Tentmaker Forum

Discussions Relating to Universal Reconciliation => Book of Revelation => Topic started by: Moshood on August 19, 2007, 04:54:39 AM

Title: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Moshood on August 19, 2007, 04:54:39 AM
THE SECOND DEATH
The Crucifixion [ Death ] and Burial [ Destruction ] of the Unrighteous Individual's Old Corrupted and Iniquitous Self with Christ
through His/Her Spiritual Union with Him upon Conversion in the Likeness of His Death, Burial and Resurrection

He who Overcomes shall not be Harmed by the Second Death.
- The Overcomer [ Christ in us ] is Unharmed by the Second Death.
- The Old Corrupted SELF [ Beast in us ] is Harmed by the Second Death.

Blessed are those that Overcome; The Second Death hath no power over them.
- The Second Death hath no Power [ Authority ] over the Overcomer [ Christ in us ].
- The Second Death hath Power [ Authority ] over the Old Corrupted SELF [ Beast in us ].
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: vagabond on August 19, 2007, 06:53:00 PM
I would like to lay out an outline of how i view the "lake of fire".

First, we know that God is referred to as a "consuming fire".

We also know that God is Light and in him there is no darkness.

We know also that fire, even at the time of Cain and Abel was used to sacrifice animals as an atonement. In fact, it is suggested that fire would come down and consume the sacrifice if the sacrifice was acceptable to God. If it was not acceptable no fire would come from heaven and consume it.This may be how Cain knew that his sacrifice was not acceptable. This is quite possibly why Job knew he was in good standing with God, he had sacrificed for himself and for his sons and daughters (just in case).

The tabernacle, the outer court was lightened by the natural sun, thus the sacrifice and atonement's were for the natural man. The innercourt was lightened by the candlestick (the Holy Spirit in-part) Church realm? The most Holy place was lightened by the Glory of the very presence of God. Anyone entering this place defiled would drop dead. Now we know what the glory of God consumes....evil.

The face of Moses shown like an angel, so bright they had to veil his face. At his death he still looked like a young man (one cannot even age in this glory)

Christ, on the mount of transformation, when in the presence of the two witnesses became clothed in the glory of God's brightness.

And Steven, at his stoning, his face shown like an angel as he declared "lay not this sin to their charge". This is perhaps the best example of the Lake of fire, for at that time there was wailing and gnashing of teeth also:
Acts 7:54When they heard these things, they were cut to the heart, and they gnashed on him with their teeth.

55But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up steadfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,

56And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.

57Then they cried out with a loud voice, and stopped their ears, and ran upon him with one accord,

Comparing that with:Matthew 13:42
And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.


Elijah called for fire from heaven.

Jesus said:Luke 12:49
I am come to send fire on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled?

Now to the point....Jesus is like the tree...his body of many members is the forest. Jesus was but a flame....but the many membered body of Christ is like a lake of fire.

Steven stood before the Elders, being "FILLED" (not in-part) but "FILLED" with the Holy Spirit. Using the Word of God he cut them to the heart and exposed their inner thoughts and intents to the light of God.

Can you imagine what a "MANY membered body" of Steven's would be like?

Now then, keeping in mind that being in the very presence of God, as Moses, the physical body could not even age, let's look at 1 Cor.15) 51Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,

This verse shows me that a generation coming won't see physical death, but will change/transform while they are still using their natural bodies.

:53For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

:54So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.  

Is this not the manifestation of the sons of God, the many membered body? Is this not even the "rapture itself"? And what would a body of lights look like all moving in one accord? Like a lake of light(s)? A large body of fire?

And just as trees exchange bad air for good air, how would this body effect this world?

Isaiah 31:9
And he shall pass over to his strong hold for fear, and his princes shall be afraid of the ensign, saith the LORD, whose fire is in Zion, and his furnace in Jerusalem.

This is what i'm seeing as the lake of fire.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: squint on August 19, 2007, 07:27:18 PM
Many in UR are trying to make a case that the infamous Lake is God and that "all things" are therein cast and therein find their eternal life.

I have several responses, basically in the form of questions, that should cast more than a shadow of doubt upon that presentation.

A.)  There are numeous types of fires in the Bible.  Not all of them are the same, so it is somewhat disconnected to make for example, a physical fire here on earth into the same fire as that of the infamous Lake of Fire.  There are also fires that come down from heaven.  One destroys God's enemies.  There is also a fire that burns but does not consume.  So in effect there is no way to logically connect "all of these fires" as having the same intent and purpose when that obviously is not the case.

B.)  We know that the fire for the DEVIL AND HIS MESSENGERS whom we know for a FACT to be headed to the Lake of Fire is the same fire as the fire presented by Jesus in Matthew 25 since we have both fire and the one's headed there being in both accounts, save the fire in Matthew 25 does not have the term "Lake" attached until Revelation accounts.

C.)  Since the "fire" in Matthew 25 is prepared or MADE for the devil and his messengers, it CANNOT be God as the consuming fire, as God is not a MADE thing.

I have put this query to several UR preachers who have been promoting this position, and most of them either cannot or will not address this situation.  I also have my own observations as to "why" they do not address this, and it revolves largely around many in UR who "believe" that their fellow man who are NOT believers are going to be tossed into that Lake of Fire for "temporary torture" and that suits a doctrine of fear peddling to "make" people believe as they believe, very similar in the way "eternal torture" of mankind believers "sell" their wares and gather their adherents and financial supporters.

squint
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: vagabond on August 19, 2007, 08:26:08 PM
Hi squint, and although i do respect your views and can see why you hold to this position, the evidence you've provided against it can also be used for it...in my view:

QuoteA.)  There are numerous types of fires in the Bible.  Not all of them are the same, so it is somewhat disconnected to make for example, a physical fire here on earth into the same fire as that of the infamous Lake of Fire.  There are also fires that come down from heaven.  One destroys God's enemies.  There is also a fire that burns but does not consume.  So in effect there is no way to logically connect "all of these fires" as having the same intent and purpose when that obviously is not the case
.

The lake of fire is to destroy death and hell...is it not?
The fire that the Hebrew children were cast into did two things, burned only the wicked (those who cast them in) and the "son of man" appeared. The Children of God were infected in no way. Thus this fire was both a consuming (of evil) and a non-consuming (of good).

The fire (light) in the Holy of Holies was both a consuming and a non-consuming fire. It would kill a man carrying guilt if he entered, but would not harm a man cleansed. A

The fire that is used to purify gold is also a consuming and non-consuming fire, it burns the dross but doesn't harm the gold.

The fire that Paul mentions in:1 Corinthians 3:15
If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
the evil deeds that even Paul mentions in Rom.7 are burned up, and the man himself is saved from the evil that once controlled his flesh.

And the sudden transformation mentioned in 1 Cor.15) Shows the mortal body being consumed/clothed with the inner immortal. And what happens "death is swallowed up", but the man himself remains unharmed.

Your faith is tried by fire:1 Peter 1:7
That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:

QuoteB.)  We know that the fire for the DEVIL AND HIS MESSENGERS whom we know for a FACT to be headed to the Lake of Fire is the same fire as the fire presented by Jesus in Matthew 25 since we have both fire and the one's headed there being in both accounts, save the fire in Matthew 25 does not have the term "Lake" attached until Revelation accounts.

Reason for that may be: Jesus was "THE" son of God, he was the "Flame" (Isaiah 10:17
And the light of Israel shall be for a fire, and his Holy One for a flame: and it shall burn and devour his thorns and his briers in one day;).  Notice Israel (the people of God) are the fire, Jesus Christ the Holy one is but a flame. In Revelation we are dealing with one "like unto" the Son of man(Rev.1:13And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.)  This, in my view is the many membered body of Christ. The one with many voices.

QuoteC.)  Since the "fire" in Matthew 25 is prepared or MADE for the devil and his messengers, it CANNOT be God as the consuming fire, as God is not a MADE thing.

The same fire that is used to purify gold also burns the dross. Look at how the sons of Levi are to be purified:

Mal.3:2But who may abide the day of his coming? and who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap:

3And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the LORD an offering in righteousness.

He shall sit and He shall purify. Purify them from what? Sounds like their little devils are going to burned in, and by, the same fire that saves them.

As for god not being made a "thing", The fire is the very "presence" of God. And what would you do with the verse "God is a consuming fire"?

QuoteI have put this query to several UR preachers who have been promoting this position, and most of them either cannot or will not address this situation.  I also have my own observations as to "why" they do not address this, and it revolves largely around many in UR who "believe" that their fellow man who are NOT believers are going to be tossed into that Lake of Fire for "temporary torture" and that suits a doctrine of fear peddling to "make" people believe as they believe, very similar in the way "eternal torture" of mankind believers "sell" their wares and gather their adherents and financial supporters.

The fire of God only tortures his enemies, it's a blessing to all else.

Let me leave you with one last verse showing the army of God (manifested sons) in the last day:

Joel 2:2A day of darkness and of gloominess, a day of clouds and of thick darkness, as the morning spread upon the mountains: a great people and a strong; there hath not been ever the like, neither shall be any more after it, even to the years of many generations.

3A fire devoureth before them; and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them.

Read on and you'll see this is God's great army.

Happy to discuss it further squint. 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Kept on August 19, 2007, 08:44:34 PM
Great Posts Vagabond!!

:girlheart:


kept
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: AbbasChild on August 19, 2007, 09:25:21 PM
I agree with Kept!  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 19, 2007, 09:44:33 PM

The lake of fire is to destroy death and hell...is it not?
The fire that the Hebrew children were cast into did two things, burned only the wicked (those who cast them in) and the "son of man" appeared. The Children of God were infected in no way. Thus this fire was both a consuming (of evil) and a non-consuming (of good
).

Same Fire with dual purpose...AMEN Vagabond....that which burns the Tares and leaves the wheat,,,...

Blessings
T
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 20, 2007, 12:49:42 AM
willieH: Hi Taffy... :hithere:

Quote from: Taffy on August 19, 2007, 09:44:33 PM

The lake of fire is to destroy death and hell...is it not?
The fire that the Hebrew children were cast into did two things, burned only the wicked (those who cast them in) and the "son of man" appeared. The Children of God were infected in no way. Thus this fire was both a consuming (of evil) and a non-consuming (of good
).

Same Fire with dual purpose...AMEN Vagabond....that which burns the Tares and leaves the wheat,,,...

Blessings
T

A few observances to consider my new friend...

DEATH and HELL (hades=grave) were DESTROYED at the CROSS... in THIS EARTH, in THIS TIME REALM... which IS the LAKE of FIRE...  CHRIST (2000 years ago) conquered DEATH and HELL... (1 Cor 15:54)  Death ...IS... swallowed up in victory! O ...DEATH... where is thy sting... O ...GRAVE... where is thy victory?

Though the COMPLETE manifestation of the ETERNAL has not yet been REVEALED... it ALREADY ...IS...   :myahoo:

The WRATH of GOD is NOW (Rom 1:18)... the JUDGMENT is NOW (John 12:32)... The SUFFERING is NOW (Rom 8:18)... these are ALL happening within TIME... and TIME's experience of these, is as noted in Ecc 3 and...

TIME shall END (Rev 10:6 / John 6:44 / John 12:48)

ALL have been "blotted out"... ALL have left their "first love"... ALL are subjected to the FIRE (Mk 9:49)... and ALL are WRITTEN in the BOOK of the Lamb's LIFE...  :gangel:

More to say later, gotta go...  :laughing7:

PeAcE...  :gamer:

In 
JESUS
...willieH   :angel4:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 20, 2007, 01:12:08 AM
Quote from: willieH on August 20, 2007, 12:49:42 AM
willieH: Hi Taffy... :hithere:

Quote from: Taffy on August 19, 2007, 09:44:33 PM

The lake of fire is to destroy death and hell...is it not?
The fire that the Hebrew children were cast into did two things, burned only the wicked (those who cast them in) and the "son of man" appeared. The Children of God were infected in no way. Thus this fire was both a consuming (of evil) and a non-consuming (of good
).

Same Fire with dual purpose...AMEN Vagabond....that which burns the Tares and leaves the wheat,,,...

Blessings
T

A few observances to consider my new friend...

DEATH and HELL (hades=grave) were DESTROYED at the CROSS... in THIS EARTH, in THIS TIME REALM... which IS the LAKE of FIRE...  CHRIST (2000 years ago) conquered DEATH and HELL... (1 Cor 15:54)  Death ...IS... swallowed up in victory! O ...DEATH... where is thy sting... O ...GRAVE... where is thy victory?

Though the COMPLETE manifestation of the ETERNAL has not yet been REVEALED... it ALREADY ...IS...   :myahoo:

The WRATH of GOD is NOW (Rom 1:18)... the JUDGMENT is NOW (John 12:32)... The SUFFERING is NOW (Rom 8:18)... these are ALL happening within TIME... and TIME's experience of these, is as noted in Ecc 3 and...

TIME shall END (Rev 10:6 / John 6:44 / John 12:48)

ALL have been "blotted out"... ALL have left their "first love"... ALL are subjected to the FIRE (Mk 9:49)... and ALL are WRITTEN in the BOOK of the Lamb's LIFE...  :gangel:

More to say later, gotta go...  :laughing7:

PeAcE...  :gamer:

In 
JESUS
...willieH   :angel4:
yo willie mmy ma..........your thots are always welcome

so the wrath of God is on those children of disobiedience......those still under the Curse...

Willie...i say little, but im with ya  matey.......

Christ   is, WAS and WILL be..I tend to read scripture that way.....trying to expound it in that manner is hard to do.......

Yes the lake is TODAY..as it was Yesterday and wil be tomorrow.......

victory...spot  on matey.....

Christ is our victory :icon_flower:

For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, [even] our faith. ....

ALL have been "blotted out"... ALL have left their "first love"... ALL are subjected to the FIRE (Mk 9:49)... and ALL are WRITTEN in the BOOK of the Lamb's LIFE

AMEN there to willie..........

talk later..
Taffy

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: vagabond on August 20, 2007, 03:17:18 AM

WillieH,
QuoteThough the COMPLETE manifestation of the ETERNAL has not yet been REVEALED... it ALREADY ...IS...  

The WRATH of GOD is NOW (Rom 1:18)... the JUDGMENT is NOW (John 12:32)... The SUFFERING is NOW (Rom 8:18)... these are ALL happening within TIME... and TIME's experience of these, is as noted in Ecc 3 and...

TIME shall END (Rev 10:6 / John 6:44 / John 12:48)

Is was and shall be, how true.....

Hi taffy,
QuoteFor whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, [even] our faith. ....

An excellent point....how important it is to have faith tried!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Redlettervoice on August 25, 2007, 01:59:30 PM



Sounds right to me! 

What do you think is the "first" death?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: julzabro2 on August 25, 2007, 03:50:42 PM
I think the 1st death is the spiritual death where one puts off the old man and becomes an "overcomer". Therefore, the 2nd death....physical death...does not affect he who has overcome the old man by putting faith in Jesus Christ.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 25, 2007, 11:05:18 PM
willieH: Hi Julz... :hithere:

Quote from: julzabro2 on August 25, 2007, 03:50:42 PM
I think the 1st death is the spiritual death where one puts off the old man and becomes an "overcomer". Therefore, the 2nd death....physical death...does not affect he who has overcome the old man by putting faith in Jesus Christ.

Absolutely, RIGHT ON! Julz...  :Yesss:

The death CHRIST "tasted" for all men (Heb 2:9)... is the death in the SPIRIT which all die upon SINNING... which is WHY CHRIST noted:  ...let the DEAD [Spiritually], bury their DEAD [Physically]... (Lk 9:60)

But the 2nd death, is the PHYSICAL one, of which we all partake of, and endure for ourselves... those in CHRIST upon dieing this death, shall not be HURT of it...

Scripture does NOT indicate that those in CHRIST shall not partake of the 2nd Death, it just notes those shall not be HURT of it... WHY you ask?  Because those in CHRIST, do not take SHAME into the Resurrection from that DEATH... (Rev 2:11)

Peace...  :thumbsup:

In 
JESUS
...willieH  :boogie:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 25, 2007, 11:47:15 PM
2Co 5:14 For the love of Christ is constraining us, judging this, that, if One died for the sake of all, consequently all died.

2Co 5:15  And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again.

Mat 6:19  Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:

Mat 6:20  But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:

Mat 7:13  Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:

Mat 7:14  Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

Mat 7:27  And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

Mat 5:13  Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savor, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.

Gal 3:3  Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?

Gal 3:10  For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.

Heb 10:23  Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised;)

Heb 10:26  For if we sin willfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,

Heb 10:27  But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

Heb 10:31  It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

Heb 10:35  Cast not away therefore your confidence, which hath great recompense of reward.

Heb 10:38  Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.

Jud 1:12  These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Moshood on August 26, 2007, 02:38:57 AM
Quote from: Redlettervoice on August 25, 2007, 01:59:30 PM



Sounds right to me! 

What do you think is the "first" death?


The First Death = To be Carnally Minded [ Dead in Sin ]
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Stardust75 on August 26, 2007, 06:16:27 PM
Willie H quoted:

"Scripture does NOT indicate that those in CHRIST shall not partake of the 2nd Death, it just notes those shall not be HURT of it... WHY you ask?  Because those in CHRIST, do not take SHAME into the Resurrection from that DEATH... (Rev 2:11)"

Question?

Those outside of Jesus Christ take shame into the resurrection? What exactly does that mean? Could you explain further....

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Redlettervoice on August 26, 2007, 07:09:34 PM
Quote from: Stardust75 on August 26, 2007, 06:16:27 PM
Willie H quoted:

"Scripture does NOT indicate that those in CHRIST shall not partake of the 2nd Death, it just notes those shall not be HURT of it... WHY you ask?  Because those in CHRIST, do not take SHAME into the Resurrection from that DEATH... (Rev 2:11)"





NOW, "I've" got a question. Willie, or anyone.......there is a "death" that is said to be the last enemy?

It says it is the "last enemy" to be DESTROYED!

What do you think that is?
'
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Kratos on August 26, 2007, 09:11:58 PM
To add to Red's question, Willie said that all are partaker of the second death. Does this mean that you do not believe that there will be a generation of Overcomers that will overcome this second death and just be changed in a twinkling of an eye without tasting this second death?

John
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 26, 2007, 10:29:47 PM
willieH: Hi Stardust!  Peace...  :Peace:

Quote from: Stardust75 on August 26, 2007, 06:16:27 PM
Willie H quoted:

"Scripture does NOT indicate that those in CHRIST shall not partake of the 2nd Death, it just notes those shall not be HURT of it... WHY you ask?  Because those in CHRIST, do not take SHAME into the Resurrection from that DEATH... (Rev 2:11)"

Question?

Those outside of Jesus Christ take shame into the resurrection? What exactly does that mean? Could you explain further....

Not ALL shall bow the knee, nor confess with the tongue in this lifetime... and therefore have NOT brought the SHAME of SIN before GOD... seeking FORGIVENESS of SIN found in the CROSS of CHRIST...

In my present view... we are amidst the Lake of Fire NOW... SD... and the RESURRECTION (from physical death) has not happened for ANYONE... those who are in CHRIST NOW, have ALREADY brought their SHAME before CHRIST... And their SHAME shall be hidden IN HIM...

(Rev 3:18) O counsel thee to buy of me gold TRIED in the FIRE [CHRIST bore the sins and suffering for ALL in the "fire" LOF], that thou mayest be RICH; and WHITE RAIMENT [cleansing] that thou mayest be CLOTHED and that the SHAME of thy NAKEDNESS do NOT APPEAR... and annoint thine EYES with eye SALVE [the TRUTH of the GOSPEL] that though mayest SEE....

When ones SINS are hidden IN CHRIST, they do NO longer APPEAR... and the SHAME (of their sins) shall not be taken to the grave, of the death of this life...

Hope that helps you understand my statement above...  :Pray:

pEAce...  :Sparkletooth:

In 
JESUS
...willieH :gamer:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 26, 2007, 11:05:06 PM
willieH: Hi Red... :hithere:

Quote from: Stardust75 on August 26, 2007, 06:16:27 PM
Willie H quoted:

"Scripture does NOT indicate that those in CHRIST shall not partake of the 2nd Death, it just notes those shall not be HURT of it... WHY you ask?  Because those in CHRIST, do not take SHAME into the Resurrection from that DEATH... (Rev 2:11)"


Quote from: REDNOW, "I've" got a question. Willie, or anyone.......there is a "death" that is said to be the last enemy?

It says it is the "last enemy" to be DESTROYED!

What do you think that is?

DEATH in ALL its FORMS was thrown AMIDST this LIFE and are ENDURED in THIS LIFE... for ADAM (& Eve) suffered the  FIRST DEATH (Spirit) for which CHRIST died FOR us... (He did not die the 2nd death for us)...

Also, ...WE DIE the 2nd Death (Physical)... At the CONCLUSION of our LIFETIME on earth...

But BOTH of these (death) "ENEMIES" are DESTROYED by CHRIST's DEATH and RESURRECTION... which for Him has already occured, but for US has yet to be realized...

We must each first DIE in the PHYSICAL... then be RESURRECTED... and WITHIN the RESURRECTION is found the DEATH of both DEATHS (spiritual and physical)...

If we DIE in CHRIST... (our sins forgiven) we are RESURRECTED (1st "resurrection") WITH HIM (spiritually), ...now, in THIS LIFETIME...

If we DIE in SHAME (in our sins)... we bring to the 2nd death (the grave of this life), those sins... and in (2nd) RESURRECTION we rise in SHAME... however... as those who rise in SHAME, bow at the knee, and CONFESS CHRIST as LORD...  the SIN which hurts in its EXPOSURE, ...is removed... for CHRIST took away ALL the SIN of the WORLD... dieing ONCE for ALL...

This is a SPIRITUAL look at the RESURRECTION (from the grave of this life)... most will continue to view the PHYSICAL, as continuing beyond this life and beyond the GRAVE... with which I presently disagree...

HELL (hades/grave) and DEATH (both spiritual [1st] & physical [2nd] ) were cast INTO the LAKE of FIRE...  to be destroyed... they were DESTROYED by the Work of the CROSS which contains FORGIVENESS and RESURRECTION (this lifetime, IS the Lake of Fire)

Once we are DONE by DEATH in the PHYSICAL... we are DONE with the PHYSICAL... which is why CHRIST stated that He not be TOUCHED just following His RESURRECTION, because He had not yet ASCENDED to the Father... once this was done (ascension), those in this tainted scenario could not DEFILE Him and His resurrected state was COMPLETE...  :dontknow:

Peace...  :Sparkletooth:

In 
JESUS
...willieH :gamer:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 26, 2007, 11:11:16 PM
willieH: Hi John... :hithere:

Quote from: Kratos on August 26, 2007, 09:11:58 PM
To add to Red's question, Willie said that all are partaker of the second death. Does this mean that you do not believe that there will be a generation of Overcomers that will overcome this second death and just be changed in a twinkling of an eye without tasting this second death?

John

There (to my knowledge) is no Scripture which states that ANYONE shall escape the 2nd Death...  The Scriptures state that the OVERCOMERS (In CHRIST) shall not be HURT of it (Rev 3:11), but does NOT SAY... that those OVERCOMERS (In CHRIST) shall escape the 2nd Death...

It is the FIRST death which is OVERCOME in this LIFE... by becoming IN CHRIST within THIS LIFE... not all shall become IN CHRIST, in this life...

All DIE the 2nd DEATH... which is PHYSICAL DEATH...  :nod:

Peace...  :Sparkletooth:

In 
JESUS
...willieH :gamer:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 26, 2007, 11:51:45 PM
Revelation 14:13 And I heard a voice out of the heaven saying to me, `Write: Happy are the dead who in the Lord are dying from this time!' `Yes, (saith the Spirit,) That they may rest from their labours -- and their works do follow them!

My understanding is that the first and second death are contained in this verse.  The first death is (as others have posted) being carnally minded and spiritually dead. The second death is "dying in the Lord", the destruction of the "man of sin" who sits on Christ's throne in His temple, who are we.  When we enter into God's rest, the last enemy, the first death, is destroyed.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Moshood on August 27, 2007, 03:24:42 AM
THE FIRST DEATH = The Conscious Separation and Spiritual Estrangement of the Individual from the Living God.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 27, 2007, 03:26:41 AM
Quote from: julzabro2 on August 25, 2007, 03:50:42 PM
I think the 1st death is the spiritual death where one puts off the old man and becomes an "overcomer". Therefore, the 2nd death....physical death...does not affect he who has overcome the old man by putting faith in Jesus Christ.

I agree with you.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Kratos on August 27, 2007, 06:31:06 AM
Quote from: willieH on August 26, 2007, 11:11:16 PM
willieH: Hi John... :hithere:

Quote from: Kratos on August 26, 2007, 09:11:58 PM
To add to Red's question, Willie said that all are partaker of the second death. Does this mean that you do not believe that there will be a generation of Overcomers that will overcome this second death and just be changed in a twinkling of an eye without tasting this second death?

John

There (to my knowledge) is no Scripture which states that ANYONE shall escape the 2nd Death...  The Scriptures state that the OVERCOMERS (In CHRIST) shall not be HURT of it (Rev 3:11), but does NOT SAY... that those OVERCOMERS (In CHRIST) shall escape the 2nd Death...

It is the FIRST death which is OVERCOME in this LIFE... by becoming IN CHRIST within THIS LIFE... not all shall become IN CHRIST, in this life...

All DIE the 2nd DEATH... which is PHYSICAL DEATH...  :nod:

Peace...  :Sparkletooth:

In 
JESUS
...willieH :gamer:

Willie,

Don't these verses speak of a generation of Ovecomers that will overcome the second death by being changed into their immortal bodies without going the way of death?

1Co 15:51  Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,
1Co 15:52  In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
1Co 15:53  For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
1Co 15:54  So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

John
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 27, 2007, 08:34:10 AM
willieH: Hi John...  :thumbsup:

Quote from: Kratos on August 26, 2007, 09:11:58 PM
To add to Red's question, Willie said that all are partaker of the second death. Does this mean that you do not believe that there will be a generation of Overcomers that will overcome this second death and just be changed in a twinkling of an eye without tasting this second death?

John

Quote from: willieHThere (to my knowledge) is no Scripture which states that ANYONE shall escape the 2nd Death...  The Scriptures state that the OVERCOMERS (In CHRIST) shall not be HURT of it (Rev 3:11), but does NOT SAY... that those OVERCOMERS (In CHRIST) shall escape the 2nd Death...

It is the FIRST death which is OVERCOME in this LIFE... by becoming IN CHRIST within THIS LIFE... not all shall become IN CHRIST, in this life...

All DIE the 2nd DEATH... which is PHYSICAL DEATH...  :nod:

Peace...  :Sparkletooth:

In 
JESUS
...willieH :gamer:

Quote from: JohnWillie,

Don't these verses speak of a generation of Ovecomers that will overcome the second death by being changed into their immortal bodies without going the way of death?

1Co 15:51  Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,
1Co 15:52  In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
1Co 15:53  For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
1Co 15:54  So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

Paul is speaking of ones who SLEEP ...# 2837/Strongs - KOIMAO = be DEAD same word is used in 1 Thess 4:14... and is saying that SLEEP (Death) shall not continue... but be REMOVED...

John, even JESUS died and was DEAD 3 days and 3 nights... He was RAISED from the PHYSICAL death He died...  We shall ALL follow Him into that DEATH, and later follow Him into the RESURRECTION from that "2nd Death"...

CHRIST tasted SPIRITUAL Death for us (the portion of the each "LUMP" which are the vessels of HONOR)...

The PHYSICAL...  The FLESH and BLOOD of which we all are, must DIE, and return to the Earth as YHVH said it would... (the portion of each "LUMP" which are the vessels of DISHONOR) (Gen 3:19)

These verses above do NOT mention the 2nd Death... they refer to the RESURRECTION of the PHYSICALLY DEAD... which will INVOLVE ALL MEN...

At the LAST DAY... (which has NOT YET occured, ...for DAYS continue do they not?)... CHRIST promises RESURRECTION (John 6:44)

As I previously noted, there is no Scripture (to my knowledge) which notes that ANY shall escape involvment in the 2nd Death...

The verses that mention it, do not denote OVERCOMERS disinvolved... only that the 2nd death has no power over them (Rev 20:6) ... that they will not be HURT of it (Rev 2:11) and that the GRAVE and DEATH are the 2nd death (Rev 20:14) ...And that all UNBELIEVERS shall have their part in it (Rev 21:8)

Before one BELIEVES he/she is an UNBELIEVER... this is true of ALL HUMANITY since the first TWO... being an UNBELIEVER qualifies that one to the Lake of Fire... which I percieve to be Here and NOW...

The list mentioned in Rev 21:8... pretty much names ALL humanity... under one or several of these categories:   

Who has not believed?  Been FEARFUL?  Done something abominable?  Lied? Been led to believe in other things aside from YHVH?  Idolators? (see movie stars, entertainers, atheletes, even the girl next door) Sorcerers (root word meaning DRUGS)? Whoremongers - fornicators (spiritual/physical)?  Murderers (CHRIST even named anger with a brother to be named as such)

The writings on the wall bro... we can see it or no... but we are here IN IT... the LAKE of FIRE...  :mshock:

pEAce...  :Sparkletooth:

In 
JESUS
...willieH   :gamer:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 27, 2007, 08:31:41 PM
Quote from: willieH on August 27, 2007, 08:34:10 AM

The verses that mention it, do not denote OVERCOMERS disinvolved... only that the 2nd death has no power over them (Rev 20:6) ... that they will not be HURT of it (Rev ) and that the GRAVE and DEATH are the 2nd death (Rev 20:14) ...And that all UNBELIEVERS shall have their part in it (Rev 21:8)

Hey Willie,

As I see it Revelation 20:14 says [1] but not [2].

[1] 2nd death = death and hades cast into the lake of fire
[2] 2nd death = death and hades

In other words it appears to me that Rev 20:14 says that the second death is a consuming process which wipes out death and hades.

God bless,
Bob
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 27, 2007, 09:34:28 PM
Quote from: bobf on August 27, 2007, 08:31:41 PM
Quote from: willieH on August 27, 2007, 08:34:10 AM

The verses that mention it, do not denote OVERCOMERS disinvolved... only that the 2nd death has no power over them (Rev 20:6) ... that they will not be HURT of it (Rev ) and that the GRAVE and DEATH are the 2nd death (Rev 20:14) ...And that all UNBELIEVERS shall have their part in it (Rev 21:8)

Hey Willie,

As I see it Revelation 20:14 says [1] but not [2].

[1] 2nd death = death and hades cast into the lake of fire
[2] 2nd death = death and hades

In other words it appears to me that Rev 20:14 says that the second death is a consuming process which wipes out death and hades.

God bless,
Bob


And the names of the cowardly, unbelieving, murderer, sorcerer, and all liars.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 27, 2007, 09:36:55 PM
willieH: Hi Bob...  :winkgrin:

Quote from: bobf on August 27, 2007, 08:31:41 PM
Quote from: willieH on August 27, 2007, 08:34:10 AM

The verses that mention it, do not denote OVERCOMERS disinvolved... only that the 2nd death has no power over them (Rev 20:6) ... that they will not be HURT of it (Rev ) and that the GRAVE and DEATH are the 2nd death (Rev 20:14) ...And that all UNBELIEVERS shall have their part in it (Rev 21:8)

Hey Willie,

As I see it Revelation 20:14 says [1] but not [2].

[1] 2nd death = death and hades cast into the lake of fire
[2] 2nd death = death and hades

In other words it appears to me that Rev 20:14 says that the second death is a consuming process which wipes out death and hades.

God bless,
Bob


I think you are correct... for JESUS came into THIS SCENARIO and DIED (death), then was buried (entombed/grave)... and OVERCAME both by His Resurrection...

Thanks for the correction Bob... I intended to say what you noted...

My point is that THIS is the Lake of Fire... and it is IN THIS SCENARIO that ALL are being TRIED... the "fire" is the trials of sorrows and sufferings, in which process, we join our Savior...

In Heb 2:10 it notes that THROUGH SUFFERINGS was JESUS made PERFECT (complete)...  SUFFERING is and INTEGRAL part of the processing of the Knowledge of GOOD and EVIL... and GOD travels through, and JOINED US in that suffering via the life of His Son...

pEAce...   :2c:

In  
JESUS
...willieH   :gamer:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 27, 2007, 10:46:14 PM
Quote from: Craig on August 27, 2007, 09:34:28 PM
And the names of the cowardly, unbelieving, murderer, sorcerer, and all liars.

What exactly does it mean to wipe out a name, or for that matter to receive a new name?  Does a name represent a spirit, a way of being and thinking?

Isaiah 66:22 For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain.

Are "seed" and the "name" two ways of saying the same thing?

Isaiah 65:15 And ye shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord GOD shall slay thee, and call his servants by another name.

Is this one person at two different times or two separate sets of people?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: squint on August 27, 2007, 10:58:58 PM
Deuteronomy 8:3
He humbled you, causing you to hunger and then feeding you with manna, which neither you nor your fathers had known, to teach you that man does not live on bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of the LORD.

Matthew 4:4
Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.'

Men will live by EVERY WORD of God.  If you have found "death" or "torture" for your fellow man by Gods Word, then you have not yet eaten the Bread of Life that is for all and unto ALL, today and forever.

Luke 20:38
For he is not a God of the dead, but of the living: for all live unto him.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 28, 2007, 03:46:54 PM
Quote from: squint on August 27, 2007, 10:58:58 PM
Deuteronomy 8:3
He humbled you, causing you to hunger and then feeding you with manna, which neither you nor your fathers had known, to teach you that man does not live on bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of the LORD.

Matthew 4:4
Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.'

Men will live by EVERY WORD of God.  If you have found "death" or "torture" for your fellow man by Gods Word, then you have not yet eaten the Bread of Life that is for all and unto ALL, today and forever.

Luke 20:38
For he is not a God of the dead, but of the living: for all live unto him.

I see a physical and spiritual difference with the above..

The literal word to be Lived by UNDER the OLD COVENANT

Gal 3:12  And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in(by) them.

We know the WORD of God IS CHRIST and HIS WORDS are SPIRIT

Jhn 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life. 


(Jhn 14:23 - 1Cr 14:19)
Jhn 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Jhn 15:7 If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you

could these just be the WORD\WORDS of faith which we live by?

seems Paul Lived by THIS WORD OF FAITH in his heart

Rom 10:8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, [even] in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;



1Ti 4:6 If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained. 
2Ti 1:13 Hold fast the form of sound words, which thou hast heard of me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.

Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.



contrary to those who are yet to have their eyes \eyes and Heart OPENED

Rom 10:17 So then faith [cometh] by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.Isa 35:1  The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them; and the desert shall rejoice, and blossom as the rose.


Isa 35:2  It shall blossom abundantly, and rejoice even with joy and singing: the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it, the excellency of Carmel and Sharon, they shall see the glory of the LORD, [and] the excellency of our God.


Isa 35:3  Strengthen ye the weak hands, and confirm the feeble knees.


Isa 35:4  Say to them [that are] of a fearful heart, Be strong, fear not: behold, your God will come [with] vengeance, [even] God [with] a recompence; he will come and save you.


Isa 35:5  Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped.


Isa 35:6  Then shall the lame [man] leap as an hart, and the tongue of the dumb sing: for in the wilderness shall waters break out, and streams in the desert.
 
For mine the WICKED is HE who sits  on GODS Throne until Christ is Revealed


2Th 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:


Blessings
Taffy
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 29, 2007, 03:21:29 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 28, 2007, 03:46:54 PM
I see a physical and spiritual difference with the above..

The literal word to be Lived by UNDER the OLD COVENANT

Gal 3:12  And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in(by) them.

We know the WORD of God IS CHRIST and HIS WORDS are SPIRIT

Jhn 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life. 


(Jhn 14:23 - 1Cr 14:19)
Jhn 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Jhn 15:7 If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you

could these just be the WORD\WORDS of faith which we live by?

seems Paul Lived by THIS WORD OF FAITH in his heart

Rom 10:8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, [even] in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;


1Ti 4:6 If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained. 
2Ti 1:13 Hold fast the form of sound words, which thou hast heard of me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.

Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.



contrary to those who are yet to have their eyes \eyes and Heart OPENED

Rom 10:17 So then faith [cometh] by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.Isa 35:1 The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them; and the desert shall rejoice, and blossom as the rose.


Isa 35:2  It shall blossom abundantly, and rejoice even with joy and singing: the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it, the excellency of Carmel and Sharon, they shall see the glory of the LORD, [and] the excellency of our God.


Isa 35:3  Strengthen ye the weak hands, and confirm the feeble knees.


Isa 35:4  Say to them [that are] of a fearful heart, Be strong, fear not: behold, your God will come [with] vengeance, [even] God [with] a recompence; he will come and save you.


Isa 35:5  Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped.


Isa 35:6  Then shall the lame [man] leap as an hart, and the tongue of the dumb sing: for in the wilderness shall waters break out, and streams in the desert.
 
For mine the WICKED is HE who sits  on GODS Throne until Christ is Revealed


2Th 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:


Blessings
Taffy

:thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on September 04, 2007, 07:18:35 PM
Quote from: bobf on August 27, 2007, 10:46:14 PM
Quote from: Craig on August 27, 2007, 09:34:28 PM
And the names of the cowardly, unbelieving, murderer, sorcerer, and all liars.

What exactly does it mean to wipe out a name, or for that matter to receive a new name?  Does a name represent a spirit, a way of being and thinking?

Isaiah 66:22 For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain.

Are "seed" and the "name" two ways of saying the same thing?

Isaiah 65:15 And ye shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord GOD shall slay thee, and call his servants by another name.

Is this one person at two different times or two separate sets of people?

If you want to understand Revelation, everything spoken within it, already happened 2000 years ago. The names of those who are thrown into the Lake of Fire, is the names of any nation, any people, any individual, but more specifically John was talking about Judah, Israel, Jerusalem and the Temple.

Because some UR movement that believes and teaches that everyone is in the Lake of Fire regardless if the believe, this knowledge will take a while before people begin to realize. The realization that the Lake of Fire has no relevance to the people who trust in Christ Jesus, they don't even walk in that judgment nor do they even face it or even have one part in it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: noreputation on September 09, 2007, 05:48:58 PM
It is my understanding the book of Revelation has two interpretations.  For those who were alive just prior to 70 AD some of Revelation foretold events that were about to come to pass in a very literal way.  This tied in with what Jesus told his followers in Matthew chapter 24 about the impending doom that was to come upon THAT GENERATION.

Also hidden in the pages of this much misunderstood book is a revealing of the life of God in his people with the various stages of development.  Often our journey to know Him begins as an external exercise filled with pomp and circumstance.  We view the life of being a follower of God as something we do.  After being baptized in the Holy Spirit, when the power to be witnesses comes upon us, we continue this outward way of thinking, as we forge ahead taking new ground for the Kingdom of God.  At this point of development how little do we see that while we are so busy building God's Kingdom that underneath it all we are also building our kingdom.

It is here we find our Lord standing at the door knocking wanting to come in.  Do you recall when your view of the Kingdom of God was some far away place?  Have you ever heard someone standing up in the front of a Christian gathering say, "Isn't it good to be in the house of the Lord today?"  Or how about someone looking up to the sky while they praise God like He is up yonder somewhere?  We have all been there and in the midst of our activity the Spirit of God is knocking, wanting to come in and sup with us.

Little by little we let Him in and we begin to recognize the Kingdom within.  It is here that the Holy Spirit reveals the Antichrist, the false prophet and the beast nature within us that has blinded us and kept our experience with God as an external exercise of wielding our sword in the name of Jesus, much like Peter did when he cut of the servant of the high priest's ear.  It is here that war breaks out in heaven as Satan is cast down to earth. The mixture that was once allowed in us comes under the judgment of God as He cleanses us and brings us through great tribulation, for the beast nature will not go without a fight!  Ah, but if we overcome we will find ourselves as a pillar in the temple that God is making, the house not made with hands, the city of God where there is no more night.

There is place of ministry that awaits us.  Not like the realm of Pentecost where the power is upon us, but a place where the life within will spill out of us upon this earth.
As we learn to drink from the life spring within us our roots will grow deep, as plantings of the Lord, trees of righteousness, our leaves will heal the nations.  It is here we recognize that the Kingdom of God does not come with observation, but is a progressive revelation as His life within us rises up as the bright morning star, dispelling the darkness of the carnal mind that has held us in bondage throughout this age. This is the path God has called us to.  It is the revealing of His life in His sons and there will come a time as we continue to enter the age that is upon us when this life will manifest and spill out upon the earth until God is All in All.

I see so clearly that the Kingdom does not come with observation, but is a progressive experience as we mature and overcome.  Yet, I also realize that we are at the close of one age and the beginning of another.  It is this age that is upon us where I believe we will see the rock cut out of the side of the mountain become a great mountain that will fill the earth.

Douglas B. Clark

 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zach on September 13, 2007, 02:11:57 PM
I understand that there are some advantages for the premillenialist and full preterist positions, when attempting a universalistic interpretation of the Bible. The advantage for the premillenialist is that it clearly shows that there are more than two ages to come (relevant, of course, to the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit), and the advantage for the full preterist is, of course, that various texts in Revelation (and potentially, elsewhere) can be interpreted as prophecies about earthly, first-century events. Obviously one shouldn't read an eschatology into the Bible simply because it fits well with universalism, however. What I'm curious about is how the other eschatological positions work with universalism. Can anyone shed some light?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Michele on September 13, 2007, 03:06:52 PM
Hey Zach :bigGrin:....I think that the ideas each of us have about eschatology have a lot to do with how we perceive time.  We were discussing this on another thread...about time not being linear in the way we perceive it.

What happens if time is spherical.....or if it resembles the flow of the water in a river?  We know that Christ is Living Water.  Now, to explain this in a symbolic way -- much of the water stays flowing down the river of life, and all through this flow process there is continually some water that ends up evaporating to the heavens (the clouds).  In my opinion this symbolizes the Son lifting us up (at our own proper time) to heaven.  It's a process that never seems to end......it's perpetual.

There are many references in relation to us and water in the scripture.  They talk about our life being a vapor, and also mention a cloud of witnesses.

Anyway, what are your thoughts Zach? :icon_flower:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: firstborn888 on September 16, 2007, 09:23:08 PM
There's a ton of interest with me as well. I've just started preterist study and though I've always known a lot of revelation was already fulfilled I never heard a serious case till now that the second coming had already occured (except back in the 80's when this guy told me Jesus had returned for sure - 'cuz he had seen Him in the back of a pickup truck in the Arizona desert  :mshock:)

Seriously though, since I'm active in leading people out of tradition, I've got to discover the bottom line on all this eschatology stuff!


- byron

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Chris on September 17, 2007, 12:16:58 AM
There are only two "men" in scripture right? The FIRST Adam (the natural man) and the LAST ADAM (the spiritual man).

First death = the death that was wrought through the first man/Adam (dead in sin).

Second death = the death of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ (the second man / last Adam) through which comes LIFE (the resurrection of the dead).

Something like that ???? :JCThink:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on September 17, 2007, 03:11:04 AM
willieH: Hi Chris...  :welcome: to Tentmaker! :hithere:

First death = SPIRIT... men die in spirit when we sin... CHRIST died TO REDEEM us from this death, and tasted DEATH for us in this capacity... (Heb 2:9) He did NOT taste PHYSICAL death for us... we do this ourselves in the...

Second death = PHYSICAL... men die this death, it is the WAGES of SIN.  WE DIE it for ourselves.  WE are APPOINTED to die this death ourselves (Heb 9:27)... (return to the earth - our seed dies awaiting RESURRECTION - Gen 3:19) 

sHaLOm  :icon_king:

In 
JESUS
...willieH  :cloud9:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Chris on September 22, 2007, 08:07:12 PM
Quote from: willieH on September 17, 2007, 03:11:04 AM
willieH: Hi Chris...  :welcome: to Tentmaker! :hithere:

First death = SPIRIT... men die in spirit when we sin... CHRIST died TO REDEEM us from this death, and tasted DEATH for us in this capacity... (Heb 2:9) He did NOT taste PHYSICAL death for us... we do this ourselves in the...

Second death = PHYSICAL... men die this death, it is the WAGES of SIN.  WE DIE it for ourselves.  WE are APPOINTED to die this death ourselves (Heb 9:27)... (return to the earth - our seed dies awaiting RESURRECTION - Gen 3:19) 

sHaLOm  :icon_king:

In 
JESUS
...willieH  :cloud9:
Hi Wilie H.  :hiya:

So you are saying that PHYSICAL death is the wage of sin?

I'd have to disagree.  :wink1:  As I see it, man was never immortal, but he suffered the wage of sin ("death", spiritual) through Adam's transgression. This (being "dead" in sin, having "no life" in us), to me, is the wage of sin.

Those who overcome ARE NOT HURT by the second death. What man is "hurt" by physical death?

Rev 20:14  And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

Rev 21:8  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

So if you are saying that the second death = physical death, then you are saying that death and hell being cast into the lake of fire = physical death? That the lake of fire = physical death?

I am not seeing that connection.

I just started looking at some of this last night, trying to look at how it is "appointed unto men, ONCE to die" in relation to "the second death" and the fact that one can be "twice dead" (plucked up from the roots). To me it all seems to tie back to the cross and the death of Jesus Christ (the second man and last Adam). Just beginning the study it, though, so I can't comment on it too much right now; but it's been nagging my mind for a few days now.  :grin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on September 22, 2007, 10:57:40 PM
willieH: Hi Chris... :hithere:

Quote from: willieH on September 17, 2007, 03:11:04 AM
willieH: Hi Chris...  :welcome: to Tentmaker! :hithere:

First death = SPIRIT... men die in spirit when we sin... CHRIST died TO REDEEM us from this death, and tasted DEATH for us in this capacity... (Heb 2:9) He did NOT taste PHYSICAL death for us... we do this ourselves in the...

Second death = PHYSICAL... men die this death, it is the WAGES of SIN.  WE DIE it for ourselves.  WE are APPOINTED to die this death ourselves (Heb 9:27)... (return to the earth - our seed dies awaiting RESURRECTION - Gen 3:19) 

sHaLOm  :icon_king:

In 
JESUS
...willieH  :cloud9:

QuoteHi Wilie H.  :hiya:

So you are saying that PHYSICAL death is the wage of sin?

Let me say that I stand partially corrected...

DEATH is the WAGE of SIN...

The DEATH which CHRIST died was a "wage" which was paid for REDEMPTION of the vessel of HONOR in each one, and was on behalf of the FIRST DEATH which each man dies, in the SPIRIT...

MAN is APPOINTED Once to die(for Himself) (Heb 9:27) and it is the 2nd DEATH which HE dies... (for the 1st death is in Spirit and CHRIST tasted this death FOR each man)...  This is also a "wage" which is required at the hand of SIN, and is the DEATH of the CARNAL (vessel of DISHONOR)...

QuoteI'd have to disagree.  :wink1:

It's okay to disagree bro...  :happygrin:

QuoteAs I see it, man was never immortal, but he suffered the wage of sin ("death", spiritual) through Adam's transgression. This (being "dead" in sin, having "no life" in us), to me, is the wage of sin.

Okay Chris... now I'm going to have to "disagree"  :wink1:

You say above that man was "never" immortal... I agree, that in the realm of TIME man has not been in an IMMORTAL state, for it is in the REALM of TIME that ALL DEATH has occured... No DEATH has happened or ever will happen in REALM of ETERNITY... and God so notes this:  (Rev 21:4)

The only "MORTALITY" that has been, is completely found in the REALM of TIME...

So concerning the REALM of TIME, I agree man is "never" IMMORTAL... however he IS IMMORTAL both preceeding his entry into time, and after his exit FROM IT...

QuoteThose who overcome ARE NOT HURT by the second death. What man is "hurt" by physical death?

Those which take UNFORGIVEN SIN to the grave of THIS LIFE... shall bring it in NAKEDNESS and SHAME (as Did Adam & Eve upon sinning in the Garden)... the "HURT" is the APPEARANCE of these before ALL, especially GOD and the Lamb... (Rev 14:10) this shame and nakedness is TORMENTING as also noted in the experience of the REVELATION of the SIN Adam & Eve...

QuoteRev 20:14  And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

DEATH and HELL were cast into the Lake of FIRE... this IS the LAKE of FIRE... DEATH and "hell" (which is actually GRAVE/Hades) are a prevalent part of THIS LIFE Chris...

QuoteRev 21:8  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

This list is one that can be applied to EVERY human being... JESUS CHRIST is the TRUTH, all have fallen short (in opposition) to that TRUTH, and therefore are LIARS... Paul notes this in Rom 3:4  Let's take the list one by one:

1. SORCERERS: The word "sorcerers" is the Greek word Pharmakeus from which is derived DRUGS and PHARMACY...
2.  IDOLOTRY...anything that is HELD above the WILL of YHVH is IDOLOTRY... just our sin alone is idolotry... but people find many other instances to practice this in everyday life... Idolizing TV, MOVIE, MUSIC personalities, even ones own CHILDREN too highly esteemed finds its way into this category... moving on...
3. MURDERERS:  JESUS said that even to be angry with your brother without just cause is the commitment of this... just about everyone has had this occurence in life... jumping to conclusions, and thereby hating or holding anger on false foundations...
4. WHOREMONGERS  Pretty much is LUST of the FLESH in sexuality... anyone that denies this has happened in their life at one time or another, simply verifies #1 on this list...
5. ABOMINABLE: This word means DETEST or ABHOR... which applies to ALL that SIN... the only HUMAN this word does not fit was CHRIST...

The lake which burns with FIRE ...and... BRIMSTONE... is the LIFE we are amidst... Brimstone is a PURIFYING agent...

It also is noted that CHRIST's trials were in THIS LIFE... and HE is the GOLD tried in FIRE (Rev 3:18)

QuoteSo if you are saying that the second death = physical death, then you are saying that death and hell being cast into the lake of fire = physical death? That the lake of fire = physical death?

The LAKE of FIRE = THIS LIFE... and all within it...

DEATH and HELL were not the ONLY things cast into the LAKE... the list above names all the applicants... DEATH was destroyed (in ETERNAL terms) at the CROSS of CHRIST...

ALL DEATH (in ANY FORM, spiritual or physical), has been prevalent ONLY in the REALM of TIME...

The verse you quote above... I believe can be read as follows...  This is the 2nd death... DEATH [in all forms] and HELL were cast into the Lake of FIRE... [bracket comments are mine]

QuoteI am not seeing that connection.

I just started looking at some of this last night, trying to look at how it is "appointed unto men, ONCE to die" in relation to "the second death" and the fact that one can be "twice dead" (plucked up from the roots). To me it all seems to tie back to the cross and the death of Jesus Christ (the second man and last Adam). Just beginning the study it, though, so I can't comment on it too much right now; but it's been nagging my mind for a few days now.  :grin:

Keep studying brother... things come at the  decision of God, whilst we are amidst our searching...  :happygrin:

Peace brother...  :Sparkletooth:

In 
JESUS
...willieH  :gamer:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Chris on September 23, 2007, 02:14:26 AM
Quote from: WillieH

Let me say that I stand partially corrected...

DEATH is the WAGE of SIN...

The DEATH which CHRIST died was a "wage" which was paid for REDEMPTION of the vessel of HONOR in each one, and was on behalf of the FIRST DEATH which each man dies, in the SPIRIT...

MAN is APPOINTED Once to die(for Himself) (Heb 9:27) and it is the 2nd DEATH which HE dies... (for the 1st death is in Spirit and CHRIST tasted this death FOR each man)...  This is also a "wage" which is required at the hand of SIN, and is the DEATH of the CARNAL (vessel of DISHONOR)...

Hi again,

I think you are losing me. At least I am confused by your response, so maybe I am not understanding exactly what you are saying? :mblush:

Are we in agreement that the wage of sin is (spiritual) death (ie being "dead" in sin)?

Quote from: WillieHIt's okay to disagree bro...  :happygrin:
:thumbsup:

Quote from: WillieHOkay Chris... now I'm going to have to "disagree"  :wink1:

You say above that man was "never" immortal... I agree, that in the realm of TIME man has not been in an IMMORTAL state, for it is in the REALM of TIME that ALL DEATH has occured... No DEATH has happened or ever will happen in REALM of ETERNITY... and God so notes this:  (Rev 21:4)

The only "MORTALITY" that has been, is completely found in the REALM of TIME...

So concerning the REALM of TIME, I agree man is "never" IMMORTAL... however he IS IMMORTAL both preceeding his entry into time, and after his exit FROM IT...
I was referring to this world and time when I said man is not immortal. I said that because many believe that Adam and Eve were immortal until they sinned, that the death that they suffered due to sin was physical death. I wasn't sure whether or not that was what you were saying since you seemed (my mistake?) to be saying that the wage of sin is physical death.

Quote from: WillieHThose which take UNFORGIVEN SIN to the grave of THIS LIFE... shall bring it in NAKEDNESS and SHAME (as Did Adam & Eve upon sinning in the Garden)... the "HURT" is the APPEARANCE of these before ALL, especially GOD and the Lamb... (Rev 14:10) this shame and nakedness is TORMENTING as also noted in the experience of the REVELATION of the SIN Adam & Eve...
OK.

Quote from: WillieHDEATH and HELL were cast into the Lake of FIRE... this IS the LAKE of FIRE... DEATH and "hell" (which is actually GRAVE/Hades) are a prevalent part of THIS LIFE Chris...
We do not disagree on this. That is why your response confuses me. I also see the lake of fire as taking place now, in this life.

QuoteThis list is one that can be applied to EVERY human being... JESUS CHRIST is the TRUTH, all have fallen short (in opposition) to that TRUTH, and therefore are LIARS... Paul notes this in Rom 3:4  Let's take the list one by one:

1. SORCERERS: The word "sorcerers" is the Greek word Pharmakeus from which is derived DRUGS and PHARMACY...
2.  IDOLOTRY...anything that is HELD above the WILL of YHVH is IDOLOTRY... just our sin alone is idolotry... but people find many other instances to practice this in everyday life... Idolizing TV, MOVIE, MUSIC personalities, even ones own CHILDREN too highly esteemed finds its way into this category... moving on...
3. MURDERERS:  JESUS said that even to be angry with your brother without just cause is the commitment of this... just about everyone has had this occurence in life... jumping to conclusions, and thereby hating or holding anger on false foundations...
4. WHOREMONGERS  Pretty much is LUST of the FLESH in sexuality... anyone that denies this has happened in their life at one time or another, simply verifies #1 on this list...
5. ABOMINABLE: This word means DETEST or ABHOR... which applies to ALL that SIN... the only HUMAN this word does not fit was CHRIST...
Agreed.  :happygrin:

Quote from: WillieHThe lake which burns with FIRE ...and... BRIMSTONE... is the LIFE we are amidst... Brimstone is a PURIFYING agent...
I agree.  :winkgrin:

Quote from: WillieHThe LAKE of FIRE = THIS LIFE... and all within it...
And here is where I am getting confused.  :happygrin:

IF... the lake of fire = SECOND DEATH

AND... the lake of fire = THIS LIFE

How does.... the second death = physical death?   :dunno2:

QuoteDEATH and HELL were not the ONLY things cast into the LAKE... the list above names all the applicants... DEATH was destroyed (in ETERNAL terms) at the CROSS of CHRIST...
AMEN!! So how is the second death man's physical death?  :Chinscratch:

Quote from: WillieHALL DEATH (in ANY FORM, spiritual or physical), has been prevalent ONLY in the REALM of TIME...
I agree.

Quote from: WillieHThe verse you quote above... I believe can be read as follows...  This is the 2nd death... DEATH [in all forms] and HELL were cast into the Lake of FIRE... [bracket comments are mine]
I'm not sure what you are saying, as the second death isn't part of the "death" (and hell) being cast into the lake of fire (which IS the second death), right?

I see these things all fulfilled in Christ and His cross and as pertaining to THIS WORLD and those in it. Those who are hurt by the second death are those who abide in "outer darkness" (where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth). So I still don't see the connection between the lake of fire and man's physical death. I see it related more to being "twice dead" (while being physically alive).

QuoteKeep studying brother... things come at the  decision of God, whilst we are amidst our searching...  :happygrin:
Agreed!!  :2thumbs:

Quote from: WillieHPeace brother...  :Sparkletooth:

In  JESUS...willieH  :gamer:


PEACE!!!  :gimmefive:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on September 23, 2007, 03:25:04 AM
The Names of those who are not in the Lambs book of Life, is not sinners. Jesus came to save sinners, the Names belong to the system of the Law which apostate Israel held as the Way of salvation. They are not in the Lambs book of Life and as I said if you read John, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, you will find out those names are all the names Jesus or John called the Pharisee. Second Death is not for us, never has been. You must take Revelation's proposition that if you are overcomer in Christ Jesus, Second Death has no power over you. If we thought Second Death is the death of the sin part in us, WE WANT IT TO HAVE POWER OVER US. Yet, that is not what it says, therefore Second Death is not the death of the 'sin' part of us. It is talking about Judiasm and those who have fallen back to the Law. The Law must die, that is Second Death and those who live by the Law....die by it as well. There is no overcomer to those who live in obedience to the Law, because Righteousness apart from the Law which comes by faith has come. I used to believe Second Death was the death of the 'sin' part of us, that it was our 'physical death'. After debating it, and discussing it for over three years now, it becomes more apparent who and what John was talking about in Revelation.

The Lake of Fire is Gehenna.
Gehenna represents a Judgment against Israel, Judah, Jerusalem and the Temple.
God is not found in Israel, Judah, Jerusalem and the Temple.
God seeks worshippers who worship in Spirit and in Truth.
Those who continue to find righteousness by the Law (Israel, Judah, Jersualem and the Temple) will not find it but suffer the Lake of Fire.
Lake of Fire is Second Death, it is the Final Death of the covenant of Death and the agreement with Shoel.
The Sea [Israel] must give up it's dead, Death [The Law] must give up it's dead, Sheol [The Agreement] must give up it's dead and Death and Sheol are thrown into the Lake of Fire. The names of those who are not written in the Lambs book of life also are thrown into the Lake of Fire.
Satan, False Prophet and His followers are also thrown into the Lake of Fire.
This is Second Death.

That is exactly what it is, we just been taught doom all this time, but it isn't the apocolypse, it is the end. The end scares people, because they think of their death and have no hope and so fear the end, instead of embracing the hope which comes at the end. That is the Apocolypse, all that condemned us will be destroyed, all that had authority to bind us on earth, is destroyed, all the systems and seperations and divisions of people which kept us divided will be destroyed. In the END, God will be all in all.

This has been happening since 33 AD. What was and is and is to come, has not stopped coming.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on September 23, 2007, 05:27:03 AM
Excellent post Craig. 

2Co 3:7  But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not steadfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:

2Co 3:13  And not as Moses, which put a veil over his face, that the children of Israel could not steadfastly look to the end of that which is abolished:

2Co 3:14  But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same veil untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which veil is done away in Christ.

2Co 3:15  But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the veil is upon their heart.

2Co 3:16  Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the veil shall be taken away.

2Co 3:17  Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

2Co 3:18  But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on September 23, 2007, 05:52:42 AM
Quote from: Craig on September 23, 2007, 03:25:04 AM
The Names of those who are not in the Lambs book of Life, is not sinners. Jesus came to save sinners, the Names belong to the system of the Law which apostate Israel held as the Way of salvation. They are not in the Lambs book of Life and as I said if you read John, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, you will find out those names are all the names Jesus or John called the Pharisee. Second Death is not for us, never has been. You must take Revelation's proposition that if you are overcomer in Christ Jesus, Second Death has no power over you. If we thought Second Death is the death of the sin part in us, WE WANT IT TO HAVE POWER OVER US. Yet, that is not what it says, therefore Second Death is not the death of the 'sin' part of us. It is talking about Judiasm and those who have fallen back to the Law. The Law must die, that is Second Death and those who live by the Law....die by it as well. There is no overcomer to those who live in obedience to the Law, because Righteousness apart from the Law which comes by faith has come. I used to believe Second Death was the death of the 'sin' part of us, that it was our 'physical death'. After debating it, and discussing it for over three years now, it becomes more apparent who and what John was talking about in Revelation.

The Lake of Fire is Gehenna.
Gehenna represents a Judgment against Israel, Judah, Jerusalem and the Temple.
God is not found in Israel, Judah, Jerusalem and the Temple.
God seeks worshippers who worship in Spirit and in Truth.
Those who continue to find righteousness by the Law (Israel, Judah, Jersualem and the Temple) will not find it but suffer the Lake of Fire.
Lake of Fire is Second Death, it is the Final Death of the covenant of Death and the agreement with Shoel.
The Sea [Israel] must give up it's dead, Death [The Law] must give up it's dead, Sheol [The Agreement] must give up it's dead and Death and Sheol are thrown into the Lake of Fire. The names of those who are not written in the Lambs book of life also are thrown into the Lake of Fire.
Satan, False Prophet and His followers are also thrown into the Lake of Fire.
This is Second Death.

That is exactly what it is, we just been taught doom all this time, but it isn't the apocolypse, it is the end. The end scares people, because they think of their death and have no hope and so fear the end, instead of embracing the hope which comes at the end. That is the Apocolypse, all that condemned us will be destroyed, all that had authority to bind us on earth, is destroyed, all the systems and seperations and divisions of people which kept us divided will be destroyed. In the END, God will be all in all.

This has been happening since 33 AD. What was and is and is to come, has not stopped coming.

Craig, I have a question for you,

what if a person adheres to the system of law abiding for righteousness, in this life; and gets to the end of themselves,their self righteousness, and turns to the Lord by faith (in this life), and then live the rest of their life by the faith of Christ.  Then would you say these people went through second death, the death of mode of life of adherence to self righteousness?? 


or would you say no,

because they had time (in this life) to build up reward (through faith in Christ), and that second death is the result of "no reward" at the "coming Day of the Lord", something future?? 

hope this makes sense??


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on September 23, 2007, 11:37:47 AM
QuoteCraig, I have a question for you,

what if a person adheres to the system of law abiding for righteousness, in this life; and gets to the end of themselves,their self righteousness, and turns to the Lord by faith (in this life), and then live the rest of their life by the faith of Christ.  Then would you say these people went through second death, the death of mode of life of adherence to self righteousness?? 

Jesus said, if you give a glass of water to a child, you certainly will not lose your reward. Those who live by faith, are reward by the faith they live. The parable of the talent, some invested wisely and recieved wisely, some invested foolishly and recieved a fools reward.

Quoteor would you say no,

because they had time (in this life) to build up reward (through faith in Christ), and that second death is the result of "no reward" at the "coming Day of the Lord", something future?? 

hope this makes sense??

It makes sense, but time is not indicator of reward, it is faith. If they lived not trusting in the Lord but in their own righteousness for a reward, as Paul states in Romans, they too will be cut off just as Israel was. There is no boasting over the branches, God is impartial, each are reward according to their deeds and their words, without their sin taken into account. A man who does all things in self-righteosness, has their deeds measured to find no good deed and no good word.

Matthew 7:21-23
"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'

Now continue reading

Matthew 7:24-27
"Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash." When Jesus had finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed at his teaching, because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law.

Matthew 23:38 Look, your (teachers of the Law) house is left to you desolate.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: SeekerSA on November 16, 2007, 01:58:04 PM
 :bottlebump:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Sarah on November 16, 2007, 04:47:46 PM
Iv'e noticed these views

-preterist

-is, was, and will be

-Sonship ages; passover, penteconstal, and tabernacles.  (I don't know if I worded that correctly)

I think the thing we see in common is that it has a happy ending.  I don't see how the 'left behind' scenario glorifies God in any light.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: JillieRose on January 19, 2008, 12:17:36 PM
A question or seven:

As regards the book of Revelation specifically: ok, I get that the Christians are resurrected, and that there is reigning with Christ for a thousand years while the enemy is bound. No clue what it means, but I'm perfectly willing to accept that it's what will happen. Rev 20:4-6.

Then, after the 1000 years, the rest of the dead are resurrected. The Enemy is released from prison and deceives the nations, who surround the saints in their camp, v9, and God consumes them in fire. Then the Devil is thrown into the lake of fire, and the false prophet, because he deceived the nations.

I'm beginning to wonder how much of the symbolism is symbolism for then, as opposed to now, but that's a side issue.

Anyway, Devil consumed in lake of fire.

Then, v11, great white throne, and judgement according to the works recorded in the books, v12.

Then Death and Hades are thrown into the lake of fire, and those whose names were not in the Book of Life (v14 and 15).

Then there's a new Heaven and a new earth, (21v1) and God will make His home among mortals, those who conquer v7. The lake of fire is for the liars, polluted, etc. (v8) Nothing unclean will enter the city, but only those in the book of life (v27).

Now, there are numerous arguments one can make from the Bible as a whole for universal reconciliation, but I'm really not seeing it here. I suppose one might wonder about the leaves of the tree of life, which are for the healing of the nations, (22v2), but that's not exactly clear. Nor am I sure about the gates never being shut, because...well, who's outside to enter it? There's nothing which suggests that the second death is anything but...well, permanent. Because...well, no more death here. That's it finished.

There's nothing there(you can make your case elsewhere) but there's nothing contained in these verses which suggests anything other than annihilation for those whose names are not in the book of Life.

Begin supposition: Even if they came out of the fire (which isn't mentioned anywhere here) then they still could not enter the city, even though the gates are open. Not because they have sin any more (because the fire would burn it away, I guess) but because in spite of that, their names are NOT in the book of life. (v27)

See my problem here? The lake of fire, the second death, seems to come as an end in the book of Revelation. At least because I can't see a mention of those who went into it at any later point.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: SeekerSA on January 19, 2008, 12:59:18 PM
Jillie

Revelation is seen traditionally as a future event, it is a prophesy and was written to the seven churches.  The opening talks of something very soon and ends off in the same manner.

Revelations is symbolic and parabolic.  You cannot really take anything literal written there.  IMO it is for each and everyone of us and it talks of this age many times.  The futurists have taken it to mean something that will literally happen somewhere in the future.

Quote from: JillieRose on January 19, 2008, 12:17:36 PM
A question or seven:

As regards the book of Revelation specifically: ok, I get that the Christians are resurrected, and that there is reigning with Christ for a thousand years while the enemy is bound. No clue what it means, but I'm perfectly willing to accept that it's what will happen. Rev 20:4-6.

The 1000 years can be symbolic of here and now, the 1st resurrection can be our rebirth.

QuoteThen, after the 1000 years, the rest of the dead are resurrected. The Enemy is released from prison and deceives the nations, who surround the saints in their camp, v9, and God consumes them in fire. Then the Devil is thrown into the lake of fire, and the false prophet, because he deceived the nations.

I'm beginning to wonder how much of the symbolism is symbolism for then, as opposed to now, but that's a side issue.

If the 2nd resurrection is that from our physical death, we shall see the rest of the dead resurrected.  The LoF now will make sense in that at physical death, neither sin nor false teachings will have anymore hold on you.

QuoteAnyway, Devil consumed in lake of fire.

Then, v11, great white throne, and judgement according to the works recorded in the books, v12.

Then Death and Hades are thrown into the lake of fire, and those whose names were not in the Book of Life (v14 and 15).

The is only one name in the BoL and that is Christ.  In Him there is no sin, thus the names refer to those names we give to sin and not the people who do them.

QuoteThen there's a new Heaven and a new earth, (21v1) and God will make His home among mortals, those who conquer v7. The lake of fire is for the liars, polluted, etc. (v8) Nothing unclean will enter the city, but only those in the book of life (v27).

Now, there are numerous arguments one can make from the Bible as a whole for universal reconciliation, but I'm really not seeing it here. I suppose one might wonder about the leaves of the tree of life, which are for the healing of the nations, (22v2), but that's not exactly clear. Nor am I sure about the gates never being shut, because...well, who's outside to enter it? There's nothing which suggests that the second death is anything but...well, permanent. Because...well, no more death here. That's it finished.

If you had a vision of heaven, words would never describe the experience, John does his best here to articulate what he saw.  The gates need no locking as sin is not resurrected with us.  We are judged on works hence the books plural.

QuoteThere's nothing there(you can make your case elsewhere) but there's nothing contained in these verses which suggests anything other than annihilation for those whose names are not in the book of Life.

The names are not John, Mary and Joe.  They are names for sins.

QuoteBegin supposition: Even if they came out of the fire (which isn't mentioned anywhere here) then they still could not enter the city, even though the gates are open. Not because they have sin any more (because the fire would burn it away, I guess) but because in spite of that, their names are NOT in the book of life. (v27)

They do not come out as they require no resurrection.

QuoteSee my problem here? The lake of fire, the second death, seems to come as an end in the book of Revelation. At least because I can't see a mention of those who went into it at any later point.

This is a very simplistic answer I gave but this is the way I see it now.

One thing to be aware of is, the writing style of John in revelation does not match John or the epistles.  In fact they say Revelation was written before the gospel of John.  One assumes that John was the beloved John but there is no conclusive evidence to support this.

There are two ways to read Revelation and that is

Fulfilled eschatology - Preterist
Perpetual present - applies to each one individually.

No one really has the answers, only opinions.

Blessings
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: JillieRose on January 19, 2008, 01:16:17 PM
Thank you, that's a very helpful...thingy. Explanation. (Go vocabulary!)

I can see the interpretation of the names not in the book of Life being the names of sins. I can't find anywhere that specifically says that, but hey, it's a sensible possibility.

One question: where does it say that it's only the name of Jesus that's written in the book? It sounds...vaguely familiar, but I can't remember where from off the top of my head.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: SeekerSA on January 19, 2008, 01:41:12 PM
Well if you think about it from a perspective of the ones that do not believe in OSAS, then the many backsliders and the sins we commit would sure make the book a mess.

We are in Christ hence there is only one name Christ.  All will agree to this irrespective of their POV as it makes sense.

There is no verse apart from what Jesus said to His disciples, "...rejoice rather that your names are written in heaven"

I think all beliefs can make their case from Revelation.  Oddly enough, it is the book where most myths come from.

Tree-of-Life ----> Book-of-Life, the keyword is Life.  What did Jesus say?  Take all these versus and replace them with Christ.

Joh 1:4  In Him was life, and the life was the light of men.

Joh 4:14  but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst, but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.

Joh 5:26  For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has given to the Son to have life within Himself,

Joh 5:40  and you will not come to Me that you might have life.

Joh 6:33  For the bread of God is He who comes down from Heaven and gives life to the world.

Joh 6:48  I am the Bread of life.

Joh 6:63  It is the Spirit that makes alive, the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit and are life.

Joh 8:12  Then Jesus spoke again to them, saying, I am the Light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

Joh 10:10  The thief does not come except to steal and to kill and to destroy. I have come so that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.

Joh 11:25  Jesus said to her, I am the Resurrection and the Life! He who believes in Me, though he die, yet he shall live.

Joh 14:6  Jesus said to him, I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life; no one comes to the Father but by Me.

Joh 17:3  And this is life eternal, that they might know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent.

Joh 20:31  But these are written so that you might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you might have life in His name.

Blessings
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: JillieRose on January 19, 2008, 10:10:33 PM
Um.

I don't...I think I'm misunderstanding you. Surely 'your names are written in heaven' would mean that their names (plural) are in the book.

Maybe not.

1. Books of works are opened

2. Book of life is opened

3. Dead are judged

4. Those not in the book of life (it still seems to me like it's names plural, with those names corresponding to those in Christ. And as God knows everything anyway, surely He would know who is there and who is not, regardless of human tendencies to inconsistency?) are put through the second death.

5. Those whose names are in the book of life aren't. (Doesn't he also have our names written on His hands? Isaiah 49:16 seems to suggest something like it)

I can't see that there's evidence to state that only Christ's name is in the book. But maybe I'm just having trouble understanding your argument here.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: SeekerSA on January 20, 2008, 07:45:15 AM
Think about it.  If the names in the BoL were our names, that implies we get there by something we do.

The evangelicals will lead you in a sinner's prayer, not biblical, and then say to you

IF you believe what you have just prayed, you are born again and your name is written in heaven/BoL

or

If you have prayed that prayer, you are born again, and you name is written in heaven/BOL

There are other versions, all of them are wrong.

Rom 10:9  Because if you confess the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you shall be saved.
Rom 10:10  For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth one confesses unto salvation.

Nowhere does it say we must confess our sins and thank Him for dying on the cross, and even if we were the only person alive........

The whole sinner's prayer is one of self condemnation.  BTW I did it too.

If being in the BoL means your name Jillie Rose, then getting there makes it dependent on you Jillie Rose.  If getting there means you are in Christ and Christ is in you, then there is only one name - CHRIST.

Everything pertaining to your salvation was of God and His will, not your will.  Salvation is a gift and one can only receive a gift, you cannot earn a gift.

I don't know why I have gone back to basics with you, maybe it is what you needed to hear.

Perhaps you are looking for answers to the LoF as you are still possibly seeing you were saved from hell.  You were not saved from hell. You are saved from your sins.

Blessings
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Kratos on January 20, 2008, 09:18:30 AM
Seeker,

I don't think this is basics at all to most people. I still see our names as the ones either in or not in the Book of Life. Notice this verse:

Php 4:2  I beseech Euodias, and beseech Syntyche, that they be of the same mind in the Lord.
Php 4:3  And I intreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which laboured with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and with other my fellowlabourers, whose names are in the book of life.

Notice that names is plural and is referring to people that Paul knew. Here is another interesting verse:

Rev 3:5  He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.  

If words mean anything, your name can be written or blotted out fo the Book of Life.

To me, these observations have nothing to do with what we do or do not do to have our name added or removed from this Book. I, also, see the "sinner's prayer" as unbiblical as it usually does not require making Him Lord rather than just "asking Jesus into your heart".

I know that everyone is not the same and comes to knowledge of the Lord in different ways, but I like to start with the simplest interpretation of what the Bible says and build upon that. Others prefer to start with beliefs and interpret the Word in light of these beliefs. Both are valid as we all learn in different ways. I only know what works for me.

John
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: SeekerSA on January 20, 2008, 10:08:22 AM
Hi John

Even the verse you offered I still see one name Christ.

Whose names are written in the book of life (Christ) In Christ, Christ in us.

What I am trying to show is that this book is not one requiring updating viz additions or deletions.

and with other my fellow labourers, whose names are in the book of life Christ.

He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life Christ.

Blessings
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: JillieRose on January 21, 2008, 10:12:25 AM
Dear SeekerSA,

I do appreciate you explaining your point of view to me. And it does make a certain degree of sense.

I understand perfectly (and agree with) the point of view that you are coming from (I think): that we are in Christ, and that He is the book of life. Right? That's fine, I have no problem with that.

But Christ being the book of life, and Christ being the name written in the book of life are two different things.

I don't believe in Hell as traditionally purported by Christians, no. So you don't need to worry.

Here's my line of reasoning: because we are in Christ (who chose us and saved us by the free gift of grace, so that none may boast) our names (plural) are in this book (in Christ). But not because of anything we have done, you understand? Being in Christ, and being in this book are the same thing. Which (I think) is what the text suggests, rather than Christ is the name in the book, which I can't see Biblical support for anywhere, but hey. I am wrong about a great many things: that this may be one of them is not surprising, no?

Anyway, this thread has been of great use as clarification of my thoughts, so thank you for your patience with a newbie!  :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: SpiritDriven on January 21, 2008, 11:28:12 AM
Hi Group...ever notice how Scripture describes those at the first ressurection....how the second death has no power over them....

Thats because they have already died to Sin...they where the dead and buried in Christ.

Them that that goes to the second death, have too, how else they gonna die to sin eh!
The Lake of fire does a top job of totaly destroying the old vile sinner man, non glorified body they where ressurected with.....fizzel pop...died to sin at long last.

We see them again later on at the consumation, because the only thing holding them back now is death....

Who is the final enemy God does away with....


Peace
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: SeekerSA on January 21, 2008, 04:38:56 PM
Quote from: JillieRose on January 21, 2008, 10:12:25 AM
Dear SeekerSA,
--snip--

Here's my line of reasoning: because we are in Christ (who chose us and saved us by the free gift of grace, so that none may boast) our names (plural) are in this book (in Christ). But not because of anything we have done, you understand? Being in Christ, and being in this book are the same thing. Which (I think) is what the text suggests, rather than Christ is the name in the book, which I can't see Biblical support for anywhere, but hey. I am wrong about a great many things: that this may be one of them is not surprising, no?

Anyway, this thread has been of great use as clarification of my thoughts, so thank you for your patience with a newbie!  :icon_flower:


Hi Jillie

Your reasoning is OK from a traditional stance for the traditional sense of being "saved".  The problem comes in when we say all shall be saved eventually (and there are many POV's how this may transpire, mine is just one) then that is where your POV becomes challenging.

In a nutshell, again from a traditional stance, Jesus dying for us means that ALL are saved and hence ALL will be/are in Christ.

The way I am now starting to see things, is that Jesus and Christ are not the same and Christ in us or us in Christ is IMO where the focus is changing to.  Believe me I also see dimly and do not have all the answers but much is starting to make more sense now.  I call it RIP - Revelation in Progress.

Personally I think scripture is not this big mystery that it is made out to be, the traditions and religion we have been exposed to makes it seem this way to us.

Blessings
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: SeekerSA on January 21, 2008, 04:50:17 PM
Quote from: SpiritDriven on January 21, 2008, 11:28:12 AM
Hi Group...ever notice how Scripture describes those at the first resurrection....how the second death has no power over them....

Thats because they have already died to Sin...they where the dead and buried in Christ.

Them that that goes to the second death, have too, how else they gonna die to sin eh!
The Lake of fire does a top job of totaly destroying the old vile sinner man, non glorified body they where resurrected with.....fizzel pop...died to sin at long last.

We see them again later on at the consummation, because the only thing holding them back now is death....

Who is the final enemy God does away with....


Peace

Some see the first resurrection as equivalent to the rebirth/enlightenment/epiphany stage we have gone through and the first death is death to the adamic nature symbolized by baptism, burying the old man and standing up in newness with Christ.  This is followed up by the 2nd death (natural) and there is no power.  The now is the hell we go through thus on death, hades aka is cast into the LoF.

I do  not say I totally see it this way other than a possibility.  Once the LoF is no longer = to Eternal torment of hell, it becomes difficult to explain what it is.

All I can say, Revelation is very symbolic and parabolic and why oh why must the LoF become literal when all the other stuff like dragons, beasts from the sea, marks of the beast, Antichrist and false prophet all have been interpreted one way or another.

It is ironic that this single book probably has cause the most splits in churches known to man.  This is why I believe, the revelation of Revelation is something for each and every one of us individually.  It is one BIG Onion with many layers.

Blessings
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: JillieRose on January 21, 2008, 05:38:44 PM
QuoteIt is one BIG Onion

That deserves quoting somewhere :)

"The Book of Revelation: One big onion."

Hmm. Yes, I can see where you're coming from here. I shall go think about it some more.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Cardinal on January 21, 2008, 05:57:22 PM
Quote from: JillieRose on January 21, 2008, 05:38:44 PM
QuoteIt is one BIG Onion

That deserves quoting somewhere :)

"The Book of Revelation: One big onion."

Hmm. Yes, I can see where you're coming from here. I shall go think about it some more.

:cloud9: You know Seeker, that is so funny (in a God way) you should describe it that way. God gave me a vision in church one time. I saw in the Spirit, a large transparent gold orb with layers like an onion in me that was alive in the Spirit. I asked Him what this was and He said it was the Christ being formed in me.

The layers are experiences of the Christ that was formed in the people of the book, that we partake of. He said if we would sup with Him, He would sup with us. To sup is to consume. As we partake of the Word that is Spirit, that Word becomes life in us, it consumes us as we consume it; it is this that changes our nature from the inside out. He also said the last layer to be formed is as Abraham, the father/beginning of our faith, the first shall be last, and the last shall be first. It is all happening inside of us, just as John the revelator, saw. Blessings to all.....
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: chaela on February 10, 2008, 11:10:47 PM
WillieH, this is something I've never considered before -- the here and now is the Lake of Fire?  Up to now I've heard that it's a thing of the past, or a thing of the future, but never a thing of the Now.  Can you elaborate on this?   :icon_flower:




Quote from: willieH on August 20, 2007, 12:49:42 AM
willieH: Hi Taffy... :hithere:

Quote from: Taffy on August 19, 2007, 09:44:33 PM

The lake of fire is to destroy death and hell...is it not?
The fire that the Hebrew children were cast into did two things, burned only the wicked (those who cast them in) and the "son of man" appeared. The Children of God were infected in no way. Thus this fire was both a consuming (of evil) and a non-consuming (of good
).

Same Fire with dual purpose...AMEN Vagabond....that which burns the Tares and leaves the wheat,,,...

Blessings
T

A few observances to consider my new friend...

DEATH and HELL (hades=grave) were DESTROYED at the CROSS... in THIS EARTH, in THIS TIME REALM... which IS the LAKE of FIRE...  CHRIST (2000 years ago) conquered DEATH and HELL... (1 Cor 15:54)  Death ...IS... swallowed up in victory! O ...DEATH... where is thy sting... O ...GRAVE... where is thy victory?

Though the COMPLETE manifestation of the ETERNAL has not yet been REVEALED... it ALREADY ...IS...   :myahoo:

The WRATH of GOD is NOW (Rom 1:18)... the JUDGMENT is NOW (John 12:32)... The SUFFERING is NOW (Rom 8:18)... these are ALL happening within TIME... and TIME's experience of these, is as noted in Ecc 3 and...

TIME shall END (Rev 10:6 / John 6:44 / John 12:48)

ALL have been "blotted out"... ALL have left their "first love"... ALL are subjected to the FIRE (Mk 9:49)... and ALL are WRITTEN in the BOOK of the Lamb's LIFE...  :gangel:

More to say later, gotta go...  :laughing7:

PeAcE...  :gamer:

In 
JESUS
...willieH   :angel4:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Jaareshiah on March 01, 2008, 09:23:15 PM
The expression, "lake of fire", is used only in four occurrences in Revelation 20. This expression is also spoken as the "fiery lake" at Revelation 19:20 and as the "lake that burns with fire and sulpher" at Revelation 21:8. In speaking of "the Devil and his angels", Jesus used the term "everlasting fire" at Matthew 25:41 and has the same meaning as the "lake of fire". Jesus also used the expression "Gehenna" [Greek form of the Hebrew Geh Hin·nom´, "Valley of Hinnom"], at Matthew 5:22, 29,30; 18:9 and 23:15 meaning the same as the "lake of fire". Is the "lake of fire" literal ? No. Just as the "wild beast" and the "false prophet" are symbolic, so is the "lake of fire".

Then what is the meaning of the "lake of fire" ? Just as fire consumes and destroys that which it burns, so the "lake of fire" means total destruction, not eternal torment, for the "wild beast" nor the "false prophet" cannot be physically tormented, but can be destroyed. These political organizations, the "wild beast" being Satan's entire political system of things on the earth and the "false prophet" being the Anglo-America dual world power of Britain and America, and their supporters,(Rev 19:21) are destroyed following the total annihilation of "Babylon the Great", the world empire of false religion at the very hands of the "wild beast" or political elements of the world,(Rev 18:8) having done so because "God put it into their hearts to carry out his thought."(Rev 17:16,17)

Thus, all false religion, Babylon the Great, whom is spoken of as being "completely burned with fire",(Rev 18:8) and all the political elements or human governments of the earth, that Satan has created,(Rev 13:1) will be thrown into the "lake of fire" or eternal destruction, having received condemnatory judgment from God, never to exist again.(Dan 2:44)  What else is thrown into the "lake of fire" ? At Revelation 20:14, the King James Bible says that "death and hell" were. Death nor "hell" can be tormented, but can be destroyed. Too, "hell", before it's total demise, gives up "those dead in it".(Rev 20:13)

The Bible "hell" is not a place of torment as many teach or believe, but is the common grave of mankind, for the Greek word used there is hades. Those judged worthy of a resurrection from the dead by Jesus Christ, as held captive by hades, to life everlasting on the earth are given an opportunity to learn of the God of the Bible, Jehovah, and become faithful adherents of his laws, submitting to the "kingdom". The apostle Paul told Governor Felix, at Acts 24:15, that "there is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and unrighteous". Any who have shown themselves unwilling to fully follow "the things written in the scrolls"(Rev 20:12) during the thousand year reign of Christ, are then thrown into "the lake of fire", or the "second death".(Rev 20:14)

Hence, "whoever was not found written in the book of life was hurled into the lake of fire".(Rev 20:15) In addition, Adamic death, the death that mankind received as a result of being Adam's offspring,(Rom 5:12) will also be thrown into "the lake of fire", totally wiped out. Thus, following Adamic "death" having been cast into "the lake of fire", no one will die because of our inheritance from Adam - sin, resulting in imperfection and growing old.

A person's "name" can be removed from the "book of life".  Jesus, in providing commendation to the congregation of Sardis, said: "He that conquers will thus be arrayed in white outer garments; and I will by no means blot out his name from the book of life."(Rev 3:5) A person's "name" can be 'blotted out' if these fail in their loyalty to God. Hence, only those who do not "defile their outer garments", maintaining their Christian identity, remaining "undefiled before God...unspotted from the world" as part of the "pure religion", have their names written in the "book of life".(James 1:27)

Those that become an adulterer with the "world" and it's political elements, will never have their names in the "book of life", for Revelation 13:8 says that "all those who dwell on the earth (who) worship (the "wild beast", Satan's political system); the name of not one of them stands written in the scroll of life....from the founding of the world." James furthermore wrote: "Adulteresses, do you not know that the friendship with the world is enmity with God ? Whoever wants to be a friend of the world is constituting himself and enemy of God".(James 4:4)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Moshood on March 01, 2008, 11:09:32 PM
Quote from: vagabond on August 19, 2007, 06:53:00 PM
I would like to lay out an outline of how i view the "lake of fire".

First, we know that God is referred to as a "consuming fire".

We also know that God is Light and in him there is no darkness.

We know also that fire, even at the time of Cain and Abel was used to sacrifice animals as an atonement. In fact, it is suggested that fire would come down and consume the sacrifice if the sacrifice was acceptable to God. If it was not acceptable no fire would come from heaven and consume it.This may be how Cain knew that his sacrifice was not acceptable. This is quite possibly why Job knew he was in good standing with God, he had sacrificed for himself and for his sons and daughters (just in case).

The tabernacle, the outer court was lightened by the natural sun, thus the sacrifice and atonement's were for the natural man. The innercourt was lightened by the candlestick (the Holy Spirit in-part) Church realm? The most Holy place was lightened by the Glory of the very presence of God. Anyone entering this place defiled would drop dead. Now we know what the glory of God consumes....evil.

The face of Moses shown like an angel, so bright they had to veil his face. At his death he still looked like a young man (one cannot even age in this glory)

Christ, on the mount of transformation, when in the presence of the two witnesses became clothed in the glory of God's brightness.

And Steven, at his stoning, his face shown like an angel as he declared "lay not this sin to their charge". This is perhaps the best example of the Lake of fire, for at that time there was wailing and gnashing of teeth also:
Acts 7:54When they heard these things, they were cut to the heart, and they gnashed on him with their teeth.

55But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up steadfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,

56And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.

57Then they cried out with a loud voice, and stopped their ears, and ran upon him with one accord,

Comparing that with:Matthew 13:42
And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.


Elijah called for fire from heaven.

Jesus said:Luke 12:49
I am come to send fire on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled?

Now to the point....Jesus is like the tree...his body of many members is the forest. Jesus was but a flame....but the many membered body of Christ is like a lake of fire.

Steven stood before the Elders, being "FILLED" (not in-part) but "FILLED" with the Holy Spirit. Using the Word of God he cut them to the heart and exposed their inner thoughts and intents to the light of God.

Can you imagine what a "MANY membered body" of Steven's would be like?

Now then, keeping in mind that being in the very presence of God, as Moses, the physical body could not even age, let's look at 1 Cor.15) 51Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,

This verse shows me that a generation coming won't see physical death, but will change/transform while they are still using their natural bodies.

:53For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

:54So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.  

Is this not the manifestation of the sons of God, the many membered body? Is this not even the "rapture itself"? And what would a body of lights look like all moving in one accord? Like a lake of light(s)? A large body of fire?

And just as trees exchange bad air for good air, how would this body effect this world?

Isaiah 31:9
And he shall pass over to his strong hold for fear, and his princes shall be afraid of the ensign, saith the LORD, whose fire is in Zion, and his furnace in Jerusalem.

This is what i'm seeing as the lake of fire.

ONE FLAME OF FIRE = DROPLET OF FIRE

HUNDREDS = PUDDLE OF FIRE

THOUSANDS = POND OF FIRE

MILLIONS = LAKE OF FIRE
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on May 08, 2008, 06:11:13 AM
Basically, any view is compatible whose bottomline is the bringing of people to Christ rather than randomly excluding people as though the salvation of people weren't really central to God's purposes.  God loves people.  He doesn't love/hate people.  With this in mind, the Postmillenialism that I've embraced over the last year and a half is compatible because Postmillenialism doesn't insert a gap between Daniel chapter 7, verse 13 and Daniel chapter 7, verse 14 in the way that Premillenialism does.  The Kingdoms of this world having already become our Lord's and His Christ's as of when the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven to the Ancient of Days, then we're proceeding from that position of strength towards the discipling of all nations and the Christianizing of the globe through the preaching, teaching, and demonstration of the Gospel.  Whether every individual comes to Christ that's on the planet prior to the resurrection, as is envisioned by an Absolute Postmillenialism as taught by H.A.W. Meyer and B.B. Warfield, or whether you're talking about most people on the planet coming to Christ before the resurrection as would be taught by Kenneth Gentry and various others over the last 25+ years -- under either paradigm, then all you're left with is either a Restorationist Universalism or an Ultra Universalism to account for everybody else that's ever lived/died in what's alleged to be a state of unbelief.  In other words, although 9 tenths of the writings that you can currently find on Postmillenialism are Calvinists with a belief in ET, the ET paradigm isn't an essential to the Postmillenialist scheme of eschatology.  In fact, Postmillenialism reconciles better with UR than Premillenialism in my view, because of the danger of dispensationalists dispensationalizing themselves right out of a belief in UR, as Hal Lindsey, Grant Jeffrey, and various other dispensationalists have, who can easily envision a complete salvation of the nation of Israel but of no one else.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Dallas on June 26, 2008, 08:17:23 AM
I believe that because all things are finished and completed because Jesus was indeed sucsessful, no end times to come. Because all things are complete, all judgement has been decided, and all the courts closed forever since 70 AD that all people were included into the things of Christ.

Wether someone accepts or openly denies God or Jesus they were included in the death and ressurection of Christ. Does this mean everyone has heard and believed, absolutley not...but they will!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Dallas on June 29, 2008, 08:31:07 AM
David Chilton;

"As I mentioned above, much of the Bible is written in symbols. A helpful way to understand this, perhaps, would be to speak of these symbols as a set of patterns and associations. By this I mean that Biblical symbolism is not a code. It is, instead, a way of seeing, a perspective. For example, when Jesus speaks of "living water" (John 4:10), we rightly recognize that He is using water as a symbol. We understand that when He spoke to the woman at the well, He was not merely offering her "water." He was offering her eternal life. But He called it "water." We should immediately ask: Why did He do that? He could have simply said "eternal life." Why did He speak in metaphor? Why did He want her to think of water?

Now this is where we can make a big mistake, and this is the primary error of some interpreters who try to take a "symbolic" approach. It is to think that Biblical symbolism is primarily a puzzle for us to solve. We can suddenly decide: "Aha! Water is a special code-word which means eternal life. That means that whenever the Bible talks about water symbolically, it is really talking about eternal life; whenever someone takes a drink, he is really becoming a Christian." It just doesn't work that way (as you will see if you try to apply it throughout the Bible). Besides, what sense would it make for the Bible simply to put everything in code? The Bible is not a book for spies and secret societies; it is God's revelation of Himself to His covenant people. The puzzle-solving, mystical interpretation tends to be speculative; it does not pay sufficient attention to the way the Bible itself speaks.

When Jesus offered "water" to the woman, He wanted her to think of the multiple imagery connected with water in the Bible. In a general sense, of course, we know that water is associated with the Spiritual refreshment and sustenance of life which comes through salvation. But the Biblical associations with water are much more complex than that. This is because understanding Biblical symbolism does not mean cracking a code. It is much more like reading good poetry.

The symbolism of the Bible is not structured in a flat, this-means-that style. Instead, it is meant to be read visually. We are to see the images rise before us in succession, layer upon layer, allowing them to evoke a response in our minds and hearts. The prophets did not write in order to create stimulating intellectual exercises. They wrote to teach. They wrote in visual, dramatic symbols; and if we would fully understand their message we must appreciate their vocabulary. We must read the Bible visually. The visual symbols themselves, and what the Bible says about them, are important aspects of what God wants us to learn; otherwise, He wouldn't have spoken that way.

So, when the Bible tells us a story about water, it is not "really" telling us about something else; it is telling us about water. But at the same time we are expected to see the water, and to think of the Biblical associations with regard to water. The system of interpretation offered here is neither "literalistic" nor "symbolic"; it takes the "water" seriously and literally, but it also takes seriously what God's Word associates with water throughout the history of Biblical revelation.

What are some of the Biblical associations which might have occurred to the woman at the well, and to the disciples? Here are a few of them:



The watery, fluid mass that was the original nature of the earth at the creation, and out of which God formed all life (Gen. 1);


The great river of Eden that watered the whole earth (Gen. 2);


The salvation of Noah and his family by the waters of the Flood, out of which the earth was re-created (Gen. 6-9);


God's gracious revelations to Hagar by a fountain (Gen. 16) and a well (Gen. 21);


The well called Rehoboth, where God gave Isaac dominion (Gen. 26);


The river out of which the infant Moses, the future Deliverer of Israel, was taken and made a prince (Ex.2);


The redemptive crossing of the Red Sea, where God again saved His people by water (Ex. 14);


The water that flowed from the stricken Rock at Sinai, giving life to the people (Ex. 17);


The many ritual sprinklings in the Old Testament, signifying the removal of filth, pollution, sickness and death, and the bestowal of the Spirit upon the priests (e.g., Lev. 14; Num. 8);


The crossing of the Jordan River (Josh. 3);


The sound of rushing waters made by the pillar of cloud (Ezek. 1);


The River of Life flowing from the Temple and healing the Dead Sea (Ezek. 47).


Thus, when the Bible speaks of water, we are supposed to have in our minds a vast host of associative concepts, a complex of Biblical images that affects our thinking about water. To put it differently, water is supposed to be something like a "buzzword," a term that calls up many associations and connotations. When we read the word water we should be reminded of God's saving acts and revelations by water throughout Scripture. The Bible uses many of these "buzz-words," and increases the number of them as it goes on; until, by the time we get to Revelation (the capstone of Biblical prophecy), they all come rushing toward us at once, in a blizzard of associative references, some of which are obvious, some obscure. To the one who really knows his Bible and has noted the literary patterns and images, much of the book will look familiar; to the rest of us, it's confusing. In Revelation, we are confronted with all the Biblical connotations of numerous images: not only water, but light, fire, clouds, angels, stars, lamps, food, stones, swords, thrones, rainbows, robes, thunder, voices, animals, wings, scavengers, eyes, keys, trumpets, plagues, mountains, winds, seas, altars, blood, locusts, trees, heads, horns, and crowns.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on June 29, 2008, 08:36:48 AM
Quote from: Dallas on June 29, 2008, 08:31:07 AM
David Chilton;

"As I mentioned above, much of the Bible is written in symbols. A helpful way to understand this, perhaps, would be to speak of these symbols as a set of patterns and associations. By this I mean that Biblical symbolism is not a code. It is, instead, a way of seeing, a perspective. For example, when Jesus speaks of "living water" (John 4:10), we rightly recognize that He is using water as a symbol. We understand that when He spoke to the woman at the well, He was not merely offering her "water." He was offering her eternal life. But He called it "water." We should immediately ask: Why did He do that? He could have simply said "eternal life." Why did He speak in metaphor? Why did He want her to think of water?

Now this is where we can make a big mistake, and this is the primary error of some interpreters who try to take a "symbolic" approach. It is to think that Biblical symbolism is primarily a puzzle for us to solve. We can suddenly decide: "Aha! Water is a special code-word which means eternal life. That means that whenever the Bible talks about water symbolically, it is really talking about eternal life; whenever someone takes a drink, he is really becoming a Christian." It just doesn't work that way (as you will see if you try to apply it throughout the Bible). Besides, what sense would it make for the Bible simply to put everything in code? The Bible is not a book for spies and secret societies; it is God's revelation of Himself to His covenant people. The puzzle-solving, mystical interpretation tends to be speculative; it does not pay sufficient attention to the way the Bible itself speaks.

When Jesus offered "water" to the woman, He wanted her to think of the multiple imagery connected with water in the Bible. In a general sense, of course, we know that water is associated with the Spiritual refreshment and sustenance of life which comes through salvation. But the Biblical associations with water are much more complex than that. This is because understanding Biblical symbolism does not mean cracking a code. It is much more like reading good poetry.

The symbolism of the Bible is not structured in a flat, this-means-that style. Instead, it is meant to be read visually. We are to see the images rise before us in succession, layer upon layer, allowing them to evoke a response in our minds and hearts. The prophets did not write in order to create stimulating intellectual exercises. They wrote to teach. They wrote in visual, dramatic symbols; and if we would fully understand their message we must appreciate their vocabulary. We must read the Bible visually. The visual symbols themselves, and what the Bible says about them, are important aspects of what God wants us to learn; otherwise, He wouldn't have spoken that way.

So, when the Bible tells us a story about water, it is not "really" telling us about something else; it is telling us about water. But at the same time we are expected to see the water, and to think of the Biblical associations with regard to water. The system of interpretation offered here is neither "literalistic" nor "symbolic"; it takes the "water" seriously and literally, but it also takes seriously what God's Word associates with water throughout the history of Biblical revelation.

What are some of the Biblical associations which might have occurred to the woman at the well, and to the disciples? Here are a few of them:



The watery, fluid mass that was the original nature of the earth at the creation, and out of which God formed all life (Gen. 1);


The great river of Eden that watered the whole earth (Gen. 2);


The salvation of Noah and his family by the waters of the Flood, out of which the earth was re-created (Gen. 6-9);


God's gracious revelations to Hagar by a fountain (Gen. 16) and a well (Gen. 21);


The well called Rehoboth, where God gave Isaac dominion (Gen. 26);


The river out of which the infant Moses, the future Deliverer of Israel, was taken and made a prince (Ex.2);


The redemptive crossing of the Red Sea, where God again saved His people by water (Ex. 14);


The water that flowed from the stricken Rock at Sinai, giving life to the people (Ex. 17);


The many ritual sprinklings in the Old Testament, signifying the removal of filth, pollution, sickness and death, and the bestowal of the Spirit upon the priests (e.g., Lev. 14; Num. 8);


The crossing of the Jordan River (Josh. 3);


The sound of rushing waters made by the pillar of cloud (Ezek. 1);


The River of Life flowing from the Temple and healing the Dead Sea (Ezek. 47).


Thus, when the Bible speaks of water, we are supposed to have in our minds a vast host of associative concepts, a complex of Biblical images that affects our thinking about water. To put it differently, water is supposed to be something like a "buzzword," a term that calls up many associations and connotations. When we read the word water we should be reminded of God's saving acts and revelations by water throughout Scripture. The Bible uses many of these "buzz-words," and increases the number of them as it goes on; until, by the time we get to Revelation (the capstone of Biblical prophecy), they all come rushing toward us at once, in a blizzard of associative references, some of which are obvious, some obscure. To the one who really knows his Bible and has noted the literary patterns and images, much of the book will look familiar; to the rest of us, it's confusing. In Revelation, we are confronted with all the Biblical connotations of numerous images: not only water, but light, fire, clouds, angels, stars, lamps, food, stones, swords, thrones, rainbows, robes, thunder, voices, animals, wings, scavengers, eyes, keys, trumpets, plagues, mountains, winds, seas, altars, blood, locusts, trees, heads, horns, and crowns.



ah, i get all this stuff.  just didn't understand how u came up with "nations" as referring to non Israel. 


Does Chilton talk specifically about this??
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Dallas on June 29, 2008, 10:32:41 AM
There are numerous allusions to it, and direct refrences througout scripture. It begins all the way back in Genesis chapter 1.

Genesis 1:9 "Then God said, "Let the waters below the heavens be gathered into one place, and let the dry land appear"; and it was so.

   10God called the dry land earth, and the gathering of the waters He called seas; and God saw that it was good.

   11Then God said, "Let the earth sprout vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees on the earth bearing fruit after their kind with seed in them"; and it was so.

   12The earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed after their kind, and trees bearing fruit with seed in them, after their kind; and God saw that it was good.

   13There was evening and there was morning, a third day."


The earth was called out from the midst of the waters...Israel was called out from the midst of the nations...the earth brought forth fruit...Israel brought  forth Jesus the firstfruit.

Ya I know at first glance that seems like a stretch but as with most concepts it develops quite deeply.

But so did mountains talking about salvation.

but here;

Psalm 69: 1Save me, O God,
         For the (A)waters have threatened my life.
      2I have sunk in deep (B)mire, and there is no foothold;
         I have come into deep waters, and a (C)flood overflows me.
      3I am (D)weary with my crying; my throat is parched;
         My (E)eyes fail while I wait for my God.
      4Those (F)who hate me without a cause are more than the hairs of my head;
         Those who would destroy me (G)are powerful, being wrongfully my enemies;
      14Deliver me from the (X)mire and do not let me sink;
         May I be (Y)delivered from my foes and from the (Z)deep waters.
      15May the (AA)flood of water not overflow me
         Nor the deep swallow me up,
         Nor the (AB)pit shut its mouth on me.


Psalm 74:12Yet God is (Y)my king from of old,
         Who works deeds of deliverance in the midst of the earth.
      13[a]You (Z)divided the sea by Your strength;
         You (AA)broke the heads of the (AB)sea monsters in the waters.
      14You crushed the heads of (AC)Leviathan;

Deliverance of the earth- Israel
The sea, genesis 1 in which were seperated and earth was formed
Gen 1 God filled the sea with monsters after earth was called out
Revlation and Daniel the beasts of many waters, the dragon that comes up from he sea

Psalm 77:16The (AD)waters saw You, O God;
         The waters saw You, they were in anguish;
         The deeps also trembled.
      17The (AE)clouds poured out water;
         The skies (AF)gave forth a sound;
         Your (AG)arrows flashed here and there.
      18The (AH)sound of Your thunder was in the whirlwind;
         The (AI)lightnings lit up the world;
         The (AJ)earth trembled and shook.
      19Your (AK)way was in the sea
         And Your paths in the mighty waters,
         And Your footprints may not be known.
      20You (AL)led Your people like a flock
         By the hand of (AM)Moses and Aaron

Psalm 104:13 "He waters the mountains from His upper chambers;
         (U)The earth is satisfied with the fruit of His works.


Not to mention all the mentioning of waters and a nation...The waters at Jordan etc do a concordance search.

Isaiah 8:5Again the LORD spoke to me further, saying,
      6"Inasmuch as these people have (G)rejected the gently flowing waters of Shiloah
         And rejoice in (H)Rezin and the son of Remaliah;
      7"Now therefore, behold, the Lord is about to bring on them the (I)strong and abundant waters of the (J)Euphrates,
         Even the (K)king of Assyria and all his glory;
         And it will (L)rise up over all its channels and go over all its banks.
      8"Then (M)it will sweep on into Judah, it will overflow and pass through,
         It will (N)reach even to the neck;
         And the spread of its wings will fill the breadth of your land, O (O)Immanuel.

Isaiah 17: 12Alas, the uproar of many peoples
         (X)Who roar like the roaring of the seas,
         And the rumbling of nations
         Who rush on like the (Y)rumbling of mighty waters!
      13The (Z)nations rumble on like the rumbling of many waters,
         But He will (AA)rebuke them and they will flee far away,
         And be chased (AB)like chaff in the mountains before the wind,
         Or like whirling dust before a gale.


Isaiah 19:1The (A)oracle concerning (B)Egypt
         Behold, the LORD is (C)riding on a swift cloud and is about to come to Egypt;
         The (D)idols of Egypt will tremble at His presence,
         And the (E)heart of the Egyptians will melt within them.
      2"So I will incite Egyptians against Egyptians;
         And they will (F)each fight against his brother and each against his neighbor,
         City against city and kingdom against kingdom.
      3"Then the spirit of the Egyptians will be demoralized within them;
         And I will confound their strategy,
         So that (G)they will resort to idols and ghosts of the dead
         And to mediums and spiritists.
      4"Moreover, I will deliver the Egyptians into the hand of a (H)cruel master,
         And a mighty king will rule over them," declares the Lord GOD of hosts.
      5(I)The waters from the sea will dry up,
         And the river will be parched and dry.


Revelation 17:15 "And he said to me, "The waters which you saw where the harlot sits, are peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues."

Exodus 34:10 "Then God said, "Behold, I am going to make a covenant Before all your people I will perform miracles which have not been produced in all the earth nor among any of the nations; and all the people among whom you live will see the working of the LORD, for it is a fearful thing that I am going to perform with you." -(there is a very clear distinction between the earth and nations here)

Isaiah 23:3 "And were on many waters. The grain of the Nile, the harvest of the River was her revenue;And she was the market of nations."

That's enough for now eh?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on June 29, 2008, 04:28:12 PM
yes, very helpful;  thank you


laren
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Dallas on July 12, 2008, 08:33:25 PM
http://members.aol.com/thalonpentad/fullpreteriststudies.html
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: firstborn888 on July 13, 2008, 08:19:24 AM
Very much so. Been studying this for a while now. Will definitely rattle your cage.
- Byron
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Dallas on July 16, 2008, 01:50:05 AM
Just like when I didn't believe in the inclusive love of God and heard about it I was quite taken back. Then I became informed and couldn't deny the plain truth. Now in preterism theleogy there is alot of undeniable truths also.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Loveroftruth on July 17, 2008, 03:26:50 PM
It opens up the Bible in a totally new way, everything suddenly makes sense  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Dallas on July 18, 2008, 10:06:45 AM
Amen loveroftruth
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: waitinontheLamb on July 20, 2008, 11:53:51 PM
Quote from: Loveroftruth on July 17, 2008, 03:26:50 PM
It opens up the Bible in a totally new way, everything suddenly makes sense  :thumbsup:
Wow. That is an overstatement. Preterism is one view that makes you spiritualize way too much literal teaching in the Bible. No way.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Our Wings are Burning on July 21, 2008, 05:15:33 AM
Quote from: waitinontheLamb on July 20, 2008, 11:53:51 PM
Wow. That is an overstatement.

Perhaps... however...

Quote from: waitinontheLamb on July 20, 2008, 11:53:51 PM
Preterism is one view that makes you spiritualize way too much literal teaching in the Bible. No way.

I'm not sure I understand this.  This is actually the first time I've read about Preterism, but believing that when Jesus says, "Behold, I am coming soon," He actually means soon as we understand it, not soon as in "approximately two millennia from now," seems to be the more literal teaching to me.

That's just my views so far, I'll definitely have to do more study on this subject to be convinced, however.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on July 21, 2008, 05:43:33 AM
QuoteWhen Paul wrote to the Romans, he advised them that the hour had come for them to realize that their salvation was much sooner than originally expected (Rom. 13:11). Then, he told them that it would not be long before God crushed Satan under their feet (Rom. 16:20). James instructed the people to be patient until the coming of the Lord. Next, he stated that Jesus and the Judgment were coming soon (Jas. 5:7-9). Paul informed the Philippians that the Lord's coming was near (Php. 4:5). The author of Hebrews wrote that the Old Covenant was in the process of passing away and that it would shortly be abolished (Heb. 8:13).



20The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet.
      The grace of our Lord Jesus be with you.


--Romans 16


So, who or what is satan according to this?  Or, how was he crushed?

I also find this a very interesting point of view.   I need to study more about the culture of the Jews at that time and how the events of 70 ad changed it.  But, one thing that seems clear, although this was not the first time Jerusalem was destroyed and the Jews scattered, it was the last time the temple was ever in existence, and the last time (I think) that they performed animal sacrifice.  It seems like it was indeed the end of an era.   It would also mean that again the rapture ready Christians have it wrong, because to rebuild the temple and return to animal sacrifice with their red heiffer would mean going backwards into the ministry of death.

7Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, fading though it was, 8will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious?

--2 Cor 4



I'd also like to hear or discuss how this fits in with other end times prophecy.  What do we have to look forward to if this piece of it has already happened?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on July 21, 2008, 06:13:23 AM
if any are interested in exploring more the preterist universalist view, this forum I belong to is good.  those there are very willing to discuss their view.

www.talk-grace.com



and this thread there i found interesting, re: what's left if preterism is true?  some are partial and some full preterists.

http://www.talk-grace.com/showthread.php?t=923
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Dallas on July 21, 2008, 08:16:00 AM
QuoteBut, one thing that seems clear, although this was not the first time Jerusalem was destroyed and the Jews scattered, it was the last time the temple was ever in existence, and the last time (I think) that they performed animal sacrifice.  It seems like it was indeed the end of an era.
-molly

This is an excellent point.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: SeekerSA on July 21, 2008, 09:06:02 AM
As for end times check this out:

http://www.bible.ca/pre-date-setters.htm

Seems this has been the mindset for 2 millenia
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Loveroftruth on July 21, 2008, 01:06:42 PM
Quote
I'm not sure I understand this.  This is actually the first time I've read about Preterism, but believing that when Jesus says, "Behold, I am coming soon," He actually means soon as we understand it, not soon as in "approximately two millennia from now," seems to be the more literal teaching to me.

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

It is the "literal approach" as you say. The other is the more spiritual approach.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on August 16, 2008, 07:05:53 PM



  This is a great thread and have been dropped  lol
  I was hoping to bring it  back up  , its awesome vagabond! 
and many contributions , thanks all , this last one confirms much to me

  I just want to say  that this  chapter in Isaiah 33  being a very bold prophet according to Paul , seems to speak to Him  in the same Spirit of Faith Jesus Christ ,and as to us even
Isa 33:10 ¶ Now will I rise, saith the LORD; now will I be exalted; now will I lift up myself.  
Ye shall conceive chaff, ye shall bring forth stubble: your breath, [as] fire, shall devour you.
 
And the people shall be [as] the burnings of lime: [as] thorns cut up shall they be burned in the fire. Hear, ye [that are] far off, what I have done; and, ye [that are] near, acknowledge my might.
Isa 33:14 The sinners in Zion are afraid; fearfulness hath surprised the hypocrites. Who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire? who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings? Hewbrew4168 mowqed
1) a burning mass, burning, hearth
  He that walketh righteously, and speaketh uprightly; he that despiseth the gain of oppressions, that shaketh his hands from holding of bribes, that stoppeth his ears from hearing of blood, and shutteth his eyes from seeing evil;He shall dwell on high: his place of defence [shall be] the munitions of rocks: bread shall be given him; his waters [shall be] sure.

Thine eyes shall see the king in his beauty: they shall behold the land that is very far off.

it  may not make any sense to some , but for me it is confirmation
  of the lake of fire being many peoples tongues and nations    found  burning in  Christs Body ,  being purged  and cleansed ,  as Peter knew
and confirms in  GODS WORD , dont think it strange  that  some fiery trial has come upon you IT  is to test our FAITH and perfect it

  the end would be soul salvation  with His Same Spirit    perfecting this fruit of our lips ,  Honoring God   with praise and  glory to Him

here it is  for me anyways . love rose
 
If any man speak, [let him speak] as the oracles of God; if any man minister, [let him do it] as of the ability which God giveth: that God in all things may be glorified through Jesus Christ, to whom be praise and dominion for ever and ever. Amen. 1Pe 4:12 Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you: But rejoice, inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ's sufferings; that, when his glory shall be revealed, ye may be glad also with exceeding joy.

Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations:

  1Pe 1:7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see [him] not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory: Receiving the end of your faith, [even] the salvation of [your] souls.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 21, 2008, 12:24:32 AM
willieH: Hello dear brothers  :icon_king: and sisters  :icon_queen:

I have started this thread in order to discontinue the hijacking of the "CAN YOU EXPLAIN" thread (which is my fault!  :mblush:)

This thread is entitled: 

LAKE OF FIRE...Part of The Revelation of JESUS CHRIST...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  

willieH: Hi Craig... :hithere:

There is SPIRITUAL observation necessary to see the LAKE of FIRE bro... Just as the Tree of the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL contained BOTH... yet most Literally/Naturally -- see only that EVIL was unveiled to men...

JESUS CHRIST ...IS... the ALPHA ...and... OMEGA... He is BOTH entities simultaneously... much as was the TREE in the Garden BOTH entities (good & evil) simulataneously...

"Chronology" is not an issue in SPIRITUAL vision...

(1)  The Knowledge of Good & Evil, is known simulataneously
(2)  JESUS CHRIST is the END and BEGINNING simultaneously.

The LAKE of FIRE is PART of the REVEALING of JESUS CHRIST... which IS revealed in THIS LIFE... (chronologically speaking 2000 "years" ago according to TIME observation,  ...but IS revealed at and from the BEGINNING, ...and IS revealed at and from the END)

Quote from: SOtW on August 20, 2008, 06:24:28 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 20, 2008, 05:16:55 AM
Quote from: willieHTHIS LIFE, ...IS... the Lake of Fire...

I think it might be for us believers,--Judgment begins at the house of God-- but I don't know about the others.

I see a lot of wicked seeming to prosper. :dontknow:



1 Peter 4:17
For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?


Believers don't go through the Lake of Fire. This cannot be the Lake of Fire, because it happens last.

I disagree... There is no Scripture which states that "believers" do NOT go through and/or partake of the Lake of Fire... Please note them if you can...

These are the verses which mention this "entity" (Rev 19:20 / Rev20:10 / Rev 20:14-15 / Rev 21:8)

NONE of these verses state that "believers" do not participate in the "Lake of Fire"  :dontknow:

On the contrary... the list which is made in Rev 21:8... includes ALL MEN... for there is NO MAN which can be DISattached from one or more of these:  Unbelieving, fearful,liars, abominable, murderers, whoremongers, idolators, sorecerers (drugs)

Just in this verse alone (Rom 11:32) ...qualifies ALL for the LAKE of FIRE!

However, lets break it down further:

1. Anyone who has ever "LIED" is an eligible participant...
2. Anyone who has ever KILLED or been angry with a brother without cause  ("murderer") is an eligible participant...
3.  Anyone who has ever been FEARFUL is an eligible participant...
4.  Anyone who has ever LUSTED after another is an eligible participant...
5.  Anyone who has ever IDOLIZED ANYTHING, is an eligible participant...
6.  Anyone who has ever taken DRUGS, is an eligible participant...
7.  Anyone who has NOT BELIEVED at one time or another, is an eligible participant...
8.  Anyone who has ever involved him/herself in ANYTHING which God considers ABOMINABLE (all of the above) is an eligible participant...

Several of this list in the "Revelation" appear in:

Prov 6:16-17  These six doth YHVH hate, yea SEVEN are an ABOMINATION unto Him... a PROUD LOOK (#7), ...a LYING TONGUE (#1), ...and HANDS that SHED (#2) innocent blood, ...an heart that DEVISETH WICKED IMAGINATIONS (#4), ...feet that are swift RUNNING to MISCHIEF (#5), ...a FALSE WITNESS that speaketh LIES (#1), ...and he that SOWETH DISCORD (#3 / "ET") among brethren....


I see your observation that the Lake of Fire, ..."happens last"...  Is found viewing a SYMBOLIC entity which is UNCONFINED and (IS) ETERNAL,  ...from a CONFINED (WILL BE) and FINITE... angle or observation... ("TIME chronology")

The Book of Revelation is not a book of "chronology"... it is the REVEALING of JESUS CHRIST... which is an ETERNAL entity, being revealed as He sees fit from His ETERNAL perspective, ...within the framework of His Creation, which is in TIME...

From its END to its BEGINNING (alpha/omega)... as HE IS... which state of BEING, is not associated with chronology... rather ALWAYS IS...

GOD's WORD - being ETERNAL, is NOT confined to CHRONOLOGY... for It ALWAYS IS... and IS revealed or IS veiled during and THROUGHOUT, the course of TIME...

The book of the Revelation of JESUS CHRIST, is not a "this happens" then "that happens" report.   RELIGION has created this error...

Believe what you will, Chronological viewpoint is just another "RELIGION born darkness" ...within the veiled vision of Babylon...

There is no "LAST" thing that "happens"... CONCLUSION IS BEGINNING for they are THE SAME ENTITY:   

JESUS CHRIST, ...IS THE BEGINNING ...AND... IS the END...  "the ALPHA, ...AND... the OMEGA... ARE, ...ONE & the SAME...  :yes:

(Rev 1:8 / Rev 1:11 / Rev 22:13)

Rev 1:8    I AM Alpha and Omega, the BEGINNING ...AND... the ENDING...

Rev 1:11   I AM Alpha and Omega, the FIRST ...AND... the LAST...

Rev 22:13  I AM... Alpha and Omega, the BEGINNING ...AND... the END, ...the FIRST ...AND... the LAST...



(http://dl3.glitter-graphics.net/pub/117/117193tdajxe3wh8.gif)

PeacE...
...willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on August 21, 2008, 12:49:21 AM
Hi Willie!  :HeartThrob:

I have a really hard time understanding what you wrote. I'm not even sure the next questions have relevance in this thread  :umnick:

Are you saying we are now living in LoF?
Does that mean we are already dead?
Why so much sinning during this correctional period?

Willie rescue me from darness  :teaching:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 12:59:45 AM
I think what throws a lot of people from this passage is the fact, that again appealing to chronology, Revelation 20 implies bodily resurrection prior to the Lake of Fire judgment.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 21, 2008, 01:20:14 AM
willieH: Hi WW... :hithere:

Nice to seeya!  :cloud9:

Quote from: WhiteWings on August 21, 2008, 12:49:21 AM
Hi Willie!  :HeartThrob:

I have a really hard time understanding what you wrote. I'm not even sure the next questions have relevance in this thread  :umnick:

Are you saying we are now living in LoF?

Sorry that my post was not clear to you... I did not mean to go over anyone's head... guess I could've simplified... sorry...  :mblush:

but to answer this question...

YES, (in my observation) this IS the Lake of FIRE...

Quote from: WhiteWings on August 21, 2008, 12:49:21 AMDoes that mean we are already dead?

ALL are DEAD in the Spirit, until CHRIST is revealed within them (the inward man - Rom 7:22)

This is done by the DRAWING of your heart to the SON (Word of God)... accomplished by the Father... (John 6:44)

Quote from: WhiteWings on August 21, 2008, 12:49:21 AMWhy so much sinning during this correctional period?

It is part of the process in which GOD, is WORKING ALL THINGS... (Eph 1:11)

We are MARRED (sin) in the HAND of the POTTER (Jer 18:4)... also... we ARE HIS WORKMANSHIP (Eph 2:10)... in which TWO VESSELS are made of the SAME LUMP (Rom 9:21) one for DISHONOR (flesh), ...one for HONOR... Children of GOD...

Our pathways are ordained of GOD...  We are become as IS HE, by the KNOWLEDGE of Good and Evil... (Gen 3:22)  which KNOWLEDGE is gained, by the application of INFORMATION to EXPERIENCE...

In this process, we become AS is GOD... having the KNOWLEDGE of Good and Evil... prior to our SIN... only GOD had this KNOWLEDGE... but in making us in HIS IMAGE... it is necessary that we TOO, have this KNOWLEDGE...

I hope I have helped you gain some insight, or at least a new view for your  consideration, as you continue to seek Father...  :cloud9:

I do not try to convince anyone of anything!  ...that is GOD's Work... I teach what He has given me... in hopes that in my clumsy way, He might USE me as a tool to help another such as yourself...  :friendstu:

PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 21, 2008, 01:20:44 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 12:59:45 AM
I think what throws a lot of people from this passage is the fact, that again appealing to chronology, Revelation 20 implies bodily resurrection prior to the Lake of Fire judgment.

The Lake of Fire is part of the Revelation of Jesus Christ. That is not in dispute, so I have no idea why it is even the title of this. The issue WillieH makes is that we are presently living in the Lake of Fire, that is in dispute.

The Lake of Fire is Second Death. Second Death has no power over those who trust in the Lord. If it has no power, it has no power period; that means, no power to correct, no power to lift up and edify, no power to destroy, no power at all. There is no way around what both Martin and I brought up, scripturally, biblically, logically, reasonably or even emotionally. To say we are living in the Lake of Fire is not just is not the case. The Lake of Fire is final Judgment for those who continued to live according to their sinful natures, for those who did not continue to trust in the Lord (described as keeping their robes clean in the blood of Christ). There is no way around what both Martin and I brought up so simply which says this life, or present age, is NOT the Lake of Fire.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 01:56:04 AM
I'm really glad that we're getting into this 'cause I've been going back and forth on this issue, sorta seeing both sides, yet still having issues with both sides.

Craig,

Is inheriting the Kingdom of God a daily thing or an eschatological event?  My reading of St. Paul indicates that he's saying to me that we reign now, which would indicate to me that while we're practicing such sins, as he lists in a few places, we're cutting ourselves off from the inheritance that's already rightfully ours.  St. Paul said that wrath on the children of disobedience is revealed from heaven now.  Ephesians 2 says that while you're indulging in the carnal appetites of the flesh and of the mind that you're a child of wrath right now.  But God Who is rich in mercy...

Matthew 25 indicates a reigning of the righteous when all are gathered to Him, yet Jesus said He'd draw all men to Himself when He was lifted up out of the earth in John 12.  He seemed to make His lifting up out of the earth the eschatological event that would draw all of mankind to Himself rather than His return to the earth.

This is part of my recent difficulty [this year] with afterlife punishments.  While we're walking by faith and not by sight, we're not judged with the world.  That's 100% true, and how I'm taking 1Corinthians 11.  Looking at Willie's argument for a second, if there were a separation between us and the Lake of Fire, then it would be because we were judging ourselves, according to 1Corinthians 11 so that we're not judged with the world.  For me, right now, both views on this thread seem like an over-simplification in some ways.  St. Paul teaches that we reign now, and that the world abides under God's wrath now.  John's Gospel brings up the fact that the world is presently under wrath as well in the 3rd chapter, with the implication that we come out of wrath into salvation.

And as you brought up, the Second Death has absolutely zero power over those who overcome, and St. John calls our faith the victory that overcomes the world in 1John.  And Romans 10 says that faith comes by [hearing and hearing] by the Word of God.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 01:57:47 AM
Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

THIS AS ALWAYS intrigued me,....Their PART....Just what ""part"" would that BE.... :laughing7:,

seems Paul after the Flesh only KNEW IN """"PART"""""


1Cr 13:12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.


Doesnt the SWORD cut Into TWO"""""""PARTS""""""""""""

nough of me...

baptised WITH FIRE?....SEEMS like Christ to me, could this be the SAME FIRE willie talks about..or are these two different fires....that being the LAKE...or does this fire have two different purposes...sorta getting complicated aint it :icon_flower:

:icon_flower:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 21, 2008, 01:58:33 AM
willieH: Hi brother M... :hithere:

I see what you are saying below...

Quote from: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 12:59:45 AMI think what throws a lot of people from this passage is the fact, that again appealing to chronology, Revelation 20 implies bodily resurrection prior to the Lake of Fire judgment.

"IMPLIES" is the keyword here bro...  :dunno:

Rev 20:12 notes that the books were opened and that ALL stood before Him, great and small... but it does not say they STOOD before Him in the SAME MOMENT...  :dontknow:

Our LIVES are LIVED as OPEN BOOKS, ...before Him... Scripture notes over and again that this is so... as noted by DAVID:  Ps 139:7-8

What it amount to is... DOES any portion of the REVEALING of CHRIST, depend on TIME, in order to be manifest?  Or is "LAKE of FIRE judgment", NOW as HE stated it was:

John 12:31  NOW is the JUDGEMENT OF THIS WORLD... NOW shall the prince of THIS WORLD be CAST OUT.

JESUS CHRIST is the SAME, yesterday, today and forever... He also, SIMULTANEOUSLY,

...IS... the BEGINNING and the END... of ALL THINGS...

This means that SIMULTANEOUSLY, ...HE... is BOTH in ALL THINGS...

As men continue to observe from a (chronological) TIME perspective, ...SPIRITUAL perspective is LOST...

For instance... the LAMB SLAIN from the foundation of the WORLD... IS... a NOW thing, ...not a "was" or "will be" thing...

From finite or TIME perspective CHRIST's death had a TIME "chronology"... and was manifest in TIME, 2000yrs ago... however... This TIME--chronological observation, ...is NOT the SPIRITUAL and ETERNAL perspective which NOTES

Rev 13:8  And ALL that dwell upon the earth SHALL WORSHIP Him, whose names ARE NOT written in the book of the life of the Lamb ...SLAIN FROM the FOUNDATION of the WORLD...

SPIRITUAL perspective is an ETERNAL UNCREATED entity,  ...and is NOT found in LITERAL/Natural perspective which notes its persepctive with "chronology" in a CREATED entity called TIME...

I'm sorry if this might sound a bit confusing to some... but to note SPIRITUAL concepts in words, is sometimes a difficult endeavor...  :mblush:

If one is to gain SPIRITUAL understanding... we each must abandon what we see with our eyes... and hear with our ears... the OUTWARD MAN, ...and begin to watch and listen with the heart... the INWARD MAN...

The heart KNOWS no TIME, nor does it KNOW chronology... it is embedded in the ETERNAL LOVE of CHRIST which DWARFS and COMPLETELY passes (temporal) KNOWLEDGE...

(Eph 3:16-19 ) and HAS no BEGINNING or END, as is commonly found in TIME and in its "little brother", ...CHRONOLOGY...

PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 02:05:24 AM
Quote from: willieH on August 21, 2008, 01:58:33 AM
For instance... the LAMB SLAIN from the foundation of the WORLD... IS... a NOW thing, ...not a "was" or "will be" thing...
This comes into crystal clarity over the Bread and Cup.  I stand before Him on the Cross daily, while at the same time communing with the Risen Conquerer of Death and the Unseen.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 02:13:22 AM
Quote from: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 01:57:47 AM
baptised WITH FIRE?....SEEMS like Christ to me, could this be the SAME FIRE willie talks about..or are these two different fires....that being the LAKE...or does this fire have two different purposes..
I've even heard Rod Parsley, an ET preacher from Columbus, Ohio, say that it's the exact same fire and that the only difference is the condition of the heart.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 02:21:55 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 02:13:22 AM
Quote from: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 01:57:47 AM
baptised WITH FIRE?....SEEMS like Christ to me, could this be the SAME FIRE willie talks about..or are these two different fires....that being the LAKE...or does this fire have two different purposes..
I've even heard Rod Parsley, an ET preacher from Columbus, Ohio, say that it's the exact same fire and that the only difference is the condition of the heart.
Im asking Martin , not enquiring who else said it...got an opinion yourself?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 02:24:41 AM
Quote from: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 02:21:55 AM
Im asking Martin , not enquiring who else said it...got an opinion yourself?
There's no question to me that it's the exact same fire.  I'm just startled that ETers can see and believe the same thing, while still drawing an opposite conclusion.  That's the good ol' KJV for you, as well as long standing tradition of nonsense about the "fate" of the wicked.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 02:31:10 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 02:24:41 AM
Quote from: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 02:21:55 AM
Im asking Martin , not enquiring who else said it...got an opinion yourself?
There's no question to me that it's the exact same fire.  I'm just startled that ETers can see and believe the same thing, while still drawing an opposite conclusion.  That's the good ol' KJV for you, as well as long standing tradition of nonsense about the "fate" of the wicked.
yall have to forgive me matey...I really pay no interest to any preacher out there...MR P inc..who ever he is,,Thanks for clarifying Bro :icon_flower:

so, could we conclude that Christ is this CONSUMING fire,which is Now ,and which was ,and which is to COME,being the same Fire , named the lake of fire...if this be so ?what willie suggests ,The Lake being Christ AS WELL, is NOW....simple enough for simple minds like me...

:icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 02:35:35 AM
QuoteI'm sorry if this might sound a bit confusing to some... but to note SPIRITUAL concepts in words, is sometimes a difficult endeavor...
ya dont say...just love that saying...Steve Martin\ John Candy..Cars , trains and automobiles something like that
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 02:44:14 AM
Quote from: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 02:31:10 AM
so, could we conclude that Christ is this CONSUMING fire,which is Now ,and which was ,and which is to COME,being the same Fire , named the lake of fire...if this be so ?what willie suggests ,The Lake being Christ AS WELL, is NOW....simple enough for simple minds like me...
This being the case, where's the need for afterlife punishment?  The difference between how the Lake relates to us and how it relates to the world is based upon the condition of the heart.  Ananias and Sapphira evidently weren't overcomers when they lied.  They weren't in a state of inheriting the Kingdom of God.  And they were hurt by the Second Death which is the penalty of all sins unrepented of by the world, or by believers after the Blood atonement of Christ has been received, but they're continuing in willful sin.  St. Paul indicated that when we judge ourselves we are chastened so that we're not judged with the world.  And the implication was that sickness and death as a result of unrepented of sin is being judged with the world.  Not all physical death would be being judged with the world, but the particular deaths that St. Paul indicated in 1Corinthians 11 from not rightly discerning the Lord's Body and from not judging ourselves when we've sinned (i.e. as being in the wrong and repenting, or maintaining good faith with a previous act of repentance per 1John 1:7-9.  If you've previously repented of the same thing, just rejoice in your cleansing from all unrighteousness rather than spending time developing a sin consciousness).  Again, I'm just looking at St. Paul's comments in 1Corinthians 11 and thinking "if words mean anything, then..." regarding sin, righteousness, and the judgment to come (which is a moment by moment thing in this world).
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 21, 2008, 02:46:27 AM
Quote from: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 02:31:10 AM
so, could we conclude that Christ is this CONSUMING fire,which is Now ,and which was ,and which is to COME,being the same Fire , named the lake of fire...if this be so ?what willie suggests ,The Lake being Christ AS WELL, is NOW....simple enough for simple minds like me...

:icon_flower:

For me, the Noah story is a good similtude.  

Christ is the Ark.  Those in Ark were not "swimming in the water/fire".  They did not get hurt by it.  They received their reward.  Those who did not build there lives upon the Rock (ark), saw their world come crashing down.  The fire/water destroyed them.  Left desolate with a perptual shame.  The fire imo, is the water/rain/flood.  

I see a fire that tries one's faith as different than the fire that destroys.  I agree with Craig that believers do not get hurt of the LOF, they "rise" above the waters.    

I don't see the new testament written in a way that is talking about "wheat/tares" within.  

Paul imo, was referring to two different sets of peoples in Galatians (Isaacs and Ishamaels).  Law zealot jews/OC Israel, and those called and chosen to come out of that whoredom.

I lean toward a preterist view, and believe that those who built their house upon the "law", saw there house come crashing down.  Those given eyes to see, and ears to hear received reward.  

Where/what  I personally struggle with, is today are we still having two sets of "people", one's hardened, and ones shown mercy just as in the New testament times,

or is it all fulfilled, and the working out of the NEW in us can be viewed as a "wheat/tares" in us, with one part being burned, and one part Living (which would be along the lines of Taffy, Willie, and Pneuma).

or are there many many layers that scripture can be interpreted and all "right".

just my opinion at this time.  

blesssings


Laren

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 03:42:28 AM
QuoteThis being the case, where's the need for afterlife punishment?  The difference between how the Lake relates to us and how it relates to the world is based upon the condition of the heart. 

Christ conditions the heart Martin,  Tis truly all his doing, when I say this, some pots for Honour..you Know the rest,
but each moulded from the  same Piece....


For me Like Pharoah, ALL is done for HIS GLORY...not out understanding....

it comes to what we percieve to Be CORRECTION,..we do look at things carnally, not truly grasping the LOVE of GOD.

as Laren stated with the ARK..Christ is our rest NOW, we receive OUR REWARD now, as did \do those who Drowned beneath the WATERS....BOTH recieved ....

we PAY our dues NOW,..each and every MAN...., I can only see a JUST GOD,...I also see Life eternal Being Now ,But different to immortality..shared this with Seth yrs back, and( laren a few weeks back)..seems thesedays he preaches it....To me thats our REWARD....NOW,... as those who  DO not believe or live beneath the waters.....reap theirs now...ALLS FAIR from My perspective,....
FOR ME, to many christians believe theres still MORE...I dont see that,

ITS ALL FINISHED....paid for...done complete....

we LIVE FOR HIS GLORY, not ours....

so, what of these Hitler types.?..like paul..he was Converted Instantly..thats how easy it is...if HE WANTS IT THAT WAY...

No Martin, I dont expect the Likes of the hitlers etc to suffer any more or less than we do when we were converted..the whole purpose is to see LIFE....we just are BLESSED to see it NOW....THATS OUR REWARD NOW.

ITS not something I wait for, oh yes Bro ,I long to Be rid of this crap body...ill tell you about it sometime, started at 15 and has plagued me since,,,gee matey I COULD HAVE  Much to Curse our Lord for for doing this to me,,,,but bro..im not flesh..im spirit,thats the BIGGER PICTURE.

sorry bud, Im no post thingy ma jig....God heals within in..and it got nothing to do with HEALTH,

ITS OUR PART, the fleshy PART, the Contrary PART... which is purified in the LAKE....we are Just purified In the Mind before HAND,understanding the Love its done in , First hand,...which will come as a Bigger shock for those who never..makes more sence to me than what ever I seen written ....what ever the ISM....

wow... wheres the scrips..not like me....but there again that time will come

oh annias etc.... they never TRULY gave up THIER ""PART""""""""""""..they were stealers...we all give up OUR part COMPLETELY..OR YOULL reap His vengeance...... so the INNER part can BE MADE MANIFEST..theirs ONLY one winner...and I aint going to argue :icon_flower:











Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 21, 2008, 03:47:46 AM
willieH: Hi sotw... :hithere:

Quote from: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 12:59:45 AM
I think what throws a lot of people from this passage is the fact, that again appealing to chronology, Revelation 20 implies bodily resurrection prior to the Lake of Fire judgment.

Quote from: SOtW on August 21, 2008, 01:20:44 AMThe Lake of Fire is part of the Revelation of Jesus Christ. That is not in dispute, so I have no idea why it is even the title of this. The issue WillieH makes is that we are presently living in the Lake of Fire, that is in dispute.

Your arrogance preceeds you... Many have no understanding of the LOF... and you propose to RENAME this THREAD in your own honor...  :thumbdown:

Dispute is fine... it is part of the process in which we share ideas... and logically arrive at REASON... I welcome your dispute...  :thumbsup:

Quote from: SOtW on August 21, 2008, 01:20:44 AMThe Lake of Fire is Second Death.

It is your "UNDERSTANDING" of Rev 20:14-15 ...that results in your FINITE observation of it bro...

DEATH (both spiritual and physical) and HELL [hades/grave]... Were CAST INTO the LAKE of FIRE... DEATH and HELL, ...being CAST INTO the LAKE of FIRE, ...IS, the 2nd DEATH...

DEATH and HELL [hades/grave] are active elements/scenarios in THIS LIFE, on THIS EARTH... NOW... CHRIST also noted that the JUDGMENT of THIS WORLD is NOW... (John 12:31)

DEATH (spiritual and physical) and HELL [hades/grave] are the 2 elements that CHRIST overcame IN THIS LIFE...

QuoteSecond Death has no power over those who trust in the Lord. If it has no power, it has no power period; that means, no power to correct, no power to lift up and edify, no power to destroy, no power at all.

Your finite perspective clouds SPIRITUAL vision Craig...

You (in my observation) misunderstand...

While we are "in the body of THIS DEATH" (Rom 7:23-24) ... correction DEFINITELY takes place in the here and now... which is WHY Scripture has been given to us (2 Tim 3:16) WHILE we ARE (in THIS LIFE as was PAUL), IN the BODY of THIS DEATH...

CHRIST overcame BOTH DEATHS and HELL [hades/grave].  Those IN CHRIST, overcome IN HIM... they are part of the FIRST resurrection... and their SIN is found CLOTHED (covered IN HIM -- Rev 3:18)

The 1st DEATH men DIE, is SPIRITUAL (which death CHRIST "tasted for us" to redeem us FROM) (let the DEAD bury their DEAD -- (Matt 8:22)... He said this of [physically] "Living" men, burying [physically] Dead men...

The 2nd DEATH is PHYSICAL and once it has been entered INTO, it has no POWER over those who trusted in CHRIST as their SIN is COVERED, rendering SIN's "REPORT" before GOD, POWERLESS ...(NAKEDNESS of SHAME -- Rev 3:18)

Quote from: SOtW on August 21, 2008, 01:20:44 AMThere is no way around what both Martin and I brought up, scripturally, biblically, logically, reasonably or even emotionally. To say we are living in the Lake of Fire is not just is not the case.

You (to the point of nausea) accuse others of using fallitious arguements, and here, INSTEAD of using SCRIPTURE, ...you seek to add Martin as a fellow proponent in YOUR arguement, and thereby try to FALSELY verify that arguement... please...   :grin:

Martin admittedly noted IMPLICATION of RESURRECTION, which actually is NOT IN THE TEXT...  And He also admitted that he is UNDECIDED about this issue, and was GLAD it had been presented for discussion!  :thumbsup:

You FALSELY note him as decided IN YOUR FAVOR (which he IS NOT), in hopes to validate your own position bro...  :dontknow:

If you wish to "DISPUTE"... try doing it on your own...  :dontknow:

That YOU say above, that my statement that THIS LIFE, IS the LAKE of FIRE, is "not the case", in no way PROVES what you say to be true... nor does it prove my statement to be false...

This is not BIBLICAL DISPUTE... it is reduced to what it IS, ...YOUR OPINION only...   :Sparkletooth:

QuoteThe Lake of Fire is final Judgment for those who continued to live according to their sinful natures, for those who did not continue to trust in the Lord (described as keeping their robes clean in the blood of Christ).

More inaccurate opinion of what IS WRITTEN!  There is no such notation that the LAKE of FIRE is any FINAL judgment... :mnah:  If there is, please note the verse...  :dontknow:

This is just TRADITIONAL "church"... hocus-pocus...  :thumbdown:  It is without SPIRITUAL insight, and is based upon OPINION and a NATURAL/LITERAL observation of SPIRITUAL/SYMBOLIC notations...

WE do not, "keep our robes clean"... CHRIST does this FOR US, ...IN US...

NO MAN, can do anything BUT SIN... until CHRIST changes that nature and lives within that ONE, of HIS DOING...  

We are HIS WORKMANSHIP Craig, ...NOT our own...  We do not ascend to the LIGHT via OUR decided, abandonment of the SINFUL NATURE... ...HE rescues us from ALL DEATH that encompasses each of us, bro... in HIS due time (2 Tim 2:3-6)

Quote from: SOtW on August 21, 2008, 01:20:44 AMThere is no way around what both Martin and I brought up so simply which says this life, or present age, is NOT the Lake of Fire.

Again... Martin (unlike you) noted himself undecided on this issue... and also as I said above, that IMPLICATION of RESURRECTION (which does not appear)... is in part why, the LAKE of FIRE is traditionally observed...

You stating the LOF is not THIS LIFE, has not proven a thing...

Your observation makes GOD subject to TIME and CHRONOLOGY Craig... He IS NOT... He is NOT encumbered by it whatosoever... neither is He SUBJECT to IT in ANY WAY or at ANY TIME...  :happygrin:

Furthermore, your teaching is that of FEAR... and within the grip of FEAR'S TORMENT does your doctrine writhe... not GOOD NEWS... rather, it is the negative prophecy which, as does the ET belief, conveniently DISINCLUDES yourself, while comfortably condemning others to future PAIN... and SUFFERING...  :thumbdown:

Teaching just another "alternative" version of HELL which YOU think you have sidestepped...

You are in for a big surprise... for it is the SHAME of this misrepresentation of GOD, which you shall carry into RESURRECTION, unless SEEKING, ...you shall find GOD's LOVE within the entire message you preach...  For if any portion of LOVE, is PRIDEFULLY disregarded... that portion shall bear its SHAME...

You're a smart guy brother, ...Stick to what YOU know...  and try speaking for yourself, instead of grabbing others by the inaccurate "nape of the quote" in hopes their words might somehow back or "verify" what you say...  :laughing7:

Might I conclude with the sincere hope,  :cloud9: ...that you shall soon find, the length, and depth and breadth and height of His LOVE brother, ...which PASSES KNOWLEDGE... it really IS ...COMPLETELY, ...GOOD NEWS!

Forsaking the doom & gloom approach, in which most find permeating themselves and their report of GOD to others...

PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on August 21, 2008, 03:52:53 AM
Hi Willie,

Just for clarification,  do you believe this physical life, from birth to physical death is the lake of fire or only part of it?   Does this extend after this physical life or is it over when we die on this earth?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 03:57:49 AM
GUYS

Be Nice,..lets have a GOOD healthy discussion....you bring out the BEST and worst of you,..you BOTH KNOW this....

:icon_flower: :icon_flower: :icon_flower: :icon_flower: :icon_flower:



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 04:15:10 AM
Quote from: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 03:57:49 AM
Be Nice,..lets have a GOOD healthy discussion....you bring out the BEST and worst of you,..you BOTH KNOW this....
That's one of the reasons I've jumped into this one as far as I have, so that I could keep additional ideas on the table so that it doesn't degenerate into a tit-for-tat.  In fairness to Craig, Willie, I recently quoted Hosea 13:14 and Zechariah 9:11 in support as passages for deliverance from Hell.  If Craig didn't see that or take that as a belief in temporary [afterlife] Hell on my part, it wouldn't be hard for others to have taken me that way if they hadn't seen my other posts on Gehenna, Sheol, Hades, Matthew 25's judgment, 1Corinthians 5 judgment by fire, Tartarus, and the Lake of Fire, which I'm seeing as easily divided between judgments over wrong beliefs/paradigms/teachings and our works.  I'm having serious questions about any of that related to the next life when I see what the judgments are, what they're about, and how weak of an argument for punishment's duration that even "ages of ages" is.  The fire isn't physical, as is easily observed by comparing the Greek between fire passages related to judgment and the fire passage when Peter was warming his hands on the night that Jesus was arrested.  If the fire isn't physical, then why it's related to another age or location [beyond this world] is beyond my comprehension since I can't find specific Scriptures teaching that.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 21, 2008, 04:19:57 AM
willieH: Hi brother Paul   :dsunny:

Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on August 21, 2008, 03:52:53 AM
Hi Willie,

Just for clarification,  do you believe this physical life, from birth to physical death is the lake of fire or only part of it?   Does this extend after this physical life or is it over when we die on this earth?

I believe THIS LIFE alone, is the LAKE of FIRE... and that the only thing which remains for anyone, is to be raised CLOTHED in CHRIST finding the RICHES (Rom 2:4 / Rev 3:18) in that "clothing"... OR... to be raised in the SHAME of CHRIST-LESS misrepresentation of Him, or purposed disregard and ignorance of Him...

Either way, there is no TORMENTING FIRE which shall burn anyone... rather, the PASSIONATE, FORGIVING and TENDER LOVE of GOD... welcoming home, the myriads of prodigals, ...wiping away the tears of their GOD GIVEN, (Rom 2:4) repentent sorrow, from their eyes, all to the JOY of those witnessing,  ...the kings which actually KNEW Him, and HE THEM, while in THIS LIFE, ...the LAKE of FIRE... to the EVERLASTING  GLORY of the KING of kings, ...JESUS CHRIST...

Hope that answers your question brother P...  :cloud9:

PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 04:29:18 AM
Quote from: willieH on August 21, 2008, 04:19:57 AM
willieH: Hi brother Paul   :dsunny:

Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on August 21, 2008, 03:52:53 AM
Hi Willie,

Just for clarification,  do you believe this physical life, from birth to physical death is the lake of fire or only part of it?   Does this extend after this physical life or is it over when we die on this earth?

I believe THIS LIFE alone, is the LAKE of FIRE... and that the only thing which remains for anyone, is to be raised CLOTHED in CHRIST finding the RICHES (Rom 2:4 / Rev 3:18) in that "clothing"... OR... to be raised in the SHAME of CHRIST-LESS misrepresentation of Him, or purposed disregard and ignorance of Him...

Either way, there is no TORMENTING FIRE which shall burn anyone... rather, the PASSIONATE, FORGIVING and TENDER LOVE of GOD... welcoming home, the myriads of prodigals, ...wiping away the tears of their GOD GIVEN, (Rom 2:4) repentent sorrow, from their eyes, all to the JOY of those witnessing,  ...the kings which actually KNEW Him, and HE THEM, while in THIS LIFE, ...the LAKE of FIRE... to the EVERLASTING  GLORY of the KING of kings, ...JESUS CHRIST...

Hope that answers your question brother P...  :cloud9:

PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:

If ya dont mind....ill witness it..AMEN.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on August 21, 2008, 04:29:40 AM

I think that gets me a better idea of where you are coming from.   I have  more questions about this lake of fire from your perspective.  

What spiritual purpose can this lake of fire serve if it is happening while we are still in physical bodies?

And what is actually happening to us in the perspective of knowing there are believers and non believers both.  

Is it possible for anyone to avoid the lake of fire and how so?




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 21, 2008, 04:34:46 AM
Quote from: NThis is part of my recent difficulty [this year] with afterlife punishments.  While we're walking by faith and not by sight, we're not judged with the world.  That's 100% true, and how I'm taking 1Corinthians 11.  Looking at Willie's argument for a second, if there were a separation between us and the Lake of Fire, then it would be because we were judging ourselves, according to 1Corinthians 11 so that we're not judged with the world.  For me, right now, both views on this thread seem like an over-simplification in some ways.  St. Paul teaches that we reign now, and that the world abides under God's wrath now.  John's Gospel brings up the fact that the world is presently under wrath as well in the 3rd chapter, with the implication that we come out of wrath into salvation.

My view has never been expressed, every time I express it, there is a tailspin argument on the meaning of 'Fire' and so forth which has relevance but no important in describing what the Lake of Fire is. The over-simplification of what I present in rebuttal, is not my position, it is an objection to the proposed argument that we are in the Lake of Fire right now.

Things like, if we are in the Lake of Fire right now, then what happened to those who don't repent while in the Lake of Fire, this current life? They don't reap what they sow, because everyone dies in this life and there is evil in this world where a righteous man dies poor, sick, and alone; while a wicked man dies rich, healthy and with many children beside him.

So concerning Paul's writings, I agree with him. We are presently reigning now with Christ, and the world is under God's wrath now. God said to me in a vision, my wrath only abides on men while they live. So I have no objection to this Paul or the position that we reign now, and God's judgment is now.

There are just so many scenarios that are unscriptural in nature and unbiblical in practice which are a result of believing that the Lake of Fire (Second Death) is now. I already mentioned one. Another would be if someone who repents is delivered from the darkness and into the light; let us say that the believer now is not in the Lake of Fire, but prior to this, he was and endured the wrath of God up until the day they repented, that would be good and dandy, except I would then be an exception. I know I am not that special not to ever endured the world. I knew Jesus from the day I could comprehend that I was alive, and what about all the babies who were aborted or born and died in crib death? They never had a chance to repent of anything let alone commit anything worthy of the wrath of God. We know that the Kingdom of God belongs to the children.

If someone actually would have a civil conversation and actually extrapolate each instance of dissension for agreement and understanding, we may actually get somewhere with the discussion. I cannot explain what I know, because I am so aware of what it is I know I don't know where a person needs to start in order for me to explain. Though, some will think this is pride, that I am not willing to learn from them, this is quite the opposite, I learn much from them despite our disagreements there are some profound things people have learned that I did not know and I do openly accept them.

Craig
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 21, 2008, 04:36:02 AM
Quote from: willieH on August 21, 2008, 04:19:57 AM
willieH: Hi brother Paul   :dsunny:

Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on August 21, 2008, 03:52:53 AM
Hi Willie,

Just for clarification,  do you believe this physical life, from birth to physical death is the lake of fire or only part of it?   Does this extend after this physical life or is it over when we die on this earth?

I believe THIS LIFE alone, is the LAKE of FIRE... and that the only thing which remains for anyone, is to be raised CLOTHED in CHRIST finding the RICHES (Rom 2:4 / Rev 3:18) in that "clothing"... OR... to be raised in the SHAME of CHRIST-LESS misrepresentation of Him, or purposed disregard and ignorance of Him...

Either way, there is no TORMENTING FIRE which shall burn anyone... rather, the PASSIONATE, FORGIVING and TENDER LOVE of GOD... welcoming home, the myriads of prodigals, ...wiping away the tears of their GOD GIVEN, (Rom 2:4) repentent sorrow, from their eyes, all to the JOY of those witnessing,  ...the kings which actually KNEW Him, and HE THEM, while in THIS LIFE, ...the LAKE of FIRE... to the EVERLASTING  GLORY of the KING of kings, ...JESUS CHRIST...

Hope that answers your question brother P...  :cloud9:

PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:


I don't disagree with most of it, only the part that you actually think that what you explained is the Lake of Fire.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 04:50:44 AM
QuoteWhat spiritual purpose can this lake of fire serve if it is happening while we are still in physical bodies?

Hi Paul...for mine if I may....

The Lake ,which is Christ ,as is the Fire we are Baptised in...serves ONE purpose...the purification of the Heart and Mind...Christianity is Not something WE DO...its what we are...

The lake , like the sword ,divides and seperates the Flesh from the Spirit, its Purpose is to RE-- VEAL,the HIDDEN man of the Heart,..which Paul calls the Mystery of the AGES...Christ Lies asleep In the HEART of  all MEN,...( wow,,,now thats a Can of worms)Scripture speaks accordingly...one  who is ASLEEP, or OR SLEEPING or dead to HIM, which willie notes as OUR spiritual DEATH.....

so  ,THROUGH the death of the Flesh..just as the Lake which kills flesh , EACH soul will have ITS PART in it...will Live In HIS LIFE...the LAKE seperates THE FLESH from spirit....


Taffy
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 21, 2008, 04:53:51 AM
Quote from: willieH on August 21, 2008, 04:19:57 AM
...to be raised in the SHAME of CHRIST-LESS misrepresentation of Him, or purposed disregard and ignorance of Him...



this part is what I would call the LOF. 

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 04:58:24 AM
QuoteIf someone actually would have a civil conversation and actually extrapolate each instance of dissension for agreement and understanding, we may actually get somewhere with the discussion. I cannot explain what I know, because I am so aware of what it is I know I don't know where a person needs to start in order for me to explain. Though, some will think this is pride, that I am not willing to learn from them, this is quite the opposite, I learn much from them despite our disagreements there are some profound things people have learned that I did not know and I do openly accept them.

Craig Bro,,Tis a discussion, Like willie has done and presented by word of scripture ,his Views ..Please Bro ,do the same...

if By presenting , then as paul has done to Willie ,asking questions..then Bro, others can do likewise with what you propose..tis an OPEN court,.... :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 21, 2008, 05:00:29 AM
This imo, is the lake of fire:


Jer 23:39  Therefore, behold, I, even I, will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you, and the city that I gave you and your fathers, and cast you out of my presence:

Jer 23:40  And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 05:02:16 AM
Martin..tis 3am here time for me beauty sleep  :happy3:   ...you got the Night shift Bro :Sparkletooth:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 21, 2008, 05:02:41 AM
Quote from: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 04:58:24 AM
QuoteIf someone actually would have a civil conversation and actually extrapolate each instance of dissension for agreement and understanding, we may actually get somewhere with the discussion. I cannot explain what I know, because I am so aware of what it is I know I don't know where a person needs to start in order for me to explain. Though, some will think this is pride, that I am not willing to learn from them, this is quite the opposite, I learn much from them despite our disagreements there are some profound things people have learned that I did not know and I do openly accept them.

Craig Bro,,Tis a discussion, Like willie has done and presented by word of scripture ,his Views ..Please Bro ,do the same...

if By presenting , then as paul has done to Willie ,asking questions..then Bro, others can do likewise with what you propose..tis an OPEN court,.... :icon_flower:

I do many times, most of what WillieH brings up is not relevant to the Lake of Fire. He doesn't want to learn, he wants to 'teach'. So he won't answer any questions I have for him, nor will he agree on any statements I make that are correct. It is how he stays in control, and I don't play that game anymore. If he wants to have a discussion, he needs to stop with the many questions fallacy and discuss each point as they come up. Otherwise, I am having discussion with Martin, Paul and yourself, and totally ignoring what Willie has to say because most of it means nothing to the discussion.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 21, 2008, 05:03:24 AM
Quote from: laren on August 21, 2008, 05:00:29 AM
This imo, is the lake of fire:


Jer 23:39  Therefore, behold, I, even I, will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you, and the city that I gave you and your fathers, and cast you out of my presence:

Jer 23:40  And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten.

Yep.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 21, 2008, 05:16:05 AM
Heb 12:18  For ye are not come unto the mount that might be touched, and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and tempest,

Heb 12:22  But ye are come unto mount Zion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,

Heb 12:23  To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

Heb 12:24  And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.

Heb 12:28  Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:


Heb 12:25  See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven:

Heb 12:29  For our God is a consuming fire.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 21, 2008, 05:30:28 AM
willieH: Hi Paul... :hithere:

Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on August 21, 2008, 04:29:40 AM

I think that gets me a better idea of where you are coming from.   I have  more questions about this lake of fire from your perspective.  

What spiritual purpose can this lake of fire serve if it is happening while we are still in physical bodies?

We are amidst the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL which has everything to do with SPIRITUAL understanding, and gives differentiation between the two while in the Flesh...

CHRIST was made in FLESH (Heb 2:9), for the specific reason of suffering of DEATH... that He might CONQUER IT, for ALL...

It was SPIRITUAL LIGHT shining amidst SPIRITUAL DARKNESS...

Suffering is PART of the COMPLETION process bro... (Heb 2:10) ...and we ALL follow CHRIST in suffering, which occurs HERE and NOW... It did FOR HIM, ...it DOES for US...

By SUFFERING, we are made in HIS LIKENESS...

QuoteAnd what is actually happening to us in the perspective of knowing there are believers and non believers both.

In order for BELIEF/FAITH to be displayed, DISBELIEF/FAITHLESSNESS must contrast it... 

GOD concludes ALL to UNBELIEF... (Rom 11:32)... that MERCY might be shown to ALL...

The reason for UNBELIEF is to display the MERCY of GOD...

QuoteIs it possible for anyone to avoid the lake of fire and how so?

NO... :mnah:

ALL have been concluded as UNBELIEVERS (Rom 11:32) which is one of several qualifying aspects for participation in the LAKE of FIRE (Rev 21:8)

God is NO RESPECTER of PERSONS... all that IS, is OF HIM (1 Cor 8:6 / Col 1:16-20 / John 1:3)


PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 21, 2008, 05:41:29 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 21, 2008, 05:02:41 AM
I do many times, most of what WillieH brings up is not relevant to the Lake of Fire.

Opinion...  :thumbdown:

QuoteHe doesn't want to learn, he wants to 'teach'. So he won't answer any questions I have for him, nor will he agree on any statements I make that are correct.

:grave:  You are the one not answering questions...  and ALWAYS,  the ONE on TENTMAKER, which ALWAYS refuses to "learn"  :laughing7:


QuoteIt is how he stays in control, and I don't play that game anymore. If he wants to have a discussion, he needs to stop with the many questions fallacy and discuss each point as they come up.

Making up rules as he goes...  :laughing7:  the "many questions fallacy?"  Please...  :thumbdown:  As if asking many questions is a FALLACY...  :pointlaugh:

QuoteOtherwise, I am having discussion with Martin, Paul and yourself, and totally ignoring what Willie has to say because most of it means nothing to the discussion.

:Yeahright:  Displayed by yet another meaningless, Scriptureless, answerless post...

I am quite content not to discuss with you...  :myahoo:  ...for you only know how to talk,  :blahgreen: :blah:  :director: :help:

And remain as always,  deaf of ear...  :sigh:

PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 21, 2008, 07:31:27 AM
Whether I post Scripture or not, WillieH consistently finds some excuse not to accept it. In the beginning, that is all I did was present my opinion with Scripture, and I was accused of posting too much Scripture and now I am being accused of having no point because my posts are without Scripture.

Quoteas if asking many questions is a FALLACY...


I am not making anything up, you just demonstrate you don't know what you are talking about.

Many Question Fallacy: The truth of A is assumed within the original premise about A. Thus A is not really proven by the argument. This may occur through a simple statement or via a more complex set of statements that go around in a circle and eventually 'prove' the original statement to be true.

QuoteYou are the one not answering questions... 

Actually I am one of the few who actually addresses and answers most questions. I just do not participate in the many questions fallacy. If a question stands alone without presupposition, then it is answered. If a question is followed by more questions and statements, then it is not a question and does not get addressed.

Quoteam quite content not to discuss with you......for you only know how to talk,

Once again, you prove my point. I pointed this out earlier, you just confirm it. Not many have problems with how I communicate. The reason this is happening is like clockwork.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 21, 2008, 07:46:19 AM
Quote from: SOTWI knew Jesus from the day I could comprehend that I was alive,


Me, too.  But I have friends who are only starting to know him recently, well into adulthood.

So, are you saying that the wrath of God is the default position for those who don't know Jesus?

And, those who do know Jesus are judged in this life? (which is more a case of being guided?)

Then,what happens to both groups after death?

Why is it a lake?  I'm sure you've noticed the Greek word--limne--meaning 'by nearness to shore', from the root word meaning 'safe harbor.'
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 21, 2008, 07:50:42 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 21, 2008, 07:46:19 AM
Quote from: SOTWI knew Jesus from the day I could comprehend that I was alive,


Me, too.  But I have friends who are only starting to know him recently, well into adulthood.

So, are you saying that the wrath of God is the default position for those who don't know Jesus?

And, those who do know Jesus are judged in this life? (which is more a case of being guided?)

Then,what happens to both groups after death?

Why is it a lake?  I'm sure you've noticed the Greek word--limne--meaning 'by nearness to shore', from the root word meaning 'safe harbor.'

I am not saying that at all. That is what WillieH is claiming by saying that we are in the Lake of Fire now. Notice how I am accused of not answering questions, yet always address and answer them when I can; but when I present questions and dilemma's WillieH does not address or answer them. Ask WillieH if he believes that the wrath of God is the default position for those who don't know Jesus.

Molly, I have addressed the rootword fallacy concerning lake. It is a lake, not a safe harbor. However, you make a good point. If God is the Lake of Fire, why was it not called the Ocean of Fire or the Sea of Fire, because that would represent God better than a lake.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 21, 2008, 07:51:09 AM
Quote from: laren on August 21, 2008, 05:00:29 AM
This imo, is the lake of fire:


Jer 23:39  Therefore, behold, I, even I, will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you, and the city that I gave you and your fathers, and cast you out of my presence:

Jer 23:40  And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten.

yikes! :mshock:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 21, 2008, 07:54:30 AM
Quote from: SOTWMolly, I have addressed the rootword fallacy concerning lake. It is a lake, not a safe harbor. However, you make a good point. If God is the Lake of Fire, why was it not called the Ocean of Fire or the Sea of Fire, because that would represent God better than a lake.

Yes, why a lake?  It also means 'pond.'  A small body of water.  Lakes are/can be cozy, compared to a huge body of water like the ocean.

Could it be something --personal?

Anyway, I'm trying to figure out your position on it--which I understand so far to not pertain to believers,-- and happens after death to nonbelievers?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 21, 2008, 07:58:59 AM
I have stated my position many times. The Lake of Fire is the judgment which happens at physical death for the wicked. It is corrective punishment which is reserved for the persistent wicked so that they may enter the Kingdom of God. It is the Day of Light which reveals each man's work, the righteous receive their reward because the fire has no power over them nor does it hurt them, but for the wicked they lose everything and are near cursed but are saved but like one through fire. We as believers have already access to the Tree of Life, even while we live; but those who are outside must go through the fire that blocks the way.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 21, 2008, 08:04:01 AM
Oh!  This fire:

23 So the Lord God drove the man out of the Garden of Eden to work the ground he had been made out of. 24 The Lord God drove him out and then placed cherubim on the east side of the Garden of Eden. He also placed a flaming sword there. It flashed back and forth. The cherubim and the sword guarded the way to the tree of life.

--Gen 3
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 21, 2008, 08:09:40 AM
Right, there are more than that reference in regarding to what this fire is in Old Testament. It is far more difficult to explain than some simple explanation. As Martin said, WillieH's position seems (I believe it is) an over-simplification, people want answers quickly and in a simple package. These questions are far more complex to answer but because people are fearful, there is also a constant interference with fearful reasonings created by emotionalism, slippery slopes, straw men, and other constant fallacy. There is no simple answer to what the Lake of Fire is, and how it works.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 21, 2008, 08:11:05 AM
Cool! I got it. :girlheart:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on August 21, 2008, 08:18:05 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 21, 2008, 07:50:42 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 21, 2008, 07:46:19 AM
Quote from: SOTWI knew Jesus from the day I could comprehend that I was alive,


Me, too.  But I have friends who are only starting to know him recently, well into adulthood.

So, are you saying that the wrath of God is the default position for those who don't know Jesus?

And, those who do know Jesus are judged in this life? (which is more a case of being guided?)

Then,what happens to both groups after death?

Why is it a lake?  I'm sure you've noticed the Greek word--limne--meaning 'by nearness to shore', from the root word meaning 'safe harbor.'

I am not saying that at all. That is what WillieH is claiming by saying that we are in the Lake of Fire now. Notice how I am accused of not answering questions, yet always address and answer them when I can; but when I present questions and dilemma's WillieH does not address or answer them. Ask WillieH if he believes that the wrath of God is the default position for those who don't know Jesus.

Molly, I have addressed the rootword fallacy concerning lake. It is a lake, not a safe harbor. However, you make a good point. If God is the Lake of Fire, why was it not called the Ocean of Fire or the Sea of Fire, because that would represent God better than a lake.

When I combine your (Craig) and Mollies statement I have come to my own personal conclusion lake is a better word.
Sure God is big as a ocean. But the lake is punishment/correction. A lake can be quite big. But you see the shore. The end of punishment. And perhaps Jesus is the shore (Mollies safe harbor). When lost in the middle of the Atlantic ocean there is no hope. When lost in a lake you see the shore and have hope you can reach the shore where Jesus is waiting with a towel and bathrobe.
In a way lake=UR, ocean=ET

BTW I'm not picking a fight.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 08:23:01 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 21, 2008, 07:46:19 AM
Why is it a lake?  I'm sure you've noticed the Greek word--limne--meaning 'by nearness to shore', from the root word meaning 'safe harbor.'
Interesting.  I had an odd quickening from that, that my mind would have ordinarily blown off, that I'll have to pray out until I've got the interpretation, or the point of why that registered on my gut.  Nothing to add right now.  Just "hmmm...."  I'd heard it before though.  Not sure if it was from Preston Eby or from whom.

Quote from: Molly on August 21, 2008, 07:54:30 AM
...why a lake?  It also means 'pond.'  A small body of water.  Lakes are/can be cozy, compared to a huge body of water like the ocean.  Could it be something --personal?
Hmmm.... Again, nothing intelligent to add...yet...  I'm sincerely wondering what the usage of that word would be like in either the Septuignt or in other areas of ancient Greek.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 21, 2008, 08:24:39 AM
Craig--a little more here--

So the flaming sword is the Word, which is Jesus--the one who baptises with Spirit and fire?

I am the way--no one gets to the Father but by me--we have to go through Jesus to get to the Father, that is, to get [back] into the garden?

So--in a sense--aren't we believers doing this in our lifetime?  So maybe you and Willie are both right?

Pick up your cross and follow me--we are walking in the footsteps of Christ, now--following him through the fire into the garden.  Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death...Thou art with me...

Judgment begins at the house of God...

We are being purified now by the Word...
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 08:29:47 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 21, 2008, 08:24:39 AM
Craig--...maybe you and Willie are both right?
:omg: I sincerely hope you don't get clobbered by both of them for that statement :rolllol: :mrflo:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 21, 2008, 08:31:22 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 08:29:47 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 21, 2008, 08:24:39 AM
Craig--...maybe you and Willie are both right?
:omg: I sincerely hope you don't get clobbered by both of them for that statement :rolllol: :mrflo:
LOL thereby proving myself right.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on August 21, 2008, 08:42:36 AM
Quote from: willieH on August 21, 2008, 01:20:14 AM
willieH: Hi WW... :hithere:
Sorry that my post was not clear to you... I did not mean to go over anyone's head... guess I could've simplified... sorry...  :mblush:

I'm still clueless. Not only about what you wrote btw. About most/all answers in this thread.
The concept is above my head. I'm likey to new to this. I'll just keep monitoring this thread as I do with most other threads.
Anyway thanks trying to re-explain.
(btw strong opposing views in a discussion are a good learning point for me too. So guys and gals sharpen your  :swordfight: of  :HeartThrob: )
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 21, 2008, 08:52:32 AM
 Running wild here...


Psalm 110:4
The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.


An eternal priesthood on the order of  Melchizedek--priest of the most high God...

Priest and King [of Salem =peace/ Jerusalem--city of peace]

1 Peter 2:9
But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

Eternal kings and priests unto the Most High God..





9And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:


--Rev 14



"angels"=prophets, priests, and kings...teachers..




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 21, 2008, 08:57:59 AM
There's no harm in letting this thread stop here for the time being.  No one has to "prove" anything.  Lots of other threads to reply to and to start.  If emotions are starting to run high, then just try to leave it alone for now, unless Paul Hazelwood or anybody else has anything to either contribute or to specifically ask.  Sometimes threads like this die for a week or two, or even a month or two and either a newbie or just someone that hasn't been around in a while will give it fresh warm blood and get it out of it's rut.  Of the threads on the Lake of Fire that have thus far been done at these boards, I do feel as though this has been one of the more enlightening ones whatever the rest of you decide to do from this point forward.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 21, 2008, 03:07:16 PM
Mar 13:14  But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, let (him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judea flee to the mountains:

flee:

G5343
φεύγω
pheugō
fyoo'-go
Apparently a primary verb; to run away (literally or figuratively); by implication to shun; by analogy to vanish: - escape, flee (away).
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 21, 2008, 03:16:01 PM
Mar 13:16  And let him that is in the field not turn back again for to take up his garment.


turn back

G1994
ἐπιστρέφω
epistrephō
ep-ee-stref'-o
From G1909 and G4762; to revert (literally, figuratively or morally): - come (go) again, convert, (re-) turn (about, again).


garment

G2440
ἱμάτιον
himation
him-at'-ee-on
Neuter of a presumed derivative of ἕννυμι hennumi (to put on); a dress (inner or outer): - apparel, cloke, clothes, garment, raiment, robe, vesture.


Luk 16:19  There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 03:50:41 PM
Quote from:  LARENHI bRO

Where/what  I personally struggle with, is today are we still having two sets of "people", one's hardened, and ones shown mercy just as in the New testament times,

or is it all fulfilled, and the working out of the NEW in us can be viewed as a "wheat/tares" in us, with one part being burned, and one part Living (which would be along the lines of Taffy, Willie, and Pneuma).

or are there many many layers that scripture can be interpreted and all "right".

YeS matey..i came to my undertanding as you Know by LAW being the shadow,seeing TWO types everywhere...like the Pharisees being one type the Church the other...outward that is...BUT, that too tellS me of the In ward working process..its like it bears witness to it..get what I mean...hence the Wheat and the Tares.....the Tares the FLESH grow with the Hidden man, BUT when the HARVEST is ready,the tares( flesh) are Burnt....


you sort to see outwardly but also applied inwardly...,
Luk 17:35 Two [women] shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left

2Cr 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to [give] the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
2Cr 4:7  But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.
2Cr 4:10 Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body.

Rom 14:9  For to this end Christ both ((died, and rose)), and ((revived)), that he might be Lord BOTH of the **dead** and **living**.

