to the point of my need
When the sin that I carried
Was all I could see
And when I could not reach mercy
Mercy came running to me
Sometimes I still feel so far
So far from where I really should be
He gently calls to my heart
Just to remind me
Mercy came running
Like a prisoner set free
Past all my failures to the point of my need
When the sin that I carried
Was all I could see
And when I could not reach mercy
Mercy came running to me
Phillips, Craig, and Dean
Grace and faith, not Grace or faith ...
Faith and works, not Faith or works ...
Grace and works, but No One Can Merit the Unmerited!
peacemaker :Peace2:
Quote from: trettep on March 13, 2009, 06:26:41 AM
Well, I want to clarify that I don't believe we have personally obtained Grace until it is accessed. Grace is FAVOR and only what is favored is going to be saved. (of course all will eventually obtain favor).
Paul
The problem with this is that grace is originally given before we are even conscious of it. Grace is
unmerited favor.
Perhaps we can get some further clarification here. How do you believe we "obtain" or "access" grace?
Quote from: Doc on March 14, 2009, 12:32:58 AM
The problem with this is that grace is originally given before we are even conscious of it. Grace is unmerited favor.
Perhaps we can get some further clarification here. How do you believe we "obtain" or "access" grace?
I hope you will expand on what you mean by the Grace is originally given before we are even conscious of it. Because if that is so then it means we are already saved since Grace means "favor".
As for the clarification, I'm glad you asked.
The Apostles Paul writes:
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have
access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Let's consider that together Doc. That is not my words so if you disagree with them then please elaborate but if you agree with them then we must conclude that it Grace requires a form of Access and this scripture is telling us that Faith is that access. That means before we personally have obtained FAVOR (Grace) that we have Faith.
James tells us this:
Jas 2:14 What doth it
profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
Now I'm sure we both agree that Grace is profit. So can Faith without works (no profit) obtain what is profitable? - No, according to James.
The key problem Doc is that everyone wants to quote verses in the Bible that the Apostles Paul says as which is:
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Eph 2:9
Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Notice in those verses the word "works". But Paul says this also:
Rom 2:6 Who will render to every man
according to his works:
Rom 2:7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, aionios life:
That is Paul saying that those that are continuing in well doing (working) will receive "aionios life"
See the verse in Ephesians 2:9 clarifies whos works it refers to by saying "lest any MAN should boast". The works that are done by those in Christ are His works.
Psalms shows the distinction more clearly:
Psa 28:3 Draw me not away with the wicked, and with the workers of iniquity, which speak peace to their neighbours, but mischief is in their hearts.
Psa 28:4 Give them according to
their deeds, and according to the wickedness of their endeavours: give them after the
work of their hands; render to them their desert.
Psa 28:5 Because they
regard not the works of the LORD, nor the operation of his hands, he shall destroy them, and not build them up.
So Doc, the obtaining or access to Grace is FAITH + (works of Jesus Christ) THRU us. If we do that we shall be saved.
Consider the parable of the talents Doc. All of those servants were given a pound. Is not everyone in Christ given a pound? And what happens to one that did no works to increase his pound?
Luk 19:12 He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.
Luk 19:13 And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.
Luk 19:14 But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.
Luk 19:15 And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading.
Luk 19:16 Then came the first, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.
Luk 19:17 And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities.
Luk 19:18 And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds.
Luk 19:19 And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities.
Luk 19:20 And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin:
Luk 19:21 For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.
Luk 19:22 And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:
Luk 19:23 Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?
Luk 19:24 And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.
Luk 19:25 (And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)
Luk 19:26 For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.
Luk 19:27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.
So see Doc, we have to DO Works. Jesus is going to inspect the fruit of the branches. Now know this - at no time did I mention that we are to do OUR works or the works of the letter of the law. I am saying that the works we MUST do are those of the Christ. It is Him working in us.
Paul
Access to Grace is through the faith of Jesus Christ, not of ourselves, it is that which is given; a gift. And, the work of Christ!
One does not profit from the weakness of others, but when we are weak; then I am (He is) strong.
In the same way the Spirit also helps our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we should, but the Spirit Himself intercedes for us with groaning too deep for words; and He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the saints according to the will of God.
And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.
For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren; and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified.
What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who is against us?
He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him over for us all, how will He not also with Him freely give us all things?
Who will bring a charge against God's elect? God is the one who justifies; who is the one who condemns? Christ Jesus is He who died, yes, rather who was raised, who is at the right hand of God, who also intercedes for us.
Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
Just as it is written, "For Your sake we are being put to death all day long; We were considered as sheep to be slaughtered."
But in all these things we overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loves us.
For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:26-39)
peacemaker
Quote from: trettep on March 14, 2009, 04:14:18 AM
I hope you will expand on what you mean by the Grace is originally given before we are even conscious of it. Because if that is so then it means we are already saved since Grace means "favor".
While we
were still His enemies, Christ died for us. If that isn't grace given before we're conscious of it, then I don't know what is.
How someone put it on another thread is: We have been saved, we are being saved and we will be saved.
Quote
As for the clarification, I'm glad you asked.
The Apostles Paul writes:
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Let's consider that together Doc. That is not my words so if you disagree with them then please elaborate but if you agree with them then we must conclude that it Grace requires a form of Access and this scripture is telling us that Faith is that access. That means before we personally have obtained FAVOR (Grace) that we have Faith.
I don't disagree with those words, I disagree with your understanding of them. If you will notice, the access by faith is into the grace
in which they're already standing.Quote
James tells us this:
Jas 2:14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
Now I'm sure we both agree that Grace is profit. So can Faith without works (no profit) obtain what is profitable? - No, according to James.
The key problem Doc is that everyone wants to quote verses in the Bible that the Apostles Paul says as which is:
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Notice in those verses the word "works". But Paul says this also:
Rom 2:6 Who will render to every man according to his works:
Rom 2:7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, aionios life:
That is Paul saying that those that are continuing in well doing (working) will receive "aionios life"
See the verse in Ephesians 2:9 clarifies whos works it refers to by saying "lest any MAN should boast". The works that are done by those in Christ are His works.
Psalms shows the distinction more clearly:
Psa 28:3 Draw me not away with the wicked, and with the workers of iniquity, which speak peace to their neighbours, but mischief is in their hearts.
Psa 28:4 Give them according to their deeds, and according to the wickedness of their endeavours: give them after the work of their hands; render to them their desert.
Psa 28:5 Because they regard not the works of the LORD, nor the operation of his hands, he shall destroy them, and not build them up.
So Doc, the obtaining or access to Grace is FAITH + (works of Jesus Christ) THRU us. If we do that we shall be saved.
That conclusion is a non-sequitur from the verses posted above.
Quote
Consider the parable of the talents Doc. All of those servants were given a pound. Is not everyone in Christ given a pound? And what happens to one that did no works to increase his pound?
Luk 19:12 He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.
Luk 19:13 And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.
Luk 19:14 But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.
Luk 19:15 And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading.
Luk 19:16 Then came the first, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.
Luk 19:17 And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities.
Luk 19:18 And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds.
Luk 19:19 And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities.
Luk 19:20 And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin:
Luk 19:21 For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.
Luk 19:22 And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:
Luk 19:23 Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?
Luk 19:24 And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.
Luk 19:25 (And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)
Luk 19:26 For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.
Luk 19:27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.
So see Doc, we have to DO Works. Jesus is going to inspect the fruit of the branches. Now know this - at no time did I mention that we are to do OUR works or the works of the letter of the law. I am saying that the works we MUST do are those of the Christ. It is Him working in us.
Paul
As to the James passage, I think if we look at that verse in a bit more context, we'll see what James was talking about there:
Jam 2:8 If you truly fulfill the royal Law according to the Scripture, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself," you do well. Lev. 19:18
Jam 2:9 But if you have partiality you work sin, being reproved by the Law as transgressors.
Jam 2:10 For whoever shall keep all the Law, but stumbles in one, he has become guilty of all.
Jam 2:11 For He who said, "You shall not commit adultery," also said, "You shall not murder." Ex. 20:14, 13; Deut. 5:18, 17 But if you do not commit adultery, but commit murder, you have become a transgressor of the Law.
Jam 2:12
So speak and so do as being about to be judged through a Law of freedom. Jam 2:13
For judgment will be without mercy to the one not doing mercy. And mercy rejoices over judgment. Jam 2:14
My brothers, what is the gain if anyone says he has faith, but he does not have works? Is the faith able to save him? Jam 2:15
But if a brother or a sister is naked and may be lacking in daily food, Jam 2:16
and any one of you say to them, Go in peace, be warmed and filled, but does not give them the things the body needs, what gain is it? Jam 2:17
So also faith, if it does not have works, is dead being by itself.I see that we are judged by our works (justified or condemned), and that we are given according to our works (reward and punishment), but I don't see the conclusion from these passages that we are saved by them. The works of God are merely an outflow from real faith (that has been given to us) resulting from grace (that has been given to us). He's saying that faith without works doesn't do anyone any good.
I know you didn't mention that we are to do our works, or the works of the letter of the law. Yet you are still implying that works save us, which is trying to keep law. You appear to be saying that faith + works = access to grace leading to salvation.
If one has been given real faith, then He who has given that to you is also doing those works through you.
It's the same thing with the sermon on the mount. Jesus wasn't laying down a bunch of new rules, he was saying that if you're living the God kind of life (in other words, if God is living out His life through us), this is what it will look like.
Quote from: Doc on March 14, 2009, 08:26:37 AM
... We have been saved, we are being saved and we will be saved.
That doesn't make sense to me. If we have been saved then why would James say this:
Jas 2:14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works?
can faith save him?
Why would James be concerned about someone being saved by Faith if everyone is already saved?
Quote...I know you didn't mention that we are to do our works, or the works of the letter of the law. Yet you are still implying that works save us, which is trying to keep law. You appear to be saying that faith + works = access to grace leading to salvation.
Yes, I'm implying it because the scriptures are SCREAMING it to me. But not the letter of the law that was done away with but what still remains of the Law - the Spirit.
Quote
If one has been given real faith, then He who has given that to you is also doing those works through you.
It's the same thing with the sermon on the mount. Jesus wasn't laying down a bunch of new rules, he was saying that if you're living the God kind of life (in other words, if God is living out His life through us), this is what it will look like.
I agree with that part of what you said. But you must realize that the LAW still exists:
Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
To me that verse there is telling me that Faith plus His Works = Grace = salvation.
Paul
One thing I'd like to point out.
- Romans 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Notice it says "THIS grace WHEREIN WE STAND" is accessed by faith (which includes works). Does "THIS grace WHEREIN WE STAND" mean the same thing as "ANY grace" at all? If that were the case then faith + works would precede all grace from God. But if faith + works precedes ANY AND ALL grace from God, how then is faith a gift? How then are we His workmanship created unto good works?
What if the grace wherein Paul stood was a bit further along than the grace that an ungodly, spiritually uncircumcized heart might receive.
Let me ask you this Paul. According to how you are reading this, wouldn't it imply that a person whose heart is yet uncircumcized as NO ACCESS to ANY grace from God?
Quote from: bobf on March 14, 2009, 04:58:30 PM
One thing I'd like to point out.
- Romans 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Notice it says "THIS grace WHEREIN WE STAND" is accessed by faith (which includes works). Does "THIS grace WHEREIN WE STAND" mean the same thing as "ANY grace" at all? If that were the case then faith + works would precede all grace from God. But if faith + works precedes ANY AND ALL grace from God, how then is faith a gift? How then are we His workmanship created unto good works?
What if the grace wherein Paul stood was a bit further along than the grace that an ungodly, spiritually uncircumcized heart might receive.
Let me ask you this Paul. According to how you are reading this, wouldn't it imply that a person whose heart is yet uncircumcized as NO ACCESS to ANY grace from God?
grace chastens us, and teaches us to live godly lives. bastards are without discipline. who are bastards?? unbelievers?
how can a non believer access grace if they are not currently being chastened to live godly lives?
Quote from: Zeek on March 14, 2009, 05:06:17 PMgrace chastens us, and teaches us to live godly lives. bastards are without discipline. who are bastards?? unbelievers? how can a non believer access grace if they are not currently being chastened to live godly lives?
Yes, the grace of God has appeared to ALL men. It is my belief that God's grace precedes everything. Faith + Works is godliness. If that precedes everything then how could God "justifieth the
ungodly". However, I believe Paul is right that faith (which includes works) is required to reach the end of grace.
Quote from: trettep on March 14, 2009, 04:02:53 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 14, 2009, 08:26:37 AM
... We have been saved, we are being saved and we will be saved.
That doesn't make sense to me. If we have been saved then why would James say this:
Jas 2:14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
Why would James be concerned about someone being saved by Faith if everyone is already saved?
tret,
I'm sure it would make sense to you if you only focused on the other part of that truth.......You focused on only one part of that truth, 'you are saved'. The other part is 'you are being saved'.
This is why James is concerned about others being saved.
You say this 3 part truth does not make sense to you. God does??!!
God is the God of all the past, present and future. Like a diamond we need, not 20/20 vision, but 20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20......... vision. We need to see God and His message to us from a myriad of points or we lose out on so much!
cp
Quote from: bobf on March 14, 2009, 05:30:53 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 14, 2009, 05:06:17 PMgrace chastens us, and teaches us to live godly lives. bastards are without discipline. who are bastards?? unbelievers? how can a non believer access grace if they are not currently being chastened to live godly lives?
Yes, the grace of God has appeared to ALL men. It is my belief that God's grace precedes everything. Faith + Works is godliness. If that precedes everything then how could God "justifieth the ungodly". However, I believe Paul is right that faith (which includes works) is required to reach the end of grace.
"appeared" talks of illuminate, which is in my opinion the same as in I John of the light that lighteth every man, but the men rejected it, comprehended it not.
grace is for all, but the darkness is not able to turn toward it in faith, until the appointed time, which for some is through destruction.
Quote from: bobf on March 14, 2009, 04:58:30 PM
One thing I'd like to point out.
- Romans 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Notice it says "THIS grace WHEREIN WE STAND" is accessed by faith (which includes works). Does "THIS grace WHEREIN WE STAND" mean the same thing as "ANY grace" at all? If that were the case then faith + works would precede all grace from God. But if faith + works precedes ANY AND ALL grace from God, how then is faith a gift? How then are we His workmanship created unto good works?
What if the grace wherein Paul stood was a bit further along than the grace that an ungodly, spiritually uncircumcized heart might receive.
Let me ask you this Paul. According to how you are reading this, wouldn't it imply that a person whose heart is yet uncircumcized as NO ACCESS to ANY grace from God?
Bob, my answer is Yes, that the uncircumcized has no access to Grace. Paul says this:
Rom 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein
we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Obviously, each would have grown into Grace at different levels, this reference to "Wherein
we stand" cannot be pertaining to a level of Grace achieved but must simply refer to Grace itself.
Paul
Quote from: bobf on March 14, 2009, 05:30:53 PM
Yes, the grace of God has appeared to ALL men. It is my belief that God's grace precedes everything. Faith + Works is godliness. If that precedes everything then how could God "justifieth the ungodly". However, I believe Paul is right that faith (which includes works) is required to reach the end of grace.
Tit 2:11 For that grace of God, that bringeth saluation vnto all men, hath appeared,
That verse is from the Geneva version which I believe conveys the proper meaning better.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 14, 2009, 07:22:58 PMBob, my answer is Yes, that the uncircumcized has no access to Grace.
If the uncircumcised of heart have no access to grace, how can their hearts ever become circumcised?
Quote from: claypot on March 14, 2009, 05:37:35 PM
tret,
I'm sure it would make sense to you if you only focused on the other part of that truth.......You focused on only one part of that truth, 'you are saved'. The other part is 'you are being saved'.
This is why James is concerned about others being saved.
You say this 3 part truth does not make sense to you. God does??!!
God is the God of all the past, present and future. Like a diamond we need, not 20/20 vision, but 20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20......... vision. We need to see God and His message to us from a myriad of points or we lose out on so much!
cp
Claypot, I believe that the moment that I have ACCESSED Grace that I'm saved. I believe that we go from being unsaved to saved. See the moment we have accessed Grace is when all of our past sins have been forgiven. I do NOT believe that this means all future sins will be forgiven. I don't believe that anyone is saved BEFORE they access Grace.
Your correct, I didn't focus on the other part of James message that we are also BEING SAVED. Regarding the 3 part thing was the comment that we are "saved, being saved, and shall be saved". I don't believe that at all. It would mean that I was never unsaved. I agree with that statement if it is applied to once we access Grace. But it seemed to be presented as an argument to support that we are saved before we access Grace and in that situation I don't agree because I believe we are still unsaved before we have accessed Grace.
Paul
Quote from: bobf on March 14, 2009, 07:38:33 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 14, 2009, 07:22:58 PMBob, my answer is Yes, that the uncircumcized has no access to Grace.
If the uncircumcised of heart have no access to grace, how can their hearts ever become circumcised?
Grace means Favor. The uncircumcised are not in God's Favor thus not in His Grace. For the uncircumcised to ACCESS the Grace they must be given Faith.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 14, 2009, 07:51:35 PMGrace means Favor. The uncircumcised are not in God's Favor thus not in His Grace. For the uncircumcised to ACCESS the Grace they must be given Faith.
I would call the giving of faith to someone who has no faith an act of grace. It is both favorable and unmerited.
This is how I see it:
1. pre conversion (no faith)
2. conversion (a favorable unmerited act of God that is not accessed by faith)
3. post conversion - faith present
4. being justified = "this grace wherein we stand" which is accessed by faith including works
For example, Peter, prior to being converted, did not yet stand in the grace that Paul was referring to. He was not yet justirfied. He was fearful and ready to deny Christ. But God was still acting favorably on Peter prior to his conversion.
Quote from: bobf on March 14, 2009, 08:45:43 PMI would call the giving of faith to someone who has no faith an act of grace. It is both favorable and unmerited.
This is how I see it:
1. pre conversion (no faith)
2. conversion (a favorable unmerited act of God that is not accessed by faith)
3. post conversion - faith present
4. being justified = "this grace wherein we stand" which is accessed by faith including works
For example, Peter, prior to being converted, did not yet stand in the grace that Paul was referring to. He was not yet justirfied. He was fearful and ready to deny Christ. But God was still acting favorably on Peter prior to his conversion.
I see where the problem might be. Ok, lets instead of calling Grace - FAVOR instead call it APPROVAL. Maybe that will clear it up. They essentially are the same thing but implications are different. Now if you consider Grace as APPROVAL then you can see that giving someone Faith is not an act of approval. APPROVAL would be a better definition.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 14, 2009, 09:02:54 PMI see where the problem might be. Ok, lets instead of calling Grace - FAVOR instead call it APPROVAL. Maybe that will clear it up. They essentially are the same thing but implications are different. Now if you consider Grace as APPROVAL then you can see that giving someone Faith is not an act of approval. APPROVAL would be a better definition.
Paul
I think I agree with that. Sometimes people believe the same thing but don't agree on the words to describe those beliefs.
Quote from: bobf on March 14, 2009, 09:42:23 PM
I think I agree with that. Sometimes people believe the same thing but don't agree on the words to describe those beliefs.
Well this discussion helped because I didn't think of Favor being used in the manner you explained so this helps to explain it in the future and might explain why others are confused by that.
Paul
May I butt into this tiring debate?
The apostle Paul is a perfect of God's departure from indignation:
While Paul was uncircumcised of heart, on the road to Damascus to kill Christians and took part in Stephen's murder the grace of the Lord overwhelmed him:
1Ti 1:14-16 Yet the grace of our Lord overwhelms, with faith and love in Christ Jesus." (15) Faithful is the saying, and worthy of all welcome, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, foremost of whom am I." (16) But therefore was I shown mercy, that in me, the foremost, Jesus Christ should be displaying all His patience, for a pattern of those who are about to be believing on Him for life eonian."
Paul obviously was set for eonian life:
Acts 13:48 "Now on hearing this, the nations rejoiced and glorified the word of the Lord, and they believe, whoever were set for life eonian."
Acts 13:48 does not say that to get life eonian they had to first believe. Rather it states that those who were set for that life believed. First the setting then the believing. So Paul must have been set for that life while he was on his murderous path.
We of the nations are: "Being justified gratuitously in His grace, through the deliverance which is in Christ Jesus" (Rom 3:24). That word "gratuitously" means that we didn't do or pay anything for the justification. It is all due to the deliverance in Christ Jesus.
Paul uses Abraham as an excellent example for us of the nations:
"For if Abraham was justified by acts, he has something to boast in, but not toward God" (Rom 4:2).
If we are justified by works or acts then grace is no longer grace.
Rom 11:6 Now if it is in grace, it is no longer out of works, else the grace is coming to be no longer grace. Now, if it is out of works, it is no longer grace, else the work is no longer work."
Rom 3:28 Of works? No! But through faith's law. For we are reckoning a man to be justified by faith apart from works of law.
Quote from: Tony N on March 15, 2009, 02:01:23 PM
Acts 13:48 does not say that to get life eonian they had to first believe. Rather it states that those who were set for that life believed. First the setting then the believing. So Paul must have been set for that life while he was on his murderous path.
I'm not disagreeing at all with that Tony but think it is just a matter of perspective for both views are true are they not that to those that are to receive aionion life they will believe and also those that believe will receive aionion life.
Quote
We of the nations are: "Being justified gratuitously in His grace, through the deliverance which is in Christ Jesus" (Rom 3:24). That word "gratuitously" means that we didn't do or pay anything for the justification. It is all due to the deliverance in Christ Jesus.
I don't know of anyone so far in this thread that has preached that we can be saved by our own works.
Quote
Paul uses Abraham as an excellent example for us of the nations:
"For if Abraham was justified by acts, he has something to boast in, but not toward God" (Rom 4:2).
If we are justified by works or acts then grace is no longer grace.
Rom 11:6 Now if it is in grace, it is no longer out of works, else the grace is coming to be no longer grace. Now, if it is out of works, it is no longer grace, else the work is no longer work."
Rom 3:28 Of works? No! But through faith's law. For we are reckoning a man to be justified by faith apart from works of law.
But those works are talking about our works. Not Christ's works thru us. Let's consider this from James:
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father iustified through workes, when he offred Isaac his sonne vpon the altar?
Jas 2:22 Seest thou not that the faith wrought with his workes? and through the workes was the faith made perfect.
Jas 2:23
And the Scripture was fulfilled which sayeth, Abraham beleeued God, and it was imputed vnto him for righteousnesse: and hee was called the friende of God.
Jas 2:24 Ye see then howe that of workes a man is iustified, and not of faith onely.
Notice it says AND the scripture was fulfilled which says that Abraham believed God. This is defining what it means to "believe". It is showing us that Faith and works (not our own) are BELIEVING.
So Tony, I don't know what your position is. Do you still believe that is it not a requirement to have Faith and Works to be saved?
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 15, 2009, 05:09:35 PM
But those works are talking about our works. Not Christ's works thru us. Let's consider this from James:
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father iustified through workes, when he offred Isaac his sonne vpon the altar?
Jas 2:22 Seest thou not that the faith wrought with his workes? and through the workes was the faith made perfect.
Jas 2:23 And the Scripture was fulfilled which sayeth, Abraham beleeued God, and it was imputed vnto him for righteousnesse: and hee was called the friende of God.
Jas 2:24 Ye see then howe that of workes a man is iustified, and not of faith onely.
Notice it says AND the scripture was fulfilled which says that Abraham believed God. This is defining what it means to "believe". It is showing us that Faith and works (not our own) are BELIEVING.
So Tony, I don't know what your position is. Do you still believe that is it not a requirement to have Faith and Works to be saved?
Paul
I would like to point out something if I may?
The book of James was written to the twelve tribes of Israel which were law keepers. After Christ was crucified the apostles taught the New Covenant which had do's and don'ts attached to it. I don't think the New Covenant is for Gentiles, that is why Paul came to see something that had been hidden from the world, that the Gentiles would be saved without laws which was the Mystery he spoke of.
Our faith and our works are those of Christ, not ours. If we claim works of our own we will be judged by them. If we know that the works we do and the faith we have is all Christ works and faith. God will look at us and judge us by what Christ did not what we do. Remember we are sitting in Christ on the right hand of the father now.
If you notice. In the beginning all of the apostles taught works, even paul at first but Paul came to see that if we died and was buried and resurrected with Christ, then we have no works except those of Christ. Hope I made sense.
CHB
Quote from: CHB on March 15, 2009, 07:48:01 PM
I would like to point out something if I may?
The book of James was written to the twelve tribes of Israel which were law keepers. After Christ was crucified the apostles taught the New Covenant which had do's and don'ts attached to it. I don't think the New Covenant is for Gentiles, that is why Paul came to see something that had been hidden from the world, that the Gentiles would be saved without laws which was the Mystery he spoke of.
The New Covenant is for Jew and Gentile. Peter had already known the Gentiles would be saved.
Quote
Our faith and our works are those of Christ, not ours. If we claim works of our own we will be judged by them. If we know that the works we do and the faith we have is all Christ works and faith. God will look at us and judge us by what Christ did not what we do. Remember we are sitting in Christ on the right hand of the father now.
If you notice. In the beginning all of the apostles taught works, even paul at first but Paul came to see that if we died and was buried and resurrected with Christ, then we have no works except those of Christ. Hope I made sense.
CHB
No, I don't see where any of the Apostles taught works to be saved other than His (Jesus Christ) works. They all taught that we are saved by Christ working through us. That is His works - not our works.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 15, 2009, 07:59:44 PM
The New Covenant is for Jew and Gentile. Peter had already known the Gentiles would be saved.
The Covenants were ONLY for Israel. (Rom. 9:4) Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory,
AND THE COVENANTS, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and
the promises.(Jer. 31:31) Behold the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make
a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah.Quote from: trettep
No, I don't see where any of the Apostles taught works to be saved other than His (Jesus Christ) works. They all taught that we are saved by Christ working through us. That is His works - not our works.
Paul
They taught you had to be baptized, repent, do good works, have faith, etc.
CHB
Quote from: trettep on March 15, 2009, 05:09:35 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 15, 2009, 02:01:23 PM
Acts 13:48 does not say that to get life eonian they had to first believe. Rather it states that those who were set for that life believed. First the setting then the believing. So Paul must have been set for that life while he was on his murderous path.
I'm not disagreeing at all with that Tony but think it is just a matter of perspective for both views are true are they not that to those that are to receive aionion life they will believe and also those that believe will receive aionion life.
Quote
We of the nations are: "Being justified gratuitously in His grace, through the deliverance which is in Christ Jesus" (Rom 3:24). That word "gratuitously" means that we didn't do or pay anything for the justification. It is all due to the deliverance in Christ Jesus.
I don't know of anyone so far in this thread that has preached that we can be saved by our own works.
Quote
Paul uses Abraham as an excellent example for us of the nations:
"For if Abraham was justified by acts, he has something to boast in, but not toward God" (Rom 4:2).
If we are justified by works or acts then grace is no longer grace.
Rom 11:6 Now if it is in grace, it is no longer out of works, else the grace is coming to be no longer grace. Now, if it is out of works, it is no longer grace, else the work is no longer work."
Rom 3:28 Of works? No! But through faith's law. For we are reckoning a man to be justified by faith apart from works of law.
But those works are talking about our works. Not Christ's works thru us. Let's consider this from James:
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father iustified through workes, when he offred Isaac his sonne vpon the altar?
Jas 2:22 Seest thou not that the faith wrought with his workes? and through the workes was the faith made perfect.
Jas 2:23 And the Scripture was fulfilled which sayeth, Abraham beleeued God, and it was imputed vnto him for righteousnesse: and hee was called the friende of God.
Jas 2:24 Ye see then howe that of workes a man is iustified, and not of faith onely.
Notice it says AND the scripture was fulfilled which says that Abraham believed God. This is defining what it means to "believe". It is showing us that Faith and works (not our own) are BELIEVING.
So Tony, I don't know what your position is. Do you still believe that is it not a requirement to have Faith and Works to be saved?
Paul
James was addressing the 12 tribes of Israel (not the nations) using Abraham's works to prove his point that a man is not justified by faith alone.
The apostle Paul would never agree with James on this point because Paul was addressing the nations who are not to mix works with grace to be justified. We are justified by faith (period).
You asked: " Do you still believe that is it not a requirement to have Faith and Works to be saved?"
I do not believe the nations are under any requirements to be saved. We of the nations are not to mix faith with works to be saved. It is as simple as that.
Quote from: CHB on March 15, 2009, 09:13:50 PMThey taught you had to be baptized, repent, do good works, have faith, etc.
CHB
We still have to be baptized, repent, and do good works, and have Faith. All physical Jews or Gentiles are Israelites in Christ.
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 15, 2009, 09:41:00 PMJames was addressing the 12 tribes of Israel (not the nations) using Abraham's works to prove his point that a man is not justified by faith alone.
The apostle Paul would never agree with James on this point because Paul was addressing the nations who are not to mix works with grace to be justified. We are justified by faith (period).
You asked: " Do you still believe that is it not a requirement to have Faith and Works to be saved?"
I do not believe the nations are under any requirements to be saved. We of the nations are not to mix faith with works to be saved. It is as simple as that.
James words are for all Israelites in Christ which is can be a physical Jew or Gentile. Paul does agree with James. Yes, we are to not mix our works with Faith to be saved. However, we are required to perform His Works by our Faith to be saved.
Rom 2:6 who shall render to each according to his works;
Rom 2:7 to those, indeed, who in continuance of a good work, do seek glory, and honour, and incorruptibility--life age-during;
Paul
Quote from: trettep
However, we are required to perform His Works by our Faith to be saved.
Our faith? I live by the faith of Jesus Christ, not my faith. My faith ain't worth diddley.
What is "His works" that you speak of?
CHB
QuoteMy faith ain't worth diddley.
Whos diddley Charlotte? Is it Boo Diddley Or Diddley do-da-Day :icon_king:
:icon_flower:
Quote from: CHB on March 15, 2009, 11:27:17 PMOur faith? I live by the faith of Jesus Christ, not my faith. My faith ain't worth diddley.
What is "His works" that you speak of?
CHB
Love is His works.
Paul
Quote from: Taffy on March 15, 2009, 11:33:40 PM
QuoteMy faith ain't worth diddley.
Whos diddley Charlotte? Is it Boo Diddley Or Diddley do-da-Day :icon_king:
:icon_flower:
Well, I like Boo Diddley, guess it must be diddley do da day :laughing7: Is that a person or a song? :dontknow:
CHB
Quote from: trettep on March 16, 2009, 01:25:57 AM
Quote from: CHB on March 15, 2009, 11:27:17 PMOur faith? I live by the faith of Jesus Christ, not my faith. My faith ain't worth diddley.
What is "His works" that you speak of?
CHB
Quote from: trettep
Love is His works.
Paul
Yes, it is, as you say. Love is His works. not ours.
CHB
Quote from: CHB on March 16, 2009, 02:24:44 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 15, 2009, 11:33:40 PM
QuoteMy faith ain't worth diddley.
Whos diddley Charlotte? Is it Boo Diddley Or Diddley do-da-Day :icon_king:
:icon_flower:
Well, I like Boo Diddley, guess it must be diddley do da day :laughing7: Is that a person or a song? :dontknow:
CHB
Neither,just a saying :icon_king:....
:icon_flower:
Quote from: trettep on March 15, 2009, 09:45:56 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 15, 2009, 09:41:00 PMJames was addressing the 12 tribes of Israel (not the nations) using Abraham's works to prove his point that a man is not justified by faith alone.
The apostle Paul would never agree with James on this point because Paul was addressing the nations who are not to mix works with grace to be justified. We are justified by faith (period).
You asked: " Do you still believe that is it not a requirement to have Faith and Works to be saved?"
I do not believe the nations are under any requirements to be saved. We of the nations are not to mix faith with works to be saved. It is as simple as that.
James words are for all Israelites in Christ which is can be a physical Jew or Gentile. Paul does agree with James. Yes, we are to not mix our works with Faith to be saved. However, we are required to perform His Works by our Faith to be saved.
Rom 2:6 who shall render to each according to his works;
Rom 2:7 to those, indeed, who in continuance of a good work, do seek glory, and honour, and incorruptibility--life age-during;
Paul
In chapter two and three of Romans Paul is laying the ground work for the evangel in beginning in 3:24. Up to 3:24 Paul is proving that not one is just, that all sin and are wanting of the glory of God. Therefore your two verses above are not showing that man can save themselves by works and neither are the two verses you ripped out of context used by Paul to prove that once a believer we are to do good works to be saved. Gheesh.
Furthermore Paul is not saying that those who all sin and those who are wanting of the glory of God will get glory, honour and incorruptibility! He is saying the seek for those things but proves they can't get it because all our righteousness is as filthy rags. Paul leads up to Romans 3:24 that the only deliverance and justification is to be found in Jesus Christ.
Quote from: Tony N on March 16, 2009, 01:26:33 PM
In chapter two and three of Romans Paul is laying the ground work for the evangel in beginning in 3:24. Up to 3:24 Paul is proving that not one is just, that all sin and are wanting of the glory of God. Therefore your two verses above are not showing that man can save themselves by works and neither are the two verses you ripped out of context used by Paul to prove that once a believer we are to do good works to be saved. Gheesh.
Furthermore Paul is not saying that those who all sin and those who are wanting of the glory of God will get glory, honour and incorruptibility! He is saying the seek for those things but proves they can't get it because all our righteousness is as filthy rags. Paul leads up to Romans 3:24 that the only deliverance and justification is to be found in Jesus Christ.
Tony, I'm done talking with you on this subject since you resort to attacks. I did no such ripping out of context as you say.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 16, 2009, 02:36:01 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 16, 2009, 01:26:33 PM
In chapter two and three of Romans Paul is laying the ground work for the evangel in beginning in 3:24. Up to 3:24 Paul is proving that not one is just, that all sin and are wanting of the glory of God. Therefore your two verses above are not showing that man can save themselves by works and neither are the two verses you ripped out of context used by Paul to prove that once a believer we are to do good works to be saved. Gheesh.
Furthermore Paul is not saying that those who all sin and those who are wanting of the glory of God will get glory, honour and incorruptibility! He is saying the seek for those things but proves they can't get it because all our righteousness is as filthy rags. Paul leads up to Romans 3:24 that the only deliverance and justification is to be found in Jesus Christ.
Tony, I'm done talking with you on this subject since you resort to attacks. I did no such ripping out of context as you say.
Paul
I didn't attack you. I think you just see the untennable position you hold and have painted yourself into a corner so you are taking the easy way out by not wanting to talk about it anymore with me. That's O.K. with me.
Something else I'd like to say to the viewing audience about what you said concerning Romans 2:6,7:
QuoteJames words are for all Israelites in Christ which is can be a physical Jew or Gentile.
The apostle Paul in this section of Romans 1:14 to 3:20 is not about anyone "in Christ" but about Greeks and barbarians without law and Jews under the law, and how that not one is just.
Quote from: trettep on March 14, 2009, 09:02:54 PM
Quote from: bobf on March 14, 2009, 08:45:43 PMI would call the giving of faith to someone who has no faith an act of grace. It is both favorable and unmerited.
This is how I see it:
1. pre conversion (no faith)
2. conversion (a favorable unmerited act of God that is not accessed by faith)
3. post conversion - faith present
4. being justified = "this grace wherein we stand" which is accessed by faith including works
For example, Peter, prior to being converted, did not yet stand in the grace that Paul was referring to. He was not yet justirfied. He was fearful and ready to deny Christ. But God was still acting favorably on Peter prior to his conversion.
I see where the problem might be. Ok, lets instead of calling Grace - FAVOR instead call it APPROVAL. Maybe that will clear it up. They essentially are the same thing but implications are different. Now if you consider Grace as APPROVAL then you can see that giving someone Faith is not an act of approval. APPROVAL would be a better definition.
Paul
I haven't read the rest of the thread from this point, but I wanted to make an observation here:
1Ti 1:11 This13 accords with the glorious gospel of the blessed God14 that was entrusted to me.15
1Ti 1:12 I am grateful to the one who has strengthened me, Christ Jesus our Lord, because he
considered me faithful in putting me into ministry,
1Ti 1:13
even though I was formerly a blasphemer and a persecutor, and an arrogant16 man. But I was
treated with mercy because I acted ignorantly in unbelief,
1Ti 1:14 and our
Lord's grace was abundant, bringing faith and love in Christ Jesus.17
1Ti 1:15 This saying18 is trustworthy and deserves full acceptance: "Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners" — and I am the worst of them!19
1Ti 1:16 But here is why I was treated with mercy: so that20 in me as the worst,21 Christ Jesus could demonstrate his utmost patience, as an example for those who are going to believe in him for eternal life.
The NIV translation is a bit better at bringing it out than this translation, but Paul (Saul) was considered faithful before he was actually faithful (v.12). I haven't really gotten into an explanation of why this is so yet, but I may at some point.
Verse 14 above speaks of how he was treated with
abundant grace which brought faith and love, not the other way around...
Anyway, after I read the rest of the thread, there may be more to say.
Love is works. Does anyone disagree?
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 16, 2009, 11:00:11 PM
Love is works. Does anyone disagree?
Paul
I do not disagree, God is love, God works, God works all things, God works in us and through us. It is not OF us.
Quote from: trettep on March 16, 2009, 11:00:11 PM
Love is works. Does anyone disagree?
Paul
Are you looking for acceptance with this? Justification? Why are you struggling so with the responses here? Personally, I cringe a bit when someone starts emphasizing the activity of another regardless of what name you tag it with. God is love, Christ is the Sabbath . .there are no works. We function in him, but it's not through our own labor or reasoning . . . God reveals Christ . . .Christ transforms us as we behold him. It's all God . . . when one starts making judgments as to what is carnal works and what is Christ works . .one is more distracted by the works than by the relationship. As near as I can tell, you're platform is based on one verse . .maybe two . . .but either way, I don't live because the Bible says so . . .I live because that's just how it works when Christ is in me . . .no 7-step program to follow, no crash course on what's works and what's not . . . just relationship.
If my activity doesn't measure up to your standards . . . twisting my arm to see things as you do isn't going to turn me around. If God shows you something . . .throw it out there . . .others can pick it up or leave it lay . . .it's a choice . . .and most of the time it's not even that . .it all depends on where our relationship is with God at the time of the revelation. Personally, my passion is in the dimensions of rest in Christ . . .not in the observation of works.
Quote from: trettep on March 16, 2009, 11:00:11 PM
Love is works. Does anyone disagree?
Paul
Hmmm. God is Love... your statement is; Love is Works. Is God Works? I'm not sure that fits.
However, if you mean that Love (as the fruit of the spirit) is works, then I think I'm on board with you there.
Hi Paul. Have you ever really studied out and prayed for understanding over the ministries of Jesus (earthly ministry, prior to the cross) and Peter's ministry to the Jews? Then to Paul's ministry to us Gentiles, those grafted in through grace and the blood? I'm in the process of doing this, and I think it's very important.
Quote from: trettep on March 16, 2009, 11:00:11 PM
Love is works. Does anyone disagree?
Paul
I agree. And, the reason I say that is that I worried for a long time over what works were, and whether there was something I should be specifically doing. But, then I saw that works were the works of the Spirit which gives us life in Christ, which is why faith without works is dead.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 16, 2009, 11:29:13 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 16, 2009, 11:00:11 PM
Love is works. Does anyone disagree?
Paul
I do not disagree, God is love, God works, God works all things, God works in us and through us. It is not OF us.
So if Love is works. Then can we be saved if we don't have love?
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 17, 2009, 12:07:43 AM
Are you looking for acceptance with this? Justification? Why are you struggling so with the responses here? Personally, I cringe a bit when someone starts emphasizing the activity of another regardless of what name you tag it with. God is love, Christ is the Sabbath . .there are no works. We function in him, but it's not through our own labor or reasoning . . . God reveals Christ . . .Christ transforms us as we behold him. It's all God . . . when one starts making judgments as to what is carnal works and what is Christ works . .one is more distracted by the works than by the relationship. As near as I can tell, you're platform is based on one verse . .maybe two . . .but either way, I don't live because the Bible says so . . .I live because that's just how it works when Christ is in me . . .no 7-step program to follow, no crash course on what's works and what's not . . . just relationship.
If my activity doesn't measure up to your standards . . . twisting my arm to see things as you do isn't going to turn me around. If God shows you something . . .throw it out there . . .others can pick it up or leave it lay . . .it's a choice . . .and most of the time it's not even that . .it all depends on where our relationship is with God at the time of the revelation. Personally, my passion is in the dimensions of rest in Christ . . .not in the observation of works.
No Nathan, I don't need acceptance. I already believe that Love is works. I'm just curious who doesn't believe it is. You don't know enough about my platform Nathan if you believe it is based one verse. In fact, you can't find a single verse in the scriptures that can contradict that are saved by us performing the works of Christ via Faith can you?
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 17, 2009, 12:37:41 AM
Hi Paul. Have you ever really studied out and prayed for understanding over the ministries of Jesus (earthly ministry, prior to the cross) and Peter's ministry to the Jews? Then to Paul's ministry to us Gentiles, those grafted in through grace and the blood? I'm in the process of doing this, and I think it's very important.
Yes, Jabcat, I did study it. We had a guy that believed in this and he called it dispensationalism. If that is what you are referring to. I was able to discount it as I never seen two Gospels. In fact, there are real implications because what happens if your a gentile and then you marry a Jew? What happens vice versa? And there are much more problems with it that I can see. But quite frankly, all I see is all in Christ are Jews. I believe in ONE Gospel and believe if you look at dispensationalism - it is two gospels.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 01:57:30 AM
Quote from: Nathan on March 17, 2009, 12:07:43 AM
Are you looking for acceptance with this? Justification? Why are you struggling so with the responses here? Personally, I cringe a bit when someone starts emphasizing the activity of another regardless of what name you tag it with. God is love, Christ is the Sabbath . .there are no works. We function in him, but it's not through our own labor or reasoning . . . God reveals Christ . . .Christ transforms us as we behold him. It's all God . . . when one starts making judgments as to what is carnal works and what is Christ works . .one is more distracted by the works than by the relationship. As near as I can tell, you're platform is based on one verse . .maybe two . . .but either way, I don't live because the Bible says so . . .I live because that's just how it works when Christ is in me . . .no 7-step program to follow, no crash course on what's works and what's not . . . just relationship.
If my activity doesn't measure up to your standards . . . twisting my arm to see things as you do isn't going to turn me around. If God shows you something . . .throw it out there . . .others can pick it up or leave it lay . . .it's a choice . . .and most of the time it's not even that . .it all depends on where our relationship is with God at the time of the revelation. Personally, my passion is in the dimensions of rest in Christ . . .not in the observation of works.
No Nathan, I don't need acceptance. I already believe that Love is works. I'm just curious who doesn't believe it is. You don't know enough about my platform Nathan if you believe it is based one verse. In fact, you can't find a single verse in the scriptures that can contradict that are saved by us performing the works of Christ via Faith can you?
Paul
Hebrews 6:1
Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,
Tell you what . . .before we get into a sword fight . . . exactly what Scriptures are you basing salvation through works on?
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 01:31:39 AMI agree. And, the reason I say that is that I worried for a long time over what works were, and whether there was something I should be specifically doing. But, then I saw that works were the works of the Spirit which gives us life in Christ, which is why faith without works is dead.
See Molly, the Bible screams to me that we are to do His Works.
Paul
Going back to my previous post, we can see that God is Love. But can we say that God is Works?
Certainly, one of the fruits that the Spirit produces is Love (which God is), so we can know that love (agape) is a product of God "showing up". God does work, but I don't think we can necessarily make the connection that love is works. Love is a fruit of the spirit, and will manifest in works of God, but it seems odd to me to say that love is works.
Quote from: Nathan on March 17, 2009, 02:11:19 AM
Hebrews 6:1
Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,
Tell you what . . .before we get into a sword fight . . . exactly what Scriptures are you basing salvation through works on?
That verse doesn't contradict what I said, Nathan. Surely, you wouldn't call the works of Christ, "dead works" so how can that be a contradiction to what I said - when I'm saying that we are saved by His works?
As for "exactly what scriptures", just pick any Nathan if you think it is contrary to what I said - that we are saved by doing His works via Faith.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:12:22 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 01:31:39 AMI agree. And, the reason I say that is that I worried for a long time over what works were, and whether there was something I should be specifically doing. But, then I saw that works were the works of the Spirit which gives us life in Christ, which is why faith without works is dead.
See Molly, the Bible screams to me that we are to do His Works.
Paul
Well, we are to do His works, but it is not "we" who are doing them. "I live, yet it is no longer I, but Christ."
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:12:36 AM
Going back to my previous post, we can see that God is Love. But can we say that God is Works?
Certainly, one of the fruits that the Spirit produces is Love (which God is), so we can know that love (agape) is a product of God "showing up". God does work, but I don't think we can necessarily make the connection that love is works. Love is a fruit of the spirit, and will manifest in works of God, but it seems odd to me to say that love is works.
If Love is not a work, Doc, then please tell me what you believe it is, it could help in the discussion.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:12:22 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 01:31:39 AMI agree. And, the reason I say that is that I worried for a long time over what works were, and whether there was something I should be specifically doing. But, then I saw that works were the works of the Spirit which gives us life in Christ, which is why faith without works is dead.
See Molly, the Bible screams to me that we are to do His Works.
Paul
Yes, I agree, and now more than ever is this needed.
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:18:46 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:12:36 AM
Going back to my previous post, we can see that God is Love. But can we say that God is Works?
Certainly, one of the fruits that the Spirit produces is Love (which God is), so we can know that love (agape) is a product of God "showing up". God does work, but I don't think we can necessarily make the connection that love is works. Love is a fruit of the spirit, and will manifest in works of God, but it seems odd to me to say that love is works.
If Love is not a work, Doc, then please tell me what you believe it is, it could help in the discussion.
Paul
I just did, didn't I? I thought I said that love is a fruit of the spirit...
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:16:11 AM
Well, we are to do His works, but it is not "we" who are doing them. "I live, yet it is no longer I, but Christ."
Let me put it differently, it is Him doing the works through us. So we are performing them but He is the owner of them.
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 02:19:22 AMYes, I agree, and now more than ever is this needed.
I don't believe we just need to perform them but we must increase in performing them.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:20:44 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:16:11 AM
Well, we are to do His works, but it is not "we" who are doing them. "I live, yet it is no longer I, but Christ."
Let me put it differently, it is Him doing the works through us. So we are performing them but He is the owner of them.
Paul
We've done this one before, Paul. We are not performing them, He is performing them in/ through us. He is both the owner
and performer. Apart from Him, we can do nothing. Are you not seeing the contradiction in your own statement there?
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:20:11 AMI just did, didn't I? I thought I said that love is a fruit of the spirit...
Don't you see Love as a work that produces the fruit of love?
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:22:29 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 02:19:22 AMYes, I agree, and now more than ever is this needed.
I don't believe we just need to perform them but we must increase in performing them.
Paul
Yes, which is what you have been saying that works give us access to grace which increases works.
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 02:19:22 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:12:22 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 01:31:39 AMI agree. And, the reason I say that is that I worried for a long time over what works were, and whether there was something I should be specifically doing. But, then I saw that works were the works of the Spirit which gives us life in Christ, which is why faith without works is dead.
See Molly, the Bible screams to me that we are to do His Works.
Paul
Yes, I agree, and now more than ever is this needed.
Just a Thought :icon_flower:
SHADOW= Works of Mens Hand = LAW= Mans WORKS To that which made NOTHING PERFECT
REALITY-= Works of
His Hands= Law of the Spirit IN US\US in HIM =
HIS WORKMANSHIP= Making PERFECT
Which is- HIM creating us , one in Him , A relationship, as with man and woman , Kinda Personal dont ya Think :icon_flower:
:icon_flower:
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:24:08 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:20:11 AMI just did, didn't I? I thought I said that love is a fruit of the spirit...
Don't you see Love as a work that produces the fruit of love?
Paul
I guess not. I see that God is Love, and God in us produces after His own kind; more love.
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:23:30 AMWe've done this one before, Paul. We are not performing them, He is performing them in/ through us. He is both the owner and performer. Apart from Him, we can do nothing.
But we are still performing them Doc. Notice Jesus is not talking to Himself but to those around Him:
Mat 19:19 Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
So, Doc, let's go with what your saying for a moment, then why are we being told to have this mind in us which is in Christ? Why does our mind have to transform? And also, how it is that we can "fall away" if it it isn't us performing the works?
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:28:50 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:24:08 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:20:11 AMI just did, didn't I? I thought I said that love is a fruit of the spirit...
Don't you see Love as a work that produces the fruit of love?
Paul
I guess not. I see that God is Love, and God in us produces after His own kind; more love.
We aren't exactly that passive in this equation...
Quote from: Taffy on March 17, 2009, 02:28:00 AMJust a Thought :icon_flower:
SHADOW= Works of Mens Hand = LAW= Mans WORKS To that which made NOTHING PERFECT
REALITY-= Works of His Hands= Law of the Spirit IN US\US in HIM = HIS WORKMANSHIP= Making PERFECT
:icon_flower:
Taffy, that is how I view it. But I consider it not just our hands but whatever comes out of us that pertains to catering to the flesh is Man's works - what caters to SELF. His works are what caters to others - for He laid down His SELF to cater to others.
Paul
James gives a definition of works here that is worth looking at--The ones he mentions have proven their faith is alive by taking action that can only be based on faith--
17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
18Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
19Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
20But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
21Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
22Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
23And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
24Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
25Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?
26For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
--James 2
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:30:32 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:23:30 AMWe've done this one before, Paul. We are not performing them, He is performing them in/ through us. He is both the owner and performer. Apart from Him, we can do nothing.
But we are still performing them Doc. Notice Jesus is not talking to Himself but to those around Him:
Mat 19:19 Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
So, Doc, let's go with what your saying for a moment, then why are we being told to have this mind in us which is in Christ? Why does our mind have to transform? And also, how it is that we can "fall away" if it it isn't us performing the works?
Paul
Ok, let's try to take this through in stages. First, your comment: "
it is Him doing the works through us. So
we are performing them but He is the owner of them." Do you not see the contradiction between the two bolded portions?
Our mind has to transform, because it has to become the mind of Christ, increasing in oneness until it is only Christ left. We can fall away by taking our eyes off of the spiritual and placing them on the carnal... I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 02:36:08 AM
James gives a definition of works here that is worth looking at--The ones he mentions have proven their faith is alive by taking action that can only be based on faith--
17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
18Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
19Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
20But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
21Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
22Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
23And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
24Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
25Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?
26For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
--James 2
Well, I think you made a key comment here, Molly. "Works" are the
evidence that faith is alive.
But no man has anything that has not been given him by heaven.
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 01:54:15 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 16, 2009, 11:29:13 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 16, 2009, 11:00:11 PM
Love is works. Does anyone disagree?
Paul
I do not disagree, God is love, God works, God works all things, God works in us and through us. It is not OF us.
So if Love is works. Then can we be saved if we don't have love?
Paul
No, but I think people might be misunderstanding you.
1Jn 4:19 We are loving God, "BECAUSE" He "FIRST" loves us.
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 02:36:08 AM
James gives a definition of works here that is worth looking at--The ones he mentions have proven their faith is alive by taking action that can only be based on faith--
17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
18Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
19Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
20But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
21Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
22Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
23And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
24Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
25Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?
26For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
--James 2
What is interesting about those verses Molly is many gloss over the fact that James is defining what it meant to simply "believe". James says that scripture was fullfilled that Abraham believed when Abraham had done the works. He doesn't say that scripture was fillfulled that Abraham believed BEFORE he performed those works. Many tell me that all we have to do is believe and I tell them to look at those verse in James for it shows that believing is doing works.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:33:50 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 17, 2009, 02:28:00 AMJust a Thought :icon_flower:
SHADOW= Works of Mens Hand = LAW= Mans WORKS To that which made NOTHING PERFECT
REALITY-= Works of His Hands= Law of the Spirit IN US\US in HIM = HIS WORKMANSHIP= Making PERFECT
:icon_flower:
Taffy, that is how I view it. But I consider it not just our hands but whatever comes out of us that pertains to catering to the flesh is Man's works - what caters to SELF. His works are what caters to others - for He laid down His SELF to cater to others.
Paul
Paul
I did add a little to my post some after you quotesd this..
The emphesis IS HIM,..TO HIM the Glory, ...US being works of HIM....,Its not so much as a Conforming, but a Transforming from within......
G
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 02:37:51 AMOk, let's try to take this through in stages. First, your comment: "it is Him doing the works through us. So we are performing them but He is the owner of them." Do you not see the contradiction between the two bolded portions?
Our mind has to transform, because it has to become the mind of Christ, increasing in oneness until it is only Christ left. We can fall away by taking our eyes off of the spiritual and placing them on the carnal... I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.
Doc, no contradiction, the former self has passed away, we are to be alive with a New Spirit that is His - the Holy Spirit. We are to become Christ. Nobody here is saying we must do that which is carnal. Surely, love is not carnal. Surely the works of the Spirit are not carnal. I agree with your statement that our mind has to transform because it has to become the mind of Christ, increasing in oneness until it is only Christ left. I completely agree with that. So if our mind is transforming then how is that it isn't us performing His works?
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 02:53:07 AM
No, but I think people might be misunderstanding you.
1Jn 4:19 We are loving God, "BECAUSE" He "FIRST" loves us.
Yes, good point.
Paul
Quote from: Taffy on March 17, 2009, 03:04:16 AMPaul
I did add a little to my post some after you quotesd this..
The emphesis IS HIM,..TO HIM the Glory, ...US being works of HIM....,Its not so much as a Conforming, but a Transforming from within......
G
Yes, I agree with that Taffy, althought I believe conforming and transforming are probably the same thing and just a question of semantics.
Paul
QuoteWhat is interesting about those verses Molly is many gloss over the fact that James is defining what it meant to simply "believe". James says that scripture was fullfilled that Abraham believed when Abraham had done the works. He doesn't say that scripture was fillfulled that Abraham believed BEFORE he performed those works. Many tell me that all we have to do is believe and I tell them to look at those verse in James for it shows that believing is doing works.
Paul
Yes, James says big deal, the demons also believe in God and tremble.
But, they have no works.
Cutting to the chase. IMO, some believe we are saved AND kept by God's grace, thus any good works are a result of. Some believe we add to or take away from that by our works. As I understand it, when Ap. Paul talked of "falling from grace", what he was addressing was people starting to think that works played a part in their salvation, rather than grace alone.
Paul, I may be wrong, but I think you believe there can come a point where a son of God can cease to be one, that he can lose his salvation.
I also believe there is a mixing of the evangels, i.e., having to do with grace and works, and this is an excellent example of what comes from that confusion...mix certain aspects of Paul's message and Peter's message, and here's what we've got. Some mix of "yes, we're saved by grace, totally sustained", "but oh yeah, you've got to endure to the end and do works to make it".
Quotejust a question of semantics.
Has been said before..would not disagree :icon_flower:
Maybe someone could explain how it is the demons believe in God but have no works?
So, do they have faith? Is it dead faith?
I think a starting point would be that they're not reconciled to God, not chosen as a son (or daughter)...not given God's grace. They do know though that He exists. We are given faith to believe on/trust in...not just be aware that He's an entity.
Can people who do not believe in God have works?
I know they think they can, but do they?
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 03:17:02 AM
Maybe someone could explain how it is the demons believe in God but have no works?
So, do they have faith? Is it dead faith?
Yes Molly for mine-
Ive always considered such as those mentioned in James as those OF LAW, a Faith in DEAD works, but a Belief In GOD...
was SAUL\Paul any different?
could one consider moving FROM FAITH to FAITH as one from LAW to Grace and TRUTH?
:icon_flower:
Could be. But, those of the Law aren't so much afraid of God. They seem to think they have righteousness in themselves. So, Jesus says, do as they say, but not as they do.
It's almost like they have the Law now, they don't need God, they have become God, themselves, as dispensers of the Law to others.
Quote from: jabcat on March 17, 2009, 03:13:27 AM
Cutting to the chase. IMO, some believe we are saved AND kept by God's grace, thus any good works are a result of. Some believe we add to or take away from that by our works. As I understand it, when Ap. Paul talked of "falling from grace", what he was addressing was people starting to think that works played a part in their salvation, rather than grace alone.
Paul, I may be wrong, but I think you believe there can come a point where a son of God can cease to be one, that he can lose his salvation.
I also believe there is a mixing of the evangels, i.e., having to do with grace and works, and this is an excellent example of what comes from that confusion...mix certain aspects of Paul's message and Peter's message, and here's what we've got. Some mix of "yes, we're saved by grace, totally sustained", "but oh yeah, you've got to endure to the end and do works to make it".
Yes, I'm convinced that someone can "fall from Grace". If someone believes their works that Christ performs through them are their own then that is a means to fall from Grace. Because they have turned those works into their works and have stolen the Glory for themselves instead of praising Christ for the good deeds they performed. But it isn't just that. If someone simply returns to the flesh to serve self over others then they are falling from Grace. Remember, when we accept Christ our past sins are forgiven but that doesn't mean our future sins are. And no sin can enter the Kingdom. Therefore, as I see it, once we are converted and have accepted Christ, we are forgiven of past sins, and then Christ in us dominates our flesh by supression of the SELF through Faith such that we produce works that serve others. And if we should sin unwillingly then the covering of our sins is met by the continued perservance in Christ Jesus. This is why we must continue to increase. BUT if we willfully sin after we have received the Christ and received His nature then risk the WRATH of God in which we will have to pay for those sins until they are paid in full.
Paul
QuoteBecause they have turned those works into their works and have stolen the Glory for themselves instead of praising Christ for the good deeds they performed.
That can be so easy to do, too. It's so tempting if God is doing some great work through you that in your right mind you know you could never do yourself in a million years, to say, Man, I'm good! :laughing7:
QuoteAnd if we should sin unwillingly then the covering of our sins is met by the continued perservance in Christ Jesus. This is why we must continue to increase. BUT if we willfully sin after we have received the Christ and received His nature then risk the WRATH of God in which we will have to pay for those sins until they are paid in full.
You mean Bernie Madoff can't cover his sin by being a great philanthropist as well as a great thief?
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 03:30:25 AM
QuoteBecause they have turned those works into their works and have stolen the Glory for themselves instead of praising Christ for the good deeds they performed.
That can be so easy to do, too. It's so tempting if God is doing some great work through you that in your right mind you know you could never do yourself in a million years, to say, Man, I'm good! :laughing7:
Yes, we need to be very careful, always.
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 03:25:21 AM
Could be. But, those of the Law aren't so much afraid of God. They seem to think they have righteousness in themselves. So, Jesus says, do as they say, but not as they do.
Ya think Molly?
Tis FEAR which causes works, failing to do so causes retribution....
A law is a Law because if violated ,the result is a direct Penalty, lest it be a recomendation.
so Righteousness( self) comes way of the LAW....
Their works therefore, are Justified before GOD, ...well ,so they believe,
:icon_flower:
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 03:35:36 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 03:30:25 AM
QuoteBecause they have turned those works into their works and have stolen the Glory for themselves instead of praising Christ for the good deeds they performed.
That can be so easy to do, too. It's so tempting if God is doing some great work through you that in your right mind you know you could never do yourself in a million years, to say, Man, I'm good! :laughing7:
Yes, we need to be very careful, always.
Paul
So Paul, if you stay saved by
you doing works, are you able right now to stop being saved, or does the Spirit of God constrain and uphold you? Even despite of yourself (and myself)?
It seems to me after reading many post in this thread that most of you believe that we have to do works in order to be saved? Do you really believe this?
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 03:43:57 AM
It seems to me after reading many post in this thread that most of you believe that we have to do works in order to be saved? Do you really believe this?
No. lol
Otherwise, the great philanthropist/thief would be saved.
Tony, I think it may mostly be to "stay saved", more so than to "get saved", although there have been statements about works getting us to the grace?
Brother Paul
you quoted "we will have to pay for those sins until they are paid in full". When Jesus said that, about stripes/paid in full etc., to whom, and about what, was He speaking? A thought: Jesus' blood paid for our sins.
God's blessing, James.
Quote from: jabcat on March 17, 2009, 03:39:20 AM
So Paul, if you stay saved by you doing works, are you able right now to stop being saved, or does the Spirit of God constrain and uphold you? Even despite of yourself (and myself)?
Well the Spirit of God would mean I'm performing His works. So if I am in the Spirit then I'm sealed to salvation. If I'm not longer possessing the Spirit (then the seal is no longer) then I'm not any longer abiding in His Grace. So the Holy Spirit is the seal for my salvation.
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 03:52:23 AM
No. lol
Otherwise, the great philanthropist/thief would be saved.
What if Tony asked you if you if you believed you had to perform His works to be saved? - what would be your answer?
Paul
Rom 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
Rom 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Rom 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
Rom 13:11 And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed.
notice the past tense of believed but the present command;
Rom 13:12 The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.
Rom 13:13 Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying.
Rom 13:14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof.
past tense: believed
but now, the DAY is at hand, so PUT ON (continually) the Lord Jesus Christ.
Rom 16:26 But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith:
1Co 10:5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.
1Co 10:6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.
1Co 10:7 Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.
1Co 10:8 Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand.
1Co 10:9 Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents.
1Co 10:10 Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer.
1Co 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.
1Co 10:12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
Col 2:6 As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in him:
Col 2:7 Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving.
Col 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
Col 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
Col 2:10 And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:
Col 2:11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ:
Col 2:12 Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.
Col 2:13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;
Col 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
Col 2:15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
Col 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
Col 2:17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.
Col 2:18 Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,
Col 2:19 And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.
Col 2:20 Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,
Col 2:21 (Touch not; taste not; handle not;
Col 1:10 That ye might walk worthy of the Lord unto all pleasing, being fruitful in every good work, and increasing in the knowledge of God;
Col 1:11 Strengthened with all might, according to his glorious power, unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness;
Col 1:12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:
Col 1:13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:
Col 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:
Col 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
Col 1:16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
Col 1:17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.
Col 1:19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;
Col 1:20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
Col 1:21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled
Col 1:22 In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:
[size=18pt Col 1:23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister; [/size]
ONE GOSPEL imo.
Paul,
I would say that God in me, drawing me, convicting me, His Spirit enabling me, brings me along more into His will...enabling my increasing obedience to Him. That He changes me from the inside out, not from the outside in. That He presents options, requires me to choose from those options, and by doing that, teaches me and brings me along.
I told you, I do struggle, and often do works to try to please and/or impress God, but deep down, there's a piece of me that believes I can not change one thing about my "legal" standing with God...that His blood is my redemption, not my works. I also ponder this scripture; "Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness, Roman 4:4,5...this is of course from Paul, directed at us, the Gentiles grafted in through grace and Jesus' blood.
Quote from: jabcat on March 17, 2009, 03:55:23 AM
Tony, I think it may mostly be to "stay saved", more so than to "get saved", although there have been statements about works getting us to the grace?
Brother Paul
you quoted "we will have to pay for those sins until they are paid in full". When Jesus said that, about stripes/paid in full etc., to whom, and about what, was He speaking? A thought: Jesus' blood paid for our sins.
God's blessing, James.
Hi Jebcat, glad you asked. Here is part of the verses:
Luk 12:45 But and if that
servant say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; and shall begin to beat the menservants and maidens, and to eat and drink, and to be drunken;
Luk 12:46 The lord of that
servant will come in a day when he looketh not for him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in sunder, and will appoint him his portion with the unbelievers.
Luk 12:47 And that
servant, which
knew his lord's will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will,
shall be beaten with many stripes.
Luk 12:48 But
he that
knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with
few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.
See these are the Lord's servants. So it is those that are in Christ that if they should commit what is willful sin they are beaten (Wrath) even if they unknowingly sin (they are beaten). God holds us accountable but not responsible for sins. So this is why we must be increasing for the Good Works that He does in us help to cover a multitude of sins. Thereby, perchance we receive mercy for what we knew not.
Paul
Well, Zeek, as for me, I don't think it's a simple matter, and bears a lot of study and revelation. I'm not there yet, but right now, I'll maintain "we" often mix messages, and I think it's caused much confusion and division. I know you didn't in your post, it was stated as your opinion, but hopefully we'll all be careful in what we "swear to"...God may give us even a little more clarity yet tomorrow :thumbsup:.
Quote from: jabcat on March 17, 2009, 04:50:32 AM
Paul,
I would say that God in me, drawing me, convicting me, His Spirit enabling me, brings me along more into His will...enabling my increasing obedience to Him. That He changes me from the inside out, not from the outside in. That He presents options, requires me to choose from those options, and by doing that, teaches me and brings me along.
I told you, I do struggle, and often do works to try to please and/or impress God, but deep down, there's a piece of me that believes I can not change one thing about my "legal" standing with God...that His blood is my redemption, not my works. I also ponder this scripture; "Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness, Roman 4:4,5...this is of course from Paul, directed at us, the Gentiles grafted in through grace and Jesus' blood.
Hi Jebcat, the moment we receive the Spirit (when we are actively pursuing His will - attempt to perform His works), then we have been forgiven of past sins. That means there is no more debt at that point. Think about that. Now for those under the letter they would be forgiven their debt upon bringing a sacrifice but their conscience knew they could just sin again and then by their works they could bring another sacrifice, thus their conscience never becomes pure. They would do the works in producing the sacrifice because they had debt (sins) thus their sacrifice was payment for the sin. So they worked out of debt.
Heb 10:1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things,
can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto
perfect.
Heb 10:2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.
Heb 10:3 But in those sacrifices there is a
remembrance again made of sins every year.
Heb 10:4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
But once we have the Spirit of Christ, we are no longer in debt. The sacrifice was Jesus at the cross. So now to those that perform works via Christ, it is not because of debt for that has been forgiven. But woe to us should we continue in sin for we have no more sacrifice for sins but crucify Christ anew and put Him to an open shame.
Heb 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
Heb 10:27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 03:43:57 AM
It seems to me after reading many post in this thread that most of you believe that we have to do works in order to be saved? Do you really believe this?
For me, the work is between God and the person.
For instance, someone could have looked at my life when I met my wife and said "I see no fruit".
I might have even been even led to believe that I was not saved at that point and time in my life. After all, I did not go to church, I did not read my bible, I did not worship, whether I actually believed in God may have been questionable as all I acknowledged at the time was that there was a God I was told about and said exists and that if I didn't believe I would go to hell forever.
I was not in fear of that, only saying that according to religion, according to Christian theology they could not have recognized me as a child of God, or anyone that God was working in at all.
Yet, in that state of mind and existance, I fell in love with someone. I am still with her today and I know that it was real love.
THAT is works and it was not of me. That work MUST take place and it does and it did in me and it does in everyone. But not everyone will get the same work as I did, but they will work in the same manner.
I am sorry if some don't like posting of scriptures, but for me, the scriptures speak of one gospel.
which imo, coincide with the same gospel preached by Paul (as written below) and James, Peter, John.
Rom 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Rom 8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Rom 13:13 Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying.
2Co 5:7 (For we walk by faith, not by sight:)
Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
Eph 4:1 I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called,
Eph 5:2 And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.
Eph 5:8 For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light:
Col 1:10 That ye might walk worthy of the Lord unto all pleasing, being fruitful in every good work, and increasing in the knowledge of God;
Col 2:6 As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in him:
Col 1:21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled
Col 1:22 In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:
Rom 12:1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.
Col 1:23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:14:54 AM
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 03:43:57 AM
It seems to me after reading many post in this thread that most of you believe that we have to do works in order to be saved? Do you really believe this?
For me, the work is between God and the person.
For instance, someone could have looked at my life when I met my wife and said "I see no fruit".
I might have even been even led to believe that I was not saved at that point and time in my life. After all, I did not go to church, I did not read my bible, I did not worship, whether I actually believed in God may have been questionable as all I acknowledged at the time was that there was a God I was told about and said exists and that if I didn't believe I would go to hell forever.
I was not in fear of that, only saying that according to religion, according to Christian theology they could not have recognized me as a child of God, or anyone that God was working in at all.
Yet, in that state of mind and existance, I fell in love with someone. I am still with her today and I know that it was real love.
THAT is works and it was not of me. That work MUST take place and it does and it did in me and it does in everyone. But not everyone will get the same work as I did, but they will work in the same manner.
for me, what i struggle with is whether the verses by Paul, James, John etc. are relevant to today, in that at that time, there imo, was a soon coming destruction upon apostate Israel, and those who were preached the gospel and refused to repent.
I struggle to see if today, there is the same "soon coming" destruction, day of the LORD; and that we are being persecuted today by the "Ishmaels" and staying faithful to the end is of absolute importance, or is God working through mankind, growing us each in "personal" ways, as similar to what u described above, "spiritually" in patterns.
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 04:43:28 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 03:52:23 AM
No. lol
Otherwise, the great philanthropist/thief would be saved.
What if Tony asked you if you if you believed you had to perform His works to be saved? - what would be your answer?
