Yet when you involve yourself with biblical matters and claim to deny a relationship with God "that" raises red flags in me which I respond to.
You rarely respond to me. You just repeat your views.
Because from what I've undertstood atheists to be, they don't believe God is God.
More correctly would be to say they see no proof for God. Or there doubt so much the lean to no God.
And yet you'll go toe to toe with those who have a relationship with God and denounce them . .. all the while, stating you're an atheist.
I didn't live during WW2 but still I know things about that period. so what's your point?
Are the Scriptures to be taken so lightly that one can claim they're not a follower of Christ and yet confront others with Scripture at the same time?
Such tricks don't work with me Nathan. I
am the one that doesn't take Scriptures lightly. So please don't try to turn things around. I'm confronting you with Scripture. Please forgive me for posting verses on a Christian forum, and using Scripture lightly by assuming it are HS inspired truthful words that can be used as proof for anything.
And for the record, I've never said it's ONLY spiritual .. .I said it's ALL spiritual.
Fine. But it doesn't do any good to your case. In fact if supports my view. I believe the HS is not
a carnal dude that penned down so useless carnal ramblings.
And if we're called to walk in the spirit and not in the flesh, again, I don't understand the argument.
I'm not surprised at all.
If natural profits nothing, why the continuance of embracing the literal side of things when they "point" to the Spiritual realization of who Chirst is?
And that exactly is your problem. Or should I say the problem I have with your view.
Even the most hardcore atheist knows the Bible is about spiritual things. (they just don't believe it's true)
My view is that both things are true. Not just one. OT was the age of law. The NT has done that away. We now live in the age of grace. Etc. And then the NT is written. 800 pages of other useless carnal stuff.
BTW that's not
Which is . . .spirit. So of course I'm going to pursue the spiritual side of everything. But one can't hold on to natural and attempt to see the spiritual at the same time. Ya gotta let go of the one before you can experience the other.
Perhaps it's wise to check the carnal stuff to see if the light isn't some guy dressed as an angel of light.
You keep pointing the atheist stick at me but I thinks that's quite unfair. If I was here to ridicule Christianity I could have posted more articles than you can count.
Instead of that I posted many Christian/Jews based articles. I spend countles hours to dig up info people were looking for (I hope) And for your information I even edit my (2 year old) posts if I see I typed Jesus/God/HS/Bible without an uppercase letter. When I'm discussing something with any member on this forum it always is (has been) from a Biblical point of view. Ok, you can call my understanding shallow, wrong, perverted, etc, but still I never challenged anyone on this forum with atheistic views.