T..
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 21, 2008, 04:55:26 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 03:50:41 PM



you sort to see outwardly but also applied inwardly...,
Luk 17:35 Two [women] shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left

2Cr 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to [give] the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
2Cr 4:7  But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.
2Cr 4:10 Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body.

Rom 14:9  For to this end Christ both ((died, and rose)), and ((revived)), that he might be Lord BOTH of the **dead** and **living**.

T..


Yeah G,

I do see it as both, and I do see your view and appreciate it.  Christ is always glorified, and the Fathers unconditional love is foremost. 

:grin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 21, 2008, 05:20:39 PM
2Cr 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to [give] the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

Is this the tree of life?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 21, 2008, 05:22:46 PM
Quote from: Molly on August 21, 2008, 05:20:39 PM
2Cr 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to [give] the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

Is this the tree of life?

:bigGrin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on August 21, 2008, 11:35:43 PM
willieH: Howdy bros  :icon_king: & sistiz  :icon_queen:

The proposal of VENGENCE beyond this life, be it HELL or be it another version of it that is proposed (by such as CRAIG - sotw) of the "Lake of Fire"...  is simply proposing that GOD in fact, resorts to the "EYE for EYE" brand of "justice" that is in the Natural... which CHRIST plainly taught as REMOVED by GRACE...

ANY proposals of teaching that we offer along with the GOOD NEWS of the Gospel and Reconciliation of ALL, must ALIGN with that GOOD NEWS... If not, the HOUSE is found DIVIDED...  and the message if scrutinized, is seen to be TWO FACED, and HYPOCRITICAL...

If, as such as CRAIG (sotw) teaches, ...that the LAKE of FIRE is a place of TORMENT in ANY WAY, and that SUFFERING is to be given out for SIN in ANY WAY... then these verses (among many others) are COMPROMISED:

2 Cor 5:19   The TRESPASSES are yet HELD against those of the WORLD...

Rom 5:18-20  The JUSTIFICATION is seen as CONDITIONAL and dependent upon OBEDIENCE, not upon GRACE...

John 1:29  The SIN in fact was NOT "taken away" for it remains a PUNISHABLE obligation...

Acts 10:34  God IS shown to be a RESPECTER of PERSONS, for OVERCOMING and being IN CHRIST, is not dependent upon our efforts at all...

So any left OUTSIDE CHRIST to be further PUNISHED, are found, DIS-RESPECTED by comparison, ...concerning the GRACE which relieves Christians from "punishment" for sin...

When JESUS stated the following He changed the observation, use and, practice of NATURAL [LAW/fleshly] JUSTICE which is EYE for EYE, to

DIVINE [SPIRITUAL/Grace] JUSTICE which is GRACE... for the LAW which REQUIRED and "EYE for and EYE", had been FULFILLED by Him for ALL:

(Luke 6:26) LOVE your enemies... BLESS them that CURSE you...

And this which states MERCY:

(Luke 6:32-36 / )  What "thank" have ye? ...be MERCIFUL as YOUR FATHER is MERCIFUL -- How is FATHER MERCIFUL? By LOVING the UNLOVEABLE, Forgiving the UNFORGIVEABLE... etc...

And this which states such, ...is PERFECTION:

(Matt 5:44-48) Be PEFECT as your FATHER is PERFECT... How?  By LOVING your enemies, BLESSING the ones that CURSE you... etc.

And this in which He pled to YHVH GOD on ALL of our behalfs:

(Luke 23:34)  Father FORGIVE them, for they KNOW NOT what they DO...


Furthermore... DIVINE JUDGMENT is not about doling out PUNISHMENT, as CRAIG (sotw) falsely teaches... it is about TEACHING RIGHTEOUSNESS:

(Is 26:9) ...When the JUDGMENT of GOD is IN the EARTH... RIGHTEOUSNESS is TAUGHT and thereby LEARNED...

PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 22, 2008, 12:49:46 AM
Craig,

My view is tentative and has been for some time.

I believe the LOF is a symbol for wrath & judgment of God.  Second death is death and hades being cast into in the LOF and therefore pictures the destruction of death and hades power over the wicked.  The purpose is slaying of the old man.

I don't know if reaping wrath & judgment now can be rightly referred to by 'LOF' and 'second death', but my tentative belief is that whether it can be referred to by those words or not, judgment now has the same quality and purpose as LOF and second death.  It's bad stuff intended to destroy stuff in man's will.  It's the removal of 'stony heart'.  It's Nebuchadnezzars 'abased pride' in Dan ch 4.  And I suspect that when Christ told the Zebedee bros. they would drink His cup, it was again the same.

Q1. How can it be said that those who are raised in Christ that the second death has no power over them.
A1. Because it doesn't.  Those who are in Christ have lost their life, given up their life for Christ.  There is no life to lose and nothing to judge and nothing to reap.  But they will have their faith tried in fire, but not of the 'snare' sort.  My own sub-Q to my own answer would be: What about when those who have risen in Christ fall back to the point where they must reap some more?  Do they re-enter the LOF or it's equivalent??  Well, I certainly think they will re-enter judgment, by whatever name you call it.  Ezekiel 18 comes to mind.

Q2. What happens to those who don't repent in this life?  When do they reap what they sow.
A2. They will be raised in the 2nd resurrection to be judged in the LOF and die the second death.  That's when they reap.  So you could say that I believe that only God's elect enter the LOF or it's equivalent now.

Q3. Craig would be an exception.
A3. It's kind of hard to address someone's personal experience.  Knowing Jesus and following Jesus are two different things.  I can know Jesus, know true doctrine, know His nature, know what He want's from me, and still not follow Him.  That's actually worse than not knowing!  Many stripes.  No one is an exception to 'there is none good, none seeking God' therefore I believe that all have or will incur the wrath of God.

Q4. Aborted babies
A4. Didn't go through LOF in this life.  Judged in the second resurrection.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 22, 2008, 02:21:42 AM
Quote from: willieH on August 21, 2008, 11:35:43 PMThe proposal of VENGENCE beyond this life, be it...

Why "beyond this life"?  If suffering beyond this life violates God's grace then so would suffering in this life.

Quoteis simply proposing that GOD in fact, resorts to the "EYE for EYE" brand of "justice" that is in the Natural... which CHRIST plainly taught as REMOVED by GRACE...

The purpose of "eye for an eye" is to get even and get rid of.  God's purpose for judgment is not like that.

QuoteANY proposals of teaching that we offer along with the GOOD NEWS of the Gospel and Reconciliation of ALL, must ALIGN with that GOOD NEWS... If not, the HOUSE is found DIVIDED...  and the message if scrutinized, is seen to be TWO FACED, and HYPOCRITICAL...

Grace and judgment are not in opposition.  God's judgment (chastisement) yields holiness and righteousness (Hebews 12).  Grace involves chastening (Titus 2:11).

Quote2 Cor 5:19   The TRESPASSES are yet HELD against those of the WORLD...

Sins held against would yield permanent death.  God's plan involving judgment leads to life.

The law as a schoolmaster:
1. man breaks the law
2. the law ministers death
3. man sees he is blind, naked, and dead.

Were sins held against, that would be end of story.

But
4. The law leads us to Christ and when we follow Him we are raised from death to life.

QuoteRom 5:18-20  The JUSTIFICATION is seen as CONDITIONAL and dependent upon OBEDIENCE, not upon GRACE...

Righteousness is defined in terms of DOING.

1 John 3:7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous. 

But DOING is ultimately dependent on grace (Eph 2:8-20)
1. Faith is a gift from God.
2. We are His workmanship created unto good works that God ordains us to walk in.

God takes away stony heart, gives a fleshy heart, causes us to walk in His commandments (Ezek 11:19-20)

Paul labored, yet not Paul labored, but the grace of God that was in him labored.

QuoteJohn 1:29  The SIN in fact was NOT "taken away" for it remains a PUNISHABLE obligation...

People still sin.  Sin has not yet been taken away from the world.

QuoteActs 10:34  God IS shown to be a RESPECTER of PERSONS, for OVERCOMING and being IN CHRIST, is not dependent upon our efforts at all...

Don't see how what I believe makes God a respector of persons.   God's choice or election is not dependant on anything about the person (his running or willing) only on how it suits God's plan.

QuoteSo any left OUTSIDE CHRIST to be further PUNISHED, are found, DIS-RESPECTED by comparison, ...concerning the GRACE which relieves Christians from "punishment" for sin...

Some sooner, some later.  Same deal though.

QuoteDIVINE [SPIRITUAL/Grace] JUSTICE which is GRACE... for the LAW which REQUIRED and "EYE for and EYE", had been FULFILLED by Him for ALL:

Again, the purpose of "eye for an eye" is to get even and get rid of.  God's purpose for judgment is to do good to the person being judged.

Quote(Luke 6:26) LOVE your enemies... BLESS them that CURSE you...

And this which states MERCY:

(Luke 6:32-36 / )  What "thank" have ye? ...be MERCIFUL as YOUR FATHER is MERCIFUL -- How is FATHER MERCIFUL? By LOVING the UNLOVEABLE, Forgiving the UNFORGIVEABLE... etc...

And this which states such, ...is PERFECTION:

(Matt 5:44-48) Be PEFECT as your FATHER is PERFECT... How?  By LOVING your enemies, BLESSING the ones that CURSE you... etc.

And this in which He pled to YHVH GOD on ALL of our behalfs:

(Luke 23:34)  Father FORGIVE them, for they KNOW NOT what they DO...

What God did to Nebuchadezzar in Daniel 4 involved torment & suffering, yet it was a loving, merciful, graceful plan by God.  In fact Nebuchadnezzar didn't say that God did something TO him, he said God had WROUGHT something TOWARD him, and spoke glowingly of what God had done.

Nebuchadnezzar's judgment was no fun, yet looking back on it, he would have wished it upon himself.  Therefore God was following the golden rule, not eye for an eye.

QuoteFurthermore... DIVINE JUDGMENT is not about doling out PUNISHMENT, as CRAIG (sotw) falsely teaches... it is about TEACHING RIGHTEOUSNESS:

Isaiah 26:10 Let favour be shewed to the wicked, yet will he not learn righteousness: in the land of uprightness will he deal unjustly, and will not behold the majesty of the LORD. 11 LORD, when thy hand is lifted up, they will not see: but they shall see, and be ashamed for their envy at the people; yea, the fire of thine enemies shall devour them

God compares His chastisement to that of an earthly father (which we call punishment), and says it yields holiness and righteousness.

Hebrews 12:8  But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. 9  Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected [us], and we gave [them] reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? 10  For they verily for a few days chastened [us] after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that [we] might be partakers of his holiness. 11 Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.

God's judgment is not eye for an eye because it is "for our profit" unlike parents who judge "for their own pleasure".


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 22, 2008, 02:47:08 AM
Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 12:49:46 AM
Craig,

My view is tentative and has been for some time.

I believe the LOF is a symbol for wrath & judgment of God.  Second death is death and hades being cast into in the LOF and therefore pictures the destruction of death and hades power over the wicked.  The purpose is slaying of the old man.

I don't know if reaping wrath & judgment now can be rightly referred to by 'LOF' and 'second death', but my tentative belief is that whether it can be referred to by those words or not, judgment now has the same quality and purpose as LOF and second death.  It's bad stuff intended to destroy stuff in man's will.  It's the removal of 'stony heart'.  It's Nebuchadnezzars 'abased pride' in Dan ch 4.  And I suspect that when Christ told the Zebedee bros. they would drink His cup, it was again the same.

Q1. How can it be said that those who are raised in Christ that the second death has no power over them.
A1. Because it doesn't.  Those who are in Christ have lost their life, given up their life for Christ.  There is no life to lose and nothing to judge and nothing to reap.  But they will have their faith tried in fire, but not of the 'snare' sort.  My own sub-Q to my own answer would be: What about when those who have risen in Christ fall back to the point where they must reap some more?  Do they re-enter the LOF or it's equivalent??  Well, I certainly think they will re-enter judgment, by whatever name you call it.  Ezekiel 18 comes to mind.

Q2. What happens to those who don't repent in this life?  When do they reap what they sow.
A2. They will be raised in the 2nd resurrection to be judged in the LOF and die the second death.  That's when they reap.  So you could say that I believe that only God's elect enter the LOF or it's equivalent now.

Q3. Craig would be an exception.
A3. It's kind of hard to address someone's personal experience.  Knowing Jesus and following Jesus are two different things.  I can know Jesus, know true doctrine, know His nature, know what He want's from me, and still not follow Him.  That's actually worse than not knowing!  Many stripes.  No one is an exception to 'there is none good, none seeking God' therefore I believe that all have or will incur the wrath of God.

Q4. Aborted babies
A4. Didn't go through LOF in this life.  Judged in the second resurrection.

Now remove the presumption that LOF is this life, re-answer the questions with what is another possibility.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 22, 2008, 03:02:58 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 22, 2008, 02:47:08 AMNow remove the presumption that LOF is this life, re-answer the question with what it the possibility.

I'm not sure I understand due to typos.

I don't think much of my answer would change.  I would simply reserve the words 'wrath & judgment' for this life and the words 'LOF & second death' for the afterlife.

The reason I consider that judgment & wrath in this life may be what the LOF & second death symbolize (along with symbolizing judgment & wrath in the afterlife) is due to the strong resemblances between the two in terms of:
1. the conditions of entrance into both
2. the purpose and effects of both
3. the conditions of exit from both

If I said that 'LOF' is only for afterlife, while 'judgment and wrath' are for this life, I'd be left with two 'things' that are markedly similar (or the same except for timing) going by different names.  For those who enter / exit X in this life, X is called 'judgment & wrath', but for those who enter / exit X in afterlife, X is called 'LOF & second death'.

Maybe if you can point to a difference between the LOF & second death, vs judgment and wrath in this life, other than timing.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 22, 2008, 03:43:48 AM
The reason I asked you to answer with a different possibility is because of your sub-question in Q1 and the especially the answer in Q4, do not support your conclusion and make your conclusion redundant.

QuoteIf I said that 'LOF' is only for afterlife, while 'judgment and wrath' are for this life, I'd be left with two 'things' that are markedly similar going by different names.  Those who enter / exit X in this life is called judgment & wrath, but those who enter / exit X in afterlife is called LOF & second death.

Similarity does not mean they are the same, that is a Undistributed Middle, and Hasty Generalization.

Example:

These two things are markedly similar but completely different.

Another example:

After lifting 50lbs of weight, Jim's muscles ache and he just keeps getting stronger.
After lifting 250lbs of weight, Jim's muscles ache but he is crippled for life.

These two things are markedly similar but completely different.

Now closer to your conditions added to another example:

1. the conditions of entrance into both
2. the purpose and effects of both
3. the conditions of exit from both

Infection in the body causes pain and leads to anti-bodies which make you live.
Infection in the body causes pain and leads to death.
Surgery in the body causes pain which leads to the removal of the infection which makes you live.

Three things markedly similar but different.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 22, 2008, 04:03:35 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 22, 2008, 03:43:48 AM
The reason I asked you to answer with a different possibility is because of your sub-question in Q1 and the especially the answer in Q4, do not support your conclusion and make your conclusion redundant.

I don't see how they contradict my conclusion either.  I don't see any problem with Q4.  I don't think aborted babies went into LOF in this life, nor do I think they entered God's wrath & judgment in this life.  I'm not saying what Willie is saying, that this life IS the LOF.  I'm saying that the LOF & second death is a symbol for judgment whether in this life or in the next life.

QuoteSimilarity does not mean they are the same, that is a Undistributed Middle, and Hasty Generalization.  Three things markedly similar but different.

Yes, but things that are different have a difference you can point to.  I don't see any differences.  If everything I can learn from scripture regarding LOF and judgment are the same, that leads me to believe they might be the same.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 22, 2008, 05:13:38 AM
Not going to say much here as this topic always seems to turn into a mud fest.

For me, if you want to know what the lake of fire is read the 10 commandments, they are a lake/body of fire, the ministration of death and our schoolmaster that leads to Christ.

So we see those in death being lead to God how? by the schoolmaster and once they keep the commandments they have right to the tree of life Rev.20

And His commandments cover this age we live in, the ages past and the ages to come.

God bless

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 22, 2008, 06:15:11 AM
Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 04:03:35 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 22, 2008, 03:43:48 AM
The reason I asked you to answer with a different possibility is because of your sub-question in Q1 and the especially the answer in Q4, do not support your conclusion and make your conclusion redundant.

I don't see how they contradict my conclusion either.  I don't see any problem with Q4.  I don't think aborted babies went into LOF in this life, nor do I think they entered God's wrath & judgment in this life.  Keep in mind, I'm not saying what Willie is saying, that this life IS the LOF.  I'm saying that the LOF & second death is (or may be) a symbol of God's wrath and judgment which can occur in this life or in the next life.

QuoteSimilarity does not mean they are the same, that is a Undistributed Middle, and Hasty Generalization.  Three things markedly similar but different.

Yes, but things that are different have a difference you can point to.  I know of no such difference.  I'm pretty sure Leviticus 26 is an example of 'judgment of God' and 'wrath of God' even though the chapter does not actually use those terms.  Would I be making a hasty generalization to refer to it by those words?  At some point, when things look the same in all known essentials, one starts to wonder if they are the same.


They don't have any difference you can point to, unless you know the details. The more you know about it, the more you are able to see the difference.

A child being disciplined to not do wrong, looks also like a child who is being punished for doing wrong.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: joyful1 on August 22, 2008, 06:26:41 AM
This is the way that I see it...

The fire in this life is the same type of fire that is in the Lake of Fire = The Truth/The Word of God.

This is what "burns" a person when they know that they are doing wrong. The Father chastens every son that He receives... no one gets excluded as a "bastard." Whosoever calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved. When Saul/Paul was confronted with the Truth on the road to Damascus, he immediately fell down and called Him LORD. The Fire is pure, and frightening, and painful at first, but afterwards, yields the peaceable fruit of righteousness.

You can have fiery trials now--
or you can get immersed later--

but everyone will have to go through this process to learn righteousness--and once everyone has learned righteousness--we can, at last, have the peace that comes from God alone. We will actually be at PEACE and be ONE with all of humanity--IMHO.

I am filled with Expectation and HOPE! :icon_flower: :cloud9:
Joyce :)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 22, 2008, 06:33:26 AM
QuoteYou can have fiery trials now--
or you can get immersed later--

That is exactly how it is, Scripture is very clear concerning this process everywhere. The ones who are saved the Lake of Fire are those who kept their robes clean by the blood of the Lamb. It doesn't matter if the fire is the same fire, people keep making this an issue when it isn't. The Lake of Fire is not the fiery trails we endure, it is the last resort to those who after being washed, need their robes destroyed. (Leviticus 14, Numbers 19, Isaiah 4, Revelation 7)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 22, 2008, 08:05:07 AM
QuoteThey don't have any difference you can point to, unless you know the details. The more you know about it, the more you are able to see the difference.

I was hoping for an example from scripture pointing out the difference.

QuoteA child being disciplined to not do wrong, looks also like a child who is being punished for doing wrong.

So you think judgment is discipline while the LOF is punishment?  What is the difference between punishment and discipline?  Both are painful, though probably to different degrees.  Discipline's purpose is to correct.  That seems to leave the punishment / LOF in the category of non-corrective inflicting of pain or pure torment.

I can think of one scripture that seems to support a difference.

1 Corinthians 11:32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 22, 2008, 08:29:48 AM
Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 08:05:07 AM
So you think judgment is discipline while the LOF is punishment?  What is the difference between punishment and discipline?  Both are painful, though probably to different degrees.  Discipline's purpose is to correct.  That seems to leave the punishment / LOF in the category of non-corrective inflicting of pain or pure torment.
1Corinthians 11:32 is actually in the context of judging yourself.  That's the understood subject.  When we judge ourselves, we open the door to a type of God's anointing that'll train the flesh to discern the difference between good and evil, according to Hebrews 5:12-14.

But I'm wondering where this is going too, if Craig is interpreting the LOF as either punitive justice or retributive punishment rather than as directly and initially from first to last the process of transformation that many around here understand it to be.  KJV renders a passage in Hebrews 10 "how much sorer punishment do you suppose will he be thought worthy who has trodden underfoot the Blood of the Son of God..." and the word "punishment" in that passage is essentially the same word, though spelled a little differently and gramatically used differently without implying a change in meaning (i.e. sentence construction issue), to a word translated twice in Acts as "persecution."  Hebrews 10 is just saying that you lose your protection from the Lord and are open to the persecutions of this world, of the religious, and of the devil.  But I know that the issues of retribution and other types of punishment don't hang on that one passage.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on August 22, 2008, 09:21:05 AM
Please guys I'm not trying to stir up the coals here but...
If I look at all posts in this thread from a distance I see a part of agreement between Craig and Willie.
Both believe that there is a LoF right now. The difference is that Willie thinks all of us are in it right now. (put there by God)
While Craig thinks some stepped in it during this lifetime on volunterely(=religious) basis and so avoid the LoF after death.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 22, 2008, 04:52:54 PM
Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 08:05:07 AM
QuoteThey don't have any difference you can point to, unless you know the details. The more you know about it, the more you are able to see the difference.
Discipline's purpose is to correct.  That seems to leave the punishment / LOF in the category of non-corrective inflicting of pain or pure torment.
I can think of one scripture that seems to support a difference.
1 Corinthians 11:32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

Bob, I am puzzled why why you are resorting to an ET mindset with concerning punishment. As I said, the LOF is far more complex than a simple answer. So remove the idea that it is non-corrective, and that it is purposely inflicting pain and torment.

A child being punished for doing wrong, is still corrective but a different method of discipline is being employed and it isn't there to just inflict pain and torture, in fact the pain and torture is subjective.

Here is the difference on a small scale, one is preventive discipline, the other is corrective punishment. Preventive discipline educates a person correcting their mindset. Corrective punishment is when they do wrong, correcting their actions.

Each person is treated independently of each other, God knows the heart of everyone and will judge each person accordingly, what works for one person will not work for another, this is not a general sweep. The Lake of Fire is a directly effective and efficient correction which is not unnecessary in nature if one is subject to it, but is the Lake of Fire is not necessary for those who have endured and overcome the trials and tribulations of life.

Revelation 7:9-17
After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out in a loud voice: "Salvation belongs to our God, who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb."

All the angels were standing around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures. They fell down on their faces before the throne and worshiped God, saying:"Amen! Praise and glory and wisdom and thanks and honor and power and strength be to our God for ever and ever.   Amen!"

Then one of the elders asked me, "These in white robes—who are they, and where did they come from?"

I answered, "Sir, you know."

And he said, "These are they who have come out of the great tribulation; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. Therefore, "they are before the throne of God and serve him day and night in his temple; and he who sits on the throne will spread his tent over them. Never again will they hunger; never again will they thirst. The sun will not beat upon them, nor any scorching heat. For the Lamb at the center of the throne will be their shepherd; he will lead them to springs of living water. And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes."

Now pay attention:
2 Chronicles 23:19
He also stationed doorkeepers at the gates of the LORD's temple so that no one who was in any way unclean might enter.
Genesis 3:24
After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.
Leviticus 13:46
"He shall remain unclean all the days during which he has the infection; he is unclean. He shall live alone; his dwelling shall be outside the camp.
Matthew 8:12
But the subjects of the kingdom will be thrown outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Matthew 22:13
"Then the king told the attendants, 'Tie him hand and foot, and throw him outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.'
Matthew 25:30
And throw that worthless servant outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.'
Revelation 21:27
Nothing impure will ever enter the new city, nor will anyone who does what is shameful or deceitful, but only those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life.

You say, "So how can everyone be saved?"

Mark 10:26-28
The disciples were even more amazed, and said to each other, "Who then can be saved?"
Jesus looked at them and said, "With man this is impossible, but not with God; all things are possible with God."

Did Jesus just stay in Jerusalem? Did he not go to the Samaritan and give her living water? Did he not go to the leper and he heal the sick? Those who are outside cannot come in until they are declared clean!

Now let us read Revelation 21-22 in context....

Revelation 21:22-27, Revelation 22:1-7
I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. The city does not need the sun or the moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp. The nations will walk by its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their splendor into it. On no day will its gates ever be shut, for there will be no night there. The glory and honor of the nations will be brought into it. Nothing unclean will ever enter it, nor will anyone who does what is shameful or deceitful, but only those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life.

Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. No longer will there be any curse. The throne of God and of the Lamb will be in the city, and his servants will serve him. They will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads. There will be no more night. They will not need the light of a lamp or the light of the sun, for the Lord God will give them light. And they will reign for ever and ever. The angel said to me, "These words are trustworthy and true. The Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent his angel to show his servants the things that must soon take place."

Do you believe what Scripture is saying? It says that those on the outside will be brought back in. Nothing unclean will ever enter the city because they will be made clean! We are not secluded to the city, we go out and heal the nations outside the walls (the Lake of Fire) with the leaves from the tree of life. The river of life flows out from the city, the river is not dammed! The doors are always open! The people described in Revelation 22, are not the same people of Revelation 7. Those in Revelation 7 were never subjected to the Lake of Fire, but the people in Revelation 22 ere are those who were in the Lake of Fire and have been brought into the Kingdom.

Whatever happens in the Resurrection of the Dead, those who have kept themselves pure by the washing of the blood of Christ, will reign with God to heal those who did not. The wicked who died in their wickedness, the sinner who died in their sin, will be raised to life outside the City of God and there they will remain until they are healed.

This is the 'simple' view, because although I explain it this way, it is not exactly how it is but for understanding the concept of what is to come, that is what Scripture has said.

1 John 3:1-3
How great is the love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is. Everyone who has this hope in him purifies himself, just as he is pure.

Unfortunately, fear has kept people from understanding what Scripture is actually saying.

So quick recap, this life is not Second Death, this life is the Tribulation. There is two types of people who come out of the Tribulation those who were raised first and those who were raised last. Those who raised first were not subjected to the Lake of Fire and those who are raised last are in the Lake of Fire. The first shall serve the last. As those who reign with Christ in the first resurrection of the dead shall go out into the Lake of Fire and it will not hurt them, as they bring the Water of Life and the leaves to heal to those who are in the Lake of Fire. From there, they give life and heal them, and bring them into the Kingdom of God. The Lake of Fire literally is the Second Death that these people come out of.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 22, 2008, 05:55:59 PM
Revelation 7:9-17
After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb

You think this is still yet to happen?

Isaiah 45
22Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and there is none else.
23 I have (It's already been decreed) sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear.
24Surely, shall one say, in the LORD have I righteousness and strength: even to him shall men come; and all that are incensed against him shall be ashamed.

Paul refers to this . . .in his context
Romans 14
10But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.
11For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
12So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God

This is not to learn whether or not you're going to heaven . . .this I believe, is where that which we have built is tested by fire . . God is "the" consuming fire.

1 Corinthians 3
11For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.
12Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble;
13Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is.
15If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
16Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?


John is seeing the "now" in the spirit.  No wonder Revelation was used as a hymnal, they were of the UR mindset in the middle of their great tribulation.  Can you imagine for a moment, in the middle of all of the autrosities that took place in that time frame, how many "beleivers" were not only being tortured and mutilated, but to add to the physical pain and suffering, would be the emotional pain of thinking that their family members who were not of the same faith were going to hell besides?  What a great relief this would be to them to see that ALL are standing at the throne, serving God in the eternal realm.


And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes."
This is, to me, pointing to the fact that our memory of pain will be transformed as well.  Our memory of the curse, sin, death . . our time here on earth is all included into that.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 22, 2008, 06:18:57 PM
Quote from: NathanRevelation 7:9-17
After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb

Revelation 7:9-17 speaks of those who are going through Tribulation, not a Lake of Fire or Second Death.

The angel asked, " "These in white robes—who are they, and where did they come from? These are they who have come out of the great tribulation; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb."

So where did these in white robes come from? They came from every nation, tribe, people and language.

Read Isaiah 4:2-6
In that day the Branch of the LORD will be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of the land will be the pride and glory of the survivors in Israel.  Those who are left in Zion, who remain in Jerusalem, will be called holy, all who are recorded among the living in Jerusalem. The Lord will wash away the filth of the women of Zion; he will cleanse the bloodstains from Jerusalem by a spirit of judgment and a spirit of fire. Then the LORD will create over all of Mount Zion and over those who assemble there a cloud of smoke by day and a glow of flaming fire by night; over all the glory will be a canopy. It will be a shelter and shade from the heat of the day, and a refuge and hiding place from the storm and rain.

Now reread Revelation 7:9-17
After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out in a loud voice: "Salvation belongs to our God, who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb."

All the angels were standing around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures. They fell down on their faces before the throne and worshiped God, saying:"Amen! Praise and glory and wisdom and thanks and honor and power and strength be to our God for ever and ever.   Amen!"

Then one of the elders asked me, "These in white robes—who are they, and where did they come from?"

I answered, "Sir, you know."

And he said, "These are they who have come out of the great tribulation; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. Therefore, "they are before the throne of God and serve him day and night in his temple; and he who sits on the throne will spread his tent over them. Never again will they hunger; never again will they thirst. The sun will not beat upon them, nor any scorching heat. For the Lamb at the center of the throne will be their shepherd; he will lead them to springs of living water. And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes."


These are those who survived the great Tribulation! The issue of UR/CU is not who survived the great Tribulation! Most almost  everyone's issue in UR/CU is what happened to those who did not survive and whether or not if they or someone they love did not survive what happens to them!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 22, 2008, 06:24:32 PM
So again, you're saying that not all will survive?  That not "every knee" will bow . .only those that, by your rendition, have survived the tribulation will bow?  What if this tribulation is the same as the lake of fire . . .I mean, what if it's the same place?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 22, 2008, 11:24:50 PM
I re-read what I presented it in no way comes to the conclusion where you have to ask 'again am I saying not all will survive?' There is so much presumption in that question it is difficult for me to hold back the many words I have to refute it.

Quotewhat if this tribulation is the same as the lake of fire . . .I mean, what if it's the same place?

There is no what if, because it is not the same. Not only is there no Scriptural support for this, but that reasoning neglects the Resurrection of the Dead. Revelation makes it clear what the Lake of Fire is, it also makes it clear that the Tribulation is what happens prior to the Lake of Fire. This is consistently found in repetition throughout Scripture.

Every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. This is not an issue of survial, whether one survived or not, your question neglects the Resurrection of the Dead. This happens AFTER the resurrection of the dead.

So Nathan, what happens to the wicked in this life? Do they get the same thing that you and I get? I mean, if it is true that all that happens is that they wake up and find themselves in heaven ashamed, well you just openned the door to never doing good in the first place because who cares if I am ashamed, what is there to be ashame about? That is what believing Lake of Fire is this life gets you.

As long as people stop confusing the Tribulation for the Lake of Fire, this life for the Lake of Fire, it makes sense.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 22, 2008, 11:39:58 PM
Quote from: martincisneros on August 22, 2008, 08:29:48 AM1Corinthians 11:32 is actually in the context of judging yourself.  That's the understood subject.  When we judge ourselves, we open the door to a type of God's anointing that'll train the flesh to discern the difference between good and evil, according to Hebrews 5:12-14.

My point was addressing whether there a difference between LOF judgment and in-this-lifetime judgment.  I was focusing on what happens when we don't obey that passage by judging ourselves.  In that case we are "judged" so that we will not be "down-judged" with the world.  Therefore "judged" and "down-judged" (LOF judgment) are not equal.

QuoteKJV renders a passage in Hebrews 10 "how much sorer punishment do you suppose will he be thought worthy who has trodden underfoot the Blood of the Son of God..." and the word "punishment" in that passage is essentially the same word, though spelled a little differently and gramatically used differently without implying a change in meaning (i.e. sentence construction issue), to a word translated twice in Acts as "persecution."  Hebrews 10 is just saying that you lose your protection from the Lord and are open to the persecutions of this world, of the religious, and of the devil.  But I know that the issues of retribution and other types of punishment don't hang on that one passage.

If you take a look at verse 30 and then check the Deuteronomy passage being quoted, the purpose of that punishment & vengeance is still corrective:  God is waiting to see that their "power is gone" then God "repents" of the judgment.

Hebrews 10:30  For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.

Deuteronomy 32:35  To me belongeth vengeance, and recompence; their foot shall slide in due time: for the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things that shall come upon them make haste. 36  For the LORD shall judge his people, and repent himself for his servants, when he seeth that their power is gone, and there is none shut up, or left.







Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 03:32:14 AM
Again, if this life is the Lake of Fire.
The question remains, what happens to the wicked who die in their sin, who do not repent or change heart prior to their death.


Because so far, nobody has brought any logic to why this would be the Lake of Fire.

Ecclesiastes 4:8-18
If you see the poor oppressed in a district, and justice and rights denied, do not be surprised at such things; for one official is eyed by a higher one, and over them both are others higher still. The increase from the land is taken by all; the king himself profits from the fields.

Whoever loves money never has money enough;
       whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with his income.
       This too is meaningless.

As goods increase,
       so do those who consume them.
       And what benefit are they to the owner
       except to feast his eyes on them?

The sleep of a laborer is sweet,
       whether he eats little or much,
       but the abundance of a rich man
       permits him no sleep.

I have seen a grievous evil under the sun:
       wealth hoarded to the harm of its owner,

or wealth lost through some misfortune,
       so that when he has a son
       there is nothing left for him.

Naked a man comes from his mother's womb,
       and as he comes, so he departs.
       He takes nothing from his labor
       that he can carry in his hand.

This too is a grievous evil:
       As a man comes, so he departs,
       and what does he gain,
       since he toils for the wind?

All his days he eats in darkness,
       with great frustration, affliction and anger.

Then I realized that it is good and proper for a man to eat and drink, and to find satisfaction in his toilsome labor under the sun during the few days of life God has given him—for this is his lot. Moreover, when God gives any man wealth and possessions, and enables him to enjoy them, to accept his lot and be happy in his work—this is a gift of God. He seldom reflects on the days of his life, because God keeps him occupied with gladness of heart.

How many can you say that you have wealth from God and enjoy it? How many of you accept his lot and happy in his work? How many of you reflect on the days of your life, and you are unhappy?

I talked to a few of my wealthy friends, and they are content and spend lots of time with family and well off and happy. They don't believe in Jesus, they don't even believe in God. In fact, one said, his life is great, he doesn't need God. Wow, what a way to go through the Lake of Fire, totally opposite to what God said would happen. Opposite to what Jesus said should happen.

Believing that this life is the Lake of Fire, brings no hope to anyone especially when they see the wicked prosper in this life. It actually encourages people to be discouraged and go out and sin, so that they too can be in the position of power and wealth over another. Success in this world relies that you don't care about those around you, you have to lie, you have to cheat, but the reward is great.

So did Jesus just come to give false hope to the poor? You are poor, you don't have much, but don't worry if you live a life to God, you will be rewarded in the life to come while those who did not live to God have received their reward in full, with a happy life, big family, huge wealth, good health.

That is what saying this life is the Lake of Fire constitutes, everything is a hoax, there is no hope, you are what you are and there is nothing more, when you die even the wicked guy will be there with you, he suffers nothing but a bit of embarrassment when he realizes oops I guess there was a God.







Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: autoimmune on August 23, 2008, 04:12:21 AM
One of the best understandings of the Lake of Fire/God as Consuming Love that I have seen yet comes from Pope Benedict XVI's recent encyclical "Spe Salvi":


47. Some recent theologians are of the opinion that the fire which both burns and saves is Christ himself, the Judge and Saviour. The encounter with him is the decisive act of judgement. Before his gaze all falsehood melts away. This encounter with him, as it burns us, transforms and frees us, allowing us to become truly ourselves. All that we build during our lives can prove to be mere straw, pure bluster, and it collapses. Yet in the pain of this encounter, when the impurity and sickness of our lives become evident to us, there lies salvation. His gaze, the touch of his heart heals us through an undeniably painful transformation "as through fire". But it is a blessed pain, in which the holy power of his love sears through us like a flame, enabling us to become totally ourselves and thus totally of God. In this way the inter-relation between justice and grace also becomes clear: the way we live our lives is not immaterial, but our defilement does not stain us for ever if we have at least continued to reach out towards Christ, towards truth and towards love. Indeed, it has already been burned away through Christ's Passion. At the moment of judgement we experience and we absorb the overwhelming power of his love over all the evil in the world and in ourselves. The pain of love becomes our salvation and our joy. It is clear that we cannot calculate the "duration" of this transforming burning in terms of the chronological measurements of this world. The transforming "moment" of this encounter eludes earthly time-reckoning—it is the heart's time, it is the time of "passage" to communion with God in the Body of Christ[39]. The judgement of God is hope, both because it is justice and because it is grace. If it were merely grace, making all earthly things cease to matter, God would still owe us an answer to the question about justice—the crucial question that we ask of history and of God. If it were merely justice, in the end it could bring only fear to us all. The incarnation of God in Christ has so closely linked the two together—judgement and grace—that justice is firmly established: we all work out our salvation "with fear and trembling" (Phil 2:12). Nevertheless grace allows us all to hope, and to go trustfully to meet the Judge whom we know as our "advocate", or parakletos (cf. 1 Jn 2:1).




Considering a recent talk he gave honoring Origen, I think Benedict XVI may be a "closet URer" :)

Mary Ellen
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 06:21:47 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 23, 2008, 03:32:14 AM
Again, if this life is the Lake of Fire.
The question remains, what happens to the wicked who die in their sin, who do not repent or change heart prior to their death.




I agree, because we are saved by grace through faith,

and if the lake of fire is now, then those who go to their grave without faith, don't access grace/chastisement; and therefore are not saved. 

unless one is willing to see two different ways of being saved,

one by grace through faith and mercy,

and one by/through fire for lack of faith



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 23, 2008, 06:34:57 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 22, 2008, 04:52:54 PMBob, I am puzzled why why you are resorting to an ET mindset with concerning punishment. As I said, the LOF is far more complex than a simple answer. So remove the idea that it is non-corrective, and that it is purposely inflicting pain and torment.

Ok, I misunderstood the contrast you were drawing between discipline and punishment.  To me all corrective punishment is discipline.  I certainly believe the LOF is corrective punishment too.

QuoteA child being punished for doing wrong, is still corrective but a different method of discipline is being employed and it isn't there to just inflict pain and torture, in fact the pain and torture is subjective.  Here is the difference on a small scale, one is preventive discipline, the other is corrective punishment. Preventive discipline educates a person correcting their mindset. Corrective punishment is when they do wrong, correcting their actions.

Ok, I see what you meant now.

QuoteEach person is treated independently of each other, God knows the heart of everyone and will judge each person accordingly, what works for one person will not work for another, this is not a general sweep.

I agree with that.

QuoteThe Lake of Fire is a directly effective and efficient correction which is not unnecessary in nature if one is subject to it, but is the Lake of Fire is not necessary for those who have endured and overcome the trials and tribulations of life.

I think the scriptures show that all overcomers previously rebelled against God's word and reaped corrective judgment.

There are two kinds of 'trouble' God sends:
1. fiery snares - for the ungodly
2. fiery trials of our faith - for the godly

Psalm 11:5 The LORD trieth the righteous: but the wicked and him that loveth violence his soul hateth 6 Upon the wicked he shall rain snares, fire and brimstone, and an horrible tempest: this shall be the portion of their cup.

Psalm 107 repeatedly describes path of 'The redeemed of the Lord' as:
1. God gives them His word
2. They rebel against God's word (so they are wicked)
3. God judges them (rains snares, fire and brimstone, and an horrible tempest)
4. They turn to God
5. God saves them

Psalm 107:2 Let the redeemed of the LORD say so, whom he hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy; 3  And gathered them out of the lands, from the east, and from the west, from the north, and from the south.

Psalm 107:10 Such as sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, being bound in affliction and iron; 11 Because they rebelled against the words of God, and contemned the counsel of the most High: 12 Therefore he brought down their heart with labour; they fell down, and there was none to help. 13 Then they cried unto the LORD in their trouble, and he saved them out of their distresses. 14 He brought them out of darkness and the shadow of death, and brake their bands in sunder. 15 Oh that men would praise the LORD for his goodness, and for his wonderful works to the children of men!

Implicit in the above sequence is that fiery trials can not take place until after #4 because prior to that there is no faith to try.

So the overcomers in Revelation 7, who are seen coming out of faith-trying tribulation, at one time "rebelled against the words of God, and contemned the counsel of the most High" and were subject to God "raining snares, fire and brimstone, and an horrible tempest: this shall be the portion of their cup" on them.  It is THAT LAST QUOTED PART ONLY (which is #3 in the above sequence) that I see the LOF symbolizing.  I definitely do not say that the LOF and Second Death are 'this life'.

QuoteDid Jesus just stay in Jerusalem? Did he not go to the Samaritan and give her living water? Did he not go to the leper and he heal the sick? Those who are outside cannot come in until they are declared clean!

Now let us read Revelation 21-22 in context....

Do you believe what Scripture is saying? It says that those on the outside will be brought back in. Nothing unclean will ever enter the city because they will be made clean! We are not secluded to the city, we go out and heal the nations outside the walls (the Lake of Fire) with the leaves from the tree of life. The river of life flows out from the city, the river is not dammed! The doors are always open!

Absolutely.  I also see this in Isaiah 60 and Ezekiel 47.

QuoteThe people described in Revelation 22, are not the same people of Revelation 7.

Agree. Revelation 22 = the many, Revelation 7 = the few chosen.

QuoteThose in Revelation 7 were never subjected to the Lake of Fire, but the people in Revelation 22 ere are those who were in the Lake of Fire and have been brought into the Kingdom.

I agree that those in Revelation 7 are not subjected to the LOF along with the people in Revelation 21.  But I don't think you've proved that they never went through to the LOF.

1. If the LOF is a singular event in history, then Rev 21 decribes that event, and only those in the 2nd resurrection go through it, and those in Rev 7 didn't go through it.  So in that case I'd agree with you.
2. But if the LOF is a symbol for a spiritual event then
a) Revelation 21 would only be an example of that spiritual event for those in the 2nd resurrection.
b) The same spiritual event could take place in pre-overcomers when they were rebelling against God's word.

QuoteWhatever happens in the Resurrection of the Dead, those who have kept themselves pure by the washing of the blood of Christ, will reign with God to heal those who did not. The wicked who died in their wickedness, the sinner who died in their sin, will be raised to life outside the City of God and there they will remain until they are healed.

Agree 100%.

QuoteSo quick recap, this life is not Second Death, this life is the Tribulation. There is two types of people who come out of the Tribulation those who were raised first and those who were raised last. Those who raised first were not subjected to the Lake of Fire and those who are raised last are in the Lake of Fire. The first shall serve the last. As those who reign with Christ in the first resurrection of the dead shall go out into the Lake of Fire and it will not hurt them, as they bring the Water of Life and the leaves to heal to those who are in the Lake of Fire. From there, they give life and heal them, and bring them into the Kingdom of God. The Lake of Fire literally is the Second Death that these people come out of.

- I agree that the LOF & second death is definitely not 'this life'.
- I don't think tribulation is 'this life' either.  Tribulation is trouble sent from God, either fiery snares for the wicked or fiery trials for the godly.
- I agree with the overall picture you presented, and the roles of the first and second groups.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 23, 2008, 06:39:37 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 23, 2008, 03:32:14 AMThat is what saying this life is the Lake of Fire constitutes.

I hope you didn't think that's what I was trying to say.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 07:43:12 AM
Quote from: bobf on August 23, 2008, 06:39:37 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 23, 2008, 03:32:14 AMThat is what saying this life is the Lake of Fire constitutes.
I hope you didn't think that's what I was trying to say.

It is what people who believe the Lake of Fire is this life are saying because they fail to see the bigger picture of what they believe. There reasons of purpose and processes of why, which are neglected.

Now watch:

1 Corinthians 5:10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive what is due him for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad.

Is Paul lying?

Matthew 16:27 For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds.

Was Jesus lying?

How about these Scriptures? Psalm 62:12; Proverbs 24:12; Romans 2:6; Romans 14:12; 1 Corinthians 3:13; 2 Corinthians 5:10; Ephesians 6:8; Colossians 3:25; Revelation 2:23; Revelation 20:12; Revelation 22:12

Is Scripture lying?

If anyone believes that this life is the Lake of Fire, that is what they are affirming.

Matthew 7:13-14
"Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.

Does everyone take the wide gate and broad road that leads to destruction? No. Few will find the gate and narrow road that leads to life. Those who take the gate to life, do not experience destruction. Do people believe that, or is that just something Jesus said to pass the time?

Now, here is what is happening. Yes, Jesus died for all mankind.

2 Corinthians 5:14-15
For Christ's love compels us, because we are convinced that one died for all, and therefore all died. And he died for all, that those who live should no longer live for themselves but for him who died for them and was raised again.

Because He died for all mankind, all mankind is now considered dead in regards to way of the world and so they have a choice either live for him who died for them, or live for themselves.

What happens to those who live for themselves?

Hebrews 10:25-30
Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching.

If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God. Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? For we know him who said, "It is mine to avenge; I will repay," and again, "The Lord will judge his people." It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

What is this Day approaching, what happens to those who have trampled the Son of God underfoot and insulted the Spirit of grace? Is it not a dreadful expectation of judgment and raging fire that will consume the enemies of God? What would you call that? The Fire after the Lake of Fire?

Of course, if you are fearful, you will misunderstand what happens on that Day. If you are fearful, then you will misunderstand what is that Fire. If you are fearful, you not recognize that the raging fire that consumes the enemies of God, are those who trust in the Lord and are raised up as the royal priesthood reigning with the Son of God. The first shall serve the last. Those who lost everything will be saved but as ones through fire.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:07:15 AM
Quote from: Nathan
And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes."
This is, to me, pointing to the fact that our memory of pain will be transformed as well.  Our memory of the curse, sin, death . . our time here on earth is all included into that.



51And Joseph called the name of the firstborn Manasseh: For God, said he, hath made me forget all my toil, and all my father's house.

--Gen 41

"Manasseh"

H4519
מנשּׁה
menashsheh
men-ash-sheh'
From H5382; causing to forget; Menashsheh, a grandson of jacob, also the tribe descendant from him, and its territory: - Manasseh.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:14:35 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 23, 2008, 07:43:12 AM
If you are fearful, you not recognize that the raging fire that consumes the enemies of God, are those who trust in the Lord and are raised up as the royal priesthood reigning with the Son of God. The first shall serve the last. Those who lost everything will be saved but as ones through fire.



Rom 11:31  Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:20:59 AM

Quote from: SotwIf you are fearful, you not recognize that the raging fire that consumes the enemies of God, are those who trust in the Lord and are raised up as the royal priesthood reigning with the Son of God. The first shall serve the last. Those who lost everything will be saved but as ones through fire.

Craig, that whole post was beautiful.  You are describing the Melchizedek priesthood.  Well, you might not agree with me lol.  But, to me, that's what it is.

That priesthood, too, will be refined and purified as silver [by fire]--I'm thinking in this life--so that they will stand when he appears.




2But who may abide the day of his coming? and who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap:

3And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the LORD an offering in righteousness.

4Then shall the offering of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant unto the LORD, as in the days of old, and as in former years.


--Malachi 3

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:25:57 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:20:59 AM

Quote from: SotwIf you are fearful, you not recognize that the raging fire that consumes the enemies of God, are those who trust in the Lord and are raised up as the royal priesthood reigning with the Son of God. The first shall serve the last. Those who lost everything will be saved but as ones through fire.

Craig, that whole post was beautiful.  You are describing the Melchizedek priesthood.  Well, you might not agree with me lol.  But, to me, that's what it is.

That priesthood, too, will be refined and purified as silver [by fire]--I'm thinking in this life--so that they will stand when he appears.




2But who may abide the day of his coming? and who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap:

3And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the LORD an offering in righteousness.

4Then shall the offering of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant unto the LORD, as in the days of old, and as in former years.


--Malachi 3



but there is a difference is there not between refiners fire, and destructive fire??

I believe there is.

I also think it would be intresting to study what a "priest/priesthood" does.  What is their function? 



refiner's fire, imo; is by grace through Faith


and destructive fire is based on "not believing", and having to perish.


whoseover believes on him shall not perish (go through LOF imo)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 23, 2008, 08:32:37 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 23, 2008, 07:43:12 AMMatthew 7:13-14
"Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.

Does everyone take the wide gate and broad road that leads to destruction? No. Few will find the gate and narrow road that leads to life. Those who take the gate to life, do not experience destruction. Do people believe that, or is that just something Jesus said to pass the time?

This is the only part I disagree with in your post.

Yes, only those who take the narrow gate find life.
Yes, few are finding the narrow gate (not "will find" else few would ever find life) .
Yes, all who enter the wide gate reap destruction.

But I believe that the few finding life, the few chosen, all entered the wide gate before entering the narrow gate.

The "survivors" are those finding the narrow gate, right?

In that day the Branch of the LORD will be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of the land will be the pride and glory of the survivors in Israel.  Those who are left in Zion, who remain in Jerusalem, will be called holy, all who are recorded among the living in Jerusalem. The Lord will wash away the filth of the women of Zion; he will cleanse the bloodstains from Jerusalem by a spirit of judgment and a spirit of fire.

But what are they "surviving" and why did the "spirit of judgment" come upon them in the first place, to wash their filth?  Not because God was trying their faith.  Because they were filthy.

Isaiah 3:16 Moreover the LORD saith, Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes, walking and mincing as they go, and making a tinkling with their feet: 17 Therefore the Lord will smite with a scab the crown of the head of the daughters of Zion, and the LORD will discover their secret parts. 18  In that day the Lord will take away the bravery of their tinkling ornaments about their feet, and their cauls, and their round tires like the moon, 19  The chains, and the bracelets, and the mufflers, 20  The bonnets, and the ornaments of the legs, and the headbands, and the tablets, and the earrings, 21 The rings, and nose jewels, 22  The changeable suits of apparel, and the mantles, and the wimples, and the crisping pins, 23  The glasses, and the fine linen, and the hoods, and the vails. 24 And it shall come to pass, that instead of sweet smell there shall be stink; and instead of a girdle a rent; and instead of well set hair baldness; and instead of a stomacher a girding of sackcloth; and burning instead of beauty. 25  Thy men shall fall by the sword, and thy mighty in the war. 26  And her gates shall lament and mourn; and she being desolate shall sit upon the ground.

Here are the same two gates.

Luke 6:46 And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say? 47 Whosoever cometh to me, and heareth my sayings, and doeth them, I will shew you to whom he is like: 48  He is like a man which built an house, and digged deep, and laid the foundation on a rock: and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was founded upon a rock. 49 But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.

As I said in my prior post, the redeemed of the Lord before they are redeemed, first hear and rebel against God's word.  So they "do not the things which I say".






Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:34:32 AM
Mat 7:13  Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction (LOF imo) , and many there be which go in thereat:


Mat 7:14  Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way (by grace through faith=chastisement/suffering/fiery trial of one's faith), which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.


And those that go through the narrow gate (first fruits, children of promise, via faith), through them the nations will be blessed.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:37:15 AM
Main Entry: re·fine
Function: verb
Pronunciation: ri-'fīn
Inflected Form(s): re·fined ; re·fin·ing
transitive senses
1 : to free (as metal, sugar, or oil) from impurities or unwanted material
2 : to free from moral imperfection : ELEVATE
3 : to improve or perfect by pruning or polishing <refine a poetic style>
4 : to reduce in vigor or intensity
5 : to free from what is coarse, vulgar, or uncouth
intransitive senses
1 : to become pure or perfected
2 : to make improvement by introducing subtleties or distinctions
- re·fin·er noun


A priest is an appointed function that acts as a mediator between man and God.

But there is only one mediator between man and God, the man Jesus Christ.

This is why many of the current [unrefined] priesthood present themselves as Christ.

But only the Melchizedek priesthood could be this, a priesthood made by oath of God, eternal, a priest forever, the right hand of God.


Revelation 3:21
To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:37:52 AM
Hi bob,

do you see Jesus as having gone through the lake of fire wide gait first??


and what do you think of this verse?

Joh 11:26  And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:41:14 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:37:15 AM
Main Entry: re·fine
Function: verb
Pronunciation: ri-'fīn
Inflected Form(s): re·fined ; re·fin·ing
transitive senses
1 : to free (as metal, sugar, or oil) from impurities or unwanted material
2 : to free from moral imperfection : ELEVATE
3 : to improve or perfect by pruning or polishing <refine a poetic style>
4 : to reduce in vigor or intensity
5 : to free from what is coarse, vulgar, or uncouth
intransitive senses
1 : to become pure or perfected
2 : to make improvement by introducing subtleties or distinctions
- re·fin·er noun


A priest is an appointed function that acts as a mediator between man and God.

But there is only one mediator between man and God, the man Jesus Christ.

This is why many of the current [unrefined] priesthood present themselves as Christ.

But only the Melchizedek priesthood could be this, a priesthood made by oath of God, eternal, a priest forever, the right hand of God.



but, as the body of Christ, aren't those "given eyes to see, ears to hear, grace via faith" also a priest, a mediator. 

Jesus Christ=head plus body


Eph 2:6  And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:45:48 AM
Yes, --

That is why he is perfecting us to be a living sacrifice wholly acceptable to God.

That is why we are translated to eternal as soon as we believe.

Maybe one could say we are priests in training...

I consider Moses a Melchizedek priest, as well as Joshua and the prophets.

We are becoming Benjamin, son of the right hand.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 23, 2008, 08:46:09 AM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:37:52 AM
Joh 11:26  And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?
If I may speak up on this verse, it appears to be the same situation as "never hath forgiveness" where "never" is actually "aion" 'cause the Concordant Literal New Testament puts in the phrase "for the eon."  It's evidently not the longer, more comprehensive eon between now and 1Corinthians 15:28 that we can understand other Scriptures to be saying 'cause in John 6 Jesus says that if you eat His Flesh and drink His Blood, then you'll have life for the eon and He'll raise you up at the last day.  Perhaps this confirms my previous observations on Matthew 25:46 about both eonian life and eonian punishment coming to an end.  I'd previously said that both come to an end.  The believer has life for as long as there is death, and when death is abolished, then what else can there be but life for all?  John 6 seems to add the close to eonian life by saying you'll have it from eating His Flesh and Blood, but then He'll still have to raise you from the dead in the last Day.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:50:49 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:37:15 AM
Main Entry: re·fine
Function: verb
Pronunciation: ri-'fīn
Inflected Form(s): re·fined ; re·fin·ing
transitive senses
1 : to free (as metal, sugar, or oil) from impurities or unwanted material
2 : to free from moral imperfection : ELEVATE
3 : to improve or perfect by pruning or polishing <refine a poetic style>
4 : to reduce in vigor or intensity
5 : to free from what is coarse, vulgar, or uncouth
intransitive senses
1 : to become pure or perfected
2 : to make improvement by introducing subtleties or distinctions
- re·fin·er noun


A priest is an appointed function that acts as a mediator between man and God.

But there is only one mediator between man and God, the man Jesus Christ.

This is why many of the current [unrefined] priesthood present themselves as Christ.

But only the Melchizedek priesthood could be this, a priesthood made by oath of God, eternal, a priest forever, the right hand of God.


Revelation 3:21
To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.




Gal 3:2  This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

Gal 3:3  Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?

Gal 3:4  Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain.

Gal 3:5  He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

Gal 3:6  Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.



1Jn 5:4  For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:51:59 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:45:48 AM
Yes, --

That is why he is perfecting us to be a living sacrifice wholly acceptable to God.

That is why we are translated to eternal as soon as we believe.

Maybe one could say we are priests in training...

I consider Moses a Melchizedek priest, as well as Joshua and the prophets.

We are becoming Benjamin, son of the right hand.

so do you see this training/becoming priests as the lake of fire??
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:54:49 AM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:51:59 AM
so do you see this training/becoming priests as the lake of fire??
Well, Craig doesn't want to call it the lake of fire--he is saying these priests will be the lake of fire I think, or at least be part of it.

But, someone earlier called it fiery trials--the trying of our faith--that is part of the refining process--like what someone called a spiritual stairmaster.  It is a type of fire, for sure.  James tells us to count it all joy when we experience this.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 09:00:01 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:54:49 AM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:51:59 AM
so do you see this training/becoming priests as the lake of fire??
Well, Craig doesn't want to call it the lake of fire--he is saying these priests will be the lake of fire I think.

But, someone earlier called it fiery trials--the trying of our faith--that is part of the refining process--like what someone called a spiritual stairmaster.  It is a type of fire, for sure.  James tells us to count it all joy when we experience this.

again, for me; there is a difference between fiery trial of one's faith

and

lake of fire. 



one leaves one clothed, not ashamed

Rom 9:33  As it is written, Behold, I lay in Zion a stumblingstone and rock of offense: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.

2Ti 1:12  For the which cause I also suffer these things: nevertheless I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day.



one leaves one naked/shamed

Rev 16:15  Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.

Jer 23:40  And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 23, 2008, 09:00:31 AM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:37:52 AM
Hi bob,

do you see Jesus as having gone through the lake of fire wide gait first??

Hi Laren,

The wide gate is building your house on the sand which is calling Jesus "Lord, Lord" but not doing what Christ says.  Christ always did the Fathers will.  So no, Jesus did not go through the wide gate, ever.

But God put all the penalty of our sin on Him, even though He did no sin, so yes to Christ endured the destruction part of the wide gate.

QuoteJohn 11:26  And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

That takes place when the redeemed of the Lord turn to the Lord with all their heart.  God circumcises their heart, God fashions them as His workmanship and ordains them to good works.  They enter the narrow gate that leads to life, and they never die.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 09:03:49 AM
Quote from: bobf on August 23, 2008, 09:00:31 AM

QuoteJohn 11:26  And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

That takes place when the redeemed of the Lord turn to the Lord with all their heart.  God circumcises their heart, God fashions them as His workmanship and ordains them to good works.  They enter the narrow gate that leads to life, and they never die.




to me, these are the same

Rom 9:33  As it is written, Behold, I lay in Zion a stumblingstone and rock of offense: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed (ie: never die).

2Ti 1:12  For the which cause I also suffer these things: nevertheless I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 09:06:04 AM
Hi again bob

you have me thinking about you earlier post:

are you basically saying, all go through the wide gait to destruction (LOF), and then some from there build their house on the rock and receive reward, and some refuse, and go through LOF again?

as in two LOF's??
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 09:15:50 AM
Psa 7:5  Let the enemy persecute my soul, and take it; yea, let him tread down my life upon the earth, and lay mine honor in the dust. Selah.

Psa 7:6  Arise, O LORD, in thine anger, lift up thyself because of the rage of mine enemies: and awake for me to the judgment that thou hast commanded.

Psa 7:7  So shall the congregation of the people compass thee about: for their sakes therefore return thou on high.

Psa 7:8  The LORD shall judge the people: judge me, O LORD, according to my righteousness, and according to mine integrity that is in me.

Psa 7:9  Oh let the wickedness of the wicked come to an end; but establish the just: for the righteous God trieth the hearts and reins.

Psa 7:10  My defense is of God, which saveth the upright in heart.

Psa 7:11  God judgeth the righteous, and God is angry with the wicked every day.

Psa 7:12  If he turn not, he will whet his sword; he hath bent his bow, and made it ready.

Psa 7:13  He hath also prepared for him the instruments of death; he ordaineth his arrows against the persecutors.

Psa 7:14  Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood.

Psa 7:15  He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made.

Psa 7:16  His mischief shall return upon his own head, and his violent dealing shall come down upon his own pate.

Psa 7:17  I will praise the LORD according to his righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 23, 2008, 09:58:48 AM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 09:06:04 AM
Hi again bob

you have me thinking about you earlier post:  are you basically saying, all go through the wide gait to destruction (LOF), and then some from their build there house on the rock and receive reward, and some refuse, and go through LOF again?

as in two LOF's??

Short question but very tricky as it gets into the soveriegnity of God vs man's choices.

First of all, I believe salvation is 100% from God and that if God decides to elect say Paul to be saved in his lifetime, then Paul is going to be in the first resurrection, even though Paul will still be making choices according to his will at all times.  But Paul's salvation ultimately does not depend on Paul's will.  God chooses before a person before he is born, not according to the person's running or willing.

So it's not like God is putting all mankind through a LOF judgment now and then waiting to see which ones will repent and enter the narrow gate and then putting the rest through a LOF again, with God hoping that it will succeed the second time!!.  I think that's backwards.  God is not waiting to see whose will is 'good enough' to enter the narrow gate.  There is none good.  God saves in spite of man's will.  God causes the one's He chooses to enter the narrow gate.

If the LOF is a historic event, then it would be silly for multiple LOF's.  But the LOF as simply a symbol for God's judgment when God decides to visit judgment on a person for not doing what Christ says, then I think yes, there can be multiple reapings of judgment in this life-time.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 12:09:07 PM
THE WIDE GATE:

Psalm 9:13
Have mercy upon me, O LORD; consider my trouble which I suffer of them that hate me, thou that liftest me up from the gates of death:

14That I may shew forth all thy praise in the gates of the daughter of Zion: I will rejoice in thy salvation.



John 8:24
I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.




THE NARROW GATE:


24So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

--Gen 3


Ezekiel 43:4
And the glory of the LORD came into the house by the way of the gate whose prospect is toward the east.


2Then said the LORD unto me; This gate shall be shut, it shall not be opened, and no man shall enter in by it; because the LORD, the God of Israel, hath entered in by it, therefore it shall be shut.
3It is for the prince; the prince, he shall sit in it to eat bread before the LORD; he shall enter by the way of the porch of that gate, and shall go out by the way of the same.



Matthew 25:10
And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.



John 10:2
But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.



John 10:7
Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep.



John 10:9
I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.



"door"

G2374
θύρα
thura
thoo'-rah
Apparently a primary word (compare "door"); a portal or entrance (the opening or the closure, literally or figuratively): - door, gate.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: aspiring son on August 23, 2008, 02:13:19 PM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 12:09:07 PM
THE WIDE GATE:

Psalm 9:13
Have mercy upon me, O LORD; consider my trouble which I suffer of them that hate me, thou that liftest me up from the gates of death:

14That I may shew forth all thy praise in the gates of the daughter of Zion: I will rejoice in thy salvation.



John 8:24
I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.




THE NARROW GATE:


24So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

--Gen 3


Ezekiel 43:4
And the glory of the LORD came into the house by the way of the gate whose prospect is toward the east.


2Then said the LORD unto me; This gate shall be shut, it shall not be opened, and no man shall enter in by it; because the LORD, the God of Israel, hath entered in by it, therefore it shall be shut.
3It is for the prince; the prince, he shall sit in it to eat bread before the LORD; he shall enter by the way of the porch of that gate, and shall go out by the way of the same.



Matthew 25:10
And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.



John 10:2
But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.



John 10:7
Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep.



John 10:9
I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.



"door"

G2374
θύρα
thura
thoo'-rah
Apparently a primary word (compare "door"); a portal or entrance (the opening or the closure, literally or figuratively): - door, gate.


And the narrow door for the saints (the elect) means that the lake of fire is in their earthly lifetime...

That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than gold that perishes, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ..." 1 Pet 1-7

John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize you with water: but one mightier than I comes, the latchet on whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with Fire...."Luke 3-16

"Now no chastening for the present seems to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yeilds the peaceble fruit ot the righteousness unot them which are exercised thereby... "Heb 12-11


I wish I had time but there are many others

God Bless

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 04:31:19 PM
QuoteHi bob,

do you see Jesus as having gone through the lake of fire wide gait first??


Hi laren, I know you asked Bob this , but I hope you don't mind if I answer it also.

Yes Jesus went through the lake of fire /2nd death but it had no power over Him and He was not hurt by it. But it may well be some will disagree with this, but if one sees the 2nd death as the law all these things fall into place. When one walks in the spirit as Jesus did the law has no power over them and cannot hurt them, but when one falls from grace the law has power to hurt, but it a power that leads one back to Christ. There is only one fire and it both refines and destroys, it a double edged sword. Walk in the spirit and you are refined, walk in the flesh and it destroys.


Quoteand what do you think of this verse?

Joh 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?


Can you show me where in the lake of fire/2nd death it says people die?

For when I read about the lake of fire, those in it are alive and suffer torment.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 04:39:12 PM
Quote from: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 04:31:19 PM
QuoteHi bob,

do you see Jesus as having gone through the lake of fire wide gait first??


Hi laren, I know you asked Bob this , but I hope you don't mind if I answer it also.

Yes Jesus went through the lake of fire /2nd death but it had no power over Him and He was not hurt by it. But it may well be some will disagree with this, but if one sees the 2nd death as the law all these things fall into place. When one walks in the spirit as Jesus did the law has no power over them and cannot hurt them, but when one falls from grace the law has power to hurt, but it a power that leads one back to Christ. There is only one fire and it both refines and destroys, it a double edged sword. Walk in the spirit and you are refined, walk in the flesh and it destroys.


Quoteand what do you think of this verse?

Joh 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?


Can you show me where in the lake of fire/2nd death it says people die?

For when I read about the lake of fire, those in it are alive and suffer torment.

Hi Scott,

I think I get what you are saying from the first part of your response.  Jesus went through te lake of fire, but it didn't "harm" him, as he walked by faith.  Just as the saints go through the fire, but are protected by the "ark" and don't get "wet".  The lake of fire doesn't harm them.  It has no power over them.  So anyone living by faith of Jesus will go through the fire, but not be "hurt" of the fire.  If that is what u are saying, then I agree. 

Where I personally disagree is if people are saying that you need to be "torched" by the fire, "hurt" by the fire; so that id purifies you.  If the lake of fire is to purify, then by all means we should be hurt by it, as that's the only way to be made whole. 


as to the second part, I believe the lake of fire is not literal physical death, but "die in your sins", perish, destruction of the flesh. 

I believe that's why it is "second death". 

I got to go for now, but i'll look up some verses later that i think speak of LOF being "death".

blessings
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 04:51:56 PM
QuoteYes Jesus went through the lake of fire /2nd death but it had no power over Him and He was not hurt by it. But it may well be some will disagree with this, but if one sees the 2nd death as the law all these things fall into place. When one walks in the spirit as Jesus did the law has no power over them and cannot hurt them, but when one falls from grace the law has power to hurt, but it a power that leads one back to Christ. There is only one fire and it both refines and destroys, it a double edged sword. Walk in the spirit and you are refined, walk in the flesh and it destroys.

:thumbsup:

Its the Death of what causes Death ( M.O.D), and all those under IT,Through Death LIFE LIVES.

Each will HAVE THEIR""""""""""""PART""""""""""""""""""in the Lake, this part being the Flesh ...either way ALL Flesh( the carnality of Man) dies......

T

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 05:20:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 04:31:19 PM
QuoteHi bob,

do you see Jesus as having gone through the lake of fire wide gait first??


Hi laren, I know you asked Bob this , but I hope you don't mind if I answer it also.

Yes Jesus went through the lake of fire /2nd death but it had no power over Him and He was not hurt by it. But it may well be some will disagree with this, but if one sees the 2nd death as the law all these things fall into place. When one walks in the spirit as Jesus did the law has no power over them and cannot hurt them, but when one falls from grace the law has power to hurt, but it a power that leads one back to Christ. There is only one fire and it both refines and destroys, it a double edged sword. Walk in the spirit and you are refined, walk in the flesh and it destroys.


Quoteand what do you think of this verse?

Joh 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?


Can you show me where in the lake of fire/2nd death it says people die?

For when I read about the lake of fire, those in it are alive and suffer torment.

Hi Scott again,

I just reread your post, and I really like the way you worded that.  I think after all these years of listening and participating in these second death/lof discussions; I all along misunderstood you.  I thought you were saying "all" need to be hurt by the LOF in order to be purified.

Heb 10:31  It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.   

Gal 5:4  Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.

but for those walking by the spirit, perfect love casts out all fear. 

Joh 11:26  And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

"never die", to me; speaks of "never falling from grace" and experiencing being left unclothed in our shame.  We are clothed with His rightesouness.










Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 05:28:13 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 04:51:56 PM
QuoteYes Jesus went through the lake of fire /2nd death but it had no power over Him and He was not hurt by it. But it may well be some will disagree with this, but if one sees the 2nd death as the law all these things fall into place. When one walks in the spirit as Jesus did the law has no power over them and cannot hurt them, but when one falls from grace the law has power to hurt, but it a power that leads one back to Christ. There is only one fire and it both refines and destroys, it a double edged sword. Walk in the spirit and you are refined, walk in the flesh and it destroys.

:thumbsup:

Its the Death of what causes Death ( M.O.D), and all those under IT,Through Death LIFE LIVES.

Each will HAVE THEIR""""""""""""PART""""""""""""""""""in the Lake, this part being the Flesh ...either way ALL Flesh( the carnality of Man) dies......

T



Rev 21:8  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.


1Jn 1:7  But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.


Rom 6:14  For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.

Rom 5:2  By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.

Gal 3:7  Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.

1Jn 3:9  Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

1Jn 5:4  For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith.


Rev 2:11  He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He thatshall not overcometh   shall not be hurt of the second death.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 05:31:41 PM
Here's a question to anyone,

is there anywhere in the bible that talks of coming to a point of having our ears opened, or coming to "believing" or coming to "faith in/of Christ" is by fire?



I think what some here are saying, is that to come to faith, is through fire; and that fire is the lake of fire/second death.   

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 05:38:02 PM
24Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astonished, and rose up in haste, and spake, and said unto his counsellors, Did not we cast three men bound into the midst of the fire? They answered and said unto the king, True, O king.

25He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt;and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.

26Then Nebuchadnezzar came near to the mouth of the burning fiery furnace, and spake, and said, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, ye servants of the most high God, come forth, and come hither. Then Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, came forth of the midst of the fire.

27And the princes, governors, and captains, and the king's counsellors, being gathered together, saw these men, upon whose bodies the fire had no power, nor was an hair of their head singed, neither were their coats changed, nor the smell of fire had passed on them.

28Then Nebuchadnezzar spake, and said, Blessed be the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who hath sent his angel, and delivered his servants that trusted in him, and have changed the king's word, and yielded their bodies, that they might not serve nor worship any god, except their own God.

29Therefore I make a decree, That every people, nation, and language, which speak any thing amiss against the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, shall be cut in pieces, and their houses shall be made a dunghill: because there is no other God that can deliver after this sort.

30Then the king promoted Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, in the province of Babylon.

--Daniel 3
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 05:44:23 PM
Quote from: LaurenHere's a question to anyone,

is there anywhere in the bible that talks of coming to a point of having our ears opened, or coming to "believing" or coming to "faith in/of Christ" is by fire?

It's for growing faith to perfection--



1From James, a servant of God and of our Lord Jesus Christ.
   Greetings to the twelve tribes scattered all over the world.

2My friends, be glad, even if you have a lot of trouble. 3You know that you learn to endure by having your faith tested. 4But you must learn to endure everything, so that you will be completely mature and not lacking in anything.


--James 1
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 05:52:00 PM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 05:44:23 PM
Quote from: LaurenHere's a question to anyone,

is there anywhere in the bible that talks of coming to a point of having our ears opened, or coming to "believing" or coming to "faith in/of Christ" is by fire?

It's for growing faith to perfection--



1From James, a servant of God and of our Lord Jesus Christ.
   Greetings to the twelve tribes scattered all over the world.

2My friends, be glad, even if you have a lot of trouble. 3You know that you learn to endure by having your faith tested. 4But you must learn to endure everything, so that you will be completely mature and not lacking in anything.


--James 1

yeah, i see that.  Would you Molly call "that fire that grows faith to perfection the lake of fire/second death??" 

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 23, 2008, 06:00:19 PM
It still feels like many are looking at this outwardly rather than inwardly.  Tribulation is what we all go through . .Jesus said himself in this "world" you will have trials and tribulation . .but . .be of good cheer I have overcome the world.  So, even though I go through tribulation, whether or not I succeed in this tribulation, Christ has already over come it . . .we tend to look at it as "I gain my salvation according to overcoming my tribulation."  What Jesus is saying to me here is, my tribulation has already been overcome by him . . .not by me.  

I don't think the tribulation actually is the same as the LOF due to the fact that tribulation's purpose is different than the LOF.  Tribulation is a tool used to strengthen us in Christ.  To build our faith, trust, even relationship.  Tribulation is my natural experiences on this earth.

The lake of fire on the other hand, is not to build up or give me character, it's to purify, to purge the nature in me that can not survive spiritually.  It's not a natural place, it's a spiritual place . .and not really even a "place" but more like a realm as well.  The thing about the lake of fire ... is that those who have come into the grace of God through faith in Christ . . .will not enter into it because the cross has already done what the lake of fire does.

Did Jesus go through the lake of fire?  Dude . . .Jesus IS the lake of fire!  We, in our carnal minds, see it as a place . . .it's not a place, it's a realm, a dimension . . .and a person.  The spirit realm is Christ . . .when you are in the Spirit, you are in Christ.  You can be saved and still be spiritually blind . . .this wide gate versus narrow gate . . . it's not about going to hell . .it's about entering into the kingdom NOW!  It's reproducing after our own kind here . . .which is not I, but Christ in me . . we're to become reproductive after Christ.

Many Christians enter through the wide gate . .yes their still Christians . .and you've talked with many of them, they are comfortable where they are, they don't want to get into the meat of truth, they're very happy living on milk.  The destruction you read in Scripture is not the distruction of people . .it's the destruction of MY MIND . .that's why we need to lay our traditional studying of Scripture down and let it be transformed with the rest of us.  Reading Scripture spiritually is simply taking it internal . . .instead of seeing "people" going through the wide gate, it's my vain thoughts, my carnality, my fleshly nature that goes through the wide gate . . .and my spirit is what's called into the narrow gate . .but it's easier to cater to the flesh than take captive those thoughts by the Spirit.

It's not what your mind understands . .it's what your spirit sees.  Walk in the spirit, it doesn't know how to read, it only hears the voice and sees the sound.  There is a sound beneath the passages we quote that only the spirit can hear . . .you see it all around you in the natural . .there are so many sounds your natural ears can't hear . . .even dogs can hear sounds we can't here . . .that should be humbling in and of itself.

Even Balaam's donkey could see things this great prophet riding him couldn't see . . .we can't trust what our eyes tell us, we need to let go of that stuff and listen for the sound of what Scripture is saying . . .it's beneath the noise of doctrine.

Making any sense?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 06:06:43 PM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 05:31:41 PM
Here's a question to anyone,

is there anywhere in the bible that talks of coming to a point of having our ears opened, or coming to "believing" or coming to "faith in/of Christ" is by fire?



I think what some here are saying, is that to come to faith, is through fire; and that fire is the lake of fire/second death.   


For me we in the flesh are drawn to repent- CHANGE(Rom 2:4\Hbr 6:1)....He is the fire which renews the HEAVENS( mind) and the EARTH( body)..



Mat 3:11  I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and [with] fire:


Mat 3:12  Whose fan [is] in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire. ( is that not our FLESH)

The unbelieving Laren for mine are those Under LAW, ...those who believest NOT, be them Under the law or without.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 06:24:19 PM
Quote from: Nathan on August 23, 2008, 06:00:19 PM
. . .instead of seeing "people" going through the wide gate, it's my vain thoughts, my carnality, my fleshly nature that goes through the wide gate . . .and my spirit is what's called into the narrow gate . .but it's easier to cater to the flesh than take captive those thoughts by the Spirit.

Making any sense?

I understand what you are saying, and do look inward, but; for me;

as i've stated before; I don't believe the new tesatment writers were talking/writing of an "inward" application.  Paul was not saying my flesh part will go through the LOF, and the spirit part of me given by God won't.  He was literally (which had a huge spiritual application (literal doesn't mean it's not spiriutal imo) talking about Old Covenant law zealot jews who were not willing to give up their mindset of "law" to be righteous; and they would see there house come crashing down.

God through Christ (the head and body=Jesus and first fruits saints) were the means by which this happened.  Through the church's mercy, they (the OC law mindset people) would be given mercy too.  What did the receivng of them mean?  LIFE from the dead. 

Life from the dead means to me, God completed reconciliation. 

What does that mean now, "working out what is already completed".

Again, I see your application; and actually agree with it now, but I personally don't see how this can apply today if one is still in the mindset of we are living now in the same age as the first century church. 

That is again why I lean toward a preterist view.  I believe God "literally" (which has huge spiriutal application) worked out his plan of redemption with "HIS people" (Israel under law).  The second coming occurred, destruction came upon them.  The spiritual application is huge for us NOW.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 06:30:36 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 06:06:43 PM


Mat 3:11  I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and [with] fire:


Mat 3:12  Whose fan [is] in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire. ( is that not our FLESH)


But, I don't think that was what Paul, John, Peter etc. were saying.  They imo, were seeing a destruction coming upon those in the flesh (those who were not willing to repent).  Paul was imo, was referring to those under law, stuck in the old mindest as "the flesh". 

Where I disagree with you is that you still see the old covenant as in place, using this verse

Joh 2:10  And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now.

I don't believe the "now" in that verse is the same as "now" today.  The old covenant world was destroyed imo during the first century.  God made it known to "His people" that he was no longer in covenant with man via law, but now the world was reconciled through Jesus. 


But if we "now" continue to have a false/ignorant "mindset" of being under law; the inward/spiritual application is very much along the lines of what you have outlined.

Hope I make sense Graham.


blessings friend

Laren
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 06:33:39 PM
Quote from: NathanIt's not what your mind understands . .it's what your spirit sees.  Walk in the spirit, it doesn't know how to read, it only hears the voice and sees the sound.  There is a sound beneath the passages we quote that only the spirit can hear . . .you see it all around you in the natural . .there are so many sounds your natural ears can't hear . . .even dogs can hear sounds we can't here . . .that should be humbling in and of itself.

Even Balaam's donkey could see things this great prophet riding him couldn't see . . .we can't trust what our eyes tell us, we need to let go of that stuff and listen for the sound of what Scripture is saying . . .it's beneath the noise of doctrine.

Making any sense?


Yes, sound is vibration.  God spoke the world into existence.  He upholds all things by the word of his power.

I like the way you put this--a sound that only the spirit can hear--

Revelation 14:3
And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 06:47:31 PM
Quote from: LaurenThe old covenant world was destroyed imo during the first century.  God made it known to "His people" that he was no longer in covenant with man via law, but now the world was reconciled through Jesus. 


But if we "now" continue to have a false/ignorant "mindset" of being under law; the inward/spiritual application is very much along the lines of what you have outlined.

Paul said that which is obsolete will soon pass away.  And, it did.

Yet, there are still Christians who demand an eye for an eye (or worse, 10,000 eyes for an eye,) and think that is right because it is in the Bible.  It's like they never heard Jesus say,--


43Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.

44But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

45That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.


--Mat 5



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 06:49:11 PM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 06:30:36 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 06:06:43 PM


Mat 3:11  I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and [with] fire:


Mat 3:12  Whose fan [is] in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire. ( is that not our FLESH)


But, I don't think that was what Paul, John, Peter etc. were saying.  They imo, were seeing a destruction coming upon those in the flesh (those who were not willing to repent).  Paul was imo, was referring to those under law, stuck in the old mindest as "the flesh". 

Where I disagree with you is that you still see the old covenant as in place, using this verse

Joh 2:10  And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now.

I don't believe the "now" in that verse is the same as "now" today.  The old covenant world was destroyed imo during the first century.  God made it known to "His people" that he was no longer in covenant with man via law, but now the world was reconciled through Jesus. 


But if we "now" continue to have a false/ignorant "mindset" of being under law; the inward/spiritual application is very much along the lines of what you have outlined.

Hope I make sense Graham.


blessings friend

Laren
I agree ont he first paragraph Laren, I think we touch on this a few weeks back , the the literal Destruction of the Temple 70AD etc...and I agree, but still shows a spirtual Understanding.


Im Not sure what ya mean By" I see the Old C still In Place"?...Both are to be Kept Laren as mentioned in an earlier post, where the two wines are presereved,, BUT LIFE is Truly found ONLY in the NEW,.CHRIST OUR VICTORY AND VICTORY FOR all in their appointed time....but ya cant be In both at the SAME TIME.

Rom 3:19  Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

I Must admit bro, im not 100% sure what ya getting at...

I see the law very much for those Under the LAW , that God finds Them Guilty...which is everyone bar those in HIM,..

be now , then and to come....

again Im not sure what you think we are disagreeing on bro... :dontknow:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 06:53:40 PM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:25:57 AM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:20:59 AM

Quote from: SotwIf you are fearful, you not recognize that the raging fire that consumes the enemies of God, are those who trust in the Lord and are raised up as the royal priesthood reigning with the Son of God. The first shall serve the last. Those who lost everything will be saved but as ones through fire.

Craig, that whole post was beautiful.  You are describing the Melchizedek priesthood.  Well, you might not agree with me lol.  But, to me, that's what it is.

That priesthood, too, will be refined and purified as silver [by fire]--I'm thinking in this life--so that they will stand when he appears.

2But who may abide the day of his coming? and who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap:

3And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the LORD an offering in righteousness.

4Then shall the offering of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant unto the LORD, as in the days of old, and as in former years.


--Malachi 3



but there is a difference is there not between refiners fire, and destructive fire??

I believe there is.

I also think it would be intresting to study what a "priest/priesthood" does.  What is their function? 

refiner's fire, imo; is by grace through Faith

and destructive fire is based on "not believing", and having to perish.

whoseover believes on him shall not perish (go through LOF imo)

Right Laren. That is how Scripture describes it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 06:53:58 PM
i'll try to get back to ya taffy, got a busy day ahead.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 06:59:38 PM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:54:49 AM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:51:59 AM
so do you see this training/becoming priests as the lake of fire??
Well, Craig doesn't want to call it the lake of fire--he is saying these priests will be the lake of fire I think, or at least be part of it.

But, someone earlier called it fiery trials--the trying of our faith--that is part of the refining process--like what someone called a spiritual stairmaster.  It is a type of fire, for sure.  James tells us to count it all joy when we experience this.

Because it isn't the Lake of Fire. The coal that the priest puts to his lips, does not destroy anything, it ceremoniously purifies their lips. But the fire in which the priest throws the leper's house and clothing literally destroys everything and the leper is kicked out of the city to live outside the walls. As I said earlier in this thread, people do not know the difference between clean, unclean, ceremoniously clean and ceremoniously unclean. One is refining fire, the others is destructive fire. Whether the fire is from the same source does not matter, one purifies through faith and the other purifies through destruction.

As Laren says,
Quoteone leaves one clothed, not ashamed

That is correct. One fire which is by faith purifies and one arrives into the Kingdom fully clothed having their robes washed white in the blood of Christ.

Quoteone leaves one naked/shamed

The other purifies by destruction and that one arrives naked and beaten and outside the walls waiting for help from the ones inside the city.

Why people cannot see how obvious this pattern is in Scripture, beats me, short of condemning them for following after their imagination they still have not been able to demonstrate anything contrary to what laren and myself have presented.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 07:00:36 PM
Quotebut there is a difference is there not between refiners fire, and destructive fire??

I believe there is.

I also think it would be intresting to study what a "priest/priesthood" does.  What is their function?  

refiner's fire, imo; is by grace through Faith

and destructive fire is based on "not believing", and having to perish.

whoseover believes on him shall not perish (go through LOF imo)



QuoteRight Laren. That is how Scripture describes it.  



Just savoring a brief moment of agreement.   :icon_king:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 07:00:46 PM
I read through every 'objection', and even the inward/outward appeal and it still does not prove the Lake of Fire is in this life. This shows me a lack of knowledge concerning the resurrection of the dead.

1 Corinthians 15:16-19, 29-34
16For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised either. 17And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. 18Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ are lost. 19If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more than all men.

29Now if there is no resurrection, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized for them? 30And as for us, why do we endanger ourselves every hour? 31I die every day—I mean that, brothers—just as surely as I glory over you in Christ Jesus our Lord. 32If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus for merely human reasons, what have I gained? If the dead are not raised,
   "Let us eat and drink,
      for tomorrow we die."[d] 33Do not be misled: "Bad company corrupts good character." 34Come back to your senses as you ought, and stop sinning; for there are some who are ignorant of God—I say this to your shame.

Paul knew there was something after this life, regardless of how much he spoke of the inner man growing. The rewards of that innerman growing come at the end of the natural life in the resurrection of the dead. Otherwise as Paul said, why do we endanger ourselves every hour, why do we die every day (not taking any personal credit or gain), and if he fought wild beasts in Ephesus for merely human reasons, what has he gained? If the dead are not raised, might as well live as I said because it doesn't matter both the righteous by faith and the wicked in unbelief share the same destiny.

I bet that those who believe in Lake of Fire is this life, do not believe in a literal (abeit spiritual) bodily resurrection of the dead, knowing that the natural must come first and then the spiritual. Everything comes back to the basic foundations of the faith, there are six of them and if one is different than another, the conclusions are different completely.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 07:06:57 PM


Quote from: craigWhether the fire is from the same source does not matter, one purifies through faith and the other purifies through destruction.
I totally agree ,I was raised on the silver being REFINED,..the dross removed...,its a fact that the refiner knows exactly the right time its purified, because apparently ,HE SEES his OWN reflection while looking into it..( face to Face)....REFINED.

But what is Refined and what Is Destroyed Craig?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 07:07:10 PM
So--

The refiner's fire versus the lake of fire looks like this?

Matthew 21:44
And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 07:27:35 PM
Quote from: Molly on August 23, 2008, 07:07:10 PM
So--

The refiner's fire versus the lake of fire looks like this?

Matthew 21:44
And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.


Yes. This is repeated throughout all Scripture from the Law, Prophets and the Psalms to the words of Jesus and the disciples. There is a difficult way which results in reward in the Kingdom, and there is the easy way which results in loss in the Kingdom. You don't need to take the easy way in order to find the difficult way. In fact, most people don't know they are on the easy path, thinking that the odd pebble on the pavement get's into their shoes and it is a very long road, means it was the difficult path. Not realizing that the ones on the difficult path, are cutting through jungles, climbing mountains, crossing rivers, and the path is just as very long. Yes, everyone heard the saying, "Work smarter not harder." but the smart one would have figured out that the easy path leads to destruction.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 07:38:13 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 07:06:57 PM
Quote from: craigWhether the fire is from the same source does not matter, one purifies through faith and the other purifies through destruction.
I totally agree ,I was raised on the silver being REFINED,..the dross removed...,its a fact that the refiner knows exactly the right time its purified, because apparently ,HE SEES his OWN reflection while looking into it..( face to Face)....REFINED.

But what is Refined and what Is Destroyed Craig?

You keep thinking the dross is what goes into the Lake of Fire versus the silver which is being refined. Though it is technically correct, it is not at all how it is. The silver is not the dross that is being removed as part of the Refining Fire, it is not burned by fire, but the dross is.

Jeremiah 6:27-30
"I have made you a tester of metals and my people the ore, that you may observe and test their ways.
They are all hardened rebels, going about to slander. They are bronze and iron; they all act corruptly.
The bellows blow fiercely to burn away the lead with fire, but the refining goes on in vain; the wicked are not purged out.
They are called rejected silver, because the LORD has rejected them."


Not everyone is refined like silver, because they made of iron and bronze.

Ezekiel 22:18
Son of man, the house of Israel has become dross to me; all of them are the copper, tin, iron and lead left inside a furnace. They are but the dross of silver.

Not everyone is refined like silver, because they are made of copper tin, iron and left inside the furnace.

Isaiah 48:8-11
You have neither heard nor understood; from of old your ear has not been open. Well do I know how treacherous you are; you were called a rebel from birth.
For my own name's sake I delay my wrath; for the sake of my praise I hold it back from you, so as not to cut you off.
See, I have refined you, though not as silver;  I have tested you in the furnace of affliction.
For my own sake, for my own sake, I do this.
How can I let myself be defamed? I will not yield my glory to another.


Once again, those who are treacherous and rebellious go through not Refining Fire, even though it is the same Fire they are put into the Furnace!
So the question is, what makes you silver and what makes you iron, bronze, copper, tin and left inside the furnace?

Next question is, what purpose does silver have? Well the ancients used silver to heal burns and it is still happening today.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 07:46:51 PM
Quote from: SOtW on August 23, 2008, 07:38:13 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 07:06:57 PM
Quote from: craigWhether the fire is from the same source does not matter, one purifies through faith and the other purifies through destruction.
I totally agree ,I was raised on the silver being REFINED,..the dross removed...,its a fact that the refiner knows exactly the right time its purified, because apparently ,HE SEES his OWN reflection while looking into it..( face to Face)....REFINED.

But what is Refined and what Is Destroyed Craig?

You keep thinking the dross is what goes into the Lake of Fire versus the silver which is being refined. That is not at all how it is. Whether the silver is being refined and the dross removed, is still part of the Refining Fire and at no time is part of the Lake of Fire.

Jeremiah 6:27-30
"I have made you a tester of metals and my people the ore, that you may observe and test their ways.
They are all hardened rebels, going about to slander. They are bronze and iron; they all act corruptly.
The bellows blow fiercely to burn away the lead with fire, but the refining goes on in vain; the wicked are not purged out.
They are called rejected silver, because the LORD has rejected them."


Not everyone is refined like silver, because they made of iron and bronze.

Isaiah 48:8-11
You have neither heard nor understood; from of old your ear has not been open. Well do I know how treacherous you are; you were called a rebel from birth.
For my own name's sake I delay my wrath; for the sake of my praise I hold it back from you, so as not to cut you off.
See, I have refined you, though not as silver;  I have tested you in the furnace of affliction.
For my own sake, for my own sake, I do this.
How can I let myself be defamed? I will not yield my glory to another.


Once again, those who are treacherous and rebellious go through not Refining Fire, but a Furnace of Affliction...aka the Lake of Fire. Why? Because God cannot be defamed and He will not yield His glory to another.

So the question is, what makes you silver and what makes you iron and bronze?



Silver Is his Blood Craig, Tis His Blood Cleanses Purifies.....As ya Know the IRON and Brass , is for mine, relates to the carnality of Man..our flesh....

so maybe the question is...what Does His Blood purfify us of....well thats Sin isnt It?...so what SINS?...THE SPIRIT?

yes Craig the Dross is Likened to the tin, copper...isnt it...the scum removed from the Surface...
again the Same question ,as I know the properties Of Silver....

Ezekiel 22:18

Son of man, the house of Israel has become dross to me; all of them are the copper, tin, iron and lead left inside a furnace. They are but the dross of silver.

whats the Dross which Is removed\BURNT?.. and what gets burnt in the FURNACE, aka lake of fire?...

could you answer these before we move on to the qualities of silver Bro



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 23, 2008, 08:03:47 PM
Quote from: Taffyso maybe the question is...what Does His Blood purfify us of....well thats Sin isnt It?...so what SINS?...THE SPIRIT?

Do you think the spirit [of man] can't sin?


12For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

--Eph 6
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 08:11:24 PM
He who WALKS in the SPIRIT...absoulutley NOT.

you may find the scripture you quoted to do with the SAME battle called the Covenants...., but there again Molly you may NOT
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 23, 2008, 08:25:41 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 06:49:11 PM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 06:30:36 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 06:06:43 PM


Mat 3:11  I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and [with] fire:


Mat 3:12  Whose fan [is] in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire. ( is that not our FLESH)


But, I don't think that was what Paul, John, Peter etc. were saying.  They imo, were seeing a destruction coming upon those in the flesh (those who were not willing to repent).  Paul was imo, was referring to those under law, stuck in the old mindest as "the flesh". 

Where I disagree with you is that you still see the old covenant as in place, using this verse

Joh 2:10  And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now.

I don't believe the "now" in that verse is the same as "now" today.  The old covenant world was destroyed imo during the first century.  God made it known to "His people" that he was no longer in covenant with man via law, but now the world was reconciled through Jesus. 


But if we "now" continue to have a false/ignorant "mindset" of being under law; the inward/spiritual application is very much along the lines of what you have outlined.

Hope I make sense Graham.


blessings friend

Laren
I agree ont he first paragraph Laren, I think we touch on this a few weeks back , the the literal Destruction of the Temple 70AD etc...and I agree, but still shows a spirtual Understanding.


Im Not sure what ya mean By" I see the Old C still In Place"?...Both are to be Kept Laren as mentioned in an earlier post, where the two wines are presereved,, BUT LIFE is Truly found ONLY in the NEW,.CHRIST OUR VICTORY AND VICTORY FOR all in their appointed time....but ya cant be In both at the SAME TIME.

Rom 3:19  Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

I Must admit bro, im not 100% sure what ya getting at...

I see the law very much for those Under the LAW , that God finds Them Guilty...which is everyone bar those in HIM,..

be now , then and to come....

again Im not sure what you think we are disagreeing on bro... :dontknow:



Ok Taffy,

I got a few minutes. 

the old covenant imo,is an agreement between God and man.  God made the agreement.

Heb 8:6  But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.

Heb 8:7  For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.

Heb 8:8  For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:

Heb 8:9  Not according to the covenant that I made  with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand  to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my  covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.

Heb 8:10  For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:

Heb 8:11  And they shall not teach every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.

Heb 8:12  For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.

Heb 8:13  In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

The old was ready to vanish away.  And it did imo; when Israel was judged. 


The old is no longer in effect.  The types and figues (temple, sacrifices, etc) were done away with.  God is no longer in old covenant with man.  it is finished.  The end of the age which vanished away imo.


So now,

if one still lives as under old covenant, it has no authority.  It imo, is done.  Man is living under a covenant that no longer exists. 

so i dont' see old and new preserved till now (meaning today) as it was done away with, vanished.


what ya think?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 08:34:58 PM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 05:20:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 04:31:19 PM
QuoteHi bob,

do you see Jesus as having gone through the lake of fire wide gait first??


Hi laren, I know you asked Bob this , but I hope you don't mind if I answer it also.

Yes Jesus went through the lake of fire /2nd death but it had no power over Him and He was not hurt by it. But it may well be some will disagree with this, but if one sees the 2nd death as the law all these things fall into place. When one walks in the spirit as Jesus did the law has no power over them and cannot hurt them, but when one falls from grace the law has power to hurt, but it a power that leads one back to Christ. There is only one fire and it both refines and destroys, it a double edged sword. Walk in the spirit and you are refined, walk in the flesh and it destroys.


Quoteand what do you think of this verse?

Joh 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?


Can you show me where in the lake of fire/2nd death it says people die?

For when I read about the lake of fire, those in it are alive and suffer torment.

Hi Scott again,

I just reread your post, and I really like the way you worded that.  I think after all these years of listening and participating in these second death/lof discussions; I all along misunderstood you.  I thought you were saying "all" need to be hurt by the LOF in order to be purified.
Heb 10:31  It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.   

Gal 5:4  Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.

but for those walking by the spirit, perfect love casts out all fear. 

Joh 11:26  And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

"never die", to me; speaks of "never falling from grace" and experiencing being left unclothed in our shame.  We are clothed with His rightesouness.












Hi Laren, well that misunderstanding would definitely cause confusion. You just made me glad I participated in this thread brother, even if we don't come into agreement at least a misunderstanding of what I have been saying is now cleared up.

God bless
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 08:36:35 PM
Quote.will not enter into it because the cross has already done what the lake of fire does.

Hi Nathan, I agree that the lake of fire does the same thing the cross does, thus the lake of fire is the cross. But what is the cross, it is not some stake Jesus was nailed to, the cross is the law, when the law manifests itself it shows itself as a double edged sword, it is ordained unto LIFE but is also a ministration of DEATH and our schoolmaster that leads to Christ.

There is only one way God has designed for man to come unto Him by purification and that way is by the cross which is the law. The law is spiritual an if man fulfills the law death has no power over them, but when man falls from grace they walk again under the law and are thus hurt of it.

QuoteJesus IS the lake of fire!

Again I agree, because Jesus is the word/logos/debar, and the word/logos/debar are every commandment that comes from the mouth of God..
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 08:39:55 PM
QuoteDont put words in my Mouth Craig when Im Asking questions ...ill thanks you for that.

By your question you revealed your proposition, I already knew you thought the Silver and Dross spoke of the individual person. Though, when speaking of Silver, God was talking about mankind in general not an individual. So the silver ore is all mankind, and what it means to be purified like silver, is to separate the silver from the dross. The silver is not burned in the process, nor does it lose anything. The dross however is burned and is left in the furnace.

You don't know what is silver and what is not until the end of the process. So at the end of the process, you can now see the silver and the dross.

This is repeated by the Words of Jesus,

Matthew 13:30
'Allow both to grow together until the harvest; and in the time of the harvest I will say to the reapers, "First gather up the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them up; but gather the wheat into my barn."'

When does the Lake of Fire occur? At the end, not during. Why?

Matthew 13:28-29
"And he said to them, 'An enemy has done this!' The slaves said to him, 'Do you want us, then, to go and gather them up?'
"But he said, 'No; for while you are gathering up the tares, you may uproot the wheat with them. 

The same reason why both the silver ore is put whole into the Refiners Fire and not separated prior, because to chip away at silver ore, you may destroy some silver in the process. So the silver ore is put wholly in to the fire where both the silver and the dross are separated. Then the silver is taken from the fire, but the dross remains in the furnace. So whether or not it is the same fire, which it is, doesn't mean the same thing is happening. Both go through the Refiners Fire, but only one remains in the furnace.

So now for the explaination:

The silver ore is all of mankind. The refiners fire is the tribulations and trails is the world. The silver are the sons of the kingdom, while the dross is the sons of the evil one. At the end of the age, the silver and the dross are separated, the silver into the storehouse, the dross thrown into the furnace of fire, where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous shall shine forth as the Sun in the Kingdom of the Father. He who has ears, let them hear.


Quoteso maybe the question is...what Does His Blood purfify us of....well thats Sin isnt It?...so what SINS?...THE SPIRIT?

That isn't a question, that is many questions. :)

I have already explained what is happening. Yes, Jesus died and reconciled the world to Himself by the cross. Everyone is considered dead to sin as a result of what Jesus had done so that they should not live for themselves but for Him who died and rose again. Yet, some people live for Him, while others continue to live for themselves.  A person cannot serve two masters. Being already dead to sin the first time through Christ, they have become slaves to it once again by not choosing to live for Him who died for them. So now, they are to be refined, but not as silver but tested in the furnace of affliction where the person will die to sin a second time because God will not yield glory to another (the other master).

John 8:24
I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am the one I claim to be, you will indeed die in your sins."

John 11:25-26
Jesus said to her, "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"

Do you believe this?

So far in this discussion I have found a few who don't believe it. They do not recognize that people will die, and some will never die. They think we will all die.

So the blood purifies those who continue to wash themselves by it.

Revelation 7:14
And he said, "These are they who have come out of the great tribulation; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.

This is by faith, it is not literal but spiritual.

Hebrews 10:12-31
But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God. Since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool, because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.

The Holy Spirit also testifies to us about this. First he says: "This is the covenant I will make with them after that time, says the Lord. I will put my laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds." Then he adds: "Their sins and lawless acts I will remember no more." And where these have been forgiven, there is no longer any sacrifice for sin.

Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way opened for us through the curtain, that is, his body, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near to God with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled to cleanse us from a guilty conscience and having our bodies washed with pure water (metaphor for the blood of Jesus). Let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful. And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds. Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching.

If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God. Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? For we know him who said, "It is mine to avenge; I will repay," and again, "The Lord will judge his people."It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God."

Most people misunderstand this passage. Understand the reason there is no sacrifice for sins is left, is not because we have deliberately kept sinning. It is because where where sins are forgiven there is no longer a sacrifice for sin. That means the fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God is not because of sin, but because he is forgiven what he is doing must be stopped in order to save Him. His actions are being corrected because he is saved but as one through fire.

Now go back and read everything I had presented previously, to receive more answers to your questions.

Craig
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 08:40:39 PM
QuoteTHE old is no longer in effect.  The types and figues (temple, sacrifices, etc) were done away with.  God is no longer in old covenant with man.  it is finished.  The end of the age which vanished away imo.


So now,

if one still lives as under old covenant, it has no authority.  It imo, is done.  Man is living under a covenant that no longer exists. 

so i dont' see old and new preserved till now (meaning today) as it was done away with, vanished.

Laren...I agree with what you in essence are trying to Convey bro...

But, the OLD is preserved unto this day, BUT, does that mean the NEW hasnt replaced it..absolutely NOT....yes bro, the DAWN of a NEW DAY, its finished..I agree.

But the Old is preserved with Jesus Christ.....as the OLD bears witness too HIM,.as with the scrips..two WINES preserved and witnessed with these two

Rosie added to post concerning it earlier..preserved meaning to ne KEPT in MIND

Exd 3:15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this [is] my name for ever, and this [is] my memorial unto all generations.


1 Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, [and] calledMercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied.

iT BY THE old all men ARE BROUGHT TO JUDGMENT....

I just Hope im not confusing the issue....which would be a first :laughing7:
:icon_flower:



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 08:49:50 PM
QuoteNow go back and read everything I had presented previously, to receive more answers to your questions.

No thanks...

for we are POLES APART.....

Craig ...the dross removed is the FLESH of all men....tis purified by the the Blood(silver) of Christ..i ya think silver is all mankind bro..well..i cant say anything more,...

whats also burnt in the LOF, is also the Flesh Craig....that to is purified......so all whats Left is us in HIM and mim In us....SPIRIT.


Forgive me Bro..im not going around the world with you to Cross the road....believe as you will
Peace
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 08:51:36 PM
Quote from: NathanJesus IS the lake of fire!

Don't jump the gun, there is a process in place and not everyone goes through every stage of this process.  Jesus is not the Lake of Fire, He is the Fire. All mankind goes through this fire. Just because all mankind goes through this fire does not mean that all mankind is going through the Lake of Fire. It is only those who did not trust in the Lord who will go through the Lake of Fire, that is Jesus and His servants of ministering flame.

2 Peter 1:5
For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 08:52:50 PM
Quote from: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 08:36:35 PM
Quote.will not enter into it because the cross has already done what the lake of fire does.

Hi Nathan, I agree that the lake of fire does the same thing the cross does, thus the lake of fire is the cross. But what is the cross, it is not some stake Jesus was nailed to, the cross is the law, when the law manifests itself it shows itself as a double edged sword, it is ordained unto LIFE but is also a ministration of DEATH and our schoolmaster that leads to Christ.

There is only one way God has designed for man to come unto Him by purification and that way is by the cross which is the law. The law is spiritual an if man fulfills the law death has no power over them, but when man falls from grace they walk again under the law and are thus hurt of it.

QuoteJesus IS the lake of fire!

Again I agree, because Jesus is the word/logos/debar, and the word/logos/debar are every commandment that comes from the mouth of God..

hey Scott give me simple speech everyday of the week....AMEN..... :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 23, 2008, 08:55:12 PM
pnuema, you stated
There is only one way God has designed for man to come unto Him by purification and that way is by the cross which is the law. The law is spiritual an if man fulfills the law death has no power over them, but when man falls from grace they walk again under the law and are thus hurt of it.

Not sure I grasped this the first time I read it, had to reread it a couple times, and it still sounds mixed.  The cross is the law?  Perhaps, but Jesus brought an end to the law.  No man could ever fulfill the law . . .that's why Jesus did.  And now that he did, we don't have to try anymore, we simply believe in the one who already did.  That's why I love even more this realm of rest . . .the work is already done and accounted for.

For the record, it seems to be assumed I believe the lake of fire happens now . . .I do not.  I believe tribulation happens now . . .but the lake of fire, in it's context of all the two times mentioned in Scripture, is referring to a spiritual experience, which happens after spirit and body are separated. . not a physical one.  I believe if you come to Christ, the lake of fire has already been acknowledged and dealt with.  

I also believe the original purpose for Revelation was for "that" generation for the things happening "physically" to that nation, including the lake of fire.  You do realize that Israel burned, literally, for over a year after the slaughter began didn't you?  It was common to smell smoke and see dead bodies bloating in that day.  Our minds have created this little religious, self-consciousness atmosphere within the comforts of our home that it's all about "us".  

That in their suffering, seeing their family members taken out into the streets and slaughtered, their mother's and wives raped, the bodies stacked as high as a horse's bridal . . . it got so out of hand that those who came in to bring peace to the civil wars within the nation, ended up killing until noone was left, save those that ran to the hills to hide in caves.  In the midst of that, a cry goes out that the last living disciple, the one that they "tried" to kill also, but could not, this last disciple had a revelation from God . . .and the message of this wonderful visitation is . . . .that 2000 years from now, Jesus is returning . . .we are a selfish, selfish people.

I believe "this" generation "should" be taking things differently than those to whom Scripture was originally written to in the first place.  So much has happened between now and then . . .we look at the natural world and how advanced we've become as mankind since the days when Jesus walked the face of the earth.  We have no problem seeing that in these last few hundred years man has come so far . . .yet when we open our Bibles . . . we want to remain where they were 2,000 years ago and at the same time, claim that what was actually meant for then, is yet to happen now.  How messed up is that??!!

The truth is, regardless of your take on the lake of fire . . .there is only "one" truth to it.  If we walk in the spirit, we'll walk in the truth.  My mind doesn't have to understand or control every little thing.  The mind does play a role . . .but not at the introduction, or the conception of life.  The woman had to be removed from the man in order for God's good to manifest.  Once she was removed from within Adam, she was presented back to Adam from without.  Once without, Adam then planted the seed within her . . .and life was birthed as a result.

You want life to be birthed from your Eve . .from your mind?  The leave the separating spirit from soul up to God . .let his Word separate your Eve from your Adam . . not because Eve is bad, but because Adam can't reproduce if Eve is out of order.

Whew .  . . that's fun when that stuff happens.  Don't ask me to quote the Scripture that says what I just said . . . you won't find it . .all you'll find is the pattern of it.

Anyway, the question was asked about your spirit . . . I don't see man having a spirit . . .I see man having God's spirit.  This is probably going to be another point of argument . . .but I don't believe Adam passed on his spirit nature . .it was dead, remember?  Separated from God??  I believe Adam obviously passed on the nature of sin, but not spirit, but soul.

The spirit in me is Gods . . .and . ..here we go .  .the spirit in . . .Hitler was also God's . . .the difference is, one is dorment and the other is alive.  When I walk according to my soul, I've taken captive my spirit . .. when I walk according to spirit, I've taken captive my soul.  This is the vague explanation.

But to answer the question up front . . I believe the spirit in me doesn't have the capacity to sin, anymore than the soul . .the ego in me, has the capacity to achieve righteousness of it's own virtue.

Ecclesiastes 12
7Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.

It was never my spirit . .it's always been God's from the beginning.  I am a spirit, but I was never mine . . .I've always been his.  I was born into dormancy, but when I invited Christ in, spirit and soul reversed their place in me and the true me has been manifesting ever since.  The veil has been removed that held my spirit captive.  But if I didn't come to Christ, that veil would have remained through this life and into the next . .until . . .God would purify it, not to it's destruction, but to it's salvation back to him.

Note in this verse, there is no mention of eternal damnation.  Just a returning back to one's genesis.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 08:58:22 PM
Quote from: SOtW on August 23, 2008, 08:54:38 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 08:49:50 PM
QuoteNow go back and read everything I had presented previously, to receive more answers to your questions.

No thanks...for we are POLES APART.....

Craig ...the dross removed is the FLESH of all men....tis purified by the the Blood(silver) of Christ..i ya think silver is all mankind bro..well..i cant say anything more,...

whats also burnt in the LOF, is also the Flesh Craig....that to is purified......so all whats Left is us in HIM and mim In us....SPIRIT.


Forgive me Bro..im not going around the world with you to Cross the road....believe as you will
Peace

Since you refuse to go back and read through what I presented, you demonstrate you don't want to know the answers to your questions. Also, since you have no Scriptural support for your belief, you have not refuted anything either Laren or I have presented, you remain stubbornly in a believe not based on knowledge but on your own understanding. It is not difficult to notice this. You purposely oppose things you do not understand based on your own understanding since you have not taken either the time to demonstrate your understanding, nor have you been fair in this discussion.

Craig Im going to delete this post and do you favor..ya getting to sound like willie..and hes now banned.

its not that I cant give you scrips bro...but ya going to see it your ways anyway...wilies given multitudes of scrips to prove his point..but what did they Prove bud....

ive seen these food fight before....thi is not the first time this ha gone around but at times craig you fail to answer the simplest of questions....

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 09:04:31 PM
QuoteThat is not what Scripture says. The Silver does not purify the dross. The carnal nature of Craig has already been purified by the fire of Christ, not the Lake of Fire

So what ya saying is Craigs FLESH no longer lives and has BEEN purified by the FIRE,,,,but the dross being tin brass etc..is not flesh?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 09:09:51 PM
QuoteOk Taffy,

I got a few minutes.

the old covenant imo,is an agreement between God and man. God made the agreement.

Heb 8:6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.

Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.

Heb 8:8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:

Heb 8:9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.

Heb 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:

Heb 8:11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.

Heb 8:12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.

Heb 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

Hi Laren please reread those scriptures and take note that God under the new covenant is going to write the LAWS into our minds and hearts.



QuoteThe old was ready to vanish away. And it did imo; when Israel was judged.

Laren the LAW is not done away with in the manner you are seeing, the only way the LAW is done away with is when it is FULFILLED. This is why God is writing the LAWS in our hearts and minds right now (this is the refining fire we all are right now experiencing) Thus when we keep His commandment ( and no we cannot keep them by works of the law after the letter, they are only kept by obedience which has nothing to do with works by way of the law by letter, but by the fulfilling of the law by the spirit) it is PROOF that the laws are indeed written in our hearts and mind.


QuoteThe old is no longer in effect.

Only as long as we walk in the spirit, but if we again become entangled with the world the ministration of death/law comes into effect again. If it does not then we cannot be school mastered back to walking in Christ. For the scripture state that the LAW is for the salvation of the soul.


QuoteThe types and figues (temple, sacrifices, etc) were done away with. God is no longer in old covenant with man. it is finished. The end of the age which vanished away imo.

I agree, but don't mix up the LAW with the types and figures for they are not the same, the LAW is spiritual, always was and always will be.


QuoteSo now,

if one still lives as under old covenant, it has no authority. It imo, is done. Man is living under a covenant that no longer exists.

so i dont' see old and new preserved till now (meaning today) as it was done away with, vanished.

Again only as long as one is walking in the spirit brother.

Death also is already defeated for Christ but all things under His feet correct?

Yet we see death defeated in prophesy because death is still around.

So as death is already defeated in Christ, why is death still around?

Because we (the body of Christ) fill up that which is lacking in the suffering of Christ, and death will not be defeated until the FEET company is manifested.

All the prophesies that pertain to our Lord and saviour also pertain to us as we make up His body.

God bless 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on August 23, 2008, 09:18:40 PM
Quote from: laren on August 23, 2008, 05:31:41 PM
Here's a question to anyone,

is there anywhere in the bible that talks of coming to a point of having our ears opened, or coming to "believing" or coming to "faith in/of Christ" is by fire?

I think what some here are saying, is that to come to faith, is through fire; and that fire is the lake of fire/second death.

Hi Laren,

I'll take a stab.  Fire is a symbol, so I don't think it has to say "fire", it can say what fire repesents.

John 9:39 And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind.

Judgment is so that:
1. Those who think they see will be shown their blindness.  <-- God bringing the lofty down
2. Those who see their blindness will be given sight, they will see God.  <-- God raising up the humble

God judges His people because they have no faith.

Deuteronomy 32:20 And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be: for they are a very froward generation, children in whom is no faith.

Judgment lasts until their "power is gone".  Is that faith?

Deuteronomy 32:32 For their vine is of the vine of Sodom, and of the fields of Gomorrah: their grapes are grapes of gall, their clusters are bitter: 33  Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps. 34 Is not this laid up in store with me, and sealed up among my treasures? 35 To me belongeth vengeance, and recompence; their foot shall slide in due time: for the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things that shall come upon them make haste. 36  For the LORD shall judge his people, and repent himself for his servants, when he seeth that their power is gone, and there is none shut up, or left. 37 And he shall say, Where are their gods, their rock in whom they trusted.

In these two passages, judgment lasts until to bolded words.  Do those sound like faith?

Deuteronomy 30:1 And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and thou shalt call them to mind among all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath driven thee, 2 And shalt return unto the LORD thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul; 3 That then the LORD thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath scattered thee. 4 If any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts of heaven, from thence will the LORD thy God gather thee, and from thence will he fetch thee: 5 And the LORD thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and he will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers. 6  And the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live.

Deuteronomy 4:25 When thou shalt beget children, and children's children, and ye shall have remained long in the land, and shall corrupt yourselves, and make a graven image, or the likeness of any thing, and shall do evil in the sight of the LORD thy God, to provoke him to anger: 26 I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that ye shall soon utterly perish from off the land whereunto ye go over Jordan to possess it; ye shall not prolong [your] days upon it, but shall utterly be destroyed. 27 And the LORD shall scatter you among the nations, and ye shall be left few in number among the heathen, whither the LORD shall lead you. 28 And there ye shall serve gods, the work of men's hands, wood and stone, which neither see, nor hear, nor eat, nor smell. 29  But if from thence thou shalt seek the LORD thy God, thou shalt find him, if thou seek him with all thy heart and with all thy soul. 30  When thou art in tribulation, and all these things are come upon thee, even in the latter days, if thou turn to the LORD thy God, and shalt be obedient unto his voice; 31 (For the LORD thy God [is] a merciful God;) he will not forsake thee, neither destroy thee, nor forget the covenant of thy fathers which he sware unto them.

All of which reminds me of this:

Galatians 3:24  Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25  But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 09:19:00 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 09:04:31 PM
QuoteThat is not what Scripture says. The Silver does not purify the dross. The carnal nature of Craig has already been purified by the fire of Christ, not the Lake of Fire

So what ya saying is Craigs FLESH no longer lives and has BEEN purified by the FIRE,,,,but the dross being tin brass etc..is not flesh?

I explained this to you already, you are not seeing the details of the bigger picture. You are making generalities and not seeing how they correlate with each other. You are making hasty generalizations and concluding that similarities are not similarities but the same thing. Imagine if you were before the courts and you were accused of murder alongside a real murderer because you lived in the same building, you took the same bus, you knew the same people, and both put your garbage in the same trash can. Would you say that similarity has now made you the murderer? Why would apply this same logic to the things of God?

It is talking about all mankind, those who trust in the Lord and those who do not.  The Silver Ore, is the speaking of all mankind. Just like the wheat and the tares planted in a field, is speaking of all mankind. Those who trust in the Lord, the sons of the Kingdom are separated from those who did not trust in the Lord, sons of the enemy. Only the dross and the tares face the furnace of fire.

Now something similar happens with the individual, who now trusts in the Lord. They go through a process very similar but not the same. If you want to talk about the believer he is composed of two parts, the wheat and the chaff. The chaff is the stalk of the wheat and that is not separated through the furnace, that is separated by the threshing floor. The wheat is separated from the chaff prior to the chaff ever being thrown into the furnace of fire. After silver has been put into the fire and separated from the dross, it is then pounded out with a hammer to remove any further impurity within the silver itself. The silver never faces the furnace of fire.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 09:19:28 PM
QuoteAs demonstrated before, whether I give Scripture or not, neither WillieH, Pneuma or yourself will find every excuse to not take what I said and refute it. You still have not done so.

What! how the heck did I get dragged into your debate with Willie and Taffy?

All I have done so far is post what I see, I have not debated anyone, so please leave me out of it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 09:22:16 PM
Quote from: SOtW on August 23, 2008, 09:19:00 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 23, 2008, 09:04:31 PM
QuoteThat is not what Scripture says. The Silver does not purify the dross. The carnal nature of Craig has already been purified by the fire of Christ, not the Lake of Fire

So what ya saying is Craigs FLESH no longer lives and has BEEN purified by the FIRE,,,,but the dross being tin brass etc..is not flesh?

I explained this to you already, you are not seeing the details of the bigger picture. You are making generalities and not seeing how they correlate with each other. You are making hasty generalizations and concluding that similarities are not similarities but the same thing. Imagine if you were before the courts and you were accused of murder alongside a real murderer because you lived in the same building, you took the same bus, you knew the same people, and both put your garbage in the same trash can. Would you say that similarity has now made you the murderer? Why would apply this same logic to the things of God?

It is talking about all mankind, those who trust in the Lord and those who do not.  The Silver Ore, is the speaking of all mankind. Just like the wheat and the tares planted in a field, is speaking of all mankind. Those who trust in the Lord, the sons of the Kingdom are separated from those who did not trust in the Lord, sons of the enemy. Only the dross and the tares face the furnace of fire.

Now something similar happens with the individual, who now trusts in the Lord. They go through a process very similar but not the same. If you want to talk about the believer he is composed of two parts, the wheat and the chaff. The chaff is the stalk of the wheat and that is not separated through the furnace, that is separated by the threshing floor. The wheat is separated from the chaff prior to the chaff ever being thrown into the furnace of fire. After silver has been put into the fire and separated from the dross, it is then pounded out with a hammer to remove any further impurity within the silver itself. The silver never faces the furnace of fire.




Thanks Craig
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 09:23:05 PM
Hi Nathan, give me a few minute( more like and hour  :laughing7:) to make a reply and I'll get back to you.

Just letting you know I saw your post and will be making a reply. :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 23, 2008, 09:26:28 PM
Quote from: pneuma on August 23, 2008, 09:19:28 PM
QuoteAs demonstrated before, whether I give Scripture or not, neither WillieH, Pneuma or yourself will find every excuse to not take what I said and refute it. You still have not done so.

What! how the heck did I get dragged into your debate with Willie and Taffy?

All I have done so far is post what I see, I have not debated anyone, so please leave me out of it.

Sorry Pnemua, but in past experience concerning the Lake of Fire, you have also made the same plays as both WillieH and Taffy have made accusing me of either not using Scripture to support my position, or that using Scripture didn't matter and you still disagree regardless. Therefore you were already part of it. There are three people in this forum who continue to use these excuses against me in why they cannot find agreement, you are one of them.

I just grow weary of having to hear it over and over, and I apologize for bringing your name into it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 25, 2008, 01:52:38 AM

Quote
Not sure I grasped this the first time I read it, had to reread it a couple times, and it still sounds mixed. The cross is the law? Perhaps, but Jesus brought an end to the law. No man could ever fulfill the law . . .that's why Jesus did. And now that he did, we don't have to try anymore, we simply believe in the one who already did. That's why I love even more this realm of rest . . .the work is already done and accounted for.

Hi Nathan, yes Jesus brought an end to the law, but not after the manner you believe.
The law is not done away with except it be fulfilled.
This is hard to explain in a few words brother but if you are interested check out my blog here

http://indefenceofthecross.blogspot.com/2008/07/same-law.html

Also think of this bro, Jesus bore the cross for everyone correct?
Yet we to must bare our own cross, which cross is the same on He bore.
Thus His cross was the fulfilling of the law, so to is ours.

QuoteFor the record, it seems to be assumed I believe the lake of fire happens now . . .I do not.

I see it as WAS, IS and IS TO COME, for it (lake of fire) is for the express purpose of manifesting Christ to us and in us.

QuoteI believe tribulation happens now . . .but the lake of fire, in it's context of all the two times mentioned in Scripture, is referring to a spiritual experience, which happens after spirit and body are separated. . not a physical one. I believe if you come to Christ, the lake of fire has already been acknowledged and dealt with.


Many see it this way Nathan, but Jesus warns the churches that unless they overcome they to will have their PART in the lake of fire.




QuoteI also believe the original purpose for Revelation was for "that" generation for the things happening "physically" to that nation, including the lake of fire. You do realize that Israel burned, literally, for over a year after the slaughter began didn't you? It was common to smell smoke and see dead bodies bloating in that day. Our minds have created this little religious, self-consciousness atmosphere within the comforts of our home that it's all about "us".

That in their suffering, seeing their family members taken out into the streets and slaughtered, their mother's and wives raped, the bodies stacked as high as a horse's bridal . . . it got so out of hand that those who came in to bring peace to the civil wars within the nation, ended up killing until noone was left, save those that ran to the hills to hide in caves. In the midst of that, a cry goes out that the last living disciple, the one that they "tried" to kill also, but could not, this last disciple had a revelation from God . . .and the message of this wonderful visitation is . . . .that 2000 years from now, Jesus is returning . . .we are a selfish, selfish people.

I also see a literal side bro, after all Jesus died on a literal cross, but the cross we are to bare is not just literal but spiritual, same as with Him. And I agree it not all about us, it about all those that went before us, those in the here and now and those yet to come, WAS, IS and IS TO COME.



QuoteI believe "this" generation "should" be taking things differently than those to whom Scripture was originally written to in the first place. So much has happened between now and then . . .we look at the natural world and how advanced we've become as mankind since the days when Jesus walked the face of the earth. We have no problem seeing that in these last few hundred years man has come so far . . .yet when we open our Bibles . . . we want to remain where they were 2,000 years ago and at the same time, claim that what was actually meant for then, is yet to happen now. How messed up is that??!!

There is nothing new under the sun, what was is what will be.

QuoteThe truth is, regardless of your take on the lake of fire . . .there is only "one" truth to it. If we walk in the spirit, we'll walk in the truth. My mind doesn't have to understand or control every little thing. The mind does play a role . . .but not at the introduction, or the conception of life. The woman had to be removed from the man in order for God's good to manifest. Once she was removed from within Adam, she was presented back to Adam from without. Once without, Adam then planted the seed within her . . .and life was birthed as a result.

You want life to be birthed from your Eve . .from your mind? The leave the separating spirit from soul up to God . .let his Word separate your Eve from your Adam . . not because Eve is bad, but because Adam can't reproduce if Eve is out of order.

I like that

QuoteWhew . . . that's fun when that stuff happens. Don't ask me to quote the Scripture that says what I just said . . . you won't find it . .all you'll find is the pattern of it.

I knew where you were coming from brother.

QuoteAnyway, the question was asked about your spirit . . . I don't see man having a spirit . . .I see man having God's spirit.

His spirit bare witness with our spirit  that we are the sons of God.

QuoteThis is probably going to be another point of argument . . .but I don't believe Adam passed on his spirit nature . .it was dead, remember? Separated from God?? I believe Adam obviously passed on the nature of sin, but not spirit, but soul.

God spirit is not in need of salvation.

To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved  in the day of the Lord Jesus.



QuoteThe spirit in me is Gods . . .and . ..here we go . .the spirit in . . .Hitler was also God's . . .the difference is, one is dorment and the other is alive.

Don't forget about the spirit of the anti-christ Nathan.

Anti does not mean against according to scripture, but carries the meaning of instead of, thus man has within them a spirit INSTEAD OF  the spirit of Christ. He is the man of sin that sits in the temple, which temple we are and declares himself god.


QuoteWhen I walk according to my soul, I've taken captive my spirit . .. when I walk according to spirit, I've taken captive my soul. This is the vague explanation.

I know what you are saying Nathan and I agree in part (one of my favourite books is the spiritual man by Nee) I just see it slightly different in that our spirit when it listens to Gods who is spirit takes captive the soul. God spirit takes captive our spirit, our spirit then take captive our soul, and when spirit and soul are in union takes captive our body.

QuoteBut to answer the question up front . . I believe the spirit in me doesn't have the capacity to sin, anymore than the soul . .the ego in me, has the capacity to achieve righteousness of it's own virtue.

Ecclesiastes 12
7Then shall the dust return to the earth  as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.



It was never my spirit . .it's always been God's from the beginning. I am a spirit, but I was never mine . . .I've always been his. I was born into dormancy, but when I invited Christ in, spirit and soul reversed their place in me and the true me has been manifesting ever since. The veil has been removed that held my spirit captive. But if I didn't come to Christ, that veil would have remained through this life and into the next . .until . . .God would purify it, not to it's destruction, but to it's salvation back to him.

Note in this verse, there is no mention of eternal damnation. Just a returning back to one's genesis.

Again we agree in part Nathan, but is it our spirit that returns to God who gave it when we return to dust or is it His spirit?

Remember when Adam was cast forth from the garden he returned to the dust from whence he was taken, yet Adam still had a spirit, soul and body.

God bless



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 01:18:37 PM
QuoteBy your question you revealed your proposition, I already knew you thought the Silver and Dross spoke of the individual person. Though, when speaking of Silver, God was talking about mankind in general not an individual. So the silver ore is all mankind, and what it means to be purified like silver, is to separate the silver from the dross. The silver is not burned in the process, nor does it lose anything. The dross however is burned and is left in the furnace

Hi Craig Having re- read  and digested.

First and foremost..No, I didnt not say SILVER was an Individual,What I said it was Christ \Blood, The Hidden man of the Heart  which is Not damaged, the Dross( Flesh) is the carnality of MAN ,which is burnt...The soul ( mind and heart) of Man being purified\CLEANSED by His Blood\fire

The wheat is also the Hidden Man which dwells in the our carnal Nature ie( tares) and they too are seperated, as with the Dross which too are Burnt, DETROYED..Flesh is NOT refined,  as it serves no purpose...again its the soul( heart and Mind)being united as ONE.

The refining is through Fire\BLOOD which brings about HIM,the ore if you will ,HEATED hot enough to Bring us FACE TO FACE, meaning one with HIM( OUR HEART AND mIND)... as will also, the destruction of the Flesh bring about the same( lof)....One fire with Two purposes,one of refining and one  of destruction which will bring about the same result, that is ,the DEATH of carnality ( for the Flesh PROFITS NOTHING)...which I recall is more than you used to suggest as I believe at one time you saw TWO FIRES....for two different purposes..would that be correct ?

iF YOU WILL ,the lake of fire cannot hurt spirit, for thats what we NOW ARE,the purpose of the LAKE is for the destruction the flesh......

does this clarify my understanding a little clearer...if not show me where you believe otherwise,or what you percieve Im missing/



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 04:12:48 PM
I will answer the above questions but I want to address this:

QuoteF YOU WILL ,the lake of fire cannot hurt spirit, for thats what we NOW ARE,the purpose of the LAKE is for the destruction the flesh......

Jesus said the wheat and the tares grow together until the end, where the wheat is obvious and the tares are obvious. The tares are then torn up and thrown into the furnace at the end. Whether this is talking of the flesh or not, has no relevance to this present age/life being the Lake of Fire. Making the carnality of man the issue, makes no difference because that is the issue and it isn't going away in this lifetime, therefore this cannot be the Lake of Fire. The carnality of man is not destroyed until the flesh is literally destroyed, and at the resurrection of the dead we are raised in a spiritual body, one free of sin. You are not free of sin until you die, leave this world, no longer here. You're sin is not counted against you, since you have been reconciled by God through the Cross and if you trust in the Lord, raised first. Until then, we live continually battling our carnality, doing things we know we should not do, but do it anyways, Romans 7. Our victory is in the Resurrection of the Dead. Our Hope is in the Resurrection of the Dead. In which I have said repeatedly, it appears that those who believe the Lake of Fire is this life, do seem to demonstrate. The Lake of Fire happens after the resurrection of the dead.

Revelation 20:4-15
4I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5(The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection. 6Blessed and holy are those who have part in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.
Satan's Doom
7When the thousand years are over, Satan will be released from his prison 8and will go out to deceive the nations in the four corners of the earth—Gog and Magog—to gather them for battle. In number they are like the sand on the seashore. 9They marched across the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of God's people, the city he loves. But fire came down from heaven and devoured them. 10And the devil, who deceived them, was thrown into the lake of burning sulfur, where the beast and the false prophet had been thrown. They will be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
The Dead Are Judged
11Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. Earth and sky fled from his presence, and there was no place for them. 12And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books. 13The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what he had done. 14Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death. 15If anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

Notice, it happens after everyone is dead, the only ones in verse 11 who are not there are the ones in verse 4, because they were raised first and sitting on the thrones next to the great White throne.

As much as you continue to deny it, there is a separation (that is what holy means) between those who trust in the Lord (as God knows they did, not what man says they did) and those who do not.

I will address the rest later.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 04:37:39 PM
Still taking it literally . . .those that have been beheaded is the same as what Paul states . . .I have been 'crucified' with Christ . . .my mind has been taken captive by my spirit . . . we're to lose our head because there is only one head . . .we are the body.  This isn't about people . .this is about ME.

Walk in the spirit . . .this to me is the spiritual picture of what is being said ..it's what we're to apply to ourselves now.  It's what is seen from the person of rest rather than from a mind of labor.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: CHB on August 25, 2008, 05:37:10 PM

Quote from: Nathan
In the midst of that, a cry goes out that the last living disciple, the one that they "tried" to kill also, but could not, this last disciple had a revelation from God . . .and the message of this wonderful visitation is . . . .that 2000 years from now, Jesus is returning . . .we are a selfish, selfish people.

I believe "this" generation "should" be taking things differently than those to whom Scripture was originally written to in the first place.  So much has happened between now and then . . .we look at the natural world and how advanced we've become as mankind since the days when Jesus walked the face of the earth.  We have no problem seeing that in these last few hundred years man has come so far . . .yet when we open our Bibles . . . we want to remain where they were 2,000 years ago and at the same time, claim that what was actually meant for then, is yet to happen now.  How messed up is that??!!

Hi Nathan,

Really liked your post. I have a question as to what you said about Jesus returning. Are you saying that Jesus will return after two thousand years? Is this two thousand years from when Jesus was born, crucified, or resurrected? If this is true, that time is just about here.

I agree that most of the Bible was written to, for, and about Israel. Most people try to apply all of it to us today. Even Jesus's words were for Israel. He said, "I am sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel".  The Bible is for our learning but the rules, laws, and most of it, except for some of Paul's writings, are to, for, and about Israel.   

CHB
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 05:39:03 PM
Quote from: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 04:37:39 PM
Still taking it literally . . .those that have been beheaded is the same as what Paul states . . .I have been 'crucified' with Christ . . .my mind has been taken captive by my spirit . . . we're to lose our head because there is only one head . . .we are the body.  This isn't about people . .this is about ME.

Walk in the spirit . . .this to me is the spiritual picture of what is being said ..it's what we're to apply to ourselves now.  It's what is seen from the person of rest rather than from a mind of labor.

I am not taking it literally Nathan. That is your hangup to see, not mine to believe. Since you have not addressed anything I presented previously, why do you present it now, only to cause confusion?

Taking me out of context is bad as if I wrote this in reply to what you just said here:
Quotehis isn't about people . .this is about ME.

And said,

"Selfishness is not a good way to interpret Scripture. The world doesn't revolve around you."


So, if you are going to address what I wrote, address from post #1, not the last post and don't take me out of context again. Thank-you.

For clarification, those who have been beheaded are just as I have said, those who trust in the Lord, live by the Spirit, if that is you or I today, then we are also those who have been beheaded and sit on the thrones. So do not put words in my mouth.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 06:04:50 PM
SOtv
It almost seems like you look for an offense . . .putting words in your mouth was not what I was doing, I was stating what I saw by how you were wording your explanation.  I was not speaking on behalf of you . . .at any rate, the reason I did say that was because it "appears" that you are saying that everyone will be dead . .physically, before the passage in Revelation you quoted would come to pass.  Is that what you're saying?  Or are you saying that one must be spiritually dead . .willingly . . .at which point, one's identity is no longer theirs, but it is God's illuminating through them?  If "that's" what you're saying, then I am in agreement 100%.  The martyred souls beneath the altar . .the beheaded souls also mentioned elsewhere in the passage you quoted . . .

And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. (I must decrease . . .the beheading is my mind) They had not worshiped the beast (carnal mind) or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads (carnal thinking) or their hands.(religious works) They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years

The thousand years is not coming in the future . .it is NOW . . .it is the DAY of the Lord . .he is the SABBATH . .it's all intertwined as one and the same.  The thousand years is a person.  Not a time frame.  And your comment after this verse implies you're looking at it literally . .which again, is why I commented as I did.



CHB
Yes, and it's another reason why I think we'd benefit so much more if we stopped trying to apply the written word literally and understand our approach to it is to be spiritually.  It all has spiritually relevance, but in order to see, we need to lay our heads down . . .our mind wants to understand so we have been taught to take things in to our own hands (heads) and learn the words of Scripture and apply them to ourselves and each other as we understand them to be.  And here is the crux of the issue . . .it's not intended for me to apply to you . . .that is falling out of grace and back into law.  Anything that I enforce on you becomes a law within you.  That is the very thing we're to be freed from.

It was mentioned earlier that law and religion is not the same thing . . .I guess I just see this so much differently.  Anything that is a rule to avoid something else to me, is a law.  Good, bad, or ugly, it's still a law.  Romans states in 3:19 law is the knowledge of sin.  And that's what most churches build their platforms on, the sins of others.  It's not about right and wrong . . .I keep saying this .  . .it's about being One.  And incidentally, being one is not the same as being the same in thought . .another thread.

As for the coming of the Lord . . .Jesus didn't say he was coming again in three days, he said he would rebuild the church being torn down in three days.  He built the first church as well, but it was not intended to be a permanent place . . .Just as God had Moses built a "tent" and called it his "tabernacle" . .it was not meant to be a permanent place.  The temple that did get built was not God's idea . .it was David's who passed this on to Solomon.  God blessed it and did dwell in it, but the picture God wanted them to see was, God never remains in a stationary place, he moves whereever he desires to move.

So, the first church Jesus built became defiled for several reasons.  One, because it's purpose was no longer needed . .which is connected to Two, rather than let it go, it was embraced as "The" dwelling place of the Lord.  At which point, men defiled that which was once holy.  So, it was removed and three days later . . .and you're right, if it isn't already here, it's so close that the darkness of night is already being pushed back by the dawning of this Day coming. 

As to whether Jesus is coming in bodily form . . .part of me still says yes, but there are many UR's who feel his physical returning is actually through our physcial bodies as we are going to be the corporate body on this earth.  I still am not FULLY convinced that this is the "only" physical returnning that will be happening.  I'm still a little hung up on "just as you saw him go, you'll see him return".  This has not been fully understood in me yet as to how this fits in with him returning in the corporate body only.

The other piece to this is. . .just as there was a forerunner before the coming of Christ . . .I can easily see that the coming of the Lord "in" the corporate body "is" the forerunning of Christ coming "to" the corporate body.  And just as the forerunner of Christ has his head severed . .so we to must be beheaded so the glory of God can increase in and through us as well.  Here inlies the delimma of many of the conversations I see on the forums in general . . .we're still used to digesting the opinions of others with the proof of our minds . . .it's a tough thing to let it go . .but I believe it will happen . .it has to  . . . it's already been decreed.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 06:17:27 PM
QuoteJesus said the wheat and the tares grow together until the end, where the wheat is obvious and the tares are obvious. The tares are then torn up and thrown into the furnace at the end. Whether this is talking of the flesh or not, has no relevance to this present age/life being the Lake of Fire. Making the carnality of man the issue, makes no difference because that is the issue and it isn't going away in this lifetime, therefore this cannot be the Lake of Fire. The carnality of man is not destroyed until the flesh is literally destroyed, and at the resurrection of the dead we are raised in a spiritual body, one free of sin

The Tares Craig are likened to those who sleep or those who are withOUT....,those who are DEAD in Christ,..why are they dead,?... because of their carnality....thats why its burnt..and it matters very Much that is  now, For HE IS the Resurrection in the Hearts of Men....to those who believe.

The reapers are the ANGELS,..

1Th 5:10  Who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live TOGETHER with him.

Brother, we can both quote the scriptures and youll we see what you see, and Ill see what I see ,and never the twain shall meet, thats the point Nathan made....

Im spirrtual Craig...listen to Pauls words..SIN has NO hold on me...Im dead to it...

Rom 8:1  [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.


Rom 8:2  For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.


Rom 8:3  For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:


Rom 8:4  That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.


Rom 8:5  For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.


Rom 8:6  For to be carnally minded [is] death; but to be spiritually minded [is] life and peace.


Rom 8:7  Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

Rom 8:8  So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.


Rom 8:9  But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.


Rom 8:10  And if Christ [be] in you, the body [is] dead because of sin; but the Spirit [is] life because of righteousness.

Rom 8:11  But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

Your seing the resurRection as something literal in the future,,im sorry bro...thats NOW, im not going to go around and around because we will get Nowhere,maybe thats the reason some here see things differently ,even thou we read the same scriptures and for sure Craig, Im not pitting scripture against scripture with you or anyone,...


weve gone off what SILVER means..Dross, and youve made no mention of what I said in anyway shape of form to be correct..not even when ya believed in TWO FIRES and preached it from the HILT...cos I was one you preached it at!

do I see a Formal recognition that you Now see differently.and that you were wrong some time back?...no!..just more preaching from the Hilt...my words then never changed your thoughts ,althou others said the same things to you...AND  I DONT SEE THE POINT now.


Im not saying the lake is NOT for the destruction OF THE FLESH ( CARNALITY)...AND IM NOT SAYING EITHER THOSE IN HIM are not purified through HIS BLOOD....

Irrespective of the time element Craig....EACH man will be cleansed, Be it now through HIS Blood or whats termed the LAKE of FIRE where the flesh is consumed....its still HIM.



It obvious we dont see eye to eye with this and thats fine by Me...im not here to refute your words ,...i post what im led to see from whats written .. and I care not if you agree or not....

I just started asking you a few questions to see what you thought...interested to know why?..... but I  have no need for a scriptural war.



I  also dont agree that our carnality ( THE ENMITY)is only Destroyed when we literally Die Craig..

Rom 7:25  I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 06:26:20 PM
Taf . . . some day you're going to say something I disagree with . . .but I'm beginning to have my doubts.  You're a fun read.  I have learned much from your words.  and I appreciate you more than you know.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 07:17:53 PM
QuoteSOtv
It almost seems like you look for an offense . . .

Read this with pure heart, and do not take offense as I say it. In a forum, it is difficult enough to communicate without someone taking you out of context. I don't look for an offense, I correct before any offense can be taken, that is, if you continued to think that is what I said now, then I would take offense and write you off because all you would be doing is spreading lies. Perhaps I lack some tact in telling people that they are on the wrong track of thinking and need to correct it. I just know what you said of what I believe, is not true in what I believe.

Quoteputting words in your mouth was not what I was doing, I was stating what I saw by how you were wording your explanation.

By taking me out of context and not applying what I said from the very first post I presented, you took your presumption of what others believe, to what I said. It wasn't what I said, therefore you put words in my mouth. I am not offended as I say this, I just don't like it when this is done. By the grace of God, do you care to even now go through the beginning of the thread and give your understanding of what I said after you have read what I presented in full? Then I know any conclusion you make at least is educated.

QuoteI was not speaking on behalf of you . . .at any rate, the reason I did say that was because it "appears" that you are saying that everyone will be dead . .physically, before the passage in Revelation you quoted would come to pass. Is that what you're saying?

The word 'physically' is used wrong, what you mean is 'naturally'. If you did mean 'phyiscally', then you and I differ and I believe you are mistaken in how the resurrection of the dead works. The resurrection of the dead is of the body sown naturally and raised spiritually. The dead is sown a is natural body, and raised up spiritual spiritual body. Both the natural and spiritual body are physical, but the spiritual is not limited to the physical. By faith, we are already raised in the resurrection which has yet to happen for us who continue to live in this body.

QuoteOr are you saying that one must be spiritually dead . .willingly . . .at which point, one's identity is no longer theirs, but it is God's illuminating through them?  If "that's" what you're saying, then I am in agreement 100%.  The martyred souls beneath the altar . .the beheaded souls also mentioned elsewhere in the passage you quoted . . .

There is no man who is spiritually dead, their soul and the body can die, but the spirit cannot because this is returned back to God who gave it. But about the resurrection of the dead—have you not read what God said to you, 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'? He is not the God of the dead but of the living.

Next, you forget that while you live in this body, another law works within it's members. Though idealizing the Gospel, you have neglected much which is in front of us.

Romans 7:21-23
So I find this law at work: When I want to do good, evil is right there with me. For in my inner being I delight in God's law; but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members.

So no matter how much you submit to the inner being which delights in God's law, you still have a body subjected to corruption as it continues to work for it's food, and fight the daily grind of this life and the principalities and powers and wickedness in high places. Flesh and blood, as long as it is your home, does not inherit the kingdom of God. That is why Paul yearned to leave this body, because to be absent from the natural body, is to be present with the Lord in the spiritual body

2 Corinthians 5:1-9
For we know that if the earthly tent [natural body] which is our house is torn down, we have a building [spiritual body] from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For indeed in this house [natural body] we groan, longing to be clothed with our dwelling [spiritual body] from heaven, inasmuch as we, having put it on, will not be found naked. For indeed while we are in this tent [natural body], we groan, being burdened, because we do not want to be unclothed but to be clothed, so that what is mortal [natural] will be swallowed up by life.

Now He who prepared us for this very purpose is God, who gave to us the Spirit as a pledge. Therefore, being always of good courage, and knowing that while we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord--for we walk by faith, not by sight--we are of good courage, I say, and prefer rather to be absent from the body [natural body] and to be at home [spiritual body] with the Lord. Therefore we also have as our ambition, whether at home [natural body] or absent [from the natural body], to be pleasing to Him.

1 Corinthians 15:42-44
So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body.

The resurrection of the dead is talking about the body, not the mind. While we are in this natural body, we should already be renewing our mind by the Word and raise our minds with Him presently. This is not the resurrection of the dead, this is being pulled from darkness and into the light.

QuoteAnd I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. (I must decrease . . .the beheading is my mind) They had not worshiped the beast (carnal mind) or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads (carnal thinking) or their hands.(religious works) They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years

The thousand years is not coming in the future . .it is NOW . . .it is the DAY of the Lord . .he is the SABBATH . .it's all intertwined as one and the same.  The thousand years is a person.  Not a time frame.  And your comment after this verse implies you're looking at it literally . .which again, is why I commented as I did

Of course this is happening NOW. However, whether you believe it or not, you are still on earth, you have yet been taken from it. The resurrection of the dead is not just talking about your mind, but also your body. No matter how much your mind is raised with Christ, you still have yet to be raised from the dead since you are still in the world and not taken from it. To be raised in the mind, is not how the resurrection of the dead works. Those who have fallen asleep, that is died before you and I, are the ones presently reigning with Christ for the 1000 years and we will join them until the Lord has come for us. Something that we believe by faith, and hope for. That which is believed by faith is not presently seen, it is the hope for things to come. We live by faith NOW.

1 Thessalonians 4:15-17
According to the Lord's own word, we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left till the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever.

So what you don't know, it seems, is that you still live in the world have yet been taken from it.

John 17:6-19
"I have revealed you[a] to those whom you gave me out of the world. They were yours; you gave them to me and they have obeyed your word. Now they know that everything you have given me comes from you. For I gave them the words you gave me and they accepted them. They knew with certainty that I came from you, and they believed that you sent me. I pray for them. I am not praying for the world, but for those you have given me, for they are yours. All I have is yours, and all you have is mine. And glory has come to me through them. 11I will remain in the world no longer, but they are still in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, protect them by the power of your name—the name you gave me—so that they may be one as we are one. While I was with them, I protected them and kept them safe by that name you gave me. None has been lost except the one doomed to destruction so that Scripture would be fulfilled. "I am coming to you now, but I say these things while I am still in the world, so that they may have the full measure of my joy within them. I have given them your word and the world has hated them, for they are not of the world any more than I am of the world. My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one. They are not of the world, even as I am not of it. Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth. As you sent me into the world, I have sent them into the world. For them I sanctify myself, that they too may be truly sanctified.

Do you believe Jesus, or will you consider that perhaps you have idealized so much the resurrection of the dead, that you missed the fact that you are still in the world and need protection from the evil one. In other words, we are to take by faith and hope of the promise and live in it presently even though it has yet happened.

I pointed this out before, those who believe this present life is the Lake of Fire, or that Jesus alone is the Lake of Fire, have neglected the resurrection of the dead in their premise.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 08:04:01 PM
Once again Taffy, you make a point of disagreement where there is none!

Quote from: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 06:17:27 PM
The Tares Craig are likened to those who sleep or those who are withOUT....,those who are DEAD in Christ,..why are they dead,?... because of their carnality....thats why its burnt..and it matters very Much that is  now,

You forget, everyone who lives this life still experience the end of their life either unrepentant sinners, or repentant believer. The tares are those who have lived this life and died in their sin! I am talking what happens to the unrepentant sinner who dies in their sins. That is what Jesus was talking about in the Wheat and the Tares. The Wheat and the Chaff is what happens to the repentant believer.

John 8:24
I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am the one I claim to be, you will indeed die in your sins."

This does matter very much now because there are many today, who die who do not have to, in their sins.

QuoteFor HE IS the resurrection in the Hearts of Men....to those who believe

Again another point of disagreement where there is none. I have already said to Nathan in the above, regardless if  that by our mind (heart) we have been raised, there still is the resurrection of the body. Paul explains the two processes in depth throughout the letters to the Corinthians. By one we live by faith, by another we live in it's present reality.

QuoteThe reapers are the ANGELS,..

1Th 5:10  Who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live TOGETHER with him.

Brother, we can both quote the scriptures and youll we see what you see, and Ill see what I see ,and never the twain shall meet, thats the point Nathan made....

Once again yes, whether wake or sleep, but you will not precede those who have slept, keep reading the whole letter and not just bits and pieces.

This is a constant process, not some 'end' scenario, the angels are those who fell asleep in Christ, when Jesus comes with His angels in fire, that is the Lake of Fire. So that is how the Lake of Fire cannot be this life, it is Jesus and His angels.

This is what I agree with WillieH concerning, this is what I agree with you concerning, but you still have not seen it because you gone to look for disagreement where there is none. You have emphesized points where I did not disagree, as if they were a disagreement in the first place.

QuoteIm spirrtual Craig...listen to Pauls words..SIN has NO hold on me...Im dead to it...

Rom 8:1  [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.


Rom 8:2  For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.


Rom 8:3  For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:


Rom 8:4  That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.


Rom 8:5  For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.


Rom 8:6  For to be carnally minded [is] death; but to be spiritually minded [is] life and peace.


Rom 8:7  Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

Rom 8:8  So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.


Rom 8:9  But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.


Rom 8:10  And if Christ [be] in you, the body [is] dead because of sin; but the Spirit [is] life because of righteousness.

Rom 8:11  But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

Yes, but that is by faith you are dead. That is by faith sin has no hold on you. We aren't talking about those who sin has no hold on. Why do you think that the Lake of Fire is for you, and don't realize that you are the Lake of Fire from the very beginning? I have not been talking about what happens to those who have submitted themselves to Christ, we are talking about what happens to those who do not! They are the ones who are thrown into the Lake of Fire. So you can post Scriptures trying to find a disagreement, but they are not relevant to this discussion, or at least what I have been saying from the very first post in my discussion.

QuoteYour seing the resurRection as something literal in the future,,im sorry bro...thats NOW, im not going to go around and around because we will get Nowhere,maybe thats the reason some here see things differently ,even thou we read the same scriptures and for sure Craig, Im not pitting scripture against scripture with you or anyone,...

No I don't see the resurrection as something literal in the future. It just shows how much you have not been paying attention to this discussion. The reason you don't want to go around around on this, is because you cannot understand that I have said this is happening now, and has been for 2000 years and you cannot understand what I am saying and so you continue to attack your own presumptions, not what I believe. You have a tendency to generalize everything, over and over again, you think 'similar' means the same. Do I need to go through again the example in which similar does not mean same? Have you yet recognized it that you cannot see a tree from the forest?

What I am explaining to you, is both the tree and the forest.

Quoteweve gone off what SILVER means..Dross, and youve made no mention of what I said in anyway shape of form to be correct..not even when ya believed in TWO FIRES and preached it from the HILT...cos I was one you preached it at!

do I see a Formal recognition that you Now see differently.and that you were wrong some time back?...no!..just more preaching from the Hilt...my words then never changed your thoughts ,althou others said the same things to you...AND  I DONT SEE THE POINT now.


Im not saying the lake is NOT for the destruction OF THE FLESH ( CARNALITY)...AND IM NOT SAYING EITHER THOSE IN HIM are not purified through HIS BLOOD....

Irrespective of the time element Craig....EACH man will be cleansed, Be it now through HIS Blood or whats termed the LAKE of FIRE where the flesh is consumed....its still HIM.


If you read anything I wrote, you would notice again you are making a disagreement where there is none. You are stuck in your presumptions of what others believe rather than just paying attention to the details.

You make points that are irrelevant to the disagreement!!!!!!! That has been your problem from the very beginning of this thread and you have been called out on this more than once. Still you justify yourself.

QuoteIt obvious we dont see eye to eye with this and thats fine by Me...im not here to refute your words ,...i post what im led to see from whats written .. and I care not if you agree or not....

I just started asking you a few questions to see what you thought...interested to know why?..... but I  have no need for a scriptural war.

No, you don't want to see eye to eye and that is fine with you. If you cannot refute my words, then you have no idea what it is I am saying inthose words. That is the point brother, and once again, you have been called on it just now.

QuoteI  also dont agree that our carnality ( THE ENMITY)is only Destroyed when we literally Die Craig..

Rom 7:25  I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

You are not paying attention to the discussion, so it doesn't really matter what you say does it?

You are talking about what happens to the repentant believer, this I have no disagreement concerning happens to the repentant believer. The portion you fail, and continually fail to answer, is what I am talking about, and that is what happens to the unrepentant sinner who dies in their sins, who does live by the flesh and not by the Spirit. So now you know why there is a disagreement, you aren't paying attention to the discussion.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 08:10:30 PM
Have a Nice day Craig. :icon_flower:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 08:12:19 PM
What this took you 6:20 seconds to post after I posted it? Once again, demonstrating you would not understand the disagreement and just ignore it. The more you do this, the more it is obvious you are the one with the problem because I have been more than fair.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 08:18:33 PM
Quote from: SOtW on August 25, 2008, 08:12:19 PM
What this took you 6:20 seconds to post after I posted it? Once again, demonstrating you would not understand the disagreement and just ignore it. The more you do this, the more it is obvious you are the one with the problem.

Craig ,Im as familier with the scriptures as many..as Mentioned in the last post..im not pitting scripture against you..

you can call it what you will Craig ,.....I must remember not to ask your two simple questions to which you still havent agreed or disagreed once you actually understood MY STAND POINT nOT asummed you did and made me out to lie( AGAIN ANY SUCH APOLOGY..NOPE)...with but diverted Elsewhere...But thats fine..and if you have no desire to admit you were wrong concerning at one time a part of the Theme of this thread , AS YOU PREACHED WITH SUCH PASSION THEN AS YOU DO NOW.....then that tells me something too Bro....OK...


Be Blessed ,and if wish to have the Last word then Please do so Bro....

for im done like others here  and before ,discussing anything else with YOU.

Taffy

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 08:42:24 PM
Again, nothing even that previous post, addressed anything. Repeating what you said, doesn't change the facts. You failed to come to understanding of the supposed disagreement, because you do not want to take the time to understand the position in which you are presumably disagreeing to. So don't try to pass it off as anything more than what it is, you do not wish to discuss this because you are not willing to take the time to understand exactly what it is which I am saying.

QuoteI must remember not to ask your two simple questions to which you still havent agreed or disagreed once you actually understood MY STAND POINT nOT asummed you did and made me out to lie

How about you apologize for the times prior to that incident, of which I am fully aware you think was 'putting words in your mouth', and be the example instead of pointing fingers and being so stubborn?

Quoteyou were wrong concerning at one time a part of the Theme of this thread

Now concerning that incident I am fully aware. The whole incident where I asked you to re-read and re-post the quote, which you still have not. The incident where I rephrased myself to communicate what I meant, but you still took the old quote and misunderstood. Where you had implied earlier that silver ore was talking the silver was the spirit and the dross carnality of mankind, and then you changed it the Silver being the blood of Jesus Christ and the dross mankind.

Which I didn't challenge, because at no time did Jesus need refining....but I won't go into that.

So what is there for me to apologize for? You changed your position, or your the clarification of your position in I am not a mind reader because your question had the presupposition that the Silver Ore was the individual, the dross was your carnality and silver was the spirit. Therefore, I have nothing to apologize for, you clarified your position and I didn't challenge it any further.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on August 25, 2008, 08:44:25 PM
Quote from: SOTWThe word 'physically' is used wrong, what you mean is 'naturally'. If you did mean 'phyiscally', then you and I differ and I believe you are mistaken in how the resurrection of the dead works. The resurrection of the dead is of the body sown naturally and raised spiritually. The dead is sown a is natural body, and raised up spiritual spiritual body. Both the natural and spiritual body are physical, but the spiritual is not limited to the physical. By faith, we are already raised in the resurrection which has yet to happen for us who continue to live in this body.

Craig could you expound on this a little more?  You say 'we are already raised in the resurrection..'

You also say 'the spiritual body [is] physical.'

I'm wondering if we are raised with Christ in this lifetime [in some manner] at which point judgment begins at the house of God?

Also, what is that translation you are using?  It's really beautiful.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 09:21:37 PM
QuoteSilver Is his Blood Craig, Tis His Blood Cleanses Purifies.....As ya Know the IRON and Brass , is for mine, relates to the carnality of Man..our flesh....POST 132

CRAIG=Where you had implied earlier that silver ore was talking the silver was the spirit and the dross carnality of mankind, and then you changed it the Silver being the blood of Jesus Christ and the dross mankind.



If your Not  A MIND READER  Craig STOP assuming what you think others are thinking..


The above says ..THE SILVER..not the silver  ore which you ADDED, which I commented on  later.....From the onset ive proposed the meaning OF  Silver\blood\christ ...Purified in HIS blood till we see face to face.....the Dross being the Carnilty of man which remains in the fire..

.

why did I add the these questions which for mine could have been simply answered

Quote from: Taffythe IRON and Brass , is for mine, relates to the carnality of Man..our flesh....

[
so maybe the question is...what Does His Blood purRify us of....well thats Sin isnt It?...so what SINS?...THE SPIRIT?

THE ANSWER CRAIG is the FLESH.....which is the Dross ,which is Has its part in the fire..IT WASNT 100S of questions,one answer would have been suffice...

The only reason Im responding Craig..is that One was Made out to be A LIAR...and ive just read your post to NatHAN about One who  LIES bro...not nice is it...

I made my point Clear Craig,  yet you ASSUMED by stating YOU KNEW what I believed by filling in the Gaps yourself...

QuoteBy your question you revealed your proposition, I already knew you thought the Silver and Dross spoke of the individual person.



so you must be a MIND reader..but a VERY BAD ONE AT THAT.... :sigh:








Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 09:57:21 PM
Quote from: Molly on August 25, 2008, 08:44:25 PM
Quote from: SOTWThe word 'physically' is used wrong, what you mean is 'naturally'. If you did mean 'phyiscally', then you and I differ and I believe you are mistaken in how the resurrection of the dead works. The resurrection of the dead is of the body sown naturally and raised spiritually. The dead is sown a is natural body, and raised up spiritual spiritual body. Both the natural and spiritual body are physical, but the spiritual is not limited to the physical. By faith, we are already raised in the resurrection which has yet to happen for us who continue to live in this body.

Craig could you expound on this a little more?  You say 'we are already raised in the resurrection..'

Yes, by faith, we have been raised with Christ Jesus, and by the Spirit, we are presently seated in high places with Christ Jesus. That means even though we have yet to experience what happens after we physically die, we get to experience the fullness of Life (eternal life) even while we live.  It is this understanding, which causes confusion because we live in a promise in which we have been given and sealed by the Spirit as if it were already completed.

From this point, neither Taffy or Nathan understand what John said in 1 John 3:2-3, which says, "Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears,we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is. Everyone who has this hope in him purifies himself, just as he is pure."

Those who continually deny that there is a "what will be", do not realize there is a "what will be" and make the mistake that is has already come to pass. Jesus is who was and is and is to come, and we live life 'Now', but that does not neglect the 'is to come' either.

QuoteYou also say 'the spiritual body [is] physical.'

Yes. The body which you shall receive, is the same body in which Jesus was raised. The resurrection is not just one of the heart and mind, but also of the body. Yes, we are the Body of Christ, and many try to tie the Body of Christ as being the Spiritual Body in which we are raised, in essence this is true but concerning the resurrection of the dead and the body in which they are raised, Paul was specific along with all the other disciples including John, we have individual bodies united with Christ, in the same way a husband and a wife are of one flesh, but separate.

QuoteI'm wondering if we are raised with Christ in this lifetime [in some manner] at which point judgment begins at the house of God?

Judgment begins in the house of God among those who still live in the body. We guide and help each other live to the truth of reality, so the judgment of the house of God is now and is among it's members. This judgment is happening now within the church and the Body. I do not believe we are ever bodily resurrected while we are still living in this body, the natural body is sown and spiritual body is raised.

Of course, again, I understand some believe that Paul was talking about the LAW written on stone, versus the LAW written on the heart and means nothing more. I have investigated this avenue and found it only belongs to those who have willfully died to the carnality (flesh) and walk by the spirit. It does not apply to those who have not ceased willfully living to the carnality (flesh) and deny the spirit.

At the same time, Paul says it clearly, if there is not what will be, it then just this life, from our physical birth and to our physical death, that we that we have hope and should this be true (that there is no 'what will be') then we are to be pitied more than all and our faith is in vain.

1 Corinthians 15:19 If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more than all men.

There is more than this present life and it's battle with carnality and our choices to live by the spirit and live by the flesh. Even now, those who deny they are not presently in a spiritual battle, then find no value in continually needing to renew their mind by the washing of the Word and to continually repent when they have wronged one another. They are also found in error, because if they truly were of pure spirit, then there would be no contention anywhere in their lives especially concerning them. That freedom they claim to have is not an actual reality until they have left this world completely, that means their physical birth and physical death are part of God's plan. So you get the saying, "some people have become so spiritually high minded, they become of no earthly good.

Quote
Also, what is that translation you are using?  It's really beautiful.

NIV, NASB and AMP
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 09:58:46 PM
Taffy, Jesus Christ does not need refining, so when silver is being refined, it is always talking about the ore. So now it appears either you are not being fully truthful with what you believe, or you are trying to hang me on a technicality which is of your making failing to admit you are wrong.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 10:08:23 PM
Okay, Craig is it?
Here's how it's coming across . . . you're not one who flows in a river that doesn't meet the standards you've established.  Your arguments are coming acrossed as confrontational and it tethers the ability for one to fly.  For me and my inability to use physcially versus naturally . . .I said what I said "on purpose" because when you're dealing with the subject of natural versus spiritual . .  I try to purposefully avoid using natural unless it's speaking of carnal . .to me, they are one and the same . . . so that's why I didn't state "naturally" dying.  Because SPIRITUALLY speaking . . it is my CARNAL nature that MUST DIE.  And you misquoted me on that as well . . .I never said your spirit dies . . .and this is our problem . . .you want all of us to speak with your vocabulary and if we don't, you divide our message up and find ways to basically hack it up to by the time it's done . .all that's left is an argument.

I have no qualms with you . . .I don't dislike you, I don't even know you . . .so how you've come to the conclusion that you have the right and authority to become an administrator to everyone on the forums is beyond me.  

Can you answer this . . .in all these arguments with me, Taf and I noticed you had to step in and correct others on your version of what free will is so it's not just us . . . . has all of this been out of the unction of the spirit?  Or is this the workings of your mind?  Because usually, when it's out of the spirit, the end result is edifying others, uplifting, building up . . .

Good grief . . .
From this point, neither Taffy or Nathan understand what John said in 1 John 3:2-3, which says, "Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears,we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is. Everyone who has this hope in him purifies himself, just as he is pure."

Dude, you're wearing out the saints with this!

Do you not understand that this was written 2000 YEARS AGO!  The day has changed  He HAS appeared to us . .that's what this is all about!  That's why I can tell you I do not dress myself in armor anymore!  That's why I've turned my weapons into plowshares.  I'm not here to go to war with your words . . . but I will tell you the way you're enforcing your beliefs is yesterdays manna and THAT'S the main reason why I stated earlier you're not one that's flowing "with" the river.  You've made your stand and now change is coming and you're not willing to accept it.

It's not about the lake of fire . . .eternal security .  .UR or any of that . . .it's about walking in TOTAL TRANSFORMATION and that included how we're to apply Scriptures.  All those other things are bits and pieces of this . . . but I do not WANT to be bound by your standards . . . I am applying MY FREE WILL .  .I choose to fly without hanging on to a translation of something that may or may not be taken out of context. 

I'm just not seeing the abundant life promised to us in your version of how you're seeing things.  Show me the life, then I'll take notice of your words.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 10:22:38 PM
Quote from: SOtW on August 25, 2008, 09:58:46 PM
Taffy, Jesus Christ does not need refining, so when silver is being refined, it is always talking about the ore. So now it appears either you are not being fully truthful with what you believe, or you are trying to hang me on a technicality which is of your making failing to admit you are wrong.


all I was attempting to do was Take it One small step at a Time,,,thats all, starting with two simple questions to GRASP YOUR stand POINT.not mine.....but within two or three posts we are going throu half the Bible touching on various subjects...

I dont read MINDS Craig , and in the main most of your words fly over me head..ive told you this many times...so WHEN I Speak To you I endeavour to take it in small steps....then work out by question to why?....
nO I wasnt out to trip you like you proposed in the last thread we spoke on....just wanting to KNOW more of what you believed..be it going back to basics and then build from there....That Was IT...

I never stated Christ needed Refining, I mentioned he was the Hidden Man , Likened to the silver....not the ore,..being refined throu HIM seeing face to face....i stated this from the OFF.

all I mentioned was we are refined thru his BLOOD and FIRE...maybe you misunderstood Craig and jumped to premature conclusions.

If ya still wish to put the blame at My door bro..thats fine,no worries for there are bigger concerns than this..
Peace Bro

:icon_flower:






Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on August 25, 2008, 10:49:30 PM
Quote from: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 10:08:23 PM
Do you not understand that this was written 2000 YEARS AGO!  The day has changed  He HAS appeared to us . .that's what this is all about! 

Hi Nathan,

this statement i don't disagree with, but I come to the conclusion through a preterist view.

How do you come to this conclusion?  Why wasn't John seeing things "through the spirit, or Paul seeing things "through the spirit" in the same way as now 2000 years later.

What is the change that happened??  back then the Spirit gave life.  Now the spirit gives life??  Why were they seeing things in the natural then, and now we are not too??

would love to hear what u see as having changed in the last 2000 years, and why we now "should see" the written word as ALL spiritual and that  back then they weren't.

thanks

laren
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 11:02:03 PM
Quote from: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 10:08:23 PM
Okay, Craig is it?
Here's how it's coming across . . . you're not one who flows in a river that doesn't meet the standards you've established.

Not at all, there is a standard already in place for constructive discussion in which disagreements are addressed. It is actually formalized and standard across any forum in which communication is exchanged. The only places that these rules of discussion are forfeited seems to be religious forums, whether they are CU or not.

It is definition, proposition, presupposition, and conclusion. If a point of contention is being addressed, define the contention and the words used, next supply the proposition and presupposition of the words used and next make your conclusion based on the definition, proposition and presupposition.

I could say that you are coming across, cavalier and I would be correct even if that is not how you are coming across to someone else, because to me you are cavalier. Perception is fickle, a righteous judge does not deal with perception, he deals with facts and some of those facts include from perceptions of misunderstanding which have been exaggerated in order to sideline the main point of contention. Do not go beyond the point of contention, do not make a deal that there is contention. DEAL WITH THE POINT OF CONTENTION. 

I have not established these rules, I uphold these rules.

QuoteYour arguments are coming acrossed as confrontational and it tethers the ability for one to fly.

Let me clean that up for you. I am not confrontational, I address the issue at hand the whole point is so that a person does not fly with misunderstanding. The ability for one to fly only comes when there is agreement, not disagreement otherwise it becomes a detrimental and not an asset in the discussion.

QuoteFor me and my inability to use physcially versus naturally . . .I said what I said "on purpose" because when you're dealing with the subject of natural versus spiritual . .

If you purposely used the word physical, then as I said, I am in disagreement because the spiritual is also physical.

First point of rules of discussion, the definition. Without definition, a person can be saying the same word and meaning it completely differently. If you think that the spiritual body is not physical, then you neglect the affect the spirit has on the physical universe. If you think that the spiritual body is not natural, then you are correct since it transcends all things.

QuoteI try to purposefully avoid using natural unless it's speaking of carnal . .to me, they are one and the same . . . so that's why I didn't state "naturally" dying.

Good, however in Scripture natural is never used to speak of the carnality of man. So where you got the definition of natural to mean carnal, is beyond the reasonable scope of this discussion as natural is not commonly referred to as carnal in any sense else where. Though, now I know you think natural means carnal, it sure clears up that point of contention, now doesn't it?

QuoteBecause SPIRITUALLY speaking . . it is my CARNAL nature that MUST DIE.  And you misquoted me on that as well . . .I never said your spirit dies . . .and this is our problem . . .you want all of us to speak with your vocabulary and if we don't, you divide our message up and find ways to basically hack it up to by the time it's done . .all that's left is an argument.

It is your problem, not mine. I work to create an even playing field, that includes understanding the definitions being used. If you refuse to align your definitions with mine then you are the one causing the contention, not I. I have no problem using your words and definitions to communicate, I even gave you plenty of room in my reply to you, to clarify your words and definition. You expose a source of pride, when you believe that is to be a problem.

There is no argument as long as the point of contention is all that is being discussed.

QuoteCan you answer this . . .in all these arguments with me, Taf and I noticed you had to step in and correct others on your version of what free will is so it's not just us . . . . has all of this been out of the unction of the spirit?  Or is this the workings of your mind?  Because usually, when it's out of the spirit, the end result is edifying others, uplifting, building up . . .

Actually that is your perception interfering with what is actually happening. I can prove rationally, logically, the definitions of words, and people need to stop and realize that what they are saying does not mean what they are communicating because they don't use the same words. People have a hard time understanding that they are using a word incorrectly. Yes, it is out of the unction of the spirit, even Jesus cleared out the Temple with a whip by the unction of the Spirit, you have added your presumption of what it means to live out of unction to the spirit.

In concerns to 'free-will', I will correct it every time someone uses free-will instead of what they actually mean which is 'Free Moral Agent' and 'Self-determination' because free-will mean the ability for the will to make choices and learn from those choices, which is what we all have. Free-will does not have the power or knowledge to invent choices that don't exist, free-will does not mean freedom, it means freedom of the will, in regard to choices it is presented.

In the same way I correct those who use 'free-will' falsely, I will also correct those who use 'aionios' to mean perpetually.

By making this an issue versus spirit and mind, you have shown yourself in contempt, and have placed yourself in a place that you don't want to be. I have battled through this battle for a very long time, and have come out victorious every time. It is a path you do not want to go down, whether people love me or hate me for it, I have been long vindicated that what I am doing is out of the Spirit, unless of course you think God is an author of confusion.

QuoteGood grief . . .
From this point, neither Taffy or Nathan understand what John said in 1 John 3:2-3, which says, "Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears,we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is. Everyone who has this hope in him purifies himself, just as he is pure."

Dude, you're wearing out the saints with this!

No, I am wearing out those who refuse to address the internal contradictions they create by professing a belief which cannot be substantiated. It only wears out a few [editted: didn't mean to name names of who I think are worn out by it], and now you, if you continue to give off-cuff comments about what I believe without ever actually understanding what it is I am saying. I have tried many avenues, but you have now made comments where none should be made, and so now you have been clumped up with the other who fails to recognize that they are also part of the problem.

QuoteDo you not understand that this was written 2000 YEARS AGO!  The day has changed  He HAS appeared to us . .that's what this is all about!  That's why I can tell you I do not dress myself in armor anymore!  That's why I've turned my weapons into plowshares.  I'm not here to go to war with your words . . . but I will tell you the way you're enforcing your beliefs is yesterdays manna and THAT'S the main reason why I stated earlier you're not one that's flowing "with" the river.  You've made your stand and now change is coming and you're not willing to accept it.