Paul
Yes. To whom much is given, much is expected. But, I'm not terrifically legalistic about the whole thing. It's more of a relationship situation for me, and, like all relationshipships, it requires effort--even if it is pretty easy in one sense--because he does all the work. But, like the woman who believed if I just touch his hem, I will be healed--she had to then do something--go and touch the hem of his robe. I see that as works.
It's really, like all behavior, just an outward manifestation of what is going on inside.
But, like the thief/philanthropist, those people actually think that they are justifying their bad deeds with their good deeds. They all do the same thing. The biggest philanthropists are the biggest thieves. And, for obvious reasons, that doesn't work because only God can justify us. We can't justify ourselves.
I know this is not going to sit well with some, but oh well.
For me this is really simple, Jesus said the Father WORKS and I WORK and concerning His body greater WORKS shall they do.
Works are a requirement (I am talking about the works of faith) to those who have come of age. Once a child is old enough to take over the family business the Father gives that child the business to run although He oversee it. It called growing in the Lord, everyone knows a baby can do no WORK and must rely solely on it parents to feed it, to bath it, to look after it for it cannot do any of these things on its own. Even nature tells us this.
There are two perspectives being brought forth in this thread and both are correct, one view is that of a babe who relies solely upon the Father, seeing that they do not have to do anything because the Father does it all for them. The other view is that of one who has come to the age of taking over the Fathers business where the Father oversees but lets the SON WORK/RUN the business. The Father does not expect a babe to WORK but He most definitely expects one who has come of age to WORK.
Why do you think the scriptures say you have been faithful in the talent (is that spelled write? if not you know which scripture I am speaking of I hope) I GAVE YOU. God GIVES us the talent expecting us to USE/WORK the talent He gave us. He did NOT give us the talent so that we could horde it to ourselves.
That talent is given to us and we better start using/working it or we become an unprofitable servant.
God bless
Hbr 5:14 But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, [even] those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
2Pe 1:5 And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
2Pe 1:6 And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness;
2Pe 1:7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness LOVE.
2Pe 1:8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make [you that ye shall] neither [be] barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
2Pe 1:9 But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins.
2Pe 1:10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:
2Pe 1:11 For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
chuckt
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 04:43:28 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 03:52:23 AM
No. lol
Otherwise, the great philanthropist/thief would be saved.
What if Tony asked you if you if you believed you had to perform His works to be saved? - what would be your answer?
Paul
It begs the question: saved from what? or saved to what? Surely not saved to eonian life because that is gratuitous or not earned.
Also, you made a statement about being sealed. Here is the Scriptural view of that:
Eph 1:13 In Whom you also - on hearing the word of truth, the evangel of your salvation - in Whom
on believing also, you are sealed with the holy spirit of promise"
Eph 1:14 (which is an earnest of the enjoyment of our allotment, to the deliverance of that which has been procured) for the laud of His glory!"
It does not say you are only sealed as long as you do works. It says that once one believes they are sealed (period).
Paul, you have this thing about "His works" and how, I guess, doing His works saves us?
But what about those Corinthians and Galatians. According to your scenario they could not be saved because of all the infighting, lawsuits, illicit sex, oh, and believing they had to have works to be saved, yet the apostle Paul had to set them straight on all these things but never once did he say they were not saved.
I often get questioned about this preaching of mine about works. People tell me that we cannot earn salvation. This is true! But being required to perform His works is not earning salvation. For it is Him performing the works through us. Therefore, they are His works. We perform them but they belong to Him. So can our works earn salvation - not at all.
There is not a scripture(s) that can show that we are not saved by His works through us but quite the contrary for we have much to show we are saved by His works through us.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:49:51 PM
I often get questioned about this preaching of mine about works. People tell me that we cannot earn salvation. This is true! But being required to perform His works is not earning salvation. For it is Him performing the works through us. Therefore, they are His works. We perform them but they belong to Him. So can our works earn salvation - not at all.
There is not a scripture(s) that can show that we are not saved by His works through us but quite the contrary for we have much to show we are saved by His works through us.
Paul
dosent christ in you save you FROM hate and save you TO Love?
from wrath to gentleness
from greed to charity
from death to life...
from hauntiness to humility....ETC ETC.
and who gauges this? you, me ? Christ?, how much 10 fold 20 fold 100 fold......
Tony is right:
Why are the disciples told in MT 24:13, MK13:13 that in order to be saved that they must endure to the end? Were not the disciples already saved? What does saved mean, anyhow? Maybe we should start following the rules of grammar and, every time we see the words saved or salvation, ask the question:
"Saved from what?" and "Saved to what?".
http://www.heavendwellers.com/hd_difficult_questions.htm
peace
chuckt
Quote from: pneuma on March 17, 2009, 01:42:28 PM
I know this is not going to sit well with some, but oh well.
That talent is given to us and we better start using/working it or we become an unprofitable servant.
God bless
I'm not saying your wrong here, but I think the objection to this, is that people would feel that you might think you have the right to look at someone else and say they do not measure up based on what you believe works should be.
Many people have been victimized by this expectation people have of others when we start talking about "we must have works" and "by their fruit you shall know them"
Quote from: chuckt on March 17, 2009, 02:55:40 PM
dosent christ in you save you FROM hate and save you TO Love?
from wrath to gentleness
from greed to charity
from death to life...
from hauntiness to humility....ETC ETC.
and who gauges this? you, me ? Christ?, how much 10 fold 20 fold 100 fold......
Tony is right:
Why are the disciples told in MT 24:13, MK13:13 that in order to be saved that they must endure to the end? Were not the disciples already saved? What does saved mean, anyhow? Maybe we should start following the rules of grammar and, every time we see the words saved or salvation, ask the question: "Saved from what?" and "Saved to what?".
http://www.heavendwellers.com/hd_difficult_questions.htm
peace
chuckt
According to what I read from Tony, is that once your sealed your sealed (period) as he says. I believe that to be a modern invention. I believe in the earlier beliefs regarding the "seal":
From 2 Clement
What then think ye? If one does anything unseemly in the incorruptible contest, what shall he have to bear? For of those who do not preserve the
seal [unbroken], [the Scripture] saith, "Their worm shall not die, and their fire shall not be quenched, and they shall be a spectacle to all flesh."
...
"If ye have not kept that which was small, who will commit to you the great? For I say unto you, that he that is faithful in that which is least, is faithful also in much." This, then, is what He means: "Keep the flesh holy and the
seal undefiled, that ye may receive eternal life."
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 03:40:04 PM
According to what I read from Tony, is that once your sealed your sealed (period) as he says. I believe that to be a modern invention. I believe in the earlier beliefs regarding the "seal":
From 2 Clement
What then think ye? If one does anything unseemly in the incorruptible contest, what shall he have to bear? For of those who do not preserve the seal [unbroken], [the Scripture] saith, "Their worm shall not die, and their fire shall not be quenched, and they shall be a spectacle to all flesh."
...
"If ye have not kept that which was small, who will commit to you the great? For I say unto you, that he that is faithful in that which is least, is faithful also in much." This, then, is what He means: "Keep the flesh holy and the seal undefiled, that ye may receive eternal life."
Hey Paul, I've seen you make various comments such as "we can fall from grace" and since I see grace in a different light than some I am going to ask for a bit of clarification.
Do you believe that ALL men will be saved at some point and time, whether or not there are disagreements on exactly what salvation is or isn't?
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 03:58:35 PMHey Paul, I've seen you make various comments such as "we can fall from grace" and since I see grace in a different light than some I am going to ask for a bit of clarification.
Do you believe that ALL men will be saved at some point and time, whether or not there are disagreements on exactly what salvation is or isn't?
Yes! I see God eventually saving EVERYONE, with nobody left that shall not be saved. I don't believe in annhilationism so in other words, I believe that everyone that has ever lived shall be saved.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 04:04:11 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 03:58:35 PMHey Paul, I've seen you make various comments such as "we can fall from grace" and since I see grace in a different light than some I am going to ask for a bit of clarification.
Do you believe that ALL men will be saved at some point and time, whether or not there are disagreements on exactly what salvation is or isn't?
Yes! I see God eventually saving EVERYONE, with nobody left that shall not be saved. I don't believe in annhilationism so in other words, I believe that everyone that has ever lived shall be saved.
Paul
My view of works is the process in which God causes the salvation of all to happen. This happens no matter what anyones view of freewill is. It happens no matter what anyone thinks works is. So in that light works is necessary and must happen.
But lets clarify this a bit further.
If someone says to me that I should be doing something, to me that is a false representation of works because it is not up to them to say I should be doing anything.
For instance I attended a church one time that required you to be in some ministry of their church of you became a member. This was said to be a factor of "works". The idea was that if you were not doing something along the lines of what they expected then they could say your faith was dead.
I disagree with that also.
What say you?
:cloud9: Side note here: we are sealed with the Holy Ghost, which is His shadow.
Psalms 91:1-8
1 He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty. 2 I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust. 3 Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence. 4 He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler......
We meet El Shaddai in the inner court, which is why Jesus spoke to Jerusalem in the nature of El Shaddai, about how He would have covered them in His wings if they would have known the time of their visitation.
And Pneuma, I agree with your last post......Blessings....
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 04:17:39 PM
My view of works is the process in which God causes the salvation of all to happen. This happens no matter what anyones view of freewill is. It happens no matter what anyone thinks works is. So in that light works is necessary and must happen.
But lets clarify this a bit further.
If someone says to me that I should be doing something, to me that is a false representation of works because it is not up to them to say I should be doing anything.
For instance I attended a church one time that required you to be in some ministry of their church of you became a member. This was said to be a factor of "works". The idea was that if you were not doing something along the lines of what they expected then they could say your faith was dead.
I disagree with that also.
What say you?
Someone does say you have to do something. That someone is Jesus Christ.
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Jesus also said:
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
So, I would be foolish to consider everyone that claims to be a Christian to actually be a Christian if they do not do what He does.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 04:37:00 PM
Someone does say you have to do something. That someone is Jesus Christ.
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
The issue is the rest of this passage
Mt 7:22 Many will be declaring to Me in that *day, `Lord! Lord! Was it not in Your *name that we prophesy, and in Your *name cast out demons, and in Your name do many powerful deeds?'
This also contrasts with the implication of the next verse you quoted
QuoteJesus also said:
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
So, Jesus does say what you say, but we can go into churches and see people showing their works. We can hear testamonies of people doing works.
But the rest of the story is not all the works that religious people assert so wonderfully as them doing what Christ does will be acknowledged.
So, if we are to see all these people and think that is fruit, then there is a different perspective going on here which is why I see works the way I do.
So how does that fit into what your trying to tell us?
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 02:57:56 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 17, 2009, 01:42:28 PM
I know this is not going to sit well with some, but oh well.
That talent is given to us and we better start using/working it or we become an unprofitable servant.
God bless
I'm not saying your wrong here, but I think the objection to this, is that people would feel that you might think you have the right to look at someone else and say they do not measure up based on what you believe works should be.
Many people have been victimized by this expectation people have of others when we start talking about "we must have works" and "by their fruit you shall know them"
well, of course people are going to do all sorts of things with every teaching. So what? If someone were to say I need to speak in tongues or I'm doomed, let them say that. I do not speak in tongues. But, I know who my Lord is. What is it to me what they say? I'm not going to pretend to speak in tongues, which I could easily do, to satisfy men. We are looking for the approval of God, not men.
By their fruit you will know them. That always is true. So the false prophet doing great signs and wonders will always reveal his true fruit eventually. This is not to beat somebody else over the head with a club. It is to show us all truth.
the wicked servant who got drunk and "beat" the fellow
servants and was severely disciplined by His Master..was done
so,because of this fact 'with the same judgemnent you judge
ye shall be judged.' He had become a 'judger' of his fellow
servants..he was appointed to "feed" them not 'judge' them.
He gave stripes to them,so he received stripes in return.If he
had obeyed his Master..he would have judged not,lest he be
judged. It is disobediant to judge your fellow man. He should
have just fed them as he was ordered[share food,garment
visit sick and in prisons[those in prison are those judged as law-
breakers]
those who are 'judging' are NOT DOING the 'works' of Christ
also they are doing the sin of presumptousness by judging
before the time' He has come in HIS JUDGEMENTS AND THE
HOLY SPIRIT HAS MADE KNOWN TO US OF THE SALVATION OF
ALL...SO WHAT IS THIS FALLING FROM GRACE OTHER THAN
HEEDING THE CONDEMNATION AND JUDGEMENTS OF ANOTHER
other than what the HOLY SPIRIT HAS MADE KNOWN TO US
AND REVEALED TO US..BRINGING GREAT JOY TO THE HEARTS
OF THOSE WHO LOVE THEIR BROTHERS[MANKIND} AS
THEMSELVES.
In times past when the salvation of all was not revealed then
if we should have judged,we would have been as those who
received fewer stripes, but TO HAVE THIS MINDSET NOW
WOULD PUT US AS THE ONE RECEIVING MORE STRIPES..
FOR MUCH IS REQUIRED FROM THOSE GIVEN MUCH
to whom much is given[grace/salvation] much is expected. if
he had heeded Jesus command..forgive one another freely and
your Father will forgive you..as in the Lord's prayer...forgive us
our sins AS WE FORGIVE THOSE who sin against us
do not think you will live because of grace and another human
will not..do not think in your hearts that you have been
forgiven and others will not..that is unrighteous judgement
do not think mercy is yours and refuse to dispense it to others
I tell you to do the works of Christ which Tretp says you must
obey ..but do not do what Tretp does.JUDGE AND CONDEMN
those who have been bought with OUR LORD'S BLOOD and
are as such destined for redemption.NO-ONE CAN TAKE
THEM FROM HIS HAND
Freely forgive one another..be vessels of mercy. All the
wonderful things and gifts of the spirit God has showered on
you..share them with ALL mankind.
Sheila
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:06:18 PM
By their fruit you will know them. That always is true. So the false prophet doing great signs and wonders will always reveal his true fruit eventually. This is not to beat somebody else over the head with a club. It is to show us all truth.
There is no gaurantee that you will ever know the falsehood of someone. In some cases it is easy, to see someone be wrong, that doesn't mean there is no fruit in their life.
These verse rarely are used by people to look at themselves, they are used as justification to declare fruit in someone elses lives and critisize and say they should be doing this or that. So to me I can assert as well, that these jusgmental people that think the whole world will come into peace and harmoney, "if only" people would do works are not fruitful as much as they say they believe. Yet, I know better, because somewhere fruit happens because God works all things.
There is also a difference in watching someones life and seeing them reap the consequenses of sowing and fruit.
There is a careful balance between "God works all things" and someone who says that they can say what someones fruit is. Most of the time that fruit is to not try to say someone has or has not fruit.
If a christian looked at my life when I met my wife and said there was no fruit there (and they did) they were wrong.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 04:49:15 PMThe issue is the rest of this passage
Mt 7:22 Many will be declaring to Me in that *day, `Lord! Lord! Was it not in Your *name that we prophesy, and in Your *name cast out demons, and in Your name do many powerful deeds?'
This also contrasts with the implication of the next verse you quoted
QuoteJesus also said:
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
So, Jesus does say what you say, but we can go into churches and see people showing their works. We can hear testamonies of people doing works.
But the rest of the story is not all the works that religious people assert so wonderfully as them doing what Christ does will be acknowledged.
So, if we are to see all these people and think that is fruit, then there is a different perspective going on here which is why I see works the way I do.
So how does that fit into what your trying to tell us?
Paul, Jesus answers this:
Mat 5:46
For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
Mat 5:47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?
Mat 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
Now in the these churches you talk about. How often are they talking about the good they did to those that wronged them?
Paul, you seemed concerned that I'm preaching salvation by His performing His works. Why don't you just present those scriptures that you believe show that to be false?
Paul
My question is, if we are dead in Christ and I believe we are, how can we have any works? Isn't it the works of Christ that saves us?
Also, have you noticed this verse. (Eph. 2:10) For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained {or prepared} that we should walk in them.
My understanding of this is, if we believe and take credit for the works we do, we are taking glory away from God and focusing on ourselves. It is our attitudes and thoughts concerning the works that is important. If we always give God the glory and credit for the things we do then we won't get puffed up with pride and self righteousness like Job, Nebuchednezzer, and the pharisees. Notice, they all took all the credit for the good things they did.
CHB
QuoteMy question is, if we are dead in Christ and I believe we are, how can we have any works? Isn't it the works of Christ that saves us?
Because we don't stay dead in Christ.
Romans 6:8
Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:9Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
Quote from: sheila on March 17, 2009, 05:13:31 PM
the wicked servant who got drunk and "beat" the fellow
servants and was severely disciplined by His Master..was done
so,because of this fact 'with the same judgemnent you judge
ye shall be judged.' He had become a 'judger' of his fellow
servants..he was appointed to "feed" them not 'judge' them.
He gave stripes to them,so he received stripes in return.If he
had obeyed his Master..he would have judged not,lest he be
judged. It is disobediant to judge your fellow man. He should
have just fed them as he was ordered[share food,garment
visit sick and in prisons[those in prison are those judged as law-
breakers]
those who are 'judging' are NOT DOING the 'works' of Christ
also they are doing the sin of presumptousness by judging
before the time' He has come in HIS JUDGEMENTS AND THE
HOLY SPIRIT HAS MADE KNOWN TO US OF THE SALVATION OF
ALL...SO WHAT IS THIS FALLING FROM GRACE OTHER THAN
HEEDING THE CONDEMNATION AND JUDGEMENTS OF ANOTHER
other than what the HOLY SPIRIT HAS MADE KNOWN TO US
AND REVEALED TO US..BRINGING GREAT JOY TO THE HEARTS
OF THOSE WHO LOVE THEIR BROTHERS[MANKIND} AS
THEMSELVES.
In times past when the salvation of all was not revealed then
if we should have judged,we would have been as those who
received fewer stripes, but TO HAVE THIS MINDSET NOW
WOULD PUT US AS THE ONE RECEIVING MORE STRIPES..
FOR MUCH IS REQUIRED FROM THOSE GIVEN MUCH
to whom much is given[grace/salvation] much is expected. if
he had heeded Jesus command..forgive one another freely and
your Father will forgive you..as in the Lord's prayer...forgive us
our sins AS WE FORGIVE THOSE who sin against us
do not think you will live because of grace and another human
will not..do not think in your hearts that you have been
forgiven and others will not..that is unrighteous judgement
do not think mercy is yours and refuse to dispense it to others
I tell you to do the works of Christ which Tretp says you must
obey ..but do not do what Tretp does.JUDGE AND CONDEMN
those who have been bought with OUR LORD'S BLOOD and
are as such destined for redemption.NO-ONE CAN TAKE
THEM FROM HIS HAND
Freely forgive one another..be vessels of mercy. All the
wonderful things and gifts of the spirit God has showered on
you..share them with ALL mankind.
Sheila
Sheila, are you suggesting we disregard knowing others by their fruits so as not to judge? I'm confused by your post.
Paul
Quote from: CHB on March 17, 2009, 05:23:00 PM
My question is, if we are dead in Christ and I believe we are, how can we have any works? Isn't it the works of Christ that saves us?
Also, have you noticed this verse. (Eph. 2:10) For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained {or prepared} that we should walk in them.
My understanding of this is, if we believe and take credit for the works we do, we are taking glory away from God and focusing on ourselves. It is our attitudes and thoughts concerning the works that is important. If we always give God the glory and credit for the things we do then we won't get puffed up with pride and self righteousness like Job, Nebuchednezzer, and the pharisees. Notice, they all took all the credit for the good things they did.
CHB
because we are dead (His doings), we are now to WALK in life. Choose to do so.
Col 2:6 As ye
have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so
walk ye in him:
Rom 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also
should walk in newness of life. Rom 8:4 That the righteousness of the law
might be fulfilled in us, who
walk not after the flesh, but
after the Spirit.
Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that
we should walk in them.
Eph 4:1 I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that
ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called,
Eph 5:8 For ye were sometimes darkness, but
now are ye light in the Lord:
walk as children of light:
Col 1:10 That ye might
walk worthy of the Lord unto all pleasing, being fruitful in every good work, and increasing in the knowledge of God;
Col 1:21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet
now hath he reconciled Col 1:23
If ye
continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:18:42 PM
There is no gaurantee that you will ever know the falsehood of someone. In some cases it is easy, to see someone be wrong, that doesn't mean there is no fruit in their life.
These verse rarely are used by people to look at themselves, they are used as justification to declare fruit in someone elses lives and critisize and say they should be doing this or that. So to me I can assert as well, that these jusgmental people that think the whole world will come into peace and harmoney, "if only" people would do works are not fruitful as much as they say they believe. Yet, I know better, because somewhere fruit happens because God works all things.
There is also a difference in watching someones life and seeing them reap the consequenses of sowing and fruit.
There is a careful balance between "God works all things" and someone who says that they can say what someones fruit is. Most of the time that fruit is to not try to say someone has or has not fruit.
If a christian looked at my life when I met my wife and said there was no fruit there (and they did) they were wrong.
Paul, did Jesus Christ produce Good Fruit? Did He produce Good works? If so, how do you know He did?
Paul
QuoteThere is a careful balance between "God works all things" and someone who says that they can say what someones fruit is. Most of the time that fruit is to not try to say someone has or has not fruit.
As Sheila said, the purpose is not to judge someone. I can always tell now when someone is lying to me. That doesn't mean I say anything to them about it, or judge them.
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 05:22:23 PM
Paul, you seemed concerned that I'm preaching salvation by His performing His works. Why don't you just present those scriptures that you believe show that to be false?
No actually your message of that is too vague for me to see clearly what your intentions are.
I posted a scripture about how all these people doing works that you say they must do may hear that they were in vain.
So if you are going to preach works, then preach it so people know how to avoid hearing that.
So how can they?
Quote from: CHB on March 17, 2009, 05:23:00 PM
My question is, if we are dead in Christ and I believe we are, how can we have any works? Isn't it the works of Christ that saves us?
Also, have you noticed this verse. (Eph. 2:10) For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained {or prepared} that we should walk in them.
My understanding of this is, if we believe and take credit for the works we do, we are taking glory away from God and focusing on ourselves. It is our attitudes and thoughts concerning the works that is important. If we always give God the glory and credit for the things we do then we won't get puffed up with pride and self righteousness like Job, Nebuchednezzer, and the pharisees. Notice, they all took all the credit for the good things they did.
CHB
Yes CHB!
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 05:30:33 PM
Paul, did Jesus Christ produce Good Fruit? Did He produce Good works? If so, how do you know He did?
He actually loved. Thats how I know despite accusations that when I met my wife, I did not fit religions perversion, but I was doing works.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:33:19 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 05:30:33 PM
Paul, did Jesus Christ produce Good Fruit? Did He produce Good works? If so, how do you know He did?
He actually loved. Thats how I know despite accusations that when I met my wife, I did not fit religions perversion, but I was doing works.
Isn't that what we are saying? And, you knew. That's all that matters.
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:36:45 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:33:19 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 05:30:33 PM
Paul, did Jesus Christ produce Good Fruit? Did He produce Good works? If so, how do you know He did?
He actually loved. Thats how I know despite accusations that when I met my wife, I did not fit religions perversion, but I was doing works.
Isn't that what we are saying? And, you knew. That's all that matters.
I do not think everyone is perceiving that to be the message when someone talks about works "must" be done. That is my goal, to get people to that understanding.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:32:30 PM
No actually your message of that is too vague for me to see clearly what your intentions are.
I posted a scripture about how all these people doing works that you say they must do may hear that they were in vain.
So if you are going to preach works, then preach it so people know how to avoid hearing that.
So how can they?
Let's be more specific, I'm preaching His works, and not just works. I say that because that is where the fail to distinguish has been in my opinion of many in this thread.
Here are those verses:
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them,
I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
He cast them aside not because they did works but because He didn't know them to be His by their works. The works they did may have been proclaimed to be His but they were not His.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:38:53 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:36:45 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:33:19 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 05:30:33 PM
Paul, did Jesus Christ produce Good Fruit? Did He produce Good works? If so, how do you know He did?
He actually loved. Thats how I know despite accusations that when I met my wife, I did not fit religions perversion, but I was doing works.
Isn't that what we are saying? And, you knew. That's all that matters.
I do not think everyone is perceiving that to be the message when someone talks about works "must" be done. That is my goal, to get people to that understanding.
well, you seem to have had some horrible experience with churches. I can appreciate that. I'm still reeling from my three weeks in a church Bible study.
QuoteMat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
He cast them aside not because they did works but because He didn't know them to be His by their works. The works they did may have been proclaimed to be His but they were not His.
Paul
He's also saying they had no relationship with him.
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:26:16 PM
Because we don't stay dead in Christ.
Romans 6:8
Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
9Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
I believe WE do stay dead in Christ. If Christ is in me then what was me is no longer. My mind was carnal and hated God. So if we are dead that means that my mind is dead that hated God. What is new in us is the new man. Christ enters in and it is His Life that is alive in us.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:33:19 PM
He actually loved. Thats how I know despite accusations that when I met my wife, I did not fit religions perversion, but I was doing works.
Well, hopefully, you can see that it is important to acknowledge the demonstration of Good Works. For if we are not to do so then I don't see how someone can confess to know that Christ did them.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 05:44:22 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:26:16 PM
Because we don't stay dead in Christ.
Romans 6:8
Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
9Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
I believe WE do stay dead in Christ. If Christ is in me then what was me is no longer. My mind was carnal and hated God. So if we are dead that means that my mind is dead that hated God. What is new in us is the new man. Christ enters in and it is His Life that is alive in us.
Paul
1What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
2God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
3Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
4Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death:
that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. 5For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
6Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
7For he that is dead is freed from sin.
8Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
9Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
--Rom 6
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 05:47:14 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:33:19 PM
He actually loved. Thats how I know despite accusations that when I met my wife, I did not fit religions perversion, but I was doing works.
Well, hopefully, you can see that it is important to acknowledge the demonstration of Good Works. For if we are not to do so then I don't see how someone can confess to know that Christ did them.
Paul
If you really mean they are "His" works, then you should understand the issue of how I presented a situation in my life that was indeed works.
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
1What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
This is actually a way of writing to get people to see Gods promise. It is a promise that through "God" working all things, sin will not continue and grace will abound.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:57:01 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
1What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
This is actually a way of writing to get people to see Gods promise. It is a promise that through "God" working all things, sin will not continue and grace will abound.
Yes, but we are not to take advantage of that principle by continuing to live in sin.
Makes me think of the Catholic church. Keep sinning, go to confession.
If people stopped sinning, they would be out of business.
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:59:48 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:57:01 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
1What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
This is actually a way of writing to get people to see Gods promise. It is a promise that through "God" working all things, sin will not continue and grace will abound.
Yes, but we are not to take advantage of that principle by continuing to live in sin.
Makes me think of the Catholic church. Keep sinning, go to confession.
If people stopped sinning, they would be out of business.
I'm not saying we should, yet Paul did things he didn't want to do. Lets say someone saw Paul while he was doing that which he didn't want to do. In modern day religion they might see that and say there was no fruit.
Being sinless is not a requirement of producing fruit either.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 06:13:20 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:59:48 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:57:01 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
1What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
This is actually a way of writing to get people to see Gods promise. It is a promise that through "God" working all things, sin will not continue and grace will abound.
Yes, but we are not to take advantage of that principle by continuing to live in sin.
Makes me think of the Catholic church. Keep sinning, go to confession.
If people stopped sinning, they would be out of business.
I'm not saying we should, yet Paul did things he didn't want to do. Lets say someone saw Paul while he was doing that which he didn't want to do. In modern day religion they might see that and say there was no fruit.
Being sinless is not a requirement of producing fruit either.
Not all trees produce the same amount of fruit.
It's all a matter of semantics--because what is really being said is that my unfruitful life (which is really death) is being replaced by his fruitful life. So my works of death decrease as his works of life increase. It's a process. We are being created in the likeness of his image.
Christ's works, which were of HIS FATHER is the
salvation/redemption of ALL mankind done in
love and through love..the saving of all sinful mankind
if you are judging the tree by it's fruits..then you are still
judging from and eating from the tree of the knowledge of
good and evil...and have not been led to and given the fruit
the tree of life...for there is NO CONDEMNATION /wrath
fruit in the tree of life.
The salvation of all..which depicts the tree of life..is not
for condem[ing]nation but for healing....the twelve crops
of fruit depict the fruit of salvation of ALL..the leaves are for
the healing of the nations/covering of the tree of life...
which is of God and Christ and has no wrath or condemnation
but mercy...
to him who is thirsty I will give WITHOUT COST from the
spring of the water of life.
It is the cowardly, the unbeleiving,the vile,the murderers
the sexually immoral,those who practice majic arts,the
idolaters and ALL LIARS who receive the place of the secound
death
cowards-those who shrink back from grace based salvation
to law based works for justification[fear element]
unbeleiving- those who deny Christ's work of salvation on the
cross for the salvation of the world
the vile- worthless things-like justification based on works of
law...Paul considered it worthless as dung
murderers- you offspring of viper,you are of your father the
devil and you do his works, he was a mankiller from the
beginning[is it lawful to kill or heal on the sabbath?]
sexually immoral-lust of the flesh instead of life of the spirit
those who practice majic arts- Babylon lying signs,false
prophets.spiritual adultery-deny grace
idolaters-presumptousness is the same as idolatry..judging
and condemning mankind from three of knowledge of good and
evil...the fruit of that tree brings death AND AS SUCH IT CAN
NOT BRING LIFE
LIARS- false prophets,devil,satan-accusors of the brethern.
the denying of Christ the Lord that bought them..in favour of
their own works of righteousness
Know the tree of the knowledge of good and evil brings and
has brought death of all mankind..it is JUDGEMENT..for
sin entered in through the eating of that unlawful death
dealing fruit of disobediance...for the fruit appeared good
for food[and we must not judge by appearance of the fruit]
and for making one wise..but brought death
the tree of life
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 06:18:39 PM
It's all a matter of semantics--because what is really being said is that my unfruitful life (which is really death) is being replaced by his fruitful life. So my works of death decrease as his works of life increase. It's a process. We are being created in the likeness of his image.
Yep, I agree with that.
I have no idea why those lines are on those words.
Sheila...
p.s. the tree that you should know by it's fruits is the discerning the tree of the knowledge of good and evil's fruit from the tree of life. Not your brothers
.judgement/sin/death or grace/salvation/life
Hi Sheila,
I wondered about those lines myself. :LH: lol
These computers seem to have a mind of their own.
CHB
Quote from: sheila on March 17, 2009, 06:37:51 PM
I have no idea why those lines are on those words.
Sheila...
p.s. the tree that you should know by it's fruits is the discerning the tree of the knowledge of good and evil's fruit from the tree of life. Not your brothers
.judgement/sin/death or grace/salvation/life
Hi Sheila. take out the '[ 's' ]'
in "nations".
Quote from: sheila on March 17, 2009, 06:28:17 PM
Christ's works, which were of HIS FATHER is the
salvation/redemption of ALL mankind done in
love and through love..the saving of all sinful mankind
if you are judging the tree by it's fruits..then you are still
judging from and eating from the tree of the knowledge of
good and evil...and have not been led to and given the fruit
the tree of life...for there is NO CONDEMNATION /wrath
fruit in the tree of life.
The salvation of all..which depicts the tree of life..is not
for condem[ing]nations but for healing....the twelve crops
of fruit depict the fruit of salvation of ALL..the leaves are for
the healing of the nations/covering of the tree of life...
which is of God and Christ and has no wrath or condemnation
but mercy...
to him who is thirsty I will give WITHOUT COST from the
spring of the water of life.
It is the cowardly, the unbeleiving,the vile,the murderers
the sexually immoral,those who practice majic arts,the
idolaters and ALL LIARS who receive the place of the secound
death
cowards-those who shrink back from grace based salvation
to law based works for justification[fear element]
unbeleiving- those who deny Christ's work of salvation on the
cross for the salvation of the world
the vile- worthless things-like justification based on works of
law...Paul considered it worthless as dung
murderers- you offspring of viper,you are of your father the
devil and you do his works, he was a mankiller from the
beginning[is it lawful to kill or heal on the sabbath?]
sexually immoral-lust of the flesh instead of life of the spirit
those who practice majic arts- Babylon lying signs,false
prophets.spiritual adultery-deny grace
idolaters-presumptousness is the same as idolatry..judging
and condemning mankind from three of knowledge of good and
evil...the fruit of that tree brings death AND AS SUCH IT CAN
NOT BRING LIFE
LIARS- false prophets,devil,satan-accusors of the brethern.
the denying of Christ the Lord that bought them..in favour of
their own works of righteousness
Know the tree of the knowledge of good and evil brings and
has brought death of all mankind..it is JUDGEMENT..for
sin entered in through the eating of that unlawful death
dealing fruit of disobediance...for the fruit appeared good
for food[and we must not judge by appearance of the fruit]
and for making one wise..but brought death
the tree of life
:thumbsup:
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 05:57:01 PM
This is actually a way of writing to get people to see Gods promise. It is a promise that through "God" working all things, sin will not continue and grace will abound.
To me it is HOW Jesus is saving us. We are forgiven for PAST sins. But for those sins henceforth it must be Christ putting down sin in our own flesh.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 02:49:51 PM
I often get questioned about this preaching of mine about works. People tell me that we cannot earn salvation. This is true! But being required to perform His works is not earning salvation. For it is Him performing the works through us. Therefore, they are His works. We perform them but they belong to Him. So can our works earn salvation - not at all.
There is not a scripture(s) that can show that we are not saved by His works through us but quite the contrary for we have much to show we are saved by His works through us.
Paul
Where in Paul's epistles to us, the nations, does Paul say we are saved by His works through us?
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 06:13:20 PM
I'm not saying we should, yet Paul did things he didn't want to do. Lets say someone saw Paul while he was doing that which he didn't want to do. In modern day religion they might see that and say there was no fruit.
Being sinless is not a requirement of producing fruit either.
Being sinless is the mission given to all those in Christ. It doesn't mean will will not stumble and fall. But if we willfully sin after we have that mission then we have no excuse for that sin - we risk falling from God's Grace (Approval).
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 06:18:39 PMNot all trees produce the same amount of fruit.
It's all a matter of semantics--because what is really being said is that my unfruitful life (which is really death) is being replaced by his fruitful life. So my works of death decrease as his works of life increase. It's a process. We are being created in the likeness of his image.
I see it that way also Molly. We no longer practice sin once we receive the Spirit. Now if we should willfully sin then we must PAY for that sin. Now should we incur sin unwillfully (unknowingly), then we are still held accountable (beaten with few stripes), however, charity covers a multitude of sins.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 03:40:04 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 17, 2009, 02:55:40 PM
dosent christ in you save you FROM hate and save you TO Love?
from wrath to gentleness
from greed to charity
from death to life...
from hauntiness to humility....ETC ETC.
and who gauges this? you, me ? Christ?, how much 10 fold 20 fold 100 fold......
Tony is right:
Why are the disciples told in MT 24:13, MK13:13 that in order to be saved that they must endure to the end? Were not the disciples already saved? What does saved mean, anyhow? Maybe we should start following the rules of grammar and, every time we see the words saved or salvation, ask the question: "Saved from what?" and "Saved to what?".
http://www.heavendwellers.com/hd_difficult_questions.htm
peace
chuckt
According to what I read from Tony, is that once your sealed your sealed (period) as he says. I believe that to be a modern invention. I believe in the earlier beliefs regarding the "seal":
From 2 Clement
What then think ye? If one does anything unseemly in the incorruptible contest, what shall he have to bear? For of those who do not preserve the seal [unbroken], [the Scripture] saith, "Their worm shall not die, and their fire shall not be quenched, and they shall be a spectacle to all flesh."
...
"If ye have not kept that which was small, who will commit to you the great? For I say unto you, that he that is faithful in that which is least, is faithful also in much." This, then, is what He means: "Keep the flesh holy and the seal undefiled, that ye may receive eternal life."
Paul
Concerning Clement's statement, that is what happens when you mix the Circumcision writings with the Uncircumcision writings.
The Scripture he quoted was not ever meant for us of the nations whom "God has not appointed to indignation but to the procuring of salvation." Clement has committed the sin of the Galatians by having begun in spirit is now being completed in flesh.
And not matter how you swing it trettep, you can say "works of God in us" but it is still Galatianism.
Joh 6:27 Do not labor for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to everlasting life, which the Son of Man will give to you; for God the Father sealed this One.
Joh 6:28 Then they said to Him, What may we do that we may work the works of God?
Joh 6:29 Jesus answered and said to them, This is the work of God, that you believe into Him whom that One sent.
What do you make of this?
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 07:42:40 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 03:40:04 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 17, 2009, 02:55:40 PM
dosent christ in you save you FROM hate and save you TO Love?
from wrath to gentleness
from greed to charity
from death to life...
from hauntiness to humility....ETC ETC.
and who gauges this? you, me ? Christ?, how much 10 fold 20 fold 100 fold......
Tony is right:
Why are the disciples told in MT 24:13, MK13:13 that in order to be saved that they must endure to the end? Were not the disciples already saved? What does saved mean, anyhow? Maybe we should start following the rules of grammar and, every time we see the words saved or salvation, ask the question: "Saved from what?" and "Saved to what?".
http://www.heavendwellers.com/hd_difficult_questions.htm
peace
chuckt
According to what I read from Tony, is that once your sealed your sealed (period) as he says. I believe that to be a modern invention. I believe in the earlier beliefs regarding the "seal":
From 2 Clement
What then think ye? If one does anything unseemly in the incorruptible contest, what shall he have to bear? For of those who do not preserve the seal [unbroken], [the Scripture] saith, "Their worm shall not die, and their fire shall not be quenched, and they shall be a spectacle to all flesh."
...
"If ye have not kept that which was small, who will commit to you the great? For I say unto you, that he that is faithful in that which is least, is faithful also in much." This, then, is what He means: "Keep the flesh holy and the seal undefiled, that ye may receive eternal life."
Paul
Concerning Clement's statement, that is what happens when you mix the Circumcision writings with the Uncircumcision writings.
The Scripture he quoted was not ever meant for us of the nations whom "God has not appointed to indignation but to the procuring of salvation." Clement has committed the sin of the Galatians by having begun in spirit is not being completed in flesh.
And not matter how you swing it trettep, you can say "works of God in us" but it is still Galatianism.
which epistles apply to us then Tony?
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 07:32:48 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 06:18:39 PMNot all trees produce the same amount of fruit.
It's all a matter of semantics--because what is really being said is that my unfruitful life (which is really death) is being replaced by his fruitful life. So my works of death decrease as his works of life increase. It's a process. We are being created in the likeness of his image.
I see it that way also Molly. We no longer practice sin once we receive the Spirit. Now if we should willfully sin then we must PAY for that sin. Now should we incur sin unwillfully (unknowingly), then we are still held accountable (beaten with few stripes), however, charity covers a multitude of sins.
Paul
And what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5
But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. Rom 4:6
Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7
"Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered; Rom 4:8
blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 07:50:18 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 07:42:40 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 03:40:04 PM
Quote from: chuckt on March 17, 2009, 02:55:40 PM
dosent christ in you save you FROM hate and save you TO Love?
from wrath to gentleness
from greed to charity
from death to life...
from hauntiness to humility....ETC ETC.
and who gauges this? you, me ? Christ?, how much 10 fold 20 fold 100 fold......
Tony is right:
Why are the disciples told in MT 24:13, MK13:13 that in order to be saved that they must endure to the end? Were not the disciples already saved? What does saved mean, anyhow? Maybe we should start following the rules of grammar and, every time we see the words saved or salvation, ask the question: "Saved from what?" and "Saved to what?".
http://www.heavendwellers.com/hd_difficult_questions.htm
peace
chuckt
According to what I read from Tony, is that once your sealed your sealed (period) as he says. I believe that to be a modern invention. I believe in the earlier beliefs regarding the "seal":
From 2 Clement
What then think ye? If one does anything unseemly in the incorruptible contest, what shall he have to bear? For of those who do not preserve the seal [unbroken], [the Scripture] saith, "Their worm shall not die, and their fire shall not be quenched, and they shall be a spectacle to all flesh."
...
"If ye have not kept that which was small, who will commit to you the great? For I say unto you, that he that is faithful in that which is least, is faithful also in much." This, then, is what He means: "Keep the flesh holy and the seal undefiled, that ye may receive eternal life."
Paul
Concerning Clement's statement, that is what happens when you mix the Circumcision writings with the Uncircumcision writings.
The Scripture he quoted was not ever meant for us of the nations whom "God has not appointed to indignation but to the procuring of salvation." Clement has committed the sin of the Galatians by having begun in spirit is not being completed in flesh.
And not matter how you swing it trettep, you can say "works of God in us" but it is still Galatianism.
which epistles apply to us then Tony?
Paul's epistles
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 07:32:48 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 06:18:39 PMNot all trees produce the same amount of fruit.
It's all a matter of semantics--because what is really being said is that my unfruitful life (which is really death) is being replaced by his fruitful life. So my works of death decrease as his works of life increase. It's a process. We are being created in the likeness of his image.
I see it that way also Molly. We no longer practice sin once we receive the Spirit. Now if we should willfully sin then we must PAY for that sin. Now should we incur sin unwillfully (unknowingly), then we are still held accountable (beaten with few stripes), however, charity covers a multitude of sins.
Paul
And what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
Amen Doc!
Beautiful, Doc. Abraham is righteous before he ever does anything other than believe God. His belief is counted to him for righteousness--because you cannot believe without Christ. He is righteous before the circumcision.
So, even in the uncircumcision, he becomes the father of all who would believe--the children, not of the flesh, but of the promise.
Because the circumcision we have always been talking about here is of the heart, not of the flesh.
1Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
2And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
3And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
--Gen 12
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23
And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
Yes, the scripture is fulfilled because it could happen no other way. A righteous man will do the works of Christ.
Paul's writings and James go together like oil and water.
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 08:21:47 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
Yes, the scripture is fulfilled because it could happen no other way. A righteous man will do the works of Christ.
I want to clarify that we are debtless the moment we believe. But we cannot continue in sin and remain debtless.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
The scripture was fulfilled by the working out of the promise to Abraham. We need to notice that the "works" mature the seed of faith to perfection (completion). The trouble is, you seem to keep trying to put the cart before the horse.
We "work out" our salvation, but the working out is of something we already have been given. So it is with faith and the works of the spirit.
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:30:23 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 08:21:47 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
Yes, the scripture is fulfilled because it could happen no other way. A righteous man will do the works of Christ.
I want to clarify that we are debtless the moment we believe. But we cannot continue in sin and remain debtless.
Paul
So what you're saying is that we are forgiven of all debt at conversion, but if we continue in sin we become debtors again?
That seems odd to me, because Jesus Christ is the lamb who takes away the sin of the world, and does not impute our trespasses to us. Either Jesus' death paid for
all sin or it didn't. I'm not saying we won't be judged, but you seem to be mixing reaping and sowing with forgiveness of sin. We are forgiven, but we still reap what we sow. The promise is to save us from our sin (and death), not necessarily from all of it's consequences.
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 08:29:21 PM
Paul's writings and James go together like oil and water.
more like ice cream and chocolate sauce
Lord, be merciful, and keep us quiet until the actions of our lives speak louder than words!
"...feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, clothe the naked, house the homeless, tend to the sick, visit the fatherless and afflicted – those imprisoned, or held captive."
Let us not be overly concerned for that of our own, but for the health of others as well.
"Now it happened as they went that He entered a certain village; and a certain woman named Martha welcomed Him into her house. And she had a sister called Mary, who also sat at Jesus' feet and heard His word. But Martha was distracted with much serving (her own works), and she approached Him and said, "Lord, do You not care that my sister has left me to serve alone? Therefore tell her to help me." And Jesus answered and said to her, "Martha, Martha, you are worried and troubled about many things. But one thing is needed, and Mary has chosen that good part, which will not be taken away from her." (Luke 10:38-42)
Forgiveness received is mercy given, until we see things through His eyes, having His heart and mind.
"But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where [the injured man] was. And when he saw him, he had compassion on him, and he went to him and bandaged his wounds (from his own garment/covering), pouring on oil and wine; and he set him on his own animal, brought him to an inn, and took care of him. On the next day, when he departed, he took out two denarii, gave them to the innkeeper, and said to him, 'Take care of him; and whatever more you spend, when I come again, I will repay you.' So which of these three [the priest, the Levite or the Samaritan] do you think was neighbor to him who fell among the thieves?" And [the lawyer] said, "He who showed mercy on him." Then Jesus said to him, "Go and do likewise." (Luke 10:33-37)
"Therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, put on tender mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering; bearing with one another, and forgiving one another, if anyone has a complaint against another; even as Christ forgave you, so you also must." (Colossians 3:12-14)
I believe this work of Christ is often confused with the type of work illustrated by that of Martha (church pot-lucks), and not that of the good Samaritan – helping those in need.
"Therefore, to Him Who Knows to Do Good and Does Not Do It, to Him it is Sin." (James 4:17)
peacemaker
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
And there in lies the problem . . . who is it that has the ability to discern what is works of flesh and what is works of spirit?
Do I work to make my heart beat? no . . .thers a subconscious level of activity that FUNCTIONS without WORK. and the red flags that you've been setting off here are . . .as my heart beats . . .my "conscious" side has no awareness of what it is my "subconscious" side is doing to keep the heart beating . . .but the fact that it is beating is evidence that my subconscious is still functioning.
I believe it is the same spiritually, there's no need for me to emphasize the "works" of Chirst in me . . .if he's in me, then the result is, I'm alive. I don't need to tell myself to manifest more of his works . . .that's God's job . . .my job is to just let him function in me.
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:30:23 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 08:21:47 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
Yes, the scripture is fulfilled because it could happen no other way. A righteous man will do the works of Christ.
I want to clarify that we are debtless the moment we believe. But we cannot continue in sin and remain debtless.
Paul
Do you know the definition of what a "Bond-servant" is?
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 08:45:47 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:30:23 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 08:21:47 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
Yes, the scripture is fulfilled because it could happen no other way. A righteous man will do the works of Christ.
I want to clarify that we are debtless the moment we believe. But we cannot continue in sin and remain debtless.
Paul
So what you're saying is that we are forgiven of all debt at conversion, but if we continue in sin we become debtors again?
That seems odd to me, because Jesus Christ is the lamb who takes away the sin of the world, and does not impute our trespasses to us. Either Jesus' death paid for all sin or it didn't. I'm not saying we won't be judged, but you seem to be mixing reaping and sowing with forgiveness of sin. We are forgiven, but we still reap what we sow. The promise is to save us from our sin (and death), not necessarily from all of it's consequences.
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
QuoteAnd there in lies the problem . . . who is it that has the ability to discern what is works of flesh and what is works of spirit?
Are you saying you don't know when you sin?
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 09:01:30 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 08:45:47 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:30:23 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 17, 2009, 08:21:47 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
Yes, the scripture is fulfilled because it could happen no other way. A righteous man will do the works of Christ.
I want to clarify that we are debtless the moment we believe. But we cannot continue in sin and remain debtless.
Paul
So what you're saying is that we are forgiven of all debt at conversion, but if we continue in sin we become debtors again?
That seems odd to me, because Jesus Christ is the lamb who takes away the sin of the world, and does not impute our trespasses to us. Either Jesus' death paid for all sin or it didn't. I'm not saying we won't be judged, but you seem to be mixing reaping and sowing with forgiveness of sin. We are forgiven, but we still reap what we sow. The promise is to save us from our sin (and death), not necessarily from all of it's consequences.
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will
abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. (
1 Tim 4:1) As I urged you when I went into Macedonia, stay there in Ephesus so that you may command certain men not to teach false doctrines any longer nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies. These promote controversies rather than God's work—which is by faith. The goal of this command is love, which comes from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith.
Some have wandered away from these and turned to meaningless talk. (
1 Tim 1:3-6).
1Ti 3:6 not a new convert, lest having been puffed up
he may fall to a judgment of the devil;
Rev 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night forever and ever
Timothy, my son, I give you this instruction in keeping with the prophecies once made about you, so that by following them you may fight the good fight, holding on to faith and a good conscience. Some have rejected these and so have shipwrecked their faith. Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme. (1 Tim 1:18-20)
Watch your life and doctrine closely. Persevere in them, because if you do, you will save both yourself and your hearers. (1 Tim 4:16)
So I counsel younger widows to marry, to have children, to manage their homes and to give the enemy no opportunity for slander. Some have in fact already turned away to follow Satan. (1 Tim 5:14,15)
People who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge men into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs. But you, man of God, flee from all this, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and gentleness. (1 Tim 6:9-11)
Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to your care. Turn away from godless chatter and the opposing ideas of what is falsely called knowledge, which some have professed and in so doing have wandered from the faith. Grace be with you. (1 Tim 6:20, 21)
Col 1:21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled
Col 1:22 In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblamable and unreprovable in his sight:
Col 1:23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;
1Co 10:12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
For me, I just dont' see how one can say preached a different gospel than James, John, Peter.
The time is at hand. Satan is soon to be crushed. Work out your salvation, stay faithful, etc. etc.
GRACE be with YOU. Why was that his prayer if it was impossible for those Paul preached to in his epistles to not fall away from grace??
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 08:45:47 PMSo what you're saying is that we are forgiven of all debt at conversion, but if we continue in sin we become debtors again?
That seems odd to me, because Jesus Christ is the lamb who takes away the sin of the world, and does not impute our trespasses to us. Either Jesus' death paid for all sin or it didn't. I'm not saying we won't be judged, but you seem to be mixing reaping and sowing with forgiveness of sin. We are forgiven, but we still reap what we sow. The promise is to save us from our sin (and death), not necessarily from all of it's consequences.
No, I believe Jesus will save us from ALL consequences of sin as well via Faith. You lose me Doc. You say that Jesus takes away our sins and will not impute our sins to us then you go on to say that He saves us from sin but not from its consequences.
Let's get down to it Doc. Do you believe that if I have received Christ and turn back to my works (my works not His) that I abide in His Grace?
Paul
Quote from: peacemaker on March 17, 2009, 08:54:55 PM..."Therefore, to Him Who Knows to Do Good and Does Not Do It, to Him it is Sin." (James 4:17)
peacemaker
Great verses Peacemaker. I am especially glad you brought that one up.
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 17, 2009, 08:58:46 PMAnd there in lies the problem . . . who is it that has the ability to discern what is works of flesh and what is works of spirit?
We should if we read the scriptures unless Paul and the rest of the Apostes were speaking in vain when they told us what the fruits of the Spirit are and the works of the flesh are. We know they didn't speak in vain so they expected us to UNDERSTAND.
Quote
Do I work to make my heart beat? no . . .thers a subconscious level of activity that FUNCTIONS without WORK. and the red flags that you've been setting off here are . . .as my heart beats . . .my "conscious" side has no awareness of what it is my "subconscious" side is doing to keep the heart beating . . .but the fact that it is beating is evidence that my subconscious is still functioning.
I believe it is the same spiritually, there's no need for me to emphasize the "works" of Chirst in me . . .if he's in me, then the result is, I'm alive. I don't need to tell myself to manifest more of his works . . .that's God's job . . .my job is to just let him function in me.
I suggest you look up the works of the flesh in scriptures and the fruits of the Spirit to get quickly up to speed as to what is acceptable and not acceptable and learn to discern these things. I will STRONGLY emphasize and give glory to Christ for the Good works I do. At least I sure hope I do.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 09:34:51 PM
No, I believe Jesus will save us from ALL consequences of sin as well via Faith.
This is another issue that can be made so vague as to miss the intent. We are not spared from the law of reaping and sowing which includes positive and negative consequenses.
However, the wages of sin is death.
That death is a physical one, we all will die from this earth, there are no exceptions, even Jesus died a physical death.
We are saved from that death not because it is possible to be spared from an earthly death as some may think, but because Jesus paid the ransom for sin, otherwise we would stay dead.
We will be resurrected and made incorruptible.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 09:44:41 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 09:34:51 PM
No, I believe Jesus will save us from ALL consequences of sin as well via Faith.
However, the wages of sin is death.
That death is a physical one, we all will die from this earth, there are no exceptions, even Jesus died a physical death.
how do you know that the wages of sin is physical death?? was physical death not present before Adam and Eve sinned??
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 09:34:51 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 08:45:47 PMSo what you're saying is that we are forgiven of all debt at conversion, but if we continue in sin we become debtors again?
That seems odd to me, because Jesus Christ is the lamb who takes away the sin of the world, and does not impute our trespasses to us. Either Jesus' death paid for all sin or it didn't. I'm not saying we won't be judged, but you seem to be mixing reaping and sowing with forgiveness of sin. We are forgiven, but we still reap what we sow. The promise is to save us from our sin (and death), not necessarily from all of it's consequences.
No, I believe Jesus will save us from ALL consequences of sin as well via Faith. You lose me Doc. You say that Jesus takes away our sins and will not impute our sins to us then you go on to say that He saves us from sin but not from its consequences.
Let's get down to it Doc. Do you believe that if I have received Christ and turn back to my works (my works not His) that I abide in His Grace?
Paul
What I said was that we will still suffer
some of the consequences of our sins (the natural cause and effect type stuff). Otherwise, how would God discipline us? Otherwise, why would he say do not be deceived for God is not mocked, a man reaps what he sows? What we sow to the flesh, we will in our flesh reap corruption.
If I have received Christ, and turn back to my works, then I am not
abiding in His grace, no. But that does not mean that God cannot show or give grace to me. We have been set free from the law of sin and death.
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 09:48:10 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 09:44:41 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 09:34:51 PM
No, I believe Jesus will save us from ALL consequences of sin as well via Faith.
However, the wages of sin is death.
That death is a physical one, we all will die from this earth, there are no exceptions, even Jesus died a physical death.
how do you know that the wages of sin is physical death?? was physical death not present before Adam and Eve sinned??
Gn 2:17 Yet from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you are not to be eating from it, for in the day you eat from it, to die shall you be dying."
There is no account of death prior to this instruction.
Spiritual death does not come from sin. Paul had sin within him, yet he is an example of a spiritual man, so the idea that the wages of sin is spiritual death is a contradiction.
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 09:55:29 PM...
If I have received Christ, and turn back to my works, then I am not abiding in His grace, no. But that does not mean that God cannot show or give grace to me. We have been set free from the law of sin and death.
So if your not abiding in Grace then it means you have fallen from Grace, correct?
Paul
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 10:06:33 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 09:57:54 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 09:48:10 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 09:44:41 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 09:34:51 PM
No, I believe Jesus will save us from ALL consequences of sin as well via Faith.
However, the wages of sin is death.
That death is a physical one, we all will die from this earth, there are no exceptions, even Jesus died a physical death.
how do you know that the wages of sin is physical death?? was physical death not present before Adam and Eve sinned??
Gn 2:17 Yet from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you are not to be eating from it, for in the day you eat from it, to die shall you be dying."
There is no account of death prior to this instruction.
Spiritual death does not come from sin. Paul had sin within him, yet he is an example of a spiritual man, so the idea that the wages of sin is spiritual death is a contradiction.
i disagree, but probably a topic for another thread.
blessings
Not a problem, it's not something I argue heavily. We die on this earthand no one can say we do not.
We are saved from remaining dead, although annihilationists may argue some there.
We will be resurrected and made incorruptable, if a person says they believe in all men being saved eventually by some means there is little room for denial of that, only the details of how.
Thats the the way it is for me, you can work out the details as you think are appropriate for building your walk.
Paul says to the Galatians:
Gal 5:6 for in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith through love working.
So what does AVAIL? - Faith through love working!
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 09:59:51 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 09:55:29 PM...
If I have received Christ, and turn back to my works, then I am not abiding in His grace, no. But that does not mean that God cannot show or give grace to me. We have been set free from the law of sin and death.
So if your not abiding in Grace then it means you have fallen from Grace, correct?
Paul
I think that's what we established falling from grace was earlier in the thread, IIRC, yes.
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:17:39 PMI think that's what we established falling from grace was earlier in the thread, IIRC, yes.
Then that would mean they are no longer saved at that point, correct? (Grace is required for salvation).
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 10:19:53 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:17:39 PMI think that's what we established falling from grace was earlier in the thread, IIRC, yes.
Then that would mean they are no longer saved at that point, correct? (Grace is required for salvation).
Paul
NO! It means they have
fallen from grace, which is a temporary situation! They have simply turned back to the flesh for a time because they forgot who they are. Salvation is a
process.
He who began a good work in you is
faithful to complete it.When David screwed up, he said; "Restore to me the JOY of my salvation", he didn't say restore to me my salvation!
Quote from: chuckt on March 17, 2009, 01:54:22 PM
Hbr 5:14 But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, [even] those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
2Pe 1:5 And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
2Pe 1:6 And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness;
2Pe 1:7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness LOVE.
2Pe 1:8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make [you that ye shall] neither [be] barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
2Pe 1:9 But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins.
2Pe 1:10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:
2Pe 1:11 For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
chuckt
Ya forgot to highlight this part Chuck
give diligence to make your calling and election sure:
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 17, 2009, 02:57:56 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 17, 2009, 01:42:28 PM
I know this is not going to sit well with some, but oh well.
That talent is given to us and we better start using/working it or we become an unprofitable servant.
God bless
I'm not saying your wrong here, but I think the objection to this, is that people would feel that you might think you have the right to look at someone else and say they do not measure up based on what you believe works should be.
Many people have been victimized by this expectation people have of others when we start talking about "we must have works" and "by their fruit you shall know them"
Paul it's not about judging others but about judging ourselves.
We are to inspect our own fruit to see what manner it is of not other people's fruit. Does He not tell us to test the spirits? The test is in the fruit that comes from the spirit; whether, from the spirit of man (flesh fruit) or the Holy Spirit (spiritual fruit).
I realise many people look at it the way you present bro but that is their hang up and takes nothing away from the truth matter.
God gave us the talent and expects us to use it less we become unprofitable servants.
2 Thessalonians 3:7-12
7 For yourselves know how ye ought to follow us: for we behaved not ourselves disorderly among you; 8 Neither did we eat any man's bread for nought; but wrought with labour and travail night and day, that we might not be chargeable to any of you: 9 Not because we have not power, but to make ourselves an ensample unto you to follow us. 10 For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat. 11 For we hear that there are some which walk among you disorderly, working not at all, but are busybodies. 12 Now them that are such we command and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and eat their own bread.
Notice Paul says if any will NOT WORK they should NOT EAT.
Now I know most here see things not just in the natural sense but also in a spiritual sense, so I ask you what is the spiritual sense here Paul is talking about?
Is Paul not saying that if they eat the meat that they should WORK and if they do not WORK then they should not bother EATING?
Therefore one who eats and does NOT WORK becomes unprofitable.
Quote from: Cardinal on March 17, 2009, 04:22:33 PM
:cloud9: Side note here: we are sealed with the Holy Ghost, which is His shadow.
Psalms 91:1-8
1 He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty. 2 I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust. 3 Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence. 4 He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler......
We meet El Shaddai in the inner court, which is why Jesus spoke to Jerusalem in the nature of El Shaddai, about how He would have covered them in His wings if they would have known the time of their visitation.
And Pneuma, I agree with your last post......Blessings....
Thanks sis :thumbsup:
Quote from: CHB on March 17, 2009, 05:23:00 PM
My question is, if we are dead in Christ and I believe we are, how can we have any works? Isn't it the works of Christ that saves us?
Also, have you noticed this verse. (Eph. 2:10) For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained {or prepared} that we should walk in them.
My understanding of this is, if we believe and take credit for the works we do, we are taking glory away from God and focusing on ourselves. It is our attitudes and thoughts concerning the works that is important. If we always give God the glory and credit for the things we do then we won't get puffed up with pride and self righteousness like Job, Nebuchednezzer, and the pharisees. Notice, they all took all the credit for the good things they did.
CHB
Hi sis notice in the verse you quoted that it say created in Christ Jesus UNTO GOOD WORKS.
We are NOT talking about taking credit for these WORKS for it is GOD WHO GIVES THE TALENT, but He expects us to USE IT.
Quote from: pneuma on March 17, 2009, 10:29:46 PM
Now I know most here see things not just in the natural sense but also in a spiritual sense, so I ask you what is the spiritual sense here Paul is talking about?
Thats about the law of sowing and reaping. My comments have been towards the idea of works and salvation.
Quote from: pneuma on March 17, 2009, 10:32:14 PM
Quote from: CHB on March 17, 2009, 05:23:00 PM
My question is, if we are dead in Christ and I believe we are, how can we have any works? Isn't it the works of Christ that saves us?
Also, have you noticed this verse. (Eph. 2:10) For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained {or prepared} that we should walk in them.
My understanding of this is, if we believe and take credit for the works we do, we are taking glory away from God and focusing on ourselves. It is our attitudes and thoughts concerning the works that is important. If we always give God the glory and credit for the things we do then we won't get puffed up with pride and self righteousness like Job, Nebuchednezzer, and the pharisees. Notice, they all took all the credit for the good things they did.
CHB
Hi sis notice in the verse you quoted that it say created in Christ Jesus UNTO GOOD WORKS.
We are NOT talking about taking credit for these WORKS for it is GOD WHO GIVES THE TALENT, but He expects us to USE IT.
Not only does God "give the talent", but He is also the one who does it in us (the work). He both works and wills in us to do His good pleasure.
Quote from: pneuma on March 17, 2009, 10:29:46 PM
Therefore one who eats and does NOT WORK becomes unprofitable.
I simply see our spiritual work a result of God being the one that works all things. If someone wishes to disagree that is their right, I only know what my life has been like.
I sow and I reap physically, and while I was sowing the bad, I reaped spiritual rewards even while I was reaping the negative physical consequenses of my sowing.
So whatever anyones take is on it, I agree that it is about ourselves, but if I am somehow to work to reap spiritually, then we have to be careful as to how we judge that.
Jesus says plainly there will be some who worked in his name he did not acknowledge those works. It is because my spiritual nature is beyond my control and it is God who is working that.
I found love and I desired it, I was blessed with it, but my life contradicts the typical teaching on how I should have found love. The nature of how I found it was spiritual works and it was Gods work.
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 10:14:49 PM
Paul says to the Galatians:
Gal 5:6 for in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith through love working.
So what does AVAIL? - Faith through love working!
Paul
Gal 5:6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision is availing anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith, operating through love."
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:25:09 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 10:19:53 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:17:39 PMI think that's what we established falling from grace was earlier in the thread, IIRC, yes.
Then that would mean they are no longer saved at that point, correct? (Grace is required for salvation).
Paul
NO! It means they have fallen from grace, which is a temporary situation! They have simply turned back to the flesh for a time because they forgot who they are. Salvation is a process. He who began a good work in you is faithful to complete it.
When David screwed up, he said; "Restore to me the JOY of my salvation", he didn't say restore to me my salvation!
Very good Doc. And even though the Galatians fell from grace by listening to people like trettep who wanted to tell the Galatians that they had to do works to be perfected, the Galatians still did not lose their eonian life which is freely given, not earned, not worked for and not kept by works.
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 08:35:10 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
The scripture was fulfilled by the working out of the promise to Abraham. We need to notice that the "works" mature the seed of faith to perfection (completion). The trouble is, you seem to keep trying to put the cart before the horse.
We "work out" our salvation, but the working out is of something we already have been given. So it is with faith and the works of the spirit.
And "work out your own salvation" does not mean "work to save yourself."
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 11:04:43 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 08:35:10 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PMAnd what about this?:
Rom 4:1 What then shall we say our father Abraham to have found according to flesh?
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has a boast, but not with God.
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:4 Now to one working, the reward is not counted according to grace, but according to debt.
Rom 4:5 But to the one not working, but believing on Him justifying the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as also David says of the blessedness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawlessnesses are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 blessed the man to whom the Lord will in no way charge sin." LXX-Psa. 31:1, 2; MT-Psa. 32:1, 2
Rom 4:9 Is this blessedness then on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For we say the faith "was counted to Abraham for righteousness." Gen. 15:6
Rom 4:10 How then was it counted? Being in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!
You forgot to highlight "according to the flesh". After all that is what the "works" are referring to there. Those works are those works of the flesh. They are not "any" works. As to "believing", James clarified this and said the following:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
James tells us that the scriptures were fulfilled that "Abraham believed God" WHEN (notice it there), when Abraham's by His works were made perfect.
Paul
The scripture was fulfilled by the working out of the promise to Abraham. We need to notice that the "works" mature the seed of faith to perfection (completion). The trouble is, you seem to keep trying to put the cart before the horse.
We "work out" our salvation, but the working out is of something we already have been given. So it is with faith and the works of the spirit.
And "work out your own salvation" does not mean "work to save yourself."
Right. What I was attempting to draw out there was that we are not working to save ourselves, but rather simply allowing what has already been given to us to be worked out.
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:41:03 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 17, 2009, 10:32:14 PM
Quote from: CHB on March 17, 2009, 05:23:00 PM
My question is, if we are dead in Christ and I believe we are, how can we have any works? Isn't it the works of Christ that saves us?
Also, have you noticed this verse. (Eph. 2:10) For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained {or prepared} that we should walk in them.
My understanding of this is, if we believe and take credit for the works we do, we are taking glory away from God and focusing on ourselves. It is our attitudes and thoughts concerning the works that is important. If we always give God the glory and credit for the things we do then we won't get puffed up with pride and self righteousness like Job, Nebuchednezzer, and the pharisees. Notice, they all took all the credit for the good things they did.
CHB
Hi sis notice in the verse you quoted that it say created in Christ Jesus UNTO GOOD WORKS.
We are NOT talking about taking credit for these WORKS for it is GOD WHO GIVES THE TALENT, but He expects us to USE IT.
Not only does God "give the talent", but He is also the one who does it in us (the work). He both works and wills in us to do His good pleasure.
Yes, Doc, this is what I was saying. Or meant to. For it is God who works in you
both to will and to do of his good pleasure. There is no way that we should ever take credit for doing any kind of work. Even the faith we have is not our faith but Christ's (Eph. 2:8).
I think this verse says it all. (Phil. 1:6) Being confident of this very thing, that
he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ. God began the good work in us and he will finish it.
CHB
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:25:09 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 10:19:53 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:17:39 PMI think that's what we established falling from grace was earlier in the thread, IIRC, yes.
Then that would mean they are no longer saved at that point, correct? (Grace is required for salvation).
Paul
NO! It means they have fallen from grace, which is a temporary situation! They have simply turned back to the flesh for a time because they forgot who they are. Salvation is a process. He who began a good work in you is faithful to complete it.
When David screwed up, he said; "Restore to me the JOY of my salvation", he didn't say restore to me my salvation!
So Doc, let's go a different way since you believe that falling from a Grace is just a temporary thing. You agree that someone turning back to serve the flesh is no longer abiding in Grace. So has that person at the point that they are no longer abiding in Grace considered saved at that point?
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:41:03 PM
Not only does God "give the talent", but He is also the one who does it in us (the work). He both works and wills in us to do His good pleasure.
For what reason Doc? - why does Jesus work through us? Is the putting down of sin in our flesh a one time event at the moment we accept Christ or is it ongoing? If it is ongoing, then why? I mean if you believe that His works are not required for salvation then what is the purpose for Him to continue putting down sin? Of course my answers are that indeed Christ does put down sin in our own flesh and will continue to do so as long as we have Faith.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 12:14:08 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:41:03 PM
Not only does God "give the talent", but He is also the one who does it in us (the work). He both works and wills in us to do His good pleasure.
For what reason Doc? - why does Jesus work through us? Is the putting down of sin in our flesh a one time event at the moment we accept Christ or is it ongoing? If it is ongoing, then why? I mean if you believe that His works are not required for salvation then what is the purpose for Him to continue putting down sin? Of course my answers are that indeed Christ does put down sin in our own flesh and will continue to do so as long as we have Faith.
Paul
:sigh: I almost agree with you here. You're right, the reason (or, one of them) Christ does work through and in us is to "put down the flesh". It is not a one-time event, but it is an ongoing process. We have been reconciled to Him by His death, and "how much more will we be saved by His life." We are, in a sense, to become Christ (as His body). He must increase, I/ we must decrease.
But then you blew it at the end, and added that Christ does put down sin in our flesh and will continue to do so
"as long as we have faith". Well, it's His faith, not ours. He gives it to us. Once again, HE who began a good work in you WILL BE FAITHFUL TO COMPLETE IT. His faithfulness, not ours.
You're still making it sound as though we have to maintain our own salvation...
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 12:08:37 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:25:09 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 17, 2009, 10:19:53 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 17, 2009, 10:17:39 PMI think that's what we established falling from grace was earlier in the thread, IIRC, yes.
Then that would mean they are no longer saved at that point, correct? (Grace is required for salvation).
Paul
NO! It means they have fallen from grace, which is a temporary situation! They have simply turned back to the flesh for a time because they forgot who they are. Salvation is a process. He who began a good work in you is faithful to complete it.
When David screwed up, he said; "Restore to me the JOY of my salvation", he didn't say restore to me my salvation!
So Doc, let's go a different way since you believe that falling from a Grace is just a temporary thing. You agree that someone turning back to serve the flesh is no longer abiding in Grace. So has that person at the point that they are no longer abiding in Grace considered saved at that point?
