ATTENTION ALL - They Are Changing Our Bibles Supernaturally!

[marie glen]

I thought I'd check out the some of the links provided; and ended up with this link -

All the words on their list of 'new' words, I looked up in an 1817 Bible - were there!
Others - I remember reading in my KJ old english KJ 40 years ago..

http://mandelabiblechanges.com/index.php/2018/10/25/50-shocking-words-in-the-bible-that-werent-there-before/

--- 2 Thessalonians 2: ten to thirteen

And with all deceivableness of ——-unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth,
—————that they might be saved.
And for this cause God ————-shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
That they all might be damned ————-who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Like I mentioned before, I tend to think of this as already being present for some time now.. even in the time of the Greeks, it was around, the theory of evolution as the origins of life.. not as 'scientific' sounding as today's version, but the idea that life came about through nature somehow, was actually quite considered way back then )and I'm reminded how Paul said the "mystery of iniquity/lawlessness was already at work".

And many anti-Christs ..I assume of different stripes, however - including the circumcision crowd, the gnostic crowd

And of course if true - the strong delusion is the one that says "God is dead" (an actual Big letter title in the 70's? No, actually I think it was the cover of Time magazine..?)

Quote - "Do you want to be damned because you didn’t believe the truth?" those types of things (like chain emails or mssg's) always turn me off and do the opposite than intended. And no matter how much I believe something, even about prophecy, I never employ that sentiment. That type of thing is another red flag to me.

their list of (supposed new) words in the bible..
I'll put a yes after the ones I know I read early on, about 40 years ago:

jubile - jubilee? (decided to do a search and look in my 1817 bible - yes, 20 results,
lawyers - yes
magnifical - yes in the 1817 version
pourtrayed - yes
green withs - Judges 16:7 and 8 yes in the 1817
holpen - yes
forgat -yes
engines - its/i think so
artillery - i think so
advertise - yes in the 1817 is advertife -  {the S's are f's, very olde englishe :gsmile:
sardine - yes "fardine stone" in the 1817(rev.4:3)
salute - yes
Juda - yes
Judaea - yes
shamefacedness - yes
bethlehemjudah - yes
impotent - yes
engines - new trans?
college - new trans?
network - new trans?
mortgage - new trans?
Joses -yes
matrix - new trans?
buryingplace - its
gay clothing - James 2:3 yes
mount sion - yes
messias -yes
nebuchadrezzar - yes
Mahershalalhashbaz - yes
Osee (for Hosea) - yes
Timotheus (for Timothy) - yes
Esaisas - yes
Elias - yes
Noe - yes
couch - yes
artillery
lunatick - verses for these (the rest) would help.. I have a couple of old bibles. 1925 is one, where it's at, idk.. have to look for it, but another one is an 1817 KJV Bible, the letter S is a strange f.. I bet the ck endings are in it.. I'll see if I can find some verses.. yes i scrolled up and looked up some of the others above in the 1827 also
heretick - Titus 3:10 in the 1817 bible - yes
gatlick - bible gateway and google as relating to the bible, came up empty
musick  - 16 results, I looked up 3, yes
publick - Matthew 1:19 - yes
bishoprick - yes (i remember, but looked it up in the 1817 also) - Acts 1:20 For it is written in the book of Psalms, Let his habitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein: and his bishoprick let another take.
havock - Acts 8:3 - yes
traffick - 6 results - yes

All the ones I looked up in the 1817 Bible - were there!

[marie glen]

P.S.  - I'm quite convinced these words are only the regular King James.
For instance the New King James does not have the older phrase of gay clothing, but replaced it with fine clothing..

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A3&version=NKJV

And on biblehub we can see the different translations with differing translations of the phrase,
https://biblehub.com/james/2-3.htm

And the verse in the interlinear word for word,
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/james/2-3.htm

The Greek - https://biblehub.com/greek/2986.htm
   - "  lampros: bright
Original Word: λαμπρός, ά, όν
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: lampros
Phonetic Spelling: (lam-pros')
Definition: bright
Usage: shining, magnificent, bright, splendid.

And to think words are being changed via enchantment or from 'another dimension' (which is not in scripture and, imo, casts unbelief in God's Word(s) as in if God Almighty is doing a particular work for a particular reason - which I have to believe is what is written and seems logical, why would He need and create multiple universes or dimensions? But getting believers confused as to what truth is and they no longer have the Word / trust the Word, where will they be when trying to understand truth from error in this error steeped world? "The heart is deceitful above all things" (Jeremiah) So trusting on inner impressions even should we think it Spirit led is a recipe for disaster.. And "sheep with no shepherd".. there's a verse says.. "those who have a dream a vision.. (idk, lol, but it concludes with) those who have My Word... What is the wheat to the chaff"?

In other words man's imagination in just about all cases (unless Word based) is chaff! "Meet (KJV:) / fit" only to be burned up as waste..

And I forgot to mention I do remember in my KJV days, seeing :) somewhere (many years ago).

And this theory, what do we base it on? What the YouTube video/what someone is saying.. as I don't know how they could ever prove it if it wAs true.. So we just have to take their word for it that those words were not penned by the translators..?

It's creative though and probably gets lots of views which earn money.. To get lots of clicks, a sensational thing attracts more folks to view..

:2c: :Peace2: God bless.. of course most of us have probably believed, in our search for truth, many things not quite accurate. "Nothing new under the sun".

[jabcat]

I think that's a good place to end this thread.  God bless.