I am a partial-preterist. Not a full preterist like yourself. Since you are a full preterist, you believe there is nothing left to come. Now you have also used the fallacy of false dilemma, in which you make my beliefs, which by the way you have so far failed to comprehend since you have placed me in a futurist/dispensationalist position and not partial preterist position, old manna. Next, another fallacy of 'flowing with the river', in which if I am not in your river, then I must be on the wrong river. Boy oh boy, I saw through the second this post was made. Get out of your high position pastor, you are thinking more highly of yourself than you ought. I am a pastor too, and been in the ministry for over 18 years even as a child. So I say this in grace, and as I warned you once in this thread, and now the second time, the moment you make it personal is the moment you have forever made it your problem and you will have to learn to accept the consequences of those actions. This is not a threat, this is a point of fact you will face a constant battle over it. Talk to Taffy, or any one of the members here, I have come through this but others have not.

Just for the record, I was not your enemy and if I didn't care I wouldn't talk about it to you. You need to know what it is you are getting into, which some people don't realized. Some big taboo's, don't make it personal and don't put spirit and mind in contention, because the mind that is in submission to the spirit, speaks spiritual things.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 11:09:47 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 10:22:38 PM
In the main most of your words fly over me head..ive told you this many times
:icon_flower:
[/quote]

Then we both agree it is mutual misunderstanding and then both share the responsibility that our misunderstandings and our inability to reconcile why what the problem was before caused more problems than it was worth. For that I apologize to the forum and to you. I am pleasantly happy to admit, the problem is we just cannot understand each other.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 11:15:48 PM
Quote from: SOtW on August 25, 2008, 11:09:47 PM
Quote from: Taffy on August 25, 2008, 10:22:38 PM
In the main most of your words fly over me head..ive told you this many times
:icon_flower:

Then we both agree it is mutual misunderstanding and then both share the responsibility that our misunderstandings and our inability to reconcile why what the problem was before caused more problems than it was worth. For that I apologize to the forum and to you. I am pleasantly happy to admit, the problem is we just cannot understand each other.
[/quote]

Not on all issues Craig, this you know,far from it, just maybe  our perspective differs from time to time...

but there are times when I definately agree with what your saying..thanks for ending this peacably bro :icon_flower:, and apologies to you also. :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 11:18:39 PM
Sorry, I should add:

....cannot understand each other [in some things.]
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 11:22:42 PM
After this I'm finished . . . you've set yourself up on a pious pedastal and assume you are right above anyone with a difference of opinion.  You've accused me of things you know not of.  You've pegged me with titles that are not accurate.  It's in your own mind that you have succeeded in your arguments . . . none of us intended for this to get to where it has in the first place.  I've come here to glean truth from what others share, and in turn, share so that others can glean, you've done nothing but critique and disrupt.  I am finished.

I am a partial-preterist. Not a full preterist like yourself. Since you are a full preterist, you believe there is nothing left to come.

I have in no way proclaimed to be a "full" anything.  I've never said there is nothing left, you are doing the very thing you accuse others of, you have put words in my mouth that I never said.  There is no growth here . .there is no life . .only self-justification and false accusations.  Enjoy your sword, but know, it's what's keeping you bound and in doing so, you choose to keep others from flying.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 11:46:37 PM
Quote from: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 11:22:42 PM
After this I'm finished . . . you've set yourself up on a pious pedastal and assume you are right above anyone with a difference of opinion.  You've accused me of things you know not of.  You've pegged me with titles that are not accurate.  It's in your own mind that you have succeeded in your arguments . . . none of us intended for this to get to where it has in the first place.  I've come here to glean truth from what others share, and in turn, share so that others can glean, you've done nothing but critique and disrupt.  I am finished.

You have made it your problem Nathan, because you are a defender personality. You perceived a problem and came to defend that which you felt was some how unjust. You take sides, even when you shouldn't. Let me make this clear. I cannot disrupt a discussion I am already part of, do you understand this? Next if you cannot accept critique or let it run like water of a duck's back then it is your pride which offended. It is not in my imagination that I have succeeded in my points, I have many supporters who tell me in private and can explain it in detail, what I just said and why there is a problem in our discussions. I accept no threat from anyone, and I am fully aware of all fall out of any and all my actions and quite prepared for it when it happens.

You made it personal Nathan, that is your downfall and you are offended because you made the offense your cause to be champion and gain 'friends'. It works for awhile, but in time people will notice, there are numerous people who have come into this forum using such tactics, people learn the second time.

QuoteEnjoy your sword, but know, it's what's keeping you bound and in doing so, you choose to keep others from flying.

Titus 1:9 He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 11:49:03 PM
Not offended . . .just tired of butting my head against the wall with you . . . we're on different pages and that's that.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 25, 2008, 11:55:40 PM
Quote from: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 11:49:03 PM
Not offended . . .just tired of butting my head against the wall with you . . . we're on different pages and that's that.

That is fine, then admit this is the problem. Frustration in communication is a problem we all deal with. If we are on different pages, then that is what it is. I hold major reservation concerning certain styles of communication, yours is one of them and it seems I know how to aggravated it. What it is called is a personality difference, you find my structured and rational communication style as an impediment to your ability to fly communication style.  I should walk away and just leave it, but like you, we have to come up and talk about it and air our concerns even if they aren't even real or valid and because we have two different communication styles, we clash. Don't make it personal. I will tell you why making it personal is not good, because I defend myself.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: arcticmonster2003 on August 26, 2008, 12:35:42 AM
Quote from: SOtW on August 25, 2008, 11:55:40 PM
Quote from: Nathan on August 25, 2008, 11:49:03 PM
Not offended . . .just tired of butting my head against the wall with you . . . we're on different pages and that's that.

That is fine, then admit this is the problem. Frustration in communication is a problem we all deal with. If we are on different pages, then that is what it is. I hold major reservation concerning certain styles of communication, yours is one of them and it seems I know how to aggravated it. What it is called is a personality difference, you find my structured and rational communication style as an impediment to your ability to fly communication style.  I should walk away and just leave it, but like you, we have to come up and talk about it and air our concerns even if they aren't even real or valid and because we have two different communication styles, we clash. Don't make it personal. I will tell you why making it personal is not good, because I defend myself.

:tongue:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 26, 2008, 01:21:21 AM
And that is the difference between turning our weapons in to plowshares . . . you defend yourself, I don't need to, as I just did a terrible display of that here . . .I did anyway, but I don't need to.  I plant, you don't like what's planted . . .that's your business . .but I'm not going to defend the seed . .it's not even mine in the first place.  I don't make this stuff up.  There are many around who see these things also and no one "taught" or "instructed" them what to look for, Grace just reveals it to them.  I'd understand it if I was a rogue in my "seeing" things differently . . .which I am in any religious setting.  It's denominational heresy and I'm fully aware of that . . .but if that isn't going to stop me, then neither is a bunch of words that come across my computer screen from someone I've never met.

  If you have such a handle on explaining it, then you should also know how to control it.  Otherwise, what's the point of having such knowledge?

There needs to be "some" sort of closure to this . . .I'm not walking away from the forum and I'm not going to change my way of seeing things so I'm sure there will be other topics that you won't be able to resist taking more jabs at me.

It's not our writing, it's our thinking that's different.  I'm fully aware of all the reasons why you reject my approach . .I came from where you are.  The only difference is, I let go.  I do regret letting you pull me in though . . . it's the very thing I preach about others avoiding.  We're to be eagles and when we become tangled in earthiness . . .we become no good to anyone.

I know that there are many out there that still gain from the conversations.  I would like to continue being a part of what they gain.  Mud-throwing isn't going to cut it and I do apologize for that.  You call it as you see it, you justify why you can call it the way you do . . .I reject your titles and accusations and justify why I can label you and . . .we're off.  And in the end, all we did was show the world what a perfect example of a clanging symbol looks like.

With all due respect, whether you appreciate my approach or not, I'd much rather go back to following the sound and get out of this clatter of noise.

Blessings.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on August 26, 2008, 01:24:51 AM
Oh, and by the way . . . it's "aggrivate"  not aggravated. :HeartThrob:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 26, 2008, 01:28:53 AM


time here for beddies...just going lock the thread, when Martin or others mods ARE around he\they may opt to open it...

good night to you all.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 26, 2008, 03:02:18 AM
Has it really been necessary [or at least preferable] to lock this thread randomly like that?  It's going to be two more hours before I can fully give the net my time, but I'll err on the side of naivete of "what could possibly go wrong in two hours?" LOL!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 26, 2008, 03:19:44 AM
Quote from: Nathan on August 26, 2008, 01:21:21 AM
And that is the difference between turning our weapons in to plowshares . . . you defend yourself, I don't need to, as I just did a terrible display of that here . . .I did anyway, but I don't need to.  I plant, you don't like what's planted . . .that's your business . .but I'm not going to defend the seed . .it's not even mine in the first place.  I don't make this stuff up.  There are many around who see these things also and no one "taught" or "instructed" them what to look for, Grace just reveals it to them.  I'd understand it if I was a rogue in my "seeing" things differently . . .which I am in any religious setting.  It's denominational heresy and I'm fully aware of that . . .but if that isn't going to stop me, then neither is a bunch of words that come across my computer screen from someone I've never met.

Perhaps our definitions of defending oneself is obscured by misunderstanding, because this sure looks like you are defending yourself now.

QuoteIf you have such a handle on explaining it, then you should also know how to control it.  Otherwise, what's the point of having such knowledge?

Ecclesiastes 1:18
For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief.

QuoteThere needs to be "some" sort of closure to this . . .I'm not walking away from the forum and I'm not going to change my way of seeing things so I'm sure there will be other topics that you won't be able to resist taking more jabs at me.

I don't carry grudges, but it sure seems to me that you are one who might, looking at your 'replies' in response to my statements on other threads have been petty at best.

QuoteIt's not our writing, it's our thinking that's different.  I'm fully aware of all the reasons why you reject my approach . .I came from where you are.  The only difference is, I let go.  I do regret letting you pull me in though . . . it's the very thing I preach about others avoiding.  We're to be eagles and when we become tangled in earthiness . . .we become no good to anyone.

Let us be clear with each other, I didn't pull you into anything, you are responsible for every words and deed you commit, I have no power over you to do anything. You willingly participated, unwilling to admit this at this time to admit that you are responsible.

QuoteI know that there are many out there that still gain from the conversations.  I would like to continue being a part of what they gain.  Mud-throwing isn't going to cut it and I do apologize for that.

I accept your apology.

QuoteYou call it as you see it, you justify why you can call it the way you do . . .I reject your titles and accusations and justify why I can label you and . . .we're off.  And in the end, all we did was show the world what a perfect example of a clanging symbol looks like. With all due respect, whether you appreciate my approach or not, I'd much rather go back to following the sound and get out of this clatter of noise.

I believe it was very productive, we got apologies all around for the mistaken understandings, we aired out our concerns and things were explained and understandings were confirmed. I did not lack any love in my replies, so unless you lacked love in your reply, the only example of clanging symbols here is the music I was listening to as I wrote this. Perhaps you may need to clarify and re-address this. I am interested in wondering how a disagreement and an appeal to communication lacks love and is of 'clanging symbols'. I cannot see the connect, perhaps I am not as 'spiritual' as you to think that mutual communication and dealing with contention when it arises constitutes clatter of noise. I have theories, but ones I would not say here because we are trying to reconcile our difference not create more.

QuoteOh, and by the way . . . it's "aggrivate"  not aggravated. :HeartThrob:

There is meaningful correction, and then there is pettiness, this is an example of the latter. I don't care if I spelt it wrong, you knew what I meant and that is what matters.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on August 26, 2008, 03:37:12 AM
QuoteThe Tares Craig are likened to those who sleep or those who are withOUT....,those who are DEAD in Christ,..why are they dead,?... because of their carnality....thats why its burnt..and it matters very Much that is  now, For HE IS the Resurrection in the Hearts of Men....to those who believe.

The reapers are the ANGELS,..

1Th 5:10  Who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live TOGETHER with him.

Brother, we can both quote the scriptures and youll we see what you see, and Ill see what I see ,and never the twain shall meet, thats the point Nathan made....

Im spirrtual Craig...listen to Pauls words..SIN has NO hold on me...Im dead to it...

Rom 8:1  [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.


Rom 8:2  For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.


Rom 8:3  For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:


Rom 8:4  That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.


Rom 8:5  For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.


Rom 8:6  For to be carnally minded [is] death; but to be spiritually minded [is] life and peace.


Rom 8:7  Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

Rom 8:8  So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.


Rom 8:9  But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.


Rom 8:10  And if Christ [be] in you, the body [is] dead because of sin; but the Spirit [is] life because of righteousness.

Rom 8:11  But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

Your seing the resurRection as something literal in the future,,im sorry bro...thats NOW, im not going to go around and around because we will get Nowhere,maybe thats the reason some here see things differently ,even thou we read the same scriptures and for sure Craig, Im not pitting scripture against scripture with you or anyone,...


weve gone off what SILVER means..Dross, and youve made no mention of what I said in anyway shape of form to be correct..not even when ya believed in TWO FIRES and preached it from the HILT...cos I was one you preached it at!

do I see a Formal recognition that you Now see differently.and that you were wrong some time back?...no!..just more preaching from the Hilt...my words then never changed your thoughts ,althou others said the same things to you...AND  I DONT SEE THE POINT now.


Im not saying the lake is NOT for the destruction OF THE FLESH ( CARNALITY)...AND IM NOT SAYING EITHER THOSE IN HIM are not purified through HIS BLOOD....

Irrespective of the time element Craig....EACH man will be cleansed, Be it now through HIS Blood or whats termed the LAKE of FIRE where the flesh is consumed....its still HIM.



It obvious we dont see eye to eye with this and thats fine by Me...im not here to refute your words ,...i post what im led to see from whats written .. and I care not if you agree or not....

I just started asking you a few questions to see what you thought...interested to know why?..... but I  have no need for a scriptural war.



I  also dont agree that our carnality ( THE ENMITY)is only Destroyed when we literally Die Craig..

Rom 7:25  I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

Just wanted to say amen bro, (we do see this much alike) before bowing out of this thread.

God bless
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on August 26, 2008, 03:47:33 AM
With most of what Taffy post, I am also in agreement, some parts I am not.

I submit Taffy made an issue of contention where there is none, when he made the points of agreement clumped into the points of disagreement creating a straw man which stated I disagreed about everything he presented and thus resulting in a spin out of the discussion. It is of my opinion Taffy rejected the details of how, what, where and why and just is satisfied that it is, which in itself is not wrong; except, whether he knew it or not, the how, what, where and why was what this discussion was about.

Unable to reconcile the contradictions of his explanation I presented or the mutual misunderstandings of each other's position, this resulted in another side issue which usually comes up between Taffy and myself.

Perhaps it reply is pointless, because the ones whom it is intended don't read it or understand what I just said anyways.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on August 26, 2008, 05:24:28 AM
As far as I'm concerned, where the tongues are being confused, God is at work.  And where guests to the forum are each hearing the wonderful works of God in their own languages, as they read these threads, then that's God at work as well.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on August 26, 2008, 12:04:50 PM
QuoteJust wanted to say amen bro, (we do see this much alike) before bowing out of this thread.

God bless

Along with a few others who see a like Scott.....
Blessings Bro :icon_flower:
Taffy
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on August 26, 2008, 01:25:23 PM
 
Great mods!
  taff and Martin
I am a lurker  more these days 
and get much from the Heat /Winds  and tongues of Fire   :laughing7:

  I have noted that alot of  great things comes "shining through"   and
is ministering ,  before I saw them as fruitless ,a poor perception really ,
   I was  sooo wrong !!!!!!!!!!!!  I had the wrong Ideas of  blessed is the peacemakers they shall be called the children of God , it has its Place 
as all things do  in time ...
the End is peace in  Christ , I know this now 
but the firey  trials , are not such a strange thing to me now ...


And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.  

br 1:7  And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire.  

  Just read  Psalms 104  and now i get it    hee hee ...

no worries  Nate and Craig

  Paul was given  many of revelations in Christ  , but they were NOT  without 
buffeting


Vine's Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words

Buffet

1  Strong's Number: 2852 Greek: kolaphizo
signifies "to strike with clenched hands, to buffet with the fist" (kolaphos, "a fist"), Mat 26:67; Mar 14:65; 1Cr 4:11; 2Cr 12:7; 1Pe 2:20. 2  Strong's Number: 5299 Greek: hupopiazo
lit., "to strike under the eye" (from hupopion, "the part of the face below the eye;" hupo, "under," ops, "an eye"), hence, to beat the face black and blue (to give a black eye), is used metaphorically, and translated "buffet" in 1Cr 9:27 (AV, "keep under"), of Paul's suppressive treatment of his body, in order to keep himself spiritually fit (RV marg., "bruise"); so RV marg. in Luk 18:5, of the persistent widow, text, "wear out" (AV, "weary"). See KEEP, WEAR, WEARY.



  just remember we love you both  and

  the Lord JESUS  chastens and rebukes whom he loves  :icon_king:  .... rose

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: CHB on August 26, 2008, 07:35:02 PM

Rose,

You said exactly what I was thinking. I see God's hand in all things
including disagreements. I learn even from them sometimes. I do more reading here than I do posting. I don't learn a lot from posting, unless I am asking the questions.

:happy3: :cloud9:
CHB
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on August 26, 2008, 09:31:26 PM
Quote from: CHB on August 26, 2008, 07:35:02 PM

Rose,

You said exactly what I was thinking. I see God's hand in all things
including disagreements. I learn even from them sometimes. I do more reading here than I do posting. I don't learn a lot from posting, unless I am asking the questions.

:happy3: :cloud9:
CHB

  Bless your heart sis ,  I see God's hand in all things
me too , I learn more being quiet 
  and so  read    both/many  points  taken 
   I dont always ''see'' clearly though .... hee hee 
love yas sista thanks for the confirmation  ... rr 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on September 29, 2008, 12:54:02 AM
willieH: Greetinz! :hithere:

Subjects:   :swordfight:

(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"? 
(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"? 
(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?
(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

We read in Genesis, that GOD placed a tree in the midst of the Garden.  And notified of its location, and commanded it be avoided.  Had there been no such tree... would Adam & Eve still SINNED?

THIS is basically the proposal of FALLEN ANGELS...  That even though no "TREE" was placed in their proximity, and though no NOTIFICATION of LOCATION of that "tree" was made, and NO COMMAND made to AVOID it... Innumerable ANGELS (not just 2 as with humans) still, ...somehow found a way to "FALL" to SIN... anyway... :rolleye:


thoughts?   :JCThink:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
willieH: Hi-de-hi... Hi-de-ho... :hithere:

Here are some of my prior views:

Quote(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?

(1)  NO!  There is no ORIGIN noted for ANGELS... and ALL they have and ARE, come from GOD (Rom 13:1)  GOD provided ALL they have and are, along with prior knowledge of ALL they would DO...

Quote(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"?

(2)  Please provide Biblical evidence that any being (angelic or otherwise) in the DOMAIN of GOD, ever rebelled or sinned, ...and where it is stated  that GOD set upon this earth, those literally innumerable DEMONIC ANGELS (which "fell") as our opposers on this earth. (having left their "1st estate")

Quote(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?

(3)  CHRIST took away the SIN of the WORLD (John 1:29), ...nothing is said of Him taking away SIN which is asserted by some, to have taken place IN HEAVEN... :mnah:

Quote(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

(4)  ANGELS do not DIE, because they never SINNED, neither do they need reconciliation... 

WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Hi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?
I'm not even sure Heaven always existed? Perhaps God created it at some point in time.
I guess that last because if we always have been in Heaven and Heaven always existed we are as old as God Himself...
Anyway God is in Heaven now and every baby born has part of Gods 'breath of life'
So in that way you can say we where in Heaven.
But was there also a indivdual Willie walking around there?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 02:08:45 AM
QuoteWe read in Genesis, that GOD placed a tree in the midst of the Garden.  And notified of its location, and commanded it be avoided.  Had there been no such tree... would Adam & Eve still SINNED?

a] The fact that they didn't avoid tree means they has a sinful nature before they even knew about the tree.
b] Everything God does has a reason. So planting that tree also has a reason. If it was not planted the plans of God would be different than now I guess.
c] Even before Adam and Eve where created God knew they would sin by eating from the tree. Still God choose to plant the tree. That must had have a good reason.
d] God also could have choosen to create a Adam and Eve that are as resistant to Sin as Father and Son.
e] God also could have choosen to allow eating from that tree.

So all-in-all I think all went according to plan.
And if the tree wasn't planted.... well I can think of a billion if questions but only that one choice by God is relavant.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on September 29, 2008, 02:15:36 AM
 Hi willie and WW ,

 what of these ?

Job 4:17  Shall mortal man be more just than God? shall a man be more pure than his maker?
Job 4:18 Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly:(1) error from an unused noun (apparently from H1984) meaning bluster/sin error , go astray
How much less [in] them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foundation [is] in the dust, [which] are crushed before the moth?They are destroyed from morning to evening:

they perish for ever without any regarding [it].

Doth not their excellency [which is] in them go away? they die, even without wisdom.

   1Cr 1:24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ/ Annointed  the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

 I am not disputing you , just   wanting to know what you make of this ?
 thanks ..rose  
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on September 29, 2008, 02:22:13 AM
QuoteI'm not even sure Heaven always existed? Perhaps God created it at some point in time.

  the Promise is a New heaven and earth the old is  fading/passing  away
  Rev 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.


Psa 102:26 They shall perish, but thou shalt endure: yea, all of them shall wax old like a garment; as a vesture shalt thou change them, and they shall be changed:


Isa 50:9 Behold, the Lord GOD will help me; who [is] he [that] shall condemn me? lo, they all shall wax old as a garment; the moth shall eat them up.



Isa 51:6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look upon the earth beneath: for the heavens shall vanish away like smoke, and the earth shall wax old like a garment, and they that dwell therein shall die in like manner: but my salvation shall be for ever, and my righteousness shall not be abolished.

And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
Hbr 1:11 They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment; And as a vesture shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed: but thou art the same, and thy years shall not fail.

 
just a few verses about this work of God though Jesus Christ 

  I want to know just what the MOTH is ? hummmm... peace rose
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on September 29, 2008, 02:44:01 AM
It comes down to how you interpret principalities and powers in the heavenlies in Colossians 1, Ephesians 3, and in 1Peter 3.  It also partially depends on how you interpret exorcisms, because if these are literally animalistic spiritual parasites of some type then obviously their ultimate fate comes into question, where they went when they were cast into the pigs by Christ when He introduced the world to deviled ham, etc.  That they were cast into literal pigs that committed suicide keeps me from thinking that these were just harmed elements of the human psyche based upon wrong paradigms and alienation from God.  To me this alienation is personified if it can be cast into animals rather than to the dry place to seek for rest and find none, according to Jesus elsewhere.  I've personally seen these creatures and not just their effects.  Church history is littered with others with similar experiences to mine.  Here's a useful link with an anecdote and a very brief extract from Andrew Jukes on the subject:  http://www.biblicaluniversalist.com/Jukes.html (http://www.biblicaluniversalist.com/Jukes.html)

Again, it comes down to what you do with exorcisms, references to principalities and powers, references to the devil and to Satan in both Testaments, and the reference to the Creation entering into the liberties of the Children of God, some of these creatures being mentioned for us in the last two verses of Romans 8.  Some people think that Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 are important to this subject, but I personally don't. 

Jude and 2Peter refer to the disrobing of angelic beings to participate in sin, so whatever this disrobing means, whether a transformation into a bodily form or a putting off of what they were created to be, I'm not going to dogmatize about.  1Corinthians 15 says that we'll "put on" immortality and incorruption, so perhaps immortality and incorruption is some type of ethereal garment.  1Corinthians 15:39-40 refers to celestial bodies and contrasts them with terrestrial bodies in the context where he's describing the different types of flesh that there will be in the various resurrections.  I'm personally not the least bit satisfied with any of the alternative interpretations that I've heard on Revelation 12, so perhaps that third of the stars that were swept down to the earth or to the natural realm or to the carnal mental realm were angelic.

The author of the webpage that I've given a link to above, evidently, didn't know how to transliterate the Greek from Jukes's book.  Basically, you can fill in the blanks with this info:

It is not generally known that an older reading is, "that He should taste death for all excepting God"; "choris Theou" instead of "chariti Theou."

"chariti Theou" is the Greek in that passage in Hebrews that gets into all of our translations these days, but Origen and quite a few others of the early Church Fathers quote the passage in Hebrews [a little differently] as "choris Theou," which changes the passage in Hebrews 2 to more closely follow St. Paul's writing with a reading that He should taste death for all, "except for God."

So, for those of you with a copy of Jukes's book "Restitution of all things," you can pencil in the above info either above the text or in the margin with an arrow to the appropriate places in the blanks given by the above link.  Elhanan Winchester, in the late 1700s, refers to the same EARLIER reading in Hebrews in his book "The Universal Restoration" towards the end of the first Dialogue.  It's a handy point when you're dealing with people who want to argue against a complete restoration of all of the Creation through Jesus Christ.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...

QuoteI'm not even sure Heaven always existed?

No way to prove that to you bro... you either KNOW it, or you do not...

QuotePerhaps God created it at some point in time.

He never "created" it, ...it has always been... or better worded, ALWAYS IS.

QuoteI guess that last because if we always have been in Heaven and Heaven always existed we are as old as God Himself...

GOD, dear friend is not OLD or YOUNG... He is EVERLASTING... OUTSIDE the limitations and boundaries which TIME represents... and which FINITE boundaries denote AGE and YOUTH...

QuoteAnyway God is in Heaven now and every baby born has part of Gods 'breath of life'
So in that way you can say we where in Heaven.

You are on the right track here... That the BREATH of GOD is in each man, notes a PORTION of Himself to be present in each man... which is that which gives us LIFE.

I personally believe that portion which animates US in this Physical realm as individuals (living men), is actually the portion of the the BODY of CHRIST that we (SONS) are of the SPIRIT in the Heavenly realm... which is WHY each returns to GOD... YHVH is NEVER without ANY PORTION of HIMSELF...

QuoteBut was there also a indivdual Willie walking around there?

"willieH" is a MAN bro... a temporal member of the FINITE human race...

The SON of GOD (part) of which "willieH" (*and WW & all others) is numbered, is named, CHRIST... No individual named "willieH", just a part of the WHOLE "body" of the SON of GOD... JESUS CHRIST...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:34:10 AM
willieH: Hi Rose... :hithere:

Quote from: rosered on September 29, 2008, 02:15:36 AM
Hi willie and WW ,

 what of these ?

Job 4:17  Shall mortal man be more just than God? shall a man be more pure than his maker?
Job 4:18 Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly:(1) error from an unused noun (apparently from H1984) meaning bluster/sin error , go astray
How much less [in] them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foundation [is] in the dust, [which] are crushed before the moth?They are destroyed from morning to evening:

they perish for ever without any regarding [it].

Doth not their excellency [which is] in them go away? they die, even without wisdom.

   1Cr 1:24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ/ Annointed  the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

 I am not disputing you , just   wanting to know what you make of this ?
 thanks ..rose  

ALL have sinned (lacked wisdom) and come short of the Glory of GOD... (Rom 3:23)...

Though men are given wisdom in part, they continue to battle the portion of themselves [flesh] which continues to wax UNWISE Rose... (Rom 7:23)

As I wrote this, I turned in my Bible to the EXACT PAGE upon which this verse rested (this happens daily)... thank you Father for your guidance...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:41:26 AM
willieH: :hithere:

I will be leaving in the morning for a week long trip... so if any reply to this thread, I am not ignoring it, just will not access the board for a time...

Enjoy the discussion while I'm gone!  :bgdance:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on September 29, 2008, 12:43:06 PM


  Hi Willie ,
Yes, all Lack Wisdom  :laughing7: praying for more of Him
   Have a wonderful week , will be missing you bro !
  Peace Rose
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 02:44:19 PM
QuoteJob 4:17  Shall mortal man be more just than God? shall a man be more pure than his maker?
Job 4:18 Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly:(1) error from an unused noun (apparently from H1984) meaning bluster/sin error , go astray
How much less [in] them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foundation [is] in the dust, [which] are crushed before the moth?They are destroyed from morning to evening:


Great scriptures Rose, and they show a difference between the angelic and those who dwell in houses of clay (man)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 02:55:28 PM
Quote(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?

The angels that kept not thier first estate scripture comes to mind and of course the book of Enoch speaks of them falling but will not use it as reference because you already said it won't count to you.



Quote(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"?

They either fell before the recreation of the world or after, not sure myself, but God did not make the earth void, yet in Gen.1:1 it says the earth was(which is also translated BECAME) void.



Quote(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?

In that Christ died for the WORLD which is kosmos and incases everything He created, not just the earth.

Quote(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

But Willie the angelic do die, for the wages of sin is death and the second DEATH is prepared for the DEVIL and his ANGELS, thus a good reference to them also being sinners and paying the wages of sin.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on September 29, 2008, 04:04:13 PM
The application of the "fall" creates more contradictions which means the scriptures used to say angels can rebel in heaven are not understood properly.

Satan was a murderer from the beginning.   

Beginning of what?

This raises the possibility that murderers reside in heaven.    If there is no possibility of a murder residing in heaven, then you have to reconcile how and when this rebellion came about that did not start in the heart of an angel while in heaven. 

The mormon bible contains a description of this fall, oh such sadness in heaven it says existed.  Really????  Wow, sadness in heaven?   And so, this heaven will be a much better place than earth?  Heck in heaven I guess God didn't weed out the riff raff after all.   

So between the mormon doctrine and the book of enoch,  the contradiction here should be able to be resolved.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on September 29, 2008, 07:28:39 PM
I think it would be possible for sadness in heaven, given it is possible for joy.  I always think of the great cloud of witnesses we have, as mentioned by Paul,  and I do think they grieve over us as well as jump for joy over us.  Well, that's just me--I never feel 'alone.'




Isaiah 49:13
Shout for joy, O heavens; rejoice, O earth; burst into song, O mountains! For the LORD comforts his people and will have compassion on his afflicted ones.


Luke 15:7
I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.


As to the angels falling, well--let's just say they were thrown out....


Rev 12
7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.





Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on September 29, 2008, 07:59:14 PM


Interesting, this war in revelation has already taken place?


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on September 29, 2008, 10:12:01 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on September 29, 2008, 07:59:14 PM


Interesting, this war in revelation has already taken place?




How far out on the limb should I go?  I suppose since Willie is on vacation, I could take the chance.

Michael and his angels are fighting the war against the devil and his angels.  Jesus says,-- past tense,-- I saw satan fall from heaven like lightning.  This is when the disciples come to him and announce they are now able to trample serpents and scorpions underfoot.

So who is fighting the battle here?  We are!  The body of Christ is fighting the battle.  Satan is thrown out of heaven, and now he must be put under our feet.


Luke 20:43
Till I make thine enemies thy footstool.


"Michael"

H4317
מיכאל
mîykâ'êl
me-kaw-ale'
From H4310 and (the prefixed derivation from) H3588 and H410; who (is) like God?; Mikael, the name of an archangel and of nine Israelites: - Michael.



Romans 10:15
And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on September 29, 2008, 10:58:45 PM
Why ask me how far out on a limb to go? 

Which heaven?  Genesis depicts a plural.

See, when this issue gets talked about there is always heaven in the singular, in every church I have ever been in it has been heaven in the singular.   But there is heavens created in the scriptural nature of things.  Thats why this standard stuff of fallen angels from heaven is very scripturally weak in its general form. 

So, there is more to it and we must determine if angels actually fell  or if a spiritual realm was intended to be created with Satan and his messengers made  precisely for the purpose of what Scripture talks about (sifting us as grain).

The relative vs the absolute must also be seen.  The bible depicts things so that as infants we are introduced to the concept then grow to see the absolute of things.

Such as the supposed contradiction where the bible tells us to seek, but God says no one is seeking.  We believe "we" are seeking but John 6:44 is the absolute nature of how it is.

Lets work a bit to see the plural nature of heaven and let religion have their folly.


Ever wonder if that battle takes place in our spirit as we ascend?   So is the sadness in heaven where the angels reside, or where we reside now?   

Is there heaven on earth?

Something to think about.   
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on September 29, 2008, 11:19:30 PM
2Cr 12:2  I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up to the third heaven.

  what of the 3 part ?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on September 30, 2008, 12:49:23 AM
QuoteEver wonder if that battle takes place in our spirit as we ascend?   So is the sadness in heaven where the angels reside, or where we reside now?   

Is there heaven on earth?

Something to think about.   

The battle takes place as we ascend, yes.  That's a great way to put it.  I spend a lot of time in one of those heavens--but it takes constant renewing of my mind, and eyes on Jesus--because when I look at the wind and waves of the world, I start to sink like a rock.  As you pull away from the world, you are able to see things in a much more objective light--and the insanity and tragedy of it. 

As we are lifted up, we become a city on a hill.  Paul talks about being a 'spectacle.'

...for we are made a spectacle unto the world, and to angels, and to men.

1 Cor 4


The world doesn't see what we see--so to some we are a light on a hill, but to others a spectacle, as it was in the days of Noah building his ark while others laughed at him.


But, yes, I believe the goal is heaven on earth, as we are to demonstrate the meaning of that to men and angels.  For that to happen, satan has to be eliminated altogether, which we do by the choices we make all day long--such choices not to be minimized because they take a lot of courage, being performed, as they are, in the light of day--not hidden in the darkness of behind closed doors.



Deuteronomy 30:19
I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:








Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 01, 2008, 11:13:22 AM
10In conclusion, be strong in the Lord [be empowered through your union with Him]; draw your strength from Him [that strength which His boundless might provides].

    11Put on God's whole armor [the armor of a heavy-armed soldier which God supplies], that you may be able successfully to stand up against [all] the strategies and the deceits of the devil.

    12For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spirit forces of wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere.

    13Therefore put on God's complete armor, that you may be able to resist and stand your ground on the evil day [of danger], and, having done all [the crisis demands], to stand [firmly in your place].

    14Stand therefore [hold your ground], having tightened the belt of truth around your loins and having put on the breastplate of integrity and of moral rectitude and right standing with God,

    15And having shod your feet in preparation [to face the enemy with the firm-footed stability, the promptness, and the readiness produced by the good news] of the Gospel of peace.

    16Lift up over all the [covering] shield of saving faith, upon which you can quench all the flaming missiles of the wicked [one].

    17And take the helmet of salvation and the sword that the Spirit wields, which is the Word of God.

    18Pray at all times (on every occasion, in every season) in the Spirit, with all [manner of] prayer and entreaty. To that end keep alert and watch with strong purpose and perseverance, interceding in behalf of all the saints (God's consecrated people).


--Ephesians 6




8For You have put everything in subjection under his feet. Now in putting everything in subjection to man, He left nothing outside [of man's] control. But at present we do not yet see all things subjected to him [man].

--Hebrews 2




7How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him who brings good tidings, who publishes peace, who brings good tidings of good, who publishes salvation, who says to Zion, Your God reigns!

--Isa 52
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 01, 2008, 11:34:37 AM
Luke 22:53
When I was daily with you in the temple, ye stretched forth no hands against me: but this is your hour, and the power of darkness.


John 8:12
Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.


John 9:5
As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.



Matthew 5:14
Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.



John 11
9Jesus answered, Are there not twelve hours in the day? If any man walk in the day, he stumbleth not, because he seeth the light of this world.
10But if a man walk in the night, he stumbleth, because there is no light in him.



Psalm 139:12
Yea, the darkness hideth not from thee; but the night shineth as the day: the darkness and the light are both alike to thee.




Rev 21

23And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.

24And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it.

25And the gates of it shall not be shut at all by day: for there shall be no night there.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 03, 2008, 07:39:19 PM
QuoteEver wonder if that battle takes place in our spirit as we ascend?   So is the sadness in heaven where the angels reside, or where we reside now?   

Is there heaven on earth?

Something to think about.   

The battle takes place as we ascend, yes.  That's a great way to put it.  I spend a lot of time in one of those heavens--but it takes constant renewing of my mind, and eyes on Jesus--because when I look at the wind and waves of the world, I start to sink like a rock.  As you pull away from the world, you are able to see things in a much more objective light--and the insanity and tragedy of it. 



  yous see the night/darkness/ lack of knowledge  as the shadow

  the Lawof moses   that John the baptist speaks of ?
  this is   passing over from death  to Life 
when the Day  /Jesus Christ comes it is  a decent/lower  place  of sorts to me 
  like John told Jesus    here He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.
Jhn 3:30 He must increase, but I [must] decrease. He that cometh from above is above all: he that is of the earth is earthly, and speaketh of the earth: he that cometh from heaven is above all.

Decrease (Verb)1  Strong's Number: 1642 Greek: elattoo
signifies "to make less or inferior, in quality, position or dignity;" "madest ... lower" and "hast made ... lower," in Hbr 2:7,9. In Jhn 3:30, it is used in the Middle Voice, in John the Baptist's "I must decrease," indicating the special interest he had in his own "decrease," i.e., in authority and popularity. See LOWER. 
  as the Light/knowledge of God  shines  brighter as the Day   remains  and the night is   darker
  without the moon [ law ] to shine in the night no stars[angels ] are seen in the Day  only at night /law of moses moon ,Easton's Bible DictionaryMoonheb. yareah, from its paleness ( Ezr 6:15), and lebanah, the "white" ( Sgs 6:10; Isa 24:23), was appointed by the Creator to be with the sun "for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years" ( Gen 1:14-16). A lunation was among the Jews the period of a month, and several of their festivals were held on the day of the new moon. It is frequently referred to along with the sun ( Jos 10:12; Psa 72:5,7,17; 89:36,37; Ecc 12:2; Isa 24:23, etc.), and also by itself ( Psa 8:3; 121:6).

The great brilliance of the moon in Eastern countries led to its being early an object of idolatrous worship ( Deu 4:19; 17:3; Job 31:26), a form of idolatry against which the Jews were warned ( Deu 4:19; 17:3). They, however, fell into this idolatry, and offered incense ( 2Ki 23:5; Jer 8:2), and also cakes of honey, to the moon ( Jer 7:18; 44:17-19,25).

  I read  that none can keep the whole Law of moses
  but the Law of  liberty   is by faith in Jesus Christ [ His works ]Jam 1:25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth [therein], he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 04, 2008, 02:38:32 AM
Quote from: rosered on October 03, 2008, 07:39:19 PM
QuoteEver wonder if that battle takes place in our spirit as we ascend?   So is the sadness in heaven where the angels reside, or where we reside now?   

Is there heaven on earth?

Something to think about.   

The battle takes place as we ascend, yes.  That's a great way to put it.  I spend a lot of time in one of those heavens--but it takes constant renewing of my mind, and eyes on Jesus--because when I look at the wind and waves of the world, I start to sink like a rock.  As you pull away from the world, you are able to see things in a much more objective light--and the insanity and tragedy of it. 



  yous see the night/darkness/ lack of knowledge  as the shadow

  the Lawof moses   that John the baptist speaks of ?
  this is   passing over from death  to Life 
when the Day  /Jesus Christ comes it is  a decent/lower  place  of sorts to me 
  like John told Jesus    here He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.
Jhn 3:30 He must increase, but I [must] decrease. He that cometh from above is above all: he that is of the earth is earthly, and speaketh of the earth: he that cometh from heaven is above all.

Decrease (Verb)1  Strong's Number: 1642 Greek: elattoo
signifies "to make less or inferior, in quality, position or dignity;" "madest ... lower" and "hast made ... lower," in Hbr 2:7,9. In Jhn 3:30, it is used in the Middle Voice, in John the Baptist's "I must decrease," indicating the special interest he had in his own "decrease," i.e., in authority and popularity. See LOWER. 
  as the Light/knowledge of God  shines  brighter as the Day   remains  and the night is   darker
  without the moon [ law ] to shine in the night no stars[angels ] are seen in the Day  only at night /law of moses moon ,Easton's Bible DictionaryMoonheb. yareah, from its paleness ( Ezr 6:15), and lebanah, the "white" ( Sgs 6:10; Isa 24:23), was appointed by the Creator to be with the sun "for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years" ( Gen 1:14-16). A lunation was among the Jews the period of a month, and several of their festivals were held on the day of the new moon. It is frequently referred to along with the sun ( Jos 10:12; Psa 72:5,7,17; 89:36,37; Ecc 12:2; Isa 24:23, etc.), and also by itself ( Psa 8:3; 121:6).

The great brilliance of the moon in Eastern countries led to its being early an object of idolatrous worship ( Deu 4:19; 17:3; Job 31:26), a form of idolatry against which the Jews were warned ( Deu 4:19; 17:3). They, however, fell into this idolatry, and offered incense ( 2Ki 23:5; Jer 8:2), and also cakes of honey, to the moon ( Jer 7:18; 44:17-19,25).

  I read  that none can keep the whole Law of moses
  but the Law of  liberty   is by faith in Jesus Christ [ His works ]Jam 1:25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth [therein], he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.
:thumbsup:
Amen sis,..ive not read fully the thread being away as such , just caught this last post, so not wishing to take the thread out of context...
Quoteyous see the night/darkness/ lack of knowledge  as the shadow

  the Lawof moses   that John the baptist speaks of ?

Tis like seeing throu the GLASS """"""""""""""""DARKLY"""""""""""""""""""""", JB being symbolic of The LAW which came BEFORE as a Witness, Noted in John....The law shows US for what we are (Romans 7)...but its the SHADOW of the Reality to follow, Moving from DEATH to LIFE,...THE  Lack which you mention, I see In Rom 2, called the FORM(semblence), But NOT the Truth,Tis a FORM of TRUTH., The SHADOW,...As Pual Notes when a Child( nepios) I talked as a Child, meaning as ONE UNDER LAW, But Now FULL GROWN(MAN) I speak as a SON of Faith...

Love ya Post Kiddo.

Gramster

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 04, 2008, 03:05:24 AM
 :thumbsup:

  great to see you about  mate ! missed ya , love  ya sis ... rose
 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 04, 2008, 09:58:33 AM
willieH: Hi brother Scott... :hithere:

I must continue to disagree with you bro... but, please know that I do have deep respect for your knowledge and your deep dedication to GOD and the truth...

I just think there is something new for you to learn here...  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 02:55:28 PMThe angels that kept not thier first estate scripture comes to mind and of course the book of Enoch speaks of them falling but will not use it as reference because you already said it won't count to you.

You are correct in this assumption... I do NOT hold the book of Enoch as Scripture, and therefore its writings have no bearing on what IS Scripture...

This is a traditional viewpoint... and you do not stand alone... on the contrary... It is I which find few that might see this differently Scott...

the "angels" which kept not their "first estate" are MEN... not ANGELIC beings which once were part of the PERFECT and UNDEFILED Domain of YHVH...

If you read in the context in which JUDE mentions these "angels" ...did AS did those in Sodom & Gomorrah, gave themselves over to STRANGE FLESH (not spirit), doing likewise (Jude 7 & 8)

Jude 6-8  And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hat reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day... even AS Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about them IN LIKE MANNER, ...giving themselves OVER to FORNICATION, and GOING AFTER STRANGE FLESH, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengence of eternal fire... Likewise also these dreamers DEFILE THE FLESH, despise dominion and speak evil of dignities...  (the bearers of truth)

ANGELS do not give themselves over to FLESH, nor FORNICATION, strange or otherwise... :mnah:

Quote from: willieH(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"?

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 02:55:28 PMThey either fell before the recreation of the world or after, not sure myself, but God did not make the earth void, yet in Gen.1:1 it says the earth was(which is also translated BECAME) void.

The word Hebrew word (#H922 strongs) BOHUW which is translated into the english word,VOID in Gen 1:1 simply means EMPTINESS or VACUITY (as OUTER SPACE is yet found for the MOST PART - material is RARE in the UNIVERSE... VOID is COMMON)... in other words, until EARTH was SPOKEN of by GOD... it was in a state of EMPTINESS, just as does remain ...MOST of the UNIVERSE...

The reason that nothing is said in the Bible about Salvation for ANGELS, is because they never FELL into "sin" and are therefore, not in need of salvation...

Quote from: willieH(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 02:55:28 PMIn that Christ died for the WORLD which is kosmos and incases everything He created, not just the earth.

ANGELS of GOD are NOT created beings... they have ALWAYS BEEN... Please name any reference in Scripture which speaks of their CREATION,

Therefore, CHRIST did not DIE for ANGELS, He died for CREATION... All living entities which have found DEATH, have done so because of the SIN which was brought upon CREATION by MAN...  Not ANGELS...

This is why there is an ABSENCE of notation in Scripture about the "CREATION" of ANGELS, and an equal ABSENCE of notation of SALVATION concerning ANGELIC beings.  :dontknow:

Quote from: willieH(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 02:55:28 PMBut Willie the angelic do die, for the wages of sin is death and the second DEATH is prepared for the DEVIL and his ANGELS, thus a good reference to them also being sinners and paying the wages of sin.

Again Scott, this is evidence that you maintain a measure of traditional views... I do not demean you for it... I just contend that you are yet veiled concerning ANGELS of GOD...

What it comes down to, is that you view...

The "devil and HIS angels" as LITERAL "angelic beings"... and draw said reference from a book of SYMBOLISM, ...then promptly note LITERAL perspective concerning the SYMBOLS of the "devil and his angels",  and the "2nd death"... 

The truth (which you shall disagree with), is that the DEVIL is ADVERSITY in MAN... and "ITS" angels... are the HUMAN messengers which continue to bring their TRADITIONAL (Matt 15:6 / Mk 7:13) message of ADVERSITY to the WORLD... making the Word of GOD of NONE EFFECT...  :sigh:  (Jude 6) -- Bound in CHAINS under DARKNESS (of that tradition) ...

Teaching that GOD shall TORMENT His creatures (and ANGELS) in an UNGODLY and UNFORGIVING way, or alternatively, ...that He shall just KILL them...  :thumbdown: 

NO ANGELS of GOD, ...ever have or ever will... DIE!  :teaching:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PM
:hithere: Hi Willie  :HeartThrob:

Quote from: willieH on October 04, 2008, 09:58:33 AM
ANGELS of GOD are NOT created beings... they have ALWAYS BEEN... Please name any reference in Scripture which speaks of their CREATION
We had a little clash about 'always been' at the start of this thread. Then you just ignored why I said (asked)
Now you bring it up again so here am I again  :laughing7:
One thing first when I speak of the age of God that's just for making explanation easier (for me) So I agree with you He is of unlimted age. Or as you say just "IS" or "always been". Ok?

So you are saying that the angles are of the same age as God? => angles have "always been" just like God.
If your answer is no the the angles must have come into existance at some point.
No I can not state a verse claiming that. But that's perhaps the Bible is mainly about what happens on earth.
And even a selection from that.
In all the time 'God is' with His Son around and according to you also the angles there sure have be some interaction/conversation between them in that unlimited 'time'
I think you agree with me that let's call it the 'history of God' can't be decribed in the few thousand pages the Bible has.
So perhaps some info isn't in the Bible because God deemed it not relavant.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:42:59 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 04, 2008, 09:58:33 AM
Quote from: willieH(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?
the "angels" which kept not their "first estate" are MEN... not ANGELIC beings which once were part of the PERFECT and UNDEFILED Domain of YHVH...

According to Strong Angel means messenger (of God). So a being that lets call it acts as a postman between God and people. With that I sorta debunk the few lines I will write below; but perhaps in a way they make even sense to you  :laughing7:

The Garden of Eden was a undefiled place. Adam and Eve where good people too.
Until the sepent changed all that.
Adam and Eve fell (as in fallen) to sin.
The Garden got defilled with sin.
Adam and Eve got kicked out their "first estate"
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: CHB on October 04, 2008, 06:39:11 PM

Hi All,

This verse comes to mind when talking about sinning angels and a fall. 

(Heb.9:23) it was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.

What need would there be for sacrifices for the heavens if there was no sin there?

Also, it says that Jesus was made a little lower than the angels  when he took on human flesh. If angels don't exist how do you explain this?


(Job 4:18) Behold he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly.

(Job 15:15) Behold he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight.

Also, it says in (Col. 1:16:20) that ALL THINGS were created by him whether they be things in heaven or things on earth, visible and invisible. He will reconcile all things unto himself, whether they are things in earth or things in heaven. 

If there are no angels in heaven what is God going to reconcile unto himself?

I believe everything here on earth is a pattern of things in heaven. Maybe we have angels that look like us? Remember Peter knocking at the door and the disciples thought the woman had seen his angel (Acts 12:15). Why would they say "it is his angel"? Also Saul calling up samuel? This being looked like Samuel, but it couldn't have been for samuel was dead. (Heb. 8:5) Moses was given a pattern to make the tabernacle. (Heb. 9:23) mentions the "patterns of things in the heavens". (Ex. 25:40) "make them after their pattern". (Num. 8:4) "according unto the pattern shewed thee".

I do believe there are spirit beings and each of us has an angel that may look just like us. (Matt. 18:10) That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.

(Acts 23:8) For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit, but the Pharisees confess both.

Just my  :2c:

CHB
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PM
QuotewillieH: Hi brother Scott...

I must continue to disagree with you bro... but, please know that I do have deep respect for your knowledge and your deep dedication to GOD and the truth...

I just think there is something new for you to learn here...

Hi Willie, what you put forth here is not new to me brother, I also have contemplated that the angels which kept not there first estate was in reference to MAN but that does not bear out in scripture IMO.

QuoteQuote from: willieH
(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 07:55:28 AM
The angels that kept not thier first estate scripture comes to mind and of course the book of Enoch speaks of them falling but will not use it as reference because you already said it won't count to you.


QuoteYou are correct in this assumption... I do NOT hold the book of Enoch as Scripture, and therefore its writings have no bearing on what IS Scripture...

This is a traditional viewpoint... and you do not stand alone... on the contrary... It is I which find few that might see this differently Scott...

Not all tradition is in error bro, you yourself stand on tradition concerning the canon of 66 books.

Quotethe "angels" which kept not their "first estate" are MEN... not ANGELIC beings which once were part of the PERFECT and UNDEFILED Domain of YHVH...

You have yet to show anywhere in scripture that the angelic are or were PERFECT Willie, until you can show me this by scripture it is just conjecture on your part.


QuoteIf you read in the context in which JUDE mentions these "angels" ...did AS did those in Sodom & Gomorrah, gave themselves over to STRANGE FLESH (not spirit), doing likewise (Jude 7 & 8)

Jude 6-8 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hat reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day... even AS Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about them IN LIKE MANNER, ...giving themselves OVER to FORNICATION, and GOING AFTER STRANGE FLESH, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengence of eternal fire... Likewise also these dreamers DEFILE THE FLESH, despise dominion and speak evil of dignities... (the bearers of truth)

ANGELS do not give themselves over to FLESH, nor FORNICATION, strange or otherwise...

A couple of things here Willie that need to be pointed out is that is says of these angels is that they kept not their FIRST ESTATE but left their own HABITATION.  

FIRST: This CANNOT be speaking of man for mans FIRST ESTATE is one of corruption according to Paul. 1Co.15:46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. The natural is sown in corruption then raised in incorruption.

Therefore we know MANS FIRST ESTATE is one of corruption.

We also can see this in Gen. in that MAN was not created IN the GARDEN but OUTSIDE of the GARDEN and then put INTO the GARDEN. Gen.2:8,15 & Gen.3:23

Thus showing MANS FIRST ESTATE was NOT of the GARDEN but of the EARTH EARTHY.

SECOND: Not all FLESH is the SAME FLESH, for there are celestial and terrestrial BODIES. Thus for one to go after STRANGE FLESH would be one who had a celestial body going after one who had a terrestrial body and vice versa. Fornication does not mean just sexual intercourse but is also in reference to IDOLATRY, thus we see the angelic giving IDOL-A-TRY or giving idol worship a try  :bigGrin:,worshiping the creature instead of the creator.



QuoteQuote from: willieH
(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"?

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 07:55:28 AM
They either fell before the recreation of the world or after, not sure myself, but God did not make the earth void, yet in Gen.1:1 it says the earth was(which is also translated BECAME) void.



QuoteThe word Hebrew word (#H922 strongs) BOHUW which is translated into the english word,VOID in Gen 1:1 simply means EMPTINESS or VACUITY (as OUTER SPACE is yet found for the MOST PART - material is RARE in the UNIVERSE... VOID is COMMON)... in other words, until EARTH was SPOKEN of by GOD... it was in a state of EMPTINESS, just as does remain ...MOST of the UNIVERSE...

I think you missed my point bro. Genesis 1:1 states
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Thus in the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. There is NOTHING stated here about the earth being without form and void. So how did the earth become without form and void? When Is.45:18 states that God did NOT CREATE IT IN VAIN or WITHOUT FORM. So what happened between verse 1 and 2 that made the earth WITHOUT FORM?

Then verse two say

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.

The word WAS is also translated BECAME so it can also be read

And the earth BECAME without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.

The translation BECAME seem to match up better with Is.45:18 which state God did NOT create the earth WITHOUT FORM.

So if God did not create the earth WITHOUT FORM then something must have happened to the earth to make it that way. What happened?

Like I said I am not sure myself, but what if the angelic inhabited the earth before man did and on their account the earth BECAME WITHOUT FORM. Would this also not help to account for the age of the earth?


QuoteThe reason that nothing is said in the Bible about Salvation for ANGELS, is because they never FELL into "sin" and are therefore, not in need of salvation...

Ephesians 3:9-11
9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: 10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, 11 According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord:

The manifold wisdom of God is to be made known to the principalities and powers in heavenly places Willie so to what end is it to be made known unto them? So that they also might come into the realisation that the blood of Christ is also applicable to them.

These principalities and powers cannot be something to do with mans carnal mind bro for the carnal mind CANNOT be reconciled, CANNOT understand spiritual things, and is NOT subject to the laws of God neither indeed can be. So how in the world is the manifold wisdom of God made known to it?





QuoteQuote from: willieH
(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?


Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 07:55:28 AM
In that Christ died for the WORLD which is kosmos and incases everything He created, not just the earth.



QuoteANGELS of GOD are NOT created beings... they have ALWAYS BEEN... Please name any reference in Scripture which speaks of their CREATION,

Colossians 1:16-17
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

Seems to me ALL THINGS in heaven and earth both visible and invisible were created by HIM, for by Him do all things consists.

If the angelic have always been bro then not all things were created by Him. So you would have to show me a scripture that states not all things were made by Him to prove your point of the angelic always being.

QuoteTherefore, CHRIST did not DIE for ANGELS, He died for CREATION... All living entities which have found DEATH, have done so because of the SIN which was brought upon CREATION by MAN... Not ANGELS...

Jesus blood was shed for ALL of His creation brother and scripture testifies to that effect time and time again.



QuoteThis is why there is an ABSENCE of notation in Scripture about the "CREATION" of ANGELS, and an equal ABSENCE of notation of SALVATION concerning ANGELIC beings.

I have given you scripture Willie, but you see the principalities and powers in heavenly places as being something to do with our carnal minds, and as I pointed out that CANNOT be the case for the carnal mind CANNOT be reconciled by the blood of Christ.

But here are a few more that state the angelic were created by God.

Psalm 148:2-5
2 Praise ye him, all his angels: praise ye him, all his hosts. 3 Praise ye him, sun and moon: praise him, all ye stars of light. 4 Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens. 5 Let them praise the name of the LORD: for he commanded, and they were created.

Genesis 2:1-3
Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. 

Nehemiah 9:6
6 Thou, even thou, art LORD alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee.

That they sin and are in need of salvation


Job 4:18-19
18 Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly:  19 How much less in them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foundation is in the dust, which are crushed before the moth?

Makes the distinction of the angelic and those who dwell in houses of clay (man)

2 Peter 2:4
4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;

You will note if you keep reading that the order in 2Pet. Is in chronological order, the angelic sinned first then the days of Noah and then of Sodom and Gomorrah, seems to hint at what I said earlier about the angelic being the ones to cause the earth to become without form.


QuoteQuote from: willieH
(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 07:55:28 AM
But Willie the angelic do die, for the wages of sin is death and the second DEATH is prepared for the DEVIL and his ANGELS, thus a good reference to them also being sinners and paying the wages of sin.


QuoteAgain Scott, this is evidence that you maintain a measure of traditional views... I do not demean you for it... I just contend that you are yet veiled concerning ANGELS of GOD...

What it comes down to, is that you view...

The "devil and HIS angels" as LITERAL "angelic beings"... and draw said reference from a book of SYMBOLISM, ...then promptly note LITERAL perspective concerning the SYMBOLS of the "devil and his angels", and the "2nd death"...

The truth (which you shall disagree with), is that the DEVIL is ADVERSITY in MAN... and "ITS" angels... are the HUMAN messengers which continue to bring their TRADITIONAL (Matt 15:6 / Mk 7:13) message of ADVERSITY to the WORLD... making the Word of GOD of NONE EFFECT... (Jude 6) -- Bound in CHAINS under DARKNESS (of that tradition) ...

Teaching that GOD shall TORMENT His creatures (and ANGELS) in an UNGODLY and UNFORGIVING way, or alternatively, ...that He shall just KILL them...

NO ANGELS of GOD, ...ever have or ever will... DIE!


Willie I have seen to much of the devil and his angels to believe they are the creation of mans mind, they have names, they have personalities and they are cast out by the word of God, you might think I am standing on tradition bro but I am going by what I have seen and no one can tell me that what I have seen is just my imagination of something I made up in my carnal mind.

What you would have me believe is that Jesus was talking to himself when he was tempted of the devil, which would mean Jesus had a carnal mind.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:07:23 PM
QuoteAdam and Eve got kicked out their "first estate"

problem with that is Adams FIRST ESTATE was NOT IN the garden.

Read my reply to Willie
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:07:58 PM
Quote from: CHB on October 04, 2008, 06:39:11 PM

Hi All,

This verse comes to mind when talking about sinning angels and a fall. 

(Heb.9:23) it was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.

What need would there be for sacrifices for the heavens if there was no sin there?

Also, it says that Jesus was made a little lower than the angels  when he took on human flesh. If angels don't exist how do you explain this?


(Job 4:18) Behold he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly.

(Job 15:15) Behold he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight.

Also, it says in (Col. 1:16:20) that ALL THINGS were created by him whether they be things in heaven or things on earth, visible and invisible. He will reconcile all things unto himself, whether they are things in earth or things in heaven. 

If there are no angels in heaven what is God going to reconcile unto himself?

I believe everything here on earth is a pattern of things in heaven. Maybe we have angels that look like us? Remember Peter knocking at the door and the disciples thought the woman had seen his angel (Acts 12:15). Why would they say "it is his angel"? Also Saul calling up samuel? This being looked like Samuel, but it couldn't have been for samuel was dead. (Heb. 8:5) Moses was given a pattern to make the tabernacle. (Heb. 9:23) mentions the "patterns of things in the heavens". (Ex. 25:40) "make them after their pattern". (Num. 8:4) "according unto the pattern shewed thee".

I do believe there are spirit beings and each of us has an angel that may look just like us. (Matt. 18:10) That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.

(Acts 23:8) For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit, but the Pharisees confess both.

Just my  :2c:

CHB


:thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 04, 2008, 09:18:22 PM
willieH: Hi WW!!  :cloud9:

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PM
:hithere: Hi Willie  :HeartThrob:

Quote from: willieH on October 04, 2008, 09:58:33 AM
ANGELS of GOD are NOT created beings... they have ALWAYS BEEN... Please name any reference in Scripture which speaks of their CREATION

A hearty  :HeartThrob: HELLO to you as well bro!

QuoteWe had a little clash about 'always been' at the start of this thread. Then you just ignored why I said (asked)

Sorry bro,  :doh: ...I must have missed your question, I did not mean to ignore you!  :mblush:

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PMNow you bring it up again so here am I again  :laughing7:
One thing first when I speak of the age of God that's just for making explanation easier (for me) So I agree with you He is of unlimted age. Or as you say just "IS" or "always been". Ok?

Let me clarify my view of GOD... GOD is OUTSIDE of TIME, and TIME has no bearing on Him whatsoever!  He is NOT old or young or any other connotation which TIME demands upon beings WITHIN it's realm...

So "unlimited age" is inaccurate from where I view Him... AGE is NOT APPLICABLE to Him... He has no beginning or end, and only things with these attributes can an "AGE" be attached...

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PMSo you are saying that the angles are of the same age as God? => angles have "always been" just like God.

AGE is not a relevant factor in the HEAVENLY/ETERNAL realm...

Not only do I assert that ANGELS have ALWAYS BEEN, but so have the SONS of GOD. (of which WE are numbered)...  :HeartThrob:

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PMIf your answer is no the the angles must have come into existance at some point.

My answer was not "no"...  :cloud9:

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PMNo I can not state a verse claiming that. But that's perhaps the Bible is mainly about what happens on earth.
And even a selection from that.

Agreed... and BECAUSE the Bible is about mainly what happens on earth, we have so little information to establish that HEAVEN has been brought into a supposed SIN scenario... and WHY "Heavenly SIN" is a poor and (IMO false) arguement with little to establish it...

What ...I... propose, is that the "things IN HEAVEN" which are in need of RECONCILIATION is the BODY of CHRIST and TEMPLE of YHVH, which NEVER changes...  WE are that BODY and TEMPLE... (not "will be" or "were", but ARE)...

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PMIn all the time 'God is' with His Son around and according to you also the angles there sure have be some interaction/conversation between them in that unlimited 'time'

Again bro... TIME was created at the BEGINNING of EARTHLY things... it was NOT, is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, present in the HEAVENLY realm where ETERNAL things exist ETERNALLY...  :dontknow:

ETERNITY is NOT "unlimited time"... it is PERPETUAL existence WITHOUT beginning or end...

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PMI think you agree with me that let's call it the 'history of God' can't be decribed in the few thousand pages the Bible has.
So perhaps some info isn't in the Bible because God deemed it not relavant.

I do not think there is such a thing as the "history of GOD"... for HISTORY marks TIME, and is that which REtraces the PAST... That which has NO PAST or FUTURE (again, parameters found of and in, TIME), has NO "HISTORY"...

I DO agree with you that HEAVENLY existence is IRRELEVANT to FINITE beings... as much as COLOR is NOT RELEVANT to a BLIND man... 

It is NOT part of our ability to COMPREHEND Heavenly things which is WHY CHRIST found it IRRELEVANT and UNFRUITFUL to expound upon them, (John 3:12) ...nor does its existent DOINGS "fit in" with that which transpires in TIME...

Basically, the only thing RELEVANT to us from HEAVENLY perspective is the RECONCILING work of the Word of GOD which delivers us from this FINITE realm of DEATH due to SIN (within the gaining of the knowledge of Good and Evil)... BACK to the LIFE of ETERNITY...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 10:06:58 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 04, 2008, 09:18:22 PM
Sorry bro,  :doh: ...I must have missed your question, I did not mean to ignore you!  :mblush:
And again you get upset about 'age' while I clearly stated that I just use it for ease of explanation...
I even said you should read "is"
But still you waste half of your post on it. It clarifies nothing. On the contrary it just makes the remaining answers harder to read. Or should I say harder to find :happy3:
Bad baaaaad doggy!  :laughing7:

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PMNo I can not state a verse claiming that. But that's perhaps the Bible is mainly about what happens on earth.
And even a selection from that.

QuoteAgreed... and BECAUSE the Bible is about mainly what happens on earth, we have so little information to establish that HEAVEN has been brought into a supposed SIN scenario... and WHY "Heavenly SIN" is a poor and (IMO false) arguement with little to establish it...
Little can be enough. I/we need just one verse.

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 04, 2008, 12:26:54 PMI think you agree with me that let's call it the 'history of God' can't be decribed in the few thousand pages the Bible has.
So perhaps some info isn't in the Bible because God deemed it not relavant.

QuoteI do not think there is such a thing as the "history of GOD"... for HISTORY marks TIME,
Another 'time answer'
Sorry Willie I give up. This only lead to high blood pressure and a bad  :HeartThrob:

Take care :friendstu: ,
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 05, 2008, 12:00:06 AM
willieH: Hi Scott!  :hithere:

:omg:  Whoa!  :heat: ...I thought my answer was long!  I realize you had to refer, as will I, ...but I suggest you better grab a lunch bro!!!  ...  :ok:

This answer will be in TWO PARTS:

PART ONE:

Quote from: willieHwillieH: Hi brother Scott...

I must continue to disagree with you bro... but, please know that I do have deep respect for your knowledge and your deep dedication to GOD and the truth...

I just think there is something new for you to learn here...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMHi Willie, what you put forth here is not new to me brother, I also have contemplated that the angels which kept not there first estate was in reference to MAN but that does not bear out in scripture IMO.

Carry on...  :dontknow:

Quote from: willieH
(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 07:55:28 AM
The angels that kept not thier first estate scripture comes to mind and of course the book of Enoch speaks of them falling but will not use it as reference because you already said it won't count to you.


Quote from: willieHYou are correct in this assumption... I do NOT hold the book of Enoch as Scripture, and therefore its writings have no bearing on what IS Scripture...

This is a traditional viewpoint... and you do not stand alone... on the contrary... It is I which find few that might see this differently Scott...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMNot all tradition is in error bro, you yourself stand on tradition concerning the canon of 66 books.

Tradition is that which deters the EFFECTIVENESS of the WORD... I see this as a straw man arguement, for  within it's proposal, it deduces that ANY observance of ANY set of SCRIPTURES is TRADITIONAL...  If that were so, the ANY observance of ANY set of SCRIPTURES would render the WORD ...INEFFECTIVE...  :dontknow:

Quote from: willieHthe "angels" which kept not their "first estate" are MEN... not ANGELIC beings which once were part of the PERFECT and UNDEFILED Domain of YHVH...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMYou have yet to show anywhere in scripture that the angelic are or were PERFECT Willie, until you can show me this by scripture it is just conjecture on your part.

Again, an evasive straw man answer... In your own ASSERTION, do you prove PERFECTION concerning ANGELIC BEINGS in the HEAVENLY realm... YOU assert that ANGELS FELL in SIN... therefore it is ON YOU to prove this occured... furthermore... THEY had to be in a PERFECT (incorruptible) state in order to FALL FROM IT... (corruptible)

RECONCILIATION is from an IMPERFECT state to an PERFECT state:  (1 Cor 15:42, 49-54)

Quote from: willieHIf you read in the context in which JUDE mentions these "angels" ...did AS did those in Sodom & Gomorrah, gave themselves over to STRANGE FLESH (not spirit), doing likewise (Jude 7 & 8)

Jude 6-8 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hat reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day... even AS Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about them IN LIKE MANNER, ...giving themselves OVER to FORNICATION, and GOING AFTER STRANGE FLESH, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengence of eternal fire... Likewise also these dreamers DEFILE THE FLESH, despise dominion and speak evil of dignities... (the bearers of truth)

ANGELS do not give themselves over to FLESH, nor FORNICATION, strange or otherwise...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMA couple of things here Willie that need to be pointed out is that is says of these angels is that they kept not their FIRST ESTATE but left their own HABITATION.  

FIRST: This CANNOT be speaking of man for mans FIRST ESTATE is one of corruption according to Paul. 1Co.15:46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. The natural is sown in corruption then raised in incorruption.

Let me address this first... When a BABY is born, is he a SINNER?  Has he yet MISSED THE MARK (sin)?   It is when a CONSCIOUS decision to DISOBEY the command of GOD is made, that a Human being "puts on" corruption... prior to that, it is in an UNDEFILED state...

ALL have sinned (which notes that baby's destiny in time)... but until it DOES... it has no need of RECONCILIATION... thereby LEAVING his FIRST estate which was NOT corrupted...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMTherefore we know MANS FIRST ESTATE is one of corruption.

We also can see this in Gen. in that MAN was not created IN the GARDEN but OUTSIDE of the GARDEN and then put INTO the GARDEN. Gen.2:8,15 & Gen.3:23

Thus showing MANS FIRST ESTATE was NOT of the GARDEN but of the EARTH EARTHY.

If man was OUTSIDE the "earthy", then His FIRST ESTATE is prior to that "EARTHY", is it not?  That his "geographical" location was changed had nothing to do with the STATE of his being... For before ADAM sinned, He was SINLESS... meaning his "FIRST ESTATE" was SINLESSNESS... which is INCORRUPTION, Scott...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMSECOND: Not all FLESH is the SAME FLESH, for there are celestial and terrestrial BODIES. Thus for one to go after STRANGE FLESH would be one who had a celestial body going after one who had a terrestrial body and vice versa. Fornication does not mean just sexual intercourse but is also in reference to IDOLATRY, thus we see the angelic giving IDOL-A-TRY or giving idol worship a try  :bigGrin:,worshiping the creature instead of the creator.

You SIDESTEP the "AS", Scott... JUDE said "Even AS... Sodom and Gomorrah"...

The fact is that, Sodom & Gomorrah did not go after STRANGE Celestial FLESH... it went after STRANGE Terrestrial FLESH...  :dontknow:  And if these "angels" did AS Sodom & Gomorrah... then this same scenario is applicable to them...

Quote from: willieH(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"?

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 07:55:28 AM
They either fell before the recreation of the world or after, not sure myself, but God did not make the earth void, yet in Gen.1:1 it says the earth was(which is also translated BECAME) void.


Quote from: willieHThe word Hebrew word (#H922 strongs) BOHUW which is translated into the english word,VOID in Gen 1:1 simply means EMPTINESS or VACUITY (as OUTER SPACE is yet found for the MOST PART - material is RARE in the UNIVERSE... VOID is COMMON)... in other words, until EARTH was SPOKEN of by GOD... it was in a state of EMPTINESS, just as does remain ...MOST of the UNIVERSE...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMI think you missed my point bro. Genesis 1:1 states
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Thus in the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. There is NOTHING stated here about the earth being without form and void. So how did the earth become without form and void? When Is.45:18 states that God did NOT CREATE IT IN VAIN or WITHOUT FORM. So what happened between verse 1 and 2 that made the earth WITHOUT FORM?

You observe Gen 1:1, as do many which observe this verse trying to prove the DINOSAURS lived in a TIME other (prior) than the Biblical History indicates MAN has lived...

That Earth or MAN or Beasts or ANYTHING has not been pronounced to BE, it is found VOID or EMPTY... as I previously noted about OUTER SPACE... those vast distances of NOTHING are VOID of SOMETHING, just as the EARTH was prior to the CREATIVE power of the WORD of GOD, when SPOKEN...

I think YOU miss the point dear bro... GOD did not "CREATE the Earth" without FORM and VOID... It was IN that state until the WORD pronounced it otherwise...

The SPIRIT of GOD moved upon the face of the DEEP waters... which notes that WATER was first to EXIST... but the EARTH was yet to "surface" from the depths of the WATERS....

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMThen verse two say

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.

The word WAS is also translated BECAME so it can also be read

And the earth BECAME without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.

The translation BECAME seem to match up better with Is.45:18 which state God did NOT create the earth WITHOUT FORM.

So if God did not create the earth WITHOUT FORM then something must have happened to the earth to make it that way. What happened?

More "reaching"... When the FLOOD of Noah happened, the WATERS buried the Earth... until GOD called them to RECEDE... this is the picture of the Beginning Scott... not that the EARTH went through some prior AGE in which Dinosaurs and/or cave men existed...

If there was such an age, then the BEGINNING was not the BEGINNING, and the FIRST DAY was NOT the FIRST DAY...  :dontknow:

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMLike I said I am not sure myself, but what if the angelic inhabited the earth before man did and on their account the earth BECAME WITHOUT FORM. Would this also not help to account for the age of the earth?

Now YOU resort to CONJECTURE in order to attempt to establish PERFECT BEINGS (angelic within the realm of GOD), "falling" within that PERFECT scenario...

What Hebrew word is translated BECAME Scott?  And is it ABSOLUTELY ONLY "BECAME" exclusively?  I see the shadow of fallacy in your proposal...

Quote from: willieHThe reason that nothing is said in the Bible about Salvation for ANGELS, is because they never FELL into "sin" and are therefore, not in need of salvation...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMEphesians 3:9-11
9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: 10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, 11 According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord:

The manifold wisdom of God is to be made known to the principalities and powers in heavenly places Willie so to what end is it to be made known unto them? So that they also might come into the realisation that the blood of Christ is also applicable to them.

The principalities in HEAVENLY PLACES Scott, are the minds and hearts of MEN, which ARE the BODY and TEMPLE of GOD... (1 Cor 12:27 / 1 Cor 6:19) ...Not ANGELS which "fell" while in a PERFECT domain/scenario...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMThese principalities and powers cannot be something to do with mans carnal mind bro for the carnal mind CANNOT be reconciled, CANNOT understand spiritual things, and is NOT subject to the laws of God neither indeed can be. So how in the world is the manifold wisdom of God made known to it?

FIRST brother S... ALL POWER is of GOD... (Rom 13:1), including what you mistakenly percieve as your "free will"... ALL have been CONCLUDED as sinners BY GOD... (Rom 11:32)

Whatsoever is NOT of FAITH (unbelief) IS SIN! (Rom 14:23)

Wow!  I cannot believe you actually said what you just said Scott... stumbling within your own words and desire to be correct, you miss the WHOLE POINT that is transpiring in all this Earthly suffering, bro!

The carnal mind (missing the mark=sin) RECONCILED, ...IS, the MIND of CHRIST bro! (hitting the mark=WILL of GOD)

The EARTHLY, SINFUL mind is (RE)MADE NEW bro!  As CHRIST is REVEALED from within it... (2 Cor 5:17)

ALL THINGS are OF GOD Scott... Including the process of EVIL in us as we SIN, to our conclusion in CHRIST...

He is the AUTHOR and FINISHER of our FAITH bro... which means He is the ALPHA and OMEGA of that Faith, which is CONCLUDED in UNBELIEF... by HIM -- to BEGIN with!

end of PART ONE...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 05, 2008, 12:29:48 AM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

PART TWO: 

Quote from: willieH(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 07:55:28 AM
In that Christ died for the WORLD which is kosmos and incases everything He created, not just the earth.


Quote from: willieHANGELS of GOD are NOT created beings... they have ALWAYS BEEN... Please name any reference in Scripture which speaks of their CREATION,

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMColossians 1:16-17
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

Seems to me ALL THINGS in heaven and earth both visible and invisible were created by HIM, for by Him do all things consists.

What a difference a WORD makes... all CREATED things bro... the "created" things IN HEAVEN are the EARTHLY, TIME BOUND, beings GOD called MEN, and placed upon the EARTH which by your own words noted that were NOT on the Earth to begin with... their FIRST ESTATE being an "elsewhere" (Gen 2:8) which was (is) in the HEAVENLY realm... the SONS of GOD, which each in turn, became MEN in ADAM, and are CONCLUDED ...SONS... IN CHRIST...

And which "SONS" are also KNOWN as the BODY and TEMPLE of GOD... which has ALWAYS BEEN...  According to you, GOD was "HOMELESS" and CHRIST was a HEAD without a "BODY", prior to the Creation of the Earth and TIME... Please! :rolleye:

You (IMO) continue to arrange words in a recipe which produces in part,  TRADITION which in turn, defeats the TRUTH ...and thereby keeps those who embrace it, within the CHAINS under DARKNESS... (Jude 6)

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMIf the angelic have always been bro then not all things were created by Him. So you would have to show me a scripture that states not all things were made by Him to prove your point of the angelic always being.

Again... you fail to note where and when ANGELS were CREATED or had a BEGINNING, Scott...

GOD never, in any way changes... Neither does CHRIST... so we are left with the BODY and TEMPLE...  You believe that the INCORRUPT "HEAD" was "body-less" and in the HEAVENLY scenario, created Itself a BODY which is CORRUPT... then transformed that BODY into something INCORRUPT which is a deduction of CHANGE... rendering the Scriptures which state that YHVH and CHRIST do not VARY in any way, as incorrect or false...

I view this process differently than do you Scott... For example:  I see this as my HEAD having a knowledge of DRIVING... because my HEAD has read a BOOK on driving... but my BODY has not EXPERIENCED DRIVING, so it does NOT ...KNOW... HOW to DRIVE...

This is what has transpired between the HEAD (CHRIST) in the Heavenly places, and the BODY (sons)... the HEAD ...KNOWS... Good and Evil... the BODY has NOT yet EXPERIENCED what the HEAD KNOWS... the HEAD therefore CREATES a scenario in which the BODY might LEARN what the HEAD KNOWS... (am I going to fast?)

As with many of our interactions Scott... this one, most likely shall end in disagreement, and that is fine with me...  I do not post to convince you or anyone else, of anything... I post that which GOD has given me, and for my brothers and sisters to consider... KNOWING that there are places within those views that are yet to be completed, as CHRIST who AUTHORED my faith, ...continues to mold the clay (me)...

Quote from: willieHTherefore, CHRIST did not DIE for ANGELS, He died for CREATION... All living entities which have found DEATH, have done so because of the SIN which was brought upon CREATION by MAN... Not ANGELS...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMJesus blood was shed for ALL of His creation brother and scripture testifies to that effect time and time again.

And again I am found REPEATING myself to you... His blood was shed for CREATION, which means all things that were CREATED... not for those things which have ALWAYS BEEN, one of which are the HOLY ANGELS of GOD...

Quote from: willieHThis is why there is an ABSENCE of notation in Scripture about the "CREATION" of ANGELS, and an equal ABSENCE of notation of SALVATION concerning ANGELIC beings.

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMI have given you scripture Willie, but you see the principalities and powers in heavenly places as being something to do with our carnal minds, and as I pointed out that CANNOT be the case for the carnal mind CANNOT be reconciled by the blood of Christ.

And the redundant merry-go-round makes yet another revolution... :rolleye:

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMBut here are a few more that state the angelic were created by God.

Psalm 148:2-5
2 Praise ye him, all his angels: praise ye him, all his hosts. 3 Praise ye him, sun and moon: praise him, all ye stars of light. 4 Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens. 5 Let them praise the name of the LORD: for he commanded, and they were created.

The word translated "ANGEL" in this passage is MALAK Scott (H4397 strongs) which is translated almost as many times as MESSENGER in the OT... (this is done with aggelos - G32 in Greek -- in the NT as well)... and does not conclude that ANGELS spoken of here are of the HOLY ANGELIC compliment...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMGenesis 2:1-3
Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

The word HOST here is TSABA (H6635-strongs) ...and means many persons amassed, or "soldiers awaiting a war"...  This is again TOTALLY applicable to MEN, for MEN are they which are in the battle... fighting the ADVERSITY within themselves (carnality) which gropes for the INNER MAN of CHRIST to be CONCLUSIVELY revealed within that struggle, and, GAINS the KNOWLEDGE of Good and Evil in the process... 

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMNehemiah 9:6
6 Thou, even thou, art LORD alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee.

REPEATING again:

HOST = TSABA (H6635-strongs) again means persons amassed... or soldiers preparing for war... NOT ANGELS...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMThat they sin and are in need of salvation

Inconclusive... continuing to display GOD as NOT in control of His beings or His plan... having to "recreate" because of misbehaviors which did not find their origin in HIM, rather were self invented MYSTERIOUSLY ...by ANGELIC beings in the PERFECT and COMPLETE, ...HEAVENLY realm...

I see this as a platform to DOUBT that when MAN and/or/possibly ANGELS are reconciled to this PERFECT and COMPLETE realm... that the same process will not REPEAT somewhere along the line...

Instead I see THIS Earth and TIME as a PURPOSED classroom, in which the CHILDREN of GOD (which are His Body and Temple), are given the ONE THING they did not have... that being the (experiential) knowledge of GOOD and EVIL and thereby YHVH and HIS WORD, are found PERMEATING completely that BODY and TEMPLE as ALL in ALL...

Believe it if you wish Scott... I find it preposterous and a bit blasphemous to a degree... seeya at the end... NONE of us "KNOWS it ALL"...  :dontknow:

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMJob 4:18-19
18 Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly:  19 How much less in them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foundation is in the dust, which are crushed before the moth?

Makes the distinction of the angelic and those who dwell in houses of clay (man)

This is the BEST verse presented, and argueably does the most to prove your point... However, there are problems with it...

Seems GOD "TRUSTS" no one if this verse is read as you believe it to be... WHO are the "SERVANTS" Scott?

He (1) doesnt "TRUST" His "servants", ...(2) charges His "angels" (malak) with "folly", and (3) demeans those in houses of clay as even less...

I find the "servants", the cog in the works here... You CAN make an arguement with Malak as ANGELIC beings, and that MAN are those in the "houses of clay"... but WHO are the "SERVANTS" that YHVH doesn't TRUST, Scott?

I believe them all to be one and the SAME... (1) The SERVANTS God doesn't "TRUST" are MEN... (2) the ANGELS (malak/messengers) charged with FOLLY are MEN... (3) those LESS in houses of "clay",  are MEN...

If GOD charged His MESSENGERS with FOLLY... it means that the message they brought was FALSE... What ANGEL is shown to bear this FALSE MESSAGE Scott?  Is it NOT MEN?

If ANGELS, then how can we be sure the message which ANGELS bore in the OT, or in the NT, was a TRUTHFUL one? 

Did GOD "make these ANGELS" capable of DISOBEDIENCE, and if so, did He not show RESPECT of PERSONS, by making "ANGELS" which did NOT disobey?  Somehow giving them MORE than the others?

If GOD misTRUSTED His SERVANTS... who might they be Scott?  I think it is MEN, who unfaithfully "SERVE"...

The context is speaking of MORTAL MAN... and as it follows these verses, concludes DEATH and that they are DESTROYED from morning to evening...

I will say this is the best verse you have presented thus far... but it does have problems, which I shall seek GOD in the time to come, to better answer than I have here...  :mblush:

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PM2 Peter 2:4
4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;

This is BY FAR, the weakest of all the Scriptures you have presented to prove ANGELIC beings, SINNED...

What ANGEL (spirit being) has been cast into a GRAVE?  Please bro... you need more than these verses to establish IMPERFECTION occuring, in the PERFECT scenario of HEAVEN...

Personally, I see this type of teaching is as dangerous as ET... for it opens the door to believing that somehow, GOD,  is not able to handle His Created beings...

First, stating He blew it with the ANGELS (somewhere between Gen 1:1 & Gen 1:2), then came His MAN "project" and it failed as well...

And through all this, we are supposed to believe that He shall not have problems in an ETERNITY that has already shown (angels falling) to develop problems...

I don't buy it... I believe that GOD is IN CONTROL, and that NO HOLY ANGEL ever FELL, nor ever WILL... because... BECAUSE GOD is IN CONTROL... and KNOWS what He is DOING.  Not a "tinkering" Creator, that just can't seem to "get it right"... :mnah:

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMYou will note if you keep reading that the order in 2Pet. Is in chronological order, the angelic sinned first then the days of Noah and then of Sodom and Gomorrah, seems to hint at what I said earlier about the angelic being the ones to cause the earth to become without form.

More REACHING, ...conjecture Scott... don't buy it... The OLD WORLD which preceeded Noah was that which he was SAVED FROM bro...


Quote from: willieH(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

Quote from: pneuma on September 29, 2008, 07:55:28 AM
But Willie the angelic do die, for the wages of sin is death and the second DEATH is prepared for the DEVIL and his ANGELS, thus a good reference to them also being sinners and paying the wages of sin.


Quote from: willieHAgain Scott, this is evidence that you maintain a measure of traditional views... I do not demean you for it... I just contend that you are yet veiled concerning ANGELS of GOD...

What it comes down to, is that you view...

The "devil and HIS angels" as LITERAL "angelic beings"... and draw said reference from a book of SYMBOLISM, ...then promptly note LITERAL perspective concerning the SYMBOLS of the "devil and his angels", and the "2nd death"...

The truth (which you shall disagree with), is that the DEVIL is ADVERSITY in MAN... and "ITS" angels... are the HUMAN messengers which continue to bring their TRADITIONAL (Matt 15:6 / Mk 7:13) message of ADVERSITY to the WORLD... making the Word of GOD of NONE EFFECT... (Jude 6) -- Bound in CHAINS under DARKNESS (of that tradition) ...

Teaching that GOD shall TORMENT His creatures (and ANGELS) in an UNGODLY and UNFORGIVING way, or alternatively, ...that He shall just KILL them...

NO ANGELS of GOD, ...ever have or ever will... DIE!

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMWillie I have seen to much of the devil and his angels to believe they are the creation of mans mind, they have names, they have personalities and they are cast out by the word of God

What "NAMES" Scott?  What "PERSONALITIES"?  Be SPECIFIC!  Can you back up this statement?  With verses which note VARYING PERSONALITIES of devils, or note the VARIOUS NAMES they have?

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMyou might think I am standing on tradition bro but I am going by what I have seen and no one can tell me that what I have seen is just my imagination of something I made up in my carnal mind.

Well that is not a new thing bro... ALL men are stubborn to a degree... and TRADITION is of the most ADDICTIVE things in existence... doesnt surprise me that you find it hard to let go...

Quote from: pneuma on October 04, 2008, 09:05:43 PMWhat you would have me believe is that Jesus was talking to himself when he was tempted of the devil, which would mean Jesus had a carnal mind.

JESUS had to have a mind which could DISOBEY, otherwise, His whole thing was a sham... If there was NOT truly, FLESHLY temptation, then He was NOT tempted as are WE... Draw your own conclusions bro...

Scripture says that:  JESUS was a MAN (1 Tim 2:5)... ALL MEN are TEMPTED in the SAME WAY (James 1:14) ...Again bro, draw your own conclusions...

When you are tempted Scott (JESUS was TEMPTED in ALL POINTS ...AS... are we - Heb 4:15),   ...Does some "red guy" -- with a pitchfork come up to you and suggest to you such as: "Hey Scott, check out that hot chick" ????  Or is this temptation emerging from and OF, YOUR FLESH and IN your MIND?  ...needing no "red guy" or anyone else, ...to prompt you at all...  It is in the NATURE of FLESH to be TEMPTED... OF and BY, ITSELF...

And as that temptation awaits its answer, do you not WITHIN YOURSELF, ..."say" NO to it?  :dontknow:  Are you found thereby, ...TALKING to YOURSELF Scott?  :laughing7:

It was the depleted FLESH of CHRIST calling out to be SERVED... you dont see it... that's fine with me...  :cloud9:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 05, 2008, 12:50:35 AM
willieH: Hi WW...  :cloud9:

This answer is for the most part, very cryptic to me:

Quote from: willieH on October 04, 2008, 09:18:22 PM
Sorry bro,  :doh: ...I must have missed your question, I did not mean to ignore you!  :mblush:

QuoteAnd again you get upset about 'age' while I clearly stated that I just use it for ease of explanation...
I even said you should read "is"
But still you waste half of your post on it. It clarifies nothing. On the contrary it just makes the remaining answers harder to read. Or should I say harder to find :happy3:
Bad baaaaad doggy!  :laughing7:

I really do not understand this post at all???  :dontknow: 

First might I say, that I am NOT, and never have been "upset" with you...  :dontknow:

I made a sincere apology for missing your earlier question and you reply with a (even jokingly) reprimand of me?  :sigh:

I was just trying to note to you that as I see it, TIME is an IRRELVANT thing to GOD... therefore AGES do not apply to Him... nor does HISTORY (which marks time) find relevance concerning Him and Eternity.

You are more than welcome to disagree with these things as you will, I have no problem with it...  :dontknow:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 05, 2008, 03:22:24 AM
QuotewillieH: Hi Scott! 

   Whoa!   ...I thought my answer was long!  I realize you had to refer, as will I, ...but I suggest you better grab a lunch bro!!!  ... 

This answer will be in TWO PARTS:

Hi Willie, your right I'll need a lunch and supper in order to answer your two posts.

hopefully I'll have time tomorrow to do so, just stopped by to let you know I seen your post.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 05, 2008, 05:07:15 AM
Quote from: PneumaWhat you would have me believe is that Jesus was talking to himself when he was tempted of the devil, which would mean Jesus had a carnal mind.

Good point.

The carnal mind is at enmity with God.


Main Entry: en·mi·ty
Function: noun
Pronunciation: 'en-m&-te
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English enmite, from Middle French enemité, from Old French enemisté, from enemi enemy
: positive, active, and typically mutual hatred or ill will
synonyms ENMITY , HOSTILITY , ANTIPATHY , ANTAGONISM , ANIMOSITY , RANCOR , ANIMUSmean deep-seated dislike or ill will. ENMITY suggests positive hatred which may be open or concealed<an unspoken enmity>. HOSTILITY suggests an enmity showing itself in attacks or aggression <hostility between the two nations>. ANTIPATHY and ANTAGONISM imply a natural or logical basis for one's hatred or dislike, ANTIPATHY suggesting repugnance, a desire to avoid or reject, and ANTAGONISM suggesting a clash of temperaments leading readily to hostility <a natural antipathy for self-seekers> <antagonism between the brothers>. ANIMOSITY suggests intense ill will and vindictiveness that threaten to kindle hostility <animosity that led to revenge>. RANCOR is especially applied to bitter brooding over a wrong <rancor filled every line of his letters>. ANIMUS adds to animosity the implication of strong prejudice <objections devoid of personal animus>.



Doesn't sound like Jesus to me.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 05, 2008, 09:04:13 AM
Quote from: pneuma on October 05, 2008, 03:22:24 AM
QuotewillieH: Hi Scott! 

   Whoa!   ...I thought my answer was long!  I realize you had to refer, as will I, ...but I suggest you better grab a lunch bro!!!  ... 

This answer will be in TWO PARTS:

Hi Willie, your right I'll need a lunch and supper in order to answer your two posts.

hopefully I'll have time tomorrow to do so, just stopped by to let you know I seen your post.

Bon Appetite...  :laughing7:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 05, 2008, 09:12:34 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 05, 2008, 05:07:15 AM
Quote from: PneumaWhat you would have me believe is that Jesus was talking to himself when he was tempted of the devil, which would mean Jesus had a carnal mind.

Good point.

The carnal mind is at enmity with God.


Main Entry: en·mi·ty
Function: noun
Pronunciation: 'en-m&-te
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English enmite, from Middle French enemité, from Old French enemisté, from enemi enemy
: positive, active, and typically mutual hatred or ill will
synonyms ENMITY , HOSTILITY , ANTIPATHY , ANTAGONISM , ANIMOSITY , RANCOR , ANIMUSmean deep-seated dislike or ill will. ENMITY suggests positive hatred which may be open or concealed<an unspoken enmity>. HOSTILITY suggests an enmity showing itself in attacks or aggression <hostility between the two nations>. ANTIPATHY and ANTAGONISM imply a natural or logical basis for one's hatred or dislike, ANTIPATHY suggesting repugnance, a desire to avoid or reject, and ANTAGONISM suggesting a clash of temperaments leading readily to hostility <a natural antipathy for self-seekers> <antagonism between the brothers>. ANIMOSITY suggests intense ill will and vindictiveness that threaten to kindle hostility <animosity that led to revenge>. RANCOR is especially applied to bitter brooding over a wrong <rancor filled every line of his letters>. ANIMUS adds to animosity the implication of strong prejudice <objections devoid of personal animus>.



Doesn't sound like Jesus to me.


That is irrelevant... :mnah:

Concerning the NATURAL temptation of a MAN in FLESH...

JESUS met the CARNALITY of His flesh, with the SPIRITUAL MIND of GOD...  Always following the WILL of YHVH, as the ADVERSITY of the FLESH presented itself TO HIM... which is WHY He gained VICTORY over it...

The VICTORY of any MAN is also done in this fashion ONLY... for ONLY via submission to the WILL of GOD, can any MAN overcome SIN...

If this is not so, then JESUS was NOT TEMPTED ...AS... are ALL other men...  :dontknow:

IRREGARDLESS of what ANYONE ..."thinks"...   :hihat:

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 05, 2008, 09:31:47 AM
There is only one time when we see Jesus struggling with the will of God versus his will, and that is in the garden where he is facing the most brutal kind of death.  Even there, he is never at enmity with God, only struggling to fulfill a very difficult task.  He asks for the cup to be taken from him, but then resolves the issue himself.

We never see Jesus at enmity with God the Father.   Never.


Satan, on the other hand, is at constant enmity with God.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 05, 2008, 07:58:30 PM

Jesus had desires.   He desired not to have to go through what he knew was going to happen.  He prayed (petitioned) the father according to his desires, but was willing to see through the will of the Father.

This is where people combine things in scripture when they should be separated to get a clearer picture of what is being told to us.

The flesh, is not necessarily carnal.   Jesus in the flesh did not hate God, he has desires according to what the flesh prefers.   This is not inherantly carnal.   Jesus was limited in knowledge,  this is not inherantly carnal.

Satan tempted Jesus and Jesus without the Hatred towards God could discern through the desires of flesh as an example that Satan is not all powerful and that the Love of the Father is seen.

The serpent is apart from Satan and apart from flesh.  The serpent corrupts the flesh.   Satan tempts the flesh and if given permission can control the flesh.   The flesh is not our decision making capabilities.  Satan cannot control it,  the serpent cannot control it, but it can corrupt that which it all filters through.

We often associate "flesh" with sin.  But Jesus was in the flesh, so it cannot be inherantly sin.   This is why I reject all this singular association with everything.  The contradictions just start piling up when that is done.

Of course we can compartmentalize by topic and seemingly avoid those contradictions as long as we stay within each compartment at any given moment they go unnoticed, this was the thing that was driving me crazy in church.  Sermons researched by topic always created some contradiction with a previous lesson.  But no one cared when I pointed it out.  They would just say, well, that verse has nothing to do with the topic or the word being talked about.  It was a half truth answer, certainly the topic didn't apply to another topic.  For example: ( Gods will) Gods will seemingly has nothing to do with what we can pray for.   TRUE!!!!  However, can we "GET" what we want apart from Gods will?

This is also why I agree with SoTW view on word studies, on the surface it looks great and creates interesting material for a lesson.   But if you pay attention the contradictions start piling up between topics when such a thing is done.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 05, 2008, 10:07:50 PM
Quote from: Paul HThe flesh, is not necessarily carnal.   Jesus in the flesh did not hate God, he has desires according to what the flesh prefers.   This is not inherantly carnal.   Jesus was limited in knowledge,  this is not inherantly carnal.

Satan tempted Jesus and Jesus without the Hatred towards God could discern through the desires of flesh as an example that Satan is not all powerful and that the Love of the Father is seen.

This is interesting.  Jesus overcame any limitations of the flesh, up to and including the resurrection from the dead.

The key seems to be love in accordance with God's will.....?

But on the other thread you seem to think that all men have a beast within, yet you say the flesh is not inherently carnal.  So what then is this beast?  I do not necessarily agree with you on that--a lamb is not a 'beast' in the sense of being a monster.  Yet, beast is connotative with monster.   We are sheep.

Can you talk some more about the difference you see among satan, serpent, and flesh?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 05, 2008, 10:11:04 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 05, 2008, 09:31:47 AM
There is only one time when we see Jesus struggling with the will of God versus his will, and that is in the garden where he is facing the most brutal kind of death.  Even there, he is never at enmity with God, only struggling to fulfill a very difficult task.  He asks for the cup to be taken from him, but then resolves the issue himself.

It is just purposed ignorance or obstinance to think that a MAN in FLESH (which is what JESUS was) that had not eaten for 40 Days & Nights, would not be struggling with such a proposal as was made to CHRIST (turn the stones into loaves of bread - which end is to satisfy the desire of the FLESH to EAT)... believe what you will...

Quote from: MollyWe never see Jesus at enmity with God the Father.   Never.

No one has suggested this except YOU... but His FLESH came against Him through temptation whether you are willing to see it or not... (James 1:14)

If CHRIST had no battle at all with the FLESH, then He is hardly IN our same circumstance, and He did NOT "overcome" it for IT (the FLESH) thereby presented NOTHING to OVERCOME, ...neither was He TEMPTED ...AS... are WE...

Again you are more that welcome to believe what you shall...  :dontknow:

Quote from: MollySatan, on the other hand, is at constant enmity with God.

That is because satan (adversity) ...IS... the "enmity"... and that enmity has no mind of its own...

SIN in the end, is the successful manipulation of the CARNAL (Flesh) OVER the SPIRIT...   CHRIST came against AND WON, ...OVER... His own FLESH... or the whole proposal of Him OVERCOMING, is false.  :2c:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 05, 2008, 10:38:01 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 05, 2008, 10:07:50 PM
Quote from: Paul HThe flesh, is not necessarily carnal.   Jesus in the flesh did not hate God, he has desires according to what the flesh prefers.   This is not inherantly carnal.   Jesus was limited in knowledge,  this is not inherantly carnal.

Satan tempted Jesus and Jesus without the Hatred towards God could discern through the desires of flesh as an example that Satan is not all powerful and that the Love of the Father is seen.

This is interesting.  Jesus overcame any limitations of the flesh, up to and including the resurrection from the dead.

The key seems to be love in accordance with God's will.....?

But on the other thread you seem to think that all men have a beast within, yet you say the flesh is not inherantly carnal.  So what then is this beast?  I do not necessarily agree with you on that--a lamb is not a 'beast' in the sense of being a monster.  Yet, beast is connotative with monster.   We are sheep.

Can you talk some more about the difference you see among satan, serpent, and flesh?


Molly, I do not mean this towards you to emotionalize the issue, but until you are perfect and without sin, you do not completely follow Jesus in full devotion.   Any one of us may indeed see and talk about this Love,  but until we excersize it in faith 100%, then that beast remains whether we want to admit it or not.

This is not to say that "I" know exactly what you have to do, what you should do, or that I can judge "you".  But unless you or anyone that says that they follow Jesus is perfect then my point seems to remain.


Being a sheep does not separate us from being beasts.  Shepherding has to do with how God works his people. A sheep in a herd does not necessarily love the shepherd while the sheep dog is nipping at them to go a certain direction.   

Wolves want to eat sheep, and literally to us if a wolf eats a sheep, that sheep is gone, but we are human and God has depeicted these scenarios for us to see the nature of things, rather than to view them as so literal that we must conclude that a wolf that eats a sheep has finalized the destiny of that sheep.


As far as the distinction between Satan, serpent and flesh.

Satan to me is a being and is used by God for his purposes. I see the arguments for Satan being in the mind, yet, the explanation of  Satan affecting things outside the mind go unanswered.  This use God has for Satan shows up in accounts where he is to sift simon as grain, where he tempts Jesus, where he is allowed to affect Job within the parameters God set.  God kept his promise, he does not allow what we cannot bear. 


When we think of Satan as a being, we picture him as a human.  We do not hardly see him as a being that can do his deeds almost instantaneously of one another.  Meaning he can affect the whole world very quickly since he is spiritual in nature.

The serpent,  When we look at the old testament we see the serpent in Genesis, then in Job, it is Satan.   Why is he Satan there and the Serpent in the Garden. If they are one in the same, why didn't  Satan use this trickery on Job?  No, he simply came against his physical life.  We could conclude that Satan is stupid and did not remember how well this worked in the garden, but we do not see Satan speaking to Job at all.    The Serpent is more conclusive to the beast within all man kind, constantly at its cunning work.  Doesn't matter how much you say you love Jesus, that cunning beast will talk you into things you know you shouldn't do, and you do it anyway.


The flesh, the flesh is simply your unique qualities  our manner of desire is not initially wrong, but our desires are not necessarily the best for us.  I will use a more controversial example.

Homosexuality is a good one.  and I will pick on myself.   I have male friends and I can feel such a strong love for them, sometimes I can feel physically attracted to them.  That emotion is not inherantly wrong.  It is the flesh being normal, but not necessarily the best for us.  The serpent, would take that love and attraction and turn it into sexual perversion.  We can apply this same thing to heterosexuality.   As a married man, I come across females that I get attracted to, I feel interested in them.  This inherantly is the flesh and inherantly there is nothing wrong with that.  The serpent, will say that I can indulge those feelings in my heart and not take into account my wife, what harm would that be? 


I believe Jesus in the flesh had these desires.   Think about this.  Jesus knew that something about his purpose was to reign  correct?  So, he would know this in the flesh, to reign over all mankind,  then Satan comes along and tempts his flesh to reign over them in this physical realm.  Jesus could have and he would have done so in love, but that is not what was best.


Not saying any of this in expectation of agreement,  and Lord knows I do not know it all,  I just see the distinction between the three that needs to be studied because there is something deeper to learn.






Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 05, 2008, 10:45:46 PM
Quote from: WilliHIt is just purposed ignorance or obstinance to think that a MAN in FLESH (which is what JESUS was) that had not eaten for 40 Days & Nights, would not be struggling with such a proposal as was made to CHRIST (turn the stones into loaves of bread - which end is to satisfy the desire of the FLESH to EAT)... believe what you will...

Medically speaking, I would think the desire to eat would be greater after 1 day than after 40.  I've heard the desire goes away in people who are  fasting--but I would have to check that out more.

Let's use King David as an example.  His desire for Bathsheba took over his life and destroyed it.  We never see Jesus anywhere near this state.  Why not?  What is the difference between David and Jesus in this instance?  
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 05, 2008, 10:59:36 PM
willieH: Hi Paul H... :hithere:

Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 05, 2008, 07:58:30 PMThe flesh, is not necessarily carnal.   Jesus in the flesh did not hate God, he has desires according to what the flesh prefers.   This is not inherantly carnal.   Jesus was limited in knowledge,  this is not inherantly carnal.

Sorry to disagree brother P... but the writings of the Apostles (1 John 2:15-16 / Rom 7:23) note the FLESH as the OPPOSITION of the SPIRIT, and notes that ITS DESIRES are that which OPPOSE the Father... 

JESUS, in order to be TEMPTED as are WE, had to fight the SAME BATTLE with the SAME ENEMY - the FLESH (not some mythical "fallen angel" some call "satan")  The ADVERSITY (opposing the will of GOD) is of the FLESH...

Quote from: PaulHThe serpent is apart from Satan and apart from flesh.  The serpent corrupts the flesh.   Satan tempts the flesh and if given permission can control the flesh.   The flesh is not our decision making capabilities.  Satan cannot control it,  the serpent cannot control it, but it can corrupt that which it all filters through.

This is your view and you are welcome to it, though IMO it is astray. 

"satan" is not a being which OPPOSES us, ...it is our FLESH that OPPOSES us... as clearly noted by PAUL (Rom 7:23)... Paul does not mention a battle with any "serpent" nor does he indicate "satan", he just notes his FLESH in a WAR or BATTLE with his INNER MAN (Rom 7:22) --- (CHRIST)... concluding with the notation that with HIS MIND (heart) He shall serve GOD, but his FLESH, shall continue to SIN (Rom 7:25)

The Apostle John also concurred with this (1 John 1:8), noting that even though we are given over to GOD, ...SIN, would continue, and that DENIAL of this FACT, is DENIAL of the TRUTH (1 John 1:10)

Quote from: PaulHWe often associate "flesh" with sin.  But Jesus was in the flesh, so it cannot be inherantly sin.

The flesh prompts disobedience Paul... it is undefiled until the MIND complies with its proposals...  Without the FLESH, the MIND has no OPPOSITION to consider.   

WHAT (according to you) did CHRIST ...OVERCOME... Paul?   

PAUL notes that it is the FLESH (bodies) which is to be brought under subjection and PRESENTED to GOD, as a LIVING SACRIFICE... (Rom 12:1-2)

JAMES notes (James 4:4) that "friendship (companionship) with the WORLD" is "enmity" with GOD (makes you an ENEMY of GOD)...

JOHN
notes (John 2:15-16) that the LUST of the FLESH, which is in the "WORLD" is that which is NOT of the FATHER... but in OPPOSITION to Him.  :dontknow:

Believe what you shall...  :dbook:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 05, 2008, 11:19:06 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 05, 2008, 10:59:36 PM

Believe what you shall... 


Hey Willie, you can believe what you like too,   thank you.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 05, 2008, 11:46:37 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 05, 2008, 10:59:36 PM
Sorry to disagree brother P... but the writings of the Apostles (1 John 2:15-16 / Rom 7:23) note the FLESH as the OPPOSITION of the SPIRIT, and notes that ITS DESIRES are that which OPPOSE the Father... 

The passage in 1 John, says  "lust OF  the flesh"   That creates more depth than one word "flesh" does.

The Serpent nature causes the lust of the flesh.



Ro 7:22 For I am gratified with the law of  God accordingas to the humanman within,

Ro 7:23 yet I am observing a different law in my  members, warring with the law of my  mind, and leading me into captivity into the law of  sin thewhich is in my  members.




In Verse 22 there is a gratification of Gods law in accordance with the human man within.

But in verse 23, there is a different law and this different law is at war with the law of the mind.  You cannot have it both ways.  If Jesus was carnal, then he was not without sin.


So there is some separation between Jesus and mankind.    Jesus was an example of hope, not necessarily the example that it is possible for humans to be perfect.

Ro 8:7 because the disposition of the flesh is enmity intoto God, for it is not subject to the law of God, for neither is it able.




Notice is says the disposition of the flesh.   If your saying that the flesh is inherantly enmity to God, then your saying Jesus flesh hated God, which means Jesus had sin within him.

The disposition is the state of the flesh.  The state of Jesus flesh was not carnal.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Moshood on October 05, 2008, 11:49:14 PM
What about this scripture ...

To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh,
that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. [ 1 Corinthians 5:5 ]

The Flesh cannot represent Satan here IMO.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Moshood on October 05, 2008, 11:54:25 PM
What about when God told Satan he could do His worst upon Job but, not kill Him.

Job had sores all over his body, lost his family, possessions etc.

Certainly Satan must be more than Flesh if he was able to do all that to Job IMO.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 05, 2008, 11:54:40 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 05, 2008, 05:07:15 AM
Quote from: PneumaWhat you would have me believe is that Jesus was talking to himself when he was tempted of the devil, which would mean Jesus had a carnal mind.

Good point.

The carnal mind is at enmity with God.


Main Entry: en·mi·ty
Function: noun
Pronunciation: 'en-m&-te
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English enmite, from Middle French enemité, from Old French enemisté, from enemi enemy
: positive, active, and typically mutual hatred or ill will
synonyms ENMITY , HOSTILITY , ANTIPATHY , ANTAGONISM , ANIMOSITY , RANCOR , ANIMUSmean deep-seated dislike or ill will. ENMITY suggests positive hatred which may be open or concealed<an unspoken enmity>. HOSTILITY suggests an enmity showing itself in attacks or aggression <hostility between the two nations>. ANTIPATHY and ANTAGONISM imply a natural or logical basis for one's hatred or dislike, ANTIPATHY suggesting repugnance, a desire to avoid or reject, and ANTAGONISM suggesting a clash of temperaments leading readily to hostility <a natural antipathy for self-seekers> <antagonism between the brothers>. ANIMOSITY suggests intense ill will and vindictiveness that threaten to kindle hostility <animosity that led to revenge>. RANCOR is especially applied to bitter brooding over a wrong <rancor filled every line of his letters>. ANIMUS adds to animosity the implication of strong prejudice <objections devoid of personal animus>.



Doesn't sound like Jesus to me.

Mat 4:11  Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him.  
  HI  Molly ,  agreed !  but

     I believe that people  have  spririts / breath   that are unclean  / washed  Blue Letter Bible - Lexicon   that speak  good and evil
and that Jesus was confronted  with one of such people ,
Just like Jesus called    Satan out  but it was Peters body that  breath / spirit was in speaking    the things that be of men [ below ] earthly things  
  the    body / spirit in that body  that  tempted Jesus made offerings   to Jesus of worldly things  
Like we do  lets say ,  one of our  children
If you get all A's   in school this year I will gave you a nice car  in the spring  

 things that would make them  think about /lust desire   a car , and they would agree to it or not , but  if the didnt do as    the parent asked they  would not get a  car in the spring  an example  only ...

 after  reading Matt 4   it was    against  what Jesus   stood for   which is lowly , humble , meek and mild    in nature
  those things  that he was offered  were  self serving and prideful  to me anyways  
it was NOT Jesus mind , but the carnal mind of  the one/ a man  who spirit/unclean  was not right with God  who come to tempt Him to  me  

   I hope you dont mind me jumping in  here and there  on occasion  ?

 peace  ..rose
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 05, 2008, 11:55:55 PM
willieH: Hi Molly... :hithere:

Quote from: WilliHIt is just purposed ignorance or obstinance to think that a MAN in FLESH (which is what JESUS was) that had not eaten for 40 Days & Nights, would not be struggling with such a proposal as was made to CHRIST (turn the stones into loaves of bread - which end is to satisfy the desire of the FLESH to EAT)... believe what you will...

Quote from: Molli on October 05, 2008, 10:45:46 PMMedically speaking, I would think the desire to eat would be greater after 1 day than after 40.  I've heard the desire goes away in people who are  fasting--but I would have to check that out more.

In my life, I have fasted for as much as a week...  :heat:

Don't just "think" Molly, ...try it...  :dontknow:

Instead of checking with the Medical opinions or friends or HEARSAY, EXPERIENCE for YOURSELF, ...dont eat anything for a week Molly, see if you are more hungry at the end of the week, then after the first day...  :dontknow:

I gurantee that people which have not eaten for 40 days (if they have not died), are not merely just "hungry", they are RAVAGED by HUNGER...

Why not REALLY put it to the test, and try it for 40 days Molly?  ... (just kidn')  :laughing7:

Quote from: Molly on October 05, 2008, 10:45:46 PMLet's use King David as an example.  His desire for Bathsheba took over his life and destroyed it.  We never see Jesus anywhere near this state.  Why not?  What is the difference between David and Jesus in this instance?

David was PROMPTED by HIS FLESHLY desire... CHRIST had to have been (though it is not noted) tempted in this way as well... Otherwise, He could not say that He was TEMPTED in ALL POINTS ...AS ARE WE...

Also, David gave into his FLESHLY desire... whereas CHRIST overcame, ...THAT is the DIFFERENCE in "this instance" sis...

Besides Molly, CHRIST was the ONLY BEGOTTEN and SINLESS, ...SON of GOD... David, though a King, was still just another SINFUL man...

ALL the details which CHRIST endured in His life concerning varying TEMPTATIONS are (obviously) NOT noted...

JESUS CHRIST had a childhood, and early adulthood, but the great MAJORITY of that life is NOT NOTED... yet we KNOW it took place... and that it took place gave CHRIST the opportunity to continuously serve the WILL of GOD in the FACE of TEMPTATION.

His life had to have been assaulted with TEMPTATION on a DAILY basis from childhood to adulthood... for that is the continuing experience of MEN...  We are not TEMPTED once as teenagers or young adults, and that's it... we are assaulted with varying TEMPTATIONS all LIFE LONG...

When we SUBMIT to CHRIST in any given area, we then are become strengthened against that particular area...

I smoked cigarettes for 12 years... In 1976 I met CHRIST, ...quit smoking by placing my faith IN HIM (after failing to do so many times), and have remained a non-smoker for almost 33 years...  

The TEMPTATION was not removed... but the presence of CHRIST in ME, easily casts away that particular TEMPTATION from me, these days...  :dontknow:

Life contains INNUMERABLE TEMPTATIONS of varying detrimental degrees... Our submission to our Savior, is the WAY we OVERCOME any of them as we walk with HIM.

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 05, 2008, 11:57:27 PM
Quote from: Moshood on October 05, 2008, 11:54:25 PM
What about when God told Satan he could do His worst upon Job but, not kill Him.

Job had sores all over his body, lost his family, possessions etc.

Certainly Satan must be more than Flesh if he was able to do all that to Job IMO.

   YES  I TOO BELIEVE  SATAN IS MORE THAN JUST FLESH AND BLOOD  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 06, 2008, 03:17:30 AM
Quote from: RoseMat 4:11  Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him. 


Hi Rose,-- the devil left and angels came and ministered to him.  That says it all, doesn't it?

Those same angels minister to us, as well.


11For he shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways.
12They shall bear thee up in their hands, lest thou dash thy foot against a stone.


--Psalm 91



Yes, those angels could be spirit beings; they could be people as well.  I've experienced them both ways.

They could even be me....and you! :HeartThrob:


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 06, 2008, 09:01:45 PM
  Exactly sis !!  :thumbsup:
  I have too  entertained angels  awake and sleeping  :HeartThrob:
  God love ya .. rose   

  NIV  Heb ;13 1Keep on loving each other as brothers.


  2Do not forget to entertain strangers,[SHOW  hospitality] for by so doing some people have entertained angels without knowing it


  3Remember those in prison as if you were their fellow prisoners, and those who are mistreated as if you yourselves were suffering.............
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 07, 2008, 12:21:40 AM
willieH: Hi Moshood... :hithere:

Thanks for your comments...  :cloud9:

Below, are mine!   :thumbsup:

Quote from: Moshood on October 05, 2008, 11:49:14 PM
What about this scripture ...

To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh,
that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. [ 1 Corinthians 5:5 ]

The Flesh cannot represent Satan here IMO.

And you are more than welcome to that opinion Moshood, heres my  :2c: ...

ADVERSITY to the command of GOD is that which DESTROYS the flesh bro... SIN! SIN then takes the FLESH to its GRAVE in DEATH... destroying it.

Eve was ...in FLESH and was SINLESS until she submitted to the lusts/desires of her FLESH...

(1 John 2:16)  For ALL that is in the WORLD:  [1] the LUST of the FLESH and the, [2] LUST of the EYES, and the [3] PRIDE of LIFE is NOT of the Father but is OF the WORLD...

Gen 3:6:

(1) she saw that the fruit was good for food (lust of the flesh)
(2) she saw the fruit was pleasant to the eyes (lust of the eyes) 
(3) she desired a knowledge she did not have, and disobeyed the warning of GOD that she would die, and ATE... (pride of life)

CHRIST was also, ...in FLESH, but did not submit to its LUSTS/DESIRES... as did EVE...

The ADVERSITY which emerges from DESIRES of the FLESH is satan (which means ADVERSARY or ADVERSITY - #H7853 & #H7854 -- STRONGS)... (James 1:14)

"satan" is NOT the FLESH, neither is IT a being, ...it is that which EMERGES from the FLESH as noted by Paul: (Rom 7:23) and James: (1:14)

No "being" OUTSIDE men, "TEMPTS" them... the TEMPTATION is BORN of the DESIRES of the FLESH as James notes in the above quote verse...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 07, 2008, 01:07:54 AM
Quote from: WilliHCHRIST was also, ...in FLESH, but did not submit to its LUSTS/DESIRES... as did EVE...

So--if Jesus had not taken on the sins of the world, he would have lived forever in the flesh?


QuoteThe ADVERSITY which emerges from DESIRES of the FLESH is satan (which means ADVERSARY or ADVERSITY - #H7853 & #H7854 -- STRONGS)... (James 1:14)

"satan" is NOT the FLESH, neither is IT a being, ...it is that which EMERGES from the FLESH as noted by Paul: (Rom 7:23) and James: (1:14)


so you are saying satan "is that which emerges from the flesh".....?

It's not the flesh, but it emerges from the flesh?  So what is it?  A spirit trapped in flesh?  I'm seriously confused by your position here.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 07, 2008, 01:20:55 AM
willieH: Hi Moshood...  :cloud9:

about your other view:

Quote from: Moshood on October 05, 2008, 11:54:25 PM
What about when God told Satan he could do His worst upon Job but, not kill Him.

Job had sores all over his body, lost his family, possessions etc.

Certainly Satan must be more than Flesh if he was able to do all that to Job IMO.

Again bro... you are welcome to that opinion!  Here is my  :2c:

As I said in my previous answer to you that FLESH is not "satan" (adversity), but "satan" (adversity) is IN the FLESH... The NATURAL state of MAN, which prompts and has the ability to disobey.

Bear with me Moshood...

As I see it, GOD is IN CONTROL of ALL that occurs, irregardless of our observance of the good or bad which at times, seems to happen at random...  Which also includes these things which occured to Job.  GOD was not only IN CONTROL of the sorrows which Job experienced, He ENGINEERED the entire scenario... more on that in a minute...  :cloud9:

No being was contending with YHVH God... The "HEDGE" that was built around Job, is the BLESSINGS of GOD... As GOD removes the LIGHT of Himself (and those BLESSINGS) from ANY scenario... DARKNESS begins to engulf that scenario... So it was with JOB...

No victory (over a mythical being most call "satan") was being sought here... just the example of holding on to FAITH through ADVERSITY, ...and the BLESSINGS which ones FAITH shall bring forth in conclusion, as FAITH --  OPPOSES that ADVERSITY... 

Unless the "HEDGE" was removed, then the scenario of JOB does not even  exist - eh?

Let's examine WHO it was that actually brought those curses on JOB, shall we?  :dbook:

Job 1:10 [satan/adversity:] Hath not Thou made an HEDGE about him and about his house, and about ALL that he hath on EVERY SIDE?  Thou hast BLESSED the work of his hands, and his substance is increased in the land...

Now "satan" supposedly proposes:

Job 1:11  But put forth THINE HAND now, and TOUCH all the he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face

It was GOD who TOUCHED in a NEGATIVE WAY, ...ALL... that Job had, including HIS HEALTH...

GOD does it all bro... whether we wish to see it or not... "satan" is the ADVERSITY/ADVERSARY which was created IN MAN... and is OF GOD... who is the CREATOR of ALL THINGS...

Eph 1:11 ...in Whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according ot the PURPOSE of HIM who WORKETH ALL THINGS, after the counsel of HIS OWN WILL.

Rom 13:1 ...let every soul be subject unto the higher powers.  For there is NO POWER but OF GOD... the POWERS that ...BE.. are ORDAINED of GOD.

We are only existent in HEALTH by the POWER of GOD to maintain it according to HIS PURPOSES...  GOD hardens whom HE WILL, and whom HE WILL he has mercy (Rom 9:18)

Is 53:5 ...but He was wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities, the chastisement of PEACE upon Him, and with His stripes we are HEALED.

HEALING is according to the WORKING and WILL of YHVH, not our desires for it to be realized.  And when GOD is working His PURPOSE in our LIVES, the removal of that BLESSING of HEALTH has reason attached within that PURPOSE.. 



**********   *********   **********   **********   **********


I just underwent MAJOR SURGERY for CANCER bro... and in the midst of the PAIN and LONELINESS in ICU, ...I... QUESTIONED my GOD!   :sigh:

What I said to Him as my wife left ICU shortly after midnight on Sept 9th:   "I feel like I'm ALL ALONE!  WHY am I being put through this?  I want to die... I just can't take any more!"   :sweat: :pitiful:

What HE SAID to ME: "You CAN, and YOU WILL...  YOU are not ALONE... I live in the PAIN with you, ...and together My son shall WE find GREAT JOY, upon its dismissal"   :Peck:


**********   *********   **********   **********   **********



Here below, is a little from His WORD, on that process bro...

Rom 9:21  Hath not the POTTER, ...POWER over the CLAY, of the SAME LUMP to make one vessel unto honor and another unto dishonor? 

Part of making the clay of DISHONOR is SIN and the accompanying suffering which is brought upon us, and purposed to COMPLETE us (Heb 2:9)... to arrive at the BLESSING in the SPIRIT which is HONOR...

Jer 18:4  And the vessel that He made of the CLAY was MARRED ...in THE HAND of the POTTER: so He made it again another vessel as seemed GOOD to THE POTTER to make it...

GOD is the POTTER bro... we are just being molded... sometimes that "molding", ...brings suffering... but arrives in GLORY...

Sorry if this answer was a little long...  :mblush:  I felt I needed to emphasize and found with Scripture, my viewpoint.   :thumbsup:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 07, 2008, 01:37:53 AM
willieH: Hi Molly...   :cloud9:

Quote from: WilliHCHRIST was also, ...in FLESH, but did not submit to its LUSTS/DESIRES... as did EVE...

Quote from: Molli on October 07, 2008, 01:07:54 AMSo--if Jesus had not taken on the sins of the world, he would have lived forever in the flesh?

Don't even see the relevance of this Molly... What He DIDN'T DO (remain in the flesh), is irrelevant!


Quote from: willieHThe ADVERSITY which emerges from DESIRES of the FLESH is satan (which means ADVERSARY or ADVERSITY - #H7853 & #H7854 -- STRONGS)... (James 1:14)

"satan" is NOT the FLESH, neither is IT a being, ...it is that which EMERGES from the FLESH as noted by Paul: (Rom 7:23) and James: (1:14)


Quote from: Molli on October 07, 2008, 01:07:54 AMso you are saying satan "is that which emerges from the flesh".....?

ADVERSITY [satan] -- (which is NOT a "name", but a principality)... emerges FROM the FLESH (James 1:14 -- of his OWN LUST / Rom 7:23 -- IN my members)

Quote from: Molli on October 07, 2008, 01:07:54 AMIt's not the flesh, but it emerges from the flesh?  So what is it?  A spirit trapped in flesh?  I'm seriously confused by your position here.

The FLESH has within it ADVERSITY... and proposes that ADVERSITY to us as the above quoted SCRIPTURES attest...  I have amply displayed this, you are welcome to believe as you do Molly...

ADVERSITY is not a "spirit" (in terms of an EXTERNAL being named "satan") any  more than a Heart is a Lung... :rolleye: ...IT is simply a present characteristic principality in the NATURAL MAN, that gravitates to disobeying the command of GOD...  :dontknow:

The NATURAL will of MAN which is found in BONDAGE to that ADVERSITY, ...shown  EXALTING ITSELF ...over the stated (FREE)  WILL of GOD.  :dontknow:

You know as well as I, that you and I have already danced around these issues... so please, for the sake of peace... don't provoke intentionally... just disagree, get over it... and move on.  :sigh:

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 07, 2008, 02:04:59 AM
Quote from: Willi]The FLESH has within it ADVERSITY... and proposes that ADVERSITY to us as the above quoted SCRIPTURES attest...  I have amply displayed this, you are welcome to believe as you do Molly...

ADVERSITY is not a "spirit" (in terms of an EXTERNAL being named "satan") any  more than a Heart is a Lung...  ...IT is simply a present characteristic principality in the NATURAL MAN, that gravitates to disobeying the command of GOD... 

I'm not trying to provoke, I'm simply trying to understand what you are saying.

A heart and lung are both flesh.  They have qualities in common.

What qualities do flesh and 'adversity--not a spirit, simply a principality' have in common?

We are told we are not fighting against flesh and blood.  Well, if it's not flesh and blood--then isn't it spirit?

What else is there?  Is there some other component of our human experience other than those two?



12For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spirit forcesof wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere.

--Eph 6



"spiritual" [wickedness]

G4152
πνευματικός
pneumatikos
phyoo-mat-ik-os'
From G4151; non-carnal, that is, (humanly) ethereal (as opposed to gross), or (daemoniacally) a spirit (concretely), or (divinely) supernatural, regenerate, religious: - spiritual. Compare G5591.





Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 07, 2008, 05:59:00 AM
willieH: Hi Molly...  :icon_king:

Quote from: WilliThe FLESH has within it ADVERSITY... and proposes that ADVERSITY to us as the above quoted SCRIPTURES attest...  I have amply displayed this, you are welcome to believe as you do Molly...

ADVERSITY is not a "spirit" (in terms of an EXTERNAL being named "satan") any  more than a Heart is a Lung...  ...IT is simply a present characteristic principality in the NATURAL MAN, that gravitates to disobeying the command of GOD... 

Quote from: MolliI'm not trying to provoke, I'm simply trying to understand what you are saying.

A heart and lung are both flesh.  They have qualities in common.

Are you really?  :dontknow:   Or do you just wish to continue to argue what we have already argued several times before? :rolleye:

The point is, that a heart is not a lung... that they are flesh is not the point I was endeavoring to make.   :megashock:

I was OBVIOUSLY trying to say that ADVERSITY is NOT a SEPARATE "person" or "BEING" which prompts YOU to SIN or DISOBEY God...  You do that just fine without any assistance, because GOD created you to have that ABILITY within.  Now do you understand, Molli?  :dunno:

Quote from: MolliWhat qualities do flesh and 'adversity--not a spirit, simply a principality' have in common?

Ask the Apostle JAMES who said in James 1:14 that TEMPTATION is caused in EVERY man ...by being DRAWN AWAY by LUST that emerges from WITHIN Him/her...  :dontknow:  He DIDN'T SAY, that we are DRAWN AWAY by some misleading and persuasive "being" called "satan".

THAT is what the FLESH has to do with ADVERSITY... When one is IN the FLESH, one cannot please GOD... (Rom 8:8)  What does it mean to YOU, to be IN the FLESH Molli? 

To me it means that we are making decisions according to the dications of the FLESH and NOT according to the SPIRIT which prompts OTHERWISE... (the "INNER MAN" which is CHRIST Rom 7:22)

The CARNAL mind, is the mind which agrees only with the Physical SENSES, which are WHAT the FLESH ...IS... and which are ADVERSE to the commands and WORD of GOD... and THAT which EVE used to enact her  SIN...

Quote from: MolliWe are told we are not fighting against flesh and blood.  Well, if it's not flesh and blood--then isn't it spirit?

The Physical ANATOMY (flesh & blood) of ourselves and others is NOT what we battle with Molli...  We battle with the CHOICES those bodies PRESENT to us which are ADVERSE to GOD's Command...

Quote from: MolliWhat else is there?  Is there some other component of our human experience other than those two?

Quote from: Molli12For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spirit forcesof wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere.

--Eph 6

"spiritual" [wickedness]

G4152
πνευματικός
pneumatikos
phyoo-mat-ik-os'
From G4151; non-carnal, that is, (humanly) ethereal (as opposed to gross), or (daemoniacally) a spirit (concretely), or (divinely) supernatural, regenerate, religious: - spiritual. Compare G5591.[/quote]

G5591
psuchikos
from 5590; sensitive, i.e. animate (in distinction on the one hand from 4152 which is the HIGHER or renovated NATURE; and on the other from 5446, which is the LOWER or BESTIAL NATURE):  NATURAL, ...SENSUAL...

Don't know what version you quoted from or if the bracketed comments are OF that version or YOUR OWN... but I offer another:

KVJ:   Eph 6:12  For we wrestle not against FLESH and BLOOD, but against PRINCIPALITIES, against POWERS [adversity/satan], against the RULERS of the DARKNESS of THIS WORLD, against SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS in HIGH places.

The HIGH place in which SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS lies in IN the TEMPLE of GOD... There IS ...NO HIGHER PLACE, than the TEMPLE in which GOD dwells and which TEMPLE, WE ARE ...Molli...

It is from WITHIN MEN that these principalities come forth, shown in and by our  ACTIONS, ...not prompted by some red guy with a pitch fork that might be your favorite halloween costume, Molli...

Enough... Let us discuss the TOPIC... and discontinue disagreements which we have BOTH made known more than once on this forum...

"satan" as a particular "FALLEN ANGELIC being", as far as I am concerned is the biggest lie of all, from which emerges all other lies propegated by the Christian religion... and is utilized by that religion to keep its proponents in fear, and in the dark...

Believe in "satan" if you must Molli, ...have your [albeit -- mythical] wrestling matches with "him"... that is just fine with me...  :declare:

no problemo...  :dontknow:

:hijacked:  Let's endeavor to steer this back to the TOPIC's questions, rather than have a personal confrontation we have already had several times, and which ended in disagreement, and shall only end up there again!  Here they are in case you have forgotten:

(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"? 
(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"? 
(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?
(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)


peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 07, 2008, 06:01:18 AM
Hi Willie, just dropped by to let you know I have not forgotten about you bro. but instead of making an answer point by point like I usually do I am writting a small atricle of how I see things. I am doing it this way as to much confusion comes from long  point by point address and I want to try to make myself as clear as possible.

About half way done, hopefully by tomorrow I'll be able to post.

God bless
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 07, 2008, 07:13:58 AM
Quote from: Willi(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"? 
(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"? 
(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?
(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)


1)Angels fell, yes.  I wouldn't call them holy.


2)They fell from heaven.

7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.


--Rev 12

Luke 10:18
And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.


3) Only if you think every part of creation is going to be restored/saved--that's your argument for universal restoration.  In other words, there is the same 'salvation' for them as for anyone thrown into the lake of fire.

4)They are thrown into the lake of fire--originally prepared for them, the second death.

Matthew 25:41
Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 07, 2008, 03:36:17 PM
 
  the Thing is to me   the angels messengers fall from  what ?
  to me its grace /favor  of the Lord God   
the   messengers  can be   preachers that  go back into law to hold  /judge  many prisoners  , what types of spirits  are working in them ?
antichrist spirits   they are the generation of vipers / seeing dont see  , hearing  dont hear the SPIRIT OF CHRIST



Gal 5:4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.

Jhn 8:44 Ye are of [your] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

all of matt 23   but seeing they are in the Fire / the wrath and anger
  that consumes us ..  they uphold the Law but are  like Paul  was  a murderer   breaking it  , making him a  liar and hypocrite   , till Christ come  to him  personally and Changed him

Mat 23:33 [Ye] serpents, [ye] generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? "Gehenna of fire".


If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!) they are spiritually Dead to God
  Paul was once  disobedient  thinking he was doing  service to God  , but was  alive to the Law  once and  dead to God , but He  become dead to the Law [ through it ] and Alive to God  [through Jesus Christ] 
   the Law is the ministration of death
Gal 2:19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.

1Pe 4:6 For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.
  I may not have explained myself very well 
  but I tried 
God bless
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 07, 2008, 09:47:59 PM
willieH: Hi Molly... :hithere:

Thanks for returning to what was actually proposed as the discussion...  :ty:

Quote from: willieH(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"? 
(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"? 
(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?
(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)


Quote from: Molly1)Angels fell, yes.  I wouldn't call them holy.

That is fine, ...you can call them whatever you desire, ...however, that you "name them other than HOLY", doesn't equate to that observation as accurate...  :dontknow:  If they are now in fact, "UNHOLY" because they FELL, they must have been something else before BECOMING "UNHOLY"...  :dontknow:

If they were NOT HOLY, then from what position or place did they fall FROM Molly?  :Whistle:

If SIN is UNHOLINESS, and THAT is what they DID and became UNHOLY, then it is only LOGICAL to note their previous experience was HOLY - eh?  :dontknow:

The WORD, when speaking of the ANGELS of GOD, which shall accompany CHRIST in His Return... note them to be HOLY... and also notes that ALL (not just SOME) of them shall be with Him! 

(Matt 25:31) When the son of man shall come IN HIS GLORY, and ...ALL the HOLY ANGELS [not some, or the "remainder" which did not "fall"] ...with HIM... then shall He sit upon the throne of His glory.

If these you propose "FELL" from that company, then what "you call them" is IRRELEVANT and INACCURATE... and the "SOME" that "fell" of the ALL you propose in your belief, thereby compromises the above Scripture.


Quote from: Molly2)They fell from heaven.

Which IS a HOLY environment is it NOT Molly?  :dunno:

Quote from: Molly7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.


--Rev 12

Quotation from a book of SYMBOLS... in your deduction of them,

(1) You are ASSUMING that the "dragon" is "satan", when "satan" is NOT indicated.

(2)  You are ASSUMING that the "heaven" they no longer were a part of, is the HEAVENLY domain of GOD, which is also, NOT indicated.

Quote from: MollyLuke 10:18
And he said unto them, I beheld satan as lightning fall from heaven.

ADVERSITY ("satan") indeed falls from the "heaven" [mind/heart] of the believer which is CHRIST casting the ADVERSE will of Man, to reclaim HIS TEMPLE and HIS BODY... by REVEALING JESUS CHRIST in that TEMPLE and BODY, the WILL and PRESENCE of GOD...  :happygrin:

Quote from: Molly3) Only if you think every part of creation is going to be restored/saved--that's your argument for universal restoration.  In other words, there is the same 'salvation' for them as for anyone thrown into the lake of fire.

ALL are presently IN the Lake of Fire Molly... which is where the FIRE of ALL SUFFERING and ALL DEATH takes place...

Quote from: Molly4)They are thrown into the lake of fire--originally prepared for them, the second death.

Matthew 25:41
Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

ALL traverse the Lake of Fire Molly, ...for the Lake of Fire  (this life)
takes place NOW as He noted:  (John 12:31 / 1 Cor 3:11-15)

The "2nd death" is the death of the FLESH for which CHRIST did NOT die to redeem... (1 Cor 15:50)

The "1st death" is the death died by each man as he/she SINS, in the SPIRIT...  (which DEATH is a STATE, CHRIST indicated of men which were still PHYSICALLY ALIVE - "Let the DEAD bury their DEAD").

The death CHRIST DID "taste" for, and to redeem ALL MEN, is the "1st [spiritual] death"... (Heb 2:9)

The PHYSICAL death of the FLESH which CANNOT INHERIT the Kingdom of GOD, is appointed to each man to die...  (Heb 9:27)

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 07, 2008, 10:43:39 PM
Hi all this is longer then I thought it would be, so it will be in two posts, please give me time to get them both out there before replying, thanks.

The earth that then was

Before you read this let me warn you that there are some strange things written therein that most will likely reject, so all I ask of the reader is that they take what I put forth here before the Lord and ask Him concerning it.

Genesis 1:1-2
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Thus the heavens and the earth were created in the BEGINNING

And the DEVIL sinneth from the beginning.

1 John 3:8
8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.


2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

The word WAS here is also translated BECAME so verse two can be read "And the earth BECAME without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters".  

Now as Is.45:18 say that God did NOT create the earth in VAIN which is the same Hebrew words as WITHOUT FORM something must have happened between verse 1 & 2 that caused the earth to be WITHOUT FORM.

What happened?


According to 2Pet.3:5-7 the first heaven and the earth was overflowed with water.


2 Peter 3:5-7
5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:  6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: 7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.


Now some might argue that this is speaking of the flood in the days of Noah when the earth was flooded. And upon first glance it does look like that. But is that a proper understanding?

Did the flood in Noah's day overflow both heaven and earth (the WORLD)?

World here is kosmos and Kosmos is in reference to the whole universe, the HEAVENS and the EARTH.

So what Peter is saying is that the overflow of water covered both the HEAVEN and the EARTH.

Yet in the days of Noah only the EARTH was overflowed with water.

Therefore Peter must be talking about some other overflow of water, and the only other time it speaks of an overflow of water is in Gen.1

Now remember Peter says the HEAVEN and the EARTH ( kosmos ) was overflowed with water.

So lets go back to Gen.1:6-10 and see if the HEAVEN and the EARTH (kosmos ) was overflowed with water.

We read

Genesis 1:6-10
6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.  7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven  be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. 10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

According to these scriptures the waters overflowed both the HEAVEN and the EARTH, this is the only time in scripture that God had to separate the water in HEAVEN, nothing like this occurred in the days of Noah, thus Peter was speaking about a flood far greater then that of the flood of Noah.

Another point that backs the flood spoken of in Peter is NOT in reference to the flood in Noah's day but is in reference to a flood that was hidden in secret from man is that Peter says the people were ignorant or unaware of this flood.

Everyone has heard about the flood in Noah's day no one is ignorant of it.

From Strong's

Ignorant

2990 lanthano { lan-than'-o}

a prolonged form of a primitive verb, which is used only as an alt. in certain tenses;; v

AV - be hid 3, be ignorant of 2, unawares 1; 6

GK - 3291 { lanqavnw }

1)   to be hidden, to be hidden from one, secretly, unawares, without knowing 



So why was the HEAVEN and the EARTH overflowed with water?

According to Peter the flood of Noah's day was a figure of the baptism that saves us. 1Peter 20-21

Now as the flood waters of Noah's day which only covered the earth is a figure of baptism unto salvation for man , what then can be said of the flood of the HEAVENS?

Does this not tell us that all those in the HEAVENS also have need of the baptism that saves?

According to Job the HEAVENS are not clean in His sight, does this then not imply that those in the HEAVENS have need of the baptism unto salvation? Sure it does, for the writer of Hebrews states that the HEAVENLY things are purified by a better sacrifice.

Job 15:15
15 Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight.  


Hebrews 9:23
23 It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.  

So lets go back to Gen.1:2 and Is.45:18 and compare the two.

Genesis 1:2
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Isaiah 45:18
18 For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else.

Both the words WITHOUT FORM in Gen.1:2 and VAIN in Is.45:18 are the same words.
Thus it is clear that God did not make the earth WITHOUT FORM and as He did not make it WITHOUT FORM then something must have happened to the EARTH to make it that way.

Now some might argue that the WITHOUT FORM was before the earth was made, but it is clear from verse 2 that the earth was already in place for it specifically says the EARTH was WITHOUT FORM.

Now remember that in verse 2 of Gen. the word WAS is also translated BECAME which backs up Isaiah 45:18 that God did not create the earth WITHOUT FORM but the earth BECAME WITHOUT FORM.

Now if we only had Isaiah 45:18 to go on people might say that we need a second witness to the earth BECOMING WITHOUT FORM.

Well let's look at Gen.1:28

Genesis 1:28
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 

Did you get that? God said REPLENISH the EARTH.
This is the exact same command God gave Noah after the flood Gen.9:1

Now it should go without saying (but I am going to say it anyway) that if the earth is to be REPLENISHED then it must have had inhabitants before, just as the earth was inhabited before the flood in Noah's day.

Gen.1:28 supports the translation in Gen.1:2  that the earth BECAME WITHOUT FORM and Is.45:18 that God never created the earth WITHOUT FORM.

Now some might argue that how can there have been another heaven and earth before this one that God overflowed with water, would that not then mean death was in the world before Adam sinned?

I can answer this two ways.

First: Gen.2:17 says

Genesis 2:17
17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. 

The literal translation of thou shalt surely die is DYING THOU SHALT DIE

This literal reading clearly shows DEATH was in the world BEFORE Adam ate from the tree.

Now some might argue and say but if that is the case why does the bible say that Adam brought sin into the world and death by sin.

Lets look at the scripture

Romans 5:12-13
12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:  13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

This set of scriptures clearly says that until the LAW sin was in the world but sin was not IMPUTED.

Thus if sin was not IMPUTED until Adam broke God's LAW(commandment) not to eat of the tree then neither was death IMPUTED. Once Adam broke God's LAW both sin and death was IMPUTED unto him and death by sin entered into the world.

Second: The world that then was spoken of in 2 Peter 3:5-7 was NOT the world Adam was created into, Adam brought sin into OUR WORLD not the world that then was.


As we have just seen that before the flood in Noah's day that covered the earth there was a flood long before that which overflowed the HEAVEN and EARTH THAT THEN WAS.

So why did God have need overflow the HEAVEN and EARTH that then was?


Because of the angels that sinned and kept not their first estate.

2 Peter 2:4
4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;



Jude 6
6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. 

According to the book of Revelation there was a war in HEAVEN and the OLD SERPENT called the DEVIL was cast out along with his ANGELS into the EARTH.

Revelation 12:7-9
7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, 8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. 9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.


What was the reason for this war?

According to Is. And Eze. It was because Satan wanted to exalt himself and be like the most High.

Isaiah 14:12-17
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!  13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. 15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. 16 They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; 17 That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners? 


Ezekiel 28:11-19
11 Moreover the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, 12 Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. 13 Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.    14 Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. 15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee. 16 By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. 17 Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee. 18 Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the multitude of thine iniquities, by the iniquity of thy traffick; therefore will I bring forth a fire from the midst of thee, it shall devour thee, and I will bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that behold thee. 19 All they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at thee: thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more. 

Now I know some see these scriptures as referring to Satan, some to man(Adam) and some to the antichrist.

For myself I believe it is referring to all 3, there are layers to scripture and each layer holds the truth. Just read what the scriptures state about the antichrist and then compare those scriptures to these ones and you will see how these scriptures have reference to him.
Then read what the scriptures state about man (Adam) and you will see how these scriptures have reference to him. And just as they have reference to both man (Adam) and the antichrist they also have if you read about Satan reference to him. It is layer upon layer upon layer.

The problem with most people is that they see one layer and believe that it is the only layer there is, but you don't often find gold lying upon the earth, you have to mine for it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 07, 2008, 10:58:58 PM
Thus Satan and his angels were cast into the earth and then HEAVENS and EARTH THAT THEN WAS were overflowed with water.

Now some might ask if Satan and his angels were overflowed with water why are they here in OUR world?

Herein is one of those layers to scripture I spoke on earlier. Lucifer is in reference to Satan and man and the reason why is because in the earth that then was Satan was a MAN. That does not mean he was a MAN such as we are, but is different from us in the same way the angelic are MEN yet differ from us. Man was made a little lower then the angelic.

I already know many are shaking their heads at this and probably thinking I am nuts, but all through scripture angels are referred to as MEN.

Revelation 21:17
17 And he measured the wall thereof, an hundred and forty and four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of the angel.

We all know of the story of Sodom and Gomorra and how 3 MEN met Abraham and how 2 of those MEN went into that city and the scriptures tell us those 2 MEN were ANGELS. Gen. chapters 18 and 19


Now some might say ok I have a point but that does not explain why Satan is here in OUR world.

The reason being is he is now a SPIRIT, just as the waters that overflowed in the days of Noah did not destroy  MANS SPIRIT just MANS body so to in the flood that overflowed the earth that then was.

1 Peter 3:18-19
18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: 19 By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;

Thus the body was dead but the SPIRIT lives on.



For a clearer understanding of this look again of what it says in Isaiah and what happened to Lucifer. Scripture states that he would be cast down to HELL.

HELL here is SHEOL in the Hebrew and  HADES in the Greek and means the place of the DEAD or dwelling place of the DEAD.

Yet in Revelations it say Satan is cast into the EARTH thus making HELL (SHEOL/HADES) here on EARTH.

Think about what God said would happen to Adam if he ate from the tree, God said Adam would DIE in the DAY he ate from it.

So what happened to Adam on the DAY he ate?

He was cast out of the garden into HELL (SHEOL/HADES) and as ALL die in Adam ALL are in the place of the DEAD which is HELL (SHEOL/HADES).

Proverbs 15:24 says
24 The way of life is above to the wise, that he may depart from hell beneath.

Deuteronomy 32:22 says
22 For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth  with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.   


These scripture are clear testimony that HELL (SHEOL/HADES) is the EARTH we live in, for how else can the fire that burns into the lowest HELL consume the EARTH.


Matthew 25:41
41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:  

Ever wonder why the everlasting fire was prepared for the Devil and his angels and nothing is said about it being prepared for mankind?

It because this EARTH (HELL/SHEOL/HADES) was not PREPARED for man, the GARDEN was /is to be our dwelling place.



Remember HELL (SHEOL/HADES) is the dwelling place of the DEAD.

Now read

Ephesians 2:1-6


And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; 2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: 3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. 
4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, 5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)  6 And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:

It is clear from these scriptures that those who walk according to the course of THIS WORLD are DEAD in trespasses and sin, and that Jesus came to give us LIFE that we may sit with Him in HEAVENLY PLACES. Thus Jesus came to save us OUT OF HELL.


So then now that we have seen that the HEAVEN and EARTH that then was, was overflowed with water, that HELL (SHEOL/HADES) is this EARTHLY REALM and that Satan dwells in this prison house as SPIRIT we can gain some insight to why Gen.1:2 says the EARTH BECAME WITHOUT FORM and the reason why God RECREATED the EARTH and placed MAN into it.

Satan is now a SPIRIT and is the god and prince of this world


2 Corinthians 4:3-4
3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: 4 In whom the god of this world  hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.



John 14:30
30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.


And is why scripture tells us that when we walked according to the course of this world
We walked according to the prince of the power of the air, that SPIRIT that worketh in the children of disobedience.

Ephesians 2:2
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

This world is not God world but Satan's and he is king in it and when Adam disobeyed God Adam entered into the Satan's world the dwelling place of the DEAD.

This is seen in that Jesus states

John 8:23
23 And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world.  

Jesus is NOT of this WORLD and is why the prince of this WORLD has nothing in Him.

Jesus also states

John 18:36
36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Jesus KINGDOM is NOT of this WORLD, and this can be seen in Jesus temptation of the DEVIL.

Matthew 4:8-9
8 Again, the devil  taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; 9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

It is obvious that for one to give something away one must be in possession of that which one gives away. Thus the KINGDOMS of THIS WORLD belong to Satan.

We all know of the Greek mythology of HADES and how he is the ruler of his domain, did you ever wonder were this mythology came from?

It is not just something the Greek made up, it comes from the truth and like all of Satan's tricks he corrupted the truth with mythology so man cannot discern fact from fiction.

There is truth in all mythology but it is covered up in mythology so that we cannot see the truth for the mythology, kind of like we can't see the forest for all the trees.

I watched a program on TV awhile back and etched in the stones of the days of the Pharaohs when Israel was held captive was a story written about a man god who came to earth and died and rose again, it basically followed the story of Jesus, but was of Egyptian origin and this man god was of the Egyptians. The program was used to say the Christian  of today believe in one of the myths of the Egyptians. That we took this myth that was written thousands of years before Christ and made up our own myths to support our religion.

So were did the Egyptians thousands of years before Christ came come up with this myth that so resembles the truth found in Christ?

The answer can be found in that  Israel was a captive of Egypt and the Egyptians more then likely after reading their scriptures much as did the Romans in the day of Christ understood in part a truth written in them, or more likely thought to themselves that these Israelites have a better sounding God then the ones we serves so let's make up our own version of their God and put it before the people. Thus taking the truth found in scripture and corrupting it.

So then we can see that Satan  the ruler of this world.

So why would God create man from the dust of this world, which is the dust of the dead.

This is the age old question: WHY did God make MAN.


The answer is not what you likely think it is.

God created MAN for the salvation of the ANGELIC.


Just as God sent Jesus into this world (HELL/SHEOL/HADES) to save man, Jesus sends forth His body (the church) to make known the fellowship of the mystery, which mystery is the salvation of the whole kosmos, which was God intent from the BEGININNG, to the principalities and powers in heavenly places.

Ephesians 3:9-11
9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: 10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, 11 According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord:

This is seen more fully when we see that kingdoms of THIS WORLD which belong to Satan become the kingdoms of our LORD.

Revelation 11:15
15 And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.


Colossians 1:16-20
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.  19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; 20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven. 

What! know ye not that we shall judge angels? 1Co.6:3

Man simply does not realise his full potential in Christ, for Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. 1 Corinthians 2:9


God bless


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 08, 2008, 12:36:58 AM


  this is really good Pneuma , and Willie 
but long  :msealed:
  so I am going to copy it   for  some   slow and  sure  reading
  Thanks  to the both of you for such efforts 
GOD bless   you both  .. rose
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 08, 2008, 01:13:19 AM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

Whoa!  You are far more traditional (church aligned) in your beliefs than I first perceived!  :omg:

There is absolutely no sense in my answering your post... you are more than welcome to these thoughts...  :dontknow:

It does give me a much better perspective of your visions though...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 08, 2008, 01:12:16 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 08, 2008, 01:13:19 AM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

Whoa!  You are far more traditional (church aligned) in your beliefs than I first perceived!  :omg:

There is absolutely no sense in my answering your post... you are more than welcome to these thoughts...  :dontknow:

It does give me a much better perspective of your visions though...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:

Willie the only thing of tradition (which you make tradition sound bad) in my post was when I spoke on Lucifer, the churches do not beleive the rest.

And as tradition goes lucifer being satan might be tradition to YOU, but NOT to me, I was raised to beleive Lucifer was in reference to MAN, so in fact I am bucking the tradition I grew up beleiveing.

Tradition also states Jesus Christ came to save mankind Willie so if all tradition is wrong which you seem to think it would mean Jesus never came to save mankind.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 08, 2008, 08:54:50 PM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

Quote from: willieH on October 08, 2008, 01:13:19 AM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

Whoa!  You are far more traditional (church aligned) in your beliefs than I first perceived!  :omg:

There is absolutely no sense in my answering your post... you are more than welcome to these thoughts...  :dontknow:

It does give me a much better perspective of your visions though...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:

QuoteWillie the only thing of tradition (which you make tradition sound bad) in my post was when I spoke on Lucifer, the churches do not beleive the rest.

I was not going to answer your post, but rather then make full commentary, I will note all the TRADITION aligned with the "church" in your beliefs bro, as well as some things that I feel YOU have noted as Biblical determinations with which I disagree as unbiblical...

BTW bro... I never said ALL "TRADITION" is bad... I was pointing to the TRADITION within and OF, ...RELIGION - which is what the WORD refers to, ...not to such tradition that commonly occurs in life, like  remembering our "birthdays" or "watching the super bowl" every year, please! :rolleye:

QuoteAnd as tradition goes lucifer being satan might be tradition to YOU, but NOT to me, I was raised to beleive Lucifer was in reference to MAN, so in fact I am bucking the tradition I grew up beleiveing.

Well hoop-de-doo bro!   :happygrin:  It isn't about "bucking" anything... it is about seeking to find what is actually TRUE, that our search needs to be about!   If we are about finding the TRUTH, then RELIGION shall for the most part, ...be jettisoned in that process...  :dontknow:

ALL that RELIGION believes is not UNTRUE, and I never said it was... but there are many (most) beliefs proposed BY IT, which are quite FALSE and misleading... and many which have left the "churches", are yet carrying much of the baggage of that CHURCH  fallacy with them...

QuoteTradition also states Jesus Christ came to save mankind Willie so if all tradition is wrong which you seem to think it would mean Jesus never came to save mankind.

Now you are bordering on being offensive (but I choose to think it was unintentional)...

You KNOW that I believe JESUS CHRIST came to save ALL mankind... that is NOT a "tradition" ...rather, it is a CLEAR (not supposed) FACT and STATEMENT of Scripture... (Luke 19:10)

NO "religious tradition" is needed to understand what this verse conveys, ALL MEN are LOST!  ALL MEN are SINNERS in need of SALVATION which only JESUS CHRIST can provide!

I'll be noting a few things about your posts...  :declare:

And as always... hold on to your beliefs Scott... I am not trying to convince you or anyone else of anything... I do not post for your benefit...

I post for consideration of GOD, in hopes that HE might consider my offerings useful and worthy to enlighten, those who read them, ...as I myself, ...continue to search for HIS LIGHT (as I converse with avid students such as yourself - while reading and praying in the WORD)...  :cloud9:

I am hardly in any competition with you or anyone else here... GOD is the only one who is CORRECT... all MEN are INCORRECT, until HE enlightens us by utilizing the writings of others to direct us into the LIGHT of HIS TRUTH.  (not mine -- not yours)

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 08, 2008, 09:33:00 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 08, 2008, 08:54:50 PM
You KNOW that I believe JESUS CHRIST came to save ALL mankind... that is NOT a "tradition" ...rather, it is a CLEAR (not supposed) FACT and STATEMENT of Scripture... (Luke 19:10)

Come on Wille lets dance  :bgdance: to get you in a better mood  :icon_jokercolor:

I think you are twisting what Scott said (surely he can comment on me commenting on your comment...)

What you wrote is a fact to you. (and me)
But do you think it's a fact to the followers of ET and elect?
So at least one of the interpretations of ALL is tradition.

Tradition can be wrong but also right.
Christian tradition sees God as the supreme being. In that case all Christians agree that tradition is a fact.

Facts very often are the same as tradition.
Sometimes there is different interpretation of facts and several traditions spawn from it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 09, 2008, 12:11:26 AM
willieH: Hi Scott...  :cloud9:

I'm only going to address one of your posts... too much work... hope you dont mind!  :blush:

I will note *** CHURCH in RED, and ...***  YOU in BLUE...

*** CHURCH:
Quote from: pneuma on October 07, 2008, 10:58:58 PM
Thus Satan and his angels were cast into the earth and then HEAVENS and EARTH THAT THEN WAS were overflowed with water.

Now some might ask if Satan and his angels were overflowed with water why are they here in OUR world?

Herein is one of those layers to scripture I spoke on earlier. Lucifer is in reference to Satan and man and the reason why is because in the earth that then was Satan was a MAN. That does not mean he was a MAN such as we are, but is different from us in the same way the angelic are MEN yet differ from us. Man was made a little lower then the angelic.

I already know many are shaking their heads at this and probably thinking I am nuts, but all through scripture angels are referred to as MEN.

Revelation 21:17
17 And he measured the wall thereof, an hundred and forty and four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of the angel.

We all know of the story of Sodom and Gomorra and how 3 MEN met Abraham and how 2 of those MEN went into that city and the scriptures tell us those 2 MEN were ANGELS. Gen. chapters 18 and 19

ANGELS are messengers bro... this is a title or reference word which applies to MORTAL MEN... Only when an ANGELIC is referred to SPECIFICALLY, such as SERAPHIM, CHERUBIM, ARCHANGEL... does a HEAVENLY being enter in...

CHRIST referred to PETER as "satan", does that therefore mean the Apostle Peter was an (albeit, "fallen") ANGELIC BEING in a man's body Scott?

In the "Sodom & Gomorrah" issue, the ACTUAL judgment delivered was done by YHVH Himself (Gen 19:24)... and GOD is shown throughout Scripture to EMPOWER MORTAL MEN with Supernatural abilities, ...which the MEN (which were mortal) that both met with Abraham, and went into Sodom & Gomorrah to meet with Lot, displayed...

*** YOU:
Quote from: PneumaNow some might say ok I have a point but that does not explain why Satan is here in OUR world.

The reason being is he is now a SPIRIT, just as the waters that overflowed in the days of Noah did not destroy  MANS SPIRIT just MANS body so to in the flood that overflowed the earth that then was.

1 Peter 3:18-19
18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: 19 By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;

Thus the body was dead but the SPIRIT lives on.

For a clearer understanding of this look again of what it says in Isaiah and what happened to Lucifer. Scripture states that he would be cast down to HELL.

HELL here is SHEOL in the Hebrew and  HADES in the Greek and means the place of the DEAD or dwelling place of the DEAD.

Yet in Revelations it say Satan is cast into the EARTH thus making HELL (SHEOL/HADES) here on EARTH.

Think about what God said would happen to Adam if he ate from the tree, God said Adam would DIE in the DAY he ate from it.

So what happened to Adam on the DAY he ate?

He was cast out of the garden into HELL (SHEOL/HADES) and as ALL die in Adam ALL are in the place of the DEAD which is HELL (SHEOL/HADES).

Proverbs 15:24 says
24 The way of life is above to the wise, that he may depart from hell beneath.

Deuteronomy 32:22 says
22 For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth  with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.   

These scripture are clear testimony that HELL (SHEOL/HADES) is the EARTH we live in, for how else can the fire that burns into the lowest HELL consume the EARTH.

Matthew 25:41
41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:  

Ever wonder why the everlasting fire was prepared for the Devil and his angels and nothing is said about it being prepared for mankind?

It because this EARTH (HELL/SHEOL/HADES) was not PREPARED for man, the GARDEN was /is to be our dwelling place.

Remember HELL (SHEOL/HADES) is the dwelling place of the DEAD.

Much LITERAL observation here bro... "SPIRITS in PRISON"... HELL as a "DWELLING PLACE" (when Scripture plainly notes the DEAD "know not anything" and are shown to be OPPOSITE of the LIVING  [Ecc 9:5] - to "DWELL" is to LIVE -- to live is to "know")...

PART  *** CHURCH and PART *** YOU:
Quote from: PneumaNow read Ephesians 2:1-6

And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; 2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: 3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. 
4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, 5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)  6 And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:

*** CHURCH:It is clear from these scriptures that those who walk according to the course of THIS WORLD are DEAD in trespasses and sin, and that Jesus came to give us LIFE that we may sit with Him in HEAVENLY PLACES. Thus  Jesus came to save us OUT OF HELL.

*** YOU:  So then now that we have seen that the HEAVEN and EARTH that then was, was overflowed with water, that HELL (SHEOL/HADES) is this EARTHLY REALM and that Satan dwells in this prison house as SPIRIT we can gain some insight to why Gen.1:2 says the EARTH BECAME WITHOUT FORM and the reason why God RECREATED the EARTH and placed MAN into it.

More REACHING... Actually VOID is also mentioned in Gen 1:2 and you purposely A-VOID it!  This word means COMPLETELY EMPTY, VACUITY or without substance!  Until GOD enacted the Creation of the Earth... it remained an inert entity.

JESUS came to save us out of HELL Scott?   :omg:  That is common CHURCH teaching and horribly off the mark!

You use conjecture based upon UNSAID things to have occured, in order to establish your doctrine of "Fallen angels" and UNMENTIONED teaching in Scripture.

Some of what you believe is close... you just fail to see that "HELL" (actually, ...the grave, which is the "running partner" of DEATH) is of the things CAST into the Lake of FIRE... which is THIS LIFETIME...

CHURCH:
QuoteSatan is now a SPIRIT and is the god and prince of this world

Who was the Apostle Peter (in the flesh) - eh?  :laughing7: 

After all, JESUS definitely called Peter "satan", so, it must be that He chose a "fallen angel" as the rock upon which to build His church, is that your belief Scott?  :dunno:

Then later on, apparently "Peter" (satan) jumped into "Judas", to get the crucifixtion program going - eh?  Is this beginning to sound ridiculous?  :mshock:

CHURCH: 
Quote from: Pnuema2 Corinthians 4:3-4
3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: 4 In whom the god of this world  hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

John 14:30
30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

The "prince of this world" is the WILL of MAN which continuously acts against the command of GOD by NATURE.

CHURCH:
Quote from: PneumaAnd is why scripture tells us that when we walked according to the course of this world
We walked according to the prince of the power of the air, that SPIRIT that worketh in the children of disobedience.

Ephesians 2:2
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

This world is not God world but Satan's and he is king in it and when Adam disobeyed God Adam entered into the Satan's world the dwelling place of the DEAD.

This is seen in that Jesus states

John 8:23
23 And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world.  

Jesus is NOT of this WORLD and is why the prince of this WORLD has nothing in Him.

Jesus also states

John 18:36
36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

The LUSTS of MEN are the SPIRIT of disobedience found in the WILL of MAN which is in bondage to ITSELF...  That "will" of man has no part in the WILL of GOD... for it must be DESTROYED in man, that the WILL of GOD take precedence.

It is MEN that are the "god" of THIS WORLD, not some red guy with a pitchfork!  :laughing7:

*** CHURCH:
Quote from: PneumaJesus KINGDOM is NOT of this WORLD, and this can be seen in Jesus temptation of the DEVIL.

Matthew 4:8-9
8 Again, the devil  taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; 9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

It is obvious that for one to give something away one must be in possession of that which one gives away. Thus the KINGDOMS of THIS WORLD belong to Satan.

More of "CHURCH" Scott... how do you think that this is something YOU exclusively have believed?  This is taught in just about every denomination in the Christian religion.

"satan" is ADVERSITY, and this WORLD is STEEPING in it, from head to toe... due to MAN and his inherent selfishness, pride and greed, not some mythical "fallen angel"...


*** CHURCH:
Quote from: PneumaWe all know of the Greek mythology of HADES and how he is the ruler of his domain, did you ever wonder were this mythology came from?

It is not just something the Greek made up, it comes from the truth and like all of Satan's tricks he corrupted the truth with mythology so man cannot discern fact from fiction.

There is truth in all mythology but it is covered up in mythology so that we cannot see the truth for the mythology, kind of like we can't see the forest for all the trees.

I watched a program on TV awhile back and etched in the stones of the days of the Pharaohs when Israel was held captive was a story written about a man god who came to earth and died and rose again, it basically followed the story of Jesus, but was of Egyptian origin and this man god was of the Egyptians. The program was used to say the Christian  of today believe in one of the myths of the Egyptians. That we took this myth that was written thousands of years before Christ and made up our own myths to support our religion.

So were did the Egyptians thousands of years before Christ came come up with this myth that so resembles the truth found in Christ?

The answer can be found in that  Israel was a captive of Egypt and the Egyptians more then likely after reading their scriptures much as did the Romans in the day of Christ understood in part a truth written in them, or more likely thought to themselves that these Israelites have a better sounding God then the ones we serves so let's make up our own version of their God and put it before the people. Thus taking the truth found in scripture and corrupting it.

Wow!  You can concoct a thing or two, cantcha?  :laughing7:

Do you believe everything you watch on TV?   :laughing7:  I have a garage cleaning robot for only $19.99 + shipping & handling... (just kidn'!  :cloud9:)

Scott... that MEN have been preaching a GOD since time began, and of SALVATION from this awful mess we find ourselves in, doesnt mean that the Egyptians created that belief!  Please!

MEN which have no SPIRITUAL beliefs to speak of, ...are easily capable of creating such NEGATIVE mythology [hades - dantes inferno/divine comedy] Scott...

Just take a second and make a quick note of the mind of Steven King!  MEN are more than able to create HELL for themselves... and then speak of deliverance from it...

*** YOU:
Quote from: PneumaSo then we can see that Satan  the ruler of this world.

So why would God create man from the dust of this world, which is the dust of the dead.

This is the age old question: WHY did God make MAN.

The answer is not what you likely think it is.

God created MAN for the salvation of the ANGELIC.

This is UNBIBLICAL and you know it... Come on bro... GOD created MAN in an effort to save ANGELS?  Please!

GOD created MAN to give His CHILDREN/TEMPLE/BODY -- the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL, that HE might be ALL ...IN... ALL!  :dontknow:

The result that JESUS hands to YHVH (1 Cor 15:28) is NOT "salvation for ANGELS"...

Scripture notes that CHRIST was manifested for: DESTROYING the WORKS of the devil which is ADVERSITY!

(1 John 3:8)  The NATURAL state of MAN is DISOBEDIENCE... and IS "satan"/ADVERSE to the WILL and COMMAND of YHVH God...

Kinda *** YOU but Kinda *** CHURCH: too!
Quote from: PneumaJust as God sent Jesus into this world (HELL/SHEOL/HADES) to save man, Jesus sends forth His body (the church) to make known the fellowship of the mystery, which mystery is the salvation of the whole kosmos, which was God intent from the BEGININNG, to the principalities and powers in heavenly places.

Ephesians 3:9-11
9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: 10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, 11 According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord:

This is seen more fully when we see that kingdoms of THIS WORLD which belong to Satan become the kingdoms of our LORD.

Revelation 11:15
15 And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.


Colossians 1:16-20
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.  19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; 20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.

This stuff is also taught in some churches as well...

But you see the principalities and such as "fallen angels" which shall be SAVED, whereas most churches see it as them being DESTROYED in the LOF. 

*** CHURCH:
Quote from: PneumaWhat! know ye not that we shall judge angels? 1Co.6:3

Man simply does not realise his full potential in Christ, for Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. 1 Corinthians 2:9

ALL this is believed by many "churches" Scott... not just you...

The JUDGMENT that is done of "angels" is the obedient messengers, ...as compared to the disobedient ones...

ALL JUDGMENT is commited to the SON, Scott... not to the SINNERS which have been chosen to KNOW CHRIST in the midst of this darkness...

Not SINFUL/FALLEN MEN (which are ALL in need of SALVATION), judging SINFUL/FALLEN ANGELS (which you propose are in need of salvation)... please... :mnah:

That is just a "pot calling the kettle black" scenario!  :laughhand:


peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 09, 2008, 12:32:44 AM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 08, 2008, 09:33:00 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 08, 2008, 08:54:50 PM
You KNOW that I believe JESUS CHRIST came to save ALL mankind... that is NOT a "tradition" ...rather, it is a CLEAR (not supposed) FACT and STATEMENT of Scripture... (Luke 19:10)

Come on Wille lets dance  :bgdance: to get you in a better mood  :icon_jokercolor:

I think you are twisting what Scott said (surely he can comment on me commenting on your comment...)

Before Scott comments on you commenting on my comment, let me comment on your comment of my comment...  :heat:  :pointlaugh:

Btw... I am always in a good mood brother... but thanks for hoping to help anyway!  :cloud9:

QuoteWhat you wrote is a fact to you. (and me)
But do you think it's a fact to the followers of ET and elect?
So at least one of the interpretations of ALL is tradition.

Tradition can be wrong but also right.
Christian tradition sees God as the supreme being. In that case all Christians agree that tradition is a fact.

Scripture is NOT tradition brother... and all CHRISTIANS agree that GOD is a supreme being because they BELIEVE that Scripture is telling the TRUTH...

The TRADITION that my comment was about,  is the TRADITION of RELIGION within Christianity, and some of the beliefs that Scott maintains... MUCH of which is based upon premises ASSUMED of, UNSTATED by, or OUTSIDE of Scripture...  :dontknow:

Such "CHRISTIAN TRADITIONS" include, "the RAPTURE" / Creation of ANGELIC beings / the "TRINITY" / "SPIRITUAL ISRAEL" / "going to HEAVEN"/ man's "free will" / "satan" as a fallen angel / Salvation from "hell" / salvation of FEW / the Millennium / Sinner's prayer / Souls led to CHRIST by men / Eternal Separation / Eternal TORMENT... etc... (there are more, but you either get the idea - or you dont)

QuoteFacts very often are the same as tradition.
Sometimes there is different interpretation of facts and several traditions spawn from it.

RELIGIOUS Tradition according to the WORD, is NOT FACTUAL... and they are NOT one and the same...  That anyone can ERECT a tradition from a passage of Scripture which notes SPIRITUAL FACTS, does not equate that ensuing RELIGIOUS TRADITION, ...with... being the FACTS...

Only GOD is able to reveal to anyone, what those "FACTS" are...

An ATHIEST can read and then deduce meaning from the bible, proposing he knows what it is actually conveying... but the BIBLE is a SPIRITUAL book which is SPIRITUALLY understood, and the ATHIEST is unequipped to understand, so his "factual conclusions" are found to be SPIRITUALLY incorrect.

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 09, 2008, 01:37:46 PM
I'll be back,  no time to answer thins morning as I am just heading to work
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
QuoteTradition also states Jesus Christ came to save mankind Willie so if all tradition is wrong which you seem to think it would mean Jesus never came to save mankind.


Now you are bordering on being offensive (but I choose to think it was unintentional)...

Glad you seen it as unintentional bro, it was not meant the way you seemed to have taken it.

QuoteYou KNOW that I believe JESUS CHRIST came to save ALL mankind... that is NOT a "tradition" ...rather, it is a CLEAR (not supposed) FACT and STATEMENT of Scripture...

Yes it is scripture Willie, but it is also tradition within the church, just read the articles of faith in the Nice creed, and that was the point I was trying to convey.


QuoteI post for consideration of GOD, in hopes that HE might consider my offerings useful and worthy to enlighten, those who read them, ...as I myself, ...continue to search for HIS LIGHT (as I converse with avid students such as yourself - while reading and praying in the WORD)...

I am hardly in any competition with you or anyone else here... GOD is the only one who is CORRECT... all MEN are INCORRECT, until HE enlightens us by utilizing the writings of others to direct us into the LIGHT of HIS TRUTH. (not mine -- not yours)

I agree 100% Willie, but I also believe when people get together and reason the scriptures that it can be of help to those listening as long as it does not turn into I am right and you are wrong statements or taking shots at each other.


QuoteANGELS are messengers bro... this is a title or reference word which applies to MORTAL MEN... Only when an ANGELIC is referred to SPECIFICALLY, such as SERAPHIM, CHERUBIM, ARCHANGEL... does a HEAVENLY being enter in...

So according to your understanding the angel flying through the midst of heaven is a MAN? Rev.14:6

What about this one, are these angels men also?
Luke 12:8
8 Also I say unto you, Whosoever shall confess me before men,  him shall the Son of man also confess before the angels of God:


Seems to me these two  make a distinction between angels and men.

1 Corinthians 4:9
9 For I think that God hath set forth us the apostles last, as it were appointed to death: for we are made a spectacle unto the world, and to angels, and to men.   


1 Corinthians 13:1
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.



Quote
CHRIST referred to PETER as "satan", does that therefore mean the Apostle Peter was an (albeit, "fallen") ANGELIC BEING in a man's body Scott?

No, Like I said satan can be applied to man and to Satan himself, just as Lucifer can be applied to man and Satan himself

QuoteIn the "Sodom & Gomorrah" issue, the ACTUAL judgment delivered was done by YHVH Himself (Gen 19:24)... and GOD is shown throughout Scripture to EMPOWER MORTAL MEN with Supernatural abilities, ...which the MEN (which were mortal) that both met with Abraham, and went into Sodom & Gomorrah to meet with Lot, displayed...


Well you can interpret it that way if you like bro, but in light of 1co.4:9 and 13:1 angels also refer to the angelic.


QuoteMuch LITERAL observation here bro... "SPIRITS in PRISON"... HELL as a "DWELLING PLACE" (when Scripture plainly notes the DEAD "know not anything" and are shown to be OPPOSITE of the LIVING [Ecc 9:5] - to "DWELL" is to LIVE -- to live is to "know")...

Yup the DEAD know nothing bro, and there are many a dead men walking around even today, Jesus came to us when we were DEAD in trespasses and sin.