Paul
I suppose that all depends on what your view (or definition) of salvation is. I would say when they are not abiding in grace, they are not
experiencing their salvation at that point, which is different to what you are saying. This is what David meant when he asked God to restore the
joy of his salvation to him. David knew he had fallen from grace by turning to the flesh, but his request was not that God restore his salvation, but rather the Joy (experience) of it.
So once again . .here we stand with another chasm between us . . .both sides are building bridges for the other, that neither choose to travel on. Just when you think you've made a decent path for the other to walk on so they can see things from your perspective . . .they back out and go to yet another gap and try to build yet another bridge. Yet in the end, neither of the builders have any desire to cross over to the other's side . . .the only purpose for building the bridge is to get the other to come to our side.
It's obvious trettp that we're at that point where neither of the two sides are going to come together. No matter how many Scriptures are laid out . . there's always an excuse as to why they don't apply. Which is more important . . .me proving my point and getting you to convert, or us laying down our differences to make way for relationship?
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 12:34:42 AM:sigh: I almost agree with you here. You're right, the reason (or, one of them) Christ does work through and in us is to "put down the flesh". It is not a one-time event, but it is an ongoing process. We have been reconciled to Him by His death, and "how much more will we be saved by His life." We are, in a sense, to become Christ (as His body). He must increase, I/ we must decrease.
But then you blew it at the end, and added that Christ does put down sin in our flesh and will continue to do so "as long as we have faith". Well, it's His faith, not ours. He gives it to us. Once again, HE who began a good work in you WILL BE FAITHFUL TO COMPLETE IT. His faithfulness, not ours.
You're still making it sound as though we have to maintain our own salvation...
Ok, you say I "blew it at the end" (we can touch on that later).. but you agree that we are saved by His life (interesting) but why? I thought you believe once we are saved we are saved there is no falling away. Why then is one still BEING saved (ongoing)?
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 12:35:55 AMI suppose that all depends on what your view (or definition) of salvation is. I would say when they are not abiding in grace, they are not experiencing their salvation at that point, which is different to what you are saying. This is what David meant when he asked God to restore the joy of his salvation to him. David knew he had fallen from grace by turning to the flesh, but his request was not that God restore his salvation, but rather the Joy (experience) of it.
Well then let's get this straight as to your view. You believe then if someone is NOT still abiding in Grace - then they are still saved at that point then, correct?
Paul
Whatever a persons take is on salvation, works, faith, grace, the narrow road, the wide road, there is nothing complete in that manner until God is all in all.
We can try to spiritualize "not under the law", "removed sin" etc, but unless you know something the rest of humanity is not aware of your still an imperfect being living now imperfectly. Whether you want to say your not under the law, walking in the spirit, whatever you have been delivered from or think you've been delivered from it is not complete because your still walking this earth in a decaying body no matter how much joy and contentment you might have in the midst of all of that.
So "Something" is still in process no matter what verses you want to post.
Quote from: Nathan on March 18, 2009, 12:50:38 AM
So once again . .here we stand with another chasm between us . . .both sides are building bridges for the other, that neither choose to travel on. Just when you think you've made a decent path for the other to walk on so they can see things from your perspective . . .they back out and go to yet another gap and try to build yet another bridge. Yet in the end, neither of the builders have any desire to cross over to the other's side . . .the only purpose for building the bridge is to get the other to come to our side.
It's obvious trettp that we're at that point where neither of the two sides are going to come together. No matter how many Scriptures are laid out . . there's always an excuse as to why they don't apply. Which is more important . . .me proving my point and getting you to convert, or us laying down our differences to make way for relationship?
Nathan, it is a question of RATIONALITY. I have no problem with differences so long as each is established in rationality. When someone holds to a doctrine that contradicts scriptures that are clearly evident and explained to them and they give an illogical or irrational answer to why they discount the scripture then I depart from conversing with them unless I can find another witness.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 18, 2009, 01:20:06 AM
Whatever a persons take is on salvation, works, faith, grace, the narrow road, the wide road, there is nothing complete in that manner until God is all in all.
We can try to spiritualize "not under the law", "removed sin" etc, but unless you know something the rest of humanity is not aware of your still an imperfect being living now imperfectly. Whether you want to say your not under the law, walking in the spirit, whatever you have been delivered from or think you've been delivered from it is not complete because your still walking this earth in a decaying body no matter how much joy and contentment you might have in the midst of all of that.
So "Something" is still in process no matter what verses you want to post.
Paul, Christ is perfect. When we have Him, we have what is perfect that can put down sin in our own body. He can do it - He has done it. He is telling us to be Perfect also.
Paul
Colossians 4:12
Epaphras, who is one of you, a servant of Christ, saluteth you, always labouring fervently for you in prayers, that ye may stand perfect and complete in all the will of God.
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 01:28:01 AM
Colossians 4:12
Epaphras, who is one of you, a servant of Christ, saluteth you, always labouring fervently for you in prayers, that ye may stand perfect and complete in all the will of God.
Thanks Molly.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 01:24:32 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 18, 2009, 01:20:06 AM
Whatever a persons take is on salvation, works, faith, grace, the narrow road, the wide road, there is nothing complete in that manner until God is all in all.
We can try to spiritualize "not under the law", "removed sin" etc, but unless you know something the rest of humanity is not aware of your still an imperfect being living now imperfectly. Whether you want to say your not under the law, walking in the spirit, whatever you have been delivered from or think you've been delivered from it is not complete because your still walking this earth in a decaying body no matter how much joy and contentment you might have in the midst of all of that.
So "Something" is still in process no matter what verses you want to post.
Paul, Christ is perfect. When we have Him, we have what is perfect that can put down sin in our own body. He can do it - He has done it. He is telling us to be Perfect also.
Paul
Of course he can do it. God work all things for the sake of his delight. Tell me, how are you going to work to prevent your physical body from getting old and decaying till you die?
Doesn't matter what you wish to do, doesn't matter how hard you work, your not going to reverse that.
Are you telling me that you can be perfect and not ever die a physical death?
There is a process going on that isn't about you at all.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 18, 2009, 01:31:53 AM
Of course he can do it. God work all things for the sake of his delight. Tell me, how are you going to work to prevent your physical body from getting old and decaying till you die?
Doesn't matter what you wish to do, doesn't matter how hard you work, your not going to reverse that.
Are you telling me that you can be perfect and not ever die a physical death?
There is a process going on that isn't about you at all.
Paul, our death is a sentence (A Judgment) that was passed upon Adam for their transgression. We are all of the body of Adam. So that Judgement sticks (no matter what). Therefore, we will all die. The only way to escape that judgement would have been to not have been born of the seed of Adam. That would require a virgin birth to escape the sentence of death. But I'm not concerned about my ability to being perfect. Again, if I have Christ, I'm on my way to perfection.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 01:11:30 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 12:34:42 AM:sigh: I almost agree with you here. You're right, the reason (or, one of them) Christ does work through and in us is to "put down the flesh". It is not a one-time event, but it is an ongoing process. We have been reconciled to Him by His death, and "how much more will we be saved by His life." We are, in a sense, to become Christ (as His body). He must increase, I/ we must decrease.
But then you blew it at the end, and added that Christ does put down sin in our flesh and will continue to do so "as long as we have faith". Well, it's His faith, not ours. He gives it to us. Once again, HE who began a good work in you WILL BE FAITHFUL TO COMPLETE IT. His faithfulness, not ours.
You're still making it sound as though we have to maintain our own salvation...
Ok, you say I "blew it at the end" (we can touch on that later).. but you agree that we are saved by His life (interesting) but why? I thought you believe once we are saved we are saved there is no falling away. Why then is one still BEING saved (ongoing)?
Paul
Because Christ in you is the hope of glory. His life is replacing ours (of the flesh). Just because someone takes two steps backward in their progress by focusing on the flesh (works) doesn't mean they are no longer saved. You are essentially saying that grace=salvation. It does not. If it weren't for the grace of God bestowed upon us
before we could even comprehend what was happening, salvation wouldn't be possible for anyone. I'm not saying there is no falling away, I'm just saying it's not permanent. Perhaps what's going on here is just a fundamental misunderstanding of each other's position.
When I say you "blew it", I simply meant that you undid everything you'd just said by putting the whole thing back on us again.
there was never meant to be a bridge over the abyss..
Rev 20;3 I saw an ANGEL[evangel] coming down out of
heaven.Having a key to the Abyss and holding in his hand a
great chain and the accusor and deceiver is bound
it is where satan-the accusor of our brethern is thrown
it is locked and sealed over him..to keep him from deceiving
the nations anymore, until the 1000 yrs were ended.
After that he must be set free for a short time
Rev 12;10 now has come the salvation and power and
kingdom of our God,and the authority of his Christ.
for the accusor of our brothers,who accuses them day and night
has been hurled down. they overcame him by the blood of the
Lamb and the word of their testimony.
the accusor of our brethern is a very subtil spirit, that
ancient serpent,dragon,who is the devil or satan
Matthew 16;19 I will give you the keys of the KINGDOM of
Heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven,
and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven
Rev 1;5 to Him who loves us and has loosed us from our sins
by his blood,and has made us to be a kingdom and preists to
serve his God and Father- TO HIM BE GLORY AND POWER
FOR EVER AND EVER! AMEN
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 01:14:30 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 12:35:55 AMI suppose that all depends on what your view (or definition) of salvation is. I would say when they are not abiding in grace, they are not experiencing their salvation at that point, which is different to what you are saying. This is what David meant when he asked God to restore the joy of his salvation to him. David knew he had fallen from grace by turning to the flesh, but his request was not that God restore his salvation, but rather the Joy (experience) of it.
Well then let's get this straight as to your view. You believe then if someone is NOT still abiding in Grace - then they are still saved at that point then, correct?
Paul
On the UR view, yes. Salvation is a process. We are still
being saved, regardless of where we are at in that process. Even the act of falling away moves us in that direction, because God's judgment produces righteousness.
You seem to be implying that we can remove ourselves entirely from that process by falling from grace.
Just out of curiosity, you wouldn't happen to have had a pentecostal background would you?
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 01:45:50 AM
If I have Christ, I'm on my way to perfection.
I believe that., most people here believe that too, so what exactly is there to disagree over?
When it comes to all men being saved, that is the process all mankind will obtain.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 18, 2009, 02:59:23 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 01:45:50 AM
If I have Christ, I'm on my way to perfection.
I believe that., most people here believe that too, so what exactly is there to disagree over?
When it comes to all men being saved, that is the process all mankind will obtain.
So why not steal a bunch of money and live it up like Bernie?
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 03:00:28 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 18, 2009, 02:59:23 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 01:45:50 AM
If I have Christ, I'm on my way to perfection.
I believe that., most people here believe that too, so what exactly is there to disagree over?
When it comes to all men being saved, that is the process all mankind will obtain.
So why not steal a bunch of money and live it up like Bernie?
Will it prevent my salvation if I do?
We can never walk perfectly while in this body of decaying rotting stinking dying flesh. Not till we are changed to immortality and INCORRUPTION will be be perfect and sinless.
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 01:48:11 AMWhen I say you "blew it", I simply meant that you undid everything you'd just said by putting the whole thing back on us again.
Doc, you haven't been paying attention if you believe I ever said we are saved by our works. I haven't said that once. I continue to say that we are saved by His works through us.
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 01:52:29 AMOn the UR view, yes. Salvation is a process. We are still being saved, regardless of where we are at in that process. Even the act of falling away moves us in that direction, because God's judgment produces righteousness.
You seem to be implying that we can remove ourselves entirely from that process by falling from grace.
Just out of curiosity, you wouldn't happen to have had a pentecostal background would you?
Then Doc, your saying that someone is saved at a point in time that they don't abide in Grace. And yes, I am saying that we can remove ourselves from abiding in His Grace. I'm most definately saying that in case there is any doubt about it. I will say it again - We can remove ourselves from abiding in His Grace.
No Doc, I don't have a pentecostal background. I never attended any of the socially recognizable churches unless someone died or some other special occasion. My parent were non-devout Roman Catholics, I later followed Armstrongism (but never fellowshipped) and now I follow only the Word of God.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 18, 2009, 02:59:23 AM
I believe that., most people here believe that too, so what exactly is there to disagree over?
When it comes to all men being saved, that is the process all mankind will obtain.
I don't know, Paul. I get this feeling your disagreeing with me about Works being required to be saved. Isn't that the case?
Paul
QuoteThats about the law of sowing and reaping. My comments have been towards the idea of works and salvation.
But my post that you responded to had nothing to do with salvation Paul.
I believe we move from grace to grace, faith to faith and glory to glory. Grace is always there and so too is faith, but WORKS are required to move from grace to grace and faith to faith.
Although I agree mostly with what Paul has been saying we differ on the stance of about salvation.
QuoteI simply see our spiritual work a result of God being the one that works all things. If someone wishes to disagree that is their right, I only know what my life has been like.
I sow and I reap physically, and while I was sowing the bad, I reaped spiritual rewards even while I was reaping the negative physical consequenses of my sowing.
I believe you bro, for that has happened in my life also, but this aspect is that of a babe in Christ where He does everything for us. But we are to go on to perfection and we cannot do that if remain a babe in Him. WORKS are required of us to go on to perfection.
QuoteSo whatever anyones take is on it, I agree that it is about ourselves, but if I am somehow to work to reap spiritually, then we have to be careful as to how we judge that.
Jesus says plainly there will be some who worked in his name he did not acknowledge those works. It is because my spiritual nature is beyond my control and it is God who is working that.
Yes Jesus did say some SAID they were doing WORKS in His name, but He will NOT acknowledge WORKS of the flesh or after the letter of the law as being His WORKS. There is a difference between the WORK Paul and that is something people here are having a hard time with. They seem to think all WORKS are the same, but they are NOT. There is a need to differentiate between them.
QuoteI found love and I desired it, I was blessed with it, but my life contradicts the typical teaching on how I should have found love. The nature of how I found it was spiritual works and it was Gods work.
Ask yourself Paul if this happened while still a babe in Christ?
Can we reach perfection by continuing to sow the bad? I don't believe so.
And is not sowing bad seed related to babes?
QuoteNot only does God "give the talent", but He is also the one who does it in us (the work). He both works and wills in us to do His good pleasure.
Hi Doc yes God both works and wills IN US, but God does NOT work and will FOR US, which is the meaning you are conveying.
Let me give you an example.
The servant who did not use his talent became unprofitable, correct?
So if it was GOD who WORKED and WILLED this for that servant than it is GOD who became the unprofitable servant.
It looks all fine and dandy to say God worked and willed for the servants who gained more talents because God used the talent to gain more talent, but if you are going to say that for the profitable servant you must also say that of the unprofitable servant. Thus making God unprofitable.
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 04:12:14 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 18, 2009, 02:59:23 AM
I believe that., most people here believe that too, so what exactly is there to disagree over?
When it comes to all men being saved, that is the process all mankind will obtain.
I don't know, Paul. I get this feeling your disagreeing with me about Works being required to be saved. Isn't that the case?
Paul
No, I do not disagree with that in general and have posted what I believe those necessary works are.
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 06:11:13 AM
I believe we move from grace to grace, faith to faith and glory to glory. Grace is always there and so too is faith, but WORKS are required to move from grace to grace and faith to faith.
It's possible that you missed some of my posts pointing out how I see works. I say that in respect since there are a lot of posts here to go through. If needed I will clarify my position better but basically in a nutshell I do believe Works are required, the difference with my outlook on them is that those works are of God since he makes sure that we meet the criteria for reconciliation.
If they are of us, then that contradicts verses saying it is not out of us and even contradicts Jesus who said he can do nothing apart from the father.
Quote
I believe you bro, for that has happened in my life also, but this aspect is that of a babe in Christ where He does everything for us. But we are to go on to perfection and we cannot do that if remain a babe in Him. WORKS are required of us to go on to perfection.
Even Jesus said that he did nothing apart from the Father. So I am not refuting works I am trying to get across that those works are not of us. We cannot work our way to perfection, God works us to perfection. This is why when we work and hope for glory for ourselves those works will be burned "Yet we shall be saved"
QuoteI found love and I desired it, I was blessed with it, but my life contradicts the typical teaching on how I should have found love. The nature of how I found it was spiritual works and it was Gods work.
Quote
Ask yourself Paul if this happened while still a babe in Christ?
Can we reach perfection by continuing to sow the bad? I don't believe so.
And is not sowing bad seed related to babes?
You may be missing my point that I have been trying to build up to with all of my posts. I was dispelling the typical religious outlook on works with my story. I grew up being told works was something that I had to do a certain way to avoid hell.
My point was that works was happening in my life despite all the other stuff. I did respond to that love in the way God designed us to react to pure truth.
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 09:11:23 PM
Watch your life and doctrine closely. Persevere in them, because if you do, you will save both yourself and your hearers. (1 Tim 4:16)
So what are you trying to say, Zeek? Are you saying we can save not only ourselves but we become the saviour of our hearers also? Who needs Christ?
Paul is not talking about saving oneself and others for eonian life but saving oneself and others from the harmful things attending this life . . . things which swamp men in destruction (and I'm not talking about eternal damnation either by using Paul's words there). It is also a means of saving oneself and others from making shipwreck of the faith. This is the means God uses to save us from falling away. It doesn't mean that trettrep's idea is right that we save ourselves by our works.
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 08:53:43 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 08:29:21 PM
Paul's writings and James go together like oil and water.
more like ice cream and chocolate sauce
More like ice cream and battery acid
QuoteIt's possible that you missed some of my posts pointing out how I see works. I say that in respect since there are a lot of posts here to go through. If needed I will clarify my position better but basically in a nutshell I do believe Works are required, the difference with my outlook on them is that those works are of God since he makes sure that we meet the criteria for reconciliation.
If they are of us, then that contradicts verses saying it is not out of us and even contradicts Jesus who said he can do nothing apart from the father.
Hi Paul H that what Paul T has been stating all along.
And I agree with it up to a certain age, then God calls US to do His WORK. Yes Jesus said He could do nothing apart from the Father, but that does not mean the Father did the WORKS of Jesus. But Jesus waited until He received power from ON HIGH before He did His works. Jesus received His talent and was a faithful servant.
Its still of God because He's the one who gave the power.
Why do you think it is US that is judged according to OUR WORKS in the BODY? If these works are God doing them what need have WE to be judged?
The Father directs and enables, thus we like Jesus can do nothing apart from the Father.
QuoteEven Jesus said that he did nothing apart from the Father. So I am not refuting works I am trying to get across that those works are not of us. We cannot work our way to perfection, God works us to perfection. This is why when we work and hope for glory for ourselves those works will be burned "Yet we shall be saved"
That scenario make God the unprofitable servant then Paul, If God gives the talent and is the one who does the WORK with the talent then it is God who is unprofitable. And obedience is WORK and obedience is the ONLY way to perfection, so WORKS are indeed our way to perfection. But these WORKS are only preformed by using the talent GOD has given US. I am NOT talking about works we perform after the flesh but the works WE perform after the SPIRIT.
QuoteYou may be missing my point that I have been trying to build up to with all of my posts. I was dispelling the typical religious outlook on works with my story. I grew up being told works was something that I had to do a certain way to avoid hell.
My point was that works was happening in my life despite all the other stuff. I did respond to that love in the way God designed us to react to pure truth
.
No I did not miss your point brother these things happen to all babes in Christ. Where Christ does ALL the work because a babe does NOT nor can they WORK, they need to be feed, changed bathed all by the Father. I am not refuting this aspect Paul I agree with it, but I also see that what a babe receives is different than one who has come to the age of taking over the Fathers business, where the Father gives His sons all the necessary tools and oversees all but gives His sons to run the business.
I know some see me as saying they are babes in Christ as through I thought I was not myself but that is NOT what I am saying. I too am a babe in Christ; howbeit, a babe that knows that if we want to go on to perfection WE must USE/WORK that which the Father has given us less we become unprofitable to His work.
Again Jesus says the Father works and
I work, Jesus did not say the Father works for me, He said
I work.God bless
:cloud9: :thumbsup:
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 02:32:46 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 08:53:43 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 08:29:21 PM
Paul's writings and James go together like oil and water.
more like ice cream and chocolate sauce
More like ice cream and battery acid
Well, imo; i posted a lot of scriptures from the Pauline epistles that are the same message as the letters written by James, John, and Peter. Do you have any comment about the Pauline verses I posted??
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 03:28:33 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 02:32:46 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 08:53:43 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 08:29:21 PM
Paul's writings and James go together like oil and water.
more like ice cream and chocolate sauce
More like ice cream and battery acid
Well, imo; i posted a lot of scriptures from the Pauline epistles that are the same message as the letters written by James, John, and Peter. Do you have any comment about the Pauline verses I posted??
Why don't you quote Paul's verses and then Peter, James and John's next to Paul's and we will see how close they really are.
P.S. I did answer your post on "save yourself and those hearing you."
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 02:42:25 PM
Why do you think it is US that is judged according to OUR WORKS in the BODY? If these works are God doing them what need have WE to be judged?
The Father directs and enables, thus we like Jesus can do nothing apart from the Father.
Well, it is US because the work is being done in us and through us. Judging by a loving God is actually a wonderful thing.
QuoteI too am a babe in Christ; howbeit, a babe that knows that if we want to go on to perfection WE must USE/WORK that which the Father has given us less we become unprofitable to His work.
Well, the issue I see is from the belief of all men being saved. I see that it is impossible for any man to remain unprofitable, so how is that possible from your point of view?
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 03:44:24 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 03:28:33 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 02:32:46 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 08:53:43 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 17, 2009, 08:29:21 PM
Paul's writings and James go together like oil and water.
more like ice cream and chocolate sauce
More like ice cream and battery acid
Well, imo; i posted a lot of scriptures from the Pauline epistles that are the same message as the letters written by James, John, and Peter. Do you have any comment about the Pauline verses I posted??
Why don't you quote Paul's verses and then Peter, James and John's next to Paul's and we will see how close they really are.
P.S. I did answer your post on "save yourself and those hearing you."
thanks, saw it afterward.
OK.
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 02:42:25 PM
QuoteI too am a babe in Christ; howbeit, a babe that knows that if we want to go on to perfection WE must USE/WORK that which the Father has given us less we become unprofitable to His work.
pneuma, this is the very thing Paul warned the Galatians against; beginning in spirit and being completed in flesh by doing works. The Galatians thought they could be perfected by works. Paul said they already were.
Don't know if I am reading everyone's post right or not but it seems some are referring to the flesh and some are referring to the spirit concerning being saved, saved, works and salvation.
I see this as, we are perfect spiritually because of what Christ did but we are not, nor never will be perfect physically because of Adam.
Paul said, we are sitting in Christ in the heavenlies and we have died and was buried with him therefore we are dead to sin and works. Now spiritually that is the case but physically we are sinners because we are flesh.
We will never be perfect while in the flesh but we are now perfect in the spirit because we are in Christ. Paul said to think on things above and not on things on earth, so spiritually we can think of ourselves as being perfect because Christ did everything for us and we need no more works. To say we need to work is saying Christ didn't do his complete job and we have to help him somehow.
CHB
Quote from: Zeek on March 17, 2009, 09:10:26 PM
Timothy, my son, I give you this instruction in keeping with the prophecies once made about you, so that by following them you may fight the good fight, holding on to faith and a good conscience. Some have rejected these and so have shipwrecked their faith. Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme. (1 Tim 1:18-20)
[/quote]
Zeek, the above has nothing to do with Peter, James or John's writings. Neither is Paul telling Timothy to save himself by works.
Making shipwreck as to the faith does not mean one has lost their eonian life. It means, however, that they are not saved from the harmful things attending this life by drifting aimlessly (shipwreck) amongst the rocks. Likewise just because Hymenaeus and Alexander were handed over to Satan does not mean they have lost their eonian life nor mean they need to do good works to save themselves.
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 04:19:13 PM
Don't know if I am reading everyone's post right or not but it seems some are referring to the flesh and some are referring to the spirit concerning being saved, saved, works and salvation.
I see this as, we are perfect spiritually because of what Christ did but we are not, nor never will be perfect physically because of Adam.
Paul said, we are sitting in Christ in the heavenlies and we have died and was buried with him therefore we are dead to sin and works. Now spiritually that is the case but physically we are sinners because we are flesh.
We will never be perfect while in the flesh but we are now perfect in the spirit because we are in Christ. Paul said to think on things above and not on things on earth, so spiritually we can think of ourselves as being perfect because Christ did everything for us and we need no more works. To say we need to work is saying Christ didn't do his complete job and we have to help him somehow.
CHB
Excellent thoughts CHB! :thumbsup:
the parable of the talents refers to spiritual light and
understanding...or spiritual growth.When we engage in
transactions with others with these talents of light given
us,there is an increasing of spiritual growth in the kingdom
of light.[we see this on forums like this]to the benefit of the
KING. the two increased 100% to four...the five to 100%
to 10. The unprofitable servant did not share his spiritual
talent...or even deposit it so it could gain INTER-REST...
his FEAR led him to hide his talent...and his opinion that
his master was a 'hard' man. He failed to go about his masters
buisiness and increase to his masters benefit.
So the Lord took this talent of light and gave it to the one
who had the 10...no doubt this servant will increase
that 'understanding' 100%...for a total of 12.
there can be a great 'fear' along with an understanding in the
spirit.....I think of certain religious organizations that are so
fearful and think God is so hard...that they never grow nor can
they accept and increase in spiritual light from this fear.
what they think they have and possess spiritually will be
taken from them...they will find their actions did not increase
for their Lord but actually brought loss to their Lord.
these talents are given for the LIGHT OF THE WORLD
and we are to let our LIGHT SHINE...which increases the
KINGDOM OF LIGHT AND THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 04:19:13 PM
Paul said, we are sitting in Christ in the heavenlies and we have died and was buried with him therefore we are dead to sin and works. Now spiritually that is the case but physically we are sinners because we are flesh.
CHB
sitting,yes;
but also look at what we are to do:
1Co 15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
1Co 16:13 Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong.
2Co 1:24 Not for that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy: for by faith ye stand.
Gal 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
Eph 6:11 Put on the whole armor of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
Eph 6:14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;
Php 1:27 Only let your conversation be as it becometh the gospel of Christ: that whether I come and see you, or else be absent, I may hear of your affairs, that ye stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel;
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. (1 Tim 4:1)
As I urged you when I went into Macedonia, stay there in Ephesus so that you may command certain men not to teach false doctrines any longer nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies. These promote controversies rather than God's work—which is by faith. The goal of this command is love, which comes from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith. Some have wandered away from these and turned to meaningless talk. (1 Tim 1:3-6).
1Ti 3:6 not a new convert, lest having been puffed up he may fall to a judgment of the devil;
Rev 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night forever and ever
Timothy, my son, I give you this instruction in keeping with the prophecies once made about you, so that by following them you may fight the good fight, holding on to faith and a good conscience. Some have rejected these and so have shipwrecked their faith. Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme. (1 Tim 1:18-20)
Watch your life and doctrine closely. Persevere in them, because if you do, you will save both yourself and your hearers. (1 Tim 4:16)
So I counsel younger widows to marry, to have children, to manage their homes and to give the enemy no opportunity for slander. Some have in fact already turned away to follow Satan. (1 Tim 5:14,15)
People who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge men into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs. But you, man of God, flee from all this, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and gentleness. (1 Tim 6:9-11)
Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to your care. Turn away from godless chatter and the opposing ideas of what is falsely called knowledge, which some have professed and in so doing have wandered from the faith. Grace be with you. (1 Tim 6:20, 21)
Col 1:21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled
Col 1:22 In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblamable and unreprovable in his sight:
Col 1:23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;
1Co 10:12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
Php 1:10 That ye may approve things that are excellent; that ye may be sincere and without offense till the day of Christ;
Php 1:27 Only let your conversation be as it becometh the gospel of Christ: that whether I come and see you, or else be absent, I may hear of your affairs, that ye stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel;
Php 1:28 And in nothing terrified by your adversaries: which is to them an evident token of perdition, but to you of salvation, and that of God.
Php 1:29 For unto you it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake;
Php 1:30 Having the same conflict which ye saw in me, and now hear to be in me.
Php 2:14 Do all things without murmurings and disputings:
Php 2:15 That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;
Php 2:16 Holding forth the word of life; that I may rejoice in the day of Christ, that I have not run in vain, neither labored in vain.
Php 3:18 (For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ:
Php 3:19 Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.)
Php 4:1 Therefore, my brethren dearly beloved and longed for, my joy and crown, so stand fast in the Lord, my dearly beloved.
1Pe 1:5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
1Pe 1:7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold thatperisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:
1Pe 1:9 Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.
1Pe 1:13 Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
1Pe 2:1 Wherefore laying aside all malice, and all guile, and hypocrisies, and envies, and all evil speakings,
1Pe 3:21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:
1Pe 4:7 But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer.
1Pe 4:12 Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you:
1Pe 5:9 Whom resist steadfast in the faith, knowing that the same afflictions are accomplished in your brethren that are in the world.
1Pe 5:10 But the God of all grace, who hath called us unto his eternal glory by Christ Jesus, after that ye have suffered a while, make you perfect, establish, strengthen, settle you.
2Pe 1:5 And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
2Pe 1:6 And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness;
2Pe 1:7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity.
2Pe 1:8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
2Pe 1:9 But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins.
2Pe 1:10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:
2Pe 1:11 For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Jas 1:12 Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.
1Jn 2:23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: but he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.
1Jn 2:24 Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father.
1Jn 2:25 And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life,
1Jn 3:11 For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.
1Jn 4:8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
1Jn 4:11 Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another.
1Jn 4:17 Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world.
1Co 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
This is just the tip of the iceburg imo; to me the message is the same:
stand fast, be diligient, hold on to the faith that has been given to you; LOVE, and your reward will be great. Fall back from grace given to you, and deny Christ come in the flesh, deny HIM, and destruction is upon you.
I could go on, but me thinks Tony will disagree, and is a lot of time to go through it all.
blessings
Z
Matthew 11;30
FOR MY YOKE IS EASY AND MY BURDEN IS LIGHT
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
[/quote]
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
[/quote]
so are Romans, I, II Corin, I,II Tim, I, II Thes, Phill, Coll, Eph etc mixing the two also??
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
?
Colossians 3:11
Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
[/quote]
so, are you saying, the "wrath" is not the same as "destruction" that Paul talked about.
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 04:19:13 PM
To say we need to work is saying Christ didn't do his complete job and we have to help him somehow.
CHB
But, we do help Him, as he is the Head, we are the Body,
you don't see the body as an extension of HIM? to SERVE a purpose?? to be HIS body on earth??
If we are his body, do we not also through HIM, "finish the work"?
Rom 11:31 Even so have these also now not believed, that
through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 04:53:07 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
?
Colossians 3:11
Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.
Molly, if I got a dollar for every time I answered Colossiand 3:11 I'd be a wealthy man.
Please note that Paul said that was the "in Christ" position. And that was in the body of Christ position which is unique to Paul's evangel for us of the nations. The Circumcision believers are the bride of Christ. We of the nations are in the body of Christ.
Also please note that in those same letters by Paul he noted that there is till Circumcision and Uncircumcision, still slaves and free, still male and female in the Lord. So you can't just rip one of Paul's verses out of its context such as "no Circumcision nor Uncircumcision" and expect people to be swayed into believing that there is no difference between Paul's writings and those of the Circumcision.
If you don't understand this I am sorry but I cannot help you. :icon_flower:
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 05:14:33 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 04:53:07 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
?
Colossians 3:11
Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.
Molly, if I got a dollar for every time I answered Colossiand 3:11 I'd be a wealthy man.
Please note that Paul said that was the "in Christ" position. And that was in the body of Christ position which is unique to Paul's evangel for us of the nations. The Circumcision believers are the bride of Christ. We of the nations are in the body of Christ.
Also please note that in those same letters by Paul he noted that there is till Circumcision and Uncircumcision, still slaves and free, still male and female in the Lord. So you can't just rip one of Paul's verses out of its context such as "no Circumcision nor Uncircumcision" and expect people to be swayed into believing that there is no difference between Paul's writings and those of the Circumcision.
If you don't understand this I am sorry but I cannot help you. :icon_flower:
Tony, could you start a thread, or point me to some teachings re: "bride of Christ" versus "body of Christ"? I am trying to wrap my head around what u believe, and how you "divide" the bible up to what u believe is written for "nations" versus "physical jews". thanks
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:54:52 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
so, are you saying, the "wrath" is not the same as "destruction" that Paul talked about.
[/quote]
Where did Paul tell the believers of the nations that they had destruction or wrath waiting for them from God if they sin?
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 05:17:13 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:54:52 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
so, are you saying, the "wrath" is not the same as "destruction" that Paul talked about.
Where did Paul tell the believers of the nations that they had destruction or wrath waiting for them from God if they sin?
[/quote]
i already posted those scriptures, first one comes to mind is in I Corinthians. That's why i earlier asked if all Pauline written books are the same context (to the nations). Do you see his early writings as "not to the nations"?
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 05:16:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 05:14:33 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 04:53:07 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
?
Colossians 3:11
Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.
Molly, if I got a dollar for every time I answered Colossiand 3:11 I'd be a wealthy man.
Please note that Paul said that was the "in Christ" position. And that was in the body of Christ position which is unique to Paul's evangel for us of the nations. The Circumcision believers are the bride of Christ. We of the nations are in the body of Christ.
Also please note that in those same letters by Paul he noted that there is till Circumcision and Uncircumcision, still slaves and free, still male and female in the Lord. So you can't just rip one of Paul's verses out of its context such as "no Circumcision nor Uncircumcision" and expect people to be swayed into believing that there is no difference between Paul's writings and those of the Circumcision.
If you don't understand this I am sorry but I cannot help you. :icon_flower:
Tony, could you start a thread, or point me to some teachings re: "bride of Christ" versus "body of Christ"? I am trying to wrap my head around what u believe, and how you "divide" the bible up to what u believe is written for "nations" versus "physical jews". thanks
Here is an article on:
Are we the Bride of the Lamb? http://www.gtft.org/Library/knoch/arewethebride.htm (http://www.gtft.org/Library/knoch/arewethebride.htm)
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 05:21:24 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 05:16:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 05:14:33 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 04:53:07 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
?
Colossians 3:11
Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.
Molly, if I got a dollar for every time I answered Colossiand 3:11 I'd be a wealthy man.
Please note that Paul said that was the "in Christ" position. And that was in the body of Christ position which is unique to Paul's evangel for us of the nations. The Circumcision believers are the bride of Christ. We of the nations are in the body of Christ.
Also please note that in those same letters by Paul he noted that there is till Circumcision and Uncircumcision, still slaves and free, still male and female in the Lord. So you can't just rip one of Paul's verses out of its context such as "no Circumcision nor Uncircumcision" and expect people to be swayed into believing that there is no difference between Paul's writings and those of the Circumcision.
If you don't understand this I am sorry but I cannot help you. :icon_flower:
Tony, could you start a thread, or point me to some teachings re: "bride of Christ" versus "body of Christ"? I am trying to wrap my head around what u believe, and how you "divide" the bible up to what u believe is written for "nations" versus "physical jews". thanks
Here is an article on: Are we the Bride of the Lamb? http://www.gtft.org/Library/knoch/arewethebride.htm (http://www.gtft.org/Library/knoch/arewethebride.htm)
thanks
Quote from: tonyMolly, if I got a dollar for every time I answered Colossiand 3:11 I'd be a wealthy man.
Please note that Paul said that was the "in Christ" position. And that was in the body of Christ position which is unique to Paul's evangel for us of the nations. The Circumcision believers are the bride of Christ. We of the nations are in the body of Christ.
Also please note that in those same letters by Paul he noted that there is till Circumcision and Uncircumcision, still slaves and free, still male and female in the Lord. So you can't just rip one of Paul's verses out of its context such as "no Circumcision nor Uncircumcision" and expect people to be swayed into believing that there is no difference between Paul's writings and those of the Circumcision.
If you don't understand this I am sorry but I cannot help you.
Are you saying the circumcision does not have Christ and has no access to Christ?
38Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
39For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.--Mat 23
If their house is left desolate, God has left the building. What, then, is there to preach to them about except to repent?
What, then, are you claiming is this 'preaching' to the circumcision that doesn't apply to us?
God took the one most well versed in the Old Testament, the Jew of Jews, and placed him as the messenger to the Gentiles.
5Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;
6Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.--Phil 3
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 05:28:41 PM
Quote from: tonyMolly, if I got a dollar for every time I answered Colossiand 3:11 I'd be a wealthy man.
Please note that Paul said that was the "in Christ" position. And that was in the body of Christ position which is unique to Paul's evangel for us of the nations. The Circumcision believers are the bride of Christ. We of the nations are in the body of Christ.
Also please note that in those same letters by Paul he noted that there is till Circumcision and Uncircumcision, still slaves and free, still male and female in the Lord. So you can't just rip one of Paul's verses out of its context such as "no Circumcision nor Uncircumcision" and expect people to be swayed into believing that there is no difference between Paul's writings and those of the Circumcision.
If you don't understand this I am sorry but I cannot help you.
Are you saying the circumcision does not have Christ and has no access to Christ?
38Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
39For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
--Mat 23
If their house is left desolate, God has left the building. What, then, is there to preach to them about except to repent?
What, then, are you claiming is this 'preaching' to the circumcision?
All of the gospels, Acts, Peter, James and John and Hebrews are to the Circumcision.
Their (the Jews) house was left to them desolate after 70 A.D. That was not written to the nations. Once God set Israel aside the door was opened to the nations of which Paul was our apostle. Paul's writings are for us, the Uncircumcision.
The Circumcision is the Bride of the Lamb. They are not ever called "the body of Christ" as Paul calls us of the nations.
Now rather than bring up more points, Molly, can you see anything of what I wrote to you concerning no Circumcision or Uncircumcision in Christ but in the Lord there is?
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 05:34:55 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 05:28:41 PM
Quote from: tonyMolly, if I got a dollar for every time I answered Colossiand 3:11 I'd be a wealthy man.
Please note that Paul said that was the "in Christ" position. And that was in the body of Christ position which is unique to Paul's evangel for us of the nations. The Circumcision believers are the bride of Christ. We of the nations are in the body of Christ.
Also please note that in those same letters by Paul he noted that there is till Circumcision and Uncircumcision, still slaves and free, still male and female in the Lord. So you can't just rip one of Paul's verses out of its context such as "no Circumcision nor Uncircumcision" and expect people to be swayed into believing that there is no difference between Paul's writings and those of the Circumcision.
If you don't understand this I am sorry but I cannot help you.
Are you saying the circumcision does not have Christ and has no access to Christ?
38Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
39For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
--Mat 23
If their house is left desolate, God has left the building. What, then, is there to preach to them about except to repent?
What, then, are you claiming is this 'preaching' to the circumcision?
All of the gospels, Acts, Peter, James and John and Hebrews are to the Circumcision.
Their (the Jews) house was left to them desolate after 70 A.D. That was not written to the nations. Once God set Israel aside the door was opened to the nations of which Paul was our apostle. Paul's writings are for us, the Uncircumcision.
The Circumcision is the Bride of the Lamb. They are not ever called "the body of Christ" as Paul calls us of the nations.
Now rather than bring up more points, Molly, can you see anything of what I wrote to you concerning no Circumcision or Uncircumcision in Christ but in the Lord there is?
Not really. I'm going to have to look into it some more. What about the Christians who are physically circumcised? Are they all secret Jews?
As I said above, Paul was the 'Jew of Jews'. He knew the Old Testament better than any other. He was a Pharisee and blameless in the Law.
And, he points out that the circumcision was never meant of the flesh, but of the heart.
Personally, I don't want to rule from heaven, or whatever you are talking about, I want to be here, in this beautiful place God has created me for and for me. I also consider the entire Bible written for me and to me.
Romans 2:29
But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
Well, I'm willing to look into it. Maybe we need another thread. But, I cannot imagine why the one who knew the Old Testament backwards and forwards would give a teaching that departed from it.
Mind you, nobody knows to this day what people or peoples are the lost tribes of Israel, lost to history almost a millenia before Jesus walked on this earth.
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
Did Jesus address the Israelites or the Gentiles then?
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 05:51:30 PM
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
Well, I'm willing to look into it. Maybe we need another thread. But, I cannot imagine why the one who knew the Old Testament backwards and forwards would give a teaching that departed from it.
Mind you, nobody knows to this day what people or peoples are the lost tribes of Israel, lost to history almost a millenia before Jesus walked on this earth.
It has been my impression that Paul was not called to the Jews, but to the Gentiles . . .and Peter was to the Jews . . .Jesus was to the Jews, originally . . .I believe Jesus was the closing opportunity given to the Jews that the 70 weeks of Daniel speak of. He came to them on the 70th week. Traditionally, we're taught that only 69 of those weeks have been fulfilled . . .then there's this space in between that's given to the Gentiles . . .then the 7-year tribulation is supposedly the 70th week reinstated for the Jews . . .but affecting the whole earth.
But I don't agree with that anymore . . .I believe Jesus fulfilled even that upon his arrival. I believe the martyr of Stephen was the sealing of the 70th week . . .after that incident, Paul's ministry took center stage . . .which was to the Gentiles rather than the Jews.
Quote from: Nathan on March 18, 2009, 06:00:26 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 05:51:30 PM
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
Well, I'm willing to look into it. Maybe we need another thread. But, I cannot imagine why the one who knew the Old Testament backwards and forwards would give a teaching that departed from it.
Mind you, nobody knows to this day what people or peoples are the lost tribes of Israel, lost to history almost a millenia before Jesus walked on this earth.
It has been my impression that Paul was not called to the Jews, but to the Gentiles . . .and Peter was to the Jews . . .Jesus was to the Jews, originally . . .I believe Jesus was the closing opportunity given to the Jews that the 70 weeks of Daniel speak of. He came to them on the 70th week. Traditionally, we're taught that only 69 of those weeks have been fulfilled . . .then there's this space in between that's given to the Gentiles . . .then the 7-year tribulation is supposedly the 70th week reinstated for the Jews . . .but affecting the whole earth.
But I don't agree with that anymore . . .I believe Jesus fulfilled even that upon his arrival. I believe the martyr of Stephen was the sealing of the 70th week . . .after that incident, Paul's ministry took center stage . . .which was to the Gentiles rather than the Jews.
If God intended a special teaching that was for the Jews only, it seems to me he would have taken the one most well versed in the Old Testament, the Pharisee, and put him as messenger to the Jews. God did not do that.
And, it is the Pharisee who explains that Jesus has opened the door to the entire world--
be ye reconciled to God.
i always wondered about Christ marying his own body.
i also kinda wondered if the body and bride be different, gives me a headache :coffee2:
Quote from: chuckt on March 18, 2009, 06:16:04 PM
i always wondered about Christ marying his own body.
i also kinda wondered if the body and bride be different, gives me a headache :coffee2:
..and they shall be one flesh. --Gen 2
and I have other sheep that are not of this flock,
them to I must bring..and they will be one flock John 10;16
Quote from: sheila on March 18, 2009, 06:29:49 PM
and I have other sheep that are not of this flock,
them to I must bring..and they will be one flock John 10;16
So who are those other sheep?
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 06:37:21 PM
Quote from: sheila on March 18, 2009, 06:29:49 PM
and I have other sheep that are not of this flock,
them to I must bring..and they will be one flock John 10;16
So who are those other sheep?
the other sheep were proselytes to the Jewish/Christian faith like Peter preached to after seeing the vision of the unclean animals.
Quote from: chuckt on March 18, 2009, 06:16:04 PM
i always wondered about Christ marying his own body.
i also kinda wondered if the body and bride be different, gives me a headache :coffee2:
Think about this:
Joh 1:1 In the beginning, was the Word; and the Word was with God; and the Word was God.
Compare to this:
In the beginning, was the Rib, and the Rib, was with Adam, and the Rib was Adam.
The Rib being the reference to Eve. Did you ever realize that all those born unto the Father in Heaven come by way of Christ? So to do all those born unto Adam come through Eve.
Additionally, all those born unto Christ, come through the Church.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 04:05:25 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 01:48:11 AMWhen I say you "blew it", I simply meant that you undid everything you'd just said by putting the whole thing back on us again.
Doc, you haven't been paying attention if you believe I ever said we are saved by our works. I haven't said that once. I continue to say that we are saved by His works through us.
Paul
Well, it isn't that I haven't been paying attention. It seems to be that you were using confusing language that lead me to believe that's what you were saying, if that's not what you were saying.
Perhaps it's putting too fine a point on it, but I believe that our scriptures are telling us we are saved by grace through faith, not by His works through us. I see His works through us as the
fruit of His grace and faith given to us.
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 06:12:50 AM
QuoteNot only does God "give the talent", but He is also the one who does it in us (the work). He both works and wills in us to do His good pleasure.
Hi Doc yes God both works and wills IN US, but God does NOT work and will FOR US, which is the meaning you are conveying.
Let me give you an example.
The servant who did not use his talent became unprofitable, correct?
So if it was GOD who WORKED and WILLED this for that servant than it is GOD who became the unprofitable servant.
It looks all fine and dandy to say God worked and willed for the servants who gained more talents because God used the talent to gain more talent, but if you are going to say that for the profitable servant you must also say that of the unprofitable servant. Thus making God unprofitable.
Not necessarily. We don't necessarily get to choose whether we get assigned to be vessels of honor or dishonor. If God working his will in us in choosing some of us as vessels of dishonor seems to us as being unprofitable on His part, then I think that perhaps represents a misunderstanding of how God works all things together according to the counsel of His own will. God will harden whom He will harden, and have mercy on whom he will have mercy. Perhaps the situation is somewhat different for us once we become servants, but I don't know if that parable gives us sufficient evidence to come to that conclusion.
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 04:10:41 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 01:52:29 AMOn the UR view, yes. Salvation is a process. We are still being saved, regardless of where we are at in that process. Even the act of falling away moves us in that direction, because God's judgment produces righteousness.
You seem to be implying that we can remove ourselves entirely from that process by falling from grace.
Just out of curiosity, you wouldn't happen to have had a pentecostal background would you?
Then Doc, your saying that someone is saved at a point in time that they don't abide in Grace. And yes, I am saying that we can remove ourselves from abiding in His Grace. I'm most definately saying that in case there is any doubt about it. I will say it again - We can remove ourselves from abiding in His Grace.
Paul
Well, no; I'm saying they are still in the process of
being saved at a point in time they are not abiding in grace. If our salvation depends
at all on us and our ability, then we're
all screwed. Once again; His faithfulness, not ours. Do you abide in grace perfectly all the time?
I agree that we can remove ourselves (to a degree) from abiding in grace, but that can only be for a season. You claim to believe in universal salvation, which I am finding increasingly hard to believe in view of your stance on the requirements of salvation.
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 02:42:25 PM
QuoteIt's possible that you missed some of my posts pointing out how I see works. I say that in respect since there are a lot of posts here to go through. If needed I will clarify my position better but basically in a nutshell I do believe Works are required, the difference with my outlook on them is that those works are of God since he makes sure that we meet the criteria for reconciliation.
If they are of us, then that contradicts verses saying it is not out of us and even contradicts Jesus who said he can do nothing apart from the father.
Hi Paul H that what Paul T has been stating all along.
And I agree with it up to a certain age, then God calls US to do His WORK. Yes Jesus said He could do nothing apart from the Father, but that does not mean the Father did the WORKS of Jesus. But Jesus waited until He received power from ON HIGH before He did His works. Jesus received His talent and was a faithful servant.
Its still of God because He's the one who gave the power.
Why do you think it is US that is judged according to OUR WORKS in the BODY? If these works are God doing them what need have WE to be judged?
The Father directs and enables, thus we like Jesus can do nothing apart from the Father.
QuoteEven Jesus said that he did nothing apart from the Father. So I am not refuting works I am trying to get across that those works are not of us. We cannot work our way to perfection, God works us to perfection. This is why when we work and hope for glory for ourselves those works will be burned "Yet we shall be saved"
That scenario make God the unprofitable servant then Paul, If God gives the talent and is the one who does the WORK with the talent then it is God who is unprofitable. And obedience is WORK and obedience is the ONLY way to perfection, so WORKS are indeed our way to perfection. But these WORKS are only preformed by using the talent GOD has given US. I am NOT talking about works we perform after the flesh but the works WE perform after the SPIRIT.
QuoteYou may be missing my point that I have been trying to build up to with all of my posts. I was dispelling the typical religious outlook on works with my story. I grew up being told works was something that I had to do a certain way to avoid hell.
My point was that works was happening in my life despite all the other stuff. I did respond to that love in the way God designed us to react to pure truth
.
No I did not miss your point brother these things happen to all babes in Christ. Where Christ does ALL the work because a babe does NOT nor can they WORK, they need to be feed, changed bathed all by the Father. I am not refuting this aspect Paul I agree with it, but I also see that what a babe receives is different than one who has come to the age of taking over the Fathers business, where the Father gives His sons all the necessary tools and oversees all but gives His sons to run the business.
I know some see me as saying they are babes in Christ as through I thought I was not myself but that is NOT what I am saying. I too am a babe in Christ; howbeit, a babe that knows that if we want to go on to perfection WE must USE/WORK that which the Father has given us less we become unprofitable to His work.
Again Jesus says the Father works and I work, Jesus did not say the Father works for me, He said I work.
God bless
So pneuma; I don't want to try to put words in your mouth here, so I'm going to ask for some clarification. If this post means that you are supporting Paul's (trettep) position, then are you saying that at some point in our spiritual maturity we become responsible for our own salvation, or am I misreading you here?
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 04:19:13 PM
Don't know if I am reading everyone's post right or not but it seems some are referring to the flesh and some are referring to the spirit concerning being saved, saved, works and salvation.
I see this as, we are perfect spiritually because of what Christ did but we are not, nor never will be perfect physically because of Adam.
Paul said, we are sitting in Christ in the heavenlies and we have died and was buried with him therefore we are dead to sin and works. Now spiritually that is the case but physically we are sinners because we are flesh.
We will never be perfect while in the flesh but we are now perfect in the spirit because we are in Christ. Paul said to think on things above and not on things on earth, so spiritually we can think of ourselves as being perfect because Christ did everything for us and we need no more works. To say we need to work is saying Christ didn't do his complete job and we have to help him somehow.
CHB
That's how I see it too, CHB. God's promise was never to our Adamic flesh (flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God), but to the spirit he placed within us that is a piece of Him. His promise is to His seed in us. Isaac, not Ishmael.
Quote from: sheila on March 18, 2009, 04:26:18 PM
the parable of the talents refers to spiritual light and
understanding...or spiritual growth.When we engage in
transactions with others with these talents of light given
us,there is an increasing of spiritual growth in the kingdom
of light.[we see this on forums like this]to the benefit of the
KING. the two increased 100% to four...the five to 100%
to 10. The unprofitable servant did not share his spiritual
talent...or even deposit it so it could gain INTER-REST...
his FEAR led him to hide his talent...and his opinion that
his master was a 'hard' man. He failed to go about his masters
buisiness and increase to his masters benefit.
So the Lord took this talent of light and gave it to the one
who had the 10...no doubt this servant will increase
that 'understanding' 100%...for a total of 12.
there can be a great 'fear' along with an understanding in the
spirit.....I think of certain religious organizations that are so
fearful and think God is so hard...that they never grow nor can
they accept and increase in spiritual light from this fear.
what they think they have and possess spiritually will be
taken from them...they will find their actions did not increase
for their Lord but actually brought loss to their Lord.
these talents are given for the LIGHT OF THE WORLD
and we are to let our LIGHT SHINE...which increases the
KINGDOM OF LIGHT AND THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT
Great post, sheila. :thumbsup:
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 05:51:30 PM
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
Well, I'm willing to look into it. Maybe we need another thread. But, I cannot imagine why the one who knew the Old Testament backwards and forwards would give a teaching that departed from it.
Mind you, nobody knows to this day what people or peoples are the lost tribes of Israel, lost to history almost a millenia before Jesus walked on this earth.
Well, I'm not clear on that either Molly, as this is new to me as well, but perhaps a clue is what Jesus himself said to the Pharisees: (paraphrased here) " I know what your law says, but
I say... (when he was referencing an eye for an eye, etc. vs. love your enemies). Jesus knew the Old Testament backwards and forwards and gave teaching that "departed" from it, or at least appeared to...
Just a thought.
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 09:21:06 PM
Well, it isn't that I haven't been paying attention. It seems to be that you were using confusing language that lead me to believe that's what you were saying, if that's not what you were saying.
Perhaps it's putting too fine a point on it, but I believe that our scriptures are telling us we are saved by grace through faith, not by His works through us. I see His works through us as the fruit of His grace and faith given to us.
Doc, why would God be concerned about the works at all? Since obviously, He is as we read in Chapters 2 and 3 of Revelation.
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 10:04:08 PMWell, no; I'm saying they are still in the process of being saved at a point in time they are not abiding in grace. If our salvation depends at all on us and our ability, then we're all screwed. Once again; His faithfulness, not ours. Do you abide in grace perfectly all the time?
I agree that we can remove ourselves (to a degree) from abiding in grace, but that can only be for a season. You claim to believe in universal salvation, which I am finding increasingly hard to believe in view of your stance on the requirements of salvation.
Doc, which is it? Is someone saved at a point in which they are not abiding in Grace? I know this is a "yes" or "no" question but I have a feeling that your not going to answer "yes" or "no" or maybe you will but include a "but" perhaps. Which is it?
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 05:21:24 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 05:16:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 05:14:33 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 18, 2009, 04:53:07 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on March 18, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
--Heb 10
Tony's reply:
And just where did Paul ever write such as the above to the nations? Where did Paul tell us of the nations that if we willfully sin that God is going to have fiery indignation on us etc? He never did because we are under grace. And Paul wrote that "God hath not appointed us to indignation."
I could answer every one of your points. The problem is you are mixing Paul's writings with the Circumcision writings and causing great confusion.
?
Colossians 3:11
Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.
Molly, if I got a dollar for every time I answered Colossiand 3:11 I'd be a wealthy man.
Please note that Paul said that was the "in Christ" position. And that was in the body of Christ position which is unique to Paul's evangel for us of the nations. The Circumcision believers are the bride of Christ. We of the nations are in the body of Christ.
Also please note that in those same letters by Paul he noted that there is till Circumcision and Uncircumcision, still slaves and free, still male and female in the Lord. So you can't just rip one of Paul's verses out of its context such as "no Circumcision nor Uncircumcision" and expect people to be swayed into believing that there is no difference between Paul's writings and those of the Circumcision.
If you don't understand this I am sorry but I cannot help you. :icon_flower:
Tony, could you start a thread, or point me to some teachings re: "bride of Christ" versus "body of Christ"? I am trying to wrap my head around what u believe, and how you "divide" the bible up to what u believe is written for "nations" versus "physical jews". thanks
Here is an article on: Are we the Bride of the Lamb? http://www.gtft.org/Library/knoch/arewethebride.htm (http://www.gtft.org/Library/knoch/arewethebride.htm)
That's an interesting article Tony. Some things to think about there.
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 11:00:30 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 09:21:06 PM
Well, it isn't that I haven't been paying attention. It seems to be that you were using confusing language that lead me to believe that's what you were saying, if that's not what you were saying.
Perhaps it's putting too fine a point on it, but I believe that our scriptures are telling us we are saved by grace through faith, not by His works through us. I see His works through us as the fruit of His grace and faith given to us.
Doc, why would God be concerned about the works at all? Since obviously, He is as we read in Chapters 2 and 3 of Revelation.
Paul
Probably because that is what we will be judged by, and how rewards and punishments will be meted out. This doesn't affect our ultimate salvation though, which has been the issue in this discussion from the beginning.
I don't believe that you can "lose your salvation" for lack of a better term, but I do believe one can lose out on all or part of one's "destiny", in terms of one's role in Christ and His kingdom.
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 11:05:05 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 10:04:08 PMWell, no; I'm saying they are still in the process of being saved at a point in time they are not abiding in grace. If our salvation depends at all on us and our ability, then we're all screwed. Once again; His faithfulness, not ours. Do you abide in grace perfectly all the time?
I agree that we can remove ourselves (to a degree) from abiding in grace, but that can only be for a season. You claim to believe in universal salvation, which I am finding increasingly hard to believe in view of your stance on the requirements of salvation.
Doc, which is it? Is someone saved at a point in which they are not abiding in Grace? I know this is a "yes" or "no" question but I have a feeling that your not going to answer "yes" or "no" or maybe you will but include a "but" perhaps. Which is it?
Paul
I'm sorry Paul, but the answer is not as simple as a yes or no.
People are much more motivated by love than by fear of punishment (scientific studies say so).
Therefore, we are doing his works because of love for him, not fear of punishment.
In which case, the lack of love will be a lack of works.
John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 18, 2009, 03:52:15 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 02:42:25 PM
Why do you think it is US that is judged according to OUR WORKS in the BODY? If these works are God doing them what need have WE to be judged?
The Father directs and enables, thus we like Jesus can do nothing apart from the Father.
Well, it is US because the work is being done in us and through us. Judging by a loving God is actually a wonderful thing.
QuoteI too am a babe in Christ; howbeit, a babe that knows that if we want to go on to perfection WE must USE/WORK that which the Father has given us less we become unprofitable to His work.
Well, the issue I see is from the belief of all men being saved. I see that it is impossible for any man to remain unprofitable, so how is that possible from your point of view?
Again Paul I am NOT talking about
salvation I am talking about going on to PERFECTION. And I am NOT saying they will remain unprofitable I am saying those that receive the talent and don't USE/WORK it ARE unprofitable. And it is NOT MY VIEW bro it's in the scriptures.
Matthew 25:24-30
24 Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed: 25 And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine. 26 His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed: 27 Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. 28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. 29 For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. 30 And cast ye
the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
These scriptures tell us that if we do not USE the talent given us of God we are UNPROFITABLE servants. Now if we follow the logic that it is God USING the talent does it not then equate that it is God who did NOTHING with the talent; therefore, it is God that then is the one who has become unprofitable?
Quote from: Tony N on March 18, 2009, 04:03:27 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 02:42:25 PM
QuoteI too am a babe in Christ; howbeit, a babe that knows that if we want to go on to perfection WE must USE/WORK that which the Father has given us less we become unprofitable to His work.
pneuma, this is the very thing Paul warned the Galatians against; beginning in spirit and being completed in flesh by doing works. The Galatians thought they could be perfected by works. Paul said they already were.
And your MIXING up the WORKS.
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 04:19:13 PM
Don't know if I am reading everyone's post right or not but it seems some are referring to the flesh and some are referring to the spirit concerning being saved, saved, works and salvation.
I see this as, we are perfect spiritually because of what Christ did but we are not, nor never will be perfect physically because of Adam.
Paul said, we are sitting in Christ in the heavenlies and we have died and was buried with him therefore we are dead to sin and works. Now spiritually that is the case but physically we are sinners because we are flesh.
We will never be perfect while in the flesh but we are now perfect in the spirit because we are in Christ. Paul said to think on things above and not on things on earth, so spiritually we can think of ourselves as being perfect because Christ did everything for us and we need no more works. To say we need to work is saying Christ didn't do his complete job and we have to help him somehow.
CHB
Sis we as His body fill up that which was lacking in Christ, Christ as the HEAD of the BODY did His PART, now it is His BODY's turn to do their PART, for the HEAD CANNOT say to the FEET I HAVE NO NEED OF THEE.
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
That teaching of knoch that Tony puts forth only builds back up the wall that Jesus said He tore down.
If I followed this kind of reasoning then NOTHING Jesus said or did concerns the Gentle for He said He came for only the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL.
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 09:31:25 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 06:12:50 AM
QuoteNot only does God "give the talent", but He is also the one who does it in us (the work). He both works and wills in us to do His good pleasure.
Hi Doc yes God both works and wills IN US, but God does NOT work and will FOR US, which is the meaning you are conveying.
Let me give you an example.
The servant who did not use his talent became unprofitable, correct?
So if it was GOD who WORKED and WILLED this for that servant than it is GOD who became the unprofitable servant.
It looks all fine and dandy to say God worked and willed for the servants who gained more talents because God used the talent to gain more talent, but if you are going to say that for the profitable servant you must also say that of the unprofitable servant. Thus making God unprofitable.
Not necessarily. We don't necessarily get to choose whether we get assigned to be vessels of honor or dishonor. If God working his will in us in choosing some of us as vessels of dishonor seems to us as being unprofitable on His part, then I think that perhaps represents a misunderstanding of how God works all things together according to the counsel of His own will. God will harden whom He will harden, and have mercy on whom he will have mercy. Perhaps the situation is somewhat different for us once we become servants, but I don't know if that parable gives us sufficient evidence to come to that conclusion.
Hi Doc if you use God as the one who works the talent for those and is reponsible you have to make God also the one who is unprofitable you can't change the outcome, if it is God that is profitable it is also God who is unprofitable.
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 11:45:20 PM
I'm sorry Paul, but the answer is not as simple as a yes or no.
Doc, that is all we have to discuss.
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 10:16:11 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 02:42:25 PM
QuoteIt's possible that you missed some of my posts pointing out how I see works. I say that in respect since there are a lot of posts here to go through. If needed I will clarify my position better but basically in a nutshell I do believe Works are required, the difference with my outlook on them is that those works are of God since he makes sure that we meet the criteria for reconciliation.
If they are of us, then that contradicts verses saying it is not out of us and even contradicts Jesus who said he can do nothing apart from the father.
Hi Paul H that what Paul T has been stating all along.
And I agree with it up to a certain age, then God calls US to do His WORK. Yes Jesus said He could do nothing apart from the Father, but that does not mean the Father did the WORKS of Jesus. But Jesus waited until He received power from ON HIGH before He did His works. Jesus received His talent and was a faithful servant.
Its still of God because He's the one who gave the power.
Why do you think it is US that is judged according to OUR WORKS in the BODY? If these works are God doing them what need have WE to be judged?
The Father directs and enables, thus we like Jesus can do nothing apart from the Father.
QuoteEven Jesus said that he did nothing apart from the Father. So I am not refuting works I am trying to get across that those works are not of us. We cannot work our way to perfection, God works us to perfection. This is why when we work and hope for glory for ourselves those works will be burned "Yet we shall be saved"
That scenario make God the unprofitable servant then Paul, If God gives the talent and is the one who does the WORK with the talent then it is God who is unprofitable. And obedience is WORK and obedience is the ONLY way to perfection, so WORKS are indeed our way to perfection. But these WORKS are only preformed by using the talent GOD has given US. I am NOT talking about works we perform after the flesh but the works WE perform after the SPIRIT.
QuoteYou may be missing my point that I have been trying to build up to with all of my posts. I was dispelling the typical religious outlook on works with my story. I grew up being told works was something that I had to do a certain way to avoid hell.
My point was that works was happening in my life despite all the other stuff. I did respond to that love in the way God designed us to react to pure truth
.
No I did not miss your point brother these things happen to all babes in Christ. Where Christ does ALL the work because a babe does NOT nor can they WORK, they need to be feed, changed bathed all by the Father. I am not refuting this aspect Paul I agree with it, but I also see that what a babe receives is different than one who has come to the age of taking over the Fathers business, where the Father gives His sons all the necessary tools and oversees all but gives His sons to run the business.
I know some see me as saying they are babes in Christ as through I thought I was not myself but that is NOT what I am saying. I too am a babe in Christ; howbeit, a babe that knows that if we want to go on to perfection WE must USE/WORK that which the Father has given us less we become unprofitable to His work.
Again Jesus says the Father works and I work, Jesus did not say the Father works for me, He said I work.
God bless
So pneuma; I don't want to try to put words in your mouth here, so I'm going to ask for some clarification. If this post means that you are supporting Paul's (trettep) position, then are you saying that at some point in our spiritual maturity we become responsible for our own salvation, or am I misreading you here?
Your misreading me Doc, I disagree with Paul's (trettep) stance on it being for salvation, I am talking about going on to the PERFECTION of our salvation.
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:18:47 AM
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
That teaching of knoch that Tony puts forth only builds back up the wall that Jesus said He tore down.
If I followed this kind of reasoning then NOTHING Jesus said or did concerns the Gentle for He said He came for only the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL.
Then perhaps the question we need to answer is, "who is Israel".
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:28:36 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 10:16:11 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 18, 2009, 02:42:25 PM
QuoteIt's possible that you missed some of my posts pointing out how I see works. I say that in respect since there are a lot of posts here to go through. If needed I will clarify my position better but basically in a nutshell I do believe Works are required, the difference with my outlook on them is that those works are of God since he makes sure that we meet the criteria for reconciliation.
If they are of us, then that contradicts verses saying it is not out of us and even contradicts Jesus who said he can do nothing apart from the father.
Hi Paul H that what Paul T has been stating all along.
And I agree with it up to a certain age, then God calls US to do His WORK. Yes Jesus said He could do nothing apart from the Father, but that does not mean the Father did the WORKS of Jesus. But Jesus waited until He received power from ON HIGH before He did His works. Jesus received His talent and was a faithful servant.
Its still of God because He's the one who gave the power.
Why do you think it is US that is judged according to OUR WORKS in the BODY? If these works are God doing them what need have WE to be judged?
The Father directs and enables, thus we like Jesus can do nothing apart from the Father.
QuoteEven Jesus said that he did nothing apart from the Father. So I am not refuting works I am trying to get across that those works are not of us. We cannot work our way to perfection, God works us to perfection. This is why when we work and hope for glory for ourselves those works will be burned "Yet we shall be saved"
That scenario make God the unprofitable servant then Paul, If God gives the talent and is the one who does the WORK with the talent then it is God who is unprofitable. And obedience is WORK and obedience is the ONLY way to perfection, so WORKS are indeed our way to perfection. But these WORKS are only preformed by using the talent GOD has given US. I am NOT talking about works we perform after the flesh but the works WE perform after the SPIRIT.
QuoteYou may be missing my point that I have been trying to build up to with all of my posts. I was dispelling the typical religious outlook on works with my story. I grew up being told works was something that I had to do a certain way to avoid hell.
My point was that works was happening in my life despite all the other stuff. I did respond to that love in the way God designed us to react to pure truth
.
No I did not miss your point brother these things happen to all babes in Christ. Where Christ does ALL the work because a babe does NOT nor can they WORK, they need to be feed, changed bathed all by the Father. I am not refuting this aspect Paul I agree with it, but I also see that what a babe receives is different than one who has come to the age of taking over the Fathers business, where the Father gives His sons all the necessary tools and oversees all but gives His sons to run the business.
I know some see me as saying they are babes in Christ as through I thought I was not myself but that is NOT what I am saying. I too am a babe in Christ; howbeit, a babe that knows that if we want to go on to perfection WE must USE/WORK that which the Father has given us less we become unprofitable to His work.
Again Jesus says the Father works and I work, Jesus did not say the Father works for me, He said I work.
God bless
So pneuma; I don't want to try to put words in your mouth here, so I'm going to ask for some clarification. If this post means that you are supporting Paul's (trettep) position, then are you saying that at some point in our spiritual maturity we become responsible for our own salvation, or am I misreading you here?
Your misreading me Doc, I disagree with Paul's (trettep) stance on it being for salvation, I am talking about going on to the PERFECTION of our salvation.
I kind of got that impression after reading another of your posts further up the page. Thanks for clarifying.
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 12:28:55 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:18:47 AM
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
That teaching of knoch that Tony puts forth only builds back up the wall that Jesus said He tore down.
If I followed this kind of reasoning then NOTHING Jesus said or did concerns the Gentle for He said He came for only the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL.
Then perhaps the question we need to answer is, "who is Israel".
That does not really matter Doc as Jesus tore down the wall and Nochs teaching builds it back up.
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 12:27:25 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 18, 2009, 11:45:20 PM
I'm sorry Paul, but the answer is not as simple as a yes or no.
Doc, that is all we have to discuss.
Paul
Er, Ok?
Just to clarify; are you saying that because I'm not willing/ able to answer the question the way you want, you're done discussing it with me?
Most go home as prodigals...unprofitable......
the prodigal squandered his inheritance on harlots and riotous
living....he certainly never increased his Father's interest
the elder son was productive..but still missed out on the
banquet.when the Father rejoiced that his son was alive.
most if not all of us..have been prodigals
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:28:36 AMYour misreading me Doc, I disagree with Paul's (trettep) stance on it being for salvation, I am talking about going on to the PERFECTION of our salvation.
You fell for his twist. I never said that we have a part in our salvation. I believe it is all Christ, and I also believe that once we are saved it is all towards perfection after that. But I do believe we can fall from Grace and not be therefore in a saved state.
Paul
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 12:36:22 AM
Er, Ok?
Just to clarify; are you saying that because I'm not willing/ able to answer the question the way you want, you're done discussing it with me?
Doc, I'm obligated under scripture to avoid those that run contrary to the doctrine delivered. It doesn't mean that there cannot be disagreements. After all if there is no disagreements then there is no edification. But when someone becomes irrational, then I am relieved of my obligation.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:34:52 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 12:28:55 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:18:47 AM
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
That teaching of knoch that Tony puts forth only builds back up the wall that Jesus said He tore down.
If I followed this kind of reasoning then NOTHING Jesus said or did concerns the Gentle for He said He came for only the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL.
Then perhaps the question we need to answer is, "who is Israel".
That does not really matter Doc as Jesus tore down the wall and Nochs teaching builds it back up.
Then perhaps a better question would be: What was the purpose of tearing down the wall between Jew and Gentile that Knoch's teaching re-erects?
The scripture talks about all Israel being saved, but not until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in. So from that perspective, Knoch's view makes some sense to me (I read the article). There may be other problems, but since that teaching is new to me, I haven't had time to think through all the implications.
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 12:39:22 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:28:36 AMYour misreading me Doc, I disagree with Paul's (trettep) stance on it being for salvation, I am talking about going on to the PERFECTION of our salvation.
You fell for his twist. I never said that we have a part in our salvation. I believe it is all Christ, and I also believe that once we are saved it is all towards perfection after that. But I do believe we can fall from Grace and not be therefore in a saved state.
Paul
Well, I don't think it was a "twist". I think it's just a clear indication that I wasn't the only one confused about what you were really saying.
And, I'm still not understanding your reasoning regarding your last sentence above.
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 12:43:20 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 12:36:22 AM
Er, Ok?
Just to clarify; are you saying that because I'm not willing/ able to answer the question the way you want, you're done discussing it with me?
Doc, I'm obligated under scripture to avoid those that run contrary to the doctrine delivered. It doesn't mean that there cannot be disagreements. After all if there is no disagreements then there is no edification. But when someone becomes irrational, then I am relieved of my obligation.
Paul
I see; well, thanks for appointing yourself my judge. I feel very "edified" by that. I'm astounded by your humility.
Doc..you didn't answer yes or no...Jesus said let your yes..mean yes and your no,no anything other than that is from the evil one..He is evidently marking you. as he has several here......he leads out..til he flubs you up and marks you..then cuts off conversation
He does a lot of beating around the bush and says a lot of unclear things. I do wish he would get to the point and
and spit it out. Intrigue,I know has it's purpose,but it also has
it's limits
I disagree with him wholeheartedly on the matter...
I am convinced NOTHING CAN SEPERATE US FROM THE LOVE
OF GOD [which IS GRACE]
Quote from: sheila on March 19, 2009, 01:09:05 AM
Doc..you didn't answer yes or no...Jesus said let your yes..mean yes and your no,no anything other than that is from the evil one..He is evidently marking you. as he has several here......he leads out..til he flubs you up and marks you..then cuts off conversation
He does a lot of beating around the bush and says a lot of unclear things. I do wish he would get to the point and
and spit it out. Intrigue,I know has it's purpose,but it also has
it's limits
I disagree with him wholeheartedly on the matter...
I am convinced NOTHING CAN SEPERATE US FROM THE LOVE
OF GOD [which IS GRACE]
Thanks Sheila. I wasn't trying to be evasive, simply saying the answer (which I had already given) was not that simple.
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 12:43:24 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:34:52 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 12:28:55 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:18:47 AM
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
That teaching of knoch that Tony puts forth only builds back up the wall that Jesus said He tore down.
If I followed this kind of reasoning then NOTHING Jesus said or did concerns the Gentle for He said He came for only the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL.
Then perhaps the question we need to answer is, "who is Israel".
That does not really matter Doc as Jesus tore down the wall and Nochs teaching builds it back up.
Then perhaps a better question would be: What was the purpose of tearing down the wall between Jew and Gentile that Knoch's teaching re-erects?
The scripture talks about all Israel being saved, but not until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in. So from that perspective, Knoch's view makes some sense to me (I read the article). There may be other problems, but since that teaching is new to me, I haven't had time to think through all the implications.
Doc I have read Noch's teachings and disagree with him in this area because if Pauls teaching are not for Israel then they have NOTHING for me for I am of that house. And everyone else who taught in the NT teaching including Jesus' is NOT for the Gentle.
Yes scriptures talk about all Israel being saved, they also talk about all mankind being saved, and even though all Israel is not saved until the fullness of the gentle come in remeber that Israel if they repent can be
grafted back in. BEFORE the fulness of the Gentile come in. Which Noch's teaching will NOT allow because Israel is NOT under grace only the Gentile are.
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:06:22 AM
Again Paul I am NOT talking about salvation I am talking about going on to PERFECTION. And I am NOT saying they will remain unprofitable I am saying those that receive the talent and don't USE/WORK it ARE unprofitable. And it is NOT MY VIEW bro it's in the scriptures.
ok, well we see terms a bit different and thats fine by me, I see salvation as the process as a whole. I see going on to perfection as work within the process.
Yes, we can do unprofitable things, but I go with the whole picture. If I choose to not use the talent, certainly I would be unprofitable, no disagreement there, but I am pointing out what is beyond that
What is it that ultimatly prevents me from "remaining" unprofitable? You may believe that God turns us loose and then it is up to us, that does not explain what will ultimatly prevent us from always making that choice that makes us unprofitable.
It is the promise of God that we ALL will achieve perfection that brings the idea of works into question. It is not terms that I will focus on as that missed the point of scripture.
"Salvation" "moving on to perfection" "Faith" "grace" "works" we can extract any one of those words and make issue after issue case after case, but what is the end result of how it all fits together?
Ok, so works are required and there are verses that indicate as such, there are verses that indicate works are not, but we cannot separate if we believe scriptures do not contradict in important matters.
When someone says "we" have to work, then what is the state of being that we are in when "WE" "HAVE" to work, but none will remain in in the following "forever"? None will remain in a state of not being saved, not moving on to perfection, not having faith, not having grace, not working.
So the question is, how is all that a means to an end? I think that is what is being missed in most of this thread, not by everyone though and some of it is difference of opinion on what salvation is.
Quote
These scriptures tell us that if we do not USE the talent given us of God we are UNPROFITABLE servants. Now if we follow the logic that it is God USING the talent does it not then equate that it is God who did NOTHING with the talent; therefore, it is God that then is the one who has become unprofitable?
Here is a verse that explains the logic I follow.
Ro 9:21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
I do not believe that makes God dishonorable, do you?
So, if God make the lump into a vessel of dishonour, would he make an unprofitable servant?
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 01:13:43 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 12:43:24 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:34:52 AM
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 12:28:55 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:18:47 AM
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
That teaching of knoch that Tony puts forth only builds back up the wall that Jesus said He tore down.
If I followed this kind of reasoning then NOTHING Jesus said or did concerns the Gentle for He said He came for only the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL.
Then perhaps the question we need to answer is, "who is Israel".
That does not really matter Doc as Jesus tore down the wall and Nochs teaching builds it back up.
Then perhaps a better question would be: What was the purpose of tearing down the wall between Jew and Gentile that Knoch's teaching re-erects?
The scripture talks about all Israel being saved, but not until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in. So from that perspective, Knoch's view makes some sense to me (I read the article). There may be other problems, but since that teaching is new to me, I haven't had time to think through all the implications.
Doc I have read Noch's teachings and disagree with him in this area because if Pauls teaching are not for Israel then they have NOTHING for me for I am of that house. And everyone else who taught in the NT teaching including Jesus' is NOT for the Gentle.
Yes scriptures talk about all Israel being saved, they also talk about all mankind being saved, and even though all Israel is not saved until the fullness of the gentle come in remeber that Israel if they repent can be grafted back in. BEFORE the fulness of the Gentile come in. Which Noch's teaching will NOT allow because Israel is NOT under grace only the Gentile are.
Ah, Ok I see the sticking point there.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 01:24:46 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:06:22 AM
Again Paul I am NOT talking about salvation I am talking about going on to PERFECTION. And I am NOT saying they will remain unprofitable I am saying those that receive the talent and don't USE/WORK it ARE unprofitable. And it is NOT MY VIEW bro it's in the scriptures.
ok, well we see terms a bit different and thats fine by me, I see salvation as the process as a whole. I see going on to perfection as work within the process.
Yes, we can do unprofitable things, but I go with the whole picture. If I choose to not use the talent, certainly I would be unprofitable, no disagreement there, but I am pointing out what is beyond that
What is it that ultimatly prevents me from "remaining" unprofitable? You may believe that God turns us loose and then it is up to us, that does not explain what will ultimatly prevent us from always making that choice that makes us unprofitable.
It is the promise of God that we ALL will achieve perfection that brings the idea of works into question. It is not terms that I will focus on as that missed the point of scripture.
"Salvation" "moving on to perfection" "Faith" "grace" "works" we can extract any one of those words and make issue after issue case after case, but what is the end result of how it all fits together?
Ok, so works are required and there are verses that indicate as such, there are verses that indicate works are not, but we cannot separate if we believe scriptures do not contradict in important matters.
When someone says "we" have to work, then what is the state of being that we are in when "WE" "HAVE" to work, but none will remain in in the following "forever"? None will remain in a state of not being saved, not moving on to perfection, not having faith, not having grace, not working.
So the question is, how is all that a means to an end? I think that is what is being missed in most of this thread, not by everyone though and some of it is difference of opinion on what salvation is.
Quote
These scriptures tell us that if we do not USE the talent given us of God we are UNPROFITABLE servants. Now if we follow the logic that it is God USING the talent does it not then equate that it is God who did NOTHING with the talent; therefore, it is God that then is the one who has become unprofitable?
Here is a verse that explains the logic I follow.
Ro 9:21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
I do not believe that makes God dishonorable, do you?
So, if God make the lump into a vessel of dishonour, would he make an unprofitable servant?
Thanks Paul; that was the thought I was trying to express, but couldn't quite get there.
Quote from: sheila on March 19, 2009, 01:09:05 AM
I am convinced NOTHING CAN SEPERATE US FROM THE LOVE
OF GOD [which IS GRACE]
Now here is where I start to question, not you; but what grace is
I agree, nothing separates us from the LOVE of God, and LOVE never fails; so LOVE saves all. But, imo; grace is accessed only through faith, and faith is a gift, that sons receive. Grace teaches us to live godly lives, it chastens us; and we are told that only believers are chastened, as sons.
Bastards are not chastened.
Grace, imo; is the gift to believers that continues them on through faith to the resurrection of life.
I dont' see grace and love as the same thing.
Every man woman and child is spiritual ISRAEL IN THE END
all Israel[mankind] will be saved..all will be the incorruptible
sons and daughters of God.
those that receive a prophet receives a prophets reward
if all the nations be blessed through Israel..then all the
nations receive Israel's reward..to become sons and daughters
Quote from: sheila on March 19, 2009, 01:30:26 AM
Every man woman and child is spiritual ISRAEL IN THE END
all Israel[mankind] will be saved..all will be the incorruptible
sons and daughters of God.
those that receive a prophet receives a prophets reward
if all the nations be blessed through Israel..then all the
nations receive Israel's reward..to become sons and daughters
Jer 23:40 And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten.
Quote from: Zeek on March 19, 2009, 01:29:22 AM
Quote from: sheila on March 19, 2009, 01:09:05 AM
I am convinced NOTHING CAN SEPERATE US FROM THE LOVE
OF GOD [which IS GRACE]
Now here is where I start to question, not you; but what grace is
I agree, nothing separates us from the LOVE of God, and LOVE never fails; so LOVE saves all. But, imo; grace is accessed only through faith, and faith is a gift, that sons receive. Grace teaches us to live godly lives, it chastens us; and we are told that only believers are chastened, as sons.
Bastards are not chastened.
Grace, imo; is the gift to believers that continues them on through faith to the resurrection of life.
I dont' see grace and love as the same thing.
How I see it personally, is that grace is unmerited favor, which is an aspect of unconditional love.
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 01:35:41 AM
Quote from: Zeek on March 19, 2009, 01:29:22 AM
Quote from: sheila on March 19, 2009, 01:09:05 AM
I am convinced NOTHING CAN SEPERATE US FROM THE LOVE
OF GOD [which IS GRACE]
Now here is where I start to question, not you; but what grace is
I agree, nothing separates us from the LOVE of God, and LOVE never fails; so LOVE saves all. But, imo; grace is accessed only through faith, and faith is a gift, that sons receive. Grace teaches us to live godly lives, it chastens us; and we are told that only believers are chastened, as sons.
Bastards are not chastened.
Grace, imo; is the gift to believers that continues them on through faith to the resurrection of life.
I dont' see grace and love as the same thing.
How I see it personally, is that grace is unmerited favor, which is an aspect of unconditional love.
It's the unmerited favor bestowed upon those chosen as vessels of honor isnt' it? Where are we told unmerited favor is bestowed upon vessels of dishonor?
Quote from: Doc on March 19, 2009, 01:35:41 AM
Quote from: Zeek on March 19, 2009, 01:29:22 AM
Quote from: sheila on March 19, 2009, 01:09:05 AM
I am convinced NOTHING CAN SEPERATE US FROM THE LOVE
OF GOD [which IS GRACE]
Now here is where I start to question, not you; but what grace is
I agree, nothing separates us from the LOVE of God, and LOVE never fails; so LOVE saves all. But, imo; grace is accessed only through faith, and faith is a gift, that sons receive. Grace teaches us to live godly lives, it chastens us; and we are told that only believers are chastened, as sons.
Bastards are not chastened.
Grace, imo; is the gift to believers that continues them on through faith to the resurrection of life.
I dont' see grace and love as the same thing.
How I see it personally, is that grace is unmerited favor, which is an aspect of unconditional love.
Truthfully, though; it's not something i should contend over with; because we both believe LOVE never fails.
I just in my personal studies, have been led to look really at what grace does (the verb).
grace- favour or kindness,goodwill
Luke 2;14 Glory to God in the Highest,and on earth,
peace and goodwill toward men
Hi Zeek, I see the HOLY SPIRIT as given to beleivers..
a 'helper and comfortor'
it is written in the last days he will pour out his spirit on all
flesh
sanctification is a whole other deal to me..than a state of
grace..such as God makes his sun to shine on the wicked and
righteous...this is grace...love your enemies..be gracious to
them
when others had spoken of spiritual works...I see that as
sanctification through the Holy spirit..which is a setting apart
for Gods usage...it is Father who decides who these are..for
it does not depend on who desires or wills but on God who
does the choosing...and we are told that he will pour out his
spirit on all flesh..so all will be sanctified to Him,eventually
Quote from: sheila on March 19, 2009, 01:47:05 AM
grace- favour or kindness,goodwill
Luke 2;14 Glory to God in the Highest,and on earth,
peace and goodwill toward men
Hi Zeek, I see the HOLY SPIRIT as given to beleivers..
a 'helper and comfortor'
it is written in the last days he will pour out his spirit on all
flesh
sanctification is a whole other deal to me..than a state of
grace..such as God makes his sun to shine on the wicked and
righteous...this is grace...love your enemies..be gracious to
them
when others had spoken of spiritual works...I see that as
sanctification through the Holy spirit..which is a setting apart
for Gods usage...it is Father who decides who these are..for
it does not depend on who desires or wills but on God who
does the choosing...and we are told that he will pour out his
spirit on all flesh..so all will be sanctified to Him,eventually
:HeartThrob: :HeartThrob:
thank u for your post.
more for me to think about.
How does one receive the Holy Spirit?? by grace through faith.
that's what i am seeing.
blessings
z
QuoteWhat is it that ultimatly prevents me from "remaining" unprofitable? You may believe that God turns us loose and then it is up to us, that does not explain what will ultimatly prevent us from always making that choice that makes us unprofitable.
No I don't believe that bro. God will always work with babes until they can eat the meat.
QuoteIt is the promise of God that we ALL will achieve perfection that brings the idea of works into question. It is not terms that I will focus on as that missed the point of scripture.
I agree all will eventually reach perfection also, but they won't reach it until they are in perfect obedience to the Father. Thus they MUST learn to USE their talent.
Quote"Salvation" "moving on to perfection" "Faith" "grace" "works" we can extract any one of those words and make issue after issue case after case, but what is the end result of how it all fits together?
One word
Obedience
QuoteOk, so works are required and there are verses that indicate as such, there are verses that indicate works are not, but we cannot separate if we believe scriptures do not contradict in important matters.
Two different WORK being spoken of bro.
QuoteWhen someone says "we" have to work, then what is the state of being that we are in when "WE" "HAVE" to work, but none will remain in in the following "forever"? None will remain in a state of not being saved, not moving on to perfection, not having faith, not having grace, not working.
So the question is, how is all that a means to an end? I think that is what is being missed in most of this thread, not by everyone though and some of it is difference of opinion on what salvation is.
But I AM NOT talking about SALVATION(others may be but not I)(speak to what I am saying not what others have said), I am talking about obedience which is a work.
Surely none here believe we can be made perfect while still in disobedience?
And remember what I said to Molly earlier if God says do NOTHING, then doing NOTHING is still a work of obedience.
So if any feel God has told them to do NOTHING then do NOTHING, but KNOW that doing NOTHING is still a WORK YOU perform in obedience.
That why we can't judge another fruits, for if I judge others based on the work God told me to do but told another to do NOTHING I am in grave error of judgment.
All I have been pointing out is that WORKS are required to go on to perfection, I have NOT said anything about WORKS in regards to salvation.
QuoteHere is a verse that explains the logic I follow.
Ro 9:21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
I do not believe that makes God dishonorable, do you?
So, if God make the lump into a vessel of dishonour, would he make an unprofitable servant?
I just posted something about the Potter and His clay Bro so if you read that it might help.
grace:
G5485
χάρις
charis
khar'-ece
From G5463; graciousness (as gratifying), of manner or act (abstract or concrete; literal, figurative or spiritual; especially the divine influence upon the heart, and its reflection in the life; including gratitude): - acceptable, benefit, favour, gift, grace (-ious), joy liberality, pleasure, thank (-s, -worthy).
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 12:18:47 AM
Quote from: CHB on March 18, 2009, 05:48:59 PM
I am with Tony on this circumcision and non circumcision, Bride and Body thing. We may see it a little different I don't know? All of the apostles taught New Covenant teaching. It is only in two or three of Paul's writings that this isn't the case. If you read all of the epistles with this thought in mind you can see the difference. Always ask yourself, who is it addressed to. Who, what, where, when, is the key. I do believe most of the epistles were to the Israelites, that is who Jesus told them to go to.
CHB
That teaching of knoch that Tony puts forth only builds back up the wall that Jesus said He tore down.
If I followed this kind of reasoning then NOTHING Jesus said or did concerns the Gentle for He said He came for only the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL.
Dear pneuma, I just had a good belly laugh out of what you just said above. I can't believe you said that especially when Knoch always taught that the body of Christ breaks down all barriers between Jew and Gentile by placing both in the body and both are on equal standing now rather than the way it was before which was: "To the Jew first and the Greek as well" (Romans 1:16, 2:9, 2:10). So the barrier has been torn down.
Of course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel. Peter, James and John and all those 12,000 Jewish believers all inherently zealous for the law are not joined with the Gentiles in the body of Christ. They are in the bride of Christ and have an earthly destiny while the body of Christ has a heavenly destiny.
Jesus said: "Now He, answering, said, "I was not commissioned except for the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Mat 15:24).
This does not mean He did not die for all mankind.
Jesus told His disciples:
Mat 10:5-6 These twelve Jesus commissions, charging them, saying, "Into a road of the nations you may not pass forth, and
into a city of the Samaritans you may not be entering." (6)
Yet be going rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
But Jesus commissioned Paul to go to the Gentiles.
Thanks for the good laugh anyway. LOL!
Quote from: Zeek on March 19, 2009, 03:18:23 AM
grace:
G5485
χάρις
charis
khar'-ece
From G5463; graciousness (as gratifying), of manner or act (abstract or concrete; literal, figurative or spiritual; especially the divine influence upon the heart, and its reflection in the life; including gratitude): - acceptable, benefit, favour, gift, grace (-ious), joy liberality, pleasure, thank (-s, -worthy).
I have found the definition of "Approval" to be the best that I have seen yet as it does seem to sort out some confusion.
Paul
Quote
So if any feel God has told them to do NOTHING then do NOTHING, but KNOW that doing NOTHING is still a WORK YOU perform in obedience.
That why we can't judge another fruits, for if I judge others based on the work God told me to do but told another to do NOTHING I am in grave error of judgment.
Yep, thats basically what I have been saying, we will have to disagree on some of the other points as scripture fits my life in what I observe in myself differently than it does you.
God works all things, when we "learn" and through that we are "obedient" we are not "on our own" we become in harmony with God, the connection is not broken to where we have to go it alone to be perfect, the connection is made "permanent".
But we do not get there without God "working" it to enable us to understand the connection to Him.
Quote from: trettep on March 18, 2009, 11:05:05 PM
Doc, which is it? Is someone saved at a point in which they are not abiding in Grace? I know this is a "yes" or "no" question but I have a feeling that your not going to answer "yes" or "no" or maybe you will but include a "but" perhaps. Which is it?
Paul
I'm not Doc and am not answering for Doc. The Galatians fell out of Grace, yet look at these wonderful things still said of them:
Even though they had fallen out of Grace, God and Jesus still shower them with the greetings of grace and peace:
Gal 1:3 Grace to you and peace from God, our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ,
(Gal 6:18) The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit,
brethren! Amen!"
Even though they fell out of grace Paul still recognized them as brothers in Christ:
(Gal 1:11) For I am making known to you,
brethren, as to the evangel which is being brought by me, that it is not in accord with man."
(Gal 4:12) Become as I, for I am even as you,
brethren, I beseech you. In nothing do you injure me."
(Gal 4:28) Now you,
brethren, as Isaac, are children of promise."
(Gal 4:31) Wherefore,
brethren, we are not children of the maid, but of the free woman."
(Gal 5:11) Now I,
brethren, if I am still heralding circumcision, why am I still being persecuted? Consequently the snare of the cross of Christ has been nullified."
(Gal 5:13) For you were called for freedom,
brethren, only use not the freedom for an incentive to the flesh, but through love be slaving for one another."
(Gal 6:18) The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit,
brethren! Amen!"
Paul says they are still his children:
Gal 4:19
Little children mine, with whom I am travailing again until Christ may be formed in you!"
If they had lost their salvation, why would Paul travail until Christ was formed in them?
Yes, a person is still saved when they are not abiding in grace.
QuoteOf course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel.
Well glad you had a good laugh Tony, but of course you must be mistaken that some Jews beleived Pauls evangel for according to you Pauls teaching does not apply to the Jews.
You can't have it both ways Tony, either it applies to the Jews and Gentiles or it does not. Go figure
Here is a good verse that puts works into perspective:
Jas 2:24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
I bolded the word "justified" here because justified means to be innocent. This verse is a reference to the example of Abraham. James is telling us that by works a man is made innocent and not by Faith only. So again, this is even another scripture that refutes this notion that someone can be saved without doing His works.
If we say we have faith then we are still GUILTY until we have works to become innocent. Now, I know there are those that will say that James was talking to the Israelites. Consider for a moment that here James is specifically giving the example of Abraham. The Apostles Paul also gave example of Abraham when discussing works. So how can they both be right? - the answer is that Paul spoke of Abraham's works (according to the flesh) whereas James is speaking of the works of Faith (according to Christ).
James and Paul both preach that innocence comes via works:
Rom 2:13 (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 05:28:25 AM
Quote
So if any feel God has told them to do NOTHING then do NOTHING, but KNOW that doing NOTHING is still a WORK YOU perform in obedience.
That why we can't judge another fruits, for if I judge others based on the work God told me to do but told another to do NOTHING I am in grave error of judgment.
Yep, thats basically what I have been saying, we will have to disagree on some of the other points as scripture fits my life in what I observe in myself differently than it does you.
God works all things, when we "learn" and through that we are "obedient" we are not "on our own" we become in harmony with God, the connection is not broken to where we have to go it alone to be perfect, the connection is made "permanent".
But we do not get there without God "working" it to enable us to understand the connection to Him.
Well then we are not as that far apart bro as it first seemed.
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 03:36:52 PM
QuoteOf course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel.
Well glad you had a good laugh Tony, but of course you must be mistaken that some Jews beleived Pauls evangel for according to you Pauls teaching does not apply to the Jews.
You can't have it both ways Tony, either it applies to the Jews and Gentiles or it does not. Go figure
Not true. Some Jews did come over to Paul's evangel. Paul himself was a Jew and believed the evangel of the Uncircumcision with a heavenly allotment whereas Peter James and John's evangel has an earthly allotment.
But under Paul's evangel of the body of Christ the central barrier has been broken down between Jew and Gentile and in that body both Jew and Gentile are on an equality.
Paul went to the nations with the Uncircumcision's evangel. Peter, James and John told him that was cool in Galatians 2. And Peter, James and John said they would be for the Circumcision. But this would not forbid a Circumcision Jew from leaving that paradigm and entering into Paul's.
The reason why the scriptures APPEAR to contradict one another is simple. Some are addressing the sinner and those scriptures bring death. Others are addressing the new creature in Christ and they speak life. That's why we have this constant works vs. grace vs. faith vs. free will discussion going - because there are 2 of us in each one of us - one that is perishing, the other that is being renewed inwardly. That's the way I see it.
Anne
Exactly! Anne.
thanks so much for this post.
Sheila
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 03:37:05 PM
James and Paul both preach that innocence comes via works:
Rom 2:13 (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
Paul
But it begs the question: Are there any doers of the law who shall be justified? The apostle Paul says there are not:
"because,
by works of law, no flesh at all shall be justified in His sight, for through law is the recognition of sin" (Rom 3:20).
Your problem, Paul, is that you continue to isolate verses which seem to support your paradigm when, in fact, if you looked at more verses your position is shown to be untennable.
The apostle Paul and James do not go together. They do not agree.
Quote from: Raggedy Anne on March 19, 2009, 03:59:02 PM
The reason why the scriptures APPEAR to contradict one another is simple. Some are addressing the sinner and those scriptures bring death. Others are addressing the new creature in Christ and they speak life. That's why we have this constant works vs. grace vs. faith vs. free will discussion going - because there are 2 of us in each one of us - one that is perishing, the other that is being renewed inwardly. That's the way I see it.
Anne
:cloud9: :thumbsup:
Quote from: Raggedy Anne on March 19, 2009, 03:59:02 PM
The reason why the scriptures APPEAR to contradict one another is simple. Some are addressing the sinner and those scriptures bring death. Others are addressing the new creature in Christ and they speak life. That's why we have this constant works vs. grace vs. faith vs. free will discussion going - because there are 2 of us in each one of us - one that is perishing, the other that is being renewed inwardly. That's the way I see it.
Anne
nice! :nod: :wink1:
Quote from: Raggedy Anne on March 19, 2009, 03:59:02 PM
The reason why the scriptures APPEAR to contradict one another is simple. Some are addressing the sinner and those scriptures bring death. Others are addressing the new creature in Christ and they speak life. That's why we have this constant works vs. grace vs. faith vs. free will discussion going - because there are 2 of us in each one of us - one that is perishing, the other that is being renewed inwardly. That's the way I see it.
Anne
Actually, Anne, the problem comes down to correctly cutting the word of truth.
The contradiction comes about when someone tries to wed Paul's evangel with what James wrote to the 12 tribes of Israel in the dispersion, or with what Jesus told the Circumcision. You can't marry Grace with Works under Paul's evangel. It is a form of adultery!
But we spurn the hidden things of shame, not walking in craftiness,
nor yet adulterating the word of God, but, by manifestation of the truth, commending ourselves to every man's conscience in God's sight." 2Cor 4:2
Hey Tony,
1Corinthians 7;17 Nevertheless,each one should retain
the place in life that the Lord assigned to him,and to which
God has called him. This is the rule I lay down in all the
churches. Was a man already circumcized when he was called?
He should not become uncircumcized. Was a man
uncircumcized when he was called? He should not be circumcized
Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing,
keeping God's command is what counts.Each one should remain
in the situation he was in when God called him.Were you a
slave when you were called?Don't let it trouble you-although if
you can gain your freedom,do so..........
you were bought at a price,do not become slaves of men
I take that as being judged by another man's conscience..
of which some of the jews were trying to impose aspects of
the old law covenant on the Gentiles[their conscience felt
disapproval of some of the Gentiles that ate..etc..what the old
law covenant forbid as unclean] The Holy spirit declared that
Gentiles were to abstain from food sacrificed to idols,from
blood,from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual
immorality.
The Holy spirit's work is to 'sanctify' the beleiver..lead in
worship with spirit and truth..help guide us to first KNOW
what the will of God is and truth is ,and to walk in it.
the Holy spirit told Paul that the jews would not accept his
testimony...and sent him to the gentiles...this was a 'work'
of the Holy spirit for Paul to testify or be a wittness to the
Gentiles Ephesian 4;12...to prepare God's people for works of
service,so that the body of Christ may be built up, until we
all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of
God and BECOME MATURE, attaining to the whole measure of
the fullness of Christ Ephesian 2;8 For it is by grace you have
been saved through faith- and this NOT from yourselves,it is
the gift of God-NOT BY WORKS so that no one can boast.
For we are God's workmanship..
I think of Paul addressing
the superfine apostle's here 2Cor 11;16 in this self-confident
talking here I am not speaking as the LORD WOULD but as a
FOOL,so that I may do a little boasting....you gladly put up with
fools since you are so wise.In fact you even put up with anyone
who enslaves you or exploits you or takes advantage of you or
pushes himself forward or slaps you in the face.
CREATED IN CHRIST JESUS
TO DO GOOD WORKS,WHICH GOD PREPARED IN ADVANCE
FOR US TO DO
Ephesians 2;15 For he himself is our peace who has made the
two ONE and has destroyed the barrier,the dividing wall of
hostility,by abolishing in his flesh the law with it's
commandment and regulations. His PURPOSE WAS TO CREATE
IN HIMSELF ONE NEW MAN OUT OF THE TWO, THUS MAKING
PEACE, and IN THIS ONE BODY TO RECONCILE BOTH OF THEM
TO GOD THROUGH THE CROSS,BY WHICH HE PUT TO DEATH
THEIR HOSTILITY
these works are not our slavation..they are only service to the
one who saved us...to help HIM INCREASE
having beleived..you were marked in him with a seal,
the PROMISED HOLY SPIRIT WHO IS A DEPOSIT
GUARANTEEING OUR INHERITANCE
UNTIL THE REDEMPTION OF THOSE WHO ARE GOD'S
POSSESSION- TO THE PRAISE OF HIS GLORY
Now Jesus said..'the night comes when no man can work'
and there is a time..when they will not put up with the
helpful teachings...and also..all the virgins slept....
and there is a time when all prophecies will cease,Knowledge
will pass away.where there are tongues they will be stilled
For we know in part and pophecy in part but when perfection
comes..the imperfect disappears.When I was a child I talked
like a child,I thought like a child I reasoned like a child
when I become a man I put childish ways behind me
Now we see but as a poor reflection in a mirror,then we shall
see face to faceNow I know in part,then I shall know fully
even as I am fully known And now,these three remain FAITH
HOPE AND LOVE BUT THE GREATEST OF THESE IS LOVE,
lNone of us should 'boast' in any work that the Holy spirit may
have us do in the way of service..and OUR SALVATION IS NOT
NOR WILL EVER BE OF THESE WORKS BUT OF GRACE
dang does this mean i need to stay single? :megashock:
Quote from: Sheilauntil we
all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of
God and BECOME MATURE, attaining to the whole measure of
the fullness of Christ Ephesian 2;8
14That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
15But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:
16From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.--Eph 4
Philippians 2:5
Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
:dontknow: Chuc,
it is written..those who marry will have tribulation[trouble]
in the flesh. :mshock: Paul feels that we are happier if we remain single.
Some due to prevalence of fornication it is betterfor them to
marry. :mblush:..some
are fine in singleness and some are better off married. :dontknow:
we are not to push our personal choices on others
in this matter. :2c:
at one time I actually was a member of a very legalistic religion that DID this very thing..some of the congregation actually 'marked' those who did marry..they felt they were in the last days and they should have not married so they could have 'served' GOD[?] better...when in reality their ministry
wasn't set up to accomadate 'couples' as they did not want
to or accomadate any children ,also.
Go figure :sigh: they just wanted to enslave them to their will
Sheila
Quote from: sheila on March 19, 2009, 06:30:35 PM
Hey Tony,
1Corinthians 7;17 Nevertheless,each one should retain
the place in life that the Lord assigned to him,and to which
God has called him. This is the rule I lay down in all the
churches. Was a man already circumcized when he was called?
He should not become uncircumcized. Was a man
uncircumcized when he was called? He should not be circumcized
Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing,
keeping God's command is what counts.Each one should remain
in the situation he was in when God called him.Were you a
slave when you were called?Don't let it trouble you-although if
you can gain your freedom,do so..........
you were bought at a price,do not become slaves of men
I take that as being judged by another man's conscience..
of which some of the jews were trying to impose aspects of
the old law covenant on the Gentiles[their conscience felt
disapproval of some of the Gentiles that ate..etc..what the old
law covenant forbid as unclean] The Holy spirit declared that
Gentiles were to abstain from food sacrificed to idols,from
blood,from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual
immorality.
The Holy spirit's work is to 'sanctify' the beleiver..lead in
worship with spirit and truth..help guide us to first KNOW
what the will of God is and truth is ,and to walk in it.
the Holy spirit told Paul that the jews would not accept his
testimony...and sent him to the gentiles...this was a 'work'
of the Holy spirit for Paul to testify or be a wittness to the
Gentiles Ephesian 4;12...to prepare God's people for works of
service,so that the body of Christ may be built up, until we
all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of
God and BECOME MATURE, attaining to the whole measure of
the fullness of Christ Ephesian 2;8 For it is by grace you have
been saved through faith- and this NOT from yourselves,it is
the gift of God-NOT BY WORKS so that no one can boast.
For we are God's workmanship..
I think of Paul addressing
the superfine apostle's here 2Cor 11;16 in this self-confident
talking here I am not speaking as the LORD WOULD but as a
FOOL,so that I may do a little boasting....you gladly put up with
fools since you are so wise.In fact you even put up with anyone
who enslaves you or exploits you or takes advantage of you or
pushes himself forward or slaps you in the face.
CREATED IN CHRIST JESUS
TO DO GOOD WORKS,WHICH GOD PREPARED IN ADVANCE
FOR US TO DO
Ephesians 2;15 For he himself is our peace who has made the
two ONE and has destroyed the barrier,the dividing wall of
hostility,by abolishing in his flesh the law with it's
commandment and regulations. His PURPOSE WAS TO CREATE
IN HIMSELF ONE NEW MAN OUT OF THE TWO, THUS MAKING
PEACE, and IN THIS ONE BODY TO RECONCILE BOTH OF THEM
TO GOD THROUGH THE CROSS,BY WHICH HE PUT TO DEATH
THEIR HOSTILITY
these works are not our slavation..they are only service to the
one who saved us...to help HIM INCREASE
having beleived..you were marked in him with a seal,
the PROMISED HOLY SPIRIT WHO IS A DEPOSIT
GUARANTEEING OUR INHERITANCE
UNTIL THE REDEMPTION OF THOSE WHO ARE GOD'S
POSSESSION- TO THE PRAISE OF HIS GLORY
Now Jesus said..'the night comes when no man can work'
and there is a time..when they will not put up with the
helpful teachings...and also..all the virgins slept....
and there is a time when all prophecies will cease,Knowledge
will pass away.where there are tongues they will be stilled
For we know in part and pophecy in part but when perfection
comes..the imperfect disappears.When I was a child I talked
like a child,I thought like a child I reasoned like a child
when I become a man I put childish ways behind me
Now we see but as a poor reflection in a mirror,then we shall
see face to faceNow I know in part,then I shall know fully
even as I am fully known And now,these three remain FAITH
HOPE AND LOVE BUT THE GREATEST OF THESE IS LOVE,
lNone of us should 'boast' in any work that the Holy spirit may
have us do in the way of service..and OUR SALVATION IS NOT
NOR WILL EVER BE OF THESE WORKS BUT OF GRACE
Thanks Sheila for the good thoughts. I especially liked how you ended your post!
I know you quoted this:
1Corinthians 7;17 Nevertheless,each one should retain
the place in life that the Lord assigned to him,and to which
God has called him. This is the rule I lay down in all the
churches. Was a man already circumcized when he was called?
He should not become uncircumcized. Was a man
uncircumcized when he was called? He should not be circumcized
Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing,
keeping God's command is what counts.Some here might think that since Paul wrote that that Circumcision has no place in God's counsels. However Paul asks the question:
Rom 3:1-3 What, then, is the prerogative of the Jew,
or what the benefit of circumcision? (2)
Much in every manner. For first, indeed, that they were entrusted with the oracles of God." (3) For what if some disbelieve? Will not their unbelief nullify the faithfulness of God?
So it all depends upon which group is being addressed.
For instance, in the Corinthian scripture you quoted it was addressed to the Uncircumcision that the act of circumcision or uncircumcision is nothing. This is so for us of the nations. Neither being circumcised or uncircumcised gives us any standing with God. But in Romans 3:1-3 it is a wholly different matter for the Circumcision.
Today's body of Christ is filled with uncircumcised Gentiles and circumcised Jews and each are on equal footing.
Under the paradigm of the Jews such as Peter, James and John, circumcision is first (to the Jew first) and the proselyte Gentiles who come under their jurisdiction are not on equal footing to them.
Peace,
Tony
Hi Tony;
Thanks for adding Romans 3;1-3 I think that further clarifies
it. :thumbsup:
I have a visit oot, so will see you guys later tonite.
Sheila
1What good is it to be a Jew? What good is it to be circumcised? 2It is good in a lot of ways! First of all, God's messages were spoken to the Jews. 3It is true that some of them did not believe the message. But does this mean that God cannot be trusted, just because they did not have faith? 4No, indeed! God tells the truth, even if everyone else is a liar. The Scriptures say about God,
"Your words
will be proven true,
and in court
you will win your case."
5If our evil deeds show how right God is, then what can we say? Is it wrong for God to become angry and punish us? What a foolish thing to ask. 6But the answer is, "No." Otherwise, how could God judge the world? 7Since your lies bring great honor to God by showing how truthful he is, you may ask why God still says you are a sinner. 8You might as well say, "Let's do something evil, so that something good will come of it!" Some people even claim that we are saying this. But God is fair and will judge them as well.
No One Is Good
9What does all this mean? Does it mean that we Jews are better off than the Gentiles? No, it doesn't! Jews, as well as Gentiles, are ruled by sin, just as I have said. 10The Scriptures tell us, "No one is acceptable to God!
11Not one of them understands
or even searches for God.
12They have all turned away
and are worthless.
There isn't one person
who does right.
13Their words are like
an open pit,
and their tongues are good
only for telling lies.
Each word is as deadly
as the fangs of a snake,
14and they say nothing
but bitter curses.
15These people quickly
become violent.
16Wherever they go,
they leave ruin
and destruction.
17They don't know how
to live in peace.
18They don't even fear God."
19We know that everything in the Law was written for those who are under its power. The Law says these things to stop anyone from making excuses and to let God show that the whole world is guilty. 20God doesn't accept people simply because they obey the Law. No, indeed! All the Law does is to point out our sin.
God's Way of Accepting People
21Now we see how God does make us acceptable to him. The Law and the Prophets tell how we become acceptable, and it isn't by obeying the Law of Moses. 22God treats everyone alike. He accepts people only because they have faith in Jesus Christ. 23All of us have sinned and fallen short of God's glory. 24But God treats us much better than we deserve, and because of Christ Jesus, he freely accepts us and sets us free from our sins. 25-26God sent Christ to be our sacrifice. Christ offered his life's blood, so that by faith in him we could come to God. And God did this to show that in the past he was right to be patient and forgive sinners. This also shows that God is right when he accepts people who have faith in Jesus. 27What is left for us to brag about? Not a thing! Is it because we obeyed some law? No! It is because of faith. 28We see that people are acceptable to God because they have faith, and not because they obey the Law. 29Does God belong only to the Jews? Isn't he also the God of the Gentiles? Yes, he is! 30There is only one God, and he accepts Gentiles as well as Jews, simply because of their faith. 31Do we destroy the Law by our faith? Not at all! We make it even more powerful.
--Romans 3
Seems to me, the message in Romans 3 is the same to both the Jews and the Gentiles, namely:
20Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
21But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;
22Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
23For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
24Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
25Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
26To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
--Rom 3
Hi Molly, you wrote:
28We see that people are acceptable to God because they have faith, and not because they obey the Law. 29Does God belong only to the Jews? Isn't he also the God of the Gentiles? Yes, he is! 30There is only one God, and he accepts Gentiles as well as Jews, simply because of their faith. 31Do we destroy the Law by our faith? Not at all! We make it even more powerful.
Rom 3:28-31 Of works? No! But through faith's law. For we are reckoning a man to be justified by faith apart from works of law. (29) Or is He the God of the Jews only? Is He not of the nations also? (30) Yes, of the nations also, if so be that God is One, Who will be justifying the Circumcision out of faith and the Uncircumcision through faith." (31) Are we, then, nullifying law through faith? May it not be coming to that! Nay, we are sustaining law."
God justifies the Circumcision out of faith
God justifies the Uncircumcision through faith
The Circumcision group absolutely must endure to the end to be saved:
Mat 24:13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.
We of the nations, the Uncircumcision are saved whether we endure or not.
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 08:14:37 PM
Hi Molly, you wrote:
28We see that people are acceptable to God because they have faith, and not because they obey the Law. 29Does God belong only to the Jews? Isn't he also the God of the Gentiles? Yes, he is! 30There is only one God, and he accepts Gentiles as well as Jews, simply because of their faith. 31Do we destroy the Law by our faith? Not at all! We make it even more powerful.
Rom 3:28-31 Of works? No! But through faith's law. For we are reckoning a man to be justified by faith apart from works of law. (29) Or is He the God of the Jews only? Is He not of the nations also? (30) Yes, of the nations also, if so be that God is One, Who will be justifying the Circumcision out of faith and the Uncircumcision through faith." (31) Are we, then, nullifying law through faith? May it not be coming to that! Nay, we are sustaining law."
God justifies the Circumcision out of faith
God justifies the Uncircumcision through faith
The Circumcision group absolutely must endure to the end to be saved:
Mat 24:13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.
We of the nations, the Uncircumcision are saved whether we endure or not.
What does that mean?
Quote from: Molly on March 19, 2009, 07:54:06 PM
Seems to me, the message in Romans 3 is the same to both the Jews and the Gentiles, namely:
20Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
21But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;
22Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
23For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
24Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
25Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
26To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
--Rom 3
Hi Molly, did you see this one:
Rom 2:10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that
worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:
Rom 2:11 For there is no respect of persons with God.
See Paul is telling us that Glory and Honour are to those that work Good works whether or not they are
Greek or Jew.
Paul
Rom 3:30 Because there is, one God, who justifieth the circumcision by faith, and the uncircumcision by the same faith.
Paul
Still stuck on the obsession of works I see . . .
If Christ is in you . . .his works manifest through you . . .if he's not . .they don't. And if "you" aren't seeing your standard of what those works are to be manifesting in my life . . .then what? Are you going to pull me aside and explain to me that you don't see any works? Am I supposed to conjure up some works to make you feel better? What's the purpose of you having to see my works?
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 04:32:07 PM
Quote from: Raggedy Anne on March 19, 2009, 03:59:02 PM
The reason why the scriptures APPEAR to contradict one another is simple. Some are addressing the sinner and those scriptures bring death. Others are addressing the new creature in Christ and they speak life. That's why we have this constant works vs. grace vs. faith vs. free will discussion going - because there are 2 of us in each one of us - one that is perishing, the other that is being renewed inwardly. That's the way I see it.
Anne
Actually, Anne, the problem comes down to correctly cutting the word of truth.
The contradiction comes about when someone tries to wed Paul's evangel with what James wrote to the 12 tribes of Israel in the dispersion, or with what Jesus told the Circumcision. You can't marry Grace with Works under Paul's evangel. It is a form of adultery!
But we spurn the hidden things of shame, not walking in craftiness, nor yet adulterating the word of God, but, by manifestation of the truth, commending ourselves to every man's conscience in God's sight." 2Cor 4:2
Actually, I can see validity in both Anne's and Tony's observations. They just speak from different modes of understanding.
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 08:38:21 PM
Still stuck on the obsession of works I see . . .
If Christ is in you . . .his works manifest through you . . .if he's not . .they don't. And if "you" aren't seeing your standard of what those works are to be manifesting in my life . . .then what? Are you going to pull me aside and explain to me that you don't see any works? Am I supposed to conjure up some works to make you feel better? What's the purpose of you having to see my works?
Yes, I'm still stuck on the obsession of
His works! If Christ is in you then there is no quesiton you will have His works. You can't have Christ and have no works. It isn't possible.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 08:46:18 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 08:38:21 PM
Still stuck on the obsession of works I see . . .
If Christ is in you . . .his works manifest through you . . .if he's not . .they don't. And if "you" aren't seeing your standard of what those works are to be manifesting in my life . . .then what? Are you going to pull me aside and explain to me that you don't see any works? Am I supposed to conjure up some works to make you feel better? What's the purpose of you having to see my works?
Yes, I'm still stuck on the obsession of His works! If Christ is in you then there is no quesiton you will have His works. You can't have Christ and have no works. It isn't possible.
Paul
Noone is arguing that point . . .you didn't answer the question . . .
Say you don't see your view of what his works are, manifesting in me . . .then what?
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 08:49:00 PM
Noone is arguing that point . . .you didn't answer the question . . .
Say you don't see your view of what his works are, manifesting in me . . .then what?
Then I can't conclude that you have Christ, if you don't have His works.
Paul
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 03:55:24 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 03:36:52 PM
QuoteOf course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel.
Well glad you had a good laugh Tony, but of course you must be mistaken that some Jews beleived Pauls evangel for according to you Pauls teaching does not apply to the Jews.
You can't have it both ways Tony, either it applies to the Jews and Gentiles or it does not. Go figure
Not true. Some Jews did come over to Paul's evangel. Paul himself was a Jew and believed the evangel of the Uncircumcision with a heavenly allotment whereas Peter James and John's evangel has an earthly allotment.
But under Paul's evangel of the body of Christ the central barrier has been broken down between Jew and Gentile and in that body both Jew and Gentile are on an equality.
Paul went to the nations with the Uncircumcision's evangel. Peter, James and John told him that was cool in Galatians 2. And Peter, James and John said they would be for the Circumcision. But this would not forbid a Circumcision Jew from leaving that paradigm and entering into Paul's.
I don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
Also remeber Paul went with the gospel first to the JEWS and they rejected it so he went to the gentiles who accepted it.
So what in the world was Paul preaching to the Jews the SAME Gospel that he preached to the gentile if Pauls preaching has nothing to do with them?
And if it is a different Gospel why did Paul withstand Peter? Paul would have had no right to do that if Peters gospel was not the SAME as his.
Quote from: Raggedy Anne on March 19, 2009, 03:59:02 PM
The reason why the scriptures APPEAR to contradict one another is simple. Some are addressing the sinner and those scriptures bring death. Others are addressing the new creature in Christ and they speak life. That's why we have this constant works vs. grace vs. faith vs. free will discussion going - because there are 2 of us in each one of us - one that is perishing, the other that is being renewed inwardly. That's the way I see it.
Anne
:thumbsup:
Quote from: PneumaI don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
I agree. I have the same problem. Do we have one gospel here or two?
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 08:31:51 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 19, 2009, 07:54:06 PM
Seems to me, the message in Romans 3 is the same to both the Jews and the Gentiles, namely:
20Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
21But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;
22Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
23For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
24Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
25Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
26To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
--Rom 3
Hi Molly, did you see this one:
Rom 2:10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:
Rom 2:11 For there is no respect of persons with God.
See Paul is telling us that Glory and Honour are to those that work Good works whether or not they are Greek or Jew.
Paul
Paul, did you see this one:
Rom 3:12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:02:08 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 03:55:24 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 03:36:52 PM
QuoteOf course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel.
Well glad you had a good laugh Tony, but of course you must be mistaken that some Jews beleived Pauls evangel for according to you Pauls teaching does not apply to the Jews.
You can't have it both ways Tony, either it applies to the Jews and Gentiles or it does not. Go figure
Not true. Some Jews did come over to Paul's evangel. Paul himself was a Jew and believed the evangel of the Uncircumcision with a heavenly allotment whereas Peter James and John's evangel has an earthly allotment.
But under Paul's evangel of the body of Christ the central barrier has been broken down between Jew and Gentile and in that body both Jew and Gentile are on an equality.
Paul went to the nations with the Uncircumcision's evangel. Peter, James and John told him that was cool in Galatians 2. And Peter, James and John said they would be for the Circumcision. But this would not forbid a Circumcision Jew from leaving that paradigm and entering into Paul's.
I don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
Also remeber Paul went with the gospel first to the JEWS and they rejected it so he went to the gentiles who accepted it.
So what in the world was Paul preaching to the Jews the SAME Gospel that he preached to the gentile if Pauls preaching has nothing to do with them?
And if it is a different Gospel why did Paul withstand Peter? Paul would have had no right to do that if Peters gospel was not the SAME as his.
Of course there are two gospels/evangels.
Peter preached repentance and baptism with faith.
Paul preached Christ and Him crucified.
Peter preached God was going to destroy them if they didn't repent.
Paul preached that God was at peace with all mankind and is not reckoning their offenses.
I could go on and on.
Paul withstood Peter because Peter shrank back when some from James came. Peter didn't want to be seen eating with "unclean" Gentiles even if they were believers. Paul stood up to Peter on this issue.
Quote from: Molly on March 19, 2009, 09:09:19 PM
Quote from: PneumaI don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
I agree. I have the same problem. Do we have one gospel here or two?
It's only one Gospel and its from the same person (Jesus Christ). Remember it was Paul that rebuked Peter (a Jew) for not behaving (works) the same as the Gentiles. And now some here want us to believe that Paul was preaching a different manner of behavior for the Jew and the Gentile.
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 19, 2009, 09:09:19 PM
Quote from: PneumaI don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
I agree. I have the same problem. Do we have one gospel here or two?
according to Tony it two. Go figure
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:32:58 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 19, 2009, 09:09:19 PM
Quote from: PneumaI don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
I agree. I have the same problem. Do we have one gospel here or two?
according to Tony it two. Go figure
Tis ONE, for mine Scott.
:icon_flower:
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 09:26:00 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:02:08 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 03:55:24 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 03:36:52 PM
QuoteOf course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel.
Well glad you had a good laugh Tony, but of course you must be mistaken that some Jews beleived Pauls evangel for according to you Pauls teaching does not apply to the Jews.
You can't have it both ways Tony, either it applies to the Jews and Gentiles or it does not. Go figure
Not true. Some Jews did come over to Paul's evangel. Paul himself was a Jew and believed the evangel of the Uncircumcision with a heavenly allotment whereas Peter James and John's evangel has an earthly allotment.
But under Paul's evangel of the body of Christ the central barrier has been broken down between Jew and Gentile and in that body both Jew and Gentile are on an equality.
Paul went to the nations with the Uncircumcision's evangel. Peter, James and John told him that was cool in Galatians 2. And Peter, James and John said they would be for the Circumcision. But this would not forbid a Circumcision Jew from leaving that paradigm and entering into Paul's.
I don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
Also remeber Paul went with the gospel first to the JEWS and they rejected it so he went to the gentiles who accepted it.
So what in the world was Paul preaching to the Jews the SAME Gospel that he preached to the gentile if Pauls preaching has nothing to do with them?
And if it is a different Gospel why did Paul withstand Peter? Paul would have had no right to do that if Peters gospel was not the SAME as his.
Of course there are two gospels/evangels.
Peter preached repentance and baptism with faith.
Paul preached Christ and Him crucified.
Peter preached God was going to destroy them if they didn't repent.
Paul preached that God was at peace with all mankind and is not reckoning their offenses.
I could go on and on.
Paul withstood Peter because Peter shrank back when some from James came. Peter didn't want to be seen eating with "unclean" Gentiles even if they were believers. Paul stood up to Peter on this issue.
Tony your free to beleive that if you want to , but don't exspect me to swallow it.
Two different gospels put up the wall of DIVISION that Christ tore down.
Tis the same as saying those who are christians have a different gospel preached to them then those who are not christian.
You make a division between the haves and the have nots.
Quote from: Taffy on March 19, 2009, 09:35:11 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:32:58 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 19, 2009, 09:09:19 PM
Quote from: PneumaI don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
I agree. I have the same problem. Do we have one gospel here or two?
according to Tony it two. Go figure
Tis ONE, for mine Scott.
:icon_flower:
:thumbsup:
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 09:01:33 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 08:49:00 PM
Noone is arguing that point . . .you didn't answer the question . . .
Say you don't see your view of what his works are, manifesting in me . . .then what?
Then I can't conclude that you have Christ, if you don't have His works.
Paul
Which is my whole point . . . My relationship with the Father is just that . . .mine . . .what does it matter what other people think and see? If my pursuit is Christ . . .that's all that matters. It does no good for me to follow you around looking for Christ working in you. Nor does it do any good for you to become an alarmist about questioning ones personal relationship being authentic according to what "you" consider to be the fruits of Christ manifesting. The only way you could possibly know would be if you followed someone around 24x7, otherwise, there's just no way to tell.
Christians are still human . . .and they still can't measure up to perfection . .so you catch them on a bad day . . and . .according to you . . .because "you" didn't see any works of Christ manifesting in them "that day" you then conclude they aren't a Christian. To which I would respond . . .so what???
If I were to respond to your concern and try to manufacture the appearance of what a Christian is . . .you'd feel better but you'd be making a judgment according to a lie . .either way, I don't see the emphasis of works in another to be beneficial at all.
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:38:32 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 09:26:00 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:02:08 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 03:55:24 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 03:36:52 PM
QuoteOf course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel.
Well glad you had a good laugh Tony, but of course you must be mistaken that some Jews beleived Pauls evangel for according to you Pauls teaching does not apply to the Jews.
You can't have it both ways Tony, either it applies to the Jews and Gentiles or it does not. Go figure
Not true. Some Jews did come over to Paul's evangel. Paul himself was a Jew and believed the evangel of the Uncircumcision with a heavenly allotment whereas Peter James and John's evangel has an earthly allotment.
But under Paul's evangel of the body of Christ the central barrier has been broken down between Jew and Gentile and in that body both Jew and Gentile are on an equality.
Paul went to the nations with the Uncircumcision's evangel. Peter, James and John told him that was cool in Galatians 2. And Peter, James and John said they would be for the Circumcision. But this would not forbid a Circumcision Jew from leaving that paradigm and entering into Paul's.
I don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
Also remeber Paul went with the gospel first to the JEWS and they rejected it so he went to the gentiles who accepted it.
So what in the world was Paul preaching to the Jews the SAME Gospel that he preached to the gentile if Pauls preaching has nothing to do with them?
And if it is a different Gospel why did Paul withstand Peter? Paul would have had no right to do that if Peters gospel was not the SAME as his.
Of course there are two gospels/evangels.
Peter preached repentance and baptism with faith.
Paul preached Christ and Him crucified.
Peter preached God was going to destroy them if they didn't repent.
Paul preached that God was at peace with all mankind and is not reckoning their offenses.
I could go on and on.
Paul withstood Peter because Peter shrank back when some from James came. Peter didn't want to be seen eating with "unclean" Gentiles even if they were believers. Paul stood up to Peter on this issue.
Tony your free to beleive that if you want to , but don't exspect me to swallow it.
Two different gospels put up the wall of DIVISION that Christ tore down.
Tis the same as saying those who are christians have a different gospel preached to them then those who are not christian.
You make a division between the haves and the have nots.
It apprears you might have a problem with an attention deficit. I already addressed your "walll of division" several times now.
The wall is torn down IN THE BODY OF CHRIST. IN THAT BODY THERE IS NO JEW OR GREEK.
Under Peter, James and John the believing proselyte is under the 12.
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 09:46:44 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 09:01:33 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 08:49:00 PM
Noone is arguing that point . . .you didn't answer the question . . .
Say you don't see your view of what his works are, manifesting in me . . .then what?
Then I can't conclude that you have Christ, if you don't have His works.
Paul
Which is my whole point . . . My relationship with the Father is just that . . .mine . . .what does it matter what other people think and see? If my pursuit is Christ . . .that's all that matters. It does no good for me to follow you around looking for Christ working in you. Nor does it do any good for you to become an alarmist about questioning ones personal relationship being authentic according to what "you" consider to be the fruits of Christ manifesting. The only way you could possibly know would be if you followed someone around 24x7, otherwise, there's just no way to tell.
Christians are still human . . .and they still can't measure up to perfection . .so you catch them on a bad day . . and . .according to you . . .because "you" didn't see any works of Christ manifesting in them "that day" you then conclude they aren't a Christian. To which I would respond . . .so what???
If I were to respond to your concern and try to manufacture the appearance of what a Christian is . . .you'd feel better but you'd be making a judgment according to a lie . .either way, I don't see the emphasis of works in another to be beneficial at all.
Not to mention that we are not to judge another's servant. Before his own master he stands or falls.
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 09:52:06 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:38:32 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 09:26:00 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:02:08 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 03:55:24 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 03:36:52 PM
QuoteOf course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel.
Well glad you had a good laugh Tony, but of course you must be mistaken that some Jews beleived Pauls evangel for according to you Pauls teaching does not apply to the Jews.
You can't have it both ways Tony, either it applies to the Jews and Gentiles or it does not. Go figure
Not true. Some Jews did come over to Paul's evangel. Paul himself was a Jew and believed the evangel of the Uncircumcision with a heavenly allotment whereas Peter James and John's evangel has an earthly allotment.
But under Paul's evangel of the body of Christ the central barrier has been broken down between Jew and Gentile and in that body both Jew and Gentile are on an equality.
Paul went to the nations with the Uncircumcision's evangel. Peter, James and John told him that was cool in Galatians 2. And Peter, James and John said they would be for the Circumcision. But this would not forbid a Circumcision Jew from leaving that paradigm and entering into Paul's.
I don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
Also remeber Paul went with the gospel first to the JEWS and they rejected it so he went to the gentiles who accepted it.
So what in the world was Paul preaching to the Jews the SAME Gospel that he preached to the gentile if Pauls preaching has nothing to do with them?
And if it is a different Gospel why did Paul withstand Peter? Paul would have had no right to do that if Peters gospel was not the SAME as his.
Of course there are two gospels/evangels.
Peter preached repentance and baptism with faith.
Paul preached Christ and Him crucified.
Peter preached God was going to destroy them if they didn't repent.
Paul preached that God was at peace with all mankind and is not reckoning their offenses.
I could go on and on.
Paul withstood Peter because Peter shrank back when some from James came. Peter didn't want to be seen eating with "unclean" Gentiles even if they were believers. Paul stood up to Peter on this issue.
Tony your free to beleive that if you want to , but don't exspect me to swallow it.
Two different gospels put up the wall of DIVISION that Christ tore down.
Tis the same as saying those who are christians have a different gospel preached to them then those who are not christian.
You make a division between the haves and the have nots.
It apprears you might have a problem with an attention deficit. I already addressed your "walll of division" several times now.
The wall is torn down IN THE BODY OF CHRIST. IN THAT BODY THERE IS NO JEW OR GREEK.
Under Peter, James and John the believing proselyte is under the 12.
Yes you state the wall of division is torn down, but just like the ET preacher who state that Jesus came to save the whole world proceed to show that the whole world is not saved you likewise state the wall is torn down then beging building it back up.
And you have yet to answer me why Paul preached the SAME gospel to the Jews that he did to the gentiles.
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 09:46:44 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 09:01:33 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 08:49:00 PM
Noone is arguing that point . . .you didn't answer the question . . .
Say you don't see your view of what his works are, manifesting in me . . .then what?
Then I can't conclude that you have Christ, if you don't have His works.
Paul
Which is my whole point . . . My relationship with the Father is just that . . .mine . . .what does it matter what other people think and see? If my pursuit is Christ . . .that's all that matters. It does no good for me to follow you around looking for Christ working in you. Nor does it do any good for you to become an alarmist about questioning ones personal relationship being authentic according to what "you" consider to be the fruits of Christ manifesting. The only way you could possibly know would be if you followed someone around 24x7, otherwise, there's just no way to tell.
Christians are still human . . .and they still can't measure up to perfection . .so you catch them on a bad day . . and . .according to you . . .because "you" didn't see any works of Christ manifesting in them "that day" you then conclude they aren't a Christian. To which I would respond . . .so what???
If I were to respond to your concern and try to manufacture the appearance of what a Christian is . . .you'd feel better but you'd be making a judgment according to a lie . .either way, I don't see the emphasis of works in another to be beneficial at all.
Nate that is why I stated the fruit inspection is to judge ourselves and not another, for if the Lord tells me to do something, but tells you to do nothing, how can I rightly judge you according to the work the Lord has called me to. We can't, it would be an unrightious judgment.
Quote from: TonyUnder Peter, James and John the believing proselyte is under the 12.
What does this 'believing proselyte' believe in?
You mean he doesn't believe in Jesus?
"proselyte"A new convert to a doctrine or religion.Are you suggesting we could convert to Judaism?
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 10:29:25 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 09:46:44 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 09:01:33 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 08:49:00 PM
Noone is arguing that point . . .you didn't answer the question . . .
Say you don't see your view of what his works are, manifesting in me . . .then what?
Then I can't conclude that you have Christ, if you don't have His works.
Paul
Which is my whole point . . . My relationship with the Father is just that . . .mine . . .what does it matter what other people think and see? If my pursuit is Christ . . .that's all that matters. It does no good for me to follow you around looking for Christ working in you. Nor does it do any good for you to become an alarmist about questioning ones personal relationship being authentic according to what "you" consider to be the fruits of Christ manifesting. The only way you could possibly know would be if you followed someone around 24x7, otherwise, there's just no way to tell.
Christians are still human . . .and they still can't measure up to perfection . .so you catch them on a bad day . . and . .according to you . . .because "you" didn't see any works of Christ manifesting in them "that day" you then conclude they aren't a Christian. To which I would respond . . .so what???
If I were to respond to your concern and try to manufacture the appearance of what a Christian is . . .you'd feel better but you'd be making a judgment according to a lie . .either way, I don't see the emphasis of works in another to be beneficial at all.
Nate that is why I stated the fruit inspection is to judge ourselves and not another, for if the Lord tells me to do something, but tells you to do nothing, how can I rightly judge you according to the work the Lord has called me to. We can't, it would be an unrightious judgment.
Yeah, I think you and are in agreement on this, but trettep keeps forcing it back out there trying to emphasize the importance of manifesting Christ works . . .as if we can manufacture his works on our own volition. And what you just shared is what I've been also trying to push back with . . .the assessing of another's fruit is not for the purpose of me proclaiming their salvation as authentic . . .for me . .it's actually got two purposes . . .one is just as you shared . .that the assessment is an inner one, not an outer measurement of another's actions.
And the second purpose that knowing they're Christ's disciples by their fruit or outward manifestations is so that I am personally aware of who it is I'm receiving from . . .if their words say one thing but their actions reveal something all together different . . .those are the ones we're to be wary of. That's what I was trying to get out of trettep . .but all he would provide me with is . .if you aren't manifesting Christ's works according to my interpretation of what they are . . .which can be just as faulty . . .but if you're not acting like I think a Christian should act . .then I can't call you one . . .and for all the time and effort that's been put in on this subject . . .it seems to completely sidestep the whole point . .and that is . . . "So what?"
It's really none of my business "how" you choose to let Christ manifest through you. "My" responsibility is to love you without judgment or condemnation or conditions. That alone keeps my plate full enough without announcing 'you're a Christian . . your not . . you're one as well . . .and the three of you aren't . . .
Thanks but no thanks.
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 10:47:39 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 10:29:25 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 09:46:44 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 09:01:33 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 08:49:00 PM
Noone is arguing that point . . .you didn't answer the question . . .
Say you don't see your view of what his works are, manifesting in me . . .then what?
Then I can't conclude that you have Christ, if you don't have His works.
Paul
Which is my whole point . . . My relationship with the Father is just that . . .mine . . .what does it matter what other people think and see? If my pursuit is Christ . . .that's all that matters. It does no good for me to follow you around looking for Christ working in you. Nor does it do any good for you to become an alarmist about questioning ones personal relationship being authentic according to what "you" consider to be the fruits of Christ manifesting. The only way you could possibly know would be if you followed someone around 24x7, otherwise, there's just no way to tell.
Christians are still human . . .and they still can't measure up to perfection . .so you catch them on a bad day . . and . .according to you . . .because "you" didn't see any works of Christ manifesting in them "that day" you then conclude they aren't a Christian. To which I would respond . . .so what???
If I were to respond to your concern and try to manufacture the appearance of what a Christian is . . .you'd feel better but you'd be making a judgment according to a lie . .either way, I don't see the emphasis of works in another to be beneficial at all.
Nate that is why I stated the fruit inspection is to judge ourselves and not another, for if the Lord tells me to do something, but tells you to do nothing, how can I rightly judge you according to the work the Lord has called me to. We can't, it would be an unrightious judgment.
Yeah, I think you and are in agreement on this, but trettep keeps forcing it back out there trying to emphasize the importance of manifesting Christ works . . .as if we can manufacture his works on our own volition. And what you just shared is what I've been also trying to push back with . . .the assessing of another's fruit is not for the purpose of me proclaiming their salvation as authentic . . .for me . .it's actually got two purposes . . .one is just as you shared . .that the assessment is an inner one, not an outer measurement of another's actions.
And the second purpose that knowing they're Christ's disciples by their fruit or outward manifestations is so that I am personally aware of who it is I'm receiving from . . .if their words say one thing but their actions reveal something all together different . . .those are the ones we're to be wary of. That's what I was trying to get out of trettep . .but all he would provide me with is . .if you aren't manifesting Christ's works according to my interpretation of what they are . . .which can be just as faulty . . .but if you're not acting like I think a Christian should act . .then I can't call you one . . .and for all the time and effort that's been put in on this subject . . .it seems to completely sidestep the whole point . .and that is . . . "So what?"
It's really none of my business "how" you choose to let Christ manifest through you. "My" responsibility is to love you without judgment or condemnation or conditions. That alone keeps my plate full enough without announcing 'you're a Christian . . your not . . you're one as well . . .and the three of you aren't . . .
Thanks but no thanks.
:thumbsup:
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 09:46:44 PMWhich is my whole point . . . My relationship with the Father is just that . . .mine . . .what does it matter what other people think and see? If my pursuit is Christ . . .that's all that matters. It does no good for me to follow you around looking for Christ working in you. Nor does it do any good for you to become an alarmist about questioning ones personal relationship being authentic according to what "you" consider to be the fruits of Christ manifesting. The only way you could possibly know would be if you followed someone around 24x7, otherwise, there's just no way to tell.
Christians are still human . . .and they still can't measure up to perfection . .so you catch them on a bad day . . and . .according to you . . .because "you" didn't see any works of Christ manifesting in them "that day" you then conclude they aren't a Christian. To which I would respond . . .so what???
If I were to respond to your concern and try to manufacture the appearance of what a Christian is . . .you'd feel better but you'd be making a judgment according to a lie . .either way, I don't see the emphasis of works in another to be beneficial at all.
Take it up with Christ. He is the one that says we will know them by their fruits.
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Paul
A quick note about Judging as it seems that many think that judging is just something we ought not do. Let me give you Jesus' response:
Mat 7:1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Mat 7:2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
Mat 7:3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Mat 7:4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
Mat 7:5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
Notice that Jesus says Judge not that ye be not judged and then calls them whom He is talking to "Hypocrites". Then He goes right on to say essentially to Judge after you have cast the beam out of thine own eye. So what does this all mean? It means this:
Judge Righteously.
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 10:47:39 PM
Yeah, I think you and are in agreement on this, but trettep keeps forcing it back out there trying to emphasize the importance of manifesting Christ works . . .as if we can manufacture his works on our own volition. And what you just shared is what I've been also trying to push back with . . .the assessing of another's fruit is not for the purpose of me proclaiming their salvation as authentic . . .for me . .it's actually got two purposes . . .one is just as you shared . .that the assessment is an inner one, not an outer measurement of another's actions.
And the second purpose that knowing they're Christ's disciples by their fruit or outward manifestations is so that I am personally aware of who it is I'm receiving from . . .if their words say one thing but their actions reveal something all together different . . .those are the ones we're to be wary of. That's what I was trying to get out of trettep . .but all he would provide me with is . .if you aren't manifesting Christ's works according to my interpretation of what they are . . .which can be just as faulty . . .but if you're not acting like I think a Christian should act . .then I can't call you one . . .and for all the time and effort that's been put in on this subject . . .it seems to completely sidestep the whole point . .and that is . . . "So what?"
It's really none of my business "how" you choose to let Christ manifest through you. "My" responsibility is to love you without judgment or condemnation or conditions. That alone keeps my plate full enough without announcing 'you're a Christian . . your not . . you're one as well . . .and the three of you aren't . . .
Thanks but no thanks.
Nathan, if pneuma believes that we are not to judge at all, then YES it would mean that me and pneuma do not agree.
And of course I say we must have GOOD Works. I think it is of the highest importance. After all your salvation depends on it. See Nathan, under Christ we do care about the works of others. Under Christ we indeed ARE our brother's keeper.
Sure we should love others - that is Christ's works. If I don't see Love from someone and instead see the opposite, I conclude that they don't have Christ - that is the message according to Christ. It doesn't mean someone can't announce they are a Christian - it doesn't mean I have to accept that they are and it doesn't remove my love for them or more rather His love for them.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 10:29:25 PMNate that is why I stated the fruit inspection is to judge ourselves and not another, for if the Lord tells me to do something, but tells you to do nothing, how can I rightly judge you according to the work the Lord has called me to. We can't, it would be an unrightious judgment.
Pneuma, while it is true we must Judge ourselves, that we be not judged. The scriptures concerning the fruits are about inspecting the fruits of others:
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Mat 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
Mat 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits
ye shall know them.
The scriptures distinguish between you and them in Matthew 7:20.
Paul
QuoteSo what does this all mean? It means this:
Judge Righteously.
Paul
:thumbsup:
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:03:03 PM
A quick note about Judging as it seems that many think that judging is just something we ought not do. Let me give you Jesus' response:
Mat 7:1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Mat 7:2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
Mat 7:3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Mat 7:4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
Mat 7:5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
Notice that Jesus says Judge not that ye be not judged and then calls them whom He is talking to "Hypocrites". Then He goes right on to say essentially to Judge after you have cast the beam out of thine own eye. So what does this all mean? It means this:
Judge Righteously.
Paul
Paul no one here would agrue that point, but surely your not saying you have no speak of dust in your own eyes?
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:15:26 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 10:29:25 PMNate that is why I stated the fruit inspection is to judge ourselves and not another, for if the Lord tells me to do something, but tells you to do nothing, how can I rightly judge you according to the work the Lord has called me to. We can't, it would be an unrightious judgment.
Pneuma, while it is true we must Judge ourselves, that we be not judged. The scriptures concerning the fruits are about inspecting the fruits of others:
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Mat 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
Mat 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
The scriptures distinguish between you and them in Matthew 7:20.
Paul
That speaks more to me about judging where the fruit comes from, whether the Spirit or the flesh, not the judgment of the individual
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:24:57 PM
Paul no one here would agrue that point, but surely your not saying you have no speak of dust in your own eyes?
Absolutely, I got "dust" in my own eyes. But that doesn't mean I haven't been given "vision" into certain aspects of God's Word.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:31:01 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:24:57 PM
Paul no one here would agrue that point, but surely your not saying you have no speak of dust in your own eyes?
Absolutely, I got "dust" in my own eyes. But that doesn't mean I haven't been given "vision" into certain aspects of God's Word.
Paul
Not saying you don't have any vision into Gods word Paul, just showing you that we are to JUDGE the FRUIT not the individual.
For every child of God is still in part a child of Adam and produces the fruit of Adam.
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:29:07 PMThat speaks more to me about judging where the fruit comes from, whether the Spirit or the flesh, not the judgment of the individual
It says:
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits
ye shall know them.
It refers knowing the person BY their fruits that they produce, not where they gathered it from. It even goes further and explains this with these verses:
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
These are those people that had evil fruits. It doesnt' speak to where they gathered them from. It is speaking to what they do.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Yes the scriptures speak of this, I think the bottom line is that no one is actually qualified to claim they can accuratly enough to be of a selfless purpose to do so and should keep quiet.
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:36:19 PM
Not saying you don't have any vision into Gods word Paul, just showing you that we are to JUDGE the FRUIT not the individual.
For every child of God is still in part a child of Adam and produces the fruit of Adam.
Pneuma, the individual will be known by the fruit. Adam produced the fruit of Satan which means he produced the works of Satan which is sin. So I disagree that every child of god is still producing that fruit.
Paul
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 11:40:52 PM
Yes the scriptures speak of this, I think the bottom line is that no one is actually qualified to claim they can accuratly enough to be of a selfless purpose to do so and should keep quiet.
Paul, there are numerous examples in scripture that show righteous Judgement exercised by men.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:29:07 PMThat speaks more to me about judging where the fruit comes from, whether the Spirit or the flesh, not the judgment of the individual
It says:
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
It refers knowing the person BY their fruits that they produce, not where they gathered it from. It even goes further and explains this with these verses:
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
These are those people that had evil fruits. It doesnt' speak to where they gathered them from. It is speaking to what they do.
Paul
I disagree with that understanding Paul, knowing the PERSON by their fruit is knowing which person the fruit comes from, whether Christ or Adam.
After all the people in reference in those scriptures are ALL CHRISTIANS who worked after the works of the flesh.
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:43:32 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:36:19 PM
Not saying you don't have any vision into Gods word Paul, just showing you that we are to JUDGE the FRUIT not the individual.
For every child of God is still in part a child of Adam and produces the fruit of Adam.
Pneuma, the individual will be known by the fruit. Adam produced the fruit of Satan which means he produced the works of Satan which is sin. So I disagree that every child of god is still producing that fruit.
Paul
Paul anyone who says they are without sin decieve themselves and the truth is not in them.
Do you Judge Paul as not being a child of God in Ro.7?
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:45:40 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 11:40:52 PM
Yes the scriptures speak of this, I think the bottom line is that no one is actually qualified to claim they can accuratly enough to be of a selfless purpose to do so and should keep quiet.
Paul, there are numerous examples in scripture that show righteous Judgement exercised by men.
Paul
Yes of course, this is the path this thread needs to take. Are you qualified?
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:31:01 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:24:57 PM
Paul no one here would agrue that point, but surely your not saying you have no speak of dust in your own eyes?
Absolutely, I got "dust" in my own eyes. But that doesn't mean I haven't been given "vision" into certain aspects of God's Word.
Paul
Judge Not according to the Flesh , For Flesh is Unworthy of Flesh Judging it.
For Christ came NOT to Judge the Flesh , but to exercise True\Righteous judgment , mercy and compassion to EACH man his brother...
For each man to DIE FIRST, then JUDGMENT.... :HeartThrob:
no Dust dust in these eyes Guys , for we are Spirit , For the righteous man have NO need of man Judging HIM,as long as he judges Himself worthy of being in the Body.
does not JUDGMENT,that is MERCY and Compassion first come to the HOUSE of GOD., which for me, is the Foundatain of The Cross.
Hbr 9:26 For then must
he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but
now once in the end of the world hath he
appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. Hbr 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Hbr 9:28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
:icon_flower: :HeartThrob:
James 4;11 Brothers,do not slander one another.
ANYONE WHO SPEAKS AGAINST HIS BROTHER OR JUDGES
HIM,SPEAKS AGAINST THE LAW AND JUDGES IT
WHEN YOU JUDGE THE LAW YOU ARE NOT KEEPING IT
THERE IS ONLY ONE LAWGIVER AND JUDGE
THE ONE WHO IS ABLE TO SAVE AND DESTROY
BUT YOU-WHO ARE YOU TO JUDGE YOUR NEIGHBOR?
Luke 6;27 love for enemies v37 Judging others
v 43 a tree and its fruit the good man brings good things
out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man
brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart,
for out of the overflow of his heart his mouth speaks.
what can I say to you Trettp? Is not judging and condemning
the brothers a lack of love as well as disobediance to the
command to not judge.? Are you blind to this? Luke 6;42
You hypocrite!!first take the plank out of your eye,and then
you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brothers eye
Are you so blind that you yet don't see what we are trying to
say to you...WE NEED TO SEE SOME OF THIS GOOD FRUIT
FROM YOU TO KNOW THAT YOU HAVE THE LOVE OF GOD IN
YOU...
become RECONCILED WITH YOUR BROTHERS......
agree with the adversary while you are in the way..lest you
be turned over to the court offical and put in prison
for you will not get out of there til you have paid the last cent
He who says he loves God,who he has not seen..and hates his
brothers..is a liar. 1 Timothy 5;20
1 Timothy 5;24 the sins of some men are obvious reaching the
place of judgement ahead of them; the sins of others
trail behind them. In the same way good deeds are obvious,
and even those that are not,can not be hidden.
Just because Adam sinned, does not mean he's not capable of manifesting God in others . . .did he not love his wife? Did he not love his kids?
You say I should take this up with Christ because he's the one that said it . . .you seem to think that your interpretation is the only one that is right . . . if I felt you were right, I wouldn't have pressed the issue . . .obviously it's your interpretation of what Christ intended that I have issue with. I'm about done anyway because in reading your responses to others, not to mention myself, you're not as open to receive as you are to give and I don't want to get pulled into yet another long discussion that leads to no where.
You continue to ignore the fact with those Scriptures you keep quoting, that it's not about judging everyone's fruit . . .it's about being alert what kind of fruit you receive yourself.
As to the beam in the eye of the one judging . . .you missed the entire point there as well . . .you seem to think that it's saying go ahead and judge . . .sheesh . . .
What he's saying is what WE'VE been saying all along . . .the beam in your own eye . . .he's saying take care of what's on your own plate . .worry about your own relationship . . .deal with your own issues . . . once you remove the beam in your eye . . .the spec in the eye of another WON'T MATTER ANYMORE because the problem isn't the person I'm judging . . .the problem is ME playing the role of a judge in the first place.
Bottom line . .you say . .judge righteously . . .I say . . .DON'T JUDGE.
For me, it's the Holy Spirit that has that role in my life and in others . . .and to cross that line and assume the role of a judge to others is blaspheme of the Holy Spirit . . .yeah I know . .tough words . .but seriously . . .to blaspheme . .for me again . . .is to assume the authority of another . . .Jesus was crucified because he said he was the Son of God . . .and they cried "Blaspheme". But as we know . .he was telling the truth . . . but the point is . . .we claim the spirit is working in us . .then we assume authority in areas that we have no authority in and we create more problems than solutions.
Love your brother . . .leave the judging to the only one worthy to operate righteously in that role without becoming an obstacle to others.
23Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
--Mat 23
23You Pharisees and teachers are show-offs, and you're in for trouble! You give God a tenth of the spices from your garden, such as mint, dill, and cumin. Yet you neglect the more important matters of the Law, such as justice, mercy, and faithfulness. These are the important things you should have done, though you should not have left the others undone either. 24You blind leaders! You strain out a small fly but swallow a camel.
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:46:52 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:29:07 PMThat speaks more to me about judging where the fruit comes from, whether the Spirit or the flesh, not the judgment of the individual
It says:
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
It refers knowing the person BY their fruits that they produce, not where they gathered it from. It even goes further and explains this with these verses:
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
These are those people that had evil fruits. It doesnt' speak to where they gathered them from. It is speaking to what they do.
Paul
I disagree with that understanding Paul, knowing the PERSON by their fruit is knowing which person the fruit comes from, whether Christ or Adam.
After all the people in reference in those scriptures are ALL CHRISTIANS who worked after the works of the flesh.
Sure knowing their fruit is knowing where the fruit comes from but answering to THOSE Scriptures it specifically says "you know them by their fruits". I doesn't say you them by where they got their fruits. I'm keeping it according to God's Word but I showed you the scriptures. Does it or does it not say "You know them by their fruits"?
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:49:22 PMPaul anyone who says they are without sin decieve themselves and the truth is not in them.
Do you Judge Paul as not being a child of God in Ro.7?
Paul was not being imputed his sin.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 12:54:35 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:46:52 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:29:07 PMThat speaks more to me about judging where the fruit comes from, whether the Spirit or the flesh, not the judgment of the individual
It says:
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
It refers knowing the person BY their fruits that they produce, not where they gathered it from. It even goes further and explains this with these verses:
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
These are those people that had evil fruits. It doesnt' speak to where they gathered them from. It is speaking to what they do.
Paul
I disagree with that understanding Paul, knowing the PERSON by their fruit is knowing which person the fruit comes from, whether Christ or Adam.
After all the people in reference in those scriptures are ALL CHRISTIANS who worked after the works of the flesh.
Sure knowing their fruit is knowing where the fruit comes from but answering to THOSE Scriptures it specifically says "you know them by their fruits". I doesn't say you them by where they got their fruits. I'm keeping it according to God's Word but I showed you the scriptures. Does it or does it not say "You know them by their fruits"?
Paul
yes their fruits, Christ and Adam when you put more then one person into an equation their is the proper format of speaking.
So are the people being spoken of in those verse Christian baring flesh fruit or not?
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 11:51:00 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:45:40 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 11:40:52 PM
Yes the scriptures speak of this, I think the bottom line is that no one is actually qualified to claim they can accuratly enough to be of a selfless purpose to do so and should keep quiet.
Paul, there are numerous examples in scripture that show righteous Judgement exercised by men.
Paul
Yes of course, this is the path this thread needs to take. Are you qualified?
Yes, I'm qualified where I have been given qualification.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:04:02 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:49:22 PMPaul anyone who says they are without sin decieve themselves and the truth is not in them.
Do you Judge Paul as not being a child of God in Ro.7?
Paul was not being imputed his sin.
Paul
I agree, so why judge another whos sin is not imputed unto them?
Quote from: Molly on March 20, 2009, 12:53:47 AM
23Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
--Mat 23
23You Pharisees and teachers are show-offs, and you're in for trouble! You give God a tenth of the spices from your garden, such as mint, dill, and cumin. Yet you neglect the more important matters of the Law, such as justice, mercy, and faithfulness. These are the important things you should have done, though you should not have left the others undone either. 24You blind leaders! You strain out a small fly but swallow a camel.
Yes Molly Judgment is a Part of who we are - But after TRUE judgment, not the Judgment of Condemnation.
As the Servant who owed was shown mercy and Compassion , then to whom it was Given, tis Forwarded...Judge No man by appearence( Doing),
:icon_flower:
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:06:57 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 11:51:00 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:45:40 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 11:40:52 PM
Yes the scriptures speak of this, I think the bottom line is that no one is actually qualified to claim they can accuratly enough to be of a selfless purpose to do so and should keep quiet.
Paul, there are numerous examples in scripture that show righteous Judgement exercised by men.
Paul
Yes of course, this is the path this thread needs to take. Are you qualified?
Yes, I'm qualified where I have been given qualification.
Paul
Let me guess . . .you're qualified by God to judge others and assess whether hey're Christians or not.
Quote from: Taffy on March 19, 2009, 11:55:39 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:31:01 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:24:57 PM
Paul no one here would agrue that point, but surely your not saying you have no speak of dust in your own eyes?
Absolutely, I got "dust" in my own eyes. But that doesn't mean I haven't been given "vision" into certain aspects of God's Word.
Paul
Judge Not according to the Flesh , For Flesh is Unworthy of Flesh Judging it.
For Christ came NOT to Judge the Flesh , but to exercise True\Righteous judgment , mercy and compassion to EACH man his brother...
For each man to DIE FIRST, then JUDGMENT.... :HeartThrob:
no Dust dust in these eyes Guys , for we are Spirit , For the righteous man have NO need of man Judging HIM,as long as he judges Himself worthy of being in the Body.
does not JUDGMENT,that is MERCY and Compassion first come to the HOUSE of GOD., which for me, is the Foundatain of The Cross.
Hbr 9:26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
Hbr 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Hbr 9:28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
:icon_flower: :HeartThrob:
Co 5:3 For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have
judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed,
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 20, 2009, 12:28:48 AM
Just because Adam sinned, does not mean he's not capable of manifesting God in others . . .did he not love his wife? Did he not love his kids?
You say I should take this up with Christ because he's the one that said it . . .you seem to think that your interpretation is the only one that is right . . . if I felt you were right, I wouldn't have pressed the issue . . .obviously it's your interpretation of what Christ intended that I have issue with. I'm about done anyway because in reading your responses to others, not to mention myself, you're not as open to receive as you are to give and I don't want to get pulled into yet another long discussion that leads to no where.
You continue to ignore the fact with those Scriptures you keep quoting, that it's not about judging everyone's fruit . . .it's about being alert what kind of fruit you receive yourself.
As to the beam in the eye of the one judging . . .you missed the entire point there as well . . .you seem to think that it's saying go ahead and judge . . .sheesh . . .
What he's saying is what WE'VE been saying all along . . .the beam in your own eye . . .he's saying take care of what's on your own plate . .worry about your own relationship . . .deal with your own issues . . . once you remove the beam in your eye . . .the spec in the eye of another WON'T MATTER ANYMORE because the problem isn't the person I'm judging . . .the problem is ME playing the role of a judge in the first place.
Bottom line . .you say . .judge righteously . . .I say . . .DON'T JUDGE.
For me, it's the Holy Spirit that has that role in my life and in others . . .and to cross that line and assume the role of a judge to others is blaspheme of the Holy Spirit . . .yeah I know . .tough words . .but seriously . . .to blaspheme . .for me again . . .is to assume the authority of another . . .Jesus was crucified because he said he was the Son of God . . .and they cried "Blaspheme". But as we know . .he was telling the truth . . . but the point is . . .we claim the spirit is working in us . .then we assume authority in areas that we have no authority in and we create more problems than solutions.
Love your brother . . .leave the judging to the only one worthy to operate righteously in that role without becoming an obstacle to others.
Nathan, are you saying there is reward in loving those that love you? Nathan, did you not question me when I said that God's word says to Judge Righteously? So what offence do you have? Is that in error? I'm I saying judge unrighteously? Why is your spirit contentious about this if you agree that the Word of God says to Judge Righteously?
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 20, 2009, 01:04:35 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 12:54:35 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:46:52 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:29:07 PMThat speaks more to me about judging where the fruit comes from, whether the Spirit or the flesh, not the judgment of the individual
It says:
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
It refers knowing the person BY their fruits that they produce, not where they gathered it from. It even goes further and explains this with these verses:
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
These are those people that had evil fruits. It doesnt' speak to where they gathered them from. It is speaking to what they do.
Paul
I disagree with that understanding Paul, knowing the PERSON by their fruit is knowing which person the fruit comes from, whether Christ or Adam.
After all the people in reference in those scriptures are ALL CHRISTIANS who worked after the works of the flesh.
Sure knowing their fruit is knowing where the fruit comes from but answering to THOSE Scriptures it specifically says "you know them by their fruits". I doesn't say you them by where they got their fruits. I'm keeping it according to God's Word but I showed you the scriptures. Does it or does it not say "You know them by their fruits"?
Paul
yes their fruits, Christ and Adam when you put more then one person into an equation their is the proper format of speaking.
So are the people being spoken of in those verse Christian baring flesh fruit or not?
The verses pertain to the fruits of all men but Christ is speaking to His disciples.
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Mat 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
Mat 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
There are the verses again. Please be more specific to your question as I don't see where it is applicable.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:14:57 AM
Quote from: Nathan on March 20, 2009, 12:28:48 AM
Just because Adam sinned, does not mean he's not capable of manifesting God in others . . .did he not love his wife? Did he not love his kids?
You say I should take this up with Christ because he's the one that said it . . .you seem to think that your interpretation is the only one that is right . . . if I felt you were right, I wouldn't have pressed the issue . . .obviously it's your interpretation of what Christ intended that I have issue with. I'm about done anyway because in reading your responses to others, not to mention myself, you're not as open to receive as you are to give and I don't want to get pulled into yet another long discussion that leads to no where.
You continue to ignore the fact with those Scriptures you keep quoting, that it's not about judging everyone's fruit . . .it's about being alert what kind of fruit you receive yourself.
As to the beam in the eye of the one judging . . .you missed the entire point there as well . . .you seem to think that it's saying go ahead and judge . . .sheesh . . .
What he's saying is what WE'VE been saying all along . . .the beam in your own eye . . .he's saying take care of what's on your own plate . .worry about your own relationship . . .deal with your own issues . . . once you remove the beam in your eye . . .the spec in the eye of another WON'T MATTER ANYMORE because the problem isn't the person I'm judging . . .the problem is ME playing the role of a judge in the first place.
Bottom line . .you say . .judge righteously . . .I say . . .DON'T JUDGE.
For me, it's the Holy Spirit that has that role in my life and in others . . .and to cross that line and assume the role of a judge to others is blaspheme of the Holy Spirit . . .yeah I know . .tough words . .but seriously . . .to blaspheme . .for me again . . .is to assume the authority of another . . .Jesus was crucified because he said he was the Son of God . . .and they cried "Blaspheme". But as we know . .he was telling the truth . . . but the point is . . .we claim the spirit is working in us . .then we assume authority in areas that we have no authority in and we create more problems than solutions.
Love your brother . . .leave the judging to the only one worthy to operate righteously in that role without becoming an obstacle to others.
Nathan, are you saying there is reward in loving those that love you? Nathan, did you not question me when I said that God's word says to Judge Righteously? So what offence do you have? Is that in error? I'm I saying judge unrighteously? Why is your spirit contentious about this if you agree that the Word of God says to Judge Righteously?
Paul
Well enough of this, I just finished this same conversation with Paul C and have no desire to go through it all again so I am out of this thread as it has turned from what may have been profitable into something unprofitable.
Quote from: pneuma on March 20, 2009, 01:08:10 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:04:02 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:49:22 PMPaul anyone who says they are without sin decieve themselves and the truth is not in them.
Do you Judge Paul as not being a child of God in Ro.7?
Paul was not being imputed his sin.
Paul
I agree, so why judge another whos sin is not imputed unto them?
We have no need to for those. But not everyone abides in the Grace that Paul has. Did not Paul judge Peter when Peter changed tables? Paul was righteous that he was a Jew and he didn't commit the act. Peter was committing a sin so Paul rebuked Peter and judged him as having committed a sin by doing so (hence the rebuke). No was it a bad thing that Paul did? - no.
Paul
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 01:08:40 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 20, 2009, 12:53:47 AM
23Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
--Mat 23
23You Pharisees and teachers are show-offs, and you're in for trouble! You give God a tenth of the spices from your garden, such as mint, dill, and cumin. Yet you neglect the more important matters of the Law, such as justice, mercy, and faithfulness. These are the important things you should have done, though you should not have left the others undone either. 24You blind leaders! You strain out a small fly but swallow a camel.
Yes Molly Judgment is a Part of who we are - But after TRUE judgment, not the Judgment of Condemnation.
As the Servant who owed was shown mercy and Compassion , then to whom it was Given, tis Forwarded...Judge No man by appearence( Doing),
:icon_flower:
Where is it say in the scriptures to judge no man by their doing? I'm curious how Judgment is done if it isn't based on works.
Paul
Quote from: Nathan on March 20, 2009, 01:10:09 AMLet me guess . . .you're qualified by God to judge others and assess whether hey're Christians or not.
I'm qualified to the extent that I have been given qualification.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 20, 2009, 01:22:50 AMWell enough of this, I just finished this same conversation with Paul C and have no desire to go through it all again so I am out of this thread as it has turned from what may have been profitable into something unprofitable.
Well pneuma, I hope it isn't something I said or the responses you have received from me but if it was then forgive me for not being clear or coming across in a manner that you disapprove for it surely isn't my intent. Much of the contention started when I said that the scriptures tell us to Judge Righteously. That struck a nerve with many. However, I believe the nerve to be the perception that I give off as if I come across as always being right. So if that be the case then please let me know.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:27:48 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 20, 2009, 01:08:10 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:04:02 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:49:22 PMPaul anyone who says they are without sin decieve themselves and the truth is not in them.
Do you Judge Paul as not being a child of God in Ro.7?
Paul was not being imputed his sin.
Paul
I agree, so why judge another whos sin is not imputed unto them?
We have no need to for those. But not everyone abides in the Grace that Paul has. Did not Paul judge Peter when Peter changed tables? Paul was righteous that he was a Jew and he didn't commit the act. Peter was committing a sin so Paul rebuked Peter and judged him as having committed a sin by doing so (hence the rebuke). No was it a bad thing that Paul did? - no.
Paul
My face is starting to turn blue . . .so I'm out after this as well . . .
Your take on what happened with Paul and Peter is a perfect example of what I feel is misuse of Scripture . .number one . . .they didn't have 2,000 years of church history from which to grow and learn by the mistakes of others from . . .we do.
Second, they weren't just two brothers at odds . . . they were two APOSTLES . . .which is yet another bone I will reference to but not go into any further than this . . . And that is this . . .there are two LEADERS OF THE ENTIRE MOVEMENT that were in the process of establishing the flow of life . . .and as such, Paul had the authority to approach Peter . . .but I am not an apostle speaking to another . . . most of us are just lay-people assuming we can go by the same rules as an Apostle.
None of your responses hold water for me. I beleive there is much more to be had by pursuing Christ . .and CHOOSING to see the light in others rather than point out the darkness in them. In this light, I now lay down any further discussions with you on this.
Blessings to you all.
Quote from: Nathan on March 20, 2009, 01:37:16 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:27:48 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 20, 2009, 01:08:10 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:04:02 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:49:22 PMPaul anyone who says they are without sin decieve themselves and the truth is not in them.
Do you Judge Paul as not being a child of God in Ro.7?
Paul was not being imputed his sin.
Paul
I agree, so why judge another whos sin is not imputed unto them?
We have no need to for those. But not everyone abides in the Grace that Paul has. Did not Paul judge Peter when Peter changed tables? Paul was righteous that he was a Jew and he didn't commit the act. Peter was committing a sin so Paul rebuked Peter and judged him as having committed a sin by doing so (hence the rebuke). No was it a bad thing that Paul did? - no.
Paul
My face is starting to turn blue . . .so I'm out after this as well . . .
Your take on what happened with Paul and Peter is a perfect example of what I feel is misuse of Scripture . .number one . . .they didn't have 2,000 years of church history from which to grow and learn by the mistakes of others from . . .we do.
Second, they weren't just two brothers at odds . . . they were two APOSTLES . . .which is yet another bone I will reference to but not go into any further than this . . . And that is this . . .there are two LEADERS OF THE ENTIRE MOVEMENT that were in the process of establishing the flow of life . . .and as such, Paul had the authority to approach Peter . . .but I am not an apostle speaking to another . . . most of us are just lay-people assuming we can go by the same rules as an Apostle.
None of your responses hold water for me. I beleive there is much more to be had by pursuing Christ . .and CHOOSING to see the light in others rather than point out the darkness in them. In this light, I now lay down any further discussions with you on this.
Blessings to you all.
Nathan, I'll take your words that your done with me. I'll try to avoid responding to you in the future as much as memory can serve me. I assume you believe I'm wasting your time with my words.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:11:11 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 19, 2009, 11:55:39 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:31:01 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:24:57 PM
Paul no one here would agrue that point, but surely your not saying you have no speak of dust in your own eyes?
Absolutely, I got "dust" in my own eyes. But that doesn't mean I haven't been given "vision" into certain aspects of God's Word.
Paul
Judge Not according to the Flesh , For Flesh is Unworthy of Flesh Judging it.
For Christ came NOT to Judge the Flesh , but to exercise True\Righteous judgment , mercy and compassion to EACH man his brother...
For each man to DIE FIRST, then JUDGMENT.... :HeartThrob:
no Dust dust in these eyes Guys , for we are Spirit , For the righteous man have NO need of man Judging HIM,as long as he judges Himself worthy of being in the Body.
does not JUDGMENT,that is MERCY and Compassion first come to the HOUSE of GOD., which for me, is the Foundatain of The Cross.
Hbr 9:26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
Hbr 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Hbr 9:28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
:icon_flower: :HeartThrob:
Co 5:3 For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed,
Paul
maybe you missed
WORTHY of the BODY :dontknow:
For the FLESH to be Handed to SATAN so the :icon_flower: SPIRIT maybe saved?
He who Judges Himself being
WORTHY OF the BODY,....
but Man brings on this HIMSELF..for this reason MANY
sleep,..which really has noting to do with GIVING unto others Mercy and compassion shown to us... :icon_flower: for we Forgive .....
1Cr 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink [this] cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
1Cr 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of [that] bread, and drink of [that] cup.
1Cr 11:29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself,
not discerning the Lord's body. 1Cr 11:30 For this cause many [are] weak and sickly among you,
and many sleep. 1Cr 11:31 For if we would
judge ourselves, we
should not be judged. 1Cr 11:32 But when we are
judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be
condemned with the world. :icon_flower:
I've backed out of a few threads, tired of the circular reasoning and unfruitful discussion...anyone else can have at it if you've still got the energy and/or desire...This is my summary for several threads I've been in lately, including this one, The Law, and Context of Scripture...
Context: primarily, who, what, where, when, why
Jesus: "Sent not except for the lost sheep of the House of Israel" Mt. 15:24
Peter: sent to the circumcision...different issues, including circumcision and the law
Paul: sent to the Gentiles, the nations....grace, grafted in, don't boast against the tree
"having seen that I have been entrusted with the good news of the uncircumcision, as Peter with [that] of the circumcision", Gal. 2:7
Borrowing from CHB..."The apostles except for Paul was commissioned to preach the New Covenant to the Israelites because the Israelites were promised this. Paul came to see that we Gentiles and Jews who God had given this knowledge to were destined to be in the heavenlies. Not that we are any better than those who rule on earth, just a different place for 1000 years." Only saved through Jesus, but still some different issues to deal with...IMO, we often mix them up and try to make every issue primarily fit every individual. = Confusion and division.
For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works...Eph. 2:8,9
Yes we are to be obedient...through the grace of God, His strength..in Him we live, move, and have our being
"O that even they would cut themselves off who are unsettling you!" Galatians 5:12
Turn your eyes upon Jesus
Look full in His glorious face
And the things of earth will grow strangely dim
In the light of His glory and grace....Helen Lemmel
Whosoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved, Romans 10:13
Jesus' death, blood, resurrection...the thread through it all!
G'day Mates, adios, hasta la vista, 'til we meet again..God will veil and reveal, and none of us knows it all. My goal is to be learning more of/from God.
Pursue Jesus, He will lead. God's blessing, James.
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 01:51:04 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:11:11 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 19, 2009, 11:55:39 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:31:01 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 11:24:57 PM
Paul no one here would agrue that point, but surely your not saying you have no speak of dust in your own eyes?
Absolutely, I got "dust" in my own eyes. But that doesn't mean I haven't been given "vision" into certain aspects of God's Word.
Paul
Judge Not according to the Flesh , For Flesh is Unworthy of Flesh Judging it.
For Christ came NOT to Judge the Flesh , but to exercise True\Righteous judgment , mercy and compassion to EACH man his brother...
For each man to DIE FIRST, then JUDGMENT.... :HeartThrob:
no Dust dust in these eyes Guys , for we are Spirit , For the righteous man have NO need of man Judging HIM,as long as he judges Himself worthy of being in the Body.
does not JUDGMENT,that is MERCY and Compassion first come to the HOUSE of GOD., which for me, is the Foundatain of The Cross.
Hbr 9:26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
Hbr 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Hbr 9:28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
:icon_flower: :HeartThrob:
Co 5:3 For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed,
Paul
maybe you missed WORTHY of the BODY :dontknow:
For the FLESH to be Handed to SATAN so the :icon_flower: SPIRIT maybe saved?
He who Judges Himself being WORTHY OF the BODY,....but Man brings on this HIMSELF..for this reason MANY sleep,..which really has noting to do with GIVING unto others Mercy and compassion shown to us... :icon_flower: for we Forgive .....
1Cr 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink [this] cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
1Cr 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of [that] bread, and drink of [that] cup.
1Cr 11:29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
1Cr 11:30 For this cause many [are] weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
1Cr 11:31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.
1Cr 11:32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.
:icon_flower:
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:35:03 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 20, 2009, 01:22:50 AMWell enough of this, I just finished this same conversation with Paul C and have no desire to go through it all again so I am out of this thread as it has turned from what may have been profitable into something unprofitable.
Well pneuma, I hope it isn't something I said or the responses you have received from me but if it was then forgive me for not being clear or coming across in a manner that you disapprove for it surely isn't my intent. Much of the contention started when I said that the scriptures tell us to Judge Righteously. That struck a nerve with many. However, I believe the nerve to be the perception that I give off as if I come across as always being right. So if that be the case then please let me know.
Paul
Paul maybe its just the way you come across by the way you phrase things but what it all boils down to is that as long as there is a mote in our eyes we cannot judge another.
We must first cast our own mote out so that we can see clearly and when we see clearly we then can cast the mote out of anothers eye.
So if some tries to cast the mote out of anothers eye and are unable to do so shows that they are not seeing clearly; thus a blank is still in their eye. So even though you beleive you see clearly to cast the mote out of anothers eye, the mote remaining in the other persons eye shows you are not in the place you beleive yourself to be.
I hope you can see this Paul because I do agree with you on some point and can have fellowship with you, but this judgment thing will bring in contention and I want no part of that.
So I'll see you on another thread.
God bless
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:29:21 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 01:08:40 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 20, 2009, 12:53:47 AM
23Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
--Mat 23
23You Pharisees and teachers are show-offs, and you're in for trouble! You give God a tenth of the spices from your garden, such as mint, dill, and cumin. Yet you neglect the more important matters of the Law, such as justice, mercy, and faithfulness. These are the important things you should have done, though you should not have left the others undone either. 24You blind leaders! You strain out a small fly but swallow a camel.
Yes Molly Judgment is a Part of who we are - But after TRUE judgment, not the Judgment of Condemnation.
As the Servant who owed was shown mercy and Compassion , then to whom it was Given, tis Forwarded...Judge No man by appearence( Doing),
:icon_flower:
Where is it say in the scriptures to judge no man by their doing? I'm curious how Judgment is done if it isn't based on works.
Paul
The pharisees were FLESH,enmity to who HE WAS...Judging by the DEEDS of the Law...THEY WERE DOING, but left GREATER things LEFT undone.
Im not 100% knowing what ya getting at Paul?
I see Judgment several ways....Judged By law as the Pharisees, Judged to LIFE,Mercy and Compassion, and Judgment to mans own doings which are repayed Unto the Heart,
:icon_flower:
Quote from: pneumaWe must first cast our own mote out so that we can see clearly and when we see clearly we then can cast the mote out of anothers eye.
Ok,so let's assume the beam is gone from our eye. Then what? Are we then able to judge righteously?
Or, don't you think the beam will ever be gone from our eye?
I don't really understand what Taffy and others are saying. I need to hear it in simple english.
:cloud9: This is the understanding I have on judging. We don't judge the person, but the FLESH of that person. So it's not saying, so and so is bad, ect., and that's judgment, and (worse yet), we leave them in that condition.
Judgment comes thru the Spirit of God ministering thru the gifts of the Spirit, and that judgment is unto victory, because the person by this means, gets FREE/OVERCOMES that thing in their flesh that defiles and does iniquity as it is cast into the fire of the HG. Because these things manifest thru the Spirit of God, that makes it righteous judgment.
The way He judges the flesh is in order and that order is;
1) word of knowledge
2) word of wisdom
3) to prophesy
Word of knowledge - this is where the Lord shows you something about that person that there is no way you could possibly know. This is to activate the measure of faith they are given to receive Him (as the Word that is Spirit). He basically uses this then, to get their attention, and it usually reveals what is out of order in their life and why.
Word of wisdom - this is where the Lord instructs on repentance and what to do (with a scriptural understanding) to rectify the situation the thing in the flesh has produced in their life.
To prophesy - this is not just telling someone what is going to happen in the world out there next Tuesday. In a personal application, it's in essence, speaking those things that are not (at the Lord's direction), as though they were. Think Elijah here, being told to speak to the bones. He didn't know what to say (would you?!) to the "dead" bones, but I guarantee you the Lord told him what to say to produce the results He wanted. This is the same as the when the Spirit moved upon the face of the waters. Blessings...
Quote from: pneuma on March 20, 2009, 01:58:45 AM
Paul maybe its just the way you come across by the way you phrase things but what it all boils down to is that as long as there is a mote in our eyes we cannot judge another.
I appreciate your honesty there. I don't disagree at all with your statement that we cannot judge another with a splinter in our eye to remove the splinter from their eye.
Quote
We must first cast our own mote out so that we can see clearly and when we see clearly we then can cast the mote out of anothers eye.
So if some tries to cast the mote out of anothers eye and are unable to do so shows that they are not seeing clearly; thus a blank is still in their eye.
I agree with that
Quote
So even though you beleive you see clearly to cast the mote out of anothers eye, the mote remaining in the other persons eye shows you are not in the place you beleive yourself to be.
That assumes that the person with the mote still in their eye is allowing the person who no longer has the mote to remove the mote. So I agree with that also from the clarification of my perspective towards that.
Quote
I hope you can see this Paul because I do agree with you on some point and can have fellowship with you, but this judgment thing will bring in contention and I want no part of that.
So I'll see you on another thread.
God bless
As you can see Pneuma if you have been following my discussions, I don't engage in fruitless debate. If someone is irrational or no longer desires to speak to me then I simply cease conversation with them.
See you on another thread.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 10:25:50 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 09:52:06 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:38:32 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 09:26:00 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:02:08 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 03:55:24 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 03:36:52 PM
QuoteOf course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel.
Well glad you had a good laugh Tony, but of course you must be mistaken that some Jews beleived Pauls evangel for according to you Pauls teaching does not apply to the Jews.
You can't have it both ways Tony, either it applies to the Jews and Gentiles or it does not. Go figure
Not true. Some Jews did come over to Paul's evangel. Paul himself was a Jew and believed the evangel of the Uncircumcision with a heavenly allotment whereas Peter James and John's evangel has an earthly allotment.
But under Paul's evangel of the body of Christ the central barrier has been broken down between Jew and Gentile and in that body both Jew and Gentile are on an equality.
Paul went to the nations with the Uncircumcision's evangel. Peter, James and John told him that was cool in Galatians 2. And Peter, James and John said they would be for the Circumcision. But this would not forbid a Circumcision Jew from leaving that paradigm and entering into Paul's.
I don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
Also remeber Paul went with the gospel first to the JEWS and they rejected it so he went to the gentiles who accepted it.
So what in the world was Paul preaching to the Jews the SAME Gospel that he preached to the gentile if Pauls preaching has nothing to do with them?
And if it is a different Gospel why did Paul withstand Peter? Paul would have had no right to do that if Peters gospel was not the SAME as his.
Of course there are two gospels/evangels.
Peter preached repentance and baptism with faith.
Paul preached Christ and Him crucified.
Peter preached God was going to destroy them if they didn't repent.
Paul preached that God was at peace with all mankind and is not reckoning their offenses.
I could go on and on.
Paul withstood Peter because Peter shrank back when some from James came. Peter didn't want to be seen eating with "unclean" Gentiles even if they were believers. Paul stood up to Peter on this issue.
Tony your free to beleive that if you want to , but don't exspect me to swallow it.
Two different gospels put up the wall of DIVISION that Christ tore down.
Tis the same as saying those who are christians have a different gospel preached to them then those who are not christian.
You make a division between the haves and the have nots.
It apprears you might have a problem with an attention deficit. I already addressed your "walll of division" several times now.
The wall is torn down IN THE BODY OF CHRIST. IN THAT BODY THERE IS NO JEW OR GREEK.
Under Peter, James and John the believing proselyte is under the 12.
Yes you state the wall of division is torn down, but just like the ET preacher who state that Jesus came to save the whole world proceed to show that the whole world is not saved you likewise state the wall is torn down then beging building it back up.
And you have yet to answer me why Paul preached the SAME gospel to the Jews that he did to the gentiles.
Did he really? Go through the entire book of Acts and prove your assertion.
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 02:03:29 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:29:21 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 01:08:40 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 20, 2009, 12:53:47 AM
23Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
--Mat 23
23You Pharisees and teachers are show-offs, and you're in for trouble! You give God a tenth of the spices from your garden, such as mint, dill, and cumin. Yet you neglect the more important matters of the Law, such as justice, mercy, and faithfulness. These are the important things you should have done, though you should not have left the others undone either. 24You blind leaders! You strain out a small fly but swallow a camel.
Yes Molly Judgment is a Part of who we are - But after TRUE judgment, not the Judgment of Condemnation.
As the Servant who owed was shown mercy and Compassion , then to whom it was Given, tis Forwarded...Judge No man by appearence( Doing),
:icon_flower:
Where is it say in the scriptures to judge no man by their doing? I'm curious how Judgment is done if it isn't based on works.
Paul
The pharisees were FLESH,enmity to who HE WAS...Judging by the DEEDS of the Law...THEY WERE DOING, but left GREATER things LEFT undone.
Im not 100% knowing what ya getting at Paul?
I see Judgment several ways....Judged By law as the Pharisees, Judged to LIFE,Mercy and Compassion, and Judgment to mans own doings which are repayed Unto the Heart,
:icon_flower:
Hi Taffy, I'm was responding that the remark that we are not to judge by appearance (
doing). I don't know where in scripture it shows Judgment that is not based on deeds (works).
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 19, 2009, 10:35:38 PM
Quote from: TonyUnder Peter, James and John the believing proselyte is under the 12.
What does this 'believing proselyte' believe in?
You mean he doesn't believe in Jesus?
"proselyte"
A new convert to a doctrine or religion.
Are you suggesting we could convert to Judaism?
No you can't convert to Peter, James and John's Circumcision group because Israel has been set aside until the complement of the nations is entering (see Romans 11:25).
Of course the convert would believe Jesus was the Messiah, would have to repent, would have to be baptized. Read Acts 2 and see what Peter preached to the Jews and proselytes.
Look at 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 and see what Paul preached to the nations.
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 02:17:05 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 02:03:29 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:29:21 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 01:08:40 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 20, 2009, 12:53:47 AM
23Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
--Mat 23
23You Pharisees and teachers are show-offs, and you're in for trouble! You give God a tenth of the spices from your garden, such as mint, dill, and cumin. Yet you neglect the more important matters of the Law, such as justice, mercy, and faithfulness. These are the important things you should have done, though you should not have left the others undone either. 24You blind leaders! You strain out a small fly but swallow a camel.
Yes Molly Judgment is a Part of who we are - But after TRUE judgment, not the Judgment of Condemnation.
As the Servant who owed was shown mercy and Compassion , then to whom it was Given, tis Forwarded...Judge No man by appearence( Doing),
:icon_flower:
Where is it say in the scriptures to judge no man by their doing? I'm curious how Judgment is done if it isn't based on works.
Paul
The pharisees were FLESH,enmity to who HE WAS...Judging by the DEEDS of the Law...THEY WERE DOING, but left GREATER things LEFT undone.
Im not 100% knowing what ya getting at Paul?
I see Judgment several ways....Judged By law as the Pharisees, Judged to LIFE,Mercy and Compassion, and Judgment to mans own doings which are repayed Unto the Heart,
:icon_flower:
Hi Taffy, I'm was responding that the remark that we are not to judge by appearance (doing). I don't know where in scripture it shows Judgment that is not based on deeds (works).
Paul
what do you make of this?
Jhn 8:15 Ye judge after the flesh; I
judge no man.
:icon_flower:
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 10:56:01 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 19, 2009, 09:46:44 PMWhich is my whole point . . . My relationship with the Father is just that . . .mine . . .what does it matter what other people think and see? If my pursuit is Christ . . .that's all that matters. It does no good for me to follow you around looking for Christ working in you. Nor does it do any good for you to become an alarmist about questioning ones personal relationship being authentic according to what "you" consider to be the fruits of Christ manifesting. The only way you could possibly know would be if you followed someone around 24x7, otherwise, there's just no way to tell.
Christians are still human . . .and they still can't measure up to perfection . .so you catch them on a bad day . . and . .according to you . . .because "you" didn't see any works of Christ manifesting in them "that day" you then conclude they aren't a Christian. To which I would respond . . .so what???
If I were to respond to your concern and try to manufacture the appearance of what a Christian is . . .you'd feel better but you'd be making a judgment according to a lie . .either way, I don't see the emphasis of works in another to be beneficial at all.
Take it up with Christ. He is the one that says we will know them by their fruits.
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Paul
Jesus is correct that the Jewish believers are known by their fruits.
For us of the nations it is a wholly different matter. If we use the same statement of Jesus above and apply it to believers of the nations then most of the believers Paul wrote to would be unsaved due to all their problems.
Thank God for Grace and that "God deals graciously with all our offenses"!
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 02:27:17 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 02:17:05 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 02:03:29 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:29:21 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 01:08:40 AM
Quote from: Molly on March 20, 2009, 12:53:47 AM
23Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
--Mat 23
23You Pharisees and teachers are show-offs, and you're in for trouble! You give God a tenth of the spices from your garden, such as mint, dill, and cumin. Yet you neglect the more important matters of the Law, such as justice, mercy, and faithfulness. These are the important things you should have done, though you should not have left the others undone either. 24You blind leaders! You strain out a small fly but swallow a camel.
Yes Molly Judgment is a Part of who we are - But after TRUE judgment, not the Judgment of Condemnation.
As the Servant who owed was shown mercy and Compassion , then to whom it was Given, tis Forwarded...Judge No man by appearence( Doing),
:icon_flower:
Where is it say in the scriptures to judge no man by their doing? I'm curious how Judgment is done if it isn't based on works.
Paul
The pharisees were FLESH,enmity to who HE WAS...Judging by the DEEDS of the Law...THEY WERE DOING, but left GREATER things LEFT undone.
Im not 100% knowing what ya getting at Paul?
I see Judgment several ways....Judged By law as the Pharisees, Judged to LIFE,Mercy and Compassion, and Judgment to mans own doings which are repayed Unto the Heart,
:icon_flower:
Hi Taffy, I'm was responding that the remark that we are not to judge by appearance (doing). I don't know where in scripture it shows Judgment that is not based on deeds (works).
Paul
what do you make of this?
Jhn 8:15 Ye judge after the flesh; I judge no man.
:icon_flower:
I believe it means that Jesus doesn't judge after the flesh.
Paul
well Paul
doesnt that suggest HES NOT judging after the violation of the law ? It seems a Fleshy deed?
seems the woman wasnt Judged, but she was, as HIS JUDGMENT IS TRUE.
That is of WHOM HE IS, and HIS Judgment of Others. :icon_flower:
just kinda interested in your thoughts here
:icon_flower:
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 03:21:40 AM
well Paul
doesnt that suggest HES NOT judging after the violation of the law ? It seems a Fleshy deed?
seems the woman wasnt Judged, but she was, as HIS JUDGMENT IS TRUE.
That is of WHOM HE IS, and HIS Judgment of Others. :icon_flower:
just kinda interested in your thoughts here
:icon_flower:
I don't believe that Jesus ever judges according to the letter of the Law (which would be according to the flesh as well). But I do believe He judges according to righteousness which is by the Spirit. Regarding the woman caught in adultery, she had nobody to accuse her. But I'm glad you brought that up because Jesus didn't reply that nobody should judge her. In fact, He begged it on if there were one that was righteous enough to judge her which of course He knew there were be none to.
Joh 8:7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Paul
We should probably start another thread on this subject at some point. There is much more I need to learn on this subject as well. But I believe we are all probably convinced that we not to Judge anything but righteous Judgement if we are to judge at all.
So pray for me as I pray for you all that God opens our hearts to the wealth of His wonderful Word on this subject and may He enlighten us all in the name of Jesus Christ.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 04:35:05 AM
We should probably start another thread on this subject at some point. There is much more I need to learn on this subject as well. But I believe we are all probably convinced that we not to Judge anything but righteous Judgement if we are to judge at all.
So pray for me as I pray for you all that God opens our hearts to the wealth of His wonderful Word on this subject and may He enlighten us all in the name of Jesus Christ.
Paul
Food for thought for all Paul :icon_flower:
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 04:39:06 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 04:35:05 AM
We should probably start another thread on this subject at some point. There is much more I need to learn on this subject as well. But I believe we are all probably convinced that we not to Judge anything but righteous Judgement if we are to judge at all.
So pray for me as I pray for you all that God opens our hearts to the wealth of His wonderful Word on this subject and may He enlighten us all in the name of Jesus Christ.
Paul
Yes, I just prayed moments ago for all of us studying this topic on this forum. Please remember to pray yourselves as well. And the answers will come in Jesus name.
Paul
Food for thought for all Paul :icon_flower:
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 01:06:57 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 11:51:00 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:45:40 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 19, 2009, 11:40:52 PM
Yes the scriptures speak of this, I think the bottom line is that no one is actually qualified to claim they can accuratly enough to be of a selfless purpose to do so and should keep quiet.
Paul, there are numerous examples in scripture that show righteous Judgement exercised by men.
Paul
Yes of course, this is the path this thread needs to take. Are you qualified?
Yes, I'm qualified where I have been given qualification.
Paul
Which means your not.
Quote from: Taffy on March 20, 2009, 03:21:40 AM
well Paul
doesnt that suggest HES NOT judging after the violation of the law ? It seems a Fleshy deed?
seems the woman wasnt Judged, but she was, as HIS JUDGMENT IS TRUE.
That is of WHOM HE IS, and HIS Judgment of Others. :icon_flower:
just kinda interested in your thoughts here
:icon_flower:
I think he was judging her heart and her history, from a full and complete picture about her. It's probably the first time anyone ever treated her with love and respect. First, he saves her life. And, then he honors her.
And, it's because of this respect and mercy he shows for her that she would be motivated to change.
That's not to say that he would handle everyone the way he handles her. In fact, he's quite a bit harsher with the Pharisees.
10When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
11She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more. --John 8
Notice she calls him, "Lord." The Pharisees never did that.
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
It refers knowing the person BY their fruits that they produce, not where they gathered it from. It even goes further and explains this with these verses:
No, actually it does not. The word their is traslated from a definition of a 3rd person perspective to self.
G846 autos ow-tos'
from the particle au (perhaps akin to the base of G109 through the idea of a
baffling wind) (backward);
the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the
third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:--
her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-,
thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, - by, -in,
-into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very,
which. Compare G848.
The reason that this is the proper definition and not one I just happen to like is because this verse is in a passage specifically telling YOU that it is YOU to focus on.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 20, 2009, 06:14:46 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
It refers knowing the person BY their fruits that they produce, not where they gathered it from. It even goes further and explains this with these verses:
No, actually it does not. The word their is traslated from a definition of a 3rd person perspective to self.
G846 autos ow-tos'
from the particle au (perhaps akin to the base of G109 through the idea of a
baffling wind) (backward);
the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the
third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:--
her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-,
thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, - by, -in,
-into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very,
which. Compare G848.
The reason that this is the proper definition and not one I just happen to like is because this verse is in a passage specifically telling YOU that it is YOU to focus on.
So what you saying the meaning should be, Paul?
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 03:46:01 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 20, 2009, 06:14:46 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
It refers knowing the person BY their fruits that they produce, not where they gathered it from. It even goes further and explains this with these verses:
No, actually it does not. The word their is traslated from a definition of a 3rd person perspective to self.
G846 autos ow-tos'
from the particle au (perhaps akin to the base of G109 through the idea of a
baffling wind) (backward);
the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the
third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:--
her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-,
thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, - by, -in,
-into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very,
which. Compare G848.
The reason that this is the proper definition and not one I just happen to like is because this verse is in a passage specifically telling YOU that it is YOU to focus on.
So what you saying the meaning should be, Paul?
Paul
I am telling you in that post. That why I highlighted what I did in red.
Hi Paul;
when we jdge by appearance..we are judging good and bad
fruit from the tree of good and evil.That always brings
condemnation and death.
Sin in the flesh has always been condemned..I know that..
and I know you know that. that being said..ALL have partaken
of that tree..all have fallen short of the Glory that eat from
that tree.
when we judge someone as good or bad..we judge
ourselves..for we,too have good and evil in our flesh.
the TREE OF LIFE HAS NO CONDEMNATION OF MANKIND IN IT
But by confessing this good and evil that dwells in our flesh,too
and knowing we can never be justified or be perfect,like He is
perfect..and will always fall short of it
mercy is extended..and our transgressions are not imputed to
us and we are granted to eat from the tree of life and take
part in the new life in the spirit
judging a tree by it's fruit..is discerning the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil's fruit from the tree of life's fruit
which there is no condemnation of those in Christ..those who
have eaten Christ's body and drank his blood.
it was the denying of sin in their own flesh[good and evil] and
judging by appearance from the tree of the knowledge of good
and evil...that caused the Pharisee's to condemn an innocent
man..and accuse those and persecute them whose sin had
been blotted out..as blasphemers.
so, you will know a tree by it's fruit is...judgement by
appearance from tree of knowledge of good and evil..
.which
brings condemnation and death to all including the one judging
what is good and what is evil [law]
or tree of life..
which is mercy and forgivesness and life in the spirit and a not
imputing of sin unto life and life eternal..but a providing for life
and healing and salvation for mankind
it is the fruit of these two tree's you need to discern from
as it presents itself in various men to various men..
remembering that if you forgive men their tresspasses against
you then your Father will forgive you..if you don't..your Father
will not forgive you...in this way you are fallen from Grace..that
you speak of..if you should begin judging from the tree of good
and evil again....and become subject to the judge yourself.
a shrinking back to judging by appearance from the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil..and proclaiming judgement and
condemnation on other men..brings you subject to this same
judgement.
Now the tree of life is salvation,mercy and undeserved
kindness unto all men...despite their having eaten from the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil[having good and evil
dwell in their flesh] but it is the confessing of this knowledge
that evil dwells in their flesh..that allows them to accept their
Saviour and be granted to eat from the tree of life..and the
hope they have in Jesus Christ to completely deliver them from
this body of death.
the denying of the knowledge that evil/sin dwells with
them..and the delusion of self-righteousness from eating
from the tree of knowledge of good and eviland their judging of
others as condemned..and not themselve,also..is what makes
them blind guides.
I hope this will help you understand what we speak of here
and the not judgeing by appearance but at the same time
discerning the tree by it's fruit
we must judge ourselves by discerning from these tree's
as to what fruit we are bringing forth...as to whether it is
from the tree of knowledge of good and evil or the tree of life
It is as the tree of Nebuchanezzer that grew so tall..and then
was cut down and it's stump banded until 7 times passed over
it
Sheila
Quotethe denying of the knowledge that evil/sin dwells with
them..and the delusion of self-righteousness from eating
from the tree of knowledge of good and eviland their judging of
others as condemned..and not themselve,also..is what makes
them blind guides.
I'd like to talk a little more about this. The law gives us the negative--thou shalt not--and a list of things not to do. It also gives us the positive--love God, honor father and mother, keep the sabbath--a list of things to do.
Is that the good and evil? So we think if we don't do one and do the other we are good?
Certainly this has a lot of advantages from the point of view of a stable and safe society.
Under what circumstances am I not to judge murder as evil? Or a murderer as evil?
Jesus ups the ante by saying that even hating is murder. So by raising the standard we are all pulled under it.
Even so, how am I to treat a murderer as a member of society? Because we have to live in this world.
What I'm asking is for a practical application.
Quote from: sheila on March 20, 2009, 05:14:33 PM
Hi Paul;
when we jdge by appearance..we are judging good and bad
fruit from the tree of good and evil.That always brings
condemnation and death.
Sin in the flesh has always been condemned..I know that..
and I know you know that. that being said..ALL have partaken
of that tree..all have fallen short of the Glory that eat from
that tree.
when we judge someone as good or bad..we judge
ourselves..for we,too have good and evil in our flesh.
the TREE OF LIFE HAS NO CONDEMNATION OF MANKIND IN IT
But by confessing this good and evil that dwells in our flesh,too
and knowing we can never be justified or be perfect,like He is
perfect..and will always fall short of it
mercy is extended..and our transgressions are not imputed to
us and we are granted to eat from the tree of life and take
part in the new life in the spirit
judging a tree by it's fruit..is discerning the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil's fruit from the tree of life's fruit
which there is no condemnation of those in Christ..those who
have eaten Christ's body and drank his blood.
it was the denying of sin in their own flesh[good and evil] and
judging by appearance from the tree of the knowledge of good
and evil...that caused the Pharisee's to condemn an innocent
man..and accuse those and persecute them whose sin had
been blotted out..as blasphemers.
so, you will know a tree by it's fruit is...judgement by
appearance from tree of knowledge of good and evil..
.which
brings condemnation and death to all including the one judging
what is good and what is evil [law]
or tree of life..
which is mercy and forgivesness and life in the spirit and a not
imputing of sin unto life and life eternal..but a providing for life
and healing and salvation for mankind
it is the fruit of these two tree's you need to discern from
as it presents itself in various men to various men..
remembering that if you forgive men their tresspasses against
you then your Father will forgive you..if you don't..your Father
will not forgive you...in this way you are fallen from Grace..that
you speak of..if you should begin judging from the tree of good
and evil again....and become subject to the judge yourself.
a shrinking back to judging by appearance from the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil..and proclaiming judgement and
condemnation on other men..brings you subject to this same
judgement.
Now the tree of life is salvation,mercy and undeserved
kindness unto all men...despite their having eaten from the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil[having good and evil
dwell in their flesh] but it is the confessing of this knowledge
that evil dwells in their flesh..that allows them to accept their
Saviour and be granted to eat from the tree of life..and the
hope they have in Jesus Christ to completely deliver them from
this body of death.
the denying of the knowledge that evil/sin dwells with
them..and the delusion of self-righteousness from eating
from the tree of knowledge of good and eviland their judging of
others as condemned..and not themselve,also..is what makes
them blind guides.
I hope this will help you understand what we speak of here
and the not judgeing by appearance but at the same time
discerning the tree by it's fruit
we must judge ourselves by discerning from these tree's
as to what fruit we are bringing forth...as to whether it is
from the tree of knowledge of good and evil or the tree of life
It is as the tree of Nebuchanezzer that grew so tall..and then
was cut down and it's stump banded until 7 times passed over
it
Sheila
Of course! Thanks Shiela . . .you just reminded me of why I see what I do . . .can't believe I forgot this!
Romans 3
20Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin
Law is the knowledge of sin. Knowledge of sin . . . awareness . . .emphasis . .. consciously looking for darkness in others is living under the law. And that's what this whole thing has been all about . . . focusing on the works, the actions, the attitudes . . .the outward manifestations of others . .the measuring of one's outer court . . .all of these things come under this truth . . . observing the sin in others is living according to the law . . . .living by law is turning from grace.
BUT . . .there's always silver lining in everything, we just need to refocus ourselves in order to allow it to manifest So what's the silver lining in this case? Ha! Great question . . .next verse.
21But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;
God's rightesousness manifests when we CHOOSE to IGNORE the law . . . which again . .is focusing on the outward manifestations of the darkness in others. Interesting that the law and the prophets . . .for me, this is simply saying the Old Testament Scriptures, the book of law and the prophets . . . they are a witness to this truth. They testify of this truth.
So, the law was not originally meant to focus on the sin . . .because it's the law and the prophets that testify to the righteousness of God . .which manifests when the law is not controling us. So the law originally was intended to be a witness to the righteousness of God . .and the only way the righteousness of God will manifest . . .is when law is not enforced or observed.
Same passage . . .but in Message Translation
Our involvement with God's revelation doesn't put us right with God. What it does is force us to face our complicity in everyone else's sin. But in our time something new has been added. What Moses and the prophets witnessed to all those years has happened. The God-setting-things-right that we read about has become Jesus-setting-things-right for us.
Quote from: Molly on March 20, 2009, 05:25:41 PM
Quotethe denying of the knowledge that evil/sin dwells with
them..and the delusion of self-righteousness from eating
from the tree of knowledge of good and eviland their judging of
others as condemned..and not themselve,also..is what makes
them blind guides.
I'd like to talk a little more about this. The law gives us the negative--thou shalt not--and a list of things not to do. It also gives us the positive--love God, honor father and mother, keep the sabbath--a list of things to do.
Is that the good and evil? So we think if we don't do one and do the other we are good?
Certainly this has a lot of advantages from the point of view of a stable and safe society.
Under what circumstances am I not to judge murder as evil? Or a murderer as evil?
Jesus ups the ante by saying that even hating is murder. So by raising the standard we are all pulled under it.
Even so, how am I to treat a murderer as a member of society? Because we have to live in this world.
What I'm asking is for a practical application.
For me, there are obvious consequences for such things. And we really need to understand the difference between righteousness and consequences. Because someone murdered someone in the presence of a believer, is not to say that the believer can ignore what just happened .. . the murderer may not have affected their spiritual freedom. . .but they did affect their earthly freedom. My flesh is still bound by the law of physics . . .I still get hungry and need to eat, drink, bathe . . .my body is still subject to this realm . .and as such, my earthly activity is also bound by the laws established in the earth as well . . .but my focus is not on the things of the earth . . but of the spirit.
Bottom line . . . there are separate laws for separate realms. The laws of the flesh are intended to protect the freedom of physical life . . .the laws of the spirit are the entrance into the kingdom of spiritual life. And for that, there are only two laws . . .Love God . . .and love each other as much as you love you.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 20, 2009, 04:07:56 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 20, 2009, 03:46:01 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 20, 2009, 06:14:46 AM
Quote from: trettep on March 19, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
It refers knowing the person BY their fruits that they produce, not where they gathered it from. It even goes further and explains this with these verses:
No, actually it does not. The word their is traslated from a definition of a 3rd person perspective to self.
G846 autos ow-tos'
from the particle au (perhaps akin to the base of G109 through the idea of a
baffling wind) (backward);
the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the
third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:--
her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-,
thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, - by, -in,
-into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very,
which. Compare G848.
The reason that this is the proper definition and not one I just happen to like is because this verse is in a passage specifically telling YOU that it is YOU to focus on.
So what you saying the meaning should be, Paul?
Paul
I am telling you in that post. That why I highlighted what I did in red.
Oh, ok, we are in agreement then. I thought you were disagreeing with what I said. I'm guess I have been getting so much disagreement lately, I'm under that expectation now. :dontknow:
Paul
Quote from: Molly on March 20, 2009, 05:25:41 PM
Quotethe denying of the knowledge that evil/sin dwells with
them..and the delusion of self-righteousness from eating
from the tree of knowledge of good and eviland their judging of
others as condemned..and not themselve,also..is what makes
them blind guides.
I'd like to talk a little more about this. The law gives us the negative--thou shalt not--and a list of things not to do. It also gives us the positive--love God, honor father and mother, keep the sabbath--a list of things to do.
Is that the good and evil? So we think if we don't do one and do the other we are good?
Certainly this has a lot of advantages from the point of view of a stable and safe society.
Under what circumstances am I not to judge murder as evil? Or a murderer as evil?
Jesus ups the ante by saying that even hating is murder. So by raising the standard we are all pulled under it.
Even so, how am I to treat a murderer as a member of society? Because we have to live in this world.
What I'm asking is for a practical application.
Molly what I am going to write is not trying to slight you, so bear with me. When someone tries to work around the scripture implication that we really should be judging ourselves only they seem to have to pull out the big obvious things in order to make a point.
When it comes to murder, is murder as simple as someone killing another? Does that mean based on that you can decide that persons standing with God? No... You want to think you have that right, but you do not.
What about the killer in Alabama? Can you say he is not a Christian? No you cannot, because it is not about HIM measuring up to YOU. It is about what God does with peoples hearts no matter what they do. Now, if the killer says, God loves me and wanted me to kill those people, then we have a difference in what we can rightly judge. We can judge the mans words, but we still cannot judge the mans heart and his standing with God.
Many people judged my life Molly in the past, especially so during the time I met my wife, they come to conclusions they did not have the right to come to.
If you had met a long haired drinker that never went to church, never read the bible, didn't want to to talk about religious things but said he loved woman and said he was a Christian. Could you actually judge that I was not? No you can't.
The problem is that we take what someone does out of the context of God working all things.
I do not condone getting drunk, but if you do, I still cannot say what your standing with God is. I was drunk when I met my wife, in all likelyhood if I hadn't been drinking I would of never met her. That will never be a statement saying "Hey go get drink and meet the love of your life"
What it means is that you could not possibly have judged my standing with God based on the state of drunkeness I was in. You also could not have judged that God was not using that to meet my wife and in all reality finding love in such a way that I was FORCED to make a choice between LOVE and ALCOHOL.
The difference is that many people judged that I did not actually love my wife, they judged that I could not have been manifesting fruit in my heart and they did not have the right to do so. None of them knew a hill of beans what they were talking about.
Quote from: sheila on March 20, 2009, 05:14:33 PM
Hi Paul;
when we jdge by appearance..we are judging good and bad
fruit from the tree of good and evil.That always brings
condemnation and death.
Sin in the flesh has always been condemned..I know that..
and I know you know that. that being said..ALL have partaken
of that tree..all have fallen short of the Glory that eat from
that tree.
when we judge someone as good or bad..we judge
ourselves..for we,too have good and evil in our flesh.
the TREE OF LIFE HAS NO CONDEMNATION OF MANKIND IN IT
But by confessing this good and evil that dwells in our flesh,too
and knowing we can never be justified or be perfect,like He is
perfect..and will always fall short of it
mercy is extended..and our transgressions are not imputed to
us and we are granted to eat from the tree of life and take
part in the new life in the spirit
judging a tree by it's fruit..is discerning the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil's fruit from the tree of life's fruit
which there is no condemnation of those in Christ..those who
have eaten Christ's body and drank his blood.
it was the denying of sin in their own flesh[good and evil] and
judging by appearance from the tree of the knowledge of good
and evil...that caused the Pharisee's to condemn an innocent
man..and accuse those and persecute them whose sin had
been blotted out..as blasphemers.
so, you will know a tree by it's fruit is...judgement by
appearance from tree of knowledge of good and evil..
.which
brings condemnation and death to all including the one judging
what is good and what is evil [law]
or tree of life..
which is mercy and forgivesness and life in the spirit and a not
imputing of sin unto life and life eternal..but a providing for life
and healing and salvation for mankind
it is the fruit of these two tree's you need to discern from
as it presents itself in various men to various men..
remembering that if you forgive men their tresspasses against
you then your Father will forgive you..if you don't..your Father
will not forgive you...in this way you are fallen from Grace..that
you speak of..if you should begin judging from the tree of good
and evil again....and become subject to the judge yourself.
a shrinking back to judging by appearance from the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil..and proclaiming judgement and
condemnation on other men..brings you subject to this same
judgement.
Now the tree of life is salvation,mercy and undeserved
kindness unto all men...despite their having eaten from the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil[having good and evil
dwell in their flesh] but it is the confessing of this knowledge
that evil dwells in their flesh..that allows them to accept their
Saviour and be granted to eat from the tree of life..and the
hope they have in Jesus Christ to completely deliver them from
this body of death.
the denying of the knowledge that evil/sin dwells with
them..and the delusion of self-righteousness from eating
from the tree of knowledge of good and eviland their judging of
others as condemned..and not themselve,also..is what makes
them blind guides.
I hope this will help you understand what we speak of here
and the not judgeing by appearance but at the same time
discerning the tree by it's fruit
we must judge ourselves by discerning from these tree's
as to what fruit we are bringing forth...as to whether it is
from the tree of knowledge of good and evil or the tree of life
It is as the tree of Nebuchanezzer that grew so tall..and then
was cut down and it's stump banded until 7 times passed over
it
Sheila
Hi Sheila, I never stated that we should judge by appearance. I stated what the Word of God says that we should judge righteously if we judge at all.
Paul
For those of you that disagree with what I say, tell me then why should I not judge Christ to be different than the Pharisees?
Paul
QuoteI'd like to talk a little more about this. The law gives us the negative--thou shalt not--and a list of things not to do. It also gives us the positive--love God, honor father and mother, keep the sabbath--a list of things to do.
Is that the good and evil? So we think if we don't do one and do the other we are good?
Certainly this has a lot of advantages from the point of view of a stable and safe society.
Under what circumstances am I not to judge murder as evil? Or a murderer as evil?
Jesus ups the ante by saying that even hating is murder. So by raising the we are all pulled under it.
Even so, how am I to treat a murderer as a member of society? Because we have to live in this world.
What I'm asking is for a practical application
Molly , To dwell in the Mind set of the Law of sin and death , and to speak of it as the reality unto others, Is hate , for one who hates is A murderer and liar.
1John 2:9 He that
**saith** he is in the
light, and
hateth his brother, is in
darkness even until now. 1John 2:10 He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is
none occasion of stumbling in him.
ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another :icon_flower:
For such Darkness is PAST
1John 2:8 Again, a
new commandment I write unto you, which thing is
true in him and in you: because the
darkness is past, and the
true light now shineth.OF WHICH WERE SPOKEN BEFORE,through the deceitful desires of the Mind\flesh
Titus 3:3 For
we ourselves also were sometimes foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in
malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another.
Ephes 5:8 For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye
light in the Lord: walk as children of light: For me, I cant think of any greater SIN then denying THE LIFE HE IS -
FOR THE law WORKETH Wrath..
THE CHILDREN OF WRATH released from Darkness?
Mat 27:45 Now from the
sixth hour there was
darkness over all the land unto the
ninth hour Best application I got Molly :icon_flower:
Hi Molly
murder is condemned as is all sin in the flesh..and death is
the judgement of God for sin in the flesh. It is the dwelling of
evil in our flesh that is the vessel of wrath fitted for destruction.
It is to break up the 'works' of the devil..that Christ came.
When we 'put to death" the old man..and 'deaden' our body
members as respect to fornications,murders,idolatry etc we
are in fact working in conjunction with this sentence upon
him through the Holy spirit...the man of lawlessness is the man
doomed to destruction.2Thessalonians 2;8 and then the
lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord Jesus will
overthrow with THE BREATH OF HIS MOUTH,AND DESTROY BY
THE SPLENDOR OF HIS COMING...
this man of lawlessness or old sinner man does not LOVE GOD
OR HIS FELLOW MAN
the new creation or the 'new man formed in Christ" is
delivered from this body undergoing this death..or man of sin
that dwells in our flesh...Lift yourselves erect your deliverance
draws nigh.
that is why Paul said..some of us would be 'changed' in the
twinkling of an eye at the last trump. Corruption put on
incorruption.
the old man of sin in the flesh dies and returns to dust
and the new spiritual man returns unto God. that is why
in the parable of the wheat and tares it says when the new
heads of the wheat are formed..the tares appeared too
That is why Paul said..that I wish to do,I do not,that I wish
to not do..I do..who will deliver me from this body undergoing
this death. Also Jesus spoke of placing new wine in new skins
Our new creation man in the image of the Son of God will be
placed in a new incorruptible vessel. Those whom the Holy
spirit has been given use this same Holy spirit to put to death
the old man of sin in them..by that same spirit of Christ...
it is he that goes into everlasting cutting off....
as we have all borne the image of the corruptible we shall
all bear the image of the incorruptible. We have borne the
image of the corruptible man of sin..and we shall all
bear the image of Jesus Christ. A sinless body is to me given
unto us as well as a new spirit. The Holy spirit as our token
bespeaks what is to be our inheritance
Jesus is to appear agins APART FROM SIN..he does seperate
us from our man of sin body..and reclothe us.
This is done for all mankind
also, he shepherding the nations with a rod of iron and
shattering the vessels of clay bespeak of Him putting to death
the man of sin clay vessels[breaking up the works of satan]
and giving them new sinless bodies and the creation of the
NEW MAN IN CHRIST
that rod of IRON IS THE WILL OF FATHER THAT HE YEILDS
THAT ALL MEN BE SAVED AND DELIVERED FROM SIN
Sheila
Quote from: Tony N on March 20, 2009, 02:14:25 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 10:25:50 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 09:52:06 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:38:32 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 09:26:00 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 09:02:08 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 19, 2009, 03:55:24 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 19, 2009, 03:36:52 PM
QuoteOf course, the Jews and Gentiles in the body of Christ are the ones that believe Paul's evangel.
Well glad you had a good laugh Tony, but of course you must be mistaken that some Jews beleived Pauls evangel for according to you Pauls teaching does not apply to the Jews.
You can't have it both ways Tony, either it applies to the Jews and Gentiles or it does not. Go figure
Not true. Some Jews did come over to Paul's evangel. Paul himself was a Jew and believed the evangel of the Uncircumcision with a heavenly allotment whereas Peter James and John's evangel has an earthly allotment.
But under Paul's evangel of the body of Christ the central barrier has been broken down between Jew and Gentile and in that body both Jew and Gentile are on an equality.
Paul went to the nations with the Uncircumcision's evangel. Peter, James and John told him that was cool in Galatians 2. And Peter, James and John said they would be for the Circumcision. But this would not forbid a Circumcision Jew from leaving that paradigm and entering into Paul's.
I don't have a problem with Peter and the boys preaching to the Jews and Paul preaching to the gentile Tony, my disagreement comes in when you say it is not the same gospel, that what Paul preached to the gentles is different then what Peter and the boys preached to the Jews. That makes two gospels and not one.
Also remeber Paul went with the gospel first to the JEWS and they rejected it so he went to the gentiles who accepted it.
So what in the world was Paul preaching to the Jews the SAME Gospel that he preached to the gentile if Pauls preaching has nothing to do with them?
And if it is a different Gospel why did Paul withstand Peter? Paul would have had no right to do that if Peters gospel was not the SAME as his.
Of course there are two gospels/evangels.
Peter preached repentance and baptism with faith.
Paul preached Christ and Him crucified.
Peter preached God was going to destroy them if they didn't repent.
Paul preached that God was at peace with all mankind and is not reckoning their offenses.
I could go on and on.
Paul withstood Peter because Peter shrank back when some from James came. Peter didn't want to be seen eating with "unclean" Gentiles even if they were believers. Paul stood up to Peter on this issue.
Tony your free to beleive that if you want to , but don't exspect me to swallow it.
Two different gospels put up the wall of DIVISION that Christ tore down.
Tis the same as saying those who are christians have a different gospel preached to them then those who are not christian.
You make a division between the haves and the have nots.
It apprears you might have a problem with an attention deficit. I already addressed your "walll of division" several times now.
The wall is torn down IN THE BODY OF CHRIST. IN THAT BODY THERE IS NO JEW OR GREEK.
Under Peter, James and John the believing proselyte is under the 12.
Yes you state the wall of division is torn down, but just like the ET preacher who state that Jesus came to save the whole world proceed to show that the whole world is not saved you likewise state the wall is torn down then beging building it back up.
And you have yet to answer me why Paul preached the SAME gospel to the Jews that he did to the gentiles.
Did he really? Go through the entire book of Acts and prove your assertion.
Acts 13:38-43
38 Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins: 39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses. 40 Beware therefore, lest that come upon you, which is spoken of in the prophets; 41 Behold, ye despisers, and wonder, and perish: for I work a work in your days, a work which ye shall in no wise believe, though a man declare it unto you.
42 And when the Jews were gone out of the synagogue, the Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them the next sabbath. 43 Now when the congregation was broken up, many of the Jews and religious proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas: who, speaking to them, persuaded them to continue in the grace of God.
This is Paul preaching to JEWS and GENTILES the SAME message of GRACE. Tis why the GENTILES wanted him to preach the SAME MESSAGE the next Sabbath. And Paul speaking to the JEWS persuaded them to continue in the grace of God
Acts 14:1
And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both together into the synagogue of the Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews and also of the Greeks believed.
Again we see Paul preaching the SAME message to the JEWS and the GREEKS
Kind of debunks the two different gospels does it not?
If you do not believe it debunks the two different Gospel theory please explain why Paul preached the SAME message to the JEWS and GENTILES.
Not so sure that proves that much there . . .the message he preached was of grace . . .the message to the Jews was grace as well, but their heritage also required combined works . . .which is fine if it's because you just want to do it as it keeps you connected with your heritage . . .naturally . . .but it's when they were trying to force the Gentiles to the literal circumcizing is where things got hairy for them and Paul stepped in to separate the two saying that the Gentiles did not have to be circumcized physically because the message he preached was of a spiritual circumcision.
So for me, that's the two gospels . . .and Paul's ministry was not "to" the Jews . . .his ministry was to the Gentiles . . .to say that because both Jew and Gentile were present at his gathering means the message is the same to both . . .I'd say "in those specific situations, yes, it was . . but what was the message being preached? Was it aimed at the Jews and the Gentiles elected to conform to Jewish ways? Or was it to the Gentiles and the Jews present elected to give up their literal laws and follow the law of grace . .which was again, directed primarily to the Gentiles.
Quote from: Nathan on March 23, 2009, 10:10:03 PM
Not so sure that proves that much there . . .the message he preached was of grace . . .the message to the Jews was grace as well, but their heritage also required combined works . . .which is fine if it's because you just want to do it as it keeps you connected with your heritage . . .naturally . . .but it's when they were trying to force the Gentiles to the literal circumcizing is where things got hairy for them and Paul stepped in to separate the two saying that the Gentiles did not have to be circumcized physically because the message he preached was of a spiritual circumcision.
So for me, that's the two gospels . . .and Paul's ministry was not "to" the Jews . . .his ministry was to the Gentiles . . .to say that because both Jew and Gentile were present at his gathering means the message is the same to both . . .I'd say "in those specific situations, yes, it was . . but what was the message being preached? Was it aimed at the Jews and the Gentiles elected to conform to Jewish ways? Or was it to the Gentiles and the Jews present elected to give up their literal laws and follow the law of grace . .which was again, directed primarily to the Gentiles.
Acts 9:13-16
13 Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: 14 And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. 15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: 16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's sake.
and the children of ISRAEL.
Pauls message was NOT just for the GENTILES and this scripture makes that plainer then the other ones I posted, Tis the same gospel bro.
Concering circumcision Paul said it does not matter whether one be in circumcision or one was not in circumcision.
In other word Paul made NO DISTINCTION between the TWO, which is what a different gospel would be doing.
Quote from: pneuma on March 23, 2009, 10:21:36 PMIn other word Paul made NO DISTINCTION between the TWO, which is what a different gospel would be doing.
First to Jerusalem, then to all nations.
- Luke 24:45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, 46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: 47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
To all nations
- Mathew 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world, as a testimony to all nations; and then the end will come.
Quote from: Nathan on March 23, 2009, 10:10:03 PMbut it's when they were trying to force the Gentiles to the literal circumcizing is where things got hairy for them and Paul stepped in to separate the two saying that the Gentiles did not have to be circumcized physically because the message he preached was of a spiritual circumcision.
So for me, that's the two gospels
Except that Jews didn't need to be circumcised either. So that is still one gospel of circumcision of the heart.
Quote from: pneuma on March 23, 2009, 10:21:36 PM
Pauls message was NOT just for the GENTILES and this scripture makes that plainer then the other ones I posted, Tis the same gospel bro.
Concering circumcision Paul said it does not matter whether one be in circumcision or one was not in circumcision.
In other word Paul made NO DISTINCTION between the TWO, which is what a different gospel would be doing.
No distinction between Jew and Gentile IN THE BODY OF CHRIST.
In the body of Christ neither the act of circumcision nor the act of uncircumcision is availing anything.
Tony, don't you think this whole issue is just that...a WHOLE issue? By that I mean, I don't think we can take a passage of scripture here, and two more over there and then a doctrine make. IMO, this is a study in context, taking a look at the big picture, putting together precept upon precept...not saying "well Paul said (one or two verses) so here's the way it is"....Seems to me it's comparing Peter to Paul, the whole book of Romans, putting it in context of things Jesus said about the Kingdom, then praying for understanding...not just jumping to a conclusion, perhaps even based on preconceived notions or traditions (even without realizing it)...it's a big subject, and IMO we need to be open to revelation, seek God about it, realizing there may be some nuggets God has yet to show them/me/us.
This feels to me like a kid going down to the water's edge to play in the mud and stuff . . .but then it get's too slippery and the pond beckons him to come in . . .even though he didn't come to drown . . .just play in the mud.
This discussion may be another one of those that has no end . . .just a lot of slipping and sliding around and can't quite get enough of a grip to walk back out of it.
I think things could be addressed much easier if the people who think Christians should get off their lazy butts and do something that measures up to their expectations would just come out and say thats what they mean after 43 pages. :happy3:
Quote from: jabcat on March 24, 2009, 09:31:23 PM
Tony, don't you think this whole issue is just that...a WHOLE issue? By that I mean, I don't think we can take a passage of scripture here, and two more over there and then a doctrine make. IMO, this is a study in context, taking a look at the big picture, putting together precept upon precept...not saying "well Paul said (one or two verses) so here's the way it is"....Seems to me it's comparing Peter to Paul, the whole book of Romans, putting it in context of things Jesus said about the Kingdom, then praying for understanding...not just jumping to a conclusion, perhaps even based on preconceived notions or traditions (even without realizing it)...it's a big subject, and IMO we need to be open to revelation, seek God about it, realizing there may be some nuggets God has yet to show them/me/us.
Hi Jabcat, I just find it amazing that people can take just one verse from Paul's writing which says there is no Jew or Greek and leave out the whole contextual setting. Is that what you are getting at? And yet in other writings there is still Jew and Greek. They rip out of Pauline context that there is no male or female yet in other Pauline writings Paul tells the women (obviously a female concept would you not say?) things to do and men (obviously a male subject) things to do. They rip out of context from Paul's writings that there is no more slave nor free yet in Paul's writings he tells slaves how to act and the free how to act.
The ripping out of context is all due to immaturity.
You wrote: "IMO we need to be open to revelation." I hope you don't mean revelation outside of God's written word. We need God to open His word up to our understanding so that the eyes of our heart will be enlightened to perceive. . . (see Eph.1:16 onward).
"In Him, in Whom our lot was cast also"
Tony
IMO, absolutely yes to the first part, and absolutely no to the last part...within the Word...I've said that over and over...always within the Word, better, more accurate understandings...for instance, J. Preston's teachings on Lazarus/Rich Man...within the Word, but very different, multi-layered, etc., than orthodoxy...
and yes, not just ripping pieces here and there out of context to attempt to prove some point, using a couple of verses to establish a whole doctrine, while really just putting our own spin/understanding on it...which I believe I'm guilty of as well at times...probably part of our nature, but I believe, something we need to be aware of...The very thing I/we swear up and down on and push it off as the absolute truth and THE way to view it, God may show us something different and better about it yet today or tomorrow. Part of the humbling process as well maybe...I should be a very humble guy by now :happy3:.
IMO, again, not outside the Word...anything needs to match up with accurately translated, rightly divided, in context, Spirit revelation OF the Word :thumbsup:...
QuoteThe ripping out of context is all due to immaturity.
Hey Tony :icon_flower:
I may be quiet right now but I aint dead yet.
Tell Paul that come Hebrews 11.,,he makes whole DOCTRINAL POINT on FAITH...
Beg to differ bro....
as for your comments elsewhere..multiple levels....s :icon_flower:
ya could say the ACT of immaturity IS NOT SEEING THEM.... :icon_king:
Blessing
I am going to stop when the page count equals my age, I'm just helping it along, one more page.
hey where did that post go?
Nope not there yet.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 24, 2009, 11:46:45 PM
I am going to stop when the page count equals my age, I'm just helping it along, one more page.
:cloud9: rofl.....
Ah, I decided it was unnecessary...but it would've added to the length of the thread, huh?
I'll put this part back in..."who started this thread, anyway?" Must've been a dumb guy. Let's whup'em.
It was jabcat that started the thread. Get a rope! :icon_jokercolor:
How long Martin... :laughing7:
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 24, 2009, 11:46:45 PM
I am going to stop when the page count equals my age, I'm just helping it along, one more page.
43 , Paul do you want the thread closed now ?,kinda goes agianst the flow some :laughing7:
I was caught in a quandry to reply since my announcement of not posting when it reached my age, but I guess as long as i can post and the thread not hit 45 pages I am still safe from having a double mind.
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on March 25, 2009, 12:24:00 AM
I was caught in a quandry to reply since my announcement of not posting when it reached my age, but I guess as long as i can post and the thread not hit 45 pages I am still safe from having a double mind.
:icon_king: :Sparkletooth: :icon_flower:
Quote from: Taffy on March 24, 2009, 11:16:53 PM
QuoteThe ripping out of context is all due to immaturity.
Hey Tony :icon_flower:
I may be quiet right now but I aint dead yet.
Tell Paul that come Hebrews 11.,,he makes whole DOCTRINAL POINT on FAITH...
Paul who?
Quote
Beg to differ bro....
Begging is not becoming of you :laughing7:
Quoteas for your comments elsewhere..multiple levels....s :icon_flower:
ya could say the ACT of immaturity IS NOT SEEING THEM.... :icon_king:
Blessing
What do you mean by "different levels"?
Quote from: Tony N on March 25, 2009, 01:35:16 AM
Quote from: Taffy on March 24, 2009, 11:16:53 PM
QuoteThe ripping out of context is all due to immaturity.
Hey Tony :icon_flower:
I may be quiet right now but I aint dead yet.
Tell Paul that come Hebrews 11.,,he makes whole DOCTRINAL POINT on FAITH...
Paul who?
Quote
Beg to differ bro....
Begging is not becoming of you :laughing7:
Quoteas for your comments elsewhere..multiple levels....s :icon_flower:
ya could say the ACT of immaturity IS NOT SEEING THEM.... :icon_king:
Blessing
What do you mean by "different levels"?
oopps ......the non author of Hebrews :icon_king: :icon_flower:
I beseech a Lot TT :icon_flower:
multiple levels...The SHadow representing a higher :icon_flower: SPIRITUAL understanding....
:icon_flower:
seems we may have to go throu that NATURAL \spiritual thread all over TT :laughing7:
:icon_flower:
Quote from: Taffy on March 25, 2009, 01:35:53 AM
multiple levels...The SHadow representing a higher :icon_flower: SPIRITUAL understanding....
:icon_flower:
seems we may have to go throu that NATURAL \spiritual thread all over TT :laughing7:
:icon_flower:
You mean
SOULISH \spiritual? :happy3:
It is my understanding that the flesh and the soulish is not able to understand the spirit of the word. It takes God's spirit in a person making that person spiritual in order for the eyes of the heart to see that which is spiritual. No amount of learning will unlock the scriptures without God's spirit.
Spiros Zodhiates is an excellent example of this. He speaks Greek fluently. When writing concerning 1 Corinthians 15:22-28 he says that it is concerning ALL mankind. But in the end, when he gets to 1 Cor.15:28 he hedges and says that "God will be all to the believer He desires to be but will be all to the unbeliever He must be." In other words, in the end, the unbeliever gets the shaft. But this just goes to show that one as well educated as Spiros is, he cannot understand the most simple four words: "God All
in all." It does not say "God all
to all."
If spiros had the spiritual eyes of his heart opened up he would be able to believe the "in" of "God all IN all."
Tony
Seeing it from the soulish and spiritual point bro to be more precise... :icon_flower:
This being the original thought to your post of context, scripture being ripped out etc..
IE- the levels of understanding...Thats all bud...
but im not in conflict to the soulish\spiritual man concept..seems we discussed this a few times TT :winkgrin:
Quote from: Tony N on March 24, 2009, 04:43:43 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 23, 2009, 10:21:36 PM
Pauls message was NOT just for the GENTILES and this scripture makes that plainer then the other ones I posted, Tis the same gospel bro.
Concering circumcision Paul said it does not matter whether one be in circumcision or one was not in circumcision.
In other word Paul made NO DISTINCTION between the TWO, which is what a different gospel would be doing.
No distinction between Jew and Gentile IN THE BODY OF CHRIST.
In the body of Christ neither the act of circumcision nor the act of uncircumcision is availing anything.
Hmmm I gave you scripture that shows Paul was also sent to Israel, you just seem to ignore that which you don't like
Acts 9:13-16
13 Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: 14 And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. 15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: 16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's sake.
and the children of ISRAEL.
And Bob showed the same principal from the other apostles that the gospel given to them would be preached throughout the whole world, and the gentles are a part of the whole world.
But you are free to beleive what you like Tony, but it does seem contrary to the scripture Bob and I gave.
Quote from: pneuma on March 25, 2009, 03:57:47 AM
Quote from: Tony N on March 24, 2009, 04:43:43 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 23, 2009, 10:21:36 PM
Pauls message was NOT just for the GENTILES and this scripture makes that plainer then the other ones I posted, Tis the same gospel bro.
Concering circumcision Paul said it does not matter whether one be in circumcision or one was not in circumcision.
In other word Paul made NO DISTINCTION between the TWO, which is what a different gospel would be doing.
No distinction between Jew and Gentile IN THE BODY OF CHRIST.
In the body of Christ neither the act of circumcision nor the act of uncircumcision is availing anything.
Hmmm I gave you scripture that shows Paul was also sent to Israel, you just seem to ignore that which you don't like
Acts 9:13-16
13 Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: 14 And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. 15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: 16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's sake.
and the children of ISRAEL.
And Bob showed the same principal from the other apostles that the gospel given to them would be preached throughout the whole world, and the gentles are a part of the whole world.
But you are free to beleive what you like Tony, but it does seem contrary to the scripture Bob and I gave.
Dear pneuma, actually I like those verses.
What the Scriptures you brought up don't show is Paul preaching the same message as Peter did in Acts. Just because you found a verse that says Paul was chosen to bear Christ's name before the Gentiles and Jews does not mean he taught the exact same message to both groups.
Not to mention the fact that when Israel was set aside and a door was opened to the nations that Paul was given the evangel OF the Uncircumcision otherwise known as "the Uncircumcision's evangel" (see Galatians 2).
It really shows the shallowness of one's bible study when one cannot see a difference between the evangel of the 12 and that of Paul.
Paul's name is not on the New City Jerusalem. Paul will not be sitting on one of the 12 thrones judging Israel. Paul will not be on the earth during the millennial reign or Christ nor during the new earth age and neither will we of the nations.
For the Jews under the 12 they must repent and be baptized. Under Paul's ministry there is only one baptism (in spirit), not in water and spirit. In Paul's evangel which is given in 1 Corintians 15:1-4 we are just believing, not repenting, not getting baptized in water etc.
our hope is Christ in us!
Col 1:27 To whom God would make known what [is] the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:
Rom 8:11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
WOOHOOO. into the celestials/heavenlies. for ever to be with the LORD.
there are many thoughts on this, my thought is, us in this age will be of the celestial kingdom not an earthly kingdom, that is reserved for the earthly nation of Israel.
Act 1:6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
Act 1:7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.
Couldnt Jesus had said "" the kingdom is not of this earth but in the heavens"" at this point?
he did say:
Jhn 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
lots of people use this verse to say there is/will be no kingdom IN this world.
i disagree, at this point, someone change my mind :grin:
peace
chuckt
chuckt, no need to change your mind. It looks good.
Jesus' kingdom was not based upon the realm of this world of man. It was heavenly in origin in that it comes from God and will be on the earth as Jesus taught His disciples to pray: "Thy kindom COME . . . on earth as it is in heaven."
Quote from: Tony N on March 25, 2009, 05:03:37 PM
chuckt, no need to change your mind. It looks good.
Jesus' kingdom was not based upon the realm of this world of man. It was heavenly in origin in that it comes from God and will be on the earth as Jesus taught His disciples to pray: "Thy kindom COME . . . on earth as it is in heaven."
why do you always bash my posts? im telling Jean :happy3: :bgdance:
God bless Tony.
chuckt
Jean Jean the Bible machine?
Quote from: Tony N on March 25, 2009, 03:56:51 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 25, 2009, 03:57:47 AM
Quote from: Tony N on March 24, 2009, 04:43:43 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 23, 2009, 10:21:36 PM
Pauls message was NOT just for the GENTILES and this scripture makes that plainer then the other ones I posted, Tis the same gospel bro.
Concering circumcision Paul said it does not matter whether one be in circumcision or one was not in circumcision.
In other word Paul made NO DISTINCTION between the TWO, which is what a different gospel would be doing.
No distinction between Jew and Gentile IN THE BODY OF CHRIST.
In the body of Christ neither the act of circumcision nor the act of uncircumcision is availing anything.
Hmmm I gave you scripture that shows Paul was also sent to Israel, you just seem to ignore that which you don't like
Acts 9:13-16
13 Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: 14 And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. 15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: 16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's sake.
and the children of ISRAEL.
And Bob showed the same principal from the other apostles that the gospel given to them would be preached throughout the whole world, and the gentles are a part of the whole world.
But you are free to beleive what you like Tony, but it does seem contrary to the scripture Bob and I gave.
Dear pneuma, actually I like those verses.
What the Scriptures you brought up don't show is Paul preaching the same message as Peter did in Acts. Just because you found a verse that says Paul was chosen to bear Christ's name before the Gentiles and Jews does not mean he taught the exact same message to both groups.
Not to mention the fact that when Israel was set aside and a door was opened to the nations that Paul was given the evangel OF the Uncircumcision otherwise known as "the Uncircumcision's evangel" (see Galatians 2).
It really shows the shallowness of one's bible study when one cannot see a difference between the evangel of the 12 and that of Paul.
Paul's name is not on the New City Jerusalem. Paul will not be sitting on one of the 12 thrones judging Israel. Paul will not be on the earth during the millennial reign or Christ nor during the new earth age and neither will we of the nations.
For the Jews under the 12 they must repent and be baptized. Under Paul's ministry there is only one baptism (in spirit), not in water and spirit. In Paul's evangel which is given in 1 Corintians 15:1-4 we are just believing, not repenting, not getting baptized in water etc.
Like I said Tony your welcome to beleive what you will, just don't exspect me to swallow it.
That's o.k. pneuma, you are not required to swallow it. Just absorb it.
Someday you'll see it. It is just not yet time for you.
I respect and owe much to AE Knoch although I see other aspects of the 'Diamond' than what Mr. Knoch taught. The same Diamond just a different view of it.
Tony, you remind me much of AE Knoch.
cp
Good words Tony :thumbsup: ... still pondering this issue, plenty to absorb...but I think it's an important one. We've all still got lots to learn, and I guess until immortality, there'll continue to be a glass we see through darkly...but someday face to face!
Quote from: Tony N on March 25, 2009, 09:34:44 PM
Jean Jean the Bible machine?
If Jean F Douglas is the bible machine yes, i do know know he read it while on the treadmill :happygrin:
Blessings
chuckt
Tony, I know you may have just been kidding but I want make sure....
You wrote.....
It is my understanding that the flesh and the soulish is not able to understand the spirit of the word. It takes God's spirit in a person making that person spiritual in order for the eyes of the heart to see that which is spiritual. No amount of learning will unlock the scriptures without God's spirit.
then you wrote to Pneuma.......
That's o.k. pneuma, you are not required to swallow it. Just absorb it.
Someday you'll see it. It is just not yet time for you.
Are you saying you have more of the Spirit of God or more direct access to Gods Spirit than Pneuma?
I bring this up because if you are kidding I would say to be careful in how you kid and if you are not kidding, please explain yourself a bit more and why you think God has favored you more than Pneuma.
I have found Pneuma and his words to be very insightful and extremely well thought out and to even suggest he is not guided by the Spirit of God when he writes is a huge accusation.
Tony, I have asked you before and you did not answer but do you think you are wrong in any of your stated beliefs?
cp
Quote from: claypot on March 26, 2009, 02:33:02 PM
Tony, I know you may have just been kidding but I want make sure....
You wrote.....
It is my understanding that the flesh and the soulish is not able to understand the spirit of the word. It takes God's spirit in a person making that person spiritual in order for the eyes of the heart to see that which is spiritual. No amount of learning will unlock the scriptures without God's spirit.
then you wrote to Pneuma.......
That's o.k. pneuma, you are not required to swallow it. Just absorb it.
Someday you'll see it. It is just not yet time for you.
Are you saying you have more of the Spirit of God or more direct access to Gods Spirit than Pneuma?
I bring this up because if you are kidding I would say to be careful in how you kid and if you are not kidding, please explain yourself a bit more and why you think God has favored you more than Pneuma.
I have found Pneuma and his words to be very insightful and extremely well thought out and to even suggest he is not guided by the Spirit of God when he writes is a huge accusation.
Tony, I have asked you before and you did not answer but do you think you are wrong in any of your stated beliefs?
cp
If I thought I was wrong about any of my stated beliefs they would not be my stated beliefs, now would they?
Also, no, I wasn't kidding. I'm not saying pneuma is not saved. I'm saying that God has not opened his eyes to the deeper revelation of the two groups of believers in the Scriptures and the two different evangels thereof. One can be a believer and still be soulish and fleshly. A person can have understandings as a minor has and still not have entered into the deeper things of God. Eventually he will get there. In Paul's day some believers of the Corinthians were saying the resurrection was already past. The Galatians were being swayed by some Jewish believers of James that they need to be perfected by doing the law observance. What?! You mean to tell me they were not guided by the spirit of God?! Yep, that is what I'm telling you.
Gal 5:8 "This persuasion is not of Him Who is calling you."
Quote from: Tony N on March 26, 2009, 04:38:49 PM
Quote from: claypot on March 26, 2009, 02:33:02 PM
Tony, I know you may have just been kidding but I want make sure....
You wrote.....
It is my understanding that the flesh and the soulish is not able to understand the spirit of the word. It takes God's spirit in a person making that person spiritual in order for the eyes of the heart to see that which is spiritual. No amount of learning will unlock the scriptures without God's spirit.
then you wrote to Pneuma.......
That's o.k. pneuma, you are not required to swallow it. Just absorb it.
Someday you'll see it. It is just not yet time for you.
Are you saying you have more of the Spirit of God or more direct access to Gods Spirit than Pneuma?
I bring this up because if you are kidding I would say to be careful in how you kid and if you are not kidding, please explain yourself a bit more and why you think God has favored you more than Pneuma.
I have found Pneuma and his words to be very insightful and extremely well thought out and to even suggest he is not guided by the Spirit of God when he writes is a huge accusation.
Tony, I have asked you before and you did not answer but do you think you are wrong in any of your stated beliefs?
cp
If I thought I was wrong about any of my stated beliefs they would not be my stated beliefs, now would they?
Also, no, I wasn't kidding. I'm not saying pneuma is not saved. I'm saying that God has not opened his eyes to the deeper revelation of the two groups of believers in the Scriptures and the two different evangels thereof. One can be a believer and still be soulish and fleshly. A person can have understandings as a minor has and still not have entered into the deeper things of God. Eventually he will get there. In Paul's day some believers of the Corinthians were saying the resurrection was already past. The Galatians were being swayed by some Jewish believers of James that they need to be perfected by doing the law observance. What?! You mean to tell me they were not guided by the spirit of God?! Yep, that is what I'm telling you.
Gal 5:8 "This persuasion is not of Him Who is calling you."
So you are saying God has opened your eyes to the deeper revelation of the two groups of believers and there is no doubt in your mind you are 100% right? Is this what you are saying?
I guess I have learned much through teachers of Gods word who confessed they were still learners too and who more gave me direction in seeking instead of telling me they only had the truth or Spirit of God. To tell you the truth you kind of scare me, not so much for my sake but for those newer learners who may run across your version of things and how you set yourself up.
Just my thoughts and yes, Paul might have scared me too but I think not.
PS: not to offend you but I would not only say Pneuma is saved but I would say he has much of the Spirit of God within and I would say the Spirit of God is moving in Pneumas words on this very thread as I see It is in your words too but in a different way.
cp
Quote from: claypot on March 26, 2009, 04:59:08 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 26, 2009, 04:38:49 PM
Quote from: claypot on March 26, 2009, 02:33:02 PM
Tony, I know you may have just been kidding but I want make sure....
You wrote.....
It is my understanding that the flesh and the soulish is not able to understand the spirit of the word. It takes God's spirit in a person making that person spiritual in order for the eyes of the heart to see that which is spiritual. No amount of learning will unlock the scriptures without God's spirit.
then you wrote to Pneuma.......
That's o.k. pneuma, you are not required to swallow it. Just absorb it.
Someday you'll see it. It is just not yet time for you.
Are you saying you have more of the Spirit of God or more direct access to Gods Spirit than Pneuma?
I bring this up because if you are kidding I would say to be careful in how you kid and if you are not kidding, please explain yourself a bit more and why you think God has favored you more than Pneuma.
I have found Pneuma and his words to be very insightful and extremely well thought out and to even suggest he is not guided by the Spirit of God when he writes is a huge accusation.
Tony, I have asked you before and you did not answer but do you think you are wrong in any of your stated beliefs?
cp
If I thought I was wrong about any of my stated beliefs they would not be my stated beliefs, now would they?
Also, no, I wasn't kidding. I'm not saying pneuma is not saved. I'm saying that God has not opened his eyes to the deeper revelation of the two groups of believers in the Scriptures and the two different evangels thereof. One can be a believer and still be soulish and fleshly. A person can have understandings as a minor has and still not have entered into the deeper things of God. Eventually he will get there. In Paul's day some believers of the Corinthians were saying the resurrection was already past. The Galatians were being swayed by some Jewish believers of James that they need to be perfected by doing the law observance. What?! You mean to tell me they were not guided by the spirit of God?! Yep, that is what I'm telling you.
Gal 5:8 "This persuasion is not of Him Who is calling you."
So you are saying God has opened your eyes to the deeper revelation of the two groups of believers and there is no doubt in your mind you are 100% right? Is this what you are saying?
I guess I have learned much through teachers of Gods word who confessed they were still learners too and who more gave me direction in seeking instead of telling me they only had the truth or Spirit of God. To tell you the truth you kind of scare me, not so much for my sake but for those newer learners who may run across your version of things and how you set yourself up.
Just my thoughts and yes, Paul might have scared me too but I think not.
PS: not to offend you but I would not only say Pneuma is saved but I would say he has much of the Spirit of God within and I would say the Spirit of God is moving in Pneumas words on this very thread as I see It is in your words too but in a different way.
cp
QuoteSo you are saying God has opened your eyes to the deeper revelation of the two groups of believers and there is no doubt in your mind you are 100% right? Is this what you are saying?
Yes, 100% right.
cp, I don't believe I have all the truth. Neither did I say I only have the spirit of God. What truth I do have I have confidence in being correct.
Quote from: Tony N on March 25, 2009, 05:03:37 PM
chuckt, no need to change your mind. It looks good.
Jesus' kingdom was not based upon the realm of this world of man. It was heavenly in origin in that it comes from God and will be on the earth as Jesus taught His disciples to pray: "Thy kindom COME . . . on earth as it is in heaven."
It will be on earth but we won't be?
Quote from: Molly on March 26, 2009, 08:18:33 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 25, 2009, 05:03:37 PM
chuckt, no need to change your mind. It looks good.
Jesus' kingdom was not based upon the realm of this world of man. It was heavenly in origin in that it comes from God and will be on the earth as Jesus taught His disciples to pray: "Thy kindom COME . . . on earth as it is in heaven."
It will be on earth but we won't be?
Right. We will be transported into the kingdom of the Son of His love (Col.1:13) and "our realm is belonging in the heavens out of which we are awaiting a Saviour also, the Lord Jesus" (Phil.3:20).
There is not just a terrestrial kingdom but a celestial one also:
2Ti 4:18 The Lord will be rescuing me from every wicked work and will be saving me for His celestial kingdom: to Whom be glory for the eons of the eons. Amen!
Quote from: Tony N on March 26, 2009, 07:22:23 PM
Quote from: claypot on March 26, 2009, 04:59:08 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 26, 2009, 04:38:49 PM
Quote from: claypot on March 26, 2009, 02:33:02 PM
Tony, I know you may have just been kidding but I want make sure....
You wrote.....
It is my understanding that the flesh and the soulish is not able to understand the spirit of the word. It takes God's spirit in a person making that person spiritual in order for the eyes of the heart to see that which is spiritual. No amount of learning will unlock the scriptures without God's spirit.
then you wrote to Pneuma.......
That's o.k. pneuma, you are not required to swallow it. Just absorb it.
Someday you'll see it. It is just not yet time for you.
Are you saying you have more of the Spirit of God or more direct access to Gods Spirit than Pneuma?
I bring this up because if you are kidding I would say to be careful in how you kid and if you are not kidding, please explain yourself a bit more and why you think God has favored you more than Pneuma.
I have found Pneuma and his words to be very insightful and extremely well thought out and to even suggest he is not guided by the Spirit of God when he writes is a huge accusation.
Tony, I have asked you before and you did not answer but do you think you are wrong in any of your stated beliefs?
cp
If I thought I was wrong about any of my stated beliefs they would not be my stated beliefs, now would they?
Also, no, I wasn't kidding. I'm not saying pneuma is not saved. I'm saying that God has not opened his eyes to the deeper revelation of the two groups of believers in the Scriptures and the two different evangels thereof. One can be a believer and still be soulish and fleshly. A person can have understandings as a minor has and still not have entered into the deeper things of God. Eventually he will get there. In Paul's day some believers of the Corinthians were saying the resurrection was already past. The Galatians were being swayed by some Jewish believers of James that they need to be perfected by doing the law observance. What?! You mean to tell me they were not guided by the spirit of God?! Yep, that is what I'm telling you.
Gal 5:8 "This persuasion is not of Him Who is calling you."
So you are saying God has opened your eyes to the deeper revelation of the two groups of believers and there is no doubt in your mind you are 100% right? Is this what you are saying?
I guess I have learned much through teachers of Gods word who confessed they were still learners too and who more gave me direction in seeking instead of telling me they only had the truth or Spirit of God. To tell you the truth you kind of scare me, not so much for my sake but for those newer learners who may run across your version of things and how you set yourself up.
Just my thoughts and yes, Paul might have scared me too but I think not.
PS: not to offend you but I would not only say Pneuma is saved but I would say he has much of the Spirit of God within and I would say the Spirit of God is moving in Pneumas words on this very thread as I see It is in your words too but in a different way.
cp
QuoteSo you are saying God has opened your eyes to the deeper revelation of the two groups of believers and there is no doubt in your mind you are 100% right? Is this what you are saying?
Yes, 100% right.
cp, I don't believe I have all the truth. Neither did I say I only have the spirit of God. What truth I do have I have confidence in being correct.
Now I'm hearing you clearer Brother.
cp
Quote from: Tony N on March 26, 2009, 08:42:52 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 26, 2009, 08:18:33 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 25, 2009, 05:03:37 PM
chuckt, no need to change your mind. It looks good.
Jesus' kingdom was not based upon the realm of this world of man. It was heavenly in origin in that it comes from God and will be on the earth as Jesus taught His disciples to pray: "Thy kindom COME . . . on earth as it is in heaven."
It will be on earth but we won't be?
Right. We will be transported into the kingdom of the Son of His love (Col.1:13) and "our realm is belonging in the heavens out of which we are awaiting a Saviour also, the Lord Jesus" (Phil.3:20).
There is not just a terrestrial kingdom but a celestial one also:
2Ti 4:18 The Lord will be rescuing me from every wicked work and will be saving me for His celestial kingdom: to Whom be glory for the eons of the eons. Amen!
well, what's going to go on in that celestial kingdom? Will my dog be there? Will there be trees and birds and flowers? Is this different from the restored peaceable kingdom of Isaiah?
Even though Tony often speaks as though it's all a fact . . .not everyone has the same sentiment with this. I find it interesting when people start asking about whether their pets will be in heaven . . . we still aren't able to fathom what it's all about yet. The animals mentioned when someone was having a vision or dream being caught up in the spirit . . .the animals are depicted as symbols of their natures . . horses for strength, lions for tenacity, leapards for speed . . .oxen for labor . . .on and on.
And for my natural thinking mind to try to "imagine" what heaven is going to be like . . .it's going to result in many of the other areas of Scripture pertaining to people . . .everyone has their own opinion of what they think it will all be like. We can share what we "think" it may be like . . .but no one can put it out in stone that "this is how it's going to be . . ."
And before you tell me to take it up with God because that's how Scripture says it's going to be . . just remember . . .it's the "interpretation" of the one trying to do the explaining of what heaven is like. We can't even agree with things we can naturally see . . .how will we ever agree on the things we can't?
I tell my kids that Heaven will be and is a good and fun place........period. Will there be animals there? I don't know? Will there be White Castle hamburger joints there? God, I hope so but again, I don't know. We will be content there, happy. Who the heck cares 'what will be there?' Like you say Nathan, whatever we come up with our carnal minds will probably be a disappointment to us in 'Heaven'.
cp
Quote from: Tony N on March 26, 2009, 01:04:26 AM
That's o.k. pneuma, you are not required to swallow it. Just absorb it.
Someday you'll see it. It is just not yet time for you.
:dontknow: tis in the eye of the beholder.
Tony I am not a sponge to absorb the teachings of men, especially the teachings that would build up again the wall Christ tore down.
Paul says
1 Corinthians 1:12-13
12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. 13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
Yet you divide Christ after this fashion Paul says is in error.
You say there a two different gospels (one for the Gentile and one for the JEW) Paul says there is NOT ANOTHER gospel but there are some who would pervert the gospel of Christ as though it was ANOTHER gospel.
Galatians 1:6-9
6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
So if Paul preached a different gospel then Peter and the boys which one is the false apostle?
For does not Paul say that if any preach any other gospel let them be accused?
Yet Jesus says to Peter and the boys that the gospel they received must be preached unto ALL NATIONS.
Matthew 24:14
14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
Mark 13:10
10 And the gospel must first be published among all nations.
So if Peter and the boys are to preach this gospel unto ALL NATION and it is a different gospel then the one Paul preached to the Gentiles and Paul tells the Gentiles NOT to believe this gospel and that Peter and the boys are accursed, one or the other must be a false apostle.
However if it is the SAME gospel as I maintain both Peter and the boys and Paul remain in fellowship of ONE gospel.
Here we see Peter and the boys and Paul preaching the SAME gospel to every creature.
Mark 16:15
15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
Colossians 1:23
23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;
So if it is a different gospel as you maintain and both Peter and the boys and Paul are told to preach their respective gospels to every creature either Peter and the boys or Paul's gospel is a false gospel. However, if it is the SAME gospel then both Peter and the boys and Paul teach truth.
Peter says that the Gentiles heard the word of the gospel by his mouth and the Holy Ghost made NO difference between them(gentiles) and us(jews).
Acts 15:7-9
7 And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe. 8 And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us; 9 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
Paul says he preached the gospel of Christ to the JEW FIRST and also to the GREEK.
Romans 1:16-17
16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. 17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
You say it is two different gospels Paul preached, that Paul preached a DIFFERENT gospel to the JEWS and then ANOTHER gospel to the GENTILE.
YET what was it Paul said he preached to the Jew AND the Greek?
Answer: the GOSPEL OF CHRIST
tis the SAME gospel preached to BOTH parties.
Who did Paul says that he preached Christ crucified to?1 Corinthians 1:21-24
21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. 22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: 23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; 24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.
Answer: the JEWS and the GREEKS.Did Paul preach a different gospel to the Jews then he did to the Greeks?
NO, for he preached the SAME Christ crucified to BOTH parties.
Ya be building again the walls Christ tore down Tony, so NO I won't and cannot absorb that. For where you see division of the gospel I see the unity of the gospel.
Anyway you asked for scripture that showed Paul preached the SAME gospel to the Jews as he did to the Gentiles, there they be.
Animals in the kingdom? while they were in the ARK with Noah.
Quote from: pneuma on March 26, 2009, 11:24:59 PMAnyway you asked for scripture that showed Paul preached the SAME gospel to the Jews as he did to the Gentiles, there they be.
:thumbsup:
It has always been true that both Jews and Gentiles would be justified by faith apart from deeds of the Law.
- Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. 29 Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also: 30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
This did not become true when Paul preached it or when Christ rose from the dead, or during the "age of grace" after Pentecost. This was always true.
Quote from: bobf on March 27, 2009, 12:11:21 AM
Quote from: pneuma on March 26, 2009, 11:24:59 PMAnyway you asked for scripture that showed Paul preached the SAME gospel to the Jews as he did to the Gentiles, there they be.
:thumbsup:
It has always been true that both Jews and Gentiles would be justified by faith apart from deeds of the Law.
- Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. 29 Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also: 30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
This did not become true when Paul preached it or when Christ rose from the dead, or during the "age of grace" after Pentecost. This was always true.
True, Bob, yet the Circumcision had to
repent- be baptized in water for the remission of sins
Whereas the people of the nations just
- believe Christ died for their sins
- was entombed
- and was resurrected from the dead
.
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 01:14:45 AM
True, Bob, yet the Circumcision had to
repent- be baptized in water for the remission of sins
Whereas the people of the nations just
- believe Christ died for their sins
- was entombed
- and was resurrected from the dead
Tony, in the "one is of, and another of..." passage, where do you see Peter fitting in there...or does he? I believe, and I think you do as well, that certainly it's
Jesus the Savior, but still some different issues, and
perhaps (still learning) different destinations and "ministries" for a 1,000 year period...
all through Jesus' death and resurrection, but again, different issues, including God's not being "done" with Israel..."after the fullness of the Gentiles, THEN all Israel shall be saved"... I know it's a difficult subject, but IMO, there's definitely some things there to search out and understand. I think there are some nuggets in there that are
just below the surface of our usual, mainstream interpretations. IMO, if
nothing else, we need to be aware of which scriptures are
primarily directed to whom...Man I've heard people for years make a mess out of scripture, thinking they've got it figured out, but are really just adding to the confusion. (I'll tell you sometime about a Bible study I went to last night...I enjoyed it, but man, they were taking Jesus' words out when He was talking to Jews about the Kingdom of Heaven and trying to make that about salvation, and some of our ideas were like "yikes"!) I believe sometimes we need to step back and say "God, what am I missing...what do you want to show me? Help me understand". But I won't do that if I think I already know.
Also, do you know of a good scripture study on this, either on the Concordant site or your site...one you recommend? Thanks, James
Hi Jabcat, I just heard Stevie Wonder sing: "When you believe in things that you don't understand, then you suffer."
I think we all believed in things we didn't understand and suffered for it. It is a wonderful thing when one begins to see how the Scriptures really jell through rightly dividing the word of truth.
As to your question, I would suggest as a beginning to go here:
http://www.concordant.org/expohtml/index.html (http://www.concordant.org/expohtml/index.html)
And scroll down to these topics:
Correct Partitioning
Administrations and Dispensations
Are The Bride And Body Identical (7 parts)
1-Body And Bride
2-Looking At The Prophecies
3-The Greek Scriptures On The Bride (Matthew
Through Acts)
4-The Pauline Parenthesis
5-The Greek Scriptures On The Bride (Hebrews)
6-The Greek Scriptures On The Bride (James
Through Revelation)
7-The Letters of Paul - Charter Of The Church
Are We The Bride of the Lamb?
Correctly Cutting the Word of Truth
The Address On The Envelope"
This Generation (Matthew 24:34);
with supplementary article
Thanks T, I'll check it out.
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 02:53:15 AM
Hi Jabcat, I just heard Stevie Wonder sing: "When you believe in things that you don't understand, then you suffer."
I think we all believed in things we didn't understand and suffered for it. It is a wonderful thing when one begins to see how the Scriptures really jell through rightly dividing the word of truth.
As to your question, I would suggest as a beginning to go here:
http://www.concordant.org/expohtml/index.html (http://www.concordant.org/expohtml/index.html)
And scroll down to these topics:
Correct Partitioning
Administrations and Dispensations
Are The Bride And Body Identical (7 parts)
1-Body And Bride
2-Looking At The Prophecies
3-The Greek Scriptures On The Bride (Matthew
Through Acts)
4-The Pauline Parenthesis
5-The Greek Scriptures On The Bride (Hebrews)
6-The Greek Scriptures On The Bride (James
Through Revelation)
7-The Letters of Paul - Charter Of The Church
Are We The Bride of the Lamb?
Correctly Cutting the Word of Truth
The Address On The Envelope"
This Generation (Matthew 24:34);
with supplementary article
I thought your views sounded extremely familiar. I used to study those exact texts. Good stuff in their own way. Can't get into them now for some reason. You must be heavy into them. Seems like when I read your posts I get transported back to the Concordant days!
cp
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 01:14:45 AMTrue, Bob, yet the Circumcision had to
repent- be baptized in water for the remission of sins
Whereas the people of the nations just
- believe Christ died for their sins
- was entombed
- and was resurrected from the dead
Where does it say that the Jews had to be water-baptized to be saved?
Why would repentance be preached to all nations if "we of the nations" do not need to repent?
- Luke 24:46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: 47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Another point Tony. If you look at Paul's doctrine, whether faith vs works, or Jew vs Gentile, or others - each doctrine is logically proved by citing OT scriptures. None of his proofs depend on who, where, or when. If Paul's agruments are sound then his conclusions can not depend on who, where, when either. If I prove that 2 + 2 = 4 and my proof does not depend on who, where, or when then 2 + 2 = 4 for everyone, everywhere, always.
QuoteWhere does it say that the Jews had to be water-baptized to be saved?
Remember the Jordan and John? Philip and the eunuch?
Mat 3:11 "For
I, indeed, am baptizing you in water for repentance, . . . ."
Joh 1:26 John answered them, saying, "
I am baptizing in water. Now in the midst of you One stood of Whom you are not aware."
QuoteWhy would repentance be preached to all nations if "we of the nations" do not need to repent?
Exactly my point.
QuoteLuke 24:46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: 47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Bob, the Jewish disciples were to first go to all the cities in Israel before going to the nations. They never did that because Israel was set aside.
When Christ returns this will be completed and then the disciples will make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit. But this happens AFTER the believers of the nations are taken out of here.
Paul did not preach to the nations repentance and baptism for the remission of sins to the nations when Israel was set aside. He preached 1 cor.15:1-4
QuoteAnother point Tony. If you look at Paul's doctrine, whether faith vs works, or Jew vs Gentile, or others - each doctrine is logically proved by citing OT scriptures. None of his proofs depend on who, where, or when. If Paul's agruments are sound then his conclusions can not depend on who, where, when either. If I prove that 2 + 2 = 4 and my proof does not depend on who, where, or when then 2 + 2 = 4 for everyone, everywhere, always.
Not quite true. Paul was given secrets by Christ that cannot be found in the O.T. and none of the 12 apostles knew. They were given to Paul alone and to the nations.
Tony--
So are you saying that only Jews need to repent and be baptised for remission of sins?
So the Christian churches that baptise have it wrong?
And, the Gentiles do not have to repent?
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 02:53:15 AM
Hi Jabcat, I just heard Stevie Wonder sing: "When you believe in things that you don't understand, then you suffer."
I think we all believed in things we didn't understand and suffered for it. It is a wonderful thing when one begins to see how the Scriptures really jell through rightly dividing the word of truth.
As to your question, I would suggest as a beginning to go here:
http://www.concordant.org/expohtml/index.html (http://www.concordant.org/expohtml/index.html)
And scroll down to these topics:
Correct Partitioning
Administrations and Dispensations
Are The Bride And Body Identical (7 parts)
1-Body And Bride
2-Looking At The Prophecies
3-The Greek Scriptures On The Bride (Matthew
Through Acts)
4-The Pauline Parenthesis
5-The Greek Scriptures On The Bride (Hebrews)
6-The Greek Scriptures On The Bride (James
Through Revelation)
7-The Letters of Paul - Charter Of The Church
Are We The Bride of the Lamb?
Correctly Cutting the Word of Truth
The Address On The Envelope"
This Generation (Matthew 24:34);
with supplementary article
Interesting . . .now you're turning to Stevie Wonder to bring in truth? A blind guy? Go figure.
I have to disagree once again with your logic . . ."When you believe in things that you don't understand, then you suffer."
That is a lie as far as I'm concerned. It may work on the natural plain . .but definitely not in the spiritual.
This has been a bit of a pet peeve of mine as well. This is saying that unless you understand it . .then you shouldn't accept it . . . excuse me, but are you then saying that you understand EVERYTHING about God? That's what got Jesus killed . .they didn't understand who he was . . .and so because of that, they rejected him and murdered him. This is where the mind decieves us into thinking that if my mind doesn't get it . .then I don't beleive it. When FAITH IS JUST THE OPPOSITE. Do your physical eyes "see" God? Can you "see" the wind? You can see the affects of God . . .but can you also see God himself?
No, and if you can't see him, then how can you believe in him? Actually, to use the word "beleive" in the same sentence as "understand" is almost an oxy moron. If I understand it, then I don't believe it . . I KNOW it. But if I "believe" in something . .that means that it's not visible to me yet, but I "trust" that it will be. I believe in God . .not because I understand him . . or even because I can see him . .but I believe because it's a choice I've made regardless of what I see, regardless of what I understand.
Faith is believing what I can't see, accepting what I don't understand. My natural mind doesn't function on that plain . .it needs to see to respond . . .understand to accept . . . but my relationship isn't to be established by what my mind perceives . . .my relationship is based on "faith". And through that faith, my mind begins to see things that are revealed . . .not through reasoning, but through revelation in relationship.
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 05:51:28 PM
QuoteWhere does it say that the Jews had to be water-baptized to be saved?
Remember the Jordan and John? Philip and the eunuch?
Mat 3:11 "For I, indeed, am baptizing you in water for repentance, . . . ."
Joh 1:26 John answered them, saying, "I am baptizing in water. Now in the midst of you One stood of Whom you are not aware."
QuoteWhy would repentance be preached to all nations if "we of the nations" do not need to repent?
Exactly my point.
QuoteLuke 24:46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: 47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Bob, the Jewish disciples were to first go to all the cities in Israel before going to the nations. They never did that because Israel was set aside.
When Christ returns this will be completed and then the disciples will make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit. But this happens AFTER the believers of the nations are taken out of here.
Paul did not preach to the nations repentance and baptism for the remission of sins to the nations when Israel was set aside. He preached 1 cor.15:1-4
QuoteAnother point Tony. If you look at Paul's doctrine, whether faith vs works, or Jew vs Gentile, or others - each doctrine is logically proved by citing OT scriptures. None of his proofs depend on who, where, or when. If Paul's agruments are sound then his conclusions can not depend on who, where, when either. If I prove that 2 + 2 = 4 and my proof does not depend on who, where, or when then 2 + 2 = 4 for everyone, everywhere, always.
Not quite true. Paul was given secrets by Christ that cannot be found in the O.T. and none of the 12 apostles knew. They were given to Paul alone and to the nations.
You've lost me again Tony . . .you're assumption that the believers are going to be removed before the disciples what . . .return from the dead? You're under the assumption that the saints are leaving right? What happened to the words Jesus stated in reference to the days of Noah? There were two sets of people then as well . . .godly and ungodly . . .and when the flood hit . . .which set of people were removed and which ones remained? Seems to me it was Noah and his family that remained as they were hidden in the ark . .which is Christ . . .and the ungodly were wiped out.
It's just as Proverbs states . . .
27 The fear of the LORD prolongeth days: but the years of the wicked shall be shortened.
28 The hope of the righteous shall be gladness: but the expectation of the wicked shall perish.
29 The way of the LORD is strength to the upright: but destruction shall be to the workers of iniquity.
30
The righteous shall never be removed: but the wicked shall not inhabit the earth
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 05:51:28 PM
Remember the Jordan and John? Philip and the eunuch? Mat 3:11 "For I, indeed, am baptizing you in water for repentance, . . . ." John 1:26 John answered them, saying, "I am baptizing in water. Now in the midst of you One stood of Whom you are not aware."
Yeah, I remember people being water baptized, but I don't remember anyone saying that water baptism was a requirement for salvation.
QuoteBob, the Jewish disciples were to first go to all the cities in Israel before going to the nations. They never did that because Israel was set aside.
When Christ returns this will be completed and then the disciples will make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit. But this happens AFTER the believers of the nations are taken out of here.
What would a supposed setting aside of Israel have to do with a change of plans regarding preaching repentance to ALL nations? Where are the scriptures that say
"hey, we were going to preach repentance to all nations, but all that is changed now, no repentance is needed..."
"hey, the circumcision gets saved like this and the nations get saved like that..."
QuotePaul did not preach to the nations repentance and baptism for the remission of sins to the nations when Israel was set aside. He preached 1 cor.15:1-4
Paul didn't tell people walk after the spirit and not after the flesh? Wouldn't I be safe in assuming that means that people are inclined to walk after the flesh and need to turn around and walk after the spirit instead? Isn't that repentance?
QuoteNot quite true. Paul was given secrets by Christ that cannot be found in the O.T. and none of the 12 apostles knew. They were given to Paul alone and to the nations.
How do you know those secrets are not found in the OT?
Quote from: Molly on March 27, 2009, 05:55:12 PM
Tony--
So are you saying that only Jews need to repent and be baptised for remission of sins?
So the Christian churches that baptise have it wrong?
And, the Gentiles do not have to repent?
Yes, only Jews under the administration of the 12 must repent and be baptised. Proselytes who come under the 12 must also do the same.
Repentance for gentiles comes after they have been saved, but not to be saved.
Yes, Christian churches that baptise have it wrong. Paul says there is "one faith, one baptism" to those of the nations.
Quote from: Nathan on March 27, 2009, 06:25:25 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 05:51:28 PM
QuoteWhere does it say that the Jews had to be water-baptized to be saved?
Remember the Jordan and John? Philip and the eunuch?
Mat 3:11 "For I, indeed, am baptizing you in water for repentance, . . . ."
Joh 1:26 John answered them, saying, "I am baptizing in water. Now in the midst of you One stood of Whom you are not aware."
QuoteWhy would repentance be preached to all nations if "we of the nations" do not need to repent?
Exactly my point.
QuoteLuke 24:46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: 47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Bob, the Jewish disciples were to first go to all the cities in Israel before going to the nations. They never did that because Israel was set aside.
When Christ returns this will be completed and then the disciples will make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit. But this happens AFTER the believers of the nations are taken out of here.
Paul did not preach to the nations repentance and baptism for the remission of sins to the nations when Israel was set aside. He preached 1 cor.15:1-4
QuoteAnother point Tony. If you look at Paul's doctrine, whether faith vs works, or Jew vs Gentile, or others - each doctrine is logically proved by citing OT scriptures. None of his proofs depend on who, where, or when. If Paul's agruments are sound then his conclusions can not depend on who, where, when either. If I prove that 2 + 2 = 4 and my proof does not depend on who, where, or when then 2 + 2 = 4 for everyone, everywhere, always.
Not quite true. Paul was given secrets by Christ that cannot be found in the O.T. and none of the 12 apostles knew. They were given to Paul alone and to the nations.
Quote
You've lost me again Tony . . .you're assumption that the believers are going to be removed before the disciples what . . .return from the dead? You're under the assumption that the saints are leaving right? What happened to the words Jesus stated in reference to the days of Noah? There were two sets of people then as well . . .godly and ungodly . . .and when the flood hit . . .which set of people were removed and which ones remained? Seems to me it was Noah and his family that remained as they were hidden in the ark . .which is Christ . . .and the ungodly were wiped out.
The ones left when Christ returns are the righteous Jews who remain IN the kingdom. The ones taken away are the unrighteous Jews who will be taken out of the kingdom, cast out where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Quote from: bobf on March 27, 2009, 06:25:36 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 05:51:28 PM
Remember the Jordan and John? Philip and the eunuch? Mat 3:11 "For I, indeed, am baptizing you in water for repentance, . . . ." John 1:26 John answered them, saying, "I am baptizing in water. Now in the midst of you One stood of Whom you are not aware."
Yeah, I remember people being water baptized, but I don't remember anyone saying that water baptism was a requirement for salvation.
QuoteBob, the Jewish disciples were to first go to all the cities in Israel before going to the nations. They never did that because Israel was set aside.
When Christ returns this will be completed and then the disciples will make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit. But this happens AFTER the believers of the nations are taken out of here.
What would a supposed setting aside of Israel have to do with a change of plans regarding preaching repentance to ALL nations? Where are the scriptures that say
"hey, we were going to preach repentance to all nations, but all that is changed now, no repentance is needed..."
"hey, the circumcision gets saved like this and the nations get saved like that..."
QuotePaul did not preach to the nations repentance and baptism for the remission of sins to the nations when Israel was set aside. He preached 1 cor.15:1-4
Paul didn't tell people walk after the spirit and not after the flesh? Wouldn't I be safe in assuming that means that people are inclined to walk after the flesh and need to turn around and walk after the spirit instead? Isn't that repentance?
QuoteNot quite true. Paul was given secrets by Christ that cannot be found in the O.T. and none of the 12 apostles knew. They were given to Paul alone and to the nations.
How do you know those secrets are not found in the OT?
Eph 3:5 which, in other generations, is not made known to the sons of humanity as it was now revealed to His holy apostles and prophets): in spirit"
The holy apostles and prophets were the ones in the ecclesias among the nations.
Eph 3:9 and to enlighten all as to what is the administration of the secret, which has been concealed from the eons in God, Who creates all,
Quote from: TonyThe ones left when Christ returns are the righteous Jews who remain IN the kingdom. The ones taken away are the unrighteous Jews who will be taken out of the kingdom, cast out where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
So when Christ returns, only the righteous Jews will be left on earth? The unrighteous Jews will be removed to where? The Christian gentiles and Messianic Jews will be raptured and live with Christ in the celestials? And, what about the non Christian Gentiles?
QuoteEph 3:5 which, in other generations, is not made known to the sons of humanity as it was now revealed to His holy apostles and prophets): in spirit"
I thought that secret was Christ in you, the hope of glory. You are saying there is another secret that no one knows?
Quote from: Molly on March 27, 2009, 07:51:35 PM
Quote from: TonyThe ones left when Christ returns are the righteous Jews who remain IN the kingdom. The ones taken away are the unrighteous Jews who will be taken out of the kingdom, cast out where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
So when Christ returns, only the righteous Jews will be left on earth? The unrighteous Jews will be removed to where? The Christian gentiles and Messianic Jews will be raptured and live with Christ in the celestials? And, what about the non Christian Gentiles?
No, when Christ returns He will kick out of the kingdom all Jews who are not righteous. The ones not righteous will live among the nations.
The non-christian gentiles during the 1000 year reign of Christ on the earth will be under the 12 for they will disciple all nations.
QuoteEph 3:5 which, in other generations, is not made known to the sons of humanity as it was now revealed to His holy apostles and prophets): in spirit"
QuoteI thought that secret was Christ in you, the hope of glory. You are saying there is another secret that no one knows?
There are a number of secrets.
Quote from: TonyThe non-christian gentiles during the 1000 year reign of Christ on the earth will be under the 12 for they will disciple all nations.
So, Christ will reign for 1000 years with the righteous Christians? So the Christians will be on earth during this time? Or are you saying the reigning 'saints' are the 12 apostles?
When does Armeggedon happen?
4And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. --Rev 20
Who is reigning with Christ a thousand years?
Quote from: Molly on March 27, 2009, 09:26:14 PM
Quote from: TonyThe non-christian gentiles during the 1000 year reign of Christ on the earth will be under the 12 for they will disciple all nations.
So, Christ will reign for 1000 years with the righteous Christians? So the Christians will be on earth during this time? Or are you saying the reigning 'saints' are the 12 apostles?
Christ and the 12 and the Circumcision saints will reign with Christ along with those also who washed their robes in the blood (were martyred for their faith) of the Circumcision believers.
QuoteWhen does Armeggedon happen?
4And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
--Rev 20
Who is reigning with Christ a thousand years?
The Circumcision saints reign with Christ a thousand years who pass the test of the verse you gave. The rest of the circumcision saints will just be in the kingdom on earth.
We believers of the nations will be with Christ in spirit among the celestials during that time.
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 09:49:13 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 27, 2009, 09:26:14 PM
Quote from: TonyThe non-christian gentiles during the 1000 year reign of Christ on the earth will be under the 12 for they will disciple all nations.
So, Christ will reign for 1000 years with the righteous Christians? So the Christians will be on earth during this time? Or are you saying the reigning 'saints' are the 12 apostles?
Christ and the 12 and the Circumcision saints will reign with Christ along with those also who washed their robes in the blood (were martyred for their faith) of the Circumcision believers.
QuoteWhen does Armeggedon happen?
4And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
--Rev 20
Who is reigning with Christ a thousand years?
The Circumcision saints reign with Christ a thousand years who pass the test of the verse you gave. The rest of the circumcision saints will just be in the kingdom on earth.
We believers of the nations will be with Christ in spirit among the celestials during that time.
One of the problems with this idea is . . .if the Christians can't make disciples of the world now with the assistance of the Holy Spirit . . .how do you expect the 12 disciples to do it after the Holy Spirit leaves with the church?
Doesn't matter really . . . this is all just opinion more than anything.
Quote from: Nathan on March 27, 2009, 10:01:23 PM
One of the problems with this idea is . . .if the Christians can't make disciples of the world now with the assistance of the Holy Spirit . . .how do you expect the 12 disciples to do it after the Holy Spirit leaves with the church?
Doesn't matter really . . . this is all just opinion more than anything.
The real problem is the "great commission" is not for Gentile believers to fulfill but for the Jewish believers Jesus instructed. So it doesn't amaze me that the nations in trying to fulfill that fail miserably.
The disciples will succeed because when they do it they will have the full backing of their Lord while He is on earth.
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 10:05:14 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 27, 2009, 10:01:23 PM
One of the problems with this idea is . . .if the Christians can't make disciples of the world now with the assistance of the Holy Spirit . . .how do you expect the 12 disciples to do it after the Holy Spirit leaves with the church?
Doesn't matter really . . . this is all just opinion more than anything.
The real problem is the "great commission" is not for Gentile believers to fulfill but for the Jewish believers Jesus instructed. So it doesn't amaze me that the nations in trying to fulfill that fail miserably.
The disciples will succeed because when they do it they will have the full backing of their Lord while He is on earth.
Perhaps it is actually the way they think they need to do it that fails miserably?
Quote from: TonyWe believers of the nations will be with Christ in spirit among the celestials during that time.
So we won't be on earth while Christ is reigning with the circumcision saints for 1000 years? Will we ever be on earth?
What about armegeddon? What about the 144,000? Who are they?
What if I am Jewish but I don't know it? God would know. Does that mean I get to stay on earth? Or do Messianic Jews and Christians have the same fate?
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 07:17:27 PMEph 3:5 which, in other generations, is not made known to the sons of humanity as it was now revealed to His holy apostles and prophets): in spirit"
The holy apostles and prophets were the ones in the ecclesias among the nations.
Eph 3:9 and to enlighten all as to what is the administration of the secret, which has been concealed from the eons in God, Who creates all,
I understand that "the mystery" was previously concealed and not made known, but that in no way means it was not in the OT scriptures. God is perfectly capable of hiding things in plain sight. I think it was in the OT scriptures, seeing as Paul proves elements of the mystery using OT scriptures.
:
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 10:05:14 PM
Quote from: Nathan on March 27, 2009, 10:01:23 PM
Doesn't matter really . . . this is all just opinion more than anything.
The disciples will succeed because when they do it they will have the full backing of their Lord while He is on earth.
Keep going. IMO, it matters
very much. These are the things I was trying to get at in the "Context of Scripture" thread, but since I'm still searching it out myself, was unable to be more clear and specific than I was...IMO, this is a lot of what we get all mixed up and often make our doctrines a mess that confuses many, and saying it doesn't matter or if we don't understand it doesn't make it any less important...I've heard these things all mixed up all my life, and I'd like to understand it better..."correctly cutting" :thumbsup:.
Tony,
Just wanted to say you are doing a great job explaining all of this.
I try to keep in mind that the two Covenants, Old and New are for the Israelites, not Gentiles. After Christ was resurrected all of the apostles, including Paul taught the New Covenant, which had rules and laws attached to it. God seperated Paul to go to the Gentiles, then showed Paul that the New Covenant didn't apply to them, or anyone in the Body of Christ.
Here is a short article by Ernest Martin titled "Gentiles Must Become Israelites". This is on the ASK website and it explains about the New Covenant and how Paul came to see that it was for Israel only. I would give the address but if I click out of here I may not be able to get back on for days. For some crazy reason that I can't figure out.
CHB
All I can say is that God must think we are rocket scientists to even come close to figuring this stuff out. Many discussing here have spent many hard years to come to the confusing answers that they have as I have. What is God thinking here? Hmmmmmm.
And then once we think we have a portion figured out then to apply it to our lives is another mystical step! Go figure.
All these variations on every segment and sometimes every letter of Gods word makes me want to go to a quiet island and fish for the rest of my life!
You are all great though and very patient!
I thank God for you all.
cp
Quote from: Molly on March 27, 2009, 10:33:24 PM
Quote from: TonyWe believers of the nations will be with Christ in spirit among the celestials during that time.
So we won't be on earth while Christ is reigning with the circumcision saints for 1000 years? Will we ever be on earth?
What about armegeddon? What about the 144,000? Who are they?
What if I am Jewish but I don't know it? God would know. Does that mean I get to stay on earth? Or do Messianic Jews and Christians have the same fate?
Armageddon occurs prior to the Lord's return.
The 144,000 are comprised of 12 groups of 12,000 of which 12 thousand are from each tribe of Israel. See Revelation 7:4.
If you are Jewish and don't know it and believe Christ died for your sins then you are a member of the body of Christ of which the central wall of the barrier was torn down in Christ and are on equal footing with us goyim. You do not stay on earth when the Lord returns for us. I might, just might put in a word for you and get you a free pass to have a personal meeting with the Lord while He is on the earth. I'll just have to think about it.
Messianic Jews who truly believe Christ died for their sins are in the body of Christ. It seems the word "fate" has a negative connotation connected with it. I would choose the word "blessing" instead.
Tony, all I can say is I'm glad you got God and His plan all figured out, I'll know who to call out to in the day! Put in a good word for me Brother.
I'm just plain old burned out right now but it's good to see you all going at it. God, me thinks, is having a good laugh with and at us all. I really believe He has one great sense of humor, He made me didn't He???!!!!
cp
Quote from: bobf on March 27, 2009, 10:42:58 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 27, 2009, 07:17:27 PMEph 3:5 which, in other generations, is not made known to the sons of humanity as it was now revealed to His holy apostles and prophets): in spirit"
The holy apostles and prophets were the ones in the ecclesias among the nations.
Eph 3:9 and to enlighten all as to what is the administration of the secret, which has been concealed from the eons in God, Who creates all,
I understand that "the mystery" was previously concealed and not made known, but that in no way means it was not in the OT scriptures. God is perfectly capable of hiding things in plain sight. I think it was in the OT scriptures, seeing as Paul proves elements of the mystery using OT scriptures.
Hi Bob,
Please consider this verse:
Eph 3:8 "To me, less than the least of all saints, was granted this grace: to bring the evangel of the untraceable riches of Christ to the nations,"
The word "untraceable" is indicative of that which cannot be traced out in the Old Testament. Those riches of Christ for the nations could only be given by divine revelation of the risen Lord directly to His chosen apostle of the nations, Paul. Such riches comprise our celestial blessings in Christ, being seated with Christ among the celestials, having "a part in the administration of the complement of the eras, to head up all in the Christ, both all in the heavens and all on the earth, in Him, in Whom our lost was cast also."
All these riches cannot be traced out in the Old Testament and therefore are untraceable or as the Authorized Version states: "unsearchable riches of Christ."
Quote from: claypot on March 28, 2009, 03:35:26 AM
Tony, all I can say is I'm glad you got God and His plan all figured out, I'll know who to call out to in the day! Put in a good word for me Brother.
I'm just plain old burned out right now but it's good to see you all going at it. God, me thinks, is having a good laugh with and at us all. I really believe He has one great sense of humor, He made me didn't He???!!!!
cp
cp, I wish I had it all figured out. But, alas, I am but a worm. "I just knows what I knows and that's all that I knows akakakakakak." Popeye.
Tony...let me see if I can clarify some things for my own understanding. So the unsaved Jews, those not trusting Christ in this Age will be a) reconciled in the 1,000 earthly/Kingdom reign and b) where exactly does the repentance and baptism of them come in either with, or apart from faith in Christ?
And if it's with faith in Christ, and the wall/partition is effectually torn down for them, do they still need repentance and baptism? If they don't believe, where does the repentance and baptism come in? It wouldn't profit them anything, would it? I can't quite get a handle on that detail. Thanks.
And cp...if this isn't the place God's got you at right now (digging to uncover this), and if you're tired (I've been there many times) rest in His love and know that He is your Savior, and His grace is sufficient...in our weakness HE is strong...God's blessing, James.
for cp (and me)
The blood that Jesus shed for me,
way back on Calvary;
the blood that gives me strength
from day to day,
it will never lose its power.
Chorus
It reaches to the highest mountain,
it flows to the lowest valley;
the blood that gives me strength
from day to day,
it will never lose its power.
Verse 2
It soothes my doubts and calms my fears,
and it dries all my tears;
the blood that gives me strength
from day to day,
it will never lose its power.
c Andre Crouch
Quote from: Tony N on March 28, 2009, 03:39:31 AMThe word "untraceable" is indicative of that which cannot be traced out in the Old Testament. Those riches of Christ for the nations could only be given by divine revelation of the risen Lord directly to His chosen apostle of the nations, Paul. Such riches comprise our celestial blessings in Christ, being seated with Christ among the celestials, having "a part in the administration of the complement of the eras, to head up all in the Christ, both all in the heavens and all on the earth, in Him, in Whom our lost was cast also."
All these riches cannot be traced out in the Old Testament and therefore are untraceable or as the Authorized Version states: "unsearchable riches of Christ."
I don't deny that divine revelation is required. But understanding of the OT scriptures requires divine revelation from Jesus Christ. Words can be written and/or spoken yet the understanding of those words can still be completely concealed by God.
- 2 Corinthinas 3:14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ. 15 But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart. 16 Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away
This is at least a part of the mystery.
- Ephesians 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel.
Paul reasoned from the scriptures that the Gentiles are also heirs and partakers of God's promises through faith in Christ.
- Galatians 3:8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.
<br>
- Galatians 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
<br>
- Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise
<br>
- Romans 10:11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. 13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
<br>
Tony--
Who are the sons of God? Are those the Gentiles?
Quote from: Tony N on March 28, 2009, 03:39:31 AMHi Bob,
Please consider this verse:
Eph 3:8 "To me, less than the least of all saints, was granted this grace: to bring the evangel of the untraceable riches of Christ to the nations,"
The word "untraceable" is indicative of that which cannot be traced out in the Old Testament.
Paul calls God's judgments and ways unsearchable and past finding out...
- Romans 11:33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!
...concerning how God will save all Israel...
- Romans 11:30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief: 31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy. 32 For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.
<br>
- Romans 11:28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
...which Paul calls a mystery.
- Romans 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery...that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Yet Paul backs up this unsearchable mystery from scripture:
- Romans 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
Quote from: CHB on March 28, 2009, 01:47:21 AM
Tony,
Just wanted to say you are doing a great job explaining all of this.
I try to keep in mind that the two Covenants, Old and New are for the Israelites, not Gentiles. After Christ was resurrected all of the apostles, including Paul taught the New Covenant, which had rules and laws attached to it. God seperated Paul to go to the Gentiles, then showed Paul that the New Covenant didn't apply to them, or anyone in the Body of Christ.
Here is a short article by Ernest Martin titled "Gentiles Must Become Israelites". This is on the ASK website and it explains about the New Covenant and how Paul came to see that it was for Israel only. I would give the address but if I click out of here I may not be able to get back on for days. For some crazy reason that I can't figure out.
CHB
Was this the article you were talking about?
http://www.askelm.com/essentials/ess009.htm
Wow! I found this in the link you provided Tony...I don't believe I'd ever seen this before, and it sums up what I've been carrying on about lately :happygrin:.
Correctly Cutting the Word of Truth
2 Timothy 2:15
There is a good rule to follow for finding out what a text or a section or a chapter or a book means. It is attributed to both Miles Coverdale and John Wycliffe. It is worth knowing and should be copied into one's copy of the Bible for constant reference and for constant application to all studies made of the Sacred Scriptures. Here it is:
THE GOLDEN RULE OF SCRIPTURE INTERPRETATION
"It shall greatly helpe ye to understand Scripture,
if thou mark not only what is spoken or wrytten,
but of whom, and to whom, with what words,
at what time, where, to what intent, with what circumstances,
considering what goeth before and what followeth after."
Linked this to my desktop for further study...thanks again.
Articles on Various Subjects...Correct Partitioning [of the Word] ... http://www.concordant.org/expohtml/index.html
Quote from: bobf on March 28, 2009, 04:50:56 AM
Quote from: Tony N on March 28, 2009, 03:39:31 AMHi Bob,
Please consider this verse:
Eph 3:8 "To me, less than the least of all saints, was granted this grace: to bring the evangel of the untraceable riches of Christ to the nations,"
The word "untraceable" is indicative of that which cannot be traced out in the Old Testament.
Paul calls God's judgments and ways unsearchable and past finding out...
- Romans 11:33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!
...concerning how God will save all Israel...
- Romans 11:30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief: 31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy. 32 For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.
<br>- Romans 11:28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
...which Paul calls a mystery.
- Romans 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery...that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Yet Paul backs up this unsearchable mystery from scripture:
- Romans 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
Bob, the secret not revealed in the O.T. concerning Israel was that she would be set aside and blessings to the nations would come apart from Israel. This is not found in the Scriptures. The Scriptures always show the nations being blessed through Israel. All Israel being saved was not a secret unrevealed in the Old Testament.
The nations being seated with Christ among the celestials and all the celestial blessings cannot be found in the Old Testament.
Quote from: Tony N on March 28, 2009, 03:41:43 AM
Quote from: claypot on March 28, 2009, 03:35:26 AM
Tony, all I can say is I'm glad you got God and His plan all figured out, I'll know who to call out to in the day! Put in a good word for me Brother.
I'm just plain old burned out right now but it's good to see you all going at it. God, me thinks, is having a good laugh with and at us all. I really believe He has one great sense of humor, He made me didn't He???!!!!
cp
cp, I wish I had it all figured out. But, alas, I am but a worm. "I just knows what I knows and that's all that I knows akakakakakak." Popeye.
I need more spinach.
I do see that God/Scripture (one and the same, right?) is again like one big diamond and we all see only but a few facets of it at any given time. This really helps me to understand why we have different views of the same Truth.
This is why I really like this forum, it shows so many facets! I do believe there are views that are just not of God at all as they come from carnal mindsets yet the mystery of having the mind of Christ is absolutely amazing!!!!
PS: I am speaking of myself too when I speak of carnal mindsets and the mind of Christ. Both are yet only one will triumph!!!!!!
cp
Quote from: Doc on March 28, 2009, 08:49:11 AM
Was this the article you were talking about?
http://www.askelm.com/essentials/ess009.htm
Thanks Doc, that is the one.
CHB
Quote from: Tony N on March 28, 2009, 03:03:25 PMBob, the secret not revealed in the O.T. concerning Israel was that she would be set aside and blessings to the nations would come apart from Israel. This is not found in the Scriptures. The Scriptures always show the nations being blessed through Israel.
I disagree. The scriptures say that all nations will be blessed through Abraham's seed, Isaac's seed, Jacob's seed. Paul showed that that seed is a spiritual seed, not a physical seed. Therefore the OT scriptures actually say that all nations will be blessed through those of Abraham's faith which includes both Jews and Gentiles, not through any particular physical lineage.
1. Whole World
... A) Physical Jews
..........1) Jews of Abraham's faith = Abraham's seed
..........2) Jews not of faith
... B) Physical Gentiles
..........1) Gentiles of Abraham's faith = Abraham's seed
..........2) Gentiles not of faith
(A1 + B1) are Abraham's seed. The promises pertain to them. The promises do not pertain to (A2 or B2) and therefore do not pertain to (A) as a whole.
- Romans 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel.
i.e. Not all of (A) is (A1 + B1). The promises made in the word of God were for A1 (and B1 too) not for A.
- Romans 9:7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
i.e. being in (A) does not make one a member of (A1 + B1) who are the children of God and the seed.
- Romans 9:8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
i.e. being in (A) does not make one a child of God, only those who are in (A1 + B1) are the children of God, the seed to whom the promises pertain.
- Galatians 4:28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
i.e. We in (A1 or B1) by virtue of our faith, are as Isaac (A1) was and that is to whom the promises pertain.
- Galatian 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
i.e. If you are (A1 or B1) then the promises are for you, including the promise that says all nations will be blessed through you.
QuoteThe nations being seated with Christ among the celestials and all the celestial blessings cannot be found in the Old Testament.
That may or may not be.
Bob, you one crazy, zany mathematician but I'm diggin your vibes. Groovy!
The Diamond is big.
cp
QuoteThe scriptures say that all nations will be blessed through Abraham's seed
all dont mean all........ :laughing7: :happy3: :mshock: :thumbsup: :bgdance:
Quote from: claypot on March 28, 2009, 07:01:20 PM
Bob, you one crazy, zany mathematician but I'm diggin your vibes. Groovy!
The Diamond is big.
cp
Quote from: chuckt on March 28, 2009, 07:03:23 PM
QuoteThe scriptures say that all nations will be blessed through Abraham's seed
all dont mean all........ :laughing7: :happy3: :mshock: :thumbsup: :bgdance:
all = (1/0)^all
Jesus isn't divided. If everyone is that is to be saved is being saved by the putting on of Christ (both Jew and Gentile) then the works they do will be His. He surely wouldn't do one work in the physical Jew that is performed contrarywise in the physical Gentile. But let's consider further the implications of dividing God's Gospel. If the Gospel were divided as some here claim such that the Jews must perform works and the Gentiles don't then EVERYONE (Jew or Gentile) would need to ensure that their geneologies don't shows that one is vice-versa. In other words the Gentile would need to keep track of their geneologies to ensure they were not actually physical jews. Same with the Jews to ensure they were not physical Gentiles. And to what happens should the Jewish woman married the Gentile Man? or the Gentile man marries the Jewish woman? To whom do they become and their offspring? Do they switch their gospels accordingly? And then upon divorce and remarry? Do they again switch their gospels?
Instead of entertaining those questions, I suggest we see that all that have Christ will perform His works. He doesn't perform differently depending on the physical descendency of the partaker of Christ.
Paul
2And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
3And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
10And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God,
11Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal;
12And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel:
13On the east three gates; on the north three gates; on the south three gates; and on the west three gates.
14And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
--Rev 21
Isn't Paul one of the twelve apostles? If so, then he is one of the twelve foundations on which the new city Jerusalem will stand. The Bible has just flipped things, making the last first [foundation].
The twelve tribes are also present.
Seems to me this is happening on earth. The new city is coming from heaven to earth. It says this city is the bride.
Molly said ... "Isn't Paul one of the twelve apostles?"
I of course may be wrong, but I personally don't think so...when Jesus told the 12 they would reign from 12 thrones, Judas was in the group. I think Matthias and Paul would be like a 13th and 14th Apostle, not of the 12. If that's true, then for the rest of what you say, not sure where that would then fit in :dontknow:.
Quote from: jabcat on March 28, 2009, 08:22:55 PM
Molly said ... "Isn't Paul one of the twelve apostles?"
I personally don't think so...when Jesus told the 12 they would reign from 12 thrones, Judas was in the group. Now for the rest of it, not sure where that would then fit in :dontknow:.
Every apostle was hand picked by Jesus.
Except for Mathias who was picked by lots.
Paul was picked by Christ.
:dontknow:
Quote from: Molly on March 28, 2009, 08:38:05 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 28, 2009, 08:22:55 PM
Molly said ... "Isn't Paul one of the twelve apostles?"
I personally don't think so...when Jesus told the 12 they would reign from 12 thrones, Judas was in the group. Now for the rest of it, not sure where that would then fit in :dontknow:.
Every apostle was hand picked by Jesus.
Except for Mathias who was picked by lots.
Paul was picked by Christ.
:dontknow:
Act 1:24 And they prayed, and said,
Thou, Lord, which knowest the hearts of all men,
shew whether of these two thou hast chosen,
Act 1:25 That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.
Act 1:26 And they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon
Matthias;
and he was numbered with the eleven apostles. So Matthias was numbered with the other 11 making him of the 12 and as these verses imply is that God chose Matthias by way of their lots.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 28, 2009, 08:50:27 PM
Quote from: Molly on March 28, 2009, 08:38:05 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 28, 2009, 08:22:55 PM
Molly said ... "Isn't Paul one of the twelve apostles?"
I personally don't think so...when Jesus told the 12 they would reign from 12 thrones, Judas was in the group. Now for the rest of it, not sure where that would then fit in :dontknow:.
Every apostle was hand picked by Jesus.
Except for Mathias who was picked by lots.
Paul was picked by Christ.
:dontknow:
Act 1:24 And they prayed, and said, Thou, Lord, which knowest the hearts of all men, shew whether of these two thou hast chosen,
Act 1:25 That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.
Act 1:26 And they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.
So Matthias was numbered with the other 11 making him of the 12 and as these verses imply is that God chose Matthias by way of their lots.
Paul
If Paul is not one of the apostles in the foundation of the new Jerusalem, then that sort of supports Tony's case. :dontknow:
trettep,
This article might help to explain the questions you raised. Tony can correct me if I am wrong but it isn't about whether you are a Jew or Gentile but what you believe that determins where you will be for the 1000 years. Read the phases we go through in the article below. When you think about it, the Old Covenant started man's journey back to God, then we went to the New Covenant, from there to the Mystery or final revelation. Kind of like going to School, you go from kindergarten through high school.
Here is an article that might help explain the questions you raised.
I don't agree with everything in the article but overall it does make sense.
Just Who Are You?
There is no more significant question for you to ask, and receive a proper answer to, than that of the title of this chapter. If there is one thing in this world you should find out with all the vigor you can muster, it is the matter of "Just Who Are You?" Once you find that out, you will then know far more of what human life is all about and why God selected you to be on earth in the first place. And believe me, you have a wonderful purpose for being here. You are most important to God.
We at A.S.K. (the Associates for Scriptural Knowledge) have a motto and slogan. It is one that characterizes the reason for presenting our work in biblical, historical, and scientific research to all people who are interested in the teachings of the Holy Scriptures. We are in existence to provide a service of education and research to all people. Our slogan is:
"YOU are destined to change the world for good."
Now there are some people who may take the word "You" in the plural, and others may accept it in the singular, as referring to the reader alone. You may take your pick, but we at A.S.K. prefer the singular meaning because that makes the matter personal to you and to you alone. But, if every reader views the slogan in the singular, it obviously includes all collectively in overall application, and of course we want all people to be included.
There is also one other factor in the slogan. At the end we say that you will change the world "for good" That can be taken in different ways. It can mean you will change the world "permanently" (which is quite proper when one considers what the Holy Scriptures say you will accomplish with God's help), or it can mean for "betterment" (which the Bible also says you will do). The truth is, however, no matter how you view the meaning of the slogan of A.S.K., the chief subject of our interest is YOU!
In the New Testament doctrine of "the Mystery," revealed to the apostle Paul and other apostles in 63 C.E., the teachings of God and Christ open up to such a glorious and triumphant future for all of us (including you), that one can only exclaim wonderful praises to God for what He has planned for us. The apostle Paul said,
"As it is written, Eye has not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God has prepared for them that love him. But God has revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searches all things, yea, the deep things of God."
1 Corinthians 2:9–10
You have a great future ahead of you, and the joys, and rewards can begin even now — even in this earthly life that we presently experience (Mark 10:28–30). Christ Jesus himself said, "I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly" (John 10:10). All you have to do is to claim that abundant life from Christ Jesus, and He will give it to you. After all, He has promised it.
In order to take advantage of the abundant life that is now possible, you must in all circumstances know who you are. And the Holy Scriptures tell you in the plainest words just what and who you are, and what your destiny is according to the plan of God. To rehearse what the Bible says about this matter, read once again the earlier chapters of this book. In those chapters I give you the Scriptures which define in the clearest terms your divine destiny that the Father and Christ have planned for you. And listen, what the Father and Christ set out to do, they will fulfill. They will not fail. They cannot fail.
The Seven Phases of "Who You Are"
If you survey the earlier chapters of this book carefully (and analyze what the Bible states about the divine plan of God to rescue mankind to Himself), you will discover that there are seven phases of spiritual development through which God purposes to save mankind. They are steps of progression in knowledge and understanding. We find the doctrine of Progressive Revelation being demonstrated every step of the way (see chapter 3, "Progressive Revelation" at http://www.askelm.com/essentials/ess005a.htm). In recognizing these stages of progression in the unfolding of God's knowledge and true doctrines to mankind, every person should be able to ask in an intelligent manner the question:
"Just who am I in Regard to Each Phase?"
We will see that once a person reaches (and experiences) Phase Seven (the final human stage of understanding), it will then be possible to know if any particular person is in Phase One of God's divine plan for mankind's redemption, or whether a person is in Phase Two, etc., etc. Indeed, in the simplest of ways, the mature Christian will be able to analyze the Holy Scriptures and recognize whether any individual is in either Phase One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, or even Phase Seven. The simple fact is, full spiritual truth is enjoyed only when people experience Phase Seven of God's plan.
Phase One
All people who lived from the time of the creation of Adam and Eve until the 99th year of Abraham's life (a period of about 2000 years) lived in what we can call Phase One. Prior to the Abraham's 99th year (the year that Abraham was given the covenant of circumcision by God and when Abraham became the "Father of the Faithful"), people on earth were given only the most primitive of spiritual laws by which they could worship God. Other than what became known as the Noachian Laws (regarding eating blood, murdering humans, etc.), God allowed mankind of all races to worship Him in the way that best suited them. The only requirements for obedience were the simple ones given to Adam and Eve. The only covenants were the covenant of the rainbow (Genesis 9:8–17) and also the marriage covenant of promise to the "Barren Woman" of Isaiah 54 to 55:5 (see especially verse 54:10). 1
As for today, all people who DO NOT claim to have Abraham as their "Father" fall into this first and primary category. They would include the Hindus, the Buddhists, Shintoists, all those practicing primitive animistic religions, and all other pagan religions. That means that a full half of the human family still fits into this Phase One of spiritual development, even today. God allows all of them to experience "good and evil [bad]" (Genesis 3:22) within this first stage environment. They are all gaining familiarity with "good and evil [bad]."
This is one of the main reasons God placed mankind on earth with such a short life span. The pre-Flood patriarchs had longer lives, but were not exposed to as much "evil." God limits our experience to an average of seventy years. In this first phase of spiritual development, all humans receive practice in the consequences of "good and evil."
Phase Two
In the second phase of history, God called Abram at age 75 and sent him to Canaan, then Egypt, and then back to Canaan. When the patriarch became 99, God gave him the covenant of circumcision and changed his name to Abraham ("the Father of Many Nations," Genesis 17:4–5, Romans 4:17–18). God gave Abraham specific laws and commandments to perform that separated him and his family both socially and religiously from the rest of the people in the world. In today's world, we have about a fifth of mankind who follow in the basic religious teachings of Abraham. These were introduced to the world in a grand scale at the time of Muhammad. He gave the pagan Arabs (and all the other nations who accepted Islam) the basic religion of Abraham to guide them. This was a step in the right direction into a more mature understanding of spiritual development. All the Muslim sects today fit into the category of this Second Phase of progressive revelation from God.
Phase Three
In the time of Moses God selected the people descended from Jacob (Abraham's grandson, whose name was changed to Israel) to be His covenant nation with a priesthood, a Temple, and a set of laws and commandments. This selection separated the people even further from those who kept the religious principles displayed in Phase One and in Phase Two. This Phase Three lasted to the time of David and Solomon. But before the kingdom phase was made known in the time of David and Solomon, Moses gave Israel the type of religion coded in the Book of the Law (the Torah), or the first five books of the Holy Scriptures. Within the historical periods, there have been two major groups of peoples who adhered to this type of religious and social belief after the time of Joshua and the Judges. One group was the Jewish sect of the Sadducees who believed the inspired Scriptures to be only the first five books of the Bible. The second group, the Samaritans, believed the same thing, in addition to other non-biblical doctrines.
The Samaritans in the 1st century represented as many people in population numbers as did the Jews themselves (at least 3 million people). As time went on, in the period of Justinian (6th century C.E.), the majority of the Samaritans gave up their former religious beliefs and accepted Roman Catholicism. They settled mainly in Italy (becoming in time the Italians of today) and in Southern France, and Northern Spain. Today, the remaining remnant within Phase Three are the few Samaritans still holding on to their traditional religious ways and living in two small areas of the State of Israel. 2
Phase Four
This fourth stage is that which has the Law of Moses as its basis, but it also has laws governing a kingdom and those of a king. As this later kingdom phase came into existence, the prophetic teaching was given that a future king would come on the scene who would be the Messiah, rule over all Israel and subsequently the whole earth. The people that this Phase Four define are the various sections of the Jewish people. Many of them are still expecting a Messianic King to come in the near future to rescue Israel and the Jews into the glorious Kingdom of God that the Old Testament states with dogmatism will occur at the end of this present age. These people do not accept Christ Jesus as the Messiah. They are still looking for the Messiah to come. The Jewish people fit this phase of spiritual development precisely.
Phase Five
There are some people (mainly Jewish converts to a belief in the Messiahship of Christ Jesus) who claim that Jesus is that special prophet was destined to come on the scene after the time of Moses and to take the place of Moses and his religion. They represent those who are Jews in social and religious outlook but still accept Jesus as their Messiah. They are called Messianic Jews.
Phase Six
After Christ's crucifixion and resurrection from the dead, a whole new type of religious belief system came into existence. It was one based on grace and faith. It was not a system that depended on the Law and the Ten Commandments as the standard. The people who made up this Phase Six also included many Gentile peoples (as well as Jews) who were told that they did not have to be circumcised or eat the same types of food that the Jews were accustomed to. In today's world they represent the Roman, and Greek Catholics, most Protestant groups and hordes of other splinter groups of Christians who claim to acknowledge and follow what is called New Covenant teaching. These people represent today about a third of all humans on earth.
Phase Seven
There is a very small remnant group of educated and mature Christians who have accepted as the basis of their social and religious beliefs what I have called in this book: "The Manifesto of God's Declaration of Human Rights and Privileges." These are those of us who accept (and live by) the principles put forth by the apostle Paul and others in the teaching called "the Mystery." This advanced type of teaching represents the pinnacle of spiritual development. It provides humans with a philosophy of life.
Those who find themselves within this final category comprehend that they are destined to become members of the very Family of God in heaven. They understand that they are reckoned by God the Father as sitting on His right hand side in heaven because they are accounted as being "in Christ" at this very moment. This is the position that all humans on earth — eventually — will assume when the plan of God for redemption of the human race is finally completed in the dispensation of the fullness of times (Ephesians 1:10). It means that those who understand what "the Mystery" entails, as revealed in the "Manifesto of God's Declaration of Human Rights and Privileges," are those who truly know who they are.
As the title of this chapter: "Just Who Are You?" asks the question, the teaching of "the Mystery" (given mainly in Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians) explains in detail what the answer is. It is the most glorious teaching that could be given to any human, and thankfully (though most humans do not realize it yet) the promise applies to every single human being who has ever lived, who is living now, or ever will live. We are, in short, destined to become members of the very Family of God (that single and unique Family) that both created the heavens and the earth, but also rules and sustains them. The human race has a great future.
Recapitulation
Of all people on earth today, no matter who they are or in what part of the world they live, they can be placed in one of the above seven phases of spiritual development as revealed in the teachings and principles of the Holy Scriptures. In the Millennium (at the very beginning), the people left on earth after the Great Tribulation and the Wrath of God and Christ are over (Revelation 6:12–16), will start to experience the period prophesied in the Holy Scriptures known as the Kingdom of God on earth (the Millennium).
There will still be many people on earth in India, China, and other areas that will be in Phase One.
In the regions where the Muslim world primarily exists, there will still be those in Phase Two.
Only a few will remain in Phase Three.
Most of the Jews (who formerly embraced Phase Four) will have advanced to Phase Five (according to the prophecies of Zechariah 12:10 through 13:6). They will know that Jesus was and is their Messiah.
The majority in the remainder of the world who have a Christian persuasion will be in Phase Six.
But all of those who were in Phase Seven at the Second Advent of Christ will have been taken to heaven to rule in the heavenly Kingdom of God mentioned by the apostle Paul in 2 Timothy 4:18.
What will happen with those humans (as few as there will be at the beginning of the Millennium) who find themselves within Phases One, Two, Three, Four, Five, and Six? We are told by Christ that the first apostles of Jesus, King David, the prophets, and the other resurrected saints will be allowed to exist on earth in their glorified state and teach the remaining people in a step-by-step manner until all the world comes to an understanding of the full teaching of God and become participants of Phase Seven (see Isaiah chapter 12).
What will happen after the Millennium and during the time of the Great White Throne Judgment period as found in Revelation 20 to 22 (which I discussed earlier)? The final outcome will be "the dispensation of the fullness of times" (Ephesians 1:10). This scene is described in First Corinthians 15:24–28. At that time, God then becomes "all things" and in "all things." In a word, all will become God! At that time, all human beings (then redeemed by Christ to the Father) will be able to join with the apostle Paul in his grand litany of grace and glory by saying,
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creation, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."
Romans 8:38–39
Conclusion
God the Father gave all of us (and that includes you in a very personal sense) into the secure and stable hands of Christ Jesus, and Christ made a statement concerning you. He said,
"All that the Father gives me shall come to me; and him that comes to me I will in no wise cast out ... and that of all which he has given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day."
John 6:37, 39
The apostle Paul said under divine inspiration that God is faithful and He "will confirm you unto the end, that you may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Corinthians 1:8–9).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I have to put this on two posts.
CHB
The rest of the article
But, one might ask, confirm you to what? In the earlier chapters of this book, I showed the scriptural teachings that you are destined to become a literal Son or Daughter of the Living God. In a word, you are to become deified when you are resurrected from the dead at Christ's Second Advent. But more than that, even now (while you are in this fleshly frame) you are already reckoned by God to be a part of His divine Family (1 John 3:1–2).
As far as God the Father is concerned, when He looks over His right shoulder and sees Christ Jesus sitting on that glorious throne next to Him, God the Father also sees you sitting in the same place "in Christ" (Ephesians 2:6; Colossians 3:1–3). Because of this personal closeness you now have with the Father, the apostle Paul said that there was now only one mediator between you and the Father of the universe, and that person is Christ Jesus (1 Timothy 2:5). Yes, you are sitting on the same throne as Christ in heaven (in a legal sense) because you are now reckoned to be "in Christ" and that is where Christ is, reigning over the universe with the Father.
In the period before the revelation of "the Mystery" given to the apostles in 63 C.E., there were a variety of angels who were mediators between mankind and God. As an example, remember that the Law of Moses was given by one mighty mediator called "the Angel of the Lord" and a host of angels (Galatians 3:19–20). Paul mentioned these angels who formerly mediated between women and God when women prayed (1 Corinthians 11:10). But with the revelation of "the Mystery," we are now told by the apostles that Christ has now taken away all the authority of those angelic powers between God and us (Ephesians 4:6–16). We are now reckoned by God the Father (male or female, it makes no difference) as equally sitting on the same throne as Christ Jesus at the very right hand of the Father Himself (Ephesians 2:6).
You have direct access to God the Father through Christ; you and I need no more angelic mediators standing between us. That is a glorious position we now have and Paul revealed it through "the Mystery" given in 63 C.E. That is why we can know what the true "Trinity" of the Holy Scriptures happens to be: God the Father, God the Firstborn Son (Christ Jesus), and God the Us (meaning You, Me and the rest of redeemed humanity).
Christians Are Now Reckoned as Divine Members of God's Family
We humans are now acknowledged by God the Father as members of His divine Family. Our eventual destiny is to put on a new spiritual body at our resurrections from the dead, then help God and Christ rule and sustain the universe, and for us even to create new things in the universe. This is why you (in a very personal way) were selected before the foundation of the world system by a divine lottery to become a member of the ruling Family that governs and controls the entirety of the universe (2 Timothy 1:9). That is your destiny and you should be living today as though it is a fact, which is a present reality because we are "in Christ."
If you truly want to be assured of who you are, then re-read all the chapters of this book and look up the scriptural references. Then go to a mirror and look at yourself. Ask yourself "Just Who Am I?" With the biblical information in this book, you can legally claim from the truths of the Holy Scriptures your divine status at this very time. You are at this present moment an actual Son or Daughter of the Living God. This is because you are now "in Christ." And, you are no second-born or third-born (or billionth-born) Son or Daughter of God. God does not have any second-born children in His Family. He has only firstborn Sons and Daughters. See Hebrews 12:23 where we are all called "firstborn ones" (the Greek original is in the plural). This firstborn reckoning is because we are all accounted to be "in Christ" (even all the "Sons of God"). This position of being a Firstborn Son or Daughter is your present status in a legal sense. You should never allow anyone on earth to try and take your divine position and inheritance away from you because the Father has given it to you. It is yours to keep for the rest of eternity (1 Timothy 2:4–6).
Your Citizenship Is in Heaven, Not on Earth
The King James Version uses the English word "conversation" in Philippians 3:20 to describe your present inheritance, the actual Greek that the apostle Paul used means "citizenship." That's right. You are no longer in God's eyes a citizen of any country on earth. You are now in God's view a citizen of heaven.
"For our CITIZENSHIP is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ. Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself."
Philippians 3:20–21
In the opinion of God, you no longer have to obey religious rules and regulations on this earth pertaining to human beings that supposedly control and dominate their human relationship to God in heaven. Indeed, you are reckoned to already be with God in heaven, at His very right side "in Christ." You now, in the eyes of God, are to be governed by heavenly rules of conduct, not by the earthly rules and regulations that govern the rest of mankind.
So, what kind of conduct should you be practicing while you are still in the flesh on this earth? Knowing who you are, you should be acting like a Son (a Prince) of God or a Daughter (a Princess) of God. You are even now a part of the royal Family of God and you should act like members of that Family. No one in this Royal Family practices rituals or keeps holy days, and neither do you need to practice such things as other humans have had to in the past. You should now conduct yourself as you see God the Father and Christ Jesus conducting themselves. And what conduct do they display? The Bible shows that they are motivated purely and consistently by the virtues that the apostle Paul called the fruit of the Holy Spirit.
The fruit of the Holy Spirit is manifested in nine virtuous principles. They are:
"Love, joy, peace, longsuffering [patience], gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance."
Galatians 5:22–23
There are also nine gifts and operations of the Holy Spirit and Paul lists those in 1 Corinthians 12:4–12. Indeed, in the official arrangement of the epistles of Paul in the original manuscripts of the New Testament, the seven congregations to whom Paul wrote were given nine epistles to instruct them:
Romans,
1 & 2 Corinthians,
Galatians,
Ephesians,
Philippians,
Colossians,
1 & 2 Thessalonians.
There are also 27 books of the New Testament (three times nine). And though our slogan of ASK is not to be compared in importance to the Holy Scriptures, even it has nine words that sum up your destiny. It is: "You are destined to change the world for good." The words of this motto of A.S.K. are true to Scripture. In reality, the type of conduct recommended for us, the children of God, is best summed up by the apostle Paul when he said,
"Whether therefore you eat, or drink, or whatsoever you do, DO ALL TO THE GLORY OF GOD."
1 Corinthians 10:31
That is the social and religious demeanor that any obedient Son and Daughter of God should be doing. Yes, it is that simple. Remember that you are either a Prince or a Princess of God, because you are NOW God's royal children. Christianity is a philosophy of life (not a religion). It is time that we all practice its principles. In short, act in this world like the Prince or the Princess that you are.
Ernest L. Martin
Quote from: trettep on March 28, 2009, 08:50:27 PM
So Matthias was numbered with the other 11 making him of the 12 and as these verses imply is that God chose Matthias by way of their lots.
Paul
IMO, just because they hoped God would tell them what to do, THEN they "cast lots" :mshock:, doesn't
necessarily mean God did it, as in, it being His perfect will. They could have "numbered" him themselves...like I could "number" someone (although I
do realize
I'm not one of the original 11 doing the numbering :laughing7:) as one of the 144,000, but that wouldn't necessarily make it so...there's an argument to be made that they "got ahead of God" by doing it by their lots, because Jesus apparently later did hand-pick Paul as an apostle, and ambassador to the nations. IMO, as Molly said, actually the other 13 apostles were directly hand-picked by Jesus, EXCEPT for Mathias.
Also, this gets into that discussion of "was Judas Jesus' enemy, or as much or more so, fulfilling his destiny, the reason for which he was born"...to (temporarily) be a created vessel of dishonor? I believe the latter. My :2c:.
Good post, C....
Many thoughts and ideas put forth about Paul preaching a different gospel to the Jews then he did to the Gentiles. And as far as I can see these thought run contrary to what Paul stated himself. Are we really being asked to believe some mans teaching over what Paul stated himself?
Again here is what Paul stated about the gospel he preached and to who he preached it.
Paul says he preached the gospel of Christ to the JEW FIRST and also to the GREEK.
Romans 1:16-17
16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. 17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
You say it is two different gospels Paul preached, that Paul preached a DIFFERENT gospel to the JEWS and then ANOTHER gospel to the GENTILE.
YET what was it Paul said he preached to the Jew AND the Greek?
Answer: the GOSPEL OF CHRIST
tis the SAME gospel preached to BOTH parties.
Who did Paul says that he preached Christ crucified to?
1 Corinthians 1:21-24
21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. 22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: 23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; 24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.
Answer: the JEWS and the GREEKS.
Did Paul preach a different gospel to the Jews then he did to the Greeks?
NO, for he preached the SAME Christ crucified to BOTH parties.
For myself I'll believe Paul's own words over anyone else's.
The PROOF is in Paul's own words, so why believe another man's words that run contrary to Paul's?
So for you guys who believe knochs teaching how do you explain Paul saying he preached the SAME GOSPEL to both Jews and Greeks?
Tis hard breaking down the doctrines of men even when scripture proclaims something totally different then men's doctrine.
Bob good posts brother :thumbsup:
Great posts everyone.
Yes, Jabcat, Judas could not do otherwise for, as Peter said, the scripture must be fulfilled
Act 1:16 "Men! Brethren! Fulfilled must be the scripture in which the holy spirit said before through the mouth of David, concerning Judas, who becomes the guide of those apprehending Jesus,"
The casting of the lot was to take out the human from the deciding equation and let God decide.
Pro 16:33 It is the lot that is cast forth in the bosom; Yet from Yahweh is its every judgment. CLNT
Pro 16:33 The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.
Pro 18:18 Casting the lot causes quarrels to cease, And keeps staunch foes apart."
Why does the casting of the lot cause quarrels to cease?
Because they knew that the final result of the draw is of the Lord.
Quote from: pneuma on March 29, 2009, 04:01:34 PM
Many thoughts and ideas put forth about Paul preaching a different gospel to the Jews then he did to the Gentiles. And as far as I can see these thought run contrary to what Paul stated himself. Are we really being asked to believe some mans teaching over what Paul stated himself?
Again here is what Paul stated about the gospel he preached and to who he preached it.
Paul says he preached the gospel of Christ to the JEW FIRST and also to the GREEK.
Romans 1:16-17
16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. 17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
You say it is two different gospels Paul preached, that Paul preached a DIFFERENT gospel to the JEWS and then ANOTHER gospel to the GENTILE.
YET what was it Paul said he preached to the Jew AND the Greek?
Answer: the GOSPEL OF CHRIST
tis the SAME gospel preached to BOTH parties.
Who did Paul says that he preached Christ crucified to?
1 Corinthians 1:21-24
21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. 22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: 23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; 24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.
Answer: the JEWS and the GREEKS.
Did Paul preach a different gospel to the Jews then he did to the Greeks?
NO, for he preached the SAME Christ crucified to BOTH parties.
For myself I'll believe Paul's own words over anyone else's.
The PROOF is in Paul's own words, so why believe another man's words that run contrary to Paul's?
So for you guys who believe knochs teaching how do you explain Paul saying he preached the SAME GOSPEL to both Jews and Greeks?
Tis hard breaking down the doctrines of men even when scripture proclaims something totally different then men's doctrine.
pneuma, Israel was already set aside when Paul wrote Romans and Corinthians. Paul was preaching the same message to Jews as he was to the Gentiles. If the Jews believed Paul's message then they would be in the body of Christ and have a celestial allotment along with the nations.
Quote from: Tony N on March 29, 2009, 04:11:39 PM
pneuma, Israel was already set aside when Paul wrote Romans and Corinthians. Paul was preaching the same message to Jews as he was to the Gentiles. If the Jews believed Paul's message then they would be in the body of Christ and have a celestial allotment along with the nations.
Tony, the conclusions that Paul reaches in Galatians 3 are based soley on OT verses and reasoning given by the Holy Spirit. The premises apply to all
therefore the conclusions must apply to all. The only thing in the premises that separates person A from person B is faith in Christ. When faith in Christ comes to a person, he moves from being under the curse of the law to being "the seed", a child of God, an heir of the promises. Since Galatians 3:9 says that Abraham "
is blessed" via his faith ("Abraham looked forward to see My day AND HE SAW IT and was glad" John 8:56) then the requirement of faith in Christ
can predate Christ's death & resurrection. Thus the gospel preached to Abraham is a brief summary of Paul's gospel, the one and only gospel. Obedience to that gospel was, is, and always will be the only way to be a child of the promises.
CONCLUSIONS REACHED IN GALATIANS 3CONCLUSIONS REGARDING TO WHOM THE PROMISES WERE MADE- The promises were not made to seeds, but to seed
- The promise is given to those who believe
- Those who are Christ's are heirs according to the promise
- Those who are of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham
- Abraham's blessings come to the Gentiles through Christ
- The inheritance is not of the law
CONCLUSIONS REGARDING WHO IS THE SEED- The seed is Christ
- The seed is those who are Christ's
- Those of faith are the children of Abraham
- We are the children of God by faith in Jesus Christ
- There is neither Jew nor Greek, etc. All are one in Christ
CONCLUSIONS REGARDING LAW VS FAITH- The law was added because of transgressions
- The law is not of faith
- No man is justified by the law
- The inheritance is not of the law
- The law could not give life
- As many as are of the works of the law are under the curse
- The law could not disannul the promise that came before it
- Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law
- Before faith came we were under the law until faith would come
- The law is our schoolmaster to lead us to Christ so we can be justified by faith
- Once faith comes we are no longer under a schoolmaster
- The just shall ive by faith
PREMISESOT SCRIPTURES USED TO REACH THE ABOVE CONCLUSIONS- Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.
- The scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.
- For it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
- For it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.
- The scripture hath concluded all under sin.
- The man that doeth them shall live in them.
PS - I suppose it could be argued that what constitutes faith in Christ differs from group to group.
Quote from: pneumatis the SAME gospel preached to BOTH parties.
Who did Paul says that he preached Christ crucified to?
1 Corinthians 1:21-24
21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. 22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: 23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; 24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.
Answer: the JEWS and the GREEKS.
Quote from: Tony Npneuma, Israel was already set aside when Paul wrote Romans and Corinthians. Paul was preaching the same message to Jews as he was to the Gentiles. If the Jews believed Paul's message then they would be in the body of Christ and have a celestial allotment along with the nations.
How many stumbling blocks are there Tony? The Jew's stumbling block above was "we preach Christ crucified". Isaiah prophesied that they would stumble at this stumbling block.
- Romans 9:31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness. 32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone. 33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
If they were set aside prior to this preaching then they must have stumbled at a different stumbling block.
I personally am not saying there is a "totally different gospel" to those that are given faith to believe...I see it as anyone that believes on Jesus as Savior is saved...but I do believe there are some different issues involved, that there is still a general blindness to Jews regarding the Messiah; and that God will deal with the nation of Israel (those that have not yet known Him...and HE knows who they are) in such a way that He will reconcile them (including kingdom issues that I believe can be missed if not careful); when "all Israel will be saved...after the fullness of the Gentiles has come in".
I don't fully understand this topic, I'm still searching it out...and I really don't believe anyone has all the answers to it on either side of the issue...so to take a narrow view and shut out any possibilities that we can all still learn and grow in the matter, IMO, would be a mistake... There's no one I've ever encountered in my life that I'd cast my lot on :happy3: them being absolutely, 100% right on such a huge topic. My :2c:.
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
No Doc that is not the point of contention, Noch and Tony beleive that it is a different gospel preached to defferent parties, that what Paul say has nothing to do with the Jews and those things that Peter and the boys said has nothing to do with the Gentiles.
That and that alone is the contention here.
Quote from: jabcat on March 30, 2009, 06:38:55 AM
I personally am not saying there is a "totally different gospel" to those that are given faith to believe...I see it as anyone that believes on Jesus as Savior is saved...but I do believe there are some different issues involved, that there is still a general blindness to Jews regarding the Messiah; and that God will deal with the nation of Israel (those that have not yet known Him...and HE knows who they are) in such a way that He will reconcile them (including kingdom issues that I believe can be missed if not careful); when "all Israel will be saved...after the fullness of the Gentiles has come in".
I don't fully understand this topic, I'm still searching it out...and I really don't believe anyone has all the answers to it on either side of the issue...so to take a narrow view and shut out any possibilities that we can all still learn and grow in the matter, IMO, would be a mistake... There's no one I've ever encountered in my life that I'd cast my lot on :happy3: them being absolutely, 100% right on such a huge topic. My :2c:.
Jab, I also agree with some of Nochs conclussions, but don't beleive we need two gospels to come to those conclussions, and it has ONLY been Nochs and Tony's insistence of the two gospel theory that I have been battling in these threads.
If you look back over the thread brother you will see I have said this before but departed from Noch on the two gospel theory.
Quote from: pneuma on March 30, 2009, 02:47:18 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
No Doc that is not the point of contention, Noch and Tony beleive that it is a different gospel preached to defferent parties, that what Paul say has nothing to do with the Jews and those things that Peter and the boys said has nothing to do with the Gentiles.
That and that alone is the contention here.
Then I misunderstood what Tony was saying here?: (Emphasis mine)
"pneuma, Israel was already set aside when Paul wrote Romans and Corinthians.
Paul was preaching the same message to Jews as he was to the Gentiles.
If the Jews believed Paul's message then they would be in the body of Christ and have a celestial allotment along with the nations."
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
Doc,
This is the way I see it as well. I also agree with what jabcat said about not being 100% correct on it all.
I do see Paul preaching the same thing as the other apostles at first because they were to go to the Israelites first and the advanced teaching hadn't been given to Paul at that time. When Paul began to see that Gentiles didn't need to be grafted into Israel to be saved, that all was in Christ the Body and the Family of God and not Israel. The Israelites didn't want to hear this so he went to the Gentiles which were glad to hear this. After all who wants to belong to another country in order to be saved if there is a better way? Paul began to see that this wasn't necessary, that we should be a member of the Body of Christ, not Israel.
I know this is hard to grasp. I wrestled with it a long time myself but you can see the difference in Paul's writings than that of the other apostles and even Paul's writings are different in the first epistles. Paul spent a lot of time in prison when he was understanding this and he wasn't able to preach this like he said he should.
Another thing that should be considered in all of this is, Paul's epistles should be positioned last in the Bible. I believe they are in the earlier manuscripts. I believe paul received the final and mature revelation of salvation.
CHB
Quote from: CHB on March 30, 2009, 08:15:33 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
Doc,
This is the way I see it as well. I also agree with what jabcat said about not being 100% correct on it all.
I do see Paul preaching the same thing as the other apostles at first because they were to go to the Israelites first and the advanced teaching hadn't been given to Paul at that time. When Paul began to see that Gentiles didn't need to be grafted into Israel to be saved, that all was in Christ the Body and the Family of God and not Israel. The Israelites didn't want to hear this so he went to the Gentiles which were glad to hear this. After all who wants to belong to another country in order to be saved if there is a better way? Paul began to see that this wasn't necessary, that we should be a member of the Body of Christ, not Israel.
I know this is hard to grasp. I wrestled with it a long time myself but you can see the difference in Paul's writings than that of the other apostles and even Paul's writings are different in the first epistles. Paul spent a lot of time in prison when he was understanding this and he wasn't able to preach this like he said he should.
Another thing that should be considered in all of this is, Paul's epistles should be positioned last in the Bible. I believe they are in the earlier manuscripts. I believe paul received the final and mature revelation of salvation.
CHB
:thumbsup:
Quote from: CHB on March 30, 2009, 08:15:33 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
Doc,
This is the way I see it as well. I also agree with what jabcat said about not being 100% correct on it all.
I do see Paul preaching the same thing as the other apostles at first because they were to go to the Israelites first and the advanced teaching hadn't been given to Paul at that time. When Paul began to see that Gentiles didn't need to be grafted into Israel to be saved, that all was in Christ the Body and the Family of God and not Israel. The Israelites didn't want to hear this so he went to the Gentiles which were glad to hear this. After all who wants to belong to another country in order to be saved if there is a better way? Paul began to see that this wasn't necessary, that we should be a member of the Body of Christ, not Israel.
I know this is hard to grasp. I wrestled with it a long time myself but you can see the difference in Paul's writings than that of the other apostles and even Paul's writings are different in the first epistles. Paul spent a lot of time in prison when he was understanding this and he wasn't able to preach this like he said he should.
Another thing that should be considered in all of this is, Paul's epistles should be positioned last in the Bible. I believe they are in the earlier manuscripts. I believe paul received the final and mature revelation of salvation.
CHB
Actually sis Pauls writting were written BEFORE Peter and the Boys wrote. And many people have tried to use that fact to say Peter and the boys were batteling Pauls false gospel.
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 07:54:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 30, 2009, 02:47:18 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
No Doc that is not the point of contention, Noch and Tony beleive that it is a different gospel preached to defferent parties, that what Paul say has nothing to do with the Jews and those things that Peter and the boys said has nothing to do with the Gentiles.
That and that alone is the contention here.
Then I misunderstood what Tony was saying here?: (Emphasis mine)
"pneuma, Israel was already set aside when Paul wrote Romans and Corinthians. Paul was preaching the same message to Jews as he was to the Gentiles. If the Jews believed Paul's message then they would be in the body of Christ and have a celestial allotment along with the nations."
Tony only came up with this weak rebuttle after I showed him Paul preached the same gospel to both parties. But even in those scriptures it cannot be speaking about those in Christ because Christ would not have then been a stumbbling block to the Jews and foolsihness to the Greeks.
This all happended before they were made one in Christ not afterwards.
Quote from: pneuma on March 30, 2009, 10:22:38 PM
Quote from: CHB on March 30, 2009, 08:15:33 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
Doc,
This is the way I see it as well. I also agree with what jabcat said about not being 100% correct on it all.
I do see Paul preaching the same thing as the other apostles at first because they were to go to the Israelites first and the advanced teaching hadn't been given to Paul at that time. When Paul began to see that Gentiles didn't need to be grafted into Israel to be saved, that all was in Christ the Body and the Family of God and not Israel. The Israelites didn't want to hear this so he went to the Gentiles which were glad to hear this. After all who wants to belong to another country in order to be saved if there is a better way? Paul began to see that this wasn't necessary, that we should be a member of the Body of Christ, not Israel.
I know this is hard to grasp. I wrestled with it a long time myself but you can see the difference in Paul's writings than that of the other apostles and even Paul's writings are different in the first epistles. Paul spent a lot of time in prison when he was understanding this and he wasn't able to preach this like he said he should.
Another thing that should be considered in all of this is, Paul's epistles should be positioned last in the Bible. I believe they are in the earlier manuscripts. I believe paul received the final and mature revelation of salvation.
CHB
Actually sis Pauls writting were written BEFORE Peter and the Boys wrote. And many people have tried to use that fact to say Peter and the boys were batteling Pauls false gospel.
I don't see this as being the case. I don't believe they were battling Paul because they thought his message was false. On the contrary, Peter gave Paul a good report in his epistle. I believe it was other things that caused friction between them. They each knew what their calling was.
CHB
Quote from: CHB on March 30, 2009, 08:15:33 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
Doc,
This is the way I see it as well. I also agree with what jabcat said about not being 100% correct on it all.
I do see Paul preaching the same thing as the other apostles at first because they were to go to the Israelites first and the advanced teaching hadn't been given to Paul at that time. When Paul began to see that Gentiles didn't need to be grafted into Israel to be saved, that all was in Christ the Body and the Family of God and not Israel. The Israelites didn't want to hear this so he went to the Gentiles which were glad to hear this. After all who wants to belong to another country in order to be saved if there is a better way? Paul began to see that this wasn't necessary, that we should be a member of the Body of Christ, not Israel.
I know this is hard to grasp. I wrestled with it a long time myself but you can see the difference in Paul's writings than that of the other apostles and even Paul's writings are different in the first epistles. Paul spent a lot of time in prison when he was understanding this and he wasn't able to preach this like he said he should.
Another thing that should be considered in all of this is, Paul's epistles should be positioned last in the Bible. I believe they are in the earlier manuscripts. I believe paul received the final and mature revelation of salvation.
CHB
This is all resolved when you consider that Jesus Christ is what is preached. Now if the Jews and the Gentiles both are receiving Christ then it means that those recipients are now becoming as Christ. So if both Jews and Gentiles are becoming as Christ then how can they ever become two different Christs (as if there is such a thing)? But that is what this two gospel theory amounts to. It preaches two different Christs since it would mean that Christ in the Jews is inclined to perform works while the Christ in Gentiles is not inclined to do works. As you can conclude, if that were the case, it would mean that Christ acts countrarywise to Himself when He operates through Jews compared to how He operates through Gentiles.
Paul
Quote from: CHB on March 30, 2009, 11:23:05 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 30, 2009, 10:22:38 PM
Quote from: CHB on March 30, 2009, 08:15:33 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
Doc,
This is the way I see it as well. I also agree with what jabcat said about not being 100% correct on it all.
I do see Paul preaching the same thing as the other apostles at first because they were to go to the Israelites first and the advanced teaching hadn't been given to Paul at that time. When Paul began to see that Gentiles didn't need to be grafted into Israel to be saved, that all was in Christ the Body and the Family of God and not Israel. The Israelites didn't want to hear this so he went to the Gentiles which were glad to hear this. After all who wants to belong to another country in order to be saved if there is a better way? Paul began to see that this wasn't necessary, that we should be a member of the Body of Christ, not Israel.
I know this is hard to grasp. I wrestled with it a long time myself but you can see the difference in Paul's writings than that of the other apostles and even Paul's writings are different in the first epistles. Paul spent a lot of time in prison when he was understanding this and he wasn't able to preach this like he said he should.
Another thing that should be considered in all of this is, Paul's epistles should be positioned last in the Bible. I believe they are in the earlier manuscripts. I believe paul received the final and mature revelation of salvation.
CHB
Actually sis Pauls writting were written BEFORE Peter and the Boys wrote. And many people have tried to use that fact to say Peter and the boys were batteling Pauls false gospel.
I don't see this as being the case. I don't believe they were battling Paul because they thought his message was false. On the contrary, Peter gave Paul a good report in his epistle. I believe it was other things that caused friction between them. They each knew what their calling was.
CHB
I never said that was the case sis, I said people have used the fact that Paul wrote before Peter and the boys as some type of proof that Paul was false, we don't beleive that to be the case but other people do, This is all proven through the history of the church sis, that histroy show how some twisted the words of Paul and Peter indevoring to make it look like Peter wrote his epistles to counteract Pauls teaching.
Quote from: trettep
But that is what this two gospel theory amounts to. It preaches two different Christs since it would mean that Christ in the Jews is inclined to perform works while the Christ in Gentiles is not inclined to do works.
Hi,
Isn't that the way it has been all down through the ages, works and no works? Jews works, Gentiles, no works.
We are just talking about this being up to the end when God becomes all in all. This isn't about two Christs. Wasn't the Israelites a chosen nation? The Gentiles wasn't even promised salvation until after Christ was crucified, at least it wasn't known by anyone until Paul was given this truth. Paul said this had been kept secret until God showed it to him. Of course it was always in the plan of God from the beginning but no one knew about it until Paul.
CHB
Quote from: CHB on March 31, 2009, 02:07:52 AM
Quote from: trettep
But that is what this two gospel theory amounts to. It preaches two different Christs since it would mean that Christ in the Jews is inclined to perform works while the Christ in Gentiles is not inclined to do works.
Hi,
Isn't that the way it has been all down through the ages, works and no works? Jews works, Gentiles, no works.
We are just talking about this being up to the end when God becomes all in all. This isn't about two Christs. Wasn't the Israelites a chosen nation? The Gentiles wasn't even promised salvation until after Christ was crucified, at least it wasn't known by anyone until Paul was given this truth. Paul said this had been kept secret until God showed it to him. Of course it was always in the plan of God from the beginning but no one knew about it until Paul.
CHB
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jesus himself had said on more than one occasion regarding the Gentile that he saw more faith outside Israel than he had in all of Israel, now the Gentiles were not the chosen people of the old covenant and they had not the law of Moses yet Jesus saw greater faith shown forth in the Gentile than he had found in ALL of Israel because they trusted him with what few crumbs they had received and had heard.
Reminds me of the verse that says for him who doesn't work but trusts God that faith is accounted as righteousness.
Peace,
Fire Walker
Quote from: CHB on March 31, 2009, 02:07:52 AM
Quote from: trettep
But that is what this two gospel theory amounts to. It preaches two different Christs since it would mean that Christ in the Jews is inclined to perform works while the Christ in Gentiles is not inclined to do works.
Hi,
Isn't that the way it has been all down through the ages, works and no works? Jews works, Gentiles, no works.
We are just talking about this being up to the end when God becomes all in all. This isn't about two Christs. Wasn't the Israelites a chosen nation? The Gentiles wasn't even promised salvation until after Christ was crucified, at least it wasn't known by anyone until Paul was given this truth. Paul said this had been kept secret until God showed it to him. Of course it was always in the plan of God from the beginning but no one knew about it until Paul.
CHB
Again, if we have Christ why would Christ perform differently in the Jew then what He performs via the Gentile?
Also, let me ask you this. Are you a Gentile or a Jew and how do you know?
Paul
I think it was this thread, where some were talking of the bride of Christ being different than the body of Christ, with the body being those who believed "Paul's" gospel; and the bride being "Israel".
I found this interesting from another forum I am on:
"The bride and groom are "one flesh." The husband is "head of the wife" so it naturally is understood that the bride is the body of Christ. This is confirmed in that when speaking about how a man should treat his wife, it is said that no man abuses his own body - meaning his wife, with whom he is one flesh.
I remember some dispensationalists trying to make this argument, saying that the Church is the body of Christ, while natural Israel (who they see as being redeemed after the millennium) is the bride of Christ. It has no biblical, nor even logical support."
Well, we all certainly have varying understandings, degrees of revelation, viewpoints, and opinions. Keeps it interesting, to say the least. The scriptures are absolute...us, not so much :happy3:. It's amazing how saved people can have so many differing thoughts about any one topic...can boggle the mind.
Quote from: jabcat on March 31, 2009, 07:11:57 AM
Well, we all certainly have varying understandings, degrees of revelation, viewpoints, and opinions. Keeps it interesting, to say the least. The scriptures are absolute...us, not so much :happy3:.
I agree.
I do think though the writer of my post made some good points. do you have any thots re: his ideas (ie: man/woman one flesh, and man (Christ) the head; so woman the body?
the husband and wife (Christ and his church) become ONE/married, with HIM being the head, and the church his body.
Hi Zeek. Oh, I've got lots of thoughts :laughing7:...I've read that belief...I find it interesting, but am probably not far enough along in this study to be able to say anything definitively on that...I don't call myself a dispensationalist, AFAIK, that's just another label...negative, positive, neutral connotations, probably depends on the context and the one saying it. So, simply, my thoughts are I believe anyone given faith to believe on Jesus is saved; I believe we often mix up contexts of scripture; I believe God has and will in the future deal specifically with Israel (and He knows who that is); and that after the time of the Gentiles has come in, all Israel will be saved, and God will end up All in All.
Anyway, I must learn of Him". And I bet you're the same Zeke, that you seek to learn of God...
Suffice it to say, I think it's a BIG topic...
Re-reading your post, yes, I think it makes some sense...however, a thought I have is, even though a unit is 'one', it is still made up of different/many parts...not necessarily the same...different functions, different 'places' even, though working as a whole and moving in the same direction...a lot of layers in an onion, huh brother?
Quote from: jabcat on March 31, 2009, 07:11:57 AM
Well, we all certainly have varying understandings, degrees of revelation, viewpoints, and opinions. Keeps it interesting, to say the least. The scriptures are absolute...us, not so much :happy3:. It's amazing how saved people can have so many differing thoughts about any one topic...can boggle the mind.
Be we should all be striving for the Truth which is the knowledge of One.
Paul
Quote from: pneuma on March 30, 2009, 02:47:18 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
No Doc that is not the point of contention, Noch and Tony beleive that it is a different gospel preached to defferent parties, that what Paul say has nothing to do with the Jews and those things that Peter and the boys said has nothing to do with the Gentiles.
That and that alone is the contention here.
It is "Knoch."
When Israel was set aside Paul preached to Jews and Gentiles the same message to both groups. Paul did not preach repentance and baptism for the remission of sins as Peter did. Paul preached FAITH in what Christ accomplished in His death, burial and resurrection to both Jews and Gentiles.
Why would Peter preach Paul's message? Peter and those of Peter's message were remaining on the earth. Paul and those of Paul's message are to be taken among the celestials.
Peter couldn't preach to the Galatians his gospel because Paul warned the Galatians that if anyone brought a different gospel/evangel other than what he (Paul) brought, let him be anathema.
Quote from: Zeek on March 31, 2009, 06:48:01 AM
I think it was this thread, where some were talking of the bride of Christ being different than the body of Christ, with the body being those who believed "Paul's" gospel; and the bride being "Israel".
I found this interesting from another forum I am on:
"The bride and groom are "one flesh." The husband is "head of the wife" so it naturally is understood that the bride is the body of Christ. This is confirmed in that when speaking about how a man should treat his wife, it is said that no man abuses his own body - meaning his wife, with whom he is one flesh.
I remember some dispensationalists trying to make this argument, saying that the Church is the body of Christ, while natural Israel (who they see as being redeemed after the millennium) is the bride of Christ. It has no biblical, nor even logical support."
If it has no Biblical nor logical support then why do they use the Bible and logic to support their side?
Besides, the terms Body of Christ and Bride of Christ are figures of speech. They are not literal terms though they do have real spiritual ramifications.
Quote from: Tony N on March 31, 2009, 04:56:02 PM
Besides, the terms Body of Christ and Bride of Christ are figures of speech. They are not literal terms though they do have real spiritual ramifications.
and you got from the post i posted that they were not figures of speech??
It still is interesting to me and imo; a valid point, that the Christ is the
head, and he has a
body (church). And the
Head and
body are ONE flesh (married), thus the body being the bride of Christ.
Quote from: Zeek
"The bride and groom are "one flesh." The husband is "head of the wife" so it naturally is understood that the bride is the body of Christ. This is confirmed in that when speaking about how a man should treat his wife, it is said that no man abuses his own body - meaning his wife, with whom he is one flesh.
Hi Zeek,
The bride is one that is not a wife yet. A bride is different from a wife.
CHB
Quote from: Zeek on March 31, 2009, 05:00:54 PM
Quote from: Tony N on March 31, 2009, 04:56:02 PM
Besides, the terms Body of Christ and Bride of Christ are figures of speech. They are not literal terms though they do have real spiritual ramifications.
and you got from the post i posted that they were not figures of speech??
It still is interesting to me and imo; a valid point, that the Christ is the head, and he has a body (church). And the Head and body are ONE flesh (married), thus the body being the bride of Christ.
Yes it is interesting, yet even though they become "one" they are still separate entities such as husband and wife.
The head which is Christ is the head of the body, that body being the believers of the nations with Jews who came over to Paul's evangel.
The Jewish believers under Peter are never said to be in the body of Christ. The term "in Christ" is strictly Pauline. The term "the body of Christ" is also strictly Pauline.
take it higher ,guys
when Jesus Christ came in flesh..He became joined/one
with all mankind..in essence all were betrothed to Him....
what if some of His wife were unbeleivers?
1Cor 7;14 for the unbeleiving wife has been sanctified
through her beleiving husband
and this 'what God has joined to gather let no man put
asunder"
this also testifies to the salvation of all mankind to me
:cloud9: AMEN Sheila! :thumbsup:
Quote from: sheila on March 31, 2009, 07:13:30 PM
take it higher ,guys
when Jesus Christ came in flesh..He became joined/one
with all mankind..in essence all were betrothed to Him....
what if some of His wife were unbeleivers?
1Cor 7;14 for the unbeleiving wife has been sanctified
through her beleiving husband
and this 'what God has joined to gather let no man put
asunder"
this also testifies to the salvation of all mankind to me
It isn't the flesh that establishes the union. That would be a fleshy covenant perspective. But what establishes the union is the Spirit. Therefore the fact that Jesus came in the flesh doesn't imply inclusion into the Spirit. The Spirit still comes by Faith.
Paul
until Shiloh comes[spirit] [He that has the legal right,Holy
spirit/LOVE ] faith,trust,beleif
the flesh union is still a UNION just as a bethrothal was considered a marriage before the actual union took place
these were arranged marriages by parents mainly...the betrothed often didn't even lay eyes on the groom before the wedding..what spirit of love/unity there?
otherwise the WORD OF GOD COME IN FLESH would mean nothing
Immanuel /God with us
Quote from: trettep on March 31, 2009, 03:15:01 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 31, 2009, 07:11:57 AM
Well, we all certainly have varying understandings, degrees of revelation, viewpoints, and opinions. Keeps it interesting, to say the least. The scriptures are absolute...us, not so much :happy3:. It's amazing how saved people can have so many differing thoughts about any one topic...can boggle the mind.
Be we should all be striving for the Truth which is the knowledge of One.
Paul
I agree, but IMO, some seem to think they already pretty much have it down pat...and IMO, that's often where the real learning stops and the disunity begins.
Quote from: sheila on March 31, 2009, 08:19:30 PM
until Shiloh comes[spirit] [He that has the legal right,Holy
spirit/LOVE ] faith,trust,beleif
the flesh union is still a UNION just as a bethrothal was considered a marriage before the actual union took place
these were arranged marriages by parents mainly...the betrothed often didn't even lay eyes on the groom before the wedding..what spirit of love/unity there?
otherwise the WORD OF GOD COME IN FLESH would mean nothing
Immanuel /God with us
Yes, the flesh union is still a union but it is a union according to the fleshy perspective. Just because Jesus came in the flesh doesn't mean that all flesh are in Christ.
Jesus came in the flesh to show us that by the Spirit He could put down sin in the flesh and thus showed us the way to salvation. For if we put on Christ then it means by Christ in us He will put down sin in our flesh also.
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on March 31, 2009, 10:07:37 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 31, 2009, 03:15:01 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 31, 2009, 07:11:57 AM
Well, we all certainly have varying understandings, degrees of revelation, viewpoints, and opinions. Keeps it interesting, to say the least. The scriptures are absolute...us, not so much :happy3:. It's amazing how saved people can have so many differing thoughts about any one topic...can boggle the mind.
Be we should all be striving for the Truth which is the knowledge of One.
Paul
I agree, but IMO, some seem to think they already pretty much have it down pat...and IMO, that's often where the real learning stops and the disunity begins.
Some do have it down pat on certain subjects. I believe when someone says that God will eventually save everyone that on that point they got it down pat.
Paul
What was finished at the cross in my opinion is nothing more than the qualification. Jesus showed at that point that He put down sin in His own flesh and that He endured unto the end in doing so.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 31, 2009, 10:42:18 PM
Quote from: sheila on March 31, 2009, 08:19:30 PM
until Shiloh comes[spirit] [He that has the legal right,Holy
spirit/LOVE ] faith,trust,beleif
the flesh union is still a UNION just as a bethrothal was considered a marriage before the actual union took place
these were arranged marriages by parents mainly...the betrothed often didn't even lay eyes on the groom before the wedding..what spirit of love/unity there?
otherwise the WORD OF GOD COME IN FLESH would mean nothing
Immanuel /God with us
Yes, the flesh union is still a union but it is a union according to the fleshy perspective. Just because Jesus came in the flesh doesn't mean that all flesh are in Christ.
Jesus came in the flesh to show us that by the Spirit He could put down sin in the flesh and thus showed us the way to salvation. For if we put on Christ then it means by Christ in us He will put down sin in our flesh also.
Paul
Yet it says that all have been made subject to Christ, but we do not
yet see all subjected. Jesus came not only to
show us the way, He
is the Way.
no Paul..it wasn't 'just' that He was without sin..it was that
he bore the sin of our flesh..on the cross. In that way He put
down sin/death of our flesh..in HIS. And raised it to life
by the spirit
the blotting out of offenses..not counting your sins against
you...all of these are an intricate concern with our salvation..
along with God bruising Him and making Him a guilt offering
And the salvation of all mankind is just that a union,betrothal
though some as yet, are not in Christ, or Christ in them,
in the 'intimate' sense. The intimacy will take place.
For every tongue shall confess and every knee bow.
Quote from: sheila on March 31, 2009, 08:19:30 PM
until Shiloh comes[spirit] [He that has the legal right,Holy
spirit/LOVE ] faith,trust,beleif
the flesh union is still a UNION just as a bethrothal was considered a marriage before the actual union took place
these were arranged marriages by parents mainly...the betrothed often didn't even lay eyes on the groom before the wedding..what spirit of love/unity there?
otherwise the WORD OF GOD COME IN FLESH would mean nothing
Immanuel /God with us
:cloud9: Again, AMEN Sheila! He is in all flesh, but all flesh does not know (the darkness comprehended it not) it yet. He gives all men a measure of faith (which comes by and IS the Spirit of Him) to receive Him, which is how He can be (and is) the light of ALL men that come into the world. Blessings....
Quote from: Cardinal on April 01, 2009, 12:10:46 AM
Quote from: sheila on March 31, 2009, 08:19:30 PM
until Shiloh comes[spirit] [He that has the legal right,Holy
spirit/LOVE ] faith,trust,beleif
the flesh union is still a UNION just as a bethrothal was considered a marriage before the actual union took place
these were arranged marriages by parents mainly...the betrothed often didn't even lay eyes on the groom before the wedding..what spirit of love/unity there?
otherwise the WORD OF GOD COME IN FLESH would mean nothing
Immanuel /God with us
:cloud9: Again, AMEN Sheila! He is in all flesh, but all flesh does not know (the darkness comprehended it not) it yet. He gives all men a measure of faith (which comes by and IS the Spirit of Him) to receive Him, which is how He can be (and is) the light of ALL men that come into the world. Blessings....
What about this?
Matthew 6:23
But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!
:cloud9: I don't think they were talking to or about unbelievers in that scripture. And it's a reference to the lust of the eyes, which will cause the whole body to fall. But if we fall, (and we do) we know we have an advocate with the Father.
The way He showed me one day that all were His, which came as quite a shock to me I might add, was He spoke to me that "There were two trees in the midst of the garden."
And since understanding comes in a split second of revelation, I was shown that the TOL was the golden candlestick and the TOKOGAE was the table of Shewbread.
Therefore, if the tabernacle inner court was the midst of the garden (we are the planting of the Lord) then the WHOLE GARDEN was His, which includes the outer court where women and STRANGERS were.
He is what gives us our first breath here (awareness of being in a body, then later awareness of being in HIS body, which we call "saved"), and what is that same breath of life when we die. Actually, as He gave me, think of the spirit of us AS His breath.
Breathing in = being called back to Father from whence we came.
Breathing out = being birthed into a body.
He breathes in, He breaths out, but it's the same breath. Blessings....
Quote from: Cardinal on April 01, 2009, 12:27:04 AM
:cloud9: I don't think they were talking to or about unbelievers in that scripture. And it's a reference to the lust of the eyes, which will cause the whole body to fall. But if we fall, (and we do) we know we have an advocate with the Father.
The way He showed me one day that all were His, which came as quite a shock to me I might add, was He spoke to me that "There were two trees in the midst of the garden."
And since understanding comes in a split second of revelation, I was shown that the TOL was the golden candlestick and the TOKOGAE was the table of Shewbread.
Therefore, if the tabernacle inner court was the midst of the garden (we are the planting of the Lord) then the WHOLE GARDEN was His, which includes the outer court where women and STRANGERS were.
He is what gives us our first breath here (awareness of being in a body, then later awareness of being in HIS body, which we call "saved"), and what is that same breath of life when we die. Actually, as He gave me, think of the spirit of us AS His breath.
Breathing in = being called back to Father from whence we came.
Breathing out = being birthed into a body.
He breathes in, He breaths out, but it's the same breath. Blessings....
Awesome, Cardinal. :thumbsup: I wish I had half the insight you've been given...
:cloud9: PTL and thanks :girlheart:
Hi Card
I especially appreciated your post where you spoke of Breath
as the spirit has also been declaring those things to me,
of late.
That Lust of the eyes speaks to me of the desiring to see
miracles etc then when they are manifested to claim them to
be of the devil. In short, if your eye be evil..how can you see
good when it comes/manifests. How great is that darkness!
it is a darkness more dark than any earthly darkness
Sheila
:cloud9: Thanks for the witness, Sheila! :thumbsup:
:cloud9: You know, Sheila, I've been thinking about the last part of your post here, and I can see that clearly in what has been done to Benny Hinn and others. How many ministries had prayed for decades to see a "revival" of God's Spirit come with gifts and miracles, and then when it came, did their best to "kill" the messenger, and call good evil?
They just don't get that there's only been one perfect one, and therefore God has no choice but to manifest thru that which is IMperfect. No wonder He said these things follow them that BELIEVE, not these things follow them that are perfect. :sigh: Blessings....
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Now consider those verses. If a Gentile claims to be in Christ's name and says they are saved - how can it be so if they still work iniquity? Doesn't this PROVE that anyone in Christ's name must not be practicing sin (thus doing Good works)?
Paul
Quote from: sheila on March 31, 2009, 11:51:30 PM
no Paul..it wasn't 'just' that He was without sin..it was that
he bore the sin of our flesh..on the cross. In that way He put
down sin/death of our flesh..in HIS. And raised it to life
by the spirit
the blotting out of offenses..not counting your sins against
you...all of these are an intricate concern with our salvation..
along with God bruising Him and making Him a guilt offering
And the salvation of all mankind is just that a union,betrothal
though some as yet, are not in Christ, or Christ in them,
in the 'intimate' sense. The intimacy will take place.
For every tongue shall confess and every knee bow.
No, I don't see Him boring my sin on the cross at all. I see Him as my sacrifice for sin. The sacrifice was the debt owed for the sin. If He bore my sins then that would make Him a sinner of which He isn't. The only way Christ can put down my sin is by His Spirit working through me to suppress the cravings of my self centered flesh.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on March 31, 2009, 10:44:43 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 31, 2009, 10:07:37 PM
Quote from: trettep on March 31, 2009, 03:15:01 PM
Quote from: jabcat on March 31, 2009, 07:11:57 AM
Well, we all certainly have varying understandings, degrees of revelation, viewpoints, and opinions. Keeps it interesting, to say the least. The scriptures are absolute...us, not so much :happy3:. It's amazing how saved people can have so many differing thoughts about any one topic...can boggle the mind.
Be we should all be striving for the Truth which is the knowledge of One.
Paul
I agree, but IMO, some seem to think they already pretty much have it down pat...and IMO, that's often where the real learning stops and the disunity begins.
Some do have it down pat on certain subjects.
Paul
Yep, but IMO, the trick can be knowing
when we do, and when we just
think we do..I've done both, the latter MANY times....Anyway, if we present in love and
as our opinion/understandings, no real problems, huh? We can then learn and grow together...and I think, even have unity of spirit even if we have some doctrinal differences. Seems to me, on this side we'll never all see everything the same, but we
can "not think more highly of ourselves than we ought" (guilty) and "in love, prefer one another" (not often enough)...and in so doing, increase our unity. Oh well, what are we talking about? This is about works...or, maybe it still fits...Maybe a 'unity' thread would be nice...
Quote from: trettep on April 01, 2009, 02:51:26 AM
Quote from: sheila on March 31, 2009, 11:51:30 PM
no Paul..it wasn't 'just' that He was without sin..it was that
he bore the sin of our flesh..on the cross. In that way He put
down sin/death of our flesh..in HIS. And raised it to life
by the spirit
the blotting out of offenses..not counting your sins against
you...all of these are an intricate concern with our salvation..
along with God bruising Him and making Him a guilt offering
And the salvation of all mankind is just that a union,betrothal
though some as yet, are not in Christ, or Christ in them,
in the 'intimate' sense. The intimacy will take place.
For every tongue shall confess and every knee bow.
No, I don't see Him boring my sin on the cross at all. I see Him as my sacrifice for sin. The sacrifice was the debt owed for the sin. If He bore my sins then that would make Him a sinner of which He isn't. The only way Christ can put down my sin is by His Spirit working through me to suppress the cravings of my self centered flesh.
Paul
Christ does put away our sin by His Spirit working in us to not suppress, but to actually eventually burn away all of our fleshly desires.
But not only did he
bear our sins on the cross, He who had no sin
became sin for us. (Yet He wasn't a "sinner") It was to the point where the Father had to turn away, and Jesus cried out, "why have you forsaken me?"
Galations 3;13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law
by becoming a curse for us,for it is written
'CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO HANGS ON A TREE"
He redeemed us in order that the BLESSING given to
ABRAHAM might come to the gentiles through Christ Jesus,
So that by faith we might receive the promises of the spirit
Since the verse was mentioned:
Mat 27:46 And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
I wanted to explain my take on this verse:
I believe here Jesus is the sacrifice and is on the cross praying on behalf of Israel. He is saying why have you forsaken me (a reference to Israel) the very ones that are tormenting Him. The very ones whom He represents on the cross as their sacrifice. I do not believe that anyone should think that Jesus believed at that moment that He was forsaken. But often I hear others preach that very thing.
Paul
:cloud9: I've also heard it said that He was saying "Elohim, Elohim, why hast thou forsaken me?" Elohim being a plural term, much like when He said in the OT, "Have I not said ye are gods and yet ye die like men?" Blessings....
well, I have an IMO too.
I think the reason He said that is because He took on the
curse that was meant for us. Causing God to forsake him
I think it must have been a horror..that part the worst part of
it. And He did it for all mankind.
But I can see how your two posts apply also...if you but
just realize that Israel forsook God first,which caused God to
forsake in return[which curse Christ bore on the cross]
Quote from: sheila on April 01, 2009, 09:49:24 PMwell, I have an IMO too.
IMHO YHO is a good one.
- Isaiah 53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
<br>
- Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
<br>
- Galatians 3:13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.
<br>
- Deuteronomy 31:16 And the LORD said unto Moses, Behold, thou shalt sleep with thy fathers; and this people will rise up, and go a whoring after the gods of the strangers of the land, whither they go to be among them, and will forsake me, and break my covenant which I have made with them. 17 Then my anger shall be kindled against them in that day, and I will forsake them, and I will hide my face from them, and they shall be devoured, and many evils and troubles shall befall them; so that they will say in that day, Are not these evils come upon us, because our God is not among us?
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 12:49:36 AM
Quote from: sheila on April 01, 2009, 09:49:24 PMwell, I have an IMO too.
IMHO YHO is a good one.
- Isaiah 53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
<br>- Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
<br>- Galatians 3:13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.
<br>- Deuteronomy 31:16 And the LORD said unto Moses, Behold, thou shalt sleep with thy fathers; and this people will rise up, and go a whoring after the gods of the strangers of the land, whither they go to be among them, and will forsake me, and break my covenant which I have made with them. 17 Then my anger shall be kindled against them in that day, and I will forsake them, and I will hide my face from them, and they shall be devoured, and many evils and troubles shall befall them; so that they will say in that day, Are not these evils come upon us, because our God is not among us?
I also agree...I believe he bore our trangressions, took our sin upon Him, AS the perfect sacrifice...HIS righteousness for our rags.
Quote from: jabcat on April 02, 2009, 01:00:58 AMI also agree...I believe he bore our trangressions, took our sin upon Him, AS the perfect sacrifice...HIS righteousness for our rags.
I believe Christ bore my sins, but I don't see much evidence that Christ bore them as a
subsitute. If I don't follow Christ then I still bear my sins.
- Galatians 6:8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.
<br>
- Galatians 5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
<br>
- Matthew 7:26 And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: 27 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it
If I'm not led by the Spirit then I am still under the law, which has lots of curses in it.
- Galatians 5:18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
Bob, I'm guessing you will probably never be on the cross, or be able to pay the true price for your sins...IMO, there's a lot more to these scriptures you're quoting, much bigger discussion and context...in part, having to do with which comes first, righteousness or works, for instance...which I believe is the former, as I've earlier stated in this thread. Substitutionary atonement (which I believe in) is another huge topic. The cross of Jesus, the Age of Grace!
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 12:49:36 AM
Quote from: sheila on April 01, 2009, 09:49:24 PMwell, I have an IMO too.
IMHO YHO is a good one.
- Isaiah 53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
<br>- Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
<br>- Galatians 3:13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.
<br>- Deuteronomy 31:16 And the LORD said unto Moses, Behold, thou shalt sleep with thy fathers; and this people will rise up, and go a whoring after the gods of the strangers of the land, whither they go to be among them, and will forsake me, and break my covenant which I have made with them. 17 Then my anger shall be kindled against them in that day, and I will forsake them, and I will hide my face from them, and they shall be devoured, and many evils and troubles shall befall them; so that they will say in that day, Are not these evils come upon us, because our God is not among us?
That supports what I stated Bob that Jesus was the sacrifice for Israel and that His prayer about being forsaken was applicable to those to whom He was the sacrifice for = Israelites.
Paul
If Jesus took ownership of our sins then forgiveness is for what?
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on April 02, 2009, 01:18:38 AM
Bob, I'm guessing you will probably never be on the cross, or be able to pay the true price for your sins...IMO, there's a lot more to these scriptures you're quoting, much bigger discussion and context...in part, having to do with which comes first, righteousness or works, for instance...which I believe is the former, as I've earlier stated in this thread. Substitutionary atonement (which I believe in) is another huge topic. The cross of Jesus, the Age of Grace!
But it's not really a matter of whether I've ever paid the true or full price for my sins. If Christ paid the full price of my sins (which I believe) as a substitute (which I do not believe) then believers wouldn't be found suffering the consequences of their sins, but they are.
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 01:58:14 AMThat supports what I stated Bob that Jesus was the sacrifice for Israel and that His prayer about being forsaken was applicable to those to whom He was the sacrifice for = Israelites.
Paul
The way I read it, God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ which would include all the curse of the law, including dying for our sins and being forsaken for our sins.
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 03:11:27 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 01:58:14 AMThat supports what I stated Bob that Jesus was the sacrifice for Israel and that His prayer about being forsaken was applicable to those to whom He was the sacrifice for = Israelites.
Paul
The way I read it, God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ which would include all the curse of the law, including dying for our sins and being forsaken for our sins.
Being this thread is already so long that it just doesn't matter anymore may I please jump in with a few questions?
God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ. Let me get back to the basics and ask what this means. What sins did and do people do that are so terrible as to need to have them penalized in the first place. I know and have known a lot of people in my time and most of them are great people.
I sure can't imagine anything they have done that even remotely comes close to requiring Jesus to die so horribly on the cross.
Now as to.....
The way I read it, God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ which would include all the curse of the law, including dying for our sins and being forsaken for our sins.People are under the curse of the law. What in the world does this mean? Sounds horrible. What ever did little newborn Jonny do to merit such condemnation?
cp
Good questions cp
First of all, I've got a lot to learn myself, God may correct me today and show me something else tomorrow...I can judge no one. That said,
To Bob and Paul's posts...My thoughts are, my understanding is; precept upon precept...If we reject foundational precepts, then it becomes harder to find the foundation upon which the rest are to reside...and circular questions ensue.
Yet all is of God who conciliates us to Himself through Christ and is giving us the dispensation of the conciliation, how that God was in Christ conciliating the world to Himself, not reckoning their offenses to them, and placing in us the Word of the Conciliation....He makes to us a sin offering for our sakes that we may be becoming God's righteousness in Him. II Cor. 5:18,19
But not as the trespass, so also is the free gift. For if by the trespass of the one the many died, much more did the grace of God, and the gift by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, abound unto the many. Romans 5:15
Now to one who works, his wages are not reckoned as a gift but as his due. And to one who does not work but trusts him who justified the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness. So also David pronounces a blessing upon the man to whom God reckons righteousness apart from works: "Blessed are those whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered; blessed is the man against whom the Lord will not reckon his sin.
IMO, many foundational precepts have already been presented in earlier posts in this thread. As we pray for discernment, God veils and reveals.
God's blessing, James.
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 03:40:17 AMLet me get back to the basics and ask what this means. What sins did and do people do that are so terrible as to need to have them penalized in the first place. I know and have known a lot of people in my time and most of them are great people.
I sure can't imagine anything they have done that even remotely comes close to requiring Jesus to die so horribly on the cross.
How about being selfish, merciless, unforgiving, or holier than thou.
QuotePeople are under the curse of the law. What in the world does this mean? Sounds horrible. What ever did little newborn Jonny do to merit such condemnation?
I'm not talking about the law putting newborns under a curse. I'm talking about people reaping what they themselves have actually sown.
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 03:11:27 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 01:58:14 AMThat supports what I stated Bob that Jesus was the sacrifice for Israel and that His prayer about being forsaken was applicable to those to whom He was the sacrifice for = Israelites.
Paul
The way I read it, God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ which would include all the curse of the law, including dying for our sins and being forsaken for our sins.
I believe He incurred the penalty for our sins but not the sin, therefore, I disagree that He was forsaken because of sins. In other words, I don't believe He ever was imputed our sins. Had He been imputed sins then He would have need of a sacrifice.
Paul
Paul
Quote from: jabcat on April 02, 2009, 04:31:22 AMYet all is of God who conciliates us to Himself through Christ and is giving us the dispensation of the conciliation, how that God was in Christ conciliating the world to Himself, not reckoning their offenses to them, and placing in us the Word of the Conciliation....He makes to us a sin offering for our sakes that we may be becoming God's righteousness in Him. II Cor. 5:18,19
When God was in Christ reconciling the wolrd unto Himself?
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 03:40:17 AM
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 03:11:27 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 01:58:14 AMThat supports what I stated Bob that Jesus was the sacrifice for Israel and that His prayer about being forsaken was applicable to those to whom He was the sacrifice for = Israelites.
Paul
The way I read it, God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ which would include all the curse of the law, including dying for our sins and being forsaken for our sins.
Being this thread is already so long that it just doesn't matter anymore may I please jump in with a few questions?
God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ.
Let me get back to the basics and ask what this means. What sins did and do people do that are so terrible as to need to have them penalized in the first place. I know and have known a lot of people in my time and most of them are great people.
I sure can't imagine anything they have done that even remotely comes close to requiring Jesus to die so horribly on the cross.
Now as to.....
The way I read it, God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ which would include all the curse of the law, including dying for our sins and being forsaken for our sins.
People are under the curse of the law. What in the world does this mean? Sounds horrible. What ever did little newborn Jonny do to merit such condemnation?
cp
Claypot, newborn Jonny was born as a child of Adam and a member of the body of Adam, thus newborn Jonny has acquired the death sentence as a result. Jonny, had no other need to commit a sin for he already has it. Just like all those born into the body of Christ have Life, so all those born from the body of Adam shall have death. God passed a Judgement - the Great Judge has spoken and He has sentenced us all to death. All of us born of the body of Adam that is (of Adam's seed). Jesus was not born of the seed of Adam but of the seed of God, His Father in Heaven and thus not under that Judgment.
Paul
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:17:44 AMI believe He incurred the penalty for our sins but not the sin, therefore, I disagree that He was forsaken because of sins. In other words, I don't believe He ever was imputed our sins. Had He been imputed sins then He would have need of a sacrifice.
Paul
I also don't believe He was imputed our sins (considered by God to be a sinner). But if Christ paid the full penalty for our sins then one of those penalties was to be forsaken by God.
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 05:31:01 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:17:44 AMI believe He incurred the penalty for our sins but not the sin, therefore, I disagree that He was forsaken because of sins. In other words, I don't believe He ever was imputed our sins. Had He been imputed sins then He would have need of a sacrifice.
Paul
I also don't believe He was imputed our sins (considered by God to be a sinner). But if Christ paid the full penalty for our sins then one of those penalties was to be forsaken by God.
Please clarify then bob. Are you of the belief that when Jesus asked God why have you forsaken me that He was referring to Himself. Asking God why have you forsaken me (Jesus)?
Paul
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:36:08 AMPlease clarify then bob. Are you of the belief that when Jesus asked God why have you forsaken me that He was referring to Himself. Asking God why have you forsaken me (Jesus)?
Possibly, but not necessarily. He could simply have been quoting the Psalm. I guess I'm not sure, but I don't see anything unscriptural about that possibility.
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:36:08 AM
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 05:31:01 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:17:44 AMI believe He incurred the penalty for our sins but not the sin, therefore, I disagree that He was forsaken because of sins. In other words, I don't believe He ever was imputed our sins. Had He been imputed sins then He would have need of a sacrifice.
Paul
I also don't believe He was imputed our sins (considered by God to be a sinner). But if Christ paid the full penalty for our sins then one of those penalties was to be forsaken by God.
Please clarify then bob. Are you of the belief that when Jesus asked God why have you forsaken me that He was referring to Himself. Asking God why have you forsaken me (Jesus)?
Paul
I do. Why have you forsaken me--he's asking God,
Where are you?I see it as the mirror image of the garden when God asked Adam,
Where are you?
Isaiah 53:6
All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
Amen! Molly!!!
He came to break up the works of satan[which 'works'
brought about that very first scenario in the garden!]
talk about 'reverse the curse'! or was that the LAW fufilled
an eye for an eye,tooth for tooth?
Wow!!
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:25:14 AM
Claypot, newborn Jonny was born as a child of Adam and a member of the body of Adam, thus newborn Jonny has acquired the death sentence as a result.
Paul
so was Christ not really the
last adam then?
Amen! Zeek
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 05:49:02 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:36:08 AMPlease clarify then bob. Are you of the belief that when Jesus asked God why have you forsaken me that He was referring to Himself. Asking God why have you forsaken me (Jesus)?
Possibly, but not necessarily. He could simply have been quoting the Psalm. I guess I'm not sure, but I don't see anything unscriptural about that possibility.
No, I think your correct that He is quoting the psalm. But my point is that their is still substance to merit here even for the psalm other than just quoting it to show that He is the Christ.
Psalm 22:1 (Apostolic Bible - Septuagint)
O God, my God, take heed to me! Why did you abandon me? The words of my transgressions are far from my deliverance.
I think that can only be pertaining to the Israelites.
Paul
Quote from: Molly on April 02, 2009, 05:49:07 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:36:08 AM
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 05:31:01 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:17:44 AMI believe He incurred the penalty for our sins but not the sin, therefore, I disagree that He was forsaken because of sins. In other words, I don't believe He ever was imputed our sins. Had He been imputed sins then He would have need of a sacrifice.
Paul
I also don't believe He was imputed our sins (considered by God to be a sinner). But if Christ paid the full penalty for our sins then one of those penalties was to be forsaken by God.
Please clarify then bob. Are you of the belief that when Jesus asked God why have you forsaken me that He was referring to Himself. Asking God why have you forsaken me (Jesus)?
Paul
I do. Why have you forsaken me--he's asking God, Where are you?
I see it as the mirror image of the garden when God asked Adam, Where are you?
But Molly, why would He? Jesus even told His disciples that He would be handed over and be crucified. He knew death awaited Him. So why would He be wanting to be delivered?
Paul
Quote from: sheila on April 02, 2009, 05:58:12 AM
Amen! Molly!!!
He came to break up the works of satan[which 'works'
brought about that very first scenario in the garden!]
talk about 'reverse the curse'! or was that the LAW fufilled
an eye for an eye,tooth for tooth?
Wow!!
You mean the works that were CONTRARY. Recall that the other things that Adam was told to do, he did. Those were works also. But only when Adam did contrary to command was it sin. So how can doing works today be sin if those works are not contrary?
Paul
Quote from: Zeek on April 02, 2009, 06:08:14 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:25:14 AM
Claypot, newborn Jonny was born as a child of Adam and a member of the body of Adam, thus newborn Jonny has acquired the death sentence as a result.
Paul
so was Christ not really the last adam then?
Christ is the last Adam but not OF the first (by seed).
Paul
A sinful heart is the father of lies; the seed of corruption. When we speak a lie, or commit a murder, it is not from some evil spirit being that has entered us - "For nothing that has entered, can defile a man." But that which comes out of their mouth – "Crucify Him."
It appears that Christ, publicly, bore their sins. Completely exposing and enduring the natural disposition of their hearts.
As a Penalty, or Substitution for our (sin) wickedness?
Yet, are not the wages of sin death; physically and spiritually?
"To bear one in love, is not to carry the decorum of their malice aforethought."
Especially, in cases of first-degree murder, but that's just my opinion.
I look more to His Life, rather than his death.
peacemaker
See what I see is that Jesus took on the flesh of Adam (having been born by Mary) but not of the nature (having been born of the Father via the Spirit). The Word of God is the SEED. Hence Mary, was pregnant because of the Word of God (God's seed).
Paul
with strong outcrys and pleadings He entreated HE who was
able to deliver him from death=resurrect
Jesus was to of the seed of adam/man /woman
from the lineage of EVE
Adam is the name of man,both male and female
Quote from: sheila on April 02, 2009, 06:39:08 AM
with strong outcrys and pleadings He entreated HE who was
able to deliver him from death=resurrect
Jesus was to of the seed of adam/man /woman
from the lineage of EVE
Adam is the name of man,both male and female
Shiela, if Jesus was of the seed of Adam then Jesus would have been born with a carnal nature that cannot be subject to the Law of God.
Paul
the seed of the woman would crush the serpents head
a woman is born with all her ovum at birth....
they just ripen later...her ovum were intact and already
formed before she was deceived.
A man is not made that way,,,he produces and forms sperm
all his life
kinda like spirit impregnanting a soul and bringing forth life
the sperm as spirit and egg as soul
a sinless soul could be produced this way by Holy spirit
Quote from: sheila on April 02, 2009, 06:50:23 AM
the seed of the woman would crush the serpents head
a woman is born with all her ovum at birth....
they just ripen later...her ovum were intact and already
formed before she was deceived.
A man is not made that way,,,he produces and forms sperm
all his life
kinda like spirit impregnanting a soul and bringing forth life
the sperm as spirit and egg as soul
a sinless soul could be produced this way by Holy spirit
Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Notice two different seed.
Paul
Adam was just a bunch of clay with the breath of God.
7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
--Gen 2
Jesus calls himself the son of Adam.
He is also called the second Adam and the last Adam.
Question: Isn't Jesus the first and the last? Mustn't he have pre-eminence in all things?
How, then, could he be descended from a man? How could a mere mortal be first?
Adam is created in the image of God, but Jesus is born--the Word become flesh.
Both are without sin.
Quote from: Molly on April 02, 2009, 07:04:32 AM
Adam was just a bunch of clay with the breath of God.
7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
--Gen 2
Jesus calls himself the son of Adam.
He is also called the second Adam and the last Adam.
Question: Isn't Jesus the first and the last? Mustn't he have pre-eminence in all things?
How, then, could he be descended from a man? How could a mere mortal be first?
Adam is created in the image of God, but Jesus is born--the Word become flesh.
Both are without sin.
What was the first thing to ever come from God in creating our kosmos (creation)? - answer is His Word. Because it is by His Word that was uttered that the creation came into existence. But what is in the Word was not created but existed always. That which is in the Word or that the Word carries is the nature of the Father in Heaven (God). This nature of God is the very Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the very BEING of the Father in Heaven. Jesus said:
Joh 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the
words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
This is how we receive the Holy Spirit. When we consume the Word of God into our hearts (via Faith) we become filled with the Spirit of God (Holy Spirit). Meaning we begin to have the Father's very nature (being) in us.
So don't
think of Jesus (the man) as the first begotten but that which is in Him as the first begotten (the Word of God). But it is true to say Jesus is the first begotten because we know Him by that Being that He possesses which is the Word of God. So when I say don't "THINK" of it as the "MAN" Jesus, I'm referring to when He came in the flesh. For He - the Word of God existed before all and by the Word of God that the Father uttered did ALL coming into creation. So the "man" Jesus is descended by the seed of Adam as pertaining to the flesh. But speaking Spiritually, Jesus (the annointed - having the Spirit) is not descended from Adam.
This way Jesus can put down via the Spirit what which causes man to sin which is the flesh. This is complicated to understand I'm sure but a good understanding of what the Holy Spirit is makes it comprehensible.
Paul
Hi,
I see that the spirit of God in Jesus is what overcame..too.
the SON OF GOD portion/Christ/by MY SPIRIT
but the Word of God come in flesh..I see that as the
fulfillment of the Word of God given in the garden..[promise]..
' the seed of the woman will crush the serpents head'
I see it this way because I don't want to downplay
the signifigance of what Jesus Christ[Word of God]
coming in the flesh spiritually means to mankind.
the SON OF MAN portion
Many times Jesus Christ called himself 'son of man'
Mitochondrial dna [mother] is always inherited from the
womans Mother...and passed down to daughters and sons.
And when a female is born her eggs are already formed,
they just need to ripen
Sons will inherit their Mothers mdna but their wives mdna
will pass down exact copies to all daughters and sons.
And I see the " Word of God", spoken in the Garden, referring
to the womans seed crushing the mind of the serpent
as the womans seed spoken of[Eve] really bespeaks of
the promised seed 'prophesied by God' in the garden,as
Jerusalem's above ovum and mDna, or as
the son of man' portion of Jesus Christ.
Now a woman is born with all her eggs/seed...they
must merely ripen or mature.
It is through this undrstanding that I also realize the
significance of what was going on in the days of Noah.
The making of giants when the fallen sons of God took the
daughters of men...and giants were born..much mixing etc.
I know this may be hard to follow, for I don't have it quite all
thrashed out yet,myself.
Adam's flesh may just be dust of the earth, but it also is
where 'good' seed is sown and also the 'seed' of the enemy
was sown. And it is God's field...though coveted and sown
by an enemy of His.
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 05:11:16 AM
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 03:40:17 AMLet me get back to the basics and ask what this means. What sins did and do people do that are so terrible as to need to have them penalized in the first place. I know and have known a lot of people in my time and most of them are great people.
I sure can't imagine anything they have done that even remotely comes close to requiring Jesus to die so horribly on the cross.
How about being selfish, merciless, unforgiving, or holier than thou.
You mean to tell me that because someone may be a bit selfish or curious or even a bit disobedient or as you say, holier than though or unforgiving.......that these character traits require the King of Glory Himself to be shredded and killed? It seems a bit overkill to me. Are we missing something here Bob?
QuoteQuotePeople are under the curse of the law. What in the world does this mean? Sounds horrible. What ever did little newborn Jonny do to merit such condemnation?
I'm not talking about the law putting newborns under a curse. I'm talking about people reaping what they themselves have actually sown.
Again, please see above. I see a lot of good being sown by people and an awful lot of crap being reaped by these same people. I see a lot of people wanting to do good and actually doing good. Lots of sacrifices by believers and unbelievers alike.
cp
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 05:25:14 AM
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 03:40:17 AM
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 03:11:27 AM
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 01:58:14 AMThat supports what I stated Bob that Jesus was the sacrifice for Israel and that His prayer about being forsaken was applicable to those to whom He was the sacrifice for = Israelites.
Paul
The way I read it, God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ which would include all the curse of the law, including dying for our sins and being forsaken for our sins.
Being this thread is already so long that it just doesn't matter anymore may I please jump in with a few questions?
God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ.
Let me get back to the basics and ask what this means. What sins did and do people do that are so terrible as to need to have them penalized in the first place. I know and have known a lot of people in my time and most of them are great people.
I sure can't imagine anything they have done that even remotely comes close to requiring Jesus to die so horribly on the cross.
Now as to.....
The way I read it, God laid the penalty of our sins on Jesus Christ which would include all the curse of the law, including dying for our sins and being forsaken for our sins.
People are under the curse of the law. What in the world does this mean? Sounds horrible. What ever did little newborn Jonny do to merit such condemnation?
cp
Claypot, newborn Jonny was born as a child of Adam and a member of the body of Adam, thus newborn Jonny has acquired the death sentence as a result. Jonny, had no other need to commit a sin for he already has it. Just like all those born into the body of Christ have Life, so all those born from the body of Adam shall have death. God passed a Judgement - the Great Judge has spoken and He has sentenced us all to death. All of us born of the body of Adam that is (of Adam's seed). Jesus was not born of the seed of Adam but of the seed of God, His Father in Heaven and thus not under that Judgment.
Paul
So, newborn Jonny really did nothing wrong? Just born and even that he didn't ask to be. He acquires the death sentence, God has spoken. Doesn't this sound a bit weird (and unfair for Jonny) even for God? What should Jonny praise God for? If someone conked me on the head and threw me in the middle of the ocean and then later came and saved me I don't think I would be thanking him for saving me, at least not how we thank God for saving us.
Why did God sentence us all to death Paul? I am being serious here. We use certain phrases that sometimes lose their meaning to describe something I don't think we truely understand and then we have huge discussions over them.
Again, in plain english, what did Adam do that was so wrong?
cp
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 03:54:01 PM
So, newborn Jonny really did nothing wrong? Just born and even that he didn't ask to be. He acquires the death sentence, God has spoken. Doesn't this sound a bit weird (and unfair for Jonny) even for God? What should Jonny praise God for? If someone conked me on the head and threw me in the middle of the ocean and then later came and saved me I don't think I would be thanking him for saving me, at least not how we thank God for saving us.
Why did God sentence us all to death Paul? I am being serious here. We use certain phrases that sometimes lose their meaning to describe something I don't think we truely understand and then we have huge discussions over them.
Again, in plain english, what did Adam do that was so wrong?
cp
Be more specific - what seems unfair? Is it unfair that we die now? God sentenced us to death when we took of the forbidden fruit (we are of the body of Adam). But let's go further, did you know we all murdered Christ also? Did not He have to come and die for ALL - that ALL would include Jonny. And if someone says they didn't murder Christ then that means they haven't killed their passover Lamb. So then next time anyone wants to put down a murderer as if they are above them, they better think twice. We ALL killed Jesus. We are ALL murderers. So was that fair? - for God to make us all murderers? Jonny, is a murderer by nature as soon as he is born. We all are.
Paul
Hi Cp;
Say your a grown man with wisdom. You have a young son you are raising to manhood. You desire to guide him in
a good way. You tell him the dangers of something,and warn
him not to do it. Your child is very naive and tied up with the foolishness of youth,not able to see ahead what certain consequences are..you may tell him,but he does not really know what they are.
enter an enemy of the wise man.He is a killer at heart.
He sneaks into the boys life..and starts telling him how his father has it all wrong....that he can DO what the father has warned about..without that bad consequence..that father said would happen.That in fact the son was grown up and could choose for himself if this was good for him. The boy rebels
against his father..under the influence of that enemy.
the death came because the son didn't heed the warning..
the father gave the warning to protect the son from harm.
Now the father gets a clue to what is going on, he speaks warnings and further warnings..but it falls on deaf ears.
well the fathers love for his son is flaming..he's gonna do everything to save his sons life in his power. He did not give his warning or command to destroy his son, but to protect him.
All he wants is his son back,alive and well. Mercy will triumph
over any judgement as to the sons disobediance.
If anybody is going to be judged harshly in this matter,by
the father it is going to be that man with the killers heart.
the father may severely chastise his son for not listening to
him, bringing home the danger that his very life was in
and that the killer's sole purpose was to destroy
him ,because he didn't listen.and alienate him from dad
nothing will stop that father from recovering his sons life,
if he finds him dead..he will do mouth to mouth recessatation
[give the breath of life into his body] until he returns to life
the sabbath was made for the benefit of man, not man
made for the benefit of the sabbath
the law was made for the benefit of man,also, it showed the
killer for what he was,lawless, and broke the command to honor
the father that the son should have kept[fathers protection]
newborn Jonny has been born naive..and suceptible to
develope a spirit of rebellion in him against the wisdom of his
father that can and does endanger his life. that spirit
will cause him to reject his father[and wisdom/protection]
and follow in a way that is not good. and put his very life in
danger.
Little Jonnys big brother who was obediant was sent looking
for his little brother, He found him and placed his self smack
dab between the enemy and the little brother.He rebuked
the enemy to his face, told little Jonny how much dad loved
him and was greived over him[heartbroken] The enemy
struck out and stabbed the big brother,and gave a greivous
wound to the big brother. The big brother died recovering his
little brother.
a few days later,the big brothers father brought him back to
life. He wasn't going to lose either one of them, He was really
wise,and he could do anything!
little Jonny realized a lot of things from that horrible
expierence. He was reunited with his family in love...
he realized the deep love his father had for him and his
brother...and the hate that was inside the enemys heart
that acted like a freind or mentor to him..was exposed
I'm not saying this little scenario I painted above is a perfect
rep of what has occured, but I hope you can get the gist of it.
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 04:55:16 PM
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 03:54:01 PM
So, newborn Jonny really did nothing wrong? Just born and even that he didn't ask to be. He acquires the death sentence, God has spoken. Doesn't this sound a bit weird (and unfair for Jonny) even for God? What should Jonny praise God for? If someone conked me on the head and threw me in the middle of the ocean and then later came and saved me I don't think I would be thanking him for saving me, at least not how we thank God for saving us.
Why did God sentence us all to death Paul? I am being serious here. We use certain phrases that sometimes lose their meaning to describe something I don't think we truely understand and then we have huge discussions over them.
Again, in plain english, what did Adam do that was so wrong?
cp
Be more specific - what seems unfair? Is it unfair that we die now? God sentenced us to death when we took of the forbidden fruit (we are of the body of Adam). But let's go further, did you know we all murdered Christ also? Did not He have to come and die for ALL - that ALL would include Jonny. And if someone says they didn't murder Christ then that means they haven't killed their passover Lamb. So then next time anyone wants to put down a murderer as if they are above them, they better think twice. We ALL killed Jesus. We are ALL murderers. So was that fair? - for God to make us all murderers? Jonny, is a murderer by nature as soon as he is born. We all are.
Paul
Maybe it seems unfair we die at all. You say we took of the forbidden fruit. What does that mean? I did not personally murder Christ. I was born 50 plus years ago. I didn't kill Him. Why do you say that? Paul, maybe someone way back in your family history stole a horse. I would never accuse you of being a horse thief and I wouldn't advocate hanging you for it now. Why is God condemning me for something some guy did a long time ago?
Paul, I am playing a bit of the Devil's advocate here but I am really asking to get back to earth here. Do we know what we are talking about when we talk of God and His ways? I wonder sometimes.
cp
Quote from: sheila on April 02, 2009, 02:03:24 PM
And when a female is born her eggs are already formed,
they just need to ripen
:cloud9: Sheila, this spoke to me as to why He is already in man, but not "awakened" in all until they acknowledge Him as Lord of their life. :thumbsup: Blessings....
Quote from: sheila on April 02, 2009, 05:22:23 PM
Hi Cp;
Say your a grown man with wisdom. You have a young son you are raising to manhood. You desire to guide him in
a good way. You tell him the dangers of something,and warn
him not to do it. Your child is very naive and tied up with the foolishness of youth,not able to see ahead what certain consequences are..you may tell him,but he does not really know what they are.
enter an enemy of the wise man.He is a killer at heart.
He sneaks into the boys life..and starts telling him how his father has it all wrong....that he can DO what the father has warned about..without that bad consequence..that father said would happen.That in fact the son was grown up and could choose for himself if this was good for him. The boy rebels
against his father..under the influence of that enemy.
the death came because the son didn't heed the warning..
the father gave the warning to protect the son from harm.
Now the father gets a clue to what is going on, he speaks warnings and further warnings..but it falls on deaf ears.
well the fathers love for his son is flaming..he's gonna do everything to save his sons life in his power. He did not give his warning or command to destroy his son, but to protect him.
All he wants is his son back,alive and well. Mercy will triumph
over any judgement as to the sons disobediance.
If anybody is going to be judged harshly in this matter,by
the father it is going to be that man with the killers heart.
the father may severely chastise his son for not listening to
him, bringing home the danger that his very life was in
and that the killer's sole purpose was to destroy
him ,because he didn't listen.and alienate him from dad
nothing will stop that father from recovering his sons life,
if he finds him dead..he will do mouth to mouth recessatation
[give the breath of life into his body] until he returns to life
the sabbath was made for the benefit of man, not man
made for the benefit of the sabbath
the law was made for the benefit of man,also, it showed the
killer for what he was,lawless, and broke the command to honor
the father that the son should have kept[fathers protection]
newborn Jonny has been born naive..and suceptible to
develope a spirit of rebellion in him against the wisdom of his
father that can and does endanger his life. that spirit
will cause him to reject his father[and wisdom/protection]
and follow in a way that is not good. and put his very life in
danger.
Little Jonnys big brother who was obediant was sent looking
for his little brother, He found him and placed his self smack
dab between the enemy and the little brother.He rebuked
the enemy to his face, told little Jonny how much dad loved
him and was greived over him[heartbroken] The enemy
struck out and stabbed the big brother,and gave a greivous
wound to the big brother. The big brother died recovering his
little brother.
a few days later,the big brothers father brought him back to
life. He wasn't going to lose either one of them, He was really
wise,and he could do anything!
little Jonny realized a lot of things from that horrible
expierence. He was reunited with his family in love...
he realized the deep love his father had for him and his
brother...and the hate that was inside the enemys heart
that acted like a freind or mentor to him..was exposed
I'm not saying this little scenario I painted above is a perfect
rep of what has occured, but I hope you can get the gist of it.
Good stuff Sheila. I know I'm not perfect and need and want saving from much ignorance and vanity but I think I could be saved from much of my foolishness without God Himself having to be tortured and killed. A good talking to and some perfect love and attention might do the trick especially if the one doing it all is God Himself.
Hey, that brings up another question that I hope fits here. When God speaks things happen, right? He said let there be light and light appeared. Jesus said to the water.........be wine, and wine appeared. Jesus said to Matthew, follow me and Matthew followed. Now God says to Adam.............Don't eat of the tree...............and Adam eats! What happened here?
cp
hey CP
the mouth of another spirit spoke that into being
Card,
yes!!
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 05:53:33 PMMaybe it seems unfair we die at all. You say we took of the forbidden fruit. What does that mean? I did not personally murder Christ. I was born 50 plus years ago. I didn't kill Him. Why do you say that? Paul, maybe someone way back in your family history stole a horse. I would never accuse you of being a horse thief and I wouldn't advocate hanging you for it now. Why is God condemning me for something some guy did a long time ago?
Paul, I am playing a bit of the Devil's advocate here but I am really asking to get back to earth here. Do we know what we are talking about when we talk of God and His ways? I wonder sometimes.
cp
We took of the forbidden fruit. We are all in Adam so his sin is ours. If you didn't murder Jesus Christ then you don't have a passover sacrifice. And there is no other passover lamb than Christ. See I am the thief, I am the murderer, I am the child molester, I'm all the evil that there is. I am SATAN. And Christ has come to destroy me (the me that must die) in order to give me Life. He is going to do this by destroying my works. So walking with God is to no longer walk according to my ways which are evil (the works of Satan) but instead I will be performing His works.
Paul
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 06:04:04 PMGood stuff Sheila. I know I'm not perfect and need and want saving from much ignorance and vanity but I think I could be saved from much of my foolishness without God Himself having to be tortured and killed. A good talking to and some perfect love and attention might do the trick especially if the one doing it all is God Himself.
Hey, that brings up another question that I hope fits here. When God speaks things happen, right? He said let there be light and light appeared. Jesus said to the water.........be wine, and wine appeared. Jesus said to Matthew, follow me and Matthew followed. Now God says to Adam.............Don't eat of the tree...............and Adam eats! What happened here?
cp
God is making His own Kind. His own Kind has the knowledge of Good and Evil. So if Adam and Eve are to be His kind they must acquire the knowledge of Good and Evil. They did that when they took of the forbidden fruit. See it was intended for them to take of the forbidden fruit.
Paul
p.s.
even though a mouth of another spirit spoke that seed into being,Father also prophesied about the Lamb that was slain from the foundation of the earth
another thing CP a parent and child are so intertwined..
that if a child suffers..so does the Parent a parent can not
and will not be happy unless the child is well
I went through years of agony with my daughter...I tell you
it almost literally killed me. Boy was that ever a cross bore by
me...I was bound to that cross/tortue stake by nothing but
LOVE
Quote from: trettep on April 02, 2009, 06:30:24 PM
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 06:04:04 PMGood stuff Sheila. I know I'm not perfect and need and want saving from much ignorance and vanity but I think I could be saved from much of my foolishness without God Himself having to be tortured and killed. A good talking to and some perfect love and attention might do the trick especially if the one doing it all is God Himself.
Hey, that brings up another question that I hope fits here. When God speaks things happen, right? He said let there be light and light appeared. Jesus said to the water.........be wine, and wine appeared. Jesus said to Matthew, follow me and Matthew followed. Now God says to Adam.............Don't eat of the tree...............and Adam eats! What happened here?
cp
God is making His own Kind. His own Kind has the knowledge of Good and Evil. So if Adam and Eve are to be His kind they must acquire the knowledge of Good and Evil. They did that when they took of the forbidden fruit. See it was intended for them to take of the forbidden fruit.
Paul
I always thought that was a set up. lol
But, God provided Adam, with the breath of God, not deceived, without sin,--so that Eve wouldn't enter into the holy of holies without blood.
Hebrews 9:7
But into the second went the high priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors of the people:
Quote from: sheila on April 02, 2009, 06:11:03 PM
hey CP
the mouth of another spirit spoke that into being
Card,
yes!!
I hear ya Sheila. Most of the absurd stuff I think and speak come from who knows where!!!! I, of course, always hope and trust my thoughts and words AND QUESTIONS are ordered of the Lord.
What do you think though, why didn't God's word come to pass with Adam in regards to the tree? Seemed like a direct command and not a suggestion. Also does it say the God said.......Don't eat but when you eat.......? Sounds like God planned on him eating.
cp
Dealing with some real evil right now so got to run but I am finding this helpful.
cp
Quote from: Molly on April 02, 2009, 06:37:55 PMI always thought that was a set up. lol
But, God provided Adam, with the breath of God, not deceived, without sin,--so that Eve wouldn't enter into the holy of holies without blood.
Hebrews 9:7
But into the second went the high priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors of the people:
In the beginning was the Rib and the Rib was with Adam and the Rib was Adam.
Adam and Eve are a type. I believe that as the Rib is from Adam so is the Word from God. Eve is comprised of the flesh of Adam, likewise, the Word of God is comprised of the Spirit of God. The Rib comes from from Adam, likewise, the Word of God comes forth from God. Same with Jesus and the Church. The Church is the body of Christ. It is comprised of His Spirit.
Adam and Eve were purposed to have taken of the forbidden fruit. If God didn't want them to take of it then we know what God would have done - He would have treated the forbidden tree like He did the Tree of Life
after they took of the forbidden fruit.
Paul
Hi CP
God knew there was an adversary[rebellious spirit/serpent]
in the garden,too, Nothing was hidden from Him.
He completely foresaw it all...and made provisons beforehand
we realize that fruit from the tokogae basically choked or
strangled us[cut off breath placed in Adam by God]
but He was there to do CPR[CHRIST PROMISED
RESURRECTION] He had the cure already prepared before
the poison[ed tougne] was given
:cloud9: Yep, we were set up...... :winkgrin:
Quote from: Cardinal on April 02, 2009, 08:27:45 PM
:cloud9: Yep, we were set up...... :winkgrin:
Had to be that way I agree. OK so we were made lacking. This gave God occasion to save us from our lack. Then I can see how we can praise Him for saving us, for building us into complete beings.
We are not guilty for having this lack, can't be. So here I am, a not so good guy but not too bad either but I lack whatever I need to be complete.
Why did God have to incarnate Himself and die such a horrible death just because I lack something? What's that all about?
cp
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 03:43:11 PMYou mean to tell me that because someone may be a bit selfish or curious or even a bit disobedient or as you say, holier than though or unforgiving.......that these character traits require the King of Glory Himself to be shredded and killed? It seems a bit overkill to me. Are we missing something here Bob?
Yes, I could be missing something. No, I didn't say being curious. I'm talking about attitudes of hatred, selfishness, mercilessness, non-caring for our fellow man. Those are the kinds of sins Jesus took real issue with while not making a big issue of a woman caught in adultery or a woman with five husbands etc.
If Jesus died as my subsitute and all I need to is "confess and believe" to have my sins erased -- past present and future -- apart from repentance, though I may continue in the same very same sins, God doesn't even see them. Then yes it seems like overkill or just plain nonsense to me.
I believe that Jesus died as an EXAMPLE not as a substitute. First, as an example of what hatred, pride, holier than thou attitudes can lead to in human beings. The culmination of those attitudes against Christ was murder. Christ equated hatred with murder. Why? I don't consider myself inherantly any different than those who murdered Christ. We are all dust of the earth. If their hatred & pride culminated in murder are we somehow immune to that of we have the same attitudes? I don't think so or Christ would not have equated them.
Second, I believe Christ died as an example of what true love looks like. Christ laid down his life for those who loved Him and those who hated him. That is our example to follow. No, we will never literally die on a cross. Probably, never literally die for anyone. But it's still a "picture" of losing our lives for both friends and enemies that we are called upon to follow.
Finally, I suspect you've never experienced what your own selfishness can cause another human being as I have. I'm not even talking anything deliberate. Just selfishness here and there with no intended harm. The effects can be much greater than you imagine if God chooses to prove them to you. So I'd be less apt to downplay those kinds of sins if I were you (or maybe I should say if you were me).
God bless,
Bob
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 09:50:28 PM
Quote from: claypot on April 02, 2009, 03:43:11 PMYou mean to tell me that because someone may be a bit selfish or curious or even a bit disobedient or as you say, holier than though or unforgiving.......that these character traits require the King of Glory Himself to be shredded and killed? It seems a bit overkill to me. Are we missing something here Bob?
Yes, I could be missing something. No, I didn't say being curious. I'm talking about attitudes of hatred, selfishness, mercilessness, non-caring for our fellow man. Those are the kinds of sins Jesus took real issue with while not making a big issue of a woman caught in adultery or a woman with five husbands etc.
If Jesus died as my subsitute and all I need to is "confess and believe" to have my sins erased -- past present and future -- apart from repentance, though I may continue in the same very same sins, God doesn't even see them. Then yes it seems like overkill or just plain nonsense to me.
I believe that Jesus died as an EXAMPLE not as a substitute. First, as an example of what hatred, pride, holier than thou attitudes can lead to in human beings. The culmination of those attitudes against Christ was murder. Christ equated hatred with murder. Why? I don't consider myself inherantly any different than those who murdered Christ. We are all dust of the earth. If their hatred & pride culminated in murder are we somehow immune to that of we have the same attitudes? I don't think so or Christ would not have equated them.
Second, I believe Christ died as an example of what true love looks like. Christ laid down his life for those who loved Him and those who hated him. That is our example to follow. No, we will never literally die on a cross. Probably, never literally die for anyone. But it's still a "picture" of losing our lives for both friends and enemies that we are called upon to follow.
Finally, I suspect you've never experienced what your own selfishness can cause another human being as I have. I'm not even talking anything deliberate. Just selfishness here and there with no intended harm. The effects can be much greater than you imagine if God chooses to prove them to you. So I'd be less apt to downplay those kinds of sins if I were you (or maybe I should say if you were me).
God bless,
Bob
Well, I know I've experienced the selfishness thing you're talking about. It's not fun to come to the realization that you've hurt people you weren't intending to hurt.
I firmly believe that the scripture teaches that Christ died for us as
both an example (which you have some very good insights on)
and a substitute, in terms of removing us from the law of sin and death. That stuff was put away 2000 years ago.
In so doing, He set us free to
be His body. We are to 're-present' Christ in this earth. He wants us to
be Christ in this world as He fills us all with Himself. This filling process causes us to die to ourselves, so that He can be manifested fully in us so that others can live.
Quote from: Doc on April 02, 2009, 10:49:55 PMWell, I know I've experienced the selfishness thing you're talking about. It's not fun to come to the realization that you've hurt people you weren't intending to hurt.
Amen to that.
QuoteI firmly believe that the scripture teaches that Christ died for us as both an example (which you have some very good insights on) and a substitute, in terms of removing us from the law of sin and death. That stuff was put away 2000 years ago. In so doing, He set us free to be His body.
I agree that Christ died for the purpose of freeing us from the law of sin and death. Nevertheless, to be carnally minded now, 2000 years later, is still death and still leaves one under the law of sin and death.
- Romans 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: 4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. 5 For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. 6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
<br>
- Romans 8:13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.
carnally minded = mind the things of the flesh = walk after the flesh ---> death
vs
spiritually minded = mind the things of the spirit = walk after the spirit ---> life
Seems to me there is still a requirement here. Through the spirit mortify the deeds of the body.
QuoteWe are to 're-present' Christ in this earth. He wants us to be Christ in this world as He fills us all with Himself. This filling process causes us to die to ourselves, so that He can be manifested fully in us so that others can live
I agree with this part too Doc.
Quote from: Tony N on March 31, 2009, 04:52:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on March 30, 2009, 02:47:18 PM
Quote from: Doc on March 30, 2009, 10:00:39 AM
I think the point of contention is really not that Paul was preaching a "different" gospel, but he was preaching a more "advanced" version of it than had previously been given. So not a different gospel per se, but a deeper or better understanding of the same gospel, as I see it.
No Doc that is not the point of contention, Noch and Tony beleive that it is a different gospel preached to defferent parties, that what Paul say has nothing to do with the Jews and those things that Peter and the boys said has nothing to do with the Gentiles.
That and that alone is the contention here.
It is "Knoch."
When Israel was set aside Paul preached to Jews and Gentiles the same message to both groups. Paul did not preach repentance and baptism for the remission of sins as Peter did. Paul preached FAITH in what Christ accomplished in His death, burial and resurrection to both Jews and Gentiles.
Why would Peter preach Paul's message? Peter and those of Peter's message were remaining on the earth. Paul and those of Paul's message are to be taken among the celestials.
Peter couldn't preach to the Galatians his gospel because Paul warned the Galatians that if anyone brought a different gospel/evangel other than what he (Paul) brought, let him be anathema.
While if he never preached baptism what in the world was he doing baptizing people?
And Bob already answered you point about this being after Israel was set aside.
Quote from: bobf on April 02, 2009, 11:08:19 PM
Quote from: Doc on April 02, 2009, 10:49:55 PMWell, I know I've experienced the selfishness thing you're talking about. It's not fun to come to the realization that you've hurt people you weren't intending to hurt.
Amen to that.
QuoteI firmly believe that the scripture teaches that Christ died for us as both an example (which you have some very good insights on) and a substitute, in terms of removing us from the law of sin and death. That stuff was put away 2000 years ago. In so doing, He set us free to be His body.
I agree that Christ died for the purpose of freeing us from the law of sin and death. Nevertheless, to be carnally minded now, 2000 years later, is still death and still leaves one under the law of sin and death.
- Romans 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: 4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. 5 For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. 6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
<br>- Romans 8:13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.
carnally minded = mind the things of the flesh = walk after the flesh ---> death
vs
spiritually minded = mind the things of the spirit = walk after the spirit ---> life
Seems to me there is still a requirement here. Through the spirit mortify the deeds of the body.
It might be a fine-point, but I guess I don't see it as so much of a "requirement" as a statement of fact. And notice it's
through the spirit. It can only be accomplished by Christ filling us with His spirit (which is not of us). His spirit filling us until there is nothing left of "us" is what accomplishes the mortification of the deeds of the body. Jesus didn't come to give us a new set of rules to live by.
Quote from: Doc on April 03, 2009, 01:50:22 AM
I don't see it as so much of a "requirement" as a statement of fact. And notice it's through the spirit. It can only be accomplished by Christ filling us with His spirit (which is not of us). His spirit filling us until there is nothing left of "us" is what accomplishes the mortification of the deeds of the body. Jesus didn't come to give us a new set of rules to live by.
Amen, Doc....."no one is recognizing the Son except the Father; neither is anyone recognizing the Father except the Son, and he to whom the Son should be intending to unveil Him. Hither to Me, all who are toiling and laden, and I will be giving you rest. Lift My yoke upon you and be learning from Me, for meek am I and humble in heart, and you shall be finding rest in your soul, for My yoke is kindly and My load is light....now I am saying to you that a Greater than the sanctuary is here. Now if you had known what this is: Mercy am I wanting, and not sacrifice--you would not convict the faultless, for the Son of Mankind is Lord of the sabbath. What wonderful words from our Savior, AND THIS WAS SPOKEN TO ISRAEL/THE APOSTLES BEFORE THE CROSS, WHICH USHERED IN THE AGE OF GRACE TO THOSE WHO TRUST IN HIM. Praise God, and thank you Savior Jesus."
Quote from: Doc on April 03, 2009, 01:50:22 AMIt might be a fine-point, but I guess I don't see it as so much of a "requirement" as a statement of fact. And notice it's through the spirit. It can only be accomplished by Christ filling us with His spirit (which is not of us). His spirit filling us until there is nothing left of "us" is what accomplishes the mortification of the deeds of the body.
Galatians 5:24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
It says "THEY...have crucified the flesh" and "If YE live after the flesh" and "If YE throught he Spirit do mortify..." so I will stick with that. At the same time I believe this is accomplished by the grace of God and we have no power of ourselves to do these tings. I see it kind of like how Peter walked on the water. Peter DID walk on the water, but had no power to do so. He walked by faith.
QuoteJesus didn't come to give us a new set of rules to live by.
What else was Jesus doing when He said things like:
Ye have heard it said... BUT I SAY UNTO YOU....
Forgive and you will be forgiven.
Forgive not and you will not be forgiven.
etc.
:cloud9: I liked that point bobf; Peter did walk on the water, but obviously he had no power of his own to do so. Not something I ever thought about in that way before. :thumbsup: Blessings...
QuotePeter DID walk on the water, but had no power to do so. He walked by faith.
On the other hand, given that Peter did have the faith to walk a step or two on water, he still had to get out of the boat. He had to do something to act on that faith.
Eve, also, could have just believed God. Why would she let the serpent talk her into something? Did she not have the faith, or did she choose not to act on it? Is that what it means to be deceived?
Quote from: Cardinal on April 03, 2009, 06:19:03 AM
:cloud9: I liked that point bobf; Peter did walk on the water, but obviously he had no power of his own to do so. Not something I ever thought about in that way before. :thumbsup: Blessings...
Thx Cardinal.
A couple of more verses along those lines.
One of my favs... Paul labored yet not Paul labored!
- 1 Corinthians 15:10 But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me.
And Christ preaching implicitly salvation by the grace of God
From Matthew 19:21-26:
Rich young man: How can I inherit eternal life?
Jesus: Sell everything and give to the poor!
Diciples: Yikes! Who then can be saved!??
Jesus: No one, it's impossible...except with God then it's possible!
Quote from: Molly on April 03, 2009, 06:27:39 AMOn the other hand, given that Peter did have the faith to walk a step or two on water, he still had to get out of the boat. He had to do something to act on that faith.
Yeah, that's pretty much what I was trying to say. Peter DID DO something that he had no power to do on his own, but he didn't just sit there either.
QuoteEve, also, could have just believed God. Why would she let the serpent talk her into something? Did she not have the faith, or did she choose not to act on it? Is that what it means to be deceived?
I think A&E lacked faith and were carnal as we all are in our spiritual childhood.
:cloud9: Yes, I think the gist of it is, HE EQUIPS us to do His will, and so being in agreement with it, we then CAN labour for that which is eternal, ie. the fruit that remains. Blessings...
Quote from: bobf on April 03, 2009, 06:10:59 AM
Quote from: Doc on April 03, 2009, 01:50:22 AMIt might be a fine-point, but I guess I don't see it as so much of a "requirement" as a statement of fact. And notice it's through the spirit. It can only be accomplished by Christ filling us with His spirit (which is not of us). His spirit filling us until there is nothing left of "us" is what accomplishes the mortification of the deeds of the body.
Galatians 5:24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
You can read that verse two ways, as something we initiate, or as something that God initiates (and completes).
Quote
It says "THEY...have crucified the flesh" and "If YE live after the flesh" and "If YE throught he Spirit do mortify..." so I will stick with that. At the same time I believe this is accomplished by the grace of God and we have no power of ourselves to do these tings. I see it kind of like how Peter walked on the water. Peter DID walk on the water, but had no power to do so. He walked by faith.
The way it's worded makes it clear to me that they have done these things because they are already Christ's. In other words, they have been made his to the point that it's automatic. It's never something they're trying to do, it just happens because Christ has filled them to the point that that stuff just falls off.
QuoteJesus didn't come to give us a new set of rules to live by.
What else was Jesus doing when He said things like:
Ye have heard it said... BUT I SAY UNTO YOU....
Forgive and you will be forgiven.
Forgive not and you will not be forgiven.
etc.
[/quote]
What he was doing was illustrating that we need to listen to
Him, not the law. He was saying, "I know what your scriptures, your law says, but here is what
I say". He was showing the principles of the kingdom, not laying down "rules". He was showing us what living a God kind of life looks like.
As soon as you make a rule to follow out of something that God has said, rather than just letting Him fill you and watching His life flow out of you to do these things, you've lost it and have turned back into a religious Pharisee. You're back to trying in the flesh to become like God by eating of TOKOGAE and trying to choose the good over the evil, rather than eating of the tree of life and letting its seed produce the fruit of the spirit from within you.
:sigh: Who was Jesus talking to, and about what? I like your summary, Doc.
------------------------------
If I may witness; The CROSS OF JESUS, His blood cleansing us, His mercy covering us, His Spirit enabling us...flowing through us, working through us, bringing us into obedience and sonship. .. being confident of this very thing, that He who has begun a good work in you will complete it until the day of Jesus Christ..Phil 1:6. Thank God for sending us His Son. Pray that we look to Him and not marginalize the work of the cross...
Oh, the blood of Jesus
Oh, the blood of Jesus
Oh, the blood of Jesus
It washes white as snow
If we have no part to play and it is all of God why then does the scriptures say that the HEAD of the BODY cannot say to the FEET I have no need of you?
Quote from: jabcat on April 03, 2009, 08:36:47 AM:sigh: Who was Jesus talking to, and about what?
To you and me of course.
Quote from: Doc on April 03, 2009, 08:24:37 AMYou can read that verse two ways, as something we initiate, or as something that God initiates (and completes).
I don't deny that these things are accomplished by God's grace and we have no power of ourselves to do them apart from God's work in us. But if WE do not have to do them then why Paul's advice and warning?
QuoteAs soon as you make a rule to follow out of something that God has said, rather than just letting Him fill you and watching His life flow out of you to do these things, you've lost it and have turned back into a religious Pharisee.
The problem with the pharisees was that they were cleaning the outside of the cup without regard to the inside. Outwardly they appeared clean but inwardly they were ravenous wolves, thinking themselves better, despising other sinners, ready to kill Christ. They thought they were entitled entrance into the kingdom of God because of their position and physical descent and outward forms of righteousness.
What you're telling me is that if a person strived his best to...
a) forgive
b) love his neighbor
c) love his enemy
d) bless those who curse him
Christ would have chided that person as a whited-over grave?? I don't think so.
I realize that we are sinners and need God's work to do any of those things, but those things are not in the same category as being outward "rules" like
a) physical circumcision
b) saying long prayers
c) keeping the weekly Sabbath
d) tithing
the Free gift is one thing,and a "talent' is another.
The free gift does not require any effort on our part.
It is our eternal life assured,regardless of works.
The talent is given and it is expected we increase it through
some effort on our part.
Does everyone possess a talent? Yes, at least one.
If a man be totally overcome by a wicked spirit of rebellion
and hide his talent, it shall be taken from him[he shall
suffer loss] But still receive the free gift and the spirit of
rebellion that was with him,will go into everlasting cutting off .
When you don't increase your talent you don't grow in the
kingdom of God or help increase the interest of your Father's
buisiness, which is the Kingdom. You miss out on the
oportunity offrded you in this world at this time.To be a
partaker and sharer in the kingdom of God and Christ.
Does your eternal life depend on it? No.but it is your life
and you do depend on it . If you have a great interest invested
in your
Father's buisiness you are in fact increasing His interests.
You may further increase His interests with sharing your talent
or talents with your brothers,so that all may increase..
to the Glory of God and His Christ
Good post Sheila...by the way, I have been enjoying your posts on different threads :thumbsup:. And others are making some good points too, even those I may differ with on some doctrinal issues...We all have our measures of understanding God grants us...
IMO, salvation, by grace through faith...and THAT not of ourselves...we can't boast...we can only glory in the cross of Christ. If we hold a view of the cross (many times I have not and am guilty of forgetting/neglecting) His work there keeps us humble...and saved
Doc, this spoke to me today as a witness to your post yesterday that having Christ in us, ensures the works of salvation...not our effort, but His in us...
10If Christ is in you, though the body is dead because of sin, yet the spirit is alive because of righteousness.
11But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who dwells in you.
12So then, brethren, we are under obligation, not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh--
13for if you are living according to the flesh, you must die; but if by the Spirit you are putting to death the deeds of the body, you will live.
14For all who are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God.
15For you have not received a spirit of slavery leading to fear again, but you have received a spirit of adoption as sons by which we cry out, "Abba! Father!"
As I understand, we do nothing to get Him and His spirit in us, except use the faith that He gives us, to believe on Him ...What else can Him being the Author and Finisher of our salvation possibly mean? I believe it. To God be the glory.
Saw an interesting thought on this yesterday..."our salvation is a free gift, our works are for our rewards".
I would add to that, our works are more for obedience, "pressing in"...however, IMO, we still need to be careful with that and maintain an attitude of looking to Him, the Author and Finisher...because, our works are still as filthy rags as far as gaining us any sort of righteousness; focusing on our works can bring an attitude of self-righteousness, and we can become prideful, judgmental and contentious; our works are still ONLY as empowered by the Spirit within us; and, we still have to depend only on the finished work and the power of the cross, because Paul said he was CONSTANTLY unable to do what he wanted, and CONSTANTLY doing the things he didn't want...so Who would deliver him? Jesus, His Master...if it holds true for Paul, I'm counting on it holding true for us :thumbsup:.
Quote from: bobf on April 04, 2009, 12:19:25 AM
I don't deny that these things are accomplished by God's grace and we have no power of ourselves to do them apart from God's work in us. But if WE do not have to do them then why Paul's advice and warning?
The problem with the pharisees was that they were cleaning the outside of the cup without regard to the inside. Outwardly they appeared clean but inwardly they were ravenous wolves, thinking themselves better, despising other sinners, ready to kill Christ. They thought they were entitled entrance into the kingdom of God because of their position and physical descent and outward forms of righteousness.
What you're telling me is that if a person strived his best to...
a) forgive
b) love his neighbor
c) love his enemy
d) bless those who curse him
Christ would have chided that person as a whited-over grave?? I don't think so.
I realize that we are sinners and need God's work to do any of those things, but those things are not in the same category as being outward "rules" like
a) physical circumcision
b) saying long prayers
c) keeping the weekly Sabbath
d) tithing
To answer the first question, WE do not do them; the spirit of God in us does them. I think we're probably saying the same thing here and the semantics are just different.
As to the second point, the problem is not in the works themselves, it's in the "striving". A person who is filled with the spirit will have forgiveness, love of neighbors and enemies, and blessings for those cursing flowing out of them without any self-effort. But you can try all day long to do these things out of the flesh, and it just won't work. If you're
trying to do these things, or making a rule out of doing them, it's ultimately through self-effort, and our flesh cannot please God. In that case you'd be more or less in the same boat, except that the Pharisees weren't even genuinely trying. Either way,
our righteousness counts for nothing.
With some other discussions going on, I happened to think more along the lines of works. Although disagreement exists in some areas, it seems all agree that works fit in somewhere, somehow, accomplishing some thing. :happy3:
So then in thinking about works, agreeing they are a part of it, I also got to thinking again about
where they come from. Believe me when I say, you'd have to really know me and my upbringing to understand that I thought one work one way or the other could cause me to either split hell wide open or not - but probably
so, because I didn't figure I could ever get it quite right enough to stay of that place. (I was right about that, just wrong about hell).
Anyway, so I'm thinking, "works must be done. But
who's works? Where do they come from, and how do we "do" it? Must be
His works through me somehow, because even though works are necessary,
my own works are as filthy rags". They count as nothing towards my righteousness. So even if I'm working, it can't be me. Maybe it's me only responding to Him, as I yield to Him and submit my will to His? Then HE brings about the works of righteousness that I can't do. And how do we know if it's HIM working through us to accomplish His purpose, or just us "trying to be good" and "earn some righteousness points"?
OK, that's an outline. Anyone have any further insight into where these works come from and how they get done? I.e, works of the Spirit vs. works of our flesh that will mean nothing, even though we strive with all our might for righteousness with them? Remembering, Paul said "So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy." Rm 9:16
The following are at least parts of the last 3 posts in this VERY long thread that ended over 2 years ago.
**I'd like for this thread to stay on the topic of WORKS specifically - how, what, when, who, etc. Edify one another, "encourage one another to good works"! :thumbsup:Quote from: sheila on April 04, 2009, 02:06:14 AM
the Free gift is one thing,and a "talent' is another.
The free gift does not require any effort on our part.
It is our eternal life assured,regardless of works.
The talent is given and it is expected we increase it through
some effort on our part.
Quote from: jabcat on April 06, 2009, 08:24:41 PM
Saw an interesting thought on this yesterday..."our salvation is a free gift, our works are for our rewards".
I would add to that, our works are more for obedience, "pressing in"...however, IMO, we still need to be careful with that and maintain an attitude of looking to Him, the Author and Finisher...because, our works are still as filthy rags as far as gaining us any sort of righteousness; focusing on our works can bring an attitude of self-righteousness, and we can become prideful, judgmental and contentious; our works are still ONLY as empowered by the Spirit within us; and, we still have to depend only on the finished work and the power of the cross, because Paul said he was CONSTANTLY unable to do what he wanted, and CONSTANTLY doing the things he didn't want...so Who would deliver him? Jesus, His Master...if it holds true for Paul, I'm counting on it holding true for us :thumbsup:.
Doc replying to bobf
Quote from: Doc on April 06, 2009, 09:45:52 PM
To answer the first question, WE do not do them; the spirit of God in us does them. I think we're probably saying the same thing here and the semantics are just different.
As to the second point, the problem is not in the works themselves, it's in the "striving". A person who is filled with the spirit will have forgiveness, love of neighbors and enemies, and blessings for those cursing flowing out of them without any self-effort. But you can try all day long to do these things out of the flesh, and it just won't work. If you're trying to do these things, or making a rule out of doing them, it's ultimately through self-effort, and our flesh cannot please God. In that case you'd be more or less in the same boat, except that the Pharisees weren't even genuinely trying. Either way, our righteousness counts for nothing.
AndersonJas 220 But will you know, vain man, that faith without works is dead?
For me that means that people who claim to have faith but have no works have no faith at all.
Quote from: Jabcatmy own works are as filthy rags
ACVEccl 94 Because to him who is joined with all the living there is hope, for
a living dog is better than a dead lion.
I like your definition of the James verse. That's what I believe, that the appearance of works is evidence of faith.
On the last part, are you waiting for me to bark, or can I just scratch a flea?
The other part of that is though, it seems we can work and work and work until we're blue in the face, all in our own efforts, and in the context of "eternity", it means nothing. "did we not do x,y,z?" "depart from Me, I never knew you".
So if faith produces good works, is it really me doing them (Paul said "I, yet not I"), or is it that I'm looking to Jesus the Author and Finisher of my faith, keeping me eyes on Him, yielding to His will, and then HE does the works through me? And how do know where that line is between "this is God working through me" vs. "this is me being a 'good' guy and earning my way"?
Personally, sometimes I think I can really tell when it's God working through me. Other times, I feel I struggle on my own strength.
Quote from: jabcat on August 30, 2011, 08:31:51 AM
On the last part, are you waiting for me to bark, or can I just scratch a flea?
I think you are just playing dead James :laughing7:
Thinking about the context thread now.
Works of ourselves are seen as useles or even bad. Although I admit that's what the verses are implying I think it isn't the correct/full understanding. What if we widen to context to the personality of Jesus.
Assume Jesus and the twelve walk past someone who is clearly a Baal worshipper. But at that moment that person is doing some very good works. Say he's handing out food and medicine to lepers.
What would Jesus teaching be on that? Would He use terms like viper or far more positive words.... I think He would be positive.
:2c: