It occured to me after seing a picture of supernatural apparitions on a shirt, 1 picture included of a giant foot on top of a snake, on another angle it looked like a giant foot on top of a dinosaur.
So it got me thinking and it occured to me in Genesis.
"Cursed art thou above all cattle, and on thy belly thou shall go"
Often in scripture there is a natural truth and spiritual truth. Ok most Christians agree that the serpent = the devil.
But what if the scripture also refers to natural means, a hidden truth, that Christendom might have missed?
Ok, so here we have God comparing this serpent to cattle and beasts right,
Now what do cattle and beasts have in common?
They walk on all fours?
So if God says right from now on you are now going to slide on your belly, that means that before this transition or curse, the serpent did not slide on its belly. So if God compares the serpent to cattle and says cursed art thou above all cattle?
Don't dinosaur resemble beasts and cattle? Big, walk on 4 legs?
So here we can see that what if the reason dinosaur no longer exist is because they were cursed and transformed into snakes, that they have not really been extinct, but have been supernaturally transformed or cursed, mutated into snakes. Since in bibllical language a serpent could mean, either dinosaurs and/or reptiles, so the dinosaurs or reptile species are cursed to become snakes and perhaps even crocs, for they crawl on their belly and lick the dust, just as much as snakes and even more striking is that unlike snakes, crocs will gladly eat humans for lunch, so scripturally they fit in a spiritual sense that they eat man who is dust, and also they eat dust, because their mouths drag along the sand and extremely likely to lick dust. Another thing about crocs is that their heads resemble t rex type dinosaurs, so another possibility = Trex dino types mutated into crocs, and brontosaurus types mutated into snakes. Since that God says you are cursed to go on thy belly, I conclude that serpents might refer to dinosaurs and not reptiles, since there are reptiles which go on all fours, but then again crocs do go on all fours, but they do drag themselves on the ground have very short legs like most reptilians. If there are no long legged reptilians originally,(e,g perhaps the frog, somehow mutated and growed their legs back) then, it is possible that serpents in biblical language did refer to reptilian species.
Another possibility, what if say a t rex which, started to appear later on in the dino timetable is begining to mutate from the giant brontosaurus type which look like cattle, with a snake head, and then mutates into Trex types, that loses its front legs and is beggining to lose all it legs so it transforms into a snake over time, maybe a small snake seems impossible, but what about giant anocandas?
Now also I do not neccessarily means that a bront dino becomes a t rex, in fact, a bronotosarus could be mutating into a snake also, because of the curse, hence its snake like head.
Think Tank