QuoteMore REACHING... Actually VOID is also mentioned in Gen 1:2 and you purposely A-VOID it! This word means COMPLETELY EMPTY, VACUITY or without substance! Until GOD enacted the Creation of the Earth... it remained an inert entity.

Well I was not talking about VOID I was talking about WITHOUT FORM/VAIN
And scripture say God did not make the earth WITHOUT FORM.


QuoteJESUS came to save us out of HELL Scott? That is common CHURCH teaching and horribly off the mark!

Hardly church teaching bro, the church teaches Jesus came to save us from going to hell, I said He came to save us OUT OF HELL, HUGE difference.

QuoteYou use conjecture based upon UNSAID things to have occured, in order to establish your doctrine of "Fallen angels" and UNMENTIONED teaching in Scripture.

Don't know how you came to that conclusion when I used scripture for every point I made.

QuoteSome of what you believe is close... you just fail to see that "HELL" (actually, ...the grave, which is the "running partner" of DEATH) is of the things CAST into the Lake of FIRE... which is THIS LIFETIME...


If that is the case Willie then this LIFETIME was prepared for satan and His angels, which is what I had said.

The only difference is you see satan and his angels as referring to MAN, but death was not prepared for man bro the GARDEN WAS.


QuoteWho was the Apostle Peter (in the flesh) - eh?

After all, JESUS definitely called Peter "satan", so, it must be that He chose a "fallen angel" as the rock upon which to build His church, is that your belief Scott?

Then later on, apparently "Peter" (satan) jumped into "Judas", to get the crucifixtion program going - eh? Is this beginning to sound ridiculous?

Willie it like I have said brother there is more then ONE LAYER to scripture and because you refuse to hear this you come up with this lame defence. I have said many a time bro the satan can be applied to man, but that does not mean there is not a spiritual enemy called satan.

John 14:30
30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

QuoteThe "prince of this world" is the WILL of MAN which continuously acts against the command of GOD by NATURE.

Hmm I thought you said Jesus had a carnal mind (and yes that is were volition comes from)

So Jesus was made just like us but did not have the will of man, kind of dug yourself a hole here bro.

QuoteThe LUSTS of MEN are the SPIRIT of disobedience found in the WILL of MAN which is in bondage to ITSELF... That "will" of man has no part in the WILL of GOD... for it must be DESTROYED in man, that the WILL of GOD take precedence.

It is MEN that are the "god" of THIS WORLD, not some red guy with a pitchfork!

You just made that hole bigger bro.

Jesus KINGDOM is NOT of this WORLD, and this can be seen in Jesus temptation of the DEVIL.

Matthew 4:8-9
8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; 9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

It is obvious that for one to give something away one must be in possession of that which one gives away. Thus the KINGDOMS of THIS WORLD belong to Satan.


QuoteMore of "CHURCH" Scott... how do you think that this is something YOU exclusively have believed? This is taught in just about every denomination in the Christian religion.

"satan" is ADVERSITY, and this WORLD is STEEPING in it, from head to toe... due to MAN and his inherent selfishness, pride and greed, not some mythical "fallen angel"...


Never said anything about I was the only one who seen this Willie, maybe you can explain how Jesus had inherent selfishness, pride and greed, do to Jesus being a MAN.

Do you yet see how big of a hole you are digging?

QuoteWow! You can concoct a thing or two, cantcha?

Do you believe everything you watch on TV? I have a garage cleaning robot for only $19.99 + shipping & handling... (just kidn'! )

Scott... that MEN have been preaching a GOD since time began, and of SALVATION from this awful mess we find ourselves in, doesnt mean that the Egyptians created that belief! Please!

MEN which have no SPIRITUAL beliefs to speak of, ...are easily capable of creating such NEGATIVE mythology [hades - dantes inferno/divine comedy] Scott...

Just take a second and make a quick note of the mind of Steven King! MEN are more than able to create HELL for themselves... and then speak of deliverance from it...

Hmmm maybe you can explain how an Egyptian Myth told a story so close to that of Jesus thousands of years before He ever came. And as I said they used this Egyptian MYTH to say the Christian of today believe in a MYTH, basically saying Jesus is a MYTH.

Obviously I don't agree with their finding Willie but its pretty clear they took the TRUTH and created a MTYH out of the TRUTH.

QuoteThis is UNBIBLICAL and you know it... Come on bro... GOD created MAN in an effort to save ANGELS? Please!

GOD created MAN to give His CHILDREN/TEMPLE/BODY -- the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL, that HE might be ALL ...IN... ALL!

The result that JESUS hands to YHVH (1 Cor 15:28) is NOT "salvation for ANGELS"...

Scripture notes that CHRIST was manifested for: DESTROYING the WORKS of the devil which is ADVERSITY!

(1 John 3:8) The NATURAL state of MAN is DISOBEDIENCE... and IS "satan"/ADVERSE to the WILL and COMMAND of YHVH God...

Well that's standard church doctrine bro and I also agree with it, but as the scriptures point out the manifold wisdom of God by the church will be made known unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places.

I know you believe these principalities and powers deal with the carnal mind, so maybe you can explain how the carnal mind will understand the mysteries of God when the carnal mind cannot understand spiritual things.

QuoteALL this is believed by many "churches" Scott... not just you...

The JUDGMENT that is done of "angels" is the obedient messengers, ...as compared to the disobedient ones...

ALL JUDGMENT is commited to the SON, Scott... not to the SINNERS which have been chosen to KNOW CHRIST in the midst of this darkness...

Not SINFUL/FALLEN MEN (which are ALL in need of SALVATION), judging SINFUL/FALLEN ANGELS (which you propose are in need of salvation)... please...

That is just a "pot calling the kettle black" scenario!

The body of Christ will be perfect Willie just as their HEAD is perfect and their judgment will be the same judgment as the HEADS.



QuoteScripture is NOT tradition brother...

Seems to me I used scripture for everything I posted.

Your disagreement does not make it what you term TRADITION of RELIGION
Again read the Nice creed bro for that is where the TRADITION of RELIGION first started. And I bet you agree with MOST of it.

QuoteThe TRADITION that my comment was about, is the TRADITION of RELIGION within Christianity, and some of the beliefs that Scott maintains... MUCH of which is based upon premises ASSUMED of, UNSTATED by, or OUTSIDE of Scripture...

Hmm I used scripture for EVERY POINT I MADE Willie, just because you do not agree with the way I translate scripture does not mean I am assuming anything. Even though I could have used the book of Enoch I did not even though I believe it is scripture.
Where you stand on the religious tradition of 66 books  MAN put together.
See we can both play that religious tradition crap bro but it profits NOTHING.
We will both believe as we will bro until God changes us.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 10, 2008, 09:18:38 AM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

got to divide this answer in TWO parts...


PART ONE:

QuoteANGELS are messengers bro... this is a title or reference word which applies to MORTAL MEN... Only when an ANGELIC is referred to SPECIFICALLY, such as SERAPHIM, CHERUBIM, ARCHANGEL... does a HEAVENLY being enter in...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
So according to your understanding the angel flying through the midst of heaven is a MAN? Rev.14:6

The Revelation is a book of SYMBOLS bro... YES is my answer!  

What ANGEL have you seen PREACHING the EVERLASTING GOSPEL to the inhabitants ON EARTH?

MEN do this brother (preach the GOSPEL to MEN), not ANGELIC BEINGS from God's domain...  :dontknow:

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
What about this one, are these angels men also?
Luke 12:8
8 Also I say unto you, Whosoever shall confess me before men,  him shall the Son of man also confess before the angels of God:

Seems to me these two  make a distinction between angels and men.

You didnt read what I said, did you... Go up to the quote and re-read it...

The ANGELS of GOD are SPECIFICALLY NOTED here Scott... reference to ANGELIC beings...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
1 Corinthians 4:9
9 For I think that God hath set forth us the apostles last, as it were appointed to death: for we are made a spectacle unto the world, and to angels, and to men.  


1 Corinthians 13:1
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

Okay, I'll buy these, ...as a SPECIFIC DIFFERENTIATION is herein made between MEN and ANGELS...

Did you re-read the quote Scott?  SPECIFICS... "SUCH AS" (such as means FOR EXAMPLE):  SERAPHIM, CHERUBIM, ARCHANGEL...

When SPECIFIC separations between MEN and ANGELS are made, how can it be denied? These are another form of SPECIFICATION, are they not?

Sorry you did not see that was intended in my statement... Don't know everything, but I still stand by my statement that SPECIFICS are necessary in the text...  :thumbsup:

Quote from: willieHCHRIST referred to PETER as "satan", does that therefore mean the Apostle Peter was an (albeit, "fallen") ANGELIC BEING in a man's body Scott?

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
No, Like I said satan can be applied to man and to Satan himself, just as Lucifer can be applied to man and Satan himself

Is this a "cake & eat it too" statement or what Scott?  Get off the fence...

JESUS plainly NAMED Peter satan... and you failed to answer me... does that mean that CHRIST built His church upon satan (Peter), Scott?

After all, CHRIST noted that He had chosen the 12 and ONE of them was A DEVIL, did He not?  Is that your position?  Peter was actually "satan"?  :mshock:

Quote from: willieHIn the "Sodom & Gomorrah" issue, the ACTUAL judgment delivered was done by YHVH Himself (Gen 19:24)... and GOD is shown throughout Scripture to EMPOWER MORTAL MEN with Supernatural abilities, ...which the MEN (which were mortal) that both met with Abraham, and went into Sodom & Gomorrah to meet with Lot, displayed...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Well you can interpret it that way if you like bro, but in light of 1co.4:9 and 13:1 angels also refer to the angelic.

I already concurred with this thought because of SPECIFICS in the text...

Quote from: willieHMuch LITERAL observation here bro... "SPIRITS in PRISON"... HELL as a "DWELLING PLACE" (when Scripture plainly notes the DEAD "know not anything" and are shown to be OPPOSITE of the LIVING [Ecc 9:5] - to "DWELL" is to LIVE -- to live is to "know")...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Yup the DEAD know nothing bro, and there are many a dead men walking around even today, Jesus came to us when we were DEAD in trespasses and sin.

Did you actually SKIP when you made this "sidestep" Scott?  :laughing7:  Ecclesiates is not speaking of MEN dead in the Spirit and you know it... This is what I mean... you remain obstinate in the face of proof... and THAT is TRADITION in action...

Quote from: willieHMore REACHING... Actually VOID is also mentioned in Gen 1:2 and you purposely A-VOID it! This word means COMPLETELY EMPTY, VACUITY or without substance! Until GOD enacted the Creation of the Earth... it remained an inert entity.

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Well I was not talking about VOID I was talking about WITHOUT FORM/VAIN
And scripture say God did not make the earth WITHOUT FORM.

But the TEXT, Scott... continues to say the EARTH was VOID (empty/vacuous) as well!  More of that obstinacy...

Quote from: willieHJESUS came to save us out of HELL Scott? That is common CHURCH teaching and horribly off the mark!

QuoteHardly church teaching bro, the church teaches Jesus came to save us from going to hell, I said He came to save us OUT OF HELL, HUGE difference.

Sorry me bratha... but I have had MANY a convo on Christian Message Board with Baptists, Catholics, Methodists, Pentecostals... about this very thing... they ALL maintain the we are SAVED from HELL... you just use different words to say the same thing...

CHRIST is LIFE... and LIFE conquered DEATH (which is "hell"/grave)...

Like I said brother, you are close... almost there... it is the LAKE of FIRE in which CHRIST entered, and conquered DEATH and HELL (grave)... and it is out of DEATH that His Salvation conquered with LIFE... and will do so for all in RESURRECTION... not from some literal firepit... with a red-guy with a pitchfork in charge!  :laugh:

Quote from: willieHYou use conjecture based upon UNSAID things to have occured, in order to establish your doctrine of "Fallen angels" and UNMENTIONED teaching in Scripture.

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Don't know how you came to that conclusion when I used scripture for every point I made.

No brother, you maintain that UNSAID things occured between Gen 1:1 & 1:2... to establish the misleading Daily DOUBLE -- "Cake & eat it too"!  ...you endeavor to concoct a teaching that notes MAN as satan and some (mythical) FALLEN ANGEL as satan as well...

Quote from: willieHSome of what you believe is close... you just fail to see that "HELL" (actually, ...the grave, which is the "running partner" of DEATH) is of the things CAST into the Lake of FIRE... which is THIS LIFETIME...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
If that is the case Willie then this LIFETIME was prepared for satan and His angels, which is what I had said.

The only difference is you see satan and his angels as referring to MAN, but death was not prepared for man bro the GARDEN WAS.

Like I said Scott... I don't think we are that far off in belief concerning the Lake of Fire... our separation comes with understanding what "HELL" actually is...

If death was not prepared for MAN bro, then why is MAN APPOINTED once to DIE Scott? :dunno:

Quote from: willieHWho was the Apostle Peter (in the flesh) - eh?

After all, JESUS definitely called Peter "satan", so, it must be that He chose a "fallen angel" as the rock upon which to build His church, is that your belief Scott?

Then later on, apparently "Peter" (satan) jumped into "Judas", to get the crucifixtion program going - eh? Is this beginning to sound ridiculous?

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Willie it like I have said brother there is more then ONE LAYER to scripture and because you refuse to hear this you come up with this lame defence. I have said many a time bro the satan can be applied to man, but that does not mean there is not a spiritual enemy called satan.

I was purposely being facetious, because it IS RIDICULOUS... and you are unbending bro... one day you shall see...  :thumbsup:

You have proven my words not to be a "lame" defence brother, ...you only call it "lame" because you were unable to respond to it...  :laughing7:

"satan" is the ADVERSITY which is found in ALL MEN... it is not a being... and its ANGELS are the messengers which bring HELL to the WORLD as the "GOSPEL", instead of the GOOD NEWS of the SALVATION of ALL MEN... (not angels)

QuoteJohn 14:30
30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

Quote from: willieHThe "prince of this world" is the WILL of MAN which continuously acts against the command of GOD by NATURE.

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Hmm I thought you said Jesus had a carnal mind (and yes that is were volition comes from)

JESUS had to BE TEMPTED just as are WE, in order for many verses to be so... He was part of "EVERY MAN", Scott...

The WILL and WAR factor in the FLESH is the CARNAL Scott... and the CARNAL is destroyed IN US, the same way CHRIST destroyed it... by the WORD

When the WORD is presented to TEMPTATION (in us as well as JESUS)... temptation flees from us and is not found.

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
So Jesus was made just like us but did not have the will of man, kind of dug yourself a hole here bro.

First, JESUS was NOT made just like us, HIS FATHER or SIRE was GOD... you and I had 2 EARTHLY parents...

Second, ...NO!  So sorry to disappoint your short victory dance bro, but CHRIST prayed that the "cup pass" which displayed the WILL of MAN, within Him, ...THEN, He noted... "nevertheless, NOT MY WILL, but THINE be done"...

The NATURAL portion of CHRIST's MANhood, asked for the cup to PASS, but met that portion with the WILL of GOD as His preference... no hole at all...

Quote from: willieHThe LUSTS of MEN are the SPIRIT of disobedience found in the WILL of MAN which is in bondage to ITSELF... That "will" of man has no part in the WILL of GOD... for it must be DESTROYED in man, that the WILL of GOD take precedence.

It is MEN that are the "god" of THIS WORLD, not some red guy with a pitchfork!

end of PART ONE...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 10, 2008, 09:19:42 AM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

PART TWO:

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
You just made that hole bigger bro.

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AMJesus KINGDOM is NOT of this WORLD, and this can be seen in Jesus temptation of the DEVIL.

Matthew 4:8-9
8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; 9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

It is obvious that for one to give something away one must be in possession of that which one gives away. Thus the KINGDOMS of THIS WORLD belong to Satan.

No HOLE bro... CHRIST did not give way to the ADVERSITY presented to Him by His flesh... 

ALL the kingdoms of this world ARE ruled by FLESH Scott!  They are not subject to GOD, but to CORRUPT MEN... which is WHY we have the world we have!

He KNEW that the FULLNESS of the POWER of GOD was in His hand at any time, for DIVINITY in its FULLNESS, Dwelt in Him... Which is why He said that He could call LEGIONS of ANGELS to rescue Him, but that was NOT the WILL of YHVH...

Quote from: willieHMore of "CHURCH" Scott... how do you think that this is something YOU exclusively have believed? This is taught in just about every denomination in the Christian religion.

"satan" is ADVERSITY, and this WORLD is STEEPING in it, from head to toe... due to MAN and his inherent selfishness, pride and greed, not some mythical "fallen angel"...

Quote from: willieHNever said anything about I was the only one who seen this Willie, maybe you can explain how Jesus had inherent selfishness, pride and greed, do to Jesus being a MAN.

Do you yet see how big of a hole you are digging?

Please Scott... I have said no such thing and you know it... In order to OVERCOME SIN in ALL POINTS... ALL POINTS were presented to Him... Selfishness, pride, and greed were ALL presented to Him, and He met those presentations with the WORD... No hole...

Quote from: willieHWow! You can concoct a thing or two, cantcha?

Do you believe everything you watch on TV? I have a garage cleaning robot for only $19.99 + shipping & handling... (just kidn'! )

Scott... that MEN have been preaching a GOD since time began, and of SALVATION from this awful mess we find ourselves in, doesnt mean that the Egyptians created that belief! Please!

MEN which have no SPIRITUAL beliefs to speak of, ...are easily capable of creating such NEGATIVE mythology [hades - dantes inferno/divine comedy] Scott...

Just take a second and make a quick note of the mind of Steven King! MEN are more than able to create HELL for themselves... and then speak of deliverance from it...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Hmmm maybe you can explain how an Egyptian Myth told a story so close to that of Jesus thousands of years before He ever came. And as I said they used this Egyptian MYTH to say the Christian of today believe in a MYTH, basically saying Jesus is a MYTH.

Sorry Scott... but your TV program isn't sufficient grounds to found your MYTH, & by the way:

Send me a tape of your TV program (which founds your Egyptian Myth), then MAYBE, I will respond... the above are just YOUR WORDS... and I have found your words a bit on the edge, here & there...  :laughing7:

This is as weak as Science stating evolution as fact, when it has never ever been anything else but a theory...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Obviously I don't agree with their finding Willie but its pretty clear they took the TRUTH and created a MTYH out of the TRUTH.

Like many ancient writings are considered Scripture (some by you), which are NOT... I dont have time to dabble and argue with a bunch of hoo-ha presented on TV...

Quote from: willieHThis is UNBIBLICAL and you know it... Come on bro... GOD created MAN in an effort to save ANGELS? Please!

GOD created MAN to give His CHILDREN/TEMPLE/BODY -- the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL, that HE might be ALL ...IN... ALL!

The result that JESUS hands to YHVH (1 Cor 15:28) is NOT "salvation for ANGELS"...

Scripture notes that CHRIST was manifested for: DESTROYING the WORKS of the devil which is ADVERSITY!

(1 John 3:8) The NATURAL state of MAN is DISOBEDIENCE... and IS "satan"/ADVERSE to the WILL and COMMAND of YHVH God...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Well that's standard church doctrine bro and I also agree with it, but as the scriptures point out the manifold wisdom of God by the church will be made known unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places.

I know you believe these principalities and powers deal with the carnal mind, so maybe you can explain how the carnal mind will understand the mysteries of God when the carnal mind cannot understand spiritual things.

The NATURAL MIND is made NEW Scott... by the REVELATION of CHRIST within... When that REVELATION takes place... CARNAL is replaced by SPIRITUAL... SELF is replaced by CHRIST, our imprisoned WILL is replaced by the FREE WILL of GOD...

No "SALVATION of ANGELS" is accomplished by GOD creating man... :rolleye: UNBIBLICAL.

Quote from: willieHALL this is believed by many "churches" Scott... not just you...

The JUDGMENT that is done of "angels" is the obedient messengers, ...as compared to the disobedient ones...

ALL JUDGMENT is commited to the SON, Scott... not to the SINNERS which have been chosen to KNOW CHRIST in the midst of this darkness...

Not SINFUL/FALLEN MEN (which are ALL in need of SALVATION), judging SINFUL/FALLEN ANGELS (which you propose are in need of salvation)... please...

That is just a "pot calling the kettle black" scenario!

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
The body of Christ will be perfect Willie just as their HEAD is perfect and their judgment will be the same judgment as the HEADS.

THAT is exactly IT Scott!  The JUDGMENT is done by the HEAD, not the toenails & intestines!

No ANGELIC being is in need to be judged... and the Bible does not support it, just as it does not support ET, the RAPTURE, the TRINITY, and -- oh yeah... satan as a BEING or FALLEN ANGEL...  :happygrin:

Quote from: willieHScripture is NOT tradition brother...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Seems to me I used scripture for everything I posted.

ALL churches use SCRIPTURE to found their beliefs Scott... posting Bible verses does not equate to posting TRUTH...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Your disagreement does not make it what you term TRADITION of RELIGION
Again read the Nice creed bro for that is where the TRADITION of RELIGION first started. And I bet you agree with MOST of it.

TRADITION concerning RELIGION was present in the days of JESUS... I dont need to refer to ancient peripheral books to know that, brother... CHRIST noted (religious) TRADTION as a WORD of GOD, neutralizer... and to this day, it still IS...

Quote from: willieHThe TRADITION that my comment was about, is the TRADITION of RELIGION within Christianity, and some of the beliefs that Scott maintains... MUCH of which is based upon premises ASSUMED of, UNSTATED by, or OUTSIDE of Scripture...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Hmm I used scripture for EVERY POINT I MADE Willie, just because you do not agree with the way I translate scripture does not mean I am assuming anything. Even though I could have used the book of Enoch I did not even though I believe it is scripture.
Where you stand on the religious tradition of 66 books  MAN put together.
See we can both play that religious tradition crap bro but it profits NOTHING.
We will both believe as we will bro until God changes us.

As they say in Sweden -- Youbetcha-sure...  :laughing7:

Enoch isnt even an issue in this conversation, get over it...  You can believe it all you like... or anything else you wish to believe... Make Josephus the "new Moses" if that is your fancy...

One thing you can count on Scott, ...It wont fly with me...

Using Scripture does not facilitate TRUTH Scott... only GOD can do that... To me, RELIGIOUS TRADITION is basing doctrinal teaching upon THAT which is NOT in Scripture...

IMO... You do that often...  :sigh:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 11:00:45 AM
Quote from: willieH on October 10, 2008, 09:18:38 AM
Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
So according to your understanding the angel flying through the midst of heaven is a MAN? Rev.14:6
The Revelation is a book of SYMBOLS bro... YES is my answer!  

What ANGEL have you seen PREACHING the EVERLASTING GOSPEL to the inhabitants ON EARTH?

MEN do this brother (preach the GOSPEL to MEN), not ANGELIC BEINGS from God's domain...  :dontknow:
Hebrews 2:9  But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death....
That verse states Jesus, at that point in time, was somewhere between man and angel.
So preaching is not only done by men.

Quote
Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
1 Corinthians 13:1
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

Okay, I'll buy these, ...as a SPECIFIC DIFFERENTIATION is herein made between MEN and ANGELS...

Did you re-read the quote Scott?  SPECIFICS... "SUCH AS" (such as means FOR EXAMPLE):  SERAPHIM, CHERUBIM, ARCHANGEL...

When SPECIFIC separations between MEN and ANGELS are made, how can it be denied? These are another form of SPECIFICATION, are they not?
So basicly Jesus was lower than the lowest angel, including mankind as a type of angel?
Hebrews 2:9  But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death....
Seems to say that an important part of being less that an angele is that immortality is taken away.
Angel type 'man' has no immortality in this lifetime.


Quote
Quote from: willieHJESUS came to save us out of HELL Scott? That is common CHURCH teaching and horribly off the mark!

QuoteHardly church teaching bro, the church teaches Jesus came to save us from going to hell, I said He came to save us OUT OF HELL, HUGE difference.

Sorry me bratha... but I have had MANY a convo on Christian Message Board with Baptists, Catholics, Methodists, Pentecostals... about this very thing... they ALL maintain the we are SAVED from HELL... you just use different words to say the same thing...

For me that's huge difference!
This how I read it.
- Saved out of hell means you can even be saved if you are in hell. Meaning when cast in hell it's not by defenition eternal.
- Saved from hell means you never enter hell. Ok, it can also be extended to get saved once you are in hell. But:
a] That's less sure
b] That's not what those ET followers you mentioned are believing

Scott can you please give a verse that proves your point/claim?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 11:19:54 AM
Quote
Quote from: willieH on October 10, 2008, 09:19:42 AM
Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Hmmm maybe you can explain how an Egyptian Myth told a story so close to that of Jesus thousands of years before He ever came. And as I said they used this Egyptian MYTH to say the Christian of today believe in a MYTH, basically saying Jesus is a MYTH.

Sorry Scott... but your TV program isn't sufficient grounds to found your MYTH, & by the way:

Send me a tape of your TV program (which founds your Egyptian Myth), then MAYBE, I will respond... the above are just YOUR WORDS... and I have found your words a bit on the edge, here & there...  :laughing7:
I'm not sure what Scott is exactly reffering to; but I think part one of Zeitgeist comes close.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeZB2EsPqGE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmzailhVl-U&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6UdQxt7b24&feature=related




QuoteThis is as weak as Science stating evolution as fact, when it has never ever been anything else but a theory...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
Obviously I don't agree with their finding Willie but its pretty clear they took the TRUTH and created a MTYH out of the TRUTH.

Like many ancient writings are considered Scripture (some by you), which are NOT... I dont have time to dabble and argue with a bunch of hoo-ha presented on TV...[/quote]
Looks you are misreading things now Willie.
Scott said that some are using myth, that is based on Bible facts, to prove the Bible facts are a myth.






Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on October 10, 2008, 03:19:29 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 11:00:45 AM
Hebrews 2:9  But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death....
That verse states Jesus, at that point in time, was somewhere between man and angel.
So preaching is not only done by men.


Jas 4:10  Humble yourselves5013 in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up.

G5013
ταπεινόω
tapeinoō
tap-i-no'-o
From G5011; to depress; figuratively to humiliate (in condition or heart): - abase, bring low, humble (self).
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 05:50:56 PM
Laren,

So you are suggesting 'lower' is meaning 'humble'?
I can understand that someone can act/be humble but what about 'suffering from death'
I think that is the key part of this verse.
Jesus was lower as an angel because He was able to die.
Acting very humble or extremely arrogant wouldn't change that fact.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on October 10, 2008, 06:12:07 PM
Quote from: laren on October 10, 2008, 03:19:29 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 11:00:45 AM
Hebrews 2:9  But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death....
That verse states Jesus, at that point in time, was somewhere between man and angel.
So preaching is not only done by men.


Jas 4:10  Humble yourselves5013 in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up.

G5013
ταπεινόω
tapeinoō
tap-i-no'-o
From G5011; to depress; figuratively to humiliate (in condition or heart): - abase, bring low, humble (self).


short on time, but here's something to think about

Mat 16:25 For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on October 10, 2008, 06:41:40 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 05:50:56 PM
Laren,

So you are suggesting 'lower' is meaning 'humble'?
I can understand that someone can act/be humble but what about 'suffering from death'
I think that is the key part of this verse.
Jesus was lower as an angel because He was able to die.
Acting very humble or extremely arrogant wouldn't change that fact.




Rom 6:3  Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 11, 2008, 01:10:52 AM
willieH: Hi WW...  :cloud9:

Sorry for the long answer WW, but it is necessary...  :mblush:

Quote from: willieH on October 10, 2008, 09:18:38 AM
Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
So according to your understanding the angel flying through the midst of heaven is a MAN? Rev.14:6
The Revelation is a book of SYMBOLS bro... YES is my answer! 

What ANGEL have you seen PREACHING the EVERLASTING GOSPEL to the inhabitants ON EARTH?

MEN do this brother (preach the GOSPEL to MEN), not ANGELIC BEINGS from God's domain...  :dontknow:

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 11:00:45 AMHebrews 2:9  But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death....
That verse states Jesus, at that point in time, was somewhere between man and angel.
So preaching is not only done by men.

This is an off base conclusion brother WW... JESUS was a ...MAN... NOT somewhere "in between" men and angels:  (1 Tim 2:5) ...the MAN, CHRIST JESUS...  Because He was BOTH, the son of MAN, and the Son of GOD, gave Him the position of mediator between GOD and MAN... He was 'kin to GOD for GOD was His FATHER, ...and 'kin to MAN, because Mary [a human] was His MOTHER...

Quote from: pneuma on October 10, 2008, 06:47:21 AM
1 Corinthians 13:1
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

Quote from: willieHOkay, I'll buy these, ...as a SPECIFIC DIFFERENTIATION is herein made between MEN and ANGELS...

Did you re-read the quote Scott?  SPECIFICS... "SUCH AS" (such as means FOR EXAMPLE):  SERAPHIM, CHERUBIM, ARCHANGEL...

When SPECIFIC separations between MEN and ANGELS are made, how can it be denied? These are another form of SPECIFICATION, are they not?

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 11:00:45 AMSo basicly Jesus was lower than the lowest angel, including mankind as a type of angel?

Hebrews 2:9  But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death....

Seems to say that an important part of being less that an angele is that immortality is taken away.

Angel type 'man' has no immortality in this lifetime.

The word AGGELOS in the Greek means MESSENGER... ANGELIC beings as well as HUMANS can be defined by this word...

There is a SPECIFIC noted here WW... that JESUS [a MAN] was made a little lower than the ANGELS [heavenly beings]... NOT human "messengers"...

JESUS obviously was NOT made LOWER than MEN... He was the ONLY BEGOTTEN Son of the FATHER... and was SIRED by the HOLY SPIRIT of GOD... One of His "parents" was NOT HUMAN...

All other MEN aside from ADAM (which encompasses both Adam & Eve), are sons [daughters] of MEN...

JESUS, as He often noted Himself was BOTH, ...a son of MAN, and the SON of GOD...

Quote from: willieHJESUS came to save us out of HELL Scott? That is common CHURCH teaching and horribly off the mark!

Quote from: PneumaHardly church teaching bro, the church teaches Jesus came to save us from going to hell, I said He came to save us OUT OF HELL, HUGE difference.

Quote from: willieHSorry me bratha... but I have had MANY a convo on Christian Message Board with Baptists, Catholics, Methodists, Pentecostals... about this very thing... they ALL maintain the we are SAVED from HELL... you just use different words to say the same thing...

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 11:00:45 AMFor me that's huge difference!
This how I read it.
- Saved out of hell means you can even be saved if you are in hell. Meaning when cast in hell it's not by defenition eternal.

It all comes down to what YOUR perception and definition of what "hell" [hades] actually ...IS...  WW, you either believe 1 or 2 below: 

ONE:  If you define it [hades] FIREPIT, then the doctrine becomes a disassociation for SOME MEN... which is false...

TWO:  If you define it [hades] GRAVE, then the doctrine becomes ASSOCIATION, which is TRUE and applicable to and for ALL MEN...

If "HELL" [hades] is defined and percieved, the GRAVE [which it IS], then we are SAVED OUT of IT... for we ALL [not SOME] go down INTO IT...

However, ...The church defines HADES as a FIREPIT from which it is saved from ever going INTO it... which is where the fork in the road appears between TRUTH and ERROR...

SIN takes us to DEATH (Rom 6:23) not to a FIREPIT... DEATH takes its PRISONERS to the HOUSE of the GRAVE [hades]...

CHRIST
overcame and CONQUERED DEATH by RESURRECTION to LIFE... He did not DOUSE FLAMES for us...

SALVATION, ...which is SIN neutralized or "paid for" (John 1:29), ...removes those prison bars [sins], and RETURNS men to LIFE...

SALVATION is NOT a rescue from OR "OUT OF" a FIREPIT... no matter how one chooses to WORD it...

If we are saved FROM it... that means we never enter INTO it... which in part, is the 2 faced FALLACY the Church believes:  That we are (1) SAVED from going to HELL [firepit] by (2) "accepting" JESUS, and are saved FROM IT... 

When the truth is that ALL GO into the GRAVE [not firepit NOR this LIFE as Scott views this]... and we are SAVED ...OUT... of it... DEATH. :dontknow:

Quote- Saved from hell means you never enter hell. Ok, it can also be extended to get saved once you are in hell. But:
a] That's less sure
b] That's not what those ET followers you mentioned are believing

I once believed in HELL as an ETERNAL FIRE/TORTURE chamber... so I am quite well aware of what ET believers percieve... (spent 20yrs in Salvation Army - HELL believers)

I am not perfect in my ability to convey words WW, and it appears you are not either, so please do not expect what you are unable to do, ...from me...

We are SAVED ...OUT... of DEATH/Grave [hades] which ALL go into... by the RESURRECTED and CONQUERING LIFE of JESUS CHRIST... is that clear enough?

The Church believes that it is saved FROM HELL [firepit]... which it supposes it never enters... and its misunderstanding of the Greek word HADES is the root of its belief...

Scott believes THIS LIFE is HELL [hades] and that we are saved OUT of IT, leaving OUT the NATURAL DEATH we are APPOINTED to, and each of us DO, DIE... which amounts to dismissing NATURAL DEATH as the enemy of SPIRITUAL LIFE... again, misunderstanding the Greek word HADES, which is SHEOL, which is the GRAVE of NATURAL DEATH...

Below is the quote where words of confusion between us began...

SCOTT looks at THIS LIFE as HELL [hades] and that we are LIVING in HELL [hades] in this life, further proposing that the GARDEN [not the earth] was prepared for MAN... and that we are saved from this life which he believes is HELL [hades]... 

I on the other hand believe THIS LIFE is the LAKE of FIRE, into WHICH "hell" [hades] was cast INTO, and IS a pivitol part of it... and WAS that which CHRIST came to conquer and DESTROY...

I furthermore believe that MAN was APPOINTED to DIE (Heb 9:27), which means that THIS LIFE which ends in DEATH, was APPOINTED for man ...BY GOD, and thereby also means the EARTHLY GRAVE [hades] was also APPOINTED for MAN...  and IN that APPOINTMENT, is found what Man was PREPARED for...  Scripture notes in Gen 3:19, that MAN was TAKEN from the DUST, and to the DUST [grave] he shall RETURN...  He wasnt "taken" from the Garden, rather... from the earth... and he doesnt "return" to the Garden, he "returns" to the earth.

Scott also contends that we were prepared for the "garden" which he appears to allude to the Heavenly... but Scripture notes ADAM as EARTHY... not HEAVENLY... (1 Cor 15:47 )

The "GARDEN" of Ayden [paradise] was only PARADISE because the presence of HOLINESS was AMIDST it, and permeated it... Had GOD "prepared" us for the Garden, then we would STILL be there...  But when UNHOLINESS prevailed, PARADISE was no longer the case... and thereby from the PRESENCE of PARADISE or HOLINESS, was man cast away... and APPOINTED to DIE...

We go amiss of each other because of WORDS, and definitions of those words...  It is a tough discussion... and much of the gaining of UNDERSTANDING, depends upon ALL THREE of us (including YOU, WW)... finding the SAME definitions for the SAME WORDS... particularly HADES... what it ...IS... and what part it PLAYS in THIS LIFE...  Unless this is accomplished, our discussion cannot end in any other state than, disagreement...

Quote
Quote from: PneumaEver wonder why the everlasting fire was prepared for the Devil and his angels and nothing is said about it being prepared for mankind?

It because this EARTH (HELL/SHEOL/HADES) was not PREPARED for man, the GARDEN was /is to be our dwelling place.

Remember HELL (SHEOL/HADES) is the dwelling place of the DEAD.

Much LITERAL observation here bro... "SPIRITS in PRISON"... HELL as a "DWELLING PLACE" (when Scripture plainly notes the DEAD "know not anything" and are shown to be OPPOSITE of the LIVING  [Ecc 9:5] - to "DWELL" is to LIVE -- to live is to "know")...

PART  *** CHURCH and PART *** YOU:
Quote from: PneumaNow read Ephesians 2:1-6

And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; 2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: 3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. 
4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, 5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)  6 And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:

*** CHURCH:It is clear from these scriptures that those who walk according to the course of THIS WORLD are DEAD in trespasses and sin, and that Jesus came to give us LIFE that we may sit with Him in HEAVENLY PLACES. Thus  Jesus came to save us OUT OF HELL.

*** YOU:  So then now that we have seen that the HEAVEN and EARTH that then was, was overflowed with water, that HELL (SHEOL/HADES) is this EARTHLY REALM and that Satan dwells in this prison house as SPIRIT we can gain some insight to why Gen.1:2 says the EARTH BECAME WITHOUT FORM and the reason why God RECREATED the EARTH and placed MAN into it.

More REACHING... Actually VOID is also mentioned in Gen 1:2 and you purposely A-VOID it!  This word means COMPLETELY EMPTY, VACUITY or without substance!  Until GOD enacted the Creation of the Earth... it remained an inert entity.

JESUS came to save us out of HELL Scott?   :omg:  That is common CHURCH teaching and horribly off the mark!

Some of what you believe is close... you just fail to see that "HELL" (actually, ...the grave, which is the "running partner" of DEATH) is of the things CAST into the Lake of FIRE... which is THIS LIFETIME...

JESUS came to SAVE us OUT of DEATH, not OUT of DIRT, and not OUT of a FIREPIT... He came to RESTORE LIFE... in those APPOINTED to DIE, and return to the EARTH...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 11, 2008, 01:16:54 AM
willieH: Hi everyone...  :cloud9:

Again, I would like to remind those in discussion, of the OP...  I believe much sidetracking, although pertinent in part, is really not addressing the TOPIC... and has prompted LONG discussions which vere off the TOPIC... ( :mblush: -- I am guilty of participating in this, but really do wish to discuss the OP with everyone)

Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?

Maybe the Mods, can separate the discussion into two topics... one which can deal with "HELL", ...what it is or is not, and how or why it is percieved by those various views...  :2c:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 11, 2008, 02:08:36 AM
QuoteSorry Scott... but your TV program isn't sufficient grounds to found your MYTH, & by the way:

Send me a tape of your TV program (which founds your Egyptian Myth), then MAYBE, I will respond... the above are just YOUR WORDS... and I have found your words a bit on the edge, here & there...


Hi Willie I was going to respond to your post when I came across this, bro that very close to saying I am falsifying words, basically close to calling me a liar, you probably did not mean it that why, but it close enough that I will now end my participation on this thread, neither of us will change our views bro, only God can do that for us, so I'll leave you to yours.

Plus I would like to get back to my rebuttal to Matt as I have been remiss because I am posting on to many other threads.

God bless bro.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 11, 2008, 02:10:07 AM
QuoteFor me that's huge difference!
This how I read it.
- Saved out of hell means you can even be saved if you are in hell. Meaning when cast in hell it's not by defenition eternal.
- Saved from hell means you never enter hell. Ok, it can also be extended to get saved once you are in hell. But:
a] That's less sure
b] That's not what those ET followers you mentioned are believing

Scott can you please give a verse that proves your point/claim?

Deuteronomy 32:19-25
19 And when the LORD saw it, he abhorred them, because of the provoking of his sons, and of his daughters.  20 And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be: for they are a very froward generation, children in whom is no faith. 21 They have moved me to jealousy with that which is not God; they have provoked me to anger with their vanities: and I will move them to jealousy with those which are not a people; I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation. 22 For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.   23 I will heap mischiefs upon them; I will spend mine arrows upon them. 24 They shall be burnt with hunger, and devoured with burning heat, and with bitter destruction: I will also send the teeth of beasts upon them, with the poison of serpents of the dust.  25 The sword without, and terror within, shall destroy both the young man and the virgin, the suckling also with the man of gray hairs.   

Jonah 2:1-2


Then Jonah prayed unto the LORD his God out of the fish's belly, 2 And said, I cried by reason of mine affliction unto the LORD, and he heard me; out of the belly of hell cried I, and thou heardest my voice.   

These scriptures show people who are alive, on earth and said to be in hell.

Thus hell is this earth

And here we see LIFE OUT OF HELL
John 5:25
25 Verily, verily, I say unto you,  The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 08:44:25 AM
Quote from: willieH on October 11, 2008, 01:10:52 AM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 11:00:45 AMSo basicly Jesus was lower than the lowest angel, including mankind as a type of angel?

Hebrews 2:9  But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death....

Seems to say that an important part of being less that an angele is that immortality is taken away.

Angel type 'man' has no immortality in this lifetime.

The word AGGELOS in the Greek means MESSENGER... ANGELIC beings as well as HUMANS can be defined by this word...

There is a SPECIFIC noted here WW... that JESUS [a MAN] was made a little lower than the ANGELS [heavenly beings]... NOT human "messengers"...
So man is just a little lower than angel? (the heavenly type)
If Angles are more than a little higher than man it would again mean Jesus was somewhere in between.
Personal note: With all those special qualities like brains and the power of healing I just can't see Jesus are just a man...

QuoteJESUS obviously was NOT made LOWER than MEN... He was the ONLY BEGOTTEN Son of the FATHER... and was SIRED by the HOLY SPIRIT of GOD... One of His "parents" was NOT HUMAN...
Let there be no misunderstanding about that Willie for me Jesus/Son is the second highest of everything. Just below the Father. But the verse also states He was during those 33 years of human life less that all angels.
Right now He's again second in command.

QuoteJESUS, as He often noted Himself was BOTH, ...a son of MAN, and the SON of GOD...
We all are.... Otherwise God wouldn't be Father. God is Father of Adam. Adam is father of.... and that traces all the way to you and me. That said I agree with the very special conditions of the birth off Jesus.


Quote
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 10, 2008, 11:00:45 AMFor me that's huge difference!
This how I read it.
- Saved out of hell means you can even be saved if you are in hell. Meaning when cast in hell it's not by defenition eternal.

I think we now have come to one of those fruitless word battles.
The remark I made wasn't even about scripture. It was how I read/understand everyday English. Being not a native English speaker I leave this to others...

But for your information:
a] I don't believe in real fire
b] I know the diffrence between hell/hades/firepit/etc and all its mistranslation/misusage
c] I wrote my comment because IMO 'out of hell' is a strong UR quote that refutes ET

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 08:58:33 AM
Quote from: willieH on October 11, 2008, 01:16:54 AM
Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?

Ok, Willie I'll try to post on topic this time.
I searched a bit for you and I just copy and past it here. It looks like sensible information.
If you consider this off-topic too just ask one of the crew to deleted the messages. No problem for me!
If the articles are of any use to you I can probably dig up some more.



Question: "How, why, and when did Satan fall from heaven?"

Answer: Satan's fall from heaven is described in Isaiah 14:12-14 and Ezekiel 28:12-18. While these two passages are referring specifically to the king of Babylon and the king of Tyre, they also reference the spiritual power that was behind those kings - Satan. These passages describe why Satan fell, but they do not specifically say when the fall occurred. What we do know is this: the angels were created before the earth (Job 38:4-7) Satan fell before he tempted Adam and Eve in the Garden (Genesis 3:1-14) Satan's fall, therefore, must have occurred somewhere after the time the angels were created and before he tempted Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Whether Satan's fall occurred a few minutes, hours, or days before he tempted Adam and Eve in the garden, Scripture does not specifically say.

The book of Job tells us that, for a time at least, Satan still had access to heaven and to the throne of God. "One day the angels came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came with them. The LORD said to Satan, 'Where have you come from?' Satan answered the LORD, 'From roaming through the earth and going back and forth in it'" (Job 1:6-7). Apparently at that time, Satan was still moving freely between heaven and earth, speaking to God directly and answering for his activities. At what point God discontinued this access is unknown.

Why did Satan fall from Heaven? Satan fell because of pride. He desired to be God, not to be a servant of God. Notice the many "I will..." statements in Isaiah 14:12-15. Ezekiel 28:12-15  describes Satan as an exceedingly beautiful angel. Satan was likely the highest of all angels, the most beautiful of all of God's creations, but he was not content in his position. Instead, Satan desired to be God, to essentially "kick God off His throne" and take over the rule of the universe. Satan wanted to be God, and interestingly enough, that is what Satan tempted Adam and Eve with in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:1-5).  How did Satan fall from Heaven? Actually, a fall is not an accurate description. It would be far more accurate to say that God cast Satan out of Heaven (Isaiah 14:15; Ezekiel 28:16-17).
Source: http://www.gotquestions.org/Satan-fall.html
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 09:01:02 AM
Question: "Does Satan still have access to Heaven? Why does God allow Satan to enter Heaven, as recorded in the Bible?"

Answer: Satan was originally one of God's holy angels, but he rebelled against God and was cast out of heaven (Luke 10:18).  That was only the first stage of his judgment. Satan's kingdom was vanquished at the cross (John 12:31-32).  Later, he will be bound in the abyss for one thousand years (Revelation 20:1-3) and then will be cast into the lake of fire for eternity (Revelation 20:10).

Until his final judgment, Satan is "the prince of this world" (John 14:30), but it seems that he still has restricted access to the heavenly realms. In Job 1:6, Satan stands in the presence of God. (See 2 Chronicles 18:18-21  for a similar situation involving a "lying spirit.")

Since God is holy and absolutely without sin (Isaiah 6:3), and since He will not even look on evil (Habakkuk 1:13), how can Satan be in heaven? The answer involves God's sovereign restraint of sin. In Job 1, Satan stood before God to give an account of himself. God initiated the meeting, led the proceedings, and remained in absolute control (verse 7). The result was that Satan's power was limited (verse 12) and God was glorified.

Here are some other facts to note: 1) Satan does not have open access to God's presence. He is summoned by God. 2) The visits are temporary. His time before God's throne is limited. 3) In no way is the purity of heaven tainted by the brief, God-ordained presence of a sinful being, "quarantined," as it were, by God's regulatory power. And, 4) Satan's access is only granted prior to the final judgment. After the judgment, God creates a new heaven and new earth (Revelation 21:1), wipes away all tears from our eyes (verse 4), reveals the New Jerusalem (verse 10), and promises the complete absence of sin (verse 27).

When we say, "God cannot allow sin into heaven," we simply mean that God cannot allow human beings who are still in their sin to live in His presence. But it is possible for God to command a sinful being to stand (temporarily) in His presence in order to commission him (Isaiah 6), to exact an account from him (Job 1-2), or to judge him (Revelation 20:11-15) without compromising His holiness.

God's holiness will eventually consume all sin. Until that day, His holiness regulates sin, and that means that Satan, on certain occasions, is briefly summoned before his Creator to give an account of his actions.

Source: http://www.gotquestions.org/Satan-access.html
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 09:02:47 AM
When Did Satan Fall?

by Terence Chambers

I believe Satan possibly fell from heaven AFTER the creation of the heaven and the earth! Does that sound different from what you have learned? The understanding of this view from scripture will help you answer many questions. Why do some churches believe in "election" to salvation? Why did God create us knowing that many would go to hell and suffer? What does predestination mean? Many more questions and false theories such as the "gap theory" can be answered by this Bible acknowledgment of Satan's fall. There is an assumption that Lucifer fell many ages ago. Are we putting Biblical ideas into an evolutionary framework like many sinners do the dinosaur? The Bible does not put an exact date on when Lucifer lost his position, but many scriptures give ideas to ponder.

When God created the heaven and the earth, everything was good! The heaven (air or atmosphere) around the earth, of which Satan became the "prince of the power of the air," was called good. "And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day." (Genesis 1:31). "Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience." (Ephesians 2:2). If Satan had already been cast down to rule the air, this verse could not have been stated. Everything God had made was good. I believe that the creation of man, who began to receive fellowship with God, made Lucifer jealous. This may have been the event that enticed Lucifer to rebel against God.

Lucifer was in the Garden of Eden. God called him beautiful when he was there. "Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire." (Ezekiel 28:13-14). Notice in the surrounding verses that he was the special covering cherub. Compare this to jeweled descriptions of God's presence and surroundings in other scriptures. A later verse says: "Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee." (Ezekiel 28:15). (The King of Tyrus could not have been in Eden. This is a dualistic prophecy against a king by comparing him to Lucifer or Satan is being called the King of Tyrus. Tyrus: a rock )

When the earth was founded, ALL of the sons of God (angels) shouted for joy! "Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" (Job 38:4-7). Lucifer was present to rejoice at creation!

In a passage that probably has a dual meaning and purpose, God tells Nebuchadnezzer that he is like Lucifer in his desires and designs and will suffer as he in the latter's fall. "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north." (Isaiah 14:12-13). While some use these verses to show the pre-adamic race that Lucifer weakened, it instead shows Lucifer's (Satan's) desire to exalt his throne above the stars of God. If these stars are the lights in the sky, they were created on the 4th day. If the stars are God's people (Israel), that is a moot point since Nebuchadnezzer had already done this by conquering that nation and taking many as slaves. If the stars are angels, then Lucifer wanted to be as God above an angel status or role; and Nebuchadnezzer could never attain that since men were created lower than the angels. Lucifer was apparently above all the angels already, so why would he try to get above the other angels (stars of God) that he already controlled? This word "star" means: literal - a star (as round or as shining); figurative-a prince. (Satan is called a prince in John 12: 31, "Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.") Of course, Nebuchadnezzer did not fall from heaven.

Satan was not a murderer BEFORE the beginning, but from the beginning. "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning." (John 8:44). What beginning? Satan's beginning? Did he work with God for eons as a sinful angel? No! He was a murderer FROM the beginning of OUR existence. "In the beginning..." His change of heart and action took place at our beginning. Scripture uses the term "beginning" as the start of the earth.

Sin entered the world when Adam and Eve disobeyed God. There was no death in the world until sin. "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." (Romans 5:12). A pre-adamic race or a formerly "cast down to earth" devil would eliminate the use of this verse. This earth was created perfect with no sin on the earth or in the heaven (immediate atmosphere). There was no death! Yet Satan is called the prince of the power of the air and thereby affects us to the point of being the "god of this world."

If God planned this world and knew man would fall, then He would have planned a Savior BEFORE the foundation (beginning) of the world. "And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world." (Revelation 13:8). God planned a Savior FROM, not before, the foundation. At the beginning, it is possible that Satan's jealousy, and tempting of Eve, caused him to fall from his position and God then immediately planned a Savior. The prior verse is often misquoted with a "before" instead of the "from." This Savior was already planned to fellowship with us. (Predestination and election) "According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love." (Ephesians 1:4). Then sin caused man to have blame, but lambs, and then The Lamb, has given us back to Him.

If Lucifer fell earlier (in a prior humanity; "gap theory"), why did God not put him away forever as He does in the Book of Revelation? Is God so mean that He would create man knowing the devil was out and about and that millions would go to hell? Many sinners are disturbed by a God that planned so much horror. If Satan fell after creation, then sinners can know God planned only good for them and Satan is the problem, not God!

Hopefully, you can see that this answers many doctrinal questions and misconceptions about God. We were ALL predestined to serve God, but Satan ruined it for many since Eden. We were ALL elected to be God's children and serve His Son, but the fall of man diverted God's plan for a while. (though He made plans for those who had a heart for Him) "Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will." (Ephesians 1:5). To know we would sin would be to create us predestined to sin. Anything that He knows has to happen. If Lucifer fell AFTER creation, then the doctrines of predestination and election are even more understandable. Many hyper-Calvinists struggle with these doctrines because most feel that Lucifer fell in ages past BEFORE the earth and heaven were created. This possible understanding of Lucifer's fall allows "whosoever will..." to coincide with election very easily. Otherwise, much confusion results. I cannot conceive God making a plan knowing it would fail. He only knows what He wants to know. Just as He can forget my sin, He could create earth with all great intentions and plans. SATAN WAS THE MESS-MAKER. It seems odd that God would create us knowing sin would develop. But maybe God only knows what He wants to know. Does He remember your sin? Not if your sin is washed away by faith in His Son and the power of His blood to cleanse! So God could have possibly created the heaven and the earth with full intention of having us as His children (predestined) by the fellowship of His only begotten Son. Even now, all have been elected to be His, by virtue of His breath (spirit) in us. Many refuse and God uses them to accomplish His plans (such as Pharoah was raised up for Him). There is no need for a gap theory to prove time for dinosaurs (large reptiles) or to provide a space for Satan to fall. "In the beginning..." means just that. We don't even know that angels were created very long before the beginning. Why have we assumed millions of years for angels? Maybe angels have been around for most of eternity. Why did it take so long for Satan to reveal his true nature? The creation of man for God to love and receive love from must have been the catalyst to cause Lucifer to take self-willed action to mess up God's plan. If Satan fell before the beginning, then it is easy to see why sinners think God is playing some type of game with mankind. God did not plan death of any type, because He planned "the green herb" and fruits for man to eat. Meat was allowed after the flood. God's plan was good. He has won the victory over Satan and you can win with Christ! THINK ON THESE THINGS!

(http://www.angelfire.lycos.com/doc/images/images2/devil.gif)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 09:05:09 AM
The Origin of Satan



Lucifer and other Fallen Angels


Who was Lucifer?

Lucifer was the Anointed Cherub. Anointed means to be set apart for Gods Divine purpose. It also means "bestowal of Gods divine favor", and "appointment to a special place or function."
God had given Satan a certain amount of power and authority. But he perverted that power. Lucifer wanted to exalt himself above God... rather than "just" being the Angel of God.




If God is so good, then why did he create Satan?

Lucifer was created perfect in all his ways, but iniquity was found in him. It was not put there by God. Lucifer created it.
( this is found in Ezekiel 28:15 )

Like man, the angels were created perfect, and with a free will.

Satan was lifted up because of his beauty, he corrupted the wisdom by reason of his brightness (This is in Ezekiel 28:17)



Ezekiel 28:12 (KJV)


"Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty."
13 Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.

14 Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire."

This is not an earthly king, as the word "cherub" is only used in references to angels.

15 "Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee."

16 By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.

The word "covering" is from the Hebrew word cakak, and means: to entwine, to fence in, cover over, protect, defend, hedge in, (source "The complete word study Old Testament")

Was Lucifer's job to protect the very earth he corrupted? Was this one of his duties that gave him so much pride?

17 Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee.

0 18 Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the multitude of thine iniquities, by the iniquity of thy traffick; therefore will I bring forth a fire from the midst of thee, it shall devour thee, and I will bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that behold thee.



Question:
"Where does Satan and the fall fit into all of this? He must have been cast down before Adam and Eve were created because he was there to tempt Eve in the Garden? Was there, could there have been, a pre-Adamic age - and surly this would have been a catastrophic event?
Best regards
Amanda S. Q. 6/19/01

Answer:
Satan was cast out of heaven after Adam and Eve were created, because God said the Creation was still "very good" on day 6 after man had been created.

There was nothing and no one here before Adam and Eve. Read my page disproving the Gap Theory for more information.



Isaiah 14:12


"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
Satan wanted to be God. The Bible tells us in 2nd Corinthians 4:4 that Satan has become the "god of this world". And Revelation 20:10 tells us that he will be eternally punished for it.


15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.


When Lucifer was cast out of Heaven, one third of all the angels were cast out with him. (Rev.12:4,9)

Lucifer became Satan, and the fallen angels became Demons.




Why didn't God just destroy Satan?

Because sin had entered the world, and into the very nature of man through Adams transgression, then for God to destroy Satan, he would also have had to destroy the man he loved. But God had a better way. A way of Redemption.


And Christ the Redeemer was on His way !


What does Satan look like? 

We've all seen pictures of Satan portrayed as a hoofed creature, red in color.. with little horns on his head.



But this description is not Biblical. The hoofed being we usually see is actually closer to that of "Pan" from Greek mythology.

Perhaps Satan wants this image of himself to be used, because of its absurdity. Knowing that the day would come when God and the Devil would both be dismissed as "mythical"

Revelation 12:3 speaks of the red horned dragon. This is not Satan himself, but a reference to him from where these physical attributes possibly originate.


Revelation 12:3 (KJV)
And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
The Book of "Ezekiel" tells us what Lucifer really looked like before he sinned.

Lucifer was a being "of perfect beauty". He was covered in every precious stone. He had pendants and jewels of gold...

Lucifer was beautiful before he sinned. An expression of Gods own beauty and power. But like man, Lucifer's very nature changed when he sinned. His (Lucifer's) physical appearance may have as well.


When did Lucifer fall from Heaven? It was not before day 6 like many people believe (those who believe the "Gap Theory" wrongly claim this). The Bible tells us that Lucifer was in Eden (which was created on day 6) and was still without sin on that day.

Ezekiel 28:13 (KJV)


"Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created."


In the literature of our society, Satan is almost always shown in robes of red. Some believe that the color of an angels robes are symbolic of their rank in heaven. I am unaware of a scripture to support this however.



There is a coming judgment of Satan and his angels.

< center> 2 Peter 2:4 (KJV)

"For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell [the Greek word here is "tartarus"], and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;"

Jude 1:6 (KJV)

"And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day."
In the day of judgment "...the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

John 17: (verify verse #) talks of the time of judgment, the prince of this world will be driven out.

Hell was not made for man. Hell was prepared for the devil and his angels. But those who do not receive Christ as their Lord and Savior will be sent to Hell, and have their part in the lake of fire.

Satan is "the god of this world" he " has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the Gospel of the Glory of Christ" ( 2 Corinthians 4;4)

Satan is a liar. The Bible tells us he is the father of all lies.


John 8:44 (KJV)
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

He will deceive man in any way he can. Some are deceived by the New Age Movement, others are deceived by Humanists, Evolutionary lies, etc.

Source: http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/lucifer.html

(http://www.angelfire.lycos.com/doc/images/images2/devil.gif)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 01:21:49 PM
Satan - Our Enemy
Getting Started
In our last two lessons we learned how to develop a relationship with God. In this lesson we will study about Satan. Who is he? Is there really such a being? And if there is, has he existed from all eternity? Is he therefore another god, who is in conflict with Jehovah? We will answer these questions in this lesson.

There are many who believe that Satan doesn't exist, while others believe he has existed from eternity, a god, and enemy god in conflict with the true and living God.

1. Where did Jesus say Satan came from?
"And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven" (Luke 10:18).

Jesus told His followers that He saw Satan fall from heaven. When Satan and the Son of God first met in conflict, Christ was the commander of the heavenly host, and Satan, the leader of revolt in heaven, was cast out. It was in heaven that Satan first attempted to overthrow God's law. A vast number of the angels were seduced, but this apparent success resulted in defeat, separation from God, and banishment from heaven.

2. Why did Satan fall from heaven?
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit" (Isaiah 14:12-15).

In heaven Satan was called Lucifer, where he desired to be like God and above God. Once holy and undefiled, he stood in the presence of the great Creator. He was full of wisdom and beauty and little by little he indulged the desire for self-exaltation. Not content with his position, he coveted the homage due to the Creator.

3. How did Satan come into being, and what was he like?
"Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee" (Ezekiel 28:13).

Satan is a created being like ourselves. In Ezekiel 28:12 Satan is referred to as the king of Tyre. Just as the Lord was the real king behind the human ruler in Israel (1 Chronicles 29:23), so Satan was the real king behind the pagan kingdoms of Babylon and Tyre.

4. Since Satan was created as a holy and perfect angel, what change took place in him that caused him to be cast out of heaven?
"Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. ... Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee" (Ezekiel 28:13, 14, 17).

Satan was perfect in his ways until iniquity was found in him. He was one of the covering cherubs in the sanctuary in heaven, but he sinned. Becoming the first sinner, he in fact originated sin, though he had been the highest of all created beings.

5. Who were expelled from heaven with Satan?
"And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. ... Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time" (Revelation 12:7-9, 12).

Opposition to the law of God had its beginning in the courts of heaven. Satan wanted to be first in the councils of heaven and equal with God. He began his work of rebellion with the angels under his command seeking to create a spirit of discontent, working with such deception that many of the angels were won to his side. This continued until there was open revolt and war in heaven. Satan and all the angels who sympathized with him were cast out.

Full atrticle: http://www.projectrestore.com/bible_guides/someonecares/sc04.htm
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 11, 2008, 05:51:11 PM

I personally do not agree that lucifer is a proper reference to Satan.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 06:10:28 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 11, 2008, 05:51:11 PM
I personally do not agree that lucifer is a proper reference to Satan.

Mmm, I expected similar remarks. Luckily I didn't write those articles  :grin:
But still the verses answer partly what this thread is about.

Willie don't shoot the messenger  :Shoot:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 11, 2008, 09:21:28 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 06:10:28 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 11, 2008, 05:51:11 PM
I personally do not agree that lucifer is a proper reference to Satan.

Mmm, I expected similar remarks. Luckily I didn't write those articles  :grin:
But still the verses answer partly what this thread is about.

Willie don't shoot the messenger  :Shoot:

I found an article   that the King of Babylon was  King Nebuchadnezzar !!

   the  article  is called '' Lucifer of Nebuchadnezzar ?''

  and it was awesome !  I cannot put links up  for some reason ???
 

but it was by Chuck  Fisher  and  the name lucifer from luke light bearer/bringer 
was interesting stuff! looked into it before , but more clarity this time
  thanks a bunch  WW and all for this   thread lots of things
  to consider...

  personally I agree with   both  Willie on the Lake of Fire 
anbd Pnuema   as this place [the void earth] us lol our bodies  being the  grave / hell

  I just  see it as  first  place being the below state  [as one dead] spirit
and than rising up only to fall /fail in   from grace of God
  and be cast into the lake of fire  / second death  /trials  the soul state to me /tested    ever look into   the Touchstone ?   Jasper Stone   to me it is Jesus Christ

   the second death GODS CHILDREN / MESSENGERS  they are not  harmed by it !!   Isaiah  28 I think ?  yes  it is !!! and   here   Hear, ye [that are] far off, what I have done; and, ye [that are] near, acknowledge my might. Isa 33:14 The sinners in Zion are afraid; fearfulness hath surprised the hypocrites. Who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire? who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings?     
  I saw most of this when doing a study on the White stone and new name  in Rev.    Greek for G5586  to handle feel touch !!!![  touchstone ? maybe {}}}}JESUS CHRIST IS THAT CHEIF HEAD CORNER STONE !!

psēlaphaō

1) to handle, touch and feel

2) metaph. mentally to seek after tokens of a person or a thing

  the Touchstone   touch·stone      /ˈtʌtʃˌstoʊn/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[tuhch-stohn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. a test or criterion for the qualities of a thing. 
2. a black siliceous stone formerly used to test the purity of gold and silver by the color of the streak produced on it by rubbing it with either metal. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: 1475–85; touch + stone]


—Synonyms 1. standard, measure, model, pattern.touch·stone      (tŭch'stōn')  Pronunciation Key 
n.   
A hard black stone, such as jasper or basalt, formerly used to test the quality of gold or silver by comparing the streak left on the stone by one of these metals with that of a standard alloy.
An excellent quality or example that is used to test the excellence or genuineness of others: "the qualities of courage and vision that are the touchstones of leadership" (Henry A. Kissinger). See Synonyms at standard.
touchstone 

1481, from touch (v.) + stone. Black quartz, used for testing the quality of gold and silver alloys by the color of the streak made by rubbing them on it. Fig. sense is from 1533.
touchstone

noun
a basis for comparison; a reference point against which other things can be evaluated; "the schools comply with federal standards"; "they set the measure for all subsequent work" [syn: standard]  . something considered by an authority or by general consent as a basis of comparison; an approved model. 
2. an object that is regarded as the usual or most common size or form of its kind: We stock the deluxe models as well as the standards. 
3. a rule or principle that is used as a basis for judgment: They tried to establish standards for a new philosophical approach. 
4. an average or normal requirement, quality, quantity, level, grade, etc.: His work this week hasn't been up to his usual standard. 
5. standards, those morals, ethics, habits, etc., established by authority, custom, or an individual as acceptable: He tried to live up to his father's standards. 
6. a grade of beef immediately below good. 
7. the authorized exemplar of a unit of weight or measure. 
8. a certain commodity in or by which a basic monetary unit is stated. Compare gold standard, silver standard, bimetallism, monometallism. 
9. the legally established content of full-weight coins. 
10. the prescribed degree of fineness for gold or silver. 
11. British. a class or grade in elementary schools. 
12. a musical piece of sufficiently enduring popularity to be made part of a permanent repertoire, esp. a popular song. 
13. a flag indicating the presence of a sovereign or public official. 
14. a flag, emblematic figure, or other object raised on a pole to indicate the rallying point of an army, fleet, etc. 
15. Military. a. any of various military or naval flags. 
b. the colors of a mounted unit. 
c. (initial capital letter) a U.S. Navy radar-guided surface-to-air missile with a range of 10–30 miles (16–48 km). 

16. Heraldry. a long, tapering flag or ensign, as of a monarch or a nation. 
17. something that stands or is placed upright. 
18. a long candlestick or candelabrum used in a church. 
19. an upright support or supporting part. 
20. Armor. a standing collar of mail. 
21. Horticulture. a plant trained or grafted to have a single, erect, treelike stem. 
22. Botany. a distinct petal, larger than the rest, of certain flowers; a vexillum. 
–adjective 23. serving as a basis of weight, measure, value, comparison, or judgment. 
24. of recognized excellence or established authority: a standard reference on medieval history. 
25. usual, common, or customary: Chairs are standard furniture in American households. 
26. manual; not electric or automatic: standard transmission. 
27. conforming in pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, etc., to the usage of most educated native speakers, esp. those having prestige, and widely considered acceptable or correct: Standard American English; standard pronunciation. Compare nonstandard (def. 2). 
28. authorized or approved: The program was broadcast on the standard broadcast band. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: 1125–75; ME < OF, prob. < Frankish *standord (cf. G Standort standing-point), conformed to -ard -ard]


—Synonyms 1, 3. gauge, basis, pattern, guide. Standard, criterion refer to the basis for making a judgment. A standard is an authoritative principle or rule that usually implies a model or pattern for guidance, by comparison with which the quantity, excellence, correctness, etc., of other things may be determined: She could serve as the standard of good breeding. A criterion is a rule or principle used to judge the value, suitability, probability, etc., of something, without necessarily implying any comparison: Wealth is no criterion of a person's worth. stan·dard      (stān'dərd)  Pronunciation Key 
n.   
A flag, banner, or ensign, especially:
The ensign of a chief of state, nation, or city.
A long, tapering flag bearing heraldic devices distinctive of a person or corporation.
An emblem or flag of an army, raised on a pole to indicate the rallying point in battle.
The colors of a mounted or motorized military unit.
An acknowledged measure of comparison for quantitative or qualitative value; a criterion.
An object that under specified conditions defines, represents, or records the magnitude of a unit.
A degree or level of requirement, excellence, or attainment.
A requirement of moral conduct. Often used in the plural.
The large upper petal of the flower of a pea or related plant.
One of the narrow upright petals of an iris. Also called banner, vexillum.

An acknowledged measure of comparison for quantitative or qualitative value; a criterion.
An object that under specified conditions defines, represents, or records the magnitude of a unit.
A degree or level of requirement, excellence, or attainment.
A requirement of moral conduct. Often used in the plural.
The large upper petal of the flower of a pea or related plant.
One of the narrow upright petals of an iris. Also called banner, vexillum.
The set proportion by weight of gold or silver to alloy metal prescribed for use in coinage.
The commodity or commodities used to back a monetary system.
Something, such as a practice or a product, that is widely recognized or employed, especially because of its excellence.

A degree or level of requirement, excellence, or attainment.
A requirement of moral conduct. Often used in the plural.
The large upper petal of the flower of a pea or related plant.
One of the narrow upright petals of an iris. Also called banner, vexillum.
Chiefly British A grade level in elementary schools.
A pedestal, stand, or base.
Botany
The large upper petal of the flower of a pea or related plant.
One of the narrow upright petals of an iris. Also called banner, vexillum.
A shrub or small tree that through grafting or training has a single stem of limited height with a crown of leaves and flowers at its apex.
Music A composition that is continually used in repertoires.

adj.   
Serving as or conforming to a standard of measurement or value.
Widely recognized or employed as a model of authority or excellence: a standard reference work.
Acceptable but of less than top quality: a standard grade of beef.
Normal, familiar, or usual: the standard excuse.
Commonly used or supplied: standard car equipment.
Linguistics Conforming to established educated usage in speech or writing.


[Middle English, from Old French estandard, rallying place, probably from Frankish *standhard : *standan, to stand; see stā- in Indo-European roots + *hard, fast, hard; see kar- in Indo-European roots.]

now look up in the bible Banner / ensign and  Standard ! 
wow !!
  the  pure white  Voice  from above , that healing  ears to hear what the   ETERNAL  LIVING SPIRIT  IS SAYING !   you will be given a clean white /pure voice  as  clear waters from ABOVE !  your earth  no longer  swallowing the dragons flood
its not as exciting for   as it was for me when I saw ! and heard !   
ironically  its the same Stone / Mountain , that when  broke against scatters our  flesh / dust !!!serpents food   wow ! :mshock:   perhaps   simultaneously   ''at the same time ''   spiritual man   is gathered in Christ  and the carnal man is scattered abroad   just a thought
  God love ya!  rose
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 11:37:08 PM
Rose this link?: http://pelajus.com/lucifer.html
If Satan is or isn't Lucifer/.... isn't why I posted those articles.
It's the verses. That's the part everyone agrees upon.
Maybe I should replace all names with XYZ to keep teh thread on-topic  :laughing7:




Lucifer or Nebuchadnezzar?
by Chuck Fisher
Recently, I was challenged to a debate over the validity of the New International translation of the Bible, by a person who believes that the King James Bible is the only true word of God. (My Christianity must be showing through, as I am not using one of the terms I would like to use, given my opinion of KJOnly-ists.)

I was surprised when one of the first attacks that he made on the NIV was that the modern translations were giving the title of "Morning Star," Christ's title, to Satan. It seems that there is a New Age conspiracy to make Christ and Satan one, and the NIV is part of that conspiracy. This man pointed to Isa 14:12, which, in the King James says, "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!" It seems that this brother, and many KJOnly cultists along with him, were upset that the new translations don't use the name "Lucifer" here. Instead, they say something else, and the NIV, the worst offender in the lot, has the text read this way: "How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn!"

So, the question is asked, is there a conspiracy by New Agers to deify Satan, or did the NIV translators have valid reasons for omitting the name Lucifer in this verse? After doing my homework, I find that, surprise, Isaiah 14:12  is not a reference to Satan, and that Lucifer was not Satan's pre-fall name.

Translations
First off, let's see how some other versions, other than the NIV translate this phrase:

"How you have fallen from heaven, O star of the morning, son of the dawn!" The New American Standard Bible.

"How you are fallen from heaven, O shining star, son of the morning!" The New Living Translation.

"How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn!" The Revised Standard Version

How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn!" The New Revised Standard Version

"How hast thou fallen from the heavens, O shining one, son of the dawn!" Young's Literal Translation.

"How art thou fallen from heaven, O day-star, son of the morning!" American Standard (1901).

"King of Babylon, morning star, you have fallen from heaven," New Century Version

"King of Babylon, bright morning star, you have fallen from heaven!" The Good News Bible in Today's English Version

King of Babylon, Not Satan
Look at the last two citations, the New Century Version and the Good News Bible (TEV). Notice that they, both, start this verse addressing the King of Babylon. Could it be, that after all these years, some are claiming that Isa. 14:12 is not about Satan/Lucifer, but about someone else? In a word, yes. And this translation has great support down through the ages.

The Geneva Bible, 1549
In the Geneva Bible, published in 1549, they did use the word, "Lucifer":

"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer*, son of the morning!

Please notice the asterisk, in that verse, behind the name of Lucifer. That is there because the translators of the Geneva Bible, 60 years before the King James (therefore not a part of any New Age plot) put an explanatory footnote here. Here is what they said about the word "Lucifer." "You who thought yourself most glorious and as it were placed in the heaven for the morning star that goes before the sun, is called Lucifer, to whom Nebuchadnezzar is compared."

Did you see that? These translators, 60 years before the King James, say that this verse is not about Satan, but Nebuchadnezzar. Admittedly, they do believe that Nebuchadnezzar is being compared to Lucifer, but they recognize that this verse, this Lucifer, is not Satan, but the King of Babylon.

Matthew Henry, 1706
Next stop, Matthew Henry, King of Commentators. If a minister doesn't have a Matthew Henry's Commentary in his pastoral library, then his ministerial library is sadly lacking. In 1706, in writing his commentary, Henry had this to say about Isaiah 14:12.

"The king of Babylon shone as brightly as the morning star, and fancied that wherever he came he brought day along with him; and has such an illustrious prince as this fallen, such a star become a clod of clay? Did ever any man fall from such a height of honour and power into such an abyss of shame and misery?" This has been commonly alluded to (and it is a mere allusion) to illustrate the fall of the angels, who were as morning stars (Job 38:7),"

Henry, considered one of the greatest of Biblical commentators, says that this refers to the king of Babylon, making no mention of Lucifer being Satan's first name. And, please note, yes, Henry does say that preachers have used this to allude to the fall of angels, but, "IT IS A MERE ALLUSION."

And, further note, please, that Henry does not say that the title morning star is reserved for Christ alone, but is the biblical term for angels, as well. The thinking of the KJO cultists runs along this line:

a. Christ is called the Morning Star in Rev. 22:16.  
b. The Morning Star is Christ' title.
c. New translations translate Lucifer, in Isa. 14:12, as Morning Star.
d. New translations are trying to identify Christ with Lucifer.

But, as Matthew Henry pointed out, the term "morning star" is not exclusively Christ's title. Angels, Henry noted, were called "morning stars" in the book of Job. So much for the reasoning capability of KJO cultists.

John Wesley, 1754-1765
John Wesley, founder of Methodism, wrote in his Notes on the Bible, 1754-1765, this about Isaiah 14:12

"Lucifer - Which properly is a bright star, that ushers in the morning; but is here metaphorically taken for the mighty king of Babylon."

Wesley, not a New Ager, by any stretch of the imagination, tells us that this word mean a bright star, and is a metaphor for the king of Babylon.

Adam Clarke, 1760-1832,
In his Commentary on the Bible, Adam Clarke wrote this about "Lucifer."

"Verse 12. O Lucifer, [son of the morning] The Versions in general agree in this translation, and render kkyh heilel as signifying Lucifer, the morning star, whether Jupiter or Venus; as these are both bringers of the morning light, or morning stars, annually in their turn. And although the context speaks explicitly concerning Nebuchadnezzar, yet this has been, I know not why, applied to the chief of the fallen angels, who is most incongruously denominated Lucifer, (the bringer of light!) an epithet as common to him as those of Satan and Devil. That the Holy Spirit by his prophets should call this arch-enemy of God and man the light-bringer, would be strange indeed. But the truth is, the text speaks nothing at all concerning Satan nor his fall, nor the occasion of that fall, which many divines have with great confidence deduced from this text. O how necessary it is to understand the literal meaning of Scripture, that preposterous comments may be prevented! Besides, I doubt much whether our translation be correct. llqh heilel, which we translate Lucifer, comes from llq yalal, yell, howl, or shriek, and should be translated, "Howl, son of the morning;" and so the Syriac has understood it; and for this meaning Michaelis contends"

Clarke does not beat around the bush. As he puts it, "the truth is, the text speaks nothing at all concerning Satan nor his fall, nor the occasion of that fall, which many divines have with great confidence deduced from this text." To Clarke, the idea that the Holy Spirit would give the name of Light-Bringer to Satan is both "strange" and "preposterous."

Smith's Bible Dictionary, 1860
Smith's Bible Dictionary, 1860, has this reference for Lucifer:

"(light-bearer ), found in (Isaiah 14:12) coupled with the epithet "son of the morning," clearly signifies a "bright star," and probably what we call the morning star. In this passage it is a symbolical representation of the king of Babylon in his splendor and in his fall. ITS APPLICATION, FROM ST. JEROME DOWNWARD, TO SATAN IN HIS FALL FROM HEAVEN arises probably from the fact that the Babylonian empire is in Scripture represented as the type of tyrannical and self idolizing power, and especially connected with the empire of the Evil One in the Apocalypse."

(I placed one section of this quote in caps, to highlight it, the statement that "St." Jerome, the translator of the Latin Vulgate bible, is the source of the belief that Lucifer is Satan's pre-Fall name. I discuss Jerome as the source of the idea that Lucifer was Satan's name, and that it was foreign to the writers of the Bible, below.)

This venerable bible dictionary tells us what others before him have said, that the Hebrew word that the King James translates as "Lucifer" is actually referring to the Morning Star, Venus, which is seen in the sky at dawn. Smith tells us, like all the others above, that this is a reference to the king of Babylon, and further tells us that the idea of the word "Lucifer" referring to Satan comes from the Catholic writer, Jerome.

Jamieson, Faussett and Brown, 1871
Another of the standards in biblical commentary, Jamieson, Faussett and Brown, 1871, wrote this about the passage in Isaiah 14:12-15.

"THE JEWS ADDRESS HIM AGAIN AS A FALLEN ONCE-BRIGHT STAR.
The language is so framed as to apply to the Babylonian king primarily, and at the same time to shadow forth through him, the great final enemy, the man of sin, Antichrist, of Daniel, St. Paul, and St. John; he alone shall fulfil exhaustively all the lineaments here given."

and

"Lucifer--"day star." A title truly belonging to Christ (Revelation 22:16),  "the bright and morning star," and therefore hereafter to be assumed by Antichrist. "

Did you see that? JFB says that this refers to, primarily, to Nebuchadnezzar, but can be seen to apply to, not Satan, but Anti-Christ. An interesting interpretation, especially when they bolster the interpretation with the statement that the title "Day Star" belongs to Christ, and will be assumed by the anti-Christ. But it is still just an interpretation. What is not in doubt, is that this is another commentator, another commentary, that says that Isa. 14:12 does NOT refer to Satan, but to the king of Babylon.

George Easton (1823-1894)
This is what Easton's Bible Dictionary says about Lucifer:

"brilliant star, a title given to the king of Babylon (Isaiah 14:12) to denote his glory. "

Another reference tool saying that this is Nebuchadnezzar, and not Satan.

Orville Nave, early 1900's
Nave's Topical Bible (early 1900's) has this entry for Lucifer:

"Nebuchadnezzar called by this name"

Source for Lucifer as Satan
I did find another translation translation of the Bible that did agree with the King James reading, of using the name Lucifer, in this verse:

"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the earth, that didst wound the nations?" The Douay-Rheims Bible

Is there a good reason why the Roman Catholic Douay Bible puts the name Lucifer in here, when all of the newer translations carry the idea of the morning star? Yes. In fact, the name Lucifer is directly traceable to a Catholic priest, the translator of the Bible in Latin, Jerome.

As noted in Smith's Bible Dictionary, above, the idea that the Pre-Adamic name of Satan was Lucifer dates from the time of Jerome, the translator of the Bible from Hebrew and Greek into Latin. The word, in the Hebrew, that is translated "Lucifer" by the King James and the Douay is heylel, and which means "shining one." In his excellent on-line article, Brian Tegart, says this about Jerome as the source of the name, "Lucifer."

The use of "Lucifer" appears to have originated from the Latin Vulgate. The Vulgate was produced by Jerome (c. 347-420) by translating available Greek and Hebrew manuscripts into Latin. It was started in approximately 382 A.D. and was completed in approximately 405 A.D. It was the scriptures used by the Catholic Church for nearly 1000 years....It would seem that Jerome understood the meaning of the Hebrew word heylel, and translated it into "lucifer", the Latin word meaning "light bearer" (from the Latin lux "light" and ferre "to bear or bring."). Because many people thought this passage was referring to Satan, people began to think of the term of "lucifer" as a proper name "Lucifer". However, this is not what "lucifer" meant. "lucifer", at the time of the Vulgate and even at the time of the KJV translation, meant "morning star" or "day star" in reference to Venus. Even though Jerome himself (and others before him) thought the passage was referring to Satan, he did not use the word "lucifer" to mean "Satan" - his view that the passage was referring to Satan was purely an interpretational issue of the entire passage - the term "lucifer" was not used to indicate Satan in any way.
Isaiah 14:12, Job 38:7 & Revelation 22:16
Will The Real "morning star" Please Stand Up...
http://www.tegart.com/brian/bible/kjvonly/isa14_12.html

Conclusion
What does this mean, then, for the teaching that Lucifer was Satan's Pre-Fall name? After all, it is a teaching that all of us have heard in church. From pastors, from traveling evangelists, from Sunday School teachers, from radio teachers and televangelists. It is a 'truth,' it is something that we all know to be true. However, after looking at different translations, not created by New Agers, and after looking at writings of such non-New Agers as John Wesley, Adam Clarke, Matthew Henry, etc., we can see quite clearly that this teaching is not biblical. True, we have aphorisms in our language, like "He's as proud as Lucifer," which refer to this teaching, but that doesn't mean the teaching is true.

What is our obligation, in face of this? To give up a flawed teaching, to admit that what we have been told by those who have gone before us was wrong, and go to the Bible to seek the truth of the passage.

And, to ignore the ignorant musings of troglodytes who have lost another club with which to wale away at new translations of the Scriptures.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 12, 2008, 12:24:44 AM
willieH: Hi WW...  :cloud9:

Thanks for TOPIC discussion... I will give an OVERALL answer below to this offering (instead of responding to all the articles you have pasted here)...  :Sparkletooth:

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 08:58:33 AM
Quote from: willieH on October 11, 2008, 01:16:54 AM
Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?

Ok, Willie I'll try to post on topic this time.
I searched a bit for you and I just copy and past it here. It looks like sensible information.
If you consider this off-topic too just ask one of the crew to deleted the messages. No problem for me!
If the articles are of any use to you I can probably dig up some more.



Question: "How, why, and when did Satan fall from heaven?"

Answer: Satan's fall from heaven is described in Isaiah 14:12-14 and Ezekiel 28:12-18. While these two passages are referring specifically to the king of Babylon and the king of Tyre, they also reference the spiritual power that was behind those kings - Satan. These passages describe why Satan fell, but they do not specifically say when the fall occurred. What we do know is this: the angels were created before the earth (Job 38:4-7) Satan fell before he tempted Adam and Eve in the Garden (Genesis 3:1-14) Satan's fall, therefore, must have occurred somewhere after the time the angels were created and before he tempted Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Whether Satan's fall occurred a few minutes, hours, or days before he tempted Adam and Eve in the garden, Scripture does not specifically say.

The book of Job tells us that, for a time at least, Satan still had access to heaven and to the throne of God. "One day the angels came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came with them. The LORD said to Satan, 'Where have you come from?' Satan answered the LORD, 'From roaming through the earth and going back and forth in it'" (Job 1:6-7). Apparently at that time, Satan was still moving freely between heaven and earth, speaking to God directly and answering for his activities. At what point God discontinued this access is unknown.

Why did Satan fall from Heaven? Satan fell because of pride. He desired to be God, not to be a servant of God. Notice the many "I will..." statements in Isaiah 14:12-15. Ezekiel 28:12-15  describes Satan as an exceedingly beautiful angel. Satan was likely the highest of all angels, the most beautiful of all of God's creations, but he was not content in his position. Instead, Satan desired to be God, to essentially "kick God off His throne" and take over the rule of the universe. Satan wanted to be God, and interestingly enough, that is what Satan tempted Adam and Eve with in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:1-5).  How did Satan fall from Heaven? Actually, a fall is not an accurate description. It would be far more accurate to say that God cast Satan out of Heaven (Isaiah 14:15; Ezekiel 28:16-17).
Source: http://www.gotquestions.org/Satan-fall.html


The biggest problem with these type of traditional perceptions ( I say "traditional" at the risk of riling our brother Scott,  :mshock: ...but this is common -- handed down teaching in most all churches) ...is that "satan" fell with no EXTERNAL prompting... No scenario is depicted where the TREE of the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL was accessed by satan (which is required in order for EVIL ...OR... GOOD, to be known), ...nor any of the other "demons/angels" which supposedly "fell" with satan...  No WARNING instruction noted BY GOD to these angels, ...nothing...

Without taking a bite of this tree, how would "satan" (or any of the other angels which supposedly "fell" with him)  KNOW his "looks were GOOD"?

It further subliminally proposes that in GOD's "manufacturing process" of this (supposed) "being",  ...that somehow, a flaw was manifest in the works, which in itself,  denies the PERFECTION of the workings of GOD... and thereby casts doubt on all other workings of GOD...

Above, it says that satan fell because of pride... from whence did this KNOWLEDGE emerge that enabled him to KNOW or percieve "GOOD"? 

Did he have too many mirrors in his house?  :laughing7:

What about CHRIST?  He is getting the CHIEF office from GOD, will He too fall to His BEAUTY and PRIDE which supposedly did in old "satan" (or "lucifer" - if you prefer)?  What is to keep this SCENARIO from repeating itself?

Here you have "lucifer"... extremely beautiful and powerful... but those things end up INEXPLICABLY, CORRUPTING him!   What shall happen to JESUS?  For within the KINGDOM of GOD, ...He is destined for MUCH MORE than ANY ANGEL!

To deny this to be possible (CHRIST falling as did "lucifer" because of power and beauty), ...as one adopts the above thinking, is quite hypocritical and idealistic as well as UNREALISTIC...

What is to keep PRIDE from creeping into CHRIST?  It supposedly ALREADY did so to the MOST powerful and beautiful ANGEL?  :dontknow:

I know this is distasteful to consider, but it must be considered by those who believe the above (hoo-ha) as THE truth... (I do not believe the above is anything but a LIE, ...therefore, I maintain CHRIST shall NEVER  have any such problem)

Another issue is that once this IMPERFECTION occured in "satan", that a vast number of OTHER "ANGELS" of which Scripture give NO ACCOUNT of them "over esteeming" themselves, ...FELL as WELL! ...(the supposed 1/3 of Heavens Angels - which composes the "demons" which supposedly infest our world)

Why is there no mention of "their fall" and the processes of that "fall"? ...and how did an IMPERFECT angel - "satan" have more CONVINCING power than did GOD, to persuade this vast number to REBEL ...with Him?  Scripture is SILENT of such things... It also is silent in noting the potential beauty and power these also held... for they MUST needs be very powerful, in order to wage WAR against the other 2/3 of the ANGELS + GOD!

The articles which you have pasted here, are all commonly known in the "church" and are followed and endorsed by those sheep within the walls of the "church" as truth...  :sigh:

Every church which believes there are "fallen angels" (which is literally ALL of them)  produce these Scriptures as the verfication of that "fall"...

The bottom line is this... If HEAVEN is a PERFECT place... and is ETERNAL... and GOD, in His PERFECT and ALMIGHTY ability, brought forth "angelic beings" which OPPOSED Him... then how or what is to prevent SIMILAR activity in ETERNITY?

If angels in fact "fell"... and it was PURPOSED by GOD (in His creation of them - IF they were created)... then HOW did it happen without the TREE of the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL?  For it takes "eating" its fruit to gain the REBELLION and DISOBEDIENCE of SIN...

And if it were PURPOSED by GOD that His ANGELS fall... why repeat this (falling from grace and perfection) with MAN? 

Why was not satan and "his" cronies -- cast upon the earth or wherever by GOD... and then GOD send CHRIST as an ANGEL (not MAN), to SAVE them from this problem?

CHRIST came as a MAN, not an ANGEL... Lived as a MAN, ...died as a MAN, and is noted as (temporarily) LOWER than are ANGELS... for the suffering of DEATH to SAVE MAN... tasting DEATH for EVERY MAN (Heb 2:9), ...NOT... ANGELS...  :dontknow:

...peaCe

...willieH  :cloud9:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 12, 2008, 12:31:38 AM
QuoteThe biggest problem with these type of traditional perceptions ( I say "traditional" at the risk of riling our brother Scott,   ...but this is common -- handed down teaching in most all churches) ...is that "satan" fell with no EXTERNAL prompting... No scenario is depicted where the TREE of the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL was accessed by satan (which is required in order for EVIL ...OR... GOOD, to be known), ...nor any of the other "demons/angels" which supposedly "fell" with satan...  No WARNING instruction noted BY GOD to these angels, ...nothing...

Without taking a bite of this tree, how would "satan" (or any of the other angels which supposedly "fell" with him)  KNOW his "looks were GOOD"?

Didn't Eve fall from grace the minute she believed the lie?  She fell before she ate from the tree.  She was deceived.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 12, 2008, 12:32:17 AM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 11, 2008, 11:37:08 PM
Rose this link?: http://pelajus.com/lucifer.html
If Satan is or isn't Lucifer/.... isn't why I posted those articles.
It's the verses. That's the part everyone agrees upon.
Maybe I should replace all names with XYZ to keep teh thread on-topic  :laughing7:







LOL yeppers  !!  you said  is satan lucifer
isn't why I posted those articles ,   me   I say

;I know bro
 I am all over the place   !!  but in those verses   I was reading and looking  on the Web  and found that accidently  :mshock:
 
Sorry I got off topic  :icon_jokercolor:   XYZ     FORGIVE ME  :winkgrin:
It started a study for me
  " In those verses "'  and we can all agree on something lol hee hee  

  what is prepared for the devil and his angels/messengers     purging ...lake of fire
 Isaiah 33  it is all the false  teachers  and liars  etc , the very  stink of death ..   below the earthly sensual and devilish  thinking/speaking  to me .. why because the fail /fall  from giving God the glory  every time .. :(   look up glory  wow!

 the LOF IS WHERE the purging begins verb, purged, purg·ing, noun
–verb (used with object) 1. to rid of whatever is impure or undesirable; cleanse; purify.  
2. to rid, clear, or free (usually fol. by of or from): to purge a political party of disloyal members.  
3. to clear of imputed guilt or ritual uncleanliness.  
4. to clear away or wipe out legally (an offense, accusation, etc.) by atonement or other suitable action.  
5. to remove by cleansing or purifying (often fol. by away, off, or out).  
6. to clear or empty (the bowels) by causing evacuation.  
7. to cause evacuation of the bowels of (a person).  
8. to put to death or otherwise eliminate (undesirable or unwanted members) from a political organization, government, nation, etc.  
9. Metallurgy. a. to drive off (undesirable gases) from a furnace or stove.  
b. to free (a furnace or stove) of undesirable gases.  

–verb (used without object) 10. to become cleansed or purified.  
11. to undergo or cause purging of the bowels.  
–noun 12. the act or process of purging.  
13. the removal or elimination of members of a political organization, government, nation, etc., who are considered disloyal or otherwise undesirable.  
14. something that purges, as a purgative medicine or dose.  


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: 1250–1300; (v.) ME purgen < OF purg(i)er < L pūrgāre to cleanse; (n.) ME < OF, deriv. of the v.]

—Related forms
purge·a·ble, adjective
purger, noun


—Synonyms 8. oust, liquidate, extirpate.

  in   #9     I see them gases are foul spirits  in the furnace of affiction / firey trials  evaporating ,lol   see what I mean ?

 I compare  things  to every scripture , lots of differnt  comparisions , that was just one example   hee hee

   WhiteWings , just ignore me bro , most do  :msealed:     you see I stuggle more than I should  with  all of the  Bible stuff and communicating to others  with it ........  I see so differently than most do

  a "strange one" indeed  
   God love ya ,, rose  


ps I looked up Glory for anyone  here to look into Glory, GloriousA-1 Noun Strong's Number: 1391 Greek: doxa
:dontknow:. It is used (1) (a) of the nature and acts of God in self-manifestation, i.e., what He essentially is and does, as exhibited in whatever way he reveals Himself in these respects, and particularly in the person of Christ, in whom essentially His "glory" has ever shone forth and ever will do, Jhn 17:5,24; Hbr 1:3; it was exhibited in the character and acts of Christ in the days of His flesh, Jhn 1:14; Jhn 2:11; at Cana both His grace and His power were manifested, and these constituted His "glory;" so also in the resurrection of Lazarus, Jhn 11:4,40; the "glory" of God was exhibited in the resurrection of Christ, Rom 6:4, and in His ascension and exaltation, 1Pe 1:21, likewise on the Mount of Transfiguration, 2Pe 1:17. In Rom 1:23 His "everlasting power and Divinity" are spoken of as His "glory," i.e., His attributes and power as revealed through creation; in Rom 3:23 the word denotes the manifested perfection of His character, especially His righteousness, of which all men fall short; in Col 1:11 "the might of His glory" signifies the might which is characteristic of His "glory;" in Eph 1:6,12,14, "the praise of the glory of His grace" and "the praise of His glory" signify the due acknowledgement of the exhibition of His attributes and ways; in Eph 1:17, "the Father of glory" describes Him as the source from whom all Divine splendor and perfection proceed in their manifestation, and to whom they belong; (b) of the character and ways of God as exhibited through Christ to and through believers, 2Cr 3:18; 4:6; (c) of the state of blessedness into which believers are to enter hereafter through being brought into the likeness of Christ, e.g., Rom 8:18,21; Phl 3:21 (RV, "the body of His glory"); 1Pe 5:1,10; Rev 21:11; (d) brightness or splendor, (1) supernatural, emanating from God (as in the shekinah "glory," in the pillar of cloud and in the Holy of Holies, e.g., Exd 16:10; 25:22), Luk 2:9; Act 22:11; Rom 9:4; 2Cr 3:7; Jam 2:1; in Tts 2:13 it is used of Christ's return "the appearing of the glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ" (RV); cp. Phl 3:21, above; (2) natural, as of the heavenly bodies, 1Cr 15:40,41; (II) of good reputation, praise, honor, Luk 14:10 (RV, "glory," for AV, "worship"); Jhn 5:41 (RV, "glory," for AV, "honor"); Jhn 7:18; 8:50; 12:43 (RV, "glory," for AV, "praise"); 2Cr 6:8 (RV, "glory," for AV "honor"); Phl 3:19; Hbr 3:3; in 1Cr 11:7, of man as representing the authority of God, and of woman as rendering conspicuous the authority of man; in 1Th 2:6, "glory" probably stands, by metonymy, for material gifts, an honorarium, since in human estimation "glory" is usually expressed in things material. The word is used in ascriptions of praise to God, e.g., Luk 17:18; Jhn 9:24, RV, "glory" (AV, "praise"); Act 12:23; as in doxologies (lit., "glory-words"), e.g., Luk 2:14; Rom 11:36; 16:27; Gal 1:5; Rev 1:6. See DIGNITY, HONOR, PRAISE, WORSHIP. A-2 Noun Strong's Number: 2811 Greek: kleos
"good report, fame, renown," is used in 1Pe 2:20. The word is derived from a root signifying "hearing;" hence, the meaning "reputation." Note: In 2Cr 3:11 the phrase dia doxes, "through (i.e., by means of) glory," is rendered "with glory" in the RV (AV, "glorious"); in the same verse en doxe, "in glory" (RV), i.e., "accompanied by glory," is rendered "glorious" in the AV. The first is said of the ministration of the Law, the second of that of the Gospel. B-1 Adjective Strong's Number: 1741 Greek: endoxos
signifies (a) "held in honor" (en, "in," doxa, "honor"), "of high repute," 1Cr 4:10, RV, "have glory" (AV, "are honorable"); (b) "splendid, glorious," said of apparel, Luk 7:25, "gorgeously;" of the works of Christ, 13:17; of the Church, Eph 5:27. See GORGEOUSLY, HONORABLE.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 12, 2008, 12:33:55 AM
willieH: Hi Scott...  :cloud9:

Quote from: pneuma on October 11, 2008, 02:08:36 AM
QuoteSorry Scott... but your TV program isn't sufficient grounds to found your MYTH, & by the way:

Send me a tape of your TV program (which founds your Egyptian Myth), then MAYBE, I will respond... the above are just YOUR WORDS... and I have found your words a bit on the edge, here & there...


Hi Willie I was going to respond to your post when I came across this, bro that very close to saying I am falsifying words, basically close to calling me a liar, you probably did not mean it that why, but it close enough that I will now end my participation on this thread, neither of us will change our views bro, only God can do that for us, so I'll leave you to yours.

Plus I would like to get back to my rebuttal to Matt as I have been remiss because I am posting on to many other threads.

God bless bro.

Never have and never will call you a LIAR brother... I believe that you BELIEVE what you BELIEVE... and that you ALWAYS post that BELIEF in earnest of a sincere heart...

My remark "on the edge" was meant to say that I believe you are teetering close to the TRUTH on this matter, but a few elements you propose remain veiled... thus "on the edge"

I was just trying to make the point that TV programs are NOT to be depended upon in any way as a basis for TRUTH... especially considering SPIRITUAL matters...

I look upon you as a very learned, dedicated lover of GOD, and my brother... When I call you BRO, it is not just some tag I throw around, without meaning...

I Don't know how you view me, but I truly see you as my DEAR and RESPECTED, brother!

...peaCe

...willieH  :cloud9:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 12, 2008, 12:50:16 AM
 
  Hi Willie
  I do see alot of what you say bro 
and Pneuma   too  and you know a sense of humor  is great! 

  I love ya both 
for differnt  reasons lol :laughing7:  I really get to considering

the  verses at hand ...
  and well WW   is  a bud  after me own heart ... hee hee
  God love ya all
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 12, 2008, 12:51:34 AM
willieH: Hi Molly... :hithere:

Quote from: Molly on October 12, 2008, 12:31:38 AM
QuoteThe biggest problem with these type of traditional perceptions ( I say "traditional" at the risk of riling our brother Scott,   ...but this is common -- handed down teaching in most all churches) ...is that "satan" fell with no EXTERNAL prompting... No scenario is depicted where the TREE of the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL was accessed by satan (which is required in order for EVIL ...OR... GOOD, to be known), ...nor any of the other "demons/angels" which supposedly "fell" with satan...  No WARNING instruction noted BY GOD to these angels, ...nothing...

Without taking a bite of this tree, how would "satan" (or any of the other angels which supposedly "fell" with him)  KNOW his "looks were GOOD"?

Didn't Eve fall from grace the minute she believed the lie?  She fell before she ate from the tree.  She was deceived.

But the Scenario of the TREE was THERE and the COMMAND given that she not eat of it...

I agree that her sin actually took place within her doubt because "whatsoever is not of FAITH, is SIN"... AND her DISBELIEF was actually SIN... however... it was not until ADAM ATE, that their NAKEDNESS was revealed... I believe Eve, though she doubted and ate, still did not KNOW GOOD and EVIL, until ADAM ate, as noted in Genesis (Gen 3:6 ..and.. 7)

So the KNOWLEDGE of Good and Evil, ...was NOT REVEALED, until the MAN - ADAM  actually ATE the fruit...

Gen 6, notes Her eating, but NO KNOWLEDGE appeared... it wasnt until ADAM ate, that BOTH their eyes were opened... (Gen 3:7)

This however, doesn't address the problem with "satan" Molly... WHO or WHAT, TEMPTED "satan"?  Scripture states that GOD tempts no MAN, ...but does He tempt ANGELS?  I think NOT!  :thumbdown:

"satan" could not KNOW his (It's) "looks" were GOOD, for that KNOWLEDGE (good & evil) was KNOWN only to GOD...  And if he (It) did not KNOW his (it's) "looks" were GOOD, then "PRIDE" would have no platform from which to emerge...

It is VERY interesting that we see EVERYONES FACE, but our OWN...  :dontknow:  How could "satan" therefore, be getting all puffed up about something which he could not even see...  :dontknow:

He could not KNOW GOOD or EVIL, for He had not accessed the TREE (If satan DID this, it is not mentioned, and if it is not mentioned, ...it cannot be assumed)

...peaCe

...willieH  :cloud9:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 12, 2008, 01:15:15 AM
 

  well  Hi willie H .  I guess it goes back to the age old question
  what is the origin of satan  than ? 
   because the origin of good and evil seem to be in that Tree ? :sigh:


Zec 3:1 And he shewed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the LORD, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him.

--

Zec 3:2 And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan; even the LORD that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: [is] not this a brand plucked out of the fire?

  to me it seems its all  a metaphorical  fire /adversarial / anger resist  issue ??

first mentioned  here as adversary    , is it a type of wisdom /knowledge ?


Num 22:22  And God's anger was kindled because he went: and the angel of the LORD stood in the way for an adversary against him. Now he was riding upon his ass, and his two servants [were] with him.   

  I just dont know!! ???  , please  wave that little red cap my way  bro  lol
    God love ya
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 12, 2008, 04:44:16 AM
QuoteSo the KNOWLEDGE of Good and Evil, ...was NOT REVEALED, until the MAN - ADAM  actually ATE the fruit...

The difference between Adam and Eve is that he had the breath of God, [Holy breath, Holy Spirit], and she did not.  She was flesh of his flesh, not spirit of his spirit.  Maybe such knowledge can only be known by spirit and not by flesh.  Paul tells us we are to learn to discern good from evil.

Hebrews 5:14
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

Discernment is done by spirit, not by flesh.


"discern"


G1253
διάκρισις
diakrisis
dee-ak'-ree-sis
From G1252; judicial estimation: - discern (-ing), disputation.


This discernment has to do with judgment.


G1252
διακρίνω
diakrinō
dee-ak-ree'-no
From G1223 and G2919; to separate thoroughly, that is, (literally and reflexively) to withdraw from, or (by implication) oppose; figuratively to discriminate (by implication decide), or (reflexively) hesitate: - contend, make (to) differ (-ence), discern, doubt, judge, be partial, stagger, waver.



1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?


Genesis 1
4And God saw that the light was good (suitable, pleasant) and He approved it; and God separated the light from the darkness.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 12, 2008, 05:02:21 AM

Quote from: WilliH
This however, doesn't address the problem with "satan" Molly... WHO or WHAT, TEMPTED "satan"?  Scripture states that GOD tempts no MAN, ...but does He tempt ANGELS?  I think NOT! 

"satan" could not KNOW his (It's) "looks" were GOOD, for that KNOWLEDGE (good & evil) was KNOWN only to GOD...  And if he (It) did not KNOW his (it's) "looks" were GOOD, then "PRIDE" would have no platform from which to emerge...





Satan is an evil spirit.  He is opposed to God and therefore, to God's glory, Man.



1 Corinthians 10:20
No, I am suggesting that what the pagans sacrifice they offer [in effect] to demons (to evil spiritual powers) and not to God [at all]. I do not want you to fellowship and be partners with diabolical spirits [by eating at their feasts].
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 12, 2008, 05:11:30 AM
1THEN [the guiding angel] showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the Angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at Joshua's right hand to be his adversary and to accuse him.

    2And the Lord said to Satan, The Lord rebuke you, O Satan! Even the Lord, Who [now and habitually] chooses Jerusalem, rebuke you! Is not this [returned captive Joshua] a brand plucked out of the fire?

    3Now Joshua was clothed with filthy garments and was standing before the Angel [of the Lord].

    4And He spoke to those who stood before Him, saying, Take away the filthy garments from him. And He said to [Joshua], Behold, I have caused your iniquity to pass from you, and I will clothe you with rich apparel.

    5And I [Zechariah] said, Let them put a clean turban on his head. So they put a clean turban on his head and clothed him with [rich] garments. And the Angel of the Lord stood by.

    6And the Angel of the Lord [solemnly and earnestly] protested and affirmed to Joshua, saying,

    7Thus says the Lord of hosts: If you will walk in My ways and keep My charge, then also you shall rule My house and have charge of My courts, and I will give you access [to My presence] and places to walk among these who stand here.

    8Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, you and your colleagues who [usually] sit before you--for they are men who are a sign or omen [types of what is to come]--for behold, I will bring forth My servant the Branch.

    9For behold, upon the stone which I have set before Joshua, upon that one stone are seven eyes or facets [the all-embracing providence of God and the sevenfold radiations of the Spirit of God]. Behold, I will carve upon it its inscription, says the Lord of hosts, and I will remove the iniquity and guilt of this land in a single day.


    10In that day, says the Lord of hosts, you shall invite each man his neighbor under his own vine and his own fig tree.

--Zech 3
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 12, 2008, 03:42:23 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 12, 2008, 12:33:55 AM
willieH: Hi Scott...  :cloud9:

Quote from: pneuma on October 11, 2008, 02:08:36 AM
QuoteSorry Scott... but your TV program isn't sufficient grounds to found your MYTH, & by the way:

Send me a tape of your TV program (which founds your Egyptian Myth), then MAYBE, I will respond... the above are just YOUR WORDS... and I have found your words a bit on the edge, here & there...


Hi Willie I was going to respond to your post when I came across this, bro that very close to saying I am falsifying words, basically close to calling me a liar, you probably did not mean it that why, but it close enough that I will now end my participation on this thread, neither of us will change our views bro, only God can do that for us, so I'll leave you to yours.

Plus I would like to get back to my rebuttal to Matt as I have been remiss because I am posting on to many other threads.

God bless bro.

Never have and never will call you a LIAR brother... I believe that you BELIEVE what you BELIEVE... and that you ALWAYS post that BELIEF in earnest of a sincere heart...

My remark "on the edge" was meant to say that I believe you are teetering close to the TRUTH on this matter, but a few elements you propose remain veiled... thus "on the edge"

I was just trying to make the point that TV programs are NOT to be depended upon in any way as a basis for TRUTH... especially considering SPIRITUAL matters...

I look upon you as a very learned, dedicated lover of GOD, and my brother... When I call you BRO, it is not just some tag I throw around, without meaning...

I Don't know how you view me, but I truly see you as my DEAR and RESPECTED, brother!

...peaCe

...willieH  :cloud9:


Hi Willie, thanks for clearifying bro, like I said you probably did not mean it that way, but I like to clear any misconceptions up just in case.

I know we all say things that others take the wrong way, that one of the main problems with this boards, if we could sit in a room with each other and come to know the person personally I don't think these things would ever be an issue.

That said bro I am still going to bow out as I have not had a chance to add my next reply to Matt's rebuttal and would like to get it finished sometime this year :bigGrin:

P.S. I do see you as a brother Willie and I do respect you, doctrinal views should never be a reason to dislike or disrespect others.

God bless
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 12, 2008, 10:16:39 PM
willieH: Hi Molly...  :icon_king:

Quote from: willieHSo the KNOWLEDGE of Good and Evil, ...was NOT REVEALED, until the MAN - ADAM  actually ATE the fruit...

QuoteThe difference between Adam and Eve is that he had the breath of God, [Holy breath, Holy Spirit], and she did not.  She was flesh of his flesh, not spirit of his spirit.  Maybe such knowledge can only be known by spirit and not by flesh.  Paul tells us we are to learn to discern good from evil.

The "breath of life" is the breath (spirit of GOD) which RETURNS to GOD... only that which comes FROM God, ...RETURNS to Him...

So your definition of the "HOLY breath" above, is simply selective (to base your beliefs upon) and not objective (statements obviously made in Scripture which state the SPIRIT -- of each man -- RETURNS to GOD)...

I agree that such KNOWLEDGE can only be known in the SPIRIT and not the flesh... for it is a WAR between the two [good vs evil] as noted by Paul (Rom 7:23)... 

The "INNER MAN" of each man is CHRIST... to some, revealed to others VEILED... according to the ELECTION and PURPOSE of YHVH...

Quote from: Molly on October 12, 2008, 04:44:16 AMHebrews 5:14
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

Discernment is done by spirit, not by flesh.

Again, the SPIRIT either LIVES (in CHRIST), or remains DEAD in the FLESH...

The KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL, is known by ANYONE who SINS... for right and wrong is KNOWN by its practitioners...  Many unconverted souls KNOW and PRACTICE the difference between RIGHT and WRONG/GOOD and EVIL... but have no alligiance or gravitation to CHRIST...

This is displayed in LAWS made in various societies all over the Earth, which claim, these are based on morality and the common GOOD of that society... leaving out the WORD of GOD as the basis for those laws...

Quote from: Molly on October 12, 2008, 04:44:16 AM"discern"

G1253
διάκρισις
diakrisis
dee-ak'-ree-sis
From G1252; judicial estimation: - discern (-ing), disputation.

This discernment has to do with judgment.

Quote from: Molly on October 12, 2008, 04:44:16 AMG1252
διακρίνω
diakrinō
dee-ak-ree'-no
From G1223 and G2919; to separate thoroughly, that is, (literally and reflexively) to withdraw from, or (by implication) oppose; figuratively to discriminate (by implication decide), or (reflexively) hesitate: - contend, make (to) differ (-ence), discern, doubt, judge, be partial, stagger, waver.

And judgment made by unconverted souls is by what means Molly?  It is obvious that a decision is made by a given individual to participate IN or abstain FROM, EVIL... So that the word DISCERN is derived from a word which notes JUDGMENT, just makes common sense... for a "JUDGMENT" is made whether that judgment is a good or bad...

What is a "JUDGMENT" made in a court of law Molly?  Is it not a DECISION?  Does the JUDGE not "DECIDE" the outcome of the matter?  :dontknow:

If an unconverted person teaches his/her child that it is wrong to steal or kill... is that emerging from flesh?  :Chinscratch:  ...I think not... I believe CHRIST is in every man... and REVELATION of Him is done incrementally... that is to say, his influence (concerning GOOD and EVIL) is on EVERY MAN, but every man does not KNOW Him, nor believes and acknowledges Him as a being, ...or their Savior, ...or as an influence within them...

Quote from: Molly on October 12, 2008, 04:44:16 AM1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

This is yet another spin of a "broken record"... Scripture claims ALL JUDGMENT is committed unto the SON, Molly (John 5:22)... If ALL JUDGMENT is done by the SON... what is left to JUDGE Molly?

And said JUDGMENT is seen and EVIDENTIAL in our submission to the SON, which by comparison is used by CHRIST to JUDGE those UNSUBMITTED...

WE do not do the JUDGING... GOD is the JUDGE of ALL... Any converted SINNER has no right to JUDGE another unconverted SINNER (John 8:7), for CONVERSION of the soul, is the WORK of GOD and is MANIFESTED by the WORD in the heart of the converted... 

Besides, ANGELIC beings are NOT being spoken of in this verse anyway... MEN have decieved other MEN, ...ANGELS had no part of it...

How could WE "judge" ANGELIC beings which "FELL" in a scenario and situation, in which we were not even a part? :mnah:

MEN (which are messengers/angels) are found either bearing the TRUTH, or bearing LIES to other men, ...and the TRUTH of the WORD shall be the JUDGE of those LIES...  For those LIES are EXPOSED, BY IT...

Let's face it Molly, ...you are going to believe contrary to me no matter what I say, and vice-versa, so why continue to post the same things?  :dontknow:

You believe "satan" is a being, ...I do NOT...
You believe angelic beings fell, ...I do NOT...
You believe YOU will JUDGE "fallen" angelic beings, ...I do NOT...

Must we needs repeat this over and over till everyone is sick to death of it?   :eeew:

...peaCe

...willieH  :cloud9:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 13, 2008, 02:05:13 AM
willieH: Hi sister Rose! here comes the "cap" ... :hithere:

Quote from: rosered on October 12, 2008, 01:15:15 AM


  well  Hi willie H .  I guess it goes back to the age old question
  what is the origin of satan  than ? 
   because the origin of good and evil seem to be in that Tree ? :sigh:

Of course the "tree" is symbolic and metaphorical... I mean there was an actual tree, but it was what the "tree" represented to Adam that was the point... and that POINT was one which only YHVH "knew" (Gen 3:22)

Guess there are many speculations as to who "US" is in this verse, but it is more than obvious to me that it is the FATHER who is GOD and His WORD which is an inseparable element of Himself as it is within "US" as well...

QuoteZec 3:1 And he shewed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the LORD, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him.

The "right hand" symbolizes that which is the extension of the one spoken of... CHRIST was the EXPRESSED [projected into visible/audible terms] IMAGE of the invisible/silent YHVH God...  JESUS is referred to as being at the RIGHT HAND of GOD... which showed in His life, that He is ALWAYS IN HARMONY with YHVH...

ALL MEN, however have displayed that they are ADVERSE to God, as SINNERS... which notes "satan" [ADVERSITY] to be at the "RIGHT HAND" of MAN...

QuoteZec 3:2 And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan; even the LORD that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: [is] not this a brand plucked out of the fire?

  to me it seems its all  a metaphorical  fire /adversarial / anger resist  issue ??

first mentioned  here as adversary    , is it a type of wisdom /knowledge ?

Whether or not we wish to acknowledge it... GOOD is contrasted and established, concerning KNOWLEDGE, ...BY EVIL...  The LAW noted the standard of HOLY behavior... and STOOD accusing MAN, as each MAN has found a way to BREAK that standard of HOLY behavior... which is Biblically defined as SIN (missing the mark -- which in essence is -- MISbehavior)

QuoteNum 22:22  And God's anger was kindled because he went: and the angel of the LORD stood in the way for an adversary against him. Now he was riding upon his ass, and his two servants [were] with him.   

  I just dont know!! ???  , please  wave that little red cap my way  bro  lol
    God love ya

The "ADVERSARY" of EVIL is GOOD sis... the angel of YHVH [noted as an ADVERSARY/"satan") stood in the way of that which Baalam was about to do...

The Hebrew word "satan" is not a NAME... it is a word which defines a POSITION... It appears in this verse translated ADVERSARY and is noted, describing the ANGEL of YHVH... and the "ANGELS"  positional place was to be ADVERSE to Baalam, to keep him from disobeying the instruction of YHVH...

For example:  If I am on the side of GOOD, then I am an ADVERSARY of EVIL...  InMyObservation this is the single greatest deception which plagues man...  EVIL is the ADVERSARY [satan] of GOOD, and vice-versa... satan is a descriptive positional adjective, NOT a NAME of a "fallen angel"...

"satan" is commonly known to be the "ADVERSARY" of GOOD and that which prompts man to DISOBEY the COMMAND of God which is GOOD... because it is a DEFINITIVE word, it can be used in its definitive position to mean, that GOOD is also, ...the "ADVERSARY" [satan]  of EVIL!

The most RELIGIOUSLY ingrained teaching of the Bible is that "satan" is a "being"... this "being" is proposed by RELIGION to be EVERYWHERE or present with EVERYONE...

Only GOD has this Charateristic of OMNIPRESENCE... but the ADVERSARY of GOD ...IS... present with EVERY MAN, in the NATURAL/Sinful state of Flesh which man finds himself, in the present... and Wherever GOD is (which is EVERYWHERE), so is found His ADVERSARY!

GOD is about addressing WORDS... His WORD as opposed to others... He addresses His WORD as His "Son" in whom He is well pleased... and further addresses His WORD as an extension and EXPRESSION of HIMSELF...

ANYTHING [mans will] which OPPOSES that WORD [GOD's will] is an ADVERSARY [satan] of that WORD... and that ..."ANYTHING"...  which OPPOSES that WORD, finds the WORD of GOD as ...ITS ADVERSARY [satan]... (am I conveying to you?  Hope so, its hard to put into words)

...peaCe

...willieH  :cloud9:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 13, 2008, 06:14:24 AM
Quote from: WilliHThe "ADVERSARY" of EVIL is GOOD sis... the angel of YHVH [noted as an ADVERSARY/"satan") stood in the way of that which Baalam was about to do...

The Hebrew word "satan" is not a NAME... it is a word which defines a POSITION... It appears in this verse translated ADVERSARY and is noted, describing the ANGEL of YHVH... and the "ANGELS"  positional place was to be ADVERSE to Baalam, to keep him from disobeying the instruction of YHVH...

Actually, Satan is a proper name and is treated as such in the Bible.  Just because it has also a meaning, does not mean that it can not also be a name.  All the Hebrew names have a meaning--Abraham, Isaac, Jacob,  Michael, even Y'shuah--but they are also names of specific beings.

The Bible is not calling the Angel of the Lord 'Satan' --that is not his name, nor would anyone suggest it is.  In this case, the word is used in its meaning as adversary or opponent, not as a proper name as it is used in other cases.   Or do you wish to say that anyone good who opposes evil should also be called Satan?  In that case, we could even call Jesus, 'Satan.'


"Satan"
"adversary"

H7854
שׂטן
śâṭân
saw-tawn'
From H7853; an opponent; especially (with the article prefixed) Satan, the arch enemy of good: - adversary, Satan, withstand.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 13, 2008, 08:52:57 PM
  from WILLIE  H .. :)
QuoteQuote
Zec 3:2 And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan; even the LORD that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: [is] not this a brand plucked out of the fire?

  to me it seems its all  a metaphorical  fire /adversarial / anger resist  issue ??

first mentioned  here as adversary    , is it a type of wisdom /knowledge ?


Whether or not we wish to acknowledge it... GOOD is contrasted and established, concerning KNOWLEDGE, ...BY EVIL...  The LAW noted the standard of HOLY behavior... and STOOD accusing MAN, as each MAN has found a way to BREAK that standard of HOLY behavior... which is Biblically defined as SIN (missing the mark -- which in essence is -- MISbehavior)


Quote
Num 22:22  And God's anger was kindled because he went: and the angel of the LORD stood in the way for an adversary against him. Now he was riding upon his ass, and his two servants [were] with him.   

  I just dont know!! ???  , please  wave that little red cap my way  bro  lol
    God love ya

The "ADVERSARY" of EVIL is GOOD sis... the angel of YHVH [noted as an ADVERSARY/"satan") stood in the way of that which Baalam was about to do...

The Hebrew word "satan" is not a NAME... it is a word which defines a POSITION... It appears in this verse translated ADVERSARY and is noted, describing the ANGEL of YHVH... and the "ANGELS"  positional place was to be ADVERSE to Baalam, to keep him from disobeying the instruction of YHVH...

For example:  If I am on the side of GOOD, then I am an ADVERSARY of EVIL...  TInMyObservation this is the single greatest deception which plagues man...  EVIL is the ADVERSARY [satan] of GOOD, and vice-versa... satan is a descriptive positional adjective, NOT a NAME of a "fallen angel"...

"satan" is commonly known to be the "ADVERSARY" of GOOD and that which prompts man to DISOBEY the COMMAND of God which is GOOD... because it is a DEFINITIVE word, it can be used in its definitive position to mean, that GOOD is also, ...the "ADVERSARY" [satan]  of EVIL!

  Hi Willie   ,  BRAVO !  I got cha !!   believe  it or not .I DO  understand  what you are saying  ! 

and  it is because of some studying  back in the day lol ,,, some  light clicked on the ol  empty  noggin '   hee hee 
       I know what you are saying , and putting it into words will be challenging   and  for whats its worth ,  here I go .... 

I also will use some examples , they seem to work  too lol

   you  are right about the Law of moses , it being that tree of Knowledge of good and evil , maybe ?  my  thoughts have always been thats it !  , because   it is good and yet it is the ministration of death ,,, without mercy  you die under 2 or 3 witnesses  etc ..

  and  I will not go into great detail over that thought   ha ha! 

  but   the best way for me to explain my getting it  , was when seaching the word HEAVEN    ,  and this  is why I got it , seems the  Higher AIR [ BREATH ]    is less dense /thick more   clean / pure    , and that is where  I understand the  messengers/spirits  are getting their  life / breath  from

  where  the lower denser air   is where  the unclean
spirits  messengers are  getting theirs from
   Jesus  , the WORD gave life to the    folks  whom it was time to receive  [ fresh air / breath / life ] a good washing away   in them and the unclean spirits casting them out  from their  minds / hearts . bodies etc ...   Peter is a  prime  example when I read it for the  first time  was  blown away  , and had  to look into it   more  closely   
  calling Peter satan / adversary   and his    mindfulness   dwelling on the things of men [ lower air / dense  thought s] and not God , when Jesus was to be humiliated and killed and  raisied up the 3rd DAY    this was Gods will ,  desire and  adversarial   to what Gods intent was  though Jesus   cross /  upright POINT AT STAKE
I see  it more as I study , its not so easy to explain , but its stirring within us   this TRUTH/LIGHT     and it is more comforting  than the  fear / denseness of not knowing

  I will stop for now  .. i have to go  :(
  peace  and thanks  God love ya  rose
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 13, 2008, 10:40:12 PM
willieH: Hi Molly...  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieHThe "ADVERSARY" of EVIL is GOOD sis... the angel of YHVH [noted as an ADVERSARY/"satan") stood in the way of that which Baalam was about to do...

The Hebrew word "satan" is not a NAME... it is a word which defines a POSITION... It appears in this verse translated ADVERSARY and is noted, describing the ANGEL of YHVH... and the "ANGELS"  positional place was to be ADVERSE to Baalam, to keep him from disobeying the instruction of YHVH...

QuoteActually, Satan is a proper name and is treated as such in the Bible.

In Hebrew, punctuation and CAPITALIZATION are done and decided by TRANSLATORS... and the "treatment" given to the word "satan" concerning CAPS was done in the OPINION of those doing the TRANSLATION (just as 31 times SHEOL is translated GRAVE and 31 other times it is translated HELL)... 

It does NOT mean that "satan" is a NAME... any word could be considered a NAME with this thinking...  We could read the Bible and "translate" any given word we might feel is conducive to our doctrine as a NAME, by CAPTILIZING it...  :thumbdown:

Quote from: Molly on October 13, 2008, 06:14:24 AMJust because it has also a meaning, does not mean that it can not also be a name.  All the Hebrew names have a meaning--Abraham, Isaac, Jacob,  Michael, even Y'shuah--but they are also names of specific beings.

I don't disagree with this... however... Abraham, Issac, Jacob and Michael, even JESUS were MEN... and therefore SPECIFIC living "BEINGS" which had names...

Quote from: Molly on October 13, 2008, 06:14:24 AMThe Bible is not calling the Angel of the Lord 'Satan' --that is not his name, nor would anyone suggest it is.

The context is NOT "calling" the ANGEL of YHVH by a name, it is naming ITS POSITION in proximity to Baalam... read for yourself Molly:

Numbers 22:22  ...and GOD's ANGER was kindled BECAUSE, he WENT... and the ANGEL of YHVH stood in the way as AN ADVERSARY [satan #H7854 - strongs] AGAINST him...

This is naming the ANGEL of YHVH as in OPPOSITION ["an ADVERSARY -- AGAINST him"] to Baalam doing other than he was instructed...

Quote from: Molly on October 13, 2008, 06:14:24 AMIn this case, the word is used in its meaning as adversary or opponent, not as a proper name as it is used in other cases.   Or do you wish to say that anyone good who opposes evil should also be called Satan?  In that case, we could even call Jesus, 'Satan.'

This is SELECTIVE in observation... the word "satan" can be observed as ADVERSARY or ADVERSITY, ...EVERYWHERE it appears in the Bible...

Peter was so named BY JESUS, Molly... Do you think Peter is/was "satan"... for this command by JESUS "appears" that He was CALLING Peter "satan", not just naming him ADVERSE... 

I believe without reservation, that JESUS was NOT NAMING Peter "the devil"... He was just naming his words as in OPPOSITION of GOD...

What I am saying is that the POSITION of ADVERSITY or ADVERSARY, can be seen from either perspective...  Peter was NOT "satan", but his words were ADVERSE to the mission of CHRIST...

Quote from: Molly on October 13, 2008, 06:14:24 AM"Satan"
"adversary"

H7854
שׂטן
śâṭân
saw-tawn'
From H7853; an opponent; especially (with the article prefixed) Satan, the arch enemy of good: - adversary, Satan, withstand.

This word definition, as with all others, are still "TRANSLATION" and STILL hold given influences as to DEFINITION, which were held by those "translating"... 

When considering DEFINITION of this word, we must know that the MEANING of the word IS the DEFINITION, not the NAME which can be applied...

You noted that Hebrew names MEANT something... this had PURPOSE, for the MEANING of the name, was the description of the one NAMED... defining the POSITION that this person would take in life...

Word definitions take varying courses in time, for instance:  The ENGLISH word GAY once meant "happy"... but NOW is used to name or describe  HOMOSEXUALITY, ...or in some cases LAME...  That the word GAY now is used to mean HOMOSEXUAL, does not negate its prior meaning, nor shall future varying uses of this word establish that it does not mean HAPPY...  Words are devices of communication.  "satan" means ADVERSE or ADVERSARY for it communicates the postion of OPPOSITION.

That the definition for "satan" includes the ARCH ENEMY of GOOD doesn't change in any way, it's POSITIONAL meaning nor does it WRITE that meaning IN STONE as the only definition! 

It is defined by Hebrew translators as the arch enemy of GOOD - which simply means ADVERSE to GOOD, ...but also is shown in Biblical usage, to be the "ARCH" ENEMY of EVIL as displayed in Numbers 22:22 as it was applied to the ANGEL of YHVH...

You cannot "win" this difference we have, Molly... (and neither can I) for your belief is that it can be used as a proper NAME, and my belief states that ADVERSITY appears wherever the word "satan" is used in Scripture, ...be it ADVERSE to GOOD or to EVIL...

I say:  Let the FATHER use our OPPOSING beliefs in whatever way HE has chosen they should be used.  And in the end, we BOTH shall find out which of us was observing from the correct position...  :cloud9:

As I said many times before Molly... believe "satan" is a being if you like, I have no problem with it, and MANY in TRADITION side with that belief... YOUR BELIEFS are your affair... and far be it from me to wish to rob you of your beliefs...  It is pretty obvious that I stand against most of them... and FYI,  ...I will continue to do so...  :happygrin:

...peaCe
...willieH  :cloud9:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 13, 2008, 11:24:27 PM
 

  Brother Willie ,
I am sorry I had to run off , My hubby now works the night shift and had to help him out , get ready and all  :HeartThrob:
By the Way I am glad you are doing much better after your surgery and all that went with it ..
  I am worried  about my old brother G [Graham] , right now . love that   fella  to pieces 
     ,,  I  left out alot of stuff lol , cause I was in a hurry ,

  love the little  red capped guy by the way  hee hee 
  Peace   bro ........ rose
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 14, 2008, 07:38:45 AM
Quote from: Rosebut   the best way for me to explain my getting it  , was when seaching the word HEAVEN    ,  and this  is why I got it , seems the  Higher AIR [ BREATH ]    is less dense /thick more   clean / pure    , and that is where  I understand the  messengers/spirits  are getting their  life / breath  from

  where  the lower denser air   is where  the unclean
spirits  messengers are  getting theirs from
   Jesus  , the WORD gave life to the    folks  whom it was time to receive  [ fresh air / breath / life ] a good washing away   in them and the unclean spirits casting them out  from their  minds / hearts . bodies etc ... 

Isaiah 57:15
For thus saith the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity, whose name is Holy [Qâdôsh Qâdôsh]  ; I dwell in the high and holy place, with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones.


H6918
קדשׁ    קדושׁ
qâdôsh  qâdôsh
kaw-doshe', kaw-doshe'
From H6942; sacred (ceremonially or morally); (as noun) God (by eminence), an angel, a saint, a sanctuary: - holy (One), saint.



H6942
קדשׁ
qâdash
kaw-dash'
A primitive root; to be (causatively make, pronounce or observe as) clean (ceremonially or morally): - appoint, bid, consecrate, dedicate, defile, hallow, (be, keep) holy (-er, place), keep, prepare, proclaim, purify, sanctify (-ied one, self), X wholly.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 14, 2008, 03:59:21 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 14, 2008, 07:38:45 AM
Quote from: Rosebut   the best way for me to explain my getting it  , was when seaching the word HEAVEN    ,  and this  is why I got it , seems the  Higher AIR [ BREATH ]    is less dense /thick more   clean / pure    , and that is where  I understand the  messengers/spirits  are getting their  life / breath  from

  where  the lower denser air   is where  the unclean
spirits  messengers are  getting theirs from
   Jesus  , the WORD gave life to the    folks  whom it was time to receive  [ fresh air / breath / life ] a good washing away   in them and the unclean spirits casting them out  from their  minds / hearts . bodies etc ... 

Isaiah 57:15
For thus saith the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity, whose name is Holy [Qâdôsh Qâdôsh]  ; I dwell in the high and holy place, with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones.


H6918
קדשׁ    קדושׁ
qâdôsh  qâdôsh
kaw-doshe', kaw-doshe'
From H6942; sacred (ceremonially or morally); (as noun) God (by eminence), an angel, a saint, a sanctuary: - holy (One), saint.



H6942
קדשׁ
qâdash
kaw-dash'
A primitive root; to be (causatively make, pronounce or observe as) clean (ceremonially or morally): - appoint, bid, consecrate, dedicate, defile, hallow, (be, keep) holy (-er, place), keep, prepare, proclaim, purify, sanctify (-ied one, self), X wholly.


Iam gratful you see/saw that Molly ,
its the tip of the Iceburg sis , so much in the study of heaven/ heavens / air  , I was amazed all over again ! especially in Daniel  and in the new testament   the correlating  of King Nebs   rise and fall/demise  ,and   humbled
   my studies are so ''formal'' I never put them up , because  a friend of mine said I get nothing out of them when I sent them to her  , please put it in your own words , she said  and I said,'' I cannot''  ....   
    this has been  a  frustration for me  for many years now 
  I am afraid   , I get off topic to easy and mess up threads 
  but I had no way to explain  satan/ adversary  without bringing up the  air /  heavens  , I DO see them connected   as well as dark/thick  clouds etc ..   
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: The0 on October 14, 2008, 07:33:09 PM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...


Hello willieH!

I do not think your argument PROVES that we 'HAVE ALWAYS BEEN', and were once, residents of HEAVEN. While it is true that God never changes, MAN does change. We are God's temple NOW, and God indwells us NOW. But what about before God's forgiveness of our sins? He didn't indwell us! What about when God did not indwell ANY man? Following your line of reasoning, God didn't have a temple IN WHICH to dwell then. He had no abode! Fact is God has no need of man-made temples nor of hearts or spirits of men to dwell in. If that were true, God would depend ON us. But you know that God does not depend on man for anything! He is self-sufficient.

Where did God dwell BEFORE He created mankind?


SONS are SPIRIT? and they have always been (you mean always existed?)?

The Scriptures declare that God IS spirit (John 4:24). Man IS NOT spirit. Man HAS a spirit. Because God is spirit, we cannot see Him. Jesus Christ IS the image of the INVISIBLE GOD. (Col. 1:15) He came to reveal the Father to us. He is purely spirit. Men are not purely spirit. Men are made of dust and GIVEN spirits. Because God GAVE us our spirits, at death they must GO BACK to him, the giver of our spirits. Man WAS NOT before. Man had a beginning when he was created.

We are the body of Christ NOW, but there was a time that no man was a member of the body of Christ. Christ's body never changes? Just because Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever does not mean that his symbolic body [the believers] do not change. We change everyday. Christ's symbolic body, the believers, is growing in numbers, for instance. Let's not even talk about 'maturity'. We change from being immature to mature. Our being the symbolic body of Christ does not make us UNCHANGEABLE.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: The0 on October 14, 2008, 08:41:05 PM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 12:54:02 AM
willieH: Greetinz! :hithere:

Subjects:   :swordfight:

(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"? 
(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"? 
(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?
(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

We read in Genesis, that GOD placed a tree in the midst of the Garden.  And notified of its location, and commanded it be avoided.  Had there been no such tree... would Adam & Eve still SINNED?

THIS is basically the proposal of FALLEN ANGELS...  That even though no "TREE" was placed in their proximity, and though no NOTIFICATION of LOCATION of that "tree" was made, and NO COMMAND made to AVOID it... Innumerable ANGELS (not just 2 as with humans) still, ...somehow found a way to "FALL" to SIN... anyway... :rolleye:


thoughts?   :JCThink:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:


Hello willieH!

The simple truth is that God created Satan to be his adversary, and a worthy one at that.

Now we know from the gospel of John that it was through Christ that  this was all done:

  Joh_1:3 All things were made by him [Christ]; and  without him was not any thing made that was made. 
"Without Him was not  anything made [especially the Adversary that Old Serpent the Devil]  that was made... His hand formed the crooked serpent."

So there are two  verses which tell us that God through Christ, "made all things"  including "the crooked serpent." But that is not the only two verses.  Look at these verses:

  Isa_45:5 I am the LORD, and, there is no God beside me: I girded  thee, though thou hast not known me:
  Isa_45:6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from  the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and [there is]  none else.
  Isa_45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make  peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. 


"I the Lord do all these things." So God tells us that it was He,  through Christ, whose hand "formed the crooked serpent." Are we to  believe that God is simply telling us that it was He who created snakes  and snails? Anyone who does not see that God is telling us that it was  "His hand that formed the [Adversary] is spiritually blind. "The  crooked serpent" is Satan. And God tells us plainly that it was His  hand which formed Satan. But just in case someone still thinks that  Satan was first formed as a good spirit who has gone bad, we have yet  another scriptural witness to the contrary for all who have been given  eyes to see:

  Isa_54:16 Behold, I have created  the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire, and that bringeth forth  an instrument for his work; and I have created the waster to  destroy.   

And who is it that has come to destroy? 

  John_10:10 The thief cometh  not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come  that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. 
Who is it who Christ tells us is the original murderer, who was created  to "steal to kill and to destroy?" 

  John_8:44 Ye [You Jews which believe  on me] are of your father the devil, and the  lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the  beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he  speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 
  John_8:31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye  continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; 

So let's just ask the question, 'how long has Satan been a murderer?  Did he start out as a good angel who went bad, or what did Christ just  tell us? What Christ has just told those with eyes to see, is:  He ["Your father, the devil"] was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because  there is no truth in him.

Although God created his adversary this way, it does not mean that Satan does not sin. He kills, he steals, he destroys, he murders, he lies, etc., etc. Jesus call Satan "the father of" lies. He has lusts also.

The tree of the knowledge of good and evil pertains to US, humans. The first couple was created with the potential to sin, NOT PERFECT HUMAN BEINGS. However, they knew not good nor evil. They had to partake of the fruit  in order to know BOTH, good and evil.

Satan did not need to eat of that fruit. Do not lose sight of the fact that he is a spirit, and therefore has no need of nourishment like we do.


Concerning Satan this is the Truth of God's Word as mentioned above:                 

  Job_26:13 By his spirit he hath garnished the   heavens; his hand hath formed the crooked   serpent.

Just as with man, it was God who created Satan as he is -   a crooked serpent. As such it is God's responsibility to do just this:

   Eph_1:9 Having made known unto us the mystery of  his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:

   Eph_1:10 That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather   together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even   in him: All things...both which are in heaven and   which are on earth, certainly includes Satan and the entire spirit realm, both   the good and the evil.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 14, 2008, 11:43:38 PM
willieH: Hi The0!   :cloud9:

Welcome to Tentmaker, and thanks for your comments below!  :happygrin:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 12:54:02 AM
willieH: Greetinz! :hithere:

Subjects:   :swordfight:

(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"? 
(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"? 
(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?
(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

We read in Genesis, that GOD placed a tree in the midst of the Garden.  And notified of its location, and commanded it be avoided.  Had there been no such tree... would Adam & Eve still SINNED?

THIS is basically the proposal of FALLEN ANGELS...  That even though no "TREE" was placed in their proximity, and though no NOTIFICATION of LOCATION of that "tree" was made, and NO COMMAND made to AVOID it... Innumerable ANGELS (not just 2 as with humans) still, ...somehow found a way to "FALL" to SIN... anyway... :rolleye:


thoughts?   :JCThink:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:


Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 08:41:05 PMHello willieH!

The simple truth is that God created Satan to be his adversary, and a worthy one at that.

Now we know from the gospel of John that it was through Christ that  this was all done:

  Joh_1:3 All things were made by him [Christ]; and  without him was not any thing made that was made. 
"Without Him was not  anything made [especially the Adversary that Old Serpent the Devil]  that was made... His hand formed the crooked serpent."

Hmmm... "his hand formed the crooked serpent" does NOT appear in My BIBLE as part of John 1:3... but rather is part of Job 26:13... It would be helpful if you wouldnt run portions of verses together which are in DIFFERENT contexts, but note them separately... thanks!

It is an assumption that the "crooked serpent" is a BEING...

I do not argue that "satan" (adversity/adversary) was created by YHVH... on the contrary... my contention is that this "satan" is an actual sentient entity or being...  AND... that "satan" is OMNIPRESENT, as ALL MEN must deal with this entity, whatever form it might be understood (external "being" or internal characteristic/principality in man)

Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 08:41:05 PMSo there are two  verses which tell us that God through Christ, "made all things"  including "the crooked serpent." But that is not the only two verses.  Look at these verses:

It is absolutely agreed that there are many Scriptural evidences that YHVH GOD created EVERYTHING... again that is not in contention...  :dontknow:

Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 08:41:05 PMIsa_45:5 I am the LORD, and, there is no God beside me: I girded  thee, though thou hast not known me:
  Isa_45:6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from  the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and [there is]  none else.
  Isa_45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make  peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. 

"I the Lord do all these things."

So God tells us that it was He,  through Christ, whose hand "formed the crooked serpent." Are we to  believe that God is simply telling us that it was He who created snakes  and snails? Anyone who does not see that God is telling us that it was  "His hand that formed the [Adversary] is spiritually blind. "The  crooked serpent" is Satan. And God tells us plainly that it was His  hand which formed Satan. But just in case someone still thinks that  Satan was first formed as a good spirit who has gone bad, we have yet  another scriptural witness to the contrary for all who have been given  eyes to see:

  Isa_54:16 Behold, I have created  the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire, and that bringeth forth  an instrument for his work; and I have created the waster to  destroy.   

And who is it that has come to destroy? 

  John_10:10 The thief cometh  not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come  that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. 
Who is it who Christ tells us is the original murderer, who was created  to "steal to kill and to destroy?" 

  John_8:44 Ye [You Jews which believe  on me] are of your father the devil, and the  lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the  beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he  speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 

  John_8:31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye  continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; 

Let me interrupt your oration for a moment, bro...   :laughing7:

"satan" is a principality which exists within the NATURAL ADVERSITY of MAN's "will" and stands IN OPPOSITION to GOD's WILL...

I contend that this principality ("satan"/adversity) was created IN MAN, ...BY GOD...  The WILL of man in the NATURAL state of the flesh, IS contrary to the SPIRIT... and IS the father of lies,  IS come to steal, kill and destroy, ...for Scripture notes that it is APPOINTED to man ONCE to DIE... (Heb 9:27) and that "appointment" cannot be met unless an involvement with a DEATH causing scenario was inserted in our experience...  :dontknow:  That being the NATURAL, FLESHLY (earthy) image which is in OPPOSITION to the SPIRIT (1 Cor 15:46-50)

Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 08:41:05 PMSo let's just ask the question, 'how long has Satan been a murderer?  Did he start out as a good angel who went bad, or what did Christ just  tell us? What Christ has just told those with eyes to see, is:  He ["Your father, the devil"] was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because  there is no truth in him.

Man from the BEGINNING, ...gravitated to the FLESH... it is from the DESIRES [lust] of the FLESH that temptation emerges, and the gravitation to its desires begins with the attention of MAN, then ends in SIN which brings for the APPOINTED, DEATH.  (James 1:14)

James makes no mention of any ANGELIC being as the perpetrator of this process, rather... he points to it as coming from the NATURAL desires of the FLESH of man, made of DUST ("earthy")...

QuoteAlthough God created his adversary this way, it does not mean that Satan does not sin. He kills, he steals, he destroys, he murders, he lies, etc., etc. Jesus call Satan "the father of" lies. He has lusts also.

God DID create His "adversary" [satan], but it is NOT a being, and NOT an omnipresent "fallen angel"... It is the FLESH of man which WARS against the SPIRIT of man as is noted by PAUL and which agrees with JAMES:

(Rom 7:23) ...but I SEE another "law" ...IN MY MEMBERS, ...WARRING AGAINST... the "law" [CHRIST] of my mind [see previous verse]. and BRINGING ME into the CAPTIVITY to the "law" of SIN, ...which ...IS, ...IN ...MY ...MEMBERS

NOT externally prompted by a MYTHICAL "red guy with a pitchfork", ...rather INTERNALLY prompted from WITHIN the members, ...by the FLESH...

Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 08:41:05 PMThe tree of the knowledge of good and evil pertains to US, humans. The first couple was created with the potential to sin, NOT PERFECT HUMAN BEINGS. However, they knew not good nor evil. They had to partake of the fruit  in order to know BOTH, good and evil.

By your own admission, the KNOWLEDGE (of G & E) was gained only from EATING the fruit...

Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 08:41:05 PMSatan did not need to eat of that fruit. Do not lose sight of the fact that he is a spirit, and therefore has no need of nourishment like we do.

This is selective observation...  You maintain that "satan" is a SPIRIT, and therefore conclude as you do... that "satan" gains the KNOWLEDGE of EVIL via being "created" as such... there is no verse (in my knowledge - if there is please name it) which states "satan" was a created being... nor that "he" was created "evil"...

In order to gain the KNOWLEDGE of EVIL, ..."satan" would have had to have done the same thing. gained ACCESS to the "tree" which provides such KNOWLEDGE... 

Previous to ADAM (& Eve), only GOD previously had this KNOWLEDGE as noted in Gen 3:22... No other "spirit" being had this knowledge...

If "satan" had the KNOWLEDGE of EVIL... "he" had to have the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD as well, as they are ROOTED in the SAME SOURCE (tree/GOD)... Both GOOD and EVIL are cooperative and coinciding INFORMATION... and GOD has BOTH these "KNOWLEDGES"...

"satan" is simply the WILL of man which is IN CAPTIVITY to ITSELF of the FLESH, as noted above by BOTH Paul and James...

And is WHY, CHRIST instructed that we seek the WILL of GOD (see the "Lord's prayer"), which is that which FREES us from the CAPTIVITY of our OWN WILL... which is NATURALLY ADVERSE ("satan") to GOD...

Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 08:41:05 PMConcerning Satan this is the Truth of God's Word as mentioned above:                 

Job_26:13 By his spirit he hath garnished the   heavens; his hand hath formed the crooked   serpent.

Just as with man, it was God who created Satan as he is -   a crooked serpent. As such it is God's responsibility to do just this:

   Eph_1:9 Having made known unto us the mystery of  his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:

   Eph_1:10 That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather   together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even   in him:

All things...both which are in heaven and   which are on earth, certainly includes Satan and the entire spirit realm, both   the good and the evil.

This is YOUR current conclusion bro... and you are more than WELCOME to it... As ...I SEE IT... this view clashes WITH, and COMPROMISES, ...TOO many verses in the WORD...

There is NO VERSE in the WORD in which it is stated that "satan" (adversity/adversary) is either (1) a created sentient and PURPOSED ANGELIC BEING, or (2) was a "fallen angel" which was once HOLY...

The WORD just notes ADVERSITY as the PROBLEM, and that ADVERSITY isn't some external being, but that which is WITHIN the NATURAL man... 

Which, in turn,  ...is WHY we must be RENEWED in MIND, and become a NEW CREATION... There would be no need for any such RENEWAL or RECREATION, if "satan" (adversity to GOD) were an EXTERNAL problem...  The problem (adversity/"satan") is INTERNAL...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 15, 2008, 12:22:32 AM
willieH: Hi The0... :hithere:

Again, thanks for your thoughts, here are mine:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...


Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 07:33:09 PMHello willieH!

I do not think your argument PROVES that we 'HAVE ALWAYS BEEN', and were once, residents of HEAVEN. While it is true that God never changes, MAN does change. We are God's temple NOW, and God indwells us NOW. But what about before God's forgiveness of our sins? He didn't indwell us! What about when God did not indwell ANY man?

If you maintain the GOD never changes, but He DOES NOT do "something" (dwell in man), but later DOES that "something" (dwell in man)... it CERTAINLY DOES INDICATE that HE CHANGES!

Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 07:33:09 PMFollowing your line of reasoning, God didn't have a temple IN WHICH to dwell then. He had no abode! Fact is God has no need of man-made temples nor of hearts or spirits of men to dwell in. If that were true, God would depend ON us. But you know that God does not depend on man for anything! He is self-sufficient.

That is NOT my "line of thinking" at ALL The0!  I maintain that GOD is IN every man, for Scripture notes this: 

(John 1:9) ...that was the TRUE LIGHT, which LIGHTETH ...EVERY MAN... that cometh INTO the WORLD...

Also, GOD is the FATHER of SPIRITS (which ALL MEN, in fact, ARE):

(Heb 12:9)  Furthermore, we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence, shall we not rather be in subjection unto the FATHER of SPIRITS and live?

GOD does not "sire" NON-SPIRIT entities... In the SPIRIT is LIFE, The0... which is WHY AT death, ...the carcass of FLESH is left behind, inanimate and LIFE--LESS!

QuoteWhere did God dwell BEFORE He created mankind?

SONS are SPIRIT? and they have always been (you mean always existed?)?

Yes, ...at CREATION ...ALL the SONS of GOD shouted for JOY... (Job 38:7)  If ALL the SONS of GOD shouted for JOY, then ALL the SONS were there The0...

QuoteThe Scriptures declare that God IS spirit (John 4:24). Man IS NOT spirit. Man HAS a spirit. Because God is spirit, we cannot see Him. Jesus Christ IS the image of the INVISIBLE GOD. (Col. 1:15) He came to reveal the Father to us. He is purely spirit. Men are not purely spirit. Men are made of dust and GIVEN spirits. Because God GAVE us our spirits, at death they must GO BACK to him, the giver of our spirits. Man WAS NOT before. Man had a beginning when he was created.

MEN are not SONS of God The0... MEN are FLESHLY creations -- Houses of FLESH  if you will...

SONS of GOD are the TEMPLE and BODY of GOD (and ALWAYS have been)... which temporarily, DWELL in FLESH for the PURPOSE of gaining the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL (which only GOD had prior)... that YHVH might be ALL ...in ...ALL... to INCLUDE the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL...

Quote from: The0 on October 14, 2008, 07:33:09 PMWe are the body of Christ NOW, but there was a time that no man was a member of the body of Christ. Christ's body never changes? Just because Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever does not mean that his symbolic body [the believers] do not change. We change everyday. Christ's symbolic body, the believers, is growing in numbers, for instance. Let's not even talk about 'maturity'. We change from being immature to mature. Our being the symbolic body of Christ does not make us UNCHANGEABLE.

You are observing FLESH with eyes of FLESH that note CHANGE in FLESH The0...

The SONS of GOD have ALWAYS BEEN the TEMPLE and BODY of CHRIST... if, as you presently believe... the BODY changes, or was NOT the BODY at one moment or another, than CHRIST and YHVH indeed CHANGE... and are NOT the SAME continually...

Previous to this existence... ONLY the HEAD, knew GOOD and EVIL, and there was a portion of YHVH (knowledge of good and evil) that did not permeate His BODY...

Let me ask you a question bro... Do your fingers do what THEY want, or what "your HEAD" wants?

GOD is in process of showing His Children... what it is for "HIS BODY" to do OTHER than what the "HEAD wants"  :winkgrin:  ...And IN that process, gain agreement from the BODY, that the HEAD "knows best" and further SHOW, that the desire of the HEAD is PURPOSED to bring JOY continually ...to the BODY...

AND in that display, He is giving HIS BODY, the ability to recognize the KNOWLEDGE of that GREAT JOY via the contrasts we have been shown through the EXPERIENCE of this life in which we have endured its OPPOSITE -- SORROWS...

Is that not what YOUR "HEAD" wants and does for YOUR BODY The0?  Do you like to HIT HOME RUNS in a ballgame?  Or EAT delicious FOOD?  Or have the BEST FRIENDS? Or write the greatest SONGS?  Or wear the nicest CLOTHES? 

Let's face it bro... we (as "HEADS"), are very cognizant of OUR BODY's needs and desires... And we are about furnishing that BODY with the BEST we are able!  And the BEST PARAMETERS we are able to furnish it with, ...are found within the TRUTH of the WORD of GOD...

You are welcome to believe as you do bro... and I certainly DO NOT condemn you for it... hold onto it, until such time as GOD changes that belief, ...I once believed as do you, ...and just see a veil upon your eyes in this matter... 

There is NO DOUBT, that we'll all find out in the end, who had this right, and who had it wrong -- eh?  :dontknow:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 15, 2008, 03:12:00 PM
 

  WOW ! GOOD POSTING WILLIEH!! :icon_flower:

    you know I am  glad your here bro !
  I am encouraged  greatly  and want you to know that ..   
      openly  :HeartThrob:    :thumbsup:
seems the Body of Christ is scattered abroad    Head in Place  and IS being gathered back together again  [ no fragments remain ] left behind !

  thank you   :cloud9:
God love ya .....
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 16, 2008, 11:12:30 PM
willieH: Hi Sister R... :hithere:

Quote from: rosered on October 15, 2008, 03:12:00 PM
  WOW ! GOOD POSTING WILLIEH!! :icon_flower:

    you know I am  glad your here bro !
  I am encouraged  greatly  and want you to know that ..   
      openly  :HeartThrob:    :thumbsup:
seems the Body of Christ is scattered abroad    Head in Place  and IS being gathered back together again  [ no fragments remain ] left behind !

  thank you   :cloud9:
God love ya .....

Consider ALL of the above MUTUAL sister Rose!  I always find an uplifting spirit in your words...  :cloud9:

CHRIST ...IS... the "Head" of His Body and ALWAYS has been it's Head! 

Father YHVH God has always LOVED His Body, ...just as do we, ours...  :bgdance:

So glad you are here as well!

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 16, 2008, 11:46:14 PM
 
Awwwww  that sweet Willie , you know I am learning alot here  :) Thanking God too for that  :HeartThrob:  I appreciate   the Lords whole  being !
   and I do better being  a lurker/quiet  lol  perhaps   :girlheart:

     thanks !  Gods  love to ya..  rose
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 17, 2008, 07:37:23 PM
3He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake.
--Psalm 23



"restore" [my soul]

H7725
שׁוּב
shûb
shoob
A primitive root; to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point); generally to retreat; often adverbially again: -  ([break, build, circumcise, dig, do anything, do evil, feed, lay down, lie down, lodge, make, rejoice, send, take, weep]) X again, (cause to) answer (+ again), X in any case (wise), X at all, averse, bring (again, back, home again), call [to mind], carry again (back), cease, X certainly, come again (back) X consider, + continually, convert, deliver (again), + deny, draw back, fetch home again, X fro, get [oneself] (back) again, X give (again), go again (back, home), [go] out, hinder, let, [see] more, X needs, be past, X pay, pervert, pull in again, put (again, up again), recall, recompense, recover, refresh, relieve, render (again), X repent, requite, rescue, restore, retrieve, (cause to, make to) return, reverse, reward, + say nay, send back, set again, slide back, still, X surely, take back (off), (cause to, make to) turn (again, self again, away, back, back again, backward, from, off), withdraw.


John 15:19
If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.



Acts 22
14And he said, The God of our fathers hath chosen thee, that thou shouldest know his will, and see that Just One, and shouldest hear the voice of his mouth.

15For thou shalt be his witness unto all men of what thou hast seen and heard.




Hebrews 12:1
Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us,


"compassed about"
G4029
περίκειμαι
perikeimai
per-ik'-i-mahee
From G4012 and G2749; to lie all around, that is, inclose, encircle, hamper (literally or figuratively): - be bound (compassed) with, hang about.





Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 17, 2008, 08:03:42 PM
21Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.
22And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:


--Genesis 3



"coats"

H3801
כּתּנת    כּתנת
kethôneth kûttôneth
keth-o'-neth, koot-to'-neth
From an unused root meaning to cover (compare H3802); a shirt: - coat, garment, robe.



"skins"

H5785
עור
‛ôr
ore
From H5783; skin (as naked); by implication hide, leather: - hide, leather, skin.



H5783
עוּר
‛ûr
oor
A primitive root; to (be) bare: - be made naked.





Hebrews 12:1
Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us,

[let us] "lay aside"
G659
ἀποτίθημι
apotithēmi
ap-ot-eeth'-ay-mee
From G575 and G5087; to put away (literally or figuratively): - cast off, lay apart (aside, down), put away (off).




Galatians 3:27
For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.


"have put on"  Christ

G1746
ἐνδύω
enduō
en-doo'-o
From G1722 and G1416 (in the sense of sinking into a garment); to invest with clothing (literally or figuratively): - array, clothe (with), endue, have (put) on.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 17, 2008, 10:00:12 PM
willieH: How--D  Bratha's  :icon_king: & Sistiz  :icon_queen: !!!!  :cloud9:

CLOTHING is something that PROTECTS and keeps NAKEDNESS from being seen, and is also an ADORNMENT which flatters the wearer... and is that which is shown to be a COVERING... which spares the wearer of unnecessary EXPOSURE...

Concerning "CLOTHING" and SPIRITUAL things JESUS said:

Rev 3:18  I counsel [recommend] thee to buy of ME, ...GOLD ...TRIED... in FIRE [in this present life] that thou mayest be rich; and WHITE RAIMENT [clothing] that thou mayest be CLOTHED [covered] and that the SHAME of thy NAKEDNESS do not APPEAR; and anoint thine eyes with eye salve, that thou mayest see.

NOTE that the GOLD comes FIRST, ...then, ...the CLOTHING.  It is the Revelation of CHRIST ...WITHIN... that GENERATES the OUTWARD changes in sinful MEN...

CHRIST is symbolically stating above, that our OUTWARD actions which EMERGE of HIM, which is WITHIN, are demonstrated before the WORLD, as a testimony of HIMSELF, and DISPLAY  that "CLOTHING" that covers the NAKEDNESS of NATURAL FLESH which gravitates BY NATURE to SIN...   Showing the WORLD the NEW CREATION which is accomplished from the INSIDE -- OUT...

In doing so, we both bear a SOLID WITNESS of HIM, and in His INWARD power [GOLD] as we destroy the OUTWARD NATURE of OUR FLESHLY SHAME...

This BATTLE which is fought day by day, CLOTHES us IN CHRIST, is done from the INSIDE -- OUT, as PAUL has aptly noted for us:  (Rom 7:23-25 / 1 Cor 15:31)

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 18, 2008, 02:24:45 AM
53For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

--1 Cor 15


[must] "put on" [immortality]


G1746
ἐνδύω
enduō
en-doo'-o
From G1722 and G1416 (in the sense of sinking into a garment); to invest with clothing (literally or figuratively): - array, clothe (with), endue, have (put) on.





22But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:

23And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry:

24For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry.

--Luke 15




54So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

--1Cor 15



2 Chronicles 6:41
Now therefore arise, O LORD God, into thy resting place, thou, and the ark of thy strength: let thy priests, O LORD God, be clothed with salvation, and let thy saints rejoice in goodness.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 18, 2008, 01:26:54 PM
10Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.

11Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.


--Eph 6



"Put on" [the whole armour of God]

G1746
ἐνδύω
enduō
en-doo'-o
From G1722 and G1416 (in the sense of sinking into a garment); to invest with clothing (literally or figuratively): - array, clothe (with), endue, have (put) on.






12For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
13Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.


--Eph 6

"take unto you" [the whole armour of God]

G353
ἀναλαμβάνω
analambanō
an-al-am-ban'-o
From G303 and G2983; to take up: - receive up, take (in, unto, up).


G2983
λαμβάνω
lambanō
lam-ban'-o
A prolonged form of a primary verb, which is used only as an alternate in certain tenses; to take (in very many applications, literally and figuratively [probably objective or active, to get hold of; whereas G1209 is rather subjective or passive, to have offered to one; while G138 is more violent, to seize or remove]): - accept, + be amazed, assay, attain, bring, X when I call, catch, come on (X unto), + forget, have, hold, obtain, receive (X after), take (away, up).



12But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

--John 1

"received" [him]

G2983
λαμβάνω
lambanō
lam-ban'-o
A prolonged form of a primary verb, which is used only as an alternate in certain tenses; to take (in very many applications, literally and figuratively [probably objective or active, to get hold of; whereas G1209 is rather subjective or passive, to have offered to one; while G138 is more violent, to seize or remove]): - accept, + be amazed, assay, attain, bring, X when I call, catch, come on (X unto), + forget, have, hold, obtain, receive (X after), take (away, up).


4And the LORD said unto Moses, Put forth thine hand, and take it by the tail. And he put forth his hand, and caught it, and it became a rod in his hand:

--Ex 4


"caught" [it]

H2388
חזק
châzaq
khaw-zak'
A primitive root; to fasten upon; hence to seize, be strong(figuratively courageous, causatively strengthen, cure, help, repair, fortify), obstinate; to bind, restrain, conquer: - aid, amend, X calker, catch, cleave, confirm, be constant, constrain, continue, be of good (take) courage (-ous, -ly), encourage (self), be established, fasten, force, fortify, make hard, harden, help, (lay) hold (fast), lean, maintain, play the man, mend, become (wax) mighty, prevail, be recovered, repair, retain, seize, be (wax) sore, strengten (self), be stout, be (make, shew, wax) strong (-er), be sure, take (hold),be urgent, behave self valiantly, withstand.



33I have told you these things, so that in Me you may have [perfect] peace and confidence. In the world you have tribulation and trials and distress and frustration; but be of good cheer [take courage; be confident, certain, undaunted]!  For I have overcome the world. [I have deprived it of power to harm you and have conquered it for you.]

--John 16

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 19, 2008, 02:04:54 PM
Mark 14
28But after that I am risen, I will go before you into Galilee.


"Galilee"
G1056
Γαλιλαία
Galilaia
gal-il-ah-yah
Of hebrew origin [H1551]; Galilaea (that is, the heathen circle), a region of Palestine: - Galilee.


This is the first circumcision:


Exodus 13:21
And the LORD went before them by day in a pillar of a cloud, to lead them the way; and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; to go by day and night:



This is the second circumcision:


Joshua 5

2At that time the LORD said unto Joshua, Make thee sharp knives, and circumcise again the children of Israel the second time.



5Now all the people that came out were circumcised: but all the people that were born in the wilderness by the way as they came forth out of Egypt, them they had not circumcised.

6For the children of Israel walked forty years in the wilderness, till all the people that were men of war, which came out of Egypt, were consumed, because they obeyed not the voice of the LORD: unto whom the LORD sware that he would not shew them the land, which the LORD sware unto their fathers that he would give us, a land that floweth with milk and honey.




It is the second circumcision which is delivered from the burden of death and destruction, and which is led by the resurrected Christ into the promised land, the land of the living:



Joshua 5:9
And the LORD said unto Joshua, This day have I rolled away the reproach of Egypt from off you. Wherefore the name of the place is called Gilgal unto this day.


[this day]" have I rolled away"
H1556
גּלל
gâlal
gaw-lal'
A primitive root; to roll (literally or figuratively): - commit, remove, roll (away, down, together), run down, seek occasion, trust, wallow.


"Gilgal
H1536
גּלגּל
gilgâl
ghil-gawl'
A variation of H1534: - wheel.



Joshua 5

12And the manna ceased on the morrow after they had eaten of the old corn of the land; neither had the children of Israel manna any more; but they did eat of the fruit of the land of Canaan that year.

13And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries?

14And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the LORD am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my Lord unto his servant?

15And the captain of the LORD's host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so.




Isaiah 52

10The LORD hath made bare his holy arm in the eyes of all the nations; and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God.

11Depart ye, depart ye, go ye out from thence, touch no unclean thing; go ye out of the midst of her; be ye clean, that bear the vessels of the LORD.

12For ye shall not go out with haste, nor go by flight: for the LORD will go before you; and the God of Israel will be your reward.



..and all the ends of the earth shall see Y'shû‛âh...

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 19, 2008, 09:50:06 PM
willieH: Hi Molly... :hithere:

Your observance of the topic was certainly short-lived...  :sigh:

Quote(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"? 
(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"? 
(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?
(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

Let this be that last of discussing a different topic than the one proposed, if you would be so kind...

Why not start a "CLOTHING" thread Molly?  :dontknow:  If you are unsure about how to begin a discussion, PM me, and I'll be happy to help you!  :cloud9:

This discussion is about WHETHER or NOT, HOLY ANGELS ever FELL, and any proofs which might found such a contention... not about conversion of the soul... which seems to be that which you wish to discuss:

Quote from: Molly on October 18, 2008, 02:24:45 AM
53For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

--1 Cor 15


[must] "put on" [immortality]


G1746
ἐνδύω
enduō
en-doo'-o
From G1722 and G1416 (in the sense of sinking into a garment); to invest with clothing (literally or figuratively): - array, clothe (with), endue, have (put) on.





22But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:

23And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry:

24For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry.

--Luke 15




54So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

--1Cor 15



2 Chronicles 6:41
Now therefore arise, O LORD God, into thy resting place, thou, and the ark of thy strength: let thy priests, O LORD God, be clothed with salvation, and let thy saints rejoice in goodness.

What has this to do with HOLY ANGELS "falling"?  It is just more traditional, "Outside--In" observance... of the conversion of the soul... which is certainly a worthy topic of discussion, but IS NOT this one...  :dontknow: 

The outside is found to be the establishment of the corruption of the WORLD and the FLESH which happens from the OUTSIDE--IN... and,

The inside is found to be the establishment of the incorruption of the KINGDOM of GOD and the SPIRIT... which happens from the INSIDE--OUT!  :declare:

Change in SPIRIT is done from the INSIDE--OUT...  We do not "PUT ON" the armor of God on our extremity... it is worn WITHIN...

The CLOTHING of CHRIST is not OUTER WEAR... it is INNER WEAR!  :laughing7:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 19, 2008, 11:27:23 PM
Quote from: WillieHLet this be that last of discussing a different topic than the one proposed, if you would be so kind...

Why not start a "CLOTHING" thread Molly?    If you are unsure about how to begin a discussion, PM me, and I'll be happy to help you! 

This discussion is about WHETHER or NOT, HOLY ANGELS ever FELL, and any proofs which might found such a contention... not about conversion of the soul... which seems to be that which you wish to discuss:



50Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these.

51And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.


--John 1



Who are these angels of God?  They start on earth and ascend into heaven upon the Son of man.



"angels" [of God]

G32
ἄγγελος
aggelos
ang'-el-os
From ἀγγέλλω aggellō (probably derived from G71; compare G34; to bring tidings); a messenger; especially an "angel"; by implication a pastor: - angel, messenger.



These angels moving up and down Jacob's ladder, the Christ, are men.  Such a man was Jacob himself.  Such a man was John the Baptist.

And, yes clothing matters because it is our covering, which is Christ, which we see here is lost during the hour of darkness:




50And they all forsook him, and fled.

51And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:

52And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.


--Mark 14
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 20, 2008, 02:01:36 AM
willieH: Hello Molly... :rolleye:

Your observance of THIS topic was certainly short-lived...  :sigh: and continues to be:

Quote from: willieHLet this be that last of discussing a different topic than the one proposed, if you would be so kind...

Why not start a "CLOTHING" thread Molly?    If you are unsure about how to begin a discussion, PM me, and I'll be happy to help you! 

This discussion is about WHETHER or NOT, HOLY ANGELS ever FELL, and any proofs which might found such a contention... not about conversion of the soul... which seems to be that which you wish to discuss:

Quote from: Molly on October 19, 2008, 11:27:23 PM 50Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these.

51And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.


--John 1

Who are these angels of God?  They start on earth and ascend into heaven upon the Son of man.

"angels" [of God]

G32
ἄγγελος
aggelos
ang'-el-os
From ἀγγέλλω aggellō (probably derived from G71; compare G34; to bring tidings); a messenger; especially an "angel"; by implication a pastor: - angel, messenger.

Where in the text does it say these "angels" ...START on EARTH Molly?   

And regardless, ...what does ANY of this have to do with "FALLEN ANGELS" Molly?

The text you quote, says AS HEAVEN OPENS, they ascend and descend upon the Son of man, who is CHRIST... it DOES NOT say they "start" on EARTH... 

Irregardless, ...the above mentioned ANGELS, in John 1:51 are SPECIFICALLY noted as ANGELS of GOD, which are ascending and descending upon the Son of man -- CHRIST... :rolleye:

Quote from: Molly on October 19, 2008, 11:27:23 PMAnd, yes clothing matters because it is our covering, which is Christ, which we see here is lost during the hour of darkness:

50And they all forsook him, and fled.

51And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:

52And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.


--Mark 14

No one has said that "CLOTHING" concerning CHRIST does not matter...  :dontknow:

The truth is, that You just wish to argue about something that is not herein contended... and continue to make IRRELEVANT and INADAQUATE comments  concerning the TOPIC of this discussion.

As I previously suggested, ...why dont you start a thread on "CLOTHING", since you find it such a matter which is in need of discussion?   :Whistle:

You have been asked nicely by me to either discuss the topic or originate a new one which would entertain your agenda... yet you do not... Why?   :dunno:

Face yourself... and your motives Molly...  :sigh:

You refrain from contributing useful commentary to THIS TOPIC, mainly because you are WILLINGLY obstinate (with me in particular), and are become a WILLINGLY disruptive force within THIS DISCUSSION...

To this point you have contributed ZERO value to THIS DISCUSSION, for you continue to FAIL to address the TOPIC...  :dontknow:

Please refrain from further distractions from it... and start a thread about that which you are able, and wish to discuss... thank you...  :sigh:

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 03:25:27 AM
Quote from: WillieWhere in the text does it say these "angels" ...START on EARTH Molly? 


It's Jacob's ladder, Willie.  Jacob's ladder starts on earth.


11And he lighted upon a certain place, and tarried there all night, because the sun was set; and he took of the stones of that place, and put them for his pillows, and lay down in that place to sleep.

12And he dreamed, and behold a ladder set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to heaven: and behold the angels of God ascending and descending on it.


--Genesis 28



Jesus identifies himself as Jacob's ladder



51And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.

--John 1



Jacob himself ascends this ladder and speaks with God who is at the top of it.



15And, behold, I am with thee, and will keep thee in all places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done that which I have spoken to thee of.

16And Jacob awaked out of his sleep, and he said, Surely the LORD is in this place; and I knew it not.

17And he was afraid, and said, How dreadful is this place! this is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.

18And Jacob rose up early in the morning, and took the stone that he had put for his pillows, and set it up for a pillar, and poured oil upon the top of it.

19And he called the name of that place Bethel: ["House of God"]

--Genesis 28

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 20, 2008, 07:11:01 AM
willieH: Molly...  :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

For CRYING OUT LOUD!  :mshock:  ext thing you know, you'll be talking about Britney Spears in this thread!   :sigh:

What will it take to get through :director: to YOU?

This TOPIC is not about the "earthly doings of ANGELS, or that they exist, or that they ministered to CHRIST, ...it is about the CONTENTION of the TRADITIONAL Church, that ANGELS FELL while in a PERFECT Place and Scenario -- HEAVEN... :rolleye:

I'm done indulging you... get off your "word defintion" :soap: soap box...

STICK to the discussion TOPIC discussion, and cease inventing your own discussion, within it...  :thumbdown:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 08:02:04 AM
Quote from: WillieThis TOPIC is not about the "earthly doings of ANGELS, or that they exist, or that they ministered to CHRIST, ...it is about the CONTENTION of the TRADITIONAL Church, that ANGELS FELL while in a PERFECT Place and Scenario -- HEAVEN...

well, what are they doing on earth in need of a staircase to heaven if they didn't ....fall?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 04:07:42 PM


Wasn't Britney an angel who fell?,  or maybe that was her pants, I forget.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 05:15:46 PM


Satan was a murderer from the beginning.


John 8:44 Ye are of [your] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.


Beginning of what?   Scripture please.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 05:45:42 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 05:15:46 PM


Satan was a murderer from the beginning.


John 8:44 Ye are of [your] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.


Beginning of what?   Scripture please.



From the beginning of the story of Adam.

Our first introduction to him in Genesis 3 shows him lying to Eve in order to commit murder of both Adam and Eve.

1Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?


...Ye shall not surely die:


--Genesis 3


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 06:01:23 PM



In Genesis it says Serpent,  it does not say Satan or even Devil.


H5175  nachash  naw-khawsh'

from H5172;

a snake (from its hiss):--serpent.



H5172  nachash  naw-khash'

a primitive root;

properly, to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally, to prognosticate:--X
certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) X enchantment, learn by experience, X
indeed, diligently observe.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 06:05:20 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 06:01:23 PM



In Genesis it says Serpent,  it does not say Satan or even Devil.


H5175  nachash  naw-khawsh'

from H5172;

a snake (from its hiss):--serpent.



H5172  nachash  naw-khash'

a primitive root;

properly, to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally, to prognosticate:--X
certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) X enchantment, learn by experience, X
indeed, diligently observe.




Same thing.


Revelation 20:2
And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 06:19:48 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 06:05:20 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 06:01:23 PM



In Genesis it says Serpent,  it does not say Satan or even Devil.


H5175  nachash  naw-khawsh'

from H5172;

a snake (from its hiss):--serpent.



H5172  nachash  naw-khash'

a primitive root;

properly, to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally, to prognosticate:--X
certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) X enchantment, learn by experience, X
indeed, diligently observe.




Same thing.


Revelation 20:2
And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

Context can be see that Serpent  applies to the nature of man through the word and root word.

The original manuscripts do not contain the commas used to try to show that they are one and the same.

The definition for serpent in revelation is especially of Satan,  but that is not the primary meaning, especially when the root word is looked at.




and he holds the dragon the serpent the original who is thru-caster and the satan and he binds him thousand years

The greek for him in this passage

G846  autos  ow-tos'

from the particle au (perhaps akin to the base of G109 through the idea of a
baffling wind) (backward);

the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the
third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:--
her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-,
thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, - by, -in,
-into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very,
which. Compare G848.


In usage and context when you remove the commas  and in context with the Serpent being Mans nature and not Satan,   This should be translated THEM.


There is still nothing along these lines that says Satan was a perfect angel who fell through a choice to become imperfect.   
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 20, 2008, 06:20:49 PM
satan / adversary  is

 the worldly wisdom  to me  and comes from  the earth  [Red Adam] clay
Jam 3:15 This wisdom descendeth not from above, but [is] earthly, sensual, devilish. For where envying and strife [is], there [is] confusion and every evil work.
 what is above  is the  wisdom of God over all  wisdom Jam 1:17 Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. two covenants

 the lightof  the  moon light and Sun Light

being  knowledge  of God


 we know that the serpents food is DUST ADAMS FLESH  Greek for G3789 ὄφις Transliteration
ophis
Pronunciation

o'-fēs (Key)

Part of Speech
masculine noun

Root Word (Etymology)

probably from G3700 (through the idea of sharpness of vision)

TDNT Reference
5:566,748
Vines
View Entry


Outline of Biblical Usage 1) snake, serpent

2) with the ancients, the serpent was an emblem of cunning and wisdom. The serpent who deceived Eve was regarded by the Jews as the devil.
its is a wisdom that even Peter tried to tell Jesus not to go to the  cross and Jesus told him  get behind me  satan / adversity  
  that he was mindful of the things of men  the low form of   knowledge /wisdom  beneath   eartly and sensual   devilish  going by feelings  
not by What is Right and true








 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 06:27:55 PM
Quote from: PaulContext can be see that Serpent  applies to the nature of man through the word and root word.

If Satan is just man's nature, then why don't we see him in Genesis 2?

Instead we see Adam walking and talking with God--no problems.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 06:50:32 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 06:27:55 PM
Quote from: PaulContext can be see that Serpent  applies to the nature of man through the word and root word.

If Satan is just man's nature, then why don't we see him in Genesis 2?

Instead we see Adam walking and talking with God--no problems.


It's how we are,  we can do well with God at times.   That doesn't mean that is not our nature to go against God.  None of us are perfect, and how we define something as bad, worse or horrible is irrevalent.  Until you are perfect you do things that are emnity to God. 


The story of the Serpent is about the depiction of how our Nature works,  it does not prove that it was Satan that came around and deceived.   The word and root and context does not introduce the Serpent as Satan.

Yes, their nature went against God, or it would not have happened in the first place.

How does a wonderful, perfect flawless being get deceieved if it is perfect as we want to usually define it? 


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 06:51:24 PM
Quote from: Rosesatan / adversary  

Satan is God's adversary.  That's why he opposes the men of God.  If you are in Satan's camp, worshipping him and bowing down to him, he is not opposing you.

And, that's why when Michael is in a dispute with Satan, he says, The Lord rebuke thee.


"In the very same way, these dreamers pollute their own bodies, reject authority and slander celestial beings.  But even the archangel Michael, when he was disputing with the devil about the body of Moses, did not dare to bring a slanderous accusation against him, but said, "The Lord rebuke you!"

--Jude 1
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:00:39 PM
Quote from: PaulHow does a wonderful, perfect flawless being get deceived if it is perfect as we want to usually define it?

Adam wasn't deceived.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:06:34 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:00:39 PM
Quote from: PaulHow does a wonderful, perfect flawless being get deceived if it is perfect as we want to usually define it?

Adam wasn't deceived.


I will rephrase that if necessary.

Answer the question pertaining to EVE.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 20, 2008, 07:09:53 PM
 
I was thinking more of the left hand [power] bad name in a sense  
to and good name    right hand  in  power authority  
after  studying them  both  I saw that   it can also  be a sense of direction as well   ?

  the  reason I think this Is JESUS TELLING US  THIS  

Mat 12:26 And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand?  
 the scattering  of dust the serpents food ...  Mat 12:30 He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.

Mar 3:26 And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end.  

 Greek for G1188 δεξιός Transliteration
dexios
Pronunciation

de-ksē-o's (Key)

Part of Speech
adjective

Root Word (Etymology)

from G1209

TDNT Reference
2:37,143
Vines
View Entry


Outline of Biblical Usage 1) the right, the right hand

2) metaph.

a) a place of honour or authority
Greek for G2176 εὐώνυμος Transliteration
euōnymos
Pronunciation

yü-ō'-nü-mos (Key)

Part of Speech
adjective

Root Word (Etymology)

from G2095 and G3686

TDNT Reference
n/a
Vines
View Entry


Outline of Biblical Usage 1) of good name and of good omen

a) in the latter sense used in taking auguries; but those omens were euphemistically called "euonumos" which in fact were regarded as unlucky, i.e. which came from the left, sinister omens, (for which a good name was desired)

2) left, on the left hand

 and  Jesus tells them  that   not to rejoice that the  they had power over the spirits , but rather their Names were written in Heaven


hope this  helps distinguish  between the two
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:10:04 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:06:34 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:00:39 PM
Quote from: PaulHow does a wonderful, perfect flawless being get deceived if it is perfect as we want to usually define it?

Adam wasn't deceived.


I will rephrase that if necessary.

Answer the question pertaining to EVE.




Eve did not have the Holy Spirit--the breath of God.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 20, 2008, 07:14:16 PM



  here paul gives an awesome clue to this dilema  the jealousy  [godly ] type to make them chaste VIRGINS /PURE MINDS READY for Christ to come into them

2Cr 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or [if] ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye  have not accepted, ye might well bear with [him].
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:16:15 PM
Yes, she is opened to being corrupted by another spirit.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:26:16 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:10:04 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:06:34 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:00:39 PM
Quote from: PaulHow does a wonderful, perfect flawless being get deceived if it is perfect as we want to usually define it?

Adam wasn't deceived.


I will rephrase that if necessary.

Answer the question pertaining to EVE.




Eve did not have the Holy Spirit--the breath of God.


Then she was not perfect.


I'm assuming your saying that Adam had the breath of God therefore perfect and flawless.  Yet,  he sinned,  why he sinned is irrevalent to the issue.  He sinned, why did this happen if he was flawless and perfect as is often implied in the traditional explanations?

Adam died because to the WAGES of SIN is DEATH.

What was perfect about ADAM that MADE HIM SIN?   

This still has no bearing on Satan falling from the perfection of being a heavenly flawless being in heaven. 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 20, 2008, 07:31:29 PM
Scripture states that Adam was not created perfect, but very good. Even then, very good does not mean sinless or with the inability to sin. It is ontologically very good and perfection is also ontologically perfect. In other words, we are considered good and perfect by God, not by our standards in the first place.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:31:53 PM
Quote from: PaulHe sinned, why did this happen if he was flawless and perfect as is often implied in the traditional explanations?

Because he was God's son, and he did what God would do himself if he saw his loved one dying--give himself to save her.

...the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:34:55 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 20, 2008, 07:31:29 PM
Scripture states that Adam was not created perfect, but very good. Even then, very good does not mean sinless or with the inability to sin. It is ontologically very good and perfection is also ontologically perfect. In other words, we are considered good and perfect by God, not by our standards in the first place.

I agree,  Adam was created perfect for Gods purpose.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:37:55 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:34:55 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 20, 2008, 07:31:29 PM
Scripture states that Adam was not created perfect, but very good. Even then, very good does not mean sinless or with the inability to sin. It is ontologically very good and perfection is also ontologically perfect. In other words, we are considered good and perfect by God, not by our standards in the first place.

I agree,  Adam was created perfect for Gods purpose.

Adam is the first High Priest on the order of Aaron.

Jesus is a Melchizedek priest.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:40:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:31:53 PM
Quote from: PaulHe sinned, why did this happen if he was flawless and perfect as is often implied in the traditional explanations?

Because he was God's son, and he did what God would do himself if he saw his loved one dying--give himself to save her.

...the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.



How are you using the word perfect here?

God is perfect?   God will sin then?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 20, 2008, 07:40:56 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:16:15 PM
Yes, she is opened to being corrupted by another spirit.
Yes Molly  ,  a spirit / breath  to respire  respire definition | Dictionary.com
 has the power in the tongue / speech  / language  to  have life or death in it    wrath or  mercy etc ,
 and I see that  the beast  had  the  appearance  of a Lamb , but spoke as a dragon
 has  some signifigance in it as well
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:42:31 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:31:53 PM
Quote from: PaulHe sinned, why did this happen if he was flawless and perfect as is often implied in the traditional explanations?

Because he was God's son, and he did what God would do himself if he saw his loved one dying--give himself to save her.

...the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.




Now tie this reasoning to angels who fell.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:43:11 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:40:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:31:53 PM
Quote from: PaulHe sinned, why did this happen if he was flawless and perfect as is often implied in the traditional explanations?

Because he was God's son, and he did what God would do himself if he saw his loved one dying--give himself to save her.

...the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.



How are you using the word perfect here?

God is perfect?   God will sin then?



Behold the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world.

--John 1:29
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 20, 2008, 07:46:06 PM
Mat 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. [COMPLETE]for teleios (Strong's G5046) Greek for G5046 τέλειος Transliteration
teleios
Pronunciation

te'-lā-os (Key)

Part of Speech
adjective

Root Word (Etymology)

from G5056

TDNT Reference
8:67,1161
Vines
View Entry


Outline of Biblical Usage 1) brought to its end, finished

2) wanting nothing necessary to completeness

3) perfect

4) that which is perfect

a) consummate human integrity and virtue

b) of men

1) full grown, adult, of full age, mature
What of this ??
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 20, 2008, 07:48:23 PM


  well in Adam  all die , In Christ they shall be made ALIVE
  seems Adam was not complete than huh ?    just very good  , not perfect
   thats what I am seeing
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:50:19 PM
Quote from: PaulNow, tie this reasoning to angels who fell.


The celestial spirits known as angels who fell were fighting against [opposing/adversaries] the angels of God.

It is a spiritual battle.

Satan can never be a son.  He will never be what Adam was by birthright.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:51:01 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:43:11 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:40:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:31:53 PM
Quote from: PaulHe sinned, why did this happen if he was flawless and perfect as is often implied in the traditional explanations?

Because he was God's son, and he did what God would do himself if he saw his loved one dying--give himself to save her.

...the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.



How are you using the word perfect here?

God is perfect?   God will sin then?



Behold the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world.

--John 1:29



Therefor Adam was not created without the Serpent nature in the first place.   But created perfect for the very purpose of dying so that all could be made alive,  learning righteousness.  

Satan was created perfect for the very purpose that he is.  

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:54:19 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:51:01 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:43:11 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:40:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:31:53 PM
Quote from: PaulHe sinned, why did this happen if he was flawless and perfect as is often implied in the traditional explanations?

Because he was God's son, and he did what God would do himself if he saw his loved one dying--give himself to save her.

...the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.



How are you using the word perfect here?

God is perfect?   God will sin then?



Behold the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world.

--John 1:29



Therefor Adam was not created without the Serpent nature in the first place.   But created perfect for the very purpose of dying so that all could be made alive,  learning righteousness.  

Satan was created perfect for the very purpose that he is.  


I do not believe or agree that Adam had 'the serpent nature.'

Although I'm sure Satan would like to think so, so that he can accuse God by indicting his son.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:56:40 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:50:19 PM

The celestial spirits known as angels who fell were fighting against the angels of God.

It is a spiritual battle.

Satan can never be a son.  He will never be what Adam was by birthright.



Another problem is that the word along these lines that are traslated to angels is primarily translated to messengers.  Angels imply something that is not in proper context with the whole thing.


A messenger of Satan was not inherantly once holy angel in heaven in union with God.

This subject also rarely if ever see the that there are Heavens not just a one heaven.  So this creation of subjects that turned to fight against God,  goes against the normal thought that they were flawless with God.   There is more to it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 08:00:09 PM
Yes, it's a deep subject.

What would you say of a priest of God who purposely leads the sheep astray?

A pastor who lies about Jesus?

A king who rules unjustly?

A prophet who lies?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 08:01:04 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:54:19 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:51:01 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:43:11 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:40:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:31:53 PM
Quote from: PaulHe sinned, why did this happen if he was flawless and perfect as is often implied in the traditional explanations?

Because he was God's son, and he did what God would do himself if he saw his loved one dying--give himself to save her.

...the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.



How are you using the word perfect here?

God is perfect?   God will sin then?



Behold the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world.

--John 1:29



Therefor Adam was not created without the Serpent nature in the first place.   But created perfect for the very purpose of dying so that all could be made alive,  learning righteousness.  

Satan was created perfect for the very purpose that he is.  


I do not believe or agree that Adam had 'the serpent nature.'

Although I'm sure Satan would like to think so, so that he can accuse God by indicting his son.



Did Adam sin?   And if so how does that make him like God or Jesus?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 08:03:50 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 08:00:09 PM
Yes, it's a deep subject.

What would you say of a priest of God who purposely leads the sheep astray?

A pastor who lies about Jesus?

A king who rules unjustly?

A prophet who lies?


Different issue,

God has the control, so are we ever truly led astray?    That sentiment in your quote can be said if there is the possibility that our choices can lead us to be eternally Damned?   Far as I can tell Molly, you do not believe that,  but there have been people post here where ultimatly that was revealed.

In Romans, you cannot deny what it says.   Subject to Vanity "not willingly".   Thats what God did.

But as long as a person emotionalizes it,  then it will appear evil.


But when the purpose is so that "the inhabitants of the earth LEARN righteousness" then everything changes.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 08:07:34 PM
Adam transgressed against a commandment of God--Don't eat from that tree.

He is like God in that he has God's nature--he is God's son--the image of the one who is to come.

God knows the motives of the heart.

Jesus is the unique Son of God, the second Adam, the last Adam.  He doesn't sin himself but takes on the sin of the world in order to redeem the world, just as Adam takes on Eve's sin in order to redeem her.

We see the first of the ritual sacrifice of the lamb happening outside the garden, as well, in the person of Able.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 08:14:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 08:07:34 PM
Adam transgressed against a commandment of God--Don't eat from that tree.

He is like God in that he has God's nature--he is God's son--the image of the one who is to come.

God knows the motives of the heart.

Jesus is the unique Son of God, the second Adam, the last Adam.  He doesn't sin himself but takes on the sin of the world in order to redeem the world, just as Adam takes on Eve's sin in order to redeem her.

We see the first of the ritual sacrifice of the lamb happening outside the garden, as well, in the person of Able.




I can see what your saying here, but it over looks a greater fundamental problem.
Adam shows his nature here opposite of what your trying to say.

Gn 3:12 And saying is the human,  "The woman whom You gave, withal, she gave to me from the tree and I am eating."


If Adam was making this sacrifice in righteousness, then  Adam would have no reason to try to blame God for giving him the woman in the first place,  therefor trying to get out of this predicament.


So Adam is showing the crafty nature of the serpent right here.   

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 08:30:34 PM
You are quoting from something Adam says after he eats from the tree.

Now his eyes are opened and he is blind.

Now he hides from God.

But, even so, Jesus calls his son, Able, righteous.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 08:51:34 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 08:30:34 PM
You are quoting from something Adam says after he eats from the tree.

Now his eyes are opened and he is blind.

Now he hides from God.

First, it is plain that there is no solid scriptural support for angels falling from perfect communion with God to be at war with him.   The point in all of this is that Adam and Eve were created with the prupose of sinning and dying to manifest the process that God put in place.

The same goes for Satan and his messengers, created to do exactly what they do.

If we want to use the phrase "fell from heaven"   Which heaven?


Secondly, what your saying here further solidifies my point.    If Adam had done something out of a pure heart it would NOT have been a sin.

The fact that it was a sin, says otherwise.

Quote
But, even so, Jesus calls his son, Able, righteous.

And that does not mean without sin.   Did Able die?   What is the wages of Sin?






Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on October 20, 2008, 09:25:09 PM
this is a writing from a friend of mine,   Just another perspective. 


Rev 20:2
He laid hold of the dragon , that serpent of old, who is the Devil and Satan,

Here John ties several name as having the same meaning.


Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made.

We are taught that the serpent is smarter than the other beasts of the field. But that is not what is said it says that he has more knowledge and understanding that the beast of the field, not that he is one of them.


And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? {Yea...: Heb. Yea, because, etc.} 2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3 But of the fruit of the tree which [is] in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, (?) lest ye die.


This was given to Adam not Eve so were did Eve and the serpent get this from?

4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:. 4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.6 And when the woman saw that the tree [was] good for food, and that it [was] pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make [one] wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

The serpent lied.

Here we can see Adam is right there with Eve and God had given him the command not to eat the fruit. Why didn't Adam step in and put a stop to this?

Why did Adam take the fruit from Eve?


7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they [were] naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. {aprons: or, things to gird about} 8 And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.


Were is the serpent?


9 And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where [art] thou? 10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I [was] naked; and I hid myself. 11 And he said, Who told thee that thou [wast] naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? 12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest [to be] with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. 13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What [is] this [that] thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. 14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou [art] cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:


Why would a supernatural spirit being eat?


15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, (why only two and not 3 ?) and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. 16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. {to thy...: or, subject to thy husband} 17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed [is] the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat [of] it all the days of thy life; 18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field; {bring...: Heb. cause to bud} 19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou [art], and unto dust shalt thou return.


Looks as though Adam and the seperent have dust in common.


20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve, because she was the mother of all living. 21 Also for Adam and his wife the LORD God made tunics of skin, and clothed them. 22 Then the LORD God said, "Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever" -- 23 therefore the LORD God sent him out of the garden of Eden to till the ground from which he was taken. 24 So He drove out the man; and He placed cherubim at the east of the garden of Eden, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way to the tree of life.


God put them out before they ate from the Tree of life therefore Adam's sin caused death to all of man.




Ezekiel 28:1 And the Word of Jehovah was to me, saying, 2 Son of man, say to the ruler of Tyre, So says the Lord Jehovah, Because your heart is lifted up, and you have said, I am a god, I sit in the seat of gods, in the heart of the seas; yet you are a man, and not God, though you give your heart as the heart of gods. 3 Behold, you are wiser than Daniel. Every one of the secret things are not hidden to you. 4 With your wisdom and with your understanding you have made riches for yourself, and have worked gold and silver into your treasuries. 5 By your great wisdom, by your trade you have multiplied your riches, and your heart is lifted up because of your riches. 6 So the Lord Jehovah says this: Because you have given your heart as the heart of gods, 7 behold, so I will bring on you awesome strangers of the nations. And they shall draw their swords against the beauty of your wisdom and will defile your splendor. 8 They will cause you to go down to the Pit, and you shall die the deaths of the slain in the heart of the seas. 9 Saying, do you say, I am of the gods before him who strikes you? But you are a man, and not God, in the hands of him who pierces you. 10 You shall die the deaths of the uncircumcised, by the hand of strangers. For I have spoken, says the Lord Jehovah. 11 And the Word of Jehovah was to me, saying, 12 Son of man, lift up a lament over the king of Tyre, and say to him, So says the Lord Jehovah: You seal the measure, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. 13 You have been in Eden, the garden of God. Every precious stone was your covering; the ruby, the topaz, and the jasper, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the turquoise, and the carbuncle, and gold; the workmanship of your tambourines and of your flutes in you. In the day you were created, they were prepared. 14 You were the anointed cherub that covers, and I had put you in the holy heights of God, where you were. You walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.



Now this is interesting, The perfect anointed cherub that was in the garden of Eden with God that fell.

This can only be the serpent.

But don't it say that he is only a man?

Isn't the only man in Eden Adam?

15 You were perfect in your ways from the day you were created, until  iniquity was found in you. 16 By the multitude of your trade, they filled your midst with violence, and you sinned. So I cast you defiled from the height of God, and I destroyed you, O covering cherub, from among the stones of fire. 17 Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom because of your splendor. I have cast you to the ground.


Isn't that what happened to the serpent?

(Gen.3:14 upon thy belly shalt thou go)

I will put you before kings, that they may see you. 18 By the host of your iniquities, by the iniquity of your trade, you have defiled your holy places. So I brought a fire from your midst and it shall devour you, and I will give you for ashes on the earth in the sight of all who see you. 19 All who know you among the peoples shall be appalled at you. You shall be terrors, and you will not be forever. 20 And the Word of Jehovah was to me, saying, 21 Son of man, set your face against Sidon and prophesy against her, 22 and say, So says the Lord Jehovah, Behold, I am against you, O Sidon, and I will be glorified in your midst. And they shall know that I am Jehovah when I have done judgments in her and shall be sanctified by her. 23 And I will send a plague into her, and blood into her streets. And the slain will fall in her midst by the sword, on her from all around. And they shall know that I am Jehovah. 24 And there will not be a pricking brier or a painful thorn to the house of Israel any more from all who surround them, those who hate them. And they shall know that I am the Lord Jehovah. 25 So says the Lord Jehovah: When I have gathered the house of Israel from the peoples among whom they are dispersed, and have been sanctified in them in the sight of the nations, then they shall dwell on their land which I have given to My servant Jacob. 26 And they shall dwell in it securely and shall build houses and plant vineyards. Yes, they shall dwell securely, when I have done judgments on all those who hate them round about them. And they shall know that I am Jehovah their God.



Isaiah 14:1 For the LORD will have mercy on Jacob, and will still choose Israel, and settle them in their own land. The strangers will be joined with them, and they will cling to the house of Jacob. 2 Then people will take them and bring them to their place, and the house of Israel will possess them for servants and maids in the land of the LORD; they will take them captive whose captives they were, and rule over their oppressors. 3 It shall come to pass in the day the LORD gives you rest from your sorrow, and from your fear and the hard bondage in which you were made to serve, 4 that you will take up this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say: "How the oppressor has ceased, The golden city ceased! 5 The LORD has broken the staff of the wicked, The scepter of the rulers; 6 He who struck the people in wrath with a continual stroke, He who ruled the nations in anger, Is persecuted [and] no one hinders. 7 The whole earth is at rest [and] quiet; They break forth into singing. 8 Indeed the cypress trees rejoice over you, [And] the cedars of Lebanon, [Saying,] 'Since you were cut down, No woodsman has come up against us.' 9 "Hell from beneath is excited about you, To meet [you] at your coming; It stirs up the dead for you, All the chief ones of the earth; It has raised up from their thrones All the kings of the nations. 10 They all shall speak and say to you: 'Have you also become as weak as we? Have you become like us? 11 Your pomp is brought down to Sheol, [And] the sound of your stringed instruments; The maggot is spread under you, And worms cover you.' 12 " How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! [How] you are cut down to the ground, You who weakened the nations! 13 For you have said in your heart: 'I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God; I will also sit on the mount of the congregation On the farthest sides of the north; 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds, I will be like the Most High.' 15 Yet you shall be brought down to Sheol, To the lowest depths of the Pit. 16 "Those who see you will gaze at you, [And] consider you, [saying:] '[Is] this the man who made the earth tremble, Who shook kingdoms,


Here again we are taught this is the fall of Satan. He was cut to the ground like the serpent but it also says that he is a man.

John 8:44 "You are of [your] father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and [does not] stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own [resources,] for he is a liar and the father of it.


Were did the devil kill anyone from the beginning?

It was Adam that brought death unto all from the beginning when he ate the fruit.

The serpent was the liar he told Eve that death wouldn't come if they ate the fruit.

Either Jesus is confused or Adam and the serpent are one and the same.


Romans 5:12 Therefore, just as through one man (Adam) sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men,

1 John 3:11-12For this is the message that you heard from the beginning, that we should love one another, not as Cain who was of the wicked one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his works were evil and his brother's righteous.

Genesis 4:1 Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain.


Cain was of Adam so John is saying Adam is the wicked one (devil).


Jer 9:11And I will make Jerusalem heaps, and a den of dragons

The Dragons here are wicked men.


Matt 3:4-7
Now John himself was clothed in camel's hair, with a leather belt around his waist; and his food was locusts and wild honey. Then Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the region around the Jordan went out to him and were baptized by him in the Jordan, confessing their sins. But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them,"Brood of vipers


Here John called men vipers.

Matt 23:33 Serpents, brood of vipers ! How can you escape the condemnation of hell?

Jesus calls men vipers here.

Satan is the "adversary" and Adam deliberately went against God.

1 Tim.2:14 And Adam was not deceived.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on October 20, 2008, 09:33:49 PM
and if interested, another perspective from another forum of a friend of mine.

"Hi guys, these are my thoughts in response to what Laren posed in the Mystery of Ages thread:

Laren said:


Quote:Here are two verses i've been pondering that i think might be related to this topic:

1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

why wasnt' he deceived??

Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

where does this "internal" knowledge come from??

Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

notice the order here,

first knowledge and "knew God", then became vain in their imaginations

knew:

G1097
γινώσκω
ginōskō
ghin-oce'-ko
A prolonged form of a primary verb; to "know" (absolutely), in a great variety of applications and with many implications (as shown at left, with others not thus clearly expressed): - allow, be aware (of), feel, (have) known (-ledge), perceive, be resolved, can speak, be sure, understand.


casting out imaginations and every high thing.

2Co 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the incorruptible God (where was this knowledge?? in their perceptions) into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.


so it seems to me, the order is "know God", clearly see this, glorify him not, become vain in imaginations and then have FOOLISH heart darkened.

Rom 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves:

Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

again look at the order. know truth first, then turn it into a lie, then be turned over to their own lusts.

Adam was not decieved.



My friend writes:

These are great insights Laren! I wanted to add my "version" which I realize is limited at best, since the study of the mind is phenomenally huge.....but here's my lil ole attempt...

As you know my friend, I tend to see the scriptures more so as symbolic than anything else, and in fact my understanding is bordering on (dare I say) mystical....sooooo....just a disclaimer to all those who are easily offended or view scriptures more literally...

I will venture to say then, that on a parabolic level I see Eve as that part of our mind which contains the womb or birthing place of thought....an idea that begins to conceptualized...this takes place in the conscious mind (as I understand it scientifically)

I see Adam as that deeper part of our mind, the subconscious which is "the knowing"....

Now from what I understand, the subconscious does not rationalize...it takes what is given to it after it has been filtered through the conscious mind....it doesn't question what it is given...

".... she (the conscious mind) took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband (the subconscious mind) who was with her, and he ate. Gen 3:6

he doesn't question, Adam just takes what Eve gives her and eats...

Now, if then in a symbolic way we can see Eve as the conscious mind we can begin to see why it is that she was deceived, yet Adam was not...

the conscious mind takes in information according to the senses...it then formulates beliefs, ideas, thoughts according to those senses....the conscious mind is prone to allowing the physical world determine what is truth...

the subconscious mind, I believe, has a sense of being and knowing that is deeply connected to spirit...it (adam) is the witness to the conscious mind (eve)...it (adam) doesn't judge one way or the other, but experiences and co-operates along with the conscious mind (eve) according to what the conscious mind believes....

this is why I see that the serpent spoke specifically with Eve...she is the only one who is able to take in information according to the senses...she is the "filter" so to speak...

the serpent is said to be "subtle"....meaning shrewd, sensible, prudent

sensible means: Capable of being perceived by the senses

prudent means: Sagacious (of quick sense perceptions) in adapting means to ends; circumspect (to look about one's self) in action

this all has to do with the senses....by which we experience the outside world...

and isn't it the senses which beguile us?? isn't it the senses which tempt us? which trigger the lusts within our own flesh...

eg...you're on a diet but you smell that yummy pizza which tastes so good but which you don't need for nutrition because you just ate a healthy salad...your senses trick you into eating it...

But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
James 1:14


what I am saying here is that the subconscious cannot be tempted or deceived because it simply takes in that which it is given...

there are many who believe that the subconscious has the faith of a child...it goes along with whatever you tell it....and therein lies the rub...tell it lies, it goes along with the lies and so man, who houses both the conscious and subconscious, experiences the consequences of whatever his conscious mind feeds to his subconscious....

Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness.

(oh boy, if we could only get our conscious minds to shut up... )

I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.

(if we would stop allowing the physical sensual world to teach the conscious mind of truth we would not be feeding the subconscious mind with the forbidden fruit of duality....to be still and know that I God...to stop being a slave to our thoughts which have previously taken authority over us, we in Christ are to take authority over our thoughts...)

For Adam (the subconscious where the essence of being resides) was formed first,

then Eve (the conscious mind where thoughts are formed and through which ideas spring forth into the physical world);

and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.

Yet she will be saved through childbearing--if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.
1 Timothy 2:11-15

this childbearing I believe to be the birth of thought in the womb of the conscious mind which manifests into expression...this is where we are to be "self-controlled" and thinking thoughts of faith, love and holiness...

the subconscious and conscious cannot be separated and one depends on the other just as in a true marraige...

so as any true husband should, adam (the subconscious) supports his wife (the conscious) in whatever she believes, and in fact does everything he can to fulfill her desires...whether they be productive or non-productive

so what I see is that, when the conscious mind begins to perceive the illusionary element to the physical world, and that what is going on in our minds is being projected outwards, we begin to take care of what we are birthing/thinking....if we can be saved through childbearing...we can be saved through changing our minds, (repenting) and through birthing Christed thoughts into the world rather than the thoughts seeded by the serpent (thoughts seeded by the sensual temptations of the physical world)....

interestingly "cherub" means imaginary thing and in fact there is some indication in the Hebrew traditions that it is connected to the serpent....could this then be connected to "vain imaginations"....if the cherubs are guarding eden, we could say our vain imaginations are guarding us from achieving that higher state of consciousness which is eden....

in my study of "image and likeness of God" months ago I saw that in one sense what we see when we look at ourselves is imaginary...a phantam, an illusion....only an "image" of Elohim...the essense of who we are lies not in what we can perceive with the senses, but is deeper....the essence of who we are lies in the subconscious...the witness, the knowing....and this cannot be deceived...it has known throughout the ages the truth, though hidden...and the experience of the conscious mind serves to lead man back to this deeper knowing that Laren pointed out...

Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God (the subconscious part of our minds), they (the conscious part of our minds) glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

so as Laren showed the "knowing God" comes first...that's Adam, the subconscious....then the conscious mind is deceived by the senses, turns the truth of God into a lie...takes God who is within and perceives Him as without....and the subconscious supports this belief to the extent that man ACTS out in this way....

what if the conscious mind is personified as the "Lord"...and what if in conjunction to that, the subconscious contains the I AM essence...then wouldn't so many verses make more sense with regards to the Lord commanding deaths of woman and children, sending evil spirits, creating calamity....isn't it man, deceived of our essence, creating the chaos in the world through the thoughts we birth in our conscious mind???

I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD (in the conscious mind) do all these things.
Isaiah 45:7

but in the subconscious, there is no duality, no turning of shadow, no deception....everything is what it is....everything is witnessed and experienced...and somewhere along the way the woman (the conscious mind) gets tired of playing the harlot with the world, turns within to see her true husband who has been there all along unperceived by the veil between the subconscious and the conscious in the marriage chamber (man's head), merges and mates with him and begins to birth that which will save her....thoughts that have been taken captive to Christ....

hope that all made sense somehow....

just one of many levels of meaning I see in these scriptures,
peace and love,"

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 20, 2008, 11:39:00 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 08:51:34 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 08:30:34 PM
You are quoting from something Adam says after he eats from the tree.

Now his eyes are opened and he is blind.

Now he hides from God.

First, it is plain that there is no solid scriptural support for angels falling from perfect communion with God to be at war with him.   The point in all of this is that Adam and Eve were created with the prupose of sinning and dying to manifest the process that God put in place.

The same goes for Satan and his messengers, created to do exactly what they do.

If we want to use the phrase "fell from heaven"   Which heaven?


Secondly, what your saying here further solidifies my point.    If Adam had done something out of a pure heart it would NOT have been a sin.

The fact that it was a sin, says otherwise.

Quote
But, even so, Jesus calls his son, Able, righteous.

And that does not mean without sin.   Did Able die?   What is the wages of Sin?









Quote from: PaulFirst, it is plain that there is no solid scriptural support for angels falling from perfect communion with God to be at war with him.   The point in all of this is that Adam and Eve were created with the prupose of sinning and dying to manifest the process that God put in place.

well, we go back and forth on this free will thing, but now you are saying what the blinded Adam said, The woman you gave me handed me the fruit.  Does that mean none of them have any responsibility for their actions?  In that case, let's just throw out the ten commandments, because people are going to do what they were created to do anyways, good or bad--within God's purpose for them.  Is God just playing with a bunch of puppets on a string?

Yes there is an account of a war in heaven, and Jesus himself references seeing Satan fall from heaven.


7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.


--Rev 12


Able dies, yet his blood still speaks to God.  But, Cain is banished from God's presence--because he unrepentedly won't do the right thing.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 21, 2008, 12:03:11 AM
willieH: Hi Molly... :hithere:

Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:10:04 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 20, 2008, 07:06:34 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 07:00:39 PM
Quote from: PaulHow does a wonderful, perfect flawless being get deceived if it is perfect as we want to usually define it?

Adam wasn't deceived.


I will rephrase that if necessary.

Answer the question pertaining to EVE.

Eve did not have the Holy Spirit--the breath of God.

When GOD destroyed the world via the FLOOD, it says all that had the BREATH of LIFE... were destroyed... (Eve, btw had the breath of LIFE)

JESUS said:  I am the way, the truth and the, ...LIFE... 

Which means ALL that have LIFE, have JESUS within... whether He has been REVEALED to them, as IN them, or NOT...

JESUS is HOLY, therefore the BREATH which animates any creature to LIFE, ...is HIM... for HE is the LIFE within us... the portion which gives us LIFE is HIM...

John 1:9 ...the TRUE LIGHT which LIGHTETH ...EVERY MAN, that cometh INTO THE WORLD...

No mythical being named "satan" concluded [decided] us in SIN by supposedly tempting us...  for THAT decision is GOD'S:

Rom 11:32  For GOD CONCLUDED them ALL in UNBELIEF, that He might have mercy upon ALL...

Rom 14:23  ...whatsoever is NOT of FAITH [belief in the WORD] is SIN...

peacE...
willieH   :HeartThrob:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 21, 2008, 12:19:30 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 20, 2008, 11:39:00 PM

Adam said, The woman you gave me handed me the fruit.  Does that mean none of them have any responsibility for their actions? 


Yes we can go back and forth on free will  if you like, but it has nothing to do with this issue.  It has nothing to do with the purpose God intended.   

If God did not intend for us to sin, then why did he create us knowing full well the ramifications of all that he created?   

We are accountable for our actions,  and your again solidifying my point,  Adam's nature was sinful or he would not have sinned and he was held accountable for doing so.

You ignoring that your depiction makes Adam this saint that did what Jesus did to protect eve and then you say he did it for mankind.  Great, you believe that, but it contradicts scripture up down and sideways and it does that before we even start talking about free will.

Quote
In that case, let's just throw out the ten commandments, because people are going to do what they were created to do anyways, good or bad--within God's purpose for them.  Is God just playing with a bunch of puppets on a string?

Irrevalent to the topic at hand.

Quote
Yes there is an account of a war in heaven, and Jesus himself references seeing Satan fall from heaven.

Which heaven?  Theres more than one.  And is the heaven depicted the holiness of God or the carnal realm?    Thats the idea that willie often talks about when refering to tradition,  it is not that tradition is bad, it is the bias that it provides as we read.  I am not saying ALL, but I've been a member of 10 churches of various denominations and not a one of them ever, once talked about more than one heaven and how that can change the outlook of scripture.

So which one?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 21, 2008, 05:03:37 PM
Quote from: WilliWhen GOD destroyed the world via the FLOOD, it says all that had the BREATH of LIFE... were destroyed... (Eve, btw had the breath of LIFE)

I am not disputing that Eve was breathing in and out as all living creatures breath.

I am saying that when God breathes into the nostrils of Adam, he gives him the breath of God (Holy Spirit).

7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

--Gen 2


When Jesus says, Let the dead bury their dead, he is talking about living breathing people who are walking around and, yet,  dead.

But, Adam, who is not deceived when he makes his decision to take the fruit from Eve's hand, is born from above.  That is what defines him as God's son.



5Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. 6Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit.

7You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.'


--John 3


[born] "again"

G509
ἄνωθεν
anōthen
an'-o-then
From G507; from above; by analogy from the first; by implication anew: - from above, again, from the beginning (very first), the top.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 21, 2008, 09:33:17 PM
willieH:  :thumbdown:

More NON TOPICAL business from you:

Quote from: Molly on October 21, 2008, 05:03:37 PM
Quote from: WilliWhen GOD destroyed the world via the FLOOD, it says all that had the BREATH of LIFE... were destroyed... (Eve, btw had the breath of LIFE)

I am not disputing that Eve was breathing in and out as all living creatures breath.

I am saying that when God breathes into the nostrils of Adam, he gives him the breath of God (Holy Spirit).

7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

--Gen 2


When Jesus says, Let the dead bury their dead, he is talking about living breathing people who are walking around and, yet,  dead.

But, Adam, who is not deceived when he makes his decision to take the fruit from Eve's hand, is born from above.  That is what defines him as God's son.



5Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. 6Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit.

7You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.'


--John 3


[born] "again"

G509
ἄνωθεν
anōthen
an'-o-then
From G507; from above; by analogy from the first; by implication anew: - from above, again, from the beginning (very first), the top.

In your own quotation above it is noted the BREATH of LIFE [CHRIST] was THAT which animated Adam...  :dontknow:  And it so animates to LIFE, ...ALL creatures which have it [the BREATH of LIFE]...

If you only could get past the SURFACE, you would find a world of understanding you have yet to encounter...  :sigh:

Get back to the TOPIC of this discussion Molly,  ...or are you in your stubborness, just UNABLE to do so?  :thumbdown:

When people ask you a question, do you ever answer it?  Or do you continue blabbing your own agenda in "response", as you have here, which is NOT an answer to the question?

Did HOLY ANGELS ever Fall... Molly?  :Whistle:

peacE...
willieH   :HeartThrob:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 21, 2008, 09:50:05 PM
Quote from: WilliDid HOLY ANGELS ever Fall... Molly? 

....and more!  lol


I'm the 'more.'

Men are ruled by spirits and angels are spirit beings.

Therefore, it's reasonable also to call men angels, which the Bible does, as well.

There are many spirits floating around, but only one that counts.

I don't think I'm off topic.  Yes, angels can fall, both the celestial type and the human type.



Matthew 12:30
He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

Please provide the rest of the "several proofs of this". If there are other proof texts, but "mainly because...", I think your other missing proof verses must be less convincing than the ones quoted below.

Quote

(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...


You are 'twisting the arms' of these verses to make them prove your belief. But even so, they do not prove it at all. It seems to me you are convinced that these verses, and the ones you have omitted, show beyond the shadow of a doubt that your position is correct.

It amazes me that you cannot see that these verses have nothing to do with what you are trying to show.

Also, have you ever witnessed the possession of an individual by an evil spirit? I think if you did, you might change your "opinion". What if you yourself were possessed by an evil spirit? what would you think then?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 21, 2008, 10:02:44 PM
Willieeeeeeeeeeeee! :hithere: :reachout:

Quote from: willieH on October 21, 2008, 09:33:17 PM
Or do you continue blabbing your own agenda in "response"
I had to   :LH: :pointlaugh: :rolllol: :laughing7: a bit reading such a reply from you...

http://www.versebyverse.org/doctrine/angels.html


Preliminary considerations.
That there is an order of beings quite distinct from humanity and from the Godhead, who occupy an exalted state, is the teaching of much of Scripture.
They are referred to at least 108X in the Old Testament and 165X in the New Testament.
It is from this body of Scripture that we construct the Doctrine of Angels.
The designation "angel", whether %a'l.m; (mal-ak) of the Old Testament, or a;ggeloj (aggelos) of the New Testament, means "messenger".
The holy angels carry out the purpose of the One they serve.
The fallen angels are messengers of Satan whom they have chosen to serve.
Angels as created beings more closely resemble God in their make up than man. Angels combine the material with the immaterial.
Angels are thus designated "spirits".
These generally unseen creatures not only observe the activities of men, but the good angels minister to man (Heb.1:14).
The evil angels wage war against man (Eph.6:12).


The creation of angels.
The Son of God, the Father's agent in creation, created the angels (Col.1:16,17; Neh.9:6; Ps.148:2,5).
All angels were created simultaneously in eternity past.
None will be added to their number.
They do not procreate and are not subject to death (Mt.22:28-30).
The angels were created before the universe. They were worshipping spectators when the world was founded (Job.38:4-7).
As to the number of the angels, it is unstated, but it is a multitude (Heb.12:22; 1Kgs.22:19; Ps.68:17; Dan.7:10; Rev.5:11).


The nature of angels.
They are incorporeal beings (i.e., having no material body; Ps.104:4 "He makes the winds His messengers"; Eph.6:12).
However, they can reveal themselves in bodily form (Gen.18-219; Mt.1:20; Jn.20:12; Heb.13:2).
They are greater than man in knowledge, but are not omniscient (2Sam.14:20; Mt.24:36; 1Pet.1:12).
They are stronger than man, but are not omnipotent (Ps.103:20; 2Pet.2:11; 2Thess.1:7).
Angels possess volition, as seen in the fall of Satan.



The fall of angels.
The fact of their fall.
Angels were all created perfect and sinless, as the case with Satan makes apparent (Ezek.28:15).
Satan's fall is described in Ezek.28:15-17 (cp. Isa.14:12).
Satan took with him one-third of all angels (Rev.12:4).
Scripture represents some of the angels as evil (Mt.25:41).
The time of their fall was before man's creation and sometime after original creation. Gen.1:2 speaks of the pre-restoration chaos of planet earth, and Gen.3 speaks of man's temptation and fall under Satan.
The cause of their fall.
Angels, being created perfect but with volition, individually chose to follow Satan's lead and revolt against God (Ezek.28:15-17; Rev.12:4).
God is not the cause of their fall, as that would make Him the author of evil in the universe (Jam.1:13; 1Jn.1:5).
God created the angels with volition knowing some would fall and bring evil into the universe, but God is not responsible for their sin (note the five "I will's" of Satan in Isa.14:13,14).
The result of their fall.
They lost their original holiness and became corrupt in nature and conduct (Mt.10:1; Eph.6:11,12).
They were sentenced to hell but were not immediately sent there (Mt.25:41; cp. Rev.20:10).
They were left free to engage in opposition to:
God (Isa.14:12-14).
The work of the good angels (Dan.10:12,13,20,21; Jd.9).
The people of God (1Chr.21:1; 1Pet.5:8; Eph.6:11; 2Tim.2:26).
The nations (Isa.14:12).
The unbeliever (Lk.8:12; 2Cor.4:3,4).
Satan, through the serpent in Eden, caused Adam's fall and has the power over death to mankind (Gen.3; Heb.2:14; 1Jn.3:8).
Satan and his angels continue to have an audience in heaven, during which they malign believers (Zech.3:1; Lk.22:31; Rev.12:10). Satan insinuated that God hired men like Job to love Him by making them rich (Job.1:6-12).
In the Tribulation they will be cast to the earth (Rev.12:8,9). Following their judgment by believers (1Cor.6:3), they will be cast into the Lake of Fire (Rev.20:10).


Classification of the angels.
The good angels, called "elect" and "holy", are classified as (1Tim.5:21; Mk.8:38):
Angels, of which there are gradations, as indicated by Col.1:16.
Cherubim (meaning uncertain), which are angels chosen by God to guard and cover as seen in:
Lucifer's pre-fall ministry as the cherub that covers (Ezek.28:14).
The two cherubs sent to guard the entrance to Eden (Gen.3:24).
The two cherubs on the top of the Ark of the Covenant in the tabernacle and temple, symbolizing support for God's throne.
Seraphim, mentioned by name only in Isa.6:2,6 and stand above God and lead heaven in the worship of God.
The "living creatures" of Rev.4 and 5 share aspects of both the cherubim of Ezek.1,10 and the seraphim of Isa.6.
The evil angels are called "unclean" (Rev.16:13) and "evil" (Lk.8:2), and are classified as:
The angels who are kept in prison for their role in the Gen.6 infiltration, mentioned in 2Pet.2:4 and Jd.6, and are the same as those released to torment men in the Tribulation for five months (Rev.9:1-11).
The angels who remain free, usually mentioned in connection with Satan (Mt.25:41; Rev.12:7-9; cp. Rom.8:38).
The demons, a term used to describe all fallen angels (including Satan) and means a "lesser god" (Mt.12:24-28; 17:18; 1Cor.10:20,21; 1Tim.4:1; Jam.2:19; Rev.9:20; 18:2; Mk.1:32).
Having different ranks and functions under Satan (Eph.6:12).
Some individually named angels include:
Lucifer, son of the morning (pre-fall title), known as:
Satan (adversary; 1Chr.21:1; Job.1:6; 2:1; Ps.109:6; Zech.3:1,2; Mt.4:10, et al.).
The devil (slanderer or accuser; Mt.4:1).
Serpent (which implies his guile; Rev.12:9).
Dragon (which implies his power).
Apollyon (meaning "destroyer"; Rev.9:11).
The prince of this world.
The prince of the power of the air.
The god of this world.
Beelzebub (which implies that he is prince of the demons; Mt.12:24).
the evil one (Jn.17:15; 2.Thess.3:3; 1Jn.5:19).
the tempter (1Thess.3:5).
Michael (meaning "who is like God?") is given the title archangel (Jd.9), and is seen as Israel's protector (Dan.10:11,21). He disputed with Satan over Moses' body and, with his angels, engages Satan and his angels midway through the Tribulation in a great "star wars", forcing Satan out of the heavens (Rev.12:7-12).
Gabriel (meaning "the mighty one") is always seen in the Bible as a messenger or revealer of God's purposes, as to Daniel (Dan.8:15-27; cp. 9:20-27) and to Zacharias and to the virgin Mary (Lk.1:26-3).


Some other occurrences.
Angels of judgment (Gen.19:13; 2Sam.24:16; 2Kgs.19:35; Ps.78:49; Act.12:23).
Watchers (Dan.4:13,23).
Angel over fire (Rev.14:18).
Angel over waters (Rev.16:5).
Seven angels of the apocalypse (Rev.8:2).
Sons of the Most High (Ps.82:6); sons of God (in the OT only; Gen.6:24; Job.1:6; 38:7.
Gods (elohim; Ps.82:1 rulers; Ps.82:6 gods; Heb.2:7 elect angels).


The ministry of the elect angels.
They continually, night and day, offer praise and worship God in heaven (Isa.6:3; Ps.148:1,2; Rev.4:8; 5:11).
They protect and deliver God's people (Heb.1:14; Dan.6:22; Ps.91:11; Gen.19:11; Act.12:11; Mt.18:10).
They guide and encourage believers (Mt.28:5-7; Act.8:26; 27:23,24).
They interpret God's Word to men (no longer an issue with the closing of the canon; Dan.7:16; 10:5,11; Zech.1:9,19; 4:1,5; 5:5-11; 6:4,5; the teaching angel of Revelation, Rev.1:1; 17:7; 22:16).
Angels mediated the Law to Moses (Act.7:53; Gal.3:19).
Angels carry the saved home when they die (Lk.16:22).
They execute judgment on individuals and societies (Act.12:23; Gen.19:12,13; Ezek.9:1,5,7; note the active role they play in the judgments of the Tribulation, Rev.16).
Angels were active in the life and ministry of Jesus.
Angels informed Mary, Joseph, and the shepherds of Christ's birth (Lk.1:26-38; Mt.1:20: Lk.2:8-15).
Angels ministered to Christ after His temptation (Mt.4:11).
An angel strengthened Him in Gethsemane (Lk.22:43).
Angels were poised to deliver Him from His enemies (Mt.26:53).
An angel rolled the stone from the empty tomb (Mt.28:2-7).
Angels ascended with Him into heaven (Act.1:11).
Angels as spectators.
They rejoice when even one sinner is saved (Lk.15:10).
They actually learn Bible Doctrine from the local church, taking a keen interest in our assembly (Eph.3:10; 1Pet.1:12).
They observe all the affairs of men, and are pleased or offended, as the passage on hair suggests (1Cor.11:10).
They took great interest in the incarnation (1Tim.3:16).
Angels have future ministries.
They will make important announcements during the Tribulation (Rev.14:6-11; 18:2,21).
They will protect (seal) God's servants and carry out the prescribed judgments of that time (Rev.7:1-3; 8:2-13; 9:1,2,13; 12:7-9; 14:14-16; 15:1;16).
They will be associated with the Second Advent (Mt.13:37-39,49,50; 2Thess.1:7; Heb.1:6; Dan.7:9,10).
They will stand before the gates of the New Jerusalem as a kind of honorary body of sentinels, as if to guarantee that nothing that is unclean will ever enter that city (Rev.21:12).


The relationship of men and angels.
Angels were created superior to man in both position and inherent qualities (Ps.8:4,5; Heb.2:6,7).
Christ was made lower than angels for a little while by assuming a human form so as to redeem fallen man (Heb.2:5-13).
The very fact that He did not partake of the nature of angels (becoming a "God-Angel"), but did partake of human nature (becoming God-Man), has led the author of Hebrews to conclude that salvation was not provided for fallen angels, but only for man (Heb.2:15-18). Put another way, if He had to partake of humanity to be a high priest to man, would He not have had to partake of angelic nature to do likewise for angels?
Furthermore, we are not to worship angels (Col.2:18; Rev.22:8,9), but to view them as our servants (Heb.1:14).
Our final position will constitute us superior to angels in every way, for as He is so shall we be (Heb.1,2; Phil.3:21). At present, we are positionally superior to angels, being His Body and Bride.
Ps.103:20 "Bless the Lord, you His angels, Mighty in strength, who perform His word, Obeying the voice of His word!"
Ps.104:4 "He makes the winds His messengers, Flaming fire His ministers."

Heb.1:6 "And when He again brings the first born into the world, He says, 'and let all the Angels of God worship Him.'"

Heb.1:14 "Are they not all ministering spirits, sent out to render service for the sake of those who will inherit salvation?"




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on October 21, 2008, 10:25:32 PM
Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

Please provide the rest of the "several proofs of this". If there are other proof texts, but "mainly because...", I think your other missing proof verses must be less convincing than the ones quoted below.

Quote

(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...


You are 'twisting the arms' of these verses to make them prove your belief. But even so, they do not prove it at all. It seems to me you are convinced that these verses, and the ones you have omitted, show beyond the shadow of a doubt that your position is correct.

It amazes me that you cannot see that these verses have nothing to do with what you are trying to show.

Also, have you ever witnessed the possession of an individual by an evil spirit? I think if you did, you might change your "opinion". What if you yourself were possessed by an evil spirit? what would you think then?


restitution:  the return of something to it rightful owner


Act 3:21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. 


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 21, 2008, 11:41:27 PM
QuoteAlso, have you ever witnessed the possession of an individual by an evil spirit? I think if you did, you might change your "opinion". What if you yourself were possessed by an evil spirit? what would you think then?

Hi Theo, that one of my points also, Willie and others tell me that there is no devil, but I have come into close contact with him and know for a fact he is real, therefore all the points of scripture that they try to say means something else, falls flat for me.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 21, 2008, 11:47:04 PM
Quote from: laren on October 21, 2008, 10:25:32 PM
Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

Please provide the rest of the "several proofs of this". If there are other proof texts, but "mainly because...", I think your other missing proof verses must be less convincing than the ones quoted below.

Quote

(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...


You are 'twisting the arms' of these verses to make them prove your belief. But even so, they do not prove it at all. It seems to me you are convinced that these verses, and the ones you have omitted, show beyond the shadow of a doubt that your position is correct.

It amazes me that you cannot see that these verses have nothing to do with what you are trying to show.

Also, have you ever witnessed the possession of an individual by an evil spirit? I think if you did, you might change your "opinion". What if you yourself were possessed by an evil spirit? what would you think then?


restitution:  the return of something to it rightful owner


Act 3:21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. 




Laren man fell from a state of grace and is to be restored back into that state.
Nothing in scripture leads me to beleive Man was first spiritual and then natural, espcially when Paul when speaking of MAN reverses that thought.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on October 21, 2008, 11:55:41 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 21, 2008, 11:47:04 PM
Quote from: laren on October 21, 2008, 10:25:32 PM
Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

Please provide the rest of the "several proofs of this". If there are other proof texts, but "mainly because...", I think your other missing proof verses must be less convincing than the ones quoted below.

Quote

(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...


You are 'twisting the arms' of these verses to make them prove your belief. But even so, they do not prove it at all. It seems to me you are convinced that these verses, and the ones you have omitted, show beyond the shadow of a doubt that your position is correct.

It amazes me that you cannot see that these verses have nothing to do with what you are trying to show.

Also, have you ever witnessed the possession of an individual by an evil spirit? I think if you did, you might change your "opinion". What if you yourself were possessed by an evil spirit? what would you think then?


restitution:  the return of something to it rightful owner


Act 3:21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. 




Laren man fell from a state of grace and is to be restored back into that state.
Nothing in scripture leads me to beleive Man was first spiritual and then natural, espcially when Paul when speaking of MAN reverses that thought.





Hi Scott,

"all things restored"

did "all things" fall from a state of grace??


also, what was it like for man, in "grace" before he fell?  Did he/she know they were in a state of "grace"?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 22, 2008, 01:51:28 AM
Hi Scott,

"all things restored"

did "all things" fall from a state of grace??

Yes all things fell from a state of grace, that is to say because man fell it brought ruin to all things, thus the promise of a  NEW heaven and earth.

also, what was it like for man, in "grace" before he fell? Did he/she know they were in a state of "grace"?


To see ones nakedness and not be ashamed








Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on October 22, 2008, 02:26:25 AM
Quote from: pneuma on October 22, 2008, 01:51:28 AM


To see ones nakedness and not be ashamed


is that not a spiritual state/mindset??



Rom 8:5  For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.

Rom 8:6  For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.













Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: The0 on October 22, 2008, 04:43:14 AM
Quote from: pneuma on October 21, 2008, 11:47:04 PM
Quote from: laren on October 21, 2008, 10:25:32 PM
Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

Please provide the rest of the "several proofs of this". If there are other proof texts, but "mainly because...", I think your other missing proof verses must be less convincing than the ones quoted below.

Quote

(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...


You are 'twisting the arms' of these verses to make them prove your belief. But even so, they do not prove it at all. It seems to me you are convinced that these verses, and the ones you have omitted, show beyond the shadow of a doubt that your position is correct.

It amazes me that you cannot see that these verses have nothing to do with what you are trying to show.

Also, have you ever witnessed the possession of an individual by an evil spirit? I think if you did, you might change your "opinion". What if you yourself were possessed by an evil spirit? what would you think then?


restitution:  the return of something to it rightful owner


Act 3:21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. 




Laren man fell from a state of grace and is to be restored back into that state.
Nothing in scripture leads me to beleive Man was first spiritual and then natural, espcially when Paul when speaking of MAN reverses that thought.


This is correct pneuma. Paul teaches that the natural body is first; the spiritual body is second.


The following passage is speaking about our resurrection.

1Co 15:44  It is sown a natural body: it shall rise a spiritual body. If there be a natural body, there is also a spiritual body, as it is written:

1Co 15:45  The first man Adam was made into a living soul; the last Adam into a quickening spirit.

1Co 15:46  Yet that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural: afterwards that which is spiritual.

1Co 15:47  The first man was of the earth, earthly: the second man, from heaven, heavenly.

1Co 15:48  Such as is the earthly, such also are the earthly: and such as is the heavenly, such also are they that are heavenly.

1Co 15:49  Therefore, as we have borne the image of the earthly, let us bear also the image of the heavenly.

We learn from the above that:

The first Adam WAS MADE into a living soul.
The first man WAS OF the earth. The second man, FROM heaven.
The natural IS FIRST, the spiritual comes AFTER the natural.

As an aside, I think I read somewhere in this thread that after the first couple had sinned and God was telling the serpent that it would crawl on its belly and eat DUST. And what are we? WE ARE DUST. In other words, Satan the old serpent DINES ON US. And man, does he have a fabulous banquet?!

God's law teaches about restitution in the old testament. What did we lose that will be restituted? I think someone already cited the scripture.

Rom 11:32  For God hath concluded all in unbelief, that he may have mercy on all.

God himself concluded ALL OF US in unbelief; therefore, He will restitute to us that which took away from us. He will pay us back. Don't lose sight of the fact that Adam represented all of us. In him, we all died, we all disobeyed the Creator.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 22, 2008, 10:23:27 AM
willieH: Hi The0...  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PMPlease provide the rest of the "several proofs of this". If there are other proof texts, but "mainly because...", I think your other missing proof verses must be less convincing than the ones quoted below.

Why should I do this The0?  :dontknow:  You are already unconvinced by what I have presented, and that is fine with me...

I notice that YOU have shown nothing to PROVE otherwise...  :rolleye:

If I posted a thousand verses, it shall not be any more convincing to you, for you are concluded against it... and you will object to them as well... so why waste my time?

As CHRIST noted in Parable,  ...and if they HEAR NOT Moses and the prophets, NEITHER will they be persuaded though one rose from the DEAD...

He is saying that if you have not ears to hear, it doesnt matter what is said to you... you WILL NOT hear it...

I have no problem with your disagreement... you are more than welcome to continue your belief as is (whatever it is?) ...but you WILL discover one day, that what I have posted concerning this is TRUE...  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...

Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PMYou are 'twisting the arms' of these verses to make them prove your belief.

Says YOU... (in YOUR words only!)   :thumbdown:

I am doing no such thing... YHVH God and His CHRIST are noted as UNCHANGING... I have provided the verses that state this...  If in fact they do not change... then that which they INHABIT (body and temple) does not change... which is the SPIRIT of men... which is the LIFE which animates ALL MEN...  ALL MEN die for they are NATURAL not SPIRITUAL...

That portion of MEN which is a member of the BODY, and TEMPLE of GOD, returns to HIM...

That you have not received this revelation is that which prompts you to object to it... just as those who have not received the revelation of UR, and believe ET... will argue with you till the cow come home...

I have stated plainly, that I do not try to convince anyone of anything... You are welcome to believe anything you like...  :dontknow:

Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PMBut even so, they do not prove it at all. It seems to me you are convinced that these verses, and the ones you have omitted, show beyond the shadow of a doubt that your position is correct.

It amazes me that you cannot see that these verses have nothing to do with what you are trying to show.

This is a hollow answer, containing NOTHING to disprove what I have stated... You failed to NAME the verses I have SUPPOSEDLY ...OMITTED... All we have here is an ongoing OPINION spouting from YOU in YOUR WORDS, not GOD'S...  :thumbdown:

You continue to him-haw... FAILING to present SCRIPTURAL notations or even POSTING what you are actually objecting to!  ...You are only found disagreeing with what I say... which is nothing more than YOUR self-constructed (but not even noted), ...INCONCLUSIVE OPINION...  :laughing7:

Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PMAlso, have you ever witnessed the possession of an individual by an evil spirit? I think if you did, you might change your "opinion". What if you yourself were possessed by an evil spirit? what would you think then?

You have little knowledge as to my experience The0... I have witnessed many things in my 33 year walk with God... 

Possession of and by an "evil spirit" is nothing but a RELIGIOUS assumption...  I have witnessed several such cases... and in ALL of them, it was nothing but MENTAL deficient, sick minds which are disconnected from the INWARD MAN... which cause them to wreak havoc upon themselves...

Even modern science agrees that the MIND can and WILL produce SYMPTOMS of diseases and such which are CHEMICALLY NOT PRESENT... And that the MIND can and WILL present apparitions to itself...

When one farts, it isn't an "evil spirit" leaving the body... only a little gas...  :laughing7:

All your answer here amounts to, is YOUR OPINION, which is COMPLETELY ABSENT of God's WORDS, but FULL of, and EXCLUSIVELY words of YOUR OWN...  :sigh:

As I said before... you are welcome to believe anything your little heart desires... become an Muslim or Buddhist, Athiest or UFOLOGIST, if you like, ...it does not matter to me...  :Sparkletooth:

For ALL that occurs in His Creation, is under the CONTROL of YHVH God... even disagreement with TRUTH that YOU (or I or anyone else) might object to along the way...  :dontknow:

GOD concludes ALL in UNBELIEF The0... no one is exempt...  And only through Him can revelation be known...  Most of the time, those "revelations" will find OBJECTION from MOST... for they have not the eyes or ears to see it...

peacE...

willieH   :HeartThrob:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 22, 2008, 02:19:51 PM
Quote from: laren on October 22, 2008, 02:26:25 AM
Quote from: pneuma on October 22, 2008, 01:51:28 AM


To see ones nakedness and not be ashamed


is that not a spiritual state/mindset??



Rom 8:5  For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.

Rom 8:6  For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.















Your point being?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: laren on October 22, 2008, 03:05:16 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 22, 2008, 02:19:51 PM
Quote from: laren on October 22, 2008, 02:26:25 AM
Quote from: pneuma on October 22, 2008, 01:51:28 AM


To see ones nakedness and not be ashamed


is that not a spiritual state/mindset??



Rom 8:5  For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.

Rom 8:6  For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.















Your point being?

We fell from a spiritual state
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 22, 2008, 10:23:27 AM
willieH: Hi The0...  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 04:25:36 AM
willieH: Hi WW... peace!  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 01:40:13 AM
WE on the other hand, ...have ALWAYS BEEN, and were once, residents of HEAVEN (can't "return" to a place you've never been), and which are THEY which having once been in the DOMAIN of GOD (Heaven), are the "Heavenly things" in need of reconciliation... (Col 1:20)

Quote from: WhiteWings on September 29, 2008, 01:54:16 AMHi Willie :dsunny:

Just wondering how you reach the conclusion we always have been in Heaven. Some verses perhaps?

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PMPlease provide the rest of the "several proofs of this". If there are other proof texts, but "mainly because...", I think your other missing proof verses must be less convincing than the ones quoted below.

Why should I do this The0?  :dontknow:  You are already unconvinced by what I have presented, and that is fine with me...

I notice that YOU have shown nothing to PROVE otherwise...  :rolleye:

If I posted a thousand verses, it shall not be any more convincing to you, for you are concluded against it... and you will object to them as well... so why waste my time?

As CHRIST noted in Parable,  ...and if they HEAR NOT Moses and the prophets, NEITHER will they be persuaded though one rose from the DEAD...

He is saying that if you have not ears to hear, it doesnt matter what is said to you... you WILL NOT hear it...

I have no problem with your disagreement... you are more than welcome to continue your belief as is (whatever it is?) ...but you WILL discover one day, that what I have posted concerning this is TRUE...  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...

Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PMYou are 'twisting the arms' of these verses to make them prove your belief.

Says YOU... (in YOUR words only!)   :thumbdown:

I am doing no such thing... YHVH God and His CHRIST are noted as UNCHANGING... I have provided the verses that state this...  If in fact they do not change... then that which they INHABIT (body and temple) does not change... which is the SPIRIT of men... which is the LIFE which animates ALL MEN...  ALL MEN die for they are NATURAL not SPIRITUAL...

That portion of MEN which is a member of the BODY, and TEMPLE of GOD, returns to HIM...

That you have not received this revelation is that which prompts you to object to it... just as those who have not received the revelation of UR, and believe ET... will argue with you till the cow come home...




Hi willieH! thanx for undertaking the monumental task of explaining things to me.  :bigGrin:

By reading this thread, i do not think i fully know what it is that you believe on the topic.

I am not concluded, as you say, against believing what you understand scriptures to mean. I am willing to try to understand your belief, and accept it as gospel truth IF AND ONLY IF you can show to me that it (your belief) is backed by scripture.

The verses you quoted do not show this backing. Let me tell you what I understand from these verses you quoted.

TRUTH: The Lord God is unchangeable
TRUTH: The Son of God is unchangeable
TRUTH: Our bodies are the temple of God

So far so good. The above three truths are backed by scripture, which you quoted. Where scripture ends and your opinion begins is when you state that He [God] does not change, "so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed..."

This quote of yours is your conclusion drawn from the premises of the quoted verses; however, your conclusion does not follow from the premises, and it is not backed by scripture. Quote me the scripture that says that "we are the temple of God AND as such, just as God does not change, WE do not change either." Don't you ever change, willieH? If you say you don't, then you must have a glorified body already.

Here's proof that we change and we will have one LAST CHANGE:

1Co 15:51  Behold, I tell you a mystery: We all shall not sleep, but we shall all be changed,
1Co 15:52  in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

We are being perfected, and this requires change. We go from glory to glory. Not even the Apostle Paul considered that he had already attained the prize.

Php 3:12  Not that I have already obtained, or AM ALREADY MADE PERFECT: but I press on, if so be that I may lay hold on that for which also I was laid hold on by Christ Jesus.
Php 3:13  Brethren, I count not myself yet to have laid hold: but one thing I do, forgetting the things which are behind, and stretching forward to the things which are before,
Php 3:14  I press on toward the goal unto the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.

God does not change because He is perfect. What can you possibly add to something or somebody who is perfect? NOTHING.

Everyday life shows us that WE, the temple of God, change. The only one that remains unchangeable is GOD. His temple, his habitation, his abode, his residence CAN change. In fact, God has made His abode in SEVERAL "temples". THREE TIMES has God changed habitation.

When Israel first went into the land of Canaan, the Ark of the Covenant was placed in the Ephraimite town of Shiloh. Joshua 18:1 says,

1 Then the whole congregation of the sons of Israel assembled themselves at Shiloh, and set up the tent of meeting there; and the land was subdued before them.

After a few hundred years, the priestly family of Eli at Shiloh had become totally corrupted. His sons were seducing the women (1 Sam. 2:22) and stealing the offerings (1 Sam. 2:16). So God sent a prophet to Eli who told him (1 Sam. 2:27-36) that God was going to remove Eli's family from holding the position of the high priesthood. He would instead give it "a faithful priest" (1 Sam. 2:35).

The Bible then tells how the Philistines captured the Ark of the Covenant, and how Eli and his corrupt sons were killed the same day (1 Sam. 4:11, 18). The Philistines then destroyed the town of Shiloh and killed the priests there (Ps. 78:64). Although the Ark was returned seven months later (1 Sam. 6:1), it never went back to Shiloh. It was taken to the house of Abinadab in the town of Kirjeath-jearim (1 Sam. 7:1, 2) for the next twenty years.

The priestly center itself was relocated to the town of Nob (1 Sam. 21:1). David later moved the Ark to Jerusalem (2 Sam. 6:17), and when his son, Solomon, built the temple, the Ark was placed in it (1 Kings 8:6). Psalm 78:67-69 says,

67 He also rejected the tent of Joseph, and did not choose the tribe of Ephraim,
68 But chose the tribe of Judah, Mount Zion which He loved.
69 And He built His sanctuary like the heights, like the earth which He has founded forever.

In other words God TOOK HIS NAME OUT of the tribe of Ephraim when He removed the Ark from the Ephraimite town of Shiloh. HIS NAME AND PRESENCE had been entrusted to this son of Joseph first, because Joshua had been from this tribe. However, after the priesthood of Shiloh was rejected, He moved the Ark to Jerusalem in the tribe of Judah.

This was not merely the transfer of the Ark; it was the transfer of His name, as the prophet Jeremiah tells us later. The temple of Solomon stood for over three centuries before the Babylonian army destroyed it in 586 B.C. God allowed that temple to be destroyed because the priesthood of that place had also corrupted itself.

But before its destruction, Jeremiah prophesied that His name would be removed from that place like it had been removed earlier from Shiloh. Jeremiah 7:9-15 says,

9 Will you steal, murder, and commit adultery, and swear falsely, and offer sacrifices to Baal, and walk after other gods that you have not known,
10 then come and stand before Me in this house, which is called by My name, and say, We are delivered--that you may do all these abominations?
11 Has this house, which is called by My name, become a den of robbers in your sight? Behold, I, even I, have seen it, declares the Lord.
12 But go now to My place which was in Shiloh, where I made My name dwell at the first, and see what I did to it because of the wickedness of My people Israel.
13 And now, because you have done all these things, declares the Lord . . .
14 therefore, I will do to the house which is called by My name, in which you trust, and to the place which I gave you and your fathers, as I did to Shiloh.
15 And I will cast you out of My sight, as I have cast out all your brothers, all the offspring of Ephraim.

This makes it clear that Shiloh had been the first place where God had placed His name and His presence.

Years later, the priests in Jerusalem corrupted themselves as much as the house of Eli had done earlier in the Ephraimite town of Shiloh. They, too, had turned the house of God into a den of robbers. A robber den is a hideout where robbers can be immune from the law's prosecution. By violating the law, the priests in Jerusalem had turned the temple into a place where the law could be violated with immunity.

Their excuse, Jeremiah says, was that "We are delivered." The word "delivered" comes from the Hebrew word natsal, which means "to snatch away." In other words, to be exempt. The priests claimed to be exempt from following the law. This is not much different from the excuses we often hear today.

The prophet Ezekiel records seeing in a vision the glory of God depart from the temple in Jerusalem. Ezekiel 10:4 says,

4 Then the glory of the Lord went up from the cherub to the threshold of the temple, and the temple was filled with the cloud, and the court was filled with the brightness of the glory of the Lord.

Verse 18 continues,

18 Then the glory of the Lord departed from the threshold of the temple and stood over the cherubim.

In Ezekiel 11:22, 23 the prophet saw the glory depart to the Mount of Olives:

22 Then the cherubim lifted up their wings with the wheels beside them, and the glory of the God of Israel hovered over them.
23 And the glory of the Lord went up from the midst of the city, and stood over the mountain which is east of the city.

Ezekiel's vision ceased with the glory hovering over the Mount of Olives to the east of Jerusalem. This was to be the place where Jesus was crucified, for the top of the mount was precisely 2,000 cubits outside of the city walls. Jesus was crucified "outside the camp" (Heb. 13:11-13)

This was also the place where David made his sacrifice when his throne was usurped by Absalom with the help of Ahithophel, David's friend that had betrayed him. 2 Sam. 15:30 says,

30 And David went up the ascent of the Mount of Olives, and wept as he went, and his head was covered and he walked barefoot. Then all the people who were with him each covered his head and went up weeping as they went.
31 Now someone told David, saying, Ahithophel is among the conspirators with Absalom. And David said, O Lord, I pray, make the counsel of Ahithophel foolishness.
32 It happened as David was coming to the summit [Heb. rosh, "head, skull"], where God was worshiped. . . .

Ahithophel was David's friend that betrayed him. He was a prophetic type of Judas who betrayed Jesus. When David wrote about Ahithophel in Psalm 69:25 and Psalm 109:8, these passages were applied to Judas in Acts 1:20.

The summit, or "head" of the Mount of Olives was called in the New Testament Calvary, "the skull." Luke 23:33 says,

33 And when they came to the place called The Skull [Greek: kranion, "head or skull"], there they crucified Him and the criminals, one on the right and the other on the left.

So even as David sacrificed on the top of the Mount of Olives, so also did Jesus offer up Himself as the Supreme Sacrifice for sin at the same location. This, as we have seen, was also the place where the glory of the Lord had been last seen by Ezekiel.

The Final Departure and Return of God's Glory -- After Jesus' death and resurrection, He ascended to the Father. Acts 1:12 then tells us the location of His final departure:

12 Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day's journey away.

Why is it important to know that it was "a Sabbath day's journey"? Because this was a distance of 2,000 cubits. It was the distance from the city gate to the top of the Mount of Olives. In other words, Jesus ascended from the place where Ezekiel had last seen the glory of God as it was departing from Solomon's temple. Jesus' ascension completed this departure to heaven.

He ascended on the fortieth day from His resurrection (Acts 1:3), the traditional time of Elijah's ascension. Ten days later at the Feast of Pentecost, the glory of God returned to earth. This time it filled not the temple in Jerusalem, but the 120 disciples in the upper room (Acts 2:1-3).

This was the third time THE GLORY AND NAME of God had been fully transferred to another location. The first was at Shiloh; the second at Jerusalem; the third was the body of people known as the true temple of God. 1 Cor. 3:16 says,

16 Do you not know that you are a temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?

The glory of God--known most often in the New Testament as the Holy Spirit--now indwells us as people. God has moved from a tent at Shiloh to a temple at Jerusalem and finally now indwells a temple made of living stones (1 Peter 2:5). When He left Shiloh, He never returned. When He left Jerusalem, He said in Jer. 7:14 that He was going to leave Jerusalem like He did Shiloh.

In other words, He would never return to such mundane buildings made of wood, stone, gold, and silver. His chief desire from the beginning has been to indwell us. All other houses were inadequate to manifest His glory. The Jews may attempt to build God a new house in Jerusalem, but God is not interested in moving to a new address.


Where Has God Put His Name?

Revelation 22:4 makes it clear where God has placed His name,

4 and they shall see His face [presence], and His name shall be on their foreheads.

In the message to the Church of the Laodiceans, we read in Rev. 3:12,

12 He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he will not go out from it anymore; and I will write upon him the name of My God, and the name of the city of My God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God, and My new name.

It is clear from this that God has now placed His name upon PEOPLE, not upon buildings, organizations, shrines, or holy real estate.

Using a partial quote of what you said to reiterate:

"for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed..."

I do believe I have shown above WITH scripture that God has dwelt in other temples, which were "other than the one MAN represents". Has God indeed changed because of this? OF COURSE NOT!!! God has dwelt in a tent and later in a temple, both manmade and perishable and destructible and changable; however, it does not follow from this that the tent did not change, or that the temple did not change. Both were destroyed! They did change! And YET, God remained unchanged!

I have shown you that God has dwelt "in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents". First He dwelt in a tent, but He departed from it. BUT, He did not change. Second, He dwelt in a temple made of stones, but He departed from it. BUT, God did not change. Surely, these two abodes of God are "other than the one MAN represents".
Using your premise, God has changed BECAUSE He has dwelt "in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents"; and not only once, but twice!

Before Christ saved you, what state was your spirit in?

After Christ saved you, what state was your spirit in?

Did your spirit undergo any changes?

Read Christ's letters to the churches in Revelation for more proof that WE, the body of Christ and temple of the Holy Spirit, DO INDEED CHANGE! The incontrovertible scriptural teaching is that God and His Christ do not change; but nowhere in scripture can be found that we, the temple of God, do not change. Quite the contrary.f

As long as I don't see solid and scriptural proof about this, I cannot accept it as a truth of God. I do not need eyes to see nor ears to hear something that is clearly a misunderstanding of scripture. As you said before, you have the right to believe this thing or other thing. IMO, this is speculation.

What's your opinion of God's dialogue with Satan in the book of Job? Does it not convince you of the existence of Satan? What about ALL the accounts of demonic possessions found throughout the New Covenant? Maybe it is you who needs the ears to ears and the eyes to see to realize that you are in error? What does it mean to you that Satan is also thrown into the lake of fire? We already know the purpose of the lake of fire for the unsaved. Why would God throw Satan in the same lake where He will also throw human beings so they can learn righteousness?

Your Christian walk might be a lengthy one, as you say. But that does not guarantee that this your belief in particular is correct. Hopefully, I have provided enough scripture this time.  :laughing7:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 22, 2008, 06:45:13 PM
Willieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  :reachout:
Quote from: willieH on October 22, 2008, 10:23:27 AM

Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PMAlso, have you ever witnessed the possession of an individual by an evil spirit? I think if you did, you might change your "opinion". What if you yourself were possessed by an evil spirit? what would you think then?

You have little knowledge as to my experience The0... I have witnessed many things in my 33 year walk with God... 

Possession of and by an "evil spirit" is nothing but a RELIGIOUS assumption...  I have witnessed several such cases... and in ALL of them, it was nothing but MENTAL deficient, sick minds which are disconnected from the INWARD MAN... which cause them to wreak havoc upon themselves...

Even modern science agrees that the MIND can and WILL produce SYMPTOMS of diseases and such which are CHEMICALLY NOT PRESENT... And that the MIND can and WILL present apparitions to itself...

Mark 16:9  Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.

Matthew 9:32  As they went out, behold, they brought to him a dumb man possessed with a devil.

Mark 7:26  The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought him that he would cast forth the devil  out of her daughter.

Also mental deficient Willie? :laughing7:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 22, 2008, 11:55:09 PM
willieH: Hi The0... :hithere:

Quote from: willieH on October 22, 2008, 10:23:27 AM
willieH: Hi The0...  :cloud9:

There are several proofs of this, but mainly because GOD in His WORD says:

Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PMPlease provide the rest of the "several proofs of this". If there are other proof texts, but "mainly because...", I think your other missing proof verses must be less convincing than the ones quoted below.

Quote from: willieHWhy should I do this The0?  :dontknow:  You are already unconvinced by what I have presented, and that is fine with me...

I notice that YOU have shown nothing to PROVE otherwise...  :rolleye:

If I posted a thousand verses, it shall not be any more convincing to you, for you are concluded against it... and you will object to them as well... so why waste my time?

As CHRIST noted in Parable,  ...and if they HEAR NOT Moses and the prophets, NEITHER will they be persuaded though one rose from the DEAD...

He is saying that if you have not ears to hear, it doesnt matter what is said to you... you WILL NOT hear it...

I have no problem with your disagreement... you are more than welcome to continue your belief as is (whatever it is?) ...but you WILL discover one day, that what I have posted concerning this is TRUE...  :cloud9:

Quote from: willieH(1) YHVH never changes (Mal 3:6) ...We are HIS TEMPLE (1 Cor 6:19) in which HE DWELLS... He does not CHANGE, so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed...  MEN are created, physical and TIME BOUND and TEMPORAL beings, ...SONS are SPIRIT and have ALWAYS BEEN...

(2)  we are the BODY of CHRIST (Rom 12:5 / 1 Cor 12:12-18 / 1 Cor 12:27)... and Scripture states that CHRIST never changes (Heb 13:8)... so subsequently, His BODY never changes either...

Quote from: The0 on October 21, 2008, 09:55:00 PMYou are 'twisting the arms' of these verses to make them prove your belief.

Quote from: willieHSays YOU... (in YOUR words only!)   :thumbdown:

I am doing no such thing... YHVH God and His CHRIST are noted as UNCHANGING... I have provided the verses that state this...  If in fact they do not change... then that which they INHABIT (body and temple) does not change... which is the SPIRIT of men... which is the LIFE which animates ALL MEN...  ALL MEN die for they are NATURAL not SPIRITUAL...

That portion of MEN which is a member of the BODY, and TEMPLE of GOD, returns to HIM...

That you have not received this revelation is that which prompts you to object to it... just as those who have not received the revelation of UR, and believe ET... will argue with you till the cowz come home...

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMHi willieH! thanx for undertaking the monumental task of explaining things to me.  :bigGrin:

By reading this thread, i do not think i fully know what it is that you believe on the topic.

It is really curious that you have not gained my perspective, for I have noted it several times, and YOU have found DISAGREEMENT with it!  How can you DISAGREE with something of which you have no perspective?  :dontknow:

So you may be clear as to what I believe, as briefly and to the point, ...here goes...

Quote(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"?

MY BELIEF:  NO... there is no Scriptural basis for this, even though THEOLOGIANS have ascribed to passages which they contend that do so...  Those passages are NEGATED within the various texts noted by them... (i.e. ...Is 14, ...Ez 28 ...Rev 12)

Furthermore, that an IMPERFECT activity ("angels" falling, rebelling, ...whatever) happened in a PERFECT scenario, negates the PERFECTION of that scenario... as well as promotes the idea that if it occured ONCE, it is "PERFECTLY" possible that it can occur AGAIN...
 
Quote(2) And if so, WHERE and HOW, did they "Fall"?

MY BELIEF:  No such scenario ever took place... the "fall" is a creation of THEOLOGY, which IGNORES specifics within the TEXT or the settings of the TEXT.  ALL (not some, or 2/3's) of the HOLY ANGELS of GOD shall accompany CHRIST when He "comes" (Matt 25:31)


Quote(3) And if so, where do we find SALVATION from "their Fall" provided for them?

MY BELIEF:  There is NO SCRIPTURAL basis for "SALVATION of ANGELS"... CHRIST came as a MAN [not an "angel" on behalf of "fallen angels"](1 Tim 2:5)   ...tasted DEATH for EVERY MAN [not "fallen" angels]... (Heb 2:9)

Quote(4) If ANGELS "sinned", why do they NOT ...DIE? (wages of sin being death & all that!)

MY BELIEF:  There is no SCRIPTURAL basis that any ANGEL of GOD ever "sinned".  SIN being a side effect in the gaining of the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL... NO SUCH SCENARIO is presented in the WORD of GOD concerning ANGELS and the ASSUMPTION, that they too, had access to this KNOWLEDGE...

On the contrary... the SUPPOSITION is that an ANGEL of GOD, 1st found a way to challenge GOD, then had power enough to convince 1/3 of the Heavenly ANGELS that He was indeed justified... This is a concocted event which upon scrutiny of "proof texts" offered (not just blind acceptance of theological proposals)... falls into fallacy.

THERE!  If you yet do not understand my belief... then there is not much sense in a continuing dialogue between us...  :dontknow:

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMI am not concluded, as you say, against believing what you understand scriptures to mean. I am willing to try to understand your belief, and accept it as gospel truth IF AND ONLY IF you can show to me that it (your belief) is backed by scripture.

The verses you quoted do not show this backing. Let me tell you what I understand from these verses you quoted.

TRUTH: The Lord God is unchangeable
TRUTH: The Son of God is unchangeable
TRUTH: Our bodies are the temple of God

Let me stop here for a moment...

1... To begin with The0... it is YOUR belief that the verses I quoted do not show "this backing"... I challenge that thinking.  You must therefore believe that [1] CHRIST was an ETERNAL "head" without a BODY... and that [2] FLESHLY BEINGS had to be created to SUPPLY the need for a SPIRITUAL ENTITY to have a BODY... 

Also... you must needs believe that a PERFECT and ALL POWERFUL YHVH GOD had NO TEMPLE in which to DWELL... so He "dwelled" in NOTHING...  :thumbdown:  You are welcome to this thinking bro...

2... Your #3 "truth" you mention above, is concerning a SPIRITUAL ENTITY, not FLESH... For the SPIRIT of GOD and KINGDOM of GOD are not affiliated with FLESH...  The defiling of the TEMPLE of GOD is the defiling of SPIRIT, ...not flesh... for FLESH can only be defiled by that which coincides and COOPERATES with DEATH... which is OF the FLESH...

CHRIST showed in His life on earth, while living WITHIN FLESH, that He did not and WOULD NOT align Himself with the FLESH... for a SON of GOD does not align itself with FLESH... Which is HOW and WHY He was able to be OUR SAVIOR from it... and is that which TRANSFORMS us, bringing us out of FLESH which must die and be deposited as dust, where IT began... to the SONS of GOD which by the POWER of the SAVIOR, rescues us and RETURNS us where WE began, SONS... members of His Body... the TEMPLE of the ALMIGHTY... which ALWAYS IS...

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMSo far so good. The above three truths are backed by scripture, which you quoted. Where scripture ends and your opinion begins is when you state that He [God] does not change, "so His DWELLING must remain the same as well... for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed..."

This quote of yours is your conclusion drawn from the premises of the quoted verses; however, your conclusion does not follow from the premises, and it is not backed by scripture. Quote me the scripture that says that "we are the temple of God AND as such, just as God does not change, WE do not change either." Don't you ever change, willieH? If you say you don't, then you must have a glorified body already.

As a MAN... I certainly DO change The0... but as a SON, which is submitted to the one that DOES NOT CHANGE... I do NOT CHANGE...  I absorb the KNOWLEDGE which is wrought in the FLESH... a different entity... 

We are 2 things here on earth as CHRIST aptly noted... that those who are NOT converted (from flesh), are IN FLESH and DEAD which is that which CHRIST DID NOT die to redeem...  :mnah:

Those that ARE converted (from flesh), are ALIVE in the SPIRIT The0... which is that which CHRIST DID die to redeem...  :bgdance:

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMHere's proof that we change and we will have one LAST CHANGE:

1Co 15:51  Behold, I tell you a mystery: We all shall not sleep, but we shall all be changed,
1Co 15:52  in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

We are being perfected, and this requires change. We go from glory to glory. Not even the Apostle Paul considered that he had already attained the prize.

Php 3:12  Not that I have already obtained, or AM ALREADY MADE PERFECT: but I press on, if so be that I may lay hold on that for which also I was laid hold on by Christ Jesus.
Php 3:13  Brethren, I count not myself yet to have laid hold: but one thing I do, forgetting the things which are behind, and stretching forward to the things which are before,
Php 3:14  I press on toward the goal unto the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.

God does not change because He is perfect. What can you possibly add to something or somebody who is perfect? NOTHING.

You confine yourself to FLESHLY and CONTRADICTORY observance here brother T...  GOD does NOT CHANGE, yet His TEMPLE and BODY ...do?  Please... The "change" that PAUL notes above is the REDEMPTION from the FLESHLY experience required in the process of GAINING [via experience] the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL...

Here is an EXAMPLE:  If I read a book on DRIVING a CAR... my "HEAD" has the KNOWLEDGE of DRIVING... but do I therefore ...KNOW how TO DRIVE? NO... I do NOT... it is NOT UNTIL that INFORMATION which my "HEAD" has, is transferred to MY BODY... that I GAIN the KNOWLEDGE (completely) of DRIVING a CAR...

In this process... is my "HEAD" changed? ...NO... is my "BODY" changed? ...again, NO...

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMEveryday life shows us that WE, the temple of God, change. The only one that remains unchangeable is GOD. His temple, his habitation, his abode, his residence CAN change. In fact, God has made His abode in SEVERAL "temples". THREE TIMES has God changed habitation.

I think what you do not understand is:  ...what comprises a SON, and ...what comprises a MAN... MEN are NOT SONS... they are an entity which is ADVERSE to the SON within them... they are of FLESHLY MIND, and of FLESHLY substance...  SONS are the body and temple of GOD which are of SPIRITUAL MIND and SPIRITUAL substance...

We are NOT individual "SONS"... we are MEMBERS of the SON (Body -- not Bodies of CHRIST)... we are NOT individual "TEMPLES", we are components of the TEMPLE... 

Paul didnt note:  No ye not that ye are the TEMPLES [plural] of GOD?  He said:  "No ye not that ye are the TEMPLE [singular] of GOD?"

GOD does not INHABIT foul places dear brother The0... He is a HOLY GOD and only occupies HOLY Things, one of which is EACH portion (son) of His SON which is within FLESH which is DEFILED... GOD does not inhabit our FLESH, come on dude!  It is our FALLEN minds which occupy this nastiness... But we are 2 entities as was CHRIST...  We, as FLESHLY beings have CARNAL minds... that mind is in OPPOSITION to CHRIST... (which is the WORD)

The MIND that was IN CHRIST was the WILL of YHVH -- SPIRITUAL... the MIND which is in and constitutes MEN, is -- CARNAL. (Phil 2:5)

This is WHY our minds must be ELIMINATED!  It is OUR WILL which is the CARNAL mind... and which enacts the deeds of the flesh...

We must DIE DAILY... Let that mind be IN YOU that was also IN, ...CHRIST JESUS... That "mind" is SPIRIT which enacts the WILL of GOD...

Thanks for providing all the Scriptural notations...

It shows me where you are in your observance...

This will end here and continue in my next post... too many characters.

END of PART ONE...

peacE...

willieH   :HeartThrob:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 12:09:44 AM
Quote from: Willi1... To begin with The0... it is YOUR belief that the verses I quoted do not show "this backing"... I challenge that thinking.  You must therefore believe that [1] CHRIST was an ETERNAL "head" without a BODY... and that [2] FLESHLY BEINGS had to be created to SUPPLY the need for a SPIRITUAL ENTITY to have a BODY... 




Quote from: WilliAlso... you must needs believe that a PERFECT and ALL POWERFUL YHVH GOD had NO TEMPLE in which to DWELL... so He "dwelled" in NOTHING...    You are welcome to this thinking bro...

1Thus saith the LORD, The heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool: where is the house that ye build unto me? and where is the place of my rest?
2For all those things hath mine hand made, and all those things have been, saith the LORD: but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word.


---Isa 66



20Jesus replied, "Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head."

--Mat 8
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 12:16:52 AM
Quote from: WilliWe are NOT individual "SONS"... we are MEMBERS of the SON (Body -- not Bodies of CHRIST)... we are NOT individual "TEMPLES", we are components of the TEMPLE... 

3And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

--Rev 21
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 23, 2008, 12:38:09 AM
willieH: Hi The0...  :cloud9:

Continuing...  :heat:

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMThe prophet Ezekiel records seeing in a vision the glory of God depart from the temple in Jerusalem. Ezekiel 10:4 says,

4 Then the glory of the Lord went up from the cherub to the threshold of the temple, and the temple was filled with the cloud, and the court was filled with the brightness of the glory of the Lord.

Verse 18 continues,

18 Then the glory of the Lord departed from the threshold of the temple and stood over the cherubim.

The word translated here "departed" [YATSA -- #H3318 strongs]  in vs 18 has MANY applications, one of which is depart, but also means  Appear, Bring forth, and many others... GOD never LEAVES... He IS ALWAYS there... in ALL the "there's" there are!  :laughing7:

The context does not conclude that HE LEFT His temple... GOD is OMNIPRESENT The0 and ...DOES NOT CHANGE... so HE IS... ALWAYS EVERYWHERE! ...He does not "come and go" as do finite men who endeavor to observe Him... As you attempt to propose with this verse.

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMIn Ezekiel 11:22, 23 the prophet saw the glory depart to the Mount of Olives:

22 Then the cherubim lifted up their wings with the wheels beside them, and the glory of the God of Israel hovered over them.
23 And the glory of the Lord went up from the midst of the city, and stood over the mountain which is east of the city.

More of the same inaccurate and FINITE attempt at observance of the INFINITE... This verse is easily seen as His GLORY emanating from the "midst" to "over the mountain east of the city"...

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMEzekiel's vision ceased with the glory hovering over the Mount of Olives to the east of Jerusalem. This was to be the place where Jesus was crucified, for the top of the mount was precisely 2,000 cubits outside of the city walls. Jesus was crucified "outside the camp" (Heb. 13:11-13)

This was also the place where David made his sacrifice when his throne was usurped by Absalom with the help of Ahithophel, David's friend that had betrayed him. 2 Sam. 15:30 says,

30 And David went up the ascent of the Mount of Olives, and wept as he went, and his head was covered and he walked barefoot. Then all the people who were with him each covered his head and went up weeping as they went.
31 Now someone told David, saying, Ahithophel is among the conspirators with Absalom. And David said, O Lord, I pray, make the counsel of Ahithophel foolishness.
32 It happened as David was coming to the summit [Heb. rosh, "head, skull"], where God was worshiped. . . .

Ahithophel was David's friend that betrayed him. He was a prophetic type of Judas who betrayed Jesus. When David wrote about Ahithophel in Psalm 69:25 and Psalm 109:8, these passages were applied to Judas in Acts 1:20.

The summit, or "head" of the Mount of Olives was called in the New Testament Calvary, "the skull." Luke 23:33 says,

33 And when they came to the place called The Skull [Greek: kranion, "head or skull"], there they crucified Him and the criminals, one on the right and the other on the left.

So even as David sacrificed on the top of the Mount of Olives, so also did Jesus offer up Himself as the Supreme Sacrifice for sin at the same location. This, as we have seen, was also the place where the glory of the Lord had been last seen by Ezekiel.

The Final Departure and Return of God's Glory -- After Jesus' death and resurrection, He ascended to the Father. Acts 1:12 then tells us the location of His final departure:

12 Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day's journey away.

Why is it important to know that it was "a Sabbath day's journey"? Because this was a distance of 2,000 cubits. It was the distance from the city gate to the top of the Mount of Olives. In other words, Jesus ascended from the place where Ezekiel had last seen the glory of God as it was departing from Solomon's temple. Jesus' ascension completed this departure to heaven.

:laughhand:  To be honest dear brother T, this is really quite humourous... 2000 "cubits" ...is approximately 3000 to 4000 feet... (cubit= 1.5 - 2.25 feet) much less than even a mile (5280 feet)

You are really reaching in your theology... which is just fine with me...  :grin:

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMHe ascended on the fortieth day from His resurrection (Acts 1:3), the traditional time of Elijah's ascension. Ten days later at the Feast of Pentecost, the glory of God returned to earth. This time it filled not the temple in Jerusalem, but the 120 disciples in the upper room (Acts 2:1-3).

This was the third time THE GLORY AND NAME of God had been fully transferred to another location. The first was at Shiloh; the second at Jerusalem; the third was the body of people known as the true temple of God. 1 Cor. 3:16 says,

16 Do you not know that you are a temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?

More PHYSICAL displacements place upon an entity which has NO PHYSICAL attributes whatsoever... It is the "how many angels can fit on the head of a pin" type of thinking...

Try removing your mind from the confines of the PHYSICAL when you endeavor to percieve the SPIRITUAL, it will help your understandings immensely bro...

GOD does NOT move from one "location" to another, neither does He INDWELL non-living entities... for He is the GOD of the LIVING, not of the the "dead"... the "dead" comprise all things which are SPIRITUALLY INANIMATE... or "NOT LIVING"... (Mark 12:27 / Matt 22:32)

HE does NOT DWELL in temples made by the hand of Man (such as MANufactured TENTS or MANufactured cities -- Jerusalem)... (Acts 7:48 & 17:24-25)

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMThe glory of God--known most often in the New Testament as the Holy Spirit--now indwells us as people. God has moved from a tent at Shiloh to a temple at Jerusalem and finally now indwells a temple made of living stones (1 Peter 2:5). When He left Shiloh, He never returned. When He left Jerusalem, He said in Jer. 7:14 that He was going to leave Jerusalem like He did Shiloh.

In other words, He would never return to such mundane buildings made of wood, stone, gold, and silver. His chief desire from the beginning has been to indwell us. All other houses were inadequate to manifest His glory. The Jews may attempt to build God a new house in Jerusalem, but God is not interested in moving to a new address.

Your biggest problem here is that you continue in PHYSICAL thinking to percieve SPIRITUAL... JESUS said:  I will NEVER LEAVE you nor FORSAKE you... NEVER goes in ALL DIRECTIONS bro... JESUS is an ETERNAL entity which is not confined to such as TIME and the PHYSICAL... You are stuck in yesterdays theology which is rooted in CARNALITY... and engages SPIRITUAL entities with its limited, PHYSICAL proximities...

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMWhere Has God Put His Name?

Revelation 22:4 makes it clear where God has placed His name,

4 and they shall see His face [presence], and His name shall be on their foreheads.

In the message to the Church of the Laodiceans, we read in Rev. 3:12,

12 He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he will not go out from it anymore; and I will write upon him the name of My God, and the name of the city of My God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God, and My new name.

It is clear from this that God has now placed His name upon PEOPLE, not upon buildings, organizations, shrines, or holy real estate.

Using a partial quote of what you said to reiterate:

"for if He dwells in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents... then HE indeed has changed..."

I do believe I have shown above WITH scripture that God has dwelt in other temples, which were "other than the one MAN represents". Has God indeed changed because of this? OF COURSE NOT!!! God has dwelt in a tent and later in a temple, both manmade and perishable and destructible and changable; however, it does not follow from this that the tent did not change, or that the temple did not change. Both were destroyed! They did change! And YET, God remained unchanged!

I have shown you that God has dwelt "in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents". First He dwelt in a tent, but He departed from it. BUT, He did not change. Second, He dwelt in a temple made of stones, but He departed from it. BUT, God did not change. Surely, these two abodes of God are "other than the one MAN represents".

Using your premise, God has changed BECAUSE He has dwelt "in a TEMPLE which is other than the one MAN represents"; and not only once, but twice!

Before Christ saved you, what state was your spirit in?

After Christ saved you, what state was your spirit in?

Did your spirit undergo any changes?

Read Christ's letters to the churches in Revelation for more proof that WE, the body of Christ and temple of the Holy Spirit, DO INDEED CHANGE! The incontrovertible scriptural teaching is that God and His Christ do not change; but nowhere in scripture can be found that we, the temple of God, do not change. Quite the contrary.f

As long as I don't see solid and scriptural proof about this, I cannot accept it as a truth of God. I do not need eyes to see nor ears to hear something that is clearly a misunderstanding of scripture. As you said before, you have the right to believe this thing or other thing. IMO, this is speculation.

What's your opinion of God's dialogue with Satan in the book of Job? Does it not convince you of the existence of Satan? What about ALL the accounts of demonic possessions found throughout the New Covenant? Maybe it is you who needs the ears to ears and the eyes to see to realize that you are in error? What does it mean to you that Satan is also thrown into the lake of fire? We already know the purpose of the lake of fire for the unsaved. Why would God throw Satan in the same lake where He will also throw human beings so they can learn righteousness?

Your Christian walk might be a lengthy one, as you say. But that does not guarantee that this your belief in particular is correct. Hopefully, I have provided enough scripture this time.  :laughing7:

And I have shown you that your thinking is in PHYSICAL terms not SPIRITUAL... you have an OMNIPRESENT being, coming and going... From a tent to a MAN... GOD is in everything and EVERYWHERE The0...  but His DWELLING PLACE is in the TEMPLE of the HEART of His SON... and subsequently, ..the MEMBERS of HIS SON's BODY...


You have indeed quoted A lot of SCRIPTURE (for which I commend you), however you fail to make ONE SPIRITUAL point... bringing your PHYSICAL observance of SPIRITUAL matters into your conclusions...  :dontknow:

Your provision of SCRIPTURE is only the observance of the HISTORICAL actions of MAN, which when SIMPLIFIED, denote that GOD FREES or brings BACK what HE decided would be made CAPTIVE...

As far as my "lengthy walk" The0... your NON-lengthy one does not conclude that it is "correct" either...

I noted the length of my walk, not to compare it to you or anyone, nor to verify my observances as "correct" (btw -- no man is "correct" GOD is the ONLY entity which is "correct" and HE deems who shall KNOW what HE KNOWS)...

Rather that "length" was revealed to note that in 33 years I have observed many things concerning that which is called SPIRITUAL... to include the false SPIRITUAL "demonic possessions" which MEN observe and CONCLUDE in the FLESH to be SPIRITUAL... Please!  :laughing7:


peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 23, 2008, 12:45:31 AM
willieH: :rolleye:

More short sighted offerings from you:

Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 12:16:52 AM
Quote from: WilliWe are NOT individual "SONS"... we are MEMBERS of the SON (Body -- not Bodies of CHRIST)... we are NOT individual "TEMPLES", we are components of the TEMPLE... 

3And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

--Rev 21

The MEMBERS of the BODY and TEMPLE, are "they, them & their"... get a clue  :rolleye:

Try reading (1 Cor 12:12-27)... if you desire to learn... or ignore it if you desire ignorance...  :sigh:

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 12:54:46 AM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 12:54:02 AM

(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"? 




If the answer to (1) is No, then the next 3 questions need not be addressed.



Hb 2:5 For not to messengers does He subject the impending inhabited earth, concerning which we are speaking.


In the new testament, it appears that the same greek word is used for messengers and context provides the way to determine whether it is to be translated angels,  as a result, these passages, whether translated messengers or angels, should be meticulously looked at.

In the verse above, we find the qualifying context in verse 7.

Hb 2:7 Thou makest him some bit inferior to messengers, With glory and honor Thou wreathest him, And dost place him over the works of Thy hands.


God does not subject his angels to the inhabited earth, Jesus was made a little lower than the angels and did subject him to the inhabited earth.  We were subjected to this earth, unwillingly.   Whatever was subjected to this earth was done so by Gods hands.

Since God does not do that to his angels, then the scriptures saying angels fell to earth in sin are not understood properly by the ones holding that doctrine.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 01:26:16 AM
Quote from: willieH on October 23, 2008, 12:45:31 AM
willieH: :rolleye:

More short sighted offerings from you:

Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 12:16:52 AM
Quote from: WilliWe are NOT individual "SONS"... we are MEMBERS of the SON (Body -- not Bodies of CHRIST)... we are NOT individual "TEMPLES", we are components of the TEMPLE... 

3And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

--Rev 21

The MEMBERS of the BODY and TEMPLE, are "they, them & their"... get a clue  :rolleye:

Try reading (1 Cor 12:12-27)... if you desire to learn... or ignore it if you desire ignorance...  :sigh:

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:

1 Corinthians 3:16
Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?


....yet in my flesh shall I see God.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 01:39:50 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 12:54:46 AM
Quote from: willieH on September 29, 2008, 12:54:02 AM

(1) Did HOLY ANGELS ever "Fall"? 




If the answer to (1) is No, then the next 3 questions need not be addressed.



Hb 2:5 For not to messengers does He subject the impending inhabited earth, concerning which we are speaking.


In the new testament, it appears that the same greek word is used for messengers and context provides the way to determine whether it is to be translated angels,  as a result, these passages, whether translated messengers or angels, should be meticulously looked at.

In the verse above, we find the qualifying context in verse 7.

Hb 2:7 Thou makest him some bit inferior to messengers, With glory and honor Thou wreathest him, And dost place him over the works of Thy hands.


God does not subject his angels to the inhabited earth, Jesus was made a little lower than the angels and did subject him to the inhabited earth.  We were subjected to this earth, unwillingly.   Whatever was subjected to this earth was done so by Gods hands.

Since God does not do that to his angels, then the scriptures saying angels fell to earth in sin are not understood properly by the ones holding that doctrine.






What that means is that the angels do not have dominion.  God gave man dominion.



5 God has not put angels in charge of the world that is going to come. We are talking about that world. 6 There is a place where someone has given witness to it. He said,
   "What is a human being that you think about him?
      What is the son of man that you take care of him?
7 You made him a little lower than the angels.
      You placed on him a crown of glory and honor.
    8 You have put everything under his control." —(Psalm 8:4-6)
So God has put everything under him. Everything is under his control.
   We do not now see everything under his control. 9 But we do see Jesus already given a crown of glory and honor. He was made a little lower than the angels. He suffered death. By the grace of God, he tasted death for everyone. That is why he was given his crown.


--Hebrews 2



26And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

--Gen 1

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 02:17:29 AM
G5293  hupotasso  hoop-ot-as'-so

from G5259 and G5021;

to subordinate; reflexively, to obey:--be under obedience (obedient), put
under, subdue unto, (be, make) subject (to, unto), be (put) in subjection (to,
under), submit self unto.


The roots that help with context to this has nothing to do with giving dominion.  It is subjection to something and it is not the same as dominion.

This is what he does not do to the angels concerning the world.   The verse when looking at the greek does not imply  the world after this one.



G3195  mello  mel'-lo

a strengthened form of G3199 (through the idea of expectation);

to intend, i.e. be about to be, do, or suffer something (of persons or things,
especially events; in the sense of purpose, duty, necessity, probability,
possibility, or hesitation):--about, after that, be (almost), (that which is,
things, + which was for) to come, intend, was to (be), mean, mind, be at the
point, (be) ready, + return, shall (begin), (which, that) should (after,
afterwards, hereafter) tarry, which was for, will, would, be yet.



The root modifier

G3199  melo  mel'-o

a primary verb;

to be of interest to, i.e. to concern (only third person singular present  
indicative used impersonally, it matters):--(take) care.


Then we have position context, right in scripture, hebrews is after the account of Jesus life on earth.

Hb 2:9 Yet we are observing *Jesus, Who |has been made anysome bit inferior~ besideto messengers (because of the suffering of death, wreathed with glory and honor), so that in the grace of God, He should be tasting death for the sake of everyone.





Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 02:22:50 AM
Quote from: laren on October 22, 2008, 03:05:16 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 22, 2008, 02:19:51 PM
Quote from: laren on October 22, 2008, 02:26:25 AM
Quote from: pneuma on October 22, 2008, 01:51:28 AM


To see ones nakedness and not be ashamed


is that not a spiritual state/mindset??



Rom 8:5  For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.

Rom 8:6  For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.















Your point being?



We fell from a spiritual state

Laren I also beleive while in the garden Adam was in a spiritual state.

But Adam was NOT CREATED IN THE GARDEN, he was of the EARTH earthy.

Thus to say he was first in spirit and then natural is contrary to all scripture.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 23, 2008, 05:21:42 AM
willieH: to the TOPIC ignoring, discussionist...  :thumbdown:

Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 01:26:16 AM
Quote from: willieH on October 23, 2008, 12:45:31 AM
willieH: :rolleye:

More short sighted offerings from you:

Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 12:16:52 AM
Quote from: willieHWe are NOT individual "SONS"... we are MEMBERS of the SON (Body -- not Bodies of CHRIST)... we are NOT individual "TEMPLES", we are components of the TEMPLE... 

3And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

--Rev 21

The MEMBERS of the BODY and TEMPLE, are "they, them & their"... get a clue  :rolleye:

Try reading (1 Cor 12:12-27)... if you desire to learn... or ignore it if you desire ignorance...  :sigh:

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:

1 Corinthians 3:16
Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?


....yet in my flesh shall I see God.

:laugh:

I see you are still stuck in the FLESH, as you continue to ignore the TOPIC...  :thumbdown:

Please note the SCRIPTURE which says the YOU shall SEE GOD while IN FLESH...

The YOU that GOD dwells in, ...is SPIRIT... not FLESH... get a clue...  :pitiful:

FLESH & BLOOD have nothing to do with the KINGDOM of GOD... get a clue... :pitiful:

FLESH is contrary to SPIRIT (Gal 5:17) ...get a clue... :pitiful:

We are to know no man according to FLESH (2 Cor 5:16) ...get a clue... :pitiful:

You obviously opt for IGNORANCE... not surprising... for the stubborn of heart, learn not...  :sigh:

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 05:22:33 AM
5For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

5Now it was not to angels that God subjected the world to come, of which we are speaking.

5We know that God did not put the future world under the power of angels.

5 For He has not put the world to come, of which we speak, in subjection to angels.

5 God did not choose angels to be the rulers of the new world that was coming, which is what we have been talking about.


---Hebrews 2



He is pointing out that the angels will not rule over the world to come, but Christ and his saints (who are men) will rule over that world.

But, for now, for a little while, He has placed men, and therefore Christ (who comes to save men), a little lower than the angels--even though man has been given dominion over the world.





7Thou madest him a little lower than the angels; thou crownedst him with glory and honour, and didst set him over the works of thy hands:




7For some little time You have ranked him lower than and inferior to the angels; You have crowned him with glory and honor and set him over the works of Your hands:



7You made him for a little while lower than the angels;
  you have crowned him with glory and honor



7You made us lower

  than the angels

  for a while.

  Yet you have crowned us

  with glory and honor



7 You have made him a little lower than the angels;
     You have crowned him with glory and honor,
      And set him over the works of Your hands.





Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 05:25:54 AM
Quote from: WilliPlease note the SCRIPTURE which says the YOU shall SEE GOD while IN FLESH...

I thought I did.  Job does see God while he is still in the flesh.  He spends the last part of the book of Job talking to God.


Mat 5
8"Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 05:46:20 AM


Think your right on that count Molly.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on October 23, 2008, 06:25:11 AM
Sorry WillieH, I have to go with Molly on this one.  1Corinthians 6:15-20 says that it's your body that's the Temple and it warns against making the Temple of God one with prostitutes, remember?  This is along the lines of what I've been warning occasionally about that "flesh and blood can't inherit the kingdom of God" is a truth, but not the truth.  It's a partial truth.  You inherit the kingdom, but not with your flesh or your performance or your self sacrifice, but it's with your faith, or rather with the faith of Jesus as Scripture clarifies more fully elsewhere.  Otherwise, overcoming wouldn't be until the next life, yet our rewards are based upon forcefully advancing the kingdom while in the flesh.  And 1John says that we are of God and HAVE overcome spirits of antiChrist.  St. Paul was simply paraphrasing Jesus' comment, or alluding to Jesus' comment, about the flesh profiting nothing, the Words that I speak to you are spirit and they are life. 

But if the flesh literally profited nothing under any circumstances, then why are the Scriptures so meticulous about the details of the suffering of Christ and the benefits that we derive from each particular thing that happened to Him instead of simply leaving it at the fact that He went through a lot, He can sympathize, and He's merciful?  But the Bible gets graphic about "by His stripes ye were healed; He was bruised for our iniquities; He was marred more than any other man; none of His bones were broken; His side was pierced and Blood and Water flowed -- likely the same Blood and Water mentioned in 1John 5."  His obedience is a spiritual matter and it makes all that He did in our behalf good in our behalf, and I'm not minimizing that, but the Bible says that our labors in the Lord aren't in vain, and yet most of our laborers are the working of flesh and blood under the direction of our spirit trying to follow the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

1Corinthians 3:16-17 says that you are God's temple and it's an isolated instance where the "you" is talking about your body because it's saying that if you destroy God's temple, then God will destroy the one who destroys God's temple.  Or is it an isolated instance? Harming the temple is virtually impossible, apart from false doctrine and things like that, if you were talking only in terms of your spirit.  But 1Thessalonians 5:23 talks about being sanctified completely: spirit, soul, and body.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: The0 on October 23, 2008, 01:58:39 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 23, 2008, 12:38:09 AM
willieH: Hi The0...  :cloud9:

Continuing...  :heat:

Quote from: The0 on October 22, 2008, 03:46:10 PMThe prophet Ezekiel records seeing in a vision the glory of God depart from the temple in Jerusalem. Ezekiel 10:4 says,

4 Then the glory of the Lord went up from the cherub to the threshold of the temple, and the temple was filled with the cloud, and the court was filled with the brightness of the glory of the Lord.

Verse 18 continues,

18 Then the glory of the Lord departed from the threshold of the temple and stood over the cherubim.

The word translated here "departed" [YATSA -- #H3318 strongs]  in vs 18 has MANY applications, one of which is depart, but also means  Appear, Bring forth, and many others... GOD never LEAVES... He IS ALWAYS there... in ALL the "there's" there are!  :laughing7:

The context does not conclude that HE LEFT His temple... GOD is OMNIPRESENT The0 and ...DOES NOT CHANGE... so HE IS... ALWAYS EVERYWHERE! ...He does not "come and go" as do finite men who endeavor to observe Him... As you attempt to propose with this verse.

You think me a child that does not and cannot understand that He left His temple while at the same staying because of His omnipresence. Before the Lord descended upon Mount Sinai, was there a cloud covering it and lightning? did the mount tremble? NO. Because the Lord had not descended. Was He at the mount before He descended? Of course He was. The fact is that God's presence at the mount was made known by the visible cloud and thunder and lightning AND scripture says that God descended. Do not ignore the plain text.

:cloud9: Come down from cloud nine, my brother! You are too high and exalted! :cloud9:

thank you for saying that my experience is NON-lengthy.  :thumbdown: by this you have asserted you know me well. i don't know how. wait! it must be your spiritual eyes and spiritual ears, which i and other BLIND and DEAF humans who disagree with you lack so sorely.

i prefer to wait for God to confirm to me PERSONALLY the strange belief that you are trying to pass for truth. At this time, your poorly constructed 'proof' does not do the job. You are so close and convinced by your own argument, that you fail to see that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.

HOWEVER, UR I can believe because it is taught by scripture. In fact, early believers held to UR belief. Can you trace back your strange belief all the way to the early church? I wonder...

If you are going to post about a strange belief like this one which you believe to be true and hope to enlighten us, at least provide supporting scripture and well constructed arguments which can lead readers to consider and ultimately accept the your strange belief as "truth". As you present it, it does not pass muster; it remains a pet belief of yours, at best!

Having said this, I have no more desire nor interest to discuss this because it is not edifying me. UR fills me with joy and hope for my loved ones and all others who have died and are dying and will die not knowing our Lord Jesus Christ. This strange belief does not even excite one cell of my being. And I know why this is.

I close by saying that I respect your right to hold this or any other belief and your right to post about it. May the Lord bless us both, and continue to fulfill His purpose for our lives.

:grouppray:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 02:31:14 PM
We have those on earth now who are controlled by the spirit of Satan.  They are unrepentant, remorseless sociopaths, without mercy, without empathy, driven by a blind need for power over others.

We have those who are like Eve, watching the mesmerizing sway of the serpent, falling into a trance, and lining up in agreement with him that good is evil and evil good--the walking dead.

And, we have--I look for them everywhere--the sons of God--the second Adam--yes they are here among us.

I have seen them--the crowning glory of the creation of God.




19Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

20But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?


--James 2




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 06:33:17 PM
I was definatly wrong about the verse I thought I saw that God would not subject his angels to the inhabited earth,  a bit of dyslexia as I was reading, LOL.

However, I am still not convinced that Angels once residing with God "Fell" from a state of grace to a state of sin through some choice to be rebellious.

We still have the problem of more than one heaven to contend with as well.    Are we in a realm of heaven as we speak?   

The problem is that I do not believe there has been close enough attention paid to the verses that are translated with the word angels.

For instance:

2Pt 2:4 For if God spares not sinning messengers, but thrusting them into the gloomy caverns of Tartarus, gives them up to be kept for chastening judging;



Does this verse really pertain to angels considering this following passage?


Mt 7:21  "Not everyone *saying to Me  `Lord! Lord!'  will be entering into the kingdom of the heavens, but he who is doing the will of My Father Who is in the heavens.

Mt 7:22 Many will be declaring to Me in that day,  `Lord! Lord! Was it not in Your name that we prophesy, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name do many powerful deeds?'

Mt 7:23 And then shall I be avowing to them that  `I never knew you! Depart from Me, workers of  lawlessness!'

Nothing in the passage denies that they were doing things in Jesus name,  it doesn't even deny the success of these deeds.   It merely shows the motivation behind what was done.  However, this also does not mean they were not messengers that "were not spared"
Spared from what?   Judgment.    Could have those workers of lawlessness been messengers as the word allows for defining as "pastors", yes indeed I believe so.    Could have these pastors delivered a message of God that inspired others to do Gods work?  Yes indeed,  we have physical proof of that today.


Another example

In the old testament, we see the limitations of strongs to be relied upon real heavily.  Not that strongs is  bad,  only that we must recognize limitations when we see them.

Here is what I am talking about.

The same strongs reference is given for two variations.

Ps 78:49 He sent upon them the heat of His anger, Rage and menace and distress, A mission of the messengers of perils,
Above "messengers" is  H4397  in the Hebrew  it is translated   "messengers - of"  mlaki



Ps 91:11 For He shall enjoin His messengers concerning you, To keep you in all your ways.

Again,  the exact same strongs reference  however, the hebrew says  "messengers-of him"
the spelling also has an additional character.  mlaki.u 


In the new testament,  there is only one word that i have seen that is translated to messengers.

G32  aggelos  ang'-el-os

from aggello (probably derived from G71; compare G34) (to bring tidings);

a messenger; especially an "angel"; by implication, a pastor:--angel,
messenger.


The word is not limited to being an angel,  but,  the verses that use that word,  contain the context for how it is used and determines its usage.

A couple of specific examples.

Mark 8:38  in a translation that says "Holy Angels"   literally rendered for context  "of the Father" of him   with the  "messengers  the holy"


Matthew 25:41  talks about "Satan and his angels"

Literally for context  "to the" "thru-caster" and "to the" "messengers" "of him"


I think the word angels is not a proper word in many cases.   I am not saying that there are no "Angels"  What I believe is that the word "angel" automatically induces the thought of something that is "WITH GOD"   so when we hear  "satan and his angels"  we think  "Oh No, what happened?"

When in reality,  there was no fall from heaven,   Satan was created exactly as he is and so were "his" messengers.   


The word angel invokes a line of reasoning that skews how scripture is looked at in my opinion. 

 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 07:52:26 PM
43When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none.

44Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished.

45Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this wicked generation.


---Mat 12





12For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spirit forces of wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere.

--Eph 6
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 23, 2008, 08:47:19 PM
There are two problems here:
1) The problem here that I see once again, some people are demonstrating they know not what a spirit is. They keep going towards Hollywood versions and fictional books.

Spirits are not living beings, they are spirits. Spirits do not have form, they are strong holds and powers of the mind. If you are a giver, you have the spirit of giving. If you are a liar, you have a lying spirit in your mouth. If you have joy and peace, you have the spirit of joy and peace. If you are evil, you have within you an evil spirit.

2) The believe that Celestial Angels have fallen from heaven. They keep going towards Hollywood versions and fictional books.

The problem of Celestial Angels falling from heaven, is not that it is impossible (though I have demonstrated in the past very improbable). The first aspect to this problem is theological. If Angels, the very spirit messengers of God, fell from heaven, then none of us, anyone or anything in Creation is ever safe and salvation is a false hope. What stops anything from rebelling against God again?

The second aspect to this problem is Jesus's words in the Gospels. Angels cannot die, that means they cannot sin because the only way one can die is to sin. Jesus said Angels have no sexual relations, which most people say is the cause to the angelic rebellion. Jesus said that a Kingdom divided against itself will not stand. If a kingdom divided against itself shall not stand, then why are you submitting to a God who had a rebellion in his own heavenly kingdom by the very spirits He created to administrate it?

There is no reason, logical or theological, which in the end constitutes the God created Celestial Angels to fall or that spirits are living beings.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 09:58:18 PM
Quote from: SOTWWhat stops anything from rebelling against God again?

That's what we are for.

1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 10:44:36 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 09:58:18 PM
Quote from: SOTWWhat stops anything from rebelling against God again?

That's what we are for.

1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?



How will our ability to judge a messenger ( One of Gods or otherwise), prevent that messenger from rebelling against God? 

Thats the key,   how will that prevent it from happening again?   And not  all of mankind  will be that judge,  the elect maybe,  but what about the hope of all mankind that the idea of falling away,  of failing,  is removed once and for all from us?   If heaven, of the sort where holy angels can gather together and conspire against God exists, then we are trading one corrupt life here for another there.   

How is that hope?

Corruption will exist if you are saying some of mankind will be the judge of the angels, because they would have to do something that will require judgement in the first place.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 11:03:53 PM
Romans 12:21
Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

1 John 4:4
Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.


1 John 5:5
Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?




25But that which ye have already hold fast till I come.

26And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:

27And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.


---Rev 2
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 11:04:34 PM
QuoteSpirits are not living beings


God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

Pretty sure God is a living being.


QuoteIf Angels, the very spirit messengers of God, fell from heaven, then none of us, anyone or anything in Creation is ever safe and salvation is a false hope. What stops anything from rebelling against God again?


Well that depends on whether you believe Jesus takes AWAY the SIN of the world.
If you believe He does, just as scriptures state, then rebellion or any other SIN if the future become a moot point.



QuoteAngels cannot die, that means they cannot sin because the only way one can die is to sin.


Huh, the wages of sin is DEATH, that would be the second DEATH and all those cast into the second DEATH are ALIVE. It not talking about a physical death bro as before Adam sinned he was already dying a physical death.



QuoteJesus said that a Kingdom divided against itself will not stand.

Do you believe Satan's kingdom stands or is it falling apart before his eyes.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:13:43 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 11:03:53 PM
Romans 12:21
Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.


1 John 4:4
Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.


1 John 5:5
Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?




25But that which ye have already hold fast till I come.

26And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:

27And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.


---Rev 2




If evil is overcome,  what are we to judge.   Judgment is an assement of an action taken, not a prevention.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:22:54 PM
Quote
Well that depends on whether you believe Jesus takes AWAY the SIN of the world.
If you believe He does, just as scriptures state, then rebellion or any other SIN if the future become a moot point.

So where does it state he takes away the sin in heaven?   The issue here is if angels fell,  angels had to sin first.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 11:26:53 PM
QuoteIf evil is overcome,  what are we to judge.   Judgment is an assement of an action taken, not a prevention.


Hebrews 5:14
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.



1 Corinthians 15:25
For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:33:30 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 11:26:53 PM
QuoteIf evil is overcome,  what are we to judge.   Judgment is an assement of an action taken, not a prevention.


Hebrews 5:14
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.


How does that prevent another rebellion in heaven?


Quote
1 Corinthians 15:25
For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.


Jesus reigns, that does not answer your assertion that "our ability to judge" is prevention of a future rebellion.

What says that once all the enemies are put under Jesus feet and he reigns no more, that another rebellion can't take place since Jesus is no longer reigning.


Can you answer which heaven the angels fell from?


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 11:35:18 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:22:54 PM
Quote
Well that depends on whether you believe Jesus takes AWAY the SIN of the world.
If you believe He does, just as scriptures state, then rebellion or any other SIN if the future become a moot point.

So where does it state he takes away the sin in heaven?   The issue here is if angels fell,  angels had to sin first.


Paul the world being spoken of here is the cosmos not the earth and don't forget that His blood speaks of something far greater then the blood of bulls and goat and it is by His blood that the HEAVENS are purified.

Now as the HEAVENS needed to be purified by His blood for me it goes without saying that somehow those in the heavens has corrupted themselves.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:43:26 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 11:35:18 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:22:54 PM
Quote
Well that depends on whether you believe Jesus takes AWAY the SIN of the world.
If you believe He does, just as scriptures state, then rebellion or any other SIN if the future become a moot point.

So where does it state he takes away the sin in heaven?   The issue here is if angels fell,  angels had to sin first.


Paul the world being spoken of here is the cosmos not the earth and don't forget that His blood speaks of something far greater then the blood of bulls and goat and it is by His blood that the HEAVENS are purified.

Now as the HEAVENS needed to be purified by His blood for me it goes without saying that somehow those in the heavens has corrupted themselves.


I'm not against that line of reasoning, but I think the fact that "heavens"  plural is being spoken of that is a missing factor in this discussion.

To just say. angels fell from heaven is not taking the plural nature of that depiction into account.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 11:48:18 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:43:26 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 11:35:18 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:22:54 PM
Quote
Well that depends on whether you believe Jesus takes AWAY the SIN of the world.
If you believe He does, just as scriptures state, then rebellion or any other SIN if the future become a moot point.

So where does it state he takes away the sin in heaven?   The issue here is if angels fell,  angels had to sin first.


Paul the world being spoken of here is the cosmos not the earth and don't forget that His blood speaks of something far greater then the blood of bulls and goat and it is by His blood that the HEAVENS are purified.

Now as the HEAVENS needed to be purified by His blood for me it goes without saying that somehow those in the heavens has corrupted themselves.


I'm not against that line of reasoning, but I think the fact that "heavens"  plural is being spoken of that is a missing factor in this discussion.

To just say. angels fell from heaven is not taking the plural nature of that depiction into account.



I agree Paul, scripture speaks of at least 3 heavens, the Jews beleive 7 heavens (I think, could be wrong)

Just because angels fell from heaven does not mean Gods kingdom was divided because for all we know the second or maybe first heavens was created for thier domain and they like man were to be the rulers of it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 23, 2008, 11:48:41 PM
1TRUE, THERE is nothing to be gained by it, but [as I am obliged] to boast, I will go on to visions and revelations of the Lord.

   2I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago--whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows--was caught up to the third heaven.

   3And I know that this man--whether in the body or away from the body I do not know, God knows--

   4Was caught up into paradise, and he heard utterances beyond the power of man to put into words, which man is not permitted to utter.

---2 Cor 12

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:56:53 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 11:48:41 PM
1TRUE, THERE is nothing to be gained by it, but [as I am obliged] to boast, I will go on to visions and revelations of the Lord.

   2I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago--whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows--was caught up to the third heaven.

   3And I know that this man--whether in the body or away from the body I do not know, God knows--

   4Was caught up into paradise, and he heard utterances beyond the power of man to put into words, which man is not permitted to utter.

---2 Cor 12


And what heaven does scripture state angels fell from?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 12:07:06 AM
QuoteHow does that prevent another rebellion in heaven?



The rod is what the shepherd used to beat off the evil predators of the sheep--the bear and the wolf.

But, first, you have to know the difference between good and evil--which, it turns out, most people don't--so that you can recognize it when you see it, and, before that, you have to be able to even see it is a spiritual battle.



26And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:

27And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.


--Rev 2


8Ask of Me, and I will give You the nations as Your inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth as Your possession.

---Psa 2
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 12:34:11 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:22:54 PM
Quote
Well that depends on whether you believe Jesus takes AWAY the SIN of the world.
If you believe He does, just as scriptures state, then rebellion or any other SIN if the future become a moot point.

So where does it state he takes away the sin in heaven?   The issue here is if angels fell,  angels had to sin first.



Thus it was necessary for these earthly copies of the things in heaven to be cleansed by these sacrifices, but the heavenly things themselves are made clean with better sacrifices than these.

--Heb 9:23
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 12:36:41 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 12:07:06 AM
QuoteHow does that prevent another rebellion in heaven?



The rod is what the shepherd used to beat off the evil predators of the sheep--the bear and the wolf.


So there will still be things that need beating off in heaven?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 12:41:16 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 12:36:41 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 12:07:06 AM
QuoteHow does that prevent another rebellion in heaven?



The rod is what the shepherd used to beat off the evil predators of the sheep--the bear and the wolf.


So there will still be things that need beating off in heaven?

You think the battle is done?  Technically it is.  Jesus won.  But he needs us to manifest it.

Look around you--the world is up to its eyeballs in evil and it's getting worse by the day.


19For [even the whole] creation (all nature) waits expectantly and longs earnestly for God's sons to be made known [waits for the revealing, the disclosing of their sonship].



Romans 8:19
For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 01:03:26 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 12:34:11 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:22:54 PM
Quote
Well that depends on whether you believe Jesus takes AWAY the SIN of the world.
If you believe He does, just as scriptures state, then rebellion or any other SIN if the future become a moot point.

So where does it state he takes away the sin in heaven?   The issue here is if angels fell,  angels had to sin first.



Thus it was necessary for these earthly copies of the things in heaven to be cleansed by these sacrifices, but the heavenly things themselves are made clean with better sacrifices than these.

--Heb 9:23



says earthly copies.......  OF the things in heaven.

then it says  heavenly things.


I want to point out a difference.

A couple of examples of verses pertaining to a singular heaven

Hb 9:24 For Christ entered not into holy places made by hands, representations of the true, but into *heaven itself, now to be disclosed to the face of *God for our sakes


Mt 6:26  "Look at into the flying creatures of *heaven, that they are not sowing, neither are they reaping, nor are they gathering into barns, and your *heavenly *Father is nourishing them. Are not you' of rathermore |consequence than they?


If angels fell from this "singular" heaven here then there is a contradiction.  Did not a fallen angel reap what it sowed?   Here it states there is no sowing or reaping.


A couple of examples pertaining to plural heavens

Mt 3:2 saying:  "|Repent! for near is the kingdom of the heavens!"

Mk 13:25 and the moon shall not be giving her beams, and the stars shall be falling out of heaven, and the powers in the heavens shall be shaken.
It suggests a created realm apart from  the singular.  


Yep, how we act now pertains to the need for repentance,  so a heaven realm exists right here, but it is not pertaining to being "one" with God.



The suggestion I am making here is  God being all in all is the gathering  of those created in realms outside of God direct presence, his (face),  It was all created as we see it in imperfection to prepare us for being "in" him.

If the 3rd heaven has things in it that cannot be uttered by man, how is it we think an angel fell from any place where we can describe what happened?   That contradicts the whole notion.


Mt 13:47  "Again, like is the kingdom of the heavens to a dragnet cast into the sea, which gathers out of every species,


This talks of heavens, but it is showing the gathering,  we are being gathered here, so we are possibly in a heavenly realm now.

So the picture that we are often told is   God was in heaven and the angels there with him rebelled and he kicked them out.


I believe the scriptural issue is that  God  "created the heavens and the earth"  and it was there that he created us, satan, demons , the  serpent for a specific purpose.

To prepare us to be "ONE" with him.   God is everywhere, and we are never truly separated from God, however, we are not ONE with him in the same way  two people who are next to each other are not one,  but when they get married they are one.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 01:07:06 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 12:41:16 AM

Look around you--the world is up to its eyeballs in evil and it's getting worse by the day.



What I see in this physical earth is irrevalent to the need for such concern in a realm where we can look into the face of God.


Like I said, your suggestion makes the whole thing of running the race and doing good moot, if I have to sacrifice here, so that I can get to heaven only to realize that there is still garbage and crap to contend with,  then,  really,  that is the ultimate in "Who cares what I do now".   


And people call that hope?


Hope for what?

More crap?


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 01:13:22 AM
Paul I can see things along this lines also, for we are all well aware of a spiritual realm, which could easily be called a heavenly realm.

When Jesus was baptised the HEAVENS or all realms were OPEN unto Him.

Something to think about at least.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 01:36:59 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 01:07:06 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 12:41:16 AM

Look around you--the world is up to its eyeballs in evil and it's getting worse by the day.



What I see in this physical earth is irrevalent to the need for such concern in a realm where we can look into the face of God.


Like I said, your suggestion makes the whole thing of running the race and doing good moot, if I have to sacrifice here, so that I can get to heaven only to realize that there is still garbage and crap to contend with,  then,  really,  that is the ultimate in "Who cares what I do now".   


And people call that hope?


Hope for what?

More crap?



I didn't say that, did I?

The battle is here and now--where you are standing.


13And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries?

14And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the LORD am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my Lord unto his servant?

15And the captain of the LORD's host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so.


--Josh 5



"host"

H6635
צבאה    צבא
tsâbâ'  tsebâ'âh
tsaw-baw', tseb-aw-aw'
From H6633; a mass of persons (or figurative things), especially regularly organized for war (an army); by implication a campaign, literally or figuratively (specifically hardship, worship): - appointed time, (+) army, (+) battle, company, host, service, soldiers, waiting upon, war (-fare).





Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 01:52:50 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 01:36:59 AM

I didn't say that, did I?

The battle is here and now--where you are standing.


Ok, so this battle now, determines that angels will not fall again from heaven.   Alright, concerning that the bible speaks of "heavens"  which pretty much is being ignored entirely,  I can entertain this to some degree.

But, which heaven did angels fall from?   Please answer.


Because if there "was" angels who can bask directly into the face of God and they rebelled,  then this whole idea that God needed to do anything to prevent it from happening again creates a paradox.   

If God could not have prevented it in the first place, then there is no hope whatsoever that even Jesus trampling things under his feet will conclusively prevent it from happening again.

There is no assurance of such a thing, if angels fell while basking directly in the face of God.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 24, 2008, 06:00:46 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 09:58:18 PM
Quote from: SOTWWhat stops anything from rebelling against God again?

That's what we are for.

1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?


You don't understand, you have no hope. Jesus said a Kingdom divided against itself shall not stand. If the Kingdom of God was divided, then the God you worship is no God of mine.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on October 24, 2008, 06:24:19 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 01:52:50 AM
Because if there "was" angels who can bask directly into the face of God and they rebelled,  then this whole idea that God needed to do anything to prevent it from happening again creates a paradox.   

If God could not have prevented it in the first place, then there is no hope whatsoever that even Jesus trampling things under his feet will conclusively prevent it from happening again.

There is no assurance of such a thing, if angels fell while basking directly in the face of God.
Unless what Jesus did alters and completes the Creation THAT MUCH....Unless it was the one missing revelation that they were needing to stay at peace and obedience to Him.
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 06:00:46 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 09:58:18 PM
Quote from: SOTWWhat stops anything from rebelling against God again?

That's what we are for.

1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?


You don't understand, you have no hope. Jesus said a Kingdom divided against itself shall not stand. If the Kingdom of God was divided, then the God you worship is no God of mine.
It still doesn't prevent God from having Created us as the extensions of His very own nature, through Christ, to balance the Creation and keep everything conciliated.  Salvation involves judgment and revealing.  Aren't we the more free to grow into God in all things knowing that Christ is our net that keeps us from dying in this circus that we call life?  What if there is a direction of growth that God wants the angels to grow in that though not necessarily involving sonship is still something they can't fully participate in without knowing that He'll crush every rebellion and restore what's been crushed; a bruised reed He won't break and smoking flax He won't quench til He sends forth judgment to victory.  We're the bruised reeds without a doubt, but what's the smoking flax?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 24, 2008, 07:18:48 AM
QuoteIt still doesn't prevent God from having Created us as the extensions of His very own nature, through Christ, to balance the Creation and keep everything conciliated.  Salvation involves judgment and revealing.  Aren't we the more free to grow into God in all things knowing that Christ is our net that keeps us from dying in this circus that we call life?  What if there is a direction of growth that God wants the angels to grow in that though not necessarily involving sonship is still something they can't fully participate in without knowing that He'll crush every rebellion and restore what's been crushed; a bruised reed He won't break and smoking flax He won't quench til He sends forth judgment to victory.  We're the bruised reeds without a doubt, but what's the smoking flax?

We were not created in the Kingdom of God, but the so-called "Fallen" Angels were. You need better wisdom than what you provided, to support your claim. Otherwise it is a justification of something that has no reasoning only speculation. Jesus was clear when he said a Kingdom divided shall not stand, therefore anything that was of God's Kingdom will not be divided.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 24, 2008, 07:21:24 AM
QuoteThat's what we are for.

1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

Those "angels" refers to Israel and the fallen prophets of God who chosen by God were still just human.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:23:43 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 07:21:24 AM
QuoteThat's what we are for.

1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

Those "angels" refers to Israel and the fallen prophets of God who chosen by God were still just human.
And you know this...how?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:30:30 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 06:00:46 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 09:58:18 PM
Quote from: SOTWWhat stops anything from rebelling against God again?

That's what we are for.

1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?


You don't understand, you have no hope. Jesus said a Kingdom divided against itself shall not stand. If the Kingdom of God was divided, then the God you worship is no God of mine.

If the kingdom is not divided, why does anything have to be reconciled?

1 a : to restore to friendship or harmony <reconciled the factions> b : SETTLE , RESOLVE <reconcile differences>

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 24, 2008, 08:14:43 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:23:43 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 07:21:24 AM
QuoteThat's what we are for.

1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

Those "angels" refers to Israel and the fallen prophets of God who chosen by God were still just human.
And you know this...how?

By Scripture. Once you recognize the words of Jesus stating that no Celestial angel has ever sinned, nor given into marriage (that is have sexual relationships) and not rebelled from the Kingdom of God. The only answer is mankind is the only chosen of God who can rebel because they are rebelling against something they do not know and have been on the outside. There is only one who has ever descended from Heaven, and that is Jesus Christ so that He could bring us up with Him. Therefore, instead of speculation and listening to the bs of religion and vain imaginations of men fearful to look upon what is truth, read what Scripture says in it's entirety.

The whole 'angelic army' that we told to imagine does not exist. Neither does the 'fallen angelic army'. It is very simple and not convoluded.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 24, 2008, 08:36:06 AM
Quote1 a : to restore to friendship or harmony <reconciled the factions> b : SETTLE , RESOLVE <reconcile differences>

I know your line of reasoning and it is the slippery slope. First mankind was not created in the Garden, he was created outside and brought into it. Second, only mankind can rebel and be reconciled back to God.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 08:46:46 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 12:07:06 AM
QuoteHow does that prevent another rebellion in heaven?
The rod is what the shepherd used to beat off the evil predators of the sheep--the bear and the wolf.

So according to your view there is sin/evil in heaven?
If everything is in harmony no shepard is needed. And certainly no rod to beat enemies/sinners that don't exist.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 09:10:10 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:33:30 PM
Quote
1 Corinthians 15:25
For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.


Jesus reigns, that does not answer your assertion that "our ability to judge" is prevention of a future rebellion.

What says that once all the enemies are put under Jesus feet and he reigns no more, that another rebellion can't take place since Jesus is no longer reigning.

Paul,
I think this depends on what 'under his feet' exactly means.
If the enemies are submitted forcefully they will rebel as soon as the 'foot is taken away'
But perhaps the enemies submitted themselfs because they concluded for themselfs that they where wrong in the past and now follow the wishes of Father and Son.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 09:23:08 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:43:26 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 11:35:18 PM
Now as the HEAVENS needed to be purified by His blood for me it goes without saying that somehow those in the heavens has corrupted themselves.

I'm not against that line of reasoning, but I think the fact that "heavens"  plural is being spoken of that is a missing factor in this discussion.

To just say. angels fell from heaven is not taking the plural nature of that depiction into account.

No but perhaps that's only so because we don't know what angel look like?
Nowadays a drawing of an angel is a human with feathered wings.
But much older drawings show an angel as flying dragon. During flight they are long stretched and look like a flying snake.
Then the mentioned heaven is simply 'our sky'
Their wings got clipped to 'eat dust'...
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 09:29:37 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 11:48:41 PM
   2I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago--whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows--was caught up to the third heaven.

Quote3772 ouvrano,j ouranos {oo-ran-os'}
Meaning:  1) the vaulted expanse of the sky with all things visible in it 1a) the universe, the world 1b) the aerial heavens or sky, the region where the clouds and the tempests gather, and where thunder and lightning are produced 1c) the sidereal or starry heavens 2) the region above the sidereal heavens, the seat of order of things eternal and consummately perfect where God dwells and other heavenly beings

Heaven #1: The planet we are standing on
Heaven #2: Just above us
Heaven #3: Place of the clouds
Heaven #4: Place of the starts
Heaven #5: Above/beyond the stars.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 03:03:59 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 07:18:48 AM
QuoteIt still doesn't prevent God from having Created us as the extensions of His very own nature, through Christ, to balance the Creation and keep everything conciliated.  Salvation involves judgment and revealing.  Aren't we the more free to grow into God in all things knowing that Christ is our net that keeps us from dying in this circus that we call life?  What if there is a direction of growth that God wants the angels to grow in that though not necessarily involving sonship is still something they can't fully participate in without knowing that He'll crush every rebellion and restore what's been crushed; a bruised reed He won't break and smoking flax He won't quench til He sends forth judgment to victory.  We're the bruised reeds without a doubt, but what's the smoking flax?

We were not created in the Kingdom of God, but the so-called "Fallen" Angels were. You need better wisdom than what you provided, to support your claim. Otherwise it is a justification of something that has no reasoning only speculation. Jesus was clear when he said a Kingdom divided shall not stand, therefore anything that was of God's Kingdom will not be divided.

Yes Jesus was clear when He said a kingdom divided shall not stand, but Craig Jesus cast satan out which clearly shows satan is NOT of Gods kingdom.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 04:05:01 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 08:14:43 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:23:43 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 07:21:24 AM
QuoteThat's what we are for.

1 Corinthians 6:3
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

Those "angels" refers to Israel and the fallen prophets of God who chosen by God were still just human.
And you know this...how?

By Scripture. Once you recognize the words of Jesus stating that no Celestial angel has ever sinned, nor given into marriage (that is have sexual relationships) and not rebelled from the Kingdom of God. The only answer is mankind is the only chosen of God who can rebel because they are rebelling against something they do not know and have been on the outside. There is only one who has ever descended from Heaven, and that is Jesus Christ so that He could bring us up with Him. Therefore, instead of speculation and listening to the bs of religion and vain imaginations of men fearful to look upon what is truth, read what Scripture says in it's entirety.

The whole 'angelic army' that we told to imagine does not exist. Neither does the 'fallen angelic army'. It is very simple and not convoluded.
I'm asking you, when we are told that we will judge "angels," how do you know that refers to "Israel and the fallen prophets of God who chosen by God were still just human."   Is there scripture that supports that?

If so, why would he call Old Testament Israel "angels"?  Why not just be clear if this statement is not referring to celestial angels?

Also, where does Jesus say "no celestial angel has ever sinned"? 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:09:01 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 09:10:10 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:33:30 PM
Quote
1 Corinthians 15:25
For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.


Jesus reigns, that does not answer your assertion that "our ability to judge" is prevention of a future rebellion.

What says that once all the enemies are put under Jesus feet and he reigns no more, that another rebellion can't take place since Jesus is no longer reigning.

Paul,
I think this depends on what 'under his feet' exactly means.
If the enemies are submitted forcefully they will rebel as soon as the 'foot is taken away'
But perhaps the enemies submitted themselfs because they concluded for themselfs that they where wrong in the past and now follow the wishes of Father and Son.


Well, one of the factors of the story of fallen angels has to do with free will as your pointing out.  
If we have free will to rebell against God while being one with him in the first place, then what says we will not have free will to devise another scheme that we will think will work "this time"?    


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:23:12 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 09:23:08 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:43:26 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 11:35:18 PM
Now as the HEAVENS needed to be purified by His blood for me it goes without saying that somehow those in the heavens has corrupted themselves.

I'm not against that line of reasoning, but I think the fact that "heavens"  plural is being spoken of that is a missing factor in this discussion.

To just say. angels fell from heaven is not taking the plural nature of that depiction into account.

No but perhaps that's only so because we don't know what angel look like?
Nowadays a drawing of an angel is a human with feathered wings.
But much older drawings show an angel as flying dragon. During flight they are long stretched and look like a flying snake.
Then the mentioned heaven is simply 'our sky'
Their wings got clipped to 'eat dust'...


What they look like I am not sure is at issue.  It is whether scripture provides the description of beings that were one with God, then rebelled against him. 


The point of creation is  "created the heavens and the earth"   So first off, if an angel "fell from heaven"  was that a choice to be removed from being one with God, or was it a creature in a created realm that sinned?   And  was it actually Gods "messengers" or was it the created beings that were created that way to begin with?

Satan was created the adversary,  there is little support to say he was created a messenger, one with God, then he rebelled and became a murderer.   Satan and his messengers were created that way to begin with for a purpose.

The serpent was created crafty and subtle to begin with.   Adam and Eve were created with that nature or they could not have disobeyed "before" knowing Good and Evil.

Creation started out corrupt as we see it.   In reality,  creation started out PERFECT for the reason God made it the way he did.

It did not start out "one" with God, then on its own became corrupt.

Romans says creation was subject to vanity unwillingly,  so there is nothing concerning choice there.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 04:26:41 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 03:03:59 PM
Yes Jesus was clear when He said a kingdom divided shall not stand, but Craig Jesus cast satan out which clearly shows satan is NOT of Gods kingdom.

Or not anymore....
Perhaps was Gods kingdom divided and God fixed that by kicking out the opposition...
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:33:39 PM
Quote from: martincisneros on October 24, 2008, 06:24:19 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 01:52:50 AM
Because if there "was" angels who can bask directly into the face of God and they rebelled,  then this whole idea that God needed to do anything to prevent it from happening again creates a paradox.   

If God could not have prevented it in the first place, then there is no hope whatsoever that even Jesus trampling things under his feet will conclusively prevent it from happening again.

There is no assurance of such a thing, if angels fell while basking directly in the face of God.
Unless what Jesus did alters and completes the Creation THAT MUCH....Unless it was the one missing revelation that they were needing to stay at peace and obedience to Him.


Jesus does change creation that much, the issue is if creation was one with God, then chose not to be hence "fallen angels".

What does romans say?  "to vanity was the creation subject to unwillingly"

What does Genesis say?  "God created the heavens and the earth"    

Where is God?   God is not in a place,  he is.....   So being with God in heaven is not the same as being one with God,  "ALL in ALL"


We are with God now, but we are not one with him.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 04:34:28 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:09:01 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 09:10:10 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:33:30 PM
Quote
1 Corinthians 15:25
For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.


Jesus reigns, that does not answer your assertion that "our ability to judge" is prevention of a future rebellion.

What says that once all the enemies are put under Jesus feet and he reigns no more, that another rebellion can't take place since Jesus is no longer reigning.

Paul,
I think this depends on what 'under his feet' exactly means.
If the enemies are submitted forcefully they will rebel as soon as the 'foot is taken away'
But perhaps the enemies submitted themselfs because they concluded for themselfs that they where wrong in the past and now follow the wishes of Father and Son.


Well, one of the factors of the story of fallen angels has to do with free will as your pointing out.  
If we have free will to rebell against God while being one with him in the first place, then what says we will not have free will to devise another scheme that we will think will work "this time"?    
Nothing says that.
But nothing says the contrary either.
The fallen angels had free will. They abused it and got kicked out. They get thousands of years to enjoy their free will and living by their own standards. Maybe in the end they conclude God was right from the start and His methods are the best.
Just my personal opinion; I don't think people in heaven will be forcefully submitted. Perhaps for a short while but after that no force whatsoever is needed. Neither are people brainwashed to follow God.
If that was the way He wants things He just could have created 10 biljon people according to His standards, skip the whole Bible and place them directly in eternal life in Heaven.
So my believe is that thinking people live withoutsin and force in Heaven.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:38:06 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:30:30 AM

1 a : to restore to friendship or harmony <reconciled the factions> b : SETTLE , RESOLVE <reconcile differences>




The structure of word and root and context does not limit the word reconcile (God being all in all) to a restoration of what once was.


"to win over to friendliness; cause to become amicable" 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 04:40:27 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:23:12 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 09:23:08 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:43:26 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 11:35:18 PM
Now as the HEAVENS needed to be purified by His blood for me it goes without saying that somehow those in the heavens has corrupted themselves.

I'm not against that line of reasoning, but I think the fact that "heavens"  plural is being spoken of that is a missing factor in this discussion.

To just say. angels fell from heaven is not taking the plural nature of that depiction into account.

No but perhaps that's only so because we don't know what angel look like?
Nowadays a drawing of an angel is a human with feathered wings.
But much older drawings show an angel as flying dragon. During flight they are long stretched and look like a flying snake.
Then the mentioned heaven is simply 'our sky'
Their wings got clipped to 'eat dust'...


What they look like I am not sure is at issue.  It is whether scripture provides the description of beings that were one with God, then rebelled against him. 
And I'm not sure it's not an issue :-)
Just as an example:
Suppose science can prove there where once flying dragons and they lost their ability to fly. Just like the snake in Genesis that got cursed.
Then fell from heaven means "Fell from the sky just like when you shoot a flying bird."
Meaning they where not in the Heaven with God but just in 'our' air.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:43:52 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 04:34:28 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:09:01 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 09:10:10 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:33:30 PM
Quote
1 Corinthians 15:25
For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.


Jesus reigns, that does not answer your assertion that "our ability to judge" is prevention of a future rebellion.

What says that once all the enemies are put under Jesus feet and he reigns no more, that another rebellion can't take place since Jesus is no longer reigning.

Paul,
I think this depends on what 'under his feet' exactly means.
If the enemies are submitted forcefully they will rebel as soon as the 'foot is taken away'
But perhaps the enemies submitted themselfs because they concluded for themselfs that they where wrong in the past and now follow the wishes of Father and Son.


Well, one of the factors of the story of fallen angels has to do with free will as your pointing out.  
If we have free will to rebell against God while being one with him in the first place, then what says we will not have free will to devise another scheme that we will think will work "this time"?    
Nothing says that.
But nothing says the contrary either.
The fallen angels had free will. They abused it and got kicked out. They get thousands of years to enjoy their free will and living by their own standards. Maybe in the end they conclude God was right from the start and His methods are the best.
Just my personal opinion; I don't think people in heaven will be forcefully submitted. Perhaps for a short while but after that no force whatsoever is needed. Neither are people brainwashed to follow God.
If that was the way He wasnts things He just could have created 10 biljon people according to His standards, skip the whole Bible and place them directly in eternal life in Heaven.
So my believe is that thinking people live withoutsin and force in Heaven.


Thats my point,   the hope depicted in the bible lends to the fact that we do not have to be concerned with corruption when we are "ALL in ALL".   This story thats being discussed, if true, contradicts that hope.  

Because being in heaven (which one again?) with God is not equal to being  one with him in paradise.   It is this being one with him in paradise that the story says the angels fell from.

Free will is free will in the context of the story.  If there was free will to break being one with God,  then there is free will that it will happen again.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 04:45:28 PM
QuoteWhat they look like I am not sure is at issue.  It is whether scripture provides the description of beings that were one with God, then rebelled against him.  

Paul were are you getting the idea that the angels that fell were ONE WITH GOD?


QuoteThe point of creation is  "created the heavens and the earth"   So first off, if an angel "fell from heaven"  was that a choice to be removed from being one with God, or was it a creature in a created realm that sinned?   And  was it actually Gods "messengers" or was it the created beings that were created that way to begin with?

Satan was created the adversary,  there is little support to say he was created a messenger, one with God, then he rebelled and became a murderer.   Satan and his messengers were created that way to begin with for a purpose.

Yes satan was a liar and murderer from the BEGINING Paul, but what was he BEFORE the Begining when the sons of God shouted for joy at the formation of the world.

QuoteThe serpent was created crafty and subtle to begin with.   Adam and Eve were created with that nature or they could not have disobeyed "before" knowing Good and Evil.

Agreed



QuoteRomans says creation was subject to vanity unwillingly,  so there is nothing concerning choice there.

You know Paul I always read that scripture the same way you are doing here, but I am not so sure that reading is correct.

Question: who is the word unwillingly in referance to? is it in reference to the creation or to God?

if the creation then it would be a correct reading but if God, then it changes the whole meaning of the scripture and it would then say God subjected the creation to vanity NOT WILLINGLY.

Which to me seem to be more in line with His nature, God does not willingly chastise His children but chastise them He will because of DISOBEDIENCE.

Also bro if it is in relation to creation do we then not have waring scriptures? for do not scriptures proclaim because of one MANS disobedience the world is now in a state of vainity.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:50:43 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 04:40:27 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:23:12 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 09:23:08 AM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 23, 2008, 11:43:26 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 23, 2008, 11:35:18 PM
Now as the HEAVENS needed to be purified by His blood for me it goes without saying that somehow those in the heavens has corrupted themselves.

I'm not against that line of reasoning, but I think the fact that "heavens"  plural is being spoken of that is a missing factor in this discussion.

To just say. angels fell from heaven is not taking the plural nature of that depiction into account.

No but perhaps that's only so because we don't know what angel look like?
Nowadays a drawing of an angel is a human with feathered wings.
But much older drawings show an angel as flying dragon. During flight they are long stretched and look like a flying snake.
Then the mentioned heaven is simply 'our sky'
Their wings got clipped to 'eat dust'...


What they look like I am not sure is at issue.  It is whether scripture provides the description of beings that were one with God, then rebelled against him. 
And I'm not sure it's not an issue :-)
Just as an example:
Suppose science can prove there where once flying dragons and they lost their ability to fly. Just like the snake in Genesis that got cursed.
Then fell from heaven means "Fell from the sky just like when you shoot a flying bird."
Meaning they where not in the Heaven with God but just in 'our' air.


Thats always a possibility I suppose,  I have no problems with the depiction of "falling"  as the bible says we do all fall short of his glory.  

The problem is that the story depicts this falling as a free will choice to become imperfect as we view perfection.  I do not believe there is a very solid scriptural picture of that.

Rather to me,  God created a realm of existance that is his spirit, but separated from his ultimate glory and placing us on this journey to be prepared to be one with him and aware of it.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 05:01:48 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 04:45:28 PM
QuoteWhat they look like I am not sure is at issue.  It is whether scripture provides the description of beings that were one with God, then rebelled against him.  

Paul were are you getting the idea that the angels that fell were ONE WITH GOD?



Thats what the story that is being depicted implies.   It is in reference to a singular heaven, the same heaven that is said we go to where there is no sadness, etc etc.  So if it is this "heaven" we are to be at when God is all in all, then the story implies this same place is where it all started.



Quote
Yes satan was a liar and murderer from the BEGINING Paul, but what was he BEFORE the Begining when the sons of God shouted for joy at the formation of the world.

Perhaps whatever Satan can be shown to be was not created yet.


Quote
You know Paul I always read that scripture the same way you are doing here, but I am not so sure that reading is correct.

Question: who is the word unwillingly in referance to? is it in reference to the creation or to God?

Well here is the structure of the greek.

"to the" "for" "Vanity" "the creation" "was under set" "not" "voluntarily" "but" "thru" "the" "one under setting" "on" "expectation"


I can't see it any other way.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:04:14 PM
QuoteThe problem is that the story depicts this falling as a free will choice to become imperfect as we view perfection.  I do not believe there is a very solid scriptural picture of that.

It's more a rebellion against God which results in a fall.


.....ye shall be as gods,...



13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

14I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

15Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.


--Isa 14




1And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.

2And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

3And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

--Rev 20
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 05:07:16 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:04:14 PM
QuoteThe problem is that the story depicts this falling as a free will choice to become imperfect as we view perfection.  I do not believe there is a very solid scriptural picture of that.

It's more a rebellion against God which results in a fall.




What is the root cause of the rebellion then?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:13:48 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 05:07:16 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:04:14 PM
QuoteThe problem is that the story depicts this falling as a free will choice to become imperfect as we view perfection.  I do not believe there is a very solid scriptural picture of that.

It's more a rebellion against God which results in a fall.




What is the root cause of the rebellion then?


Perversion.  Pride.  Wickedness.  Desire for power.  Which spirits man can easily succumb to because it all sounds good at first.


12For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spirit forces of wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere.

--Eph 6




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 05:15:56 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 04:43:52 PM
Thats my point

Sorry, then I misunderstood (and understand you)
:Peace:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 05:29:32 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:13:48 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 05:07:16 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:04:14 PM
QuoteThe problem is that the story depicts this falling as a free will choice to become imperfect as we view perfection.  I do not believe there is a very solid scriptural picture of that.

It's more a rebellion against God which results in a fall.




What is the root cause of the rebellion then?


Perversion.  Pride.  Wickedness.  Desire for power.  Which spirits man can easily succumb to because it all sounds good at first.


12For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spirit forces of wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere.

--Eph 6







And where does that come from in an environment that is supposed to be perfect and holy?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:34:45 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 05:29:32 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:13:48 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 05:07:16 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:04:14 PM
QuoteThe problem is that the story depicts this falling as a free will choice to become imperfect as we view perfection.  I do not believe there is a very solid scriptural picture of that.

It's more a rebellion against God which results in a fall.




What is the root cause of the rebellion then?


Perversion.  Pride.  Wickedness.  Desire for power.  Which spirits man can easily succumb to because it all sounds good at first.


12For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spirit forces of wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere.

--Eph 6







And where does that come from in an environment that is supposed to be perfect and holy?


God allows it up to a point, as he did with the Israelites in the wilderness, and then he allows it no more.

God didn't create a bunch of automatons.  But an angel's job is to obey the one in charge. An angel is a servant.   A man's job is to learn to obey through humility.  A man is to become a son.

We are to learn to obey out of love and respect for God's wisdom, not because our fingers will be broken if we don't.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 05:35:26 PM
QuoteThats what the story that is being depicted implies. It is in reference to a singular heaven, the same heaven that is said we go to where there is no sadness, etc etc. So if it is this "heaven" we are to be at when God is all in all, then the story implies this same place is where it all started.

Ok, but just so your aware that not were I am coming from, I already stated I believe the angelic inhabited the earth before man.

QuoteWell here is the structure of the greek.

"to the" "for" "Vanity" "the creation" "was under set" "not" "voluntarily" "but" "thru" "the" "one under setting" "on" "expectation"


I can't see it any other way.

Ya I looked it up in a couple of translation Paul and they all seem to agree that the not willingly is in reference to the creation, but something does not sit right with me, but maybe it has to do with what vanity means, if it just means God made man mortal I have no problem with the original understanding, but if it means God made man sin  (and I have seen more then a few that use it this way) , then I am against that notion.

Yes God made man with the capacity to sin, but He did not make man sin.

So I guess it really comes down to what it means for God to subject the creation to vanity.  
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:48:12 PM
QuoteSo I guess it really comes down to what it means for God to subject the creation to vanity.

Satan is god of this aeon.

It's not going to last forever for him.

Satan is a destroyer, a killer, a murderer, a liar.

We are given a choice every hour of every day whom we will serve.

God has allowed this--in hope--He is the God of hope--

21That nature (creation) itself will be set free from its bondage to decay and corruption [and gain an entrance] into the glorious freedom of God's children.

--Romans 8


We are to be participants with God in his creation, as Adam was in the naming of animals and the dressing and keeping of God's garden.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 06:30:20 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:34:45 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 05:29:32 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:13:48 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 05:07:16 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 05:04:14 PM
QuoteThe problem is that the story depicts this falling as a free will choice to become imperfect as we view perfection.  I do not believe there is a very solid scriptural picture of that.

It's more a rebellion against God which results in a fall.




What is the root cause of the rebellion then?


Perversion.  Pride.  Wickedness.  Desire for power.  Which spirits man can easily succumb to because it all sounds good at first.


12For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spirit forces of wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere.

--Eph 6







And where does that come from in an environment that is supposed to be perfect and holy?


God allows it up to a point, as he did with the Israelites in the wilderness, and then he allows it no more.

God didn't create a bunch of automatons.  But an angel's job is to obey the one in charge. An angel is a servant.   A man's job is to learn to obey through humility.  A man is to become a son.

We are to learn to obey out of love and respect for God's wisdom, not because our fingers will be broken if we don't.


The story depicts this "place" and this place is the same place where we hope to be...  "according to the story".  Within this great place we want to be was the possibility for a being to become corrupted.  Of course that caused the expulsion of the corrupted beings.


What I am saying is that for perversion to take root, it had to exist in that perfect realm to begin with, and that is the contradiction.


If it started perfect and was corrupted, then there is no assurances that it will get back to perfection and stay that way, none whatsoever.   


This story offers no hope and there is no case for it. 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 06:43:43 PM
well, how do you explain these scriptures then?


7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.


--Rev 12



Luke 10:18
And [Jesus] said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 07:02:12 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 06:43:43 PM
well, how do you explain these scriptures then?


7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.


--Rev 12



Luke 10:18
And [Jesus] said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.




Which heaven?   



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:03:08 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 07:02:12 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 06:43:43 PM
well, how do you explain these scriptures then?


7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.


--Rev 12



Luke 10:18
And [Jesus] said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.




Which heaven?   





You tell me--but he falls like lightning from heaven--meaning to earth.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 07:27:56 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:03:08 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 07:02:12 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 06:43:43 PM
well, how do you explain these scriptures then?


7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.


--Rev 12



Luke 10:18
And [Jesus] said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.




Which heaven?   





You tell me--but he falls like lightning from heaven--meaning to earth.



You believe those verses support the story you believe. I do not believe the fall is from a state of perfection with God, you do.

Which heaven?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:30:50 PM
QuoteYou believe those verses support the story you believe. I do not believe the fall is from a state of perfection with God, you do.

Which heaven?

I never said anything about 'a state of perfection with God.'  You are the one who said that.

Which heaven?  You tell me.  What is your reading of these scriptures?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 07:31:02 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 05:35:26 PM
Yes God made man with the capacity to sin, but He did not make man sin.

Phew, this is hard to explain/answer for me.
In short God did create sin.
Explanation:
God created everything. That includes the corrupt human brain.
God is very well knew, even before creation, that mankind would sin.
God is also very capable creating sinless humans or other things.
Somehow He made the choice to made us as we are.
Doesn't that imply He created sin.

This little story explains what I mean:

QuoteThe Scorpion and the Otter

One day a scorpion was on the bank of the River Jordan, wanting to get across to the other side. But of course scorpions can't swim. Luckily it spotted an otter that was about to swim across the river.
'Please, otter,' said the scorpion, 'I need to get across the river, but I can't swim - let me ride on your back.'
'What sort of a fool do you take me for?' said the otter. 'If I let you near me you'll sting me to death.'
'Of course I won't,' said the scorpion. 'I'm trying to get across the river. What possible good would it do me to sting you? I'd drown!'
The otter thought it over, and could see the logic of the scorpion's argument. So he let the scorpion jump onto his back, and set off swimming across the Jordan. But half-way across the river, where the river was at its deepest, the otter felt the scorpion's sting stab deep into his flesh. As both animals began to drown, the otter cried out: 'Why did you sting me--now we'll both drown!'
The scorpion replied: 'Don't blame me--you knew I was a scorpion when you took me on your back - I'm just following my nature. Stinging is what I do.'

Moral: The otter represents logic and reason. The scorpion, madness and unreason. Notice that the scorpion was not averse to using logic when it suited his purpose? 'What possible good would it do me to sting you? I'd drown!'

Notice also that the otter--being a creature of logic and reason, failed to see the mindlessness and madness that lurked behind the logic of the scorpion's argument? And so he died.

Isaiah 45:7 Forming light, and preparing darkness, Making peace, and preparing evil, I am Jehovah, doing all these things.
Romans 11:32 For God has imprisoned all in disobedience so that he may be merciful to all.

I hope I didn't quote out of context but those verses clearly state God created evil/sin.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 07:49:34 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:30:50 PM
QuoteYou believe those verses support the story you believe. I do not believe the fall is from a state of perfection with God, you do.

Which heaven?

I never said anything about 'a state of perfection with God.'  You are the one who said that.

Which heaven?  You tell me.  What is your reading of these scriptures?



It is the garden of eden.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 24, 2008, 07:55:27 PM
QuoteYou believe those verses support the story you believe. I do not believe the fall is from a state of perfection with God, you do.

Which heaven?

For mine,..Heaven ,is related to the High PLACE, that being the MIND...

Stan, the POWER AND  WISDOM of this WORLD, becomes NO more , relates pretty much to me about the Glory which once WAS, but IS NO MORE....



Psa 36:12 There are the workers of iniquity fallen: they are cast down, and shall not be able to rise.

Did you ever Notice, darkness comes before LIGHT, in the same MANNER THE NIGHT comes before ""DAY""", NO DIFFERENT TO ""first the NATURAL then the spirtual,or first the OLDC , then the NEW...the Glory which ONCE WAS but is NO MORE,
12For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this """present darkness"", against the spirit forces of wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere..

The Children of DARKNESS are NO MORE than those who dwell in the OLD C, the POWER of which WAS, that which was a WATCH IN THE NIGHT but NOW PAST.

The heavnens of the CARNAL MIND still bound by LAW need SHAKING......

HERES A hint.

Act 4:31 And when they had prayed, the place was shaken where they were assembled together; and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and they spake the word of God with boldness

once established..

2Th 2:2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand

FOR MINE..ITS  the context of what scripture talks OF.....LAW v GRACE AND TRUTH....

Got to agreew with Craig..about angels,..and that which PAUL talks of who are JUDGED, being israel, those of LAW.


Gods wrath lays on those who still dwell in the DARKNESS of the OLD C, THOSE FOR MINE which still see throu a GLASS """""""""""""""""""""" DARKLY"""""""""""""""""""., AND NOT YET face to face.Hbr 12:24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than [that of] Abel.


Hbr 12:25 See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more [shall not] we [escape], if we turn away from him that [speaketh] from heaven:


Hbr 12:26 Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.

Hbr 12:27 And this [word], Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.


Hbr 12:28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:


Hbr 12:29 For our God [is] a consuming fire.




2Pe 2:4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast [them] down to hell, and delivered [them] into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;  


Got to agree much with WILLIE H too... :icon_flower:
anyways ..nough of my Jabber...

back to stan and those angels from Hollywood.. :laughing7:

Blessings
Taffy

 






Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 08:00:59 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 24, 2008, 07:49:34 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 07:30:50 PM
QuoteYou believe those verses support the story you believe. I do not believe the fall is from a state of perfection with God, you do.

Which heaven?

I never said anything about 'a state of perfection with God.'  You are the one who said that.

Which heaven?  You tell me.  What is your reading of these scriptures?



It is the garden of eden.


The garden of eden is where satan and his angels fell from heaven?

So, who are his angels in the garden?

And, who is michael and his angels in the garden?  Is that Adam?

Are you referring to Genesis 3?

Then that must happen after the account in Job?

6Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.

7And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.


--Job 1


What other scripture supports it as the garden of eden?


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 08:24:19 PM
Quote from: TaffyFor mine,..Heaven ,is related to the High PLACE, that being the MIND...

Are you saying there is no spirit outside of my mind?

That all of this is occurring inside of our minds?  And there is no evil that exists independent of the human mind, and therefore, no good that exists independent of the human mind?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 24, 2008, 08:30:54 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 08:24:19 PM
Quote from: TaffyFor mine,..Heaven ,is related to the High PLACE, that being the MIND...

Are you saying there is no spirit outside of my mind?

That all of this is occurring inside of our minds?  And there is no evil that exists independent of the human mind, and therefore, no good that exists indepedent of the human mind?

That is such a loaded question. It is irrelevant and has no respect for anything discussed in this thread. Of course good exists independent of the human mind, the One who created everything is all in all.  What is relevant is what spirits are, you still think spirits are living beings and not spirits. It still has come to my attention over and over that you believe spirits are living things with choices and work independent of a mind, whether God or man.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 08:58:17 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 08:30:54 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 08:24:19 PM
Quote from: TaffyFor mine,..Heaven ,is related to the High PLACE, that being the MIND...

Are you saying there is no spirit outside of my mind?

That all of this is occurring inside of our minds?  And there is no evil that exists independent of the human mind, and therefore, no good that exists indepedent of the human mind?

That is such a loaded question. It is irrelevant and has no respect for anything discussed in this thread. Of course good exists independent of the human mind, the One who created everything is all in all.  What is relevant is what spirits are, you still think spirits are living beings and not spirits. It still has come to my attention over and over that you believe spirits are living things with choices and work independent of a mind, whether God or man.

It's not a loaded question. It is a real question.

Yes I believe spirits are real.  I believe celestial angels are real.  I believe satan is real.  I believe God is real.

And, like the Bible says, I believe man is involved in spiritual warfare  which is going on 'out there'.

We can protect our own minds with the armour of God, but that doesn't exempt us from the war.

We are Christ's footsoldiers.  Remember "onward Christian soldiers"?  He's not talking about a literal warfare with guns.



13Therefore put on God's complete armor, that you may be able to resist and stand your ground on the evil day [of danger], and, having done all [the crisis demands], to stand [firmly in your place].

    14Stand therefore [hold your ground], having tightened the belt of truth around your loins and having put on the breastplate of integrity and of moral rectitude and right standing with God,

    15And having shod your feet in preparation [to face the enemy with the firm-footed stability, the promptness, and the readiness produced by the good news] of the Gospel of peace.

    16Lift up over all the [covering] shield of saving faith, upon which you can quench all the flaming missiles of the wicked [one].

    17And take the helmet of salvation and the sword that the Spirit wields, which is the Word of God.

    18Pray at all times (on every occasion, in every season) in the Spirit, with all [manner of] prayer and entreaty. To that end keep alert and watch with strong purpose and perseverance, interceding in behalf of all the saints (God's consecrated people).


--Eph 6




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 09:30:40 PM
QuotePhew, this is hard to explain/answer for me.
In short God did create sin.

Not according to scripture bro for sin is of the devil.

QuoteExplanation:
God created everything.

Yes but man has corrupted everything God created.

QuoteThat includes the corrupt human brain.

There is NOTHING wrong with the human brain, the mind only becomes corrupt upon listening to the voice of satan. But if you see satan as being nothing more then the imaginations of mans mind I guess there would be no difference to you.


QuoteGod is very well knew, even before creation, that mankind would sin.

I agree, but having foreknowledge of an event and being responsible for the event are two different animals.


QuoteGod is also very capable creating sinless humans or other things.
Somehow He made the choice to made us as we are.
Doesn't that imply He created sin.

It would only imply God created sin if man did not have free will to make a choice.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 09:44:42 PM
1And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes.

2And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit,

3Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains:

4Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him.

5And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones.

6But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him,

7And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not.

8For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit.

9And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.

10And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country.

11Now there was there nigh unto the mountains a great herd of swine feeding.

12And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them.

13And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and were choked in the sea.

14And they that fed the swine fled, and told it in the city, and in the country. And they went out to see what it was that was done.

15And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid.

16And they that saw it told them how it befell to him that was possessed with the devil, and also concerning the swine.

17And they began to pray him to depart out of their coasts.

18And when he was come into the ship, he that had been possessed with the devil prayed him that he might be with him.

19Howbeit Jesus suffered him not, but saith unto him, Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee.

20And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and all men did marvel.

--Mark 5

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 09:46:15 PM
QuoteI agree with Taffy and Craig... Satan is a spirit...

Anne no one is questioning whether satan is a spirit or not, we all agree he is a spirit, the debate is whether a spirit is a being or just the carnal mind of man.

If it is just the carnal mind of man then God is also just man imagination for God is a spirit.

Satan greatest deception is that he has gotten man to beleive he does not exist.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 09:48:33 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 09:44:42 PM
1And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes.

2And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit,

3Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains:

4Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him.

5And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones.

6But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him,

7And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not.

8For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit.

9And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.

10And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country.

11Now there was there nigh unto the mountains a great herd of swine feeding.

12And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them.

13And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and were choked in the sea.

14And they that fed the swine fled, and told it in the city, and in the country. And they went out to see what it was that was done.

15And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid.

16And they that saw it told them how it befell to him that was possessed with the devil, and also concerning the swine.

17And they began to pray him to depart out of their coasts.

18And when he was come into the ship, he that had been possessed with the devil prayed him that he might be with him.

19Howbeit Jesus suffered him not, but saith unto him, Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee.

20And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and all men did marvel.

--Mark 5



I agree Molly, how people get Jesus casting the imaginations of man into a herd of swine out of those scriptures is beyond me.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 09:51:11 PM
QuoteSatan is a spirit...

Satan and his demons are spirits which can enter into living bodies--Judas, men, swine, an angel of light.  They recognize Jesus and know that he is the Son of the Most High God [El Elyon].   Even the demons tremble at his name.

Reality is all about spirit.

We are spirit beings in an earthly vessel.


John 4:24
God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 24, 2008, 10:04:55 PM
5And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones.


  a dear friend of mine , showed me that this man , in the tombs , was among the dead ,  that being  symbolic
and  cutting himself with stones 
the Law of Moses was written in stone tablets 
and this man was driving himself crazy trying to measure up 
symbolically , that was me 
all those years trying to keep all the LAW  cutting with stones ?   consider it please before you thow it out
' i was wounded  and failing at  one point  or many points   , there was no peace 
I was as a mad man too  , I wanted to die   I was at the wits end 
   the bible is very symbolic   to me  , men as trees 
men as  evil beasts  swine even 
  Ishmael is seen as a wild man /  ass


  Gen 16:12 And he will be a wild 6501 man 120; his hand 3027 [will be] against every man, and every man's hand 3027 against him; and he shall dwell 7931 in the presence 6440 of all his brethren 251. 


Job 11:12 For vain 5014 man 376 would be wise 3823 , though man 120 be born 3205 [like] a wild ass's 6501 colt 5895. 

 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 24, 2008, 10:11:28 PM
 

   Satan/adversary  is a spirit  , evil in nature and its not seen   as  much as percieved ,  yet  real , known
Just as God is spirit  and truth   and they are not your minds , BUT enter the mind , or Heart [being]   something as simple as a  thought  /desire 
that  comes from  within or without/outside 

  when I see the scriptures say Mighty Wind  , I think of a Strong  Spirit
  gusting  in my thoughts  , just as in  nature I have seen  a strong frontline wind

come and rip trees out of the ground  literally

 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 24, 2008, 11:09:40 PM
Quote from: rosered on October 24, 2008, 10:04:55 PM
5And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones.


  a dear friend of mine , showed me that this man , in the tombs , was among the dead ,  that being  symbolic
and  cutting himself with stones 
the Law of Moses was written in stone tablets 
and this man was driving himself crazy trying to measure up 
symbolically , that was me 
all those years trying to keep all the LAW  cutting with stones ?   consider it please before you thow it out
' i was wounded  and failing at  one point  or many points   , there was no peace 
I was as a mad man too  , I wanted to die   I was at the wits end 
   the bible is very symbolic   to me  , men as trees 
men as  evil beasts  swine even 
  Ishmael is seen as a wild man /  ass


  Gen 16:12 And he will be a wild 6501 man 120; his hand 3027 [will be] against every man, and every man's hand 3027 against him; and he shall dwell 7931 in the presence 6440 of all his brethren 251. 


Job 11:12 For vain 5014 man 376 would be wise 3823 , though man 120 be born 3205 [like] a wild ass's 6501 colt 5895. 

 
Hi Rosey :thumbsup:
:icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 24, 2008, 11:25:30 PM
QuoteI agree Molly, how people get Jesus casting the imaginations of man into a herd of swine out of those scriptures is beyond me

Who said they were imaginations? Once again, both Molly and yourself always ASSUME what you do not know and debase it down to it's lowest denominator. Is the spirit of giving a vain imagination? Is an evil spirit a vain imagination? Nope. You both lose in your perception department because nobody here said that, even after I explained what spirits were in previous articles and threads and the little I put in this, there is NO WHERE that assumption can be made. You do a good job to try to confuse the issue with your vain imaginations of what others are talking about but never actually looking for understanding at all.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 24, 2008, 11:39:49 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 11:25:30 PM
QuoteI agree Molly, how people get Jesus casting the imaginations of man into a herd of swine out of those scriptures is beyond me

Who said they were imaginations? Once again, both Molly and yourself always ASSUME what you do not know and debase it down to it's lowest denominator. Is the spirit of giving a vain imagination? Is an evil spirit a vain imagination? Nope. You both lose in your perception department because nobody here said that, even after I explained what spirits were in previous articles and threads and the little I put in this, there is NO WHERE that assumption can be made. You do a good job to try to confuse the issue with your vain imaginations of what others are talking about but never actually looking for understanding at all.

Is there such a thing as 'the spirit of giving'?

Is that in the Bible?

Why don't you just speak in a positive fashion instead of a negative fashion?

Is there a spirit of negativity?

I will know what you are talking about only if you tell me.

God is a Spirit.  Is God a being?  Or something else?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 24, 2008, 11:43:30 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 09:48:33 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 09:44:42 PM
1And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes.

2And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit,

3Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains:

4Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him.

5And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones.

6But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him,

7And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not.

8For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit.

9And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.

10And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country.

11Now there was there nigh unto the mountains a great herd of swine feeding.

12And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them.

13And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and were choked in the sea.

14And they that fed the swine fled, and told it in the city, and in the country. And they went out to see what it was that was done.

15And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid.

16And they that saw it told them how it befell to him that was possessed with the devil, and also concerning the swine.

17And they began to pray him to depart out of their coasts.

18And when he was come into the ship, he that had been possessed with the devil prayed him that he might be with him.

19Howbeit Jesus suffered him not, but saith unto him, Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee.

20And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and all men did marvel.

--Mark 5



I agree Molly, how people get Jesus casting the imaginations of man into a herd of swine out of those scriptures is beyond me.

Hi Scott,
Ya know to well i Indeed respect your input Bro,... :icon_flower:    and not just that ,but also you .having got to know you some over the seasons. :icon_flower:

Like yourself. Im away very much from debate,..well I try....Its not always that easy as Ya Know :icon_flower:

I realy dont mean to take poetic licence Bro but I see SPIRIT meaning very MUCH """LIFE""", therefore, one , if you will, from My understanding at least, see this very much, as Moving FROM DEATH to LIFE, the confusion , Maybe, being the term Spirit bro,...,agaian , im sure i must bore other stupid, but,..the UNCLEAN spirits are likene to FROGS in Rev....ya may find them to be LIARS bro???...ya Know, murderes, Liars, the SONS of thier fathers?????

Each KINGDOM finds ITS own ,....as  LAW and Grace and TRUTH dont mix,..ya Know them SWINE,"" choked in the SEA"..DEAD THAT is, and we KNOW ALL FLESH needs to die before its LIVES..............esh,..awful strange that we KNOW that the FLESH of PIG is very much like that MAN,..did ya Know, yrs back, they used PIGS valves in Heart surgery,  

What Mark talks of is..Moving from Life to Death, from LAW to Grace..just like the parables....

Well that my take scott..and as a Bro, I too respect your understanding Liewise matey.... :icon_flower:..without the NEED for debate.
Blessings
G

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 24, 2008, 11:48:14 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 09:30:40 PM
QuotePhew, this is hard to explain/answer for me.
In short God did create sin.

Not according to scripture bro for sin is of the devil.
And the devil is a part of God creation.

Quote
QuoteExplanation:
God created everything.

Yes but man has corrupted everything God created.

Quote
QuoteThat includes the corrupt human brain.
There is NOTHING wrong with the human brain, the mind only becomes corrupt upon listening to the voice of satan. But if you see satan as being nothing more then the imaginations of mans mind I guess there would be no difference to you.
So the ability to even think of the sad things like wars and torture mankind has done is a sign of a perfect brain.
Jesus had a perfect brain that could resist all tempations.
I admit I have no clear picture how I see Satan but certainly not imaginary.


Quote
QuoteGod is very well knew, even before creation, that mankind would sin.

I agree, but having foreknowledge of an event and being responsible for the event are two different animals.
I disagree with that. Place a Jew in a cellblock with 100 skinheads. And then act suprised if the Jew gets an 'accident'.
The warden did knew the skinheads had the ability to hate and kill the Jew but just took the 0.000000001% change the Jew would become close friends with the skinheads.


Quote
QuoteGod is also very capable creating sinless humans or other things.
Somehow He made the choice to made us as we are.
Doesn't that imply He created sin.
It would only imply God created sin if man did not have free will to make a choice.
The skinheads also had a free choice.... The outcome of that was very predictable.
My point is if the chance that someone lives up to your (=God) standards is very close to zero. The Bible even states all men are sinners. God knew that verse/fact before he started creation. He has given mankind a (limited) free will as you said. I agree with that. But God knew even before He started creation free will always choses the wrong path.
If we are talking about cars it would be called a design flaw.
But if we talk about Gods creation it suddenly is free will?
I want to add I do not believe our sinful nature is a design flaw. Gods design works 100% as He designed it to work.
For me it means He for some purpose, that we humans perhaps don't understand, created sin.

That's how I view it  :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 24, 2008, 11:52:24 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 11:39:49 PM
Why don't you just speak in a positive fashion instead of a negative fashion?

Because it doesn't matter any more. Pneuma made it clear he doesn't care what others think only what he thinks and you keep going off on tangents that have no relevance to the discussion. Compare the Spirit of God to a demonic spirit again, and see how positive this conversation will go. You think they are the same thing?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 24, 2008, 11:55:14 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 11:39:49 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 11:25:30 PM
QuoteI agree Molly, how people get Jesus casting the imaginations of man into a herd of swine out of those scriptures is beyond me

Who said they were imaginations? Once again, both Molly and yourself always ASSUME what you do not know and debase it down to it's lowest denominator. Is the spirit of giving a vain imagination? Is an evil spirit a vain imagination? Nope. You both lose in your perception department because nobody here said that, even after I explained what spirits were in previous articles and threads and the little I put in this, there is NO WHERE that assumption can be made. You do a good job to try to confuse the issue with your vain imaginations of what others are talking about but never actually looking for understanding at all.

Is there such a thing as 'the spirit of giving'?

Is that in the Bible?

Why don't you just speak in a positive fashion instead of a negative fashion?

Is there a spirit of negativity?

I will know what you are talking about only if you tell me.

God is a Spirit.  Is God a being?  Or something else?
Hi Molly...

the SPIRIT of.............LIFE AND DEATH....

he he,..

Craig summed it upp for mine at least, some posts Back...what spirit relates to....go re read.

Im maybe a little more simplistic....., Maybe we could say..the SPIRIT is what we BEATHE life INTO...

As God IS LIFE ,HE is "ultimate SPIRIT :icon_flower:
Rom 8:10 And if Christ [be] in you, the body [is] dead because of sin; but the Spirit [is] life because of righteousness



BUT we have those with the spirit of DARKNESS,UNCLEAN, OR MAYBE """ooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh."Dare I say evil"

maybe we can state...FALSE life, or Lying Life....or even, the MINISTRY of DEATH....go figure

Taffy
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 25, 2008, 12:18:16 AM
Quote from: TaffyMaybe we could say..the SPIRIT is what we BEATHE life INTO

Indeed Taffy, that is the jist of it. That which one makes their idol, becomes their God. That which one makes their law, because their Law. That doesn't mean that there is not God, and His Law of Life in Christ Jesus. We need to renew our minds, and repent and put on the Mind of God so that we have God and the Law of Life in us. He is working outside us to bring Himself to us and in us.

So that which we breathe life into... It get's even deeper, you imagine demons, they appear and their life appears beyond your influence and can affect others. Walk into a room not knowing something bad just happened, and the air is tense? Ever walk into a place of great joy, and just feel it? Those are spirits, spirits others created by their belief and action. When you walk into an evil spirit, you can cast it out and rebuke it and it will leave in Jesus Name. Therefore, changing the spirit that was there and bringing in the Spirit of Life into the situation.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 25, 2008, 12:24:11 AM
  That was a great simile    Craig ,  thank you  :happy3:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 25, 2008, 12:29:07 AM

  I would  go as far as to say its the power 
not the tongue  itself that gives life or death
  a spirit / as  breath   has power


Pro 18:21 Death and life [are] in the power  of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on October 25, 2008, 12:31:46 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 12:18:16 AM
Quote from: TaffyMaybe we could say..the SPIRIT is what we BREATHE life INTO

Indeed Taffy, that is the jist of it. That which one makes their idol, becomes their God. That which one makes their law, because their Law. That doesn't mean that there is not God, and His Law of Life in Christ Jesus. We need to renew our minds, and repent and put on the Mind of God so that we have God and the Law of Life in us. He is working outside us to bring Himself to us and in us.

So that which we breathe life into... It get's even deeper, you imagine demons, they appear and their life appears beyond your influence and can affect others. Walk into a room not knowing something bad just happened, and the air is tense? Ever walk into a place of great joy, and just feel it? Those are spirits, spirits others created by their belief and action. When you walk into an evil spirit, you can cast it out and rebuke it and it will leave in Jesus Name. Therefore, changing the spirit that was there and bringing in the Spirit of Life into the situation.
:goodpost:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 25, 2008, 12:34:04 AM
Quote from: rosered on October 25, 2008, 12:29:07 AM

  I would  go as far as to say its the power 
not the tongue  itself that gives life or death
  a spirit / as  breath   has power


Pro 18:21 Death and life [are] in the power  of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.

Indeed Rosey :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 25, 2008, 12:41:44 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on October 25, 2008, 12:31:46 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 12:18:16 AM
Quote from: TaffyMaybe we could say..the SPIRIT is what we BREATHE life INTO

Indeed Taffy, that is the jist of it. That which one makes their idol, becomes their God. That which one makes their law, because their Law. That doesn't mean that there is not God, and His Law of Life in Christ Jesus. We need to renew our minds, and repent and put on the Mind of God so that we have God and the Law of Life in us. He is working outside us to bring Himself to us and in us.

So that which we breathe life into... It get's even deeper, you imagine demons, they appear and their life appears beyond your influence and can affect others. Walk into a room not knowing something bad just happened, and the air is tense? Ever walk into a place of great joy, and just feel it? Those are spirits, spirits others created by their belief and action. When you walk into an evil spirit, you can cast it out and rebuke it and it will leave in Jesus Name. Therefore, changing the spirit that was there and bringing in the Spirit of Life into the situation.
:goodpost:
Dat you Martin.. :icon_flower:..the EVER changing face?....avatar :laughing7:

Thanks for the re edit  R  ,,,...Now ,could you spend a Life time doing the same to thousands of old posts of mine,,,,, :laughing7: :laughing7:

T :icon_flower:




...
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 25, 2008, 01:36:54 AM
Quote from: Taffy on October 24, 2008, 11:55:14 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 11:39:49 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 24, 2008, 11:25:30 PM
QuoteI agree Molly, how people get Jesus casting the imaginations of man into a herd of swine out of those scriptures is beyond me

Who said they were imaginations? Once again, both Molly and yourself always ASSUME what you do not know and debase it down to it's lowest denominator. Is the spirit of giving a vain imagination? Is an evil spirit a vain imagination? Nope. You both lose in your perception department because nobody here said that, even after I explained what spirits were in previous articles and threads and the little I put in this, there is NO WHERE that assumption can be made. You do a good job to try to confuse the issue with your vain imaginations of what others are talking about but never actually looking for understanding at all.

Is there such a thing as 'the spirit of giving'?

Is that in the Bible?

Why don't you just speak in a positive fashion instead of a negative fashion?

Is there a spirit of negativity?

I will know what you are talking about only if you tell me.

God is a Spirit.  Is God a being?  Or something else?
Hi Molly...

the SPIRIT of.............LIFE AND DEATH....

he he,..

Craig summed it upp for mine at least, some posts Back...what spirit relates to....go re read.

Im maybe a little more simplistic....., Maybe we could say..the SPIRIT is what we BEATHE life INTO...

As God IS LIFE ,HE is "ultimate SPIRIT :icon_flower:
Rom 8:10 And if Christ [be] in you, the body [is] dead because of sin; but the Spirit [is] life because of righteousness



BUT we have those with the spirit of DARKNESS,UNCLEAN, OR MAYBE """ooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh."Dare I say evil"

maybe we can state...FALSE life, or Lying Life....or even, the MINISTRY of DEATH....go figure

Taffy
Shut it Taffy...you Welsh be all the SAME... :icon_flower:

jABBER ...jABBER..AND jabber

Act 26:18 To open their eyes, [and] to turn [them] from darkness to light, and [from] the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 25, 2008, 01:43:23 AM
Quote from: rosered on October 25, 2008, 12:29:07 AM

  I would  go as far as to say its the power 
not the tongue  itself that gives life or death
  a spirit / as  breath   has power


Pro 18:21 Death and life [are] in the power  of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.

Hi SiS..
ya KNOW that POWER... :icon_flower:...ME THINKS IT very Much over looked when I see this verse QUOTED so many times....for mine, takes a WHOLE, COMPLETE\ oneness OF meaning :icon_flower:

Rom 9:21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

OH....tis hidden everywhere...

Blessings sis
T

Rom 9:21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour? 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 25, 2008, 01:50:29 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 12:18:16 AM
Quote from: TaffyMaybe we could say..the SPIRIT is what we BEATHE life INTO

Indeed Taffy, that is the jist of it. That which one makes their idol, becomes their God. That which one makes their law, because their Law. That doesn't mean that there is not God, and His Law of Life in Christ Jesus. We need to renew our minds, and repent and put on the Mind of God so that we have God and the Law of Life in us. He is working outside us to bring Himself to us and in us.

So that which we breathe life into... It get's even deeper, you imagine demons, they appear and their life appears beyond your influence and can affect others. Walk into a room not knowing something bad just happened, and the air is tense? Ever walk into a place of great joy, and just feel it? Those are spirits, spirits others created by their belief and action. When you walk into an evil spirit, you can cast it out and rebuke it and it will leave in Jesus Name. Therefore, changing the spirit that was there and bringing in the Spirit of Life into the situation.

:icon_flower:

Sorta makes it easy to understand aye Bro... :icon_flower:...
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 05:40:11 AM
Quote from: Molly on October 24, 2008, 08:00:59 PM

The garden of eden is where satan and his angels fell from heaven?


Satan and his messengers never fell from any higher plane.  They were created exactly as they were and they were not in the Garden of Eden. 

The war with the Dragon, was the greek language depicting the hebrew story of the Garden of Eden. 

This


Re 12:7 And a battle occurred~ in *heaven. *Michael and his *messengers *battle with the dragon, and the dragon battles, and its *messengers.

Re 12:8 And they are not strong enough towardfor him, neither was their place still found in *heaven.


relating this

Battle with the dragon (Serpent nature of man)

Genesis 3: 1-7


Gn 3:14 And saying is Yahweh Elohim to the serpent,  "As you do this, most cursed are you of every beast, and of all field life. On your torso shall you go, and soil shall you eat all the days of your lives.


Yahweh Elohim is plural......

Their place was no more in heaven........
Gn 3:23 And Yahweh Elohim is sending him away from the garden of Eden to serve the ground whence he is taken.

Gn 3:24 And He is driving out the human, and is causing him to tabernacle at the east of the garden of Eden. And He set the cherubim, and a flaming sword turning itself, to keep the way of the tree of the living.


I'm learning that the new testament has a fascinating multiple nature when it comes to words.   "fowls of the air"  The word air in some translations also use the word heaven, because it is the same word.  Usage and context is the only way to get to the proper relationship of the word.

Luke 10:18 in context is talking about the strong hold of pride falling due to the text talking about the seventy disciples he appointed having an awe that they had the power over the devils.  That realization was Satan falling in the realms of their spiritual power.  Satan is more than just this singular entity as representative in scripture.


Quote
So, who are his angels in the garden?

The messenger rightly called the  angels of God, who never have and never will fall.   There are no fallen angels of God, they do not exist.

Quote
And, who is michael and his angels in the garden?  Is that Adam?

Nope,  your still thinking adam is sinless and he is not.  I have no proof positive that the aspect of adam and eve and the picture of their corruption was michael and his angels driving them to the realm of the carnal flesh.   But I refuse to allow the contradiction of the story of a perfect paradise with God being corrupted into my thinking any longer.

I'm willing to be wrong about everything I have said concerning heaven realms and such,   I refuse to allow the christendom nonsense of failed perfection to pervert me.


Quote
Then that must happen after the account in Job?

You have to realize where I am coming from.   I do not believe Satan was in the picture in the garden of eden.

It is the picture of the creation of a being with the ability to sin and the serpent is the picture that EXPLAINS how sin works within us.   SIN is in us as Paul explains what it is that causes him to do the things he knows he should not do.


The translated word "Satan" does not appear in scripture till Job,  this story explains exactly what Satans purpose is.   Satan is always depicted differently that the Serpent.

Satan is not crawling around on his belly.  Man crawls around the earth, figuratively in corruption, all of us, every one of us.

Satan is going To and Fro walking up and down in it. 

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 25, 2008, 05:56:39 AM
willieH: Hi molly...  :Sparkletooth:

Have to "catch up" was out of town the last few days for medical reasons...  :sigh:

Quote from: willieHPlease note the SCRIPTURE which says the YOU shall SEE GOD while IN FLESH...

Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 05:25:54 AMI thought I did.

NO... you didn't! :mnah:

Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 05:25:54 AMMat 5
8"Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

This says NOTHING about "being in FLESH" when this takes place...

I myself make no such claim as to be "pure of heart", for GOD is yet working on my heart, and it admittedly, does fall short of PURITY,

As long as you continue your disrespect in this thread, ...you join me, coming short of being "pure of heart"... because of that disrespect, Molly  :sigh:

Until you and I begin to respect one another MUCH better, neither of us can make this claim...  :crywipe:

(this includes your purposed misspellings of my name -- you see that as emerging from a PURE HEART?)

So let me begin by apologizing  :flowerred: ...for my "get a clue" remarks to you, which were unnecessary and had nothing to do with the point I was trying to make to you...

If anything they helped to deter my intention, instead of help it.  They were just reactions to your ongoing insistance to discuss other than the TOPIC... but again, were just plain unnecessary.  :blush:  :Mcry:

Quote from: Molly on October 23, 2008, 05:25:54 AMJob does see God while he is still in the flesh.  He spends the last part of the book of Job talking to God.

Job speaking to God does not mean he SAW God...

CHRIST:  (John 6:46) not that ANY MAN hath SEEN the FATHER, ...he that hath SEEN ME, hath SEEN the Father... (Job did not SEE CHRIST, did he Molly?)

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 25, 2008, 08:05:58 AM
14And when they were come to the multitude, there came to him a certain man, kneeling down to him, and saying,

15Lord, have mercy on my son: for he is lunatick, and sore vexed: for ofttimes he falleth into the fire, and oft into the water.

16And I brought him to thy disciples, and they could not cure him.

17Then Jesus answered and said, O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I suffer you? bring him hither to me.

18And Jesus rebuked the devil; and he departed out of him: and the child was cured from that very hour.

19Then came the disciples to Jesus apart, and said, Why could not we cast him out?

20And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.

21Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.

--Mat 17
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 25, 2008, 08:11:46 AM
willieH: Hi Anne & Scott... :hithere:

ANNE:

There is a part of "we" here that does not believe "satan" is a spirit... ME!

Quote from: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 09:46:15 PMI agree with Taffy and Craig... Satan is a spirit...

Quote from: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 09:46:15 PMAnne no one is questioning whether satan is a spirit or not, we all agree he is a spirit, the debate is whether a spirit is a being or just the carnal mind of man.

SCOTT:

This is incorrect bro! ...You know that I do NOT believe that "satan" is a "spirit" which is sentient, fallen, nor purposed as an individual...  :dontknow:

I believe "satan" is exactly what the word means in Hebrew:  ADVERSITY which is the ADVERSARY of GOD (which is TRUTH)... 

And that the NATURAL state of man is >>IN<<  this ADVERSARIAL position IN THE FLESH... with no help from a mythical "being" invented by men.

Quote from: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 09:46:15 PMIf it is just the carnal mind of man then God is also just man imagination for God is a spirit.

This is just a statement which "naturally" follows your belief that satan is a "he" and is an ENTITY, and not a principality governing the NATURAL state of man...

Quote from: pneuma on October 24, 2008, 09:46:15 PMSatan greatest deception is that he has gotten man to beleive he does not exist.

This is the most ironic statement of the post...  :dontknow:

I believe that the "greatest deception" is that the "church" which calls itself Christianity has convinced itself (self decieved),  that "satan" is a BEING, ...and that this "being" is CONTINUOUSLY present with ALL MEN (making "him" omnipresent - an attribute of GOD alone)...

And armed with these astray deductions, ...is preaching this erroneous message to the world (man)...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 25, 2008, 10:30:57 AM
Though it seems like I go through this with people in this forum, I apologize for my short patience in some of the replies I see from some. It is tiring to continue seeing people attribute their assumptions of what someone believes as what a person believes, and after so many years of having this topic discussed the same objections, which were answered, keep being used despite them being refuted. It is difficult to have a discussion with people who cannot listen.

Quote from: pneuma
I agree with Taffy and Craig... Satan is a spirit...

What a spirit is, is what is being discussed now. Satan does exist, but he is not a being but a spirit, a lying spirit which was created outside the truth because the truth was never in him. This spirit resides in all mankind and outside mankind (because God created him that way). We call it a 'him' to identify that is part of mankind which is an 'adversary' to God and to itself, but not God or mankind itself.

Quote from: willieHThere is a part of "we" here that does not believe "satan" is a spirit... ME!

This is semantics. What you describe later and previously in your post WillieH, is what I know to be called a spirit.

Quote from: willieHAnd that the NATURAL state of man is >>IN<<  this ADVERSARIAL position IN THE FLESH... with no help from a mythical "being" invented by men.

I agree, that adversarial position in the flesh, is also known as a spirit. That adversarial position in the flesh can manifest itself in many particular ways, especially since the battle ground has always been in the mind.

Romans 7:22-23
For I joyfully concur with the law of God in the inner man, but I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin which is in my members.

James 7:7-8
Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Come near to God and he will come near to you. Wash your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded.

Romans 12:2
Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.g me a prisoner of the law of sin which is in my members.

Ephesians 4:17-27
So I tell you this, and insist on it in the Lord, that you must no longer live as the Gentiles do, in the futility of their thinking. They are darkened in their understanding and separated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them due to the hardening of their hearts. Having lost all sensitivity, they have given themselves over to sensuality so as to indulge in every kind of impurity, with a continual lust for more.

You, however, did not come to know Christ that way. Surely you heard of him and were taught in him in accordance with the truth that is in Jesus. You were taught, with regard to your former way of life, to put off your old self, which is being corrupted by its deceitful desires; to be made new in the attitude of your minds; and to put on the new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness.

Therefore each of you must put off falsehood and speak truthfully to his neighbor, for we are all members of one body. "In your anger do not sin"[d]: Do not let the sun go down while you are still angry, and do not give the devil a foothold.


Ephesians 6:12
For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.

Satan is a product of the adversarial mindset, a product of the spirit of the mind called and therefore also a spirit. The heavenly realms, is the head, as Paul stated in Romans 7, the war is waged in the mind.

Now read the following and find out where the serpent came from. I have numbered them, and want you to compare.

Genesis 3:1-5
(1)Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, "Did God really say, 'You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?"
The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.' "
"You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
(2)When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.
(3)Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.


Isaiah 59:3-5
For your hands are stained with blood, your fingers with guilt. (1) Your lips have spoken lies, and your tongue mutters wicked things.No one calls for justice; no one pleads his case with integrity. They rely on empty arguments and speak lies; (2)they conceive trouble and give birth to evil. They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a spider's web. Whoever eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched. (3) Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves with what they make. Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence are in their hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed innocent blood.T  Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and destruction mark their ways.

1.
The first lie was, and reliance of empty arguments was introduced by the woman (woman:a part of man). It added to the command of God, going beyond what was commanded.
2.
This is the birth of evil, and the hatching of the serpent. The serpent came to be, because a part of man (woman) began to speculate a lie in order to justify an adversarial role to the command. The woman (part of man) gave birth to the serpent, the father of lies, one created outside the truth because the truth was never in him. A spirit of the mind.
3.
As a result of sin, man is found to be naked, unable to cover himself from what he has done in an adversarial role to God. His deeds are obvious, and he recognizes nothing he can do can hide himself from God. So they rush to evil and are quick to shed innocent blood, that is, they blame even God who created them, etc.

2 Corinthians 11:3 But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent's cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ.

This is Satan, the serpent, the evil spirit that resides in mankind and when we submit to God by renewing of the spirit of our minds and putting on the Mind of God (also known as the Spirit of God) we can resist this spirit, the devil, and it will flee from us.

What is a spirit? It is exactly what Taffy said so eloquently, it is the things we give 'breath' to. It is the things we give birth to by the spirit of our mind. It is what rosered affirmed by understanding it is the power of the tongue (also known as the mind).

This is why Paul says,

2 Corinthians 10:3-5
For though we live in the world, we do not wage war as the world does. The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of the world. On the contrary, they have divine power to demolish strongholds (of the mind). We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.

Evil spirits, are arguments, pretensions and thoughts that set itself up against (also known as ADVERSARY) to the knowledge of God. We are called as ambassadors in Christ, to take up the whole armour of God and demolish such spirits, taking every thought captive to make it obedient to Christ. In otherwords, submit to God, resist the devil and He will flee from you.

1 John 4:1
Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.

I don't know how much clearer this is. There are spirits that are created by, birthed by, conceived by false prophets. These are false knowledge, lies, errors, vain imaginations, that though given life, this life is not from the breath of God but the breath of mankind.

An objection? Experiencing demons, spirits, manifestations, possessions, etc.?

...because of the gift of discernment and the gift of knowledge, some people are able to comprehend a tactile (see, hear, smell, feel, taste) and an intuitive (mystical understanding) manifestation of arguments, pretensions, strongholds, thoughts, etc. This manifestation is commonly given form where there is no form so that one may recognize them for what they are, spirits whether good or evil. So that we can accurately test these spirits to see if they are from the Mind of God, or from the mind of man. Unfortunately, some people decide to believe what they see to be the truth rather than living by faith that what they see is not actually a tactile form but the gift of knowledge and discernment given to them so that they can cast the spirits which are evil, from them in the Name of Jesus.

1 Corinthians 2:13-16
This is what we speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit, expressing spiritual truths in spiritual words. The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. The spiritual man makes judgments about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man's judgment:"For who has known the mind of the Lord that he may instruct him?" But we have the mind of Christ.

Romans 8:14-16
For all who are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God. For you have not received a spirit of slavery leading to fear again, but you have received a spirit of adoption as sons by which we cry out, "Abba! Father!" The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God."

I could write on and on of this, but simply put: Satan (the serpent of old, the devil), is a spirit created by a part of man which justifies rebels against God's Law through lies, strongholds, arguments, pretensions, thoughts, principalities and powers of the mind which is not found in the truth and never part of the truth since they deny the knowledge of the Truth. These lies, arguments, strongholds, pretensions, thoughts, principalities and powers are an adversary to God, and our enemy which tempts us away from Him. This spirit is found in all mankind (not because He is omnipotent, but because it is part of mankind just as having mankind in all parts of the world does not make mankind omnipotent), and can be destroyed and resisted by submitting to God, putting on the mind of Christ, that is: repent, renew our mind by the washing of the Word of God, embracing the Spirit of God whom He has given us.

Once given life, a spirit is outside our sphere of influence and can appear to have a life of it's own, that is why we must cast it out. Spirits are real, they are not imaginary, even if they are can be products of our imagination. Spirits are not beings, even though they can have life of their own and behave independently to the will of mankind who consequently created them. Spirits are principalities and powers which operate in certain aspects, whether good or evil, created by God or mankind, but God is master over all things. Everything, including spirits, must submit to the Name of Jesus (to him who believes of course).

I am not making this stuff up, everything I say is accounted for in Scripture. I have seen angels, I have seen demons, I have seen spiritual forces at work which were created by people who have long gone from this earth continue to wreak havoc until they were cast out by the Name of Jesus.

They are not imaginary, they are real with substance.

All ministering spirits are angels sent by God to those to inherit salvation (that is all mankind as we understand). Teaches us all things pertaining to God. Created by God and mankind to ontologically fulfill a purpose.

All adversarial spirits are demons, devils, Satan who stands opposed to God by human traditions, vain imaginations, empty arguments, lies, hedges, laws, principalities, powers, wickedness, thoughts, pretensions which set itself up against the true knowledge of God. Created both by God and mankind to ontologically fulfill a purpose.

Fallen angels are men, who chosen by God to administer the Gospel fell into temptation and held by evil and began to work in human tradition, vain imagination, empty arguments, lies, hedges, laws, principalities, powers, wickedness, thoughts and pretension which set itself up against the true knowledge of God.

There is no documented proof of any good spirit, turning out to be evil or fallen.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 03:54:49 PM
QuoteHi Scott,
Ya know to well i Indeed respect your input Bro,... and not just that ,but also you .having got to know you some over the seasons.

Like yourself. Im away very much from debate,..well I try....Its not always that easy as Ya Know

I realy dont mean to take poetic licence Bro but I see SPIRIT meaning very MUCH """LIFE""", therefore, one , if you will, from My understanding at least, see this very much, as Moving FROM DEATH to LIFE, the confusion , Maybe, being the term Spirit bro,...,agaian , im sure i must bore other stupid, but,..the UNCLEAN spirits are likene to FROGS in Rev....ya may find them to be LIARS bro???...ya Know, murderes, Liars, the SONS of thier fathers?????

Each KINGDOM finds ITS own ,....as LAW and Grace and TRUTH dont mix,..ya Know them SWINE,"" choked in the SEA"..DEAD THAT is, and we KNOW ALL FLESH needs to die before its LIVES..............esh,..awful strange that we KNOW that the FLESH of PIG is very much like that MAN,..did ya Know, yrs back, they used PIGS valves in Heart surgery,

What Mark talks of is..Moving from Life to Death, from LAW to Grace..just like the parables....

Well that my take scott..and as a Bro, I too respect your understanding Liewise matey.... ..without the NEED for debate.
Blessings

Hi Graham, I to see satan, devils etc. as those things that apply to the flesh, but also believe some people take it to far and do away with the spirit being MOST refer to as satan.

I believe there are layers to scripture bro, and what it seems to me is that some have forsaking one layer for another, not realising the milk is still the word of God.
Graham the way I see it is the milk and the meat will work together, I'll use Roses thoughts as an example.


What Rose brought out on the man in the tomb was very good and I can agree with it, but that is one layer, but I would ask why he cut himself, was it because of the law which is ordained unto life, or because satan used the law to deceive and bring condemnation?

Thus you have the milk and the meat working together for a clearer imo understanding of what transpires in and around men.

Brother I have come into contact with these spirits and I know that they are more then just the imagination or conjuring of the carnal mind.

3 beings were in the garden.
Adam
Eve
Serpent.
Now if the serpent is a representation of those things in the carnal mind of man, why is it not until AFTER the serpent beguiled Eve and she ate along with Adam that God placed enmity between the two seeds?

And what is the enmity?

According to scripture it is the carnal mind.

God bless
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 04:18:56 PM
QuotePneuma made it clear he doesn't care what others think only what he thinks

Craig you know very well you are taking that out of context, low blow bro.


QuoteWho said they were imaginations? Once again, both Molly and yourself always ASSUME what you do not know and debase it down to it's lowest denominator.


QuoteIt get's even deeper, you imagine demons, they appear and their life appears beyond your influence and can affect others

Both quotes are yours Craig so if I misread you it is because of the words you use.



QuoteSatan (the serpent of old, the devil), is a spirit created by a part of man

This would imply that man is the FATHER of DEVILS, yet Jesus reversed the order and said ye are of YOUR FATHER the DEVIL.


Quotewhich justifies rebels against God's Law through lies, strongholds, arguments, pretensions, thoughts, principalities and powers of the mind which is not found in the truth and never part of the truth since they deny the knowledge of the Truth 

These lies, arguments, strongholds, pretensions, thoughts, principalities and powers are an adversary to God, and our enemy which tempts us away from Him

And yet these principalities and powers are said to be RECONCILED by the blood of JESUS.







QuoteSpirits are not beings,

You keep saying this, but God is a spirit, thus you are saying God is not a being.

Craig if spirits are man made or to use your words created by a part of man, and God is a spirit you are saying God is a creation of man.

That is simple logic bro, and for someone who I know is very logical not to see this logic is illogical.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 04:32:46 PM
Jb 1:12 Hence Yahweh said to Satan, Behold, all that he has is in your hand, but you must not put forth your hand upon himself. Then Satan went forth from Yahweh's presence.


Jb 1:19 when behold, a great wind came from across the wilderness, and it assaulted against the four corners of the house. It fell upon the lads, and they died, yet I escaped, but I myself alone, to tell it to you.




I want to be clear on peoples thoughts on Satan without trying to interject my own beliefs in argument to that.  

What has not been made clear from those who dwell mainly on the mind aspect of Satan,  is how that relates to the story of Job.   Jobs life was affected outside of his own mind concerning other people as a result of the permission God gave Satan over Jobs life.

Clearly Job did not sin during this trial , nor did he fall prey to unbelief, nor did he curse God.   These attributes seem to be what some are saying would manifest Satan, or the adversary,  yet, this story shows the attempt to make Job fail in his faith by Satan, without the aid of those things from Job.

How does this story tie in with satan in the view of the mind only.







Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 05:08:57 PM
Quote
Phew, this is hard to explain/answer for me.
In short God did create sin.

Not according to scripture bro for sin is of the devil.


QuoteAnd the devil is a part of God creation.

Yes but was he always as he is now? If he is to be reconciled to me indicates that he is different then he once was.


QuoteExplanation:
God created everything.
That includes the corrupt human brain.

There is NOTHING wrong with the human brain, the mind only becomes corrupt upon listening to the voice of satan. But if you see satan as being nothing more then the imaginations of mans mind I guess there would be no difference to you.

QuoteSo the ability to even think of the sad things like wars and torture mankind has done is a sign of a perfect brain.

The Hitler's of this world are not led by the mind of man, Jesus said ye are of your father the DEVIL and so do his works (paraphrased)

QuoteJesus had a perfect brain that could resist all tempations.

Jesus brain was no different then ours and the reason He resisted all temptation was because He always did the will of the Father. We to are to have the mind of Jesus, that does not mean we have a different brain now and get Jesus brain later it just means that our brain is to be focused on the exact same things Jesus brain was focused on, which is the perfect will of the Father.


QuoteI admit I have no clear picture how I see Satan but certainly not imaginary.
:thumbsup:





QuoteGod is very well knew, even before creation, that mankind would sin.

I agree, but having foreknowledge of an event and being responsible for the event are two different animals.

QuoteI disagree with that. Place a Jew in a cellblock with 100 skinheads. And then act suprised if the Jew gets an 'accident'.
The warden did knew the skinheads had the ability to hate and kill the Jew but just took the 0.000000001% change the Jew would become close friends with the skinheads.

The skinheads also had a free choice.... The outcome of that was very predictable.
My point is if the chance that someone lives up to your (=God) standards is very close to zero. The Bible even states all men are sinners. God knew that verse/fact before he started creation. He has given mankind a (limited) free will as you said. I agree with that. But God knew even before He started creation free will always choses the wrong path.
If we are talking about cars it would be called a design flaw.
But if we talk about Gods creation it suddenly is free will?
I want to add I do not believe our sinful nature is a design flaw. Gods design works 100% as He designed it to work.
For me it means He for some purpose, that we humans perhaps don't understand, created sin.

That's how I view it


Ya a lot of people see it from your view brother, but that to me implies that the skinheads cannot make a choice for themselves whether to kill the Jew or not.

Note on responsibility: I used a wrong word here WW I should have used cause and said having foreknowledge of an event and being the cause of the event are two different animals.

The reason I am making this distinction is because God does take responsibility for the actions of men, He does not cause man to sin, but take the responsibility upon Himself for man sinning. For if He never placed the tree before man and told him not to eat, man never would have transgressed the commandment.
Thus God is responsible for putting the tree in man path, but God did not make man eat from that tree, that was man choice then and still is today.

Hope that helps clear my thoughts up a little.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 25, 2008, 05:38:09 PM
QuoteWhat Rose brought out on the man in the tomb was very good and I can agree with it, but that is one layer, but I would ask why he cut himself, was it because of the law which is ordained unto life, or because satan used the law to deceive and bring condemnation?

Thus you have the milk and the meat working together for a clearer imo understanding of what transpires in and around men.

  Hi Pneuma,
   Yes ! what influence  does satan / adversary have  on mortal man ?
and what would cause the  wild man to  cut himself on stones
 to me it was  ouside influence , namely  the  hell fire church i was attending at the time  , they desired to glory in the flesh  [lusts there of ]  and abusing a power /authority  over the vunerable  [unlearned and innocent ] a type of bondage

 I think of Ishmael  being that wild man  whos hand is against his bretheren ALL BY VIOLENCE   the kingdom come by violence till Jesus /Spirit of Gods love and mercy  towards us   appeared     , comparing the two  Gal 4

 I will use Judas  as an example also  when satan entered his heart  
 that influence  was to  steal and do injustice by stealing  , Judas  a thief   desired money more than doing what was right [betrayal ],  having to make a choice  greedy gain  was the reward  of iniquity , it was not his to have /take  and  Judas  was tormented by his choice

 there is  another  word i  want to use  it is covet  
Paul touches alot on coveting  , even within himself  and that lust or desire to have [power, riches ,authority, influence,  etc] usually BY VIOLENCE a prideful state of being   I did a huge study on coveting  and  what was in the scriptures  
and  there was a huge blessing in it


Book of  James also  speaks  of the lusts being the  weakness in man that

tempts  the flesh
putting the soul  in jeopardy and misery   thats what I saw in Judas  
and the man in the  tombs [dead inside] till Jesus comes to restore
 the  body , soul and spirit  of us , it is a 3 part work  
and the scripptures speaks of a  1/3  and  3 parts many times  , to many times for me to ignore  them
God bless you bro .. rose
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 25, 2008, 05:40:01 PM
Quote
QuoteAnd the devil is a part of God creation.
Yes but was he always as he is now? If he is to be reconciled to me indicates that he is different then he once was.
I think everything (besides Father, Son, HS) can (and will) change.
As said I think God has a reason for everything. I (we?) may not understand it of find it totally illogical. But once we will understand the real reasons.


QuoteYa a lot of people see it from your view brother, but that to me implies that the skinheads cannot make a choice for themselves whether to kill the Jew or not.
Not anymore I think. If a baby is taken from his/her natural parents and placed in a rich left wing family or a poor skinhead home that almost resembles hell; then yes I think the character will develop otherwise. Just like some men prefer skinny girls and others prefer more flesh on the bones. Why don't ask me. But it seems reality....?


QuoteNote on responsibility: I used a wrong word here WW I should have used cause and said having foreknowledge of an event and being the cause of the event are two different animals.
Don't worry about that Scott. I always try to read the meaning of a post. I'm not a lawyer that builds a whole case on a missing comma  :laughing7:


QuoteThe reason I am making this distinction is because God does take responsibility for the actions of men,
In my understanding responsibility means that some blame rests on the shoulders of God.
If you would say that taking responsibility is equal to forgiving I could agree with that sentence.

QuoteHope that helps clear my thoughts up a little.
Your thoughts where clear from the start. I still don't agree with them. But I'm still learning and perhaps in six months I switched side. And if we don't get to an agreement in this life I challenge you for a 100 year debate in the next life. A drinking contest would be fine too. We got enough time then  :laughing7:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 25, 2008, 06:03:35 PM


  Paul Hazelwood
QuoteJb 1:12 Hence Yahweh said to Satan, Behold, all that he has is in your hand, but you must not put forth your hand upon himself. Then Satan went forth from Yahweh's presence.


Jb 1:19 when behold, a great wind came from across the wilderness, and it assaulted against the four corners of the house. It fell upon the lads, and they died, yet I escaped, but I myself alone, to tell it to you.




I want to be clear on peoples thoughts on Satan without trying to interject my own beliefs in argument to that. 

What has not been made clear from those who dwell mainly on the mind aspect of Satan,  is how that relates to the story of Job.   Jobs life was affected outside of his own mind concerning other people as a result of the permission God gave Satan over Jobs life.

Clearly Job did not sin during this trial , nor did he fall prey to unbelief, nor did he curse God.   These attributes seem to be what some are saying would manifest Satan, or the adversary,  yet, this story shows the attempt to make Job fail in his faith by Satan, without the aid of those things from Job.

How does this story tie in with satan in the view of the mind only.
,

Hi  Paul   the book of Job is  way full of wonders of God , I have to say that  its   more  of a parable to me ,like  the rich man and lazarus is a parable
  Job  was one of the main studies I have done  off and on for  several years now   and cannot begin to   count the blessings in them chapters 
   he spoke without knowledge 
  he was rich and had influence , power  , and all was because of what God had given him , when it was all taken away  from him ,suffered GREAT LOSS  all  but his life
  he humbled by this  spoke wisely of God ,
  one of the main influences  outside him  was miserable comforters /friends 
untill he prayed for them he was not restored whole again

  just a  small  bit I considered  on them  chapters 
ps  when giving up all his children for dead  it did not seem to affect him the way  in real life this would devastate any of us , to loose just one child 
  how could God restore  3 daughters and 7 sons without missing them 
other children  and their personalities ?  can another child take the place of the one  you lost?  these are the things I considered when reading the book of Job  and  seen it as a parable   more so  than a literal interpetation of Job
  Paul speaks of suffering loss  ,yet the man shall be saved as by fire 
was Jobs trials a   fire to see what remains ?


God bless you all


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 06:18:07 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 05:08:57 PM
Yes but was he always as he is now? If he is to be reconciled to me indicates that he is different then he once was.


Not necessarily, I have seen that scripture represents reconciliation as such


"to win over to friendliness; cause to become amicable: to reconcile hostile persons."

How can this happen with adversary?

First lets see the nature of an adversary.   We only look at it in the light of opposition to God, but thats only how it is being used now.

1. a person, group, or force that opposes or attacks; opponent; enemy; foe.  What if adversary then becomes a shield, won over to friendliness?

One verse in the following passage is often used to say that satan can be a light among us for the purposes of deceit, and it was not until I started seeing verses in the light of Gods power to reconcile ALL of his creation in HOPE  (Romans 8)



2C 11:12 Now what I am doing and will be doing is that I should |strike off the incentive from *those wanting an incentive, that in what they are boasting~ they may be |found according as we also.

2C 11:13 For *such are false apostles, fraudulent workers, being transfigured~ into apostles of Christ.

2C 11:14 And not marvel, for *Satan samehimself is being transfigured~ into a messenger of light.

2C 11:15 It is not great thing, then, if his *servants also are being transfigured~ as dispensers of righteousness--whose *consummation shall be according to their *acts.

2C 11:16 Again I am saying, no anyone should |presume me to be imprudent. Otherwise surely, +even if it should be as imprudent, receive~ me, that I'  also should |boast~ anysome little!



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 25, 2008, 06:34:12 PM
You were like a virgin bride I had chosen only for Christ. 3But now I fear that you will be tricked, just as Eve was tricked by that lying snake. I am afraid that you might stop thinking about Christ in an honest and sincere way. 4We told you about Jesus, and you received the Holy Spirit and accepted our message. But you let some people tell you about another Jesus. Now you are ready to receive another spirit and accept a different message. 5I think I am as good as any of those super apostles. 6I may not speak as well as they do, but I know as much. And this has already been made perfectly clear to you.

    7Was it wrong for me to lower myself and honor you by preaching God's message free of charge? 8I robbed other churches by taking money from them to serve you. 9Even when I was in need, I still didn't bother you. In fact, some of the Lord's followers from Macedonia brought me what I needed. I have not been a burden to you in the past, and I will never be a burden. 10As surely as I speak the truth about Christ, no one in Achaia can stop me from bragging about this. 11And it isn't because I don't love you. God himself knows how much I do love you.

    12 I plan to go on doing just what I have always done. Then those people won't be able to brag about doing the same things we are doing. 13Anyway, they are no more than false apostles and dishonest workers. They only pretend to be apostles of Christ. 14And it is no wonder. Even Satan tries to make himself look like an angel of light. 15So why does it seem strange for Satan's servants to pretend to do what is right? Someday they will get exactly what they deserve.




2Co 11:13  For1063 such5108 are false apostles,5570 deceitful1386 workers,2040 transforming themselves3345 into1519 the apostles652 of Christ.5547
2Co 11:14  And2532 no3756 marvel;2298 for1063 Satan4567 himself846 is transformed3345 into1519 an angel32 of light.5457



"transforming themselves"
"is transformed"


G3345
μετασχηματίζω
metaschēmatizō
met-askh-ay-mat-id'-zo
From G3326 and a derivative of G4976; to transfigure or disguise; figuratively to apply (by accommodation): - transfer, transform (self).



Be careful, Paul.  We cannot transform ourselves, except by disguise!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 06:36:42 PM


Hi Rosered

I understand the nature of the bible being a parable and always try to see that in every story.  Seeing the reality of that opens so much more up spiritually.

I certainly understand the connection of loss there, I understand the picture of love for God and those who wish to deter us from that path.

Yes, you are right, the story of Job contains many things, and undoubtedly we will learn more.

But your reply, and no offense,  does not not seem to answer what I am after.  If you were not trying to answer my inquiry directly, no worries.

I must say, that I do not agree that Satan is only a figurative of the mind.  But my intention is not to debate you or anyone on that at this time.

I simply want to see the reasoning gathered to come to that conclusion.  So, concerning your reply consider these things.

1. God pointed out Job to Satan first.
2. Satan then challenged God concerning why Job was so faithful.
3. God then set the rules of the challenge to prove to Satan that Job would not fail.
4. God then gave permission to affect Job within those rules. (God keeps his promise that we will not get more than we can bear)

Where does this scenario, not taking place within Jobs mind, fit in the belief that Satan is only in our mind?   For if Satan is only in our mind, then he was only in Jobs mind as well.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 06:37:13 PM
QuoteYour thoughts where clear from the start. I still don't agree with them. But I'm still learning and perhaps in six months I switched side. And if we don't get to an agreement in this life I challenge you for a 100 year debate in the next life. A drinking contest would be fine too. We got enough time then

:thumbsup: I'll drink to that :bigGrin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 06:39:41 PM
Quote from: rosered on October 25, 2008, 05:38:09 PM
QuoteWhat Rose brought out on the man in the tomb was very good and I can agree with it, but that is one layer, but I would ask why he cut himself, was it because of the law which is ordained unto life, or because satan used the law to deceive and bring condemnation?

Thus you have the milk and the meat working together for a clearer imo understanding of what transpires in and around men.

  Hi Pneuma,
   Yes ! what influence  does satan / adversary have  on mortal man ?
and what would cause the  wild man to  cut himself on stones
 to me it was  ouside influence , namely  the  hell fire church i was attending at the time  , they desired to glory in the flesh  [lusts there of ]  and abusing a power /authority  over the vunerable  [unlearned and innocent ] a type of bondage

 I think of Ishmael  being that wild man  whos hand is against his bretheren ALL BY VIOLENCE   the kingdom come by violence till Jesus /Spirit of Gods love and mercy  towards us   appeared     , comparing the two  Gal 4

 I will use Judas  as an example also  when satan entered his heart  
 that influence  was to  steal and do injustice by stealing  , Judas  a thief   desired money more than doing what was right [betrayal ],  having to make a choice  greedy gain  was the reward  of iniquity , it was not his to have /take  and  Judas  was tormented by his choice

 there is  another  word i  want to use  it is covet  
Paul touches alot on coveting  , even within himself  and that lust or desire to have [power, riches ,authority, influence,  etc] usually BY VIOLENCE a prideful state of being   I did a huge study on coveting  and  what was in the scriptures  
and  there was a huge blessing in it


Book of  James also  speaks  of the lusts being the  weakness in man that

tempts  the flesh
putting the soul  in jeopardy and misery   thats what I saw in Judas  
and the man in the  tombs [dead inside] till Jesus comes to restore
 the  body , soul and spirit  of us , it is a 3 part work  
and the scripptures speaks of a  1/3  and  3 parts many times  , to many times for me to ignore  them
God bless you bro .. rose

Rose I read that twice and I'm still not sure if you were agreeing with me or disagreeing or agreeing but only in part.

You'd think because we both jump all over the place we would understand each other better. like two peas in a pod :happygrin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 06:42:07 PM
Quote from: pneuma on Today at 10:08:57 AM
Yes but was he always as he is now? If he is to be reconciled to me indicates that he is different then he once was.



QuoteNot necessarily, I have seen that scripture represents reconciliation as such


"to win over to friendliness; cause to become amicable: to reconcile hostile persons."

But would that not mean then that to be reconciled means something different then restoration?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 06:51:03 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 25, 2008, 06:34:12 PM
Be careful, Paul.  We cannot transform ourselves, except by disguise!


Molly, thank you for the contrast,  I counted on that.   :happy3:

I can only go by what I see,  I look at the words in the greek and hebrew and realize that many translations add words that are based on the context the translators believe.

I see the multiple message of scripture.  The greek is an amazing language for that.   See, we know there are deceivers, no doubt,  we also know that transformation is possible.

If a human can disguise its nature how much more power to transform does God have to do that.  There is an underlying context and it refers to Satan as well.



2C 11:15 It is not great thing, then, if his *servants also are being transfigured~ as dispensers of righteousness--whose *consummation shall be according to their *acts.


It's another factor in reconciliation.   They can be transformed to true light.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 25, 2008, 06:57:36 PM
[Satan himself] "is transformed"

G3345
μετασχηματίζω
metaschēmatizō
met-askh-ay-mat-id'-zo
From G3326 and a derivative of G4976; to transfigure or disguise; figuratively to apply (by accommodation): - transfer, transform (self).


The word is metaschematizo.  We can almost translate that without knowing the Greek.

It is formed from two Greek words,  meta and schema



G3326
μετά
meta
met-ah'
A primary preposition (often used adverbially); properly denoting accompaniment; "amid" (local or causal); modified variously according to the case (genitive case association, or accusative case succession) with which it is joined; occupying an intermediate position between G575 or G1537 and G1519 or G4314; less intimate than G1722, and less close than G4862): - after (-ward),X that he again, against, among, X and, + follow, hence, hereafter, in, of, (up-) on, + our, X and setting, since, (un-) to, + together, when, with (+ -out). Often used in composition, in substantially the same relations of participation or proximity, and transfer or sequence.


G4976
σχῆμα
schēma
skhay'-mah
From the alternate of G2192; a figure (as a mode or circumstance), that is, (by implication) external condition: - fashion.


Satan is transforming himself with a disguise.

Happy Halloween!

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 06:59:10 PM
Quote from: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 06:42:07 PM
Quote from: pneuma on Today at 10:08:57 AM
Yes but was he always as he is now? If he is to be reconciled to me indicates that he is different then he once was.



QuoteNot necessarily, I have seen that scripture represents reconciliation as such


"to win over to friendliness; cause to become amicable: to reconcile hostile persons."

But would that not mean then that to be reconciled means something different then restoration?



Yes,  and the biblical context for God being ALL in ALL is the word translated to reconcile.


Restore and restoration in the bible appears to have a different usage than what is pertaining to all creation.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 07:00:14 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 25, 2008, 06:57:36 PM

Satan is transforming himself with a disguise.

Happy Halloween!




Wasn't completely disputing that if you read closely. 

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 25, 2008, 07:03:17 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 07:00:14 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 25, 2008, 06:57:36 PM

Satan is transforming himself with a disguise.

Happy Halloween!




Wasn't completely disputing that if you read closely. 


I guess I didn't understand what you were saying, then.  I have no idea what Bible you are reading but the translation is like jibberish to me.


Quote--whose *consummation shall be according to their *acts.


...whose3739 end5056 shall be2071 according2596 to their846 works.2041



"end"
G5056
τέλος
telos
tel'-os
From a primary word τέλλω tellō (to set out for a definite point or goal); properly the point aimed at as a limit, that is, (by implication) the conclusion of an act or state (termination [literally, figuratively or indefinitely], result [immediate, ultimate or prophetic], purpose); specifically an impost or levy (as paid): - + continual, custom, end (-ing), finally, uttermost. Compare G5411.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 07:13:07 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 25, 2008, 07:03:17 PM
Quote from: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 07:00:14 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 25, 2008, 06:57:36 PM

Satan is transforming himself with a disguise.

Happy Halloween!





Wasn't completely disputing that if you read closely. 


I guess I didn't understand what you were saying, then.  I have no idea what Bible you are reading but the translation is like jibberish to me.


Well, I do not know what to do about that,  I read mostly from the hebrew and greek renderings.  Not that I am educated in the language, but it is the structure of the literal hebrew and greek before translators formulate it into structured english sentences.

What I am saying is,  I posted "a"  not "the only"  side of that passage that I see.  I did that intentionally, so that someone would post the typical interpretation, that is correct, but it is not the only message that is there.

Meaning, whatever deceivers are able to do of themselves,  God can do permanantly.

It is an underlying indication that Satan transforms into an angel of light because that light is what truth is and Satan knows what it is or he could not know to transform into that.   It is also an indication that is the fate, the finished work of Christ, because Satan,  no matter what anyone wishes to believe, is a creation of God.

God must be all in all, that is set in stone,  so,  what will Satan become but light in the end?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 25, 2008, 07:18:55 PM
QuoteMeaning, whatever deceivers are able to do of themselves,  God can do permanantly.

It is an underlying indication that Satan transforms into an angel of light because that light is what truth is and Satan knows what it is or he could not know to transform into that.   It is also an indication that is the fate, the finished work of Christ, because Satan,  no matter what anyone wishes to believe, is a creation of God.

God must be all in all, that is set in stone,  so,  what will Satan become but light in the end?

I'm not sure what that means.  It sounds like when your mother says, Don't make faces, your face might get stuck like that.

Yes, Satan is the ultimate trickster.  He knows the Bible better than most Christians.  He comes at Jesus with the Bible twisted ever so slightly--the word of God in disguise--and Jesus comes right back at him with the word--spoken in context as it is meant to be spoken.

It sounds like you are saying that someday while Satan is pretending to be an angel of light, God will freeze him in place.  lol

That would be cool rofl.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 25, 2008, 07:19:06 PM
QuoteGod must be all in all, that is set in stone,  so,  what will Satan become but light in the end?

Or non-existent. After all, Satan, is a title meaning "Adversary". It is that space between to points which are divided. It is the cut on the body which is open. When the body is healed, the wound is no more. When the two points are reconciled, the space is no more. When all things are brought into Harmony, the Adversary is no more. When the knowledge of the Truth is finally revealed, the lie has no power and is no more.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 25, 2008, 07:26:41 PM
QuoteWhen the knowledge of the Truth is finally revealed, the lie has no power and is no more.

This I can agree with.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 25, 2008, 07:28:01 PM
Quote from: pneumaCraig you know very well you are taking that out of context, low blow bro.

No pneuma it isn't a low blow, those are you own words. You don't care what people say about it, zip, zero. Can't low blow something you admit freely to everyone in this forum. As well as your continual attribution of your thoughts of what others think as what they think, also show me that you are not listening to what is being presented. You will think what you want to think, you don't much take into consideration other people's positions and only take up those positions when arguing against them rather than taking time to understand them....

Example of your errors...

QuoteCraig if spirits are man made or to use your words created by a part of man, and God is a spirit you are saying God is a creation of man. That is simple logic bro, and for someone who I know is very logical not to see this logic is illogical.

No, that is a fallacy called error in composition. There is no logic to what you are saying since it is a fallacy. There is God, and then there are gods. We are not God, we are gods. There is Spirit, and then there is spirit. Spirit which is Life and then there is spirit which is life. If you cannot distinguish between Spirit and spirit, then you have a long way to go in your walk.

Like God, we too can create and destroy. I said the battle ground is in the mind and spirits can be created by mankind as well as God ontologically for a purpose though we do not know it at the time since God created us that way. Your logic is flawed because you again assume a position that doesn't exist and has never been stated. It sees you cannot comprehend what a spirit is, as you need to, like most people, associate it as being anthropomorphic beings, rather than what they actually are which are spirits.

God created the first Serpent, where did it come from but from within woman.

Let me show once again, what evil spirits are and where they come from.

Mark 7:20-23
And Jesus was saying, "That which proceeds out of the man, that is what defiles the man. For from within, out of the heart (mind) of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man."

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 07:33:51 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 07:19:06 PM
QuoteGod must be all in all, that is set in stone,  so,  what will Satan become but light in the end?

Or non-existent. After all, Satan, is a title meaning "Adversary". It is that space between to points which are divided. It is the cut on the body which is open. When the body is healed, the wound is no more. When the two points are reconciled, the space is no more. When all things are brought into Harmony, the Adversary is no more. When the knowledge of the Truth is finally revealed, the lie has no power and is no more.


Not disputing that possibility,  but the depiction of Satan in Job raises a larger question here than no one is answering concerning what Satan is and whether he will just disappear or a created being that will also be transformed.


People give their explanations, but ignore the picture in Job where he is conversing with God as a being.  

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 25, 2008, 07:35:23 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 07:28:01 PM
No pneuma it isn't a low blow, those are you own words. You don't care what people say about it, zip, zero. Can't low blow something you admit freely to everyone in this forum.

QuoteCraig if spirits are man made or to use your words created by a part of man, and God is a spirit you are saying God is a creation of man. That is simple logic bro, and for someone who I know is very logical not to see this logic is illogical.

No, that is a fallacy called error in composition. There is no logic to what you are saying since it is a fallacy. There is God, and then there are gods. We are not God, we are gods. Like God, we too can create and destroy. I said the battle ground is in the mind and spirits can be created by mankind as well as God ontologically for a purpose though we do not know it at the time since God created us that way. Your logic is flawed because you again assume a position that doesn't exist and has never been stated.



Not quite.  We are given our choice of who we will serve--Life or Death.


Joshua 24:15
And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 25, 2008, 07:41:52 PM
Quote
QuoteJoshua 24:15
And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

Those gods were either a) Figments of man's imagination or b) men who assumed the place of power (as most ancient religions did).

We can choose to follow spirits (the thoughts, strongholds, imaginations, empty arguments, etc.) the things that are Death or follow the Spirit (Truth, Knowledge, Wisdom, Love) the Thing that is Life.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on October 25, 2008, 07:52:44 PM
 

 LOL ok Pnuema and Paul ,
thanks I thought i was being clear hee hee  

so I will just back to reading again

 Paul  you wrote this for me ..

QuoteBut your reply, and no offense,  does not not seem to answer what I am after.  If you were not trying to answer my inquiry directly, no worries.

I must say, that I do not agree that Satan is only a figurative of the mind.  But my intention is not to debate you or anyone on that at this time.

I simply want to see the reasoning gathered to come to that conclusion.  So, concerning your reply consider these things.

1. God pointed out Job to Satan first.
2. Satan then challenged God concerning why Job was so faithful.
3. God then set the rules of the challenge to prove to Satan that Job would not fail.
4. God then gave permission to affect Job within those rules. (God keeps his promise that we will not get more than we can bear)

Where does this scenario, not taking place within Jobs mind, fit in the belief that Satan is only in our mind?   For if Satan is only in our mind, then he was only in Jobs mind as well.

 Hi Paul  no offense taken  bro    and  I will be honest here  totally ok

 to me only , and this is what I think  , thought about for a long time now  , This   thread has been an eye opener to me

 satan is a spirit [ a power] and  it  is   held /bound  in worldly wisdom ! thats it ..  I cannot explain it any better than that  :mblush:..
 the worldly wisdom/adverse to Gods Wisdom    has cause and affect and  mostly ACTS  on  every aspect of our being  moral law  ,    the Laws of Christ   and every thing  we  Believe IN   :mshock: or  no not believe in

Knowing and  not knowing what is right/wrong .,  it effects  our minds and much  much more than that , to say its the mind only is , narrowmindedness to me lol .. but it does also effect the mind , heart  soul etc  and  puts fear into us , we  fear what we dont know or understand ,
example , when I was little  i  was afraid of the dark  literally [blindness , could not see , just feel and fear what was in the dark  the boogy man   , now I realize  I was afraid  of my ignorance  of the dark , always  such horrible  anxiety , but , now  I cannot sleep with a light on lol .. and My Comfort is in trusting the Lord and I dont fear everything in the world now , my fear is in the Lord , turned around so to speak   :thumbsup:


my life is the Lords  now and  I am not trying to preserve/keep  it for myself and its desires  , but  His purpose for all  is of value to me now

 

 


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 25, 2008, 07:54:29 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 25, 2008, 07:18:55 PM

It sounds like you are saying that someday while Satan is pretending to be an angel of light, God will freeze him in place.  lol

That would be cool rofl.




LOL,  why not?    :laughing7:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 25, 2008, 08:04:32 PM
QuoteNot disputing that possibility,  but the depiction of Satan in Job raises a larger question here than no one is answering concerning what Satan is and whether he will just disappear or a created being that will also be transformed. People give their explanations, but ignore the picture in Job where he is conversing with God as a being.  

God is conversing with Satan which is a spirit. Technically a being, but not a being like mankind or God himself. Job is a play which in which Job experiences some hardship.  Satan is given anthropomorphic traits, so that we are able to understand the conflict which is taking place in Job's life and how Job does not give into the lies (empty arguments, justifications, speculations) his mind creates and his friends share for the reason it is happening and turn from God. All these things are happening from within Job, and since Job is a play, we see what is happening spiritually is God is testing Job, just as you pointed out, it was God who started this battle within Job and spoke to the spiritual adversary in Job's life, knowing Job had his mind on the things of God, the mind of God.

Deuteronomy 13:3-4
The LORD your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul. It is the LORD your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him.

Exodus 20:20
Moses said to the people, "Do not be afraid; for God has come in order to test you, and in order that the fear of Him may remain with you, so that you may not sin."

Deuteronomy 8:2
"You shall remember all the way which the LORD your God has led you in the wilderness these forty years, that He might humble you, testing you, to know what was in your heart, whether you would keep His commandments or not.

Deuteronomy 8:16
In the wilderness He fed you manna which your fathers did not know, that He might humble you and that He might test you, to do good for you in the end.

2 Chronicles 32:31
Even in the matter of (A)the envoys of the rulers of Babylon, who sent to him to inquire of the wonder that had happened in the land, God left him alone only to test him, that He might know all that was in his heart.

So here we see that Satan arrives in our lives, when we are tested. That is his purpose.

How did the Serpent get into the Garden? God placed him there. What was his purpose? To test Adam and woman. Where did it all begin? With the lie that formulated in woman's mind that we were not to touch it, lest we die. With the lie in her head, the serpent was arrived to test her and Adam. The serpent did not come until evil had already been conceived in the heart and mind. As Isaiah states, the serpent comes when we begin to think evil thoughts and we have a choice, follow through with the evil that has been developing or submit to God and cast it away.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on October 25, 2008, 08:32:51 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 07:28:01 PM
Quote from: pneumaCraig you know very well you are taking that out of context, low blow bro.

Mark 7:20-23
And Jesus was saying, "That which proceeds out of the man, that is what defiles the man. For from within, out of the heart (mind) of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man."




:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 25, 2008, 08:37:12 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 07:41:52 PM
Quote
QuoteJoshua 24:15
And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

Those gods were either a) Figments of man's imagination or b) men who assumed the place of power (as most ancient religions did).

We can choose to follow spirits (the thoughts, strongholds, imaginations, empty arguments, etc.) the things that are Death or follow the Spirit (Truth, Knowledge, Wisdom, Love) the Thing that is Life.

See, that's where we disagree (which is ok, just want to be clear about it).  When Moses has his 'shooting match' with the prophets of Baal, those prophets are performing miracles, etc.  Moses wins because they decide that his God is bigger than their god.

To me, these other gods that men serve (Satan and his demons) are real. There is a power which is not of God. Sorcery, witchcraft, etc taps into a real power that is of the unholy one.  I have seen it.  That is why God forbids these practices.  Certainly the men they kill on the alter of their gods are real.  Their death is real.  And, those that serve death will die.


Numbers 25:5
So Moses ordered Israel's judges, "Each of you must put to death the men under your authority who have joined in worshiping Baal of Peor."

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 09:02:40 PM
Quote from: pneuma
Craig you know very well you are taking that out of context, low blow bro.


QuoteNo pneuma it isn't a low blow, those are you own words. You don't care what people say about it, zip, zero. Can't low blow something you admit freely to everyone in this forum.
As well as your continual attribution of your thoughts of what others think as what they think, also show me that you are not listening to what is being presented. You will think what you want to think, you don't much take into consideration other people's positions and only take up those positions when arguing against them rather than taking time to understand them....

Craig you and I and everyone who read where I said that know perfectly well it was in context of you trying to shove those with so called higher learning down my throat, and I said I don't care what they think, I won't be led about by the nose just because someone else says this is the only way one can understand the bible.

So yes bro you took me out of contexts.






QuoteExample of your errors...


Craig if spirits are man made or to use your words created by a part of man, and God is a spirit you are saying God is a creation of man.

That is simple logic bro, and for someone who I know is very logical not to see this logic is illogical.


QuoteNo, that is a fallacy called error in composition. There is no logic to what you are saying since it is a fallacy. There is God, and then there are gods. We are not God, we are gods. There is Spirit, and then there is spirit. Spirit which is Life and then there is spirit which is life. If you cannot distinguish between Spirit and spirit, then you have a long way to go in your walk.

Nice try Craig but that does not answer what you proposed when you said a spirit is not a being.

Now your trying to say a spirit is a being as long as it applies to God, Pleeeeeease at least be consistent. 


QuoteLike God, we too can create and destroy. I said the battle ground is in the mind and spirits can be created by mankind as well as God ontologically for a purpose though we do not know it at the time since God created us that way. Your logic is flawed because you again assume a position that doesn't exist and has never been stated. It sees you cannot comprehend what a spirit is, as you need to, like most people, associate it as being anthropomorphic beings, rather than what they actually are which are spirits.

And like I said Craig if man creates devils then man is the devils father, yet Jesus reverse that order. Also you say God creates spirits seemingly to destroy them at a later date, yet scripture state God is the Father of spirits. Therefore your saying God will destroy His children.   

QuoteGod created the first Serpent, where did it come from but from within woman.

Let me show once again, what evil spirits are and where they come from.

Mark 7:20-23
And Jesus was saying, "That which proceeds out of the man, that is what defiles the man. For from within, out of the heart (mind) of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man."


And like I have said repeatedly  Craig I don't have a problem with that scenario my problem is with those who hold to the belief that that is the only truth out there.
Milk and meat are both true and you are rejecting one of those in favour of the other and you are wrong to do so.

QuoteGod is conversing with Satan which is a spirit. Technically a being, but not a being like mankind or God himself

First satan is a spirit but not a being and now satan is a spirit and a being but different then God or man, Craig you accuse me of not paying attention, but when you flop around like a fish out of water what conclusion can anyone understand of you.

First a spirit is not a being.
Then a spirit is a being when applied to God.

Second satan is not a being
Then satan is a being but different then man or God.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 09:04:58 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 25, 2008, 08:37:12 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 07:41:52 PM
Quote
QuoteJoshua 24:15
And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

Those gods were either a) Figments of man's imagination or b) men who assumed the place of power (as most ancient religions did).

We can choose to follow spirits (the thoughts, strongholds, imaginations, empty arguments, etc.) the things that are Death or follow the Spirit (Truth, Knowledge, Wisdom, Love) the Thing that is Life.

See, that's where we disagree (which is ok, just want to be clear about it).  When Moses has his 'shooting match' with the prophets of Baal, those prophets are performing miracles, etc.  Moses wins because they decide that his God is bigger than their god.

To me, these other gods that men serve (Satan and his demons) are real. There is a power which is not of God. Sorcery, witchcraft, etc taps into a real power that is of the unholy one.  I have seen it.  That is why God forbids these practices.  Certainly the men they kill on the alter of their gods are real.  Their death is real.  And, those that serve death will die.


Numbers 25:5
So Moses ordered Israel's judges, "Each of you must put to death the men under your authority who have joined in worshiping Baal of Peor."



:thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 25, 2008, 10:17:31 PM
Quotehen Moses has his 'shooting match' with the prophets of Baal, those prophets are performing miracles, etc.  Moses wins because they decide that his God is bigger than their god.

Because their god does not exist!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 25, 2008, 10:22:22 PM
willieH: Hi Craig... :hithere:

I like your approach in this post!   :goodpost: :clapping:

And after reading it, find that you and I do not really have much disagreement concerning the issue presented in the TOPIC...

You admit below a bit of impatience concerning the listening capabilities of others... Well, we ALL are in that boat brother (we all have this trouble with one another)... We ALL have moments where we say to ourselves, "why can't he/she HEAR?  How can I word this, that he/she will, ...GET IT?

Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 10:30:57 AM
Though it seems like I go through this with people in this forum, I apologize for my short patience in some of the replies I see from some. It is tiring to continue seeing people attribute their assumptions of what someone believes as what a person believes, and after so many years of having this topic discussed the same objections, which were answered, keep being used despite them being refuted. It is difficult to have a discussion with people who cannot listen.

We are emerged in a discussion of words which is basically and simulataneously, BOTH our greatest friend and enemy...

Quote from: willieHThere is a part of "we" here that does not believe "satan" is a spirit... ME!

Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 10:30:57 AMThis is semantics. What you describe later and previously in your post WillieH, is what I know to be called a spirit.

This is what "you know"... and you stand by that... that's cool with me... I "know" a different perspective, which, like yourself, I stand by... and YES it is a matter of semantics, for WORDS are either found flowing to one another as a river, or are held hostage from flowing to one another as is a dam to a river... 

GOD means this to be so... which is HIS DOING... as He concludes ALL in UNBELIEF... and it is HIS MERCY which frees us from that UNBELIEF by the REVELATION of JESUS CHRIST... the INNER MAN...

Being able to understand the words of another -- is the BIGGEST conduit AND obstacle to communication.  GOD means this to be so...

He has put the Cherubim (another discussion) in place and only HE can remove them from performing their duties within our communications...

I think it is more how we view the process (which is finite), rather than what the process actually IS (which is eternal)...

If my observation of your words is correct, ...You see "satan" as a manifestation of a "SPIRIT" in man... an individual adversary IN us...

I see "satan" as an IT... a principle which is WITHIN the flesh (the OUTWARD man), NATURALLY warring against the SPIRIT (of CHRIST) which is also IN [each] man... (John 1:9)

I see it (not he) as the NATURAL (carnal/fleshly) state in which man was created... (that it was there, waiting to emerge in his actions)  As natural and part of Adam as his heart beating, or liver functioning, digestion of food, etc...

CHRIST noted that "satan" was a liar and murderer from the BEGINNING... well, CHRIST is the BEGINNING of all things... so "satan" was present in ADAM before he actually manifested his ADVERSARIAL actions...

Only difference, it was a principle of MIND conveyed in ACTIONS, which was either in Harmony with the INNER MAN (CHRIST), or ADVERSE to Him, who was ALWAYS there from each "beginning" for HE IS the BEGINNING (and the END)...  Very much like the digestive process was not enacted until ADAM ate something... or the liver did not process liquids until he drank something...

We cannot "begin" without CHRIST, for He ...IS... the BEGINNING.  :thumbsup:  And upon that "BEGINNING", was "satan" found present...

Concerning the INNER man - CHRIST - Paul explains this process admirably in Rom 7, explaining that there is a twofold man in each of us... one being the OUTWARD NATURAL or carnal, ...the other being the INWARD SPIRITUAL - CHRIST...

CHRIST said... I will NEVER leave you, nor forsake you... NEVER is a word which means that He was positioned from the BEGINNING, ...IN... man, in order to NEVER leave Him...

He did not state:  "once I am "IN YOU" I will NEVER leave you... He stated this in terms of His position from the BEGINNING, meaning He is with each of us FROM our "beginning", NEVER to leave us... NOTHING can SEPARATE us from Him - Rom 8:38-39

CHRIST is a REVEALED entity... a thing that is REVEALED is present, just not understood or seen as present, until it is REVEALED... 

For example... a painting by an artist which is covered at an gallery exhibit is OBSCURED by the COVER... yet is still EXISTENT in the exhibit gallery... Only upon the REMOVAL of the COVER is the painting SEEN or KNOWN by the eyes of the beholders...

GOD says that He is not a respecter of persons... CHRIST was a MAN, therefore a person...

Some of the biggest differences between CHRIST and ourselves, is that He was (1) in part, parented by the HOLY SPIRIT (2) Had the TRUTH of GOD as an UNRESTRICTED and UNOBSCURED commodity within [fullness of divinity] (3) was the "HEAD", sent to save the "BODY"...  :happygrin:

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 25, 2008, 10:27:29 PM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

Quote from: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 09:02:40 PM
Quote from: pneuma
Craig you know very well you are taking that out of context, low blow bro.

Wow Scott!  You really "waxed poetic" bratha!  :thumbsup:  (just kidnya!  :grin:)

It's actually a "tongue -- twister!"  Try repeating it quickly!  :laughing7:


peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 10:42:45 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 25, 2008, 10:27:29 PM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

Quote from: pneuma on October 25, 2008, 09:02:40 PM
Quote from: pneuma
Craig you know very well you are taking that out of context, low blow bro.

Wow Scott!  You really "waxed poetic" bratha!  :thumbsup:  (just kidnya!  :grin:)

It's actually a "tongue -- twister!"  Try repeating it quickly!  :laughing7:


peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:



:laughing7: yep, now try


A big black bug bit a big black bear 5 times  :winkgrin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 25, 2008, 10:50:58 PM
willieH: Hi Scott... :hithere:

As I pick my tongue out of my teeth,  :tease:

try this one... GOOD BLOOD -- BAD BLOOD!  :laughing7:


peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 26, 2008, 02:50:54 AM
Quoteou admit below a bit of impatience concerning the listening capabilities of others... Well, we ALL are in that boat brother (we all have this trouble with one another)... We ALL have moments where we say to ourselves, "why can't he/she HEAR?  How can I word this, that he/she will, ...GET IT?
After 4 years of saying it, it isn't impatience. So, there is no admission of impatience, it is an understanding that there is no reason for patience any longer since there was ample enough time for someone to actually 'get' it, just as Jesus had no patience for the money changers in the temple and the pharisee who condemn Israel to desolation.

What I said is, it is difficult to discuss things with people who do not listen.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 26, 2008, 04:19:10 AM
willieH: Hi Craig... :hithere:

Like you said in your answer, ...semantics...

Nothing slanderous was meant in my remark... on the contrary, I commended your post on the whole...

I was just noting SHORT PATIENCE to a BIT of Impatience... which it basically, IS...

"Short patience" would mean to most... patience that is very limited...  :bigGrin:

Just as PATIENT would mean to most... a patience that is not limited...  :dontknow:

Quote from: SOtW on October 26, 2008, 02:50:54 AM
Quoteyou admit below a bit of impatience concerning the listening capabilities of others... Well, we ALL are in that boat brother (we all have this trouble with one another)... We ALL have moments where we say to ourselves, "why can't he/she HEAR?  How can I word this, that he/she will, ...GET IT?

After 4 years of saying it, it isn't impatience. So, there is no admission of impatience, it is an understanding that there is no reason for patience any longer since there was ample enough time for someone to actually 'get' it, just as Jesus had no patience for the money changers in the temple and the pharisee who condemn Israel to desolation.

What I said is, it is difficult to discuss things with people who do not listen.

The "get it" factor is either GOD closing the ears of the "listener" because the speaker is either speaking a TRUTH which GOD has decided that "listener" is yet to be authorized to know, OR...

That the speaker is speaking FALSELY, and GOD has decided that the "listener" not be corrupted by the speaker...

Here is what you said:

Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 10:30:57 AM
Though it seems like I go through this with people in this forum, I apologize for my short patience in some of the replies I see from some. It is tiring to continue seeing people attribute their assumptions of what someone believes as what a person believes, and after so many years of having this topic discussed the same objections, which were answered, keep being used despite them being refuted. It is difficult to have a discussion with people who cannot listen.

ALL people do not listen from time to time brother...

ALL...

So each of us must find a way to exercise the patience we are able, within our discussions, concerning that which, ALL do on occasion... that being:  NOT LISTENING...  :dontknow:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 26, 2008, 06:14:43 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 25, 2008, 08:04:32 PM
QuoteNot disputing that possibility,  but the depiction of Satan in Job raises a larger question here than no one is answering concerning what Satan is and whether he will just disappear or a created being that will also be transformed. People give their explanations, but ignore the picture in Job where he is conversing with God as a being.  

God is conversing with Satan which is a spirit. Technically a being, but not a being like mankind or God himself.


I don't disagree with what you say to the extent I need to take issue with it.  What I will say it that there is what you say and more.

I agree that there is a difference in "What" satan is.  He is not flesh, so, of course he is not really the Red Devil with the pitchfork and tail,  He is not omni present as God is.

But, in our realm I believe he is a spirit entity outside the thinking of our mind. I think he can move too and fro and up and down in the earth very quickly. 

God sending a delusional spirit is also different from Satan.  There was never any conversation depicted in the bible with those types of spirits.

So I believe he is an entity that can move about outside of our thinking.   I believe that is one thing the story of Job is telling us about Satan.   Certainly there is the issue of Jobs mind as he has to deal with what is going on in his thinking.

But, Jobs family was killed and it was not only in his mind that this took place. 

So thats mainly all that I am saying,  I sure can be wrong on various points I make, I have no problem with that.   Satan as a being, technically or not,  there is the depiction that he is more than just our thoughts, or there would be no reason for the story leading that direction.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 26, 2008, 07:08:52 AM
I understand. I believe Satan is also outside us, it is a spirit that God created.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 26, 2008, 07:09:47 AM
It is not lack of patience, it is my patience is short with those who do not listen. This is not lack of patience. One is negative, the other is proactive.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 26, 2008, 07:18:36 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 26, 2008, 02:50:54 AM
So, there is no admission of impatience, it is an understanding that there is no reason for patience any longer since there was ample enough time for someone to actually 'get' it, just as Jesus had no patience for the money changers in the temple and the pharisee who condemn Israel to desolation.

What I said is, it is difficult to discuss things with people who do not listen.

FIRST... Sorry, but I do not agree that JESUS was IMPATIENT in the temple... He exerted RIGHTEOUS judgement upon what they were doing... It did not have anything to do with "patience"...

This thinking would lead to GOD being IMPATIENT when He calls an end to this realm... to say His "patience" with "sin" ran out... which to me is an observation which is amiss...

GOD has PURPOSE to EVERYTHING... and JESUS' actions were PURPOSED within the mission, and according to the moment YHVH God PURPOSED they occur...

SECOND... amounts of TIME have NOTHING to do with REVELATION from GOD... which is the "get it" factor that matters...

He REVEALS His WORD, THROUGH whom HE chooses, ...WHEN HE chooses, and ...TO whomever, HE chooses... it is not according to US... and anything we might percieve we know...

Our part is to remain submitted to Him... that should HE CHOOSE according to HIMSELF  and HIS PURPOSE, ...He might use us and our words, as a tool to REVEAL Himself (truth) to others...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 26, 2008, 07:20:18 AM
Whatever man. Whatever floats your boat.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 26, 2008, 07:22:15 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 26, 2008, 07:20:18 AM
Whatever man. Whatever floats your boat.

You know brother... your demeanor has not changed an iota, in four years...  :sigh:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 26, 2008, 07:23:48 AM
Quote from: willieH on October 26, 2008, 07:22:15 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 26, 2008, 07:20:18 AM
Whatever man. Whatever floats your boat.

You know brother... your demeanor has not changed an iota, in four years...  :sigh:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:

Whatever you think, I have others who can testify otherwise. You are the one who wants to be an 'elder', so act like one. I am not going to argue this any more. So whatever you want to think, you think, that is your prerogative and when you tell people I am thinking something when I am not, you will be rebuked over and over.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on October 26, 2008, 08:27:18 AM
Ease up on the character generalizations about each other based upon a disagreement on definitions.  We've been down this road before and it doesn't really go anywhere fruitful and usually winds up having someone calling me for someone's head or whatever. I put up my ax years ago when I left the ET scene. :icon_jokercolor:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 26, 2008, 09:16:14 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 26, 2008, 07:09:47 AM
It is not lack of patience, it is my patience is short with those who do not listen. This is not lack of patience. One is negative, the other is proactive.
[/quote

I can't look it other peoples minds. Even my own mind sometimes is a mystery for me... :mblush:
Most likely there is a group of people that don't want to listen. But often people for some reason aren't able to listen.
That's also true in life outside Bible study.
The Bible are not just some isolated verses as you surely know. After years of study people finally taste victory because they figured out all those hidden links between the verses. That is even true for me that is at the bottom of the Biblical understanding ladder.
Right now I don't see the fuss about this part of the discussion. Satan is a red guy with a pitchfork? a spirit? a feeling? It doesn't matter for me right now. Whatever he/it is its negative. When people get higher on the ladder of understanding the 'shape' of Satan may become far more important. The real point is this: (IMO)
Take for example you (Craig) debating a ET fanatic. Both with know their Bible inside out. Now you start a discussion about aion.
Your opponent listens to your argument and thinks: Mmm, Craig as a point. He can backup his weird claims. He's far more smarter than I thought.
And then suddenly the brain of your opponent locks up. But... if Craig is right then.... what about the implication of <list of 1000 verses>
Then suddenly the brain has to reprocess 20 years of Bible study. It can't. Perhaps it tries but keeps verifying the new info with the old info.
And then.... well the change/understanding stops.
I'm now assuming the shape of Satan is affecting many verses (can't comment on that myself).
When you explain in your mind a simple concept of satan then the brain of your discussing partner starts referencing to all those other verses and implications.
Basically for the understanding of that one word the whole brain needs to retrained...
And ofcourse reverified and studied because beware of false theachers! (no pun intended here)
And that can take a (very) long time

I hope the above makes more sense to you than it does to me  :laughing7:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Sarah on October 26, 2008, 07:24:59 PM
QuoteBut, in our realm I believe he is a spirit entity outside the thinking of our mind. I think he can move too and fro and up and down in the earth very quickly.

I believe this too somewhat. I just don't believe it is a central intelligence if you will. More like a parasite. Maybe I'm wrong but I felt that the Lord showed me it was like mosquitoes, or that parasite that destroys colonies of insects by infecting their brains, growing out of it, and releasing spores.

A few questions I had if someone has any insight regarding legion.

1. Did it want to go into the pigs to avoid torment?
2. What would this torment include?
3. Why would Jesus allow this?
4. And then why would it then kill the pigs?

For some reason in my thinking it seems that demons want a host, and it doesn't make sense it would kill the pigs.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 26, 2008, 07:30:11 PM
Quote from: SOtW on October 26, 2008, 07:23:48 AM
Quote from: willieH on October 26, 2008, 07:22:15 AM
Quote from: SOtW on October 26, 2008, 07:20:18 AM
Whatever man. Whatever floats your boat.

You know brother... your demeanor has not changed an iota, in four years...  :sigh:

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:

Whatever you think, I have others who can testify otherwise. You are the one who wants to be an 'elder', so act like one. I am not going to argue this any more. So whatever you want to think, you think, that is your prerogative and when you tell people I am thinking something when I am not, you will be rebuked over and over.

what a pity...  :pitiful:

As far as an "elder" is concerned, get over it!  Thank GOD it is not up to YOU whether I am such a thing or not... GOD chooses who IS and who is NOT, ...within HIS PURPOSE, according to His WILL not yours...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: jabcat on October 26, 2008, 07:48:54 PM
Quote from: Sarah on October 26, 2008, 07:24:59 PM

A few questions I had if someone has any insight regarding legion.

1. Did it want to go into the pigs to avoid torment?
2. What would this torment include?
3. Why would Jesus allow this?
4. And then why would it then kill the pigs?

For some reason in my thinking it seems that demons want a host, and it doesn't make sense it would kill the pigs.

Interesting questions I'm not sure I have the answers to.  However, I believe it's in Thomas Kissinger's book "The Noble Berean", that he addresses this to some degree.  His thoughts address Satan as being God's tool, and that God and Satan, though in an "adversarial" position, are not on "I'm gon'na kill you" terms...that the demons, though certainly uncomfortable in Jesus' presence, were actually on "speaking terms" with Him, and made a request that Jesus fulfilled for them.  I know this isn't a total answer, but may give some things to think about and explore.  For instance, when Satan and God discussed Job....that was less of a violent argument than a conversation...sort of makes it easier for me to think in terms of Satan and all beings eventually being cleansed and reconciled...

Not having yet been reconciled, maybe they (the legion) would "burn" in His presence, so sort of wildly "ran amock" to get out of His presence ("let's get the heck out of Dodge") and plunged over the cliff out of a sort of desperation?  Just guessing here. :dontknow:.

God's blessing, James.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 26, 2008, 08:11:33 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 26, 2008, 07:30:11 PM
As far as an "elder" is concerned, get over it!  Thank GOD it is not up to YOU whether I am such a thing or not... GOD chooses who IS and who is NOT,
peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:


You finally admit it, been waiting 4 years for you to realize that. Good.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 26, 2008, 08:19:12 PM
Is this thread supposed to be some kind of street theatre of *satan at work* ?


22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,

23Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.


--Gal 5




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on October 26, 2008, 08:19:16 PM
Quote from: Sarah on October 26, 2008, 07:24:59 PM
For some reason in my thinking it seems that demons want a host, and it doesn't make sense it would kill the pigs.
Trying to limit my comments here because of the purpose of the thread and of the boards, but basically it was the pigs that were refusing demonic oppression and possession. Some would argue the fear of the demons in trying to get away from Jesus, but there's some types and shadows and some Bible prophecy numerology related to this passage that relate to other aspects of Bible prophecy where animals are specifically concerned that I won't hijack the thread with related passages and exposition of. You have both the aspect of the pigs refusing the demonic oppression and possession and the fact that these particular spirits were related to self harm, because that's what the demoniac that Jesus freed was doing to himself. He was constantly cutting himself. Self hatred is actually the presence of demons. When it lifts when someone binds, rebukes, and resists it in the Name of Jesus then that's one of your number 1 clues.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 26, 2008, 08:39:53 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 08:19:12 PM
Is this thread supposed to be some kind of street theatre of *satan at work* ?

It was my point to show where spirits come from and how they work, that is caused by the choices and deeds of an individual or group. Since people still don't understand what Satan is, and what spirits are and where they come from, this was a good example, though not necessarily intended. :)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 26, 2008, 08:53:11 PM
willieH: :hithere:

Sorry to all for this sidetracking...

Quote from: SOtW on October 26, 2008, 08:11:33 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 26, 2008, 07:30:11 PM
As far as an "elder" is concerned, get over it!  Thank GOD it is not up to YOU whether I am such a thing or not... GOD chooses who IS and who is NOT,
peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:


You finally admit it, been waiting 4 years for you to realize that. Good.

Talk about READING things into a statement!  :thumbdown:

I didn't ADMIT anything! ...I stated a FACT... which is that neither YOU nor I decide what IS or IS NOT a position (elder) in the WORK of GOD...

GOD is LOVE Craig...  :HeartThrob:

THAT which positions one (as an "elder") within the WORK of GOD, ...is GOD Himself... which is LOVE...

When (and certainly ...IF...) one gravitates to LOVE first and foremost...  Then one is found humbling oneself to be used BY LOVE... in the WORK of LOVE...

Might I carefully note for us all to consider in that aspiration...

Arrogance is never used in the work of LOVE... humility IS...  :dontknow:

Think about it...  :JCThink:

Now if I might also so humbly SUGGEST, ...let's get back to the TOPIC brother...

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 26, 2008, 09:01:09 PM
Sorry Guys..got me MOD hat On.

Quote
Now if I might also so humbly SUGGEST, ...let's get back to the TOPIC brother...

so PLEASE....LETS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:icon_flower: :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 26, 2008, 09:12:22 PM
Did angels fall?



18 "Yes," he told them, "I saw Satan falling from heaven as a flash of lightning!

--Luke 10


12 "How you are fallen from heaven, O shining star, son of the morning! You have been thrown down to the earth, you who destroyed the nations of the world.

13 For you said to yourself, `I will ascend to heaven and set my throne above God's stars. I will preside on the mountain of the gods far away in the north.

14 I will climb to the highest heavens and be like the Most High.'

15 But instead, you will be brought down to the place of the dead, down to its lowest depths.


--Isa 14



Oops...is this the place of the dead?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on October 26, 2008, 09:24:15 PM
I think that some people around here are looking for a direct statement of the Scriptures that Satan was a fallen angel.  My only retort at this point is "are absolutely all of our beliefs from the Scriptures based upon direct statements of the Scriptures or have pretty much all of us got beliefs from the Scriptures that were more of a matter of putting two and two together over the course of enough Scriptures and enough time with the Scriptures to get their general sense about certain things?" 

Secondly, if we limit all of our beliefs to direct statements from the Scriptures, are there any levels of what we know that the Scriptures have genuinely taught us that we'd have to likewise set aside if nothing else but a direct statement from the Scriptures would do? 

How much from each of our spirits and our minds would we have to uproot that has come to us from the Scriptures on the sole basis that we don't have a direct statement from a Book that in many ways is deliberately enigmatic? 

Are direct statements from the Scriptures the only way to gauge the truth of something we genuinely believe that we've perceived from the Scriptures? 

Or are sincerely Scripturally derived beliefs to be set aside if they don't pass the acid test of being able to successfully convince someone else that such and such is contained in the Scriptures?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 26, 2008, 09:44:07 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 09:12:22 PM
Did angels fall?



18 "Yes," he told them, "I saw Satan falling from heaven as a flash of lightning!

--Luke 10


12 "How you are fallen from heaven, O shining star, son of the morning! You have been thrown down to the earth, you who destroyed the nations of the world.

13 For you said to yourself, `I will ascend to heaven and set my throne above God's stars. I will preside on the mountain of the gods far away in the north.

14 I will climb to the highest heavens and be like the Most High.'

15 But instead, you will be brought down to the place of the dead, down to its lowest depths.


--Isa 14



Oops...is this the place of the dead?


Molly isn't the above about Satan?
I thought it was about the death of the king of Babylon....
QuoteHow you are fallen from heaven, O shining star, son of the morning! You have been thrown down to the earth, you who destroyed the nations of the world.
That would mean satan fell long after creation/eden because he destroyed (past tense) several nations.
The first nation was formed long after Eden.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 26, 2008, 10:10:12 PM
willieH: Hi Molly... :hithere:

Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 09:12:22 PM
Did angels fall?

18 "Yes," he told them, "I saw Satan falling from heaven as a flash of lightning!

--Luke 10

NO they did NOT!  But you shall believe what you will...  :dontknow:

CHRIST only spoke IN PARABLE... which means that this is NOT a literal statement, but has SPIRITUAL meaning... and ATHIEST can deduce the above as LITERAL and conclude that "satan" fell from the PERFECT HEAVEN of GOD...

The HEAVEN that "satan" fell from is NOT the HEAVEN of YHVH God which is ETERNALLY, UNDEFILED and PERFECT... such a falling would constitute that Heaven to NOT be PERFECT and UNDEFILED... believe what you will...

Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 09:12:22 PM12 "How you are fallen from heaven, O [lucifer] shining star, son of the morning! You have been thrown down to the earth, you who destroyed the nations of the world.

13 For you said to yourself, `I will ascend to heaven and set my throne above God's stars. I will preside on the mountain of the gods far away in the north.

14 I will climb to the highest heavens and be like the Most High.'

15 But instead, you will be brought down to the place of the dead, down to its lowest depths.


--Isa 14

Why'd you leave out "lucifer" Molly?  After all, it is the ONLY appearance of this word in the Scriptures, and you left it out?

This Scripture speaks of a MAN being addressed which is STATED in the NEXT VERSE:

16  they that SEE thee [spirits are unseen] shall narrowly LOOK UPON THEE [again spirits are unseen]  and consider thee, saying:  is this not the MAN [#H376 LYSH - male person/man] that made the earth to tremble that did shake kingdoms.

and IN THIS CONTEXT, is further noted as a MAN with a CARCASE in a GRAVE

19  but thou are cast out of thy GRAVE [sheol-grave of men] like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a SWORD [spirits cannot be "thrust through with swords" #H2719 CHEREB - cutting instrument - knife] that go DOWN to the stones of the PIT [hole]; as a CARCASE [dead body] under feet.

Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 09:12:22 PMOops... is this the place of the dead?

C'mon Molly... unnecessary remarks...

If this is the place of the DEAD, ... what are YOU doing here?...  (and no doubt, you will continue to be here, if I know you)...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on October 26, 2008, 10:16:41 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 26, 2008, 09:44:07 PM
That would mean satan fell long after creation/eden because he destroyed (past tense) several nations.
The first nation was formed long after Eden.
This gets over into the tricky subjects related to what some believe about a Pre-Adamic race of people.  He hath not put the coming world into subjection to angels whereof we speak in the book of Hebrews is taken by some to indicate that perhaps a Pre-Adamic race of people were governed by angels.  A lot of people build a whole lot on the statements in Genesis to Adam about re-plenishing the earth, as though it were being reclaimed from some great catastrophe.  For people who believe along these lines, this reconciles for them the apparent long age of the earth with their view of humanity being less than 10,000 years old.  And it gives them a convenient out for the Pyramids, cave paintings, and other man made objects that date closer to 15,000+ years old.  Some of the dating on the Pyramids has been pulled back in the last couple of years to being thought to be just under 10,000 years, but the issue of impossibly big stones that went into their construction is still problematic for many scholars.

For other people, this gets into the tricky subject of past or future tenses on some of the Hebrew language with stricter translations like Young's, Rotherham's, and a few others conflicting on some of these passages as to whether we're talking past or future tense within the text.  It's either an interpretation issue or an issue with the particular Hebrew manuscripts appealed to, or maybe a little of both.  I don't know if that particularly comes up with this particular passage, but I have seen these kinds of conflicts between translations before.

Other people would put a gap in the timing between the falling of this son of the morning, whomever it may be in this passage, and would link the attempted overthrow of God to the events of the book of Revelation and their interpretation of Armageddon, or earlier with the defilement of the Jewish temple in Daniel 9 and 2Thessalonians 2.  So for them, the fall and the destruction of nations wouldn't overlap, but the fall would have been over something else entirely and much earlier, then later the destruction of nations, and then the passage that some take as the mockery of this one who has destroyed the nations when he's viewed in the true light of how small he's been made by God.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 26, 2008, 10:18:52 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 26, 2008, 10:10:12 PM
Why'd you leave out "lucifer" Molly?  After all, it is the ONLY appearance of this word in the Scriptures, and you left it out?

Willie  :bottlebump:

Lucifer is only in half of the translations I've seen.
All others exept one translate it as morning/day star, son of the morning.
Good New Bible translates it as King of Babylon.

BTW I think Lucifer can't be a correct translation because it's Latin
lucis-ferre => light-bringer
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 26, 2008, 10:34:40 PM
Quote from: martincisneros on October 26, 2008, 10:16:41 PM
Quote from: WhiteWings on October 26, 2008, 09:44:07 PM
That would mean satan fell long after creation/eden because he destroyed (past tense) several nations.
The first nation was formed long after Eden.
This gets over into the tricky subjects related to what some believe about a Pre-Adamic race of people.  He hath not put the coming world into subjection to angels whereof we speak in the book of Hebrews is taken by some to indicate that perhaps a Pre-Adamic race of people were governed by angels. 
You are referring to the gap theory?

QuoteA lot of people build a whole lot on the statements in Genesis to Adam about re-plenishing the earth, as though it were being reclaimed from some great catastrophe.
Yeah, I've read quite a lot about that. Some scholars claim it is "In a beginning"
And the words creating/void was better translated as repairing damage.
According to some "re-plenshing" meant filling and not refilling at the time KJB was written. I can't verify that myself.


QuoteFor people who believe along these lines, this reconciles for them the apparent long age of the earth with their view of humanity being less than 10,000 years old.  And it gives them a convenient out for the Pyramids, cave paintings, and other man made objects that date closer to 15,000+ years old.  Some of the dating on the Pyramids has been pulled back in the last couple of years to being thought to be just under 10,000 years, but the issue of impossibly big stones that went into their construction is still problematic for many scholars.
Sorry Willie! but I have to ask now Martin mentioned it...
What do you thing about the theory that there where humanoids before Adam but the Bible calls them animals because they didn't have the special 'spirit of humanity'?

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on October 26, 2008, 10:45:35 PM
Quote from: martincisneros on October 26, 2008, 09:24:15 PM
I think that some people around here are looking for a direct statement of the Scriptures that Satan was a fallen angel. 


Actually it is those more direct scriptures that people are maintaining is the proof he was a fallen angel.   It is the value of scripture that means more than the literal text that brings question to that literal reading.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 26, 2008, 10:55:03 PM
Quote from: WillieH'mon Molly... unnecessary remarks...

If this is the place of the DEAD, ... what are YOU doing here?...  (and no doubt, you will continue to be here, if I know you)...

I meant is this earth the place of the dead?

Satan was cast down to earth.  And, that scripture said he was brought down to the place of the dead.

One plus one...

Actually, if this earth is the place of the dead, it would explain a lot...
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 26, 2008, 11:12:35 PM
QuoteI meant is this earth the place of the dead?

YUP!

QuoteSatan was cast down to earth.  And, that scripture said he was brought down to the place of the dead.

YUP!



QuoteActually, if this earth is the place of the dead, it would explain a lot...

and YuP once MORE,....That is, if one relates the EARTH to being Clay= man etc...personified in the Pharisees Noted as those ""so called BEING alive"" speaking from the GRAVE"...

Therefore ,MAN needs a NEW earth ( BODY) and a NEW ( HEAVEN) mind to live..as scripture NOTES""moving from DEATH to life....

Isa 65:17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.



:icon_flower:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 26, 2008, 11:19:35 PM
willieH: Hi WW...  :cloud9:

Quote from: WhiteWings on October 26, 2008, 10:18:52 PM
Quote from: willieH on October 26, 2008, 10:10:12 PM
Why'd you leave out "lucifer" Molly?  After all, it is the ONLY appearance of this word in the Scriptures, and you left it out?

Willie  :bottlebump:

Lucifer is only in half of the translations I've seen.
All others exept one translate it as morning/day star, son of the morning.
Good New Bible translates it as King of Babylon.

BTW I think Lucifer can't be a correct translation because it's Latin
lucis-ferre => light-bringer

I was just noting this to Molly, because it is used a "proof Scripture" by those which endeavor to establish that ANGELS of GOD... fell from Heaven...

The word translated LUCIFER ...IS... in the Bible bro... regardless of the translation of it... HEYLEL (#H1966 strongs)...

And the definition of HEYLEL is rooted in a word which means shine... but irregardless,  ...The point is that the context of Is 14 does not establish "satan" as a fallen ANGEL of GOD... for "satan" is not even mentioned and, what ever HEYLEL actually means, in the CONTEXT... it is used in pointing toward a MAN which was a King, at the time of this writing...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 26, 2008, 11:30:01 PM
Quote from: WillieH16  they that SEE thee [spirits are unseen] shall narrowly LOOK UPON THEE [again spirits are unseen]  and consider thee, saying:  is this not the MAN [#H376 LYSH - male person/man] that made the earth to tremble that did shake kingdoms.

and IN THIS CONTEXT, is further noted as a MAN with a CARCASE in a GRAVE




The word is iysh which could mean 'one,' 'champion,' fellow,' 'another.'


"man"
H376
אישׁ
'îysh
eesh
Contracted for H582 (or perhaps rather from an unused root meaning to be extant); a man as an individual or a male person; often used as an adjunct to a more definite term (and in such cases frequently not expressed in translation.) : - also, another, any (man), a certain, + champion, consent, each, every (one), fellow, [foot-, husband-] man, (good-, great, mighty) man, he, high (degree), him (that is), husband, man [-kind], + none, one, people, person, + steward, what (man) soever, whoso (-ever), worthy. Compare H802.


16They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;
17That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?


--Isa 14

Is this the fellow?

Is this the one?

Is this another one?

..who shook the nations, made the earth to tremble, made the world a wilderness, imprisoned people forever,  and destroyed cities.



Aren't we getting sick of Satan, yet?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 26, 2008, 11:33:50 PM
willieH: Hi Molly...  :icon_flower:

Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 10:55:03 PM
Quote from: WillieH'mon Molly... unnecessary remarks...

If this is the place of the DEAD, ... what are YOU doing here?...  (and no doubt, you will continue to be here, if I know you)...

I meant is this earth the place of the dead?

Thanks for clarifying...  :thanks:

Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 10:55:03 PMSatan was cast down to earth.  And, that scripture said he was brought down to the place of the dead.

One plus one...

Actually, if this earth is the place of the dead, it would explain a lot...

The "earth" IS the "place" of the dead... it is the CLAY VESSEL first molded in DISHONOR... FITTED (made) for DESTRUCTION... 

GOD ...MAKES... men to be in this scenario... He has CONCLUDED [decided] that we ALL travel through the valley of DEATH due to UNBELIEF which is NOT decided by us... This takes "place" in the FLESH... which is ADVERSE to the SPIRIT... which is eventually REVEALED to be in ALL -- CHRIST, the beginning and the end...

"satan" is IN the EARTH (not the planet)... which IS the CLAY VESSEL which is MADE PURPOSELY, unto DISHONOR and DESTRUCTION...

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 26, 2008, 11:43:28 PM
well, I was thinking..

As long as man allows satan to take over his mental faculties and turn him functionally insane,

God is required to condemn man to death, such that this world isn't more of a living Hell than it already is.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on October 26, 2008, 11:56:35 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 11:43:28 PM
well, I was thinking..

As long as man allows satan to take over his mental faculties and turn him functionally insane,

God is required to condemn man to death, such that this world isn't more of a living Hell than it already is.

Ya see Molly, Man WAS made subject to"" vanity"...The Flesh, Now being adverse to KNOWING WHO or what TRUTH IS, and that Dear ONE, is LIFE ITSELF, ( Christ)...

Insanaity is relative to the WORD SANE.....For mine ,while we DWELL, and live in the""""""""""""""" wisdom"of the Flesh """which has been noted very clearly by Rosered, then Indeed we remain insane,....for the sense of a Better word.

Me sincerely thinks you miss the WHOLE POINT molly.......bUT IM SURE YA MAY WELL THINK THAT OF ME :icon_flower:

:icon_flower:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 27, 2008, 12:06:49 AM
Quote from: Taffy on October 26, 2008, 11:56:35 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 11:43:28 PM
well, I was thinking..

As long as man allows satan to take over his mental faculties and turn him functionally insane,

God is required to condemn man to death, such that this world isn't more of a living Hell than it already is.

Ya see Molly, Man WAS made subject to"" vanity"...The Flesh, Now being adverse to KNOWING WHO or what TRUTH IS, and that Dear ONE, is LIFE ITSELF, ( Christ)...

Insanaity is relative to the WORD SANE.....For mine ,while we DWELL, and live in the""""""""""""""" wisdom"of the Flesh """which has been noted very clearly by Rosered, then Indeed we remain insane,....for the sense of a Better word.

Me sincerely thinks you miss the WHOLE POINT molly.......bUT IM SURE YA MAY WELL THINK THAT OF ME :icon_flower:

:icon_flower:


I don't necessarily disagree with you, except in that I see how it can be used as an excuse--the woman, flesh, you gave me made me do it.

God makes it clear he has given us a choice--therefore, we have a choice, life or death.

He has commanded us to choose life.

What is so hard about that?

Personally, satan and his fallen angels have gotten on my last nerve.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 27, 2008, 12:15:58 AM
willieH:  :heat:

Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 11:30:01 PM
Quote from: willieH16  they that SEE thee [spirits are unseen] shall narrowly LOOK UPON THEE [again spirits are unseen]  and consider thee, saying:  is this not the MAN [#H376 LYSH - male person/man] that made the earth to tremble that did shake kingdoms.

and IN THIS CONTEXT, is further noted as a MAN with a CARCASE in a GRAVE


The word is iysh which could mean 'one,' 'champion,' fellow,' 'another.'


"man"
H376
אישׁ
'îysh
eesh
Contracted for H582 (or perhaps rather from an unused root meaning to be extant); a man as an individual or a male person; often used as an adjunct to a more definite term (and in such cases frequently not expressed in translation.) : - also, another, any (man), a certain, + champion, consent, each, every (one), fellow, [foot-, husband-] man, (good-, great, mighty) man, he, high (degree), him (that is), husband, man [-kind], + none, one, people, person, + steward, what (man) soever, whoso (-ever), worthy. Compare H802.


16They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;
17That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?


--Isa 14

Is this the fellow?  willieH: "satan" is a FELLOW?

Is this the one?

Is this another one?

..who shook the nations, made the earth to tremble, made the world a wilderness, imprisoned people forever,  and destroyed cities.

Aren't we getting sick of Satan, yet?

IYSH is translated CHAMPION - 2 times...

IYSH is translated ANOTHER -  5 times...

IYSH is translated ONE - Many times, too many to count as with:

IYSH is translated MAN... SEVERAL HUNDRED times... (I got tired of counting a 200 with pages left)

Which give us a good idea what the word actually meant... It generally was observed as meaning ONE or MAN... and was applied in MYRIADS of instances in the OT... As ONE or MAN... few times as the other noted definitions...

Another thing you miss is the earlier context of Is 14 which names this person the KING of BABYLON... which is to end up in a GRAVE... and WORMS cover him...

Is "satan" in a GRAVE Molly?   Is satan "covered" by WORMS? (Is 14:11)  :dontknow:

Where is "satan" referred to elsewhere, as a KING Molly?  Is "he" one of the "kings" that JESUS is KING of?

Let's face it Molly... you will believe "satan" as a "person" addressed in the Bible as "LUCIFER"... and as "the SERPENT"... and as "the DRAGON"... as "BEELZEBUB"... whatever, ...and far be it from me to wish to change that... G-head!  Believe it...  :dontknow:

But truth be told, that CHRIST ...NAMED (by HIS own  WORDS) as "satan"... only PETER... whom He also named as the (little) ROCK upon which He would build His church... :rolleye:

And when CHRIST called someone a given thing... are we not to accept that as basis enough to note it as SO?  When He called the Pharisees BLIND GUIDES... are they NOT what He CALLED them?  Or when He CALLED them VIPERS... was He just kidding?

So knowing that He addressed PETER as "satan"... are you not going to accept His Word? 

Does it mean the CHRIST is building his church upon "satan" Molly?

We are just...  :bdh:  ...I'll leave you to believe in "satan" however you choose, but as far as I am concerned it is a belief in a myth...  Just as is the belief of those who believe and preach that GOD shall eternally burn the objects of HIS LOVE...  :sigh:

peacE...
willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 27, 2008, 12:32:23 AM
Quote from: WillieHLet's face it Molly... you will believe "satan" as a "person" addressed in the Bible as "LUCIFER"... and as "the SERPENT"... and as "the DRAGON"... as "BEELZEBUB"... whatever, ...and far be it from me to wish to change that... G-head!  Believe it... 

But truth be told, that CHRIST ...NAMED (by HIS own  WORDS) as "satan"... only PETER... whom He also named as the (little) ROCK upon which He would build His church...

Satan is a spirit that can enter into anything, even an angel of light.

But, man has a way to protect himself.

Or man could not choose life, because satan is all about death and destruction.

Who in their right mind would love death and destruction?




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on October 27, 2008, 08:42:43 AM

Quote from: willieH on October 26, 2008, 10:10:12 PM
The word translated LUCIFER ...IS... in the Bible bro... regardless of the translation of it... HEYLEL (#H1966 strongs)...

You are missing my point Willie. And I never claimed that strong isn't in the Bible

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 27, 2008, 12:18:32 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 27, 2008, 12:06:49 AM
Quote from: Taffy on October 26, 2008, 11:56:35 PM
Quote from: Molly on October 26, 2008, 11:43:28 PM
well, I was thinking..

As long as man allows satan to take over his mental faculties and turn him functionally insane,

God is required to condemn man to death, such that this world isn't more of a living Hell than it already is.

Ya see Molly, Man WAS made subject to"" vanity"...The Flesh, Now being adverse to KNOWING WHO or what TRUTH IS, and that Dear ONE, is LIFE ITSELF, ( Christ)...

Insanaity is relative to the WORD SANE.....For mine ,while we DWELL, and live in the""""""""""""""" wisdom"of the Flesh """which has been noted very clearly by Rosered, then Indeed we remain insane,....for the sense of a Better word.

Me sincerely thinks you miss the WHOLE POINT molly.......bUT IM SURE YA MAY WELL THINK THAT OF ME :icon_flower:

:icon_flower:


I don't necessarily disagree with you, except in that I see how it can be used as an excuse--the woman, flesh, you gave me made me do it.
God makes it clear he has given us a choice--therefore, we have a choice, life or death.

He has commanded us to choose life.

What is so hard about that?

Personally, satan and his fallen angels have gotten on my last nerve.

Hi Molly I maybe the only one who picked up on this but you brought forth a very good point when you said that man would blame his FLESH (for she is flesh of my flesh)  for all of his folly, and this is exactly what I see happening on this thread.

Some only see the flesh as responsible and lay all the blame at its feet, but mans FLESH says hey wait a minute it not my fault that old serpent called the devil and satan decieived me.

It would seem to me that some like Adam have never come into contact with the serpent so they can only blame the flesh, while all along the flesh is being decieved by serpent.

Why is this so important to understand?

Because when you go to war you better have a very good understanding of all the enemies you will face, if all you battle is those who have been decieved you will never get close to defeating the one who decieves.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 27, 2008, 12:27:31 PM
It just baffles me how people put up with this "them versus us reasoning", which is just chalk full of fallacy and based on nothing factual, logical, reasonable or anything. Ad Hominem reasoning is all bs and a lowest form of reasoning there is.

Quote from: pneumaHi Molly I maybe the only one who picked up on this but you brought forth a very good point when you said that man would blame his FLESH (for she is flesh of my flesh)  for all of his folly, and this is exactly what I see happening on this thread.

Then you are NOT paying attention to ANYTHING in this thread Scott, once again, assuming things and never listening. Both Molly and yourself continue to assign your ASSUMPTIONS of what you think is being discussed as being the reality of which is discussed, and as I said before it is disrespectful to everyone in this thread. Continually you will be refuted until you actually take the time to UNDERSTAND and LISTEN to what you think you are refuting. Otherwise it is all hot air, and your vain imaginations.

QuoteBecause when you go to war you better have a very good understanding of all the enemies you will face, if all you battle is those who have been decieved you will never get close to defeating the one who deceives.

How IRONIC, because it is in fact what YOU are doing. You think your enemy is external to you, you in fact are blaming a outside created spirit, even God, that you had no choice or control over, to YOUR folly. You believe Satan is something external to man and deny your involvement in his continual existence.

Therefore you have never blamed yourself for your sin and evil you commit, you deny your responsibility and accountability to your words, thoughts and actions believing that if evil is birthed, it is EXTERNAL to you and not actually created within you by you. At least those who recognize that the flesh, understand that it is actually themselves, a part of themselves that that they are battling and actually taking responsibility for their thoughts and actions.

HOW IRONIC you are defeated by your own words. You just rebuke everyone who doesn't believe Satan is a spirit outside mankind by alluding that they blame something 'external' to themselves, but cannot recognize that is what you are doing if you believe Satan is outside mankind. Talk about not knowing your enemy.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on October 27, 2008, 01:29:16 PM
QuoteIt just baffles me how people put up with this "them versus us reasoning", which is just chalk full of fallacy and based on nothing factual, logical, reasonable or anything. Ad Hominem reasoning is all bs and a lowest form of reasoning there is.

Craig there is no us verses them scenario, that just goes to show where your head is at. it obvious to all reading that some believe the flesh is satan and some believe satan is satan, and there is nothing wrong in pointing this out.



QuoteThen you are NOT paying attention to ANYTHING in this thread Scott, once again, assuming things and never listening. Both Molly and yourself continue to assign your ASSUMPTIONS of what you think is being discussed as being the reality of which is discussed, and as I said before it is disrespectful to everyone in this thread. Continually you will be refuted until you actually take the time to UNDERSTAND and LISTEN to what you think you are refuting. Otherwise it is all hot air, and your vain imaginations.


Whatever, but as you seem to think I am being disrespectful to others (no one else has said anything, I think it just your dislike for me showing up again) but just in case I'll ask them.

So speak up guys and gals, do you see me as being disrespectful as Craig point out?

If so please let me know and I will leave this thread alone. I am not here to hurt anyone, just to discuss what I see along with everyone else.



QuoteHow IRONIC, because it is in fact what YOU are doing. You think your enemy is external to you, you in fact are blaming a outside created spirit, even God, that you had no choice or control over, to YOUR folly. You believe Satan is something external to man and deny your involvement in his continual existence.


Craig again and again you accuse me of not listening, but brother that is your problem not mine, how many time have I stated in this thread that I believe in layers to scripture and see satan as also concerning our flesh, but also see satan as a spirit being?

Go ahead count them, for obviously by this post you have not read my replies but just skimmed through them as you are want to do when reading anything I post, not taking the time to really look at what I have said, still going by your old standard of I don't have to read everything you write in order to understand you are wrong.


QuoteTherefore you have never blamed yourself for your sin and evil you commit, you deny your responsibility and accountability to your words, thoughts and actions believing that if evil is birthed, it is EXTERNAL to you and not actually created within you by you. At least those who recognize that the flesh, understand that it is actually themselves, a part of themselves that that they are battling and actually taking responsibility for their thoughts and actions.

HOW IRONIC you are defeated by your own words. You just rebuke everyone who doesn't believe Satan is a spirit outside mankind by alluding that they blame something 'external' to themselves, but cannot recognize that is what you are doing if you believe Satan is outside mankind.


You really do not LISTEN or READ what I write do you, and how you get me REBUKING anyone out of anything I said just goes to show where your head is at Craig.
Grow up.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Craig on October 27, 2008, 02:15:29 PM
QuoteWhatever, but as you seem to think I am being disrespectful to others (no one else has said anything, I think it just your dislike for me showing up again) but just in case I'll ask them.

Let us find out, how many here are tired of having someone assume what they believe and then assign that assumption to them, but that was never what they believed to begin with? Would anyone here believe that is disrespect?

Quoteit obvious to all reading that some believe the flesh is satan and some believe satan is satan, and there is nothing wrong in pointing this out.

Of course there is nothing wrong with that, but that is NOT what people are doing.

Quote from: pneumaI maybe the only one who picked up on this but you brought forth a very good point when you said that man would blame his FLESH (for she is flesh of my flesh)  for all of his folly, and this is exactly what I see happening on this thread.

There is nobody blaming their flesh for all their folly, whether Satan is the flesh or not. WHERE IN DID ANYONE HERE BLAME THE FLESH FOR THEIR FOLLY?!!?!?!?!? So what REASONING do you see EXACTLY happening in this thread, that is in disagreement to what you have stated? If you are in disagreement, and thinking that THIS IS EXACTLY what you is happening this thread but IS NOT, who here is not listening? Perhaps you are not communicating yourself properly, and maybe you are not seeing anything but what you want to see. It is still the them versus us mentality, since I still see you are applying your ASSUMPTIONS of what you think you are seeing as a reason for disagreement, than what is actually being discussed.

QuoteYou really do not LISTEN or READ what I write do you, and how you get me REBUKING anyone out of anything I said just goes to show where your head is at Craig.

Do you know what a rebuke is?

QuoteGo ahead count them, for obviously by this post you have not read my replies but just skimmed through them as you are want to do when reading anything I post, not taking the time to really look at what I have said, still going by your old standard of I don't have to read everything you write in order to understand you are wrong.

Funny that you say, "understand you are wrong" instead of saying, "to understand you are correct." This shows me once again IT IS AN US VERSUS THEM MENTALITY. It shows me where YOUR heart is at, brother. Listen to the nuances of your words.

You treat everyone who disagrees with you in the same manner you treat Mr. Slick from CARM, with contempt and sarcasm and then focus on the most obtuse reasonings and use much fallacy in your rebuttal usually relying on an emotional appeal rather than reason itself for your position.

It is a MUST to be reading everything a person writes and communicates to understand if they are correct or not, this is not MY standard this is how things work in life.

Here is where my head is at. I am not a fan of hearing this rhetoric from you an others, and actually doing a disservice to the truth by introducing things that have no truth at all as you reasoning. The use of Amphibolies, Argumentum ad hominems, Argumentum ad ignorantiam, Argumentum ad logicam and such to support what you think is true. On top of this, finding fault by accusing others of lack of love, or full of pride, or other emotional appeals, just shows me where your heart is at and along with others. I just stop catering to this non-sense.

Can we not have matter of fact discussions, not speculations of what others believe in order to disagree?

As you can see at this point, I don't care if I am banned for subjective perceptions of what the 'rules' are. I don't care about how you feel about what is happening right now. At this point, I only care about what is true and untrue, and I don't see how our emotions have no relevance in that. I don't care if you disagree with that statement concerning emotion is not an indication of truth, because I have yet to see one supportive reasoning that has ever come from an emotional appeal, that could not have been found in a non-subjective reasoning.

This politically correct environment is stifling and I find does nothing but justify fallacy and destroy any accountability. I keep seeing the ones who are punished are the ones who cannot cater to this enviroment.

Anyways, this is pretty much sums up what I see happening in this forum by it's prominent 'teaching' members.

Seeya.

[just editted spelling]
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on October 27, 2008, 09:33:56 PM
wow! :icon_flower:

I'm actually enjoying this thread--learning a lot.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on October 27, 2008, 09:54:53 PM
willieH: Hi WW...  :icon_king:


QuoteA lot of people build a whole lot on the statements in Genesis to Adam about re-plenishing the earth, as though it were being reclaimed from some great catastrophe.

QuoteYeah, I've read quite a lot about that. Some scholars claim it is "In a beginning"
And the words creating/void was better translated as repairing damage.
According to some "re-plenshing" meant filling and not refilling at the time KJB was written. I can't verify that myself.

I can verify it bro... the word which was translated REPLENISHING actually means FILL... (MAIA #H4390 -- strongs ...to FILL or be FULL OF) Many doctrines are based on TRANSLATED WORDS instead of what the WORD actually meant...

The word translated VOID is (#H922 BOHUW  -- strongs ...to be EMPTY, a VACUITY) the word means VACUOUS or EMPTY... not something in need of "repair"...  again... people establish doctrinal views elsewhere, and then often, "adjust" the Scriptures that might be in opposition to the teaching, to fit those views...

The Dinosaur/Caveman/Earth strata trip which science requires MILLIONS, even BILLIONS of "years" to gain explanation, is simply explained with TIME PAST moving at an EXTREMELY SLOWER pace then we observe today...

Even my daughter who is half my age, is stating TIME to be moving at a much greater pace then when she was a child... and EVERY generation makes this same observance...

TIME and SPACE, though they are part of the PHYSICAL and FINITE creation, are a SPIRITUALLY controlled factor which GOD holds in His hand... That we observe our watches moving one second at a time with the very same increment of TIME for each one, does not prove that that increment is NOT increasing speed even though we are unable to detect it to be doing so...

If you watch the hands on a precision clock, they MOVE with TIME, but cannot be observed MOVING... But with "time lapse photography" the clock is seen speeding at a pace only equaled by the gasoline gauge in my car! (toward empty)

An example forya:  A train which is going 65mph, when observed in a proximity of 20 feet is WHIZZING by... but if that observation point is moved to 20 MILES away... the train appears to be almost, MOTIONLESS...

peacE...

willieH  :icon_king:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on November 01, 2008, 10:35:28 AM

Quote from: willieH on October 27, 2008, 09:54:53 PM
QuoteA lot of people build a whole lot on the statements in Genesis to Adam about re-plenishing the earth, as though it were being reclaimed from some great catastrophe.

I can verify it bro... the word which was translated REPLENISHING actually means FILL... (MAIA #H4390 -- strongs ...to FILL or be FULL OF) Many doctrines are based on TRANSLATED WORDS instead of what the WORD actually meant...

I agree with the part of basing a doctrine on mistranslations. But I think that's not all that can be said about my little example.
Today replenshing means refilling. But some claim that during the time KJV was written replenishing simply had the meaning of filling.
There is also a verse in KJV that seems to say that people are stopped from ascending to heaven when called.
I can't remember the verse but I do remember the explanation. KJV did translate correctly because back then, 1611, the meaning of the word was opposite to what it means now.
So we do not only have to be on guard for mistranslations but also old translations that contain words that have changed definitions.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on November 03, 2008, 01:17:53 AM
willieH: Hi-de-ho -- there... WW!  :grin:

Quote from: willieH on October 27, 2008, 09:54:53 PM
QuoteA lot of people build a whole lot on the statements in Genesis to Adam about re-plenishing the earth, as though it were being reclaimed from some great catastrophe.

I can verify it bro... the word which was translated REPLENISHING actually means FILL... (MAIA #H4390 -- strongs ...to FILL or be FULL OF) Many doctrines are based on TRANSLATED WORDS instead of what the WORD actually meant...

Quote from: WhiteWings on November 01, 2008, 10:35:28 AMI agree with the part of basing a doctrine on mistranslations. But I think that's not all that can be said about my little example.
Today replenshing means refilling. But some claim that during the time KJV was written replenishing simply had the meaning of filling.

YO!  :thumbsup:  Personally, I do not know that "replenishing" meant filling in olde English terms, but the HEBREW word means FILL... irregardless of the "olde English" meaning.

Quote from: WhiteWings on November 01, 2008, 10:35:28 AMThere is also a verse in KJV that seems to say that people are stopped from ascending to heaven when called.
I can't remember the verse but I do remember the explanation. KJV did translate correctly because back then, 1611, the meaning of the word was opposite to what it means now.
So we do not only have to be on guard for mistranslations but also old translations that contain words that have changed definitions.

I agree with you brother... It is up to individual student, to research all aspects of the doctrines he/she teaches or promotes, and the TRUE meanings of the verses which he/she uses to establish that teaching/promotion...

One thing to take into consideration is that DICTIONARIES are reports of the historical applied useages of a given word...  As I have previously noted -- GAY meant "happy" or "joyful" in the 1940's-50's... but today, can mean HOMOSEXUAL or LAME, which it did NOT MEAN back then...  :dontknow:

So if a youthful one, is speaking to an elderly person, and uses the word GAY... it could be easily misunderstood by the elderly... because the two can thereby be placing the SAME WORD in 2 very different CONTEXTS...  :surrender:

peacE...

willieH   :icon_jokercolor:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on November 03, 2008, 06:13:34 AM
For those that believe that the Second Death is a mass execution, then wouldn't the "First Death" be Noah's Flood rather than either the deaths of Adam, Christ, or ourselves?

I know that some of you believe that the Second Death is the casting of Death and Hades into the Lake of Fire.  But I'm tossing a thought towards those that believe that people being cast into the Lake of Fire is the Second Death.  It's a more relevant question for them because I'm doing a 2Peter 3 comparison/contrast within the paradigm that they work with and under.

With this idea that I'm working with, then the abolishment of death wouldn't only be the swallowing up of our lower lives with the higher lives of immortality, but it would also be the abolishment of cataclysms upon/within Creation.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Texas Son on November 23, 2008, 04:31:50 AM
Greetings all!

Forgive me if this is posted in the wrong forum or is a repeat. I'm still feeling my way around.

I am a few months into the blessing of univeralism. What a weight lifted off of my heart to know that we have a God that desires that none shall perish! Even the view of preterism is new for me, as I have always been a traditionalist in church.

The question I have as I continue to study is whether the Lake of Fire is temporal in the view of preterism. Are those who are being purified by our Fathers all consuming Spirit (fire) already in the Lake of Fire for the ages, or is this yet to come? Was the Lake of Fire open for business in 70 A.D. or before?

Blessings to all!
TS
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on November 23, 2008, 04:43:53 AM
Hopefully some preterists still post around here occasionally so that you'll get some answers to this.  I'm partial preterist, personally, believing in both a past fulfillment of many of the prophesies and in future fulfillments yet to come of other prophecies.  Thomas Whittemore who was a total preterist in the early 1800s of Christian Universalist conviction was of the opinion that the Lake of Fire was the burning of Jerusalem in 70AD.  I can see that as a partial fulfillment, but I'm leaning towards an actual cleansing of the earth leading to the New Earth of the last couple of chapters of Revelation, according to 2Peter 3, which would be the "Second Death," in the Book of Revelation, in contrast with Noah's Flood having been the "First Death."
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on November 23, 2008, 04:54:42 AM
I'm not a full preterist either . . .not sure what percentage I'd label myself to be.  How about a "dimensional preterist"  I see this in different levels/realms/dimensions . .whatever you call it.  In the natural, the flood of Noah did purge the earth of the evilness that had conceived through the perversions of men mixing with spirit (my opinion is all).  And I believe there isn't a need for another purging as the second death is not like the first.  One is natural, the other is spiritual.  The earth has already been purged naturally through the flood.  And . . . the second purging came via the spirit where it was "poured out" on ALL flesh . . .upper room.

As to the lake fire, there is no such place physically, but spiritually, I can see people being there right now . . .in the sense that they were born, lived, and returned to the spirit realm from which they came and if the name is not in the book of life, the cleasning of the lake is awaiting them.  For us who are alive . . .not so much . . .I'm thinking more along the lines of hell on our earths.  In the end, our hell is also purged in this refining lake . .but not us, just the soulish reality in the end, becomes totally transformed back to it's original pure self in the nature of Christ Alone.

Just some observations on the topic.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Texas Son on November 23, 2008, 04:55:39 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on November 23, 2008, 04:43:53 AM
Hopefully some preterists still post around here occasionally so that you'll get some answers to this.  I'm partial preterist, personally, believing in both a past fulfillment of many of the prophesies and in future fulfillments yet to come of other prophecies.  Thomas Whittemore who was a total preterist in the early 1800s of Christian Universalist conviction was of the opinion that the Lake of Fire was the burning of Jerusalem in 70AD.  I can see that as a partial fulfillment, but I'm leaning towards an actual cleansing of the earth leading to the New Earth of the last couple of chapters of Revelation, according to 2Peter 3, which would be the "Second Death," in the Book of Revelation, in contrast with Noah's Flood having been the "First Death."

Thanks Martincisneros!

I can see the Lake of Fire being the burning of Jerusalem in 70AD. Though I lean more towards a purifying by the Lord. Is not the New Earth already present in the fact that the old heaven and earth passed away with the Old Covenant?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on November 23, 2008, 05:39:03 AM
Quote from: Texas Son on November 23, 2008, 04:55:39 AM
I can see the Lake of Fire being the burning of Jerusalem in 70AD. Though I lean more towards a purifying by the Lord. Is not the New Earth already present in the fact that the old heaven and earth passed away with the Old Covenant?
There's too many details of the last two chapters of Revelation that are not here yet:

1. There shall be no more curse.  Yet many are still hungering and thirsting, even of those that have embraced the Lordship of Jesus, and people still curse and wear curses as a garment every single day.

2. God shall wipe away ALL tears.  Presently, God is wiping away some tears but not yet all.

3. There are still Temples made with hands, which don't exist after the purging fire that takes us into the last couple of chapters of Revelation.  And some of them God is genuinely supporting, although I know what many around here would say inclusively about all of them.  But I can't negatively touch the Anointing as easily in the handful of places that I know beyond a shadow of doubt that it's what's created them for the meeting of the needs of people in desperate situations spiritually and physically.

4. People are still finding abuse, rather than TOTAL healing, through the leaves of the trees as a result of the pharmaceutical companies.

5. 1John chapters 2 and 3 indicates that on the New Earth that we'll not need anyone to teach us, but we're still currently and righteously under the administration of Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors, Teachers, Workers of Miracles, Gifts of Healings, Helps, Bishops, Administrative and Economic gifts, both private devotionally prophetic and public ministry in tongues and interpretation of tongues, and if there's any other ministry gift listed in Romans 12, 1Corinthians 12, Ephesians 4, and in the Pastoral epistles.  I've ministered [and continue to minister] in many of these gifts, personally, through the blessing of Jesus' High Priestly ministry, so I know beyond a shadow of doubt both from the Scriptures and by personal experience that that's still going on.

6. Revelation 21:3 indicates to me that Jesus is physically among us again on the New Earth.  That is not yet the case, although He's spiritually among us through the Holy Spirit, and the Bread and Cup as often as we eat and drink thereof.  We're still thereby proclaiming the Lord's death until He comes and absolutely no Christians after 70AD ceased partaking of the Bread and Cup, meaning they understood Bodily return.

7.  And I've personally seen the Holy City, New Jerusalem, on numerous occasions so that although I'm able to go along with most spiritual interpretations of each of the meticulous, meticulous details given about that city by way of explanation of our relationship with the Lord, our righteousness and holiness in Him, etc., yet I'm personally still awaiting an actual city that I've been to on numerous occasions.

8.  Currently, those of us who've received the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness are able to reign with Him to the close of the present eon; however long it is between the time that we've entered into discipleship with Christ Jesus by being very diligent doers of the Word with signs following, and the close of our life here.  But in the last couple of chapters of Revelation it says that we reign with Him to the ages of ages.  We're not there yet, and most Christians in this life shrug off their reigning responsibilities with the Word and never become victorious in every area of their lives.  Most people never even acheive the minimum spoken of in Hebrews 5:12-14 of having a physical body that knows the difference between good and evil; that rejects the evil choosing only the good.

9.  Obviously, not all of us have the rewards mentioned in the first 3 chapters of Revelation, which indicates more to come as we overcome by love, grace, truth, affirmation, blessing, faith, and fellowship.

10.  I believe in a literal immortal; bodily immortal state that we enter into according to all of St. Paul's writings.  There are hints in the New Testament that to not fully believe in that coming reality is to not yet be fully converted to Christ.  Minimally, it's called foolishness and not in a good way.

11.  Isaiah 11:1-9, Isaiah 30:23-26, Hosea 2:18, Jeremiah 31:27-28, Ezekiel 34:10, Mark 4:30-32, Romans 8:21 hasn't seen the fullest part of it's fulfillment yet.

12. The Body of Christ hasn't been completed yet in the way that Ephesians 4 anticipates, so that in one mind with both the Lord and one another they're able to set the rest of Creation free COMPLETELY.


And that's the furthest I can go and the most controversial that I can get on these boards before this Corinthians Church acts up. :icon_jokercolor:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Texas Son on November 23, 2008, 07:50:22 AM
Excellent words to study Martincisneros! I appreciate your time. You have given me much to think about.   :thumbsup:

Blessings!
TS
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: DeeDee on November 23, 2008, 09:10:39 AM
QuoteThomas Whittemore who was a total preterist in the early 1800s of Christian Universalist conviction was of the opinion that the Lake of Fire was the burning of Jerusalem in 70AD.  I can see that as a partial fulfillment, but I'm leaning towards an actual cleansing of the earth leading to the New Earth of the last couple of chapters of Revelation, according to 2Peter 3, which would be the "Second Death," in the Book of Revelation, in contrast with Noah's Flood having been the "First Death."

I have to agree, I think the lake of fire is still coming. If it was Jerusalem it would make some sense except for the fact Jesus speaks of a "Lake" of fire - the burning of a city is not a burning lake so to speak.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: reFORMer on November 23, 2008, 09:30:06 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on November 23, 2008, 05:39:03 AM
And that's the furthest I can go and the most controversial that I can get on these boards before this Corinthians Church acts up. :icon_jokercolor:
OK!  That's enough!  I've had it!  I know you're talking about me!  Veiled references to my sojourn in exile living a dog's life attached to the temple of . . . now I can't remember . . . you know, before I came here . . . but you can be sure my mother and I will make a flambouyant kafluffle, stomping out in the middle of your oration at the next gathering if you so much as mention our sins, Mr. High-and-Mighty, Mr. Clean smarty pants.  Everybody knows we only do what comes naturally and we can't be expected to deny ourselves.  We have to be true to our nature.  You just think you can take over and run everybody else's life!  Your's is not the only mud-puddle in town.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on November 26, 2008, 07:22:12 AM
 :icon_jokercolor: GOOFY! :laugh2: Someone actually reported this post of yours!!  They weren't sure if you were for real or not.  I nearly fell out of my chair laughing when I saw that your post had gotten reported.  If my cat had been snoozing beside me, he might have needed a team of emergency vets if I'd fallen on him from the height of this chair. :bdh: What was particularly funny about them having reported it is that when I saw your post maybe 30 minutes to an hour earlier, for just a second or a second and a half, I wasn't sure if you were being serious. :eek: You and Craig are the only ones that I know (maybe WillieH) that if you're kidding, someone's liable to report it! :mock: I'm still laughing pretty hard as I'm typing this. :mrflo:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on November 26, 2008, 04:33:15 PM
Texas Son,

The Dating of the book of Revelation from Lardner's Works

Below, I have copied from Lardner's Works what I could find as to the dating of the book of Revelation. If Lardner is correct and the ancients are correct, then the modern day Preterist view that the thousand year reign began around 70 A.D. should be re-thought. If John wrote Revelation around 96 A.D. and that he was looking forward yet to the coming 1000 year reign as written in Rev.20:4-7, this would show that John knew that the 1000 year reign had not begun in his lifetime. "Domitian is computed to have died, Sept. I8, A. D. 96." It also shows the lake of fire as still future.

what follows is the dating of when Revelation was written from Lardner.

I shall therefore first put down the accounts of ancient authors, and then observe the opinions of learned men of later times.
Irenaeus says of the Revelation, "that it was seen no long time ago, but almost in our age, at the end of the reign of Domitian." And thought Irenaeus does not say that St. John was then in Patmos, yet since he supposeth him to be the person who had the revelation, he must have believed him to be then in Patmos, as the book itself says, ch.1.9.
415

Clement of Alexandria, in his took, entitled, Who is the rich Man that may be saved, as cited by Eusebius, speaks of John's returning from Patmos to Ephesus, after the death of the tyrant:' by whom, It is probable, he means Domitian.
Tertullian, in his Apology, speaks of Domitian as hav­ing banished some christians, and afterwards giving them leave to return home: probably intending St. John, and some others. In another work he says,' that John having been sent for to Rome, was cast into a vessel of boiling oil, and then banished into an island" in the time of Domitian, as is most probable.
Origen, explaining Matt. xx. 23, says: 'James, the brother of John, was killed with a sword by Herod. And a Roman emperor, as tradition teaches, banished John into the island Patmos for the testimony which he bore to the word of truth. And John himself bears witness to his banishment, omitting the name of the emperor by whom he was banished, saying' in the Revelation : " I John, who also am your brother and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle of Patmos, for the word of God and for the testimony of Jesus Christ." And it seems, that the Revelation was seen in that island.'
Victorinus, bishop of Pettaw about 290, again and again says, that John was banished by Domitian, and in his reign saw the Revelation.
Eusebius, giving an account of Domitian's persecution, says : ' In this persecution, as it is said, John, the apostle and evangelist, being still living, was banished into the island Patmos for the testimony of the word of God.'

416

Epiphanius, as formerly shown, says : ' John prophesied in the isle of Patmos, in the reign of Claudius.' And in another place, then only referred to, he says: ' John wrote his gospel in his old age, when he was more than ninety years old, after his return from Patmos, which was in the time of Claudius Caesar.'
Jerom, in his book of Illustrious Men, as formerly cited, says : ' Domitian in the fourteenth year of his reign raising the second persecution after Nero, John was banished into the island Patmos, where he wrote the Revelation.' And in another work, also cited formerly, he says again; John was a prophet, as he saw the Revelation in the island Patmos, where he was banished by Domitian.' he comments upon Matt. xx. 23, where he speaks of St. John's having been banished into Patmos but does not name the emperor, by whom he was banished.
Sulpicius Severus says, ' that ' John the apostle and evangelist, was banished by Domitian into the island Patmos where he had visions, and where he wrote the book of the Revelation.'
Arethas in his commentary upon the Revelation, Supposed to be written in the sixth century, says, upon the authority of Eusebius, that John was banished into Patmos by Domitian.
Isidore, of Seville, near the end of the sixth century, says, Domitian raised a persecution against the christians. In his time the apostle John having been banished into the island Patmos saw the Revelation.'
We may now make a remark or two.
1. All these testimonies are of use, whether they name the island where John was banished, or the emperor by whom

417

he was banished, or not. They all agree that St. John was sent thither by way of punishment, or restraint, for bearing witness to the truth: which confutes the opinion of Lightfoot, ' that John travelling in the ministry of the gospel, up and down, from Asia westward, comes into the isle Patmos, in the Icarian sea, an island about thirty miles compass: and there on the Lord's day he has these visions, and an angel interprets to him all he saw.
2. All these writers, who mention the time of the Revela­tion, and of the banishment, say, it was in the time of Domitian, and that he was the emperor by whom St. John was banished: except Epiphanius, who says it was in the time of Claudius. As he is singular, it should seem that he cannot be of any great weight against so many others. Nevertheless, as some learned men, particularly Grotius have paid great regard to Epiphanius in this point, it is fit we should consider what they say.
Says Grotius in a tract, entitled, A Comment upon divers Texts of the New Testament, relating' to Antichrist: particularly upon the tenth verse of the seventeenth chapter of the Revelation: John began to be illuminated with divine visions in the island Patmos, in the time of Claudius which was the opinion of the most ancient christians. See Epiphanius in the heresy' of the Alogians. Claudius, as we learn from Acts xviii. 2, " commanded all Jews to depart from Rome." Under the name of Jews, christians also were comprehended, as has been observed by many learned men. And it cannot be doubted, but many governors of the Roman provinces followed that example. So therefore John was driven from Ephesus.'
That argument was long ago examined by David Blonde, who says, 1. It is not true, that the most ancient writers said that St. John was sent into Patmos by Claudius. It is Epiphanius only who says so: he is altogether singular. There are no ancients, either before or after him, who have said this. 2. As Epiphanius is singular, he ought not to be regarded. 3. There was no persecution of the christians in

418

the reign of Claudius. There is no proof from any ancient monuments, that christians, as such, suffered banishment under that emperor. It is allowed that Nero was the first Roman emperor who persecuted the christians. 4. The edict of Claudius only banished the Jews from Rome. It did not affect the Jews in the provinces, as appears from the New Testament itself particularly Acts xviii and xix. It is manifest from the history in the Acts, that in the reign of Claudius, in other parts of the empire out of Rome, the Jews enjoyed as full liberty as they did before. Paul and Silas, Aquila and Priscilla, dwelt quietly at Corinth; where the men of their nation had their synagogue, and assembled in it according to custom without molestation. 5. Nor could the governors of provinces banish either Jews or christians out of their governments, without order from the emperor: and that they had no such order, is apparent. Neither Jews nor christians were molested by them at Ephesus, as may be perceived from the history in the nineteenth chapter of the Acts. That they were not molested by them at Corinth, appears from the preceding chapter. 6. St. John could not be banished from Ephesus by Claudius, or the governors under him: for he was not in that city during the reign of that emperor, nor in the former part of the reign of Nero, as has been shown. He did not come thither till near the end of the reign of the last-mentioned emperor: therefore he could not be sooner banished from Ephesus.
These observations if I am not mistaken, are sufficient to confute the opinion of Grotius.
Sir Isaac Newton was of opinion, that St. John was

419

banished into Patmos, and that the Revelation was seen in the reign of Nero, before the destruction of Jerusalem.
'Eusebius,' says he, 'in his Chronicle and Ecclesiasti­cal History follows Irenaeus: (who said the Apocalypse was written in tile time of Domitian:) but afterwards in his Evangelical Demonstration he conjoins the banishment of John into Patmos, with the deaths of Peter and Paul.'
To which I answer, first, that the Ecclesiastical History was not written before the Evangelical Demonstration, but after it: for the Demonstration is referred to at the end of the second chapter of the first book of the Ecclesiastical History. Secondly, Eusebius in his Demonstration is not different from himself in his Ecclesiastical History. In his Demonstration, having spoken of the imprisonment of all the apostles at Jerusalem, and of their being beaten, and of the stoning of Stephen, the beheading of James the son of Zebedee, and the imprisonment of Peter, he adds: 'James, the Lord's brother; was stoned, Peter was crucified at Rome with his head downward, and Paul was beheaded, and John banished into an island.' But he does not say, that all these things happened in the time of one and the same emperor. It is plain, that it is not his design to mention exactly the time of the sufferings of all these persons. Nothing hinders our supposing, that the apostles Peter and Paul were put to death by order of Nero, and John banish­ed by Domitian, many years afterwards, agreeably to what himself writes in his Chronicle and History.
It follows in Sir Isaac Newton. 'And so do Tertullian, and Pseudo-Prochorus, as well as the first author, whoever he was, of that very ancient fable, that St. John was put by Nero into a vessel of hot oil.'
"...It is true, that Tertullian speaks of the death of Peter and Paul, and of John's being cast into boiling oil, and then banished, all together but he does not say, that all happened in the same reign. St. John's banish-

420

ment is the last thing mentioned by him: and, probably, it happened not till after the death of Peter and Paul. It is likely, that Tertullian supposed it to have been done by the order of Domitian; for in another place he speaks of the persecution of that emperor, as consisting chiefly in banish­ments.
'--and Pseudo-Prochorus.' What place of Prochorus, who pretended to be one of the seven deacons, and is called by Baronius himself a great liar, Sir Isaac Newton refers to, I do not know. But in his history of St. John he is entirely against him. For he particularly relates the sufferings, which St. John underwent in the second persecution of the christians, which was raised by Domitian. That emperor sent orders to the proconsul at Ephesus, to apprehend the apostle. When the proconsul had got St. John in his power, he informed Domitian of it ; who then commanded the proconsul to bring him to Rome. When he was come the emperor would not see him, but ordered him to he cast into a vessel of scalding oil, and he came out unhurt. Then Domitian commanded the proconsul to have St. John back again to Ephesus. Some time after that, by order of the same Domitian, John, and others at Ephesus, were banished into Patmos. Domitian being dead, they returned to Ephesus with the leave of his successor, who did not persecute the christians. So Pseudo-Prochorus.
Since the great Newton has been pleased to refer to such a writer, I shall take notice of another of the like sort; I mean Abdias, who assumed the character of the first bishop of Babylon. What he says is to this purpose: that John

421

who survived the other apostles, lived to the time of Domitian, preaching the word to the people in Asia. When Domitian's edict for persecuting the christians was brought to Ephesus, and John refused to deny Christ, or to give over preaching, the proconsul ordered that he should be drowned in a vessel of boiling oil: but John presently leaped out unhurt. The proconsul would then have set him at liberty, if he had not feared to transgress the emperor's edict. He therefore banished John into Patmos, where he saw and wrote the Revelation. After the death of Domitian, his edicts having been abrogated by the senate, they who had been banished, returned to their homes: and John came to Ephesus, where he had a dwelling, and many friends.
Then follows an account of St. John's visiting the churches in the neighborhood of Ephesus. Where is inserted also the story, formerly taken notice of concerning the young man, as related by Eusebius from Clement of Alexandria: and as happening, not after the death of Nero, but of Domitian.
Newton proceeds: 'as well as the first author, whoever he was, of that very ancient fable, that John was put by Nero into a vessel of hot oil, and coming out unhurt, was banished by him into Patmos. though this story be no more than a fiction, yet it was founded on a tradition of the first churches, that John was banished into Patmos in the days of Nero.' Who was the first author of that fable, I do not know But it does not appear, that Tertullian, the first writer who has mentioned it, thought it to be in the time of Nero. He might mean, and probably did mean, Domitian, the same who banished John into an island: as did also the two writers just taken notice of, Prochorus and Abdias to whom we were led by Sir Isaac. Jerom, who in his books against Jovinian, mentions this story, as from Tertullian,

422

according to some copies, says, it was done at Rome, according to others, in the time of Nero. However in the same place, as well as elsewhere, Jerom expressly says, that John was banished into Patmos by Domitian. And in the other place, where he mentions the casting St. John into boiling oil, he says: 'and presently afterwards he was banished into the island Patmos.' Therefore that other trial, which St. John met with, was in the same reign, that is, Domitian's. And indeed Jerom always supposes St. John's banishment to have been in that reign: as he particularly relates in the ninth chapter of his book of Illustrious Men. Let me add, that if the story of St. John's being put into a vessel of scalding oil be a fable and a fiction, it must be hazardous to build an argument upon it.
It follows in Newton: 'Epiphanius represents the gospel of John as written in the time of Domitian, and the Apocalypse even before that of Nero.' I have already said enough of Epiphanius in considering the opinion of Grotius. However, as one would think, Sir Isaac Newton had little reason to mention Epiphanius, when he does not follow him. He says, that St. John was banished into Patmos in the time of Claudius: Sir Isaac, not till near the end of the reign of Nero.
'Arethas,' says Sir Isaac, ' in the beginning of his commentary quotes the opinion of Irenaeus from Eusebius, but does not follow it. For he afterwards affirms, that the Apocalypse was written before the destruction of Jerusalem and that former commentators had expounded the sixth seal of that destruction.'
To which I answer. Arethas does indeed say, that some interpreters had explained things under the sixth seal, as relating to the destruction of Jerusalem by Vespasian: but they were some only, not the most. Yea, he presently afterwards says, that the most interpreted it otherwise. Nor does he say, that any of. those commentators were of opinion, that the Apocalypse was written before the destruction of Jerusalem. Arethas seems to have been of opinion, that things, which had come to pass long before, might be represented in the Revelation. Therefore immediately before

423

that passage, explaining Rev. vi. 12, 13, he says : ' What is the opening of the sixth seal? It is the cross and death of the Lord, followed by his resurrection, desirable to all faithful and understanding men. And lo, there was a great earthquake." Manifestly denoting, says he, the signs that happened during the crucifixion, the shaking of the earth, the darkness of the sun, the turning the moon into blood. For when it was full moon, being the fourteenth day, how was it possible, that the sun should be eclipsed by its interposition?'
However, I must not conceal what he says afterwards, in another chapter of his Commentary. He is explaining Rev. vii. 4-8. ' These, says he who instructs the evan­gelist, will not partake in the calamities inflicted by the Romans. For the destruction caused by the Romans had not fallen upon the Jews, when the evangelist received these instructions. Nor was he at Jerusalem, but in Ionia, where is Ephesus: for he stayed at Jerusalem no more than fourteen years.--And after the death of our Lord's mother, he left Judea, and went to Ephesus: as tradition says: where also, as is said, he had the revelation of future things.' But how can we rely upon a writer of the sixth century for these particulars ; that John did not stay at Jerusalem more than fourteen years: that he left Judea upon the death of our Lord's mother, and then went to Ephesus: when we can evidently perceive from the history in the Acts, that in the fourteenth year after our Lord's ascension, there were no christian converts at Ephesus: and that the church at Ephesus was not founded by St. Paul, till several years afterwards? What avails it to refer to such passages as these? Which, when looked into and examined, contain no certain assurances of any thing. And Sir Isaac Newton himself says 'It seems to me, that Peter and John stayed with their churches in Judea and Syria, till the Romans made war upon their nation, that is, till the twelfth year of Nero,' or A. D. 66.
We proceed with this great man's arguments, who adds: With the opinion of the first commentators agrees the tradition of the churches of Syria, preserved to this day in the title of the Syriac version of the Apocalypse, which title is this: "The Revelation, which was made to John the
(continued)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on November 26, 2008, 04:34:06 PM
424

evangelist by God in tile island Patmos, into which he 'was banished by Nero Caesar." ' But how comes it to pass, that the tradition of the churches of Syria is alleged here, when the Apocalypse was not generally received by them? Moreover in the titles of the books of the New Testament received by them, there are manifest errors. Nor can we say when the Syriac version of the Apocalypse was made: nor is it impossible that the authors of that title might mean Domitian by Nero. It is not a greater error, than that of supposing the epistle of James to have been written by James the son of Zebedee.
Again, says the celebrated Newton : 'That same is confirmed by a story told by Eusebius out of Clemens Alexandrinus, and other ancient authors, concerning a youth, whom St. John, some time after his return from Patmos, committed to the care of the bishop of a certain city. This is a story of many years, and requires, that John should have returned front Patmos rather at the death of Nero, than at that of Domitian.'
But, first, if this be only a feigned story, or apologue, as some have thought it, contrived to convey moral instruction; circumstances ought not to be strained, nor the truth of history be founded upon it. Secondly, we must take the story, as it is related by Clement, and other ancient authors. Clement placeth it after the death of the tyrant, by whom John had been banished: and Eusebius supposeth him to mean Domitian. Thirdly, if St. John lived in Asia two, or three, or four years after his return from Patmos, that is time enough for the events of this story.
Sir Isaac adds in the same place : ' And John in his old age was so infirm, as to he carried to church, dying' above ninety years old: and therefore could not be then supposed able to ride after the thief.'
Nevertheless in the original account, which we have of
425

this affair, St. John is expressly called an old man: Sir Isaac therefore has no right to make him young; for that would be making a new story. If a man allows himself so to do, and argues upon it; the necessary consequence is, that he deceives himself and others.
Upon the whole, I see not much weight in any of these arguments of Sir Isaac Newton; and must adhere to the common opinion, that St. John was banished into Patmos, in the reign of Domitian, and by virtue of his edicts for persecuting the christians, in the latter part of his reign. Says Mr. Lampe : ' All ' antiquity is agreed, that St. John's b banishment was by order of Domitian.'
VI. We should now inquire, when St. John was released, or how long his banishment lasted. According' to Tertullian, Domitian's persecution was very short, and the emperor himself before he died, recalled in those whom he had banished. Hegesippus likewise says, of that Domitian by an edict put an end to the persecution which he had ordered. Eusebius says, ' that after the death of Domitian, John returned from his banishment.' And before, in another chapter of the same book, he said move largely: 'After Domitian had reigned fifteen years, Nerva succeeded him and the Roman senate decreed, that the honourable titles bestowed upon Domitian should be abrogated, and moreover, that they who had been banished by him might return to their homes, and repossess their goods, of which they had been unjustly deprived. This we learn from such as have written the history of those times. Then therefore, as our ancestors say, the apostle John returned from his banishment, and again took up his abode at Ephesus.'
Jerom, in his book of Illustrious men, says: ' When Domitian had been killed, and his edicts had been repealed by the senate, because of their excessive cruelty, John returned to Ephesus, in the time of the emperor Nerva.' I place below a passage of the martyrdom of Timothy

426

in Photius, and another of Suidas, saying, that after Domitian's death, when Nerva was emperor, St. John returned from his banishment. This is also agreeable to the general accounts in Dion Cassius, and the author of the Deaths of Persecutors. Indeed, Hegesippus and Tertullian, as before observed, intimate, that the persecution of Domitian ended before his death. But it is very remarkable, that Eusebius having quoted both of them, gives a different account, as we saw just now. And, as learned men have observed, it is a great prejudice to their authority in this point, that Eusebius does not follow them, but presently afterwards differs from them.
It seems probable therefore, that St. John, and other exiles, did not return from their banishment, until after the death of Domitian: which is the opinion of Basnage, and likewise of Cellarius. Domitian is computed to have died, Sept. I8, A. D. 96, after having reigned fifteen years, and some days. Nerva died the 27th day of Jan.98, after having reigned one year, four months, and nine days. Therefore Trajan began his reign, Jan.27, A. D. 98.
If the persecution of Domitian began in the fourteenth year of his reign, and St. John was sent to Patmos that year, and restored in the beginning of the reign of Nerva, his exile could not last more than two years, perhaps not much above a year. If St. John's life reached to the third year of the reign of Trajan, which is the opinion of Cave and many others, he

427

lived three years after his return from Patmos: if it reached to the fourth year of Trajan, as Basnage thought, he must have lived four years after his return.
Or, in other words: if St. John returned about the end of the year 96, or the beginning of 97, and did not die till the year 101, he lived four years in Asia, after his return from Patmos. If he died in the year 100, he lived three years after his return.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Doc on December 02, 2008, 11:01:01 PM
There's some good stuff on dating Revelation on www.tektonics.org
He does a really good job on the (partial) preterism stuff, but unfortunately he's an "eternal separationist"

It seems the evidence overall leans slightly in favor of an early dating of Revelation (Pre-AD 70).
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 02:44:03 PM
I went to a link Zeek provided in another post where he stated concerning Revelation:
QuoteNot necessarily to you Tony, as u are quite sure you have the "sane" TRUTH, but to any others open to other views, check out

http://www.bereanbiblechurch.org/studyIndex.php

eschatology articles.

So I went there and went to the link under Preterism (that should tell you it won't be biased :) ) to the link: Introduction to Revelation Part 1

The person wrote in that link this:

QuoteThe text of Revelation provides a self-witness for the date it was written.

Revelation 11:1-2 (NKJV) Then I was given a reed like a measuring rod. And the angel stood, saying, "Rise and measure the temple of God, the altar, and those who worship there. 2 "But leave out the court which is outside the temple, and do not measure it, for it has been given to the Gentiles. And they will tread the holy city underfoot for forty-two months.

These verses refers to a temple standing in a city called the `holy city'. Based upon Old Testament Scripture, we can surmise that a Christian Jew such as John would have had the historical Jerusalem in mind when he spoke of the holy city.

This person believes the above internal evidence supports an early date writing for Revelation prior to 70 A.D.

But let's look at some internal evidence the writer left out (probably because it was too embarrassing or he didn't understand what John said):

"I came to be, in spirit, in the Lord's day . . ." (Rev 1:10)

The Lord's day is yet future. The KJV improperly says "I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day" making the reader think John was in spirit on Sunday since Sunday in merry ole England in 1611 was supposedly "the Lord's Day" when everyone went to church.

Since John was in spirit IN the Lord's day, and he went to Jerusalem to do some measuring, he did so in the future day of the Lord.

When John was in spirit ON the new earth in Revelation he saw the holy city New Jerusalem being measured as well. So if the measuring of the city took place while John was on Patmos then this should tell us we are on the new earth since the measuring of the New City Jerusalem took place while John wrote Revelation. Makes perfect sense to me. Not.

Do you see the problem?
The Berean writer, who is an unbiased? Preterist (I guess) says that if John measured the temple of God that he must have done this while the temple was still standing before 70 A.D. But what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Since the New City Jerusalem was measured and John saw it being measured (Rev.21), then Revelation was written after the earth was destroyed by fire and after the new earth came. So that puts the dating of Revelation waaaay late. Either that, we are living on the new earth and have been since John wrote Revelation (even though no one knew we've been living on the new earth, not even Jesus and His church knew. But I bet some are reading this know.

The dating of Revelation is very important. If Revelation was written after 70 A.D. (which I believe it was) and since John was still looking forward to the Lord's return and looking forward to the setting up of His millennial reign, it is a nail in the coffin of Preterism.

O.K. so that is my beginning salvo. Let's keep it friendly  :handshake:

Tony
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Texas Son on December 06, 2008, 04:27:23 PM
Interesting! This will be fascinating to watch as I am just coming to grasp with the preterist view and have found merit in it.

I am eager to see the discourse on this subject.

One question I do have: How would we know whether "the Lord's day" was meant to be Saturday or Sunday for John? Might John have had another significance for the day of the Lord? Resurrection day?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 05:00:51 PM
Quote from: Texas Son on December 06, 2008, 04:27:23 PM
Interesting! This will be fascinating to watch as I am just coming to grasp with the preterist view and have found merit in it.

I am eager to see the discourse on this subject.

One question I do have: How would we know whether "the Lord's day" was meant to be Saturday or Sunday for John? Might John have had another significance for the day of the Lord? Resurrection day?

Hi Texas Son,
The day of the Lord, otherwise known in the Old Testament as "the day of Yahweh" is what Isaiah wrote about and which Christ reiterated:

Isa 13:6 Howl! For near is the day of Yahweh! As devastation from Him Who-Suffices shall it come.
Isa 13:7 Therefore all hands shall be slack, and every mortal's heart shall melt"
Isa 13:8 and be flustered. Throes and cramps shall take hold of them. As a bearing woman shall they travail. A man at his associate shall be amazed, and as a facade of blazes are their faces."
Isa 13:9 Behold! The day of Yahweh has come, cruel, with rage and hot anger, to make the entire earth a desolation, and its sinners is He exterminating from it."
Isa 13:10 For the stars of the heavens are not appearing, and their constellations are not irradiating their light. Dark is the sun in its faring forth, and the moon is not brightening with its light."

Jesus Christ:
Mat 24:29 Now immediately after the affliction of those days the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not be giving her beams, and the stars shall be falling from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken."
Mat 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven, and then all the tribes of the land shall grieve, and they shall see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory."

This was in answer to the disciple's request:

Mat 24:3 ". . . the disciples came to Him privately, saying, "Tell us, when will these things be? And what is the sign of Thy presence and of the conclusion of the eon?

So when the Lord comes again it is known as "the Lord's day" and "the day of Yahweh" or "Yahweh's day" (same thing).

And John the revelator was in spirit in that future day of the Lord:

Rev 6:12-14  And I perceived, when It opens the sixth seal, and a great cataclysm occurred, and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the whole moon became as blood,  (13)  and the stars of heaven fall on the earth as a fig tree is casting its shriveled figs, quaking under a great wind."  (14)  And heaven recoils as a scroll rolling up, and every mountain and island was moved out of its place."
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 05:36:08 PM
There is enough out there for anyone to come up with their own belief, but here is two things interesting:

http://www.newjerusalemcommunity.net/?c=54&a=1921


and

i've been told, but don't have proof that

The Syriac Pecrapto (Murdock's version) opens Revelation, "The Revelation, which was made by God to John the Evangelist, in the island of Patmos, to which he was banished by Nero the Emperor."

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 05:38:50 PM
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/jewishtemple.htm


Dan 9:26  And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

Rev 18:2  And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.

Mat 24:34  Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.

Luk 21:33  Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 05:49:32 PM
Zec 14:1  Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.

Zec 14:2  For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.

Zec 14:3  Then shall the LORD go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle.

Zec 14:4  And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

Zec 14:5  And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.

Zec 14:6  And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear, nor dark:

Zec 14:7  But it shall be one day which shall be known to the LORD, not day, nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light.

Zec 14:8  And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be.

Zec 14:9  And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one.

Zec 14:10  All the land shall be turned as a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem: and it shall be lifted up, and inhabited in her place, from Benjamin's gate unto the place of the first gate, unto the corner gate, and from the tower of Hananeel unto the king's winepresses.

Zec 14:11  And men shall dwell in it, and there shall be no more utter destruction; but Jerusalem shall be safely inhabited.

Zec 14:12  And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.

Zec 14:13  And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbor, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbor.

Zec 14:14  And Judah also shall fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the heathen round about shall be gathered together, gold, and silver, and apparel, in great abundance.

Zec 14:15  And so shall be the plague of the horse, of the mule, of the camel, and of the ass, and of all the beasts that shall be in these tents, as this plague.

Zec 14:16  And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.

Zec 14:17  And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.

Zec 14:18  And if the family of Egypt go not up, and come not, that have no rain; there shall be the plague, wherewith the LORD will smite the heathen that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.

Zec 14:19  This shall be the punishment of Egypt, and the punishment of all nations that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.

Zec 14:20  In that day shall there be upon the bells of the horses, HOLINESS UNTO THE LORD; and the pots in the LORD's house shall be like the bowls before the altar.

Zec 14:21  Yea, every pot in Jerusalem and in Judah shall be holiness unto the LORD of hosts: and all they that sacrifice shall come and take of them, and seethe therein: and in that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 05:52:44 PM
Mat 24:16  Then let them which be in Judea flee into the mountains


"Josephus tells us that when Cestius Gallus had earlier come with his army against Jerusalem, after some time he raised the siege. After he had left, many of the oldest of the Jews went out from Jerusalem as from a sinking ship. He says that a few years later, when Vespasian come with his troops against Jerusalem, a great multitude fled from Jerusalem to the mountains for security. It is reasonable to suppose that some Christians were among these. When Jerusalem was surrounded, the Christians were to think of their safety, and seize the first opportunity for flight. Jesus had warned them when these things started happening to flee into the mountains."

http://latter-rain.com/ot/jewar.htm
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 06:03:09 PM
Titus pressed the siege of Jerusalem, which was crowded with people because of the paschal festivities, cutting off the water and food supply. The besieged were terribly hard pressed by these tactics, as well as by the insufferable heat. Those who tried to escape were captured and crucified before the very walls as an example to others. According to Josephus, such famine that a mother actually ate the flesh of her own small son. He tells of 2,500,000 assembled at the last Passover just before the city was taken by Titus. 1,000,000 perished in the siege, 347,000 perished in other places. Of the remainder, 97,000 were carried into captivity and 11,000 starved through neglect or sullen refusal of food. On July 17th the daily sacrifices were interrupted.

Mat 24:7  For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
Mat 24:8  All these are the beginning of sorrows.
Mat 24:9  Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.
Mat 24:10  And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.


Some weeks later, after the legions had assaulted the walls and gained entrance like an irresistible stream, the Romans put to the sword all Jews whom they happened to encounter. Titus desired greatly that the Temple should be spared, and promised to spare the Jews if they would stop their resistance. Several times he sent Josephus to persuade his countrymen, but the providence of God directed otherwise. First the Jews themselves set fire to the court of the temple, and afterwards the Romans. Fire consumed the buildings and the temple went up. But the prophecy of the Redeemer had to be fulfilled; the destruction of the temple occurred on the Jewish Sabbath, August 10th, 70. When Jerusalem was captured, the temple was burned and scavengers would turn over every stone to retrieve the melted gold. The Jewish people were expatriated, and never since has sacrifice been offered up to God on Jewish altars.

Mat 24:19  And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!
Mat 24:20  But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day:
Mat 24:21  For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
Mat 24:22  And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.

The temple was leveled to the ground and utterly destroyed


Mat 24:2  And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.


http://latter-rain.com/ot/jewar.htm





Mat 24:14  And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.

Col 1:5  For the hope which is laid up for you in heaven, whereof ye heard before in the word of the truth of the gospel;

Col 1:6  Which is come unto you, as it is in all the world; and bringeth forth fruit, as it doth also in you, since the day ye heard of it, and knew the grace of God in truth:

Col 1:23  If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: CHB on December 06, 2008, 07:42:34 PM

I see in the Bible that things tend to happen in threes. If this is the case, maybe parts of Revelation will still happen in the future? I do see in Revelation that a lot of it are about things spoken of in the Old Testament. I also believe that a lot of Revelation has already happened but could happen again.

A year ago I couldn't see the above at all, I didn't agree with preterism a bit but I watched a few Mike Bloom sermons on You Tube and he makes a lot of sense. I don't agree that everything has been fulfilled but I do think a lot has. Don't know what the future holds from here on out? Zeek, do you have any ideas?

Anyone else see things this way?

CHB
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 07:43:39 PM
Quote from: Texas Son on December 06, 2008, 04:27:23 PM
Interesting! This will be fascinating to watch as I am just coming to grasp with the preterist view and have found merit in it.

I am eager to see the discourse on this subject.

One question I do have: How would we know whether "the Lord's day" was meant to be Saturday or Sunday for John? Might John have had another significance for the day of the Lord? Resurrection day?
Hi TS

This comes around time after a Time.

Anyways,

Christ is Known as "To day", hes also the LIGHT of The DAY,and we also are the Children of The DAY...to list but a few.

John in REV was In the SPIRIT of the DAY, as paul  says we are SPIRIT(LIFE) NOT Flesh.

The DAY of REST is the SABBATH which Christ is ALSO, He is THE LORD OF THE SABBATH....whicH again, in times of LAW a  ALSO A .DAY

Also scripture LISTS a DAY to the Lord is LIKENED to  a 1000yrs,this isnt a Literal TIME, ITS  a WHO..

Christ seperates the Night from DAY, the NIGHT was the OLD C , the DAY is the NEWC which again IS HIM, its always ALL HIM, nothing changes, as BOTH old and NEW C testify to HIM...one the shadow, the other the reality.


Christ is ALSO the DAY of salvation which scripture states as NOW( IS), ITS ALL THE SAME.

He is the WAY , the Light , The truth , the DAY also Known as the foolishness of God( to the eyes of the world), the wisdom of God, the power of God and so on....


so, if this ISNT the DAY of the LORD now, we too are without HOPE....for mine Just how much of scripture do WE need to see this is NOT just a future event,...HE is and WAS and will be

If you wish for greater detail and listed Scrips..then they will be provided for you.

Blessings
T

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 08:42:31 PM
Quote from: CHB on December 06, 2008, 07:42:34 PM

I see in the Bible that things tend to happen in threes. If this is the case, maybe parts of Revelation will still happen in the future? I do see in Revelation that a lot of it are about things spoken of in the Old Testament. I also believe that a lot of Revelation has already happened but could happen again.

A year ago I couldn't see the above at all, I didn't agree with preterism a bit but I watched a few Mike Bloom sermons on You Tube and he makes a lot of sense. I don't agree that everything has been fulfilled but I do think a lot has. Don't know what the future holds from here on out? Zeek, do you have any ideas?

Anyone else see things this way?

CHB

I tend to believe that there is a huge "internal/spiritual" application of the scripture; and what happened literally in the first century; is a reflection NOW internally/spiritually as the HIDDEN MAN is released, revealed.  It's an internal application, my mind being the "garden, the world" etc.   

For me, it is a discovery into the depths of God's love.  A journey with HIM.

Rather than seeing the world as a huge evil place that is going to get worse and worse, and more evil till a catastrophic ending;

i believe the DOOR is open, and NOW is the time to awaken to who we truly are.  I believe this is happening.  I have much hope because of "fulfilled belief", and we are "awakening, discovering" LOVE.

here is a good article

http://www.gem-international.org/kingdomlife/awakening_the_mind_of_christ.htm

Henceforth we know no man after the Flesh.  The NEW is here.  NOW is the time to enjoy. 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 08:44:56 PM
Quote from: zeekI tend to believe that there is a huge "internal/spiritual" application of the scripture; and what happened literally in the first century; is a reflection NOW internally/spiritually as the HIDDEN MAN is released, revealed.  It's an internal application, my mind being the "garden, the world" etc.

:thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 09:01:55 PM
THAT WHICH WAS LOST



"For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost." Luke 19:10
Jesus came to seek and to save. He came to seek that which was lost. What was lost? Most religious people would say that Jesus came to seek and to save lost sinners. And they would be correct, according to the words of Paul in 1 Timothy 1:15: "This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners...However, Christ Jesus did not save sinners by seeking them. He saved them by seeking that which they had lost.
When Jesus appeared on this earth plane, there were plenty of humans walking the face of the earth. They were the walking dead, manifesting sin in their lives because they had lost something. Jesus did not have to seek sinners. They were very much in evidence. It is what man had lost that Jesus came to seek and to save,- deliver, -preserve.

So Jesus came not to save, deliver, and preserve so -called sinners, nor their human, material consciousness. He came to do away with human, material consciousness or sense, the cause of sin. He came to destroy the lie that held man in bondage all their lives. Jesus came to save divine consciousness, which man had lost. Only the finding, restoration, and preservation of divine consciousness could take away the sin of the world. "Behold the lamb of God which takes away the sin of the world?" John 1:29. Only the Lamb of God nature, the Lamb of God consciousness, has power to free humans from a material sense of life, which makes sin, a sense of separation from God, appear as reality.

The Father did not send Jesus to seek sinners, because God has never known a sinner. God did not send Jesus to improve humanity, because God has never recognized humanity. He cannot seek, save, improve, deliver, preserve something that does not exist as far as He is concerned.

All that God has ever seen, sees now, or will ever see is man made in His own image and likeness. All that God has ever said, says now, and ever will say is, "This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased. I find no fault in him."

Oh! Think of it! The Father had always been saying these words! He had
always been pleased with his creation. Why? Because it was perfect. And nobody nor nothing could ever change that. But nobody since Adam had been able to hear those wonderful words, because of the sense of separation. The spiritual ear had been shut up. But finally someone whose ear had been opened heard the words! Jesus! He was able to hear them within his own being the moment he came out from under the law at the River Jordan to live under grace. by the grace of God! Then He heard: "This is my beloved son in whom I
am well pleased" And then, and only then, could He cry out: "Abba, Father!"

Jesus had found that which had been lost: He had sought and found His IDENTITY. And He had found it not just for Himself. He knew that what was true of Himself was true of all men. Beloved, the father is not pleased with His sons because they behave themselves, or are 'Good', but because they are His creation, mad in His image and likeness. Is it not wonderful? Beloved, our Father is pleased with you! You are His beloved son. Now, you are his beloved son. Not will be, nor becoming! May your ear be opened to hear Father's voice within telling you so. You must hear it for yourself. Nobody else can convince you. Nobody else can make it reality for you.

The son, the image and likeness of God, has been buried, hidden in the tomb or grave of material sense of being. Paul spoke of the Son the image and likeness of God, being revealed in him by God (Gal. 1:16). How could the Son be revealed in him if the Son had not already been in him.?

Jesus came into this earthly realm to do the will of the Father. However, He was sent forth made of a woman, made under the law. (Gal. 4). Before He could redeem others who were also under the law-slaves to the law of sin and death-He Himself had to be brought forth from under the law. Therefore he had to discover his own true identity, which had been veiled over by flesh (material sense) and resurrect it from the dead. He did this by dissolving the 'dream or lie' of mortal sense, and revealing or bringing to light life and immortality (incorruption). (11 Tim. 1:10). Jesus did not come to earth in the form of a baby already fully aware of whom he was. It would seem, however, that the veil within was thinner than in any other who had ever come to earth. But Jesus had to discover his identity. But in seeking the Father, obeying the Father, loving the Father, and being taught of the Father, Jesus became conscious of the Father within as being His very own and only parent. When He became fully Father conscious, He became fully conscious of His Sonship. He discovered who He was! He realized and walked in the reality of Being individualized: eternal, immortal, invisible, infinity, incorruptible life. He was the firstborn of a new creation. Or, perhaps we could say: the first of the original creation now rediscovered.

Because Jesus came to do the Father's will, His ear was opened to hear the Father's voice within. God awakened him morning by morning (from one dawning of understanding to a greater dawning of understanding), until He was fully awakened from the Adam sleep of mortality. (Isa. 50:4,5). He found Himself to be in God's image and likeness and He was satisfied. "As for me, I will behold thy face in righteousness: I shall be satisfied when I awake with thy likeness" (Psalm 1715). Jesus was not rebellious: i.e., He did not try to
hold onto his personal identity or sense of life: but gave it up for the
realization of his true identity, the true sense of life. Jesus awoke to the
knowledge of who He was. He no longer knew himself as mortal being, Jesus of Nazareth, but as the I AM, the Christ, whom God knew from the beginning as the Word. Now, He could say:"My Father and I are one.".

Jesus came to know Himself as He was known by the Father. Did not Paul say that when that which is perfect (understanding, enlightenment, realization) is come, then we shall know (ourselves) even as we are known (by the Father)? Jesus no longer looked in a mirror that gave only a dim, blurred reflection (of reality as in a riddle or enigma), but He saw in reality and face to face. 1cor. 13:10-12. When Jesus sought and found his true identity as the I AM, He heard once again the words that the Father had spoken from the beginning: "You are my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased. I find no fault in you."

Jesus knew that nobody else really knew who He was, who they were. He walked alone among dead men, the first to be raised out from among the dead. He set Himself to be about the Fathers business. That business was to demonstrate to men who they were, so that they in turn might find them selves-their true selves, their deity. Which had been lost, buried in the depths of human consciousness as a treasure hidden in a field or a pearl of great price.

Jesus knew that at on time man knew God, and therefore, themselves. Rom.1). But man had pushed down his deity into the deepest grave of forgetfulness. So there was man-true man-the image and likeness of God-in the grave asleep. While false man seemingly was walking and talking and moving upon the earth.

When Jesus rose up from the grave of mortal consciousness and finally ascended above all mortal sense, He brought all men up with Him. He was the first-born from among the dead, but the first-born among many brethren. Because the deity of Jesus, which was temporarily buried in the grave of forgetfulness when Jesse entered the world, was awakened and brought to life when He heard the Father's voice: so the deity of each man, the true son of God, which every man is, brought to light when that man hears the voice of the Son of God and is brought to light when that man hears the voice of the Son of God and is resurrected to newness of life. John 5:25.

Jesus said: "I am the way, the truth, and the life." He is the way for our
own experience of reality , our own personal knowing of the truth of our
identity as I AM. I AM the Light that lights every man that comes into the world, but every man must experience his own light.

Jesus was brought into the human experience as He partook of flesh and blood. He was then awakened to his own identity-deity. This took place as he sought and found that he did not have beginning with human, biological parents in a flesh body in a certain race and culture, but that he had come from above, from God , with whom he had always existed. That its why he said to the Pharisees that he came from above, but that they came from below. This is the knowledge that was lost to man. It is still there, buried deep within, but lost from conscious awareness. This causes men to walk in ignorance in a false identity. Yet within most men is felt some vague flicker, some lost memory which cannot be grasped, which causes a dissatisfaction in them. Thus men seek for a meaning to life very often, but seek in al the wrong places.

When a person discovers through remembrance that he is born of God and no longer calls any man "father", he is 'Born again". It is a role of the Holy Ghost to bring this truth to our remembrance. Yes, Christ has come to us to indwell us, and bring this lost, forgotten identity to our remembrance. Christ gives us this reborn experience as the Son with in is revealed (unveiled, disclosed). Now we have the same experience Jesus had, and that which we truly are saved. Jesus is not about himself as a separate person or individual. Jesus is about every man. Everything that he discovered about himself he discovered
about the universal son of God which every man is in the essence of his being . When we individually seek and find our true identity, also, we know that this was not something received at the time of our conversion, but something that has been from the beginning.

Jesus proves that man born of God is the Son of God and not the shell that human perception sees man to be. Jesus proves that true man is not a creature made of dust to turn again to dust and despair. He is a part of the eternal whole. There never was a time when he was not. A time will never come when he will not be.

Johanna Pascale
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 10:49:48 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 05:52:44 PM
Mat 24:16  Then let them which be in Judea flee into the mountains


"Josephus tells us that when Cestius Gallus had earlier come with his army against Jerusalem, after some time he raised the siege. After he had left, many of the oldest of the Jews went out from Jerusalem as from a sinking ship. He says that a few years later, when Vespasian come with his troops against Jerusalem, a great multitude fled from Jerusalem to the mountains for security. It is reasonable to suppose that some Christians were among these. When Jerusalem was surrounded, the Christians were to think of their safety, and seize the first opportunity for flight. Jesus had warned them when these things started happening to flee into the mountains."

http://latter-rain.com/ot/jewar.htm


The interesting thing is not what Josephus wrote but what he left out. He obviously left out the greatest earth shaking, earth shattering earthquake the world will ever know in which ALL the cities of the nations shall fall and all the islands will be moved. He accidently left out all the signs and wonders of the sun being darkened, the moon turned to blood, stars falling from the sky, the powers of the heavens shaken, etc. etc. etc.

Josephus also forgot to write about Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and all the righteous coming out of their tombs and entering into the kingdom which Christ set up in Jerusalam and from there ruling over the nations.

Josephus also forgot to write about all the Christians coming out of their tombs and meeting the Christians alive at that time and ascending to Christ in the air.

He also forgot to write about the 3 1/2 years of the greatest tribulation Israel will ever go through by the antichrist.

He also forgot to write about Christ killing the antichrist and capturing Satan for 1000 years and during that 1000 years the nations were not deceived. Ghee, what happened? Were all the nations ever not deceived since Christ left? Was there ever a time since Christ left that Satan was not deceiving the nations?

Josephus never wrote about Peter and the eleven apostles coming back to life and ruling over the nations with Christ from Jerusalem.

Josephus was not the only historian back then. They all, all the historians failed to see any of these earth shattering events! The church also never wrote about them happenning.

Therefore Revelation has not happened yet. The 1000 year kingdom has not arrived yet.

Tony
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 10:55:22 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 07:43:39 PM
Quote from: Texas Son on December 06, 2008, 04:27:23 PM
Interesting! This will be fascinating to watch as I am just coming to grasp with the preterist view and have found merit in it.

I am eager to see the discourse on this subject.

One question I do have: How would we know whether "the Lord's day" was meant to be Saturday or Sunday for John? Might John have had another significance for the day of the Lord? Resurrection day?
Hi TS

This comes around time after a Time.

Anyways,

Christ is Known as "To day", hes also the LIGHT of The DAY,and we also are the Children of The DAY...to list but a few.

John in REV was In the SPIRIT of the DAY, as paul  says we are SPIRIT(LIFE) NOT Flesh.


Incorrect. Please stick with Scripture, Taffy. The Scripture does not say "John was in the spirit of the day." John stated "I came to be in spirit IN the Lord's day." And what does Revelation say to those who add or subtract from the words of that prophecy?

Let's not make things up as we go along but stick with what God has said. O.K.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 11:01:21 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 10:55:22 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 07:43:39 PM
Quote from: Texas Son on December 06, 2008, 04:27:23 PM
Interesting! This will be fascinating to watch as I am just coming to grasp with the preterist view and have found merit in it.

I am eager to see the discourse on this subject.

One question I do have: How would we know whether "the Lord's day" was meant to be Saturday or Sunday for John? Might John have had another significance for the day of the Lord? Resurrection day?
Hi TS

This comes around time after a Time.

Anyways,

Christ is Known as "To day", hes also the LIGHT of The DAY,and we also are the Children of The DAY...to list but a few.

John in REV was In the SPIRIT of the DAY, as paul  says we are SPIRIT(LIFE) NOT Flesh.


Incorrect. Please stick with Scripture, Taffy. The Scripture does not say "John was in the spirit of the day." John stated "I came to be in spirit IN the Lord's day." And what does Revelation say to those who add or subtract from the words of that prophecy?

Let's not make things up as we go along but stick with what God has said. O.K.  :thumbsup:

Well Hi Tony, sorry bud for the ADD lib..

so what was the spirit of the """""""""""""""""""""""  LORDS DAY""""""""""""""""""""

maybe theres Two Days of the LORD..or maybe THREE...HOW many do you Know and where can I find them?

or are you totally dismissing the LITTLE section Which was given,,,,ANY COMMENT THERE BUD


SCRIPTURE WILL BE FINE



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 11:11:38 PM
"If you are not familiar with the apocalyptic language of the Old Testament, you will not understand what Christ is saying here. This language is common among the Old Testament prophets. This idea is seen clearly as we look at passages where mention is made of the destruction of a state and government using language which seems to set forth the end of the world.

Isaiah 13:1 (NKJV) The burden against Babylon which Isaiah the son of Amoz saw.

In this chapter God is talking about the judgement that is to fall upon Babylon. The word "burden" is the Hebrew word "massa", an utterance, chiefly a doom. This introduction sets the stage for the subject matter in this chapter, and if we forget this, our interpretations of Isaiah 13 can go just about anywhere our imagination wants to go. This is not an oracle against the universe or world but against the nation of Babylon.

Isaiah 13:6 (NKJV) Wail, for the day of the LORD is at hand! It will come as destruction from the Almighty.

Isaiah 13:9-13 (NKJV) Behold, the day of the LORD comes, Cruel, with both wrath and fierce anger, To lay the land desolate; And He will destroy its sinners from it. 10 For the stars of heaven and their constellations Will not give their light; The sun will be darkened in its going forth, And the moon will not cause its light to shine. 11 "I will punish the world for its evil, And the wicked for their iniquity; I will halt the arrogance of the proud, And will lay low the haughtiness of the terrible. 12 I will make a mortal more rare than fine gold, A man more than the golden wedge of Ophir. 13 Therefore I will shake the heavens, And the earth will move out of her place, In the wrath of the LORD of hosts And in the day of His fierce anger.

Now remember, he is speaking about the destruction of Babylon, but is sounds like world wide destruction. The terminology of a context cannot be expanded beyond the scope of the subject under discussion. The spectrum of language surely cannot go outside the land of Babylon. If you were a Babylonian and Babylon was destroyed, would it seem like the world was destroyed? Yes! Your world would be destroyed.

Isaiah 13:17 (NKJV) "Behold, I will stir up the Medes against them, Who will not regard silver; And as for gold, they will not delight in it.

This is an historical event that took place in 539 BC. When the Medes destroyed Babylon, the Babylonian world came to an end. This destruction is said, in verse 6, to be from the Almighty, and the Medes constitute the means that God uses to accomplish this task. This is apocalyptic language. This is the way the Bible discusses the fall of a nation. This is obviously figurative language. God did not intend for us to take this literally. If we take this literally, the world ended in 539 BC.

In Isaiah 34, we have a description of the fall of Edom, notice the language that is used:

Isaiah 34:3-5 (NKJV) Also their slain shall be thrown out; Their stench shall rise from their corpses, And the mountains shall be melted with their blood. 4 All the host of heaven shall be dissolved, And the heavens shall be rolled up like a scroll; All their host shall fall down As the leaf falls from the vine, And as fruit falling from a fig tree. 5 "For My sword shall be bathed in heaven; Indeed it shall come down on Edom, And on the people of My curse, for judgment.

This is Biblical language to describe the fall of a nation. It should be clear that it is not to be taken literally. Let's look at other Old Testament use of this language.

Nahum 1 (NKJV) The burden against Nineveh. The book of the vision of Nahum the Elkocrape. 2 God is jealous, and the LORD avenges; The LORD avenges and is furious. The LORD will take vengeance on His adversaries, And He reserves wrath for His enemies; 3 The LORD is slow to anger and great in power, And will not at all acquit the wicked. The LORD has His way In the whirlwind and in the storm, And the clouds are the dust of His feet. 4 He rebukes the sea and makes it dry, And dries up all the rivers. Bashan and Carmel wither, And the flower of Lebanon wilts. 5 The mountains quake before Him, The hills melt, And the earth heaves at His presence, Yes, the world and all who dwell in it.

The subject of this judgement is Nineveh, not the physical world. This is the way God describes the fall of a nation. If this language describes the judgement of God on nations, why, when we come to the New Testament, do we make it be the destruction of the universe? It is only because we do not understand how the Bible uses this apocalyptic language.

Ezekiel speaks in the same manner of Egypt:

Ezekiel 32:7-8 (NKJV) When I put out your light, I will cover the heavens, and make its stars dark; I will cover the sun with a cloud, And the moon shall not give her light. 8 All the bright lights of the heavens I will make dark over you, And bring darkness upon your land,' Says the Lord GOD.

The prophet Daniel speaks, in the same manner, of the slaughter of the Jews by the little horn, the power of the Romans.

Daniel 8:10 (NKJV) And it grew up to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and some of the stars to the ground, and trampled them.

In the prophetic language, great commotions and revolutions upon earth are often represented by commotions and changes in the heavens. None of these things literally took place!

Milton Terry said, " From these quotations it is apparent that there is scarcely an expression employed in Matthew and Luke which has not been taken from the Old Testament Scriptures. Such apocalyptic forms of speech are not to be assumed to convey in the New Testament a meaning different from that which they bear in the Hebrew Scriptures. They are part and parcel of the genius of prophetic language."

Samuel Hinds (1829) said, "It requires but a slender acquaintance with the writings of the Old Testament prophets to enable us to observe the peculiarity. It is not only figurative, but the figures are of the boldest kind, involving analogies so remote, as in some instances to be scarcely discoverable. If revolutions in empires be the subject, the prophetic representation is filled with disturbance of the laws of the natural world, and the sun, moon, and stars, are exhibited in commotion. If a deliverer is promised to the Jews, the prophet expresses the promise by the rising of a star, and the like" (Hinds, pp. 209-210)

Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) said, "The figurative language of the prophets is taken from the analogy between the world natural and an empire or kingdom considered as a world politic. Accordingly, the world natural, consisting of heaven and earth, signifies the whole world politic, consisting of thrones and people, or so much of it as is considered in prophecy; and the things in that world signify the analogous things in this. For the heavens and the things therein signify thrones and dignities, and those who enjoy them: and the earth, with the things thereon, the inferior people; and the lowest parts of the earth, called Hades or Hell, the lowest or most miserable part of them. Great earthquakes, and the shaking of heaven and earth, are put for the shaking of kingdoms, so as to distract and overthrow them; the creating of a new heaven and earth, and the passing of an old one; or the beginning and end of a world, for the rise and ruin of a body politic signified thereby. The sun, for the whole species and race of kings, in the kingdoms of the world politic; the moon, for the body of common people considered as the king's wife; the starts, for subordinate princes and great men; or for bishops and rulers of the people of God, when the sun is Christ. Setting of the sun, moon, and stars; darkening the sun, turning the moon into blood, and falling of the stars, for the ceasing of a kingdom."(Observations on the Prophecies, Part i. chap. ii)

Dr. John Owen (1721) said, "Not to hold you too long upon what is so plain and evident, you may take it for a rule, that, in the denunciations of the judgments of God, through all the prophets, heaven, sun, moon, stars, and the like appearing beauties and glories of the aspectable heavens, are taken for governments, governors, dominions in political states, as Isa. 14:12-15; Jer 15:9, 51:25. Isaiah 13:13; Ps. 68:6; Joel 2:10; Rev. 8:12; Matt. 24:29; Luke 21:25; Isa 60:20; Obad. 4; Rev 8:13; 11:12; 20:11." (vol. 8, p. 255, in a sermon entitled Shaking and Translating of Heaven and Earth, preached on April 19, 1649)

James Stuart Russell (1878) said, "The symbols are, in fact, equivalent to those employed by our Lord when predicting the doom of Israel. 'Immediately after the tribulation of those days (the horrors of the siege of Jerusalem) shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken (Matt 24:29). Both passages refer to the same catastrophe and employ very similar figures; besides which we have the authority of our Lord for fixing the event and the period of which He speaks within the limits of the generation then in existence: that is to say, the reference can only be to the judgment of the Jewish nation and the abrogation of the Mosaic economy at the Parousia." (p. 289-290).

John Gill (1809) said, "Ver. 29. Immediately after the tribulation of those days, &c.] That is, immediately after the distress the Jews would be in through the siege of Jerusalem, and the calamities attending it; just upon the destruction of that city, and the temple in it, with the whole nation of the Jews, shall the following things come to pass;...... and that one day with the Lord is as a thousand years, will not answer to the word 'immediately', or show that that should be understood of two thousand years after: besides, all the following things were to be fulfilled before that present generation, in which Christ lived, passed away, #Mt 24:34 and therefore must be understood of things that should directly, and immediately take place upon, or at the destruction of the city and temple."

We see this apocalyptic language used all through the book of Revelation. I believe that the book of Revelation is an expanded version of the Olivet Discourse. Notice how John used apocalyptic language.

Revelation 6:13-17 (NKJV) And the stars of heaven fell to the earth, as a fig tree drops its late figs when it is shaken by a mighty wind. 14 Then the sky receded as a scroll when it is rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved out of its place. 15 And the kings of the earth, the great men, the rich men, the commanders, the mighty men, every slave and every free man, hid themselves in the caves and in the rocks of the mountains, 16 and said to the mountains and rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the face of Him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! 17 "For the great day of His wrath has come, and who is able to stand?"

Is this talking about the end of the world in our future? NO! John is dealing with Jerusalem's destruction in AD 70. Look at what Jesus said as he was on his way to be crucified:

Luke 23:28-30 (NKJV) But Jesus, turning to them, said, "Daughters of Jerusalem, do not weep for Me, but weep for yourselves and for your children. 29 "For indeed the days are coming in which they will say, 'Blessed are the barren, wombs that never bore, and breasts which never nursed!' 30 "Then they will begin 'to say to the mountains, "Fall on us!" and to the hills, "Cover us!"'

Jesus was telling the women of His day to weep for THEMSELVES because judgement was going to come upon THEM. In Revelation 6, during the great tribulation which happened in AD 67-70, we see them crying out for the mountains to fall on them, just as Jesus said they would. This language is picturing the response of sinful man to the awful judgement of God.

The biblical evidence is overwhelming, the Olivet Discourse, in its entirety, is speaking of the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. The only thing that would make us push any of these things into the future are our own presuppositions. In this vivid picturesque language Jesus is describing Jerusalem's destruction. In AD 70, the lights went out in Israel for good. When the tribulation was over, physical Israel ceased to exist. God's people were no longer distinguished by physical birth, but by spiritual birth alone. The Old Covenant was over, and the New fully instituted. "


http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/lights_went_out.htm
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:13:16 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 11:01:21 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 10:55:22 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 07:43:39 PM
Quote from: Texas Son on December 06, 2008, 04:27:23 PM
Interesting! This will be fascinating to watch as I am just coming to grasp with the preterist view and have found merit in it.

I am eager to see the discourse on this subject.

One question I do have: How would we know whether "the Lord's day" was meant to be Saturday or Sunday for John? Might John have had another significance for the day of the Lord? Resurrection day?
Hi TS

This comes around time after a Time.

Anyways,

Christ is Known as "To day", hes also the LIGHT of The DAY,and we also are the Children of The DAY...to list but a few.

John in REV was In the SPIRIT of the DAY, as paul  says we are SPIRIT(LIFE) NOT Flesh.


Incorrect. Please stick with Scripture, Taffy. The Scripture does not say "John was in the spirit of the day." John stated "I came to be in spirit IN the Lord's day." And what does Revelation say to those who add or subtract from the words of that prophecy?

Let's not make things up as we go along but stick with what God has said. O.K.  :thumbsup:

Well Hi Tony, sorry bud for the ADD lib..

so what was the spirit of the """""""""""""""""""""""  LORDS DAY""""""""""""""""""""


Dear Taffy,
John did not say he was "in spirit of the Lords day." He said "I came to be in spirit in the Lord's day." So the question you pose is not germain to the point John made.

Quotemaybe theres Two Days of the LORD..or maybe THREE...HOW many do you Know and where can I find them?

or are you totally dismissing the LITTLE section Which was given,,,,ANY COMMENT THERE BUD
SCRIPTURE WILL BE FINE

Scriptures concerning the day of the Lord have already been given in this thread. That day is the same as the day of Yahweh Isaiah wrote about and which Christ cited in Matthew 24 and which Peter cited in Acts 2:20. The Lord's day is yet future. John was in spirit in that future day.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 06, 2008, 11:23:33 PM
Rev 1:10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,


Rev 1:11 Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, Whatyou see , write in a book, and send [it] unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea.


Rev 1:12 And I turned to see the voice that spoke with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks;


Rev 1:13 And in the midst of the seven candlesticks [one] like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.

  My Bible says John  was IN the SPIRIT   ON THE LORDS DAY ..   In  and on  being the same words!

   1) in, by, with etc.a primary preposition denoting (fixed) position (in place, time or state), and (by implication) instrumentality (medially or constructively), i.e. a relation of rest (intermediate between G1519 and G1537)

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 06, 2008, 11:26:58 PM


i also believe alot of revelation has been and is being fulfilled  even now


  Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John: apokalypsis
Pronunciation

ä-po-kä'-lü-psēs (Key)

Part of Speech
feminine noun

Root Word (Etymology)

from G601

TDNT Reference
3:563,405
Vines
View Entry


Outline of Biblical Usage 1) laying bare, making naked

2) a disclosure of truth, instruction

a) concerning things before unknown

b) used of events by which things or states or persons hitherto withdrawn from view are made visible to all

3) manifestation, appearance

I see Jesus in and thoughout the BOOK in Spirit and Truth   :happygrin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:27:34 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 11:11:38 PM

Revelation 6:13-17 (NKJV) And the stars of heaven fell to the earth, as a fig tree drops its late figs when it is shaken by a mighty wind. 14 Then the sky receded as a scroll when it is rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved out of its place. 15 And the kings of the earth, the great men, the rich men, the commanders, the mighty men, every slave and every free man, hid themselves in the caves and in the rocks of the mountains, 16 and said to the mountains and rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the face of Him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! 17 "For the great day of His wrath has come, and who is able to stand?"

Is this talking about the end of the world in our future? NO! John is dealing with Jerusalem's destruction in AD 70.  

dear Zeek,
It seems you and I are at polar ends these days.
If Revelation has already come to pass, if that which you quote above has already come to pass then you must conclude that this has already come to pass:

1Th 4:13-18  Now we do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who are reposing, lest you may sorrow according as the rest, also, who have no expectation."  (14)  For, if we are believing that Jesus died and rose, thus also, those who are put to repose, will God, through Jesus, lead forth together with Him."  (15)  For this we are saying to you by the word of the Lord, that we, the living, who are surviving to the presence of the Lord, should by no means outstrip those who are put to repose,  (16)  for the Lord Himself will be descending from heaven with a shout of command, with the voice of the Chief Messenger, and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ shall be rising first,  (17)  Thereupon we, the living who are surviving, shall at the same time be snatched away together with them in clouds, to meet the Lord in the air. And thus shall we always be together with the Lord."  (18)  So that, console one another with these words."

If the above has come to pass then you and I are living on the new earth at this very moment and God and Christ are reigning in Jerusalem along with the 12 apostles and no nation is presently deceived for Satan and the false prophet are imprisoned.

We have no future resurrection to look forward to for all my friends who died are in their graves. All who were to be saved of the nations were saved prior to 70 A.D.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob somehow resurrected a couple thousand years ago and sat down in the kingdom which Christ ruled over but all the earth never saw it. It was a dismal failure. Christ came and went. He must have lied about ruling over the whole earth with the twelve. What an abject failure!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 11:30:42 PM
QuoteDear Taffy,
John did not say he was "in spirit of the Lords day." He said "I came to be in spirit in the Lord's day." So the question you pose is not germain to the point John made.

Hi Tony , Then maybe HOW did he become TO BE IN the THE Lords DAY...FLOAT?...in or or ON go Check?

Your quotes from Math and Acts bear no reference,to the LORDS DAY some futuristic event..maybe you could consider and refute the little Zeek has proposed?.

, you totally dismIss without quote or SCRIPTURE to the Little  shared ON THE DAY of the LORD....

AGAIN T..dismiss this FIRST and we will continue...


please dont throw a Red flag at me bro...we can share and learn together :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:30:54 PM
Quote from: rosered on December 06, 2008, 11:23:33 PM
Rev 1:10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,



  My Bible says John  was IN the SPIRIT   ON THE LORDS DAY ..   In  and on  being the same words!

Sorry to have to say this rosered but your bible is just wrong.
Look at any Greek text from which we get the Bible. The Greek text says: I John was in (Grk. en) spirit in (Grk. en) the Lord's day."
The Greek word for "in" is "en."
The Greek word for "on" is "epi."
Epi is absent.

Better get a better bible.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 11:34:29 PM
Heb 8:13  In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.


Heb 9:1  Then verily the first covenant had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary.

Heb 9:2  For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary.

Heb 9:8  The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:



Heb 9:28  So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.

Heb 10:1  For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.


Heb 10:9  Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.

Heb 10:25  Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.

Heb 10:26  For if we sin willfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,

Heb 10:27  But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

Heb 10:28  He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:

Heb 10:29  Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant,
wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace
?

Heb 10:30  For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.

Heb 10:31  It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.


Heb 10:37  For yet, a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry.  

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 06, 2008, 11:35:42 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 05:38:50 PM
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/jewishtemple.htm


Dan 9:26  And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

Rev 18:2  And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.

Mat 24:34  Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.

Luk 21:33  Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.


Oh my goodness..

Babylon...is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.

:mshock:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:36:52 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 11:30:42 PM
QuoteDear Taffy,
John did not say he was "in spirit of the Lords day." He said "I came to be in spirit in the Lord's day." So the question you pose is not germain to the point John made.

Hi Tony , Then maybe HOW did he become TO BE IN the THE Lords DAY...FLOAT?...in or or ON go Check?

Dear Taffy, he was "IN (Greek en) spirit IN (Greek en) the Lord's day." If he was in spirit ON the Lord's day then John would have used "epi" for "on." Get it?
How did he come to be in the Lord's day? He came to be in the Lord's day IN SPIRIT. It was a vision. John said: Rev 9:17 "And thus I perceived the horses in the vision,"

QuoteYour quotes from Math and Acts bear no reference,to the LORDS DAY some futuristic event..maybe you could consider and refute the little Zeek has proposed?.

Of course they bear directly on the subject at hand.

Quote, you totally dismIss without quote or SCRIPTURE to the Little  shared ON THE DAY of the LORD....

Please note my other posts to Zeek and rosered as to in or on the Lord's day.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 11:37:59 PM
1Cor 10:11 Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 11:40:19 PM
Rom 13:11-12 And do this, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep; for now our salvation is nearer than when we first believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand. Therefore let us cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Rom 16:20 And the God of peace will crush Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen.

Jas 5:7-9 Therefore be patient, brethren, until the coming of the Lord. See how the farmer waits for the precious fruit of the earth, waiting patiently for it until it receives the early and latter rain. You also be patient. Establish your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is at hand. Do not grumble against one another, brethren, lest you be condemned. Behold, the Judge is standing at the door!

1Pet 4:7 But the end of all things is at hand; therefore be serious and watchful in your prayers.

Phil 4:5 Let your gentleness be known to all men. The Lord is at hand.

1Cor 1:4-8 I thank my God always concerning you for the grace of God which was given to you by Christ Jesus, That you were enriched in everything by Him in all utterance and all knowledge, Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you, So that you come short in no gift,

1Cor 7:29 But this I say, brethren, the time is short, so that from now on even those who have wives should be as though they had none,

Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants--things which must shortly take place. And He sent and signified it by His angel to His servant John,

Rev 1:3 Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written in it; for the time is near.

Rev 22:10 And he said to me, "Do not seal the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is at hand.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 11:47:05 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:36:52 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 06, 2008, 11:30:42 PM
QuoteDear Taffy,
John did not say he was "in spirit of the Lords day." He said "I came to be in spirit in the Lord's day." So the question you pose is not germain to the point John made.

Hi Tony , Then maybe HOW did he become TO BE IN the THE Lords DAY...FLOAT?...in or or ON go Check?

Dear Taffy, he was "IN (Greek en) spirit IN (Greek en) the Lord's day." If he was in spirit ON the Lord's day then John would have used "epi" for "on." Get it?
How did he come to be in the Lord's day? He came to be in the Lord's day IN SPIRIT. It was a vision. John said: Rev 9:17 "And thus I perceived the horses in the vision,"

QuoteYour quotes from Math and Acts bear no reference,to the LORDS DAY some futuristic event..maybe you could consider and refute the little Zeek has proposed?.

Of course they bear directly on the subject at hand.

Quote, you totally dismIss without quote or SCRIPTURE to the Little  shared ON THE DAY of the LORD....



Please note my other posts to Zeek and rosered as to in or on the Lord's day.


Yes T..I did

What you dont GET TONY is the LORDS DAY,,be in  or ON it.....

AGAIN you dont note NOR recognise the few words Shared ON WHAT and WHO the LORDS day is..you dimeiss them

you gave me Two, which in reality bear litte reference to what the LORDS day is,,,,is talks of the LORDS day but doesnt tell us """""""""""" WHO """" it is,,,,..DO YOU GET THAT bro,,,,


FIRST find OUT what and who THE lords DAY IS.... and lets Talk about what HAPPENS ON or IN it...DO YOU GET THAT.?

try again TN...dont dismiss those scrips
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Sarah on December 06, 2008, 11:51:27 PM
Tony, I'm not sure where you are getting that the word is 'in' and not 'on' in Revelations regarding the Day of the Lord. I'm a little confused by your argument as to the magnitude of your view of a misinterpertation. Obviously what John saw was future for him, but would shortly come to pass, and was at hand. How do you explain the immediancy issue? To me, if we are still looking for a fulfillment then we must accept that most of the prophets, including Jesus had it wrong in their view as to when these things would take place.

I do understand the futurist view in that it gives hope in a new heaven and the new earth, because if this is it, we got a raw deal. We need a hope of a heavenly city where all tears are wiped away, and there is not hurt. I believe it exists, but it certainly isn't what we see in the natural. Many futurists probably see us with a fulfilled eschology view as those with either rose-colored glasses or ostriches with our heads in the sand. I certainly understand this when the popular view of a new heaven and new earth resembles that on the Jehovah Witnessess magazines with the family feasting in front of a snow-capped mountain. I suppose I had a paradigm shift as to what I see a new heaven and a new earth as.

I agree with Zeek when He says that the fulfillment of those things that happened in the first centery is a picture of those things that happen internally/spiritually. I also believe that the kingdom of God is like a musturd seed. It starts small, but eventually is the largest tree of all. This is not only on an individual level, but someday I believe on a global scale. Everyone says how evil things have gotten spiraling down into the apocalype, but history isn't holding up a shining flame to aspire to. I wouldn't say evil has gotton worse, it has just remained evil. I am just praying that this 'musturd tree' continues to grow.

Love, Sarah
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 06, 2008, 11:51:46 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:30:54 PM
in  light of the new rules and  moderating , I will comply  :bigGrin:
have a good evening
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 06, 2008, 11:59:34 PM


  I also believe along the same lines of Zeek
  we tend to get way to literal in   our interpretations :mblush:
and completely miss out on the very things God has given us to SEE ! 


to be in the Spirit and Truth is the only way we can see anything from the  Book of Life my friend
  ps I am not mad at you at all lol bro 
just a little   ferverent  when it comes to  speaking in Love  :winkgrin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 12:58:18 AM
Quote from: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:27:34 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 11:11:38 PM

Revelation 6:13-17 (NKJV) And the stars of heaven fell to the earth, as a fig tree drops its late figs when it is shaken by a mighty wind. 14 Then the sky receded as a scroll when it is rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved out of its place. 15 And the kings of the earth, the great men, the rich men, the commanders, the mighty men, every slave and every free man, hid themselves in the caves and in the rocks of the mountains, 16 and said to the mountains and rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the face of Him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! 17 "For the great day of His wrath has come, and who is able to stand?"

Is this talking about the end of the world in our future? NO! John is dealing with Jerusalem's destruction in AD 70. 

dear Zeek,
It seems you and I are at polar ends these days.
If Revelation has already come to pass, if that which you quote above has already come to pass then you must conclude that this has already come to pass:

1Th 4:13-18  Now we do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who are reposing, lest you may sorrow according as the rest, also, who have no expectation."  (14)  For, if we are believing that Jesus died and rose, thus also, those who are put to repose, will God, through Jesus, lead forth together with Him."  (15)  For this we are saying to you by the word of the Lord, that we, the living, who are surviving to the presence of the Lord, should by no means outstrip those who are put to repose,  (16)  for the Lord Himself will be descending from heaven with a shout of command, with the voice of the Chief Messenger, and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ shall be rising first,  (17)  Thereupon we, the living who are surviving, shall at the same time be snatched away together with them in clouds, to meet the Lord in the air. And thus shall we always be together with the Lord."  (18)  So that, console one another with these words."

If the above has come to pass then you and I are living on the new earth at this very moment and God and Christ are reigning in Jerusalem along with the 12 apostles and no nation is presently deceived for Satan and the false prophet are imprisoned.

We have no future resurrection to look forward to for all my friends who died are in their graves. All who were to be saved of the nations were saved prior to 70 A.D.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob somehow resurrected a couple thousand years ago and sat down in the kingdom which Christ ruled over but all the earth never saw it. It was a dismal failure. Christ came and went. He must have lied about ruling over the whole earth with the twelve. What an abject failure!
Hi Tony,

Many of the people at these boards either come from no background in being taught the prophetic Scriptures, or they've come from a dispensational premillenialist perspective and are either still coming from that perspective or honestly believe that God has moved them on to a different perspective.  Whether people here happen to be premillenial dispensationalist, amillenialist, or postmillenialist those perspectives would be entirely independent of the issue of whether or not many prophesies in the Gospels and in St. Paul's writings, and perhaps even in Revelation have been fulfilled.  I'm just asking if you really have the patience for all of the different perspectives that you're going to have to be dealing with here.  I was personally dispensational premillenialist until a couple of years ago when I started studying the book of Revelation for myself.  Not what others before me had previously said, but what the book actually had to say.  And the Concordant Literal, in particular, along with some help from Scarlett's, brought me to radically different conclusions that I'd never considered previous to those studies.  I'm personally postmillenial now because of my own studies.  I have some notes and web links on the book of Revelation board on this forum regarding the Postmillenialist perspective.  Unfortunately, many Postmillenialists are far more preterist than I'm comfortable with 'cause while I do see many, many of the prophecies as having already happened, you've got an excellent point about some [or actually many] of the details of Revelation regarding the earthquake of all earthquakes, etc.  But a Postmillenial perspective seems far more consistent with the truth of the Scriptures, with the revelation of UR, and the growing momentum of the Holy Spirit over the last century and a half or so.

Can you demonstrate why the 1Thessalonians 4 passage that you've repeatedly cited must happen around Revelation 4:1, if that's where you're coming from, or why you believe it's in the 11th, 19th, or 20th chapters if you believe that it happens Premillenially?  And can you demonstrate why Christ Jesus must be here during the millenium from any passage that's not as easily a reference to His High Priestly ministry at work over the Body of Christ, like in Isaiah 40 and other similar passages?  Zechariah's prophecy said that Christ Jesus came as King when He rode the donkey into Jerusalem.  The Kingdom wasn't offered and then withdrawn.  He came as King, and the Scriptures say that with His resurrection He is now Lord and Anointed; King and Priest after the Order of Melchezedec.  Were He not yet reigning, then He could not yet be subduing His enemies under His feet.  Are you Scripturally able to answer all 95 points of this:

http://www.againstdispensationalism.com/95theses.shtml (http://www.againstdispensationalism.com/95theses.shtml)

And yes, all 95 of them because they cut to the heart of the matter on a premillenial belief which is found nowhere in any of the early Church creeds.  Not in any of them.  If you're wishing to limit the scope of this thread to proving that not all of the prophecies of Revelation have happened yet, then that's fine.  That's understandable and that requires a whole lot less of your time.  But please be respectful of the beliefs of others unless you have the time and patience to Scripturally address each thing that's come up in this thread, including in this post.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 07, 2008, 01:34:22 AM
What year was the Book of Revelation written?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on December 07, 2008, 01:47:45 AM
willieH: Hey Bobf...  :happygrin:

Sorry I missed this post, so thought I would resurrect it to give it its deserved answer!  :cloud9:

No offense is intended in my reply below... just a (hopefully - sobering) look at the message you take to the "world"...

Quote from: willieH on August 21, 2008, 11:35:43 PMThe proposal of VENGENCE beyond this life, be it...

Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 02:21:42 AMWhy "beyond this life"?  If suffering beyond this life violates God's grace then so would suffering in this life.

The problem with this Bob... is that "beyond this life", is the SPIRITUAL ,not more of the FLESHLY... It is our FLESH which brings us suffering... as IT prompts us to disobey (James 1:14)

What is to prevent GOD's "grace" ...from enacting continual "life" scenarios, with AGENDAS of SUFFERING? 

What "GOOD NEWS" is found in the preaching to the world... a "GOSPEL" that proposes MORE  SUFFERING continuing in the next for most, but also says within it, that GOD is IMPARTIAL one to another?  And He lets a FEW, ...slide...  :dontknow:  The rest get the FURNACE!  :sigh:

DID YOU suffer TORMENT for your SIN bob? :mnah:   Do you think, ...you WILL?  :JCThink:  Somehow, I doubt that is expected by you...  :dontknow:

:omg:  Yet you shall preach to others, that if they do not "DO" as "DO YOU"... they shall meet FIERY INDIGNATION... and the FIERCE CHASTISEMENTS of an ANGRY GOD...  :mshock:

My parents LOVED me... they NEVER, within their sweet and UNSELFISH LOVE, did what YOU PROPOSE that GOD shall DO! (whose LOVE is MUCH greater than was theirs --- *GOD* ...who claims that He IS LOVE itself)...  :mshock:

Don't you see the HYPOCRISY in this?  This is basically what makes Christianity a hypocritical, forked tongue, ...laughing stock to the other 2/3's of the world... and WHY MOST of the 1/3 that claim themselves as messengers of the "GOSPEL"... shall find themselves amongst THIS GROUP:  (Matt 7:22-23)  (note that this verse Bob, ...states: MANY will "SAY"!)

Here's what they "SAY" to the world in behalf of JESUS:

"Sinner, ...GOD LOVES you with a LOVE that cannot even be understood,

...BUT...

He's gonna GETCHA and BURNYA for being the SINFUL HUMAN being your ARE, if YOU don't listen to ...ME..."  (even though you are a SINNER, because HE placed YOU of HIS DECISION -- IN ADAM, and within a human DESCENDENCY which displays that - "ALL have SINNED" - even before any are even BORN!)...  :mshock:

:Yeahright: What a bunch of  UNHOLY crap!   :thumbdown:

You are welcome to your belief Bob... I see JOY and LOVE as the message of the GOSPEL,  ...preach whatever is in your heart...  :sigh:

Quote from: willieHis simply proposing that GOD in fact, resorts to the "EYE for EYE" brand of "justice" that is in the Natural... which CHRIST plainly taught as REMOVED by GRACE...

Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 02:21:42 AMThe purpose of "eye for an eye" is to get even and get rid of.  God's purpose for judgment is not like that.

The JUDGMENT of GOD brings forth the knowledge of RIGHTEOUSNESS... (Is 26:9), not SUFFERING...

DIVINE JUDGMENT is of LOVE Bob, ...there is NO FEAR in LOVE (1 John 4:18)... and its BY-PRODUCT is knowledge of RIGHTEOUSNESS, not TORMENT! (Is 26:9)

When CHRIST revealed Himself IN and TO you, it was not a SUFFERING experience was it?   Sure, it was a SORROWING experience when you got to SEE who YOU really ARE (which is the product of JUDGMENT),  ...followed by JOY... (not TORMENT)

Quote from: willieHANY proposals of teaching that we offer along with the GOOD NEWS of the Gospel and Reconciliation of ALL, must ALIGN with that GOOD NEWS... If not, the HOUSE is found DIVIDED...  and the message if scrutinized, is seen to be TWO FACED, and HYPOCRITICAL...

Quote from: bobfGrace and judgment are not in opposition.  God's judgment (chastisement) yields holiness and righteousness (Hebews 12).  Grace involves chastening (Titus 2:11).

How does Titus 2:11 establish your point Bob?  What in this verse notes CHASTISEMENT?

What makes you think JUDGMENT is about CHASTISEMENT?  JUDGMENT is about REVELATION!

SUFFERING in THIS WORLD ...IS the WRATH of GOD which IS [not WILL] come against UNRIGHTEOUSNESS and UNGODLINESS of men...  (Rom 1:18)

Where do you see CHASTISEMENT of Heb 12:6... as in the "next life"?  Verse 11 says:

11 ...NOW, no CHASTENING for the PRESENT, seemeth to be joyous, but grievous, nevetheless afterward it yieldeth PEACEABLE fruit of RIGHTEOUSNESS unto them which ARE exercised thereby...

In verse 6... It says:

6  For WHOM the Lord ...LOVETH... He CHASTENETH, and SCOURGETH ...EVERY SON... He receiveth...

WHOM does the LORD LOVE, is it NOT, those in THIS WORLD? (John 3:16)  ...does He LOVE people in THIS LIFE Bob?  If indeed He does (which indeed He does)... then this CHASTENING is occuring NOW...

What do you see in the sorrows and pain of HURRICANES, TORNADOES, EARTHQUAKES, FLOODS, HEARTBREAK, ABUSIVENESS, ADULTERY, FAMINE, CANCER, AIDS, HEART DISEASE, MURDER, RAPE, WAR, to mention just a few of the major SORROWS of EVIL that Men and Women suffer IN THIS LIFE, ...not to mention COMPLETE  DISASSOCIATION with our CREATOR for many, if not MOST... 

And this list is NOT ENOUGH for you and your observation of CHASTENING? ...that you must preach even MORE?  As we EACH are confronted in life with at least SOME, and sometimes MANY of these?

What kind of (so-called) "GOSPEL" message tells the world:

"after you suffer, ONE by ONE, the losses of ALL your loved ones to DEATH, ...then you shall experience the PAINFUL torment of CANCER, ...and to TOP it OFF, the SORROW of the depletion of your HOME and FAMILY to a hurricane...

Then tell them that GOD (who "REALLY LOVES you") is going to welcome you to MORE of the SAME - in the LIFE to come!"
   :mshock:

As I said... take this message of NEGATIVITY to the world if you must... (which I believe is quite EXTREMELY CONTRARY to the meaning of the Greek WORDS translated GOSPEL [euaggelizo, euaggelion], let alone its message)...

As for me, ...NOT at all INTERESTED! :mnah:

Quote from: willieH2 Cor 5:19   The TRESPASSES are yet HELD against those of the WORLD...

Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 02:21:42 AMSins held against would yield permanent death.  God's plan involving judgment leads to life.

I agree, which is LOVE... in which there is NO FEAR! (1 John 4:18)

Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 02:21:42 AMThe law as a schoolmaster:
1. man breaks the law
2. the law ministers death
3. man sees he is blind, naked, and dead.

Were sins held against, that would be end of story.

But
4. The law leads us to Christ and when we follow Him we are raised from death to life.

What did CHRIST do with "LAW" Bob?  (Col 2:14)

He made PEACE of it, by FULFILLING it! (Col 1:20)  NOT create more SUFFERING for us in the life to come...  :thumbdown:

Quote from: willieHRom 5:18-20  The JUSTIFICATION is seen as CONDITIONAL and dependent upon OBEDIENCE, not upon GRACE...

Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 02:21:42 AMRighteousness is defined in terms of DOING.

1 John 3:7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous. 

But DOING is ultimately dependent on grace (Eph 2:8-20)
1. Faith is a gift from God.
2. We are His workmanship created unto good works that God ordains us to walk in.

God takes away stony heart, gives a fleshy heart, causes us to walk in His commandments (Ezek 11:19-20)

Paul labored, yet not Paul labored, but the grace of God that was in him labored.

No offense Bob, but you are speaking here much like a wind-up toy going in circles...  :sigh:

GRACE enters the LIFE, and IT produces the obedience within, WE do not OBEY of ourselves! ...Of ITS doing and ITS decision, not of ours...

We CANNOT come to the WORD, except by the decision and DRAGGING of GOD (John 6:44) ...so any area in which we fail, even though we CANNOT do anything about it...

GOD is going to chastise us with His "next life" DIVINE --"FIRE WHIP" :flamebreath:  ...Is that your "message of LOVE", Bob?  =  :spank: :punish:  :talkangry: :ticked:

Did JESUS say:  Go WARN them that if they do not LISTEN (even though I didn't give them ears to hear) ...that I WILL BURN them intensely, and JUDGE them and then GET THEM BACK for ALL their SINS...  and, ...oh yeah,  ...tell'em I, ...I "LOVE'em"???   :rolleye:

Is THAT IT Bob?  Is THAT what YOU get out of the WORD and command CHRIST gave to us to preach the "GOSPEL"?  :sigh:

Sorry brother, that is NOT the GOSPEL of PEACE (Rom 10:15 / Eph 6:15)...  :sigh:

QuoteJohn 1:29  The SIN in fact was NOT "taken away" for it remains a PUNISHABLE obligation...

Quote from: bobf on August 22, 2008, 02:21:42 AMPeople still sin.  Sin has not yet been taken away from the world.

Your vision here, is confined to the PHYSICAL and TEMPORAL... (that men "still sin")

The SCRIPTURES in various places and ways, say:  JESUS CHRIST ...TOOK AWAY... the SIN of the WORLD... (John 1:29 / Col 2:14 / 2 Cor 5:19 / John 19:29 / Matt 18:21-22)

That is an ETERNAL and COMPLETE statement...  which is not made according to the progression of the lives of men, nor of the chronology of "time"... 

"ALL have SINNED" (Rom 3:23) is a PAST TENSE statement, which includes millions maybe BILLIONS that are not even here, Bob! ...YET to be BORN, Bro!  They haven't even set foot on earth, yet they ARE SINNERS!  It's PAST TENSE!

It amazes me that most cannot see this... but... Then again, it remains GOD's REVELATION, not mine...  However, when you DO see it... you too will be amazed that you didn't see it before!  :mshock:

That men complete [by the manifestation of time] what has been SAID of them (Rom 3:23), does not REMOVE the FINISHED and COMPLETED work of CHRIST...  (John 1:29 / John 19:30)

I see that your message to be steeped in the grim report of future, "next life" torment, and misses the elements of the FINISHED and COMPLETED work of CHRIST's, filled with LOVE and VICTORY ...which can only be seen by eyes of FAITH, and requires the FAITH of the GOD of LOVE, as the SUBSTANCE to see it...

I think I'll end here... not much sense in continuing an OVERALL disagreement that I have with you brother Bobf, as to WHAT the GOSPEL is...  believe  and preach what you will... seeya at the "end"...  :friendstu: 

                                                                (http://dl3.glitter-graphics.net/pub/117/117193tdajxe3wh8.gif) (http://www.glitter-graphics.com)


PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 02:06:06 AM
Quote from: Molly on December 07, 2008, 01:34:22 AM
What year was the Book of Revelation written?
Dogmatists about the Babylon that's burning in that book being Jerusalem, since it's one of quite a few cities on 7 hills (including Rome, Italy and Bath, England), insist upon a mid to late 60s AD composition, while others say it was written in the 90s.  Those that insist upon an early dating will boastfully say that there were more than 7 Churches in Asia after 70AD.  But there were more than 7 Churches in Asia prior to 70AD, so that proves nothing. 

The likelihood on why those 7 Churches were selected as recipients is because of the spiritual function that those Churches held in Asia and not because they were the only 7 Churches in Asia or the most important based upon anything external in terms of their numbers or whatever.  Every decision that Christ Jesus makes over His Church is based upon the furtherance of the Anointing, just as He expects all of our decisions to be based on the Anointing and it's flow in the earth.  They were likely the intercessor Churches in Asia and were probably receiving the book as an interpretation of other tongues that they'd spoken.  I've had stuff supernaturally sent to me that wound up being the exact same thing.  Something I'd prayed out and because for whatever reason in Christ's administration of the anointings it wound up coming that way.  That's how I got my first copy of Winchester's Dialogues, and irony or ironies, A.E. Knoch's "All in All" book came into my hands based on a vision that I'd had 10 years earlier of a red book, or what I would interpret as red.  Don't want to get into it with anybody over online HTML color codes and being asked to pick my copy up again and say if that's really red based on an online comparison. :icon_jokercolor:

Besides, the monitor that I'm using right now for this computer isn't the greatest.

The earliest copies that scholars have of Revelation are from the 90s A.D.  But if it was written earlier, then either earlier copies will be found, or their having copies from the 90s might someday prove out the earlier date because of how much time it would have taken for copies to be made and distributed of that book.  But I personally believe that both sides of the dating debate oversimplify the reasons for the dating and don't factor in the Anointing and who the real prayer warriors were and why that would have been valuable info for them, so that they'd know that their 7 Churches would be revived at the start of Revelation 20 with the forcefully advancing millenium dawning upon the world as a result of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in Revelation 19 depicted by the heavenly man of war. 

There's too many Biblical problems with Christ's return being at Megiddo, plus He still has to fulfill the time outside of Israel before Moses can set foot into New Jerusalem on New Earth.  Abraham's not heir of an earthly city, according to Hebrews.  Revelation 19 is simply the open door promised to the Churches of Asia and Christ doing prophetic battle with the sword of His mouth through His Church on the earth as the Holy Spirit fills the Body of Christ to unprecidented levels.  The third day that we'd live in His sight in Hosea's prophecy is on the New Earth.  First day is the world before Noah's Flood, we've been in the Second Day, and the third day is the New Earth where it says in Revelation 21 that death by flood and fire will never happen again.  Isaiah's prophecy says that lifespans on the New Earth will be the same as that of trees.  I could, conservatively and minimally, double the number of points in the 95 thesis against dispensationalism that I gave in my previous post.

As with every other book of the New Testament, the date that it was written is completely irrelevant to when the events within it would come to pass and to what Biblical doctrines that we're supposed to derive from it and supplement with it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 02:23:04 AM
For anyone interested, this is a list of cities on 7 hills:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_claimed_to_be_built_on_seven_hills (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_claimed_to_be_built_on_seven_hills)
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 07, 2008, 02:26:55 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 02:23:04 AM
For anyone interested, this is a list of cities on 7 hills:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_claimed_to_be_built_on_seven_hills (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_claimed_to_be_built_on_seven_hills)
Yo Martin

Go ye therefore and preach UNTO.." ALL"" the WORLD.... :icon_flower:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 02:43:00 AM
Quote from: Taffy on December 07, 2008, 02:26:55 AM
Go ye therefore and preach UNTO.." ALL"" the WORLD.... :icon_flower:
It's all I do, everywhere God opens the doors and pays the bills for it so that I'm able to owe no man anything but to love 'em.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 07, 2008, 02:53:42 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 02:43:00 AM
Quote from: Taffy on December 07, 2008, 02:26:55 AM
Go ye therefore and preach UNTO.." ALL"" the WORLD.... :icon_flower:
It's all I do, everywhere God opens the doors and pays the bills for it so that I'm able to owe no man anything but to love 'em.

YO................Preach the " light "  of Truth Bro   :icon_flower:  .....tis Known as Foolishness,  ALONG   the wisdom of this world, but the Hidden wisdom( foolishness) is from above...Christ truly IS FOOLISHNESS...sorta gets ya thinking egh BRO,
got to watch that wording.... :icon_flower:

br
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: alihaymeg on December 07, 2008, 03:58:13 AM
If I might,

     I would like to present a perspective that has been weighing heavily on my heart lately.
It seems as though we may be missing a big part of the plan. Before the future judgments and dispensations become relevant, it is necessary to understand what the ultimate goal and purpose of our existence here is.

It is my contention that it is folly to assume, once grace has entered our hearts, that we are excluded from judgment. Romans 14:10,13
10You, then, why do you judge your brother? Or why do you look down on your brother? For we will all stand before God's judgment seat. 13...therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another...

Paul implied that we are being trained to be worthy to judge the world and even angels. 1 Cor. 6:1-8

1 Does any one of you, when he has a case against his neighbor, dare to go to law before the unrighteous and not before the saints?

2 Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? If the world is judged by you, are you not competent to constitute the smallest law courts?

3 Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more matters of this life?

Paul seemed to present the perspective that we are to become perfected in love starting right here and now. Not that we are to wait for rapture or death to achieve this perfection. It is not something that happens all at once because of a confession of faith. It is the process of becoming purified by fire. The reason the analogy was used is because it was widely understood that the way to purify metal in order to make a stronger finished product was to heat it in the fire and burn away the impurities.

I believe that we are here to prove our metal, and that the fire is purifying us continually. 1 Corinthians 3:15 (Young's Literal Translation)

15if of any the work is burned up, he shall suffer loss; and himself shall be saved, but so as through fire.

Therefore, our purpose here is to be trained to be worthy of judging all of creation even angels; In other words to become priests and Kings.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PM
Quote from: willieH on December 07, 2008, 01:47:45 AMAnd He lets a FEW, ...slide...  :dontknow:  The rest get the FURNACE!  :sigh:

He does not let any slide. "Therefore, every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire"

QuoteDID YOU suffer TORMENT for your SIN bob? :mnah:

Absolutely.

Quote:omg:  Yet you shall preach to others, that if they do not "DO" as "DO YOU"... they shall meet FIERY INDIGNATION... and the FIERCE CHASTISEMENTS of an ANGRY GOD...  :mshock:

Do as Christ commanded.  "Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."

QuoteMy parents LOVED me... they NEVER, within their sweet and UNSELFISH LOVE, did what YOU PROPOSE that GOD shall DO! (whose LOVE is MUCH greater than was theirs --- *GOD* ...who claims that He IS LOVE itself)...  :mshock:

Hebrews 12:6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. 7 If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? 8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.

QuoteDon't you see the HYPOCRISY in this?  This is basically what makes Christianity a hypocritical, forked tongue,

There is no hypocrisy.  It applies to all equally.

QuoteHe's gonna GETCHA and BURNYA for being the SINFUL HUMAN being your ARE, if YOU don't listen to ...ME..."  (even though you are a SINNER, because HE placed YOU of HIS DECISION -- IN ADAM, and within a human DESCENDENCY which displays that - "ALL have SINNED" - even before any are even BORN!)...  :mshock:

:Yeahright: What a bunch of  UNHOLY crap!   :thumbdown:

You are welcome to your belief Bob...

Luke 6:49 But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.

QuoteThe JUDGMENT of GOD brings forth the knowledge of RIGHTEOUSNESS... (Is 26:9), not SUFFERING...

Hebrews 12:11 Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.

QuoteHow does Titus 2:11 establish your point Bob?  What in this verse notes CHASTISEMENT?

Titus 2:11 For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, 12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world.

Hebrews 12:6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. 7 If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?

The highlighted words "teaching" and "chastening" are the same word in greek.

QuoteWhat makes you think JUDGMENT is about CHASTISEMENT?  JUDGMENT is about REVELATION!

1 Corinthians 11:32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

QuoteWhere do you see CHASTISEMENT of Heb 12:6... as in the "next life"?  Verse 11 says:

Because for example Sodom & Gommorah will be resurrected and judged.  Their judgment will be more tolerable than Jerusalem's.  Therefore both Sodom's and Jerusalem's judgment will not be a fun-party. But neither will it be pointlness torment either.  It will be correction.  "....for when thy judgments [are] in the earth, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness."

QuoteBob: Paul labored, yet not Paul labored, but the grace of God that was in him labored.
Willie: No offense Bob, but you are speaking here much like a wind-up toy going in circles...  :sigh:

Take it up with the apostle Paul: "I laboured....yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me."

etc.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 08, 2008, 04:14:28 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 07, 2008, 02:53:42 AM
Quote from: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 02:43:00 AM
Quote from: Taffy on December 07, 2008, 02:26:55 AM
Go ye therefore and preach UNTO.." ALL"" the WORLD.... :icon_flower:
It's all I do, everywhere God opens the doors and pays the bills for it so that I'm able to owe no man anything but to love 'em.

YO................Preach the " light "  of Truth Bro   :icon_flower:  .....tis Known as Foolishness,  ALONG   the wisdom of this world, but the Hidden wisdom( foolishness) is from above...Christ truly IS FOOLISHNESS...sorta gets ya thinking egh BRO,
got to watch that wording.... :icon_flower:

br
:thumbsup:   :icon_flower:

  yes our flesh is that darkness /ignorance bro , got cha!  :winkgrin:

But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:


2Cr 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.  


2Cr 4:5 For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake.


2Cr 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to [give] the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.  

2Cr 4:7 But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.  
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 08, 2008, 06:49:00 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 11:37:59 PM
1Cor 10:11 Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.


Dear Zeek, Hi.
If you are inferring from the above verse that the ages ended when Paul wrote that, then all the things of Revelation came and went just prior to Paul writing that.

But what did Paul mean by that verse?

1Co 10:11 Now all this befalls them typically. Yet it was written for our admonition, to whom the consummations of the eons have attained."

What is it the believers attained to which will come to all mankind when the eons end? Is it not peace with God? reconciliation? salvation? being made immortal, being justified? being made righteous? etc?

The verse which you quoted has nothing to do with Revelation.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 08, 2008, 07:25:17 PM
Quote from: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 12:58:18 AM
Quote from: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:27:34 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 06, 2008, 11:11:38 PM

Revelation 6:13-17 (NKJV) And the stars of heaven fell to the earth, as a fig tree drops its late figs when it is shaken by a mighty wind. 14 Then the sky receded as a scroll when it is rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved out of its place. 15 And the kings of the earth, the great men, the rich men, the commanders, the mighty men, every slave and every free man, hid themselves in the caves and in the rocks of the mountains, 16 and said to the mountains and rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the face of Him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! 17 "For the great day of His wrath has come, and who is able to stand?"

Is this talking about the end of the world in our future? NO! John is dealing with Jerusalem's destruction in AD 70. 

dear Zeek,
It seems you and I are at polar ends these days.
If Revelation has already come to pass, if that which you quote above has already come to pass then you must conclude that this has already come to pass:

1Th 4:13-18  Now we do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who are reposing, lest you may sorrow according as the rest, also, who have no expectation."  (14)  For, if we are believing that Jesus died and rose, thus also, those who are put to repose, will God, through Jesus, lead forth together with Him."  (15)  For this we are saying to you by the word of the Lord, that we, the living, who are surviving to the presence of the Lord, should by no means outstrip those who are put to repose,  (16)  for the Lord Himself will be descending from heaven with a shout of command, with the voice of the Chief Messenger, and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ shall be rising first,  (17)  Thereupon we, the living who are surviving, shall at the same time be snatched away together with them in clouds, to meet the Lord in the air. And thus shall we always be together with the Lord."  (18)  So that, console one another with these words."

If the above has come to pass then you and I are living on the new earth at this very moment and God and Christ are reigning in Jerusalem along with the 12 apostles and no nation is presently deceived for Satan and the false prophet are imprisoned.

We have no future resurrection to look forward to for all my friends who died are in their graves. All who were to be saved of the nations were saved prior to 70 A.D.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob somehow resurrected a couple thousand years ago and sat down in the kingdom which Christ ruled over but all the earth never saw it. It was a dismal failure. Christ came and went. He must have lied about ruling over the whole earth with the twelve. What an abject failure!
Hi Tony,

Many of the people at these boards either come from no background in being taught the prophetic Scriptures, or they've come from a dispensational premillenialist perspective and are either still coming from that perspective or honestly believe that God has moved them on to a different perspective.  Whether people here happen to be premillenial dispensationalist, amillenialist, or postmillenialist those perspectives would be entirely independent of the issue of whether or not many prophesies in the Gospels and in St. Paul's writings, and perhaps even in Revelation have been fulfilled.  I'm just asking if you really have the patience for all of the different perspectives that you're going to have to be dealing with here.  I was personally dispensational premillenialist until a couple of years ago when I started studying the book of Revelation for myself.  Not what others before me had previously said, but what the book actually had to say.  And the Concordant Literal, in particular, along with some help from Scarlett's, brought me to radically different conclusions that I'd never considered previous to those studies.  I'm personally postmillenial now because of my own studies.  I have some notes and web links on the book of Revelation board on this forum regarding the Postmillenialist perspective.  Unfortunately, many Postmillenialists are far more preterist than I'm comfortable with 'cause while I do see many, many of the prophecies as having already happened, you've got an excellent point about some [or actually many] of the details of Revelation regarding the earthquake of all earthquakes, etc.  But a Postmillenial perspective seems far more consistent with the truth of the Scriptures, with the revelation of UR, and the growing momentum of the Holy Spirit over the last century and a half or so.

Can you demonstrate why the 1Thessalonians 4 passage that you've repeatedly cited must happen around Revelation 4:1, if that's where you're coming from, or why you believe it's in the 11th, 19th, or 20th chapters if you believe that it happens Premillenially?  And can you demonstrate why Christ Jesus must be here during the millenium from any passage that's not as easily a reference to His High Priestly ministry at work over the Body of Christ, like in Isaiah 40 and other similar passages?  Zechariah's prophecy said that Christ Jesus came as King when He rode the donkey into Jerusalem.  The Kingdom wasn't offered and then withdrawn.  He came as King, and the Scriptures say that with His resurrection He is now Lord and Anointed; King and Priest after the Order of Melchezedec.  Were He not yet reigning, then He could not yet be subduing His enemies under His feet.  Are you Scripturally able to answer all 95 points of this:

http://www.againstdispensationalism.com/95theses.shtml (http://www.againstdispensationalism.com/95theses.shtml)

And yes, all 95 of them because they cut to the heart of the matter on a premillenial belief which is found nowhere in any of the early Church creeds.  Not in any of them.  If you're wishing to limit the scope of this thread to proving that not all of the prophecies of Revelation have happened yet, then that's fine.  That's understandable and that requires a whole lot less of your time.  But please be respectful of the beliefs of others unless you have the time and patience to Scripturally address each thing that's come up in this thread, including in this post.

Dear Martin, I will have a looky at the 95 theses and then get back with you.

Concerning your question, dear brother to me as to my bringing up 1 Thessalonians 4, let's have a look at it again:

1Th 4:13-17  Now we do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who are reposing, lest you may sorrow according as the rest, also, who have no expectation."  (14)  For, if we are believing that Jesus died and rose, thus also, those who are put to repose, will God, through Jesus, lead forth together with Him."  (15)  For this we are saying to you by the word of the Lord, that we, the living, who are surviving to the presence of the Lord, should by no means outstrip those who are put to repose,  (16)  for the Lord Himself will be descending from heaven with a shout of command, with the voice of the Chief Messenger, and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ shall be rising first,  (17)  Thereupon we, the living who are surviving, shall at the same time be snatched away together with them in clouds, to meet the Lord in the air. And thus shall we always be together with the Lord."

Please note that the next time the Lord was to come all the believers who had died (literally died) and were entombed would rise first and then at the same time, the living believers would be snatched together with them in couds to meet the Lord in the air.

I have heard some preterists state that the above verse is talking about when a person believes they meet the Lord (somehow in the air). But what is impossible with that scenario is that ALL the death who have died in the Lord and the living ones who are presently believers (not potential believers) meet the Lord in the air as a whole group all at the same time.

Now then, if the Lord truly came back in 70 A.D. as some claim (though to be sure no one has proof of this either spiritually or physically), then all those who died in the Lord as well as all the living have already risen from the graves and met the living believers and together met the Lord in the air and presently are with Him.

If that is the case, we are not under grace but under the law emenating from Jerusalem where Christ and the 12 have been ruling for almost 2000 years now (though to be sure, no one who has gone there has seen them since they've been in hiding all those years).

I'm not sure why you bring up Revelation 4:1 with the Thessalonian passage unless you mean by it that since John was asked to "come up" to the door opened in heaven that this means the fulfillment of the Thessalonian passage I just quoted. But it was just a vision and John did not literally go to heaven and did not literally meet the Lord in the air. Neither did John meet the Lord in the air with any of the dead who were supposed to rise from their graves for if Rev.4:1 is supposed to be the fulfillment of the Thessalonian passage then it fails miserably.

Does this help?
Now I will try to look at the 95 thesis and get back with you on that.
Thanks for being so kind too in your post!

Love,
Tony
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 08, 2008, 07:50:25 PM
Quote from: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 02:23:04 AM
For anyone interested, this is a list of cities on 7 hills:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_claimed_to_be_built_on_seven_hills (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_claimed_to_be_built_on_seven_hills)

I am a little curious why you give a list of cities on 7 hills when Revelation does not say the 7 mountains are cities but kings?

Rev 17:9 Here is the mind which has wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains where the woman is sitting on them,

Who is the woman? Babylon (Rev.17:5). In the vision Babylon is sitting on the seven mountains which are not really mountains but seven kings also called seven heads.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 08, 2008, 08:10:45 PM
 :thumbsup:

Yo Roseybud

QuoteBut if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:

That which is HID will be revealed, was promised

Mat 10:26 Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.

Mat 10:27 What I tell you in darkness, [that] speak ye in light: and what ye hear in the ear, [that] preach ye upon the housetops.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 08, 2008, 08:36:44 PM
 WOW!!
  great connection bro!! :thumbsup:   

   His promises     cleansing the flesh and spirit  :winkgrin:
Since we have these promises, dear friends, let's cleanse ourselves from everything that contaminates body and spirit by becoming mature in our holy fear of God.

Therefore, having these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all defilement of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.
................................................................................
  ................................................................................
Since we have these promises, dear friends,
we need to cleanse ourselves from everything that contaminates body and spirit and live a holy life in the fear of God.
................................................................................
................................................................................
Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on December 08, 2008, 08:49:13 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 08, 2008, 07:50:25 PM
Quote from: martincisneros on December 07, 2008, 02:23:04 AM
For anyone interested, this is a list of cities on 7 hills:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_claimed_to_be_built_on_seven_hills (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_claimed_to_be_built_on_seven_hills)

I am a little curious why you give a list of cities on 7 hills when Revelation does not say the 7 mountains are cities but kings?

Rev 17:9 Here is the mind which has wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains where the woman is sitting on them,

Who is the woman? Babylon (Rev.17:5). In the vision Babylon is sitting on the seven mountains which are not really mountains but seven kings also called seven heads.

I think mountain simply means high place. Leaders are in high places.

Revelation 17:4  And the woman was clothed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a gold cup full of abominations and of the unclean things of her immorality,

Purple and scarlet perhaps point to a religious leader?
The best article I found on this subject concludes de woman in the pope (likely the current one)
In that article the mountains are groups on names.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: CHB on December 08, 2008, 09:25:47 PM

Quote from: Tony N
Now then, if the Lord truly came back in 70 A.D. as some claim (though to be sure no one has proof of this either spiritually or physically), then all those who died in the Lord as well as all the living have already risen from the graves and met the living believers and together met the Lord in the air and presently are with Him.

If that is the case, we are not under grace but under the law emenating from Jerusalem where Christ and the 12 have been ruling for almost 2000 years now (though to be sure, no one who has gone there has seen them since they've been in hiding all those years).

Hi Tony,

I have thought about what you say above and it does seem like Christ came back and there was a resurrection after John, or during John's life time. What if??? and I say IF, Jesus came back and there was a resurrection in John's day and these are the saints that it says that Christ will bring with him when he comes again (1 Thess.3:13) (Zech. 14:5). (Joel 3:11). There are so many verses that point to this.

What IF Christ came back and took all the saints back with him in John's day and will come back and THEN set up an earthly kingdom? What IF the saints have been with God for two thousand years and are being trained to do a job in the kingdom of God, still future?

Maybe there are a lot to be fulfilled yet but there are so many scriptures that speak of Christ coming back soon and they all point to the time of the apostles.  (Luke 8:27) says "there be some standing here that shall not taste of death till they see the kingdom of God". Christ said "if I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee"? Could this have been John?

Look at this verse. (1Cor. 15:23) But every man in his own order: Christ, {then}the firstfruits, afterward they that are Christ at his coming.

I put a coma after Christ because how could Christ be a firstfruits, plural? Wouldn't he be a firstfruit? We would still have a resurrection and maybe an earthly kingdom that is future.

CHB


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 08, 2008, 09:26:46 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 08, 2008, 06:49:00 PM


The verse which you quoted has nothing to do with Revelation.

It has everything imo, to do with Revelation.  


Rev 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but [are] the synagogue of Satan.


Rev 1:9 I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.




Rev 2:10 Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast [some] of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.


Rev 3:5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.

.  
Act 14:22 Confirming the souls of the disciples, [and] exhorting them to continue in the faith, and that we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God.  


Rom 5:3 And not only [so], but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience;  


Rom 8:35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? [shall] tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?  


Rom 12:12 Rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation; continuing instant in prayer; 

2Cr 1:4 Who comforteth us in all our tribulation, that we may be able to comfort them which are in any trouble, by the comfort wherewith we ourselves are comforted of God.  


2Cr 7:4 Great [is] my boldness of speech toward you, great [is] my glorying of you: I am filled with comfort, I am exceeding joyful in all our tribulation. 

1Th 3:4 For verily, when we were with you, we told you before that we should suffer tribulation; even as it came to pass, and ye know.  




Gal 4:28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.


Gal 4:29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him [that was born] after the Spirit, even so [it is] now.


Gal 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.

Revelation is all about casting out the bondwoman.  IN WITH The NEW

For me, I don't see Revelation as some future time for God to deal with Israel.  I don't see the "parenthetical" church age in the same way you do.  

But praise God we both see the LOVE of the FATHER.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 08, 2008, 09:29:41 PM
Enjoyed that  post Zeek :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 08, 2008, 10:23:07 PM
 
  and I as well
    Believe that Jesus comes many times to many folks   in the Spirit and Truth   all the time NOW ! TODAY this minute with His saints /holy ones
ministering to us  and judging us chasting us  etc .  the key that opens heaven , which is His peace and His joy and  His Holy Spriit  anlong with the Fathers of course  :thumbsup:
  CHB
  GOOD post too , Jesus IS  the RESSURECTION  and the life     could it be any plainer than that ? yeee haaa!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 08, 2008, 10:32:12 PM
Quote from: CHB on December 08, 2008, 09:25:47 PM

Quote from: Tony N
Now then, if the Lord truly came back in 70 A.D. as some claim (though to be sure no one has proof of this either spiritually or physically), then all those who died in the Lord as well as all the living have already risen from the graves and met the living believers and together met the Lord in the air and presently are with Him.

If that is the case, we are not under grace but under the law emenating from Jerusalem where Christ and the 12 have been ruling for almost 2000 years now (though to be sure, no one who has gone there has seen them since they've been in hiding all those years).

Hi Tony,

I have thought about what you say above and it does seem like Christ came back and there was a resurrection after John, or during John's life time. What if??? and I say IF, Jesus came back and there was a resurrection in John's day and these are the saints that it says that Christ will bring with him when he comes again (1 Thess.3:13) (Zech. 14:5). (Joel 3:11). There are so many verses that point to this.

Hi CHB,
Where in the Bible does it say Christ came back and there was a resurrection during John's life time? If there was a resurrection, why is Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David etc. still in their tombs?
Also, The Lord coming with His saints cannot be any saints in heaven because there are no saints in heaven even today. The saints He comes with are from the vantage point of the prophet being on the earth and seeing the Lord coming while He is on the earth and the saints coming out of their tombs or while alive and coming with Him.
Again, if the Lord came back after Paul wrote Thessalonians which was pre-70A.D. and Paul said that when the Lord returns they, the living would be changed and those dead would be brought to life, well, it never happened. But if it did, we are on the new earth by now and Christ and God are ruling with the 12 apostles in Jerusalem on the earth PHYSICALLY. And righteousness covers the whole earth (which I sincerely doubt is if we look at Hitler, Stalin, Mugabe, Pol Pot, etc). If this is the new earth then Christ fails at reigning over the nations and so does God as do the 12 and 144,000 etc.

QuoteCHB wrote: What IF Christ came back and took all the saints back with him in John's day and will come back and THEN set up an earthly kingdom? What IF the saints have been with God for two thousand years and are being trained to do a job in the kingdom of God, still future?

Friend, I don't deal with "what ifs." After John wrote Revelation he lived quite a while so we know he wasn't taken. If Christ came back in John's day then Paul's prophecy of the saints being changed etc. has already occurred and we are not under grace but under the thumb of the 12 apostles ruling over the nations with an iron club. The only time believers of the nations are taken out is when "the complement of the nations may be entering" (Romans 11:25). Since this has not come to pass yet, (the filling up of the body of Christ to completion) then we know Christ has not returned yet.

QuoteCHB wrote: Maybe there are a lot to be fulfilled yet but there are so many scriptures that speak of Christ coming back soon and they all point to the time of the apostles.  (Luke 8:27) says "there be some standing here that shall not taste of death till they see the kingdom of God". Christ said "if I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee"? Could this have been John?

Tony's reply:
That's Matthew 16:28 not Luke 8:27.
But Jesus said he really didn't know the hour or the day of His return:

Mat 24:36  "Now, concerning that day and hour no one is aware, neither the messengers of the heavens, nor the Son; except the Father only."

And there was the secret administration given to Paul and the secret of Israel being set aside which was not revealed at all in the Scriptures except to Paul, so all bets were off as to the Kingdom coming.

Quote
Look at this verse. (1Cor. 15:23) But every man in his own order: Christ, {then}the firstfruits, afterward they that are Christ at his coming.

I put a coma after Christ because how could Christ be a firstfruits, plural? Wouldn't he be a firstfruit? We would still have a resurrection and maybe an earthly kingdom that is future.

CHB

Yes, in the Concordant Literal New Testament and the Greek Text "firstfruit" is singular and should be "Firstfruit."
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 08, 2008, 10:35:13 PM


    the  HEAD CHRIST is made of all first fruit  in the begining  the many that rule and reign   with Christ right now .. :icon_flower:
  Christ/ annointed .
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 08, 2008, 11:26:09 PM
Quote from: rosered on December 06, 2008, 11:51:46 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:30:54 PM
Quote from: rosered on December 06, 2008, 11:23:33 PM
Rev 1:10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,



  My Bible says John  was IN the SPIRIT   ON THE LORDS DAY ..   In  and on  being the same words!

Sorry to have to say this rosered but your bible is just wrong.
Look at any Greek text from which we get the Bible. The Greek text says: I John was in (Grk. en) spirit in (Grk. en) the Lord's day."
The Greek word for "in" is "en."
The Greek word for "on" is "epi."
Epi is absent.

Better get a better bible.

ho ho ho !!  come on it means the same thing !!!  :mshock:
Literally "epi" means "upon" 1909
epi
epi
ep-ee'
a primary preposition; properly, meaning superimposition (of time, place, order, etc.), as a relation of distribution (with the genitive case), i.e. over, upon, etc.; of rest (with the dative case) at, on, etc.; of direction (with the accusative case) towards, upon, etc.:--about (the times), above, after, against, among, as long as (touching), at, beside, X have charge of, (be-, (where-))fore, in (a place, as much as, the time of, -to), (because) of, (up-)on (behalf of), over, (by, for) the space of, through(-out), (un-)to(-ward), with. In compounds it retains essentially the same import, at, upon, etc. (literally or figuratively).
1722
en
en
en
a primary preposition denoting (fixed) position (in place, time or state), and (by implication) instrumentality (medially or constructively), i.e. a relation of rest (intermediate between eiV - eis 1519 and 1537); "in," at, (up-)on, by, etc.:--about, after, against, + almost, X altogether, among, X as, at, before, between, (here-)by (+ all means), for (... sake of), + give self wholly to, (here-)in(-to, -wardly), X mightily, (because) of, (up-)on, (open-)ly, X outwardly, one, X quickly, X shortly, (speedi-)ly, X that, X there(-in, -on), through(-out), (un-)to(-ward), under, when, where(-with), while, with(-in). Often used in compounds, with substantially the same import; rarely with verbs of motion, and then not to indicate direction, except (elliptically) by a separate (and different) preposition.


 this is silly  Tony to prove a point   ?   John  was in the  Holy  Spirit seeing all these things

O.K. rosered have it your way. This is the Burger King of Scriptures where you can have it any way you desire. Here is a burger king crown for you too :icon_queen:
LOL

Now then, if you believe In means On by all means go through the Scriptures and everywhere "in" is just put "on" in its place. I won't look so silly then.

If God says Jesus was in a house, am I to suppose he was on the house?
If a demon was in a person was it on the person?
If the pigs jumped in the lake did they somehow jump on it and walk on water?
Did Peter jump out of the boat in the water or on the water naked?
Was Jesus born in Bethlehem or on it?

John was IN spirit IN the Lord's day. The Lord's day is yet future. It has not come yet. He was not in spirit on Sunday.

The two Greek words en and epi don't mean the same thing. en means "in" and "epi" means "on."

If God wanted John to use "epi" he would have been "on spirit on the Lord's day." LOL
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 12:23:03 AM
Quote
John was IN spirit IN the Lord's day. The Lord's day is yet future. It has not come yet. He was not in spirit on Sunday.

so what is the Lords Day Tony.I concur Not a Sunday, WHAT is it, where can we find it in the scripis,,just Revelation? It ? ...then maybe we can Discuss what Happens In\on IT?

What say you T?

I say the Lords DAY Is Christ, did ya ever Notice that the LORDS DAY Got LORD in IT?

Ever Notice we are IN the LORD and the LORD is IN us?..is that In suffice for you?

Im a Simple type of Guy T, so can we start with Basics before we Move to your Level?
:icon_flower:






Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: CHB on December 09, 2008, 12:30:59 AM
Quote from: Tony N on December 08, 2008, 10:32:12 PM
Hi CHB,
Where in the Bible does it say Christ came back and there was a resurrection during John's life time? If there was a resurrection, why is Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David etc. still in their tombs?
Also, The Lord coming with His saints cannot be any saints in heaven because there are no saints in heaven even today. The saints He comes with are from the vantage point of the prophet being on the earth and seeing the Lord coming while He is on the earth and the saints coming out of their tombs or while alive and coming with Him.
Again, if the Lord came back after Paul wrote Thessalonians which was pre-70A.D. and Paul said that when the Lord returns they, the living would be changed and those dead would be brought to life, well, it never happened. But if it did, we are on the new earth by now and Christ and God are ruling with the 12 apostles in Jerusalem on the earth PHYSICALLY. And righteousness covers the whole earth (which I sincerely doubt is if we look at Hitler, Stalin, Mugabe, Pol Pot, etc). If this is the new earth then Christ fails at reigning over the nations and so does God as do the 12 and 144,000 etc.

Tony,

Where in the Bible does it say Christ didn't come back? There are more proof that he did than he didn't. Also, how do you know that David, Abraham, Jacob, and Isaac are still in their graves? Why do you say "if this happened we are on the new earth"? Not necessarly.


Quote from: Tony N
Friend, I don't deal with "what ifs." After John wrote Revelation he lived quite a while so we know he wasn't taken. If Christ came back in John's day then Paul's prophecy of the saints being changed etc. has already occurred and we are not under grace but under the thumb of the 12 apostles ruling over the nations with an iron club. The only time believers of the nations are taken out is when "the complement of the nations may be entering" (Romans 11:25). Since this has not come to pass yet, (the filling up of the body of Christ to completion) then we know Christ has not returned yet.

Why would we not be under grace. I thought the apostles would be ruling over Israel? Christ coming back and a resurrection doesn't necessarly mean the kingdom is already here. There doesn't need to be a kingdom set up exactly when Christ came back and took the saints back with him. It could still be in the future.

Quote from: Tony N
Tony's reply:
That's Matthew 16:28 not Luke 8:27.
But Jesus said he really didn't know the hour or the day of His return:

That was (Luke 9:27) wrong chapter. Sorry.

Quote from: Tony N
Mat 24:36  "Now, concerning that day and hour no one is aware, neither the messengers of the heavens, nor the Son; except the Father only."

That is true. I don't know what day nor hour Christ came, if he even did. But what do you do with all the scriptures that indicate that he did return?

Quote from: Tony N
And there was the secret administration given to Paul and the secret of Israel being set aside which was not revealed at all in the Scriptures except to Paul, so all bets were off as to the Kingdom coming.

What do you mean "secret of Israel"? I know about the mystery being revealed to Paul. (Eph. 3:5) says the Mystery is now {at that time} revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit.

CHB






Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 12:45:40 AM
Quote from: CHB on December 09, 2008, 12:30:59 AM

Quote from: Tony N
Tony's reply:
That's Matthew 16:28 not Luke 8:27.
But Jesus said he really didn't know the hour or the day of His return:

That was (Luke 9:27) wrong chapter. Sorry.

Quote from: Tony N
Mat 24:36  "Now, concerning that day and hour no one is aware, neither the messengers of the heavens, nor the Son; except the Father only."

That is true. I don't know what day nor hour Christ came, if he even did. But what do you do with all the scriptures that indicate that he did return?







at the time matthew was written, the "hour" was unknown. 

but look at this verse written approximately 30 years later by John


1Jo 2:18 Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour. 

even more proof to me that the imminent return was upon those then.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: WhiteWings on December 09, 2008, 12:48:13 AM

Quote from: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:30:54 PM
Sorry to have to say this rosered but your bible is just wrong.
Look at any Greek text from which we get the Bible. The Greek text says: I John was in (Grk. en) spirit in (Grk. en) the Lord's day."
The Greek word for "in" is "en."
The Greek word for "on" is "epi."
Epi is absent.

Better get a better bible.

KJV Revelation 1:10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,

In and on both have the same Greek word:

Quote1722 ἐν en {en}
Meaning:  1) in, by, with etc.
Origin:  a primary preposition denoting (fixed) position (in place, time or state), and (by implication) instrumentality (medially or constructively), i.e. a relation of rest (intermediate between 1519 and 1537); TDNT - 2:537,233; prep
Usage:  AV - in 1874, by 141, with 134, among 117, at 112, on 46, through 37, misc 321; 2782
Misc:  Wigram's frequency count is 2798 not 2782.

Quoteevn noun genitive feminine singular from ge,nesij

[GING] ge,nesij
ge,nesij, ewj, h` birth {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Mat 1:18')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 1:18}}}\cf1\ulnone ; {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Luk 1:14')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 1:14}}}\cf1\ulnone . In {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Mat 1:1')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 1:1}}}\cf1\ulnone  g) may mean origin or descent, and the expression bi,bloj gene,sewj may mean genealogy as {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Gen 5:1')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Gen 5:1}}}\cf1\ulnone . pro,swpon g) natural face {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Jam 1:23')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Js 1:23}}}\cf1\ulnone . troco.j th/j g) course of life {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Jam 3:6')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 3:6}}}\cf1\ulnone .* [Genesis] [pg 38]
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 12:51:57 AM
Quoteat the time matthew was written, the "hour" was unknown.  

but look at this verse written approximately 30 years later by John


1Jo 2:18 Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour.  

even more proof to me that the imminent return was upon those then.

Hi Zeek

If we search the greater depths of the scriptures we see..there are seasons for all things, within those seasons come Years, Months , Weeks ,Days ,and Hours...they mean the same..ALL appointed Times...

Did the woman  who was In travail Give Birth in a AN hour.?.HER hour(time) had COME...all spiritual and to be understood that way Bro..but you know me anyways... :icon_flower:




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 01:08:15 AM
Quote from: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 12:51:57 AM
Quoteat the time matthew was written, the "hour" was unknown.  

but look at this verse written approximately 30 years later by John


1Jo 2:18 Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour.  

even more proof to me that the imminent return was upon those then.

Hi Zeek

If we search the greater depths of the scriptures we see..there are seasons for all things, within those seasons come Years, Months , Weeks ,Days ,and Hours...they mean the same..ALL appointed Times...

Did the woman  who was In travail Give Birth in a AN hour.?.HER hour(time) had COME...all spiritual and to be understood that way Bro..but you know me anyways... :icon_flower:






I hear ya T, no worries, I "see" what you are saying too. 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 02:20:37 AM
Quote from: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 12:23:03 AM
Quote
John was IN spirit IN the Lord's day. The Lord's day is yet future. It has not come yet. He was not in spirit on Sunday.

so what is the Lords Day Tony.I concur Not a Sunday, WHAT is it, where can we find it in the scripis,,just Revelation? It ? ...then maybe we can Discuss what Happens In\on IT?

What say you T?

I say the Lords DAY Is Christ, did ya ever Notice that the LORDS DAY Got LORD in IT?

Ever Notice we are IN the LORD and the LORD is IN us?..is that In suffice for you?

Im a Simple type of Guy T, so can we start with Basics before we Move to your Level?
:icon_flower:

Hi dear T., Yes we are in the Lord, not on the Lord. And yes, the Lord is in us, not on us.
If we are "in the Lord" why cannot John be in the future day of the Lord? The phrase "day of the Lord" is the same as "the Lord's day." Just as "the Son of God" is the same as "God's Son" and "the Lord's supper" is the same as "the supper of the Lord."

T, I already said what the day of the Lord is. Please, T, look at the third post on page one of this thread to see what "the day of the Lord" is. It can't be Christ because Christ is not "the day." And "the day" is not IN us.

"In all these places, as the context abundantly proves, the Day of the Lord is the (day of His public interference in the affairs of men and the display of His judgments in the earth—the day when amidst an avalanche of ruin "the loftiness of man shall be bowed down, and the haughtiness of man shall be brought low: and Yahweh alone shall be exalted" (Isa.2:17). The Day of the Lord appears in the New Testament three times, 1 Thess.5:2; 2 Thess.2:2, and 2 Peter 3:10, in precisely the same way—in connection with apostasy, the manifestation of the man of sin, and the advent of Christ in judgment. And the Lord's Day in Revelation is seen in the same relation as the Day of the Lord in both Testaments—the judgment of the host of the high ones on high, and the kings of the earth on the earth, accompanied by seismic convulsions and the shaking of the powers of heaven." (Unsearchable Riches, vol.1, pg.349).
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 02:32:07 AM
In glancing through your #3 post, I notice you are using Matthew 24 to back up your opinion that the Lord's day is not Christ . . . but at the same time, Matthew 24 has the same language as Revelation . . .We saw Christ come as the redeemer in the flesh.  We saw him come as the comforter in the Spirit in the upper room . .and both Matthew 24, and Revelation . as well as Daniel's prophecy, all speak of Christ returning as judge to a nation that called for the blood to be upon them and their children. 

What is the significance of John taking the pains to explain that it was on Sunday or Saturday, literally, if there is not a spiritual picture being drawn there?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 02:38:19 AM
QuoteT, I already said what the day of the Lord is. Please, T, look at the third post on page one of this thread to see what "the day of the Lord" is. It can't be Christ because Christ is not "the day." And "the day" is not IN us.

"In all these places, as the context abundantly proves, the Day of the Lord is the (day of His public interference in the affairs of men and the display of His judgments in the earth—the day when amidst an avalanche of ruin "the loftiness of man shall be bowed down, and the haughtiness of man shall be brought low: and Jehovah alone shall be exalted" (Isa.2:17). The Day of the Lord appears in the New Testament three times, 1 Thess.5:2; 2 Thess.2:2, and 2 Peter 3:10, in precisely the same way—in connection with apostasy, the manifestation of the man of sin, and the advent of Christ in judgment. And the Lord's Day in Revelation is seen in the same relation as the Day of the Lord in both Testaments—the judgment of the host of the high ones on high, and the kings of the earth on the earth, accompanied by seismic convulsions and the shaking of the powers of heaven." (Unsearchable Riches, vol.1, pg.349).

Hi Tony Good yo nice chatting again, ya may not remeber as Ive had many handles we chatted the savior for all Forum moons back.

First, I was RAISED on what Your telling me, nothing NEW here ,I see BOTH sides OF the Coin.

What You see is WHAT happens on the Lords DAY..not what the LORDS Day Is...


so Bud explain that away..t like I mentioned,,can we start at basics First before we get to your level?...

Yes T , I  Know the Thief in the NIGHT verses etc...read some posts of mine to get Know more of my veiws on such things...It may help you Bro...to at least KNOW where in coming From. :icon_flower:
.

again T what IS the LORDS day



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 02:40:13 AM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 02:32:07 AM
In glancing through your #3 post, I notice you are using Matthew 24 to back up your opinion that the Lord's day is not Christ . . . but at the same time, Matthew 24 has the same language as Revelation . . .We saw Christ come as the redeemer in the flesh.  We saw him come as the comforter in the Spirit in the upper room . .and both Matthew 24, and Revelation . as well as Daniel's prophecy, all speak of Christ returning as judge to a nation that called for the blood to be upon them and their children. 

What is the significance of John taking the pains to explain that it was on Sunday or Saturday, literally, if there is not a spiritual picture being drawn there?

I don't think John was saying it was on a Sunday or Saturday literally or figuratively. I am saying that when John was "in spirit in the Lord's day" that he was in spirit thousands of years in the future from his day when he saw, in his vision, the day of the Lord.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 02:43:21 AM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 02:40:13 AM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 02:32:07 AM
In glancing through your #3 post, I notice you are using Matthew 24 to back up your opinion that the Lord's day is not Christ . . . but at the same time, Matthew 24 has the same language as Revelation . . .We saw Christ come as the redeemer in the flesh.  We saw him come as the comforter in the Spirit in the upper room . .and both Matthew 24, and Revelation . as well as Daniel's prophecy, all speak of Christ returning as judge to a nation that called for the blood to be upon them and their children. 

What is the significance of John taking the pains to explain that it was on Sunday or Saturday, literally, if there is not a spiritual picture being drawn there?

I don't think John was saying it was on a Sunday or Saturday literally or figuratively. I am saying that when John was "in spirit in the Lord's day" that he was in spirit thousands of years in the future from his day when he saw, in his vision, the day of the Lord.

so what he saw was thousands of years in the future, but he thought it was "at hand".  He just wasn't shown the "mystery" i take it, the church age??  is that what u think??
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 02:47:22 AM
Hi Taffy,
I don't recognize your name from the savior for all forums.

Taffy, let me put it this way, if you read Revelation and see all the judgments, the bowls being poured out (and I don't mean cereal bowls either he he) earthquakes, lightning, pestilence, famine, darkness, death, destruction, all in that future day THAT IS THE DAY OF THE LORD. That is the Lord's day. Right now we are in what is called "man's day."
1Co 4:3 "Now to me it is the least trifle that I may be being examined by you or by man's day. But neither am I examining myself."
Man's day is when man tries to do things by the will of the flesh. Man's day has been going on for thousands of years. When the Lord's day arrives it will be a time of judgment . . . a settling of accounts . . . a setting right of wrongs done.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 02:50:44 AM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 02:43:21 AM
I don't think John was saying it was on a Sunday or Saturday literally or figuratively. I am saying that when John was "in spirit in the Lord's day" that he was in spirit thousands of years in the future from his day when he saw, in his vision, the day of the Lord.

so what he saw was thousands of years in the future, but he thought it was "at hand".  He just wasn't shown the "mystery" i take it, the church age??  is that what u think??
[/quote]

That is quite possible. John might have thought these things were right around the corner since he did not know about the "mystery" or "secret" that was given to Paul.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 03:03:41 AM
John "might" have???  That's not what it says . .it's pretty straight forward that it was upon them and John wasn't the one saying it . . .he was recording what was being said to him.

 Not sure if you answered the "open/close" book question earlier either.

What about signed and signified?  What about written to the "bond" servants?  What about while in the spirit he had to "turn" in order to see?

I can't help but see the correlation between those who choose to take it literally, and the disciples, Pharisees, and just general listeners of Christ who also couldn't understand a word he said either . .because they took everything he said literally, rather than "looking for" the spiritual significance.

What good did it do for God to allow John to be captured, beaten, boiled in oil, then thrown on an Island which ironically means "Place of my killing" which also apparently has no significance either, then given this Revelation which was specifically directed toward 7 specific churches. . .and the language is ironically the same as what Jesus described in Matthew 24 where leading into it he also speaks of the fact that these things were to happen "to this generation" and again in Matthew 23 he says the same . . .but Jesus prophecy was meant for "another" generation 2000 years later?  Again, the traditional way of looking at it just doesn't fit.

I know they say that John recorded "that which was, is and is to come" and that is their reasoning for saying it's a futuristic event . . .but did they read the part just 11 verses previous to that?

Revelation 1:19
19Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter

Verse 8
8I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

Hebrews 13:8
8Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.

Seems to be a pattern emerging.




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 03:09:17 AM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 02:47:22 AM
Hi Taffy,
I don't recognize your name from the savior for all forums.

Taffy, let me put it this way, if you read Revelation and see all the judgments, the bowls being poured out (and I don't mean cereal bowls either he he) earthquakes, lightning, pestilence, famine, darkness, death, destruction, all in that future day THAT IS THE DAY OF THE LORD. That is the Lord's day. Right now we are in what is called "man's day."
1Co 4:3 "Now to me it is the least trifle that I may be being examined by you or by man's day. But neither am I examining myself."
Man's day is when man tries to do things by the will of the flesh. Man's day has been going on for thousands of years. When the Lord's day arrives it will be a time of judgment . . . a settling of accounts . . . a setting right of wrongs done.
No worries

Gee brud, you see very Much in the literal sence and Spirit which IS the word Of Christ Ya dont Im afraid, wel will be Here  for ever, getting Nowheres.


So If I may...We are In the LORDS DAY now, as THAT DAY is Now as scriptures notes its so..oh if ya want the scrips ASK


TO DAY is the DAY of Salvation, Today Is the same as The first Day which is the same as the Third day , which equally the 7th day and The 8th...

Which makes Christ the same to day and yesterday and tomorrow, which also includes the Covenats...

TO DAY is The DAY of Salvation WHICH comes TO EACH MAN as THEIF in the NIGHT,,,,

look up  the difference BETWEEN NIGHT and DAY...

That May help you understand why HE COMES in the NIGHT not the DAY...he doesnt come in the DAY cos HE IS THE DAY.



Christ seperates THE DAY from the NIGHT, for there are TWLVE hrs In each...but both testify to HIM,

Jhn 11:9 Jesus answered, Are there not twelve hours in the day? If any man walk in the day, he stumbleth not, because he seeth the light of this world.  
.

This day is the DAY of the LORD.....we dont have two or three..WE HAVE ONE....

We walk in the DAY Tony , not the NIGHT, for the Night has Past as watch In the NIGHT...

We see In day cos ITS light NOT DARKNESS,BUT i dont think  YOU  KNOW what darkness and Light is...
LET you eye BE FULL OF LIGHT,.....

Tony me bro,,the DAY of the LORD is NOW, lest we have NO hope..what you read in REVELATION is literal and youll be forever stumbling around from pillar to post , going round and Round and get Nowheres...

Your turn Go check the Little I gave ON SHOWING WHO the LORDS day IS AND  then ya may come to see why JOHN was in\on the Lords DAY..he was always there Bro..The vision was a REVEALING of the LIFE of Christ, written In symbols...

Scripture SPEAKS of ONE and HIS..CHRIST....thats It.

seek him where hes Hidden, youll see differently then..but thats Just me Bud...

Christ is Life Not death and so Is revelation if we can start to see it

time for beddies T .till we talk again

Nice chatting :icon_flower:




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 09, 2008, 03:12:09 AM
Quote from: WhiteWings on December 09, 2008, 12:48:13 AM

Quote from: Tony N on December 06, 2008, 11:30:54 PM
Sorry to have to say this rosered but your bible is just wrong.
Look at any Greek text from which we get the Bible. The Greek text says: I John was in (Grk. en) spirit in (Grk. en) the Lord's day."
The Greek word for "in" is "en."
The Greek word for "on" is "epi."
Epi is absent.

Better get a better bible.

KJV Revelation 1:10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,

In and on both have the same Greek word:

Quote1722 ἐν en {en}
Meaning:  1) in, by, with etc.
Origin:  a primary preposition denoting (fixed) position (in place, time or state), and (by implication) instrumentality (medially or constructively), i.e. a relation of rest (intermediate between 1519 and 1537); TDNT - 2:537,233; prep
Usage:  AV - in 1874, by 141, with 134, among 117, at 112, on 46, through 37, misc 321; 2782
Misc:  Wigram's frequency count is 2798 not 2782.

Quoteevn noun genitive feminine singular from ge,nesij

[GING] ge,nesij
ge,nesij, ewj, h` birth {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Mat 1:18')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 1:18}}}\cf1\ulnone ; {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Luk 1:14')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 1:14}}}\cf1\ulnone . In {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Mat 1:1')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 1:1}}}\cf1\ulnone  g) may mean origin or descent, and the expression bi,bloj gene,sewj may mean genealogy as {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Gen 5:1')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Gen 5:1}}}\cf1\ulnone . pro,swpon g) natural face {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Jam 1:23')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Js 1:23}}}\cf1\ulnone . troco.j th/j g) course of life {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_Jam 3:6')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 3:6}}}\cf1\ulnone .* [Genesis] [pg 38]
you see what I see bro ! yaaaaayyyh!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 05:02:40 AM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 02:50:44 AM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 02:43:21 AM
I don't think John was saying it was on a Sunday or Saturday literally or figuratively. I am saying that when John was "in spirit in the Lord's day" that he was in spirit thousands of years in the future from his day when he saw, in his vision, the day of the Lord.

so what he saw was thousands of years in the future, but he thought it was "at hand".  He just wasn't shown the "mystery" i take it, the church age??  is that what u think??

That is quite possible. John might have thought these things were right around the corner since he did not know about the "mystery" or "secret" that was given to Paul.
[/quote]

So when did Paul receive the "secret"?  It must have been after the time of Romans, I,II Corinth, I,II Thes, I,II Timothy since he talked of an imminent return of Christ. 

What book do you think then applies to you today??  only Ephesians and maybe Collosians?? 

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 01:10:51 PM
I think it is important to get back to what started this thread.
The Berean said that since John was told to measure the temple of God and the altar etc. in Revelation 11:1.
He stated that the temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. Fair enough.
So he stated that Revelation must have been written before 70 A.D.

I maintain John was in spirit IN the Lord's day and was looking into the far off future when the temple would be built again with the altar etc. Why? Why was he looking into the future?

The New City Jerusalem did not land on the earth before 70 A.D. Yet John said he saw it being measured:
Rev 21:15-17  And he who is speaking with me had a measure, a golden reed, that he should be measuring the city, and its portals, and its wall."  (16)  And the city is lying four square: and its length is as much as the breadth. And he measures the city with the reed to twelve thousand stadia. Its length and breadth and height are equal.  (17)  And he measures its wall of a hundred forty-four cubits of a human measure, which is that of the messenger."

The new earth did not come at 70 A.D. because the whole earth nor the heavens were  destroyed in 70 A.D. by fire and possibly nuclear destruction (booming noise).

2Pe 3:10 "Now the day of the Lord will be arriving as a thief, in which the heavens shall be passing by with a booming noise, yet the elements shall be dissolved by combustion, and the earth and the works in it shall be found."

Jerusalem was not John's nor Peter's nor the Lord's world. They traveled far and wide (John to Patmos, Peter to Babylon, Jesus to Egypt as a youth).

So do you see the problem?
The Berean man is using the measuring of the temple to say Revelation was written pre-70A.D. But more internal evidence shows the New City Jerusalem being measured which puts John in spirit thousands of years into the future.

Therefore, in John's vision, he still looked forward to the thousand year reign of Christ. Even if John's revelation was written in 60 some A.D. it is impossible to  have the thousand year reign of Christ and the New earth take place all within 10 years or less (before 70 A.D).

Let's try to stick with this issue which started this thread and then we can branch out. O.K.?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 03:43:38 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 01:10:51 PM
I think it is important to get back to what started this thread.
The Berean said that since John was told to measure the temple of God and the altar etc. in Revelation 11:1.
He stated that the temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. Fair enough.
So he stated that Revelation must have been written before 70 A.D.

I maintain John was in spirit IN the Lord's day and was looking into the far off future when the temple would be built again with the altar etc. Why? Why was he looking into the future?

The New City Jerusalem did not land on the earth before 70 A.D. Yet John said he saw it being measured:
Rev 11:15-17  And he who is speaking with me had a measure, a golden reed, that he should be measuring the city, and its portals, and its wall."  (16)  And the city is lying four square: and its length is as much as the breadth. And he measures the city with the reed to twelve thousand stadia. Its length and breadth and height are equal.  (17)  And he measures its wall of a hundred forty-four cubits of a human measure, which is that of the messenger."

The new earth did not come at 70 A.D. because the whole earth nor the heavens were  destroyed in 70 A.D. by fire and possibly nuclear destruction (booming noise).

2Pe 3:10 "Now the day of the Lord will be arriving as a thief, in which the heavens shall be passing by with a booming noise, yet the elements shall be dissolved by combustion, and the earth and the works in it shall be found."

Jerusalem was not John's nor Peter's nor the Lord's world. They traveled far and wide (John to Patmos, Peter to Babylon, Jesus to Egypt as a youth).

So do you see the problem?
The Berean man is using the measuring of the temple to say Revelation was written pre-70A.D. But more internal evidence shows the New City Jerusalem being measured which puts John in spirit thousands of years into the future.

Therefore, in John's vision, he still looked forward to the thousand year reign of Christ. Even if John's revelation was written in 60 some A.D. it is impossible to  have the thousand year reign of Christ and the New earth take place all within 10 years or less (before 70 A.D).

Let's try to stick with this issue which started this thread and then we can branch out. O.K.?

I maintain John was in spirit IN the Lord's day and was looking into the far off future when the temple would be built again with the altar etc

First, for me, regardless of the throngs of men who believe the temple will be rebuilt . .I am not one that sees that ever happening.  A.D. 70 was the completion of the removal of that which Jesus began on the cross.  The Levitical system has already been removed and it was replaced "once and for all" by the ultimate sacrifice which was the Lamb of God.  To think that God would turn around and allow the old system to be rebuilt is to say that God didn't see his Son as the remedy, only as an "option" for us to choose as a remedy.  And that was definitely not the case.

Man didn't come up with the temple sacrifices in the first place, what makes us think that man will be able to start them now?  The reason why so many have taken that point of view is again, because they're assuming the things written are literal and not instead, literal symbols that point to a spiritual experience rather than a natural one.  To have man rebuild the temple is saying that yesterday's manna is still edible . . .even though Scripture states that it rots and is full of worms (carnality).

Why? Why was he looking into the future?
He wasn't, he was looking into Christ.  This is not a revelation of natural events happening to a natural world.  This is a revelation of Jesus Christ . . .who is a spirit.

The New City Jerusalem did not land on the earth before 70 A.D. Yet John said he saw it being measured:

The New Jerusalem isn't going to "land" anywhere.  Whenever we see some one or some thing ascending or descending, what we're seeing is something "appearing" or "disappearing".  It's transcending from one realm into another.  The New Jerusalem is not a literal city any more than the temple is a literal temple.  I should say also that even though I don't believe that the temple so many feel is going to be rebuilt will ever come to be, I "do" believe there is "a" temple that "is" being rebuilt . .but not by men.  Jesus stated "tear down this temple and in 3 days I . . . ."I" . . .will rebuild it.  When we let Scripture interpret itself, rather than find two verses that appear to support each other and "interpet" what they are both saying . . .we'd see that "we" are living stones with which God is using to build his temple of worship . . ."we" are that temple . . .and "we" are the New Jerusalem.  When the sons of God manifest to the groaning earth . .that is the same as the New Jerusalem "descending" from "heaven".  It's already finished in the spirit, but now it's manifesting in the flesh. 

The disciples that were spread out across the world THEN were the first generation of that New Jerusalem.  And this next piece is where I see the traditional interpretation really starts falling apart . .if it hasn't already.  It's your quote of Revelation.

Rev 21:15-17  And he who is speaking with me had a measure, a golden reed, that he should be measuring the city, and its portals, and its wall."  (16)  And the city is lying four square: and its length is as much as the breadth. And he measures the city with the reed to twelve thousand stadia. Its length and breadth and height are equal.  (17)  And he measures its wall of a hundred forty-four cubits of a human measure, which is that of the messenger."

Tell me, how can you have a literal city that is a square cube . . including "height"?  I understand you can have width and length to be squared . .but height also?  Here's where the traditional belief "decides" to go spiritual.  And that's been my problem with the traditional take of Revelation from the get-go.  The claim is that it's all literal, until they get to places like this and then they'll say "oh, well, this city isn't like the cities we live in now . .this city is actually "suspended" in the air and only those who have their new bodies will be able to enter into it because they can fly now . . . "  I taught Revelation "before" realizing there was much demo work to be done in my doctrine in order for the spiritual perspective could manifest.

The point is . . .you can't jump back and forth from literal to spiritual, and back again.  "It's all spiritual".  Jesus Christ THE SAME Yesterday, Today, and Forever . . .in every dimension, there is the consistency of Truth.  This city's dimension are the same in width, length and height, this city is us in the completion of all things . . .and even though I am currently incomplete in the flesh . . .I am fully complete in the spirit.  So, my responsbility now is, to enter into my completed state in the spirit, and call out those finished things in the spirit into my flesh.  At any rate, this New Jerusalem is the of equal measure in all dimensions.  natural, (body) moral (soul) and spiritual (spirit)

2Pe 3:10 "Now the day of the Lord will be arriving as a thief, in which the heavens shall be passing by with a booming noise, yet the elements shall be dissolved by combustion, and the earth and the works in it shall be found."

For me, when there is a passing of the "heavens" it's saying that it's a spiritual event that is happening, but when the earth also passes . .it's telling me that what is transpiring in the spirit, is also affecting the flesh.  A booming noise . . .thunder . . .what causes thunder?  It's a CLASHING of atmospheres . . there is a change of climate coming (was).  That's what happened at the cross, there was thunder then to, and earth quakes . .what makes an earthquake?  There is a shifting of the "fault lines" interesting use of definition there . . .beneath the surface of my earth.  Paul speaks of this as inner wrestling going on and you don't do what you should and you do do what you shouldn't . .this creates earthquakes in us.  In fact, Hebrews tells us that there is going to be one final shaking to remove the things in us that God never built so that only the things God did build will remain.

Lastly, I could finish out your entire post this way, but it's already lengthy and the point is made that natural reasoning just doesn't fit here.  But lastly, the elements will be burned up in fervent heat . . .you may want to look up that word "elements" because it's not referring to natural objects . .but it's referring to principles . . .doctrines . .belief systems . . .there are a couple other places in Scripture where it uses the term "rudiments" which is the exact same word.  This is depicting the affects of the lake of Fire . .which again . .is God . .a "consuming" Fire . .the lake part is connecting it to the laver.

Ezekiel was caught up in the spirit, same as John, and he was shown the glory of God leaving the temple IN THE SPIRIT before the Babylonians came in and destroyed the temple in the flesh.  It's all spiritual. Nothing was intended to be taken literally.  There are comments that we need to start at the beginning before we can build anything further . . .and then the references quoted begin in Revelation 11?  Kind of interesting.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Sarah on December 09, 2008, 04:02:10 PM
Quoteit is impossible to  have the thousand year reign of Christ and the New earth take place all within 10 years or less (before 70 A.D).

In order to believe the 1000 years was literal, you must maintain that Christ and John were not speaking by the spirit regarding the issure of immediacy. Revelations is chaulk full of symbolism, imagry, and metaphor, why would we then think that because it is a number it is all of a sudden literal?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 04:27:54 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 01:10:51 PM
I think it is important to get back to what started this thread.
The Berean said that since John was told to measure the temple of God and the altar etc. in Revelation 11:1.
He stated that the temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. Fair enough.
So he stated that Revelation must have been written before 70 A.D.

I maintain John was in spirit IN the Lord's day and was looking into the far off future when the temple would be built again with the altar etc. Why? Why was he looking into the future?

The New City Jerusalem did not land on the earth before 70 A.D. Yet John said he saw it being measured:
Rev 21:15-17  And he who is speaking with me had a measure, a golden reed, that he should be measuring the city, and its portals, and its wall."  (16)  And the city is lying four square: and its length is as much as the breadth. And he measures the city with the reed to twelve thousand stadia. Its length and breadth and height are equal.  (17)  And he measures its wall of a hundred forty-four cubits of a human measure, which is that of the messenger."

The new earth did not come at 70 A.D. because the whole earth nor the heavens were  destroyed in 70 A.D. by fire and possibly nuclear destruction (booming noise).

2Pe 3:10 "Now the day of the Lord will be arriving as a thief, in which the heavens shall be passing by with a booming noise, yet the elements shall be dissolved by combustion, and the earth and the works in it shall be found."

Jerusalem was not John's nor Peter's nor the Lord's world. They traveled far and wide (John to Patmos, Peter to Babylon, Jesus to Egypt as a youth).

So do you see the problem?
The Berean man is using the measuring of the temple to say Revelation was written pre-70A.D. But more internal evidence shows the New City Jerusalem being measured which puts John in spirit thousands of years into the future.

Therefore, in John's vision, he still looked forward to the thousand year reign of Christ. Even if John's revelation was written in 60 some A.D. it is impossible to  have the thousand year reign of Christ and the New earth take place all within 10 years or less (before 70 A.D).

Let's try to stick with this issue which started this thread and then we can branch out. O.K.?

the measuring of the temple is one piece of the puzzle, but when taking the whole picture into consideration, the immediancy of scriptures, the "some standing here.... verse", the "this generation verse...., the gospel preached to the whole world then the end comes, and Paul stating the gospel was preached to the whole earth, the "no one knows the hour, yet in I John, it is not the "last hour", the "one stone will not be left standing" and the destruction of the temple, the Josephus account, the fact that the temple has never been rebuilt, the symbolism, the "apocrolyptic sp??" examples given earlier, the "you" statements to those alive at the time, the suffering the apostles went through and the hope they hung onto etc.  I could go on and on. 




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 04:28:41 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 03:43:38 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 01:10:51 PM
I think it is important to get back to what started this thread.
The Berean said that since John was told to measure the temple of God and the altar etc. in Revelation 11:1.
He stated that the temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. Fair enough.
So he stated that Revelation must have been written before 70 A.D.

I maintain John was in spirit IN the Lord's day and was looking into the far off future when the temple would be built again with the altar etc. Why? Why was he looking into the future?

The New City Jerusalem did not land on the earth before 70 A.D. Yet John said he saw it being measured:
Rev 11:15-17  And he who is speaking with me had a measure, a golden reed, that he should be measuring the city, and its portals, and its wall."  (16)  And the city is lying four square: and its length is as much as the breadth. And he measures the city with the reed to twelve thousand stadia. Its length and breadth and height are equal.  (17)  And he measures its wall of a hundred forty-four cubits of a human measure, which is that of the messenger."

The new earth did not come at 70 A.D. because the whole earth nor the heavens were  destroyed in 70 A.D. by fire and possibly nuclear destruction (booming noise).

2Pe 3:10 "Now the day of the Lord will be arriving as a thief, in which the heavens shall be passing by with a booming noise, yet the elements shall be dissolved by combustion, and the earth and the works in it shall be found."

Jerusalem was not John's nor Peter's nor the Lord's world. They traveled far and wide (John to Patmos, Peter to Babylon, Jesus to Egypt as a youth).

So do you see the problem?
The Berean man is using the measuring of the temple to say Revelation was written pre-70A.D. But more internal evidence shows the New City Jerusalem being measured which puts John in spirit thousands of years into the future.

Therefore, in John's vision, he still looked forward to the thousand year reign of Christ. Even if John's revelation was written in 60 some A.D. it is impossible to  have the thousand year reign of Christ and the New earth take place all within 10 years or less (before 70 A.D).

Let's try to stick with this issue which started this thread and then we can branch out. O.K.?

I maintain John was in spirit IN the Lord's day and was looking into the far off future when the temple would be built again with the altar etc

First, for me, regardless of the throngs of men who believe the temple will be rebuilt . .I am not one that sees that ever happening.  A.D. 70 was the completion of the removal of that which Jesus began on the cross.  The Levitical system has already been removed and it was replaced "once and for all" by the ultimate sacrifice which was the Lamb of God.  To think that God would turn around and allow the old system to be rebuilt is to say that God didn't see his Son as the remedy, only as an "option" for us to choose as a remedy.  And that was definitely not the case.

Man didn't come up with the temple sacrifices in the first place, what makes us think that man will be able to start them now?  The reason why so many have taken that point of view is again, because they're assuming the things written are literal and not instead, literal symbols that point to a spiritual experience rather than a natural one.  To have man rebuild the temple is saying that yesterday's manna is still edible . . .even though Scripture states that it rots and is full of worms (carnality).

Why? Why was he looking into the future?
He wasn't, he was looking into Christ.  This is not a revelation of natural events happening to a natural world.  This is a revelation of Jesus Christ . . .who is a spirit.

The New City Jerusalem did not land on the earth before 70 A.D. Yet John said he saw it being measured:

The New Jerusalem isn't going to "land" anywhere.  Whenever we see some one or some thing ascending or descending, what we're seeing is something "appearing" or "disappearing".  It's transcending from one realm into another.  The New Jerusalem is not a literal city any more than the temple is a literal temple.  I should say also that even though I don't believe that the temple so many feel is going to be rebuilt will ever come to be, I "do" believe there is "a" temple that "is" being rebuilt . .but not by men.  Jesus stated "tear down this temple and in 3 days I . . . ."I" . . .will rebuild it.  When we let Scripture interpret itself, rather than find two verses that appear to support each other and "interpet" what they are both saying . . .we'd see that "we" are living stones with which God is using to build his temple of worship . . ."we" are that temple . . .and "we" are the New Jerusalem.  When the sons of God manifest to the groaning earth . .that is the same as the New Jerusalem "descending" from "heaven".  It's already finished in the spirit, but now it's manifesting in the flesh. 

The disciples that were spread out across the world THEN were the first generation of that New Jerusalem.  And this next piece is where I see the traditional interpretation really starts falling apart . .if it hasn't already.  It's your quote of Revelation.

Rev 21:15-17  And he who is speaking with me had a measure, a golden reed, that he should be measuring the city, and its portals, and its wall."  (16)  And the city is lying four square: and its length is as much as the breadth. And he measures the city with the reed to twelve thousand stadia. Its length and breadth and height are equal.  (17)  And he measures its wall of a hundred forty-four cubits of a human measure, which is that of the messenger."

Tell me, how can you have a literal city that is a square cube . . including "height"?  I understand you can have width and length to be squared . .but height also?  Here's where the traditional belief "decides" to go spiritual.  And that's been my problem with the traditional take of Revelation from the get-go.  The claim is that it's all literal, until they get to places like this and then they'll say "oh, well, this city isn't like the cities we live in now . .this city is actually "suspended" in the air and only those who have their new bodies will be able to enter into it because they can fly now . . . "  I taught Revelation "before" realizing there was much demo work to be done in my doctrine in order for the spiritual perspective could manifest.

The point is . . .you can't jump back and forth from literal to spiritual, and back again.  "It's all spiritual".  Jesus Christ THE SAME Yesterday, Today, and Forever . . .in every dimension, there is the consistency of Truth.  This city's dimension are the same in width, length and height, this city is us in the completion of all things . . .and even though I am currently incomplete in the flesh . . .I am fully complete in the spirit.  So, my responsbility now is, to enter into my completed state in the spirit, and call out those finished things in the spirit into my flesh.  At any rate, this New Jerusalem is the of equal measure in all dimensions.  natural, (body) moral (soul) and spiritual (spirit)

2Pe 3:10 "Now the day of the Lord will be arriving as a thief, in which the heavens shall be passing by with a booming noise, yet the elements shall be dissolved by combustion, and the earth and the works in it shall be found."

For me, when there is a passing of the "heavens" it's saying that it's a spiritual event that is happening, but when the earth also passes . .it's telling me that what is transpiring in the spirit, is also affecting the flesh.  A booming noise . . .thunder . . .what causes thunder?  It's a CLASHING of atmospheres . . there is a change of climate coming (was).  That's what happened at the cross, there was thunder then to, and earth quakes . .what makes an earthquake?  There is a shifting of the "fault lines" interesting use of definition there . . .beneath the surface of my earth.  Paul speaks of this as inner wrestling going on and you don't do what you should and you do do what you shouldn't . .this creates earthquakes in us.  In fact, Hebrews tells us that there is going to be one final shaking to remove the things in us that God never built so that only the things God did build will remain.

Lastly, I could finish out your entire post this way, but it's already lengthy and the point is made that natural reasoning just doesn't fit here.  But lastly, the elements will be burned up in fervent heat . . .you may want to look up that word "elements" because it's not referring to natural objects . .but it's referring to principles . . .doctrines . .belief systems . . .there are a couple other places in Scripture where it uses the term "rudiments" which is the exact same word.  This is depicting the affects of the lake of Fire . .which again . .is God . .a "consuming" Fire . .the lake part is connecting it to the laver.

Ezekiel was caught up in the spirit, same as John, and he was shown the glory of God leaving the temple IN THE SPIRIT before the Babylonians came in and destroyed the temple in the flesh.  It's all spiritual. Nothing was intended to be taken literally.  There are comments that we need to start at the beginning before we can build anything further . . .and then the references quoted begin in Revelation 11?  Kind of interesting.

Enjoyed the post Nathan. 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 04:31:13 PM
I'd still be interested Tony, which scriptures you think apply to today, during your parenthetical "church" age?  Which Pauline epistles was Paul wrong on, and which one's was he right on??  When did he receive the "secret"?  and do any of the books written by John, James and Peter apply to the "church age"?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 04:57:18 PM
Quote from: Sarah on December 09, 2008, 04:02:10 PM
Quoteit is impossible to  have the thousand year reign of Christ and the New earth take place all within 10 years or less (before 70 A.D).

In order to believe the 1000 years was literal, you must maintain that Christ and John were not speaking by the spirit regarding the issure of immediacy. Revelations is chaulk full of symbolism, imagry, and metaphor, why would we then think that because it is a number it is all of a sudden literal?

Hi Sarah, you certainly give some good thoughts to chew on.
First the immediacy issue. Jesus told John that these things occur swiftly. The bowls, the judgments, the destruction, all occur swiftly. They are not long drawn out.

Revelation is filled with symbolism. I surely agree with you, imagry, metaphor etc. But the symbol must stand for the real. The metaphor must stand for the real.

The lamb in Revelation is not a real lamb but represents that which is real . . . Jesus.

The sword issuing out of the Lord's mouth is symbolic of the actual, literal words which will issue from His mouth which will be death to those smitten by His actual words.

Now then, Sarah, I appreciate what you have brought up. Let's look at some things Jesus said which are not symbolic but were meant to be taken literally:

Mat 19:28  And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

Peter alluded to the above passage when he said:   "Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began" (Act 3:21) .

When Christ comes again to set up His kingdom will He do it invisibly? No . . .

Act 1:11  Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.

In what manner was He taken up? Visibly, by over 500 witnesses. He will come visibly:

Mat 24:30  And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

This will be a visible return with power and great glory. The apostle Paul saw the Lord in great glory and it temporarily blinded him. But this appearing to Saul/Paul was not the return to gather all the tribes of Israel back to the land of promise. That will happen once the restitution of all things occurs. Until then He must remain in heaven.

Now then, when He does indeed visibly return, John in Revelation writes of that return thusly:

Rev 20:3-6  And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.  (4)  And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.  (5)  But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.  (6)  Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

The above passage is when the restitution of all has been completed and is the beginning of the regeneration Christ spoke of in my Matthew passage.

Why regeneration? Because the earth as we know it will go through a lot of literal destruction. Much of mankind wiped out by plagues, pestilance, earthquakes in which the cities of the world will fall. Imagine all the skyscrapers of just New York falling. If you thought the twin towers falling caused such a disruption to our economy imagine every building of every city in the world falling. Bridges collapsing from the great earthquake. Water towers falling. No fresh water. No showers. No way to wash clothes, wash dishes. Electric power plants shut down. Natural gas lines no longer giving gas for warmth and cooking. No bridges to get food from farms to people. Mass starvation. This all must happen first before Christ comes and a regeneration follows.

Does this help? I maintain that John saw a literal, visible return of Christ and will visibly rule with his disciples/apostles in the regeneration. John saw this in the far off future.

He measured the temple in the future and saw the new city Jerusalem being measured in the future.

Nathan, your post is so huge it will take me some time to digest what your wrote.

Peace!

Tony
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 05:09:55 PM
Quote2Pe 3:10 "Now the day of the Lord will be arriving as a thief, in which the heavens shall be passing by with a booming noise, yet the elements shall be dissolved by combustion, and the earth and the works in it shall be found."

For me, when there is a passing of the "heavens" it's saying that it's a spiritual event that is happening, but when the earth also passes . .it's telling me that what is transpiring in the spirit, is also affecting the flesh.  A booming noise . . .thunder . . .what causes thunder?  It's a CLASHING of atmospheres . . there is a change of climate coming (was).  That's what happened at the cross, there was thunder then to, and earth quakes . .what makes an earthquake?  There is a shifting of the "fault lines" interesting use of definition there . . .beneath the surface of my earth.  Paul speaks of this as inner wrestling going on and you don't do what you should and you do do what you shouldn't . .this creates earthquakes in us.  In fact, Hebrews tells us that there is going to be one final shaking to remove the things in us that God never built so that only the things God did build will remain.

Lastly, I could finish out your entire post this way, but it's already lengthy and the point is made that natural reasoning just doesn't fit here.  But lastly, the elements will be burned up in fervent heat . . .you may want to look up that word "elements" because it's not referring to natural objects . .but it's referring to principles . . .doctrines . .belief systems . . .there are a couple other places in Scripture where it uses the term "rudiments" which is the exact same word.  This is depicting the affects of the lake of Fire . .which again . .is God . .a "consuming" Fire . .the lake part is connecting it to the laver.

As you were so Brief, :laughing7:

These Elements , rudiments can be found Elswhere to what they are,

Gal 4:3 Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:


Gal 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,


Gal 4:5 To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.

Gal 4:9 But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?

Col 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

Dont take much figuring for mine , sounds awfully like the Old C...

Thsi LOUD Noice, Thunder maybe ?
Thunder is Likened to HIS Voice

Rev 14:2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps:

Psa 104:7 At thy rebuke they fled; at the voice of thy thunder they hasted away.

Earthquakes we see can Mean Release...to OPEN up

Mat 27:51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;

Mat 27:52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,

Mat 27:53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.


Mat 27:54 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.

The KEY of Hades OPENS

Mat 28:2 And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it.

Act 16:26 And suddenly there was a great earthquake, so that the foundations of the prison were shaken: and immediately all the doors were opened, and every one's bands were loosed.    

Its no doubt for mine that Christ who comes as A Theif In the NIGHT, night comes before DAY ,as does the Old C come before The New , TO reveal THE HIDDEN man of the Heart, we Hear HIS voice, blessed are those who SEE and Hear,Releasing Man FROM LAW and bondage which came with IT,Pufiying our Mind and HEART through the FIRE( new SOUL)


And people are still waiting for this?......Hope Not


The Golden REED is Christ , we are the Living stones within the City, PILLARS,etc which consist of the HIM and the Church, symbolized by the 144 ,ooo etc etc


Oh ,Lightening COMES where all righteouness comes from...THE EAST, a revelation , a LIGHT,which is Him also.
:icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: ScarletWren on December 09, 2008, 05:11:32 PM
Hey All,

This is a great topic, one that we won't agree on until it is all evidently in the 'past'.  

I certainly don't have any educated or spiritual 'revelation' on this.  First, tho, let's make it clear that the book of Revelation is in the singular, one revelation, not plural...revelations.  I'm not saying this to say anyone who has stated it as revelations has an inferior position, spelling and grammar is certainly not everyone's forte and does not make his/her opinions/insights any less valuable

I remember reading Hal Lindsay's take on Revelation back when I was in Babylon.  I was amazed at his insights, lol.  Enthralled even.  It seemed so intellectual and I felt he had unravelled the thread.  Now I'm sort of back at square one.

To me, Revelation is something that has happened, is happening and will happen.  Just as the story of Joseph and his brothers really happened in the past, it keeps happening over and over in each overcomer during his lifetime, and then, I believe there will be a literal antitype with Christ taking the throne under God as did Joseph under Pharoah and then his family receiving special blessings with Benjamin (whom I believe represents the overcomers) having extra special blessings.

I believe what happened to Jerusalem was in part a fulfillment of Revelation plus prophecies in the Old Testament.  I also think there is much symbolic in it of what happens to each believer as we advance in our journey.  There will continue to be revelation until God is all in all.  But personally, I think there will be many more ages than just one or two before that happens.  The Bible does not reveal everything about God's creation nor, in my opinion, does it reveal everything about what is to be beyond the next few ages.

It always bothered me when people said that time will be no more.  I don't know how we can exist without time.  Time will no longer be an enemy for we will never fear that we won't have enough 'time' to do whatever we desire to do. We won't become 'old' and get sick, etc.  But for things to keep on 'happening' it seems to me that there has to be time.  Perhaps what I view as time is different to others' views of time. Sometimes the way some Christians describe the culmination of creation sounds to me similar to those who talk about Nirvana where everyone will be just one big consciousness with no personal identity.  What was the use of any of this if that is true?  Just because we will be in complete harmony with God does not mean that we won't have personal feelings or activities we like more than others.  I guess that to me is what makes Christianity so unique.  We maintain a personal identity even in the midst of so much harmony.

We all have such diverse opinions.  And that is ok for now.  Some of us disagree on the scope of free will, the trinity doctrine, consciousness after death, etc.  It is good to discuss it.  It is normal to get frustrated when we can't make someone else see our point of view.  I'm sure many of you will feel I have too simplistic a view of all of this.  Well, my brain is simple and I can only digest so much at a time.  When God wants me to change my views or come into new knowledge it will happen and not one moment sooner.  I've learned that.  Doesn't mean I am always content with that, lol.

Anyway, just an insert here.  Let the controversy continue.  It is a good place to see just how different we can view the scriptures.  I respect each one of you and know you all love the things of God.  I know I certainly can learn a lot.  You all seem to study more than I do lately.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 05:18:51 PM
Hi Scarletwren

We havent met, but nice to see you on the Thread participating and airing your thoughts, Thanks For sharing,you make some valid points

QuoteTo me, Revelation is something that has happened, is happening and will happen.

IS WAS AND WILL BE, yes tis how I see it too.

youll have to forgive my grammer..tis awful, as is My tuyping and Shpelllling :icon_flower:

Good to see you at Tent :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:27:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 04:27:54 PM
the measuring of the temple is one piece of the puzzle, but when taking the whole picture into consideration, the immediancy of scriptures, the "some standing here.... verse", the "this generation verse...., the gospel preached to the whole world then the end comes, and Paul stating the gospel was preached to the whole earth, the "no one knows the hour, yet in I John, it is not the "last hour", the "one stone will not be left standing" and the destruction of the temple, the Josephus account, the fact that the temple has never been rebuilt, the symbolism, the "apocrolyptic sp??" examples given earlier, the "you" statements to those alive at the time, the suffering the apostles went through and the hope they hung onto etc.  I could go on and on. 

Hi Zeek, the first thing the disciples asked the Lord during the 40 days after His resurrection from the dead was this:

Act 1:6-7  When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?  (7)  And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.

In other words, the restoring of the kingdom to Israel by taking it out of Roman hands was not to be at this time. It never happened during the Acts period. It never happened while some of the disciples were killed off. It must occur when all the disciples are alive and reigning on twelve thrones. All the disciples/apostles are still dead. They must be alive in order to reign over the twelve tribes of Israel. They must be alive when the kingdom is restored to Israel and the twelve reign with Christ bodily in Jerusalem. So the immediacy verses are yet future.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 05:32:28 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:27:41 PM
All the disciples/apostles are still dead. They must be alive in order to reign over the twelve tribes of Israel.



Jhn 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this? 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:46:47 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 04:31:13 PM
I'd still be interested Tony, which scriptures you think apply to today, during your parenthetical "church" age?  Which Pauline epistles was Paul wrong on, and which one's was he right on??  When did he receive the "secret"?  and do any of the books written by John, James and Peter apply to the "church age"?

Zeek, you are asking me to prove the unprovable. Paul was not wrong on any epistle he wrote.

Look at the address on the envelope of Peter, James and John's epistles. To whom were they written.

Paul was given the "administration of the secret" which none of the circumcision writers were given in the New nor Old Testaments.

He was given one of the secrets either prior to or when he wrote his epistle to the Roman ecclesia:

Rom 11:25 For I am not willing for you to be ignorant of this secret, brethren, lest you may be passing for prudent among yourselves, that callousness, in part, on Israel has come, until the complement of the nations may be entering."

So Israel was set aside until the complement of the nations may be entering.
When John wrote Revelation he did not know about this for it was only given to Paul. It was a secret.

Now back to when Revelation was written.
How did John, while on Patmos get to Jerusalem to measure the temple? The Berean guy says the temple had to be standing for John to measure it. But the New Jerusalem had to be on the earth for John to see it being measured too. Revelation says it came down out of heaven and landed on the earth.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:52:32 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 05:32:28 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:27:41 PM
All the disciples/apostles are still dead. They must be alive in order to reign over the twelve tribes of Israel.



Jhn 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this? 

Zeek, it is so easy to take a verse and build an improper premis on it. What is the context of what Christ said above? That should be your primary consideration:

Joh 11:25 Jesus said to her, "I am the Resurrection and the Life. He who is believing in Me, even if he should be dying, shall be living."

So "even if he should be dying" means that those who believe in Him should be dying. But that is not the end. They shall be living via a resurrection to life and those who are resurrected shall not be dying in the future.

And yet they are still dead. So how are we to take what Christ said? It is meant for when they are resurrected. They shall never die THEN.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 05:54:50 PM
While I agree that there are many spiritual dimensions to Revelation, I know that there are many who are reading these scriptures literally who want to see them fulfilled literally.  They want to rebuild the temple, and return to animal sacrifice, and rule the world from the real Jerusalem. They do not think Jesus is the Messiah.  They think the Messiah has not come, yet.  They think they are/will be the Messiah themselves. Others are supporting them.  Look at the book just released by Hagee.  I know this to be the case and have read about it for years.  

So I am sort of leaning in Tony's direction of a literal playing out of things, up to a point.  I am hoping God will put a stop a to it.  The question is how far into it do we get before He does?  These things are being brought down by man.   Don't you know that man has wanted to rule the whole world  since the first kingdom, Babylon?  To me, this is a perfectly insane desire for power.   They are insane.  But they have enough power to make it happen, or give it a good try.  Look at the cameras going up on every street corner throughout the Western world.  I'm sure that's happening because they are worried about little old ladies being mugged...NOT.

Right now the world is experiencing all the famines, plagues, death, and destruction written about in the book.  Just because it hasn't come to your neck of the woods does not mean it's not happening.  Nor does it mean it couldn't be stopped tomorrow if people wanted it to stop.  But they won't! :sigh:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: ScarletWren on December 09, 2008, 05:57:06 PM
Hi Taffy,

Nice to meet  you also.  I've already 'met' Tony on another thread.  I enjoy reading your differing viewpoints.  It's ok about your spelling and typing.  I've worked as a secretary many years and still even tho I proof before I post, I miss typos and occasional misspellings.  We can pretty much figure out what most people are saying anyway.

I do enjoy this forum.  On 'another' forum any time you post a view differing from the mainstream there you are just plain 'wrong'.  I didn't stay there long.  Too much of that in Babylon.

Have a great day.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 06:03:01 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:52:32 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 05:32:28 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:27:41 PM
All the disciples/apostles are still dead. They must be alive in order to reign over the twelve tribes of Israel.



Jhn 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this? 

Zeek, it is so easy to take a verse and build an improper premis on it. What is the context of what Christ said above? That should be your primary consideration:

Joh 11:25 Jesus said to her, "I am the Resurrection and the Life. He who is believing in Me, even if he should be dying, shall be living."

So "even if he should be dying" means that those who believe in Him should be dying. But that is not the end. They shall be living via a resurrection to life and those who are resurrected shall not be dying in the future.

And yet they are still dead. So how are we to take what Christ said? It is meant for when they are resurrected. They shall never die THEN.

I hear ya, for me, the whole context can be summed up as "Revealtion of Jesus Christ". 

How do you know the apostels are still dead??
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 06:10:47 PM
Further proof that John was looking into the far off future is the fact that there were no Jewish churches in those seven cities in Asia when he received his vision.

Writers/theologians today make the seven churches stand for seven church ages (which is never spoken of in all the Bible) because they know they never existed when John wrote Revelation.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 06:13:19 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:27:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 04:27:54 PM
the measuring of the temple is one piece of the puzzle, but when taking the whole picture into consideration, the immediancy of scriptures, the "some standing here.... verse", the "this generation verse...., the gospel preached to the whole world then the end comes, and Paul stating the gospel was preached to the whole earth, the "no one knows the hour, yet in I John, it is not the "last hour", the "one stone will not be left standing" and the destruction of the temple, the Josephus account, the fact that the temple has never been rebuilt, the symbolism, the "apocrolyptic sp??" examples given earlier, the "you" statements to those alive at the time, the suffering the apostles went through and the hope they hung onto etc.  I could go on and on. 

Hi Zeek, the first thing the disciples asked the Lord during the 40 days after His resurrection from the dead was this:

Act 1:6-7  When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?  (7)  And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.

In other words, the restoring of the kingdom to Israel by taking it out of Roman hands was not to be at this time. It never happened during the Acts period. It never happened while some of the disciples were killed off. It must occur when all the disciples are alive and reigning on twelve thrones. All the disciples/apostles are still dead. They must be alive in order to reign over the twelve tribes of Israel. They must be alive when the kingdom is restored to Israel and the twelve reign with Christ bodily in Jerusalem. So the immediacy verses are yet future.

For me, this is like all of the other parables Jesus taught and nobody got without Jesus having to set down and explain it to them word for word.  It's the same picture as to why the Roman soldiers put a crown on Jesus, they were mocking him as king . .but the whole point was, Jesus was always speaking from a spiritual plain, not a natural one.  He didn't come to literally be king of a natural Israel.  It was never about seeing it naturally.  He "is" the King of kings and Lord of lords.  We are the kings he is King over . .but it's a SPIRITUAL position.  He's not going to be king in the future . . .he's KING of the NOW.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 06:19:44 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 06:03:01 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:52:32 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 05:32:28 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:27:41 PM
All the disciples/apostles are still dead. They must be alive in order to reign over the twelve tribes of Israel.



Jhn 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this? 

Zeek, it is so easy to take a verse and build an improper premis on it. What is the context of what Christ said above? That should be your primary consideration:

Joh 11:25 Jesus said to her, "I am the Resurrection and the Life. He who is believing in Me, even if he should be dying, shall be living."

So "even if he should be dying" means that those who believe in Him should be dying. But that is not the end. They shall be living via a resurrection to life and those who are resurrected shall not be dying in the future.

And yet they are still dead. So how are we to take what Christ said? It is meant for when they are resurrected. They shall never die THEN.

I hear ya, for me, the whole context can be summed up as "Revealtion of Jesus Christ". 

How do you know the apostels are still dead??

Because if they were brought back to life you would know that

Christ and they would all be bodily reigning in Jerusalem.
Christ said: "Perceive My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and perceive, for a spirit has not flesh and bones according as you behold Me having" (Luk 24:39).

He was saying He was not a spirit. He had flesh and bones. Spirits don't have flesh and bones. When He comes back He will come back with flesh and bones just as they saw Him ascending into heaven.

If the 12 were brought back to life, Israel's Messiah would be arriving out of Zion and all Israel would be saved and the nations would have been completed (Romans 11).

This has not happened in 70 A.D. not before 70 A.D. and not after 70 A.D. yet.

John, in his vision called "the unveiling of Jesus Christ" looked into the far off future and saw Christ unveiled in His day called "the day of the Lord."
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 06:23:45 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 06:10:47 PM
Further proof that John was looking into the far off future is the fact that there were no Jewish churches in those seven cities in Asia when he received his vision.

Writers/theologians today make the seven churches stand for seven church ages (which is never spoken of in all the Bible) because they know they never existed when John wrote Revelation.
Doesnt ANY bible student grasp seven is the Perfection of ONE...ONE CHURCH, ONE BODY,ONE BAPTISM, ONE BODY.

Like we are going to See Christ HOLD the churches IN HIS HAND as he Watlzes about, it symbolism..
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 06:27:17 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 06:10:47 PM
Further proof that John was looking into the far off future is the fact that there were no Jewish churches in those seven cities in Asia when he received his vision.

Writers/theologians today make the seven churches stand for seven church ages (which is never spoken of in all the Bible) because they know they never existed when John wrote Revelation.

Whoever told you the churches didn't exist then are twisting truth to fit their theology.  Just looking at the seven listed . .the church of "Ephesus"???  Sound familiar?  Paul wrote Ephesians to this same church . .of course they existed then.

The fact that were were "7" churches is extremely telling.  God has a universal language . .it's not Hebrew, Greek or english . . .the language he uses is in the creation established by his Word.  Romans 1:20 . . he uses natural things to reveal spiritual truth . . .the earth is God's language.  Which means . .colors, metals, objects, animals and numbers are all used as his alphabet.  He uses four horses that are colored . .. to understand what they are, one needs to realize what the number four represents . .what a white horse is to a black horse  . .and what a horse is . . .all these things are used to manifest the character and nature of Christ.  

The number 7 is the same thing.  It's for completion and perfection.  This is a revelation given to the "whole" church.  But the thing about the church is . . .it's established in the second dimensin FOR THE PURPOSE TO ENABLE US TO ENTER INTO THE THIRD.  Problem is, the church has failed to do that. They have set up camp in the ministry arena, but can't seem to realize that there's a whole other dimension beyond the ministries.  The one thing Jesus addressed to ALL the churches . . ."I see your works . .. I see your works . .I see your works"  It's the same with the passage that Jesus addressed about not everyone who says "Lord, Lord" will actually be able to enter into the kingdom . . .because their identity is in their "works" rather than in their "relationship" with the Father.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 06:31:19 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 06:13:19 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:27:41 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 04:27:54 PM
the measuring of the temple is one piece of the puzzle, but when taking the whole picture into consideration, the immediancy of scriptures, the "some standing here.... verse", the "this generation verse...., the gospel preached to the whole world then the end comes, and Paul stating the gospel was preached to the whole earth, the "no one knows the hour, yet in I John, it is not the "last hour", the "one stone will not be left standing" and the destruction of the temple, the Josephus account, the fact that the temple has never been rebuilt, the symbolism, the "apocrolyptic sp??" examples given earlier, the "you" statements to those alive at the time, the suffering the apostles went through and the hope they hung onto etc.  I could go on and on. 

Hi Zeek, the first thing the disciples asked the Lord during the 40 days after His resurrection from the dead was this:

Act 1:6-7  When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?  (7)  And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.

In other words, the restoring of the kingdom to Israel by taking it out of Roman hands was not to be at this time. It never happened during the Acts period. It never happened while some of the disciples were killed off. It must occur when all the disciples are alive and reigning on twelve thrones. All the disciples/apostles are still dead. They must be alive in order to reign over the twelve tribes of Israel. They must be alive when the kingdom is restored to Israel and the twelve reign with Christ bodily in Jerusalem. So the immediacy verses are yet future.

For me, this is like all of the other parables Jesus taught and nobody got without Jesus having to set down and explain it to them word for word.  It's the same picture as to why the Roman soldiers put a crown on Jesus, they were mocking him as king . .but the whole point was, Jesus was always speaking from a spiritual plain, not a natural one.  He didn't come to literally be king of a natural Israel.  It was never about seeing it naturally.  He "is" the King of kings and Lord of lords.  We are the kings he is King over . .but it's a SPIRITUAL position.  He's not going to be king in the future . . .he's KING of the NOW.

Dear Nathan,
When Jesus is "King of kings and Lord of lords" he will be telling all kings what to do and all lords what to do.
In this present era Christ is still in heaven awaiting.

This verse shows Him being King of kings and Lord of lords as yet future:

1Ti 6:15 which, to its own eras, the happy and only Potentate will be showing: He is King of kings and Lord of lords,

When will He be showing He is? When He takes over all the earth from Jerusalem. That happens in the future as written in Rev.11:15.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 06:34:13 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 06:19:44 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 06:03:01 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:52:32 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 05:32:28 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 05:27:41 PM
All the disciples/apostles are still dead. They must be alive in order to reign over the twelve tribes of Israel.



Jhn 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this? 

Zeek, it is so easy to take a verse and build an improper premis on it. What is the context of what Christ said above? That should be your primary consideration:

Joh 11:25 Jesus said to her, "I am the Resurrection and the Life. He who is believing in Me, even if he should be dying, shall be living."

So "even if he should be dying" means that those who believe in Him should be dying. But that is not the end. They shall be living via a resurrection to life and those who are resurrected shall not be dying in the future.

And yet they are still dead. So how are we to take what Christ said? It is meant for when they are resurrected. They shall never die THEN.

I hear ya, for me, the whole context can be summed up as "Revealtion of Jesus Christ". 

How do you know the apostels are still dead??

Because if they were brought back to life you would know that

Christ and they would all be bodily reigning in Jerusalem.
Christ said: "Perceive My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and perceive, for a spirit has not flesh and bones according as you behold Me having" (Luk 24:39).

He was saying He was not a spirit. He had flesh and bones. Spirits don't have flesh and bones. When He comes back He will come back with flesh and bones just as they saw Him ascending into heaven.

If the 12 were brought back to life, Israel's Messiah would be arriving out of Zion and all Israel would be saved and the nations would have been completed (Romans 11).

This has not happened in 70 A.D. not before 70 A.D. and not after 70 A.D. yet.

John, in his vision called "the unveiling of Jesus Christ" looked into the far off future and saw Christ unveiled in His day called "the day of the Lord."

Tony try a Little of what you just said to ZEEK :icon_flower:

OY YE of Little FAITH,they percieved the NATURAL, not the spiritual, he had YET to return a SECOND TIME without observation.

they believed NOT FOR JOY, JOY if ya want proof is another Hidden TERM for Christ.

Why Broiled FISH and Honey?...or was that all what was left in the cupboard :happygrin:

Luk 24:38 And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?


Luk 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.


Luk 24:40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them [his] hands and [his] feet.


Luk 24:41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?


Luk 24:42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.


Luk 24:43 And he took [it], and did eat before them.


Luk 24:44 And he said unto them, These [are] the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and [in] the prophets, and [in] the psalms, concerning me.


Luk 24:45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,  Luk 24:46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 06:36:22 PM
Quote from: NathanFor me, this is like all of the other parables Jesus taught and nobody got without Jesus having to set down and explain it to them word for word.  It's the same picture as to why the Roman soldiers put a crown on Jesus, they were mocking him as king . .but the whole point was, Jesus was always speaking from a spiritual plain, not a natural one.  He didn't come to literally be king of a natural Israel.  It was never about seeing it naturally.  He "is" the King of kings and Lord of lords.  We are the kings he is King over . .but it's a SPIRITUAL position.  He's not going to be king in the future . . .he's KING of the NOW.

Yes, he is for you and for me.  But don't you see a day when Christ will rule the world?

Or is this mess as good as it gets on earth according to you?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 06:44:12 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 06:36:22 PM
Quote from: NathanFor me, this is like all of the other parables Jesus taught and nobody got without Jesus having to set down and explain it to them word for word.  It's the same picture as to why the Roman soldiers put a crown on Jesus, they were mocking him as king . .but the whole point was, Jesus was always speaking from a spiritual plain, not a natural one.  He didn't come to literally be king of a natural Israel.  It was never about seeing it naturally.  He "is" the King of kings and Lord of lords.  We are the kings he is King over . .but it's a SPIRITUAL position.  He's not going to be king in the future . . .he's KING of the NOW.

Yes, he is for you and for me.  But don't you see a day when Christ will rule the world?

Or is this mess as good as it gets on earth according to you?
What Christ reigns over MOLLY is DEATH, and those who REIGN now with HIM also do , blessed are They.

What matters Molly is DEATH is BEAT, if for now some realise that or not ,so this Mess we live in now,  is hardly a  comparrison
For it will all end very quickly.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 06:44:42 PM
So when he took the pains to say "It is finished" . . .he also, while hanging on the cross, jumped into a futuristic time to proclaim it's finished . . .THEN???

Sorry, I'm not buying into that.  All things are complete in him . . .now.  Which is to say, all things prophesied to happen have already spiritually happened.  And when we choose to walk in the spirit, we also walk in the "finished" works and can also see the end from the beginning.  But the more we embrace the natural, the more we miss out on releasing the spiritual life and power in others.

I don't disagree that Christ is still to come in the flesh . . . and i can see the "just as you saw him go" piece relate also.  I don't argue that the natural realm is not yet complete.  But I believe what is going to bring the natural into completion, will be those who are in the spiritual that begin trumpeting what is already finished in the spirit, is now to be finished in the flesh.  Jesus prayed that himself "thy kingdom COME thy will be done on earth AS IT IS in heaven.

Kinda hard to proclaim completion in the flesh if we can't see it already finished in the spirit.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 06:51:40 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 06:44:12 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 06:36:22 PM
Quote from: NathanFor me, this is like all of the other parables Jesus taught and nobody got without Jesus having to set down and explain it to them word for word.  It's the same picture as to why the Roman soldiers put a crown on Jesus, they were mocking him as king . .but the whole point was, Jesus was always speaking from a spiritual plain, not a natural one.  He didn't come to literally be king of a natural Israel.  It was never about seeing it naturally.  He "is" the King of kings and Lord of lords.  We are the kings he is King over . .but it's a SPIRITUAL position.  He's not going to be king in the future . . .he's KING of the NOW.

Yes, he is for you and for me.  But don't you see a day when Christ will rule the world?

Or is this mess as good as it gets on earth according to you?
What Christ reigns over MOLLY is DEATH, and those who REIGN now with HIM also do , blessed are They.

What matters Molly is DEATH is BEAT, if for now some realise that or not ,so this Mess we live in now,  is hardly a  comparrison
For it will all end very quickly.
He came so we could have life and have it more abundantly.  That could be a reality today for everyone, if only those with the power to make it happen would wake up!  Instead, the tent cities are growing by the hour, and how many are lost each day to starvation?  How many to diseases that we have already cured?  It's shameful.

While Christians fight their phoney wars and look for some pie in the sky, and satan continues his murder by death.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 06:53:54 PM
Quote from: ScarletWren on December 09, 2008, 05:57:06 PM
Hi Taffy,

Nice to meet  you also.  I've already 'met' Tony on another thread.  I enjoy reading your differing viewpoints.  It's ok about your spelling and typing.  I've worked as a secretary many years and still even tho I proof before I post, I miss typos and occasional misspellings.  We can pretty much figure out what most people are saying anyway.

I do enjoy this forum.  On 'another' forum any time you post a view differing from the mainstream there you are just plain 'wrong'.  I didn't stay there long.  Too much of that in Babylon.

Have a great day.


Its good to have ya here , I hope your hang around awhiles ,and thanks for seeing past my errors :icon_jokercolor:

Tony dont recall. we chatted some over at another forum a few yrs back , went as KT themdays

Ditto
have a Great day yaself :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 06:56:56 PM
QuoteHe came so we could have life and have it more abundantly.

The abundance is LIFE itself , HIM in US, through HIM life  Is FULLNESS. :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 07:38:50 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 06:56:56 PM
QuoteHe came so we could have life and have it more abundantly.

The abundance is LIFE itself , HIM in US, through HIM life  Is FULLNESS. :icon_flower:
Yes, of course.  But what did he do?  He fed people.  He healed people.

As if we couldn't do that today..and, not even needing a miracle to do it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 07:50:39 PM
John 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

It's not about feeding people who are hungry with natural food . . .Taf, I'd love to hear your take on the representation of the fish and honeycomb . . . but it's about Christ feeding us through each other.

Would you like to have one lump?  Or two??
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 08:11:45 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 07:50:39 PM
John 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

It's not about feeding people who are hungry with natural food . . .Taf, I'd love to hear your take on the representation of the fish and honeycomb . . . but it's about Christ feeding us through each other.

Would you like to have one lump?  Or two??

No sugar for me Bud ,Thanks, Like a few cookies to please.

Yup Bro, Self pollination ,..The manna was SWEET as Honey.

Read this a while back and kept it..like ya do from Time to time.

Deborah (bee) was a warrior (battled evil) was a prophet (pollinated the people with revelation from the spirit) and judged between good and evil. I see that we each have the ability to self pollinate now (each endowed with the Holy Spirit)

The bee has the most complex and detailed functional language among the animals. Let's say that a bee has located a particularly good source of nectar and returns to the hive to tell its friends where it is. Our bee dances a figure eight, with the cross points at the center of the eight giving the direction of the nectar in relation to the sun. As the bee dances on the wall of the honeycomb, the position of the sun is always down. If the bee moves up the comb wall at 17 degrees to the left of vertical, it means the honey is 17 degrees to the left of the sun. This communication even works on cloudy days, since bees can see the ultraviolet light that penetrates the clouds. Distance is communicated by the speed of the dance.

Neither man's languages, nor the bees' language evolved - they were given by God. Why else would the bee indicate direction relative to the sun in the same way that human beings do? That the bee is the best communicator in the animal world, and not the apes, helps to show that language cannot be explained by evolution.

As For Fish ,Not only symbolic of the FISH( men- who dwell in the sea beneath),..Rosey shared this with me a while back,
Can be attributted to the HOPE which Lays in the heart of ALL MEN( Christ Our HOPE of Glory)

Mar 6:41 And when he had taken the five loaves and the two fishes, he looked up to heaven, and blessed, and brake the loaves, and gave [them] to his disciples to set before them; and the two fishes divided he among them all.

Luk 11:11 If a son shall ask bread of any of you that is a father, will he give him a stone? or if [he ask] a fish, will he for a fish give him a serpent? 

:icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:27:12 PM
Ha . .I'd forgotten manna tasted like wafers of honey . . .I remember the fish part, it was the honeycomb I couldn't remember.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 08:27:31 PM
O.K. everyone, can we get back to John's Revelation?

If the kingdom came in 70 A.D., if Jesus came to rule over the earth in 70 A.D. if the 12 ruled with Christ beginning in 70 A.D., how come nobody noticed? Not even the Christians back then noticed.

Did not Jesus say concerning the coming of the kingdom:

Luk 17:23-24  "And they shall be declaring to you, 'Lo! there!' or 'Lo! here!' You may not come away, nor yet should you be pursuing."  (24)  For even as the lightning, flashing out from here under heaven to there under heaven, is shining, thus will be the Son of Mankind in His day."

When lightning flashes it is apparent to all. It is not in secret. There are some people in verse 23 above which Jesus warns us about who will say 'Lo! there!' or 'Lo! here!' as in "here is the kingdom Christ set up or there is the kingdom Christ set up! But do not follow them because Jesus said when it comes it will be like lightning flashing from one point under heaven to another point under heaven. It will be obvious to all.

Some have been posting here who say it is already on the earth thus falling withing the group in verse 23.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 08:31:46 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 08:27:31 PM
O.K. everyone, can we get back to John's Revelation?

If the kingdom came in 70 A.D., if Jesus came to rule over the earth in 70 A.D. if the 12 ruled with Christ beginning in 70 A.D., how come nobody noticed? Not even the Christians back then noticed.

Did not Jesus say concerning the coming of the kingdom:

Luk 17:23-24  "And they shall be declaring to you, 'Lo! there!' or 'Lo! here!' You may not come away, nor yet should you be pursuing."  (24)  For even as the lightning, flashing out from here under heaven to there under heaven, is shining, thus will be the Son of Mankind in His day."

When lightning flashes it is apparent to all. It is not in secret. There are some people in verse 23 above which Jesus warns us about who will say 'Lo! there!' or 'Lo! here!' as in "here is the kingdom Christ set up or there is the kingdom Christ set up! But do not follow them because Jesus said when it comes it will be like lightning flashing from one point under heaven to another point under heaven. It will be obvious to all.

Some have been posting here who say it is already on the earth thus falling withing the group in verse 23.
we are Tony, they are the scripts which you posted,,well a verse anyways, thought Id care to share the Context you mentioned to zeek by  only quoting one verse..
is that OK? :icon_flower:

, its Ok to differ yes? :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 08:36:27 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:27:12 PM
Ha . .I'd forgotten manna tasted like wafers of honey . . .I remember the fish part, it was the honeycomb I couldn't remember.
:icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 08:42:26 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 07:50:39 PM
John 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

It's not about feeding people who are hungry with natural food . . .Taf, I'd love to hear your take on the representation of the fish and honeycomb . . . but it's about Christ feeding us through each other.

Would you like to have one lump?  Or two??
So are you saying that Jesus did not literally feed the multitude?

Because I think he did.

And, you know--we could do that today.

Except satan enjoys turning breadbaskets into wastelands, because he likes to see people starve to death.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 08:46:05 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 08:31:46 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 08:27:31 PM
O.K. everyone, can we get back to John's Revelation?

If the kingdom came in 70 A.D., if Jesus came to rule over the earth in 70 A.D. if the 12 ruled with Christ beginning in 70 A.D., how come nobody noticed? Not even the Christians back then noticed.

Did not Jesus say concerning the coming of the kingdom:

Luk 17:23-24  "And they shall be declaring to you, 'Lo! there!' or 'Lo! here!' You may not come away, nor yet should you be pursuing."  (24)  For even as the lightning, flashing out from here under heaven to there under heaven, is shining, thus will be the Son of Mankind in His day."

When lightning flashes it is apparent to all. It is not in secret. There are some people in verse 23 above which Jesus warns us about who will say 'Lo! there!' or 'Lo! here!' as in "here is the kingdom Christ set up or there is the kingdom Christ set up! But do not follow them because Jesus said when it comes it will be like lightning flashing from one point under heaven to another point under heaven. It will be obvious to all.

Some have been posting here who say it is already on the earth thus falling withing the group in verse 23.
we are Tony, they are the scripts which you posted,,well a verse anyways, thought Id care to share the Context you mentioned to zeek by  only quoting one verse..
is that OK? :icon_flower:

, its Ok to differ yes? :icon_flower:

Fire away matey!  :happygrin:

Just don't put yourself in the verse 23 group saying the kingdom came secretly. Or I'll have to come over there to your country and knock some sense into ya!  :laughing7:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:51:51 PM
You keep saying things that are presumptuous rather than factual.  If you go back to that era I can promise you EVERYONE knew what happened to Israel.  They ALL were aware of the slaughtering that took place.  So to say that no one knew is just inaccurate.  It was the coming of the Lord's Judgment upon a nation that chose to "let his blood be upon us and our children".  It wasn't the coming of the Lord as redeemer or comforter, but judge.  The end DID come . . .otherwise they would still be making animal sacrifices today.

We're not even in the same age as they were in.  History states and Acts even gives reference to the historical accounts that in those days there was a great increase of false prophets who would come in and decieve many by claiming "they" were the Christ.  the reason this exploded was because after Jesus clearly explained that he was not there to literally take the throne from the Romans, but he was their to take the throne spiritually, that those looking to profit themselves took advantage of a nation still looking for something that had already come and gone . .much like the traditional thinking people today.  Still looking for something to come when it's come and gone.

The only time natural repeats itself, is when God orchestrates it to do so in order to fulfill his original plan of declaring Christ as the head of the body.  Adam, put to sleep, woman removed from within him to manifest without him so God could bring the two back together . . .so they could once again become one, to reproduce after their own kind.

Jesus, put to sleep at the hand of a Roman soldier through the manipulation of religious priests . .but still all planned previously by God . . .out of him, a bride was also poured out he called the church and she to was removed from within Christ so that she could be joined back to him from without for the purpose of reproducing after "his" own kind.

But the revelation of Jesus was given "in the spirit" through spiritual language to reproduce spiritual life.  It manifested in the natural to the nation to whom it was originally written.  For those of us who are grafted in generations later, it still applies, but moreso spiritually than naturally.

Keep throwin the natural curves, I'll keep swinging the spiritual bat.  Every natural thing has a spiritual application.  It's not about being mystic, it's about pursuing that which is profitible to the maturiting of the saints.  Christ has come, is come and will continue to be coming.  his coming is a personal revelation to the individual being and also to the natural man.  That's the city cubed.  Christ fulfills all things in every dimension.  He already came as a judge and the world OF THAT DAY was fully aware of it. He's not going to come as a judge again . . .the next time (for me) that he manifests his coming to this earth, it will be as King of Peace . . .the message of the Word is the sword and those that die by it is the carnal man in all of us.

When all men come into the awareness of the unexplainable nature of Christ, they will wilingly lay down their weapons of warfare.  Some have already come into that now and even though, I do still tend to get caught up in a warring atmosphere at times, I still choose to see myself as on with plowshares as priority over weapons.  The Word of God is not my weapon to weld, but it's my source from where all seeds come from to be planted in the fields of other's who are willing to recieve and let God grow the truth in their understanding without the laboring mind trying to weed out what it can't comprehend.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:53:50 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 08:42:26 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 07:50:39 PM
John 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

It's not about feeding people who are hungry with natural food . . .Taf, I'd love to hear your take on the representation of the fish and honeycomb . . . but it's about Christ feeding us through each other.

Would you like to have one lump?  Or two??
So are you saying that Jesus did not literally feed the multitude?

Because I think he did.

And, you know--we could do that today.

Except satan enjoys turning breadbaskets into wastelands, because he likes to see people starve to death.

Of course he did it physcially.  But the point is, what we see physically done, we're to apply spiritually.  Those people he fed eventually got hungry again.  The more we try to pursue the natural things the hungrier we become because the natural can not satisfy what is in the spirit.  Only the Spirit can satisfy your spirit.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 08:56:52 PM
QuoteFire away matey!  

Just don't put yourself in the verse 23 group saying the kingdom came secretly. Or I'll have to come over there to your country and knock some sense into ya!  

:laughing7:
Wes Gentlmen here T, its Pistols come Dawn at Ten Paces :icon_joker:

but Id be happy to settle over a Pint of Chilled British Ale

:icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 09:00:04 PM
Why 10??  What are ya tryin' ta say???  Ya gonna shoot me at the risin of the Sun over law?

Sorry . . .couldn't resist. :bgdance:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 09:01:24 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:53:50 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 08:42:26 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 07:50:39 PM
John 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

It's not about feeding people who are hungry with natural food . . .Taf, I'd love to hear your take on the representation of the fish and honeycomb . . . but it's about Christ feeding us through each other.

Would you like to have one lump?  Or two??
So are you saying that Jesus did not literally feed the multitude?

Because I think he did.

And, you know--we could do that today.

Except satan enjoys turning breadbaskets into wastelands, because he likes to see people starve to death.

Of course he did it physcially.  But the point is, what we see physically done, we're to apply spiritually.  Those people he fed eventually got hungry again.  The more we try to pursue the natural things the hungrier we become because the natural can not satisfy what is in the spirit.  Only the Spirit can satisfy your spirit.
Yes, but...let me ask you this.

If no one can see the starving people as long as their own belly is full, are they missing the spiritual?  And, if they are missing the spiritual, are they then leaving that domain to satan?

Or, more specifically, since the 20th Century belonged to satan, are we spiritual folks ever planning to take it back, before he proceeds with his plan to destroy the planet?  This has to do with a literal interpretation of the book of Revelation because it is not until God dwells with man in his own tent that the New Jerusalem will be here for everyone.



31When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:

32And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:

33And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:

36Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.

37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

38When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?

39Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?

40And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.


--Mat 25



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 09:02:11 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 09:00:04 PM
Why 10??  What are ya tryin' ta say???  Ya gonna shoot me at the risin of the Sun over law?

Sorry . . .couldn't resist. :bgdance:
yup Judgment matey.... :laughing7:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 09:23:33 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 09:01:24 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:53:50 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 08:42:26 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 07:50:39 PM
John 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

It's not about feeding people who are hungry with natural food . . .Taf, I'd love to hear your take on the representation of the fish and honeycomb . . . but it's about Christ feeding us through each other.

Would you like to have one lump?  Or two??
So are you saying that Jesus did not literally feed the multitude?

Because I think he did.

And, you know--we could do that today.

Except satan enjoys turning breadbaskets into wastelands, because he likes to see people starve to death.

Of course he did it physcially.  But the point is, what we see physically done, we're to apply spiritually.  Those people he fed eventually got hungry again.  The more we try to pursue the natural things the hungrier we become because the natural can not satisfy what is in the spirit.  Only the Spirit can satisfy your spirit.

Yes, but...let me ask you this.

If no one can see the starving people as long as their own belly is full, are they missing the spiritual?  And, if they are missing the spiritual, are they then leaving that domain to satan?


In pursuing the spiritual, you are fulfilling the natural as well.  One equips you to do serve the other.

Or, more specifically, since the 20th Century belonged to satan, are we spiritual folks ever planning to take it back, before he proceeds with his plan to destroy the planet?  This has to do with a literal interpretation of the book of Revelation because it is not until God dwells with man in his own tent that the New Jerusalem will be here for everyone.

First, the only reason why the 20th century belongs to the adversary is because man is still identifying himself with the days of labor and not rest.  This line of thinking is not something that can be "blended into" one's current doctrinal beliefs . . .it's a complete paradigm shift within our own identity.



31When the Son of man shall come in his glory, (the throne of my heart) and all the holy angels (Messengers/message) with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: (within Me)

32And before him shall be gathered all nations:(within me are cities of my nature and character, belief systems, doctrines with walls that he's had to bring down so that "he" can take the cities in me)  and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: (Word of God, dividing Spirit from Soul . . .within ME)
33And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, (Spiritual fruit within me) Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:

36Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. (This is why I pursue the spirit.  Flesh profits nothing, but the spirit brings forth life)

37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

38When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?

39Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?

40And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
  (When we walk in the spirit, we're not always aware that we are serving the master through our actions toward others, as it's his spirit working in us both to WILL and to do is good pleasure)
--Mat 25




When we enter into the spirit, it "equips" our flesh.   
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 09, 2008, 09:36:29 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 09:23:33 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 09:01:24 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:53:50 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 08:42:26 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 07:50:39 PM
John 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

It's not about feeding people who are hungry with natural food . . .Taf, I'd love to hear your take on the representation of the fish and honeycomb . . . but it's about Christ feeding us through each other.

Would you like to have one lump?  Or two??
So are you saying that Jesus did not literally feed the multitude?

Because I think he did.

And, you know--we could do that today.

Except satan enjoys turning breadbaskets into wastelands, because he likes to see people starve to death.

Of course he did it physcially.  But the point is, what we see physically done, we're to apply spiritually.  Those people he fed eventually got hungry again.  The more we try to pursue the natural things the hungrier we become because the natural can not satisfy what is in the spirit.  Only the Spirit can satisfy your spirit.

Yes, but...let me ask you this.

If no one can see the starving people as long as their own belly is full, are they missing the spiritual?  And, if they are missing the spiritual, are they then leaving that domain to satan?


In pursuing the spiritual, you are fulfilling the natural as well.  One equips you to do serve the other.

Or, more specifically, since the 20th Century belonged to satan, are we spiritual folks ever planning to take it back, before he proceeds with his plan to destroy the planet?  This has to do with a literal interpretation of the book of Revelation because it is not until God dwells with man in his own tent that the New Jerusalem will be here for everyone.

First, the only reason why the 20th century belongs to the adversary is because man is still identifying himself with the days of labor and not rest.  This line of thinking is not something that can be "blended into" one's current doctrinal beliefs . . .it's a complete paradigm shift within our own identity.



31When the Son of man shall come in his glory, (the throne of my heart) and all the holy angels (Messengers/message) with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: (within Me)

32And before him shall be gathered all nations:(within me are cities of my nature and character, belief systems, doctrines with walls that he's had to bring down so that "he" can take the cities in me)  and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: (Word of God, dividing Spirit from Soul . . .within ME)
33And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, (Spiritual fruit within me) Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:

36Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. (This is why I pursue the spirit.  Flesh profits nothing, but the spirit brings forth life)

37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

38When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?

39Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?

40And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
  (When we walk in the spirit, we're not always aware that we are serving the master through our actions toward others, as it's his spirit working in us both to WILL and to do is good pleasure)
--Mat 25




When we enter into the spirit, it "equips" our flesh.   

Thanks Nat for your contribution, you have further helped me iron out some paradigm shifts for me.

Z
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 09:51:19 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:51:51 PM
You keep saying things that are presumptuous rather than factual.  If you go back to that era I can promise you EVERYONE knew what happened to Israel.  They ALL were aware of the slaughtering that took place.  So to say that no one knew is just inaccurate.  It was the coming of the Lord's Judgment upon a nation that chose to "let his blood be upon us and our children".  It wasn't the coming of the Lord as redeemer or comforter, but judge.  The end DID come . . .otherwise they would still be making animal sacrifices today.

Nathan, I'll cut to the main point.
Jesus said:
Luk 17:23-24  "And they shall be declaring to you, 'Lo! there!' or 'Lo! here!' You may not come away, nor yet should you be pursuing."  (24)  For even as the lightning, flashing out from here under heaven to there under heaven, is shining, thus will be the Son of Mankind in His day."

You say it came when Jerusalem was destroyed. The Bible does not say Christ would come when Jerusalem was destroyed.

The Bible does not say the kingdom would come when Jerusalem was destroyed.

The Bible does say however that there are to be many different things occur BEFORE the kingdom and BEFORE Christ comes again. And Jesus said when it comes it will not come with scrutiny. In other words you won't have to squint your eyes to try to find it. It will be like lightning flashing brilliantly from east to west. It will be apparent to all who see it. Christ's kingdom which is supposed to bring down every kingdom is never said to be a spiritual, invisible kingdom.

So let's stick with the Bible.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 10:11:20 PM
Quote from: ibelieveIt seems to me that during Jesus' earthly ministry He was constantly and consistently using the physical things to teach spiritual truths.

Hi ibelieve and Welcome :icon_flower:

Indeed, I too believe that to be very much the case.


:icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: NathanFirst, the only reason why the 20th century belongs to the adversary is because man is still identifying himself with the days of labor and not rest.  This line of thinking is not something that can be "blended into" one's current doctrinal beliefs . . .it's a complete paradigm shift within our own identity.

What does this mean to you?  Does it mean I sit back and do nothing?  Or does it mean that I am the right hand of God on earth, and if I am doing his will, it will happen easily?  Or something else altogether.

If a farmer loves to farm, it's not necessarily labor to him, particularly with all the modern farming techniques that have been developed--more a labor of love.  But, satan pays him not to farm, until his fields run fallow.  Satan forecloses on his house and farm.  And,all the world starves.

I am very practical.  Show me something practical.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 10:21:39 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 09:51:19 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:51:51 PM
You keep saying things that are presumptuous rather than factual.  If you go back to that era I can promise you EVERYONE knew what happened to Israel.  They ALL were aware of the slaughtering that took place.  So to say that no one knew is just inaccurate.  It was the coming of the Lord's Judgment upon a nation that chose to "let his blood be upon us and our children".  It wasn't the coming of the Lord as redeemer or comforter, but judge.  The end DID come . . .otherwise they would still be making animal sacrifices today.

Nathan, I'll cut to the main point.
Jesus said:
Luk 17:23-24  "And they shall be declaring to you, 'Lo! there!' or 'Lo! here!' You may not come away, nor yet should you be pursuing."  (24)  For even as the lightning, flashing out from here under heaven to there under heaven, is shining, thus will be the Son of Mankind in His day."

You say it came when Jerusalem was destroyed. The Bible does not say Christ would come when Jerusalem was destroyed.

The Bible does not say the kingdom would come when Jerusalem was destroyed.

The Bible does say however that there are to be many different things occur BEFORE the kingdom and BEFORE Christ comes again. And Jesus said when it comes it will not come with scrutiny. In other words you won't have to squint your eyes to try to find it. It will be like lightning flashing brilliantly from east to west. It will be apparent to all who see it. Christ's kingdom which is supposed to bring down every kingdom is never said to be a spiritual, invisible kingdom.

So let's stick with the Bible.

That's half the problem . . .I thought I "was" but it doesn't seem to be working with you.

Check this out and see what happens this time.

Matthew 24
1And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.  2And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.  3And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?  

First question . . .what stones are Jesus referring to?

And "if" you say the temple buildings, my next question would then be, if "they" saw the collapse of the temple to be connected with the end of the world, why are you having so much trouble with it?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 10:31:20 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 10:21:39 PM
That's half the problem . . .I thought I "was" but it doesn't seem to be working with you.

Check this out and see what happens this time.

Matthew 24
1And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.  2And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.  3And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?  

First question . . .what stones are Jesus referring to?

And "if" you say the temple buildings, my next question would then be, if "they" saw the collapse of the temple to be connected with the end of the world, why are you having so much trouble with it?

Very good point, Nathan.  It is the end of the Levite priesthood, and the beginning of something new, a new priesthood based on an eternal life.  The beginning of a new aion.  What we call the New Testament.

But Babylon never went away, and still has its death grip on the world.

Hebrews 9:28
So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 10:38:54 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: NathanFirst, the only reason why the 20th century belongs to the adversary is because man is still identifying himself with the days of labor and not rest.  This line of thinking is not something that can be "blended into" one's current doctrinal beliefs . . .it's a complete paradigm shift within our own identity.

What does this mean to you?  Does it mean I sit back and do nothing?  Or does it mean that I am the right hand of God on earth, and if I am doing his will, it will happen easily?  Or something else altogether.

If a farmer loves to farm, it's not necessarily labor to him, particularly with all the modern farming techniques that have been developed--more a labor of love.  But, satan pays him not to farm, until his fields run fallow.  Satan forecloses on his house and farm.  And,all the world starves.

I am very practical.  Show me something practical.

I wish I could Molly . . . but you use a different key chart than I use.  You see the devil as this high ranking evil being in control of all the darkness . .and I see the devil as the image in my mind that my ego has created.  So I can't really give you what you're asking for on that level.

But you're right, farmers do what they do because they love the land, they love their work . . in fact, it's just as you said, it's  not work to them, it's life.  Well, that's the same here.  Planting seeds in others is not work of labor, it's a function of life.  Some soils are harder to plant in than others.  Some soils are nearly unplantable all together.  But as a planter, the seed is released regardless because that is the "function" and life of the farmer.

It's not the farmers responsibility to keep checking the seed to see if it's taking root or not.  Once it's planted, the farmer stays away and let's the seed do what seeds do.  But when it comes to people, many assume it's their responsibility to not only plant, but to also water and grow the seed in others.  And "if" the plant doesn't sprout up into what they think they planted . . .they try to change it's nature . . .which is impossible once the seed has already taken root, it is what it is.

The seed is the Word of God . . .not just the Bible . .but life giving truth to another.  If it's rejected, we can't very well go back and force it into the ground . . .we can't expect a ground producing thorns (a cursed mind) to recieve good seed because the thorns choke it out.  The life of the Word get's choked out by the choking . .another word for "conforming" mind of the controling nature of man.

I look at us as kings.  A king does not labor in his wishes.  he makes a proclamation and it's carried out without question.  Did the king work?  No, he "functioned" within his rightful authority as king.  When we proclaim life in each other, those words take root in our natural surroundings and objects respond . . . it's the mystery of quantum.  But it's all through faith.

Roman's 1 opens up with Paul refering to the "gospel of faith".  He didn't carry a Bible around and quote it and convince others that if anyone came in and stated anything that "appeared" to be contrary to this Bible that they should reject it.  his gospel was the gospel of "faith".  It's a "belief" in the unseen things.  His message was one of being free from tradtions and law.  His warning was to avoid those who still claimed there were laws that we needed to heed to.  My comfort zone has boundaries . . .there are certain subjects and I feel free in "to a certain point".  

Faith is not hesitating when I reach the boundaries of my comfort zone.  Faith is trusting in Christ in all things, especially in the areas where my mind can not see into.  The crazy thing is, once I take captive those conforming thoughts, I begin to get glimpses of what lies beyond my veil of understanding.  
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Paul Hazelwood on December 09, 2008, 10:56:37 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 09, 2008, 10:18:54 PM

What does this mean to you?  Does it mean I sit back and do nothing?  Or does it mean that I am the right hand of God on earth, and if I am doing his will, it will happen easily?  Or something else altogether.


I think it means to live as you believe the spirit is guiding you and living in faith is seeing that God does the work in others the way he needs it to be.

My parents did what they believed was right,  Church Sunday morning, Sunday evening,  Wednesday evening and all week long evening if it was a revival service.

That planted the seeds God intended for me to have,  but it grew to a much different way of believing than my parents would have wanted.   

I see a spiritual progression, rather than looking back to see all the things my parents did that I did not like,  I see that it was intended that they remain mostly physical in this life, while I also remain in the physical to some degree, the spiritual nature is  more present in my life than it was theirs.   I also see that my sons are alot like I am in that manner, yet, sometimes their spiritual faith is greater than mine.  It doesn't mean I cannot grow spiritually, it only means that there are just some things that God intends that we cannot do anything about.

I look upon that in awe because I have noticed the same things in other families generations.

I once heard a minister that asked the question, are you less religious than your parents?

The answer for my own life is yes, the minister was actually trying to paint the negative view that since we are less religious, then we do not love God as much as our parents may have.

However, I do not see it that way,  I see a greater spiritual progression of societies around the world, and yes some hate the fact that alot of that includes beliefs other than our own.

But mostly I see those who cringe at things like that are dealing with more lawful physical aspects of a belief system.

But, I see it is evidence that God is guiding humanity, and it excites me greatly.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 11:03:57 PM
Quote from: NathanThe crazy thing is, once I take captive those conforming thoughts, I begin to get glimpses of what lies beyond my veil of understanding. 

And, what is it?  What is it you see?


Quote from: PaulBut, I see it is evidence that God is guiding humanity, and it excites me greatly.

Sometimes I do, too.  These kids, for instance, I don't know where they came from, but they live for truth.  They won't accept lies like the rest of us.  They demand truth.  How could a generation raised on illusion come to that?  It has to be God.

But, then satan just goes on doing his satan-y thing, and that's the end of that.  But I don't think these kids will stand for it.  This world will be theirs some day.  I hope.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 11:06:31 PM
Quote from: nathanMatthew 24
1And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.  2And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.  3And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the


First question . . .what stones are Jesus referring to?

And "if" you say the temple buildings, my next question would then be, if "they" saw the collapse of the temple to be connected with the end of the world, why are you having so much trouble with it?

Well Nat, I dont think they be the Rolling stones, Mick Jagger is not even that Old.


FOR mine,
as for the latter , .....sign OF the END of the WORLD....,one can see two fold, the end of the age , no more BLACK stones,those ones saul cast his vote with, but equally so, the END of the WORLD within, Christ BEING the "END" of the salvation of our Souls,,HE being the " Beginning and END "of our FAITH, ie Moving from Faith to Faith.


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 11:24:05 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 09, 2008, 11:06:31 PM
Quote from: nathanMatthew 24
1And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.  2And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.  3And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the


First question . . .what stones are Jesus referring to?

And "if" you say the temple buildings, my next question would then be, if "they" saw the collapse of the temple to be connected with the end of the world, why are you having so much trouble with it?

Well Nat, I dont think they be the Rolling stones, Mick Jagger is not even that Old.


FOR mine,
as for the latter , .....sign OF the END of the WORLD....,one can see two fold, the end of the age , no more BLACK stones,those ones saul cast his vote with, but equally so, the END of the WORLD within, Christ BEING the "END" of the salvation of our Souls,,HE being the " Beginning and END "of our FAITH, ie Moving from Faith to Faith.



The stones  that were under the water.


8And the Israelites did as Joshua commanded, and took up twelve stones out of the midst of the Jordan, according to the number of the tribes of the Israelites, as the Lord told Joshua, and carried them over with them to the place where they lodged and laid them down there.

    9And Joshua set up twelve stones in the midst of the Jordan in the place where the feet of the priests bearing the ark of the covenant had stood. And they are there to this day.


--Joshua 4




20And those twelve stones which they took out of the Jordan Joshua set up in Gilgal.

    21And he said to the Israelites, When your children ask their fathers in time to come, What do these stones mean?

    22You shall let your children know, Israel came over this Jordan on dry ground.

    23For the Lord your God dried up the waters of the Jordan for you until you passed over, as the Lord your God did to the Red Sea, which He dried up for us until we passed over,

    24That all the peoples of the earth may know that the hand of the Lord is mighty and that you may reverence and fear the Lord your God forever.

--Joshua 4


"Gilgal"

H1536
גּלגּל
gilgâl
ghil-gawl'
A variation of H1534: - wheel.





H1534
גּלגּל
galgal
gal-gal'
By reduplication from H1556; a wheel; by analogy a whirlwind; also dust (as whirled): - heaven, rolling thing, wheel.





Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 11:30:52 PM
No the stones were in the air. They used to be standing but then the slipped and fell down and could not get up.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 09, 2008, 11:40:38 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 11:30:52 PM
No the stones were in the air. They used to be standing but then the slipped and fell down and could not get up.
Yes, some, not all.  These:

9And Joshua set up twelve stones in the midst of the Jordan in the place where the feet of the priests bearing the ark of the covenant had stood. And they are there to this day.



But now is a new building, not built with hands, with Christ as the cornerstone.  Those were the ones pulled out of the Jordan.

1 Peter 2:9
But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 11:44:06 PM
No the stones weren't in the water they were floating in the air, in the oxygen and clouds and came crashing down to the earth with a thunderous sound.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: CHB on December 10, 2008, 12:22:48 AM
Quote from: ScarletWren on December 09, 2008, 05:11:32 PM
Hey All,

This is a great topic, one that we won't agree on until it is all evidently in the 'past'.  

I certainly don't have any educated or spiritual 'revelation' on this.  First, tho, let's make it clear that the book of Revelation is in the singular, one revelation, not plural...revelations.  I'm not saying this to say anyone who has stated it as revelations has an inferior position, spelling and grammar is certainly not everyone's forte and does not make his/her opinions/insights any less valuable

I remember reading Hal Lindsay's take on Revelation back when I was in Babylon.  I was amazed at his insights, lol.  Enthralled even.  It seemed so intellectual and I felt he had unravelled the thread.  Now I'm sort of back at square one.

To me, Revelation is something that has happened, is happening and will happen.  Just as the story of Joseph and his brothers really happened in the past, it keeps happening over and over in each overcomer during his lifetime, and then, I believe there will be a literal antitype with Christ taking the throne under God as did Joseph under Pharoah and then his family receiving special blessings with Benjamin (whom I believe represents the overcomers) having extra special blessings.

I believe what happened to Jerusalem was in part a fulfillment of Revelation plus prophecies in the Old Testament.  I also think there is much symbolic in it of what happens to each believer as we advance in our journey.  There will continue to be revelation until God is all in all.  But personally, I think there will be many more ages than just one or two before that happens.  The Bible does not reveal everything about God's creation nor, in my opinion, does it reveal everything about what is to be beyond the next few ages.

It always bothered me when people said that time will be no more.  I don't know how we can exist without time.  Time will no longer be an enemy for we will never fear that we won't have enough 'time' to do whatever we desire to do. We won't become 'old' and get sick, etc.  But for things to keep on 'happening' it seems to me that there has to be time.  Perhaps what I view as time is different to others' views of time. Sometimes the way some Christians describe the culmination of creation sounds to me similar to those who talk about Nirvana where everyone will be just one big consciousness with no personal identity.  What was the use of any of this if that is true?  Just because we will be in complete harmony with God does not mean that we won't have personal feelings or activities we like more than others.  I guess that to me is what makes Christianity so unique.  We maintain a personal identity even in the midst of so much harmony.

We all have such diverse opinions.  And that is ok for now.  Some of us disagree on the scope of free will, the trinity doctrine, consciousness after death, etc.  It is good to discuss it.  It is normal to get frustrated when we can't make someone else see our point of view.  I'm sure many of you will feel I have too simplistic a view of all of this.  Well, my brain is simple and I can only digest so much at a time.  When God wants me to change my views or come into new knowledge it will happen and not one moment sooner.  I've learned that.  Doesn't mean I am always content with that, lol.

Anyway, just an insert here.  Let the controversy continue.  It is a good place to see just how different we can view the scriptures.  I respect each one of you and know you all love the things of God.  I know I certainly can learn a lot.  You all seem to study more than I do lately.

Hi Scarlet,

I guess I would have to say I see things pretty much the same as you do.

I do think there is still more to come because we are still human and time marches on. As long as there are humans on this earth I would assume God isn't finished with us yet. Don't know exactly what is in the future but do know that whatever it is God has ordained it.

CHB
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 12:40:29 AM
Okay, your in a river . . .Jordan . .it means "descending" it's a picture of death.  Jesus was baptized in death and once buried, he birthed resurrection life.  The plant looks nothing like the seed.

In your place where they piled stones . . . there is a connection between there and Revelation again.  In Revelation, the Euphrates (fruitfulness) river dries up and makes way for the kings of the east . . .again . .that's us.  for me, that's a picture of the source that brings life to the earth (flesh) dries up and creates the avenue, it opens a door for the kings of the east . . .traditional teaching will tell you it's China as they are actually the neighboring country next to Israel . . .makes me kinda chuckle now at the idea of how we can get so caught up with our natural reasoning when in reality . .. God's ways are not our ways . . .he is spirit and sees all things from above, we are flesh and see all things from below . .and we end up at opposite ends with our understanding . .broken record time . . .but "walk in the spirit" and that which my mind called last is now first, and that which I think is least important . . .is actually most important.

Okay .  .so the first time Israel actually crosses this river of death . . . it's connected to my old man.  Ever hear of this one???  I think this is so cool.  Molly, this is what I mean by being able to see things I never saw by my own natural reasoning.  These guys knew how to move in God . .they carried him on their shoulders . .yes?  That's a picture of having the mind of Christ.  David didn't know this when he tried to move the ark on a cart pulled by oxen.  He thought you could usher in God's presence from one place to another by labor (oxen=plowing) and all it did was kill the good intentions when someone tried to actually use their laboring hands to steady the ark as they navigated it over their earth.

Oops . .back to the river . . . the priests feet had to "touch" the flooded river of death.  Ever stand at the banks edge of a river out of control?  That flood that hit here in June  . .they're calling it the flood of the century.  Neighborhoods right now, 6 months later, are vacant even now.  I can't imagine setting foot into that kind of force.  And that's what death is, it's a force "within our mind".  And as great as that force is, life is greater . . .BY FAR.  

But something special happens here beyond a nation being baptized in the river of death.  This river . . .as soon as the "walk" of the priests who had the mind of Christ now, as soon as their feet touched this intimidating, stinky river . . .the water stopped and began to pile up . . .and the river backed up and backed up . . .all the way to a specific city . . . a city called . . . Adam.  Doesn't that just blow your mind?  God pushed back the river of death that decended all the way from our origin.  How powerful is that?

Joshua 3:14-16 (message translation)
14-16 And that's what happened. The people left their tents to cross the Jordan, led by the priests carrying the Chest of the Covenant. When the priests got to the Jordan and their feet touched the water at the edge (the Jordan overflows its banks throughout the harvest), the flow of water stopped. It piled up in a heap—a long way off—at Adam, which is near Zarethan. The river went dry all the way down to the Arabah Sea (the Salt Sea). And the people crossed, facing Jericho.


On a side note, in reading Joshua 5, I find it very revealing that it says that they wandered in the wilderness of Egypt for 40 years until the 'men of war' were consumed.  The promised land is not heaven, it's a realm of rest.  There are battles to be fought and won, but not by us.  It was never God's intention that we take up the sword and go on the attack/defense.  If we are warring men, we will wander in the wilderness of our Egypt until our warring minds are consumed . . .can't be a warring mind if you enter into the realm of rest.  The first city they take is a double-walled city. Heavily fortified . . .that was me.  I had philosophies that I had cherished and built monumental walls around so that no one could penetrait my belief system unless they had a sizeable understanding to come against me with . . .or . . .unless there was a shout in the 7th day army proclaiming the city I defend belongs to the Lord . . .and my earth consumed my walls as the 7th day blast came flooding into my mind . . .what a great day to be alive in this generation to see God's mighty hand bringing down the walls.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 01:07:17 AM
That's beautiful, Nathan.  There are two sets of 12 stones here:  one, that was presumably not under water, but Joshua sets them up in the middle of the Jordan, the other, which is underwater, and Joshua carries them out and sets them up at Gilgal.  What about that?

Of course, Jesus begins his ministry being baptized in the Jordan by the last Levite priest, John the Baptist.



10And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him:

11And there came a voice from heaven, saying, Thou art my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

12And immediately the spirit driveth him into the wilderness.


--Mark 1



7I will declare the decree of the Lord: He said to Me, You are My Son; this day [I declare] I have begotten You.

--Psa 2



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 01:11:18 AM
QuoteBut something special happens here beyond a nation being baptized in the river of death.  This river . . .as soon as the "walk" of the priests who had the mind of Christ now, as soon as their feet touched this intimidating, stinky river . . .the water stopped and began to pile up . . .and the river backed up and backed up . . .all the way to a specific city . . . a city called . . . Adam.  Doesn't that just blow your mind?  God pushed back the river of death that decended all the way from our origin.  How powerful is that?

Thats Cool Bro....as was the rest of ya Post Matey :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 02:39:16 AM
QuoteBut something special happens here beyond a nation being baptized in the river of death.  This river . . .as soon as the "walk" of the priests who had the mind of Christ now, as soon as their feet touched this intimidating, stinky river . . .the water stopped and began to pile up . . .and the river backed up and backed up . . .all the way to a specific city . . . a city called . . . Adam.  Doesn't that just blow your mind?  God pushed back the river of death that decended all the way from our origin.  How powerful is that?

Joshua 3:14-16 (message translation)
14-16 And that's what happened. The people left their tents to cross the Jordan, led by the priests carrying the Chest of the Covenant. When the priests got to the Jordan and their feet touched the water at the edge (the Jordan overflows its banks throughout the harvest), the flow of water stopped. It piled up in a heap—a long way off—at Adam, which is near Zarethan. The river went dry all the way down to the Arabah Sea (the Salt Sea). And the people crossed, facing Jericho.

Good stuff, not seen that conection before :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 02:54:04 AM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 02:39:16 AM
QuoteBut something special happens here beyond a nation being baptized in the river of death.  This river . . .as soon as the "walk" of the priests who had the mind of Christ now, as soon as their feet touched this intimidating, stinky river . . .the water stopped and began to pile up . . .and the river backed up and backed up . . .all the way to a specific city . . . a city called . . . Adam.  Doesn't that just blow your mind?  God pushed back the river of death that decended all the way from our origin.  How powerful is that?

Joshua 3:14-16 (message translation)
14-16 And that's what happened. The people left their tents to cross the Jordan, led by the priests carrying the Chest of the Covenant. When the priests got to the Jordan and their feet touched the water at the edge (the Jordan overflows its banks throughout the harvest), the flow of water stopped. It piled up in a heap—a long way off—at Adam, which is near Zarethan. The river went dry all the way down to the Arabah Sea (the Salt Sea). And the people crossed, facing Jericho.

Good stuff, not seen that conection before :thumbsup:

The crossing of the Red Sea was the dry baptism of Moses.



21And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the LORD caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea dry land, and the waters were divided.

22And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon the dry ground: and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left.


--Ex 14





Here, at the Jordan, only the priests get their feet wet.  But they are not yet totally submerged.  (The ark is still carried on the outside. )  It won't be until the baptism of John that happens.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 03:05:06 AM
I thought that might grab some of ya . . .it's what we call "revelating".  Molly you're doing it now as well.  Spell check hates that word.  But that's why I truly do love this realm, there is such a quickening in it as things begin to surface in my understanding and the connections from one nugget stream through the Scriptures and tie into another.  I used to get off track on what I considered to be rabbit trails until one day I realized . .it's all connected.  It's not a rabbit trail as much as it is a net.  And "in" the net, fish are caught and brought to the surface of the surging waters.  We are fishers of "men".  I used to think that only applied to  . ..  well . .. men.  But I can also see how the message in the net of the conversation also captures my carnal thinking and I can organize my thoughts . . .the good fish remain, the bad ones I can return to the muddy waters.

Even though this thread originally began in revelation . . .it's common that it ends up in Genesis.  In the garden there is one river with no name and no beginning . .it just "is".  And this river divides into four at the gardens edge.  On the other end of the book, there is another river . .but it's actually one and the same.  The garden and the throne are also one and the same.  And there are trees in both settings as well.  All this time, I've always seen myself forging out into the river so the current can take me where it chooses.  But the source of the water is where God is bringing us back to . .the place of our origin . .no longer are we in divided waters that split off one from another, but we are being drawn, like a trout in a stream, like a salmon in a river, we are being drawn to swim in the spiritual currents "up-stream" to the place where God began us, before sin manifested in our earth . .before our minds filled up with the curse of thorns and thistles . .God is calling the bride back to  the chamber room where reproductive life can flow from the wombs of our minds once again.  No more enmity, no more warring . . .it's all spiritual.

Blessings.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: ScarletWren on December 10, 2008, 05:16:34 AM
Hello, CHB

It's nice to meet a likeminded soul.  I have read some of  your posts on other threads and noticed we do seem to have many of the same thoughts.   :bgdance:

Great post Nathan.  I am enthralled with those kinds of explanations of scripture.   :thumbsup:

Molly, if you are led to help people in the natural, then by all means do so.  There certainly is a great need in that area.  No one thinks or cares much for scriptural doctrine when their physical needs are not being met.  We each have different callings and should pursue that which God is leading us to.  There definitely is a place for that type of ministry.

I'm really glad to be here.

Peace.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 02:22:30 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 10:21:39 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 09, 2008, 09:51:19 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 09, 2008, 08:51:51 PM
You keep saying things that are presumptuous rather than factual.  If you go back to that era I can promise you EVERYONE knew what happened to Israel.  They ALL were aware of the slaughtering that took place.  So to say that no one knew is just inaccurate.  It was the coming of the Lord's Judgment upon a nation that chose to "let his blood be upon us and our children".  It wasn't the coming of the Lord as redeemer or comforter, but judge.  The end DID come . . .otherwise they would still be making animal sacrifices today.

Nathan, I'll cut to the main point.
Jesus said:
Luk 17:23-24  "And they shall be declaring to you, 'Lo! there!' or 'Lo! here!' You may not come away, nor yet should you be pursuing."  (24)  For even as the lightning, flashing out from here under heaven to there under heaven, is shining, thus will be the Son of Mankind in His day."

You say it came when Jerusalem was destroyed. The Bible does not say Christ would come when Jerusalem was destroyed.

The Bible does not say the kingdom would come when Jerusalem was destroyed.

The Bible does say however that there are to be many different things occur BEFORE the kingdom and BEFORE Christ comes again. And Jesus said when it comes it will not come with scrutiny. In other words you won't have to squint your eyes to try to find it. It will be like lightning flashing brilliantly from east to west. It will be apparent to all who see it. Christ's kingdom which is supposed to bring down every kingdom is never said to be a spiritual, invisible kingdom.

So let's stick with the Bible.

That's half the problem . . .I thought I "was" but it doesn't seem to be working with you.

Check this out and see what happens this time.

Matthew 24
1And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.  2And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.  3And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?  

First question . . .what stones are Jesus referring to?

And "if" you say the temple buildings, my next question would then be, if "they" saw the collapse of the temple to be connected with the end of the world, why are you having so much trouble with it?


Hi Nathan!  :hithere:
Let's step through what Jesus said must take place before these things would happen such as the casting down of the stones, His coming and the conclusion of the eon. After all, that is what the disciples asked Him.

Mat 24:1 And, coming out, Jesus went from the sanctuary. And His disciples approached to exhibit to Him the buildings of the sanctuary."
Mat 24:2 Yet He, answering, said to them, "Are you not observing all these? Verily, I am saying to you, Under no circumstances may a stone here be left on a stone, which shall not be demolished."
Mat 24:3 Now at His sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, "Tell us, when will these things be? And what is the sign of Thy presence and of the conclusion of the eon?
Mat 24:4 And, answering, Jesus said to them, "Beware that no one should be deceiving you."
Mat 24:5 For many shall be coming in My name, saying, 'I am the Christ!' and shall be deceiving many."
Mat 24:6 Yet you shall be about to be hearing battles, and tidings of battles. See that you are not alarmed, for it must be occurring; but not as yet is the consummation."
Mat 24:7 For roused shall be a nation against a nation, and a kingdom against a kingdom, and there shall be famines and quakes in places."
Mat 24:8 Yet all these are the beginning of pangs.
Mat 24:9 Then shall they be giving you up to affliction, and they shall be killing you, and you shall be hated by all of the nations because of My name."
Mat 24:10 And then many shall be snared, and they shall be giving one another up and hating one another."
Mat 24:11 And many false prophets shall be roused, and shall be deceiving many."
Mat 24:12 And, because of the multiplication of lawlessness, the love of many shall be cooling."
Mat 24:13 Yet he who endures to the consummation, he shall be saved."
Mat 24:14 And heralded shall be this evangel of the kingdom in the whole inhabited earth for a testimony to all the nations, and then the consummation shall be arriving."
Mat 24:15 Whenever, then, you may be perceiving the abomination of desolation, which is declared through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let him who is reading apprehend!);"
Mat 24:16 then let those in Judea flee into the mountains.
Mat 24:17 Let him who is on the housetop not descend to take away the things out of his house.
Mat 24:18 And let him who is in the field not turn back behind him to pick up his cloak.
Mat 24:19 Now woe to those who are pregnant and those suckling in those days!"
Mat 24:20 Now be praying that your flight may not be occurring in winter, nor yet on a sabbath,
Mat 24:21 for then shall be great affliction, such as has not occurred from the beginning of the world till now; neither under any circumstances may be occurring."
Mat 24:22 And, except those days were discounted, no flesh at all would be saved. Yet, because of the chosen, those days shall be discounted."
Mat 24:23 Then, if anyone should be saying to you, 'Lo! here is the Christ! or 'Here!' you should not be believing it."
Mat 24:24 For roused shall be false christs and false prophets, and they shall be giving great signs and miracles, so as to deceive, if possible, even the chosen."
Mat 24:25 Lo! I have declared it to you beforehand.
Mat 24:26 If, then, they should say to you, 'Lo! in the wilderness is he!' you may not be coming out' 'Lo! in the storerooms!' you should not be believing it."
Mat 24:27 For even as the lightning is coming out from the east and is appearing as far as the west, thus shall be the presence of the Son of Mankind."
Mat 24:28 Wheresoever the corpse may be, there will the vultures be gathered."
Mat 24:29 Now immediately after the affliction of those days the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not be giving her beams, and the stars shall be falling from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken."
Mat 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven, and then all the tribes of the land shall grieve, and they shall see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory."
Mat 24:31 And He shall be dispatching His messengers with a loud sounding trumpet, and they shall be assembling His chosen from the four winds, from the extremities of the heavens to their extremities
."
Mat 24:32 Now from the fig tree learn a parable: Whenever its bough may already be becoming tender, and the leaves sprouting out, you know that summer is near."
Mat 24:33 Thus you, also, whenever you may be perceiving all these things, know that He is near-at the doors."
Mat 24:34 Verily, I am saying to you that by no means may this generation be passing by till all these things should be occurring."
Mat 24:35 Heaven and earth shall be passing by, yet My words may by no means be passing by."
Mat 24:36 Now, concerning that day and hour no one is aware, neither the messengers of the heavens, nor the Son; except the Father only."
Mat 24:37 For even as the days of Noah, thus shall be the presence of the Son of Mankind."
Mat 24:38 For as they were in those days before the deluge, masticating and drinking and marrying and taking in marriage until the day on which Noah entered into the ark,
Mat 24:39 and did not know till the deluge came and takes them all away, thus shall be the presence of the Son of Mankind."
Mat 24:40 Then two shall be in the field; one is taken along and one left:
Mat 24:41 two grinding at the millstone; one is taken along and one left
.
Mat 24:42 Be watching, then, for you are not aware on what day your Lord is coming."
Mat 24:43 Now that be knowing, for if the householder were aware in what watch the thief is coming, he would watch, and would not let his house be tunneled into."
Mat 24:44 Therefore you also become ready, for in an hour which you are not supposing, the Son of Mankind is coming."
Mat 24:45 Who, consequently, is the faithful and prudent slave whom the lord places over his household to give them nourishment in season?
Mat 24:46 Happy is that slave whom his lord, coming, will be finding doing thus."
Mat 24:47 Verily, I am saying to you that over all his possessions will he be placing him."
Mat 24:48 Now if that evil slave should be saying in his heart, 'Delaying is my lord,'"
Mat 24:49 and should begin to beat his fellow slaves, yet may be eating and drinking with the drunken,
Mat 24:50 the lord of that slave will be arriving on a day for which he is not hoping, and in an hour which he knows not,
Mat 24:51 and shall be cutting him asunder, and will be appointing his part with the hypocrites. There shall be lamentation and gnashing of teeth."

But Jesus doesn't stop there. He goes on into Matthew 25 and talks about being ready and about when He comes He is going to physically judge the nations as to how they treated His brothers during their great tribulation. This judging has not yet occurred. Christ has not come back yet, the consummation of the eon has not occurred yet.

So we see friend that all the above has not yet occurred.

I hope this helps clear up some things.

Tony
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 03:22:47 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 02:22:30 PM
This judging has not yet occurred. Christ has not come back yet, the consummation of the eon has not occurred yet.

So we see friend that all the above has not yet occurred.

I hope this helps clear up some things.

Tony

Nice scriptures, but as pointed out with many of the articles i presented earlier, one then could easily form the opposite opinion as you; because that is all it is; an opinion.


these listed articles again are basically Matthew 24 as seen from a fulfilled view. 

http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/intro_olivet_discourse.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/their_questions.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/gosp_preach_world.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/abom_des.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/great_trib.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/lights_went_out.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/sign_his_coming.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/this_generation.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/global_holo.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/3rd_coming.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/watch_be_ready.htm
http://bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/foolish_virgins.htm


to each to form their own opinion.  For me, by seeing the fulfilled in the "natural" world; has opened up for me the ability to look inward and the work of the LORD in me.  I was never able to see that before; having kept more of a view of "us versus them". 

blessings 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 03:47:04 PM
Dear Zeek,
I went to the first link and the guy stated this:

QuoteJohn 18:36 (NKJV) Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here."

Luke 17:20-21 (NKJV) Now when He was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, He answered them and said, "The kingdom of God does not come with observation; 21 "nor will they say, 'See here!' or 'See there!' For indeed, the kingdom of God is within you."

Could words be plainer? Jesus taught that His Kingdom is a spiritual kingdom. Yet, so many still look for a future physical kingdom.

When Jesus said "My kingdom is not OF this world" He was saying it did not have its origins in this world.

Here is a quote from a venerable writer:

"Although usually there is no especial social or political order in mind when this term is used, there are times when it is confined to the present arrangement, which was inaugurated after the flood and will continue until the kingdom of the world becomes our Lord's and His Christ's (Rev.11:15). When the word is limited by the pronoun this we must not include the ancient world (2 Peter 2:5) before the deluge, or the worlds in the coming eons. To these many passages will not apply. Christ is not of this world (John 8:23), yet He is the very essence of the next. His kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36) yet it dominates the next, for the kingdoms of this world will give place to His reign.

     "Our Lord's statement, "My kingdom is not of this world" (John 18:36), is usually taken to mean that His kingdom is not a worldly kingdom, but a spiritual one. But He did not say the world, in general, but this world, in particular. The fact that, at His unveiling, the world kingdom becomes our Lord's and His Christ's (Rev.11:15) clearly shows that His kingdom is a world kingdom. In fact the use of the word this should settle this point. It is a world kingdom, not of this world, but of that future eon, when He takes His great power and reigns."

"Such was the kingdom which the Jews were led to expect, and such was the sovereignty which our Lord heralded to them. That the displaced realms were real kingdoms on this earth is beyond dispute. The figure used is such as to leave no doubt that the coming kingdom will be the same. What we have today does not displace these kingdoms. It did not commence by crushing them as a falling stone. It is not a mountain in the earth. It is not the kingdom of the heavens. Quite the contrary! There are many governments on earth today, and their power is all based on the work of human hands. It was quite impossible for our Lord to mean any other kingdom than that spoken of by Daniel, for it would have cruelly deceived the people and misused the word of God. The kingdom of the heavens can only be that so called by Daniel the prophet."

"This world is a very different world from that which is to come. If His kingdom were like those of this world, then His slaves would have contended for Him, He would have rallied His followers to defend Him, and would have mobilized all His earthly forces in order to establish His throne. But in the next world it will be different. Then He does, indeed, establish His throne by power, but not with arms of flesh or human might. It is a heavenly kingdom and the powers of the heavens wage war with His enemies and will subdue them. Terrific inflictions from above, and a celestial army on white horses, clear the earth of His foes, while the few, frightened friends He still has on earth make no effort to seat Him on His throne."

  "We all, as citizens of the countries in which we live (unless we are without citizenship or sovereignty) are in the same position. We do not advocate the overthrow of the government by force, hence are not guilty of sedition, for we recognize the officers of the law as ministers of God (Rom.13:1-7), even though we teach that, in a future "world," which many of us now think has "drawn nigh," or, in the phraseology of the Authorized Version is "at hand," the world kingdom will become our Lord's and His Christ's (Rev.11:15). This does not involve the overthrow of all of the governments so that they will not exist in the millennium. The passage just quoted makes all one world kingdom. But such a world kingdom will exist before our Lord comes, under the wild beast, but it will include, not destroy the national governments. The nations will continue in the thousand years under the sovereignty of Messiah. " (A.E. Knoch Unsearchable Riches, vol.29).     

"Heaven is not called a world. THIS world began when this eon began, and will end at its consummation. When the next eon begins, there will be another world (system), and the kingdom will be of that world. And in order that it shall be so, Christ will fight and will kill many thousands of people. He will fight against the very kingdoms that are like Caesar's. The kingdom cannot come during this eon, for it is not of this world." (W. B. SCREWS, Unsearchable Riches, vol.29).

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 03:57:36 PM
Just thought to save Zeek the bother Bro..
Indeed the Battles In Not of the World, We fight in HIS kingdom as Promised.Eph 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.


Eph 6:11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.


Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places].


Eph 6:13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.


Eph 6:14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;


Eph 6:15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;


Eph 6:16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.


Eph 6:17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God

:icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 03:58:19 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 03:47:04 PM
Dear Zeek,
I went to the first link and the guy stated this:

QuoteJohn 18:36 (NKJV) Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here."

Luke 17:20-21 (NKJV) Now when He was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, He answered them and said, "The kingdom of God does not come with observation; 21 "nor will they say, 'See here!' or 'See there!' For indeed, the kingdom of God is within you."

Could words be plainer? Jesus taught that His Kingdom is a spiritual kingdom. Yet, so many still look for a future physical kingdom.

When Jesus said "My kingdom is not OF this world" He was saying it did not have its origins in this world.

Here is a quote from a venerable writer:

"Although usually there is no especial social or political order in mind when this term is used, there are times when it is confined to the present arrangement, which was inaugurated after the flood and will continue until the kingdom of the world becomes our Lord's and His Christ's (Rev.11:15). When the word is limited by the pronoun this we must not include the ancient world (2 Peter 2:5) before the deluge, or the worlds in the coming eons. To these many passages will not apply. Christ is not of this world (John 8:23), yet He is the very essence of the next. His kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36) yet it dominates the next, for the kingdoms of this world will give place to His reign.

     "Our Lord's statement, "My kingdom is not of this world" (John 18:36), is usually taken to mean that His kingdom is not a worldly kingdom, but a spiritual one. But He did not say the world, in general, but this world, in particular. The fact that, at His unveiling, the world kingdom becomes our Lord's and His Christ's (Rev.11:15) clearly shows that His kingdom is a world kingdom. In fact the use of the word this should settle this point. It is a world kingdom, not of this world, but of that future eon, when He takes His great power and reigns."

"Such was the kingdom which the Jews were led to expect, and such was the sovereignty which our Lord heralded to them. That the displaced realms were real kingdoms on this earth is beyond dispute. The figure used is such as to leave no doubt that the coming kingdom will be the same. What we have today does not displace these kingdoms. It did not commence by crushing them as a falling stone. It is not a mountain in the earth. It is not the kingdom of the heavens. Quite the contrary! There are many governments on earth today, and their power is all based on the work of human hands. It was quite impossible for our Lord to mean any other kingdom than that spoken of by Daniel, for it would have cruelly deceived the people and misused the word of God. The kingdom of the heavens can only be that so called by Daniel the prophet."

"This world is a very different world from that which is to come. If His kingdom were like those of this world, then His slaves would have contended for Him, He would have rallied His followers to defend Him, and would have mobilized all His earthly forces in order to establish His throne. But in the next world it will be different. Then He does, indeed, establish His throne by power, but not with arms of flesh or human might. It is a heavenly kingdom and the powers of the heavens wage war with His enemies and will subdue them. Terrific inflictions from above, and a celestial army on white horses, clear the earth of His foes, while the few, frightened friends He still has on earth make no effort to seat Him on His throne."

  "We all, as citizens of the countries in which we live (unless we are without citizenship or sovereignty) are in the same position. We do not advocate the overthrow of the government by force, hence are not guilty of sedition, for we recognize the officers of the law as ministers of God (Rom.13:1-7), even though we teach that, in a future "world," which many of us now think has "drawn nigh," or, in the phraseology of the Authorized Version is "at hand," the world kingdom will become our Lord's and His Christ's (Rev.11:15). This does not involve the overthrow of all of the governments so that they will not exist in the millennium. The passage just quoted makes all one world kingdom. But such a world kingdom will exist before our Lord comes, under the wild beast, but it will include, not destroy the national governments. The nations will continue in the thousand years under the sovereignty of Messiah. " (A.E. Knoch Unsearchable Riches, vol.29).     

"Heaven is not called a world. THIS world began when this eon began, and will end at its consummation. When the next eon begins, there will be another world (system), and the kingdom will be of that world. And in order that it shall be so, Christ will fight and will kill many thousands of people. He will fight against the very kingdoms that are like Caesar's. The kingdom cannot come during this eon, for it is not of this world." (W. B. SCREWS, Unsearchable Riches, vol.29).



:bigGrin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: CHB on December 10, 2008, 04:06:05 PM


Give a listen to this man, Mike Bloom. To the left of the page you will see many more sermons on this subject you can listen to.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4q4DFwcc_E&feature=related

CHB
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 04:55:51 PM
For me guys, this is kind of where these forums can work against us in the sense that they become a battle of the minds.  That in it's own sense seems to fit well in the forum setting because much of what gets said is fleshed out on these pages and conversations. 

But it comes to a point where there is a distinction between fleshing out, and warring against.  I really don't "want" to converse with your mind because it's just going to argue back.  it's got it's own explanation for how it has fitted everything together and it doesn't appreciate concepts that request a total reversal of thinking.  I have a mind myself and I know how it likes to get into debates through natural reasoning. 

There is a difference for me, between sharing what I can see and defending what I shared.  I think it's profitable for all when all share what they see, but not so much when we begin defending what we share.  What I see is, it's all spiritual.  To emphasize that much of Scripture is still going to happen naturally, for me is just not profitable.  It invokes the wrong motivation in people. 

I can't remember who posted it yesterday . .it was something out of Genesis where a guy's name was literally "earthquake" because it was in his day that God divided the earth.  This for me, is a HUGE deal . . .God divided the earth???  How?  When?  How much???  I want to know all the details of how "earth" was changed around.  But there is no explanation . . .what little explanation that was given is in the middle of the "begats" and they move on.  It's as if to say, the natural things REALLY have no bearing on spiritual truth.  Natural things do happen.  We are greatly affected by natural things.  Perhaps that was what Jesus was referring to when he stated it's better for a man to enter into the kingdom with one eye, than into hell with two. . . God isn't nearly as concerned with our natural state as we are.

So when it comes to these kinds of explanations . . .I much rather would like to see the spiritual truth because I know flesh profits nothing, but the Spirit quickens us unto life.

So bottom line, yeah, there was a literal manifestation . . .and I believe it ALL happened to THAT generation . .and I also believe that ALL those things mentioned in the quoted passage of Matthew 24 were also referenced here and there through the book of Acts.  Believe it or not I just preached on the six signs that must take place before the end will come . .which is out of this same passage.  And every one of them did happen.  But regardless whether they happened or they didn't . . .I still choose to apply the spiritual implication rather than dwell on the natural.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 05:15:27 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 04:55:51 PM
For me guys, this is kind of where these forums can work against us in the sense that they become a battle of the minds.  That in it's own sense seems to fit well in the forum setting because much of what gets said is fleshed out on these pages and conversations. 

But it comes to a point where there is a distinction between fleshing out, and warring against.  I really don't "want" to converse with your mind because it's just going to argue back.  it's got it's own explanation for how it has fitted everything together and it doesn't appreciate concepts that request a total reversal of thinking.  I have a mind myself and I know how it likes to get into debates through natural reasoning. 

Dear Nathan,
I didn't know any of us were warring with each other. I thought we were all being nice and civil.
Maybe the warring is what you wrongly perceive that which is just not there?

By the way, God gave us minds for a good reason . . . to use them.
Rom 12:2 and not to be configured to this eon, but to be transformed by the renewing of your mind, for you to be testing what is the will of God, good and well pleasing and perfect."

And how do we test what God's will is unless we use the mind to test His will?

2Th 2:2 that you be not quickly shaken from your mind, nor yet be alarmed, either through spirit, or through word, or through an epistle as through us, as that the day of the Lord is present."

Oh oh, some believe "the day of the Lord" is present and came in 70 A.D.  :happy3:  :laughing7:

Hey, lighten up.

We are all brothers and sisters here and are all learning.

Now, back to Revelation.

John was in spirit in the day of the Lord. If he wrote Revelation before 70 A.D. then how could he be in the day of the Lord if the day of the Lord came at 70 A.D.?
The only way he could be in that far off future day of the Lord was to be "in spirit in the day of the Lord."
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 05:17:00 PM
QuoteFor me guys, this is kind of where these forums can work against us in the sense that they become a battle of the minds.  That in it's own sense seems to fit well in the forum setting because much of what gets said is fleshed out on these pages and conversations.  

But it comes to a point where there is a distinction between fleshing out, and warring against.  I really don't "want" to converse with your mind because it's just going to argue back.  it's got it's own explanation for how it has fitted everything together and it doesn't appreciate concepts that request a total reversal of thinking.  I have a mind myself and I know how it likes to get into debates through natural reasoning.  
Hi Nat

Flesh and spirit dont mix indeed , not when one sees the literal Only and those may see differently by means of spirtualizing.

One can not force anything on anyone bro, but  if  that which is  shared  by both ,or many parties can be respected , in how and what they understand, even in friendly banter, personally I see no Problem.

:icon_flower:




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 05:24:10 PM
Quote from: TonyJohn was in spirit in the day of the Lord. If he wrote Revelation before 70 A.D. then how could he be in the day of the Lord if the day of the Lord came at 70 A.D.?
The only way he could be in that far off future day of the Lord was to be "in spirit in the day of the Lord."

We know he was in the day of the Lord because he heard the sound of the trumpet.


10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,

11Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last:...


--Rev 1



1 Corinthians 15:52
In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.


This is the war trumpet, calling [the saints] to battle.

For John the Revelator, this was happening in the present.

But, I am with you in that I believe the natural is first and has to be completely accounted for before one can move on to the spiritual.


Malachi 3:2
But who may abide the day of his coming? and who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap:



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 05:53:44 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 10, 2008, 05:24:10 PM
Quote from: TonyJohn was in spirit in the day of the Lord. If he wrote Revelation before 70 A.D. then how could he be in the day of the Lord if the day of the Lord came at 70 A.D.?
The only way he could be in that far off future day of the Lord was to be "in spirit in the day of the Lord."

We know he was in the day of the Lord because he heard the sound of the trumpet.


10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,

Dear Molly,
Thanks for bringing this up.
The voice was "as of a trumpet". John did not say he heard a trumpet. "As of a trumpet" does not mean "I heard a trumpet." It is like this: "When a baby cries it sounds like a siren." Does the mother hear a real siren?
When John heard the voice it was LOUD and distinct as a trumpet is.

Quote11Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last:...[/i]

--Rev 1



1 Corinthians 15:52
In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

The dead were not raised incorruptible when John heard the voice AS a trumpet. If they were then we have no hope.

Quote
This is the war trumpet, calling [the saints] to battle.

For John the Revelator, this was happening in the present.

But, I am with you in that I believe the natural is first and has to be completely accounted for before one can move on to the spiritual.


Malachi 3:2
But who may abide the day of his coming? and who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap:

That's good, Molly.
What is sad to see is that if I take what Christ and John wrote to be taken literal then I am unspiritual. But I believe the Bible is filled with literal and figurative language. It just takes someone who is capable to be able to distinguish between the two.

So if John wrote Revelation in 60 A.D. how was he in "the day of the Lord" before the day of the Lord came if it came in 70 A.D.? if preterists are correct (which I don't believe they are) that the day of the Lord began in 70 A.D.?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 05:57:18 PM
QuoteWhat is sad to see is that if I take what Christ and John wrote to be taken literal then I am unspiritual. But I believe the Bible is filled with literal and figurative language. It just takes someone who is capable to be able to distinguish between the two

Hi Tony
Hope your not quoting me  Bro.
for indeed ,thats Not what I said. :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:06:24 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 05:57:18 PM
QuoteWhat is sad to see is that if I take what Christ and John wrote to be taken literal then I am unspiritual. But I believe the Bible is filled with literal and figurative language. It just takes someone who is capable to be able to distinguish between the two

Hi Tony
Hope your not quoting me  Bro.
for indeed ,thats Not what I said. :icon_flower:

Count yerself lucky there bro cause ifn ya did say what I thought you said I'd have to get a canoe and go over to your country and open a can of whoop arse on ya!  :laughing7:

Now then, back to the topic:

If the day of the Lord came in 70 A.D. and most if not all preterists say John wrote Revelation prior to 70 A.D. then how did John get in "the day of the Lord" before the day of the Lord came?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 06:19:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:06:24 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 05:57:18 PM
QuoteWhat is sad to see is that if I take what Christ and John wrote to be taken literal then I am unspiritual. But I believe the Bible is filled with literal and figurative language. It just takes someone who is capable to be able to distinguish between the two

Hi Tony
Hope your not quoting me  Bro.
for indeed ,thats Not what I said. :icon_flower:

Count yerself lucky there bro cause ifn ya did say what I thought you said I'd have to get a canoe and go over to your country and open a can of whoop arse on ya!  :laughing7:

Now then, back to the topic:

If the day of the Lord came in 70 A.D. and most if not all preterists say John wrote Revelation prior to 70 A.D. then how did John get in "the day of the Lord" before the day of the Lord came?

The DAY of the LORD Tony, Is Christ Jesus,..ive listed the scrips early doors be it only a few ...

your looking for it...John was In It, Im in It it came without observation..who cares when he wrote it :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 06:21:01 PM
Quote from: TonyDear Molly,
Thanks for bringing this up.
The voice was "as of a trumpet". John did not say he heard a trumpet. "As of a trumpet" does not mean "I heard a trumpet." It is like this: "When a baby cries it sounds like a siren." Does the mother hear a real siren?
When John heard the voice it was LOUD and distinct as a trumpet is.

The dead were not raised incorruptible when John heard the voice AS a trumpet. If they were then we have no hope.

I start with the literal.  And, to me this is extremely literal--John heard the sound of the trumpet.



10 I was in Spirit in the Lord's day, and I heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet, ...


This is the same trumpet that Paul is talking about.


for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.


What is that trumpet?  It is the voice of God!


53For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

---1 Cor 15


As one of God's saints--Am I to put on immortality now or after I die?  Am I to put on incorruption now or after I die?

But we see that John, who is living on earth, saw the heavens open and was taken to the throne of God.


1 After these things I saw, and lo! a door was opened in heaven. And the first voice that I heard, was as of a trumpet speaking with me, and said, Ascend thou up hither [And the first voice that I heard, was as of a trump speaking with me, saying, Ascend up hither], and I shall show to thee which things it behooveth to be done soon after these things.

   2 And at once [And anon] I was in Spirit, and lo! a seat was set in heaven, and upon the seat one sitting [and on the seat one sitting].

   3 And he that sat, was like [to] the sight of a stone jasper, and to sardine; and a rainbow was in [the] compass of the seat, like [to] the sight of emerald [like to the sight of smaragdus].


--Rev 4



I take this all literally.  Did John die and was he raised from the dead?  Can corruption come before the throne of God?  Can a mortal man?


But we have the mind of Christ.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 06:38:06 PM
Molly

I do word studies..verse studies..not just definition or context but how each term interacts elsewhere in the scripts..takes Along time...But you benefit the Bigger Picture

To Put, To clothe

we have PUT immortality ,and so say the scrips

have you Put on the Armour of GOD"which is Christ Jesus"..NOW? Did Paul or John et all?

Rom 13:12 The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. 

Rom 13:14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to [fulfil] the lusts [thereof]. 


Rom 13:12 The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Has DEATH been swallowed up In Victory..or are we still waiting for that TOO?

1Cr 15:53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal [must] put on immortality. 
1Cr 15:54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality,
then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 

Eph 4:24 And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness. 

Col 3:10 And have put on the new [man], which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:


T
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:39:30 PM
Dear Molly,
John hearing a voice "as a trumpet" is not hearing a trumpet but a voice. The voice was, figuratively speaking, AS a trumpet.

You are confusing the trumpet for the voice.

He said he heard a voice, i.e. words being spoken.  A trumpet is loud and piercing. The voice was like a trumpet in that it was loud and piercing.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:49:30 PM
Dear Taffy,
if we have already put on immortality then why did Paul write that Christ only has immortality:

1Ti 6:16 "Who alone has immortality"

The immortality we will put on and the incorruption we will put on is when the resurrection comes.

Paul said:
1Co 15:53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality."

He did not say: This corruptible has already put on incorruption and this mortal has already put on immortality.

No, friend, John was only in the day of the Lord in spirit, in the far off future and it was a vision, not reality.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 06:56:18 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:39:30 PM
Dear Molly,
John hearing a voice "as a trumpet" is not hearing a trumpet but a voice. The voice was, figuratively speaking, AS a trumpet.

You are confusing the trumpet for the voice.

He said he heard a voice, i.e. words being spoken.  A trumpet is loud and piercing. The voice was like a trumpet in that it was loud and piercing.

Yes, if you've ever heard that voice, its sound is just like a trumpet--bold, authoritative, clear as a bell, and very beautiful.   That is the commanding voice of God.  One is not inclined to argue with it.

What trumpet do you think Paul is talking about?  Somebody in heaven playing a real trumpet?  No.  When we hear the voice of God, we shall be changed.

But the trumpet is a battle sound.  It is God calling his saints to battle.  This happens at the beginning of the book--is there a battle ahead?  Yes.


For as many of you have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

--Gal 3:27

For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

--1 Cor 15:53



"put on"
enduo

(in the sense of sinking into a garment) --array, clothe







Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: CHB on December 10, 2008, 07:01:15 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:49:30 PM
Dear Taffy,
if we have already put on immortality then why did Paul write that Christ only has immortality:

1Ti 6:16 "Who alone has immortality"

The immortality we will put on and the incorruption we will put on is when the resurrection comes.

Paul said:
1Co 15:53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality."

He did not say: This corruptible has already put on incorruption and this mortal has already put on immortality.

No, friend, John was only in the day of the Lord in spirit, in the far off future and it was a vision, not reality.

Tony, I use to have a problem with these same verses until I realized that Paul was still here when he wrote this. It is evident that no one had put on immortality at that time. We honestly don't know what happened after John, do we?

If you notice, John was in a tribulation when he wrote Revelation.

(Rev. 1:9) John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ.

CHB
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 07:03:03 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 05:15:27 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 04:55:51 PM
For me guys, this is kind of where these forums can work against us in the sense that they become a battle of the minds.  That in it's own sense seems to fit well in the forum setting because much of what gets said is fleshed out on these pages and conversations. 

But it comes to a point where there is a distinction between fleshing out, and warring against.  I really don't "want" to converse with your mind because it's just going to argue back.  it's got it's own explanation for how it has fitted everything together and it doesn't appreciate concepts that request a total reversal of thinking.  I have a mind myself and I know how it likes to get into debates through natural reasoning. 

Dear Nathan,
I didn't know any of us were warring with each other. I thought we were all being nice and civil.
Maybe the warring is what you wrongly perceive that which is just not there?

By the way, God gave us minds for a good reason . . . to use them.
Rom 12:2 and not to be configured to this eon, but to be transformed by the renewing of your mind, for you to be testing what is the will of God, good and well pleasing and perfect."

And how do we test what God's will is unless we use the mind to test His will?

2Th 2:2 that you be not quickly shaken from your mind, nor yet be alarmed, either through spirit, or through word, or through an epistle as through us, as that the day of the Lord is present."

Oh oh, some believe "the day of the Lord" is present and came in 70 A.D.  :happy3:  :laughing7:

Hey, lighten up.

We are all brothers and sisters here and are all learning.

Now, back to Revelation.

John was in spirit in the day of the Lord. If he wrote Revelation before 70 A.D. then how could he be in the day of the Lord if the day of the Lord came at 70 A.D.?
The only way he could be in that far off future day of the Lord was to be "in spirit in the day of the Lord."

I think much has to do with unity.  My idea of "warring" doesn't mean that there is aggressive bickering and name calling.  "My" opinion of warring is, neither party is interested in crossing over to the other person's persepctive.  Every response that one gives to another is not for the purpose of finding common ground, but it's to counter every other response that was there previously.  That's why I say, there's a difference between fleshing out, and warring against.

One is trying to grasp because they are interested in seeing the same way.  The other isn't interested in seeing that way and continues to reinforce their reasons.  That's where I feel this has gone and I'm not really here to defend, I'm just trying to share what I see.  I don't claim to understand it all.  But the divide is quite great when one clings to natural and literal understanding while the other is pursuing the spiritual.  We are at two separate ends of the spectrum . .and I for one, don't wish to go back to pursuing the natural and traditional belief simply because there's no value there "for me".  This is not to say there is not value there or that I'm super spiritual above everyone else.  

The difference between where you are and where I am is, I've been where you are, and you can't see where I am.  It'd be different if you were where I am and I was where you are . . . in that sense then we could perhaps come to the bridge where on crossed over and perhaps the other could do so as well. . .but this is not the case.

The case is, I've been where you are.  I've taught Revelation from a traditional perspective.  I have a clear understanding of where you are coming from.  And I'm just trying to say, there's a whole other dimension here that gets missed when we focus on the literal aspect.

Okay, lets do this . .let's say that everything you say is true . .that it's all definitely going to all happen in the future . .. how does this glorify God?  What is the reason then for all of the spiritual implications, if the overall plan was to emphasize the literal devastation?  It takes us back to the fear factor all over again.

A comment was made about taking "some" things as literal and other things as spiritual . . . I don't feel comfortable about that either because from a UR perspective, one argument was, do we really think that God would leave our eternal end up to us in our limited and carnalistic way of thinking?  But yet we turn around and say that God expects us to take his word, which originated in the spirit, and apply it as we see fit . .. some spiritual, some natural . . .?

As for the comment about the mind . . .I do get that response a lot and I can understand why.  I do spend a lot of time trying to get people to let go of their own mind, their own way of thinking, it's been ingrained in us as to how to study, what to study, what to read and even how to apply . . .but what if it's already done for us and all we have to do is step into what's already done . .without needing to understand it "first".  

In my platform on this, I've never said throw away the mind and never pick it up again, what I "have" said is . .lay the mind aside so the Spirit can plant the seed and once the seed is planted THE SEED will grow and give birth INTO my mind . .. of course our minds play a role, just not at the conception when the seed is planted.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 07:07:14 PM
Quote from: Tonyif we have already put on immortality then why did Paul write that Christ only has immortality:

1Ti 6:16 "Who alone has immortality"

You're getting warm..   :Sparkletooth:



26Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints:

27To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:


--Col 1

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 07:10:20 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:49:30 PM
Dear Taffy,
if we have already put on immortality then why did Paul write that Christ only has immortality:

1Ti 6:16 "Who alone has immortality"

The immortality we will put on and the incorruption we will put on is when the resurrection comes.

Paul said:
1Co 15:53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality."

He did not say: This corruptible has already put on incorruption and this mortal has already put on immortality.

No, friend, John was only in the day of the Lord in spirit, in the far off future and it was a vision, not reality.

Hi Tony
For we are IN HIM ,and He is In us making US one Body , a Spiritual One, HE being the HEAD.

:icon_flower:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 07:16:32 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:49:30 PM

No, friend, John was only in the day of the Lord in spirit, in the far off future and it was a vision, not reality.




Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John:


Rev 1:2 Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw.


Rev 1:3 Blessed [is] he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time [is] at hand.




Rev 22:6 And he said unto me, These sayings [are] faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done.


Rev 22:7 Behold, I come quickly: blessed [is] he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book.




Rev 22:10 And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand.





Rev 22:12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward [is] with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.





Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.


Mk 1:14-15 Now after John was put in prison, Jesus came to Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, and saying, "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent, and believe in the gospel."

Gal 4:4 But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law,

Eph 1:10 That in the dispensation of the fullness of the times He might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth--in Him.

Heb 1:1-2 God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds;

Act 3:24 Yes, and all the prophets, from Samuel and those who follow, as many as have spoken, have also foretold these days.

1Pet 1:20 He indeed was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you.

1Cor 10:11 Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.

Heb 9:26 He then would have had to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now, once at the end of the ages, He has appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.

Jas 5:3 Your gold and silver are corroded, and their corrosion will be a witness against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have heaped up treasure in the last days.

1Jn 2:18 Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour.

Act 2:16-17 But this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel: 'And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, that I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your young men shall see visions, your old men shall dream dreams.

Dan 12:4 "But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book until the time of the end; many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase."

Rev 22:10 And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand.


Mt 24:34 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place.

Jn 16:16 "A little while, and you will not see Me; and again a little while, and you will see Me, because I go to the Father."

Jn 14:19 "A little while longer and the world will see Me no more, but you will see Me. Because I live, you will live also."

Heb 10:25 Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.

Heb 10:36-37 For you have need of endurance, so that after you have done the will of God, you may receive the promise: "For yet a little while, And He who is coming will come and will not tarry."

Rom 13:11-12 And do this, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep; for now our salvation is nearer than when we first believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand. Therefore let us cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Rom 16:20 And the God of peace will crush Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen.

Jas 5:7-9 Therefore be patient, brethren, until the coming of the Lord. See how the farmer waits for the precious fruit of the earth, waiting patiently for it until it receives the early and latter rain. You also be patient. Establish your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is at hand. Do not grumble against one another, brethren, lest you be condemned. Behold, the Judge is standing at the door!

1Pet 4:7 But the end of all things is at hand; therefore be serious and watchful in your prayers.

Phil 4:5 Let your gentleness be known to all men. The Lord is at hand.

1Cor 1:4-8 I thank my God always concerning you for the grace of God which was given to you by Christ Jesus, That you were enriched in everything by Him in all utterance and all knowledge, Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you, So that you come short in no gift, eagerly waiting for the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who will also confirm you to the end, that you may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

1Cor 7:29 But this I say, brethren, the time is short, so that from now on even those who have wives should be as though they had none,

Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants--things which must shortly take place. And He sent and signified it by His angel to His servant John,

Rev 1:3 Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written in it; for the time is near.

Rev 22:10 And he said to me, "Do not seal the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is at hand.




I appreciate this thread, time for me to "bow" out. 

blessings
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 07:17:24 PM
Quote from: Taffy on December 10, 2008, 07:10:20 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:49:30 PM
Dear Taffy,
if we have already put on immortality then why did Paul write that Christ only has immortality:

1Ti 6:16 "Who alone has immortality"

The immortality we will put on and the incorruption we will put on is when the resurrection comes.

Paul said:
1Co 15:53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality."

He did not say: This corruptible has already put on incorruption and this mortal has already put on immortality.

No, friend, John was only in the day of the Lord in spirit, in the far off future and it was a vision, not reality.

Hi Tony
For we are IN HIM ,and He is In us making US one Body , a Spiritual One, HE being the HEAD.

:icon_flower:


A hologram!   :bgdance:


Hologram
A unique photographic printing that provides a three-dimensional effect on a flat surface. Holograms cannot be easily copied ....

Three dimensional picture created with a laser.



"Holograms have other surprising traits as well. If you cut one in half, each half contains whole views of the entire holographic image. The same is true if you cut out a small piece -­- even a tiny fragment will still contain the whole picture. On top of that, if you make a hologram of a magnifying glass, the holographic version will magnify the other objects in the hologram, just like a real one."


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 08:09:35 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 07:16:32 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 06:49:30 PM

No, friend, John was only in the day of the Lord in spirit, in the far off future and it was a vision, not reality.




Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John:


Rev 1:2 Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw.


Rev 1:3 Blessed [is] he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time [is] at hand.




Rev 22:6 And he said unto me, These sayings [are] faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done.


Rev 22:7 Behold, I come quickly: blessed [is] he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book.




Rev 22:10 And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand.





Rev 22:12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward [is] with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.





Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.


Mk 1:14-15 Now after John was put in prison, Jesus came to Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, and saying, "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent, and believe in the gospel."

Gal 4:4 But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law,

Eph 1:10 That in the dispensation of the fullness of the times He might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth--in Him.

Heb 1:1-2 God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds;

Act 3:24 Yes, and all the prophets, from Samuel and those who follow, as many as have spoken, have also foretold these days.

1Pet 1:20 He indeed was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you.

1Cor 10:11 Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.

Heb 9:26 He then would have had to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now, once at the end of the ages, He has appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.

Jas 5:3 Your gold and silver are corroded, and their corrosion will be a witness against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have heaped up treasure in the last days.

1Jn 2:18 Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour.

Act 2:16-17 But this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel: 'And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, that I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your young men shall see visions, your old men shall dream dreams.

Dan 12:4 "But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book until the time of the end; many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase."

Rev 22:10 And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand.


Mt 24:34 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place.

Jn 16:16 "A little while, and you will not see Me; and again a little while, and you will see Me, because I go to the Father."

Jn 14:19 "A little while longer and the world will see Me no more, but you will see Me. Because I live, you will live also."

Heb 10:25 Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.

Heb 10:36-37 For you have need of endurance, so that after you have done the will of God, you may receive the promise: "For yet a little while, And He who is coming will come and will not tarry."

Rom 13:11-12 And do this, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep; for now our salvation is nearer than when we first believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand. Therefore let us cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Rom 16:20 And the God of peace will crush Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen.

Jas 5:7-9 Therefore be patient, brethren, until the coming of the Lord. See how the farmer waits for the precious fruit of the earth, waiting patiently for it until it receives the early and latter rain. You also be patient. Establish your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is at hand. Do not grumble against one another, brethren, lest you be condemned. Behold, the Judge is standing at the door!

1Pet 4:7 But the end of all things is at hand; therefore be serious and watchful in your prayers.

Phil 4:5 Let your gentleness be known to all men. The Lord is at hand.

1Cor 1:4-8 I thank my God always concerning you for the grace of God which was given to you by Christ Jesus, That you were enriched in everything by Him in all utterance and all knowledge, Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you, So that you come short in no gift, eagerly waiting for the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who will also confirm you to the end, that you may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

1Cor 7:29 But this I say, brethren, the time is short, so that from now on even those who have wives should be as though they had none,

Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants--things which must shortly take place. And He sent and signified it by His angel to His servant John,

Rev 1:3 Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written in it; for the time is near.

Rev 22:10 And he said to me, "Do not seal the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is at hand.




I appreciate this thread, time for me to "bow" out. 

blessings

Zeek . .wow, that was an impressive display of work.  I hope you don't mind, but I've put that over onto a word document for sharing out in a class format.  Thank you so much for the effort you put into posting this.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 08:19:39 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 10, 2008, 07:07:14 PM
Quote from: Tonyif we have already put on immortality then why did Paul write that Christ only has immortality:

1Ti 6:16 "Who alone has immortality"

You're getting warm..   :Sparkletooth:



26Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints:

27To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:


--Col 1

O.K. Molly, we are getting somewhere now.
Since Paul wrote that Christ was in you ('you' is plural) and since Paul also said that Christ only has immortality, he was not saying we are immortal YET.

In Corinthians was not Christ in us? And yet Paul still said they were looking forward to putting on immortality.

Please look at the context:

1Co 15:51-53  Lo! a secret to you am I telling! We all, indeed, shall not be put to repose, yet we all shall be changed,  (52)  in an instant, in the twinkle of an eye, at the last trump. For He will be trumpeting, and the dead will be roused incorruptible, and we shall be changed."  (53)  For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality."

The putting on or incorruptibility and incorruption has to do with the resurrection when the dead come out of the tombs, rise and meet those who are living and have been changed at the same time. It is an all or nothing scenario.

Paul did not say they were already changed, already immortal, already incorruptible. So please, lets not invent things which are not there.

So, since most if not all preterists say the Lord's day came in 70 A.D., how was John in the Lord's day if he wrote Revelation around 60 some A.D.?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:31:18 PM
Hi all, did any of you think that it just might be that both views are correct?

Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. 10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.


Is that not why scripture say He IS, WAS and IS TO COME?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:34:13 PM
QuoteIf the day of the Lord came in 70 A.D. and most if not all preterists say John wrote Revelation prior to 70 A.D. then how did John get in "the day of the Lord" before the day of the Lord came?

Tony didn't Abraham see the Lords Day even though it was a far future literal event?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 08:37:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:31:18 PM
Hi all, did any of you think that it just might be that both views are correct?

Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. 10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.


Is that not why scripture say He IS, WAS and IS TO COME?

I've often thot the Is,was and is to come might have something to do with this scripture




Rev 1:18 I [am] he that liveth (present, is), and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore (will be), Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.

just some thots

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:41:44 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 08:37:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:31:18 PM
Hi all, did any of you think that it just might be that both views are correct?

Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. 10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.


Is that not why scripture say He IS, WAS and IS TO COME?

I've often thot the Is,was and is to come might have something to do with this scripture




Rev 1:18 I [am] he that liveth (present, is), and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore (will be), Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.

just some thots



yep I agree, just another layer to the onion.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 08:54:23 PM
"In" context

Message Translation
The sun comes up and the sun goes down,
      then does it again, and again—the same old round.
   The wind blows south, the wind blows north.
      Around and around and around it blows,
      blowing this way, then that—the whirling, erratic wind.
   All the rivers flow into the sea,
      but the sea never fills up.
   The rivers keep flowing to the same old place,
      and then start all over and do it again.
   Everything's boring, utterly boring—
      no one can find any meaning in it.
   Boring to the eye,
      boring to the ear.
   What was will be again,
      what happened will happen again.
   There's nothing new on this earth.
      Year after year it's the same old thing.
   Does someone call out, "Hey, this is new"?
      Don't get excited—it's the same old story.
   Nobody remembers what happened yesterday.
      And the things that will happen tomorrow?
   Nobody'll remember them either.
      Don't count on being remembered.

Nothing is new "under" the Son . . . it's what we've been saying all along about the carnal nature of man.  It's limited.  The closest it can come to in creating newness, is repeating what is old.  "under" the sun . . .we are not "under" Christ, we have been raised up "with" him.  We are a "new" creature "in" not under . ."in" him. 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 09:19:31 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 08:37:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:31:18 PM
Hi all, did any of you think that it just might be that both views are correct?

Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. 10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.


Is that not why scripture say He IS, WAS and IS TO COME?

I've often thot the Is,was and is to come might have something to do with this scripture




Rev 1:18 I [am] he that liveth (present, is), and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore (will be), Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.

just some thots


Are those the keys to the kingdom of heaven?

Matthew 16:19
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 09:29:24 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 10, 2008, 08:19:39 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 10, 2008, 07:07:14 PM
Quote from: Tonyif we have already put on immortality then why did Paul write that Christ only has immortality:

1Ti 6:16 "Who alone has immortality"

You're getting warm..   :Sparkletooth:



26Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints:

27To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:


--Col 1

O.K. Molly, we are getting somewhere now.
Since Paul wrote that Christ was in you ('you' is plural) and since Paul also said that Christ only has immortality, he was not saying we are immortal YET.

In Corinthians was not Christ in us? And yet Paul still said they were looking forward to putting on immortality.

Please look at the context:

1Co 15:51-53  Lo! a secret to you am I telling! We all, indeed, shall not be put to repose, yet we all shall be changed,  (52)  in an instant, in the twinkle of an eye, at the last trump. For He will be trumpeting, and the dead will be roused incorruptible, and we shall be changed."  (53)  For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality."

The putting on or incorruptibility and incorruption has to do with the resurrection when the dead come out of the tombs, rise and meet those who are living and have been changed at the same time. It is an all or nothing scenario.

Paul did not say they were already changed, already immortal, already incorruptible. So please, lets not invent things which are not there.

So, since most if not all preterists say the Lord's day came in 70 A.D., how was John in the Lord's day if he wrote Revelation around 60 some A.D.?


John 5:24
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.

"is passed"

G3327
μεταβαίνω
metabainō
met-ab-ah'ee-no
From G3326 and the base of G939; to change place: - depart, go, pass, remove.



John 11:26
and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"


Romans 6:8

8Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him. 9For we know that since Christ was raised from the dead, he cannot die again; death no longer has mastery over him.



2Set your minds on things above, not on earthly things. 3For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in God. 4When Christ, who is your life, appears, then you also will appear with him in glory.
--Col 3





Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 09:45:49 PM
QuoteWhat was will be again,
what happened will happen again.
There's nothing new on this earth.
Year after year it's the same old thing.
Does someone call out, "Hey, this is new"?
Don't get excited—it's the same old story.

Hi Nathan, that look more like someone's translation of what they believe the scriptures to say and not what the scriptures actually say.

Sun/shemesh is NEVER translated EARTH
There is more then just the earth under the sun, every planet in our solar system is under the sun



QuoteNothing is new "under" the Son . . . it's what we've been saying all along about the carnal nature of man. It's limited. The closest it can come to in creating newness, is repeating what is old. "under" the sun . . .we are not "under" Christ, we have been raised up "with" him. We are a "new" creature "in" not under . ."in" him.

I guess it depends on how one understands under, we are indeed in Christ and Christ in us but the body is still under the head.

But my only point really was that I see all those things happened in 70AD, but believe they will happen again in the future also, thus what was is what will be.
That why I said both views are correct imo.

Some make the argument that it happened in 70AD, Tony says it is yet to happen, and I am saying it happened in 70AD and will again happen in the future. For Jesus Himself taught us to pray thy kingdom come, thus if His kingdom is already here the prayer Jesus taught us to pray is redundant.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 10:04:52 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 09:45:49 PM
QuoteWhat was will be again,
what happened will happen again.
There's nothing new on this earth.
Year after year it's the same old thing.
Does someone call out, "Hey, this is new"?
Don't get excited—it's the same old story.

Hi Nathan, that look more like someone's translation of what they believe the scriptures to say and not what the scriptures actually say.

Sun/shemesh is NEVER translated EARTH
There is more then just the earth under the sun, every planet in our solar system is under the sun



QuoteNothing is new "under" the Son . . . it's what we've been saying all along about the carnal nature of man. It's limited. The closest it can come to in creating newness, is repeating what is old. "under" the sun . . .we are not "under" Christ, we have been raised up "with" him. We are a "new" creature "in" not under . ."in" him.

I guess it depends on how one understands under, we are indeed in Christ and Christ in us but the body is still under the head.

But my only point really was that I see all those things happened in 70AD, but believe they will happen again in the future also, thus what was is what will be.
That why I said both views are correct imo.

Some make the argument that it happened in 70AD, Tony says it is yet to happen, and I am saying it happened in 70AD and will again happen in the future. For Jesus Himself taught us to pray thy kingdom come, thus if His kingdom is already here the prayer Jesus taught us to pray is redundant.

if it is to again happen in the future, and again, and again, then that means the Old covenant never vanished away, and that it continually is given life.   

For me, the old has vanished and is fulfilled in HIM; even though we may try to put ourselves back under it.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 10:11:49 PM
eek gad Zeek that is not what I am saying.

Let me ask this question, is Christ going to literally come again and set up His kingdom on earth?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 10:19:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 10, 2008, 09:19:31 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 08:37:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:31:18 PM
Hi all, did any of you think that it just might be that both views are correct?

Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. 10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.


Is that not why scripture say He IS, WAS and IS TO COME?

I've often thot the Is,was and is to come might have something to do with this scripture




Rev 1:18 I [am] he that liveth (present, is), and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore (will be), Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.

just some thots


Are those the keys to the kingdom of heaven?

Matthew 16:19
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.


Molly, don't take it out of context.  The keys are not just given to anyone.  It's the same with Revelation. . .I believe that's why it's so confusing and misunderstood . .it's not written to just anyone.  Revelation is for "bondservants"  it's important to understand what one is before assuming who it's really written to.

As for the keys you quote . . .read the whole context.  Christ just stated that "upon this rock"  The keys are what unlock that which the foundation is built on.  They are authoritive by nature, but only to those who have what I'd call the "Peter experience".  They don't come by way of flesh and blood.

Matt 16
15He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

16And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

17And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

18And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

19And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 10:19:57 PM
Also is this a future event or has it already happend?or is it both as I maintain?


He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; 38 The field is the world;  the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; 39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil;  the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. 40As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. 41The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;  42And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.



Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 10:28:57 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 09:45:49 PM
QuoteWhat was will be again,
what happened will happen again.
There's nothing new on this earth.
Year after year it's the same old thing.
Does someone call out, "Hey, this is new"?
Don't get excited—it's the same old story.

Hi Nathan, that look more like someone's translation of what they believe the scriptures to say and not what the scriptures actually say.

Sun/shemesh is NEVER translated EARTH
There is more then just the earth under the sun, every planet in our solar system is under the sun



QuoteNothing is new "under" the Son . . . it's what we've been saying all along about the carnal nature of man. It's limited. The closest it can come to in creating newness, is repeating what is old. "under" the sun . . .we are not "under" Christ, we have been raised up "with" him. We are a "new" creature "in" not under . ."in" him.

I guess it depends on how one understands under, we are indeed in Christ and Christ in us but the body is still under the head.

But my only point really was that I see all those things happened in 70AD, but believe they will happen again in the future also, thus what was is what will be.
That why I said both views are correct imo.

Some make the argument that it happened in 70AD, Tony says it is yet to happen, and I am saying it happened in 70AD and will again happen in the future. For Jesus Himself taught us to pray thy kingdom come, thus if His kingdom is already here the prayer Jesus taught us to pray is redundant.

We're still not connecting on this.  The prayer . .for me, the point of the prayer is to release that which is already finished in the spirit, upon this earth.  But for me to release that which is in the spirit. . it would mean I would actually have to be "in" the spirit.  It's the spirit that gives life, this is my argument from the beginning . . .why would I want to focus on the repeat of something in the natural when the source is not in the natural, but the spiritual?

To dwell on the current state of your life is not faith.  Faith is seeing things AS THOUGH they are. . .not "as" they are.  In the spirit . .they are complete, in the flesh, they are not.  So dwell where the completion is, and release it into where the completion isn't.  It's also connected to Molly's reference of releasing and binding . . .it comes through revelation by way of relationship with the Father toward the Son.

As far as things repeating . . . there are patterns, yes . .on the one hand, your telling me that it did happen in the past, and it's going to happen again in the future . .on the other side, I'm being told it "has" to be something happening in the future "because" there is no place where it's happened in the past . .so which is it???
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 10:30:08 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 10:19:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 10, 2008, 09:19:31 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 08:37:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:31:18 PM
Hi all, did any of you think that it just might be that both views are correct?

Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. 10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.


Is that not why scripture say He IS, WAS and IS TO COME?

I've often thot the Is,was and is to come might have something to do with this scripture




Rev 1:18 I [am] he that liveth (present, is), and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore (will be), Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.

just some thots


Are those the keys to the kingdom of heaven?

Matthew 16:19
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.


Molly, don't take it out of context.  The keys are not just given to anyone.  It's the same with Revelation. . .I believe that's why it's so confusing and misunderstood . .it's not written to just anyone.  Revelation is for "bondservants"  it's important to understand what one is before assuming who it's really written to.

As for the keys you quote . . .read the whole context.  Christ just stated that "upon this rock"  The keys are what unlock that which the foundation is built on.  They are authoritive by nature, but only to those who have what I'd call the "Peter experience".  They don't come by way of flesh and blood.

Matt 16
15He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

16And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

17And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

18And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

19And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Yes I understand that.  You say the keys are given to his bondservants--whom I will call his [Melchizedek] priests.  Such was Peter.  

I'm just asking --what are these keys.  And, are the keys of hell and death the same as the keys to the kingdom of heaven?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 10:46:27 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 10:11:49 PM
eek gad Zeek that is not what I am saying.

Let me ask this question, is Christ going to literally come again and set up His kingdom on earth?

That may not be what you're consciously saying . .but that is what it would boil down to.  That's why I caution against leaving the choosing of what is to be taken spiritual and what is to be taken literal up to men.  It's all literal . . .to those to whom it was written to.  It's all moral to those who it was written to and to us.  It's all spiritual to all who walk in the spirit and see it with spiritual vision.

Christ has come, is come and will be coming.  The question is, in what form?  He came in the flesh "for" us, He'll come in the flesh "through" us (manifestation of the sons of God) will he come back in the flesh "to" us?  If he did one and two, I would lean toward #3 as well.  But it's not something that's dominant in correlation with everything else.  
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 10:51:47 PM
QuoteWe're still not connecting on this. The prayer . .for me, the point of the prayer is to release that which is already finished in the spirit, upon this earth. But for me to release that which is in the spirit. . it would mean I would actually have to be "in" the spirit. It's the spirit that gives life, this is my argument from the beginning . . .why would I want to focus on the repeat of something in the natural when the source is not in the natural, but the spiritual?

To dwell on the current state of your life is not faith. Faith is seeing things AS THOUGH they are. . .not "as" they are. In the spirit . .they are complete, in the flesh, they are not. So dwell where the completion is, and release it into where the completion isn't. It's also connected to Molly's reference of releasing and binding . . .it comes through revelation by way of relationship with the Father toward the Son.

Nathan I agree with what you just said, my post was concerning the question did revelation already happen.

My stance is Yes but it will also happen in the future.

QuoteAs far as things repeating . . . there are patterns, yes . .on the one hand, your telling me that it did happen in the past, and it's going to happen again in the future . .on the other side, I'm being told it "has" to be something happening in the future "because" there is no place where it's happened in the past . .so which is it???

It not either or for me bro, it IS, WAS and IS TO COME for me.
So far from what I have read some here are saying it happened and that's it, all done, Tony is saying it never happened but is a future event.
And I am saying BOTH sides are right, for it happened in 70AD and will again in the future.

Rev. is so hard to explain and is one of the reason I don't usually get involved in the discussions concerning it.

Here is the  preface to my Great White Throne article, which explains how I see Revelation, maybe it will help clear up some of the confusion on what I am trying to say.

Preface

Before we look into what the great white throne is and its purpose we need to be clear on what the book of Revelation is.

The book opens with the words "The Revelation of Jesus Christ".
Revelation comes from the Greek word apokalupsis meaning to unveil or manifest.
So the book of Revelation is all about the unveiling or manifestation of Jesus Christ.
Everything written in this book is about Jesus Christ; there is nothing in this book that does not speak of Him. It is the unveiling of the mystical body of Jesus Christ from head to feet. Our Lord being the head of the body and us being members of that same body.
This whole body is simply called Jesus Christ. This can be seen in Ephesians 3:14-15 For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named.
So when we read this book of mystery we should be reading it with a singleness of purpose and that is to see Jesus Christ. When we read of the judgments spoken so often within this book, we should be looking at how those judgments reveal Jesus Christ. What I mean by that is that the judgments written in this book are for the express purpose of manifesting Jesus Christ to and in us. They are not written to condemn men but to unveil Christ within us. Thus when we read about the judgment of the great white throne which judgment is the second death we should be looking at how that judgment reveals to us and in us Jesus Christ.
The book of Revelation goes on to say "I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty".
To some it is a future experience, to those who have died and gone on to be with the Lord this experience is already passed, and to us it is a present reality. For this is a book of the unveiling of Jesus Christ which is, which was and which is to come. Every judgment written in this book has already happened, is happening right now and will happen in the future.
Ecclesiastes 1:
9. That which has been is what will be, that which is done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun.
10. Is there anything of which it may be said, "See, this is new''? It has already been in ancient times before us.

People look at the great white throne judgment and see only a future judgment of a lake of fire and brimstone. Now it is true for some this judgment is a future event yet to happen but for us this judgment is happening right now and for others this judgment is already past.
The scriptures are very plain that the book of Revelation is the unveiling of Jesus Christ which is, which was and which is to come. Can we say in all honesty that those men of generations past never had an unveiling of Jesus Christ, of course we can't. Men like Abraham and Moses most assuredly had Jesus Christ revealed to them. And how could they have had Him revealed to them unless they had gone though the fiery judgments spoken of so often in the book of Revelation?
The scriptures themselves show us in Gen.19:24 and Lu.17:29 the judgment of the great white throne being sent out from the Lord, and that judgment came and will come when the son of man is revealed.
Ezekiel 38:22-23
22 And I will plead against him with pestilence and with blood; and I will rain upon him, and upon his bands, and upon the many people that are with him, an overflowing rain, and great hailstones, fire, and brimstone. 23 Thus will I magnify myself, and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am the LORD.

Can there be any doubt that the great white throne judgment of fire and brimstone is for the unveiling or manifestation of Jesus Christ? And can we not see that it has happened in the past, is happening right now and will happen in the future? To believe otherwise would be to say that Jesus Christ was not made manifest to people like Abraham and Moses.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 11:00:29 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 10, 2008, 10:30:08 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 10:19:42 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 10, 2008, 09:19:31 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 10, 2008, 08:37:23 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:31:18 PM
Hi all, did any of you think that it just might be that both views are correct?

Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. 10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.


Is that not why scripture say He IS, WAS and IS TO COME?

I've often thot the Is,was and is to come might have something to do with this scripture




Rev 1:18 I [am] he that liveth (present, is), and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore (will be), Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.

just some thots


Are those the keys to the kingdom of heaven?

Matthew 16:19
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.


Molly, don't take it out of context.  The keys are not just given to anyone.  It's the same with Revelation. . .I believe that's why it's so confusing and misunderstood . .it's not written to just anyone.  Revelation is for "bondservants"  it's important to understand what one is before assuming who it's really written to.

As for the keys you quote . . .read the whole context.  Christ just stated that "upon this rock"  The keys are what unlock that which the foundation is built on.  They are authoritive by nature, but only to those who have what I'd call the "Peter experience".  They don't come by way of flesh and blood.

Matt 16
15He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

16And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

17And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

18And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

19And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Yes I understand that.  You say the keys are given to his bondservants--whom I will call his [Melchizedek] priests.  Such was Peter.  

I'm just asking --what are these keys.  And, are the keys of hell and death the same as the keys to the kingdom of heaven?

Keys = authority.  Authority is not in the flesh but the spirit.  However, when I exercise that authority in the spirit, I have dominion over natural because Spirit is a higher plain than natural.  But one can't exercise spiritual power while embracing natural reasoning.  It's like being with child, either you are, or your not.  There is "well, I am a little".  But the "appearance" of that spiritual experience is what happens in stages . . just like a pregnancy.  My outward actions change gradually "with" the maturing of the life seed within me.  The more I understand, the more I react to that understanding.  

 Is hell a natural place or a spiritual?  Do you think natural death is what this is referring to here?  Or spiritual?  If you have the spiritual keys, you have power over spiritual and natural realms.  There is no real power in applying the spiritual word naturally.  The outcome is really religion because it comes out of works and labor, rather than rest and relationship.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 10, 2008, 11:03:29 PM
 
 I just wanted to share this with  everyone
 about revelation happened / happening and will continue to Happen
as Long as Gods Word IS  and the 1000 year reign of Jesus Christ  seen in this concept
the reason ,  I believe this and have never shared it yet
 is because  of this  the 1000 year reign to me is  930  age of Adam  at death  
Gen 5:5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.  and in Psalms  David says  70 years than fly away  , making 1000  total     and  its seems the Lord shortened the days/work  for the elects sake  
 

Psa 90:10 The days of our years [are] threescore years and ten; 70  and if by reason of strength [they be] fourscore years, yet [is] their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away. days of our flesh    

 this is the Lord Jesus Christ to me  70 years was also the captivity of the Jews in Babylon  [confusion]    i see this spiritually  too , there is more to this , but for now something to consider  i hope ?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 11:10:26 PM
Quote from: rosered on December 10, 2008, 11:03:29 PM

 I just wanted to share this with  everyone
 about revelation happened / happening and will continue to Happen
as Long as Gods Word IS  and the 1000 year reign of Jesus Christ  seen in this concept
the reason ,  I believe this and have never shared it yet
 is because  of this  the 1000 year reign to me is  930  age of Adam  at death  
Gen 5:5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.  and in Psalms  David says  70 years than fly away  , making 1000  total     and  its seems the Lord shortened the days/work  for the elects sake  
 

Psa 90:10 The days of our years [are] threescore years and ten; 70  and if by reason of strength [they be] fourscore years, yet [is] their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away. days of our flesh    

 this is the Lord Jesus Christ to me  70 years was also the captivity of the Jews in Babylon  [confusion]    i see this spiritually  too , there is more to this , but for now something to consider  i hope ?

I enjoyed that Rose, 70,70AD these things are not Coincidences
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 10, 2008, 11:10:54 PM
 :omg:

I feel like I just went over Niagra Falls!!

Rose, I want to ponder on this for a while, but I gotta tell ya . . .this was awesome.  It's one of those "ah ha!" things that my head hasn't fully comprehended . .but the spirit is affirming there's truth there to be had.

Great sharing!!!
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 10, 2008, 11:33:39 PM
 
  I am glad  i done a study on this years ago   , I have them spiritual quickings " lightning bolts"    with you all too  :thumbsup:


enjoyed your piece  Pnuma
  and agree
  and the saints judging the world  I see the great white Throne as those holy ones  dressed in White as the throne of Grace  as God sits in it ,

Daniel 7 and revelation go hand in hand to me , what Daniel saw was to come and John was uopn us   they were the same things  the Cross of Christ IS POWERFUL  and the event that turned the world on its  head ,  bruising it and the Lords footstool heel  1) heel, rear, footprint, hinder part, hoof, rear of a troop,

  footstep

a) heel

b) mark of heel, footprint

c) hinder part, rear




QuoteCan there be any doubt that the great white throne judgment of fire and brimstone is for the unveiling or manifestation of Jesus Christ?
Dan 7:9 I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment [was] white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne [was like] the fiery flame, [and] his wheels [as] burning fire.  
throne Strong's G2362 - thronos θρόνος
Transliteration
thronos
Pronunciation

thro'-nos (Key)

Part of Speech
masculine noun
from thrao (to sit), a stately seat ("throne")

TDNT Reference
3:160,338
Vines
View Entry


Outline of Biblical Usage 1) a throne seat

a) a chair of state having a footstool

b) assigned in the NT to kings, hence, kingly power or royalty

1) metaph. to God, the governor of the world

2) to the Messiah, Christ, the partner and assistant in the divine administration

a) hence divine power belonging to Christ

3) to judges i.e. tribunal or bench

4) to elders



Rev 7:17 For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.
Rev 20:11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.


  Rev 19:8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints. 
them with God /Lamb judging the world

  We are the temple of the Living God  Paul states 

  so much more than this , I cannot grasp it all  /soak it all in at once
  lol   i cannot explain things very well :(
peace
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 10, 2008, 11:45:37 PM
1And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.

2And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

3And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

4And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

5And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.

6And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.


--Rev 21



"tabernacle" [of God]

G4633
σκηνή
skēnē
skay-nay'
Apparently akin to G4632 and G4639; a tent or cloth hut (literally or figuratively): - habitation, tabernacle.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 10, 2008, 11:47:18 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 10, 2008, 11:45:37 PM
1And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.

2And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

3And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

4And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

5And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.

6And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.


--Rev 21


:thumbsup:  AWESOME!  :icon_flower: :HeartThrob:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 11, 2008, 12:00:21 AM
Quote from: rosered on December 10, 2008, 11:03:29 PM

 I just wanted to share this with  everyone
 about revelation happened / happening and will continue to Happen
as Long as Gods Word IS  and the 1000 year reign of Jesus Christ  seen in this concept
the reason ,  I believe this and have never shared it yet
 is because  of this  the 1000 year reign to me is  930  age of Adam  at death  
Gen 5:5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.  and in Psalms  David says  70 years than fly away  , making 1000  total     and  its seems the Lord shortened the days/work  for the elects sake  
 

Psa 90:10 The days of our years [are] threescore years and ten; 70  and if by reason of strength [they be] fourscore years, yet [is] their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away. days of our flesh    

 this is the Lord Jesus Christ to me  70 years was also the captivity of the Jews in Babylon  [confusion]    i see this spiritually  too , there is more to this , but for now something to consider  i hope ?

Hi sis, :icon_flower: :icon_flower:

:icon_flower:



The *END of The World * of the Old man, Old C....?

Rom 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

witnessed

Duet 34:7 And Moses an hundred and twenty years when he died , (The End of the Old man)

Gen 6:3 And the LORD said, My Spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

Comes A Renewing of the FACE of the Earth) :icon_flower:

1Cr 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening Spirit.
???????????
:icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 11, 2008, 12:02:43 AM
 
Quote from: Roseand the saints judging the world  I see the great white Throne as those holy ones  dressed in White as the throne of Grace  as God sits in it ,

Daniel 7 and revelation go hand in hand to me , what Daniel saw was to come and John was uopn us   they were the same things  the Cross of Christ IS POWERFUL  and the event that turned the world on its  head ,  bruising it and the Lords footstool heel  1) heel, rear, footprint, hinder part, hoof, rear of a troop,

 footstep

a) heel

b) mark of heel, footprint

c) hinder part, rear

"rear of a troop"


18And he said, I beseech thee, shew me thy glory.

19And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy.

20And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.

21And the LORD said, Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock:

22And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by:

23And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.


--Ex 33



13And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries?
14And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the LORD am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my Lord unto his servant?

15And the captain of the LORD's host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so.

--Joshua 5



"host" [of the LORD]

H6635
צבאה    צבא
tsâbâ'  tsebâ'âh
tsaw-baw', tseb-aw-aw'
From H6633; a mass of persons (or figurative things), especially regularly organized for war (an army); by implication a campaign, literally or figuratively (specifically hardship, worship): - appointed time, (+) army, (+) battle, company, host, service, [/b]soldiers,[/b] waiting upon, war (-fare).





...whose name is the LORD of hosts.

Jer 51:57




Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 11, 2008, 12:13:05 AM
Hebrews 2:10
For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 11, 2008, 12:51:38 AM
Quote from: Taffy on December 11, 2008, 12:00:21 AM
Quote from: rosered on December 10, 2008, 11:03:29 PM

 I just wanted to share this with  everyone
 about revelation happened / happening and will continue to Happen
as Long as Gods Word IS  and the 1000 year reign of Jesus Christ  seen in this concept
the reason ,  I believe this and have never shared it yet
 is because  of this  the 1000 year reign to me is  930  age of Adam  at death  
Gen 5:5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.  and in Psalms  David says  70 years than fly away  , making 1000  total     and  its seems the Lord shortened the days/work  for the elects sake  
 

Psa 90:10 The days of our years [are] threescore years and ten; 70  and if by reason of strength [they be] fourscore years, yet [is] their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away. days of our flesh    

 this is the Lord Jesus Christ to me  70 years was also the captivity of the Jews in Babylon  [confusion]    i see this spiritually  too , there is more to this , but for now something to consider  i hope ?

Hi sis, :icon_flower: :icon_flower:

:icon_flower:



The *END of The World * of the Old man, Old C....?

Rom 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

witnessed

Duet 34:7 And Moses an hundred and twenty years when he died , (The End of the Old man)

Gen 6:3 And the LORD said, My Spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

Comes A Renewing of the FACE of the Earth) :icon_flower:

1Cr 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening Spirit.
???????????
:icon_flower:


  Bro G that is got to mean something too ! the law and  grace  120 years ?

  the sons  Adam and Jesus Christ

Luk 3:38 Which was [the son] of Enos, which was [the son] of Seth, which was [the son] of Adam, which was [the son] of God.


  Yes I can see that the LAW  of moses  /serviantude  though,
  is was will be in effect    seeing the connections bro 
  I was  comparing the 1000  years reign  in numbers

Deu 34:7 And Moses [was] an hundred and twenty years old when he died: his eye/ of mental and spiritual faculties was not dim, nor his natural force/moisture , freshness , vigour abated/ to flee, escape  

  120 end of flesh

  we have studied this , the 3 musketeers  a while back with many bro
  I can rember there was alot more to it as well 
somewhere in Job maybe
  I never  saved anything  :sigh:


 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 12:51:53 AM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 08:34:13 PM
QuoteIf the day of the Lord came in 70 A.D. and most if not all preterists say John wrote Revelation prior to 70 A.D. then how did John get in "the day of the Lord" before the day of the Lord came?

Tony didn't Abraham see the Lords Day even though it was a far future literal event?

Joh 8:56  Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

"Besides this promise of a long mortal life to law keepers, there were much higher ones for the faithful in Israel. As far back as Abraham we find this great future expectation of life. When he was about to offer his son Isaac, he reckoned that God was able also to rouse from among the dead (Heb.11:19). Yet that would only have been a return to the previous mortal life. Beside this, however, he had the faith of those who looked forward to a better resurrection (Heb.11:36), as an entrance into a higher life. This faith was founded on the promises given to him by God that, in the future, the land in which he was an alien would become his allotment (Heb.11:8). In order to realize this he must be given another life after he had died. He received a grand revelation of this expectation of future life of which we do not hear until Christ revealed it to prove to the Jews that He was God's Son, and said, "Abraham, your forefather, exults that he may become acquainted with My day, and he was acquainted with it and rejoiced" (John 8:56). Abraham had a preview of the Lord's day, the millennial kingdom. The exultation he had was based on the certainty that he, by resurrection, must receive a new life, in order to enter this day, and have a part in its blessedness. This future expectation later became the common possession of all faithful Israelites, and its fulfillment their idea of highest bliss."

So Abraham looked into the far off future to see the Lord's day just as John did in his vision we call "Revelation."
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 12:58:04 AM
Quote from: pneuma on December 10, 2008, 10:19:57 PM
Also is this a future event or has it already happend?or is it both as I maintain?


He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; 38 The field is the world;  the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; 39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil;  the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. 40As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. 41The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;  42And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

pneuma, I say this hoping you are not offended but, your translation leaves alot to be desired.

When the reaping comes as Christ said it would, it is not the end of the world. The world does not end till 1000 years after that when it is destroyed by fire and then a new earth comes. A better translation is the Concordant Literal New Testament which states it this way:

Mat 13:37-43  Now He, answering, said, "He Who is sowing the ideal seed is the Son of Mankind."  (38)  Now the field is the world. Now the ideal seed, these are the sons of the kingdom. Now the darnel are the sons of the wicked one."  (39)  Now the enemy who sows them is the Adversary. Now the harvest is the conclusion of the eon. Now the reapers are messengers.  (40)  Even as the darnel, then, are being culled and burned up with fire, thus shall it be in the conclusion of the eon."  (41)  The Son of Mankind shall be dispatching His messengers, and they shall be culling out of His kingdom all the snares and those doing lawlessness,  (42)  and they shall be casting them into a furnace of fire. There shall be lamentation and gnashing of teeth.  (43)  Then shall the just be shining out as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who has ears to hear, let him hear!"

The above happens just prior to Jesus setting up His millennial reign on the earth.

John the Revelator saw in his vision the day of the Lord when He comes with vengeance and a sword.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 11, 2008, 01:00:40 AM
Yo Sis
Sometime I cant see what RIGHT in Front Me...See it Now though,,yehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...RIEGN...Got it. :icon_flower:
To busy seeing Connections...

Thanks Kiddo :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: rosered on December 11, 2008, 01:08:24 AM
Quote from: Taffy on December 11, 2008, 01:00:40 AM
Yo Sis
Sometime I cant see what RIGHT in Front Me...See it Now though,,yehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...RIEGN...Got it. :icon_flower:
To busy seeing Connections...

Thanks Kiddo :icon_flower:

  well sometimes i loose me Head lol :idea2:

and i cannot think for nothing  :help:
   my   last post prime example of that, all over the place  and other times it flows  ? 
God help I get  scattered about  :nod:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 03:39:37 PM
Something no preterist or partial preterist has been able to answer satisfactorily is this:

How did each and every event of Matthew 24 and 25 come to pass?

If Jesus meant that no one would see these things come to pass then, what's the point of telling anyone they would visibly come to pass?

If all of them visibly  came to pass, why is it that not one person in church history or any historian recorded them as coming to pass in 70 A.D. or before 70 A.D. or after 70 A.D.?

This has much to do with John's vision we call Revelation.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 11, 2008, 03:48:21 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 03:39:37 PM
Something no preterist or partial preterist has been able to answer satisfactorily is this:

How did each and every event of Matthew 24 and 25 come to pass?

If Jesus meant that no one would see these things come to pass then, what's the point of telling anyone they would visibly come to pass?

If all of them visibly  came to pass, why is it that not one person in church history or any historian recorded them as coming to pass in 70 A.D. or before 70 A.D. or after 70 A.D.?

This has much to do with John's vision we call Revelation.
I think at a minimum it says that the book is still relevant today.

Why that is so, whether because it is spiritual or the events described are going to actually happen to the world, remains to be seen.

However, I do know that there are people who are counting on it playing out in the real world as described, and those who are using it to deceive others. 

All this talk about armageddon these days, and yet we can see from Revelation 20 that if we are talking in the physical, we would see Christ physically reigning on earth for 1000 years before it could happen.  But, in the general consciousness--what is put out there--you would think we are on the verge of it today.  And, some are using that to cower and deceive people.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 03:55:45 PM
We have been told were on the verge every generation in our past.  Remember the book years ago "88 Reasons why Jesus is coming back in 1988"?  And when it didn't happen, there was a revised book "89 Reasons why . . ."  and when that didn't happen, another book "90 reasons why . . ."  That went on for like 5 or 6 years before somebody finally talked him out of continuing his quest to date the rapture.

We've stated the evidence on this thread that both Scripture and historians DID document those things that transpired and were directly connected to the prophetic words of Daniel, Matthew and Revelation . .but the responses are being rejected . .there's really no place else to go with this other than down
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 11, 2008, 04:05:24 PM
well, if you take something like the gov of Illinois who was just arrested for trying to sell the vacant senate seat, you really have to wonder what kind of progress we've made in 2000 years.

It seems that the world is as corrupt as ever. 

It would be nice to have something to look forward to--like Jesus running the show,--because the rest of it gets very discouraging.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 04:07:36 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 03:39:37 PM
Something no preterist or partial preterist has been able to answer satisfactorily is this:

How did each and every event of Matthew 24 and 25 come to pass?


we each see through our lenses, our paradigms.  For many, satisfactory answers have been provided; just as I don't think u/futurists have satisfactorily shown why the "at hand" verses were innacurate.  

 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 04:10:28 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 11, 2008, 04:05:24 PM
well, if you take something like the gov of Illinois who was just arrested for trying to sell the vacant senate seat, you really have to wonder what kind of progress we've made in 2000 years.

It seems that the world is as corrupt as ever. 

It would be nice to have something to look forward to--like Jesus running the show,--because the rest of it gets very discouraging.

I appreciate that you used the word "seems".  Because to me, I see the opposite. 

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 11, 2008, 04:13:09 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 04:10:28 PM
Quote from: Molly on December 11, 2008, 04:05:24 PM
well, if you take something like the gov of Illinois who was just arrested for trying to sell the vacant senate seat, you really have to wonder what kind of progress we've made in 2000 years.

It seems that the world is as corrupt as ever. 

It would be nice to have something to look forward to--like Jesus running the show,--because the rest of it gets very discouraging.

I appreciate that you used the word "seems".  Because to me, I see the opposite. 


How so?  I could use some encouragement right now.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 04:19:03 PM
The system that was in place that kept one "locked" up has been fulfilled.  This journey is now a journey we can all discover; the types and figures are fulfilled.  God is no longer dealing with man through types and figures. 

For me, the prison  door has been opened.  People are hungry, people are looking and hearts are vulnerable.  Unity is being realized. 

For me, I can "see" it in my heart.  The people I work with are such amazing people, many who don't claim Christ as their savior.  Their love is amazing.  I'll talk later, got to get to work.

 

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 04:31:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 03:39:37 PM
Something no preterist or partial preterist has been able to answer satisfactorily is this:

How did each and every event of Matthew 24 and 25 come to pass?

If Jesus meant that no one would see these things come to pass then, what's the point of telling anyone they would visibly come to pass?

If all of them visibly  came to pass, why is it that not one person in church history or any historian recorded them as coming to pass in 70 A.D. or before 70 A.D. or after 70 A.D.?

This has much to do with John's vision we call Revelation.

So the Preterist and partial preterist wants to believe they came to pass but can't give a good reason that they did? But they believe they did anyway? Though no church historian or any other historian which saw Jerusalem destroyed like Josephus did records any of Matthew 24 or 25 coming to pass.

As to "this generation shall not pass till . . ." I thought this was a good response:
http://concordant.org/expohtml/CorrectPartitioning/thisgen.html
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 04:57:03 PM
The reason:  JESUS CHRIST

Fulfillment!!!!

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 05:43:36 PM
Quotepneuma, I say this hoping you are not offended but, your translation leaves alot to be desired.

When the reaping comes as Christ said it would, it is not the end of the world. The world does not end till 1000 years after that when it is destroyed by fire and then a new earth comes. A better translation is the Concordant Literal New Testament which states it this way:

Mat 13:37-43 Now He, answering, said, "He Who is sowing the ideal seed is the Son of Mankind." (38) Now the field is the world. Now the ideal seed, these are the sons of the kingdom. Now the darnel are the sons of the wicked one." (39) Now the enemy who sows them is the Adversary. Now the harvest is the conclusion of the eon. Now the reapers are messengers. (40) Even as the darnel, then, are being culled and burned up with fire, thus shall it be in the conclusion of the eon." (41) The Son of Mankind shall be dispatching His messengers, and they shall be culling out of His kingdom all the snares and those doing lawlessness, (42) and they shall be casting them into a furnace of fire. There shall be lamentation and gnashing of teeth. (43) Then shall the just be shining out as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who has ears to hear, let him hear!"

The above happens just prior to Jesus setting up His millennial reign on the earth.

John the Revelator saw in his vision the day of the Lord when He comes with vengeance and a sword.



Hi Tony I am well aware the end of the world is actually the end of the age. And it is the same end of the world/age spoken here

Matthew 24:3
3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?  

You see this only as a future event, I agree it's a future event but also agree with those who have stated it happened in 70AD.

My question was addressed to both parties, those who believe everything is past and that's it, if the end of the world spoken of in Matt.24 Has already happened and won't happen in the future I wanted to know then how they viewed Matt.13:37-43, do they see it as a future event, if so then they cannot say it is past and that it, as they both speak of the same thing.

Thus helping to prove my point that it is past and yet is still to come to pass again in the future. Thats if they believe Mt.13:37-43 is a future event.

As to your stance that it is only a future event I think Zeek has given you enough to show that it happened in 70AD.

I suppose the only way any are going to come into agreement is to ask what does the end of the world/age mean to them, so that my question to all

What does the end of the world/age mean to you?

I'll give you a hint of what it means to mean, it is speaking of the end of the law of sacrifice.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 05:48:31 PM
What does end of age mean to me?

http://www.infinite-grace.com/
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 06:00:51 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 04:31:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 03:39:37 PM
Something no preterist or partial preterist has been able to answer satisfactorily is this:

How did each and every event of Matthew 24 and 25 come to pass?

If Jesus meant that no one would see these things come to pass then, what's the point of telling anyone they would visibly come to pass?

If all of them visibly  came to pass, why is it that not one person in church history or any historian recorded them as coming to pass in 70 A.D. or before 70 A.D. or after 70 A.D.?

This has much to do with John's vision we call Revelation.

So the Preterist and partial preterist wants to believe they came to pass but can't give a good reason that they did? But they believe they did anyway? Though no church historian or any other historian which saw Jerusalem destroyed like Josephus did records any of Matthew 24 or 25 coming to pass.

As to "this generation shall not pass till . . ." I thought this was a good response:
http://concordant.org/expohtml/CorrectPartitioning/thisgen.html

I didn't.

Here's a snipit from the long, hard to stay focused, article.
After all, they reason, the sun was not darkened and the moon did not fail to give her beams, and the stars did not fall from heaven, nor were the powers of the heavens shaken; the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven did not appear, all the tribes of the land did not grieve, nor did they see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory (Matt.24:29,30

Not that it's going to matter much at this point, but I'm giong to try playing this a little more.  It's not that we are ignoring those things that were to happen so that we can still hold our theology, it's that we/I believe regardless of what language it's written in, be it english, Greek, Aramaic, or Hebrew . . .none of those languages are God's language.  When he speaks to me, he doesn't speak in Hebrew because I don't know the language.  He speaks to me "in my tongue".  

But what is "his" language?  You've got a world here that you created, you create beings to reproduce . . . how would you talk to them?  You do it "through" your creation.  God's alphabet consists of trees, metals, colors, numbers, materials and elements (wind, water, fire, dirt, etc.)  That's "his" language.  And unlike the U.S., when you enter into his realm, you've got to know his language.  If you try to "interpret" his words, you risk missing the original intent of what is being said.

That's why Jesus spoke in parables, using natural things to reveal spiritual truth . .but those listening were stuck on the natural things so they couldn't make any sense of what he was saying because it was intended to be heard with spiritual ears.  But the Spirit was not yet poured out on all flesh . .but it would be, and Jesus knew that.   So he continued planting the seeds in the waterless soil, all the while, knowing that when the Spirit was poured out, these seeds would be activated in the hearts of men, and understanding of everything he said would then come.

That's "how" Peter knew that "this is that spoken of by the prophet Joel".  God proclaims his glory "through" the things he created.  The stars shine, the moon reflects and the sun illuminates the earth.  Sun, moon, and stars . . .you can NOT take this literally.  You MUST understand the language . .and the simplest way to do that is, to let SCRIPTURE interpet ITSELF.  Where else to you read of the sun, moon and stars together?  How about Joseph's dream??  He had the sun, moon and stars bow at his feet . .and who were they?  His family.  And who are his family?  They were the patriarchs of the nation of ISRAEL.  

Jesus cried over Israel and prayed over them.  He spoke of how he so desired to take them under his wing as a hen does with her chicks and they wouldn't let him.  as a result, it left them desolate.  It was lights out of the nation when Rome went in . . .this "A.D. 70" issue is not about a "day".  There were MANY things that were strange wonders that led up to the removal.  Voices were heard in the night, thunder was heard, light would shine and light up the enter city in the middle of the night . . .there was a merging of spirit and flesh during that time.   Just because "you" don't know of it, is not enough basis to claim that it didn't happen.  

The stars that fell . .you keep looking for natural stars . .. they've got nothing to do with it.  They are created for "signs" and seasons.  A star represents a prophet . .ships in the night can find their way by the alignment of the stars.  My ship is my belief system with which I navigate my life through the uncharted waters before me.  It's based on the prophets of God . .a prophet is simply one who speaks on the behalf of another.  Jude speaks of wandering stars being false prophets.  They are stars that fell from heaven (spiritual realm)

The powers of heaven are not shaken?  What do you think transpired during this slaughter?  It was recorded that there were earthquakes all over Israel in the day these things happened.  Even when Jesus died on the cross, there was a great earth quake.  It's a picture that proclaims there is a shifting beneath the surface of our understanding.  Israel was greatly shaken.  That's why not one stone was left on top of the other . . .God brought the entire religious system down to the dust from which it was originally erected.  You're not seeing it because you refuse to see it from any other perspective than the one "you" have chosen.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 06:05:11 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 05:48:31 PM
What does end of age mean to me?

http://www.infinite-grace.com/

Which is the end of the law of sacrifice.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 06:05:38 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 06:05:11 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 05:48:31 PM
What does end of age mean to me?

http://www.infinite-grace.com/

Which is the end of the law of sacrifice.

I agree.   :grin: :grin:

which had huge implications for those "attached" to that system. 

Saved through destruction. 

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 06:15:50 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 06:05:38 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 06:05:11 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 05:48:31 PM
What does end of age mean to me?

http://www.infinite-grace.com/

Which is the end of the law of sacrifice.

I agree.   :grin: :grin:

which had huge implications for those "attached" to that system. 

Saved through destruction. 



I agree and the reason these scriptures concerning the end of the world/age or as we just agreed upon the end of the law of sacrifice were fulfilled in 70AD is because the temple was destroyed and without the temple there can be no sacrifice thus ending the law of sacrifice. Therefore we have a literal fulfillment of a more spiritual application, first the natural then the spiritual.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 11, 2008, 06:16:51 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 06:00:51 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 04:31:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 03:39:37 PM
Something no preterist or partial preterist has been able to answer satisfactorily is this:

How did each and every event of Matthew 24 and 25 come to pass?

If Jesus meant that no one would see these things come to pass then, what's the point of telling anyone they would visibly come to pass?

If all of them visibly  came to pass, why is it that not one person in church history or any historian recorded them as coming to pass in 70 A.D. or before 70 A.D. or after 70 A.D.?

This has much to do with John's vision we call Revelation.

So the Preterist and partial preterist wants to believe they came to pass but can't give a good reason that they did? But they believe they did anyway? Though no church historian or any other historian which saw Jerusalem destroyed like Josephus did records any of Matthew 24 or 25 coming to pass.

As to "this generation shall not pass till . . ." I thought this was a good response:
http://concordant.org/expohtml/CorrectPartitioning/thisgen.html

I didn't.

Here's a snipit from the long, hard to stay focused, article.
After all, they reason, the sun was not darkened and the moon did not fail to give her beams, and the stars did not fall from heaven, nor were the powers of the heavens shaken; the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven did not appear, all the tribes of the land did not grieve, nor did they see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory (Matt.24:29,30

Not that it's going to matter much at this point, but I'm giong to try playing this a little more.  It's not that we are ignoring those things that were to happen so that we can still hold our theology, it's that we/I believe regardless of what language it's written in, be it english, Greek, Aramaic, or Hebrew . . .none of those languages are God's language.  When he speaks to me, he doesn't speak in Hebrew because I don't know the language.  He speaks to me "in my tongue".  

But what is "his" language?  You've got a world here that you created, you create beings to reproduce . . . how would you talk to them?  You do it "through" your creation.  God's alphabet consists of trees, metals, colors, numbers, materials and elements (wind, water, fire, dirt, etc.)  That's "his" language.  And unlike the U.S., when you enter into his realm, you've got to know his language.  If you try to "interpret" his words, you risk missing the original intent of what is being said.

That's why Jesus spoke in parables, using natural things to reveal spiritual truth . .but those listening were stuck on the natural things so they couldn't make any sense of what he was saying because it was intended to be heard with spiritual ears.  But the Spirit was not yet poured out on all flesh . .but it would be, and Jesus knew that.   So he continued planting the seeds in the waterless soil, all the while, knowing that when the Spirit was poured out, these seeds would be activated in the hearts of men, and understanding of everything he said would then come.

That's "how" Peter knew that "this is that spoken of by the prophet Joel".  God proclaims his glory "through" the things he created.  The stars shine, the moon reflects and the sun illuminates the earth.  Sun, moon, and stars . . .you can NOT take this literally.  You MUST understand the language . .and the simplest way to do that is, to let SCRIPTURE interpet ITSELF.  Where else to you read of the sun, moon and stars together?  How about Joseph's dream??  He had the sun, moon and stars bow at his feet . .and who were they?  His family.  And who are his family?  They were the patriarchs of the nation of ISRAEL.  

Jesus cried over Israel and prayed over them.  He spoke of how he so desired to take them under his wing as a hen does with her chicks and they wouldn't let him.  as a result, it left them desolate.  It was lights out of the nation when Rome went in . . .this "A.D. 70" issue is not about a "day".  There were MANY things that were strange wonders that led up to the removal.  Voices were heard in the night, thunder was heard, light would shine and light up the enter city in the middle of the night . . .there was a merging of spirit and flesh during that time.   Just because "you" don't know of it, is not enough basis to claim that it didn't happen.  

The stars that fell . .you keep looking for natural stars . .. they've got nothing to do with it.  They are created for "signs" and seasons.  A star represents a prophet . .ships in the night can find their way by the alignment of the stars.  My ship is my belief system with which I navigate my life through the uncharted waters before me.  It's based on the prophets of God . .a prophet is simply one who speaks on the behalf of another.  Jude speaks of wandering stars being false prophets.  They are stars that fell from heaven (spiritual realm)

The powers of heaven are not shaken?  What do you think transpired during this slaughter?  It was recorded that there were earthquakes all over Israel in the day these things happened.  Even when Jesus died on the cross, there was a great earth quake.  It's a picture that proclaims there is a shifting beneath the surface of our understanding.  Israel was greatly shaken.  That's why not one stone was left on top of the other . . .God brought the entire religious system down to the dust from which it was originally erected.  You're not seeing it because you refuse to see it from any other perspective than the one "you" have chosen.

Stayed out of this thread A little while BUT,

ya Know, I sorta Love it when ya Brief like this  :thumbsup:

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 06:20:18 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 06:15:50 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 06:05:38 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 06:05:11 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 05:48:31 PM
What does end of age mean to me?

http://www.infinite-grace.com/

Which is the end of the law of sacrifice.

I agree.   :grin: :grin:

which had huge implications for those "attached" to that system. 

Saved through destruction. 



I agree and the reason these scriptures concerning the end of the world/age or as we just agreed upon the end of the law of sacrifice were fulfilled in 70AD is because the temple was destroyed and without the temple there can be no sacrifice thus ending the law of sacrifice. Therefore we have a literal fulfillment of a more spiritual application, first the natural then the spiritual.

That's what i am seeing.  But more than just "the temple destroyed", it was fulfillment through HIM.  I believe there was a spiritual application t the literal that happened too. 

Today, we can put ourselves under law, under "sacrificial system", but there is no more authority; it was fulfilled in HIM. 

coming to this knowledge is a process/discovery. 
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 06:26:07 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 06:20:18 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 06:15:50 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 06:05:38 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 06:05:11 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 05:48:31 PM
What does end of age mean to me?

http://www.infinite-grace.com/

Which is the end of the law of sacrifice.

I agree.   :grin: :grin:

which had huge implications for those "attached" to that system. 

Saved through destruction. 



I agree and the reason these scriptures concerning the end of the world/age or as we just agreed upon the end of the law of sacrifice were fulfilled in 70AD is because the temple was destroyed and without the temple there can be no sacrifice thus ending the law of sacrifice. Therefore we have a literal fulfillment of a more spiritual application, first the natural then the spiritual.

That's what i am seeing.  But more than just "the temple destroyed", it was fulfillment through HIM.  I believe there was a spiritual application t the literal that happened too. 

Today, we can put ourselves under law, under "sacrificial system", but there is no more authority; it was fulfilled in HIM. 

coming to this knowledge is a process/discovery. 

:thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 06:49:31 PM
Quote from: pneuma on December 11, 2008, 05:43:36 PM

I suppose the only way any are going to come into agreement is to ask what does the end of the world/age mean to them, so that my question to all

What does the end of the world/age mean to you?

I'll give you a hint of what it means to mean, it is speaking of the end of the law of sacrifice.

Dear pneuma,
As far as we know, the Bible shows 5 distince eons.
Each eon corresponds to a cataclysmic event which affects the whole earth we live on.
The first eon ended in a cataclysm in which "the earth became chaos and vacant."

The second eon began when a new earth emerged out of that watery past and continued till Noah.
That eon ended with the whole earth being destroyed by water.
The third eon emerged from that watery destruction with a new earth.

We are still in that third eon.

The third eon will end when the earth is destroyed by an earth shattering earthquake the likes of which has never occurred before in which all the cities of the nations will fall.

Then, out of that eon will come the 1000 year eon, also known as the regeneration.

That fourth eon will end with the earth being destroyed by fire and a new earth emerging out of that destruction and will thus be the 5th eon.

Here is a very small chart depicting eath eon and the end of it with destruction of the earth.

The ending of the law was not the ending of the third eon.
The destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. was not the ending of the third eon in which we live.

It has to be something which destroys the earth which ends an eon.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 07:01:27 PM
"Let's look at the use of "heaven and earth" in Scripture and see if they have some other meaning besides the literal physical heavens and earth. If you want to know what a term means in the New Testament, you need to go back to the Old Testament and see what it meant there. If it was used a certain way in the Old Testament, wouldn't it make sense that Jesus and the New Testament writer would use those expressions in the same way? We must get our understanding of "heaven and earth" from the Old Testament:



Deuteronomy 31:30 (NKJV) Then Moses spoke in the hearing of all the assembly of Israel the words of this song until they were ended: 32:1 "Give ear, O heavens, and I will speak; And hear, O earth, the words of my mouth.



Who is God talking to here? In the song of Moses, God is speaking to Israel. He calls them, "O heavens," and, "O earth." He is clearly not speaking to the physical heavens and earth, but to Israel. Notice what he says to them in:



Deuteronomy 32:22 (NKJV) For a fire is kindled by my anger, And shall burn to the lowest hell; It shall consume the earth with her increase, And set on fire the foundations of the mountains.



God is not talking here about burning up the physical earth. God is using apocalyptic and symbolic language to warn Israel of judgement that He will bring upon them. When Israel is finally destroyed, it is as though heaven and earth are burned up.



In biblical apocalyptic language, "heavens" refers to governments and rulers, and "earth" refers to the nation of people. This can be seen in the book of Isaiah:



Isaiah 1:1-2 (NKJV) The vision of Isaiah the son of Amoz, which he saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah. 2 Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth! For the LORD has spoken: "I have nourished and brought up children, And they have rebelled against Me;



Isaiah 1:10 (NKJV) Hear the word of the LORD, You rulers of Sodom; Give ear to the law of our God, You people of Gomorrah:



God is still talking to Israel, and He calls them "Sodom and Gomorrah." The literal Sodom and Gomorrah had been destroyed for some time. Here we see "rulers" used for "heavens" in verse 2, and "people" used for "earth." So the terms "heaven and earth" are used to speak of rulers and people of a nation. This idea is seen more clearly as we look at other passages where mention is made of the destruction of a state and government using language which seems to set forth "the end of the world" as the collapse of heaven and earth.



Isaiah 13:1 (NKJV) The burden against Babylon which Isaiah the son of Amoz saw.



In this chapter, God is talking about the judgement that is to fall upon Babylon. The word "burden" is the Hebrew word massa' an utterance, chiefly a doom. This introduction sets the stage for the subject matter in this chapter, and if we forget this, our interpretations of Isaiah 13 can go just about anywhere our imagination wants to go. This is not an oracle against the universe or world but against the nation of Babylon:



Isaiah 13:6 (NKJV) Wail, for the day of the LORD is at hand! It will come as destruction from the Almighty.



Isaiah 13:9-13 (NKJV) Behold, the day of the LORD comes, Cruel, with both wrath and fierce anger, To lay the land desolate; And He will destroy its sinners from it. 10 For the stars of heaven and their constellations Will not give their light; The sun will be darkened in its going forth, And the moon will not cause its light to shine. 11 "I will punish the world for its evil, And the wicked for their iniquity; I will halt the arrogance of the proud, And will lay low the haughtiness of the terrible. 12 I will make a mortal more rare than fine gold, A man more than the golden wedge of Ophir. 13 Therefore I will shake the heavens, And the earth will move out of her place, In the wrath of the LORD of hosts And in the day of His fierce anger.



Now remember, he is speaking about the destruction of Babylon, but it sounds like world wide destruction. The terminology of a context cannot be expanded beyond the scope of the subject under discussion. The spectrum of language surely cannot go outside the land of Babylon. If you were a Babylonian and Babylon was destroyed, would it seem like the world was destroyed? Let me put it this way: If America were destroyed, would it seem to you like the world ended? Yes! Your world would have ended.



Isaiah 13:17 (NKJV) "Behold, I will stir up the Medes against them, Who will not regard silver; And as for gold, they will not delight in it.



This is a historical event that took place in 539 BC. When the Medes destroyed Babylon, the Babylonian world came to an end. This destruction is said, in verse 6, to be from the Almighty, and the Medes constitute the means that God uses to accomplish this task. The physical heaven and earth were still in tact, but for Babylon, they had collapsed. This is apocalyptic language. This is the way the Bible discusses the fall of a nation. This is obviously figurative language.



In Isaiah 24-27, we see the invasion of Israel by Nebuchadnezzar. He carries them away to captivity. Notice the language that he uses:



Isaiah 24:3-6 (NKJV) The land shall be entirely emptied and utterly plundered, For the LORD has spoken this word. 4 The earth mourns and fades away, The worldlanguishes and fades away; The haughty people of the earth languish. 5 The earth is also defiled under its inhabitants, Because they have transgressed the laws, Changed the ordinance, Broken the everlasting covenant. 6 Therefore the curse has devoured the earth, And those who dwell in it are desolate. Therefore the inhabitants of the earth are burned, And few men are left.



Isaiah 24:19-20 (NKJV) The earth is violently broken, The earth is split open, The earth is shaken exceedingly. 20 The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, And shall totter like a hut; Its transgression shall be heavy upon it, And it will fall, and not rise again.



What I want you to see in these verses is how God refers to Israel as the earth. He says, "The earth is utterly broken down, the earth is clean dissolved, the earth is moved exceedingly."Notice how many times God referred to Israel as the "earth." This is apocalyptic language speaking of the destruction of the people of Israel.



In Isaiah 34, we have a description of the fall of Edom. Notice the language that is used:



Isaiah 34:4-5 (NKJV) All the host of heaven shall be dissolved, And the heavens shall be rolled up like a scroll; All their host shall fall down As the leaf falls from the vine, And as fruit falling from a fig tree. 5 "For My sword shall be bathed in heaven; Indeed it shall come down on Edom, And on the people of My curse, for judgment.



This is Biblical language to describe the fall of a nation. It should be clear that it is not to be taken literally. God says, "His sword will be bathed in heaven," then explains what He means by saying, "It shall come down on Edom." The NIV puts it this way, "My sword has drunk its fill in the heavens; see, it descends in judgment on Edom, the people I have totally destroyed." So, God speaks of His sword being bathed in heaven, meaning the nation Edom, not the literal heaven. Edom shall be rolled up like a scroll.



Let's look at one other Old Testament use of this language:



Nahum 1 (NKJV) The burden against Nineveh. The book of the vision of Nahum the Elkocrape. 2 God is jealous, and the LORD avenges; The LORD avenges and is furious. The LORD will take vengeance on His adversaries, And He reserves wrath for His enemies; 3 The LORD is slow to anger and great in power, And will not at all acquit the wicked. The LORD has His way In the whirlwind and in the storm, And the clouds are the dust of His feet. 4 He rebukes the sea and makes it dry, And dries up all the rivers. Bashan and Carmel wither, And the flower of Lebanon wilts. 5 The mountains quake before Him, The hills melt, And the earth heaves at His presence, Yes, the world and all who dwell in it.



The subject of this judgement is Nineveh, not the physical world. This is the way God describes the fall of a nation. If this language describes the judgement of God on nations, why, when we come to the New Testament, do we make it be the destruction of the universe? It is only because we do not understand how the Bible uses this apocalyptic language. If the destruction of heaven and earth were to be taken literally in all of the Old Testament passages, it would mean that heaven and earth were destroyed a bunch of times. This language is clearly not literal but figurative and apocalyptic.



The passing away of heaven and earth is another way to speak of the end of the Old Covenant. To prove this from the Scripture, look with me at:



Hebrews 1:10-12 (NKJV) And: "You, LORD, in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth, And the heavens are the work of Your hands. 11 They will perish, but You remain; And they will all grow old like a garment; 12 Like a cloak You will fold them up, And they will be changed. But You are the same, And Your years will not fail."



These verses are a word for word quotation from Psalm 102. If all we had was the prophecy of David in Psalms 102, we might think that this is referring to the physical earth. But, the New Testament gives us insight and illumination to the Old Testament.



How is the world or the heavens and earth of old going to perish? David said, in Psalm 102:26, "They shall grow old like a garment," and then they would be "changed." Is it just a coincidence that the Bible speaks of the passing away of the old covenant using the same language?



Hebrews 8:13 (NKJV) In that He says, "A new covenant," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.



The same Greek word palaioo which means: "to make worn out, or declare obsolete" is used in Hebrews 1:11 of the heavens and earth and 8:13 of the Old Covenant. The writer of Hebrews teaches us that the "Old Covenant" and the "Heavens and earth" are synonymous.



John Brown said, " 'Heaven and earth passing,' understood literally, is the dissolution of the present system of the universe, and the period when that is to take place, is called the 'end of the world.' But a person at all familiar with the phraseology of the Old Testament Scriptures, knows that the dissolution of the Mosaic economy, and the establishment of the Christian, is often spoken of as the removing of the old earth and heavens, and the creation of a new earth and new heavens" (vol. 1, p. 170)


Believers, if we don't understand the biblical use of "heaven and earth", we will not understand Jesus' words in:



Matthew 5:18 (NKJV) "For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.



And if we don't understand these words of Jesus, we will end up in confusion like the Commentator who, commenting on this verse, said, "In saying 'till heaven and earth pass away' - the most stable of all created objects - Christ affirmed the unchangeableness of the Law." That is not at all what Christ meant!



Another commentator writes:



In other words, the whole Old Testament is authoritative until the age to come. In verse 18b the words 'one jot or one tittle' refer to the extent of the Old Testament's authority. By that Matthew means the whole Old Testament is authoritative between the two advents of Christ down to its minute details. According to Matthew 5:17, 18, the Law and the Prophets (the whole Old Testament) have their place under the administration of Christ under the New Covenant.



Let's dissect what he says here. He said, "In other words, the whole Old Testament is authoritative until the age to come." This is exactly what Jesus was saying! But what this commentator doesn't understand is that the "age to come" came in AD 70. Jesus lived in what the Bible calls "this age". We today live in what the Bible calls the "age to come". He goes on to say, "Matthew means the whole Old Testament is authoritative between the two advents of Christ down to its minute details." - This is absolutely correct! But what he doesn't understand is that the second advent took place in AD 70 at the end of the Jewish age. So, when the Jewish age ended with the destruction of the temple, so did the law.



He goes on to say this: "According to Matthew 5:17, 18, the Law and the Prophets (the whole Old Testament) have their place under the administration of Christ under the New Covenant." Is that true? NO! The Old Covenant has NO place in the New Covenant! Why is that so hard to understand? The New Covenant replaced the Old. And believers today live under the New, not the Old Covenant:



Hebrews 8:13 (NKJV) In that He says, "A new covenant," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.



In AD 65, when this epistle was written, the old covenant was "ready to vanish away". The Greek word for "vanish" is aphanismos which means: "disappearance or abrogation".



Matthew 5:18 (NKJV) "For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.



The law remains in tack, every bit of it, until it is all fulfilled and heaven and earth pass away. That's what Jesus said, isn't it? Now compare that to what Jesus says in:



Matthew 24:35 (NKJV) "Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass away.



Jesus uses the same Greek word (parerchomai) here for "pass away" as he did in Matthew 5:18. So, in Matthew 5:18 he says that heaven and earth will pass away when the law is fulfilled, and in 24:35 he says that heaven and earth will pass away, but His words will not pass away. So, Jesus' words would last forever, but the "Law" and the "heavens and earth" would pass away.



Believers, we are to live by the words of Jesus Christ, which will never pass away. Jesus brought in the New Covenant, which is an everlasting covenant. The old is passed away, and we live in the New Covenant age. "


Message preached by David B. Curtis; Sept.29,2002; Tape #255b

http://www.preteristplanet.com/id84.html
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 07:32:05 PM
Zeek, are you really convinced  by that? I'm not in the least.

In Deuteronomy 31:1 Moses was wanting the heavens and earth to testify against Israel for they were already corrupt.

In Isaiah 1:1,2 which you quoted, again Isaiah is wanting the heavens and earth to testify concerning his words against Israel. It was a form of witness in the O.T.

So when heaven and earth shall pass away does that mean what?

Dear Zeek, when the heavens and earth shall be destroyed and a new heavens and new earth come out of that, does that mean Israel will be destroyed but they won't be destroyed?

Rev 21:24 And the nations shall be walking by means of its light, and the kings of the earth are carrying their glory into it."

Will Israel have more than one King (Jesus Christ) if by earth you mean "the kings of the Israel are carrying their glory into it"? Does that make sense to you that the kings of Israel come to the New Jerusalem in the future new earth?

Rev 20:11 And I perceived a great white throne, and Him Who is sitting upon it, from Whose face earth and heaven fled, and no place was found for them."

Did only Israel flee?

Rev 20:8 And he will be coming out to deceive all the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to be mobilizing them for battle, their number being as the sand of the sea."

How many nations are there in Israel anyway? 40? 100?

Or is this just another one of your "private interpretations" you wish to force on me?

I could go on and on with your private interpretation and look at all the heaven and earth passages and show it cannot possibly be Israel.

So let's get back to the Scriptures:

The Bible shows that each eon ends in catastrophe.
We know Israel did not exist until Jacob became Israel in the 3rd eon after Noah's flood. So we know the heavens and earth in Genesis which were destroyed and became chaos and vacant could not be Israel.

When the new heavens and earth came out of Noah's flood we know that could not be Israel because they were not around yet.

We know that when the great earthquake comes and all the cities of the nations fall that Israel will be included in that but they surely are not all the cities of the nations.

We know that when the heavens and earth is destroyed by fire that this means the whole earth and not just Israel.

Now then, friend, would you like to take another stab at it?

Tony
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Molly on December 11, 2008, 07:58:00 PM
Quote from: Nathan

Here's a snipit from the long, hard to stay focused, article.
After all, they reason, the sun was not darkened and the moon did not fail to give her beams, and the stars did not fall from heaven, nor were the powers of the heavens shaken; the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven did not appear, all the tribes of the land did not grieve, nor did they see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory (Matt.24:29,30

Not that it's going to matter much at this point, but I'm giong to try playing this a little more.  It's not that we are ignoring those things that were to happen so that we can still hold our theology, it's that we/I believe regardless of what language it's written in, be it english, Greek, Aramaic, or Hebrew . . .none of those languages are God's language.  When he speaks to me, he doesn't speak in Hebrew because I don't know the language.  He speaks to me "in my tongue". 

But what is "his" language?  You've got a world here that you created, you create beings to reproduce . . . how would you talk to them?  You do it "through" your creation.  God's alphabet consists of trees, metals, colors, numbers, materials and elements (wind, water, fire, dirt, etc.)  That's "his" language.  And unlike the U.S., when you enter into his realm, you've got to know his language.  If you try to "interpret" his words, you risk missing the original intent of what is being said.

That's why Jesus spoke in parables, using natural things to reveal spiritual truth . .but those listening were stuck on the natural things so they couldn't make any sense of what he was saying because it was intended to be heard with spiritual ears.  But the Spirit was not yet poured out on all flesh . .but it would be, and Jesus knew that.   So he continued planting the seeds in the waterless soil, all the while, knowing that when the Spirit was poured out, these seeds would be activated in the hearts of men, and understanding of everything he said would then come.

That's "how" Peter knew that "this is that spoken of by the prophet Joel".  God proclaims his glory "through" the things he created.  The stars shine, the moon reflects and the sun illuminates the earth.  Sun, moon, and stars . . .you can NOT take this literally.  You MUST understand the language . .and the simplest way to do that is, to let SCRIPTURE interpet ITSELF.  Where else to you read of the sun, moon and stars together?  How about Joseph's dream??  He had the sun, moon and stars bow at his feet . .and who were they?  His family.  And who are his family?  They were the patriarchs of the nation of ISRAEL. 

Jesus cried over Israel and prayed over them.  He spoke of how he so desired to take them under his wing as a hen does with her chicks and they wouldn't let him.  as a result, it left them desolate.  It was lights out of the nation when Rome went in . . .this "A.D. 70" issue is not about a "day".  There were MANY things that were strange wonders that led up to the removal.  Voices were heard in the night, thunder was heard, light would shine and light up the enter city in the middle of the night . . .there was a merging of spirit and flesh during that time.   Just because "you" don't know of it, is not enough basis to claim that it didn't happen. 

The stars that fell . .you keep looking for natural stars . .. they've got nothing to do with it.  They are created for "signs" and seasons.  A star represents a prophet . .ships in the night can find their way by the alignment of the stars.  My ship is my belief system with which I navigate my life through the uncharted waters before me.  It's based on the prophets of God . .a prophet is simply one who speaks on the behalf of another.  Jude speaks of wandering stars being false prophets.  They are stars that fell from heaven (spiritual realm)

The powers of heaven are not shaken?  What do you think transpired during this slaughter?  It was recorded that there were earthquakes all over Israel in the day these things happened.  Even when Jesus died on the cross, there was a great earth quake.  It's a picture that proclaims there is a shifting beneath the surface of our understanding.  Israel was greatly shaken.  That's why not one stone was left on top of the other . . .God brought the entire religious system down to the dust from which it was originally erected.  You're not seeing it because you refuse to see it from any other perspective than the one "you" have chosen.

Another perfect and powerful post, Nathan.  Sometimes I think to myself how miraculous it is that a man with basically not much more than words could bring down a whole religious system in three years.  It happened just like he prophesied.  If there was ever proof to the unbeliever of who Jesus is, that's it.  Two thousand years later, there is still no temple and still no animal sacrifice. 

But, even so, the forces that run this world want to reinstate all of that.  Solomon's temple is hedged in every direction from being rebuilt, but they want to rebuild it.  They are trying to clone their red heiffer to restart animal sacrifice.  They want to run the world from Jerusalem.  They are not being prevented by money or power, because they have a lot of both, so it must be by God.

We like to separate the spiritual and the natural, but from God's point of view, they are all of one piece.  Are the atoms buzzing around in the chair that is supporting me spiritual or natural?  Are the electronic pulses whizzing through space that allow me to talk to you on a computer spiritual or natural?  What about the impulses firing in your brain that allow you to understand me?

If we live on the surface of things, the natural looks one way, the spiritual another.  But the deeper we go, the more they meet, because it all comes from God.

But to those that see a chair as a chair,  it is functional and useful, and nothing else.  Which is good--until they start demanding that others see it that way, too.

The one world religion that is being foisted on us now is nothing new.  It's the old religion of Babylon.  The Roman Empire never went away, it just changed forms to be less recognizable.  It is a religion of the carnal, of materialism, of man--and God has no place in it.  As long as that is still kicking around (and to my natural eyes winning),  Revelation has not yet been fulfilled.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 08:09:15 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 07:58:00 PM
Quote from: Nathan

Here's a snipit from the long, hard to stay focused, article.
After all, they reason, the sun was not darkened and the moon did not fail to give her beams, and the stars did not fall from heaven, nor were the powers of the heavens shaken; the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven did not appear, all the tribes of the land did not grieve, nor did they see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory (Matt.24:29,30

Not that it's going to matter much at this point, but I'm giong to try playing this a little more.  It's not that we are ignoring those things that were to happen so that we can still hold our theology, it's that we/I believe regardless of what language it's written in, be it english, Greek, Aramaic, or Hebrew . . .none of those languages are God's language.  When he speaks to me, he doesn't speak in Hebrew because I don't know the language.  He speaks to me "in my tongue". 

But what is "his" language?  You've got a world here that you created, you create beings to reproduce . . . how would you talk to them?  You do it "through" your creation. 

My warning buzzer just went off with all sorts of red flags going up everywhere.

God wrote His revelation to us in Hebrew and Greek. The only way we can know what He said, what His revelation to us is is to either know Hebrew or Greek or to have a proper translation of them. Otherwise scripture just becomes a private interpretation.

Also, God never said in the Scriptures through the apostle Paul that if you want to know what God revealed through Paul go talk to a rock. He never said to go seek it out in nature. No.

Nathan, please, I don't want to go contrary to Scripture to find out what God revealed. God revealed His will to us through the Scriptures, not a cactus or a stream or a rock or tree.

This is sooooooooooooooooooooo far off topic.

Can we stick with the topic please? I don't need people's private interpretations of new age stuff.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 08:19:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 07:32:05 PM
Zeek, are you really convinced  by that? I'm not in the least.

In Deuteronomy 31:1 Moses was wanting the heavens and earth to testify against Israel for they were already corrupt.

In Isaiah 1:1,2 which you quoted, again Isaiah is wanting the heavens and earth to testify concerning his words against Israel. It was a form of witness in the O.T.

So when heaven and earth shall pass away does that mean what?

Dear Zeek, when the heavens and earth shall be destroyed and a new heavens and new earth come out of that, does that mean Israel will be destroyed but they won't be destroyed?

Rev 21:24 And the nations shall be walking by means of its light, and the kings of the earth are carrying their glory into it."

Will Israel have more than one King (Jesus Christ) if by earth you mean "the kings of the Israel are carrying their glory into it"? Does that make sense to you that the kings of Israel come to the New Jerusalem in the future new earth?

Rev 20:11 And I perceived a great white throne, and Him Who is sitting upon it, from Whose face earth and heaven fled, and no place was found for them."

Did only Israel flee?

Rev 20:8 And he will be coming out to deceive all the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to be mobilizing them for battle, their number being as the sand of the sea."

How many nations are there in Israel anyway? 40? 100?

Or is this just another one of your "private interpretations" you wish to force on me?

I could go on and on with your private interpretation and look at all the heaven and earth passages and show it cannot possibly be Israel.

So let's get back to the Scriptures:

The Bible shows that each eon ends in catastrophe.
We know Israel did not exist until Jacob became Israel in the 3rd eon after Noah's flood. So we know the heavens and earth in Genesis which were destroyed and became chaos and vacant could not be Israel.

When the new heavens and earth came out of Noah's flood we know that could not be Israel because they were not around yet.

We know that when the great earthquake comes and all the cities of the nations fall that Israel will be included in that but they surely are not all the cities of the nations.

We know that when the heavens and earth is destroyed by fire that this means the whole earth and not just Israel.

Now then, friend, would you like to take another stab at it?

Tony

absolutely not, you've convinced me.   :grin: :grin:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 09:27:31 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 06:00:51 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 04:31:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 03:39:37 PM
Something no preterist or partial preterist has been able to answer satisfactorily is this:

How did each and every event of Matthew 24 and 25 come to pass?

If Jesus meant that no one would see these things come to pass then, what's the point of telling anyone they would visibly come to pass?

If all of them visibly  came to pass, why is it that not one person in church history or any historian recorded them as coming to pass in 70 A.D. or before 70 A.D. or after 70 A.D.?

This has much to do with John's vision we call Revelation.

So the Preterist and partial preterist wants to believe they came to pass but can't give a good reason that they did? But they believe they did anyway? Though no church historian or any other historian which saw Jerusalem destroyed like Josephus did records any of Matthew 24 or 25 coming to pass.

As to "this generation shall not pass till . . ." I thought this was a good response:
http://concordant.org/expohtml/CorrectPartitioning/thisgen.html

I didn't.

Here's a snipit from the long, hard to stay focused, article.
Jesus cried over Israel and prayed over them.  He spoke of how he so desired to take them under his wing as a hen does with her chicks and they wouldn't let him.  as a result, it left them desolate.  It was lights out of the nation when Rome went in . . .this "A.D. 70" issue is not about a "day".  There were MANY things that were strange wonders that led up to the removal.  Voices were heard in the night, thunder was heard, light would shine and light up the enter city in the middle of the night . . .there was a merging of spirit and flesh during that time.   Just because "you" don't know of it, is not enough basis to claim that it didn't happen. 

How bout some real proof? Which historian witnessed these things and what exactly did they write about them? What has that to do with the destruction of Jerusalem?
"Now immediately after the affliction of those days the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not be giving her beams, and the stars shall be falling from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken." (Mat 24:29)
This is after the affliction, not during it. What historian wrote a first hand account about seeing the above things happen immediately after the great affliction that came upon Israel?

Which historian witnessed this:
Mat 24:24 For roused shall be false christs and false prophets, and they shall be giving great signs and miracles, so as to deceive, if possible, even the chosen."

Which historian witnessed this:
Mat 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven, and then all the tribes of the land shall grieve, and they shall see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory."

Jesus said every eye shall see Him. He never said "only the hyper spiritual believers will see Him in a spiritual kind of way."

Did Josephus see this? . . .
Mat 24:31 And He shall be dispatching His messengers with a loud sounding trumpet, and they shall be assembling His chosen from the four winds, from the extremities of the heavens to their extremities."

This is also supposed to occur at the conclusion of the eon/age.
Which of your historians witnessed this?. . .
Mat 25:31-46  Now, whenever the Son of Mankind may be coming in His glory, and all the holy messengers with Him, then shall He be seated on the throne of His glory,  (32)  and in front of Him shall be gathered all the nations. And He shall be severing them from one another even as a shepherd is severing the sheep from the kids.  (33)  And He shall be standing the sheep, indeed, at His right, yet the kids at the left."  (34)  Then shall the King be declaring to those at His right, 'Hither, blessed of My Father! Enjoy the allotment of the kingdom made ready for you from the disruption of the world."  (35)  For I hunger and you give Me to eat' I thirst and you give Me drink; a stranger was I and you took Me in;  (36)  naked and you clothed Me; infirm am I and you visit Me; in jail was I and you come to Me.'  (37)  Then the just will be answering Him, saying, 'Lord, when did we perceive Thee hungering and nourish Thee, or thirsting and we give Thee drink?  (38)  Now when did we perceive Thee a stranger and took Thee in, or naked and we clothed Thee?  (39)  Now when did we perceive Thee infirm, or in jail, and we came to Thee?'"  (40)  And, answering, the King shall be declaring to them, 'Verily, I am saying to you, In as much as you do it to one of these, the least of My brethren, you do it to Me.'"  (41)  Then shall He be declaring to those also at His left, 'Go from Me, you cursed, into the fire eonian, made ready for the Adversary and his messengers."  (42)  For I hunger and you do not give Me to eat; I thirst and you do not give Me drink;  (43)  a stranger was I and you did not take Me in; naked and you did not clothe Me; infirm and in jail and you did not visit Me.'  (44)  Then shall they also be answering, saying, 'Lord, when did we perceive you hungering or thirsting, or a stranger, or naked, or infirm, or in jail, and we did not serve you?'"  (45)  Then shall He be answering them, saying, 'Verily, I am saying to you, In as much as you do it not to one of these, the least, neither do you it to Me.'"  (46)  And these shall be coming away into chastening eonian, yet the just into life eonian."







Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 09:54:06 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 08:09:15 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 07:58:00 PM
Quote from: Nathan

Here's a snipit from the long, hard to stay focused, article.
After all, they reason, the sun was not darkened and the moon did not fail to give her beams, and the stars did not fall from heaven, nor were the powers of the heavens shaken; the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven did not appear, all the tribes of the land did not grieve, nor did they see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory (Matt.24:29,30

Not that it's going to matter much at this point, but I'm giong to try playing this a little more.  It's not that we are ignoring those things that were to happen so that we can still hold our theology, it's that we/I believe regardless of what language it's written in, be it english, Greek, Aramaic, or Hebrew . . .none of those languages are God's language.  When he speaks to me, he doesn't speak in Hebrew because I don't know the language.  He speaks to me "in my tongue". 

But what is "his" language?  You've got a world here that you created, you create beings to reproduce . . . how would you talk to them?  You do it "through" your creation. 

My warning buzzer just went off with all sorts of red flags going up everywhere.

God wrote His revelation to us in Hebrew and Greek. The only way we can know what He said, what His revelation to us is is to either know Hebrew or Greek or to have a proper translation of them. Otherwise scripture just becomes a private interpretation.

Also, God never said in the Scriptures through the apostle Paul that if you want to know what God revealed through Paul go talk to a rock. He never said to go seek it out in nature. No.

Nathan, please, I don't want to go contrary to Scripture to find out what God revealed. God revealed His will to us through the Scriptures, not a cactus or a stream or a rock or tree.

This is sooooooooooooooooooooo far off topic.

Can we stick with the topic please? I don't need people's private interpretations of new age stuff.

Wow, this is a big moment for me . . .it's the first time anyone has ever called me a new ager . . .I'm impressed.  You talk of going off topic . .now "there's" a can of worms you really don't want to open here for sure!  Those things go everywhere and nowhere at the same time.  Let me have a chance to respond to your insinuations.


Hebrews 8
4For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law:

5Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount


Colossians 2
16Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:  17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.

God speaks by way of patterns.  The tabernacle was patterned after Christ.  It was the type and shadow of the substance of truth.  Revelation is the unveiling of that same Christ.  You want to understand the book of Revelation?  Study the tabernacle, it's all over in Revelation because they both are the unveiling of the same thing.

Another favorite of mine that creates the platform for pursuing the patterns that lie beneath . . .
Romans 1
16For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.  17For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven (that would be spiritual revelation) against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

19Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

Here we go . . .
20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse

God's language is to use NATURAL things to REVEAL his SPIRITUAL truth in our lives.  We've been over this before, but the flesh profits nothing, it's only the spirit the gives life.  What profit is there to try to impose Revelation as a literal event that is yet to happen?  But ask that question from a spiritual perspective and you get a totally different answer.


God wrote His revelation to us in Hebrew and Greek. The only way we can know what He said, what His revelation to us is is to either know Hebrew or Greek or to have a proper translation of them.

I have to disagree with this on all levels.  To say that learning Greek or Hebrew is the key to unlocking all the mysteries is just inaccurate.  If that were true, then the Pharisees would have been Jesus greatest supporters . .but instead, they were his biggest adversary.  Why do you suppose that is?  I'm thinking it's because they lived by the literal letter of the law . .and it was never intended to be received in that manner.  it wasn't then, and it isn't now.  If it was, there would be countless passages telling us to forgo the voice and adhere to the letter.  But instead, it says just the opposite.  The letter "kills". 

The Word . .the written Word is just the frame work of the life contained within it.  To emphasize the frame, you're missing out on the completed temple.  There was a transfer from flesh to spirit through the work of the cross.  The word went from stone to flesh.  It went from head to heart.  Knowing Greek or Hebrew does "not" unlock anything that God doesn't reveal.  Knowledge comes by way of revelation, not the other way around.  Again, what else could "walk in the spirit" mean?


Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 09:59:23 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 09:27:31 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 06:00:51 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 04:31:27 PM
Quote from: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 03:39:37 PM
Something no preterist or partial preterist has been able to answer satisfactorily is this:

How did each and every event of Matthew 24 and 25 come to pass?

If Jesus meant that no one would see these things come to pass then, what's the point of telling anyone they would visibly come to pass?

If all of them visibly  came to pass, why is it that not one person in church history or any historian recorded them as coming to pass in 70 A.D. or before 70 A.D. or after 70 A.D.?

This has much to do with John's vision we call Revelation.

So the Preterist and partial preterist wants to believe they came to pass but can't give a good reason that they did? But they believe they did anyway? Though no church historian or any other historian which saw Jerusalem destroyed like Josephus did records any of Matthew 24 or 25 coming to pass.

As to "this generation shall not pass till . . ." I thought this was a good response:
http://concordant.org/expohtml/CorrectPartitioning/thisgen.html

I didn't.

Here's a snipit from the long, hard to stay focused, article.
Jesus cried over Israel and prayed over them.  He spoke of how he so desired to take them under his wing as a hen does with her chicks and they wouldn't let him.  as a result, it left them desolate.  It was lights out of the nation when Rome went in . . .this "A.D. 70" issue is not about a "day".  There were MANY things that were strange wonders that led up to the removal.  Voices were heard in the night, thunder was heard, light would shine and light up the enter city in the middle of the night . . .there was a merging of spirit and flesh during that time.   Just because "you" don't know of it, is not enough basis to claim that it didn't happen. 

How bout some real proof? Which historian witnessed these things and what exactly did they write about them? What has that to do with the destruction of Jerusalem?
"Now immediately after the affliction of those days the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not be giving her beams, and the stars shall be falling from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken." (Mat 24:29)
This is after the affliction, not during it. What historian wrote a first hand account about seeing the above things happen immediately after the great affliction that came upon Israel?

Which historian witnessed this:
Mat 24:24 For roused shall be false christs and false prophets, and they shall be giving great signs and miracles, so as to deceive, if possible, even the chosen."

Which historian witnessed this:
Mat 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven, and then all the tribes of the land shall grieve, and they shall see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory."

Jesus said every eye shall see Him. He never said "only the hyper spiritual believers will see Him in a spiritual kind of way."

Did Josephus see this? . . .
Mat 24:31 And He shall be dispatching His messengers with a loud sounding trumpet, and they shall be assembling His chosen from the four winds, from the extremities of the heavens to their extremities."

This is also supposed to occur at the conclusion of the eon/age.
Which of your historians witnessed this?. . .
Mat 25:31-46  Now, whenever the Son of Mankind may be coming in His glory, and all the holy messengers with Him, then shall He be seated on the throne of His glory,  (32)  and in front of Him shall be gathered all the nations. And He shall be severing them from one another even as a shepherd is severing the sheep from the kids.  (33)  And He shall be standing the sheep, indeed, at His right, yet the kids at the left."  (34)  Then shall the King be declaring to those at His right, 'Hither, blessed of My Father! Enjoy the allotment of the kingdom made ready for you from the disruption of the world."  (35)  For I hunger and you give Me to eat' I thirst and you give Me drink; a stranger was I and you took Me in;  (36)  naked and you clothed Me; infirm am I and you visit Me; in jail was I and you come to Me.'  (37)  Then the just will be answering Him, saying, 'Lord, when did we perceive Thee hungering and nourish Thee, or thirsting and we give Thee drink?  (38)  Now when did we perceive Thee a stranger and took Thee in, or naked and we clothed Thee?  (39)  Now when did we perceive Thee infirm, or in jail, and we came to Thee?'"  (40)  And, answering, the King shall be declaring to them, 'Verily, I am saying to you, In as much as you do it to one of these, the least of My brethren, you do it to Me.'"  (41)  Then shall He be declaring to those also at His left, 'Go from Me, you cursed, into the fire eonian, made ready for the Adversary and his messengers."  (42)  For I hunger and you do not give Me to eat; I thirst and you do not give Me drink;  (43)  a stranger was I and you did not take Me in; naked and you did not clothe Me; infirm and in jail and you did not visit Me.'  (44)  Then shall they also be answering, saying, 'Lord, when did we perceive you hungering or thirsting, or a stranger, or naked, or infirm, or in jail, and we did not serve you?'"  (45)  Then shall He be answering them, saying, 'Verily, I am saying to you, In as much as you do it not to one of these, the least, neither do you it to Me.'"  (46)  And these shall be coming away into chastening eonian, yet the just into life eonian."









So many accusational questions here . . . but in a word . .yes.  Josephus was the source of many of those things you're asking about.  There is one place in particular where he speaks of the midnight sacrifice was taking place and at midnight, a light began to shine and it illuminated the entire city for a half and hour . . .there is a passage in Revelation that speaks of all of heaven being silent for a half hour. 

Much of what John saw was similar to what Ezekiel saw just before Babylon came in and destroyed the temple the first time.  He saw the same creatures, heard the same sounds, the cherubim, the voices the thunderings . . . he saw in the spirit what Babylon did in the flesh.  John saw in the spirit what Rome did in the flesh . . .the pattern is the same.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 10:25:05 PM
http://www.bible.ca/pre-flavius-josephus-70AD-Mt24-fulfilled.htm

this might be intersting to some here.

Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 10:28:08 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 09:54:06 PM
Tony wrote: Can we stick with the topic please? I don't need people's private interpretations of new age stuff.
Quote
Wow, this is a big moment for me . . .it's the first time anyone has ever called me a new ager

I never called you a new ager. So please, let's not go into accusations that are not true.

Please, all the other things you wrote about not needing the word to know what God has said is contrary to God's word.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 10:31:21 PM
Quote from: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 09:59:23 PM

So many accusational questions here . . . but in a word . .yes.  Josephus was the source of many of those things you're asking about.  There is one place in particular where he speaks of the midnight sacrifice was taking place and at midnight, a light began to shine and it illuminated the entire city for a half and hour . . .there is a passage in Revelation that speaks of all of heaven being silent for a half hour. 


PROOF! Where is your proof. If you have none then just say so. Quote Josephus exactly, work, page please.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Tony N on December 11, 2008, 10:39:11 PM
Quote from: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 10:25:05 PM
http://www.bible.ca/pre-flavius-josephus-70AD-Mt24-fulfilled.htm

this might be intersting to some here.



Mat 24:29 Now immediately after the affliction of those days the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not be giving her beams, and the stars shall be falling from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken."

The above was to happen after 70 A.D. so Josephus did not witness Matthew 24.
Now can we have the exact words from Josephus that he saw fulfilled Matthew 24 as to all, yes ALL the events of Matt.24?
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 10:49:50 PM
what is the "affliction"?  and who was the affliction upon??  and then what happens?? 

I don't have time now to comment, but will try to get back to this this evening.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Zeek on December 11, 2008, 11:13:13 PM
here's a little

QUESTION: Matt 24:29 "But immediately after the tribulation..." In this passage it is clearly said that Christ would come immediately after the tribulation, but in 2 Thess. 1:6-8 it is shown that it is his coming "from heaven with his angels" that is causing the tribulation! How can this be explained?

ANSWER: You are correct in pointing out that the word "tribulation" (Gr. thlipsis) is found in both passages. Both passages harmonize well. In Matthew 24, there is a great tribulation (persecution) of the saints which is followed immediately by the coming of Christ, which causes the heavens & earth to be shaken and all the tribes of the earth to mourn (Matt. 24:30). In 2 Thess. 1:6-10, we see the same scenario. The saints were being persecuted. Christ would come and give them relief (AD 66), and at the same time give tribulation to their persecutors. We are talking about two different phases of the tribulation, with Christ's return in the middle (the first against the saints in AD 62 - 66, and the second against their persecutors in AD 66-70). Both passages (in their contexts) deal with both phases.   -Edward E. Stevens

http://www.preterist.org/preteristQA.asp#question1
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Nathan on December 11, 2008, 11:24:26 PM
I do not have direct access to the accounts of Josephus.  What I share is what I've "read".  If you don't beleive me, search it out for yourself.  I've shared, I've quoted Scripture and yet you don't see what I'm saying.  

You can't even admit you referred to me as a new ager . . .I'm not offended . .it's not entirely true, but I'm not offended either way.  But you did say . . ."quote" I don't need people's private interpretations of new age stuff . . ."Unquote"  This was your direct response to me . . . so it's only natural to make the connection.

I have NEVER said you don't need to know the Word of God to know what God said.  This is why there is such division here.  You're just not hearing what I'm saying.  You are  . . . you seem to be . . . registering what I say through the sifting of your mind and in the end, you're assumption of what I'm saying . .isn't at all what I'm saying.

I said God's word is the FRAME . .it's like your skeleton . .that would be the framework of God's word.  It's what everything else is formed to . . .without it, there is no support . . . I accept that whole heartedly.  It's "through" Scripture that I see the patterns . . .I've shared this on the forum before . . of course, "read" the Scriptures . . ."know" the historical events . .apply the moral value . . .but always and forever . .pursue the spiritual intent.  

Nobody said throw out the Bible.  This charge against me to display proof for you . . .sounds much like the religious people when Jesus tried to talk to them as well.  Is it your spirit that demands this proof?  Or is it your mind?  It all boils down to walking in "faith".  Receiving in "faith" as Paul preached about the gospel of "faith".  Faith is not demanding proof.
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: Taffy on December 11, 2008, 11:33:52 PM
Maybe its Time to close this thread for a wee While Guys :icon_flower:

Take time out , its been a hot thread for the last few days.

may not please everyone...but thats never possible. :icon_flower:
Title: Re: The Revealing of Jesus Christ
Post by: willieH on December 14, 2008, 03:08:22 AM
willieH: Yo, Bobf...  :afFro:

Quote from: willieH on December 07, 2008, 01:47:45 AMAnd He lets a FEW, ...slide...  :dontknow:  The rest get the FURNACE!  :sigh:

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMHe does not let any slide. "Therefore, every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire"

I agree, all of us "trees" to one degree or another, do not bring forth GOOD FRUIT... we bring forth the "fruit" of SINFUL behavior... which REVEALS the WRATH of GOD (Rom 1:18)

Quote from: willieHDID YOU suffer TORMENT for your SIN bob? :mnah:

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMAbsolutely.

In THIS "FIRE" bobf... this life IS a FIRE in which you REAP what you sew... you sew IN THIS LIFE, and you REAP in this life, WHAT you SEW...

CHRIST was TRIED (in the FIRE) within THIS LIFE bob... (Rev 3:18)

Quote from: willieH:omg:  Yet you shall preach to others, that if they do not "DO" as "DO YOU"... they shall meet FIERY INDIGNATION... and the FIERCE CHASTISEMENTS of an ANGRY GOD...  :mshock:

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMDo as Christ commanded.  "Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."

I just answered this.  :declare:

Quote from: willieHMy parents LOVED me... they NEVER, within their sweet and UNSELFISH LOVE, did what YOU PROPOSE that GOD shall DO! (whose LOVE is MUCH greater than was theirs --- *GOD* ...who claims that He IS LOVE itself)...  :mshock:

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMHebrews 12:6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. 7 If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? 8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.

That "chastening" occurs in THIS LIFE bobf... :yes:

Quote from: willieHDon't you see the HYPOCRISY in this?  This is basically what makes Christianity a hypocritical, forked tongue,

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMThere is no hypocrisy.  It applies to all equally.

You shall see what God has for you to see... If GOD demands us to FORGIVE, then He is HYPOCRITICAL, not to do as He commands...  :dontknow:

believe what you will...

Quote from: willieHHe's gonna GETCHA and BURNYA for being the SINFUL HUMAN being your ARE, if YOU don't listen to ...ME..."  (even though you are a SINNER, because HE placed YOU of HIS DECISION -- IN ADAM, and within a human DESCENDENCY which displays that - "ALL have SINNED" - even before any are even BORN!)...  :mshock:

:Yeahright: What a bunch of  UNHOLY crap!   :thumbdown:

You are welcome to your belief Bob...

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMLuke 6:49 But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.

Don't you see that the FALL and RUIN of the HOUSE is HERE and NOW?  NOT, there & then...  :dontknow:

Quote from: willieHThe JUDGMENT of GOD brings forth the knowledge of RIGHTEOUSNESS... (Is 26:9), not SUFFERING...

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMHebrews 12:11 Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.

You herein make my point bobf... NOW is the Chastening...

Quote from: willieHHow does Titus 2:11 establish your point Bob?  What in this verse notes CHASTISEMENT?

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMTitus 2:11 For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, 12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world.

Hebrews 12:6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. 7 If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?

The highlighted words "teaching" and "chastening" are the same word in greek.

You play guessing games bobf...  why didn't you make that correlation to begin with brother?  Try being UP FRONT! ...don't make me chase you around to find out what you seek to hold in shadows...

Again the Chastening is NOW in THIS LIFETIME, ...for ALL...

Quote from: willieHWhat makes you think JUDGMENT is about CHASTISEMENT?  JUDGMENT is about REVELATION!

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PM1 Corinthians 11:32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

The JUDGMENT is NOW, bobf... or do you believe CHRIST spoke in arrears here:

John 12:31  ...NOW... is the JUDGMENT of THIS WORLD;  NOW shall the prince of THIS WORLD be CAST OUT...

Quote from: willieHWhere do you see CHASTISEMENT of Heb 12:6... as in the "next life"?  Verse 11 says:

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMBecause for example Sodom & Gommorah will be resurrected and judged.  Their judgment will be more tolerable than Jerusalem's.  Therefore both Sodom's and Jerusalem's judgment will not be a fun-party. But neither will it be pointlness torment either.  It will be correction.  "....for when thy judgments [are] in the earth, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness."

CHRIST's "judgments" ...ARE... "in the earth", bobf... the KINGDOM of GOD is NOW... not future... the JUDGMENT is NOW... not future...

Sodom & Gomorrah ARE JUDGED bobf... GOD in NO WAY is bound to TIME... and in the SHAME of that JUDGMENT which occured in TIME and suffered its FIRE... shall it BOW at the KNEE and CONFESS with the TONGUE... (with WATERY EYES I might add!)

The NAKEDNESS of SHAME appears for Sodom & Gomorrah, for they took that NAKEDNESS to the dust... and when RESURRECTION occurs... they RISE in that SHAME... to the FORGIVING LOVE of YHVH and the VICTORIOUS FORGIVENESS found in their SAVIOR...

Quote from: bobfBob: Paul labored, yet not Paul labored, but the grace of God that was in him labored.

Quote from: willieHWillie: No offense Bob, but you are speaking here much like a wind-up toy going in circles...  :sigh:

Quote from: bobf on December 07, 2008, 04:13:04 PMTake it up with the apostle Paul: "I laboured....yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me."

etc.

bobf... you make my points several times herein... and this conclusion follows suit...

PAUL nor you nor I, "labour"... it is CHRIST in us, that does the WORK...

Which is the very reason that NONE can BOAST before YHVH... (Eph 2:9)   :dontknow:

ALL aspects of SALVATION and CREATION, are accomplished by the AUTHOR and FINISHER of FAITH, and are done according to the counsel of the Sovereign WILL of YHVH...  :dontknow: (Eph 1:11 / Heb 12:2) and had been noted prior to Creation, by Him (Is 46:10-11 / Rom 4:17)


                                                             (http://dl3.glitter-graphics.net/pub/117/117193tdajxe3wh8.gif) (http://www.glitter-graphics.com)


PeacE...    

...willieH  :icon_king: